HomeMy WebLinkAbout082889-Regular Session298 MINU S
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
19 89
The City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida, met in Regular Session in
the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on August 28, 1989.
Present: Mayor-Commissioner Bettye D. Smith
Commissioner Whitey Eckstein
Commissioner Robert B. Thomas
Commissioner A.A. McClanahan
Commissioner Lon Howell
City Attorney William L. Colbert
City Manager Frank A. Faison
City Clerk Janet R. Donahoe
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman.
Sheila Belt, representing Partners in Learning, Inc., appeared and introduced
Marjorie R. Nelsen, Director of Partners In Learning, Inc. who made a presentation to
request funding for the TAPP, After TAPP and PEEK Programs, She said that it was
essential that parents are provided the skills, resources and support-vital to the
nurturing of their young children in the critical., pre-school period. Partners in Learning
has created three programs to address the. needs of parents and children - TAPP, the Teen-
Age Preganancy Program based at Crooms School of Choice to provide parent education and
support for teen-age pregnant and parenting mothers with children from birth to six months
of age; After TAPP which is an extension of TAPP and reaches teen mothers who have either
returned to their local school or have dropped out of school; and PEEK WITH BOOKS which
provides thirty-six weekly classes to mothers with children from birth to four years.
The Chairman thanked Ms. Nelsen for her presentation, stating that the work she was doing
was appreciated, but that the City does not have the sources to provide funding, for social
services.
A Public Hearing was held in accordance with
Herald on August 18, 1989, as follows:
Au0u~t~----r~;' 19s9
Notice published
in the Evening
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE
ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF
SANFORD, FLORIDA
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in the
Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida,
at 7:00 o'clock P.M'. on August 28, 1989, to consider the adoption
of an ordinance by the City of Sanford, Florida , title of which
is as follows:
ORDINANCE 2050
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1990 OF SAID CITY;
SAID ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING PLAN; SAID
AMENDMENT CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION OF
THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY LYING NORTH AND EAST OF
HIDDEN LAKE SUBDIVISION FROM SR-1AA (SINGLE
FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT TO SR-1
(SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL); FROM AG
(AGRICULTURAL) DISTRICT TO SR-1 (SINGLE
FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL); FROM AG
(AGRICULTURAL) DISTRICT TO SR-1 (SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT, AND FROM SR-I
(SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT
TO SR-1 (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL)
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
August 28
299
19 89
A copy shall be available at the office of the City Clerk. for all
persons desiring to examine the same.
Ail parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to
be heard at said hearing.
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanf'ord, Florida.
ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a
decision, made with respect to any matter considered at
the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim
record of the proceedings, including the testimony' and
evidence, which record is not provided by the City of
Sanford'. (FS 286.0105)
Janet R. Donahoe
City Clerk
Publish: August 18, 1989
Ordinance No. 2050 entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 1990 OF SAID CITY; SAID ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING
PLAN; SAID AMENDING CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION OF THAT
CERTAIN PROPERTY LYING NORTH AND EAST OF HIDDEN LAKE
SUBDIVISION FROM SR-1AA (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING RESZDENTIAL)
DISTRICT TO SR-1 (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL)
DISTRICT; FROM AG (AGRICULTURAL) DISTRICT TO SR-1 (SINGLE
FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT; FROM SR-1 (SINGLE
FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL) TO SR-1 (SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT; AND FROM. AG (AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO
SR-1 (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT; PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
introduced and placed on first reading at meeting of August 14, 1989, was next placed on
final reading. After being read by title, the Chairman announced that the Commission
would hear from those persons present to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the
proposed adoption of Ordinance No. 2050. No one appeared.
Commissioner Howell moved on the passage and adoption of Ordinance No. 2050.
Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Mayor Smith
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Howell
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Thereupon, the Chairman announced that the City Commission of the City of
Sanford, Florida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 2050, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 1990 OF SAID CITY; SAID ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING
PLAN; SAID AMENDING CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION OF THAT
CERTAIN PROPERTY LYING NORTH AND EAST OF HIDDEN LAKE
SUBDIVISION FROM SR-1AA (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL)
DISTRICT TO SR-1 (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL)
DISTRICT; FROM AG (AGRICULTURAL) DISTRICT TO SR-1 (SINGLE
FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT; FROM SR-1 (SINGLE
FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL) TO SR-1 (SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT; AND FROM AG (AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO
SR-1 (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT; PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
A Public Hearing was held in accordance with Notice published in the Evening
Herald on August 18, 1989, as follows:
August 16., '1989
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE
ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF
SANFORD, FLORIDA
300
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
19 8~
ORDINANCE 2051
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1990 OF SAID CITY;
SAID ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING PLAN; SAID
AMENDMENT CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION' OF
THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY LYING BETWEEN
TERWILLIGER LANE AND RIVERVIEW AVENUE. AND
BETWEEN U.S. 17-92 AND NARCISSUS AVENUE FROM
AG (AGRICULTURAL) DISTRICT TO MR-1 (MULTIPLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
A copy shall be available at the office of the City Clerk for all
persons desiring to examine the same.
Ail parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to
be heard at said hearing.
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida.
ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a
decision made with respect to any matter considered at
the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim
record of the proceedings, including the testimony and
evidence, which record is not provided by the City of
Sanford. (FS 286.0105)
Publish:
August 18, 1989
Janet R. Donahoe
City Clerk
Ordinance No. 2051, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 1990 OF SAID CITY; SAID ORDINANCE BEING A
ZONING PLAN; SAID AMENDMENT CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION
OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY LYING BETWEEN TERWILLIGER LANE
AND RIVERVIEW AVENUE AND BETWEEN U.S. 17-92 AND NARCISSUS
AVENUE FROM AG (AGRICULTURAL) DISTRICT TO MR-1 (MULTIPLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY,
CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
introduced and placed on first reading, at meeting of August 14, 1989, was next placed on
final reading. After being read by title, the Chairman announced that the Commission
would hear from those persons present to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the
proposed adoption of Ordinance No. 2051. No one appeared.
Commissioner Thomas moved on the passage and adoption of Ordinance No. 2051.
Seconded by Commissioner Howe.ll and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Mayor Smith
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Howell
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Thereupon, the Chairman announced that the City Commission of the City of
Sanford, FLorida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 2051, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 1990 OF SAID CITY; SAID ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING
PLAN; SAID AMENq~MENT CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION OF THAT
CERTAIN PROPERTY LYING BETWEEN TERWILLIGER LANE AND RIVERVIEW
AVENUE AND BETWEEN U.S. 17-92 AND NARCISSUS AVENUE FROM AG
(AGRICULTURAL) DISTRICT TO MR-1 (MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL)
DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE
DATE.
'MINUTES
City Commission/Sanford, Florida
Aug,~st 28
301
19 89
A Public Hearing was held in accordance with Notice published in the Evening
Harold on August 18, 1989, as follows:
August 16, 1989
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE
ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF
SANFORD, FLORIDA
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in the
Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida,
at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on August 28, 1989, to consider the adoption
of an ordinance by the City of Sanford, Florida , title of which
is as follows:
ORDINANCE 2052
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 4, ANIMALS AND FOWLS,
SECTION 4,11 OF THE SANFORD CITY CODE TO
REGULATE THE DISTANCE FROM DWELLINGS;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND
EFFECTIVE DATE.
A copy shall be available at the office of the City Clerk for all
persons desiring to examine the same.
Ail parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to
be heard at said hearing.
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida.
ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a
decision made with respect to any matter considered at
the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim
record of the proceedings, including the testimony and
evidence, which record is not provided by the City of
Sanford. (FS 286.0105)
R. Donahoe
City Clerk
Publish:
August 18, 1989
Ordinance No. 2052, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER
4, ANIMALS AND FOWLS, SECTION 4-11 OF THE SANFORD CITY CODE TO
REGULATE THE DISTANCE FROM DWELLINGS; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
introduced and placed on first reading
final reading. After being read by title, the Chairman
would hear from those persons present to speak in favor
proposed adoption of Ordinance No. 2052. No one appeared..
Commissioner Howell moved on the passage and adoption of
Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows':
Mayor Smith
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Howell
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
of meeting of August 14, 1989 was next placed on
announced that the Commission
of, or in opposition to, the
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Ordinance No. 2052.
