Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02.05.98WORKSHOP AGENDA SANFORD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Thursday, J :�� •�,z�l1,u(LJ .5' /989 6.00 P.M. CITY COMMISSION ROOM, CITYHALL City of Sanford, Florida A. Evaluation and Appraisal Report - Goals, Objectives and Policies B. Other Business ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC- If person decides to appeal a decision made with respect to any matter considered at the above meeting or hearing, he or she may need a verbatim record of proceedings, including the testimony and evidence with record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS 286.0105) Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the Personnel Office ADA Coordinator at 330 -5626, 48 hours in advance of the meeting. C ity ofSar2ford Planning and zoning Commission Regularly Scheduled Meeting 7:00 P.M. Thursday, February 5, 1998 City Commission Chambers, City Hall, Sanford, Florida AGENDA 1. Hold a Public Hearing to consider a request for a Conditional Use with an associated Dimensional Variance for International Sign & Design for an additional free standing sign with consideration of a reduction in setback requirements: 5' proposed, 15' required, a variance of 10' for property krAed at 2306 S. French Avenue. Parcel No: 35- 19- 30- 523 - 0000 -0320 Owner: Badcock Hoare Furnishing Center Representative: Todd Pressman- Pressman Associates 2. Any other business from floor or Commission Members. 3. Reports from Staff. 4. Minutes. ADVICE To THE PUBLIC. If a person decides to appeal a decision made with respect to any matter considered at the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of the proceedings including the testimony and evidence, which record is not provided by the City of Sanford (FS 286,0105) Persons with disabilities reeding assistance to participate in any of these dings should contact the personnel office ADA Coordinator at 330 - 5636., 48 hrs, In advance of the meeting. MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WORKSESSION FEBRUARY 5, 1998 6:00 P.M. CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS CITY HALL, SANFORD FLORIDA MEMBERS PRESENT: Jim Valerino Lynn Stogner Helen Stairs Mac McClanahan Michael Skat Ross Robert Otto Garrett James Hattaway 6 :30 Ben Dyal--- 6 : 4 5 OTHERS PRESENT: Jay Marder, Director of Planning and Development Andrew Van Gaale, Associate Planner Marion Anderson, Recording Secretary Mrs. Stairs noted that Kay Bartholomew wanted Staff and the Commission to know that culture and arts are important and should be included in the Comprehensive Plan. In his presentation to the Commission on the Evaluation and Appraisal Report, Mr. Van Gaale touched on what it is and the process for updating the Comprehensive Plan. He explained the objectives, the citizen participation process with the summary of interview results regarding image, major positive and negative attributes, and the potential actions to achieve leadership goals. Mr. Van Gaale explained the second phase of the citizen participation process and the elements of the Comprehensive Plan. He showed the Existing Land Use Map, Future Land Use Plan Map, Zoning, Transportation Improvement, Transit, Public Lands and Facilities, Potable Water and Sewer Service maps. He also showed the Reclaimed Water and Street Light maps. Mr. Van Gaale touched on the Historic District and pointed out the proposed areas of expansion. Revenues and expenditures, population projections, school enrollment, recreation program attendance and the City's millage rates were discussed. Mr. Van Gaale also touched on anticipated infrastructure improvements with unfunded 5 -year capital improvements highlights. He explained that discussions of other major projects included the Lake Monroe Riverwalk ( funded by ISTEA and FDOT), Highway 17--92 County CRA, waterfront hotel and convention center, midge control and seawall repairs. He showed slides of the stadium renovation concepts, and the hotel /convention center concept. Discussion of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report- Goals, Objectives and Policies concluded at 7 :00 P.M. MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION'S REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING FEBRUARY 5, 1998 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Helen Stairs Ben Dyal Mac McClanahan Lynn Stogner Ross Robert Jim Valerino Mike Skat James Hattaway Otto Garrett OTHERS PRESENT: Jay Marder, Director of Planning and Development Marion Anderson, Recording Secretary The meeting was called to order at 7 :00 P.M. The first item on the Agenda was to hold a Public Hearing to consider a request for a Conditional Use with an associated Dimensional Variance for International Sign and Design for an additional free standing sign with consideration of a reduction in setback requirements: 5' proposed, 15' required, a variance of 10' for property located at 2306 