Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04.24.69M I N U T E S ZONING AND PLANNING COMMISSION City of Sanford April 24, 1969 City Commission Room, City Hall 8 :00 P.M. Present Clifford W. McKibbin, Jr. - Chairman C' Donald Bishop, Jr. Arthur H. Harris Robert E. Karns John Daniels, Jr. Phillip H. Logan City Manager W. E. Knowles Building Official Linvel Risner Building Inspector Kermit Wallstedt Gerald L. Dake, Planning Consultant Absent Jefferson R. Davis John Y. Mercer C. F. Brooke Smith, M.D. The Chairman called the meeting to order. Alex. J. Serraes, President, Downtown Sanford Merchants' Association was present and outlined for the Board Members a proposed beautification plan for "Downtown First Street ". The project in mind is as follows: 1. Presently encourage the merchants on First Street to fix up the front of their stores in addition to the inside. 2. Merchants have specified that they do not want to eliminate the angle parking and go to parallel parking. r 3. The original plan was the continuation right on through to Sanford Avenue the construction of 3 -foot islands down the middle of the street with breaks at the intersections.with planting of palm trees in the island using rock or maple chips to finish them off which would eliminate Minutes/ Z & P 4/24/69 -2- the grass maintenance; suggesting that maintenance would be by City personnel or prisoner trustees. Mr. Serraes, associated with the local gas company, stated that he felt sure that his company would donate gas lights to be installed in the median planters, such as Winter Park has. However, the merchants were opposed to going down the middle of the street mainly because it would mean going to parallel parking and felt that it would be a hazard to those elderly persons driving. (Mr. Serraes stated that he could no longer believe that Sanford is an "old folks" town). A secondary project that he had in mind was such as the City of DeLand has which is a 3x9 foot planter on the edge of the sidewalk at the curbing which could be built out of brick, and then line benches in between each planter other than the present situation of the benches being on the sidewalks and practically in the middel of the sidewalks. Mr. Serraes therein requested the Board's endorsement of the islands, removing the benches and clearing the sidewalks, and to go to the parallel parking. Mr. Serraes stated that he felt that if the beautification plan could be implemented that it would give the merchants an incentive to do something with the fixing up of their stores. The Chairman reiterated the program of three points being that of; Constructing island in the middle of the street; parallel parking, and removing the benches to the lakefront. The Planner pointed out that some towns such as Mt. Dora and Leesburg have succeeded on their own with downtown beauti- fication ideas such as outlined by Mr. Serraes. They were carried out by one "agressive" individual starting the plan. Mr. Dake felt that the Board should give their wholehearted efforts to support the beautification plan for the downtown area. On a question relating to the parallel parking idea, the Planner felt that if the downtown is going to serve its function, we have to carry on the imitation of some of the outlying shopping centers by getting adequate off- street parking. I �R Minutes/ Z & P 4/24/69 -3- He also felt that parallel parking is not going to be any great problem and that eventually, in time, all the traffic will be taken off of First Street in some manner. Mr. Harris made mention of a mediocre idea of taking out every other two or three parking spaces and making a planting area with the benches on that and a little grass island not quite as far out as the driving lane but almost as far out as the end of the car would park. Also, with this idea, small trees or shrubs could be placed around the planting area and parallel parking could be considered. The City Manager pointed out that the present angle parking is on a 60 degree angle. The Planner suggested dropping the angle parking back to approximately 30 degrees which might still allow the island affect and still allow the two traffic lanes on the basis that the street width on First Street being that of approximately 60 feet. Mr. Karns mentioned the present traffic congestion on First and the flow of traffic backed up a block from the intersection of First and Park in the afternoons when persons are taking care of banking matters, and that this is the ease of shopping centers because of the traffic flow. Mr. Logan mentioned that he hoped consideration would be given to proper maintenance of any planters downtown so that they would not become an eyesore as did the "pot" planters that are presently on First Street from lack of care by the merchants. Mr. Serraes stated that if the planter strip down the middle of the street is not approved then he would recommend the sidewalk planters as the City of DeLand has done. He also called attention to sidewalk planting, relating particularly to use of palm trees wherein they could create a problem with the canopies on the store buildings in that some of the canopies might have to be cut back and also the hurricanes could present a problem or hazard. Mr. Serraes concluded by stating that he would like to receive the endorsement of the Zoning and Planning Commission in that he anticipated approaching the City Commission on April 28th, with