Sanford, Florida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 2052, entitled:
Thereupon, the Chairman announced that the City Commission
of the City of
302 MINU S
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
August 28
19 89
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA~ AMENDING CHAPTER
4, ANIMALS AND FOWLS, SECTION 4-11 OF THE SANFORD CITY CODE TO
EGULATE THE DISTANCE FROM DWELLINGS; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
A Public Hearing was held in
Herald on August 18, 1989, as follows:
accordance with
August 16, 1989
Notice published in the Evening
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE
ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF
SANFORD, FLORIDA
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in the
Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida,
at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on August 28, 1989, to consider the adoption
of an ordinance by the City of Sanford, Florida , title of which
is as follows:
ORDINANCE 2053
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 11, SECTION 11-30 (d),
KEEPING OF JUNK CARS, PARTS AND DEBRIS WITHIN
THE CITY OF SANFORD; EXCEPTION; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
A copy shall be available at the office of the City Clerk for all
persons desiring to examine the same.
All parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to
be heard at said hearing.
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida.
ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a
decision made with respect to any matter considered at
the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim
record of the proceedings, including the testimony and
evidence, which record is not provided by the City of
Sanford. (FS 286.0105)
ganet R. Donahoe
City Clerk
Publish: August 18, 1989
Ordinance No. 2053, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER
11, SECTION 11-30(d), KEEPING OF JUNK CARS, PARTS AND DEBRIS
IN WITHIN THE CITY OF SANFORD; EXCEPTION; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
introduced and placed on first reading at meeting of August 14, 1989, was next placed on
final reading. After being read by title, the Chairman announced that the Commission
would hear from those persons present to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the
proposed adoption of Ordinance No. 2053. William Balzar, 222 Bradshaw Avenue, Sanford,
Florida, appeared and asked who would determine whether or not it was a junk car. The
City Attorney explained that the City Code defines junk cars. No one else appeared.
Commissioner McClanahan moved on the passage and adoption of Ordinance No. 2053.
Seconded by Commissioner Eckstein and carried by the vote of' Commission as follows:
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
S
August 28
303
19 Rq
Mayor Smith
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Howell
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Yea
Yea
Yea
Nay
Yea
Thereupon,
Sanford, Florida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 2053, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER
11, SECTION 11-30(d), KEEPING OF JUNK CARS, PARTS AND DEBRIS
IN WITHIN THE CITY OF SANFORD'; EXCEPTION; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
A Public Hearing was held in accordance with Notice published
Herald on August 18, 1989, as follows:
August 16, 1989
the Chairman announced that the City Commission of the City of
in the Evening
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE
ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF
SANFORD, FLORIDA
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in the
Commission Room at %he City Hall in the City of S&nford, Florida,
at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on August 28, 1989, to consider the adoption
of an ordinance by the City of Sanford, Florida , title of which
is as follows:'
ORDINANCE 2054
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 6, BUILDING, SECTION 6-16
THROUGH 6-18 TO PROVIDE FOR POSTING AND
PUBLICATION AS AN ADDITIONAL METHOD OF NOTICE
TO OWNER IN CONDEMNATION MATTERS; AND
CREATING SECTION 6-20 OF THE SANFORD CITY
CODE TO PROVIDE FOR EMERGENCY POWERS FOR
CASES INVOLVING IMMINENT DANGER TO KUMAN LIFE
OR HEALTH; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY,
CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
A copy shall be available at the office of the City Clerk for all
persons desiring to examine the same.
All parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to
be heard at said hearing.
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida.
ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a
decision made with respect to any matter considered at
the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim
record of the proceedings, including the testimony and
evidence, which record is not provided by the City of
Sanford. (FS 286.0105)
~anet R. Donahoe
City Clerk
Publish: August 18, 1989
Ordinance No. 2054, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA-, AMENDING CHAPTER
6, BUILDINGS, SECTION 6-16 THROUGH 6-18 TO PROVIDE FOR
POSTING AND PUBLICATION' AS AN ADDITIONAL METHOD OF NOTICE TO
OWNER IN CONDEMNATION MATTERS; AND CREATING SECTION 6-20 OF
THE SANFORD CITY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR EMERGENCY POWERS FOR
CASES INVOLVING IMMINENT DANGER TO HUMAN LIFE OR HEALTH;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABII~ITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
introduced and placed on first reading and. meeting of August 14, 1989, was next placed on
second reading. After being read by title, the Chairman announced that the Commission
would hear from those persons present to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the
proposed adoption of Ordinance 2054. No one appeared.
304
MINU S
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
August 28
19 89
Commissioner Thomas moved on the passage and adoption of Ordinance No. 2054.
Seconded by Comissioner Howell and carried by the vote of the. Commission as follows:
Mayor Smith
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Howell
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Thereupon, the Chairman announced that the City Commission of the
Sanford, Florida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 2054, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA., AMENDING CHAPTER
6, BUILDINGS, SECTION 6-16 THROUGH 6-18 TO PROVIDE FOR
POSTING AND PUBLICATION AS AN ADDITIONAL METHOD OF NOTICE TO
OWNER IN CONDEMNATION MATTERS; AND CREATING SECTION 6-20 OF
THE SANFORD CITY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR EMERGENCY POWERS FOR
CASES INVOLVING IMMINENT DANGER TO HUMAN LIFE OR HEALTH;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
City of
A Public Hearing was held in accordance with Notice published in the evening
Herald on August 18, 1989, as follows:
August 16, 1989
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE
ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF
SANFORD, FLORIDA
Notice is hereby gz'ven that a Public Hearing will be held in the
Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida,
at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on August 28, 1989, to consider the adoption
of an ordinance by the City of Sanford, Florida , title of which
is as follows:
ORDINANCE 2055
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 11, GARBAGE, TRASH, WEEDS
AND SOLID WASTE, SECTION 11-12 (a) SCHEDULE
OF REFUSE COLLECTION FEES, OF THE SANFORD
CITY CODE TO INCREASE THE REFUSE RATE FOR
EACH SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
A copy shall be available at the office of the City Clerk for all
persons desiring to examine the same.
All parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to
be heard at said hearing.
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida.
ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a
decision made with respect to any matter considered at
the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim
record of the proceedings, including the testimony and
evidence, which record is not provided by the City of
Sanford. (FS 286.0105)
~anet R. Donahoe
City Clerk
Publish: August 18, 1989
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
S
305
Ordinance No. 2055 entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER
11, GARBAGE, TRASH, WEEDS AND SOLID. WASTE, SECTION 11-12 (a)
SCHEDULE OF REFUSE COLLECTION FEES, OF THE SANFORD CITY CODE
TO INCREASE THE REFUSERATE FOR EACH SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
introduced and placed on
final reading. After being read by title,, the Chairman announced
would hear from those persons present to speak in favor of, or
proposed adoption of Ordinance No. 2055. No one appeared..
Commissioner McClanahan mc.red on the passage and adoption of Ordinance No. 2055.
Seconded by Comissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
first reading at meeting of August 14, 1989, was next placed on
that the Commission
in opposition to, the
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Mayor Smith
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Howell
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
of the City of
Thereupon, the Chairman announced that the City Commission
Sanford, Florida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 2055, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER
tl, GARBAGE, TRASH, WEEDS AND SOLID WASTE, SECTION 11-12 (a)
SCHEDULE OF REFUSE COLLECTION FEES, OF THE SANFORD CITY CODE
TO INCREASE THE REFUSE RATE FOR EACH SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY CONFLICTS AN'D. EFFECTIVE DATE.
A Public Hearing was held in accordance with Notice published in the Evening
Herald on August 18, 1989, as follows:
August 16, 1989
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE
ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF
SANFORD, FLORIDA
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in the
Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida,
at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on August 28, 1989, to consider the adoption
of an ordinance by the City of Sanford, Florida , title of which
is as follows:'
ORDINANCE 2056
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 2 ADMINISTRATION, SECTION 2-
33 DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION AND PARKS OF THE
CITY CODE TO REORGANIZE SAID DEPARTMENT INTO
THE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND FACILITIES
MAINTENANCE AND THE DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL
AFFAIRS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY,
CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
A copy shall be available at the office of the City Clerk for all
persons desiring to examine the same.
Ail parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to
be heard at said hearing.
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida.
ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a
decision made with respect to any matter considered at
the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim
record of the proceedings, including the testimony and
evidence, which record is not provided by the City of
Sanford. (FS 286.0105)
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
19 89
Ordinance No. 2056, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA AMENDING CHAPTER
2 ADMINISTRATION, SECTION 2-33 DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION AND
PARKS OF THE CITY CODE TO REORGANIZE SAID DEPARTMENT INTO THE
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND FACILITIES MAINTENANCE AND THE
DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL AFFAIRS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY,
CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
introduced and placed on first reading at meeting of August 14, 1989, was next
final reading. After being read by title, the Chairman
would hear from those persons present to speak in favor
proposed adoption of Ordinance No. 2056. No one appeared.
