Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2205 W Semiole Blvd 17-1586- garbage compatorMAY 3 1 2017 6 CITY OF SANFORD BUILDING & FIRE PREVENTION l PERMIT APPLICATION Application No: / / Q 5 40 Documented Construction Value: $ 25,000.00 Job Address: 2205 W. Seminole Blvd. , Sanford, Fla. 32771 Historic District: Yes No Parcel ID: 26-19-30-300-003A-0000 Residential Commercial Type of Work: New iO Addition Alteration Repair Demo Change of Use Move Description of Work: Construct Garbage Compactor Plan Review Contact Person: Rollo E . Christensen Title: Project Manager Phone: 813/288-0008 Fax: 813/288-9112 Email: rchris tensen@ags;lanos . com Property Owner Information Name The Spanos Corporation Phone: 813/288-0008 Street: 2701 Rocky Point Drive /Suite #100 Resident of property? City, State Zip: Tampa, Florida 33607 Contractor Information Name The Spanos Corporation Phone: 813/288-0008 Street: 2701 Rocky Point Drive / S ti #100 Fax: R1 l/gAR-A11 g City, State Zip: Tampa. Florida 33607 State License No.: .;GGC1515592 Architect/Engineer Information Name: KEPHART Phone: 303/832-4474 Street: 2555 Walnut Street Fax: City, St, Zip: Denver, Colorado 80205 E-mail: _iesseg@kephart.com Bonding Company: Address: Mortgage Lender: Address: WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do the work and installations as indicated. I certify that no work or installation has commenced prior to the issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet standards of all laws regulating construction in this jurisdiction. I understand that a separate permit must be secured for electrical work, plumbing, signs, wells, pools, furnaces, boilers, heaters, tanks, and air conditioners, etc. FBC 105.3 Shall be inscribed with the date of application and the code in effect as of that date: 5t1 E ' on (2014) Florida Building Code Revised: June 30. 2015 `/ Permit Application r.. K NOTICE: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. Acceptance of permit is verification that I will notify the owner of the property of the requirements of Florida Lien Law, FS 713. The City of Sanford requires payment of a plan review fee at the time of permit submittal. A copy of the executed contract is required in order to calculate a plan review charge and will be considered the estimated construction value of the job at the time of submittal. The actual construction value will be figured based on the current ICC Valuation Table in effect at the time the permit is issued, in accordance with local ordinance. Should calculated charges figured off the executed contract exceed the actual construction value, credit will be applied to your permit fees when the permit is issued. OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT: I certify that all of the foregoing information is accurate and that all work will be done in compliance with all applicable laws regulating construction and zoning. 1 Signature ofo% er/Agent Date of y p7? 5"slzat Signature of C tractor/Agent r Date HZ n X _ L!'•IV-6o-t- Contract >gent's Name Signature of Notarv-StWof Florida Date Notary Public State of Florida Donna J Kelley My Commission FF 976291 Sores 06113rA20 Owner/Agent is Personally Known to Me or ontractor/Agent is Personally Known to Me or Produced ID Type of ID Produced ID Type of ID BELOW IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Permits Required: Building Electrical Mechanical Plumbing Gas Roof Construction Type: Occupancy Use: Flood Zone: Total Sq Ft of Bldg: Min. Occupancy Load: A11.4 of Stories: New Construction: Electric - # of Amps ti Plumbing - # of FixturesOVI,,9 Fire Sprinkler Permit: Yes No # of Heads Fire Alarm Permit: Yes No APPROVALS: ZONING: UTILITIES: WASTE WATER: ENGINEERING: FIRE: BUILDING: 4--/7-/P COMMENTS: Revised: June 30, 2015 Permit Application u MAY 3 1 2017 , rw_ `_- CITY OF SANFORD BUILDING & FIRE PREVENTION PERMIT APPLICATION Application No: //)-- /S a 4P Documented Construction Value: $ 25,000.00 Job Address: 2205 W. Seminole Blvd. , Sanford, Fla. 32771 Historic District: Yes No Parcel ID: 26-19-30-300-003A-0000 Residential Commercial Type of Work: NewiO Addition Alteration Repair Demo Change of Use Move Description of Work: Construct Garbage Compactor Plan Review Contact Person: Rollo E . Christensen Title: Project Manager Phone:813/288-0008 Fax: 813/288-9112 Email: rchristensen%gspanos.com b Property Owner Information Name The Spanos Corporation Phone: 813/288-0008 Street: 2701 Rocky Point Drive /Suite #100 Resident of property? JCity, State Zip: Tampa, Florida 33607 Contractor Information Name The Spanos Corporation Phone: 813/288-0008 Street: 2701 Rocky Point Drive / quite #100 Fax: 81 19 City, State Zip: Tampa, Florida 33607 State License No.: .4GC1515592 Architect/Engineer Information Name: KEPHART Phone: 303/832-4474 Street: 2555 Walnut Street Fax: City, St, Zip: Denver, Colorado 80205 E-mail: jessegftephart.com Bonding Company: Address: Mortgage Lender: Address: WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do the work and installations as indicated. I certify that no work or installation has commenced prior to the issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet standards of all laws regulating construction in this jurisdiction. I understand that a separate permit must be secured for electrical work, plumbing, signs, wells, pools, furnaces, boilers, heaters, tanks, and air conditioners, etc. FBC 105.3 Shall be inscribed with the date of application and the code in effect as of that date: 51" Edition (2014) Florida Building Code Revised: June 30, 2015 Permit Application NOTICE: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. Acceptance of permit is verification that I will notify the owner of the property of the requirements of Florida Lien Law, FS 713. The City of Sanford requires payment of a plan review fee at the time of permit submittal. A copy of the executed contract is required in order to calculate a plan review charge and will be considered the estimated construction value of the job at the time of submittal. The actual construction value will be figured based on the current ICC Valuation Table in effect at the time the permit is issued, in accordance with local ordinance. Should calculated charges figured off the executed contract exceed the actual construction value, credit will be applied to your permit fees when the permit is issued. OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT: I certify that all of the foregoing information is accurate and that all work will be done in compliance with all applicable laws regulating construction and zoning. Signature of O,er/Agent Date Signature of C tractor/Agent r Date Nerve • WA"t' */// of Florida Date v Notary Putec State of FWde Donna J Kelley W-4 It My Commluion FF 975291LV6aplresOWIM020 Owner/Agent is Personally Known to Me or ontmctor/Agent is Personally Known to Me or Produced ID Type of ID Produced ID Type of ID BELOW IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Permits Required: Building Electrical Mechanical Plumbing[] Gas Roof Construction Type: Occupancy Use: Total Sq Ft of Bldg: Min. Occupancy Load: Flood Zone: of Stories: New Construction: Electric - # of Amps Plumbing - # of Fixtures Fire Sprinkler Permit: Yes No # of Heads APPROVALS: ZONING -5k I I kk& UTILITIES: ENGINEERING: COMMENTS: FIRE: Fire Alarm Permit: Yes No WASTE WATER: BUILDING: Revised: June 30, 2015 Permit Application Mai' z.H L: MAY 3 1 2017 ;y a CITY OF SANFORD BUILDING & FIRE PREVENTION PERMIT APPLICATION Application No: I/)-- /S a 4P Documented Construction Value: $ 25,000.00 Job Address: 2205 W. Seminole Blvd. , Sanford, Fla. 32771 Historic District: Yes No Parcel ED: 26-19-30-300-003A-0000 Residential Commercial Type of Work: New ig Addition Alteration Repair Demo Change of Use Move Description of Work: Construct Garbage Compactor Plan Review Contact Person: Rollo E . Christensen Title: Proiect Manager Phone:813/288-0008 Fax: 813/288-9112 Email: rchristensen@agsnanos.com Property Owner Information Name The Spanos Corporation Phone: 813/288-0008 Street: 2701 Rocky Point Drive /Suite #100 Resident of property? City, State Zip: Tampa, Florida 33607 Contractor Information Name The Spanos Corporation Phone: 813/288-0008 Street: 2701 Rocky Point Drive / Sid te #100 Fax: R11/9RR-9119 City, State Zip: Tampa, Florida 33607 State License No.: .;GGC1515592 Architect/Engineer Information Name: KEPHART Phone: 303/832-4474 Street: 2555 Walnut Street City, St, Zip: Denver, Colorado 80205 Bonding Company: Address: Fax: E-mail: iesseg kepbart.com Mortgage Lender: Address: WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do the work and installations as indicated. I certify that no work or installation has commenced prior to the issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet standards of all laws regulating construction in this jurisdiction. I understand that a separate permit must be secured for electrical work, plumbing, signs, wells, pools, furnaces, boilers, heaters, tanks, and air conditioners, etc. FBC 105.3 Shall be inscribed with the date of application and the code in effect as of that date: 51" Edition (2014) Florida Building Code Revised: June 30, 2015 Permit Application NOTICE: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be " found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. Acceptance of permit is verification that I will notify the owner of the property of the requirements of Florida Lien Law, FS 713. The City of Sanford requires payment of a plan review fee at the time of permit submittal. A copy of the executed contract is required in order to calculate a plan review charge and will be considered the estimated construction value of the job at the time of submittal. The actual construction value will be figured based on the current ICC Valuation Table in effect at the time the permit is issued, in accordance with local ordinance. Should calculated charges figured off the executed contract exceed the actual construction value, credit will be applied to your permit fees when the permit is issued. OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT: I certify that all of the foregoing information is accurate and that all work will be done in compliance with all applicable laws regulating construction and zoning. Signature of O% er/Agent Date Signature of trraacttor/Ag/ennt r Date e- Omer/Agines Name I Con c &/Agent's Name anahue of NnMrv_S a of FI ride D e Signature of Notary- of Florida Date v Notary Public State of Flodda Lofdo%p Donna JKelley My Com mlaclon FF 976291 06/ 13/2020 Owner/ Agent is Personally Known to Me or ontractor/Agent is Personally Known to Me or Produced ID Type of ID Produced ID Type of ID BELOW IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Permits Required: Building Electrical Mechanical Plumbing Gas Roof Construction Type: Occupancy Use: Total Sq Ft of Bldg: Min. Occupancy Load: Flood Zone: of Stories: New Construction: Electric - # of Amps Plumbing - # of Fixtures Fire Sprinkler Permit: Yes No # of Heads APPROVALS: ZONING: UTILITIES: ENGINEERING: COMMENTS: Fire Alarm Permit: Yes No WASTE WATER: FIRE: BUILDING: Revised: June 30, 2015 Permit Application 9 N P41 MAY 3 1 2017 a CITY OF SANFORD BUILDING & FIRE PREVENTION PERMIT APPLICATION Application No: I/)-- /5 a 4P Documented Construction Value: $ 25,000.00 Job Address: 2205 W. Seminole Blvd. , Sanford, Fla. 32771 Historic District: Yes No Parcel ED: 26-19-30-300-003A-0000 Residential Commercial Type of Work: New U Addition Alteration Repair Demo Change of Use Move Description of Work: Construct Garbage Compactor Plan Review Contact Person: Rollo E . Christensen Title: Project Manager Phone:813/288-0008 Fax: 813/288-9112 Email: rchristensen(lagspanos.com Property Owner Information Name The Spanos Corporation Phone: 813/288-0008 Street: 2701 Rocky Point Drive /Suite #100 Resident of property? City, State Zip: Tampa, Florida 33607 Contractor Information Name The S anos Corporation Phone: 813/288-0008 Street: 2701 Rocky Point Drive / Suite 1100 Fax: Al 19 City, State Zip: Tampa, Florida 33607 State License No.: .jMC1515592 Architect/Engineer Information Name:' KEPHART Phone: 303/832-4474 Street: 2555 Walnut Street Fax: City, St, Zip: Denver, Colorado 80205 E-mail: Besse kephart.com Bonding Company: Mortgage Lender: Address: Address: WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do the work and installations as indicated. I certify that no work or installation has commenced prior to the issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet standards of all laws regulating construction in this jurisdiction. I understand that a separate permit must be secured for electrical work, plumbing, signs, wells, pools, furnaces, boilers, heaters, tanks, and air conditioners, etc. FBC 105.3 Shall be inscribed with the date of application and the code in effect as of that date: 51" Edition (2014) Florida Building Code Revised: June 30. 2015 Permit Application NOTICE: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. Acceptance of permit is verification that I will notify the owner of the property of the requirements of Florida Lien Law, FS 713. The City of Sanford requires payment of a plan review fee at the time of permit submittal. A copy of the executed contract is required in order to calculate a plan review charge and will be considered the estimated construction value of the job at the time of submittal. The actual construction value will be figured based on the current ICC Valuation Table in effect at the time the permit is issued, in accordance with local ordinance. Should calculated charges figured off the executed contract exceed the actual construction value, credit will be applied to your permit fees when the permit is issued. OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT: I certify that all of the foregoing information is accurate and that all work will be done in compliance with all applicable laws regulating construction and zoning. 21 Signature of0% er/Agent Date of S 2slZet Signature ofC tractor/Agent r Date ks• ty-6 iD- r Name of Florida Date v 4ef 'I Notary Public State of FloddaDonnaJKelley yj My Commlaclon FF 97b291 @ Expires 06/1312020 Owner/Agent is Personally Known to Me or ontractor/Agent is Personally Known to Me or Produced ID Type of ID Produced ID Type of ID BELOW IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Permits Required: Building Electrical Mechanical Plumbing Gas Roof Construction Type: Total Sq Ft of Bldg: Occupancy Use: Flood Zone: Min. Occupancy Load: # of Stories: New Construction: Electric - # of Amps Plumbing - # of Fixtures, Fire Sprinkler Permit: Yes No # of Heads Fire Alarm Permit: Yes No APPROVALS: ZONING: ENGINEERING: COMMENTS: UTILITIES: d ' b '/ WASTE WATER: FIRE: BUILDING: Revised: June 30. 2015 Permit Application 1 cell0 Aoi_ . MAY 3 1 2017 1a CITY OF SANFORD BUILDING & FIRE PREVENTION PERMIT APPLICATION Application No: //)-- /S S40 Documented Construction Value: $ 25,000.00 Job Address: 2205 W. Seminole Blvd. , Sanford, Fla. 32771 Historic District: Yes No Parcel ED: 26-19-30-300-003A-0000 Residential Commercial Type of Work: New ig Addition Alteration Repair Demo Change of Use Move Description of Work: Construct Garbage Compactor Plan Review Contact Person: Rollo E . Christensen Title: Project Manager Phone:813/288-0008 Fax: 813/288-9112 Email: rchristensen@agspanos.com Property Owner Information Name The Spanos Corporation Phone: 813/288-0008 Street: 2701 Rocky Point Drive /Suite #100 Resident of property? City, State Zip: Tampa, Florida 33607 Contractor Information Name The Spanos Corporation Phone: 813/288-0008 Street: 2761 Rocky Point D 've / Sui tP #100 Fax: 81 -3/98A-9119 City, State Zip: Tampa, Florida 33607 State License No.: .nGC1515592 Architect/Engineer Information Name: KEPHART Phone: 303/832-4474 Street: 2555 Walnut Street Fax: City, St, Zip: Denver, Colorado 80205 E-mail: jessegfkeghart.com Bonding Company: Address: Mortgage Lender: Address: WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do the work and installations as indicated. I certify that no work or installation has commenced prior to the issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet standards of all laws regulating construction in this jurisdiction. I understand that a separate permit must be secured for electrical work, plumbing, signs, wells, pools, furnaces, boilers, heaters, tanks, and air conditioners, etc. FBC 105.3 Shall be inscribed with the date of application and the code in effect as of that date: 51" Edition (2014) Florida Building Code Revised: June 30, 2015 Permit Application V 12— NOTICE: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. Acceptance of permit is verification that I will notify the owner of the property of the requirements of Florida Lien Law, FS 713. The City of Sanford requires payment of a plan review fee at the time of permit submittal. A copy of the executed contract is required in order to calculate a plan review charge and will be considered the estimated construction value of the job at the time of submittal. The actual construction value will be figured based on the current ICC Valuation Table in effect at the time the permit is issued, in accordance with local ordinance. Should calculated charges figured off the executed contract exceed the actual construction value, credit will be applied to your permit fees when the permit is issued. OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT: I certify that all of the foregoing information is accurate and that all work will be done in compliance with all applicable laws regulating construction and zoning. 21 22-AL611 Signature of0% er/Agent Date Signature ofC tractor/Agent F Date own /Agenes Name Con Agent's Name nature of Notarv- of Fl rida D e Signature of Notary- of Florida Date v L ems Notary Public State of Florida Donna J Kelley My commisslon FF 976291 Gores 06/1=020 1 4 VW Owner/Agent is Personally Known to Me or ontractor/Agent is Personally Known to Me or Produced ID Type of ID Produced ID Type of ID BELOW IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Permits Required: Building Electrical Mechanical Plumbing Gas Roof Construction Type: Occupancy Use: Total Sq Ft of Bldg: Min. Occupancy Load: Flood Zone: of Stories: New Construction: Electric - # of Amps Plumbing - # of Fixtures Fire Sprinkler Permit: Yes No # of Heads Fire Alarm Permit: Yes No APPROVALS: ZONING: UTILITIES: COMMENTS: WASTE WATER: ENGINEERING: FIRE: -- BUILDING: Revised: June 30, 2015 Permit Application DATE: S' ` /1% BUSINESS/PROJECT NAME: ADDRESS: CONTACT NAME: c CITY OF SANFORD BUILDING AND FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION PERMIT NUMBER: PHONE: FIRE PLAN REVIEW SERVICE FEES PHONE: 407.688.5052 l7- /SSs FAX: 407.688.5051 PLAN REVIEW INFORMATION V/CONSTRUCTION [ ]C/O [ ] FIRE ALARM [ ] FIRE SPRINKLER [ ] HOOD [ ]PAINT BOOTH [ ]TANK DOES 20% REDUCTION IN FIRE IMPACT FEES APPLY: YES TOTAL FEES: le 7-57 0 0 EP200IOS CITY OF SANFORD 5/03/18 Application Inquiry - Fees 09:37:38 Application number: 17 00001586 Property . . . . : 2205 W SEMINOLE BLVD DUMP Fee Class/Type/Description A AF 01-APPLCTN FEE -BUILDING A BR 01-BLDG PLAN REVIEW A F1 01-FIRE INSPECT -NEW CONST P PF PERMIT FEES A ZA 01-BLDG DCA SURCHARGE A ZB 01-BLDG DBPR SURCHARGE Trans amt Amt due Etruct Permit Insp 25.00 12.00 75.00 00 75.00 75.00 193.50 193.50 000000 BLOS00 2.94 2.94 4.41 4.41 Bottom Credit fees due: .00 Revenue fees due: 287.85 Total due: 287.85 Press Enter to continue. F3=Exit F11=Change view F12=Cancel F10=Amt billed City of Sanford Police ,Fire, and Recreation Impact Fees Police- $ 374.90 /unit x 280 units= $104,972.00 Fire- $ 280.43/unit x 280 units= $ 78,520.40 Recreation- $1086.29/unit x 280 units= S 304,161.20 Total $ 487,653.60 a;rr.''_`' r'-r_- ---- _ :i:,`-i. ` ...::.r,.-r. .x u::r. .,r.,:.-- c• - r, s 'c_. W._c'-r_ "'Ts uji%ic.:°£:zt_ DATE: 619 BUSINESS/PROJECT NAME: L, ADDRESS: CONTACT NAME: CITY OF SANFORD BUILDING AND FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION FIRE PLAN REVIEW SERVICE FEES PHONE: 407.688.5052 FAX: 407.688.5051 PERMIT NUMBER: I :z PHON.(: 1 PLAN REVIEW INFORMATION CONSTRUCTION [ ]C/O [ ] FIRE ALARM [ ] FIRE SPRINKLER (] HOOD [ ]PAINT BOOTH [ ]TANK DOES 20% REDUCTION IN FIRE IMPACT FEES APPLY: YES NO TOTAL FEES: BP822U06 CITY OF SANFORD Estimated Fees Listing -- Summary Totals Applica,t_on type NEW OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL Job description NEW Reference location Fee Description O1-APPLCTN FEE -BUILDING O1-BLDG PLAN REVIEW PERMIT FEES - BUILDING PERMIT - NEW/ALTE Total Press Enter to continue. F3=Exit F7=Print summary F12=Cancel 12/05/17 12:25:35 Ga r ha q e CompOr L4, Amount 25.00 75.00 215.00 315.00 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Geotechnical Engineering I Facilities Consulting I Environmental Services Construction Materials Testing and Inspection I Building Code Compliance 3632 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Structural Element: Cell Fill Set#1 of 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck General Information General Contractor: THE SPANOS CORPORATION Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9452610-1 CT 043019 WorkorderNo.: 9452610 Lab No.: 190639-C Date 1st Issue: May 08, 2019 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Sample Location: #17-1584 BLDG E ELEVATOR LEVEL 4 WALL LINTEAL - Sampled at WEST WALL Sample By: Alonzo Albert On 04/30/2019 At Lab On or Before: 05/02/2019 Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information Specified Strength: 3000 psi (d 28 days Truck Load: 3.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi Q 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 3.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 3.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 215 Time Batched: 9:11 AM Ticket No.: 1458878 Time Sampled: 10:30 AM Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: N/S Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 9.50 inches I Ambient Temp: 78 °F I Concrete Temp: 85 °F Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test X-Sect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) Lab Tech 1'G' 05/07/2019 7 3.36 3.32 3.34 11.16 17,570 1.570 BCC 2'G' 05/29/2019 29 3.36 3.30 3.33 11.09 37,050 3,341 AJA 3'G' 05/29/2019 29 3.31 1 3.33 1 3.32 1 11.02 1 36.155 1 3,281 AJA 4'G' 05/29/2019 29 3.32 1 3.35 1 3.34 1 11.12 1 34,165 1 3,072 3,230 AJA Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder -'D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable -'E'- Excluded From Average -'G'- Good Condition Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified only If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Note Test In compliance with approved plans and specifications Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used Lab Technicians AJA Angel Ayala BCC Brayan Candelaria Maldonado To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised March 2019 g]UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100. Tampa, FL 33607 Structural Element: Cell Fill Set#1 of 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck General Information General Contractor: E.Y. Young Construction Subcontractor: Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Truck No.: 653 Ticket No.: 1458820 Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: N/S Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9451977-1 CT 042619 WorkorderNo.: 9451977 Lab No.: 190546-C Date 1st Issue: May 06, 2019 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Sample Location: Elevator - Permit number 17-1585 - Sampled at NE Corner Of Elevator pit 2nd lift Sample By: Fernando Montalvo On 04/26/2019 At Lab On or Before: 04/30/2019 Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 6.00 cu yds. Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 6.00 cu yds. Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 6.00 cu yds. Time Batched: 12:50 PM Time Sampled: 1:10 PM Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 9.00 inches Ambient Temp: 81 °F I Concrete Temp: 85 OF Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.l in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test X-Sect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) Lab Tech 1'G' 05/03/2019 7 3.34 3.30 3.32 11.02 18.250 1,660 AJA 2'G' 05/24/2019 28 3.31 3.32 3.32 10.99 26,340 2,397 BCC 3'G' 05/24/2019 28 3.31 1 3.27 1 3.29 1 10.82 1 28,985 1 2,679 BCC 4'G' 05/24/2019 28 3.23 1 3.24 1 3.24 1 10.47 1 29,685 1 2,835 2,640 BCC Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder -'D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable -'E-- Excluded From Average -'G'- Good Condition Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified only If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Note Test in compliance with approved plans and specifications Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used Lab Technicians AJA Angel Ayala BCC Brayan Candelaria Maldonado To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised March 2019 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No.: 0110.1800758.0000 Date Typed: June 03, 2019 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date Type of Report 9453328-1 05/03/2019 Grout Prism Test Specimens Report 9457517-1 05/17/2019 Grout Prism Test Specimens Report 9457936-1 05/21/2019 Grout Prism Test Specimens Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (3) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 Fred Schmalzer 2019.06.05 10:07:15-04'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Geotechnical Engineering I Facilities Consulting I Environmental Services Construction Materials Testing and Inspection I Building Code Compliance 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Structural Element: Cell Fill Set#1 of 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck General Information General Contractor: E.W. Young Construction Subcontractor: Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Truck No.: 643 Ticket No.: 1459020 Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: N/A Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9453328-1 CT 050319 WorkorderNo.: 9453328 Lab No.: 190741-C Date 1st Issue: May 13, 2019 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Sample Location: Building E Elevator PitPermit number #17-1584 -Sampled at SE Corner Of Elevator Pit Buliding E level 5 Sample By: Fernando Montalvo On 05/03/2019 At Lab On or Before: 05/09/2019 Specified Strength / Sampling Times Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Water Added at Site: N/A Time Batched: 11:32 AM Time Sampled: 12:40 PM Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Placement Information Truck Load: 2.00 cu yds. Cumulative Quantity: 2.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 2.00 cu yds. Air Content: N/A Slump: 9.00 inches Ambient Temp: 82 OF I Concrete Temp: 85 °F Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test X-Sect Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) Lab Tech 1'G' 05/10/2019 7 3.34 3.37 3.36 11.26 22.880 2,030 AJA 2'G' 05/31/2019 28 3.33 3.37 3.35 11.22 35,435 3,158 AJA 3'G' 05/31/2019 28 1 3.38 1 3.37 1 3.38 1 11.39 1 33,785 1 2.966 AJA 4'G' 05/31/2019 28 3.34 3.31 3.33 11.06 33,985 3,073 3.070 AJA Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder -'D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable -'E'- Excluded From Average --G'- Good Condition Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified only If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Note Test in compliance with approved plans and specifications Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used Lab Technicians AJA Angel Ayala To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication or statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised March 2019 SALUNIVER Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9451977-1 CT 042619 WorkorderNo.: 9451977 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Lab Issue: MayDate1stIssue: May 06, 2019 Geotechnical Engineering I Facilities Consulting I Environmental Services Construction Materials Testing and Inspection I Building Code Compliance 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 33607 Structural Element: Cell Fill Set#1 of 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck General Information General Contractor: E.Y. Young Construction Subcontractor: Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Truck No.: 653 Ticket No.: 1458820 Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: N/S Sample Location: Elevator - Permit number 17-1585 - Sampled at NE Corner Of Elevator pit 2nd lift Sample By: Fernando Montalvo On 04/26/2019 At Lab On or Before: 04/30/2019 Specified Strength / Sampling Times Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi Qa 28 days Water Added at Site: N/A Time Batched: 12:50 PM Time Sampled: 1:10 PM Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Fialft Tact RPcrrltC Placement Information Truck Load: 6.00 cu yds. Cumulative Quantity: 6.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 6.00 cu yds. Air Content: N/A Slump: 9.00 inches Ambient Temp: 81 °F I Concrete Temp: 85 °F Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test X-Sect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) Lab Tech 1'G' 05/03/2019 7 3.34 3.30 3.32 11.02 18,250 1,660 AJA 2'G' 05/24/2019 28 3.31 3.32 3.32 10.99 26,340 2.397 BCC 3'G' 05/24/2019 28 3.31 3.27 3.29 10.82 28,985 2,679 BCC 4'G' 05/24/2019 28 3.23 3.24 3.24 10.47 29,685 2.835 2,640 1 BCC Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concreteacceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder -'D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average -'G'- Good Condition Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified only If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Note Test in compliance with approved plans and specifications Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used Lab Technicians AJA Angel Ayala BCC Brayan Candelaria Maldonado To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of I Revised March 2019 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG ermitting Agency: City of Sanford Project Name: Lake Monroe Apartments pdate Period: 5/20/19-5/26/19 ttention: Mr. Dave Aldrich Project Address: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard ermit No.: See Below) Ci /State2i : Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Building A/Oubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Bulldin D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 SIL No. Data No. Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location Description S.I. Engineer of Record Response S.I. Date Closed SUM No. 1 5/24119 FJS) 20 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Northeast Comer of Elevator Pit, 2nd Lift The 28-day average compressive strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Report 9451977-1, 190546, cast on 4/26/2019). FJS The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. 2The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. 3This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Does #1632149 Page 1 of 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9455902-1 Report Date: 05/28/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 05/24/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tyne of Test: Area Tested: Parking Lot Field: ASTM D-6938 Nuclear Gauge Method Material: Stabilization Laboratory: AASHTO T180 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Top of Stabilization Depth requirement is 12.00 inches The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction reauirement. Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Stab. Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test LBR pcf) pcf) Fail 1 40 Ft W From S-12 110.3 11.2 111.3 11.1 101 12.25 Pass 2 20 Ft S From S-15 110.3 11.2 110.7 10.0 100 12.50 Pass 3 80 Ft E From S-11 110.3 11.2 111.1 12.2 101 12.50 Pass 4 65Ft E / 80Ft S From S-11 110.3 1 11.2 1 111.7 1 11.9 1 101 1 12.25 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9758.0000 Workorder No: 455902-255902-2 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date: 05/28/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionE9BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3632 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 05/24/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Parking Lot Material: Limerock Reference Datum: 0 = Top of Base Course The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvae of Test: Field: ASTM D-6938 Nuclear Gauge Method Laboratory: AASHTO T180 Modified Proctor Depth requirement is 8.00 inches Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Limerock Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction Depth or No. Location of Test LBR pcf) pcf) inch) Fail 5 60 Ft E from S-11 120.7 9.5 122.0 11.7 101 8.50 Pass 6 10 Ft S from S-12 120.7 9.5 121.3 11.4 100 8.25 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UESPr 011.1800UNIVERSALOatTypedtNo.: May30, 2019 '0000 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection EDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (LIES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date Type of Report 9452610- 1 04/30/2019 1 Grout Prism Test Specimens Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments ( 1) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 Fred J. r4 0 jp.38[S• Schmalzer RAP 2019.06.02 19: 32:48-04'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universals clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 community a planning a architecture July 1, 2019 David Aldrich — Building Official City of Sandford — Building Division 300 N. Park Ave Sanford, FL 32771 RE: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 W. Seminole Blvd Permit Numbers:17-1581,17-1582,17-1583,17-1584,17-1585 BA #: 216032 2Z.o0 =05' ZZo.S 120 l2os" Dear David, I am writing to advise the department that we intend to revise the UL assembly for the floor/ceiling and roof/ceiling originally documented for this project. Our permitted plans indicated UL-L528 for the floor ceiling assembly. We intend to now use UL-1,585. The original roof/ceiling assembly was UL P556, we now intend to use UL -P544. We are making these changes, as the ceiling radiation dampers, (CRD's) listed in the proposed assemblies are more readily available to the project. I have reviewed the proposed changes and find them to be equivalent to the original design and find them to be equal to the in -place construction. We ask for the depah ment's review and acceptance of these proposed changes. I've attached copies of UL-1.585 and UL -P544, for your reference. I EPFIART CC: Jim Woods, SPANOS Amchmenm ULLS85 & UL P544 jo- "",/, KEPHARTEE 7/1/2019 L685 - BXUV.L685 - UL Product Spec FIRE -RESISTANCE DESIGN Assembly Usage Disclaimer BXUV - Fire Resistance Ratings - ANSI/UL 263 Certified for United States BXUV? - Fire Resistance Ratings - CAN/ULC-S101 Certified for Canada See General Information for Fire -resistance Ratings - ANSI/UL 263 Certified for United States Design Criteria and Allowable Variances See General Information for Fire Resistance Ratings - CAN/ULC-S101 Certified for Canada Design Criteria and Allowable Variances Design No. L585 May 28, 2019 Unrestrained Assembly Rating —1 Hr. Finish Rating — 22 Min This design was evaluated using a load design method other than the Limit States Design Method (e.g., Working Stress Design Method). For jurisdictions employing the Limit States Design Method, such as Canada, a load restriction factor shall be used — See Guide BXUV or BXUV? Indicates such products shall bear the UL or cUL Certification Mark for jurisdictions employing the UL or cUL Certification (such as Canada), respectively. productepec.ul.com/document.php?id=BXUV.L585 1/23 7/1 /2018 L585 - BXUV.L585 - UL Product Spec Flooring System — The flooring system shall consist of one of the following: System No.1 Subflooring — Min 23/32 in. thick plywood with T & G edges along the 8 ft sides and exterior glue or nonveneer APA Sturd-I-Floor T & G panels per APA specifications PRP 108. Face grain of plywood or strength axis of panel to be perpendicular to trusses with joints staggered 4 ft. Plywood or panels secured to trusses with No. 6d ring shank nails spaced 12 in. OC along each truss. Staples having equal or greater withdrawal and lateral resistance strength may be substituted for the 6d nails. Vapor Barrier — (Optional) — Nom 0.030 in. thick commercial asphalt saturated felt. Finish Flooring — Min 1 by 4 in. T & G lumber fastened diagonally to trusses, or min 15/32 in. plywood, min grade "Underlayment" or "Sturd-I-Floor" with T & G edges and conforming with PS1-83 specifications, or nonveneer APA rated Sturd-i- Floor, T & G panels per APA specifications PRP-108. Face grain of plywood to be perpendicular to joists with joints staggered. product"c.ul.com/document.php?id=13XUV.L585 2123 7/1/2019 L585 - 8XUV.L585 - UL Product spec System No. 2 Subflooring — Min 23/32 in. thick T & G wood structural panels installed perpendicular to trusses with joints staggered 4 ft. Plywood or nonveneer APA rated panels secured to trusses with construction adhesive and No. 6d ring shank nails spaced 12 in. OC along each truss. Staples having equal or greater withdrawal and lateral resistance strength may be substituted for the 6d nails. Vapor Barrier — (Optional) — Nom 0.030 in. thick commercial asphalt saturated felt. Finish Flooring — Floor Topping Mixture* — Min 3/4 in. thickness of floor topping mixture having a minimum compressive strength of 1500 psi. MAXXON CORP — Types D-C, GC, GC 2000, L-R, T F, CT, SS RAPID FLOOR SYSTEMS — Type RF, RFP, RFU, Ortecrete Floor Mat Materials* — (Optional) — Floor mat material loose laid over the subfloor. MAXXON CORP — Type Acousti-Mat 1/8, Acousti-Mat 1/4, Acousti-Mat 1/4 Premium, Acousti-Mat 3/8, Acousti-Mat 3/8 Premium, Acousti-Mat 3/4, Acousti-Mat 3/4 Premium, Acousti-Top. Floor Mat Reinforcement — (Optional) Refer to manufacturer's instructions regarding minimum thickness of floor topping for use with floor mat reinforcement. Metal Lath — (Optional) 3/8 in. expanded galvanized steel diamond mesh, 3.4 Ibs/sq yd loose laid over the floor mat material. Fiber Glass Reinforcement — (Optional) - 0.015 in. thick PVC coated non -woven fiberglass mesh, 0.368 IbsJsq. yd loose laid over the floor mat material. System No. 3 Subflooring — Min 23/32 in. thick plywood with T & G edges along the 8 ft sides and exterior glue or nonveneer APA Sturd-I-Floor T & G panels per APA specifications PRP 108. Face grain of plywood or strength axis of panel to be perpendicular to trusses with joints staggered 4 ft. Plywood or panels secured to trusses with No. 6d ring shank nails spaced 12 in. OC along each truss. Staples having equal or greater withdrawal and lateral resistance strength may be substituted for the 6d nails. Vapor Barrier — (Optional) Nom 0.030 in. thick commercial asphalt saturated felt. Finish Flooring — Floor Topping Mixture* — Min 3/4 in. thickness of floor topping mixture having a min compressive strength of 1000 psi. Refer to manufacturer's producdspec.ul.com/documenLphp?id=BXUV.L585 3/23 7/1/2019 L585 - BXUV.L585 - UL Product Spec