Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09.04.03City of Sanford PLANNING &ZONING COMMISSION Thursday - September 4, 2003 City Commission Chambers, V Floor, Sanford City Hall 300 North Park Avenue, Sanford, Florida Regular Meeting Agenda - 7:00 PAN Approval of Minutes August 21, 2003 Regular Meeting Minutes Development Plans DP -1 Consider the Site Plan to add a 6,775 square foot building on Lot 4, Sanford Central Park, Phase 2, to expand Ten -8 Fire Equipment at 141 Maritime Drive Tax Parcel Number: 28- 19 -30 -5N R- 0000 -0040 Property Owner: Ten -8 Fire Equipment Co. Representative: Jack Reynolds - American Civil Engineering Co. DP -2 Consider a Site Plan for a proposed 3,820 square foot AmSouth Bank located at 3815 Orlando Drive Tax Parcel Number: 14- 20 -30- 507 -0000 -0020 Property Owner: Lake Mary Boulevard/1 7-92 LLC c/o Charles Wayne Prop. Inc. Representative: Bill Tomala - Interplan LLC Public Hearings PH -1 Hold a Public Hearing to consider a request to Rezone twenty (20) acres from AG, Agriculture to PD, Planned Development for Harvest Time International located at 3531 Narcissus Avenue Tax Parcel Numbers: 22- 19- 30 -5AD- 0000 -0350 and 16- 19- 30 -5AC -0000 -0910 Property Owners: Margaret M. Wood & Donna R. Smith and Lyle R. Burk Representative: Ken Sanders, P.E. - Rocket and Associates PH -2a Hold a Public Hearing to consider a Conditional Use request to establish Outdoor Storage of automobiles in a RI -1, Restricted Industrial zoning district for Sanford Auto Auction, Phase 2 at 3085 St Johns Parkway Tax Parcel Number: 26 -19 -30 -5AE- 4300 -0040 Property Owner: Showtime Investments, Inc. Representative: Robert Von Herbulis - McKee Construction PH -2b Consider the Site Plan for the Sanford Auto Auction, Phase 2, a proposed 12,000 square foot detail building and a 1,000 square foot office located at 3085 St Johns Parkway Tax Parcel Number: 26- 19 -30- 5AE -4300 -0000 Property Owner: Showtime Investments, Inc. Representative: Robert "Bobby' Von Herbulis - McKee Construction Staff Reports Citizen Participation Commissioners Reports Adjournment ADVICE To THE PUBLIC. If a person decides to appeal a decision made with respect to any matter considered at the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of the proceedings including the testlmony and evidence, which record is not provided by the City of Sanford (FS 286.0105) Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the Human Resources office ADA Coordinator at 407- 330- 5625, 48 hours in advance of the meeting. Page 1 of 1 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2003 7:00 P.M. CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS CITY HALL, SANFORD, FLORIDA MEMBERS PRESENT: Ross Robert Brian Volk Andy Kutz Rami Yosefian Bobby V onHerbuli s Carol Dennison Otto Garrett Richard Huber Rob Carraway MEMBERS ABSENT: Mike Skat, excused Gary Lowell, excused OTHERS PRESENT: Russ Gibson, Director of Planning and Community Development Nick Balevich, Planner Mary Muse, Recording Secretary Mr. Robert called the meeting to order at 7:02 P.M. MINUTES. Mr. Huber moved to approve the Minutes of the August 21, 2003 Regular Meeting. Mr. Volk seconded. All in favor. Motion carried. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. Consider the Site Plan to add a 6,775 square foot building on Lot 4, Sanford Central Park, Phase 2, to expand Ten -8 Fire Equipment at 141 Maritime Drive, Jack Reynolds with American Civil Engineering was present. Mr. Reynolds stated that the eight parking spaces located in the southern parking lot were placed in a drainage easement in error and requested permission to move them to the north eighteen feet, which will make them parallel to the first bay of the new building. The eight spaces will be stripped with wheel stops. Ten -8 Fire Equipment works on fire trucks and this new building will allow them to work on the trucks under roof instead of in the parking lot, which they currently do. There is not a problem with employee parking and these eight parking spaces are required because of the square footage of the building, but they are not necessary. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES — MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2003 PAGE 2 Mr. Gibson stated that he had a discussion with another party earlier this week and is aware of their intent and Staff has no objection having these spaces in front of the overhead door. There does not seem to be a problem with the parking on site. Mr. VonHerbulis asked if there was an error with the 14 x 14 overhead door on the east side of the building because it could cause someone to drive into the retention pond. Mr. Reynolds stated that the overhead door is only there for ventilation purposes. Mr. Volk asked if there would be an interference with the dumpster when the spaces are relocated. Mr. Reynolds stated that they will just miss the dumpster and the final plans will show that. Mr. Kutz asked Mr. Reynolds if Interior Designers drew the floor plans. Mr. Reynolds stated that the actual structural engineering of this building is through American Civil Engineering and the engineer certifies the building plans for structural integrity. Mr. Kutz stated that Interior people are not allowed to provide architectural plans with an Engineer certifying them. Mr. VonHerbulis moved to approve the site plan per Staff s recommendation with the modification to the parking