Commissioner Eckstein moved on the passage and adoption of Ordinance No. 2056.
Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
placed on
announced that the Commission
of, or in opposition to, the
Mayor Smith
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Howell
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Thereupon, the Chairman announced that the City Commission of the
Sanford, Florida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 2056, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA AMENDING CHAPTER
2 ADMINISTRATION, SECTION 2-33 DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION AND
PARKS OF THE CITY CODE TO REORGANIZE SAID DEPARTMENT INTO THE
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND FACILITIES MAINTENANCE AND. THE
DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL AFFAIRS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY,
CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
City of
A Public Hearing was held in accordance with Notice published
Herald on August 18, 1989, as follows:
August 15, 1989 ....
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE
ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF
SANFORD, FLORIDA
in the Evening
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in the
Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida,
at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on August 28, 1989, to consider the adoption
of an ordinance by the City of Sanford, Florida , title of which
is as follows:
ORDINANCE 2057
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
CLOSING, VACATING, AND ABANDONING A PORTION
OF MANGOUSTINGE AVENUE LYING BETWEEN SCL RR
R/W AND WEST 7TH STREET AND BETWEEN OLEANDER
AVENUE AND OLIVE AVENUE; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
A copy shall be available at the office of the City Clerk for all
persons desiring to examine the same.
Ail parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to
be heard at said hearing.
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida.
ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a
decision made with respect to any matter considered at
the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim
record of the proceedings, including the testimony and
evidence, which record is not provided by the City of
Sanford. (FS 286.0105)
City Commission,'~'anford, Florida
307
19 on
Ordinance No. 2057, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, CLOSING,
VACATING, AND ABANDONING A PORTION OF MANGOUSTINE AVENUE LYING
BETWEEN SCL RR R/W AND WEST 7TH STREET AND BETWEEN OLEANDER
AVENUE AND OLIVE AVENUE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS
AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
introduced and placed on first reading at meeting of August 14, 1989, was next placed on
final reading. After being read by title, the Chairman announced that the Commission
would hear from those persons present' to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the
proposed adoption of Ordinance No. 2057.. No one appeared.
Commissioner McClanahan moved on the passage and adoption of Ordinance No. 2057.
Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Mayor Smith
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Howell
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Thereupon., the Chairman announced that the City Commission
of the City of
Sanford, FLorida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 2057, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, CLOSING,
VACATING, AND ABANDONING A PORTION OF MANGOUSTINE AVENUE LYING
BETWEEN SCL RR R/W AND WEST 7TH STREET AND BETWEEN OLEANDER
AVENUE AND OLIVE AVENUE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS
AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
The next item of business was discussion of proposed reuised
Regulations, recommended by the Cemetery Advisory Committee, as follows:
Cemetery
CITY OF SANFORD
RECREATION & PARKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM:
FROM: Dire c~ ~~~z/..
TO: City
DATE: August 15, 1989
SUBJECT: Update of cemetery regulations
The Cemetery Advisory Committee and staff have spent time
reviewing the current cemetery regulations.
The revisions included are updates of the
regulations adopted by the City Commission 4/19/82.
cemetery
Staff recommends
regulations.
City Commission approval
of cemetery
JRJ/lt
Attachment:
Municipal Cemetery Regulations
MINU S
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
August 28 19 89
CITY OF SANFORD
MUNICIPAL CEMETERY REGULATIONS
SECTION I. BURIAL AND CEMETERY LOT PURCHASE
A) Eligible Purchasers:
To be eligible for purchase of cemetery lots or spaces in
the Sanford Municipal Cemetery, one must be a resident of
the City of Sanford. This is interpreted to mean one must
reside within the city limits of Sanford.
REVISED TO READ:
To be eligible for purchase of cemetery lots or spaces in
the Sanford Municipal Cemetery, one must be a resident of
the City of Sanford or property owner in the City of
Sanford.
B) Eligible for Burial:
To be eligible for burial in the Sanford Municipal Cemetery,
one must:
* Be owner of record; or
* Be given permission by owner of record or
their legally appointed probater of the
family estate or executor of the deceased.
C) Method of 9rave Locations for Burial:
Assuming all conditions in Section B are met, when need
arises for use of owned cemetery spaces, the owner of the
record must:
* Contact the City of Sanford Recreation and
Parks Department and request grave layout;
and
* Designate actual space for burial; or have
funeral home handling arrangements contact
City of Sanford with information.
D) Funeral Arrangements:
Families must make all arrangements with funeral Director in
regards to:
* All arrangements directly related to burial procedures; and
* Opening ~and closin~ of graves.
E) Burial Regulations:
Those companies or individuals responsible for actually
opening and closing of graves:
Shall be liable for any damage done to monuments,
markers, turf, shrubbery and water lines or irrigation
systems which are damaged in process of performing
their duty.
The company responsible for opening and closing graves
shall be considered "sub-contractors" of the funeral
home. Therefore, in case of damages to property, the
Funeral Director shall be held responsible.
All graves for adult burials shall be a minimum of 4'3"
in depth and shall provide a covering of fill not less
than 18" on top of the vault; compacted to ground
level.
.kBSOLUTELY NO MOUNDING OF GRAVES WILL BE ALLOWED.
ADDITIONAL ITEM:
4. Cremations allowed provided owner gives permission to
bury ashe~.
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
309
19 ~89
SECTION II. VETERAN BURIALS
A)
Free burial for veterans
following circumstances:
will
be provided under the
Deceased must be a resident of the City of Sanford;
Or must be resident of Seminole County with active
membership in a local veteran organization in the City
of Sanford. (Excluded are non-residents out-of-county,
or out-of-state person).
SECTION III. COST OF CEMETERY SPACES
A)
The Sanford City Commission at their discretion may set an
equitable value on the price of cemetery spaces.
Prices are $350.00 per grave space as established July
11, 1983.
2. Baby spaces in Lakeview are $15.00 per grave space.
* Prices include perpetual care.
SECTION IV. CEMETERY LOT MAINTENANCE
A) perpetual Care:
Ail spaces purchased from the City of Sanford after November
I4, 1960 are under the Perpetual Care Program.
ADD:
~ Purchase of Perpetual Care:
Lot owners who purchased cemetery lots or spaces prior to
November 14,"1960, ma~ wis~ to purchase perpetuaI care. Th~
City of Sanford has established the followin~ formula for
determinin~ cost to cemetery lot owners for the purchase of
perpetual care:
Number of spacgs X $350.00 minus amount
originally paid for th~ lot at time of
purchase equals amount of perpetual care
cost.
It should be noted that the number of
spaces shall be determined b~ ~he size
of the cemetery lot and not accordin~ to
number of burials.
c)
Annual Care
Annual Care is available to lot owners who purchased
cemetery spaces prior to the Perpetual Care Program. The
cost is $18.00 per year.
SECTION V. MONUMENT AND MARKERS
A) Monument Dealers:
Ail monument dealers must be duly licensed in the City of
Sanford prior to any work being performed in the Municipal
Cemetery.
B) Procedures for Installin~ Monuments and Marker~:
Notify Recreation office at 330-5687 any day, Monday
through Friday, at least 24 hours in advance of work
being done.
MINU ES
..... City Com missib'h,--S~16riaa
August 28
19 89
2. When contacting office:
Give the secretary the approximate time
and date the marker will be set;
Give the exact location where the marker will be
set. (If unknown ask the secretary to verify the
location)
Give the exact dimensions of the marker.
The location of marker will be designated by 12"
wooden stakes set by Superintendent of Parks.
Monument contractor must stay within the staked
boundaries.
3. Work can be performed only during the following days:
* Monday through Friday, 7:00 AM - 4:00 PM.
Absolutely no setting of markers will be allowed on
Saturdays, Sundays or Holidays. ANY VIOLATION SHALL BE
SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION BY CITY OF SANFORD.
C) Specifications of Marker Foundations:
Ail markers must be placed in uniform fashion in compliance
with cemetery regulations and upon approval of
Superintendent of Parks.
Concrete foundation of marker bases shall be:
* Six (6) inch thickness of concrete; and
* One (1) inch overhang around perimeter of
marker; and
* Twenty-four (24) inch pilings on four
(4)corners of base.
2. Bases for Marble, Granite Slabs:
Twenty-four (24) inch pilings at six (6)
points, one (1) at each long side.
Width of base shall be four (4) inch of
concrete completely around base with
thickness being six (6) inch of concrete
throughout.
3. Inspection:
Ail foundations must be inspected and
approved by Superintendent of Parks before
markers can be set.
