HomeMy WebLinkAbout05.01.86MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MAY 1, 1986
7;00 P.M.
Members Present:
John Morris, Chairman
John LeRoy
Darrell Grieme
Gary Davidson
Sheila Roberts
Jay Malone
Brent Carli
Members Absent:
Others Present:
Dr. Hortense Evans
Eddie Keith
Bettie Sonnenberg, Zoning Inspector
Bill Simmons, Director of Engineering & Planning
Jay Marder, City Planner
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by the Chairman, John Morris.
The first item on the agenda was a public Hearing to consider a request for a rezoning
from AD to GC -2, that property located at 2700 Country Club Road for the purpose of om-
mercial use of a retail or service nature nature /pawn shop, represented by William Cagle.
William Cagle was present to represent the request. He is planning to operate a pawn
shop. The area has grown and commercial would be a better use than residential. The lot
size is 80' x 130'. He stated he will try to utilize the existing structure with small
exterior modifications.
There was no one present to speak in opposition. There was a recommendation from the
Planner to deny based on the incompatibility of uses permitted in the GC -2 zoning with
the existing residential character of the area northwest of Airport Blvd /Country Club
Road intersection and the Future Land use plan policy which excluded retail -type comm-
ercial activities.
Mr. Davidson moved to approve the rezone. Mr. Grieme seconded for discussion. Mr. Carli
asked Mr. Cagle if he would be utilizing the existing structure. Mr. Cagle stated that
he will try to utilize the structure with minor modifications to the exterior. After
discussion,. the motion carried to approve the rezone over the dissenting voted of Mrs.
Roberts, Mr Grieme and Mr. LeRoy.
The next item was to consider the site plan for Bargain Discount, a commercial busines$,
located at 918 W. 1st Street in a RI -1 zone, represented by Ed Hunter.
The staff considered the plan to be technically adequate and recommended approval. Mr.
Hunter stated that he would basically be selling furniture. He buys furniture from
estates. It would be a discount warehouse with used and some new furniture. There
would be approximately three employees. There is adequate parking for ten parking
spaces although only six are shown on the site plan. The front door is located on
Poplar Avenue at the corner of Poplar Av. and First Street. The service door is located
at the rear of the store on Poplar Avenue. The chairman suggested to Hunter that he take
MINUTES -
Page 2
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION - MAY 1, 1986
the site plan and move things around to show what is actually there. Out of the six
spaces shown on the site plan the delivery service would be utilizing one space and
the three employees three more leaving two spaces vacant for customers. Mr. Malone
questioned the 1,000 square foot service are out of a total of 7,600 square foot build-
ing. If the site plan is approved and another business came in and they utilized more
service area, would there be enough room for their parking needs?
After discussion, Mr. Carli moved to deny the site plan. Mr. LeRoy seconded. Motion
carried.
The next item was to consider the revised site plan for signage at Country Club square,
Phase II, a shopping center located 2439 - 2459 Airport Blvd. in a GC -2 zone.
Due to lack of representative, Mr. Carli move to table the item. Mrs. Roberts seconded.
Motion carried.
The next item was an addendum to consider the site plan for Popeyes Fried Chicken, an
out parcel located at the Fairway Plaza at 2660 Orlando Drive in a GC -2 zone, repre-
sented by ed Boozer, owner of the plaza.
The Chairman asked the members to take note of the traffic controls, meter size and lo-
cation on the rights -of -way. The Chairman asked Mr. Boozer if he would be willing to
move the drive on Desoto Drive to the west and he stated that he would. The signs
western and southern sides of the plaza. The piece of property is being sold to Popeyes.
There are 40 parking spaces on the Popeye's property with only 28 spaces requires.
Mr. Carli asked Mr. Boozer if there would be striping at the exit on the drive -thru.
Mr. Boozer stated that there would be.
After discussion, Mr. Malone move to approve the site plan with the stipulations of
traffic controls, meter size and location on the rights -os -way and the striping at the
drive -thru. Mrs. Roberts seconded. Motion carried.
The next item was to consider the site plan for Northlake Village. Phase II,a 116
condominum development, located at 700 lake Minnie Drive in a MR -1 zone represented by
Wes Blount.
Mr. Simmons stated that after working on it, staff recommended approval. There will
be money paid in lieu of land. The Phase II will be just like Phase I with the exception
of one three story building. The three story building will be sprinkled and all units
are masonry buildings. There will be spot clearing but they will leave as many of the
big trees as possible.
After discussion, Mr. Carli moved to approve the site plan. Mr. Leroy seconded. Motion
carried.
The next item was to consider the site plan for a change of use to an automobile dealer
from an industrial building for Carl Hill, located at 119 Commerce way in a RI -1 zone,
represented by Carl Hill.
Mr. Hill stated that he would use the building for storage of his automobiles. He has
approximately 70 cars. The cars that are not worth very much, he would like to sell by
advertising in the paper by appointment only. In order for him to buy any cars, he
needs a dealer's lecense. He would be doing repairs only on the cars that he owns.
