Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08.16.73PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 16, 1973 8:00 P. M. Members Present: Members Absent: Others Present: Arthur Harris Victor Gischler Robert Karns Philip Logan Rudy Sloan David Berrien Edward Blacksheare Jefferson Davis C. B. Franklin Al Payne, Building Inspector Bill Braceland, Building & Zoning Official Pete Grigas, Aide to City Planner Sam Ackley, Administrative Aide W. E. Knowles, City Manager The meeting was called to order by the Chairman. The first item of business was to hold a Public Hearing to consider a change and amendment to the Zoning Ordinance. After the proposed amendment was read in full, a motion was made by Mr. Sloan, seconded by Mr. Gishcler and carried by a unanimous vote, to recommend to the City Commission that Article V of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Sanford, Florida, be amended by the addi- tion of a zoning district to be designated as MR -1L, Multiple- Family Residential Limited Dwelling District, to read as follows: MR -lL MULTIPLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LIMITED DWELLING DISTRICT. Within an MR -11, Multiple - Family Residential Limited Dwelling District as shown on the Official Zoning Map of the City of Sanford, the following regulations shall apply: A. Uses Permitted Land and structures shall be used for the following pupposes: (1) Any use permitted in the SR -1 Single Family Residential Dwelling District except factory built housing. (2) Two- Family dwellings. (3) Multiple family residential structures including condominiums. Planning and Zoning Commission August 16, 1973 Page 2 B. Conditional Uses Termitted When, after review of an application and plans appurtenant thereto, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds as a fact that the following proposed use or uses are con- sistent with the general zoning and other appurtenant municipal ordinances and with the public interest, the Planning and Zoning Commission is hereby authorized to approve special permits for the following uses as permitted uses in the MR -1 District. (1) Conditional uses permitted in the SR -1 District. (2) Cemeteries. C. Approval of Site Development Plan. (1) No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used nor shall any building permit or certificate of occupancy be issued therefor, unless and until a Site Development Plan for such building, structure __laklubevshail have been approved as provided herein. D. Density Controls The following yard, density, and height of buildings requirements shall be observed except as provided in Article VIII. (1) For single family dwellings, the Density Controls in the SR -1 Single Family Residential Dwelling District shall be applicable. (2) For two- family dwellings: a. Minimum required lot area: 7,500 square feet b. Minimum required lot width:75 feet c. Minimum required front yard: 25 feet d. Minimum required rear yard: 20 feet e. Mimimum required side yard: 7.5 feet or 10% of the lot width, whichever is greater f. Minimum required living area: 700 sq. ft. per family g. Maximum 1(= coverage: 35 percent h. Maximum structure height:: 35 feet Planning and zoning Commission August 16, 1973 Page 3 (3) For Multiple - family dwellings: a. Minimum required lot area shall be 7,500 square feet for the first two dwelling units and 6,000 square feet for each additional unit that is added. b. Minimum required lot width: 100 feet c. Minimum required front yard: 30 feet d. Minimum required rear yard shall be 20 feet for the first two stories. For each story in excess of two the required rear yards shall be increased by five (5) feet for each story so added. e. Minimum required side yard on each side of the structure shall not be less thann10 feet for the first story and 20 feet for a 2 story structure. For each story in excess of 2, the required side yards shall be increased by 5 feet for each story so added. f. Minimum required living area: aa. Efficiency apartment 400 sq. ft. bb. One Bedroom apartment 700 sq. ft. CC. Two Bedroom apartment 800 sq. ft. dd. Three or more bedroom apartment 950 sq. ft. g. Maximum lot coverage: 40 percent h. Minimum open space required exclusive of parking area: 30% of site area. i. Maximum structure height: 35 ft. E. Off- Street Parkin; (1) Required off - street parking spaces shall be provided as set forth in Article VI hereof. The Chairman next read a letter from Attorney Charles E. Davis of Orlando, requesting that consideration of the request to rezone 86 acres of recently annexed property located on the north side of SR 46 -A and west of Tee 'n Green Subdivision from SR -lAA, Single - Family Residential District, to MR -1, Multiple - Family Residential Planning and Zoning Commission August 16, 1973 Page 4 Dwelling District, be postponed from August 16, 1973, to the next meeting on September 6, 1973. On motion of Mr. Logan, seconded by Mr. Gisbhler and carried, the date of September 6, 1973, wassset to hold a public hearing to consider such request for rezoning. Consideration was next given to the site plan for an addition and renovation of the Seminole County Jail. Sheriff John Polk explained that the plan was for a two -story addition withing the security com- pound and remodeling the ground floor 6f the existing building to provide for a more efficient operation without the need of more parking spaces. The trailer, now used for the detective division, located on City parking lot, will no longer be needed, thus re- leasing ten spaces for parking use. The City Manager reported that the City and the County are working together toward solving the parking problem. They are now awAlUgg the traffic engineering study which is due the third week in Novem- ber. He advised the board to consider that the concept of the use of this site is not normal and thus would not fall under normal regulAtions for parking requirements. The County and City, with cooperation, will find a solution to the problem of providing for parking needs. After consideration and discussion, on motion of Mr. Logan, seconded by Mr. Sloan and carried by unanimous vote, the site plan for an addition and renovation of the Seminole County Jail was approved. Mr. J. S. "Red" Cleveland, Airport Manager, next presented three site plans for sites at the Sanford Airport. Mr. Cleveland explained to the board that before any construction or additions are made on the Airport, plans are subject to approval by both state and federal agencies. The FAA has final say on any change or addition on the Airport. After discussion, Mr. Karns made a motion to recommend to the City Commission that apporval of site plans within the confines of the Sanford Airport property, except locations within 200 feet of its boundary, be delegated to the Airport Authority. The motion was seconded by Mr. Logan and carried by unanimous vote. After review, a motion was made by Mr. Logan, seconded by Mr. Sloan and carried, to approve the following site plans Attthe Sanford Airport: 1. Addition to commercial building No. 9A. 2. Construction of T- hangars. 3. Addition to existing steel building No. 128. Planning and Zoning Commission August 16, 1973 Page 5 Mr. Sid Vihlen, Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners, next addressed the board regarding the overall expansion plan of the County government. The decision has been made to build a new security complex, probably at Five Points; but, more pertinent to the Planning and Zoning Commission, a third floor will be constructed on the judicial wing of the court house. This addition to the court house will create another parking problem and add to the downtown parking crisis. The County is interested in solving the parking problem and hopes to solve it without sacrificing any of the green area surrounding the court house. The County will continue to make an effort to work with the City Commission on parking. The Chairman reported that the required paving had not been completed at the Fite building at French Avenue and 25th Street. The City Manager said that he would check into the matter and report back on it at the September 6th meeting. The Building Official asked for a clarification in the ZdhiNg Ordinance on the requirements for setbacks of accessory buildings. The City Planner was requested to define such requirements for a report at the next meeting. After discussion, the Chairman requested the Building Official to send for a copy of House Bill No. 1914, an act relating to municipal annexa- tion in Seminole County. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. 'W Arthur H. Harris, Chairman