SECTION VI. MISCELLANEOUS
A)
No work on lots may be started in cemetery without approval
of Superintendent.
B)
No changes in regulations can be made without approval of
City Manager.
REVISED TO READ:
B) No chan~es in regulations can be made without approval of
city Commission.
C) Burial of two bodies in one grave will not be permitted.
ADD:
~ All burials must be in vaults.
E) Only concrete or metal vaults will be allowed.
REVISED TO READ:
E) Only concrete vaults will be allowed.
F)
No persons will be allowed to remove plants or shrubs,
either wild or cultivated, from cemetery property.
REVISED TO READ:
F) No person, s will be allowed to remove plants or shrubs,
either wild or cultivated, on cemetery property without
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
~ugust 28
19 89
G-~-- No person will be allowed to plant plants or shrubs, either
'" wild or cultivated, on cemetery property without permission
from Superintendent of Parks.
H) After conclusion of funeral, all flowers, wreaths, and vases
will be allowed a seven (7). day viewing period. On the
eighth day, all such items must be removed by family,
relatives, etc. or cemetery maintenance crews.
I) The City of Sanford, or their representatives, will not be
held responsible for wreaths, flowers, vases, etc.; or other
items missing or removed from premises.
This report has been respectfully prepared by the Cemetery
Advisory Committee.
Chairman /
/
Commissioner Eckstein moved to approve the Revised Cemetery Regulations, with the
clarification of Section II. Veteran Burials, that the burial space is free, not the
burial itself. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried, by vote of the Commission as
follows:
Mayor Smith
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Howell
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
The next item of business was a memo from Principal Deputy Administrative Office
dated July 24, 1989, to the City Manager that the street commonly known as "Kennel Road"
is shown on the plat as an unnamed street. Further, that the Seminole County Planning
Technical Supervisor has asked Seminole County Board County Commissioners to name the
portion North of S.R. 46 "North Kennel Road", and has asked the City of Sanford to name
the portion South of S.R. 46 and North of Jewett Lane "South Kennel Road".
On recommendation of the City Manager, Commissioner McClanahan moved to authorize
the City Attorney to prepare the proper ordinance to designate South Kennel Road as
requested. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by vote of the Commission as
follows:
Mayor Smith
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Howell
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
The next item of business was review of the status of the Holiday Inn lease,
continued from the meeting of August 14, 1989. The City Manager submitted a letter dated
MINUTES
312
.... -City commission, Sanford, Florida
August 28
19 89
August 28, 1989 from the City Attorney to the City Manaqer, as follows:
STENSTROM, McINTOSH, JT3~,~_&N, COLBERT, WHIGI:LA~ & SIMA/ONS, P.A.
ATTORNEYS ANO COUNSELLORS AT LAW
August 28, 1989
RECEIVED
AUG 8 1989
CLT¥ OF SANFOR~
SANFORD. FLORIDA
Mr. Frank Faison
City Manager, City of Sanford
P.O. Box 1778
Sanford, Florida 32772-1778
Re: Holiday Inn Lease
Dear Frank:
The purpose of this letter is to advise you and the City
Commission of the status of the Holiday Inn matter and to request
authority from the City Commission to take legal action.
Since my report at the City Commission meeting on August 14,
several things have occurred:
1)
Attorney Doug Chunn representing Great Southern Savings
& Loan called and in the course of the conversation
advised that a foreclosure suit had been filed by Great
Southern. This was the first direct contact that I, or
to the best of my knowledge, any member of the City
st~aff had with Great Southern or any one representing
it;
2)
I received a letter from attorney Chunn responding to
our prior correspondence to Great Southern (a copy has
been furnished to you previously ) . Basically, Mr.
Chunn indicated Great Southern did not want to be
involved in any dispute between the City and Seminole
Isle Properties and took issue with our position
regarding lack of notice;
3)
I received a telephone call from Bill Hutchison
advising that Mr. Schoettelkotte had been served with a
foreclosure complaint.
At this point, it appears that the Great' Southern loan is in
default by the failure of Seminole Isle Properties to make timely
payments on the loan. ~The lease with the City is in default by
the failure of Seminole Isle Properties to make timely rent and
loan payments. And, although the City has not yet been served,
it appears that a mortgage foreclosure suit is pending.
Based on the factors described above, I recommend that the City
Commission authorize us to defend any suit filed against the City
by Great Southern including the filing of any defenses and
counterclaims available to the City. In the event the City is
served, I further recommend that we be authorized to file by
cros s-c laim, or other appropriate pleadings, an action to
terminate the lease. Finally, I recommend, in the event we
litigate with Seminole Isle Properties that we be authorized to
ask the Court to appoint a receiver as provided by paragraph XIV
of the lease to operate the facility during any litigation.
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
August 28
313
19 89
i
I
In my opinion the actions described above are necessary to
protect the City and the public's interest in the property. It
does not rule out the possiblity of Great Southern, Holiday Isle
and the City coming to some type of amicable resolution of the
issues and default status of the agreements. It does permit us
to attempt to put the City into the best defense posture possible
under the circumstances.
As always, if you or any member of the City Commission have
guestions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
STENSTROM, McINTOSH, JULIAN
COLBERT 7iGHAM & SIMMONS P.A.
w~olbsr~ ....
jeb
Commissioner Eckstein asked the City Attorney what were the duties and cost of a Receiver
to the City. The City Attorney replied
take over the operation and staffing
entitled to expenses which come out
that the Receiver answers
of the Holiday Inn. That
of Holiday Inn Revenue,
to the Court and can
the Receiver would be
but that he had the
responsibility to operate, manage and report' to the Court and all parties, and was subject
to Court approval. That the Receiver could pay monies on the outstanding balance on the
mortgage or monies to the City for back rent. Commissioner Eckstein asked if the Receiver
should be appointed for a certain time period and/or should the City look in the areas of
its own buyer, rather than having a Receiver appointed. The City attorney referred to the
lease, wherein the City may apply to the Court and ask the Court to appoint a Receiver.
The City Attorney explained how apuointment of a Receiver could occur in that Great
Southern could ask for one, the City could ask under its lease, provision, and Holiday Isle
Properties, under re-organization via bankruptcy, could ask.
Jeff Blackstone, representing the Holiday Inn appeared and stated that the
Holiday Inn was in the process of obtaining total refinancing, by way of a short-term
bridge financing venture, and that he would have a letter of intent from two different
lenders within the next two days, and, also; they are negotiating with an individual
interested in coming on as a partner. He stated that the mortage company had not
responded to them, that they had sent a proposal, but had received no answer. They hoped
that the proposal would be accepted and were waiting to see what would happen. Mayor
Smith informed Mr. Blackstone that despite those measures the City still had to protect
and act in its best interests. The City Attorney stated he reluctantly but forcefully
recommends the measures outlined in paragraph 7 of his letter to the City Manager dated
August 28, 1989, as set forth previously.
Commissioner Thomas moved to authorize the City Attorney to defend any suit filed
against the City by Great Southern, including the filing of any defenses and counterclaims
available to the City. In the event the City is served, authorize the City Attorney to
file by cross-claim, or other appropriate pleadings, an action to terminate the lease. In
the event the City litigates with Seminole Isle prouerties, authorize the City Attorney to
ask the Court to appoint a receiver as provided by paragraph XIV of the lease to operate
314
MINU S
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
August 28
19 89
the facility during any litigation'. Seconded by Commissioner Howell and
vote of the Commission, as follows:
Mayor Smith
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Howell
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
carried by the
Parks
Parks
The
A.
Department).
Department,
next item. of business was consideration of:
TABULATION OF BID 988/89-68 Groveview Park
Memo and Tabulation of Bid submitted
as follows:
CITY OF SANFORD
RECREATION & PARKS DEPARTMENT
Handball Courts
from Director of
(Recreation and
Recreation and
MEMORANDUM ,~
FROM: Dir r ~
TO: City Manager ~
SUBJECT: City of Sanford Bid
Handball Courts
DATE:
#88/89-68
(Groveview Park)
August 15, 1989
Director recommends awarding of bid for handball courts
(Groveview Park) in amount of $39,697.00 to ·Alexander
Construction Services; Lake Mary, Fl. as low bidder and meeting
specifications.
Big Oak Construction, Inc. withdrew their bid. See attached
letter.