instructions accompanying the material for specific mix design. FORMULATED MATERIALS LLC — Types FR-25, FR-30, and SiteMix Floor Mat Material* — (Optional) Floor mat material nominal 2 - 9.5 mm thick loose laid over the subfloor. Floor topping shall be a min of 3/4 in. FORMULATED MATERIALS LLC — Types M1, M2, M3, Elite, Duo, R1, and R2 System No. 4 Subflooring — Min 23/32 in. thick plywood with T & G edges along the 8 ft sides and exterior glue or nonveneer APA Sturd-I-Floor T & G panels per APA specifications PRP 108. Face grain of plywood or strength axis of panel to be perpendicular to trusses with joints staggered 4 ft. Plywood or panels secured to trusses with No. 6d ring shank nails spaced 12 in. OC along each truss. Staples having equal or greater withdrawal and lateral resistance strength may be substituted for the 6d nails. Vapor Barrier — (Optional) — Nom 0.010 in. thick commercial asphalt saturated felt. Finish Flooring — Floor Topping Mixture* — Min 3/4 in. thickness of floor topping mixture having a minimum compressive strength of 1800 psi. Refer to manufacturer's instructions accompanying the material for specific mix design. UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO — Types LRK, HSLRK, CSD USG MEXICO S A DE C V — Types LRK, HSLRK, CSD Floor Mat Materials* — (Optional) — Floor mat material loose laid over the subfloor. Refer to manufacturer's instructions regarding the minimum thickness of floor topping over each floor mat material. UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO — Types SAM, LEVELROCKO Brand Sound Reduction Board, LEVELROCKO Brand Floor Underlayment SRM-25 Alternate Floor Mat Materials* — (Optional) — Nom 3/8 in. thick floor mat material loose laid over the subfloor. GRASSWORX L L C — Type SC50 System No. 5 productspec.ul.com/document.php?Id=BXUV.L58S 4/23 7/1/2019 L585 - SXUV.L585 - UL Product Spec Subflooring — Min 23/32 in. thick T & G wood structural panels, min grade Underlayment" or "Single Floor'. Face grain of plywood or strength axis of panel to be perpendicular to the joists with end joints staggered. Plywood or panels secured to trusses with construction adhesive and No. 6d ringed shank nails. Staples having equal or greater withdrawal and lateral resistance strength may be substituted for the 6d ring shank nails. Floor Mat Materials* — (Optional) — Floor mat material nom 5/64 in. (2 mm) thick adhered to subfloor with Hacker Floor Primer. Primer to be applied to the surface of the mat prior to the placement of a min 1 in. of floor -topping mixture. ECORE INTERNATIONAL INC — Type QTscu 4002 HACKER INDUSTRIES INC — Type Hacker Sound -Mat Alternate Floor Mat Materials — (Optional) — Floor mat material nom 1/4 in. (6 mm) thick adhered to subfloor with Hacker Floor Primer. Primer to be applied to the surface of the mat prior to the placement of a min 1-1/4 in. (32 mm) of floor -topping mixture. ECORE INTERNATIONAL INC — Type QTrbm 3006-3 HACKER INDUSTRIES INC — Type Hacker Sound -Mat II. Altemate Floor Mat Materials — (Optional) — Floor mat material nom 1/8 in. (3 mm) thick loose laid over the subfloor. Floor topping thickness shall be a min of 3/4 in. (19 mm). HACKER INDUSTRIES INC — FIRM -FILL SCM 125 Alternate Floor Mat Materials — (Optional) — Floor mat material nom 1/4 in. (6 mm) thick loose laid over the subfloor. Floor topping thickness shall be a min of 1 in. 25 mm). HACKER INDUSTRIES INC — Type FIRM -FILL SCM 250, Quiet Qurl 55/025 Alternate Floor Mat Materials — (Optional) — Floor mat material nom 3/8 in. (10 mm) thick loose laid over the subfloor. Floor topping thickness shall be a min of 1-1/4 In. (32 mm). HACKER INDUSTRIES INC — FIRM -FILL SCM 400, Quiet Qurl 60/040 Alternate Floor Mat Materials — (Optional) — Floor mat material nom 3/4 in. (19 mm) thick loose laid over the subfloor. Floor topping thickness shall be a min of 1-1/2 productspec.ul.conVdocument.php?id=BXUV.L585 6123 7/1/2019 L585 - BXUV.L585 - UL Product Spec in. (38 mm). HACKER INDUSTRIES INC —Type FIRM -FILL SCM 750, Quiet Qurl 65/075 Metal Lath — (Optional) — For use with 3/8 in. (10 mm) floor mat materials, 3/8 in. expanded steel diamond mesh, 3.4 Ibs/sq yd placed over the floor mat material. Hacker Floor Primer to be applied prior to the placement of the metal lath. When metal lath is used, floor topping thickness a nom 1-1/4 in. over the floor mat. Finish Flooring — Floor Topping Mixture* — Min 3/4 in. thickness of floor topping mixture having a min compressive strength of 1100 psi. Mixture shall consist of 6.8 gal of water to 80 Ibs of floor topping mixture to 1.9 cu ft of sand. HACKER INDUSTRIES INC — Firm -Fill Gypsum Concrete, Firm -Fill 2010, Firm -Fill 3310, Firm -Fill 4010, Firm -Fill High Strength, Gyp -Span Radiant System No. 6 Subflooring — Min 23/32 in. thick wood structural panels, min grade "C-D" or Sheathing". Face grain of plywood or strength axis of panels to be perpendicular to the joists with joints staggered. Vapor Barrier — (Optional) — Commercial asphalt saturated felt, 0.030 in. thick. Vapor Barrier — (Optional) — Nom 0.010 in. thick commercial rosin -sized building paper. Finish Flooring* — Min 3/4 in. thickness of any Floor Topping Mixture bearing the UL Classification Marking as to Fire Resistance. See Floor- and Roof -Topping Mixtures (CCOX) category for names of Classified Companies. Floor Mat Materials* — (Optional) — Nom. 1/4 in. thick loose laid over the subfloor. Floor topping thickness shall be a minimum of 3/4 in. KEENE BUILDING PRODUCTS CO INC — Type Quiet Qud 55/025 and Quiet Qurl 55/025 N Alternate Floor Mat Materials* — (Optional) — Floor mat material Nom. 3/8 in. thick loose laid over the subfloor. Floor topping thickness shall be a minimum of 1 in. KEENE BUILDING PRODUCTS CO INC — Type Quiet Qurl 601040 and Quiet Qurl 60/040 N Alternate Floor Mat Materials* — (Optional) — Floor mat material Nom. 3/4 in. thick loose laid over the subfloor. Floor topping thickness shall be a minimum of 1- 1/2 in. product"c.ul.com/document.php?id=BXUV.L585 6123 7/1/2019 1.585 - BXUV.L585 - UL Product spec KEENE BUILDING PRODUCTS CO INC — Type Quiet Qurl 65/075, Quiet Qurl 65/075 N Alternate Floor Mat Materials* — (Optional) — Floor mat material Nom. 1/8 in. thick loose laid over the subfloor. Floor topping thickness shall be a minimum of 3/4 in. KEENE BUILDING PRODUCTS CO INC — Type Quiet Qurl 52/013 and Quiet Qurl 52/013 N Alternate Floor Mat Materials* — (Optional) — Floor mat material Nom. 1/4 in. entangled net core with a compressible fabric attached to the bottom loose laid over the subfloor. Floor topping thickness shall be a minimum of 1 in. KEENE BUILDING PRODUCTS CO INC — Quiet Qurl 55/025 MT and Quiet Qurl 55/025 N MT System No. 7 Subflooring — Min 23/32 in. thick plywood with T & G edges along the 8 ft sides and exterior glue or nonveneer APA Sturd-I-Floor T & G panels per APA specifications PRP 108. Face grain of plywood or strength axis of panel to be perpendicular to trusses with joints staggered 4 ft. Plywood or panels secured to trusses with No. 6d ring shank nails spaced 12 in. OC along each truss. Staples having equal or greater withdrawal and lateral resistance strength may be substituted for the 6d nails. Vapor Barrier — (Optional) — Nom 0.030 in. thick commercial asphalt saturated felt. Finish Flooring — Floor Topping Mixture* — Min 3/4 in. thickness of floor topping mixture having a min compressive strength of 1000 psi. Refer to manufacturer's instructions accompanying the material for specific mix design. ACG MATERIALS — AccuCrete types NexGen, Green, Prime, B, M, and PrePour, AccuRadiant, Accul-evel types G40, G50 and SD30. Floor Mat Material* — (Optional) — Floor mat material nominal 2 - 9.5 mm thick loose laid over the subfloor. Floor topping shall be a min of 3/4 in. ACG MATERIALS — AccuQuiet types P80, C40, 1313, D-18, 1325, DX38, EM.125, EM.125S, EM.250, EM.250S, EM.375, EM.375S, EM.750, and EM.750S. System No. 8 productspec.ul.com/documentphp?id=BXUV.L585 7/23 7/1/2019 L585 - BXUV.L585 - UL Product Spec Subflooring — Min 23/32 ,in. thick plywood with T & G edges along the 8 ft sides and exterior glue or nonveneer APA Sturd-I-Floor T & G panels per APA specifications PRP 108. Face grain of plywood or strength axis of panel to be perpendicular to trusses with joints staggered 4 ft. Plywood or panels secured to trusses with No. 6d ring shank nails spaced 12 in. OC along each truss. Staples having equal or greater withdrawal and lateral resistance strength may be substituted for the 6d nails. Vapor Barrier — (Optional) — Nom 0.030 in. thick commercial asphalt saturated felt. Finish Flooring — Floor Topping Mixture* — Min 3/4 in. thickness of floor topping mixture having a min compressive strength of 1000 psi. Refer to manufacturer's instructions accompanying the material for specific mix design. DEPENDABLE LLC — GSL M3.4, GSL K2.6, GSL-CSD and GSL RH Floor Mat Materials* — (Optional) — Nom. 114 in. thick loose laid over the subfloor. Floor topping thickness shall be a minimum of 3/4 in. KEENE BUILDING PRODUCTS CO INC — Type Quiet Qurl 55/025 and Quiet Qurl 55/025 N Alternate Floor Mat Materials* — (Optional) — Floor mat material Nom. 3/8 in. thick loose laid over the subfloor. Floor topping thickness shall be a minimum of 1 in. KEENE BUILDING PRODUCTS CO INC — Type Quiet Qurl 60/040 and Quiet Qurl 60/040 N Alternate Floor Mat Materials* — (Optional) — Floor mat material Nom. 3/4 in. thick loose laid over the subfloor. Floor topping thickness shall be a minimum of 1- 1/2 in. KEENE BUILDING PRODUCTS CO INC — Type Quiet Qud 65/075, Quiet Qurl 65/075 N Alternate Floor Mat Materials* — (Optional) — Floor mat material Nom. 1/8 in. thick loose laid over the subfloor. Floor topping thickness shall be a minimum of 3/4 in. KEENE BUILDING PRODUCTS CO INC — Type Quiet Qud 52/013. and Quiet Qurl 52/013 N Alternate Floor Mat Materials* — (Optional) — Floor mat material Nom. 1/4 in. entangled net core with a compressible fabric attached to the bottom loose laid over the subfloor. Floor topping thickness shall be a minimum of 1 in. productspec.ul.com/documentphp?id=BXUV.L585 8/23 7/1/2019 L585 - BXUV.L585 - UL Product Spec KEENE BUILDING PRODUCTS CO INC — Quiet Qurl 55/025 MT and Quiet Qurl 55/025 N MT System No. 9 Subflooring — Min 23/32 in. thick wood structural panels, min grade "C-D" or Sheathing". Face grain of plywood or strength axis of panels to be perpendicular to the joists with joints staggered. Vapor Barrier — (Optional) — Commercial asphalt saturated felt, 0.030 in. thick. Vapor Barrier — (Optional) — Nom 0.010 in. thick commercial rosin -sized building paper. Finish Flooring* — Min 3/4 in. thickness of any Floor Topping Mixture bearing the UL Classification Marking as to Fire Resistance. See Floor- and Roof -Topping Mixtures (CCOX) category for names of Classified Companies. Floor Mat Materials* — (Optional) — Nom 3/32 in. thick loose laid over the subfloor. Floor topping thickness shall be a minimum of 3/4 in. PLITEQ INC — Type GenieMat RST02 Floor Mat Materials* — (Optional) — Nom 3/16 in. thick loose laid over the subfloor. Floor topping thickness shall be a minimum of 3/4 in. PLITEQ INC — Type GenieMat FF03NP Floor Mat Materials* — (Optional) — Nom 1/4 in. thick loose laid over the subfloor. Floor topping thickness shall be a minimum of 3/4 in. PLITEQ INC — Type GenieMat FF06 Floor Mat Materials* — (Optional) — Nom 3/8 in. thick loose laid over the subfloor. Floor topping thickness shall be a minimum of 1 in. PLITEQ INC — Type GenieMat FF10 Floor Mat Materials* — (Optional) — Nom 3/4 in. thick loose laid over the subfloor. Floor topping thickness shall be a minimum of 1-1/2 in. PLITEQ INC — Type GenieMat FF17 productspec.ul.com/documenLphp?id=BXUV.L585 9123 7/1/2019 L585 - BXUV.L585 - UL Product Spec Floor Mat Materials* — (Optional) — Nom 1 in. thick loose laid over the subfloor. Floor topping thickness shall be a minimum of 1-1/2 in. PLITEQ INC — Type GenieMat FF25 System No.10 Subflooring — Min 23/32 in. thick plywood with T & G edges along the 8 ft sides and exterior glue or nonveneer APA Sturd-I-Floor T & G panels per APA specifications PRP 108. Face grain of plywood or strength axis of panel to be perpendicular to trusses with joints staggered 4 ft. Plywood or panels secured to trusses with No. 6d ring shank nails spaced 12 in. OC along each truss. Staples having equal or greater withdrawal and lateral resistance strength may be substituted for the 6d nails. Finish Flooring - Floor Topping Mixture* — Min 1 in. thickness of floor topping mixture having a min compressive strength of 4500 psi. Refer to manufacturer's instructions accompanying the material for specific mix design. SIKA DEUTSCHLAND GMBH — Type SCHONOX AP Rapid Plus 2. Trusses — Parallel chord trusses, spaced a max of 24 in. OC, fabricated from nom 2 by 4 lumber, with lumber oriented vertically or horizontally. Min truss depth is 18 in. Truss members secured together with min 0.0356 in. thick galvanized steel plates. Plates have 5/16 in. long teeth projecting perpendicular to the plane of the plate. The teeth are In pairs facing each other (made by the same punch), forming a split tooth type plate. Each tool has a chisel point on its outside edge. These points are diagonally opposite each other for each pair. The top half of each tooth has a twist for stiffness. The pairs are repeated on approx. 7/8 in. centers with four rows of teeth per inch of plate width. 3. Air Duct* — (Optional) — Any UL Class 0 or Class 1 flexible air duct installed in accordance with the instructions provided by the damper manufacturer. 4. Damper* — (Optional. To be used with Air Duct Item 3.) — Max nom 20 in. long by 18 in. wide by 2-1/8 in. high, fabricated from galvanized steel. Plenum box max size nom 21 in. long by 18 in. wide by 16 in. high fabricated from either galvanized steel or Classified Air Duct Materials bearing the UL Classification Marking for Class 0 or Class 1 rigid air duct material. Installed in accordance with the instructions provided by the manufacturer. Max damper openings not to exceed 180 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. NAILOR INDUSTRIES INC —Types 0755, 0755A, 0756, 0756D , 0757, 0757D, 0757FP, 0757DFP, 0758, 0759, 0760, 0761, 0762, 0763, CRD5, CRD5D, CRD6, CRD6D, CRD6FP, CRD6DFP. SAFE AIR DOWCO — 0455, 0455A, 0456, 0456D, 0457, 0457D, 0457-DB, 0457- CB, 0463-FB, 0457-EB; 0463-GB, 0463 productspec.ul.com/documenLphp?id=BXW.L585 10/23 7/1/2019 L685 - BXUV1585 - UL Product Spec 4A. Alternate Ceiling Damper* — Max nom area shall be 324 sq In. Max square size shall be 18 in. by 18 in. Rectangular sizes not to exceed 324 sq in. with a max width of 18 in. Max height of damper shall be 14 in. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 162 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Damper installed in accordance with the manufacturers installation instructions provided with the damper. A steel grille (Item 9) shall be installed in accordance with installation instructions. C&S AIR PRODUCTS — Model RD-521 POTTORFF — Model CFD-521 413. Alternate Ceiling Damper* — Max nom area shall be 196 sq in. Max square size shall be 14 in. by 14 in. Rectangular sizes not to exceed 196 sq in. with a max width of 26 in. Max height of damper shall be 7 in. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 98 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Damper installed in accordance with the manufacturers installation instructions provided with the damper. A steel grille (Item 9) not to exceed 144 in.2 shall be installed in accordance with installation instructions. C&S AIR PRODUCTS — Model RD-521-BT POTTORFF — Model CFD-521-BT. 4C. Alternate Ceiling Damper' — (Optional. To be used with Air Duct Item 3.) — Max nom area shall be 256 sq in. with the length not to exceed 24 in. and the width not to exceed 20 in. Max height of damper shall be 17 in. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 128 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Damper installed in accordance with the manufacturers installation instructions provided with the damper. A steel grille (Item 9) shall be installed in accordance with installation instructions. C&S AIR PRODUCTS — Model RD-521-IP, RD-521-NP POTTORFF — Models CFD-521-IP, CFD-521-NP 4D. Alternate Ceiling Damper* — For use with min 18 in. deep trusses. Max nom area shall be 144 sq in. with the length not to exceed 14 in. and the width not to exceed 12 in. Max height of damper shall be 17-7/8 in. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 74 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Damper installed in accordance with the manufacturers installation instructions provided with the damper. A steel grille (Item 9) shall be installed in accordance with installation instructions. productspec.ul.com/documenLphp?id=BXUV.L585 11123 7/1/2019 L686 - BXUV.L585 - UL Product Spec C&S AIR PRODUCTS — Model RD-521-90, RD-521-NP90 POTTORFF — Models CFD-521-90, CFD-521-90NP 4E. Alternate Ceiling Damper* — For use with min 18 in. deep trusses Max plenum box size nom 19 in. long by 19 in. wide and 11-7/8 in. high fabricated from gals steel. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 128 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Damper installed in accordance with the manufacturers installation instructions provided with the damper. AIRE TECHNOLOGIES INC — Models: CRD model 50 w/Boot, CRD model 50EA wBoot, CRD model 55 w/Boot, CRD model 55 EA wBoot LLOYD INDUSTRIES INC — Model CRD 50-13T, CRD 50-EA-BT, CRD 55-13T, CRD 55 EA-BT 4F. Alternate Ceiling Damper* — For use with min 18 in. deep trusses Max plenum box size nom 13 in. long by 13 in. wide and 11-7/8 in. high fabricated from galv steel. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 50 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Damper installed in accordance with the manufacturers installation instructions provided with the damper. LLOYD INDUSTRIES INC — Model CRD 50-BT-6, CRD 50-EA-BT-6, CRD 55-BT 6, CRD 55 EA-BT-6, CRD50-W X-BT-6 4G. Alternate Ceiling Damper* — For use with min 18 in. deep trusses Max size ceiling outlet in plenum box nom 12 in. long by 12 in. wide. Plenum box fabricated from galv steel. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 72 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Installed in accordance with the manufacturers installation instructions provided with the damper. AIRE TECHNOLOGIES INC — Models: CRD model 50 w/Boot, CRD model 50EA w/Boot, CRD model 55 w/Boot, CRD model 55 EA w/Boot LLOYD INDUSTRIES INC — Model CRD 50-9513T, CRD 50-EA-95BT, CRD 55- 9513T, CRD 55 EA-95BT 4H. Alternate Ceiling'Damper* — For use with min 18 in. deep trusses. Max size ceiling outlet in plenum box nom 16 in. long by 16 in. wide. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 128 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Damper installed in accordance with the manufacturers installation instructions provided with the damper. productspec.ul.comtdocumentphp7ld=BXUV.L585 12123 7/1/2019 L685 - BXUV.L585 - UL Product spec CROWN PRODUCTS CO INC — Models CRD50-FGPB-4.2-CP,-6.0-CP; CRD50- FGPB-4.2-EA-CP,-6.0-EA-CP LLOYD INDUSTRIES INC — Models CRD 50- FGPB-4.2, - 4.2 NI, -6.0, -6.0 NI; CRD50-EA-FGPB-4.2, -4.2 NI, -6.0,-6.0 NI 41. Ceiling Damper* — For use with min 18 in. deep trusses Max plenum box size nom 15 in. long by 15 in. wide and 11-7/8 in. high fabricated from galv steel. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 72 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Damper installed in accordance with the manufacturers installation instructions provided with the damper. LLOYD INDUSTRIES INC — Models 45-CRD-LT-BT and 45-CRD-LTD-BT 4J. Alternate Ceiling Damper' — For use with min 18 in. deep trusses Max size ceiling outlet in plenum box nom 10 in. long by 10 in. wide. Plenum box fabricated from gaiv steel. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 50 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Installed in accordance with the manufacturers installation instructions provided with the damper. LLOYD INDUSTRIES INC — Model 45-LTD-95-BT-4 4K. Alternate Ceiling Damper* — For use with min 18 in. deep trusses Max plenum box size nom 19 in. long by 15 in. wide and 11-7/8 in. high fabricated from galv steel. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 96 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Damper installed in accordance with the manufacturers installation instructions provided with the damper. LLOYD INDUSTRIES INC — Model CRD50-`" X-BT 4L. Alternate Ceiling Damper* — Ceiling damper & fan assembly for use with min 18 in. deep trusses. Max nom area shall be 75 sq in. with the length not to exceed 8- 9/16 in. and the width not to exceed 8-3/4 in. Max height of damper shall be 9-7/8 in. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 38 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Damper shall be installed in combination with one of the fan models described in, and in accordance with, the manufacturers installation instructions provided with the damper. A plastic grille (Item 9) shall be installed in accordance with installation instructions. DELTA ELECTRONICS INC — Models CRD2, GBR-CRD, ITG-CRD 4M. Alternate Ceiling Damper* — For use with min 18 in. deep trusses. Max nom area shall be 324 sq in. Max square size shall be 18 in. by 18 in. Rectangular sizes not to exceed 324 sq in. with a max length of 20 in. and a max width of 22 in. Max height of damper shall be 14 in. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 154 productspec.ul.com/document.php?Id=BXUV.L585 13123 7/1/2019 L585 - BXUV.L585 - UL Product Spec sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Damper installed in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions provided with the damper. An aluminum or steel grille shall be installed in accordance with installation instructions. UNITED ENERTECH CORP — Type C-S/R-WT or C-S/R-WTP (Max nom area 324 sq. in.) or C-S/R-WTS or C-S/R-WTPS (Max nom area 162 sq. in.) 4N. Alternate Ceiling Damper* — Ceiling damper & fan assembly for use with min 18 in. deep trusses. Max nom area shall be 75 sq in. with the length not to exceed 9- 1/4 in. and the width not to exceed 9-3/4 in. Max height of damper shall be 9-7/8 in. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 45 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Damper shall be installed in combination with one of the fan models described in, and in accordance with, the manufacturer's installation instructions provided with the damper. A plastic grille (Item 9) shall be installed in accordance with installation instructions. DELTA ELECTRONICS INC — Model SIG-CRD 40. Alternate Ceiling Dampen* — Ceiling damper & fan assembly for use with min 18 in. deep trusses. Max nom area shall be 131 sq in. with the length not to exceed 11-1/16 in. and the width not to exceed 11-7/8 in. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 66 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Damper shall be installed in combination with one of the fan models described in, and in accordance with, the manufacturer's installation instructions provided with the damper. A plastic grille Item 9) shall be installed in accordance with installation instructions. DELTA ELECTRONICS INC — Model SMT CRD 4P. Alternate Ceiling Damper" — Ceiling damper & fan assembly for use with min 18 in. deep trusses. Max nom area shall be 103 sq in. with the length not to exceed 10-1/8 in. and the width not to exceed 10-1/8 in. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 52 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Damper shall be installed in combination with one of the fan models described in, and in accordance with, the manufacturer's installation instructions provided with the damper. A plastic grille Item 9) shall be installed in accordance with installation instructions. PANASONIC CORPORATION, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA — Model PC-RD05C5 40. Alternate Ceiling Damper* — Ceiling damper & fan assembly for use with min 18 in. deep trusses. Max nom area shall be 131 sq in. with the length not to exceed 11-1/16-in. and the width not*to exceed 11-7/8 in. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 66 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Damper shall be installed in combination with one of the fan models described in, and in accordance with, the manufacturer's installation instructions provided with the damper. A plastic grille Item 9) shall be installed in accordance with installation instructions. DELTA ELECTRONICS INC — Model SMT CRD productspec.ul.com/document.php?id=BXUV.L585 14/23 7/1/2019 L585 - BXUV.L585 - UL Product Spec 4R. Alternate Ceiling Damper* — Ceiling damper & fan assembly for use with min 18 in. deep trusses. Max nom area shall be 113 sq in. with the length not to exceed 10-1/8 in. and the width not to exceed 11-1/8 in. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 57 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Damper shall be installed in combination with one of the fan models described in, and in accordance with, the manufacturer's installation instructions provided with the damper. A plastic grille Item 9) shall be installed in accordance with installation instructions. BROAN-NUTONE L L C — Model RDFUWT 4S. Alternate Ceiling Damper* — Ceiling damper & fan assembly for use with min 18 in. deep trusses. Max nom area shall be 79 sq in. with the length not to exceed 10 in. and the width not to exceed 7-15/16 in. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 40 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Damper shall be installed in combination with one of the fan models described in, and in accordance with, the manufacturer's installation instructions provided with the damper. A metallic grille Item 9) shall be installed in accordance with installation instructions. BROAN-NUTONE L L C — Models RDJ1 and RDH 4T. Alternate Ceiling Damper* — For use with min 18 in. deep trusses. Max nom area shall be 349 sq in. Max overall length and width shall not exceed 18-11/16 in. by 18-11/16 in. with max 16 in. by 16 in. register opening. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 175 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Damper installed in accordance with the manufacturers installation instructions provided with the damper. A steel grille (Item 9) shall be installed in accordance with installation instructions. MIAMI TECH INC — Model Series RxCRD, RxCRDS or RxCRPD 4U. Alternate Ceiling Damper* — For use with min 18 in. deep trusses Max plenum box size nom 19 in. long by 19 in. wide and 11-7/8 in. high fabricated from galv steel. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 128 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Damper installed in accordance with the manufacturers installation instructions provided with the damper. METAL-FAB INC — Models MSCD-HC and MRCD-HC 4V. Alternate Ceiling Damper* — Ceiling damper & fan assembly for use with min 18 in. deep trusses. Max nom area shall be 87 sq in. with the length not to exceed 9 in. and the width not to exceed 9-11/16 in. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 44 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Damper shall be installed in combination with one of the fan models described in, and in accordance with, the manufacturer's installation instructions provided with the damper. A plastic grille Item 9) shall be installed in accordance with installation instructions. BROAN-NUTONE L L C — Model RDMWT productspec.ul.com/document.php?id=BXUV.L585 15/23 7/1/2019 L585 - BXUV.L585 - UL Product Spec 4W. Alternate Ceiling Damper* — Ceiling damper & fan assembly for use with min 18 in. deep trusses. Max nom area shall be 87 sq in. with the length not to exceed 9 in. and the width not to exceed 9-11/16 in. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 44 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Damper shall be installed in combination with one of the fan models described In, and in accordance with, the manufacturers installation instructions provided with the damper. A plastic grille Item 9) shall be installed in accordance with installation instructions. GROAN-NUTONE L L C — Model RDMWT2 4X. Alternate Ceiling Damper* — (Optional, to be used with Air Duct Item 3) — For use with min 18 in. deep trusses. Max nom 21 in. long by 18 in. wide, fabricated from galvanized steel. Plenum box max size nom 21 in. long by 18 in. wide by 14 in. high inner dimension) fabricated from either galvanized steel or min 1 in. thick Listed Duct Board bearing the UL Listing Marking having a min R-Value of 4.3. Installed in accordance with the instructions provided by the manufacturer. Max damper openings not to exceed 180 sq in. per 100 sq.ft of ceiling area. GREENHECK FAN CORP — Model CRD-1 WT 4Y. Alternate Ceiling Damper* — (Optional, to be used with Air Duct Item 3) — For use with min 18 in. deep trusses. Max nom 12 in. long by 12 in. wide with an 8 in. diameter damper, fabricated from galvanized steel. Installed in accordance with the instructions provided by the manufacturer. Max damper openings not to exceed 72 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. GREENHECK FAN CORP — Model CRD-2WT 4Z Alternate Ceiling Damper* — (Optional. To be used with Air Duct Item 3.) For use with min 18 in. deep trusses. Max 12 in. diameter damper and insulated register box assembly. The maximum size of the register box assembly is nom. 20 in. long by 20 in. wide and 4 in. high fabricated from galy steel. The aggregate area of the register opening(s) through the ceiling membrane shall not exceed 128 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Damper assembly installed in accordance with the manufacturers installation instructions. AIRE TECHNOLOGIES INC — Model 571B. 4AA. Alternate Ceiling Damper* — (Optional. To be used with Air Duct Item 3.) For use with min 18 in.. deep trusses. Max 20 in. long by 16 in. wide by 4 in. high rectangular damper with plenum box assembly. The maximum outer dimensions of the plenum box assembly is 23-1/2 in. long by 19-1/2 in. wide and 17 in. high fabricated from 6pcf, 1-1/2 to 2 in. thick Knauf Air Duct Board M*. The aggregate area of the register opening(s) through the ceiling membrane shall not exceed 160 sq in. per 100 sq ft ceiling area. Damper assembly installed in accordance with the manufacturers installation instructions. productspec.ul.com/document.php9ld=BXUV.L585 16/23 7/1/2018 L686 - BXUV.L585 - UL Product Spec AIRE TECHNOLOGIES INC — Series 58. 4AB. Alternate Ceiling Damper* — (Optional. To be used with Air Duct Item 3.) For use with min 18 in. deep trusses. Max 14 in. long by 14 in. wide and 18 in. high ceiling damper with boot or box assembly, fabricated from galv steel. The aggregate area of the register opening(s) through the ceiling membrane shall not exceed 98 sq in. per 100 sq It of ceiling area. Damper assembly installed in accordance with the manufacturers installation instructions. AIRE TECHNOLOGIES INC — Model 51 w/Boot. 4AC. Alternate Ceiling Damper* — (Optional. To be used with Air Duct, Item 3) — For use with min 18 in. deep trusses. Max nom 18 in. long by 18 in. wide, fabricated from galvanized steel. Installed in accordance with the instructions provided by the manufacturer. Max damper openings not to exceed 162 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. RUSKIN COMPANY — Model CRF7T 4AD. Alternate Ceiling Damper" — (Optional. To be used with Air Duct, Item 3) For use with min 18 in. deep trusses. Max 8 in. diameter damper, fabricated from galvanized steel. Installed in accordance with the instructions provided by the manufacturer. Max damper openings not to exceed 25 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. RUSKIN COMPANY — Model CFDR7T 4AE. Damper" — (Optional, to be used with Air Duct Item 3) For use with min 18 in. deep trusses. Max nom 11-1/8 in. long by 13-5/8 in. wide, fabricated from galvanized steel. Installed in accordance with the instructions provided by the manufacturer. Max damper openings not to exceed 76 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. GREENHECK FAN CORP — Model CRD-31OWT 5. Batts and Blankets* — (Optional) — Max 3-1/2 in. thickness of glass fiber insulation. Insulation secured to plywood subfloor with staples spaced 12 in. OC., loosely laid on the back of the gypsum board, or fastened to the trusses with 0.090 in. diam galv steel wires spaced 12 in. OC. Any glass fiber insulation bearing the UL Classification Marking for Surface Burning Characteristics and/or Fire Resistance, and having- a min density of 0.5 pcf may be used. 6. Resilient Channels — Resilient channels formed of 25 MSG gaiv steel, spaced 16 in. OC perpendicular to trusses. When Batts and Blankets (Item 5) are loosely laid on the back of the gypsum board, channels are spaced a maximum of 12 in. OC. perpendicular to the trusses. Channels secured to each truss with 1-1/4 in. long Type S bugle head steel screws. Channels overlapped 4 in. at splices. Two productepec.ul.com/document.php?id=BXUV.L585 17/23 7/1/2019 L686 - BXUV.L685 - UL Product Spec channels, spaced 6 in. OC, oriented opposite each gypsum board end joint as shown in the above illustration. Additional channels shall extend min 6 in. beyond each side edge of board. 6A. Steel Framing Members* — (Not Shown) — As an alternate to Items 6. a. Furring Channels — Formed of No. 25 MSG galy steel, 2-3/8 in. wide by 7/8 in. deep, spaced 16 in. OC perpendicular to wood structural members. When insulation, Item 5 is applied over the furring channel/gypsum panel ceiling membrane, the furring channel spacing shall be reduced to 12 in. OC. Channels secured to trusses as described in Item b. Ends of adjoining channels overlapped 6 in. and tied together with double strand of No. 18 AWG galvanized steel wire near each end of overlap. b. Steel Framing Members* — Used to attach furring channels Item a) to trusses (Item 2). Clips spaced 48 in. OC, and secured to the bottom chord of alternating trusses with one No. 8 x 2-1/2 in. coarse drywall screw through center grommet. When insulation, Item 5 is applied over the furring channel/gypsum panel ceiling membrane, the clip spacing shall be reduced to 24 in. OC and secured to consecutive trusses. Furring channels are friction fitted into clips. Adjoining channels are overlapped as described in Item a. As an alternate, ends of adjoining channels may be overlapped 6 In. and secured together with two self -tapping No. 6 framing screws, min 7/16 in. long at the midpoint of the overlap, with one screw on each flange of the channel. Additional clips required to hold furring channel that supports the gypsum board butt joints, as described in Item 7. PLITEQ INC — Type Genie Clip 613. Steel Framing Members* — (Not Shown) — As an alternate to Items 6. a. Furring Channels — Formed of No. 25 MSG galv steel, 2-5/8 in. wide by 7/8 in deep, spaced 16 in OC, perpendicular to wood structural members. When insulation, Items 5 is applied over the furring channel/gypsum panel ceiling membrane, the furring channel spacing shall be reduced to 12 in. OC. Channels secured to trusses as described in Item b. Ends of adjoining channels overlapped 6 in. and tied together with double strand of No. 18 AWG gals steel wire near each end of overlap. b. Steel Framing Members* — Used to attach furring channels Item a) to the trusses (Item 2). Clips spaced at 48" OC. and secured to the bottom of the trusses with one 2 in. Coarse Drywall Screw with 1 in. diam washer through the center hole. Furring channels are then friction fitted into clips. Ends of channels are overlapped 6" and tied together with double strand of No. 18 AWG galvanized steel wire. Additional clips are required to hold the gypsum butt joints as described in item 7. productspec.ul.com/document.php?Id=BXUV.L585 18/23 7/1/2019 L585 - BXUV1685 - UL Pmduct spec STUDCO BUILDING SYSTEMS — RESILMOUNT Sound Isolation Clips - Type A237R 6C. Steel Framing Members* — (Not Shown) — As an alternate to Items 6. a. Furring Channels — Formed of No. 25 MSG gals steel, 2-1/2 in. wide by 7/8 in deep, spaced 16 in OC, perpendicular to wood structural members. When insulation, Items 5 is applied over the furring channel/gypsum panel ceiling membrane, the furring channel spacing shall be reduced to 12 in. OC. Channels secured to trusses as described in Item b. Ends of adjoining channels overlapped 6 in. and tied together with double strand of No. 18 AWG gals steel wire near each end of overlap. b. Steel Framing Members* — Used to attach furring channels Item a) to the trusses (Item 2). Clips spaced at 48" OC and secured to the bottom of the trusses with one 2-1/2 in. Coarse Drywall Screw with 1 in. diam washer through the center hole. Furring channels are then friction fitted into dips. Ends of channels are overlapped 6" and tied together with double strand of No. 18 AWG galvanized steel wire. Additional clips are required to hold the gypsum butt joints as described in item 7. REGUPOL AMERICA — Type SonusClip 6D. Steel Framing Members* — (Optional, Not Shown) — As an alternate to Item 6. a. Furring Channels — Formed of No. 25 MSG galv steel, nominal 2-1/2 in. wide by 7/8 in. deep, spaced as indicated in Item 6, perpendicular to the trusses. Channels secured to Cold Rolled Channels at every intersection with a 3/4 in. TEK screw through each furring channel leg. Ends of adjoining channels overlapped 12 in. and fastened together with two double strand No. 18 SWG galv steel wire ties, one at each end of overlap, or with two 3/4 in. TEK screws in each leg of the overlap section. Two furring channels used at end joints of gypsum board (Item 7), each extending a min of 6 in. beyond both side edges of the board. b. Cold Rolled Channels —1-1/2 in. by 1/2 in., formed from No. 16 ga. galv steel, positioned vertically and parallel to trusses, friction -fitted into the channel caddy on the Steel Framing Members Item 6Dd) and secured with two 314 in. TEK screws. Adjoining lengths of cold rolled channels lapped min. 12 in. and secured along bottom legs with four 3/4 in. TEK screws and wire tied together with two double strand 18 SWG galv steel wire ties, one at each end of overlap. productspec.ul.com/document.php?Id=BXUV.L585 18/23 7/1/2019 L585 - 8XUV.L585 - UL Product spec c. Blocking — Where truss design does not permit direct, full contact of the hanger bracket, a piece of nominal 2 by 4 in. lumber blocking), min. 12 in. long to permit full contact of the hanger bracket, to be secured vertically to the side of the trusses at the top and bottom of the blocking at each Steel Framing Member (Item 6Dd) location with 16d nails or minimum 2-1/2 in. screws. d. Steel Framing Members* — Spaced 48 in. OC. max along truss, and secured to the truss on alternating trusses with two, #10 x 1-1/2 in. screws through mounting holes on the hanger bracket. PAC INTERNATIONAL L L C — Type RSIC-SI-CRC EZ Clip 6E. Steel Framing Members* — (Not Shown) — As an alternate to Item 6. a. Furring Channels — Formed of No. 25 MSG galv steel, nominal 2-1/2 in. wide by 7/8 in. deep, spaced as indicated in Item 6, perpendicular to trusses and friction fit into Steel Framing Members Item 6Ec). Ends of adjoining channels overlapped 6 in. and tied