Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12.07.89MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WORKSESSION DECEMBER 7, 1989 7:00 P.M. City Commission Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Jay Malone John Morris Leon Brooks Joe Dennison MEMBERS ABSENT: Joe Dennison Tom Speer Oletta Yates Ben Dyal OTHERS PRESENT: Jay Marder, City Planner Bettie Sonnenberg, Land Development Coordinator Les Solin, Solin & Associates David Moon, Solin & Associates The meeting was called to order by Chairman Malone at 6:15 P.M. Mr. Solin of Solin Associates stated that this plan is not due to be submitted to DCA until April of 91. The material presented is only a draft. Several issues have been outlined in each element. Verbiage in the draft is mandated by the State and has to be included in the plan. Many policies do not concern everyday affairs as related to growth management. The Future Land Use Map was previously discussed on November 19. The Land Use Element begin with the recommendation that an architectural design study of the downtown area be made. Reference to the recent Historical Survey of the Historic District was made. A policy that keyed in with Seminole County I -4 high intensity area was included which encompasses S.R. 46 and I -4. The City's policy of the I- 4 /S.R. 46 high intensity area was framed to go into the Comprehensive Plan. The commerce center concept is framed to go in around intersections; i.e. the west side commerce centers, and are geared to a more industrial area. An Airport Industrial Center is planned within the Airport. Also incorporated is a policy for deterring further proliferation of strip commercial development which includes S.R. 46. Design parameters attached to all activities centers and encourage planned development within these centers. There is a concurrency Management Policy which requires all new development to demonstrate MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WORKSESSION DECEMBER 7, 1989 Page 2 up front to the City that they meet all levels of service. The most difficult feature of the Concurrency Management Policy is regulating all services of infrastructure, is the tracking of approved committed developments. Consideration may be given to putting a limit of time on the time of approved capacity. Mr. Morris asked if we could reach a point of allocating usages within our infrastructure system to developers? If so, will the allocation become more valuable that the development? Mr. Solin stated that this is the most significant question that surrounds the State. It has become more than a local or County issue. Mr. Malone asked if a developer can sell some of his capacity to another developer. Mr. Marder stated that there are a lot of complications that could come forth. Mr. Malone suggested that at site plan review the developer have some sort of statement that there is capacity for his development from the City. Mr. Solin stated that it is in the proposed goals and objectives that the developer provide to the Planning and Zoning Commission proof, from the City, that there is capacity where his development is to go. Mr. Marder stated that the City has a pretty good handle on most infrastructures such as water and sewer, drainage. Solid waste is mostly out of our hands because it is a county function. Mr. Morris wanted to change some of the wording in the Intergovernmental Coordination Element because it appears to put the responsibility of resolving conflicts with surrounding cities on the shoulders of the City of Sanford. We are in a subjective capacity rather than an equal capacity. Mr. Solin stated that in the Traffic Circulation Element is the identification of future roadway improvement needs. Most of the improvements are either state or county roads. There are deficiencies on several of our major target linkages in target area 2005. State DOT and County improvement programs do not include ongoing investment in the known infrastructure needs that will be necessary to meet the demand by 2005. The corporate needs of the City of Sanford is in this Traffic Circulation Element only. Mr. Moon stated that the funding for road improvements is changing on a monthly basis. Mr. Morris asked if we should concern ourselves with the funding or if we should concern ourselves with the planning stages. Mr. Moon stated that priorities are changing due to the funding. Mr. Solin stated that the projects incorporated in the table are projects they were given information MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WORKSESSION DECEMBER 7, 1989 PAGE 3 on by the County or DOT. Where programs are needed should be included in transportation element and will need further consideration. Mr. Morris stated that we need to look at both the planning and the funding. Chairman Malone asked Solin Associates to come back on January 4, 1990 to finish the outline. Would like to present the Comp Plan no later than May 1 to the City Commission. This may require having two worksessions per month. Chairman Malone asked the Commission to read the report and come in with constructive ideas. Meeting adjourned at 6:55 P.M. MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OF DECEMBER 7, 1989 7:00 P.M. CITY COMMISSION CHAFERS MEMBERS PRESENT: John Morris Leon Brooks Oletta Yates Ben Dyal Jay Malone Joe Dennison MEMBERS ABSENT: John LeRoy Tom Speer Eddie Keith OTHERS PRESENT: Jay Marder, City Planner Bettie