JRJ/lt
Copy: Walt Shearin
Attachment: letter from Big Oak
Construction
[landba 11 Courts
) TITLE ~.( .Cr,:w.~,'
) NUMBER ss/89-6s
ENING DATE 7-25-89
STING TIME/DATE FROM:
OPENED BY: wait Shear~
TABULATED BY: Jim Jerni
Walt Sh
VERIFIED BY:
.PAGE_ OF ·
' Two ttandba 1 ' Start/ ' ' '
BIDDERS TERMS Courts . End
lexander Constructim , 8t~ .~'5~ ·
:er"ic.r~Sy.a~e nar , Fl. t $39'697'00 ~
()ak Construction .
;,mford, Fl. $22,380.00 60 days .. (WSthdr, w bid
lorne[stone Bull. ding 8/1~////
4yste,ns $41 ,O72.00 / 10/1
Shoemaker Construct~o~
ford, Fl. N/B
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
19_ 89
in amount of 1,000.00
Renovation.
Commissioner. McClanahan moved A.
Request from Burke, Bales & Mills Associates for payment of Invoice No. 4,
for Architectural Services on Cultural Arts Center
Alexander Construction Service, and B. to authorize payment of invoice.
Commissioner Thomas and carried by vote of the Commission as follows:
to accept the low bid in amount of $39,697.00 from
Seconded by
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
consideration of an Engineering Contract for
Mayor Smith
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Howell
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
The next item of business was
"Site 10" Final Engineering Design. On recommendation of the City Manager, Commissioner
Thomas moved to authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment %27 to the Consulting
Engineering Contract with Conklin, Porter & Holmes, with said Amendment %27 estimated to
cost $408,671.26. Seconded by Commissioner McClanahan and
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
carried by vote of the
Commission as follows:
Mayor Smith
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Howell
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
The next item of business was consideration of request from Shaun Briggs
to fund
amount of $5185.00, and
of $5,000.00 to
in approximate
in estimated amount
to authorize funding of Beachfront ~Enhancement and
Seconded by Commissioner McClanahan and carried by
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
consideration of renewal of Excess Worker's
Memo submitted from the Personnel Director as follows:
design of Beachfront Enhancement and Protection
fund preparation of detailed engineering drawings
$10,000.00.
Commissioner Howell moved
Protection in amount up to $5,185.00.
vote of the Commission as follows:
Mayor Smith
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Howell
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
The next item of business was
Compensation and Claims Handling.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL:
AUGUST 23, 1989
MEMORANDUM
VIA:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION
CITY MANAGER ~
P~RSORNF~ DIR~C'I~R~~
CLARIFICATION OF REQUEST TO RENEW "EXCESS WORKER'S
COMPENSATION" INSURANCE AND CLAIMS HANDLING
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide clarification regarding the request
to review the City's "Excess Worker's Compensation" insurance and claims
handling which was discussed at the City Commission work session of August 21,
,.pt989 (Agenda Item 2.A.). At the work session, concern was focused on the
apparen~ increase in employer liability in the event of civil suit for
"negligence" types of claims.
.................................. MINU S
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
As outlined previously, the current level of civil liability was stated as
$100,000 while the proposed level was stated as increasing %o $850,000. As a
result of inquiry to the League of Cities service representative~'~K~t--Heyman, it
was determined that the original telephone quote was misunderstood to be $850,000
and should have been ~150,000 instead. The correct renewal scenario is as
follows:
EXCESS INSURANCE
C"JRRENT PROPOSED
Employers Reinsurance Corp.
(Sponsored by Florida
League of Cities)
$175,000 for each accident
or illness
~5,000,000
$100,000 for each suit
$1,000,000
PROVIDER
RETENTION FOR
Municipal Self Insurers Fund
(Sponsored by Florida
League of Cities)
w/c C IM
UMBRELLA COVERAGE
$150,000 for each accident
or illness
w/c CLAIM
CIVIL SUIT
LIABILITY
$10,000.000
$150,000 for each suit
CIVIL SUIT
UMBRELLA COVERAGE
$1,0o0,000
$25,936 PREMIUM $29,701
CLAIMS HANDLING
CURRENT
Insurance Servicing & Adjusting PROVIDER
Co. (ISAC).
$10,125 PREMIUM
PROPOSED
Insurance Servicing & Adjusting
Co. (ISAC)
$10,125
CURRENT PROPOSED
$36,061 $39,826
ANALYSIS: In terms of overall need and cost effectiveness, this type of coverage
has already paid for itself as evidenced by FY 88/89 exposure. The proposed
scenario reduces the City's vulnerability from $175,000 to $150,000 for Worker's
Compensation injury or disease. On the other hand, the proposed scenario will
increase the City's vulnerability from $100,000 to $150,000 in the event of civil
suit for "negligence" types of claims. As stated at the August 21st work
session, there has only been one (1) such type claim in Florida in the last
(10) years.
It should also be reaffirmed that the current worker's compensation portfolio is
no longer available through the Florida League of Cities.
RECOMMENDATION: In view of the clarification regarding the civil suit liability
coupled with the doubling in umbrella coverage from $5,000,000 to $10,000,000
with only slight premium increase, it is recommended that the City Commission
approve the proposed scenario as outlined and authorize the City Manager to
execute this agreement to be effective October 1, 1989.
TM/jr
cc: Finance Director
File
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
August 28
19 89
On recommendation of the City Manager, Commissioner McClanahan moved to authorize
the Mayor to execute the insurance
amount of $29,701.00. Seconded
Commission, as follows:
Mayor Smith
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Howell
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
renewal agreement with Florida League of Cities in
by Commissioner Eckstein and carried by vote of the
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
The next item of business was 6onsideration of renewal of Health & Life Insurance
for Fiscal Year 89/90. On recommendation of the City Manager, Commissioner McClanahan
moved to authorize the Mayor to execute the agreements. Seconded by Commissioner Eckstein
and carried by the vote of the Commission, as follows:
Mayor Smith
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Howell
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
The next item of business was consideration of Mill Creek/Cloud Branch Drainage
Basins Preliminary Engineering. On recommendation of the City Manager, Commissioner
Thomas moved to authorize the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 4 to contract with Conklin,
Porter and Holmes, in estimated amount of $98,695.56. Seconded by Commissioner Howell
and carried by vote of the Commission, as follows:
Mayor Smith
CommisSioner Eckstein
Commissioner Howell
Commissioner'Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
The next item o~f business was
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
consideration of road improvements. On
recommendation of the City Manager,_Commissioner McClanahan moved to award Change Order to
Orlando Paving Company paving contract for milling, leveling, and overlaying portions of
four streets in approximate amount of $91,827.00. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and
carried by vote of the Commission as follows:
Mayor Smith
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Howell
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
The next item of business was consideration of request from the Grand Romance to
use Memorial Park as an alternative dock~
Commissioner Thomas moved to authorize same for one year, with the stipulation
that the City of Sanford be listed as "additional insured" on Grand Romance's insurance.
Seconded by Commissioner Howell and carried by vote of the Commission as follows:
Mayor Smith
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Howell
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
........ M!NU S
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
August 28
19 89
Consideration was next given to request from City of Lake Mary to support a
public road from Lake Mary Boulevard to US 17-92, along Hospital Road as extended.
Commissioner McClanahan moved to support' same and to authorize the City Attorney to
prepare the proper resolution of support.
by vote of the Commission as follows:
Mayor Smith
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Howell
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Seconded by Commissioner Eckstein and carried
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
On motion of Commissioner Thomas, seconded by Commissioner Howell, and carried by
vote of Commission as follows:
Mayor Smith
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Howell
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Resolution No. 1561 was adopted. Said Resolution being in words and figures, as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 1561
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF
$4,365,000 CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, WATER AND
SEWER REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1989; AUTHORIZING
THE NEGOTIATED SALE OF SUCH BONDS; AUTHORIZING
THE DISTRIBUTION AND EXECUTION OF A PRELI-
MINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH
THE ISSUANCE OF THE BONDS; APPOINTING A PAYING
AGENT AND REGISTRAR; APPROVING THE FORM OF AND.
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF AN
ESCROW DEPOSIT AGREEMENT; APPOINTING AN ESCROW
HOLDER; PROVIDING CERTAIN OTHER MATTERS IN
CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE OF SUCH BONDS;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Sanford, Florida (the "Issuer" or the
"City"), has by Resolution No. 1423 adopted on October 7, 1985, as
amended and supplemented by Resolution No. 1487 adopted on July
25, 1986 (collectively, the "Resolution"), authorized the issuance
of not to exceed $25,000,000 City of Sanford, Florida, Water and
Sewer Revenue Bonds (the "Bonds") for the purpose of financing the
cost of additions, extensions, supplements or replacements of the
water and sewer systems of the City (the "System"); and
WHEREAS, the Issuer has previously issued $16,975,000 of such
Bonds; and
WHEREAS, on August 26, 1987, the Issuer issued its $3,795,000
City of Sanford, Florida, Water and Sewer Revenue Bond Anticipa-
tion Notes, Series 1987, which mature October 1, 1989; and
WHEREAS, .the Issuer desires to issue an additional $4,365,000
of Bond.s (the "Series 1989 Bonds") to refund such bond anticipa-
tion notes; and
WHEREAS, the proceeds of the Series 1989 Bonds are to be used
to (i) refund the $3,795,000 City of Sanford, Florida, Water and
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
Augu_~t
319
19 gq.