S. French Avenue. Parcel No: 36 -19- 30 --523 -0000 -0320. Owner: Badcock Home Furnishing Center; representative: Todd Pressman- Pressman Associates. Todd Pressman, 28870 US Hwy 19N, Clearwater, was present representing Value Pawn. He stated that the total square footage of the signs would still be far less than what is permitted at the site. He is requesting an additional freestanding sign. Mr. Pressman stated that the site fronts on two streets which makes the second sign allowable. The main /existing sign is used by Badcock and the proposed sign is for Value Pawn. Mr. Marder noted that the site does have access on 24t Street. The size of the sign is 42 square feet. It is smaller than what the Code allows. Mr. Marder stated that in this case with multiple tenants, 50 square feet is allowed and the owner could have another 25 square feet for a total of 75 square feet. Mr. Hattaway moved to deny based on Staff's recommendations. Seconded by Mr. Stogner. Mr. Dyal noted that the side street is not a commercial street and that the business does not front two streets. Mr. Skat stated that he was not voting on anything else on 17 -92 until the Commission receives some input from the 17 -92 CRA. Mr. McClanahan stated that he didn't feel Value Pawn needed any more exposure, and that by denying the request it would not put a hardship on the business. All in favor. Motion carried. Mr. McClanahan moved on approval of the Minutes as circulated. Seconded by Mr. Robert. All in favor. Motion carried. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 7 :45 P . M. HeLen tairs, Chairperson From the Director of Planning and Development , January 30, 1998 TO: City of Sanford Planning and Zoning Commission SUBJECT: Recommendations for Meeting of February 5,1998 VALUE PAWN - Request conditional use permit to establish a second detached sign and diminish sign setback for property Zoned GC -2, General Commercial located at 2306 South French Avenue/U.S. Highway 17 & 92. 1. The site is Zoned GC -2, General Commercial and contains a building with two tenants, one of which is the applicant. An existing detached sign is located on the site and includes copy area identifying both businesses. Site is on the west side of French Avenue/U.S. Highway 17 & 92. See below for existing detached sign and existing attached signage at the portion of site in question. West Side of 17 &92 2. Applicant requests to add an additional detached sign and also requests to locate the proposed detached sign 10 feet closer than the required 15 foot setback from the side property line. 3. The applicant has submitted a drawing of the proposed sign and a sketch of its location. A. Site - Existing Detached Sign B. Front of Site 4. Various signs are located in the vicinity as noted below: A. South of site on west side of 17 &92 - This site has two signs, the foreground plus the Aarons Rental in the background. Research indicates that these signs, though refurbished, are quite old. C. Two businesses on one site, directly opposite site on east side of 17 & 92. Planning Recommendations, January 30, 1998, Page 2 B. Directly opposite site on east side of 17 &92. D. "Grandfathered" signs on a site northeast of site. 5. The City permits additional signage for multi - tenant buildings. The site includes a building of approximately 20,000 square feet. The City permits up to 75 square feet of sign surface area for detached signage on the site in question. 6. The Zoning Ordinance sets requires findings based on criteria and standards for justifying conditional use permits and the dimensional variances in terms of special conditions and circumstances, literal interpretation of the ordinance, etc. The information provided in item 4., above, plus additional research of conditional uses and dimensional variances in the immediate area of site indicates that the City has not approved conditional uses or dimensional variances similar to that requested in the immediate area of site since the present ordinance has been in effect, a period of over 10 years. 7. Recommend denial of the request to establish a second detached sign and a related request to vary the setback from the side property line based on 1) the request does not meet criteria and standards required by the Zoning Ordinance for conditional uses and dimensional variances, 2) evidence set forth above indicates that the requests do not meet the criteria and standards set forth in the Zoning Ordinance for conditional use and dimensional variances such as but not limited to preventing the reasonable use of the land, building or structure based on similar multiple occupant buildings with a single detached sign in the immediate vicinity of site and 3) the request is not consistent with the intent of the sign regulations to encourage signs serving commercial and industrial land uses to be attached rather than detached or freestanding types of signs. Planning Recommendations, January 30, 1998, Page 3