and the applicant is to work with staff on the parking layout during Final Engineering approval. Mr. Yosefian seconded. Mr. Kutz opposed, all others in favor. Motion carried. Mr. Kutz stated that if something comes before this board that appears to be (in his opinion) illegal, there should be a process so that it can be relayed to the State because it is illegal for Interior people to provide floor plans for certification by Engineers. Mr. Gibson stated that the information submitted tonight is for informational purposes only for site plan consideration and before the City issues the building permit, staff will ensure. the legal, appropriate plans are submitted to the Building Division for permitting. Mr. Kutz stated that if the plans being submitted are for conceptual purposes only, then it probably is okay for anyone to draw them, but it appears on the drawing that the Interior Designers are providing architectural services. Consider a Site Plan for a proposed 3,820 square foot AmSouth Bank located at 3815 Orlando Drive. Bob Grant with Interplan was present. He stated that AmSouth Bank is proposing to build a 3,820 square foot facility with three drive thru lanes and an ATM lane on 17 -92. Mr. VonHerbulis stated that at the access to the rear to the east there is a dual ingress /egress driveway with some parking spaces at the exiting of the Bank line and asked if there would be any signs depicting that traffic can not go the opposite direction into the drive thru lanes. Mr. Gibson stated that there would be "no left turn" signage with the possibility of some type of stripping or pavement marking. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES — MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2003 PAGE 3 Greg Neblock with Interplan was also present. He informed the board that the last drive thru lane has an ATM and the outside lane is the access road and they can add signage to the directional signs. The employees park at the rear of the building. Mr. Volk asked about the sign on 17 -92 because he recalls that when the subdivision was approved, there would be one sign on 17 -92 and one on Lake Mary Boulevard for all of the businesses. Mr. Neblock stated that there would be a monument sign. Mr. Gibson stated that he could not recall the restriction on the signage, but would check the record for the allocation of signage. Mr. VonHerbulis moved to approve per Staff's recommendation with the applicant working with staff at final engineering on the signage, including the egress /ingress signage. Mr. Kutz seconded. All in favor. Motion carried. Mr. Gibson informed the board that the City had the opportunity to work with James Moore, an employee of Interplan, who passed away during the consideration of this project. Mr. Moore was an exceptionally unique gentleman with a bright, positive attitude and extended his regrets and the City's condolences to Interplan and to Mr. Moore's family. PUBLIC HEARINGS. Hold a Public Hearing to consider a request to Rezone twenty (20) acres from AG, Agriculture, to PD, Planned Development, for Harvest Time International located at 3531 Narcissus Avenue. John Murphy, Director of Harvest Time International, Cliff Hooper, Consultant and on the Board of Directors for Harvest Time International, and Norman Grinstead, Rockett Engineering, were present. John Murphy gave a brief summary about Harvest Time International, which informed those who were present what type of services they provided and they also distribute to other agencies that help people. They have been leasing the facilities they occupy but they need a place of their own so they can expand their services. Mr. Gibson stated that there are two existing residences along the east side of the property and with the truck traffic along that side that is why staff is requiring the size of buffer in that area. Mr. VonHerbulis mentioned a tree line along the ditch on the east side and would like to have them keep as many of the trees as possible and suggested having the parking spaces adjusted from twenty feet to eighteen. feet in order to shift to the west to try and save some of the trees. Norman Grinstead stated that the eastern boundary line has a row of trees running north/south and believes most of them are off of the property, but they plan to keep as many of the trees as feasible to develop property. There will be a retaining wall about five feet off of the property line. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES — MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2003 PAGE 4 Mr. Gibson stated that per item number 8 on staff's report, a minimum twenty -five foot buffer is required if a masonry wall is provided along the common property line or within that buffer area to mitigate the different land uses. The twenty -five foot buffer precludes any type of development other than landscaping. There should also be an acknowledgement or formal consent from the adjacent property owners to ensure their interests are protected as it relates to what is being proposed. Cliff Hooper stated that they would like to get the adjacent owners to agree with installing a good landscape buffer instead of a wall. Mr. Carraway asked that since they were providing a service to the public, would they fall under the requirements of the Community Resource Facility ordinance. Mr. Gibson stated that the activities being proposed are substantially in