together with double strand of No. 18 SWG galy steel wire near each end of overlap or with two TEK screws along each leg of the 6 in. overlap. Two furring channels used at end joints of gypsum board (Item 7). Butt joint channels held in place by strong back channels placed upside down, on top of, and running perpendicular to primary furring channels, extending 6 in. longer than length of gypsum side joint. Strong back channels spaced maximum 48 in. OC. Strong back channels secured to every intersection of primary furring channels with four 7/16 in. pan head screws, two along each of the legs at intersections. Butt joint channels run perpendicular to strong back channels and shall be minimum 6 in. longer than length of joint, secured to strong back channels with 7/16 in. pan head screws, two along each of the legs at intersection with strong back channels. b. Blocking — Where truss design does not permit direct, full contact of the hanger bracket, a piece of nominal 2 by 4 in. lumber blocking), min. 12 in. long to permit full contact of the hanger bracket, to be secured vertically to the side of the trusses at the top and bottom of the blocking at each Steel Framing Member (Item 6Ec) location with 16d nails or minimum 2-1/2 in. screws. c. Steel Framing Members* — Used to attach furring channels Item 6Ea) to trusses. Clips spaced 48 in. OC and secured along truss webs at each furring channel intersection with min. 3/4 in. long self -drilling #10 x 1-1/2 in. screws through each of the provided hole locations. Furring channels are friction fitted into clips. PAC INTERNATIONAL L L C —Type RSIC-S1-1 Ultra productspec.ul.conVdocumenLphplid=BXUV.L585 20/23 7/1/2019 L585 - BXUV.L585 - UL Product Spec 7. Gypsum Board* — Nom 5/8 in. thick, 48 in. wide gypsum board installed with long dimension perpendicular to resilient channels. Gypsum board secured with 1 in. long Type S bugle head steel screws spaced 12 in. OC and located a min of 5/8 in. from side joints and 3 in. from the end joints. End joints secured to both resilient channels as shown in end joint detail. When Batts and Blankets* (Item 5) are loosely laid on the back of the gypsum board, gypsum board secured to resilient channels with 1 in. long Type S bugle head screws spaced a maximum 8 in. OC. and located a min. of 5/8 in. from side and end joints. When Steel Framing Members (Item 6A) are used, one layer of nom 5/8 in. thick, 4 ft wide gypsum board is installed with long dimensions perpendicular to furring channels. Gypsum board secured to furring channels with nom 1 in. long No. 6 Type S bugle -head steel screws spaced 12 in. OC in the field of the board. Screw spacing is reduced to 8 in. OC when insulation is applied over the furring channel/gypsum panel ceiling membrane. Gypsum board butted end joints shall be staggered minimum 16 in. within the assembly. At the gypsum board butt joints, each and of each gypsum board shall be supported by a single length of furring channel equal to the width of the gypsum board plus 6 in. on each end. These additional furring channels shall be attached to underside of the truss with Genie clips as described in Item 6A. Screw spacing along the gypsum board butt joint shall be 6 in. OC. When Steel Framing Members (Item 613) are used, one layer of nom 5/8 in. thick, 4 ft wide gypsum board is installed with long dimensions perpendicular to furring channels. Gypsum board secured to furring channels with nom 1 in. long Type S bugle -head steel screws spaced 8 in. OC in the field of the board. Gypsum board butted end joints shall be staggered minimum 48 in. and centered over main furring channels. At the gypsum board butt joints, each end of each gypsum board shall be supported by a single length of furring channel equal to the width of the gypsum board plus 3 in. on each end. The two support furring channels shall be spaced approximately 3 in. in from joint. Screw spacing along the gypsum board butt joint and along both additional channels shall be 8 in. OC. Additional screws shall be placed in the adjacent section of gypsum board into the aforementioned 3 in. extension of the extra butt joint channels as well as into the main channel that runs between. Butt joint furring channels shall be attached with one RESILMOUNT Sound Isolation Clip at each end of the channel. When Steel Framing Members (Item 6C) are used, one layer of nom 5/8 in. thick, 4 ft wide gypsum board is installed with long dimensions perpendicular to furring channels. Gypsum board secured to furring channels with nom 1 in. long Type S bugle -head steel screws spaced 8 in. OC in the field of the board. Gypsum board butted end joints shall be staggered minimum 48 in. and centered over main furring channels. At the gypsum board butt joints, an additional single length of furring channel shall be installed and be spaced approximately 3 in. from the butt joint (6 in. from the continuous furring channels) to support the floating end of the gypsum board. Each of these shorter sections of furring channel shall extend one truss beyond the width of the gypsum panel and be attached to the adjacent trusses with one SonusClip at every truss involved with the butt joint. When Steel Framing Members (Item 6D) are used, nom 5/8 in. thick, 4 ft wide gypsum board, installed as described in Item 7. Adjacent butt joints staggered minimum 48 in. OC. When Steel Framing Members (Item 6E) are used, nom 5/8 in. thick, 4 ft wide gypsum board, installed as described in Item 7. Butt joints staggered minimum 24 in. productspec.ul.com/document.php?id=BXUV.L585 21 /23 mno1s 1.585 - MUMS - UL Product spec OC. CONTINENTAL BUILDING PRODUCTS OPERATING CO, L L C — Type LGFC- C/A 8. Finishing System — (Not Shown) — Vinyl, dry or premixed joint compound, applied in two coats to joints and screw -heads. Nom 2 in. wide paper tape embedded in first layer of compound over all joints. As an alternate, nom 3/32 in. thick veneer plaster may be applied to the entire surface of gypsum board. 9. Grille — (Not Shown — Required where indicated in Items 4 - 4V) — installed in accordance with the installation instructions provided with the ceiling damper. Indicates such products shall bear the UL or cUL Certification Mark for jurisdictions employing the UL or cUL Certification (such as Canada), respectively. Last Updated on 2019-05-28 Design/System/Construction/Assembly Usage Disclaimer Authorities Having Jurisdiction should be consulted in all cases as to the particular requirements covering the installation and use of UL Certified products, equipment, system, devices, and materials. Authorities Having Jurisdiction should be consulted before construction. Fire resistance assemblies and products are developed by the design submitter and have been investigated by UL for compliance with applicable requirements. The published information cannot always address every construction nuance encountered in the field. When field issues arise, it is recommended the first contact for assistance be the technical service staff provided by the product manufacturer noted for the design. Users of fire resistance assemblies are advised to consult the general Guide Information for each product category and each group of assemblies. The Guide Information includes specifics concerning alternate materials and alternate methods of construction. Only products which bear UL's Mark are considered Certified. The appearance of a company's name or product in this database does not in itself assure that products so identified have been manufactured under UL's Follow -Up Service. Only those products bearing the UL Mark should be considered to be Certified and covered under UL's Follow -Up Service. Always look for the Mark on the product. UL permits the reproduction of the material contained in the Online Certification Directory subject to the following conditions: 1. The Guide Information, Assemblies, Constructions, Designs, Systems, and/or Certifications (files) must be presented in their entirety and in a non -misleading manner, without any manipulation of the data (or drawings). 2. The statement "Reprinted from the Online Certifications Directory with permission from UL" must appear adjacent to the extracted'material. In addition, the reprinted material must include a copyright notice in the following format: "© 2019 UL LLC". productspec.ul.com/document.php?id=BXUV.L585 22123 7/1/2019 1-585 - BXUV.L585 - UL Product Spec UL and the UL logo are trademarks of UL LLC © 2019 All Rights Reserved. productepec.ul.com/document.php?id=BXUV.LS85 23123 7/1/2019 P644 - BXUV.P544 - UL Product spec FIRE -RESISTANCE DESIGN Assembly Usage Disclaimer BXUV - Fire Resistance Ratings - ANSI/UL 263 Certified for United States BXUV7 - Fire Resistance Ratings - CAN/ULC-S101 Certified for Canada See General Information for Fire -resistance Ratings - ANSI/UL 263 Certified for United States Design Criteria and Allowable Variances See General Information for Fire Resistance Ratings - CAN/ULC-S101 Certified for Canada Design Criteria and Allowable Variances Design No. PS" August 16, 2017 Unrestrained Assembly Rating —1 Hr. Finish Rating — 25 Min. (See Items 3 or 3A and 7),20 Min. (See Items 3B and 7A) This design was evaluated using a load design method other than the Limit States Design Method (e.g., Working Stress Design Method). For jurisdictions employing the Limit States Design Method, such as Canada, a load restriction factor shall be used — See Guide BXUV or BXUV7 Indicates such products shall bear the UL or cUL Certification Mark for jurisdictions employing the UL or cUL Certification (such as Canada), respectively. productepec.ul.conddocument.php?id=BXUV.P544 1!! 7/1/2019 P544 - BXUV.P544 - UL Product Spec AL11-104A E IMStJl.MICM PIAClcP11 N't 1. Roofing System* —Any UL Class A, B or C Roofing System (TGFU) or Prepared Roof Covering (TFWZ) acceptable for use over nom 15/32 in. thick wood structural panels, min. grade "C-D" or "Sheathing". Nom 15/32 in. thick wood structural panels secured to trusses with construction adhesive and No. 6d ringed shank nails. Nails spaced 12 in. OC along each truss. Staples having equal or greater withdrawal and lateral resistance strength may be substituted for the 6d nails. 2. Trusses — Pitch or Parallel chord trusses, spaced a max of 24 in. OC, fabricated from nom 2 by 4 lumber, with lumber oriented vertically or horizontally. Truss members secured together with 0.0356 in. thick gals steel plates. Plates have 5/16 in. long teeth projecting perpendicular to the plane of the plate. The teeth are in pairs facing each other (made by the same punch), forming a split tooth type plate. Each tooth has a chisel point on its outside edge. These points are diagonally opposite productspec.ul.com/document.php?id=BXUV.P544 20 7/1/2019 P544 - 8XUV.P544 - UL Product Spec each other for each pair. The top half of each tooth has a twist for stiffness. The pairs are repeated on approximately 7/8 in. centers with four rows of teeth per inch of plate width. Where the truss intersects with the interior face of the exterior walls, the min truss depth shall be 5-1/4 in. with a min roof slope of 3/12 and a min. area in the plane of the truss of 21 sq/ft. Where the truss intersects with the interior face of the exterior walls, the min truss depth may be reduced to 3 in. if the batts and blankets (Item 3) are used as shown in the above illustration (Alternate Insulation Placement) and are firmly packed against the intersection of the bottom chords and the plywood sheathing. 3. Batts and Blankets* — (Optional) — Glass fiber insulation, secured to the wood structural panels with staples spaced 12 in. OC or to the trusses with 0.090 in. diam gaiv steel wires spaced 12 in. OC. Any glass fiber insulation bearing the UL Classification Marking as to Surface Burning Characteristics and/or Fire Resistance, having a min density of 0.5 pd. As an option, the insulation may be fitted in the concealed space, draped over the resilient channel/gypsum wallboard ceiling membrane when resilient channels and gypsum wallboard attachment is modified as specified in Items 6 and 7. The finished rating has only been determined when the insulation is secured to the decking. 3A. Cavity Insulation - Loose Fill Material* — (Not Shown) —As an alternate to Item 3 — Any thickness of loose fill material bearing the UL Classification Marking for Surface Burning Characteristics, having a min density of 0.5 pd, fitted in the concealed space, draped over the resilient channel/gypsum wallboard ceiling membrane when resilient channels and gypsum wallboard attachment is modified as specified in Items 6 and 7. The finished rating when loose fill material is used has not been determined. 3B. Cavity Insulation - Batts and Blankets* or Loose Fill Materlal* — (Not Shown) — (As described above in Items 3 and 3A) — (For Use with Item 7A, Not Shown) — Min. 3-1/2 in thick with no limit on maximum thickness fitted in the concealed space, draped over the resilient channel (Item 6A)/gypsum board (Item 7A) ceiling membrane. 4. Air Duct* —Any UL Class 0 or Class 1 flexible air duct installed in accordance with the instructions provided by the damper manufacturer. 5. Calling Damper* — Maximum plenum box size nom. 19 in. long by 19 in. wide and 11-7/8 in. high fabricated from galvanized steel. Installed in accordance with the manufacturers installation instructions provided with the damper. Maximum damper openings not to exceed 128 sq. in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. AIRE TECHNOLOGIES INC — Models: CRD model 50 w/Boot, CRD model 50EA w/Boot, CRD model 55 w/Boot, CRD model 55 EA w/Boot LLOYD INDUSTRIES INC — Model CRD 50-13T, CRD 50-EA-BT, CRD 55-13T, CRD 55 EA-ST 5A. Ceiling Damper* — Maximum plenum box size nom. 13 in. long by 13 in. wide and 11-7/8 in. high fabricated from galvanized steel. Installed in accordance with the productepec.ul.com/documentphp?id=BXUV.P544 317 7/1/2019 P644 - BXUV.P644 - UL Product Spec manufacturers installation instructions provided with the -damper. Maximum damper openings not to exceed 50 sq. in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. HEATING AND COOLING PRODUCTS — Models 272-1, 272-2 LLOYD INDUSTRIES INC — Model CRD 50-BT-6, CRD 50-EA-BT-6, CRD 55-BT-6, CRD 55 EA-BT-6, CRD50-`" X-BT-6. 58. Ceiling Damper" — Maximum size ceiling outlet in plenum box nom.12 In. long by 12 in. wide. Plenum box fabricated from galvanized steel. Installed in accordance with the manufacturers installation instructions provided with the damper. Maximum damper openings not to exceed 72 sq. in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. AIRE TECHNOLOGIES INC — Models: CRD model 50 w/Boot, CRD model 50EA w/Boot, CRD model 55 w/Boot, CRD model 55 EA wBoot LLOYD INDUSTRIES INC — Model CRD 50-956T, CRD 50-EA-956T, CRD 55- 9513T, CRD 55 EA-95BT 5C. Altemate Ceiling Damper" — (Optional) — For use with min 18 in. deep trusses. Max size ceiling outlet in plenum box nom 16 in. long by 16 in. wide. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 128 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Damper installed in accordance with the manufacturers installation instructions provided with the damper. CROWN PRODUCTS CO INC — Models CRD50-FGPB-4.2-CP,-6.0-CP; CRD50- FGPB-4.2-EA-CP,-6.0-EA-CP LLOYD INDUSTRIES INC — Models CRD 50- FGPB-4.2, - 4.2 NI, -6.0, -6.0 Nl; CRD50-EA-FGPB-4.2, -4.2 NI, -6.0, -6.0 NI 5D. Ceiling Damper' — (Optional) — For use with min 18 in. deep trusses Max plenum box size nom 15 in. long by 15 in. wide and 11-7/8 in. high fabricated from galy steel. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 72 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Damper installed in accordance with the manufacturers installation instructions provided with the damper. LLOYD INDUSTRIES INC — Models 45-CRD-LT BT and 45-CRD-LTD-BT 5E. Ceiling Damper' — (Optional) — For use with min 18 in. deep trusses Max size ceiling outlet in plenum box nom 10 in. long by 10 in. wide. Plenum box fabricated from galv steel. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 50 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Installed in accordance with the manufacturers installation instructions provided with the damper. productspec.ul.com/documentphp?id=BXUV.P544 417 711=19 P544 - BXUV.P544 - UL Product SpeC LLOYD INDUSTRIES INC — Model 45-LTD-95-BT-4 5F. Alternate Ceiling Damper* — For use with min 18 in. deep trusses Max plenum box size nom 19 in. long by 15 in. wide and 11-7/8 in. high fabricated from galv steel. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 96 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Damper installed in accordance with the manufacturers installation instructions provided with the damper. LLOYD INDUSTRIES INC — Model CRD50-`" X-BT 5G. Alternate Ceiling Damper* — For use with min. 18 in. deep trusses. Max. nom area shall be 349 sq in. Max. overall length and width shall not exceed 18-11/16 in. by 18-11/16 in. with max. 16 in. by 16 in. register opening. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 175 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Damper installed in accordance with the manufacturers installation instructions provided with the damper. An aluminum or steel grille (Item 9) shall be installed in accordance with installation instructions. MIAMI TECH INC — Model Series RxCRD, RxCRDS or RxCRPD 5H. Alternate Ceiling Damper*-- For use with min 18 in. deep trusses Max plenum box size nom 19 in. long by 19 in. wide and 11-7/8 in. high fabricated from galv steel. Aggregate damper openings shall not exceed 128 sq in. per 100 sq ft of ceiling area. Damper installed in accordance with the manufacturers installation instructions provided with the damper. METAL-FAB INC — Models MSCD-HC and MRCD-HC 6. Resilient Channels — Resilient channels formed of 25 MSG thick galv steel, spaced 16 in. OC, installed perpendicular to trusses. When bait and blanket material, Item 3, is draped over the resilient channel/gypsum wallboard ceiling membrane, the spacing shall be 12 in. OC. Channels secured to each truss with 1- 1 /4 in. long Type S steel screws. Channels overlapped 4 in. at splices. Channels oriented opposite at wallboard butt joints (spaced 6 in. OC) as shown in the above illustration. 6A. Resilient Channels - (Not Shown) — For Use With Item 7A - Formed from min 25 MSG gals steel installed perpendicular to trusses and spaced 16 in. OC. Channels secured to each truss with 1-5/8 in. long Type S bugle head steel screws. Channels overlapped 4 in. at splices. Two channels, spaced 6 in. OC, oriented opposite each gypsum panel end joint. Additional channels shall extend min 6 in. beyond each side edge of panel. Insulation, Items 3A or 313, is applied over the resilient channel/gypsum panel (Item 7A) ceiling membrane. 7. Gypsum Board* — Nom 5/8 in. thick, 48 in. wide, installed with long dimension perpendicular to resilient channels with 1 in. long Type S screws spaced 12 in. OC and located a min of 3/4 in. from side joints and 3 in. from the end joints. At end productspec.ui.com/documentphp?id=BXUV.P544 5/7 7/1no1s P644 - BXUV.P544 - UL Product spec joints, two resilient channels are used, extending a min of 6 in. beyond both ends of the joint. When batt and blanket insulation, Item 3, is draped over the resilient channel/gypsum wallboard ceiling membrane, screws shall be installed at 8 in. OC. AMERICAN GYPSUM CO — Type AG-C CGC INC — Types C, IP-X2, IPC-AR CONTINENTAL BUILDING PRODUCTS OPERATING CO, L L C — Type LGFC- C/A NATIONAL GYPSUM CO — Types eXP-C, FSW-G, FSW-C, FSK-G, FSK-C UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO — Types C, IP-X2, IPC-AR USG BORAL DRYWALL SFZ LLC — Type C USG MEXICO S A DE C V — Types C, IP-X2, IPC-AR 7A. Gypsum Board* - (Not Shown) — For use with Items 3A or 36 and 6A. Nom 5/8 in. thick, 48 in. wide gypsum panels installed with long dimension perpendicular to resilient channels. Gypsum panels secured with 1 in. long Type S bugle head steel screws spaced 8 in. OC and located a min of 1/2 in. from side joints and 3 in. from the end joints. Finish Rating with this ceiling system is 20 min. UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO — Type ULIX. 8. Finishing System — (Not Shown) — Vinyl, dry or premixed joint compound, applied in two coats to joints and screw -heads; paper tape, 2 in. wide, embedded in first layer of compound over all joints. As an alternate, nom 3/32 in. thick veneer plaster may be applied to the entire surface of gypsum wallboard. 9. Grille —Aluminum or Steel grille, installed in accordance with the installation instructions provided with the ceiling damper. Indicates such products shall bear the UL or cUL Certification Mark for jurisdictions employing the UL or cUL Certification (such as Canada), respectively. Last Updated on 2017-08-16 Design/System/Construction/Assembly Usage Disclaimer productepec.ul.com/documenLphp?fd=BXUV.P544 gn 7/1/2019 P544 - BXUV.P544 - UL Product spec Authorities Having Jurisdiction should be consulted in all cases as to the particular requirements covering the installation and use of UL Certified products, equipment, system, devices, and materials. Authorities Having Jurisdiction should be consulted before construction. Fire resistance assemblies and products are developed by the design submitter and have been investigated by UL for compliance with applicable requirements. The published information cannot always address every construction nuance encountered in the field. When field issues arise, it is recommended the first contact for assistance be the technical service staff provided by the product manufacturer noted for the design. Users of fire resistance assemblies are advised to consult the general Guide Information for each product category and each group of assemblies. The Guide Information includes specifies concerning alternate materials and alternate methods of construction. Only products which bear UL's Mark are considered Certified. The appearance of a company's name or product in this database does not in itself assure that products so identified have been manufactured under UL's Follow -Up Service. Only those products bearing the UL Mark should be considered to be Certified and covered under UL's Follow -Up Service. Always look for the Mark on the product. UL permits the reproduction of the material contained in the Online Certification Directory subject to the following conditions: 1. The Guide Information, Assemblies, Constructions, Designs, Systems, and/or Certifications (files) must be presented in their entirety and in a non -misleading manner, without any manipulation of the data (or drawings). 2. The statement "Reprinted from the Online Certifications Directory with permission from UL" must appear adjacent to the extracted material. In addition, the reprinted material must Include a copyright notice in the following format: "© 2019 UL LLC". UL and the UL logo are trademarks of UL LLC ® 2019 All Rights Reserved. productspec.ul.cortVdocument.php?id=BXUV.P544 7/7 LOCATIONS: UNIVERSAL Daytona Beach ENGINEERING SCIENCES Fort Myers Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Fort Pierce Gainesville Geophysical Services - Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Jacksonville Building Inspection* Plan Review -Building Code Administration Miami August 1, 2019 Ocala Orlando (Headquarters) City of Sanford Pahn Coast PO Box 1788 Panama city Pensacola Sanford, Florida 32772 Rockledge Sarasota Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official St. Petersburg Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments Tifton 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 West Pal`" Beach Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 LIES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 26 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of July 1, 2019 through July 7, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of July 1, 2019 through July 7, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be venfred on any electronic copies. FJS/dkn City of Sanford Aldrich, Dave City of Sanford Antonini, Lisa The Spares Corporation Woods, Jim The Spanos Corporation Gillespie, Hardy The Sparws Corporation Jensen, Chuck The Sparws Corporation Homea, Kent CPH, Inc. (Corporate) Boyles, Inane Lee Crest Lee Crest Kephart Garland, Jesse Kephart Campbell, Paul Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 aoanuam„SCH a4j 2019.08.024 tAtE B 11:09:59 -04' 00 dave.akirich(sanfordfl.gov lisa.AntoninieSanfordfl.gov jwoods0agspanosccm hgillespie ftspams.com cjensen ftsparros corn thomeaftspanos.com iboyles0cphcorp.com jo.leeg roup=Ogmail.com jessagQkephartoom pauk®kephartoom Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. - Orlando, FI 32811 - (407) 423-0504 - (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com 0 THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO.26 Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: August 1, 2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. SP,.ECIALtINSPEC1Titl0NjLOG•: . Added This Summary Period: 0 Resolved This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: a2 SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): 1 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: 3 to 3 DAILiYAR•EPOR4TrS_. _ Daily Report No. Inspection Date Inspector(s) Reports No. of Pages Page Nola). 59 7/2I2019 Michael Felshaw 1 4 to 4 Total Number of Pages This Summary: 4 For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions or this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG SIL No. Date sum No. Bldg. Permit Structural Element LocationDescription S.I. Engineer of Record Response S.I. Date Closed SUM No. 1 5/24119 FJS) 611119 20 Rev: 22 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Northeast Comer of Elevator Pit, rd Lift The 28-day average compressive strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the Reimport 94519ified , 19054of 3.0006 castononFJS Resolved per correspondence from John M. Sailes, P.E. with 5/11ES / 19. AdvancedStructural Design on FJS 6/ 12/19 22 FJS) 4/ 26/2019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pee Rock Pump Mix. 2 6/ 12/19 22 F 17-1585 Cep Fill Elevator Shaft, Bldg. F, 3rd The 28-day average compressive FJS Lift, South Wall strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Report 9456604- 1, 190997, cast on 5114/2019). The wrong structural ma was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Ma. 3 6/ 26/19 24 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Pit, Bldg. F, Northeast The 28-day average compressive FJS Comer: P Lift strength of 2,490 psi did not meet the specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Report 9457936- 1, 19P148, cast on 5121/2019). The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. 2The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Does #1632149 This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 59 0 /1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation DATE: 7/2/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9466601-1 BUILDING PERMIT NO.: FIELD CONTACT: Jim Woods FIELD PHONE: 813-288-0008 FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Sheathing LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building F, 301 Marbella Lane: Floor ELEVATION: Level 3 Inspection was performed by: ® Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings m w E z Notes888 a Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. O Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. Trusses inspected undamaged. Truss gusset plates undamaged. Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. Tnrss plate provided forbearing on CMU. CContinuous lateral bracing property spaced. cal connections conform to uplift value. connections properly installed. Pconnections properly nailed. r Fastener used comply with structural drawings. 9 Wefiuilt areas property fastened. O O O O O 01 O r O O O_ O 01 O O O Of O 1 O O j orcal OO Ocal OOO O O O O O e Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. _ Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. Sheathing nailing type/pattem per structural drawing. isheathing inspected undamaged. i Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" clip. Sheathing edges properly blocked. Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) per approved drawings. CLP installed at specified locations_v CLP has specified plate washer sizetthickness. CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. CLP diameter per approved drawings. Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. Shear wall/load bearing walls property blocked. Top plate properly spliced. Top and bottom plate property nailed per structural drawings. Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. Headers strapped per structural drawings. _ Jack - King jacks installed per structural drawings. Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. I Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. O O O O O O i O O O O O OOw O O O O O O O a _ O O O 61 O O O O 0.0 O O O 01 O O O O O O 0. O O O O O O 1. O O O O O NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above rotes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES ® NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw COPIES TO: Kent HOnea UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES s fwnts In:Gaomon chnical Grwiinaering • Environmental Sciences Ceophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection ED BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection &Klan Review LOCATIONS: UNIVERSAL Atlanta Daytona Beach ENGINEERING SCIENCES Fort Myers Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Fort Pierce Gaussvdle Geophysical Services - Construction Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Jacksonville Building inspection -Plan Review • Building Code Administration Miami July 30, 2019 Ocala Orlando (Headquarters) City of Sanford Palm coast PO Box 1788 Panama city Pensacola Sanford, Florida 32772 Rockledge Sarasota Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official St. Pctersbu% Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments Tifton 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 west Palm Beach Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 UES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 25 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of June 24, 2019 through June 30, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of June 24, 2019 through June 30, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmaller, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. FJS/dkn City of Sanford Aldrich, Dave City of Sanford Antonini, Lisa The Spanos Corporation Woods, Jim The Spanos Corporation Gdkupie, Hardy The Spanos Corporation Jensen, Chuck The Spanos Corporation Homea, Kent CPH, Inc. (Corporate) Boyles Irene Lee Crest Lee Crest Kephart Garland, Jesse Kephart Campbell, Paul Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 gtnMwv,,ry 2019.07.31 TATE c r13:12 : 24 -04r 00 ry'nrr'Unlli,'P dave.aWrkh@sanfordfl.gov Usa.Antonini®Sanfordfl.gov jwoods&9spanos.com hg illespie0agspanos.com cjensen@agspanos.wm thomea*agspanoacom iboyles0cphcorp.com jo.leeg rou pM0eg maiI. wen jesseg0kephart.com paulcOkephart corn Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Mice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. • Orlando, FI 32811 • (407) 423-0504 - (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO.25 Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project No.: . 0110.1800762.0000 Date: July 30, 2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. S'PECIALsINSPEC:TION iLOG Added This Summary Period: 0 Resolved This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: 1a SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): 1 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: to 2 VA LYZ R£ P'A R TS -':.. . Daily Report No. Inspection Oahe Inspector(s) Reports No. of Pages Page s . 56 6/24/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 4 to 4 57 6/26/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 5 to 5 58 6/28/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 6 to 6 Total Number of Pages This Summary: 6 For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG NIL Date No Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location Description IS.I. Engineer of Record Response zS.I. Date Closed SUM No. 1 5/24/19 20 F 17-1585 Cell FBI Northeast Comer of Elevator The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 6/12/19 22 FJS) Rev. 6111119 Rev.- 22 Pit, 2nd Lift strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Report 9451977-1, 190546. cast on from John M. Bailes, P.E. with Advanced Structural Design on 5/12/19. FJS) 4/2612019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator A# cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pee Rock Pump Mix. 2 6112/19 22 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Shaft, Bldg. F, 3rd The 28-day average compressive FJS Lift, South Wall strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the specked strength of 3,000 psi (UES Report 9456604-1,190997, cast on 5/14/2019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix. 3 WWI 24 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Pit, Bldg. F. Northeast The 28-day average compressive FJS Corner: 9" Lift strength of 2,490 psi did not meet the specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Report 9457936-1, 19P148, cast on 5/21/2019). IThe Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. 2The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Dom #1632149 This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 56 0/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation DATE: 6/24/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9465194-1 BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1585 FIELD CONTACT: Jim Woods FIELD PHONE: 813-288-0008 FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Sheathing LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building F, 301 Marbella Lane: Floor ELEVATION: Level 2 Inspection was performed by: ® Contract Drawin s O Approved Shop Drawings d n z Notesis88a Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. O O Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. O O 121 Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O Trusses inspected undamaged. O O O Truss gusset plates undamaged. O Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. O O Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. O O O 121 Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. O 121 Mechanical connections property installed. O O Mechanical connections property nailed. O O O 1211 Fastener used comply with structural drawings. O O M O Overbuilt areas property fastened. O O O 0 Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. O O 121 Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. O O Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O M. Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O O 1211 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O O M Sheathing nailing type/pattem per structural drawing. O O M O Sheathing inspected undamaged. O O M Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H•• clip. O Sheathing edges properly blocked. O O O M. Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. O O O MI CLP installed at specified locations. 121 CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. O O O CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O O O CLP diameter per approved drawings. O Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. O O M. Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. O O 121 Shear walUload bearing walls properly blocked. O O 121 Top plate properly spliced. O O O Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. O O 121 Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. O Headers strapped per structural drawings. O O O 121 Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. O O O Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O O Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. 1 01 O O NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES ® NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw FIELD COPIES TO Kent Honea UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES consultants in: Gootachnical enginoating • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspectiona] Building code Administration. compliance Inspection & Wan ne-Aew WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 57 (1/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 6/26/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9465672-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1582 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Sheathing LOCATIONIGRID LINES: Building C, 601 Marbella Lane: Roof ELEVATION: Roof Inspection was performed by: ® Contract Drawings O Approved Shop Drawings c d U Q a Q Z Notes8VV Rooo of/Flr Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. 1 O Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package I O • O Ott 0 Tn is orientationconformstopackage._s O engineering TrussesinspectedundamagedO i ' 0: Truss gusset plates undamaged. O ' O 1 1 Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. O i O_ O , ®: Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. < ? d O I ~ ® I Continuous lateral bracing property spaced. O 1 Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. Mechanical connections properly installed. - p 1 0 . O®<_ -.- •_-.. __.. -_._. _.. , Mechanical connections property nailed. 0.0. ®' Fastener used comply with structural drawings. ._ 0.0. O. O ° ®' - Overbuilt areas properly fastened. O : Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. Q :..a. ® Foundation sole plate is properly fastened._ 1 O 1 k ®;` Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness - ` 0 5.Q ® Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. G : ® Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O r ® O ' Sheathing nailing type/pattem per structural drawing. ^ a , : : ® Sheathing inspected undamaged. _ O ' ®' O Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" clip. i v •-, 0, O J 0 O I Sheathing edges property blocked a O ® Off. Continuous load (CLIP), (hold down rods) installed approved drawings. t 1 O y ® pathper0 1 j . CLIP installed at specified locations. 0 1 ®, CLIP has specified plate washer size/thickness. f O , . O. O ®; CLIP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O 1 O g CLIPdiameterperapproveddrawingsO- 101010, Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. r 1 O ` ® , Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing._ O r O walUl Shearoa. bearing _ walls properly blocked. O O r Oti ®' YTop plate properly splicedr ... .^__ _ , _ O j _i ®1 0 _, . . fJop and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings = - J _O { O O " ® P e Prom To floorheadershavrpesize/bearing i ' O 0 ®1I Headers strapped per structural drawings. 