the respective plan. Mr. Dake stated that he would lend assistance toward a workable plan::of beautification and parking for First Street. The Chairman stated that he would entertain a motion to recommend to the City Commission that the pra�osed project of the Downton Merchants to have First Street islands'.Installdd MR Minutes / Z & P 4/24/69 IL42 and angular parking on First Street be revised as to angle to accomplish safety with islands installed,`; and that the Planning Commission will lend assistance in the design and advice. On mo an of Mr. Harris, seconded by Mr. Bishop and carried, it recommended to the City Commission that the beautification plan of the Downtown. Merchants Association be accepted and that the Planning Commission will lend planning assistance and advice. In answer to a question by a board member as to the City's responsibility toward the downtown merchants, the City Planner stated that if Sanford is to have individuality, an image or a focal point and wish to keep a central downtown business district, then the City has some responsibility toward keeping it. He also added that the downtown property owners should be stimulated to take as much interest as the City takes. Consideration was next given to the application of Phillip J. Ness for the rezoning from C -1, Neighborhood Commercial, to that of M -1, Light Industrial, located as follows: Bounded on the east by Hardy Avenue; south by West 25th Street; west by the old RR /ROW; north by the Shamrock service station and 7 -11 store. A Public Hearing on said application was held at the "un- official" meeting of March 13, 1969, with no action taken at that time. Mr. Harris, Acting Chairman at said meeting, apprised the board members as to what had transpired at said public hearing. After discussion of the area, Mr. Harris moved that the request of Mr. Ness for the respective rezoning be denied. Seconded by Mr. Karns and carried. Airport zoning and planning was next considered, relative to the acquisition of the Sanford Airport, with the Chairman reporting that at the Sanford Industrial Commission's meeting on the prior Monday (The Chairman being a member of the SIC), the SIC took action to accept the recommendation of W. E. Knowles that the SIC get together with the consulting firm of Booker and Associates and the Chairman understood from Mr. Rathel, Director of SIC, that he had written a letter requesting that Booker include in the thirty man days work that is allowed under Booker & Associates government contract for them to do some airport zoning work and long range planning. Minutes / Z & P 4/24/69 -S- The Chairman thought it would be well for the Z & P and the SIC to wait on Booker's final report in this area because it has been pointed out that airport zoning is quite different than municipal zoning. In the meantime, the Building Official is issuing permits under the City Manager's administrative expansiveness; referring to activities out at the Sanford Airport that are in keeping with the use of the airport. The Chairman presented a letter of resignation from board member John Y. Mercer due to meeting date conflicts with his position at the United State Bank of Seminole. The Board accepted the letter with regrets and requested that it be referred to the City Commission. Consideration was next given to name suggestions to be submitted to the City Commission for an appointment to fill said vacancy. The following names were suggested: Staff Derby B.C. Conklin Alex Serraes Garnett White (other names for future reference are: Capt. John Williams, Dr. Louis Perez, Ben Howland, Dr. Ringling, Bill Hemphill, Dr. John Darby, Donald Jones) The matter of attendance record of the members for the last past six months was next discussed as it relates to having less than five members attending and creating a "lack of quorum" wherein pertinent matters cannot be officially handled. Suggestions were made to the possibility of holding the meetings during a particular time during the day; changing to a different day of the week; upon members being absent from three consecutive regular meetings or two out of five meetings they would be required to resign. No official action was taken at this time on how attendance could be made mandatory. The Planner stated that this Board needed to be a very active board regarding the matters that will be coming up through planning and consideration should be given to appointing members that will attend the meetings. He mentioned that some retirees make very good members because they have the time and usually the interest wherein sometimes persons are appointed that are all ready overloaded with work and other board meetings. Mr. Karns suggested that possibly the City Commission might have some recommendations to the solution. However, it was felt that the matter should be handled on the level of the Zoning and Planning Commission. Minutes/ Z & P 4/24/69 -6- The Planner mentioned that beginning at the next session there are three planning items that are presently on the drawing board that will be ready for discussion and consideration. He did not elaborate as to the items. The Chairman brought to attention that the Building Official had been approached relative to a builder wishing to place an office in the C -1, Neighborhood Commercial, zoning and desired to install a redwood fence in the back with idea of leaving or storing outside his excess supplies and -or