Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09.21.89MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MORKSESSION September 21, 1989 6:00 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT Jay Malone Joe Dennison Oletta Yates John LeRoy Tom Speer Leon Brooks Eddie Keith MEMBERS ABSENT: John Morris Ben Dyal OTHERS PRESENT: Jay Marder, City Planner Bettie Sonnenberg, Principal Deputy Administrative Official Marion Anderson, Recording Secretary The meeting was called to order at 6:00 P.M. by Chairman Malone. Mr. Marder introduced Les Solin and David Moon, of Solin Associates, the Consultant Planners. Mr. Solin stated that Solin Associates have been the consultant planners since April. The process began some years ago with Staff devising a lot of research essential to the Comprehensive Plan with Ivey, Bennett, Harris and Walls assisting in these efforts. Mr. Solin stated that the Land Use Inventory is highlighted by a series of existing Land Use Map series that get into the land use, water resources, wellfields, soil topography, vegetative, historic resources and public lands. These are all components required to be produced by the Local Government Comprehensive Plan. The existing Land Use Map was compiled by Staff. The Water Resource Map emphasizes the wetlands and the 100 year flood prone area. It shows the boundary of water sheds for drainage and different aquifer recharge areas. The Analysis of Undeveloped Lands Map shows the major undeveloped lands and is color coded by existing zoning and is a flip flop of the existing land use map. In the Traffic Circulation Element the major street system is presented. Most of the roadways that need improvements are County facilities. The Chairman requested that Mr. Marder present, at the next meeting, a percentage of available lands in the City that are zoned multi - family and single family. Also how much land is available today for multi - family and single family development and what relationship there is to the projections. Meeting adjourned at 6:56 P.M. ; J lone, Chairman MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1989 7:00 P.M. CITY COMMISSION CHAFERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Jay Malone Joe Dennison Oletta Yates John LeRoy Tom Speer Leon Brooks Eddie Keith MEMBERS ABSENT: John Morris Ben Dyal OTHERS PRESENT: Jay Marder, City Planner Bettie Sonnenberg, Principal Deputy Administrative Official Marion Anderson, Recording Secretary The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Chairman Malone. The first item on the agenda was moved from No. 6 to No. 1. Reports from Staff - First Comprehensive Plan Amendment for 1990. The first advertisement relates to the First Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment for 1990. We will be taking in approximately 300 acres of land from the Annexation Outreach Program. Mr. Marder stated that the second advertisement regards the Small Scale Plan Amendment for the Lay tract that accompanies the Lay rezoning that will be considered tonight. Mr. Dennison in favor of recommending to the City Commission the approval of the First Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment for 1990 and also the Small Scale Plan Amendment. Mr. Brooks seconded both. All in favor. Motion carried. The next item on the agenda was a Public Hearing to consider a Conditional Use for property located at 800 Bay Avenue in a SR -1 zone for the purpose of a duplex use - 2 dwelling units for family members. Owner /representative: Phyllis Frage. Ms. Frage, 800 Bay Avenue, stated that this is not a duplex, and she is asking for an extra electric meter box because there is another family there that does not help with the light bill. Ms. MINUTES Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of September 21, 1989 Page 2 Frage stated that she is the administrator of the property since her Grandmother passed. The electricity part is not working out. The structure of the house will not be changed and there will be no additions. Mrs. Sonnenberg stated that there are two separate and distinct units being used now for family members. For the Building Department to o.k. separate services with separate meter boxes, we need to have a two family use established. Mr. Brooks stated that it has not changed the character of the neighborhood. It does not look like a duplex. Mr. Brooks moved on approval to allow the second electric meter. Mr. Speer seconded. Chairman Malone asked if the Commission could allow a second meter without the classification of a duplex. Mr. Marder stated "yes, that it would be a conditional use. Mr. Dennison moved to approve an electrical change to this dwelling to allow our Building Department to authorize this residence to have two meters. Seconded by Mr. Brooks and Mr. Speer. All in favor. Motion carried. The next item on the agenda was a Public Hearing to consider the request to Rezone from AD, Agriculture, to RI -1, Restricted Commercial, that property located on the East side of Kennel Road south of 3rd Street. Owner /representative: Howard Lay. Mr. Bob Seigler, 2530 South Sanford Avenue, stated that basically this is the property that was approved as the f irst item as the Small Scale Amendment. The requested rezoning is the same as the property to the south and to the west. Mr. Lay would like to start