Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04.04.02City of Sanford Planning and Zoning Commission AGENDA Thursday April 4, 2002 City Commission Chambers, City Hall, Sanford, Florida Regularly Scheduled Meeting 79600 P.M. 1.A Hold a Public Hearing to amend the Future Land Use lap designation of the comprehensive Plan from SE, Suburban Estates to LDr -SF, Lover Density Residential - Single Family for properties located at 2040 and 2200 Celery Avenue Tax Panel Numbers: Site : 29- 19-1- 300 - 0070 -0000; Site B: 29-19-31-300-0090-0000 Property O wners: Janet Gould - Spence & Vaughn Gould; Laura Vuillem t & Daniel Beeves Representative: Charlie Madden, P.E. - Madden Engineering 1.B Hold a Public Hearing to rezone properties located at 2040 and 2200 celery Avenue from AG, Agriculture to SR-1 , Single Family Residential. Tax Parcel Numbers. Site A. 29-19-31-300-0070-0000; Site B. 29-19-31-300-0090-0000 Property Owners: genet Gould - Spence & Vaughn Gould; Laura Vuillem t & Daniel reeves Representative: Charlie Madden, P.E. - Fadden Engineering 1.c consider the Preliminary Subdivision Plan for Celery Farms, a proposed 300 lot single- family subdivision located at 2250 Celery Avenue. Tax Parcel Numbers: -19 -'1 - 300 - 0070 -, 29-19-31-300-0080-0000, 29-19-31-300-0090-0000 Property Owners: : Celery Farms Manor, LLC; Janet Gould - Spence & Vaughn Gould; Laura Vuillemot & Daniel reeves Representative: Charlie Madden, P.E. - Madden Engineering 2. Minutes 3. Any other business from floor or Commission Members 4. reports from Staff Schedule E - Additional Requirements and Provisions for Specific uses Representative: Antonia Gerl!, Senior Planner Schedule F - Architectural standards and Lighting Standards Representative: Antonia Gerli, Senior Planner Schedule K : sign I e ula tion {Sections I - Representative: Fuss Gibson, Land Development Manager ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC. If a person decides to appeal a decision made with respect to any matter considered at the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of the proceedings including the testimony and evidence, which record Is not provided by the city of Sanford FS 286.01 Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate In any of these proceedings should contact the personnel office ADA coordinator at 330 -5626 48 hrs in advance of the meeting. F:\ZONING\.AGENDA\2002\04--04.02.wpd Page 1 of 1 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING of APRIL 4, 2002 7:00 P.M. CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS CITY HALL, SANFORD, FLORIDA MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Slat Ross Robert Kevin H1pes Andy I ut Gary Lowell Rams Po flan Bobby VonHerbulls Carol Dennison Otto Garrett OTHERS PRESENT: Antonia Gerfi, Senior Planner Russ Gibson, Land Development Manager Nick Balevich, Planner Mary Muse, Recording ording Secretary 1r. skat called meeting to order at 70.00 P.M. The first item on the agenda was to hold a Public Hearing to amend the Future Land Use Map designation of the Comprehensive Plan from SE, suburban Estates to LDF - SF, Low Density Residential-Single Fancily for properties located at 2040 and 2200 Cel Avenue. Mr. skat disclosed that he spoke with former Mayor Dale and reminded him about the meeting. Mr. Gibson stated that on the first item the board is to consider the c omp plan amendment of two single - family properties at 2040 Celery Avenue and 2200 Celery Avenue. Due to certain circumstances, the developer is eluting not to include 2200 Celery Avenue. The owner of 2200 Celery Avenue is here to inform the board if she is interested in proceeding with the amendment change. He stated that he would like to make it clear that the city processed this request under assumption both parcels were being included. Laura Vuillermot, owner of 2200 Celery Avenue, stated that there is a breach of contract with developer at present time. She was not aware of the request until the property was PLAITING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES — MEETING OF APRIL L , 2002 PAGE 2 posted. She would like the board to table the request until they have more time to research it. She stated that she was not sure why the developer does net want to buy their property now because she thought they were going to be part of this subdivision. If her property is not part of the development, they would like have a wall or something put up around therm. Denver Marlow of Madden Engineering was present. He stated that he understood that once the appraisal was done and the inspection on the house at 2200 Celery Avenue was done, they could not agree upon the price. The original intention was to keep the house at 2200 Celery Avenue. Mr. Gibson stated that the pro perty is already in the city. The larger track and Ms. uillermot's property was annexed in prior to parcel A. Panel A property was annexed at time of second annual comp plan. Tonight, the request is to amend the comp plan based on consistency with adjoining property. Mr. VonHerbulis stated that the property would not have to be rezoned because it can still be used as single family so the board could go ahead with the comp plan but maybe hold up the rezone. Mr. Gibson stated that the property owner needs to consent with proceeding with the land use change. Since it is not the City's intent to,, it would be best to table. r. Slat stated that the board could proceed with the comp plan amendment to make the land use consistent with the area, but table the rezone. Mr. Robert moved to approve the land use amendment for 20 40 Celery Avenue and table 2200 Celery Avenue. Mr. vonHerbulis seconded. All in favor. Notion carried. The net item was to hold a Public Hearing to rezone properties located at 2040 and 2200 Celery Avenue from AG, Agriculture to SR -1, Single Family Residential. 