Sewer Revenue Bond Anticipation Notes, Series t987 (the "Refunded
Notes"), which were issued to acquire and construct additions,
extensions and improvements to the System (the "Series ]987 Pro-
jects''), (ii) make a deposit to the special account in the Reserve
Fund established for the benefit of the Series ]989 Bonds, (iii)
pay the costs of issuance of the Series 1989 Bonds, and (iv) pay
accrued interest on the Series 1989 Bonds; and
WHEREAS, the Issuer now desires to authorize the issuance of
its Series 1989 Bonds, to authorize the execution and distribution
of a Preliminary Official Statement in connection with the issu-
ance of the Series 1989 Bonds, to establish the Reserve Require-
ment for the Series 1989 Bonds, and to take certain other action
in connection with the issuance and sale of the Series ]989 Bonds;
and
WHEREAS, all capitalized undefined terms used herein shall
have the meanings set forth in the Resolution;
NOW, .THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA: ,
SECTION 1. The issuance of the $4,365,000 of the Series 1989
Bonds by the City is hereby approved upon the terms and conditions
set forth in the Resolution. The proceeds of the Series 1989
Bonds will be used to refund the Refunded Notes, which refunding
is hereby approved.
SECTION 2. The Series 1989 Bonds shall be dated, shall bear
interest payable at the times, shall mature and shall be subject
to redemption as provided in subsequent proceedings of the Issuer.
The use of the proceeds of the Series 1989 Bonds shall be as pro-
vided in the Preliminary Official Statement relating to the Series
1989 Bonds and in the Resolution.
SECTION 3. The Series 1989 Bonds shall be issued under and
secured by the Resolution and shall be in substantially the form
attached hereto as Exhibit "A", with such additional changes and
insertions therein as conform to the subsequent proceedings of the
Issuer, subject to all provisions of the Resolution..
SECTION 4. The Reserve Requirement for the Series 1989 Bonds
is the lesser of (i) 125% of the Average Annual Bond Service
Requirement on the Series 1989 Bonds, (ii) the Maximum Bond Ser-
vice Requirement on the Series 1989 Bonds, or (iii) 10% of the
proceeds of the Series 1989 Bonds, which amount shall be deposited
to the special account in the Reserve Fund established for the
benefit of the Series 1989 Bonds.
SECTION 5. Citizens and Southern Trust Company (Florida),
National Association, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida is hereby appointed
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
August 28
19 89
SECTION 6. The form of the Escrow Deposit Agreement attached
hereto as Exhibit "B" is hereby approved. The Mayor and City
Clerk are hereby authorized to execute such agreement on behalf of
the Issuer. The Agreement shall be in substantially the form
attached hereto with such changes, insertions and omissions as may
be approved by the officers executing such agreement and the
execution of the Agreement by such officers shall be conclusive
evidence of such approval.
SECTION 7. Citizens and Southern Trust Company (Florida),
National Association, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida is hereby appointed
Escrow Holder pursuant to the terms of the Escrow Deposit Agree-
ment.
SECTION 8. The distribution by the Underwriter of the Preli-
minary Official Statement, in substantially the form presented to
the Issuer at its meeting at which this resolution is adopted and
on file with the Issuer, is hereby approved, with such additional
changes, insertions and omissions as may be made and approved by
officers of the Issuer, the execution of a certification of their
approval to be conclusive evidence of any such approval.
SECTION 9. With respect to any Series 1989 Bonds for which
the Issuer intends on the date of issuance thereof for the inter-
est thereon to be excluded from gross income for purposes of
Federal income taxation:
(A) The Issuer shall not use or permit the use of any
proceeds of the Series 1989 Bonds or any other funds of the
Issuer, directly or indirectly, to acquire any securities or obli-
gations, and shall not use or permit the use of any amounts
received by the Issuer with respect to the Series 1989 Bonds in
any manner, and shall not take or permit to be taken any other
action or actions, which would cause any Series 1989 Bonds to be
an "arbitrage bond" within the meaning of Section 148, or "feder-
ally guaranteed" within the meaning of Section 149(b), of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), or
otherwise cause interest on the Series 1989 Bonds not to be
excluded from gross income for purposes of federal income taxa-
tion.
(B) The Issuer shall at all times do and perform all
acts and things pe~nitted by law and the Resolution which are
necessary or desirable in order to assure that interest paid on
Series 1989 Bonds will be excluded from gross income for purposes
of federal income taxes and shall take no action that would result
in such interest not being so excluded.
(C) The Issuer shall pay or cause to be paid to the
United States Government any amounts required by Section 148(f) of
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
19 -89
order to insure compliance with the rebate provisions of Section
148(f) of the Code with respect to any Series 1989 Bonds for which
the Issuer intends on the date of issuance thereof to be excluded
from gross income for purposes of federal income taxation, the
Issuer has created the Rebate Fund to be held by the Issuer. The
Rebate Fund need not be maintained so long as the Issuer timely
satisfies its obligation to pay any rebatable earnings to the
United States Treasury; however, the Issuer may, as an adminis-
trative convenience, maintain and deposit funds in the Rebate Fund
from time to time. Any moneys held in the Rebate Fund shall not
be considered Pledged Revenue~ and shall not be pledged in any
manner for the benefit of the holders of the Series 1989 Bonds.
Moneys in the Rebate Fund (including earnings and deposits
therein) shall be held for future payment to the United States
Government as required by the Regulations and as set forth in
instructions of Bond Counsel delivered to the Issuer upon issuance
of such Series 1989 Bonds.
SECTION 10. The purchase of municipal bond insurance to
irrevocably guarantee the payment of principal and interest on the
Series 1989 Bonds is hereby authorized.
SECTION 11. All prior resolutions of the Issuer inconsistent
with the provisions of this Resolution are hereby modified, sup-
plemented and amended to conform with the provisions herein
contained and except as otherwise modified, supplemented and
amended hereby shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 12. The Mayor, the City Attorney and the City Clerk
o r any other appropriate officers of the Issuer are hereby
authorized and directed to execute any and all certifications or
other instruments or documents required hereby or any other
document referred to above as a prerequisite or precondition to
the issuance of the Series 1989 Bonds and any such representation
made therein shall be deemed to be made on behalf of the Issuer.
All action taken to date by the officers of the Issuer in further-
ance of the issuance of the Series 1989 Bonds is hereby approved,
confirmed and ratified.
SECTION 13. This Resolution shall take effect immediately
upon its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
SANFORD, FLORIDA, this 28th day of August, 1989.
(SEAL)
May6r ~/
ATTEST
322
....................... MI U ES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
~A_u~us t 28
19 89
The next item of business was consideration of Conditional Contract Award for
Additions to Main Water Treatment Plant and Auxiliary Water Treatment Plant. Memo
submitted from Director of Engineering and Planning., as follows:
August 24, 1989
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
City Manage~.~'
Director of Engineering and Planning
Recommendation for Conditional Contract Award -
Additions to Main Water Treatment Plant and
Auxiliary Water 1Treatment Plant
Mr. Faison:
Bids were opened on August 9, 1989 for the subject contract.
Speegle Construction, Inc. was apparent low bidder but within 24-
hours declared that a major bid error had occurred and requested
to withdraw their bid. This request was subsequently approved upon
review of their original bid estimate sheet. Lee Construction
Company of Sanford, Florida was second low bidder with a total bid
amount of $710,000.
The qualifications and bid documents of Lee Construction Company
have been reviewed and found acceptable. Furthermore, Lee
Construction Company has proposed a $10,000 deduction for utilizing
Curry controls for the telemetry system. It is recommended that
City Commission approve award of this contract to Lee Construction
Company. The contract will be awarded in the amount of $700,000
subject to the following conditions:
Proposed telemetry system equipment must be evaluated to
verify thau Curry controls will provide a telemetry
system in accordance with contract documents.
Lee Construction Company must execute all required
certifications, documentation, and forms of the contract
documents, and provide all information and submittals set
forth in the documents and required by regulatory
agencies.