The hoard would like the assurance of knowing that he would not go into retail sales,
and Mr. Hill stated that he had not intended to do that. There would be not displays
MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION - MAY 1, 1986
Page 3
or advertising at the building. Mr. Hill asked if he could make changes on the app-
roved site site plan in reference to the bay doors. The landscaping interfers with
the maneuverability for the car hauler. He would like to move the two curbcuts to make
them align with the two outside overhead doors.
After discussion, Mr. Carli moved to approve the amended site plan. Mr. LeRoy seconded.
Mr. Malone amended the motion by adding the use to allow Mr. Hill to get a dealer's
license. Mrs. Roberts seconded the amendment. The amendment and the amended motion
carried unanimously.
Mrs. Sonnenberg was requested by Gary Winn to ask the board if they would consider
two separate buildings five feet apart and connected by a decorative wall to be a duplex.
The board would like to look at some plans, but at this time, it sounds as if they two
separate buildings instead of a duplex.
Mr. Simmons informed the board that he is exploring ajoint planning session with the
county and they are favorable towards having one. The interlocal agreement is in the
process of being drafted.
Mr. Malone asked if the City Commission could appoint someone from Planning and Zoning
to the Code Enforcement Board to back up the Planning and Zoning decisions. Mr. Carli
would like to see a formal request to the City Commission to get someone on the Code
Enforcement Board. The Chairman stated that he would proceed with it.
Mr. Morris stated that some-modifications on site plans could be approved by staff
instead of coming back before the board. The board needs to come up with some guide -.
lines for staff to approve it administratively. Mr. Carli asked that staff come up with
a list of what they feel would be applicable. Mr. Simmons stated that plans are sent to
Planning and Zoning so that nothing is missed. As an alternative, he could work with
the Chairman before staff approval. The Chairman stated that he and the Vice Chair-
man, Mr. Carli, would meet with staff and come up with some ideas. The minutes of
the April 17, 1986 meeting were corrected to show that the Chairman stated that the
City Commission is responsible for taking care of the sign ordinance. The minutes
were approved as corrected.
:>-� vv I
hn Morris, Chairman
FORM 4 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT
LAST NAME —FIRST NAME -- MIDDLE NAME
LeRoy, John Jr.
THE BOARD, COUNCIL,COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE ON
WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF:
MAILING ADDRESS
1401 E. 2nd At.
P CITY O COUNTY O OTHER LOCAL AGENCY O STATE
f u
CITY COUNTY
Sanford, Seminole
NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OR STATE AGENCY
DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED
5/1/1986
CC t Of Sanford
R aLing & Zoning Commission
NAME OF BOARD. COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE
Planning & Zoning Commission
WHO MUST FILE FORM 4
This form is for use by any person'serving on either an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee,
whether state or local, and it applies equally to members of advisory and non -advisory bodies who are faced with a voting conflict of
interest.
As the voting conflict requirements for public officers at the local level differ from the requirements for state officers, this form is divided
into two parts: PART A is for use by persons serving on local boards (municipal, county, special tax districts, etc.), while PART B is
prescribed for all other boards, i.e., those at the state level.
PART C of the form contains instructions as to when and where this form must be filed.
PART A
VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
[Required by Section 112.3143(3), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).]
The Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees PROHIBITS each municoal, county, and other local public officer FROM
VOTING in an official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from
knowingly voting in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to the special gain of any principal (other than a government
agency as defined in Section 112.312(2), Florida Statutes) by whom he is retained.
In any such case a local public officer must disclose the conflict:
(a) PRIOR TO TH E VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of his interest in the matter on which he is
abstaining from voting; and
(b) WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by describing the nature of his interest as a public record in this part below.
NOTE: Commissioners of a Community Redevelopment Agency created or designated pursuant to Section 163.356 or Section 163.357,
Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984), or officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one -acre, one -vote basis are not prohibited from
voting. In such cases, however, the oral and written disclosure of this part must be made.
1, the undersigned local public officer. hereby disclose that on May 1, . 19 86
(a) I abstained from voting on a matter which (check one):
inured to my special private gain; or
X inured to the special gain of Shoemaker Construction Co. , by whom I am retained.
Ct FORM 4- REV. 1"4 PAGE I
(b) The measure on which 1 abstained and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows:
May 1, 1986
Date Filed
P {ease see PART C for instructions on when and where to Pile this fo1....
PART 0
VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR STATE OFFICERS
[Required by Section 112.3143(2), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).]
Each state public officer is permitted to vote in his official capacity on any matter. However. any state officer who votes in his official
capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain or the special gain of any principal by whom he is retained is required
to disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in Part B below within IS days after the vote occurs.
1, the undersigned officer of a state agency, hereby disclose that on ' 19
(a) I voted on a matter which (check one):
inured to my special private gain; or
inured to the special gain of
(b) The measure on which I voted and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows:
Date Filed
, by whom I am retained.
Signature
Please we PART C below for instructions on when and where to file this form.
PART C
FILING INSTRUCTIONS
This memorandum must be filed within fifteen (I5) days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the person
responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who shall incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes. This form need not
be filed merely to indicate the absence of a voting conflict.
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONSOV FLORIDA STATUTES¢ 112317 (1983], A FAI LU RE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY
BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT. REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT.
DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY. REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED 0AM.
CE FORM 4 -REV. 1044 PAGE 2