Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09.05.85MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION September 5, 1985 7:00 P.M. Members Present: John Morris, Chairman Brent Carli Jay Malone Sheila Roberts Gary L. Davidson Darrell Grieme Dr. Hortense Evans John LeRoy Members Absent: Eddie Keith Others Present: Bettie Sonnenberg, Zoning Inspector Bill Simmons, Director of Engineering and Planning Deane Jordan, Evening Herald Site Plan & Survey Class from SCC The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by the Chairman, John Morris. The first item on the agenda was a continued public hearing to consider a request for a conditional use in a GC -2 zone, that property located at 4165 Orlando Drive for the purpose of automotive, new and used, sales, service, body, repair and paint shop, represented by Dennis Young and Hassan Mokhberi. Mr. Young stated that they would be selling cars, doing minor body work on the cars they would be selling, store small parts and touch up paint on the cars. The property is lcoated north of the Aristocrat Motor car lot. There was no one present to speak in opposition. After discussion, Mr. Carli moved to approve the conditional use. Mrs. Roberts seconded. Motion carried unanimously. The next item was to consider a conditional use ina MR -1 zone, that property lcoated between 11th and 12th Street, Holly and Maple Ave. for the purpose of a church represented by the Rev. Harry Rucker. Mr. Rucker stated that the church would be located on the entire block and the seating capacity would be approximately 350. There was no one present to speak in opposition. After discussion, Dr. Evans moved to approve the conditional use. Mr. Davidson seconded. Motion carried unanimously. The next item was to consider a site plan for an addition to Penn Aluminum Co. in a MI -2 zone, that property located at 2540 Jewett Lane represented by Mack Lazenby. Mr. Lazenby stated that the site plan exceeds the minimum qualifications that are needed. The one street light located at the intersection is all that is required. The existing bay doors would be relocated to the outside of the new addition and the landscaping would be brought up to the standards. After discussion, Mr. Davidson moved to approve the site plan. Mr. Malone seconded. Motion carried unanimously. The next item was to consider a site plan for Monroe Village, a 114 unit apartment dev. located in a RMOI zone at 110 N. Terwilliger Lane represented by Steven Cahill. Mr. Cahill stated that the site plan meets all requirements for the fire department. All the units will be 2 bedroom, 2 bath with 940 sq. ft. living area. The units on the exterior will be two story and the interior units would be single story. There will be street lights at each entrance and the landscaping exceeds the requirements. The easements have been taken care of. After discussion, Mr. Malone moved to approve the site plan as presented. Mrs. Roberts seconded. Motion carried unanimously. The next item was to consider a site plan for Reflections of Hidden Lake, a shopping center and professional office building, located in a GC -2 zone at the NW corner of Lake Mary Blvd. Planning 6 Zoning Commission Minutes - Sept. 5, 1985 Page 2 and Hidden Lake Drive, represented by Fred Shipman. Mr. Shipman stated that the center would have specialty type retail stores and the professional office would have doctors, lawyers, etc. He would need to request a variance for 70 parking spaces. There are enough for the retail stores, but are short for the offices. The parking space size are 10' x 20' with 2' of additional landscaping. An additional 25 ft. right -o£ -way granted on Lake Mary Blvd. and the center would still meet the setback requirements. The retail stores have 45,000 sq. ft. which 70% is for non - storage floor area. After discussion, Mr. Malone moved to deny the site plan. Mr. Carli seconded. Motion carried with Mr. Davidson abstaining. (The signed form attached) Reason for denial: Need accel and decel lanes on Hidden Lake Drive and would like to see more parking for the office building. The next item was to consider a site plan for Airport Plaza, a shopping center, in a RI -1 zone, that property located at the SE corner of 25th Street and Mellonville Ave. represented by Ron Henson. Mr. Henson stated that the property is leased from the Sanford Airport Authority. There are approximately 10 acres, with 4 acres for retail sales, 3.5 acres for a reserved preservation area, 1.6 acres for future industrial park and .7 acres for an outparcel. The traffic would enter and exit from Mellonville Ave. The required parking spaces is 132, and they are providing 146 spaces. There would be 70% used for consumer service and 30% for storage. There will be trees along Mellonville Ave. to screen the center. water will be tied into existing lines. There will be a drive in the rear of stores to service the retail stores. There will also be a separate drive to get to the industrial park area. Mr. LeRoy asked Mr. Henson if he would be favorable to stagger the parking on Mellonville side in order to have more green area instead of so much asphalt. Mr. Henson agreed. Mr. Carli was concerned about the natural vegetation and beauty of this preservation area and trying to "mess it up" with a small shopping center when there are so many other areas for a shopping center. Why should you ruin a nice industrial area with a small commercial area? Mr. Malone was concerned about destroying the entrance to an Industrial area. It would bottleneck the traffic on that corner and there are too many small rental spaces in Sanford now. Mrs. Roberts said that they would need a light and there would definitely be a traffic problem. Mr. Grieme felt that it would not be too bad, but should stick with the comprehensive plan. After discussion, Dr. Evans moved to deny the site plan. Mrs. Roberts seconded. The chairman gave as further clarification that the particular site plan was not what the board would like to see in that area. The next item was to consider a final plat for Placid Lake, a mixed use development, located in