1. , O 1 Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. O - Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. _ l7 O O_ i Of y ~ Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans c O :^ 1 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES ® NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES a] FIELDCOPIESTO: Kent Honea Consultants In: GeorachnicalEngineering • Environmental Sciences Ceophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Wan lieview WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS r%A /1111 PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation DATE: 6/28/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9466090-1 BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1583/1584 FIELD CONTACT: FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Sheathing LOCATION/GRID LINES: 1) Building D, 501 Marbella Lane: Walls 2) Building E, 401 Marbella Lane ELEVATION: 1) Levels 3,4 2) Level 3 Ins ection was performed by: 13 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings Z Notesg' A cg g Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. O Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. O O O Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O 0 Trusses inspected undamaged. O O O Truss gusset plates undamaged. O O O Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. O O O Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. O O O 21 Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. O 63 Mechanical connections properly installed. O O O Mechanical connections property nailed. O O O Fastener used comply with structural drawings. O O O Overbuilt areas property fastened. Ea Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. O O 1121 Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. O O Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O O Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O Ea Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O O O Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. O O O Sheathing inspected undamaged. O O O Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" clip. IH Sheathing edges properly blocked. O Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. O O O CLP installed at specified locations. O CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. O O O CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O O O Ia. CLP diameter per approved drawings. O O O 21 Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. O O O Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. O Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. O O O Top plate properly spliced. O O 0. Top and bottom plate property nailed per structural drawings. O O O Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. Headers strapped per structural drawings. O O Ea Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. O Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O 1 O O Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plants. 1 O 1 1 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES ® NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw FIELD COPIES TO: Kent Honea UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants ln: Geotachnical Englneoring • ErMronmental SNencas Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration. Compliance Inspection & Wan Review UNIVERSAL LOCATIONS: Atlanta91ENGINEERINGSCIENCES Daytona Beach Fort Myers Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Fort Pierce Geophysical Services • Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Gainesville Jacksonville Building Inspection • Plan Review • Building Code Administration Miami August 1, 2019 Ocala Palm c(Headquarters) City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Panamacity Sanford, Florida 32772 Pensacola Rockledge Sarasota Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official St_ Petersburg Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments Tifton 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 West Palm Beach Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 LIES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 27 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of July 8, 2019 through July 14, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of July 8, 2019 through July 14, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. FJS/dkn City of Sanford Aldrich, Dave City of Sanford Antonini, Lisa The Spanos Corporation Woods, Jim The Spanos Corporation Gillespie, Hardy The Spanos Corporation Jensen, Chuck The Spanos Corporation Hornea, Kent CPH, Inc. (Corporate) Boyles, Irene Lee Crest Lee Crest Kephart Garland, Jesse Kephart Campbell, Paul Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 J Aa11b11Vy0ji 4nse P 2019.08.02 fir e - 1 111:09:46 -041 00 dave.aldrich@sanfordfl.gov Lisa.Antonini@Sanfordfl.gov jwoods@agspanoscom hgillespie@agspanos.com cjensen@agspanos.com thomea@agspanos.com iboyles@cphcorp.com jo.leagmup320@gmaii.com jessag@kepharLcom pauk@kephart.com Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. • Orlando, FI 32811 • (407) 423-0504 • (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO.27 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: August 1, 2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. SO. EC I'AWINSPE;CtTION LO;Gs Added This Summary Period: 0 Resolved This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: a SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): 1 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: 3 to 3 Do1L'a1f R EP'ARaTS• Daily Report No. Inspection Date Inspector(s) Reports No. of Pages Page No(s). 60 7/9/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 4 to 4 61 7/10/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 5 to 5 Total Number of Nages finis Summary: 0 For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingk authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG Permitting Agency: City of Sanford Project Name: Lake Monroe Apartments 1Update Period: 7/8/19-7/14/19 Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich Project Address: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard Permit No.: See Below) Cit /State2i : Sanford Seminole County,Florida 32771 JPE2jEct No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Building q/Clubhouse 17-1560 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 SIL No. Date SUM sum Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location a Description S.I. Engineer of Record Response 2S.1. Date Closed SUM No. 1 5/24119 20 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Northeast Comer of Elevator The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 6/12/19 22 FJS) Rev.- pit, 2"d Lift strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with Rev. 22 specified strength of 3.000 psi (UES Advanced Structural Design on 611119 Report 9451977-1, 190546, cast on 5/12/19. FJS) 4/26/2019). The wrong stroctura/ mix was used in the CMU EADvator fill ceps. Grout should hove been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix. 2 6/12/19 22 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Shaft, Bldg. F, 3rd The 28-day average compressive FJS Lift, South Wall strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the specified strength of 3,000 psi (LIES Report 9456604-1, 190997, cast on 5/1412019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Ma. 3 6/26/19 24 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Pit, Bldg. F, Northeast The 28-day average compressive FJS Corner: 51h Lift strength of 2,490 psi did not meet the specified strength of 3,000 psi (LIES Report 9457936-1,19P148, cast on 5 21/2019). The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. 2The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Docs #1632149 This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 60 (1/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 7/9/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9467368-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1584 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: Jim Woods CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: 813-288-0008 FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Sheathing LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building E, 401 Marbella Lane ELEVATION: Level 1, 2, 3 (Bottom Two -Thirds of L3) Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawin s Approved Shop Drawin s c E Q 8 8 S z Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. O O 0101 Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. O Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O O O 01 Trusses inspected undamaged. O O 0 01 Truss gusset plates undamaged. Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. O 010T. O O ; 0 I Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. O 0 Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. O O O i ®) O 0 Mechanical connections_ properly installed. O 0 0 ®_ O O 0 0 Mechanical connections properly nailed. _ Fastener used comply with structural drawings. O Overbuilt areas properly fastened. O O Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. O 1 Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. _ O O O ! O Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O 04, Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O 0 O Sh_eathing orientation comply with structural drawings. 0 Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. 0 Shthing inspected undamaged r O O O 0 0fRo;'fSheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" clip. 0 Sheathing edges properly blocked. O O 0 O Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. y O O O CLP installed at specified locations._ O O O K06!. CLP has specified plate washer sizefthickness. O O CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. 0 0 CLP diameter per approved drawings. O O O Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. O O Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. O 0.0 Shear wall/load _bearing walls properly blocked. O 1 O Top plate properly spliced O O 0 Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. 0 0 0 Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. 01 Headers strapped per structural drawings. 0.0. O .01 Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. 0 O Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O O Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. O O O 0 ; 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED 0 DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? 0 YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES113FIELDCOPIESTOKentHonesConsuhantsIn: Goontchnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Ceophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance inspection & Wan Review WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation DATE: 7/10/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9467633-1 BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1583/1584 FIELD CONTACT: Jim Woods FIELD PHONE: 813-288-0008 FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Sheathing LOCATION/GRID LINES: 1) Building D, 501 Marbella Lane: Roof 2) Building E, 401 Marbella Lane: Floor ELEVATION: 1) Level Roof 2) Level 4 Ins ection was performed by: ® Contract Drawings O Approved Shop Drawings c m m is nL' E QZ Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. O O O 01. Truss layout conforms to approved engineering_ package. Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. Trusses inspected undamaged. Truss gusset plates undamaged. Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. TrukssplateprovidedforbearingonCMU. iContinuous lateral bracing properly spaced. d Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. Mechanical connections properly installed. FMechanical connections properly nailed. Fastener used comply with structural drawings. Overbuilt areas properly fastened. O O O 01 O O 01 O O O ® " 0OOO O O 01 O O i O O O- O i O 01 O 1 O 1 0 ® ' O O O O O O O 0 framing Foundation sole plate is pressure_ treated. O O O' Wood Poun_dation sole plate is property fastened. O Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O_ Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O 1 1 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O O Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. O O Sheathing inspected undamaged. O O_ Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" clip. O O 1 O Sheathing edges properly blocked. Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. O O O O 1 CLP installed at specified locations. CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. O O O 0 0 CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O O O CLP diameter per approved drawings. O O 1 O Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. O O Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. xn O Shear walllload bearing walls properly blocked. O Top plate properly spliced. O O O Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. O O Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. O O O Headers strapped per structural drawings. O O Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. O O O Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. 1 O j Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. 10 O 00, NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above rotes) 0 IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES ® NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw FIELD COPIES TO: Kent HOnea tJN, V F.R S A L ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consuttantson: Geotachnical Etwilneeting - Etwironmantal Sclencas Geophysical Setvices - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection auddtrp Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Wan Review I UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG Permitting Agency: City of Sanford Project Name: Lake Monroe Apartments pdate Period: 8/12/19-8/18/19 Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich Project Address: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard Permit No.: See Below) City/State/Zip: Sanford Seminole County,Florida 32771 lProject No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 BuildingB 17-1S81 BuildingD 17-1583 Buildin F 17-1SBS SIL No. Date SUM No Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location a Description S.I. Engineer of Record Response 2S.1. Date Closed SUM No. 1 5/24/19 20 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Northeast Comer of Elevator The 28day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 6/12/19 22 FJS) Rev.- Pit, 2n0 Lift strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with Rev. 22 specked strength of 3,000 psi (UES Advanced Structural Design on 6111119 Report 9451977-1, 190546, cast on 6112119. FJS) 4/26/2019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator rill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix. 2 6/12/19 22 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Shaft, Bldg. F, 3rd The 28day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 8/16/19 32 Lift, South Wall strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with specked strength of 3,000 psi (UES Advanced Structural Design on Report 94566D4-1, 190997. cast on 6/12/19. 5/1412019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Ma. 3 6/26/19 24 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Pit, Bldg. F. Northeast The 28day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 8/16/19 32 Comer: P Lift strength of 2,490 psi did not meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with specified strength of 3.000 psi (LIES Advanced Structural Design on Report 9457936-1, 19P148, cast on 6112/19. 5/21/2019). The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. 2The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Does #1632149 This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 SILs 2 & 3 Attachments (1/2) Dawn Naylor Subject: FW: The Spanos Corporation ---Low 28 Day From: John Bailes<iohnbailes@advancedstructuraldesien.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 10:10 AM To: 'Wayne Gonzalez' <WGonzalez@universaleneineerine.com>; 'Arthur D. Love'<alove @universaleneineerine.corn >; Rick Wood <rwood@aespanos.com>; '(Paul Campbell at Kephart - Architect of Record)' <paulc@kephart.com>; dave. aldrich @sanfordfl.aov <dave.aldrich@sanfordfl.eov>; '(Jesse Garland at Kephart - Architect of Record)' iessee@kephart.com>; '( Lee Crest - Site Contractor)' <io.leeeroup320@email.com>; lisa.antonini@sanfordfl.sov lisa.antonini@sanfordfl. eov>; Thomas Honea <thonea@aespanos.com>; Donnie Phillips <dphillips@aespanos.com>; ibovles@cphcorp.com < ibovles@cphcorp.com>; Jim Woods <iwoods@aespanos.com> Cc: 'Darwing J. Lopez'<DLLopez@universaleneineerine.com>; 'Manuel Irizarry'<mirizarrv@universaleneineerine.com>; Fred J. Schmalzer'<FSCHMALZER@universalensineerine.com>; 'Dawn Naylor'<dnaylor@universaleneineerine.com>; Rosie Housein'< rhousein@universalensineerins.com> Subject: RE: The Spanos Corporation --Low 28 Day Sounds good. Cell fill is acceptable to me. John M. Bailes, PE, Vice President Advanced Structural Design Inc. MBE, LDB, DBE 1035 South Semoran Blvd., Suite 1019 Winter Park, Florida 32792 Tel 407- 677-S836 Fax 407- 677-5894 Cell 407- S9S-3718 www.AdvancedStructuralDesisn. com From: Wayne Gonzalez [mailto:WGonzalez@universaleneineerine.coml Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 10:06 AM To: Arthur D. Love; Rick Wood; (Paul Campbell at Kephart - Architect of Record); dave.aldrich@sanfordfl.eov; (Jesse Garland at Kephart - Architect of Record); ( Lee Crest - Site Contractor); lisa.antonini@sanfordfl.eov; Thomas Honea; Donnie Phillips; ibovles@cphcorn.com; Jim Woods Cc: Darwing J. Lopez; Manuel Irizarry; Fred J. Schmalzer; Dawn Naylor; Rosie Housein; Bailes John Subject: Re: The Spanos Corporation --Low 28 Day All floors were filled with no voids. Building F 1 st-4th levels. Wayne Gonzalez Threshold Inspector Universal Engineering Sciences 3532 Maggie Boulevard Orlando, FL 32811 Cell: 321- 287-1537 Dispatch: 407- 422-8378 From: Jim Woods <iwoods@aespanos.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 8:48:28 AM To: Arthur D. Love; Rick Wood; (Paul Campbell at Kephart - Architect of Record); dave.aldrich@sanfordfl.eov; (Jesse SILs 2 & 3 Attachments (2/2) Garland at Kephart - Architect of Record); { Lee Crest - Site Contractor); lisa.antonini@sanfordfl.eov; Thomas Honea; Donnie Phillips; iboyles@cphcorp.com Cc: Darwing J. Lopez; Manuel Irizarry; Fred J. Schmalzer; Dawn Naylor; Rosie Housein; Bailes John; Wayne Gonzalez Subject: Re: The Spanos Corporation— Low 28 Day Mimecast Attachment Protection has deemed this file to be safe, but always exercise caution when opening files. John Bailes- We had the end lift infrared tested today and all cells were full. We will need to do the infrared testing on on the 3rd lift as well based on attached report. Wayne Gonzalez- Can we please schedule the infrared for the 3rd lift of Bldg F. While you are here we should do the 4th Lift just in case. Please call me to schedule. Thanks, Jim Woods Project Manager The Spanos Corporation 2701 Rocky Point Drive, Suite 180 Tampa, Florida 33607 Cell: 912-210-1368 Office: 813-288-0008 Email: jwoodsRagsoanos.com From: Arthur D. Love<alove@universalenaineerine.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 7:02 AM To: Rick Wood; {Paul Campbell at Kephart - Architect of Record); dave.aldrichC@sanfordfl.aov; (Jesse Garland at Kephart - Architect of Record); ( Lee Crest - Site Contractor); Jim Woods; lisa.antonini@sanfordfl.eov; Thomas Honea; Donnie Phillips; iboyles@cphcorp.com Cc: Darwing J. Lopez; Arthur D. Love; Manuel Irizarry; Fred J. Schmalzer; Dawn Naylor; Rosie Housein Subject: The Spanos Corporation --Low 28 Day Please find attached file containing The Spanos Corporation- Lake Monroe Apartments, Sanford, test results. These results are low for 28 day test, so we recommend contacting your Structural Engineer of Record for further recommendations. NOTE: This is a courtesy email ....the signed / sealed copies shall follow after a formal review process. Arthur Love Lab Results Construction Services Dept. Office ext: 23332 E-mail: ALovela'i_UniversalEnQineerinQ.com Webs ite: www.universalen ingeerincom LOCATIONS: UNIVERSAL Atlanta Daytona Beach ENGINEERING SCIENCES Fort Myers Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Fort Pierce Gainesville Geophyszl Services • Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Jacksonville Building Inspection • Plan Review • Building Code Administration Miami August 16, 2019 Ocala Orlando (Headquarters) City of Sanford Palm coast PO Box 1788 Penac City Penssacola Sanford, Florida 32772 Rockledge Sarasota Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official SL Petersburg Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments Tifton 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 W0s1 Palm Beach Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 UES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 31 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of August 5, 2019 through August 11, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the "Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of August 5, 2019 through August 11, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmaller, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document ere not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. FJS/dkn City of Sanford Aldrich, Dave City of Sanford Antonini, Lisa The Spanos Corporation Woods, Jim The Spanos Corporation Gillespie, Hardy The Spanos Corporation Jensen, Chuck The Spanos Corporation Homea, Kent CPH, Inc. (Corporate) Boyles, Irene Lee Crest Lee Crest Kephart Garland, Jesse Kephart Campbell, Paul Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 p uannur. irnu... 2019.08.18 l "° rare B _ 21:33:05 -041 001 dave.aki richtipsanford fl.gov Lisa.Antonini@Sanfardfl.gov jwoods@agspanas.com hg illespieteltagspanas.com cjetsen@agspanos.com thomea@agspanoscom iboyles@cphcorp.com jo.k:eg roup320@g mail.com jesseg6kephartcom paulcteltltephart.com Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. - Orlando, FI 32811 - (407) 423-0504 • (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO.31 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: August 16, 2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. iSaP.EC'I AL INSPEC TtION!(LO,, ;G' Added This Summary Period: 0 Resolved This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: a SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): 1 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: 3 to DAILY REP_0'R TeS•:r:_' t: Daily Report No. Inspection Date Inspector(s) Reports No. of Pages Page s. 69 8/5/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 4 to 4 70 8/6/2019 Michael Felshaw 2 5 to 6 71 8/9/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 7 to 7 Total Number of Pages This Summary: 7 For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG Permitting Agency: City of Sanford Name: Lake Monroe Apartments pdate Period: 8/5119-8/11/19 Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich LPro* ect Address: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard Permit No.: See Below) ate/Zi : Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 :1roject No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Builds D 17-1583 Builds F 17-1585 SIL No. Date SUM No Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location Description S.I. Engineer of Record Response S.1. Date Closed sum No. 1 5/24/19 20 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Northeast Comer of Elevator The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 6/12/19 22 FJS) Rev.- Pk, 2nd Lift strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with Rev. 22 specked strength of 3.000 psi (UES Advanced Structural Design on 6111119 Report 9451977-1, 190546, cast on 5/12/19. FJS) 4/26/2019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator rip cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix. 2 6112/19 22 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Shaft, Bldg. F, 3rd The 28-day average compressive FJS Lift, South Wall strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Report 9456604-1. 190997, cast on 5/1412019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix. 3 6/26/19 24 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Ph. Bldg. F, Northeast The 28-day average compressive FJS Corner: 5M Lift strength of 2,490 psi did not meet the specked strength of 3,000 psi (UES Report 9457936.1, 19P148, cast on 5/21/2019). I The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Docs #1632149 This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 69 (1/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 8/5/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9473043-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1585 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: Jim Woods CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: 813-288-0008 FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Roof Sheathing LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building F, 301 Marbella Lane ELEVATION: Roof Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings O Approved Shop Drawings val V" U a3Z Notes rawings.. y r— Roof/Floor Truss I Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings-.,-,-,-- O 0 bTruss layout conforms to approved engineering package. t O O 10110 y ^a - Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. i a 06 O i ITrusses inspected undamaged. 0 O O " O Truss gusset plates undamaged._0 Q ®r-,,. Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. - a__ t O 7 _ ® J uss plate provided for bearing on CMU x. .._ _ _ ,- _ I O O ' ® jContinuous lateral bracing properly spaced. 0_i O !0' Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. 1 1 O I Mechanical connections properly installed. 1 _ 1 O ' O " O i Mechanical connections properly nailed.- -_ s O ( O ®}__ i ,1 _ , u i Fastener used complystructural drawings. " O 1 O 0 1; Y with Overbuilt areas properly fastened. - _ a . O '_ O t ® .'- Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. - ur O_®_. Y Foundation sole plate is properly fastened__ O q j O ®j_ Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. . ! O i O " 0;. O1 Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. _ —" 1 O1 r~® r Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O ` O _p ®1 O Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing O O) 0 1 _ tSheathing inspected undamaged. 0 i i Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and 'H" clip. 1 O 1 O r0 1 Sheathing edges properly blocked. _ _ O d + ®' O Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings.. 0 1 , O ®. CLP installed at specified locations - —_... . _.. i a ; 0 01 O C_LP has specified plate washer size/thickness. O . 0 i CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack`_ 0 C 7 O l ® ICLP diameter per approved drawings. 1 .010 0. SStuds are proper size/spacing. 1 Load bearing O a " ®: hear 10 ®, art wall studsarepropersize/spacing u 1 1 Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. r,_ _ , f- O Oiy 0 [ 0 ; ITop plate properly spliced. `. O O _O (®, ITop and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. O 1 1 0 j ®l _ b Top floor headers have proper size/beanng. O ; ®' 4__._. __ _. .. _ _._:... .. _: _._. _...-... _c. c;____... -. . -. c i.:--- Headers strapped per structural drawings. r. _--sR. 1}r..•.r a .. ._i._ar. _-- .ti a c-= _. .. t Ry0 _ r Jack -King jacks installed_ per structural drawings. r ` ri Ol f 0 0 Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances_ i O ` O ®,_ Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. O j 1 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES ® NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES 113 FIELD COPIESTO: K.Honea, D.Phillips Consultants in: Geotechnical [ nglneering - [nvironmentai Sciencas Ceophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Wan Review WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 70 11/21 PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 8/6/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9474218-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1581 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Framing LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building B, 701 Marbella Lane - Bathrooms ELEVATION: Level 3, 4 Inspection was performed by: ® Contract Drawin s O Approved Shop Drawings c E is 8 8 Z Notes Roof/Floor Truss! Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. ; O ®t Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package_. _ ? 0 1 0'! 0; ® K ITuuss orientation conforms to engineering package. O , O M O f Trusses inspected undamaged. 0(0, Truss gusset plates undamaged. 0 0 ;: O . 0 , Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. O 1 O 01 Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. r C O : i Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced ^ " O 1 0_I.0_ ® _ ._ -_ _ _ _ . _. •- . _ .. Mechanical connections conform to uplift value q ' O i ®1 O A Mechanical connections properly installed. 01 ®1 O Mechanical connections properly nailed. • ` T ., 0,00 ® O Fastener used comply with structural drawings. a 0 ; O 0 ; Overbuilt areas properly fastened. O 1_0T_ ®.i. Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. O ' EIO • 0: i Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. O ! O O Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O ; 0 1 G3. I Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O i O O 0 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O ! O O 1 0 - Sh_ eathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. 010 01 O 1 Ea Sheathing inspected undamaged. f 1.. 0 O i O ® Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" clip. y0 ; O 0, R 0. 1 O 1 O Y ® Sheathingedgesproperlyblocked. —ow'- ed. Continuousloadpath (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved draw ings. ; O ! O " ® - CLIP installed at specified locations. i t_O 1 0. CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. — V i O 0 A ®Y CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O 1 O ( 13 CLIP diameter per approved drawings. C i 1 0 i . R Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. r' O I O O Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. _ ® O Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. 1 0 0 ' ®: 0 Top plate properly spliced.. . 0 O 0 .P-- u _ _ s'- Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. I O i O® Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. O O 0: o Headers strapped per structural drawings. O l O ' 0 ' 0. Jack - King jacks installed per structural drawings. z t + O O ,0. Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. 0 T: ® ISO I Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. O O NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES ® NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES EDsFIELDCOPIESTO: Kent Honea, Donnie Phillips consultants In: GQOmchnical C•ngineadng - Gnvironmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building code Administration. Compliance inspection & Wan lieview WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 70 (2/2) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation DATE: 8/6/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9474218-2 BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1584 FIELD CONTACT: FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Continuous Load Path Rods LOCATIONIGRID LINES: Building E, 401 Marbella Lane ELEVATION: Level 1 Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings v c d E d (3 c3 Z Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. O O Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. O O Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O Trusses inspected undamaged. O O Truss gusset plates undamaged. O O 0. Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. O O Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. O O O Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. O O O Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. O O O Mechanical connections properly installed. O Mechanical connections properly nailed. 1 O 010 Fastener used comply with structural drawings. O Overbuilt areas properly fastened. O O O Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. O O O Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. O O 0. Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O O Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. 131 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O O Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. O O Sheathing inspected undamaged. O O O 0. Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" clip. O O O 01 Sheathing edges properly blocked. Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. 0 O O O Embed holes filled with water. CLP installed at specified locations. O O CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. O O O CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O O O 0. CLP diameter per approved drawings. O O O Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. O 0 Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. O O Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. O O O Top plate properly spliced. 01 1 Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. O O O 01 Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. O O Headers strapped per structural drawings. O Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. O O Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O O Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. i O O 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED 0 DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) 0 IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? 0 YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw FIELD COPIES TO: Kent Honea, Donnnie Phillips UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Gootochnical Erglneering • Environmenu.1 Sclencos Ceophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspectiona] Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Wan Iteview WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation DATE: 8/9/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9475879-1 BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1584 FIELD CONTACT: FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Continuous Load Path Rod (Re -Inspection) LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building E, 401 Marbella Lane - Embedment ELEVATION: Foundation Inspection was performed by: ® Contract Drawin s O Approved Shop Drawings c aV w a E a 88 8 z Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. O Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. O O O Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. Trusses inspected undamaged. O O O Truss gusset plates undamaged. O O O Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. 131 Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. O O Mechanical connections properly installed. O Mechanical connections properly nailed. O O O Fastener used comply with structural drawings. O O O Overbuilt areas properly fastened. O O Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. O O O Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. O O O Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O O Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. O O 0. Sheathing inspected undamaged. O O O Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" clip. O Sheathing edges properly blocked. O O O Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. O CLP installed at specified locations. O CLP has specified plate washer sizetthickness. O O CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O O CLP diameter per approved drawings. O O Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. O O O Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. O O O 0. Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. O O O 01 Top plate properly spliced. O O O Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. O O O Headers strapped per structural drawings. O O Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. O Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O1 O1Ledgersareproperdimensions/fastened per plans. O O 0101 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES ® NO COMMENTS: Re -inspected. THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw FIELD COPIES TO: K.Honea, D.Phillips UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotachnlcal Engineadng • Gnvironmantal Sciances Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Wan Review UNIVERSAL LOCATIONS: Atlanta Daytona Beach93ENGINEERINGSCIENCESFortMyers Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Fort Pierce GainesvilleGeophysnZServices - Construction Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Jacksonville Building Inspection - Plan Review - Building Code Administration Miami August 7, 2019 Ocala Orlando (Headquarters) City of Sanford Palm Coast PO Box 1788 Panama City Pensacola Sanford, Florida 32772 Rockledge Samsom Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official St. Petersburg Tamps Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments Tifton 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 West Nina Beach Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 UES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 28 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of July 15, 2019 through July 21, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of July 15, 2019 through July 21, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 This item has been n.,,,•,,,:,,,, electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmaker, using a 2019.0 V . 1 4 Digital Signature. Printed " 3 a copies odocument are not 12 : 44 : 21 -04' 00' considerededsignedandsealedhrrllrl!! e't '• Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 FJS/ dkn Special Inspector No. 907 City of Sanford Aldrich, Dave dave.aklrich@wnfordfl.gov City of Sanford Antonini, Lisa Lisa.Antonini@Sanfordfl.gov The Spares Corporation Woods, Jim jwoods@agspanos com The Spanos Corporation Gillespie, Hardy hgdlespie a spans corn The Spanos Corporation Jensen, Chuck cjensen@agspanmcom The Spanos Corporation Homea, Kent thomea@agspanos com CPH, Inc. (Corporate) Boyles, Inane iboyles@cphcorp•com Lee Crest Lee Crest jo.leegmup320@gmaiLcom Kephart Garland, Jesse jessegQkepharLcom Kephart Campbell, Paul paulc@kephartcom 3532 Maggie Blvd. - Orlando, FI 32811 • (407) 423-0504 - (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO.28 Addressee: City of Sanford Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: August 7, 2019 PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. SP.EC•,IALjINSPECirdO.N iLOG: Added This Summary Period: 0 Resolved This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): 1 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: I to 2 fTAILV REPt]'RT,R- Daily Report No. Inspection Date Inspector(s) Re orts No. of Pa es Page No s 62 7/15/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 4 to 4 63 7/19/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 5 to 5 Total Number of Pages This Summary: 5 For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG Permitting Agency: City of Sanford Project Name: Lake Monroe Apartments pdate Period: 7/15/19-7/21/19 Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich lCity/State/Zip: Project Address: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard kojectPermitNo.: See Below) Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1SSo Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1S83 Building F 17-1585 SIL No. Date SUM No Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location a Description S.I. Engineer of Record Response 2S.1. Date Closed SUM No. 1 5/24/19 20 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Northeast Corner of Elevator The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 6/12/19 22 FJS) Rev.