accordance with the Comprehensive Land Use Policies for the Westside Industry and Commerce area. Staff has researched this request and found that there would not be a conflict with the ordinance or the interest of the other facilities and there are no known resource facilities established in this area. Also, this proposed facility is not being classified as a Community Resource Facility. Those present to speak: King Helie, a City Planning Consultant, was present to represent Seminole Farms Trust IV and Eoghan Kelly who are the owners of the 54 acres located north of this property. He stated that they have no objection to the good works of Harvest Time, but are concerned about the access, traffic generation, and North Kennel Road. North Fennel Road currently has a thirty foot right -of -way and does not see a condition listed on the staff report that would require them to obtain additional right -of -way to ensure a sixty foot right-of-way. Mr. Helie stated that they hired a traffic consultant and mentioned several concerns noted in the study. Mr. Helie also had several map displays he referred to during his presentation. He stated that they met with Harvest Time right before the meeting and would be meeting with them again and would like to see about working out a way to make a four -lane road. He requested the board to consider continuing the hearing until the road problem could be worked out. Mr. Gibson stated that the alignment that was originally considered to extend Airport Blvd. northwest to Iowa is no longer being done, but funds are being earmarked to proceed with improving White Cedar and Church Street. There would not be a problem with placing a minimum sixty -foot right -of- way stipulation on this request. Also, regarding the wall issue, the city requirements would require a buffer adjacent to residential, even if the structures were vacant. Mr. Hooper stated that he understands the right -of -way position, but to defer this request would delay their whole project. They have to close on the twenty acres first before they can purchase the additional property that they will need. Mr. Gibson stated that the board has directed staff to have a conceptual master plan presented with zoning changes, which can be revised to accommodate any concerns. If a complication develops to secure the appropriate right -of -way, they would not be able to develop this property without obtaining the appropriate right -of -way. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES — MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2003 PAGE 5 Mr. Grinstead stated that as soon as they close on the twenty acres, they would be able to close on the other parcel that would give them a sixty -foot right -of -way from SR 46 north to the project. They will only be doing phase 1 at this time. Chris Kelly was present to speak on behalf of his father Eoghan Kelly. His concern was regarding the impact of traffic at the intersection and on the area and requested to allow time to review this with Harvest Time before the board makes a decision. Mr. Murphy stated that there are about 230 -350 families per day that come to the facility between 9:00 AM and 4:30 PM. He does not feel that traffic would be a problem at this new facility. Phase 2 will not begin until Phase 1 is completely done. Mr. Grinstead stated that the retention pond would have to be installed on the Phase 2 parcel for the entire development. Mr. Gibson stated that a Unity of Title is being required so both parcels are tied together under one ownership. Also, if the applicant is not able to secure approval from the adjacent owners of the residential uses, they will have to comply with a minimum ten foot at grade buffer. The board will be making a recommendation to the City Commission and a condition could be stated that they are required to get with the adjacent owners prior to the City Commission meeting. Mr. VonHerbulis asked staff if signage could be installed at the exits directing the semi trucks so they do not go north when leaving this property. Mr. Gibson stated that it would be imperative to address the signage at site plan review. Mr. VonHerbulis stated that the sidewalk should continue all the way through the property going north. Mr. Kutz moved to approve per Staff s recommendation with the stipulation to include a minimum dedicated fifty-five foot right -of -way shall be required prior to the commencement of any construction and the dedicated right -of -way shall be increased to a sixty foot right -of -way prior to any construction of a second building, amend Item 5 to state that the applicant is to meet with the adjacent property owners prior to the City Commission meeting, and signs are to be posted to limit semi truck traffic to the north. Mr. Yosefian seconded. During discussion Mr. VonHerbulis asked about the sidewalk being extended. Mr. Kutz amended his motion to add a stipulation that the sidewalk shall be constructed along the entire length of the east side of North Kennel Road during the construction of Phase 1 and if said construction of the sidewalk cannot be completed during construction of Phase 1, a bond shall be posted securing the future installation of said sidewalk. Mr. Yosefian seconded amended motion. All in favor. Amended motion carried. Hold a Public Hearing to consider a Conditional Use request to establish outdoor Storage of automobiles in a RI -1, Restricted Industrial zoning district for Sanford Auto Auction, Phase 2 at 3085 St Johns Parkway. Steve Esler with McKee Construction was present. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES — MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2003 PAGE 5 Mr. VonHerbulis stated that he will be abstaining from this public hearing and the following site plan, but will be available to answer questions. Present to speak were: Attorney Dean Cannon, representative for property owner to the west — the Dyson's, stated that he has two concerns. They would like to have some type of landscape buffer for a visual screening on the fence along the west side and drainage swells along the western boundary line to prevent stormwater or groundwater to come onto the adjacent property. Mr. Esler stated that there are extensive swales being installed on the property and the landscaping will be installed according to the gateway requirements. The chain link fence will be installed along the property line with the landscaping inside of the fence area so it can be maintained and they are not opposed to installing a dark coated vinyl fence. Mr. Kutz stated that maybe Jasmine plants could be planted along the western property line. Dennis Robinson, property owner at the northeast corner, stated that he currently has drainage problems on his property, there are cars already being stored on the property, and it is very noisy during all hours of the night. He has a disabled family member living with him and feels this will cause an impact on this family member. Mr. Yosefian left the meeting at this time. Mr. Robinson asked about the development of St Johns Parkway. Mr. Gibson stated that the final design has not been established for the St Johns Parkway that they are still working on the drainage and road alignment issues. Steve Triece, a consultant for the City, is dealing with the right -of -way acquisitions. Phase 3 is currently being constructed. Mr. Ester stated that they could place some "no trespassing" signs along his property line. Tom Ball, property owner to the northwest and to the south with Lars Partnership, stated that they are in favor of the request. Due to the past performance of the Sanford Auto Dealers Exchange and the way they maintain it and the way they have met the City's guidelines, he knows it will be continued on this property. Mr. Esler stated that Item 1 is requiring the landscaping to meet the Gateway Corridor requirements on both sides of Bevier Road and it is the owner's full intent to meet these requirements on the west side of the property. On the east side of the property, they would like to work with staff regarding meeting the Gateway requirements because Airport Blvd. right -of way comes all the way up to the fence and there are drainage swells on the inside of the fence. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES — MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2003 PAGE 7 Mr. Gibson stated that there might be some opportunities to provide some enhanced landscaping along the westerly property line on the existing site. The landscaping plan can be revised during the engineering approval. Mr. Esler asked if money could be put into a fund and have the landscaping installed at time of Airport Blvd. improvements. Mr. Gibson stated that it could be evaluated. Ms. Dennison moved to approve per Staff s recommendation with the landscaping to be worked out with staff to meet the Gateway Corridor specifications, where and when they can do it, and require Jasmine plantings for screening on the fence along the western property line and at the northeast corner. Mr. Carraway seconded. Mr. Robert asked about the landscaping issue. Ms. Dennison amended her motion to include having the landscaping on the west side of Bevier Road be installed per Gateway Corridor specifications, with the applicant working with staff on the installation of the landscaping on the east side of Bevier Road to attempt to meet Gateway Corridor specifications where feasible. Mr. Carraway seconded amended motion. Mr. VonHerbulis abstained, Mr.Yosef an not present, all others in favor. Amended motion carried. Consider the Site Plan for the Sanford Auto Auction, Phase 2, a proposed 12,000 square foot detail building and a 1,000 square foot office located at 3085 St Johns Parkway. Steve Ester with McKee Construction was present. Mr. VonHerbulis stated that he would be abstaining. Mr. VonHerbulis stated that the current retention pond would be filled in and relocated to the new six - acre site with a fountain installed. Mr. Esler stated that the current building located on the property would be used for storage. Mr. Kutz moved to approve per Staff's recommendation and it is to be in conformance with the conditional use that was previously approved. Ms. Dennison seconded. Mr. VonHerbulis abstained, Mr. Yosefian not present, all others in favor. Motion carried. Mr. Robinson asked if there would be any stipulation regarding the lighting. Mr.. Gibson informed him that on site lighting is not permitted to spill out beyond the property. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. STAFF REPORTS. Mr. Gibson stated that, as discussed earlier, there is a possibility of a workshop to discuss proposed amendments to the Land Development Regulations and with the Board's consent it would be scheduled for the next meeting on September 18 to begin at 6:00 PM. The Board members agreed to hold the workshop. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES — MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2003 PAGE 8 Mr, Gibson informed the Board that the City Commission adopted an ordinance to establish a moratorium on game rooms, arcades, dance halls, and other amusement facilities for 90 days to allow the City time to insure that we have appropriate measures for the permitting of these types of facilities. Mr, Gibson informed the board that pursuant to a discussion with the City Manager, the City is proposing a workshop with the City Attorney to update all Board members with regards to rules of procedure and other applicable laves. Mr, Gibson reported that the Venetian Bay subdivision is generally back on track with construction and Berry walker is taking a lead to ensure the project is completed. Mr, Gibson commended Dave Richards, Engineering Assistant, for issuing correspondence to the developer requesting it to be completed quickly, COMMISSIONERS REPORTS, Mr. VonHerbulis asked if the City Commission revoked the white Cedar Road and Church Street item. Mr Gibson reported that it was continued due to a request from Sid Vihlen and is rescheduled for the next commission meeting. Mr, VonHerbulis stated that he has a concern about the proposed townhome development by Berry Walker on white Cedar Road due to it being in a high intensity industrial and commerce area. He feels the Board would not be doing a justice to the individuals purchasing these townhomes since they would be located within a land use for industrial and commercial type uses. Mr. Gibson asked if his concern could be mitigated if some type of recorded acknowledgement from the townhome owners stating that they are aware of the land use designations that are allowed adjacent to their community was required. Mr. VonHerbulis stated that the land use is not appropriate for it and asked staff to address his concern to Berry walker, Mr Gibson informed the board that there are several various locations pending townhome considerations, which some were previously approved as apartments and now are requesting to be changed to townhomes. There was also discussion with some of the City Commissioners regarding a possibility of placing a moratorium on townhome developments. Mr, Carraway stated that he would like to encourage the board to consider the educational impacts when approving projects. Mr. Gibson stated that the Department of Community Affair requires all jurisdictions within the State to facilitate Joint Planning Agreements with the school districts. On all proposed projects, the city will be forwarding information to the School Board for a formal acknowledgement and understanding of how these developments will impact the school facilities. ADJOURNMENT. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 10:24 P.M. Ross Robert, Chairman FORM 813 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS NAME. IRST AME IQDLE NAM t N OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORt OR GOMMfTTEE .1 CA M G DR THE BARD, CdUNCI , OMMISSION, AUTH OR COMMITTEE ON (-.)- r �' C � � WHICH I SERVE 1S A TT OF: _ PN Ty M ITY ❑COUNTY ❑ OTHER L CIT CAL AGENCY �.�Jl ' ' p� r� :�: � �r�c� sus I: sio _ D AT WHICH V CCURRED MY POSII'10: - q ❑ ELECTIVE 41iPOINTtVE WHO MUST FILE FORMA 8B This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 11 2.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which 'res to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a mea- oure which inures to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the parent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or to the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 153.356 or 153.357, F.S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one -acre, one -vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that capacity. For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father -in -law, mother -in -law, son -in -law, and daughter -in -law. A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange). ELECTED OFFICERS: In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the min- utes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS: Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these matters. However, you must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made by you or at your direction. ,'OU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on other side) CE FORM 813 EFF. 1/2000 PAGE I APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued) • A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. • The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: • You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. • You must complete the form and fie it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is fled. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST ` Voo 4ef l�. �S , - t { hereby disclose that on , 20 (a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) inured to my special private gain or loss; inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate, inured to the special gain or loss of my relative, ; V<.nured to the - special gain or loss of whom I am retained; or inured to the special gain or loss of is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows: n5 Date Filed , which Signature NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $1 0,000. CE FORM 8B EFF. 112000 PAGE 2