a GC -2 and MR -2 zone, that property located north of Airport Blvd and east of Olk Lake Mary Road, represented by John Moseler and Phillip Hollis. Mr. Hollis stated that the City of Sanford is going to work with Florida Power and Light in reference to installing street lights on Airport Blvd. There would be accei and decel lanes at Live Oak Blvd and Placid Lake Drive, which is required of Seminole County. The landscaping would be addressed at each site plan per each phase of the devleopment. After discussion, Mrs. Roberts moved to approve the site plan. Mr. Davidson seconded. Motion carried. The next item was to consider a site plan for a Country Store with 3 apartments located in a GC -2 zone, that property located at 508 Cypress Ave. represented by Herbert Cherry. Mr. Cherry stated that the building was existing and he wanted to make the upstairs into 2 apartments with the downstairs having 1 apartment and the country store. The two upstair units would have 940 sq. ft, living area and the bottom unit would have 700 sq. ft. living area. There would be a small hedge placed in front of the building. Most of the traffic would come from the alley. Mrs. Sonnenberg stated that this property was on the condemnation list. Mr. Gaines bought it and is converting it. After discussion, Mr. Carli moved to approve the site plan. Mr. Malone seconded. Motion carried unanimously. The next item was to consider a site plan for Creekside Condominium, a 20 unit development, in a MR -1 zone, that property located at Collins Drive, represented by Tim Belvin. Mr. Belvin stated that each unit would be 2 bedroom, 2 bath, with 968 sq. ft. of living area Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - Sept. 5, 1985 Page 3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- with a screen porch. The retail price would be approximately $49,900. The entrance and exit would be on Collins Drive. After discussion, Mr. Carli moved to approve the site plan. Mr. Davidson seconded. Motion carried unanimously. The next item was an addendum to consider a site plan for a shopping center in a GC -2 zone, that property located at the intersection of Airport Blvd. and 25th Street, represented by Fred Shipman. Mr. Shipman stated that some of the land would need to be filled. The property is located east and south of the Pine Ridge Club. There would be no grocery store drugstore or a theater in the center. The curbcut would be aligned with the one at the Country Club Square Center. They would try to preserve as many trees and shrubbery as possible. There would be a 30 ft. drive in front of the stores. There are an additional 15 parking spaces provided, which Mr. Shipman agreed to take approximately 8 spaces in the center of the parking lot and making it a green area. After discussion, Dr. Evans moved to approve the site plan with change of 8 parking spaces to a green area. Mrs. Roberts seconded. Motion carried with Mr. Davidson abstaining. (The signed form attached) The Minutes of the previous meeting were approved. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. FOAM 4 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT LAST NAME —FIRST NAME — MIDDLE NAME Davidson, Gary L. MAILING ADDRESS P. Q. Box 88 CITY COUNTY Sanford, FL 32771 Seminole DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED THE BOARD. COUNCIL, COMMISSION. AUTHORITY. OR COMMITTEE ON WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF: X, CITY D COUNTY O OTHER LOCAL AGENCY D STATE NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OR STATE AGENCY September 5 1985 NAME OF BOARD. COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY. OR COMMITTEE Planning & Zoning Commission City of Sanford WHO MUST FILE FORM 4 This form is for use by any person'serving on either an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee, whether state or local, and it applies equally to members of advisory and non- advisory bodies who are faced with a voting conflict of interest. As the voting conflict requirements for public officers at the local level differ from the requirements for state officers, this form is divided into two parts: PART A is for use by persons serving on local boards (municipal, county, special tax districts, etc.), while PART B is prescribed for all other boards, i.e., those at the state level. PART C of the form contains instructions as to when and where this form must be filed. PART A VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS [Required by Section 112.3143(3), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).] The Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees PROHIBITS each municipal, county, and other local public officer FROM VOTING in an official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to the special gain of any principal (other than a government agency as defined in Section 112.312(2), Florida Statutes) by whom he is retained. In any such case a local public officer must disclose the conflict: (a) PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of his interest in the matter on which he is abstaining from voting; and (b) WITHIN 15 DAYS AF=TER THE VOTE OCCURS by describing the nature of his interest as a public record in this part below. NOTE: Commissioners of a Community Redevelopment Agency created or designated pursuant to Section 163.356 or Section 163.357, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984), or officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one -acre, one -vote basis are not prohibited from voting. In such cases, however, the oral and written disclosure of this part must be made. 1, the undersigned local public officer, hereby disclose that on .19 (a) I abstained from voting on a matter which (check one): inured to my special private gain; or inured to the special gain of . by whom I am retained. Ct FORM 4 -REV. 1044 PAGE I (b) The measure on which 1 abstained and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: Business relationship with the sellers. 