1r. Skat stated that the rezone would only be for 20 40 Celery Avenue. Mr. Gibson stated that the conditions that staff has included in the report are consistent with the conditions that were provided to the property to the north when it was rezoned. There will also be another development order recorded. Mr. Robert roved to approve per staff's recommendations. Mr. Hipes seconded. All in favor. Motion carried. (The rezone is approved for 20 40 Celery Avenue, with 2200 Celery Avenue being tabled) PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES — MEETING G F APRIL L , 2002 PAGE 3 The net item was to consider the preliminary subdivision plan for Celery Farms, a proposed Soo lot single - family subdivision located at 2250 Celery Avenue. Mr. Lowell stated that staff recommendations state there will be a maximum of two entrances on Celery Avenue. The subdivision plan shows only one entrance and questioned if that was okay for safety requirements. Mr. Gibson stated that it would be okay with one entrance per fire department and police department. Mr. Garrett was concerned about the location where the children would stand to catch the school bus. Mr. Gibson stated that the two subdivision's driveways mould not line up with each other, but does comply with separation requirement. Mr. Marlow stated that there is about 1100 feet between the two subdivision'sentrances. 1r. Dale stated that there will be an eagle protection area on the west side of property and there are 2. 3 lots per acre. Mr. VonHerbulis asked Mr. Dale if he would be interested in placing a "Welcome to Sanford" sign at the easterly portion of the property. Mr. Dale stated that he would not be opposed to that. Nor. Skat asked staff for information regarding Celery Avenue improvements. Mr. Gibson stated that he inquired about it and was informed that there is no program for improvements on Celery Avenue. Mr. Dale stated that some of the Penny Sales Tax will be used to make improvements all the way to CR 415, but celery Avenue would not be widened. Mr. Gibson stated that both developers will make improvements along their properties. Mr. Lowell asked why the driveways were not required to line up so if a traffic signal was needed, it could serge both subdivisions. Mr. Gibson stated that it does not show the driveways in alignment, because the missing link to rake it happen was Ms. vuillermot's property to dedicate the right -of -way. The developer load to relocate the driveway to meet city and county requireme Mr. VonHerbulis moved to approve per staff s recommendations. Mr. Robert seconded. Mr. Hipes asked if the board should address the wall issue as asked by Ms. uillermot. Mr. Gibson stated that now would be the time to address it. Mr. VonHerbulis amended the motion to add a wall requirement to go around 2200 Celery Avenue. Mr. Robert PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES — MEETING of APRIL 4, 2002 PAGE seconded amended motion. Mr. VonHerbulis further amended the notion to state a 6 ft decorative vinyl fence be installed around Ms. uillermot's property. Mr. Robert seconded the amended motion. All in favor. (lotion carried. 1r. Hipes moved to approve Minutes from March 7 th and March 21 Mr. Robert seconded. All in favor. Motion carried. 1r. skat stated that the auto lot on the corner of 17/92 and Orlando Drive should be checked to see if their license could be pulled because they have not complied with anything the board has asked there to do. Mr. Gibson stated than he would check it. 1r. VonHerbulis stated that the storage place on W. 1 st Street had six rental vehicles parked in the front on Easter weekend. 1r. skat informed the board that the City Commission unanimously approved the appeal and denied the conditional use for JP Pets. In the future, the board needs to state specific points when approving a conditional use when staff is recommending denial. He also stated that there were a lot of stipulations for code enforcement to have to enforce. Mr. skat stated that several people had approached him regarding board members attending a function where there is alcohol being served and open discussion going on prior to a board meeting. Due to the comments he received, Mr. Skat asked for the board members not to attend the board meeting if they were present at the function because it gives a negative perception. 1s. Gerli presented schedule E to the board. she stated that some of the changes made were: changing "auto" to "vehicular use" to include F's and boats, increased setback display requirement, limit height of equipment, limit types of properties where they could be sold because of minimum lot size. There are also changes to the home occupation section to restrict a customer from coming to the house and no accessory structures can be used unless it meets a 2 -ft setback requirement. Borne concerns comments from the board were: be consistent with seminol'e County regarding the setback requirement for vehicle display, storing /displaying items on top of berm area, placing all signage related issues under schedule K instead of various schedule locations, outside storage of merchandise, should be alloyed to use accessory structures without setback restriction for the home occupation, restricting square footage of the house for home occupation, restrict employees from corning to house and not the customers, add aquatic native vegetation requirements in burrow pits, and items not alloyed to be stacked higher than the fence. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ISSION MINUTES — MEETING of APRIL L , 2002 PAGE Ms. Gedi also presented Schedule F, Architectural Standards and Lighting standards, to the board, Due to some board members not being present at a previous meeting where these standards were discussed, Mr. Scat suggested the board to review therm and schedule a worksession to - discuss /approve there. 1r. Scat requested that the Schedules be reviewed during a work session. He requested the board members to revie w them and for ward their comments to staff. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:48 P.M. Michael Skat, Chairman