materials; the office being that of drafting and not like a lumber yard. The Chairman inter- preted that the building official may make a determination that is within the scope of activities that are normally within C -1. It was pointed out that the problem is one that the material keeps on accumulating. Mr. Harris interpreted the ordinance to read that it does specify that all materials will be stored within an enclosure in a C -1 area. The Planner reported that he spend the day in Orlando with the Tri- County Planning Director and has learned that this re- spective organization has contracted with the engineering firm of Howard, Needles, Tammen & Bergendoff to undertake a very ex- tensive airport study of the tri- county area w4ich will include a general aviation plan as to where the general aviation facilities should be; and, how many of these should we have and what is the role of the Sanford Airport. Included in same will be the recommendation for land use adjacent to the airports and the type of uses that do not conflict with air travel pertaining to sound, noise, airport patterns, zoning, approaches, etc.; and, coming up with some standards regarding airport property design; design of the uses that will be adjacent to the airports. The Planner recommended that in the best interest of Sanford we should have something on paper regarding what our proposals are for the use of our airport property. Not only the area that is within the airport boundary limits, but also some of the areas adjacent to the airport so that our plans can be tied in with their plans and the overall program. The Chairman stated that the SIC had requested the SIC Director to request the Booker Company to get this particular work right out within 60 days and then a copy of same could then be forwarded to the Orlando engineering firm doing the Tri- County work. The City Manager stated that a lot of the work is already done, particularly in the Booker Report and through what FAA (Federal Aviation Administration) has done with the hopes that it can all be drawn together in a plan for the City for land use and airport zoning and capital improvements. Minutes/ Z & P 4/24/69 -7- The Planner also understood that at the Shoemaker, some months ago, the Tri- County P1 did a specific study of the air base property fringe areas and the property itself, and put report. The City Manager stated he had not but would check on same. request of Kay anning Commission area, including same into a general seen such a report, The Chairman announced that A. B. (Tommie) Peterson, Jr., Chairman of the City's Scenic Improvement Board, could not be present and had anticipated the presentation of a City of Sanford Beautification Plan. The City Manager outlined it as being a beautification contract with the Tri- County Planning Commission and the City Commission's appointed Scenic Improvement Board which is working with Harlan Hanson, Director of Tri- County Planning, Orlando, and have come up with a combination contract to tie in with the Tri Planning Council, who was already doing a beauti- fication general plan for three counties, to incorporate a special study for the Sanford area only. The §IB approached the City Commission at budget time and asked for7$5,000 appropriation and the City Commission has set it aside in the congingency fund. Now the federal funds have come through. The federal project through the Tri- County is going ahead;now it has come down to the point as to whether or not the Z & P Commission feels it advisable to support and recommend along with the Scenic Improvement Board that the City undertake this specialized study,in addition to the federal program,of the City of Sanford only on a beautification project(s). Further, the contract has been outlined and the City Commission ran through it at their last meeting; it is quite detailed; and the SIB feels that it is what they need or will have to have to start with and in particular it is a requirement if the City wishes to be eligible for any of the federal funds under the federal beautification grants. The Planner stated that, as he understood it, the actual contract resulted in five specific beautification projects within the City as a first year effort within a five -year plan and of those they will do detailed drawings and detailed planning schemes, cost estimates, not only putting in the shrubbery and materials, but also the annual cost of maintenance after the plantings are in. After discussion, Mr. Harris moved that a recommendation be submitted to the City Commission that the respective beauti- fication plan be adopted and the contract for same executed. Seconded by Mr. Karns and carried. Mr. Harris moved to request of the Scenic Improvement Board that upon execution of the Contract by the City Commission Minutes/ Z & P 4/24/69 - g- with Tri- County the Z & P Commission urges the SIB to consider the beautification of the downtown area as the first priority project as a cooperative effort with the plan as presented by Mr. Serraes. Seconded by Mr. Logan and carried. The Planner stated that at the request of the Chairman he would provide in ten days a preliminary plan for the beauti- fication and parking for the downtown area of First Street. The sketch to be done for a one block area with the idea it would be implemented for the overall project. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned. L A / X l � a� d Chairman