9 -5 -85 Date Filed Signature Please we PART C for instructions on when and where to file this form. PART S VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR STATE OFFICERS (Required by Section 112.3143(2), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).] Each state public officer is permitted to vote in his official capacity on any matter. However, any state officer who votes in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain or the special gain of any principal by whom he is retained is required to disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in Part B below within 15 days after the vote occurs. 1, the undersigned officer of a state agency, hereby disclose that on , 19 (a) 1 voted on a matter which (check one): inured to my special private gain; or inured to the special gain of (b) The measure on which 1 voted and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: . by whom 1 am attained. Date Filed Signature Please see PART C below for instructions on when and where to file this form. PART C FILING INSTRUCTIONS This memorandum must be filed within fifteen (15) days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who shall incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes. This form need not be filed merely to indicate the absence of a voting conflict. NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES 6111317(1983}, A FAI LURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT. REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT. DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY. REPRIMAND. OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED MAW CF.FORM 4 - REV_ 104H PAGE 2 FORM 4 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT LAST NAME —FIRST NAME — MIDDLE NAME Davidson, Gary L. MAILING ADDRESS P. 0. Box 88 CITY COUNTY Sanf FL 3 27 71 Seminol DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED THE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE ON WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF: O CITY O COUNTY O OTHER LOCAL AGENCY O STATE NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OR STATE AGENCY September 5 1985 NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE Planning & Zoning Commission City of Sanford WHO MUST FILE FORM 4 This form is for use by any person'serving on either an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee, whether state or local, and it applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are faced with a voting conflict of interest. As the voting conflict requirements for public officers at the local level differ from the requirements for state officers, this form is divided into two parts: PART A is for use by persons serving on local boards (municipal, county, special tax districts, etc.), while PART B is prescribed for all other boards, i.e., those at the state level. PART C of the form contains instructions as to when and where this form must be filed. PART A VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS (Required by Section 1] 2.3143(3), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).] The Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees PROHIBITS each municipal, county, and other local public officer FROM VOTING in an official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to the special gain of any principal (other than a government agency as defined in Section 112.312(2), Florida Statutes) by whom he is retained. In any such case a local public officer must disclose the conflict: (a) PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of his interest in the matter on which he is abstaining from voting; and (b) WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by describing the nature of his interest as a public record in this part below. NOTE: Commissioners of a Community Redevelopment Agency created or designated pursuant to Section 163.356 or Section 163.357, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984), or officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one -acre, one -vote basis are not prohibited from voting. In such cases, however, the oral and written disclosure of this part must be made. 1, the undersigned local public officer, hereby disclose that on .19 (a) 1 abstained from voting on a matter which (check one): inured to my special private gain; or inured to the special gain of , by whom I am retained. CE FORM 4- REV, 10-84 PAGE I (b) The measure on which 1 abstained and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: Business relationship with the sellers . 9 -5 -85 Date Filed Signature Please we PART C for instructions on when and where to file this form. PART B VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR STATE OFFICERS [Required by Section 112.3143(2), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).] Each state public officer is permitted to vote in his official capacity on any matter. However, any state officer who votes in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain or the special gain of any principal by whom he is retained to disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in Part B below within IS days after the vote occurs. 1, the undersigned officer of a state agency, hereby disclose that on 1 19�~ (a) I voted on a matter which (check one): inured to my special private gain; or inured to the special gain of , by whom I am retained. (b) The measure on which 1 voted and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: Date Filed Signature Please see PART C below for instructions on when and when to file this form. PART C FILING INSTRUCTIONS This memorandum must be filed within fifteen (1 S) days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who shall incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes. This form need not be filed merely to indicate the absence of a voting conflict. NOTICE: UNDER PROV ISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES) 1 12317 (19833, A FAILU RE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT. REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT. DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY. REPRIMAND. OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $SAM. CE FORM 4 - REV. 1044 PAGE 2