construction of the property for his own use and would like to be in by January. The property is 3 acres or less. Mr. LeRoy moved on approval of the requested rezoning. Seconded by Mr. Speer. All in favor. Motion carried. The next item on the agenda was the Site /Engineering Plan for DanBach, Inc., an office warehouse use located at 136 Commerce Way, in a RI -1 zone. Owner: Dan Bach; representative: John Reynolds. Mr. Dick Holsenback, Deltona, stated that he is the owner of the parcel of land and the president of Dan Bach, Inc. Mr. Holsenback stated that they are proposing to construct an 8050 square foot building on a lot in the Sanford Commerce Park. MINUTES Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of September 21, 1989 Pace 3 Mr. Dennison moved on approval of the Site /Engineering Plan. Mr. LeRoy seconded. All in favor. Motion carried. The next item on the agenda was the revised Site /Engineering Plan for an equipment lot with outside storage and outdoor wheel stop manufacturing for the Ensley Corporation located on the southeast corner of 5th Street and Cedar Avenue in a GC -2 zone. Owner Joe W. Brooks; representative: John Frith. Mr. John Frith, 7920 Goldie Street, Orlando, stated that he has satisfied all of Staff's recommendations. Mrs. Sonnenberg stated that at last meeting there was a motion made and approved to sight proof the four sides of the equipment storage lot. The next day, Mr. Frith went to the Board of Adjustment and they gave him a variance because it is under their domain to waive the requirements of this fencing. They gave him a variance not to buffer two sides, the north and the west. Mr. LeRoy made a motion to approve the Revised Site /Engineering Plan. Mr. Dennison seconded. All in favor. Motion carried. Mr. Malone requested that worksessions be held at the last meeting of each month. Once a month Planning and Zoning will have worksessions. Mr. Brooks made a motion to approve the minutes as circulated. Mr. Speer seconded. All in favor. Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 7:30 P.M. I i I''I "' °'•r'i`I ��I „� FROM THE SANFORD CITY PLANNER ; ; �� ' �•I I, , p; September 14, 1989 it � i nw�'l17” "�.h. "MI�1 �� u i i`di "' i "✓d'" TO: The City of Sanford Planning and Zoning Commission SUBJECT: Planning Recommendations for Meeting of September 21, 1989 LAY SMALL -SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT - Request small scale comprehensive plan amendment to designate property located on the east side of Kennel Road to a Regional Commerce land use designation on the Future Land Use Concept map of the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. 1. The site includes three acres with a present land use designation of High Intensity Planned Development according to the Seminole County Comprehensive Plan. The site is the same as the Lay rezoning request immediately below. 2. The area surrounding the site located in the City of Sanford is designated as Regional Commerce. Regional Commerce in Sanford and High Intensity Planned Development in Seminole County are roughly equivalent land use designations in the respective jurisdictions. 3. Recommend approval of plan amendment to Regional Commerce based on equivalent designations between City and County plans. LAY REZONING - Request to rezone from AG, Agricultural to RI -1, Restricted Industrial for property located on the east side of Kennel Road. 1. Site is zoned AG, Agricultural and includes approximately 3 acres with a metal building. Street access to site is unpaved at the present time. 2. Area adjacent to site in the City Limits is zoned RI -1, Restricted Industrial and is basically vacant at the present time. A church is located northwest of site as are various mobile homes and an animal grooming establishment in agricultural zoning districts. 3. Recommend approval of request to rezone to RI -1, Restricted Industrial based on similarity with adjacent RI -1 zoning district already established in the immediate area. NOTE: Final action upon this request is subject to action upon the small- scale comprehensive plan amendment for property in question. PLANNING RECOMMENDATION FOR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1989 PAGE 2 FRAGE CONDITIONAL USE - Request conditional use approval to permit a duplex in order to est s separate utility service in an SR -1, Single Family Residential zoning district located at 800 Bay Avenue. 1. Site is Zoned SR -1, Single Family Residential, encompasses approximately 5,850 acres and includes an existing residential structure with entrances on Bay Avenue and 8th Street. The site does not comply with the 7,500 square foot minimum parcel area required for a two - family dwelling. 2. Sanford permits the establishment of separate living areas for a relative within a residence. In such situations utilities are shared. A question of policy regardings whether to permit the conversion of a one- family dwelling into a two - family dwelling which may involve retrofitting the physical separation between the two units. 3. Various one - family dwellings are located adjacent to the site. 4. Recommend denial of conditional use permit to establish a two - family dwelling based the undesirability of establishing a nonconformity and based on the existing one - family character of the immediate area at the present time.