Sonnenberg, Land Development Coordinator Marion Anderson, Recording Secretary The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Chairman Malone. The first item on the agenda was to Hold a Public Hearing to consider a request for a Conditional Use for property located at 912 Maple Avenue in a MR -2, zone for the purpose of a Single - Family dwelling on a non - conforming lot. Owner /Representative: George Brinson. George Brinson, 1116 Cedar Avenue, was present for representation. Mrs. Sonnenberg stated that this is a non - conforming corner lot. She stated that our Ordinance allows us to approve a single family use in a single - family zone but we could not do it administratively for a multi - family zone; so, Mr. Brinson had to come before the Planning and Zoning Commission. There was no one else present to speak in favor of or against the requested Conditional Use. Mr. Dennison moved on approval. Seconded by Mr. Brooks. All in favor. Motion carried. The next item on the agenda was the Consideration of the Site Plan for a revision to Montalvo Car Lot an Automotive Dealer use, located at 818 French Avenue in a GC -2 zone. Owner: Eileen Montalvo; representative: Alberto Montalvo. MINUTES Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of December 7, 1989 Page 2 Due to lack of representation, Mr. Dyal moved to table. Seconded by Mr. Dennison. All in favor. Motion carried. The next item on the agenda was the consideration of the Site Plan for Club Nautico, a Boat Rental use, located at Dock A at the City's Water Front Harbor in a SC -3 zone. Owner: Charles Volk; representative: Bob Smith. Mr. Dennison moved to table consideration of the Site Plan at the request of Staff for further information. Seconded by Mr. Dyal. All in favor. Motion carried. On the Addendum to the Agenda the first item was the consideration of the Site /Engineering Plan for a Farm Road for Ted Arthur's Tree Farm and Agriculture use for property located west of Narcissus Avenue, north of Rand Yard and south of U.S. 17 -92 in an AG and MI- 2 zone. Owner /representative: Ted Arthur, Tr. Mr. Ted Arthur, North Lake Sybellia Drive, Maitland, stated that he would like to put in an access road. They are waiting only for the St. Johns River Water Management District's permit. Mrs. Sonnenberg stated that Staff needs to approve all permits when obtained. Mr. Arthur stated that the Corp of Engineers have no problems with them putting in the road and a permit from DOT has been obtained for a curbcut. He also stated that the St. Johns River Water Management District is trying to find out if DER or their office has jurisdiction. The road is to be located 200 feet in from the easterly line off of 17 -92. Mr. Marder stated that a portion of this road is in unincorporated Seminole County. Mr. Arthur stated the 600 feet of frontage on 17 =92 has not been annexed. There is no access onto his property; so, he needs this road. Mr. Dennison moved in favor of the road subject to obtaining the proper permits. Seconded by Mr. Brooks. Mr. Morris stated that there are three underdrains under the road and asked if this is sufficient. Mr. Marder stated "yes ". All in favor. Mr. Dyal opposed. Motion carried. The next item on the Addendum to the Agenda was the consideration of the Site /Engineering Plan for a detached sign in a M1 -2 zone, for Bronson Company located at 1101 Cornwall Road. Owner /representative: William T. Corp. Due to lack of representation, Mr. Morris moved to table. Mr. Dyal seconded. All in favor. Motion carried. MINUTES Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of December 7, 1959 Page 3 Mrs. Sonnenberg stated that the City Commission denied the rezoning for Selma Williams. Also, Mr. Lay's property on Kennel road was approved for rezoning. The City Commission approved the recommendation for the Eagles Club for alcoholic beverages for members only. Mr. Brooks asked about all the little car lots from 13th Street to 46 on French Avenue. Chairman Malone requested Mr. Brooks to check into the Comp Plan and report to the Commission as to how it handles the car lots. Mr. Dyal stated that he was disappointed about approving anything in the wetlands. Mr. Marder stated that staff has a lot of mixed emotions in doing anything in this area and that the county is concerned also. Mr. Dennison asked if we had a "B "" zoning in our regulations in which developers are allowed to come in and put in small homes, with zero lots lines. Mr. Marder stated that it comes under a subdivision conditional uses in multi- family zoning. There being no further business,A the meeting adjourned at 7:30 P.M. - I A U 1 --_' Jay M lone, Cha: FROM THE SANFORD CITY !j I "' PIiANN ER December 1 , 1989 TO: The City of Sanford Planning and Zoning Commission SUBJECT: Planning Recommendations for Meeting of December 7, 1989 BRINSON - Request for conditional use approval to establish a one - family dwelling on a nonconforming lot in an MR -2, Multiple Family Residential Zone located at the northwest corner of 10th Street and Maple Avenue. 1. Site is Zoned MR -2, Multiple Family Residential and is vacant at the present time. 2. Various one - family dwellings are located adjacent to the site in existing MR- 2 and GC -2 Zoning Districts. 3. Recommend approval of the conditional use request to establish a one - family dwelling on a nonconforming , lot based on the similarity of uses already existing in the immediate area.