If, after review, it is found that the proposed Curry controls are
not acceptable, City Commission approval to award the contract at
the cost of $710,000 will be separately requested.
WAS:mca
xc: Utility Director
City Attorney
On recommendation of the City Manager, Commissioner Howell moved to award the
contract to Lee Construction Company in amount up to $710,000.00 with conditions set forth
in memo. Seconded by Commissioner Eckstein and carried by vote of the Commission as
follows:
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
August 28
323
19 89_
Mayor,Smith
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Howell
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
The next item of business was consideration of a request from Pam Rogers, d/b/a
Pam's Seafood, to waive the two-hour moving requirement for peddlers to sell seafood from
a truck from 8:30 AM to 7:30 PM, Monday through Sunday at 1401 South French Avenue.
Commissioner Howell moved to deny the request. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas
and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Mayor Smith
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Howell
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
The next item of business was consideration, of a request for game room approval,
from Mario Benevides, d/b/a Mario's Game. Room, 3200 South Orlando Drive.
Commissioner McClanahan stated he was concerned about the open layout, with
teenagers having access to the bar.
Mario Benevides came forward to support the request and stated that they have a
police officer on premises to ensure that minors are kept' in the game room, that no one
was in the parking lot and that no liquor-was brought in. Further, the game room is 1500
square fee¢ and is located where the restaurant was.
Commissioner McClanahan moved to table the request, pending legal, opinion from
the City Attorney. Seconded by Commissioner
Commission as follows:
Mayor Smith
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Howell
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
The next item of business was
Eckstein and carried by vote of the
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
consideration of the request from Lake Jessup
Hunting Club to renew Site 10 Out-Lease for Hunting Purposes.
The Director of Engineering and Planning reported that the City is preparing to
begin an engineering service contract for preparation, of final design and construction
documents for installation of a reclaimed water irrigationJagriculture system on Site 10;
and that the estimated time for completion of final desi.gn is approximately one year.
Further, the Director of Engineering and Planning recommended the lease be extended for
one year at the current lease amount of $8,000.00 per year, with statement-in the
extension regarding the increased presence of City representatives and consultants on the
property during the period of the lease.
Commissioner Howell moved to table the request pending discussion/review of the
Model Airplane Club request to lease part of Site 10. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas
and carried by vote of Commission as follows-:
Mayor Smith
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Howell
Yea
Yea
Yea
MINU S
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
August 28
19 8q
Commissioner Thomas Yea
Commissioner McClanahan Yea
Commissioner McClanahan moved to remove
table and reconsider same. Motion died for lack of a second.
The Commission next considered the following:
A. Requests for payment of statements:
Lake Jessup Hunt Club's request from
(1) From Southern Resources Mapping for surveying
services for Reclaimed Water Distribution System
Design ............................... $ 5,060.00
(2) From Schemmer Associates for Fire Station 93
Design Contract ....................... $ 3,300.00
(3) From. Conklin, Porter & Holmes for engineering/
consulting engineering services:
a. For Wastewater Effluent Spray Irrigation
Systems .......................... $ 204.61
b. For Water Quality Studies ........ $ 536.98
For WWTP Tertiary Improvements and Reclaimed
Water Distribution System ........ $ 20,304.65
For Update of Water, Wastewater & Reclaimed
Water Impact Fees ................ $ 975.89
For Mas~er Wastewater Pump Station. $ 624.66
For Sanford/Lake Mary Recl. Water...$ 858.46
go
For Eff. Storage and Spray Irrigation Systems
................................. Z 7,470.77
ho
For Vacuum Sewer System .......... $ 12,230.63
For Groveview Recl. Water Line...$ 1,503.20
j. For Rate Coverage Study .......... $ 594.43
k. For FY 90 Revolving Loan Program.$ 2,809.87
no
For Jewett Lane Sewer Imp ........ $ 2,423.53
For Adaption of Rate Coverage Report & Impact
Fee Report ....................... $ 4,840.26
For Additions to Main Water Treatment Plant
................................. $ 2,427.55
Tabulations of Bids:
(t) .98~./89-71, High Pressure Sewer Cleaning Hose
(Utility Department)
Memo and Tabulation of Bid submitted from Utilities as follows:
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
325
19 -Sa
MEMORANDUM
August 21, 1989
TO: City Manager ~66
From: Utility Director /~
Re: Bid #88/89-71
High Pressure Sewer Cleaning Hose
Mr. Faison -
On 08/01/890 bids were opened for the purchase of 1,200 feet of
high pressure hose. This hose is used on our cleaning trucks to
clean sewer lines.
Bid packages were mailed to seven (7) vendors with responses from
all of them. One response was a "No Bid".
The attached bid tabulation lists the various vendors with their
associated prices. The low bid was submitted by Hydraulic Hose
of Orlando, at a total price of $2,268. Their hose meets the
majority of the listed specifications. The outside hose diameter
is slightly different than the one specified. Their product is
satisfactory and meets the intent of the specifications.
It is recommended that the bid be awarded to Hydraulic Hose of
Orlando at a cost of $2,268. Funds are available for this
purchase under account number 451-4540-536-64-06.
PM/ap
xc:
PurchasinG Agent ~/~~'
Sewer Superintendent
attachment
ID TITkE Hi-Pressure Sewer
Cleaning Hose
1D NUMBER 88/89-71.
PENING DATE 8~°]'~89TIME_ 2:00
3STING TIME/DATE FROM:~ -
BIDDERS
Amazon Hose
Orlando
Davis Meter
Orlando
Hydraulic Hose
Orlando
TERMS }lose
BID TABULATION
r~,lUllg '~ rlt~ A t~rot~-"l' Wl'IIlI~t Y'I~: ~i~
~u~ ~,~. ~ ,,= ~,~ u, ,,=~ c;r~ . TAB ULATE D BY:
m~. VERIFIED BY:~_
UNTIL- - _/ _PAGE
$ 2.84 $ 3,408
NO BIDS ........
$ 1.89
OPENED BY:_ __Walt Sherin
P'A
2-3 wks
10 days
IPM Inc.
Ft. Lauderdale
Orlando Hose
Orlando
Jet-Vac
New Smyrna Beach
Rawhide_Orrville
~MARKS;
$ 2.10 $2,520
$3.i161 $3,739.
2.20 $2,640
2.24 $2,688
2 WkS
30 days'
-10 days
2 wks
CIRCLED PRIC[ INDICATES A~ARD
Account ~ 451-4540-536-64-06
7 Requests 7 Responses
326
MINU ES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
~uGu~'~- 2fl 19
(2) 988/89-75, Cemetery Entrance Improvements
(Recreation and Parks Department)
Memo and Tabulation of Bid submitted from Director of
Parks as follows':
CITY OF SANFORD
RECREATION & PARKS DEPARTMENT
Recreation. and
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manage~/
FROM: Directo~
SUBJECT: Cit½ of Sanfor'/°/'" ' d
RE:
Bid #88/89-75
Municipal Cemetery Entrance
DATE:
August 22, 1989
Improvements
Director of Recreation & Parks recommends awarding
Bid#88/89-75 Cemetery Entrance Ways to Shoemaker Construction Co,
Inc. of Sanford, Fi. as low bidder and meeting specifications.
Amount of bid was $54,837.00.
Amount in budget - $60,000.00
JRJ/lt
Copy: Walter
BID TITLE Cemetery
Shearin
Entrance Ways
QID NUMBER 88/89 - ?? _
OPENING DATE. 8-22-8%1ME 2:00 pm
POSTING TIME/DATE FROM:, ,, /
Al.exanddr Construction
Big Oak Construction
Sanford
Central Coast Contract
Palm Coast
Cornerstone Building
Systems
_~ T. nn~norl, FI
Shoemaker Constructiol
Sanford,
-The Samdel Ja~s Co'.
Or].sndo
TERMS
~ng
N/B
NIB
TOTAL
$57,990.00
$55,504.00
$5~,837.0~(
$62,987.0C
START
9/15
ARO
9/1
AR0
COFIPLETE
11/15
days
10/1
OPENED BY: Walter Shearin
TABULATED BY:J-~m Jernigan
VERIFIED BY:~, ~!o, ward Je~r,r~e
PAGE OF ' PAG
R£UARKS: CliiCLEB PRICE INDICATES AWARB
15 requests - 6 responses
Amount in budget ~60,000.00
001-5051-572-63-57
,OO~ REV. 11-5-85
MINUTES 5 2 7
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
A'u gu ~ 't- 2J::J
19 89
(3) 988/89-78, Portable Personal Compuer
(City Manager/City Clerk Department)
Memo and Tabulation of Bid sumbitted from City Clerk as follows:
MEMORANDUM
August 22, 1989
TO: CITYMANd~~'
FROM: CITY CLERK?