- Pit, 2nd Lift strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with Rev. 22 specked strength of 3,000 psi (UES Advanced Structural Design on 6111119 Report 9451977-1, 190546, cast on 5/12/19. FJS) 4/26/2019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix. 2 6/12/19 22 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Shaft, Bldg. F. 3rd The 28-day average compressive FJS Lift, South Wall strength of 2.640 psi did not meet the specked strength of 3,000 psi (LIES Report 9456604-1. 190997, cast on 5/14/2019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix. 3 626/19 24 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Pk, Bldg. F, Northeast The 28-day average compressive FJS Corner: 9h Lift strength of 2,490 psi did not meet the specked strength of 3,000 psi (LIES Report 9457936-1, 19P748, cast on 5/21/2019). The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. 2The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Docs #1632149 1This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS s12 11 /11 PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 7/15/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9468257-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1583/1585 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: Jim Woods CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: 813-288-0008 FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: 1) Continuous Load Path Rod 2) Sheathing LOCATION/GRID LINES: 1) Building 0, 501 Marbella Lane: Embed 2) Building F, 301 Marbella Lane: Floor ELEVATION: 1) Foundation 2) Level 4 Inspection was performed by: ® Contract Drawin s Approved Shop Drawings va, d a E 8 Q z Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. O Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O Trusses inspected undamaged. O O Truss gusset plates undamaged. O Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. O O Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. O Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. O Mechanical connections properly installed. O Mechanical connections properly nailed. Fastener used comply with structural drawings. O Overbuilt areas properly fastened. O O O Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. O O O 121 Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O O O Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. O O 0 Sheathing inspected undamaged. O O 0 Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" clip. O O O Sheathing edges properly blocked. O 0 O Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. CLP installed at specified locations. O CLP has specified plate washer sizetthickness. 0 CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack O O O CLP diameter per approved drawings. O O O Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. O Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. O O O Shear wallAoad bearing walls properly blocked. O O O Top plate properly spliced. Top and bottom plate property nailed per structural drawings. O O Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. O O O Headers strapped per structural drawings. O O Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. O O O Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O O . O Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. O O O NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES ® NO COMMENTS: UNIVERSALTHRESHOLDINSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw ED ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO Kent Honea Consultants In: GootoUmical Cngindwing • CmAronmental Sciences C:eophysical Services • Materials 'resting - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Wan Review WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 63 (1/11 PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 7/19/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9470232-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1585 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Sheathing LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building F, 301 Marbella Lane: Exterior Walls ELEVATION: Level 1, 2, One -Half 3 Inspection was performed by: ® Contract Drawin s O Approved Shop Drawings E d 8 8 z Notes Roof/Floor Truss. Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. O Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O Trusses inspected undamaged. O Truss gusset plates undamaged. Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. O Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. O O O Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. Mechanical connections properly installed. Mechanical connections properly nailed. O Fastener used comply with structural drawings. Overbuilt areas properly fastened. Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. O Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. Sheathing nailing type/pattem per structural drawing. O O O Sheathing inspected undamaged. Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and ••H•• clip. O O O . Sheathing edges properly blocked. O Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. O CLIP installed at specified locations. O CLIP has specified plate washer sizefthickness. O CLIP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O O CLIP diameter per approved drawings. Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. O O ' O Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. O O O , Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. O O Top plate properly spliced O Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. O O O Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. Headers strapped per structural drawings. O O . Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. O O NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES ® NO COMMENTS: UNIVERSALTHRESHOLDINSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw EDBuildingENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TOKent HOnea consultants Im Goorodviical6ngirweting • cnvitonmental 5cionce: Geophysical Services • Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Code Administration, Compliance Inspection &Wan Iteview UNIVERSAL LOCtlantaAtlanta Daytona Beach ENGINEERING SCIENCES Fort Myers Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Fort Pierce vdk MaterialsTesting • Threshold InspectionGeophysicalServices • ConstructionJackso acksonville Building Inspection • Plan Review • Building Code Administration Miami August 12, 2019 Ocala Orlando (Headquarters) City of Sanford Palm Coast PO Box 1788 Panama city Pensacola Sanford, Florida 32772 Rockledge Samsom Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official St. Petersburg Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments Tifton 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 West Palm Beach Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 LIES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 30 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of July 29, 2019 through August 4, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the "Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of July 29, 2019 through August 4, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 This item has been twuuraa,, electronically signed and sealed QbyFredJ. Sehmalzer, using a `4'`9't'"e P -` 2 01 V( • 0 V • 1 4 Digital Signature. Printed " .3 B copies ofs document are not 12 :43 : 32 -04' 00' consideredredsigned and sealed Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 FJS/ dkn Special Inspector No. 907 City of Sanford Aldrich, Dave dave.aWrichOwnfordfl.gov City of Sanford Antonini, Lisa Lisa.Antonini®Sanfordfl.gov The Spanos Corporation Woods, Jim jwoods@agspanos.com The Spanos Corporation Gillespie, Hardy hgiflespie(Daagspanos.com The Spanos Corporation Jensen, Chuck cjensen@agspanos.com The Spanos Corporation Homea, Kent thomea@agspanos.com CPH, Inc. (Corporate) Boyles, Irene iboyks@cphcorp.com Lee Crest Lee Crest jo."mup320@gmail.com Kephart Garland, Jesse jesseg@kephart.com Kephart Campbell, Paul paulc(kepharLeom 3532 Maggie Blvd. • Orlando, FI 32811 • (407) 423-0504 • (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: August 12, 2019 THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO.30 Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B I 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and.observations. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG: Added This Summary Period: 0 Resolved This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): I Sheet(s) Page No(s).: to DAILY. REPORTS - Daily Report No. Inspection Date Inspector(s) Re orts No. of Pages Page No s . 68 8/1/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 4 to 4 Total Number of Pages This Summary: - 4 For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG SIL No. Date SUM No Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location aDescription S.I. Engineer of Record Response S.I. Date Closed SUM No. 1 5/24119 20 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Northeast Comer of Elevator The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 6/12/19 22 FJS) Rev: Pk, 2"d Lift strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with Rev. 22 specked strength of 3,000 psi (UES Advanced Structural Design on 6111119 Report 9451977-1, 190546, cast on 5/12/19. FJS) 4/26/2019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator fip cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix. 2 6/12/19 22 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Shaft, Bldg. F, 3rd The 2"ay average compressive FJS Lift, South Wall strength of 2.640 psi did not meet the specked strength of 3,000 psi (UES Report 9456604-1, 190997, cast on 5/1412019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix. 3 6/26/19 24 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Pit, Bldg. F, Northeast The 28-day average compressive FJS Corner: 51" Lift strength of 2,490 psi did not meet the specked strength of 3.000 psi (LIES Report 9457936-1, 19P148, cast on 5/21/2019). The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. 2T Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Does #1632149 This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 6811/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 8/1/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9472646-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1585 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Wall Sheathng LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building F, 301 Marbella Lane ELEVATION: Levels 3, 4 Inspection was performed by: M Contract Drawings O Approved Shop Drawings N U E ag88Z Notes Roof/Floor Truss *Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O Trusses inspected undamaged. O O Truss gusset plates undamaged. O O Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. O O ' Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. O 21 Continuous lateral bracing property spaced. O Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. Mechanical connections properly installed. O O O Mechanical connections properly nailed. O Fastener used comply with structural drawings. O O O Overbuilt areas properly fastened. O O O Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. O Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O O Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. O O O Sheathing inspected undamaged. Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" clip. Sheathing edges properly blocked. O O O Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. CLP installed at specified locations. O O CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. O O O CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. CLP diameter per approved drawings. Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. O O O Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. O O Shear walUload bearing walls properly blocked. O Top plate properly spliced. O Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. O O O Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. O Headers strapped per structural drawings. O Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. O Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above rotes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? 0 YES ® NO COMMENTS: UNIVERSALTHRESHOLDINSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw 113 ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO: Kent Honea, Donnie Phillips Consultants Im Gootoumdcal Engineering • Cnvitonmental Sciences C:eophysical Services • Materials resting • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Nan Review UNIVERSAL LOCATIONS: Atlanta Daytona Beach93ENGINEERINGSCIENCESFortMyers Consultants in: Geotechnkal Engineering • Environmental Sciences Fort Pierce Geophysical Services • Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Jacksonville Jacksonville Building Inspection • Plan Review • Building Code Administration Miami August 12, 2019 Ocala Orlando (Headquarters) City of Sanford Palm Coast PO Box 1788 Panamala PensacolaSanford, Florida 32772 Rockledge Sarasota Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official St. Petersburg Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments Titlon 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 West Palm Beach Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 LIES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 29 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of July 22, 2019 through July 28, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of July 22, 2019 through July 28, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmaller, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. FJS/ dkn City of Sanford Aldrich, Dave City of Sanford Antonini, Lisa The Spanos Corporation Woods, Jim The Spanos Corporation Gillespie, Hardy The Spanos Corporation Jensen, Chuck The Spanos Corporation Homea, Kent CPH, Inc. (Corporate) Boyles, Irene Lee Crest Lee Crest Kephart Garland, Jesse Kephart Campbell, Paul Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 oa,. uw:rrr1n,, scHMa 2019. 08.14 1 1 12:43:54 -04 00 dave. aldrkh@wnfordfl.gov Lisa. Antanini@San(brdfl.gov jrvoods@agspanos. com hgiOespie@agspanos. com cjensen@agspanos. com thomea@agspanos. com iboylna@cphcorp. com jo. keg mu p320@g mai I. com jesseg6kephart. com paulc@kephart. com Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. • Orlando, FI 32811 - (407) 423-0504 • (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO.29 Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: August 12, 2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. SPECYAPINSPECTIONarLO;G: Added This Summary Period: 0 Resolved This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): j, Sheet(s) Page No(s).: to 2 DAILY REPOR:TS: Daily Report No. Inspeabon Date Inspector(s) Reports No. of Pages Page Nos. 64 7/22/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 4 to 4 65 7/23/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 5 to 5 66 7/24/2019 1 Michael Felshaw 1 6 to 6 67 7/26/2019 1 Michael Felshaw 1 7 to 7 Total Number of Pages This Summary: 7 For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, end ourselves, our reports are submilted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingfy, authorization for reliance upon, or publkation of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG SIL No. Date SUM No Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location aDescription S.I. Engineer of Record Response 2S.1. Date Closed SUM No. 1 5/24/19 20 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Northeast Comer of Elevator The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 6/12/19 22 FJS) Rev: Pit, 2"d Lift strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with Rev. 22 specked strength of 3,000 psi (LIES Advanced Structural Design on 611119 Report 9451977-1, 190546, cast on 5/12/19. FJS) 4/26/2019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator rM cells. Gnwt should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix 2 6/12/19 22 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Shaft, Bldg. F. 3rd The 28-day average compressive FJS Lift, South Wall strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the specked strength of 3,000 psi (LIES Report 9456604-1, 190997, cast on 5/14/2019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix. 3 6/26/19 24 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Pit, Bldg. F, Northeast The 28-day average compressive FJS Corner: 9h Lift strength of 2.490 psi did not meet the specked strength of 3.000 psi (LIES Report 9457936-1, 1915148, cast on 5/21/2019). The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. 2The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. rocs #1632149 This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 64 f1/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 7/22/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9470550-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1581 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: Jim Woods CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: 813-288-0008 FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Truss LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building B, 701 Marbella Lane -Balconies ELEVATION: Levels 1, 2, 3, 4 Inspection was performed by: ® Contract Drawin s O Approved Shop Drawings c m E is 8 8 gZ Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. O O Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. Trusses inspected undamaged. O O O Truss gusset plates undamaged. O Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. O O Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. O O Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. O O O Mechanical connections properly installed. O O Mechanical connections properly nailed. O O O Fastener used comply with structural drawings. Overbuilt areas property fastened. O O Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O O O Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. O Sheathing inspected undamaged. O Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" clip. O 0. Sheathing edges properly blocked. O Continuous load path (CLP). (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. O O O CLIP installed at specified locations. CLIP has specified plate washer size/thickness. O O O CLIP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack_ . O CLIP diameter per approved drawings. Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. O O Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. Top plate properly spliced. ' O O O Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. O Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. O O O Headers strapped per structural drawings. Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. O O O Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O O ; Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. O O O Fasteners -One omitted at each stud. O NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED ® DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? ® YES O NO COMMENTS: UNIVERSALTHRESHOLDINSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw ED ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO: Kent Honea Consultants In: G000tcimical Englnoering • Givironmaital Sciencos Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Wan Review WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 65 (1/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 7/23/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9471093-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1581 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Truss (Re -Inspection) LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building B, 701 Marbella Lane -Balconies ELEVATION: Levels 1, 2, 3 Inspection was performed by: ® Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings c vw m w a E a' 3 Z Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. O O Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. O Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. Trusses inspected undamaged. Truss gusset plates undamaged. O O Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. O Truss plate provided for bearing on CMIJ. Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. O O O Mechanical connections properly installed. Mechanical connections properly nailed. O Fastener used comply with structural drawings. O Overbuilt areas properly fastened. Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. O O Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O O Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. Sheathing inspected undamaged. Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" clip. Sheathing edges properly blocked. O O Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. O O O CLIP installed at specified locations. CLIP has specified plate washer size/thickness. CLIP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O O CLIP diameter per approved drawings. O O O Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. O O Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. O Top plate properly spliced. Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. O Top floor headers have proper size/beanng. O O Headers strapped per structural drawings. O O Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. O Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. O NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES ® NO COMMENTS: Re -inspection U P4' V E R S A LTHRESHOLDINSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw I]] ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO • T.Honea Consultants In: Gootachnical Enginewing • Gwlronmontal Sclancos Geophysical Services • Materiels Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Wan Review WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 66 /1/11 PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 7/24/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9471119-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1584 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Sheathing LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building E, 401 Marbella Lane -Walls ELEVATION: Level 3, 4 Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings O Approved Shop Drawin s C vW NN W w C1 a E Q 8 Z Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. O O 0 Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. O O 0 Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O O O 0 Trusses inspected undamaged. O O O 0 Truss gusset plates undamaged. O O 0 Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. 0 Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. O O 0 Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. O O O 0 Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. O O 0 Mechanical connections properly installed. O 0 Mechanical connections properly nailed. 0 Fastener used comply with structural drawings. O O 0 0 Overbuilt areas properly fastened. O 0 Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. O O O 0 Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. O O O 0 Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O 0 Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O O 0 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O O 0 Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. O 0 Sheathing inspected undamaged. O O 0 O Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" clip. 0 Sheathing edges properly blocked. O O 0 Continuous load path (CLP). (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. O O O 0 CLIP installed at specified locations. O O 0 CLIP has specified plate washer size/thickness. O O O 0 CLIP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O O O 0 CLIP diameter per approved drawings. 0` Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. O 0 Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. O O O 0 Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. O O 0 Top plate properly spliced. O O O 0 Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. O O 0 Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. O 0 Headers strapped per structural drawings. O O 0 Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. O O 0 Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O . 0 Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. O O 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? 0 YES ® NO COMMENTS: UNIVERSALTHRESHOLDINSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw ED ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO: Kent Honea, Donnie Philli Sp Consultants In: Geomcnnical Engineering • Gtvlronmental Sciences Geophyslcal Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Nan Review WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 67 (1/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 7/26/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9471593-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1584 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Sheathing LOCATIONIGRID LINES: Building E, 401 Marbella Lane -Roof ELEVATION: Roof Inspection was performed by: ® Contract Drawings O Approved Shop Drawin s c vw A v' E a g 3 z Notes Roof/Floor Truss • Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. O Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O O O Trusses inspected undamaged. Truss gusset plates undamaged. O O O Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. O Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. O O Mechanical connections properly installed. Mechanical connections properly nailed. O O O Fastener used comply with structural drawings. O O O Overbuilt areas properly fastened. Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. O O O Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. O Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O O Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. O O O Sheathing inspected undamaged. O O O Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" clip. O O Sheathing edges property blocked. O Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. O CLP installed at specified locations. O CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. O CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O O O CLP diameter per approved drawings. O O Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. _ O O O Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. Top plate properly spliced. Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. O O fil Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. Headers strapped per structural drawings. Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. O Ea Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. O NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES ® NO COMMENTS: UNIVERSALTHRESHOLDINSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw ENGINEERING SCIENCES sFIELDCOPIESTO: Kent Honea, Donnie Phillips Consultants ImGootodinicarEnglnooring • Gwn iromatalSciances Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Wan Review LOCATIONS: UNIVERSAL Atlanta Daytona Beach91ENGINEERINGSCIENCESFortMyers Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Fort Pierce Gainesville GeophyZi Services • Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Jacksonville Jacksonville Building Inspection • Plan Review • Building Code Administration Miami August 23, 2019 Ocala Orlando (Headquarters) City of Sanford Pain Coast PO Box 1788 PenCity Penssacac ola Sanford, Florida 32772 Rockledge Sarasota Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official St. Petersburg Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments Tifton 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 West Palm Beach Building A/ Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 UES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 32 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of August 12, 2019 through August 18, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the "Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log ( SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of August 12, 2019 through August 18, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmaker, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. FJS/dkn City of Sanford Aldrich, Dave City of Sanford Antonini, Lisa The Spanos Corporation Woods, Jim The Spanos Corporation Gillespie, Hardy The Spanos Corporation Jensen, Chuck The Spanos Corporation Homea, Kent CPH,Inc. ( Corporate) Boyles, Irene Lee Crest Lee Crest Kephart Garland, Jesse Kephart Campbell, Paul Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 O`ttplllll: fr/,4 2019.08. 30 utE a 1 11:04:07 -041 00 44iiiin 1Qiif1„. dor our::a• dave.ald rich4punfordfl.gov Lisa.AntoniniaSanfordfl. gov jwoods@agspanos.com hg illespietij> agspanos.com cjenseneagspa nos. com thomea0agspanos corn iboyles@cphuup.com jo.L- Nroup320@gmaii.com jesseg@kephartcom paulc@kephartcom Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. • Orlando, FI 32811 • (407) 423-0504 • (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO.32 Addressee: City of Sanford Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: August 23, 2019 PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. SPEC I INSPECrTIOvN fLO,G:;.. Added This Summary Period: 0 Resolved This Summary Period: 2 Outstanding For The Project: 0 SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): 1 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: 3 to SPECIAL INSPECTION SUMMARY: 3 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: 4 to rk D AIL YAREPOR TSt:•; Daily Report No. Inspection Date Inspector(s) Reports No. of Pages Page No(s). 72 8/13/2019 Gary Passmore 2 7 to 8 73 8/15/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 9 to 9 Total Number of Pages This Summary: ^'`'9`-_ For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG Permitting Agency: City of Sanford Project Name: Lake Monroe Apartments Update Period: 8/12/19-8/18/19 Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich Project Address: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard Permit No.: See Below) it /State2i : City/St., Sanford Seminole County, Florida 32771 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Buildin B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 SIL No. Date SUM No Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location 3 Description S.I. Engineer of Record Response S.I. Date Closed SUM No. 1 5/24/19 20 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Northeast Corner of Elevator The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 6/12/19 22 FJS) Rev.- Pit, 2" d Lift strength of 2,640 psi did rat meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with Rev. 22 specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Advanced Structural Design on 6 f f/19 Report 9451977-1, 190546, cast on 6/12119. FJS) 4/2612019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix. 2 6112/19 22 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Shaft, Bldg. F, 3rd The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 8/16/19 32 Lift, South Wall strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with specked strength of 3,000 psi (LIES Advanced Structural Design on Report 9456604-1, 190997, cast on 6112/19. 5/14/2019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix. 3 6/26/19 24 F 17-1565 Cell Fill Elevator Pit, Bldg. F, Northeast The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 8/16/19 32 Corner: P Lift strength of 2,490 psi did not meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with specified strength of 3,000 psi (LIES Advanced Structural Design on Report 9457936-1, 19P148, cast on 6/12/19. 5/21 /2019). The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. 2The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Docs #1632149 This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 72 (1 /2) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation DATE: 8/13/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9476396-1 BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1581 FIELD CONTACT: FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Roof Truss (Re -inspection) LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building B, 701 Marbella Lane ELEVATION: Roof Level Inspection was performed by: ® Contract Drawin s O Approved Shop Drawings v c ar QQ EE Z NotesV3Q Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. O Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. O Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O Trusses inspected undamaged. Truss gusset plates undamaged. O O 0.0. Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. O O O Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. O Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. Mechanical connections properly installed. Mechanical connections properly nailed. Fastener used comply with structural drawings. Overbuilt areas properly fastened. O O Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. O Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. O O 0. Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O O Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O O Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. O O O Sheathing inspected undamaged. 0. Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" clip. O O Sheathing edges properly blocked. O Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. CLP installed at specified locations. CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. O O CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O O CLP diameter per approved drawings. O O Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. O O O Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. O O O 0. Shear walUload bearing walls properly blocked. O O O 01 Top plate properly spliced. O O Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. O O O Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. O O Headers strapped per structural drawings. O O Jack -ling jacks installed per structural drawings. O O Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O O O Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. O O O NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES ® NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Gary Passmore FIELD COPIES TO: S p an0 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES consultantsin: GeumchnicalC"Ineering•Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection a] Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Wan iieview WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 72 (2/21 PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 8/13/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9476396-2 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1582 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Balcony Truss LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building C, 601 Martiella Lane ELEVATION: Levels 2, 3 & 4 Ins ection was performed by: M Contract Drawings O Approved Shop Drawings v c d d •a E d $ 3 Z Notes poor_-_— ,.—_-_,:_... ,a_.----.—,.o-,_<.._— Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. Truss orientation conforms to engineering package.- O { MI 0; O I l"®' 1 1 Trusses inspected undamaged f ._.._,.. , ____._ _..___ _. , _ _ O OITrussgussetplatesundamaged. i ` O { M ! O s Truss inspected to have minimum_ bearing. _- d _ O ®I O _ .. _._ __ . - . __ __ Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. O O I O A dContinuous lateral bracing properly spaced - i O O i O { ® ' Mechanical connections conform to uplift value 4 i 0 • Mechanical connections properly installed. 1 13, 13, ®• t Mechanical connections property Walled _ I O O ! ® O _ OFastenerusedcomplywithstructuraldrawings O . 01 O 1lOvenbuittareasproperlyfastened. Wood Framing )_Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. O 1 O O Foundation sole plate is properly fastened_ 1 O ! I Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O : O r O y- ° • - - -----__ -.-_.. tip..... -_prop_ _ . I Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness O O 10 10. Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. 1 O t O O { k_.... ... _,. - ._.. - - ....._ _ .. Sheathing inspected undamaged. _ _ _ _ ' j O ` 1 ®, Roof Sheathing installed inch and "H" clip. - , OO 0, wtih_0.125 gap Sheathing edges properly blocked. ..` in01010,121, rope looped. _ -- ..- -_.. — < _. _—.. __ -__ Continuous load path (CLP) (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. O_O O ®' - iCLP installed at specified locations O O ® i CLP has specified plate washer sizetthickness. i i installed with minimum distance allowed from stud O x O ®I ELFpack. OHO ® LCLP diameterperapproveddrawingsShearStuds are proper size/spacing._ v-0 1 O i { m l Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing i Shearwall/load bearing walls properly blocked. O I ` 0_,® ; Top plate properly spliced. 1 -- O 1 O 1 81 Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings.---1210 O ®, Top floor headers have proper size/bearing; joy 0 1 0 I 13 a .._.. _.-<...__...—_--__prop-.._. Headers strapped per structural drawings. O O j O : ® . Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. a : O r Y... .:. _ y i Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O O • I Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. i ; .®R0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES ® NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Gary Passmore UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES ED FIELD COPIESTO: S an0 p Consultants ImGeotachnicalGooualnring • Cnvironmental5deneAs Geophysical Services - MaterialsTesting • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Wan Review WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation DATE: 8/15/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9477056-1 BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1581 FIELD CONTACT: FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Floor Truss LOCATIONIGRID LINES: Building B ELEVATION: Level 3 Inspection was performed by: ® Contract Drawin s Approved Shop Drawings c m w E aZ Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. O O Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O O Trusses inspected undamaged. O Truss gusset plates undamaged. Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. O Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. 01 1 O Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. O 1 1 ® Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. O Mechanical connections properly installed. O O O Mechanical connections properly nailed. Fastener used comply with structural drawings. O O Overbuilt areas property fastened. Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. O O Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O O 0. Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O O Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. O O Sheathing inspected undamaged. O Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and ••H•• clip. O O Sheathing edges properly blocked. O Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. CLP installed at specified locations. O O CLP has specified plate washer sizetthickness. O fa CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O O 0. CLP diameter per approved drawings. O O Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. O O Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. O Top plate properly spliced. O O O 0. Top and bottom plate property nailed per structural drawings. O Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. O Headers strapped per structural drawings. O O O Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. O O O Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. O O O NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES ® NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw FIELD COPIES TO: K.HOnea,D.Philli Sp UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES consultants ln:GeotQchnicalengineering •EnvironmantalSciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection EDBuildingcodeAdministration, compliance Inspecdon & Wan Hevlew t Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Buildina Inspection • Plan Review • Buildina Code Administration SPECIAL INSPECTION LIST (SIL) ITEMS SUMMARY NO. 32 Items Recorded from 8-12-19 to 8-18-19) Special Inspection Summary List - Page 1 of 1- Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 SIL NO. 2 6 3 (RESOLVED) — Inspector Michael Felshaw, Observed On 8116119 Description: Resolved per correspondence from John M. Elailes, P.E. with Advanced Structural Design on 6/12/19. Attachments: Email (2 Pages) For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. 3532 Maggie Blvd. • Orlando, FI 32811 • (407) 423-0504 • (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com SILs 2 & 3 Attachments (1/2) Dawn Naylor Subject: FW: The Spanos Corporation ---Low 28 Day From: John Bailes<Iohnbailes@advancedstructuraldesien.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 10:10 AM To: 'Wayne Gonzalez' <WGonzalez@universaleneineerine.com>; 'Arthur D. Love'<alove@universaleneineerine.com>; Rick Wood <rwood(@aespanos.com>; '{Paul Campbell at Kephart - Architect of Record)' <paulc@kephart.com>; dave.aldrich @sanfordfl.eov <dave.aldrich@sanfordfl.eov>; '(Jesse Garland at Kephart - Architect of Record)' iessee@kephart. com>; '( Lee Crest - Site Contractor)' <0o.leeeroup320@email.com>; lisa.antonini@sanfordfl.eov lisa. antonini@sanfordfl.eov>; Thomas Honea <thonea@aespanos.com>; Donnie Phillips <dphillips@aespanos.com>; ibovles@cphcorp. com <iboyles@cphcorp.com>; Jim Woods <iwoods@aespanos.com> Cc:' Darwing J. Lopez'<DLLopez@universaleneineerine.com>;'Manuel Irizarry'<mirizarrv@universaleneineerine.com>; Fred J. Schmalzer'<FSCHMALZER@universaleneineerine.com>; 'Dawn Naylor'<dnaylor@universaleneineerine.com>; Rosie Housein'<rhousein@universaleneineerine.com> Subject: RE: The Spanos Corporation --Low 28 Day Sounds good. Cell fill is acceptable to me. John M. Bailes, PE, Vice President Advanced Structural Design Inc. MBE, LDB, DBE 1035 South Semoran Blvd., Suite 1019 Winter Park, Florida 32792 Tel 407-677-5836 Fax 407-677-5894 Cell 407-595-3718 www. Advanced5tructuraIDesien.com From: Wayne Gonzalez fmailto:WGonzalez@universaleneineerine.coml Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 10:06 AM To: Arthur D. Love; Rick Wood; (Paul Campbell at Kephart - Architect of Record); dave.aIdrich CMsanfordfl.eov: {Jesse Garland at Kephart - Architect of Record); ( Lee Crest - Site Contractor); lisa.antonini@sanfordfl.eov; Thomas Honea; Donnie Phillips; ibovles@cphcorp.com: Jim Woods Cc: Darwing J. Lopez; Manuel Irizarry; Fred J. Schmalzer; Dawn Naylor; Rosie Housein; Bailes John Subject: Re: The Spanos Corporation --Low 28 Day All floors were filled with no voids. Building F 1 st4th levels. Wayne Gonzalez Threshold Inspector Universal Engineering Sciences 3532 Maggie Boulevard Orlando, FL 32811 Cell: 321- 287-1537 Dispatch: 407- 422-8378 From: Jim Woods <*woods@aespanos.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 8:48:28 AM To: Arthur D. Love; Rick Wood; {Paul Campbell at Kephart - Architect of Record); dave.aldrich@sanfordfl.eov; {Jesse UESPrUNIVERSALDaaTypedt No.: Augu t 29, 201g 00 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (LIES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. I Date I Type of Report 9477672-1 1 08/19/20191 Grout Prism Test Specimens Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (1) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 SCFIMq ii, 2019.08.3 36 F: 011:14:18 TA'I13 O jA-,v``' ` 1„,,, ..' - 04 0 0 Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This Item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universals clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports ere submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2016 000UNIVERSALProjectNo: 94776 2-1 CT.0819ReportNo.: 9477672-1 CT 081919 WorkorderNo.: 9477672 ENGINEERING SCIENCES `ssu :' Oate 1 st Issue: August 28, 2019 Geolechnical Engineering I Facilities Consulting I Environmental Services91ConstructionMaterialsTestingandInspectionIBuildingCodeCompliance 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100. Tampa, FL US 92 8 West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL32771 33607 Structural Element: Cell Fill Sample Location: Dumpster Enclosure Walls, Compactor # 251 - Sampled at North Wall, Dumpster Enclosure Set#1 of 1 I Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Jorge L2 Rodriguez On 08/19/2019 At Lab On or Before: O8/26/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corporation Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 7.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 7.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 7.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 602 Time Batched: 10:11 AM Ticket No.: 1854958 Time Sampled: 11:39 AM Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: N/S Weather Condition: Sunny Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 9.75 inches 1 Ambient Temp: 88 °F I Concrete Temp: 85 °F Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Test XSect. Area (inj Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) Lab Tech 1 •G• 08/27/2019 8 5 3.51 3.40 E3.46 11.93 32.450 2.720 JMM 2•G• 09/16/2019 28 3•G' 09/16/2019 28 4•G• 09/16/2019 28 Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H-- Hold Cylinder 'D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable -'E'- Excluded From Average 'G'- Good Condition Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified only If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Note Test In compliance with approved plans and specifications Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used Teehnklans JMM I Jessica McNeese To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universals reports Is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in 1414 without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised March 2019 LOCATIONS: UNIVERSAL Atlanta Daytona Beach93ENGINEERINGSCIENCESFortMyers Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Fort Pierce Gainesville Geophysical Services - Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Jacksonville Building Inspection • Plan Review • Building Code Administration Miami September 30, 2019 Ocala Orlando (Headquarters) City of Sanford Pain Coast PO Box 1788 Panama City Pensacola Sanford, Florida 32772 Rockledge Sarasota Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official St. Petersburg Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments Tifton 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 WC3L Pale Beach Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 UES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 35 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of September 9, 2019 through September 15, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the "Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of September 9, 2019 through September 15, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmatzer, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies o/ this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. FJS/dkn City of Sanford Aldrich, Dave City of Sanford Antonini, Lisa The Spanos Corporation Woods, Jim The Spanos Corporation Gillespie, Hardy The Spanos Corporation Jensen, Chuck The Spanos Corporation Homea, Kent CPH, Inc. (Corporate) Boyles, Irene Lee Crest Lee Crest Kephart Garland, Jesse Kephart Campbell, Paul Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 C.`?} 2019.10.08 10:41.03-04'00' iinnuplOttJ,i dave.aldrich@sanfordfl.gov Lisa.Antonini(@Sanfordfl.gov jwoodsr@agWanos.com hg illespie@agspanos.com ciensen0agspanos.com thomea@agspanos.com iboyles@cphcorp.com jo. keg rou p320@g maiI. com jesseg@kepharLcom paulc@kephartcom Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. - Orlando, FI 32811 - (407) 423-0504 • (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO.35 Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: September 30, 2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. SPE:CIAL INSPEC T_el`ON LO;G' Added This Summary Period: 0 Resolved This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: 0 SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): .1 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: to 2 Daily Report No. Inspection Date In clots Reports No. of Pages Page N s. 78 9/10/2019 Michael Felshaw 2 4 to 5 Total Number of Pages This Summary:.; For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG Permitting Agency: City of Sanford Project Name: Lake Monroe Apartments I pdate Period: 919/19-9/15/19 Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich Project Address: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard Permit No.: See Below) City/State/Zip: Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 ro act No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17 1582 Building E 17-1584 Build) B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Build/ F 17-1SSS SIL No. Date SUM No. Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location Description S.I. Engineer of Record Response S.I. Date Closed SUM No. 1 5/24/19 20 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Northeast Comer of Elevator The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 6/12/19 22 FJS) Rev.- Pit, 2n° Lift strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with Rev. 22 specked strength of 3,000 psi (LIES Advanced Structural Design on 6/11/19 Report 9451977-1. 190546, cast on 6112119. FJS) 4/26/2019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix. 2 6/12/19 22 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Shaft, Bldg. F. 3rd The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 8/16119 32 Lift, South Wall strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with specked strength of 3,000 psi (UES Advanced Structural Design on Report 9456604-1, 190997, cast on 6/12/19. 5/1412019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix. 3 6/26/19 24 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Pk, Bldg. F, Northeast The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 8116119 32 Corner: 9h Lift strength of 2,490 psi did not meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Advanced Structural Design on Report 9457936-1, 19P148, cast on 6/12/19. 5/21/2019). IThe Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. ZThe Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Docs #1632149 This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 79 (1/2) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 9/10/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9690444-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1581 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: City of Sanford FIELD CONTACT: Jim Woods CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: 813-288-0008 FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Shear Wall LOCATIONIGRID LINES: Building B, 701 Marbella Lane ELEVATION: Level 1, 2 Inspection was Performed by: 0 Contract Drawings O Approved Shop Drawings c E z Notesg a Root/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. 0-0 Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. t 0 1 1 1 Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O 1 010 Trusses inspected undamaged. O O ' + Truss gusset plates undamaged. l7 } a Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. r.. ! 0 r O O S ® Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. OJ O '0-1-0 1 Continuous lateral bracing property spaced._ 0 1 O 0 1 0; Mechanical connections conform to uplift value.-- _ . 0 ® s_ _ - Y Mechanical connections properly installed. 0 ' O , 0 0' Mechanical connections properly nailed. O O ; 0 1 0 ' Fastener used comply with structural drawings. t 0 ® to Overbuilt areas properly fastened. 0 O . 0 ® . Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. 0! Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. _ - _ O O O t ®w Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. - f ' + ®, 1 Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness i 0 1 0 0 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing._ 0 Sheathing inspected undamaged. 0 ; ' 0 O I f Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and " H" clip.` _.. Roo O f r 0® _ -- _-+ _ ._ _. ~ Sheathing edges properly blocked. Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. 0 1 0 0 t CLP installed at specified locations. 1?: O s CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. - - t cknes 0., 0 '. CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O OJ 0 I 0 ' Tia;_ Shear p1 p ® Li;meter per approved drawings. Studs are proper size/spacing.- Oi0 :0 ., O Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. r y I O O l ® Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. O 1 O ® f JTop plate properly spliced. Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. i'O i 1 ®O O ®` O Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. O 0 j O Headers strapped per structural drawings. 1 O 0 Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. O_ 1 O ; ®_ i Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O 0 - ® .0k Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. O .:Q ` 0,0 O NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) 0 IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? 0 YES O NO COMMENTS: In -Progress. THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw UNIVERSALa] ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO: K.HOnea, O.Philli sp consultants in: Ceotochnicaltnginaaring •CmAronmentalSciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection ecBuildingcodeAdministration. Compliance Inspdon & Wan neNew WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 78 (2/2) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 9/10/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9690444-2 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1582 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: City of Sanford FIELD CONTACT: Jim Woods CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: 813-288-0008 FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: 1) Shear Wall 2) Truss LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building C, 601 Marbella Lane ELEVATION: 1) Level 1, 2 2) Roof Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawin s O Approved Shop Drawings v c GI al it v= Q a cg Z Roof/Floor Truss . Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. Notes 0 ' ` 0 O ' 4Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. O I 1 ®i O Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. 1 O j O ®' O ' Trusses inspected undamaged. 0 0 ' 0 _O_ Truss gusset plates undamaged. O' 0 1 0 O ITuuss inspected to have minimum bearing. s 0 " i . O :. 1 russ plate provided for bearing on CMU. O i O 1 ®f p Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. R O 1 O? 0 0-, Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. v O ' i Mechanical connections properly installed. 0 . O 0 r - Mechanical connections properly nailed. a _ I O I Fastener used comply with structural drawings. 1 , 0 O Overbuilt areas properly fastened. O 0 1 Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. O O i Foundation sole plate is properly fastened f : : Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness 4010,0101 i Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O ; O ' O hg Seat_hinorientationcomplywithstructuraldrawings. O; O ®', O,r_ Sheathing nailing type/pattem per structural drawing. 7 O + O I^ 0 Sheathing inspected undamaged. [3, 0 0 1 Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" clip. O O + 0 _ Sheathing edges properly blocked. " ` O , 0® 10. Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. O , • O • ® CLP installed at specified locations. O ., CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. O O ' 0 CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O—O BYO 1 ® CLP diameter per approved drawings. jShear_' Studs proper size/spacing. 1 O " O O01 I O O 0 01 ar_e _^ Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing.` O O I ®+ O Shear wall/load bearing.- walls properly blocked. O ; O ®i ' Top plate property spliced. E E 0 ®'i , r Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. 11 O Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. 0 _ 0 1 1 0 O Headers strapped per structural drawings.nt'0O y 3.® O Jack - King jacks installed per structural drawings. A T _. f _ ; 0 0, _ _ - r - Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O " 0 . i Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. ~+ w _ 0 I 0 I 0. 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) ® IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? ® YES O NO COMMENTS: In -Progress. THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO: K.Honea, D.Phillips Consultants Im Geotechnical Engineering • E•nvironmental Sciences Ceophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Wan Review LOCATIONS: UNIVERSAL Atlanta Daytona BeachEDENGINEERINGSCIENCESFortMyers Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Fort Pierce Gainesville Geophysical Services • Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection lncksonville Building Inspection • Plan Review • Building Code Administration Miami October 25, 2019 Ocala Orlando(Ileadquaners) City of Sanford Palm Coast PO Box 1788 Panama City Pensacolaa Sanford, Florida 32772 Rockledge Sarttsotn Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official St. Petersburg Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments Tifton 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 West Palrn Beach Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building 0 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 LIES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 39 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of October 14, 2019 through October 20, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the "Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of October 14, 2019 through October 20, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmaller, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document am not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. FJS/dkn City of Sanford Aldrich, Dave City of Sanford Antonini, Usa The Spanos Corporation Woods, Jim The Spanos Corporation Gillespie, Hardy The SpanosCarporatlon Jensen, Chuck The Spanos Corporation Homea, Kent CPH, Im (Corporate) Boyles, Irene Lee Crest Lee Crest Kephart Garland, Jesse Kephart Campbell, Paul Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 4' 4 2019.10.28 TA1E B _ 066:51:06 -041 001 daveaktrich@sanfordfl.gov Usa.AntonlnioSanfordfl.gov vroods*agspanos.com hgUlespleilliagsparas.com c)ensert@agspanos.Mn thomea®agsparascom Iboykstcphwrp.com o.lMmup320*gmall.com esseg*kephart.com pauloOkepharLcom Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. • Orlando, FI 32811 • (407) 423-0504 • (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO. 39 Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: October 25, 2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG: Added This Summary Period: 0 Resohed This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: 0 SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): 1 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: 3 to 3 DAILY REPORTS: Daily Report No. Inspection Date Inspector(s) Reports No. of Pages Page No(s). 86 10/14/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 4 to 4 87 10/15/2019 Michael Felshaw 2 5 to 6 88 10/18/2019 Michael Felshaw 2 7 to 8 Total Number of Pages This Summary: 8 For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG ermitting Agency: City of Sanford Project Name: Lake Monroe Apartments pdate Period: 10/14/19-10/20/19 ttention: Mr. Dave Aldrich Project Address: I 2205 West Seminole Boulevard ermit No.: See Below) City/State/Zip: Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 ro"ect No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Buildin F 17-158S SIL No. Date SUM No Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location Description S.I. Engineer of Record Response 2S.1. Date Closed SUM No. 1 5/24/19 20 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Northeast Comer of Elevator The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 6/12/19 22 FJS) Rev: Pit, 2n0 Lift strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with Rev. 22 specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Advanced Structural Design on 6111119 Report 9451977-1, 190546, cast on 6112119. FJS) 4/26/2019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator rill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix. 2 6/12119 22 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Shaft, Bldg. F, 3rd The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 8/16/19 32 Lift, South Wall strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Advanced Structural Design on Report 9456604-1, 190997, cast on 6/12/19. 5/14/2019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix. 3 6/26/19 24 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Pit, Bldg. F, Northeast The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 8116/19 32 Comer. Wh Lift strength of 2,490 psi did not meet the from John M. Sailes, P.E. with specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Advanced Structural Design on Report 9457936r1, 19P148, cast on 6/12119. 5/21/2019). The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. 2The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Does #1632149 3This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS RA(1/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation DATE: 10/14/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9699117-1 BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1583 FIELD CONTACT: Jim Woods FIELD PHONE: 813-288-0008 FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Balcony Trusses LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building D, 501 Marbella Lane ELEVATION: Roof Inspection was Performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings N am QpU0z Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. 10 Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. 0 Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O 0 Trusses inspected undamaged. O O 0 Truss gusset plates undamaged. O O 0 Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. O O 0 Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. O O 0 Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. O O 0 Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. 0 Mechanical connections properly installed. O 0 Mechanical connections properly nailed. 0 O Fastener used comply with structural drawings. O 0 Overbuilt areas properly fastened. 1 0 Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. O 0 Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. O 0 Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O 0 Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. 1 0 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. 1 1 O 0 Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. 0 Sheathing inspected undamaged. O O 0 Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" clip. O 0 Sheathing edges properly blocked. O 0 Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. O O 0 CLP installed at specified locations. O 0 CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. 0 CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O O 0 CLP diameter per approved drawings. 0 Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. O 0 Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. O O 0 Shear wallfload bearing walls properly blocked. O 0 Top plate properly spliced. O O 0 Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. 0 Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. O O 0 Headers strapped per structural drawings. 0 Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. 0 Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O 0 Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. O O 0 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw FIELD COPIES TO T.Honea, O.Philli Sp UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 87 (1/2) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation DATE: 10/15/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9699342-1 BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1582 FIELD CONTACT: FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Truss Connection LOCATIONIGRID LINES: Building C, 601 Marbella Lane - Corridors ELEVATION: Roof Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings c m to — Z Q. Qp00Z Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. 0 Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. O O O 0 Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O O 0 Trusses inspected undamaged. O 0 Truss gusset plates undamaged. O 0. Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. O 0 Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. O 0 Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. 0 Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. 0 Mechanical connections properly installed. 0 O Mechanical connections properly nailed. 0 Fastener used comply with structural drawings. O 0 O Overbuilt areas properly fastened. 0 Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. O 0 Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. O 0 Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O 0 Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. 0 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. 0 Sheathing nailing typetpattern per structural drawing. 0 Sheathing inspected undamaged. 0 Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" clip. 01 10 0 Sheathing edges properly blocked. 0 Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. O O 0 CLP installed at specified locations. 0 CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. O O 1 0 CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O O 0 CLP diameter per approved drawings. O 0 Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. O 0 Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. 0 Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. 0 Top plate properly spliced. 1 0 Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. O O 1 O 0 Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. 0 Headers strapped per structural drawings. O O 0 Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. O O 0 Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O O 101 Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. O O 101 O NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED 0 DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? 0 YES NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw T.Honea, O.Phili SFIELDCOPIESTO • p UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Wan Review WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS R7 (2/2) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation DATE: 10/15/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9699342-2 BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1583 FIELD CONTACT: FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Truss Connection LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building D, 501 Marbella Lane - Corridors ELEVATION: Roof Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawin s Approved Shop Drawings NN a Q o 0 0 Z Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. 1 Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. O 0 Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O 0 Trusses inspected undamaged. O 0 Truss gusset plates undamaged. 0 Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. O 0 Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. 01 Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. O O 0 Mechanical connections_ conform to uplift value. 0 Mechanical connections properly installed. O 0 Mechanical connections properly nailed. 0 Fastener used comply with structural drawings. 0 Overbuilt areas properly fastened. O O 0 Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated._ 0 Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. 0 Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. 0 Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O 0 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. 0 Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. 0 Sheathing inspected undamaged. 0 Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" Gip. 0 Sheathing edges properly blocked. O O O 0 Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. O 0 CLP installed at specified locations. 01 CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. 0 CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O O O 0 CLP diameter per approved drawings. 0 Shear Studs are proper sizetspacing. 0 Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. 0 Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. O 0 Top plate properly spliced. 0 Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. O O 0 Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. 0 Headers strapped per structural drawings. 0 Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. 0 Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. 0 Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. 0 O NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED 0 DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? 0 YES NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw FIELD COPIES TO • .onea,D. THDPhilli $ p UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: GeotechnlcalEngineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection EDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Wan Neview WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 88f1/21 PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation DATE: 10/18/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9700006-1 BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1582 FIELD CONTACT: FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Floor Trusses LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building C, 601 Marbella Lane ELEVATION: Level 1 Inspection was Performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings N N N t5 aN Q a 0 Q Z Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. O 0 Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. 0 Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. 0 Trusses inspected undamaged. O 0 O Truss gusset plates undamaged. O O 0 O Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. 0 Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. 0 Continuous lateral bracing property spaced. 0 O Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. O 0 Mechanical connections properly installed. O O 0 Mechanical connections properly nailed. O 0 Fastener used comply with structural drawings. 0 Overbuilt areas properly fastened. O O 0 Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. 0 Foundation sole plate is property fastened. O O 0 Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. 0 Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O 0 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. 0 Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. O 0 Sheathing inspected undamaged. O 0 Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" Gip. 0 Sheathing edges properly blocked. O O 0 Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. O 0 CLP installed at specified locations. O 0 CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. O 0 CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O O 0 CLP diameter per approved drawings. 0 Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. 0 Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. 0 Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. O O 0 Top plate properly spliced. 0 Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. O O O 0 Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. 0 Headers strapped per structural drawings. O O 0 Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. O O 0 Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. 0 Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. 1 O 01131 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw FIELD COPIES TO T.Honea,D. Phillipsp UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering -Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionlilBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 88 (2/2) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation DATE: 10/18/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9700006-2 BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1581 FIELD CONTACT: FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Wall Sheathing LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building B, 701 Marbella Lane - Mechanical Rooms • Shear Walls ELEVATION: Level 1 Inspection was Performed by: 0 Contract Drawings O Approved Shop Drawings vN (a N QaUUz Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. O 0 Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. 0 Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O O 0 Trusses inspected undamaged. O 0 Truss gusset plates undamaged. O 0 Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. 0 Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. O 0 Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. O 0 Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. 0 Mechanical connections properly installed. 0 Mechanical connections properly nailed. 0 Fastener used comply with structural drawings. O 0 Overbuilt areas property fastened. O 0 Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. 0 Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. 0 Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O 0 Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. 0 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O 0 Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. 0 Sheathing inspected undamaged. 0 O Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" dip. O O 0 Sheathing edges properly blocked. 0 Continuous toad path (CLIP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. 0 CLP installed at specified locations. O 0 CLIP has specified plate washer size/thickness. O 0 CLIP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. 0 CLIP diameter per approved drawings. 0 Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. 0 Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. O O 0 Shear wall/load bearing walls property blocked. 0 Top plate property spliced. 0 Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. O 0 Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. 0 Headers strapped per structural drawings. 0 Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. 0 Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. 0 Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. 0 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw FIELD COPIES TO • .onea, .THDPhilli S pUNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection a] Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Wan Review UESProj 0110.1800758.0UNIVERSALDateTypedtNo.: October 24, 201900 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd.,Orlando,FL 32811 P: 407A23.0504 F: 401.423.3106 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation Attn: Jim Woods 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing, US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below. Scope of Work Work Order No. Type of Report 9699411 Proctor We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie S. Housein (extension 23078). Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. COA No. 00000549 2019.10.29 9 = 13:49:23-04'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Attachments (1) Vice President - Construction Services RH STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This Item has been electronically signed and sealed by using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be vedfled on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. 3532 Maggie Boulevard - Orlando, FI 32811 - (407) 423-0504 - Fax (407) 423-3106 Visit us on the web at www.UniversalEnpineerinacom. VAN I1 R SA L Client: The Spanos Corporation Project Name: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing Sample Location: Southwest Corner of 1 st Bldg. Intended Use: Limerock Base Material Description: Limerock Sampled By: Z.B. Date Sampled: October 17, 2019 130 125 120 115 u a p 105 100 95 90 0 Project Number: 0110.1800758.0000 Lab Sample No.: 19-P1847 Work Order No.: 9699411 Area Covered: N/A Date Plotted: October 22, 2019 Tested By: A.C.V. Date Tested: October 21, 2019 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Test Method: AASHTO T-180 Method D Maximum Dry Density, pcf: 116.5 Optimum Moisture, %: 12.1 Passing 3.5" Sieve, %: 100 AASHTO T-89 (LL): N/A Passing No. 4 Sieve, %: 69 AASHTO T-90 (PI): N/A Passing No. 200 Sieve, %: N/A AASHTO M-145 (Class.): N/A turatlon for jalto: 5 10 15 20 25 30 Moisture Content (%) Sampled according to AASHTO T 002. Proctor plotted by software package. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. UNIVERSAL No DES Project No.: .1800758.00 Date Typed: November 04, 201919 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionE] Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3632 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. I Date I Type of Report 9701070-1 1 10/24/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (1) rh tl Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 2019.11.0 10:49:32 0500' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This Item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be vedred on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universars clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report Is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2016 000UNIVERSALWokordNo.: 970107000 CT 102419 ENGINEERING SCIENCES L Issue: Novem19T241berDatetatIssue: November0l, 2019 Geotechnical Engineering I FacilitiesEDConsulting I Environmental Services Construction Materials Testing and Inspection , Building Code Compliance 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens , ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 33607 Structural Element: Slab on Grade Sample Location: Clubhouse West Sidewalk - Sampled at 5' West to 10' North from NW Comer of Clubhouse Set#1 of 1 ISample From: Concrete Truck I Sample By: Justo Colon On 10/24/2019 JAt Lab On or Before: 10/28/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: ARC Development Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 9.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 9.00 cu yds. Supplier: Comex Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 9.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 66438 Time Batched: 10:55 PM Ticket No.: 36728474 Time Sampled: 12:20 PM Mix Design: 1591837 Admixture: N/S Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 4.50 inches I Ambient Temp: 86 OF I Concrete Temp: 89 °F Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dlmen.l in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimon. in) Test X-Sect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) Lab Tech 1'G' 10/31/2019 7 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 28,025 2,220 BCC 2'G' 11/21/2019 28 3'G' 11/21/2019 28 4-G- 11/21/2019 28 5'H' 11/21/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder _ D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average = G'- Good Condition Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified only If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Note Test In compliance with approved plans and specifications Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes n Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universars clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts ftm or regarding Universals reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproducer!, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised March 2019 LOCATIONS: UNIVERSAL Atlanta Daytona Beach93ENGINEERINGSCIENCESFortMyers Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Fon Pierce Gainesville Geophysical Services - Construction Materials Testing • Threshold inspection Jacksonville Building Inspection -Plan Review • Building Code Administration Miami November 11, 2019 Ocala Orlando (Headquarters) City of Sanford Palm Coast PO Box 1788 Panama City Pensacola Sanford, Florida 32772 Rockledge Sarasota Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official St. Petersburg Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments Tifton 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 West Palm Beach Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1S81 Building 0 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 UES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 40 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of October 28, 2019 through November 3, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the "Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of October 28, 2019 through November 3, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies o/ this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. FJS/dkn City of Sanford Aldrich, Dave City of Sanford Antonini, Use The Spares Corporation Woods, Jim The Spares Corporation Gillespie, Hardy The Spanos Corporation Jensen, Chuck The Spanos Corporation Homea, Kent CPH, Inc. (Corporate) Boyles, Irene Lee Crest lee Crest Kephart Garland, Jesse Kephart Campbell, Paul Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 a'' SCH`' X 2019.11.13 A141:41—05'00' nunn dave.aldrichillisanfordn.gov Usa.Antoninl0San1`ordn.gov PmWs@agspanos.com h9lllespie %Pagspanos.com cjemw@agspanos.eom thomea0agspanos.com Iboyles0cphoorp.com o.leegroup320@gmau.com jesseg0kephart.com pauk:Okephart.com Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. • Orlando, FI 32811 - (407) 423-0504 • (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO.40 Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: November 11, 2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building Alaubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG: Added This Summary Period: 0 Resoloed This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: 0 SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): I Sheet(s) Page No(s).: to 3 DAILY REPORTS: Daily Report No. Inspection Date Inspector(s) Reports No. of Pages Page No(s). 18910/28/2019 Michael Felshaw 3 4 to 6 Total Number of Pages This Summary: 6 For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG SIL No. Date SUM No Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location Description S.I. Engineer of Record Response S.I. Date Closed SUM No. 1 5/24/19 20 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Northeast Corner of Elevator The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 6/12119 22 FJS) Rev.- Pit, 2n0 Lift strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with Rev. 22 specified strength of 3,000 psi (LIES Advanced Structural Design on 6/11119 Report 9451977-1, 190546, cast on 6112119. FJS) 4/26/2019). The wrong structural ma was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump W. 2 6/12119 22 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Shaft, Bldg. F, 3rd The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 8/16/19 32 Lift, South Wall strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with specified strength of 3,000 psi (LIES Advanced Structural Design on Report 9456604-1, 190997, cast on 6/12119. 5/14/2019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rods Pump Mix. 3 6/26/19 24 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Pit, Bldg. F, Northeast The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 8/16/19 32 Comer. 51, Lift strength of 2,490 psi did not meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with specified strength of 3,000 psi (LIES Advanced Structural Design on Report 9457936-1, 19P148, cast on 6/12/19. 5/21/2019). The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. 2The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Docs #1632149 3This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 89 (1/3) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation DATE: 10/28/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9701456-1 BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1582 FIELD CONTACT: Jim Woods FIELD PHONE: 813-288-0008 FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: 1) Framing 2) Corridor Trusses - Reinspection LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building C, 601 Marbella Lane ELEVATION: 1) Level 1, 2, 3, 4 2) Roof Inspection was Performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawin s vm `a ui 1 i nm 0 ci 0 Z Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. 0 Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. 0 Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. 0 O Trusses inspected undamaged. 0 Truss gusset plates undamaged. 0 Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. 0 Truss plate provided for bearing on CMIJ. 0 Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. j 0 Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. O 0 Mechanical connections properly installed. 0 Mechanical connections properly nailed. O 0 Fastener used comply with structural drawings. 0 Overbuilt areas property fastened. 0 Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. O 0 Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. O O O 0 Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. 0 Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O 0 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. 0 Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. 0 Sheathing inspected undamaged. 0 Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" Gip. 0 Sheathing edges properly blocked. 0 O Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. 0 CLP installed at specified locations. 0 CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. O 0 CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. 0 CLP diameter per approved drawings. 0 Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. 0 Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. 0 Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. 0 Top plate properly spliced. O 0 Top and bottom plate property nailed per structural drawings. 0 Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. 0 Headers strapped per structural drawings. 0 Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. 0 Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. 0 Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. 0 1 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES 0 NO COMMENTS: Corridor Roof Trusses - Reinspection. THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw FIELD COPIES TO: T.Honea,D.Philli p S UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection a, Wan Review WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 89 (2/3) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation DATE: 10/28/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9701456-2 BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1583 FIELD CONTACT: Jim Woods FIELD PHONE: 813-288-0008 FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Corridor Roof Trusses - Reinspection LOCATIONIGRID LINES: Building D, 501 Marbella Lane ELEVATION: Roof Inspection was Performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings v N m s n t Q a 0 0 z Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. 0 Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. 0 Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. 0 Trusses inspected undamaged. 0 Truss gusset plates undamaged. O 0 Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. 01 10 Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. 1 0 Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. 0 Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. 0 O Mechanical connections properly installed. O 0 Mechanical connections properly nailed. O O 0 O Fastener used comply with structural drawings. O 0 Overbuilt areas properly fastened. O O 0 Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. 0 Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. 0 Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. 0 Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. 0 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. 0 Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. 0 Sheathing inspected undamaged. 0 Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" Gip. O O O 0 Sheathing edges properly blocked. 0 Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. 0 CLP installed at specified locations. 0 CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. 0 CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. 0 CLP diameter per approved drawings. 0 Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. O 0 Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. O O 0 Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. O O O 0 Top plate properly spliced. O O O 0 Top and bottom plate property nailed per structural drawings. 1 0 Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. 1 0 Headers strapped per structural drawings. 0 Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. O O 0 Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. 0 Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. 0 m NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED 0 DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES ® NO COMMENTS: Reinspection. THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw FIELD COPIES TO • pT.Honea,D.Philli S UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection113BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Ran Review WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 89 (3/3) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation DATE: 10/28/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9701456-3 BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1584 FIELD CONTACT: Jim Woods FIELD PHONE: 813-288-0008 FIELD OBSERVATIONS S TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Balcony Roof Trusses LOCATIONIGRID LINES: Building E, 401 Marbella Lane ELEVATION: Roof Inspection was Performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings vW Hv Ea Qo0Qz Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. 0 O Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. 0 Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. 0 O Trusses inspected undamaged. 0 Truss gusset plates undamaged. 0 10 Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. 0 O Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. O O 0 Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. O O O 0 Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. 0 Mechanical connections properly installed. O O 0 Mechanical connections properly nailed. 0 Fastener used comply with structural drawings. 0 Overbuilt areas properly fastened. O O O 0 Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. O 0 Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. O O 0 Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. 0 Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. 0 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O O 0 Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. O 0 Sheathing inspected undamaged. O 0 Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" Gip. O 0 Sheathing edges properly blocked. 0 Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. O O 0 CLP installed at specified locations. 0 CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. 0 CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O O 0 CLP diameter per approved drawings. O O O 0 Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. O O 0 Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. 0 Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. 0 Top plate properly spliced. O 0 Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. O O O 0 Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. O 0 Headers strapped per structural drawings. O 0 Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. 0 Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O 0 Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. 0 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw FIELD COPIES TO • onea,,t.HDPhilli Sp UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection113BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Wan Review UNIVERSAL Wokod No.: 9457517 00 CT 051719 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Lab No.: May8,2Oate1stIssue: May 28, 2019 Geotechnical Engineering l Facilities Consulting l Environmental Services91ConstructionMaterialsTestingandInspectionlBuildingCodeCompliance 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 33607 Structural Element: Elevator Shaft Sample Location: Building F, Permit #17-1584 - Sampled at Final Lift of Elevator Shaft Set#1 of 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck ~- Sample By: Cesar Contreras On 05/17/2019 At Lab On or Before: 05/21/2019 General Information _ _ Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information _ General Contractor: Lee Crest Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 3.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 3.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete _ Water Added at Site: N/A _ Total Placement for the Day: 3.00 cu yds. i Truck No.: 6533 Time Batched: 12:13 PM i Ticket No.: 1459404 Time Sampled: 12:50 PM Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: NIS Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 7.00 inches I Ambient Temp: 90 OF I Concrete Temp: 87 OF Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dlmen.1 In) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimon. in) Test XSect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) Lab Tech 1'G' 05/24/2019 7 3.17 3.24 3.21 10.27 15,095 1.470 BCC 2'G' 06/14/2019 28 3'G' 06/14/2019 28 4'G' 06/14/2019 28 Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the spedfied strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note W- Hold Cylinder = O'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Exduded From Average = G'- Good Condition Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified only If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Note Test In compliance with approved plans and specifications Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used 010 Technicians AL Arthur Love 8CC 'Brayan Candelaria Maldonado To'establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts hum or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revisod March 2019 58.000UNIVERSALWokordeNo.: 9457936 0 CT 052119 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Lab No.: Date 1st Issue: Mayay30 30, 2019 Geotechnical Engineering I Facilities Consulting I Environmental Services 91ConstructionMaterialsTestingandInspectionIBuildingCodeCompliance3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 33607 Structural Element: Cell Fill ~a Sample Location: Elevator Pit at Building F (Permit Number 17-1586) - Sampled at NE comer of Elevator Pit 5th Lift _ Set# 1 of Isampie From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Jose Rodriguez On 05/21/2019 1At Lab On or Before: 05/23/2019 General Information _ _ Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information t General Contractor: E.W. Young Construction Inc. Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 2.00 cu yds. I Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 2.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: 10 gals Total Placement for the Day: 2.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 643 Ticket No.: 1459494 Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: N/S Time Batched: 12:38 PM Time Sampled: 1:37 PM Weather Condition: Partly Clo Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 8.75 inches I Ambient Temp: 89 OF I Concrete Temp: 91 OF Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen. 1 in) Actual Dimen. 2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSecL Area ( in') Max Compressive Load ( Ibs) Test Compressive Strength( psi) Average psi) Lab Tech 1' G' 05/29/2019 8 3.39 3.46 3.43 11.73 16,470 1,400 AJA 2' G' 06/18/2019 28 3' G' 06/18/2019 28 4' G' 06/18/2019 28 Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable -'E'- Excluded From Average : G'- Good Condition Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified only If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Note Test in compliance with approved plans and specifications Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used Lab Technicians AJA Angel Ayala To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property or our clients and authorization for publication or statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduoed, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. t of t Revised March 2019 CATIONS: LOCATIONS: Atlanta Dolton Beach93ENGINEERINGSCIENCESFortMyers Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Fort Pierce Gainesville Geophysical Services - Construction Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Jacksonville Building Inspection -Plan Review • Building Code Administration Miami June 5, 2019 Ocala Orlando (Headquarters) City of Sanford Palm Coast PO Box 1788 Panama city Pensacola Sanford, Florida 32772 Rockledge Sarasota Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official St. Petersburg Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments Tifton West Palm Beach 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 UES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 19 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of May 13, 2019 through May 19, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of May 13, 2019 through May 19, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmaller, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. FJS/dkn City of Sanford Aldrich, Dave City of Sanford Antonini, Lisa The Spans Corporation Woods, Jim The Sparos Corporation Gillespie, Hardy The Spanos Corporation Jensen, Chuck The Spanos Corporation Homea, Kent CPH, Inc. (Corporate) Soyles, trene Lee Crest Lee Crest Kephart Garland, Jesse Kephart Campbell, Paul Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 oo`I.SCHA/44 0:,F...F.:- Fred Schmalzer rATMEF ; ' 2019.06.07 11:27: 56-04'00' dave.aktrichosanfordfl.gov Usa.Antonini@Sanfordfl.gov M oodsoagspanos.com hgiflespie@agspanos.com c)ensen@agspanos.com thomea@agspanos.com lboyles@cphcorp.00m o.leegmup3200gmall.com esseg@kephart.com paulc@kephart.com Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. • Orlando, FI 32811 • (407) 423-0504 • (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO. 19 Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: June 5, 2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. LSP.O S."N IN_SP.ECTII.OrN LO`G? Added This Summary Period: 0 Resoked This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: 0 SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): 1 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: 3 to 3 DAILkYA12E&rR4ff& : f Daily Report No. Inspection Date Inspector(s) Reports No. of Pages Page No(s). 40 5/13/2019 Michael Felshaw 2 4 to 5 41 5/16/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 6 to 6 42 5/17/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 7 to 7 Total Number of Pages This Summary: 7 For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG Permitting Agency: City of Sanford Project Name: Lake Monroe Apartments Update Period: 5/13/19-5/19/19 Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich Project Address: I 2205 West Seminole Boulevard Permit No.: See Below) City/State/Zip: Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Building q/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 SIL No. Date SUM No. Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location Description S.I. Engineer of Record Response 2S.I. Date Closed SUM No. IThe Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. 2The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Does #1632149 3This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 MASONRY THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 40 (1/2) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 5/13/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9454978-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1585 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: Jim Woods CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: 813-288-0008 FIELD OBSERVATIONS 8t TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Wall, Lintel LOCATIONIGRID LINES: Building F, 301 Marbella LaneElevator ELEVATION: Level 3 Inspection was Performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings vN N Per Project Plans, Specifications and Approved RFI's. t E o 0 0 z Notes Masonry APPROVED GROUT MIX DESIGN 0 r REBAR CLEARANCE i O 0 REBAR CONDITION 0 O REBAR DOWEL PROTRUSION I O O I ® REBAR NUMBER/QUANTITY O A 0 , 0 REBAR SIZE/DIAMETER/TYPE O O_, 0 . REBAR FASTENING 0 ' O REBAR SPACING 0 ' REBAR LAP SPLICES O 0.-•• ter— .___. - _._.._.._. _ • BLOCK CELL CLEANLINESS O ; 0 ; BLOCK CLEANOUTS 0: O 0 1 BLOCK CONDITION = • O 0 I BLOCK HEAD 8 BED JOINTS - _ 0__ BLOCK PLACEMENT i O 0 • BLOCK PLUMBNESS BLOCK REINFORCEMENT I 0 O O !0 , BLOCK SQE/TYPE/GRADE O ' 0 O IMO_R_TAR JOINT REINFORCEMENT O f 10 10 rEMBE00ED ITEMS O I O ' ® ' - JOINT LOCATIONS i O; O t 0' GROUT AGE o ` GROUT CONSOLIDATION O ; 1. GROUT SLUMP . _. . _ .. — - _ . _.. v ... __ 10.' O .,. - ® Plans References & RFI's Date(s) Pour Information: N/A Cubic Yards of Mix Design No. N/A psi concrete placed. N/A set(s) of N/A Grout Prisms Slump (inches) _ (Slump specifications = N/A to N/A inches). 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REOUIRED? YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES91FIELDCOPIESTOKentHonea Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 40 (2i2) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 5/13/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9454978-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1583 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: Jim Woods CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: 813-288-0008 FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Sheathing LOCATIONIGRID LINES: Building D, 501 Marbella Lane -Floor ELEVATION: Level 2 Inspection was Performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings VN y y nU C1 Lj j Q Z Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. O O 0 Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. 0 Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O 0 Trusses inspected undamaged. 0 Truss gusset plates undamaged. O O 0 Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. O O 0 Truss plate provided for bearing on CMIJ. 0 Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. 0 Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. 0 Mechanical connections properly installed. 0 Mechanical connections properly nailed. 0 Fastener used comply with structural drawings. O 0 Overbuilt areas properly fastened. 0 Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. 0 Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. 0 Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. 0 Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. 0 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O 0 Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. 0 Sheathing inspected undamaged. 0 Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" Gip. O 0 Sheathing edges properly blocked. O O 0 Continuous load path (CLIP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. O O 0 CLP installed at specified locations. 0 CLP has specified plate washer sizetthickness. 0 CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O O 0 CLP diameter per approved drawings. O O 0 Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. 0 Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. O 0 Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. O O 0 Top plate properly spliced. 0 Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. 0 Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. 0 Headers strapped per structural drawings. 0 Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. 0 Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O O 0 Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. O 0 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED 0 DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) 0 IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? 0 YES 0 NO COMMENTS: UNIVERSAL THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw a] ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO: Kent Honea Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Wan Review MASONRY THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 41 0/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 5/16/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9457164-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1585 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Wall, Lintel LOCATIONIGRID LINES: Building F, 301 Marbella Lane: Elevator ELEVATION: Level 4 Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawin s Approved Shop Drawings N to Per Project Plans, Specifications and Approved RFI's. CL t E QoZ Notes Masonry APPROVED GROUT MIX DESIGN 0 0 REBAR CLEARANCE 010 0 : ^ REBAR CONDITION_ 0 0 REBAR DOWEL PROTRUSION i 0 O . REBAR NUMBER/QUANTITY 1 O . 0 REBAR SIZE/DIAMETER/TYPE 0 REBAR FASTENING 0 REBAR SPACING 0 REBAR LAP SPLICES -- 0. 0-•0 BLOCK CELL CLEANLINESS BLOCK CLEANOUTS i ' 0 BLOCK_ CONDITION i O 0 ^ ' BLOCK HEAD 8 BEO JOINTS O ' 0 ' i BLOC_K PLACEMENT 0 O _ BLOCK_PLUMBNES_S 0 JY BLOCK REINFORCEMENT 0 {_0 ..0.. - BLOCK SIZE/TYPE/GRADE 10.0 010, MORTAR JOINT REINFORCEMENT 0. t 0 ' O 1 EMBEDD_ED ITEMS JOINT LOCATIONS 0 . GROUT AGE 0 O 10 GROUT CONSOLIDATION O 1 ' 0 " I GROUT SLUMP O a, Plans References & RFI's Date(s) Pour Information: N/A Cubic Yards of Mix Design No. N/A psi concrete placed. N/A set(s) of N/A Grout Prisms Slump (inches) _ (Slump specifications = N/A to N/A inches). 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO • Kent Honea Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Plan Review WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 42 (1/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 5/17/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9457431-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1581 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS 8t TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Sheathing LOCATIONIGRID LINES: Building B, 701 Marbella Lane: Floor ELEVATION: Level 4 Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings O Approved Shop Drawings vN N a 41o d U n 0 a Z Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. O O 0 Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. O O e Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O O 0 Trusses inspected undamaged. O O 0 Truss gusset plates undamaged. O O 0 Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. O O 0 Truss plate provided for bearing on CMIJ. O O 0 Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. O O 0 Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. O O 0 Mechanical connections properly installed. O 0 Mechanical connections properly nailed. O e Fastener used comply with structural drawings. O e Overbuilt areas properly fastened. O 0 Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. O 0 Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. 0 Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. 0 Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O 0 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. 0 Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. O 0 O Sheathing inspected undamaged. O 0 Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" Gip. O 0 Sheathing edges properly blocked. 0 Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. O 0 CLP installed at specified locations. O O 0 CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. O O 0 CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O O 0 CLP diameter per approved drawings. O O 0 Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. O O 0 Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. O 0 Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. O O 0 Top plate properly spliced. O 0 Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. 0 Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. e Headers strapped per structural drawings. 0 Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. O 0 Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. 0 Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. O 0 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES 0 NO COMMENTS: UNIVERSALTHRESHOLDINSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO: Kent Honea Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering " Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services " Materials Testing " Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review LOCATIONS: UNIVERSAL Adantn Dan ona Beach ENGINEERING SCIENCES FortMyersrs Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Fort Pierce Gainesville Geophysical Services • Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Jnclsonville Building Inspection • Plan Review • Building Code Administration Miami June 5, 2019 Ocala Orlando (Headquarters) City of Sanford Palm Coast PO Box 1788 CityPPeensacolansacola Sanford, Florida 32772 Rockledge Sarasota Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official St. Petersburg Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments Tifton 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 West Palm Beach Building A/ Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building 8 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 UES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 18 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of May 6, 2019 through May 12, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log ( SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of May 6, 2019 through May 12, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronicao signed and seated by Fred J. Schmaller, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. FJS/dkn Cry of Sanford Aldrich, Dave City of Sanford Antonini, Usa The Spanos Corporation Woods, Jim The Spanos Corporation Gillespie, Hardy The Spans Corporation Jensen, Chuck The Spanos Corporation Homea, Kent CPH, Inc. ( Corporate) Boyles, Irene Lee Crest Lee Crest Kephart Garland, Jesse Kephart Campbell, Paul Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 Fred Schmalzer TA1E f = 2019.06. 07 11:27: 23-04'00' dave.aldrich@sanfordfl. gov Usa.AntoninioSanfordfl. gov Moods0agspanos.com hgBlesple@agspanos.com cjensen0agspanos.com Ownea@tagspanos.com Iboylest0cphcorp.corn o.leegroup3200gmall. mm jesseg0kepharLoom paulcokephart. com Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. - Orlando, FI 32811 • (407) 423-0504 • (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO. 18 Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: June 5, 2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. iSPrECIAL IN_SP.EC-yT ION LO`Gi Added This Summary Period: 0 Resoled This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: 0 SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): 1 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: 3 to 3 D'AIL4Y REP O,RtTc'S'i•,,., j Daily Report No. I Inspection Date Inspector(s) Reports No. of Pages Page No(s). 39 5/7/2019 Gary Passmore 1 4 to 4 Total Number of rages i nis summary: r - For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG Permitting Agency: City of Sanford I Project Name: Lake Monroe Apartments pdate Period: 5/6/19-5/12/19 Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich Project Address: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard ennit No.: See Below) City/State/Zip: Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 ro'ect No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 SIL No. Date No. Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location Description S.I. Engineer of Record Response Response 2S.1. Date Closed SUM No. The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. 2The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Docs #1632149 Page 1 of 1 WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 39 0 /1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 5/7/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9453950-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1581/1582 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Floor Decking LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building B, 701 Marbella Lane & Building C, 601 Marbella Lane ELEVATION: Level 3 Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings vd N nd a L) 0 QZ Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. 0 O Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. O 0 Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O O 0 Trusses inspected undamaged. O O 0 Truss gusset plates undamaged. O 0 Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. O O 0 Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. O O 0 Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. O 0 Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. O O 0 Mechanical connections properly installed. O 0 Mechanical connections properly nailed. O 0 Fastener used comply with structural drawings. 0 Overbuilt areas properly fastened. 0 Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. O 0 Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. O 0 Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O 0 Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O 0 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O 0 O Sheathing nailing typetpattern per structural drawing. 0 Sheathing inspected undamaged. O 0 Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" dip. O O 0 Sheathing edges properly blocked. O O 0 Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. O O 0 CLP installed at specified locations. O O 0 CLP has specified plate washer sizelthic kness. O 0 CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack: O 0 CLP diameter per approved drawings. O 0 Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. O O 0 Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. O O 0 Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. O O 0 Top plate properly spliced. O 0 Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. O 0 Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. O 0 Headers strapped per structural drawings. 0 Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. O 0 Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O 0 Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. 0 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES 0 NO COMMENTS: UNIVERSALTHRESHOLDINSPECTOR: Gary Passmore ED ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO Donnie w/ AGS Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Wan Review WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 43 0/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 5/20/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9457683-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1582 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: Jim Woods CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: 813-288-0008 FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Sheathing LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building C, 601 Marbella Lane: Floor ELEVATION: Level 3 Inspection was Performed by: 0 Contract Drawincis Approved Shop Drawings vN M N 4 p 0 Q QZ Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. 0 Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. O 0 Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. 0 Trusses inspected undamaged. O 0 Truss gusset plates undamaged. O 0 Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. 0 Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. O 0 Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. O 0 Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. O O O 0 Mechanical connections properly installed. 0 Mechanical connections properly nailed. 0 Fastener used comply with structural drawings. 0 Overbuilt areas properly fastened. O 0 Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. 0 Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. O 0 Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O 0 Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O 0 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. 