RE: BID TAB ~88/89-78, PORTABLE PERSONAL COMPUTER
Bids were opened August 21, 1989 for portable personal
computers ("lap top" computers) for the City Clerk's Office
(ITEM I), and an Option to Purchase a second, like, unit for
the Director of Engineerinq and Planning's Office (ITEM II).
Thirteen (13) Requests for Bids were sent, five (5) responses
were received, as follows:
VENDOR ITEM I ITEM II DELIVERY
Micro Supply $2,797.00
Sun Office No Bid
Auto Data Services $3,295.00
Computer Works $3,098.00
Sears Business Cir. $2,620.00
No Bid 10 days
No Bid
$3,295.00 15 days
No Bid ASAP
$2,620.00 15 days
Recommend acceptance of lowest bid in amount of $2,620.00,
from Sears Business Center, Altamonte Springs. This bid does
meet specifications.
ITEM I is budgeted in FY 89 in amount of $2,500.00. The
$120.00 is available within the department budget.
jd
Attachment:
Tabulation of Bid
z BID TABULATION
UID TITLE '~,~/~z-' /~/.J~,~z~,. ~mn,Br~4 .,~,~.-~u~.,m~..~.~Mm
DID NUMBER , ~ ' ' ~....~'..~~m~
OPENING DATE ~- ~"" ' TIME.A'°~.- ~,,~~~.~,~~
POSTING TIME/DATE FROM:,, , -/ UNTIL /
OPENED BY: I/4//'/z-'r .%~:,'z',;',,'
TABULATED BY: ."J~/1
VERIFIED BY:-
PA'GE / OF r PA
BIDDERS T. E R M S ' ~ , ,,,.? . , /,. ,. ,- ~"o,~,.,/.',,,;
I
,//,,,',:~ ~,/,,p/~, , ·
bi,~ ,¢"FF' r'e.i
.. ~,,.,.;,,? .,,'..',.:,., . N ~ Iv~ ...... ..._.
..~:~;..,,/,,,. /.'.',:,;~ 3.~r75. oo ~,z~,.oo /~&~ ....
/?~;/,:~../ 3, Cg, oo z)gg /;.,.s,,'/- P
3 2 $ MINUTE S
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
August 28
19
89
follows:
C. Minutes of August 14, ].989 Regular Meeting.
On recommendation of the City Manager, Commissioner Thomas moved:
A. to authorize payment of statements;
B. (1) to accept low bid in amount of $2,268.00 from Hydraulic Hose;
(2) to accept low bid in amount of $54,837.00 from Shoemaker
Construction Co.;
(3) to accept low bid in amount of $2,620.00 from Sears Business
Center;
C. to approve Minutes of August 14, 1989 Regular Mee%ing.
Seconded by Commissioner Howell and carried by the vote of the Commission, as
Mayor Smith
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Howell
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Robin Riggins, 16 Sterling Court, appeared to read a paper on the Parks and
Recreation Department. She stated that she has worked for the City for nine years as a
recreation supervisor, umpire, coach of softball and baseball from 1973 to 1982 and is no
longer employed by the City. She stated that 50% of the students responding to the
Recreation Task Force Survey had no knowledge of the programs run by the Recreation
Department and had not participated in the programs. She said the baseball and soft ball
fields were neglected, that the water fountain at the Westside Recreation Center had
broken down several times, that there were no lights in some areas, and that when she
complained about these matters, the response was "the work order went out". She noted
that rain water pours into the Westside Recreation Center and upon complaining was again
informed, "a work order is in process". Ms. Riggins stated the Downtown Recreation Center
received new pool tables, and the old, used, tables were sent to the Westside Recreation
Center.
Mr. Guy Brewster, 111 North Orange Avenue, appeared and stated he has six years
of background experience with the Senior League, eight years with Junior League and twenty
years with Little League. He cited statistics to indicate that in the late 1970's and
early 1980's there had been a drop in all three. 6f the Leagues' participants. He stated
that protective equipment was very important. He said that four years ago, the cost was
$5.00 per person to play and that he had often assisted in this payment for those who
could not afford to play by paying from his own pocket. He said the cost will now be
increased to $20.00 per person and that no one can afford these expenses, neither the
participants, nor the coaches.
scorekeepers and that there
qualifications, that there were
He also said there was a shortage of coaches and
were unqualified people in positions that required
15 and 16 year old scorekeepers, rather than adult
scorekeepers. He said this was not a 40 hour a week job, but rather it took 80 hours to
do the job and that the best solution would be to obtain volunteezs to assist. However,
that when he suggested these solutions to the Dep~rtment of Recreation and Parks, or
MINUTE S 3 2 9
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
August 28
19 89
attemuts to correct the shortages and inefficiencies that he observed and complained
about, he was told that the Department would be run in the manner that the Department
wishes, and that they did not acknowledge his advice or recommendations. Commissioner
Howell stated he agreed with Mr. Brewster on the need for volunteers and re-organization
and that is why the Department' was now in the process.of being re-organized and split into
a Cultural Affairs Department and a Parks Department. Commissioner Thomas stated that he
appreciated what Mr. Brewster was trying to do, understood the problem and agreed that the
Department needed to change its personnel and attitude.
Janet Hewett, 162 Wildwood DriVe, appeared to discuss the conditions at the
Westside Recreation Center. She said there was no air-conditioning and that the paint is
peeling.
Joe Smith, 1709 Peach Avenue, appeared and asked
Crooms High School area and Westside Recreation Center,
activities instead of having to be driven in cars.
Mildred V. Godfrey, 1600 West 12th
drugs, shootings, break-ins, and loud music.
permitted.
that funds be spent on the
so that children could walk to
Street app'e-ared and reported problems with
Ms. Godfrey suggested that loitering not be
Natalie McGill, 1508 West 12th Street, appeared and stated that she lived in
front of a "crack house"; that even though there is a "bust", the next day the people are
out again. Ms. McGill asked why the crack houses could not just be torn down, as they do
in Orlando. The City Attorney replied that this evening, an ordinance had just been
passed to permit absentee owners of structures under condemnation proceedings to also be
notified by posting or publication and this was an effort to demolish condemned structures
in a timely manner. The Mayor noted that the Orlando demolitions occurred after all of
the legal preliminaries, notifications and processes were complete.
Turner Clayton, 1401 Mara Court, appeared and stated that he is President of the
Seminole County Chapter of NAACP and stated the City is trying to deter blacks by raising
the recreation fees. Also, the Westside Recreation' Center has been in a deteriorated
condition for a long time. Mr. Clayton reported lack of police patrols in critical areas
and recommended patrols be enhanced in certain areas.
Louise Gibson, 1502 West 12th Street, appeared and said that the services in the
New Salem' Primitive Baptist Church near where she lived were disrupted by profanity and
cursing; that there was loud music being played at 1 to 3 o'clock in the morning; that
there was no respect' for the Senior Citizens of the town, homeowners, or the Church and
something should be done about it.
William Balzer, 222 Bradshaw. Drive, appeared and stated that a sewer manhole on
Bradshaw Drive had run over, even though there had been no rain. He said nothing was done
for four hours and then the City sprayed disinfec-t~nt' and washed the overflow into the
creek. The Commission authorized the Director of Engineering and Planning to check the
situation and see what can be done to prevent it from occurring again.
Tyrone Alexander, 1619 West 16th Street, appeared and stated water cannot flow
330
MINU ES
City Commission, Sanford, FlorRta
AuUn.~t 28 19 89
from the corner of his property to Mill Creek. He stated the drainage on' 16th and
Mulberry was also deplorable. Further, 16th Street was a drag strip, there was noise, and
no police patrol. He said he felt that nothing would be done because he only hears "we
understand, we will do" but nothing happens.
Annie Addison, 1805 C West 18th Street, appeared and stated there is a problem
with "dope", that she lives near a ditch and that all the water would come into her yard
if it was not for the ditch, and that the City only cleans the ditch up to the fence.
Joseph Smith, 1709 Peach Avenue, apueared again and reported that about four
years ago, he had given the City a list of Goldsboro area drainage, problems and that they
have not been corrected. Further, he had asked the City to close the ditch near his house
and this has not been done, so he bought dirt himself, to fill in the ditch. He stated the
City "will not help us there". He asked why his water bill keeps increasing. Mayor
Smith replied there was no choice about the water bill and invited Mr. Smith to attend the
budget sessions. Mr. Smith cited the drug problem and asked that teeth be put into the
law to keep people in jail when arrested.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
~ ~Y 0 R