0 O Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. O 0 Sheathing inspected undamaged. O 0 Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" Gip. O O 0 Sheathing edges property blocked. 0 O Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. O 0 CLIP installed at specified locations. O O 0 CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. O O 0 CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O 0 CLP diameter per approved drawings. O 0 Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. O O 0 Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. O 0 Shear wall/load bearing walls property blocked. O O 0 Top plate properly spliced. 0 Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. O 0 Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. O O 0 Headers strapped per structural drawings. O 0 Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. 0 Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. 0 Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. 0 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES 0 NO COMMENTS: UNIVERSALTHRESHOLDINSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw ED ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO • Kent Honea Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering " Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services " Materials Testing " Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & plan Review MASONRY THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 44 (1/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 5/21/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9457932-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1585 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS 8t TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Wall, Lintel LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building F, 301 Marbella Lane: Elevator ELEVATION: Level 4, Roof Inspection was Performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings 06 m m Per Project Plans, Specifications and Approved RFI's. ' t E aoUUZ. Notes Masonry APPROVED GROUT MIX DESIGN V O : O 0 REBAR CLEARANCE O ; 0 v O ' — REBAR CONDITION _ _ I :0 . REBAR DOWEL PROTRUSION O 01.0 REBAR NUMBER/QUANTITY _ _ _ _ _ 0,0 REBAR SIZE/DIAMETER/TYPE - _ _ ~- _ — O O 0 O REBAR FASTENING ` 0 REBAR SPACING 'oi REBAR LAP SPLICES '; ; O 0 . O B_L_ OCK CELL CLEANLINESS O i (0 f 1 10®: BBLOCK CLEANOUTS IBLOCK CONDITN — --- - - -- - — - -- 4 1IO0,0 BLOCK HEAD 8 BED JOINTS 0.0 0 i f BLOCK PLACEMENT , 0 r 0 I BLOCK PLUM_BNESS _ _ _ 0,0 j BLOCK REINFORCEMENT - _ _ _—_ ._ 0 O BLOCK SIZE/TYPE/GRADE 1 O i 0,0 MORTAR JOINT REINFORCEMENT O ! 0 ; EMBEDDED ITEMS ' _) O 0O ` JOINT LOCATIONS 1 O 0 1 GROUT AGE : ' I O 0. ;GROUT CONSOLIDATION J 0 1 ' 0.; _ , _ _• IGROUT SLUMP I : : O I 0 Plans References & RFI's Date(s) Pour Information: N/A Cubic Yards of Mix Design No. N/A psi concrete placed. N/ A set(s) of N/A Grout Prisms Slump ( inches) _ (Slump specifications = N/A to N/A inches). 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences FIELD COPIES TO: Kent Honea Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Wan Review WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 45 0 /1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 5/22/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9458120-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1581 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Continuous Load Path Rod LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building B, 701 Marbella Lane ELEVATION: Foundation Inspection was Performed by: 0 Contract Drawings O Approved Shop Drawings vN y N t) p 0 c.' 0 QZ Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. O 0 Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. O 0 Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O O 0 Trusses inspected undamaged. 0 Truss gusset plates undamaged. 0 Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. O 0 Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. 0 Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. O O 0 Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. O O 0 Mechanical connections properly installed. O 0 Mechanical connections properly nailed. O O O 0 Fastener used comply with structural drawings. O 0 Overbuilt areas properly fastened. O O 0 Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. O O 0 Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. 0 Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O 0 Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O 0 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O 0 Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. O O 0 Sheathing inspected undamaged. 0 Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" dip. O O 0 Sheathing edges properly blocked. O 0 Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. 0 O Drilled Holes For Epoxy Adhesive Not Cleaned Per Manufacturer's Direction. CLP installed at specified locations. O 0 CLP has specified plate washer sizefthickness. O O 0 CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O O O 0 CLP diameter per approved drawings. 0 Shear Studs are proper sizelspacing. O 0 Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. O 0 Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. O 0 Top plate properly spliced. O 0 Top and bottom plate property nailed per structural drawings. O 0 Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. O O 0 Headers strapped per structural drawings. O 0 Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. O O 0 Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O 0 Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED 0 DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? 0 YES NO UNIVERSALTHRESHOLDINSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw 91 ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO Kent Honea ConsultantsIn: Geotechnical Engineering " Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration,. Compliance Inspection & Plan Review WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 46 (1/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 5/23/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9458351-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1581 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Continuous Load Path Rod LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building B, 701 Marbella Lane ELEVATION: Foundation Inspection was Performed by: 0 Contract Drawings O Approved Shop Drawings vN N a d n o 0 0 aZ Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. O O O 0 Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. O 0 Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O O 0 Trusses inspected undamaged. O O O 0 Truss gusset plates undamaged. 0 Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. 0 Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. O O 0 Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. O O O 0 Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. 0 Mechanical connections properly installed. O O 0 Mechanical connections properly nailed. 0 Fastener used comply with structural drawings. 0 Overbuilt areas properly fastened. O O 0 Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. O 0 Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. O 0 Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. 0 Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. 0 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O O O 0 Sheathing nailing type/pattem per structural drawing. O 0 Sheathing inspected undamaged. 0 Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" Gip. O O O 0 Sheathing edges properly blocked. O O O 0 Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. 0 CLP installed at specified locations. 0 CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. O O 0 CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O 0 CLP diameter per approved drawings. 0 Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. O O O 0 Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. 0 Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. O 0 Top plate properly spliced. O 0 Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. 0 Top floor headers have proper sizeibearing. O O 0 Headers strapped per structural drawings. 0 Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. O 0 Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. 0 Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. O 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES 0 NO COMMENTS: UNIVERSALTHRESHOLDINSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw a] ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO • Kent Honea Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Plan Review Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Construction Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Inspection - Plan Review - Buildinq Code Administration SPECIAL INSPECTION LIST (SIL) ITEMS SUMMARY NO. 20 Items Recorded from 5/20/2019 to 5/26/2019 Special Inspection Summary List - Page 1 of 1- Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building 8 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 SIL NO. 1 (ADDED) —Inspector Fred J. Schma/zer, P.E., S./., Observed On 5124119 Structural Element: Cell Fill Location: Building F, Permit 17-1585: Northeast Corner of Elevator Pit Elevation: 2n° Lift Description: The 28-day average compressive strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the specified strength of 3,000 psi UES Report 9451977-1, 190546, cast on 4/26/19). Attachments: LIES Report 9451977-1, 190546 (1 Page) For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. 3532 Maggie Blvd. - Orlando, FI 32811 - (407) 423-0504 - (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com 758.0000UNIVERSALWokoPdeNo.: 945/97700 CT 042619 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Lab No.: -C Oate 1st Issue: May 06, 2019 Geotechnica) Engineering I Facilities Consulting I Environmental Services91ConstructionMaterialsTestingandInspectionIBuildingCodeCompliance 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of *SIL 1 Attachment (1/1)* Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 33607 Structural Element: Cell Fill Sample Location: Elevator - Permit number 17-1585 - Sampled at NE Comer Of Elevator pit 2nd lift i Set#1 oft ISample From: Concrete Truck I Sample By: Fernando Montalvo On 04/26/2019 JAt Lab On or Before: 04/30/2019 General Information _ General Contractor: E.Y. Young Construction Subcontractor: Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Truck No.: 653 Ticket No.: 1458820 Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: N/S Times Placement Information Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi ® 28 days Water Added at Site: N/A Time Batched: 12:50 PM Time Sampled: 1:10 PM Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Truck Load: 6.00 cu yds. Cumulative Quantity: 6.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 6.00 cu yds. Air Content: N/A Slump: 9.00 inches Ambient Temp: 81 OF I Concrete Temp: 85 OF Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test X-Sect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) Lab Tech 1-G- 05/03/2019 7 3.34 3.30 3.32 11.02 18,250 1.660 AJA 2'G' 05/24/2019 28 3.31 3.32 3.32 10.99 26,340 2,397 BCC 3'G' 05/24/2019 28 3.31 1 3.27 3.29 1 10.82 1 28,985 1 2,679 BCC 4-G' 05/24/2019 28 3.23 3.24 3.24 10.47 29,685 2,835 2,640 BCC Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note W- Hold Cylinder 'D'- Defective Cylinder, Un4estable = E-- Excluded From Average = G-- Good Condition Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified only If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Note Test In compliance with approved plans and specifications Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used W lab 1ChnIClens AJA Angel Ayala BCC Brayan Candelaria Maldonado To establish a mutual protection to Universal's Clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. I of I Revised March 2019 4" LOCATIONS: UNIVERSAL Atlanta Daytona BeachEDENGINEERINGSCIENCESFortMyers Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Fort Pierce Gainesville Geophysical Services - Construction Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Jacksonville Building Inspection -Plan Review -Building Code Administration Miami June 5, 2019 Ocala Orlando (Headquarters) City of Sanford Palm Coast PO Box 1788 P Peensnsaacc Cityola Sanford, Florida 32772 Rockledge Sarasota Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official St. Petersburg Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments Tifton 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 West Palm Bench Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 LIES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 20 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of May 20, 2019 through May 26, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of May 20, 2019 through May 26, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmaller, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies o/ this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be venrred on any elecbonic copies. FJS/dkn City of Sanford Aldrich, Dave City of Sanford Antonini, Usa The Spanos Corporation woods, Jim The Spares Corporation Gillespie, Hardy The Spares Corporation Jensen, Chuck The Spares Corporation Homea, Kent CPH, Inc. (Corporate) Boyles, Irene Lee Crest Lee Crest Kephart Garland, Jesse Kephart Campbell, Paul Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 MA Fred Schmalzer 4- T _ 2019.06.07 11:28:13-04'00' dave.aktrichOsanford l.gov Lisa.AntoninioSanrordfl.gov twoodsoagspanos.com hgillespie@agspanos.com cjensen@agspanos.com thomea0agspanos.com lboyles@cphcarp.eom Jo.leegroup3200gma1l.com esseg0kephart.com paulc@kephart.com Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. - Orlando, FI 32811 - (407) 423-0504 - (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO.20 Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: June 5, 2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1S81 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. SPEC`'A L jINS P TION L O"G_,f Added This Summary Period: 1 Resolved This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): 1 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: 3 to 3 SPECIAL INSPECTION SUMMARY: 2 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: 4 to 5 h. VAIILYJ F_P(.Ff2A&: Daily Report No. Inspection Date Inspector(s) Reports No. of Pages Page No(s). 43 5/20/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 6 to 6 44 5/21/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 7 to 7 45 5/22/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 8 to 8 46 5/23/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 9 to 9 Total Number of Pages This Summary: t 9' For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG Permitting Agency: City of Sanford Project Name: Lake Monroe Apartments pdate Period: 5/20/19-5/26/19 Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich Project Address: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard Permit No.: See Below) Ci /State2i : Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-3582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 SIL No. Date SUM No Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location Description S.I. Engineer of Record Response 2S.1. Date Closed SUM No. 1 5/24119 FJS) 20 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Northeast Comer of Elevator Pit, 2nd Lift The 28-day average compressive strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Report 9451977-1, 190546, cast on 4/2612019). FJS IThe Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. 2The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Does #1632149 This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 UNIVERSAL Atlanta : IoVOM ehEDENGINEERINGSCIENCESFennMyersConsultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Fort Pierce Gainesville Geophysical Services - Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection ndsonville JacksoBuilding Inspection -Plan Review • Building Code Administration Miami June 5, 2019 Ocala Orlando ( Headquarters) City of Sanford Palm Coast PO Box 1788 Panamacity PenssacacaolaSanford, Florida 32772 Rockledge Sarasota Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official St. Petersburg Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments Tifton 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 West Palm Beach Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 LIES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 21 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of May 27, 2019 through June 2, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of June 27, 2019 through June 2, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmatzer, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. FJS/ dkn City of Sanford Aldrich, Dave City of Sanford Antonini, Usa The Spanos Corporation woods, Jim The Spares Corporation Gillespie, Hardy The Spares Corporation Jensen, Chuck The Spares Corporation Hornea, Kent CPH, Inc. (Corporate) Boyles, Irene Lee Crest lee Crest Kephart Garland, Jesse Kephart Campbell, Paul Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 091484Fred Schmalzer T e 2019. 06.07 11:26: 33-04'00' dave.aldrich@sanford0. gov Usa.Antonini@Sanfordfl. gov jwoods0agsparos.com hgiflespieCagspanos.com cjensen0agspanos.corn thomea0a0panos.com Iboyles@cphcorp.com jo.leegroup320® gma1l.com jesseg0kephad- paulcOkephart. com Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. - Orlando, FI 32811 - (407) 423-0504 - (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO.21 Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: June 5, 2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. w-ETIO.N LOG- SP,ECIAL INSP. Added This Summary Period: 0 Resolwd This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): 1 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: 3 to 3 fD A1Lw'iR EP OR TTfS?. Daily Report No. Inspection Date Inspector(s) Reports No. of Pages Page No(s). 47 5/28/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 4 to 4 48 5/30/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 5 to 5 49 5/31/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 6 to 6 Total Number of Pages This Summary: 1 _ ;sf For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 W U W a f C 2M r N O C.1 U1 O m m C O d m C a' CW y LL N OW m N uO1i E 'fn c°i oCLEnos a vma) is m • 0im RHO drn TC4 N l6 O py QQlcoSNOO N C U O t nv H maQ:v 0 W 0 o o E CW tgN za e m E W To 7 u 2 h m U E d a CI a U. m 7-NN d rn Nmv J G V1 2 F O W m WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 47 (1/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 5/28/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9458680-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-158111583 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: Jim Woods CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: 813-288-0008 FIELD OBSERVATIONS 8t TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Sheathing LOCATIONIGRID LINES: 1) Building B, 701 Marbella Ln: Exterior Wall 2) Building D, 501 Marbella Ln: Floor ELEVATION: 1) Level 1, 2 2) Level 3 Insioection was Performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings DN y N t a 0 a U Qz Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. O O 0 Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. O 0 Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. 0 Trusses inspected undamaged. 0 Truss gusset plates undamaged. O O O 0 Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. O 0 Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. 0 Continuous lateral bracing property spaced. O O 0 Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. O O 0 Mechanical connections properly installed. 0 Mechanical connections properly nailed. 0 Fastener used comply with structural drawings. 0 Overbuilt areas properly fastened. O 0 Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. 0 Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. O 0 Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O 0 Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. 0 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O 0 O Sheathing nailing type/pattem per structural drawing. 0 Sheathing inspected undamaged. O O 0 O Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" dip. O O O 0 Sheathing edges property blocked. 0 Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. O 0 CLP installed at specified locations. 0 CLP has specified plate washer sizelthickness. 0 CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O O 0 CLP diameter per approved drawings. 0 Shear Studs are proper sizelspacing. O O 0 Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. O 0 Shear wall/load bearing walls property blocked. 0 Top plate properly spliced. O O 0 Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. 0 Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. O O 0 Headers strapped per structural drawings. O 0 Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. 0 Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O 0 Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. 0 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES 0 NO COMMENTS: UNIVERSAL THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw ED ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO: Kent Honea Consultants In. Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 48 0 /1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 5/30/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9459001-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1582 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Continuous Load Path Rod LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building C, 601 Marbella Lane ELEVATION: Foundation Ins ection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings vCU to m n p 0 0 QZ Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. 0 Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. O O 0 Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O 0 Trusses inspected undamaged. O O 0 Truss gusset plates undamaged. 0 Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. 0 Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. 0 Continuous lateral bracing property spaced. 0 Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. O O 0 Mechanical connections properly installed. 0 Mechanical connections properly nailed. 0 Fastener used comply with structural drawings. O O Overbuilt areas properly fastened. 0 Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. O 0 Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. 0 Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O O 0 Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O O 0 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O 0 Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. O O 0 Sheathing inspected undamaged. O O O 0 Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" clip. O 0 Sheathing edges property blocked. O 0 Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. O 0 CLP installed at specified locations. 0 CLP has specified plate washer sizefthickness. O O O 0 CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O 0 O CLP diameter per approved drawings. O O 0 Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. O 0 Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. O 0 Shear wall/load bearing walls property blocked. O O O 0 Top plate properly spliced. 0 Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. O O O 0 Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. O 0 Headers strapped per structural drawings. O 0 Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. O O 0 Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. 0 Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. O 0 M NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES O NO COMMENTS: UNIVERSALTHRESHOLDINSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw ED ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO • Kent Honea Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Wan Review WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 49 (1/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 5/31/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9459275-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1581 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Sheathing LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building B, 701 Marbella Lane: Exterior Walls ELEVATION: Levels 3, 4 Ins ection was Performed by: 0 Contract Drawincis O Approved Shop Drawings N ts N G1 tl 0 U U QZ Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. O 0 Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. 0 Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O O 0 Trusses inspected undamaged. O 0 Truss gusset plates undamaged. O 0 Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. O 0 Truss plate provided for bearing on CMIJ. O O 0 Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. O O 0 Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. O 0 Mechanical connections property installed. O 0 Mechanical connections properly nailed. O 0 Fastener used comply with structural drawings. O 0 Overbuilt areas properly fastened. O 0 Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. 0 Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. O 0 Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O 0 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. 0 Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. O 0 O Sheathing inspected undamaged. 0 O Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" dip. O 0 Sheathing edges properly blocked. 0 Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. O O 0 CLP installed at specified locations. O 0 CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. O 0 CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O O 0 CLP diameter per approved drawings. O 0 Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. O 0 Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. O O 0 Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. O 0 Top plate properly spliced. O 0 Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. O O 0 Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. O O 0 Headers strapped per structural drawings. O 0 Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. O 0 Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O 0 Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. 0 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES O NO COMMENTS: UNIVERSALTHRESHOLDINSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw ED ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO Kent Honea Consultants In: C.eotechntcal Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing " Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Wan Review UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG ermitting Agency: City of Sanford Project Name: Lake Monroe Apartments pdate Period: 6/3/19-6/9/19 ttention: Mr. Dave Aldrich Project Address: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard ermit No.: See Below) City/State/Zip: Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 lProiect No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 SIL No. Date SUM No. Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location Description S.I. Engineer of Record Response S.I. Date Closed SUM No. 1 5124119 FJS) Rev, 6111119 FJS) 20 Rev.- 22 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Northeast Comer of Elevator Pit, 2n0 Lift The 28-day average compressive strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Report 9451977-1, 190546. cast on 4126/2019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator rill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix. FJS The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. 3 This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Docs #1632149 Page 1 of 1 58.0000 10 kdCT o42619UNIVERSAL Woallo.: 945977 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Lab Issue: May Date1stIssue: May 06, 2019 Geotechnical Engineering I Facilities Consulting I Environmental Services 91ConstructionMaterialsTestingandInspectionIBuildingCodeCompliance3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 33607 Structural Element: Cell Fill SampleLocation: Elevator -Permit number 17-1585 -Sampled at NE Comer Of Elevator pit 2nd lift On 04/ 26/21 t L Set#1of1SampleFrom: Concrete Truck Sample By Fernando Montalvo Aab On or Before 04/30/2019 +' i_ ._ _ _ . _ .. _ . GeneralInformation General Contractor: E.Y. Young Construction Subcontractor: Supplier: Truck No.: 653 Ticket No.: 1458820 Mix Design: 30550000 Concrete Admixture: WS Specified Strength / Sampling Times_ Specified Strength: - 3000 psi @ 28 days Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Water Added at Site: N/A _ Time Batched: - 12:50 PM ~ Time Sampled: 1:10 PM Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy _ Field Test Results r Placement Information _ Truck Load: 6.00 cu yds. Cumulative Quantity: 6.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 6.00 cu yds. Air Content: N/A Slump: 9.00 inches Ambient Temp: 81 °F I Concrete Temp: 85 °F Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dlmen. 1 in) Actual Dimen. 2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test X- Sect I Area (in') Max Compressive Load ( Ibs) Test Compressive Strength( psi) Average psi) Lab Tech 1' G' 05/03/2019 7 3.34 3.30 3.32 11.02 18,250 1,660 AJA 2'G' 05/24/2019 28 3.31 3.32 3.32 10.99 26,340 2,397 BCC 3'G' 05/24/2019 28 3.31 1 3.27 3.29 10.82 1 28,985 1 2.679 1 - BCC 4'G' 05/24/2019 28 3.23 1 3.24 3.24 10.47 1 29,685 1 2,835 1 2.640 BCC Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un4estable -*El- Excluded From Average = G'- Good Condition Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified only If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Note Test in compliance with approved plans and specifications Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used i:Lab Technicians ..' AJA Angel Ayala BCC Brayan Candelaria Maldonado To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised March 2019 UNIVERSAL WokoarNo 9456604°Tos°4,9 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Lab Issue: May22.-2Date1stIssue: May 22, 2019 Geotechnical Engineering I Facilities Consulting I Environmental Services91ConstructionMoterialsTestingandInspectionIBuildingCodeCompliance 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0604 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 33607 Structural Element: Cell Fill Sample Location: Bldg F - Sampled at Elevated Shaft, Bldg F. 3rd Lift, South Wally iSet#1 of Sample From: Concrete Truck ^ Sample By: Jorge L2 Rodriguez On 05/14/2019 At Lab On or Before 05/16/2019 General Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corporation Subcontractor: Concrete Truck No.: 6433 Ticket No.: 1459292 Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: N/A Times Placement Information Specified Strength: 3000 psi ® 28 days Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi Q 28 days Water Added at Site: N/A Time Batched: 10:15 AM Time Sampled: 10:55 AM Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Truck Load: 5.00 cu yds. Cumulative Quantity: 3.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 3.00 cu yds. Air Content: N/A Slump: 9.50 inches Ambient Temp: 79 °F I Concrete Temp: 85 OF Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dlmen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area (In') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psl) Average psi) Lab Tech 1'G- 05/21/2019 7 3.50 3.45 3.48 12.08 22,605 1.870 BCC 2-G- 06/11/2019 28 3.40 3.45 3.43 11.73 30.620 2,610 AJA 3-G- 06111/201 1 28 3.43 3.44 3.44 1 11.80 1 31,875 1 2.701 1 - AJA 4'G' 06/11/2019 1 28 3.46 3.40 3.43 1 11.76 1 30.810 1 2,620 1 2.640 AJA Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Exduded From Average = G'- Good Condition Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified only If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Note Test In compliance with approved plans and specifications Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used W2. Tehnlelans AJA Angel Ayala AL Arthur Love BCC Brayan Candelada Maldonado To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts hom or regarding Universals reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shell not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Silences. 1 of t Revised March 2019 ENGINEERING SCIENCESEDUNIVERSALGeotechnicolEngineeringIFacilitiesConsultingIEnvironmentalServices Construction Materials Testing and Inspection I Building Code Compliance Wo korderNo.: 9456604 1 CT 051419 Lab Issue: MayDate1stIssue: May 22, 2019 3632 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 33607 a Structural Element: Cell Fill Sample Location: Bldg F - Sampled at Elevated Shaft, Bldg F, 3rd Lift, South Wall Sample By: Jorge L2 Rodriguez On 05/14/2019 JAt Lab On or Before: 05/16/2019T !Set#1 of Sample From: Concrete Truck General Information Specified Strength I Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corporation Subcontractor: Supplier: Maschmever Concrete Truck No.: 6433 Ticket No.: 1459292 Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: N/A Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Water Added at Site: N/A Time Batched: 10:15 AM Time Sampled: 10:55 AM Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy _ Field Test Results Truck Load: 5.00 cu yds. Cumulative Quantity: 3.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 3.00 cu yds. Air Content: N/A Slump: 9.50 inches I Ambient Temp: 79 OF I Concrete Temp: 85 °F Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dlmen.2 in) Avg. Dlmen. in) Test XSect Area (In') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psl) Average psi) Lab Tech I-G' 05/21/2019 7 3.50 3.45 3.48 12.08 22.605 1,870 BCC 2-G- 06/11/2019 28 3.40 3.45 3.43 11.73 30,620 2.610 AJA 3'G' 06/11/2019 28 3.43 3.44 3.44 11.80 31,875 2.701 AJA 4-G' 06/11/2019 28 3.46 3.40 3.43 11.76 1 30,810 2.620 2,640 AJA Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average -'G'- Good Condition Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified only If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Note Test In compliance with approved plans and specifications Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used 005 Tectin Itlans ` AJA Angel Ayala AL - Arthur Love BCC Brayan Candelarta Maldonado To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our dients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universals reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval or Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of t Revised March 2019 Project No: 0110.180758.000UNIVERSALWokodNo.: 9456604 0 CT 051419 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Lab Issue: MayDate1stIssue: May 22, 2019 Geotechnicol Engineering I Facilities Consulting I Environmental ServicesEDConstructionMaterialsTestingandInspectionIBuildingCodeCompliance 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 33607 j Structural Element: Cell Fill r y, Sample Location: Bldg F - Sampled at Elevator Shaft, Bldg F, 3rd Lift, South Wall `_ I Set#1 of 1 ISample From: Concrete Truck I Sample By: Jorge L2 Rodriguez On 05/14/2019 At Lab On or Before: 05/16/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corporation Subcontractor: SuaDlier: Maschmever Concrete Truck No.: 6433 Ticket No.: 1459292 Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: N/A Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Water Added at Site: N/A Time Batched: 10:15 AM Time Sampled: 10:55 AM Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Truck Load: 5.00 cu yds. Cumulative Quantity: 3.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 3.00 cu yds. Air Content: N/A Slump: 9.50 inches I Ambient Temp: 79 -F I Concrete Temp: 85 -F Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (lbs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) Lab Tech 1'G' 05/21/2019 7 3.50 3.45 3.48 12.08 22.605 1,870 BCC 2-G' 06/11/2019 28 3.40 3.45 3.43 11.73 30.620 2.610 AJA 3-G' 06/11/2019 28 3.43 3.44 3.44 11.80 31,875 2,701 AJA 4'G' 06/11/2019 28 3.46 3.40 3.43 11.76 30,810 2,620 2,640 AJA Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable 'E'- Excluded From Average = G'- Good Condition Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified only If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Note I Test in compliance with approved plans and specifications Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used Lab Technicians AJA Angel Ayala AL Arthur Love BCC Brayan Candelaria Maldonado To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Rovised March 2019 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG ermitting Agency: City of Sanford Project Name: Lake Monroe Apartments 11.1pdate Period: 6/3/19-6/9/19 ttention: Mr. Dave Aldrich Project Address: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard ermit No.: See Below) Ci /State/Zi : Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 1Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Building A/Oubhouse 17-15B0 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 SIL No. Date SUM No Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location Description S.I. Engineer of Record Response 2S.1. Date Closed SUM No. 1 5/24/19 20 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Northeast Comer of Elevator The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 6/12/19 22 FJS) Rev.- Pit, 2n0 Lift strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with Rev. 22 specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Advanced Structural Design on 6111119 Report 9451977-1, 190546. cast on 5112/19. FJS) 4126/2019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix. 2 6112119 22 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Shaft, Bldg. F, 3rd The 28-day average compressive FJS Lift, South Wall strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the specified strength of 3.000 psi (UES Report 9456604-1, 190997, cast on 5/14/2019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix. The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Docs #1632149 This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 Dawn Naylor From: John Bailes <johnbailes@advancedstructuraldesign.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 10:11 AM To: Wayne Gonzalez; Arthur D. Love; 'Rick Wood'; '{Paul Campbell at Kephart - Architect of Record}'; dave.aldrich@sanfordfl.gov; '{Jesse Garland at Kephart - Architect of Record}'; Lee Crest - Site Contractor}'; lisa.antonini@sanfordfl.gov; 'Thomas Honea'; 'Donnie Phillips'; iboyles@cphcorp.com; 'Jim Woods' Cc: Darwing J. Lopez; Manuel Irizarry, Fred J. Schmalzer, Dawn Naylor, Rosie Housein Subject: RE: The Spanos Corporation ---Low 28 Day Sounds good. Cell fill is acceptable to me. John M. Bailes, PE, Vice President Advanced Structural Design Inc. MBE, LDB, DBE 1035 South Semoran Blvd., Suite 1019 Winter Park, Florida 32792 Tel 407-677-5836 Fax 407-677-5894 Cell 407-595-3718 www.AdvancedStructuralDesign.com From: Wayne Gonzalez[mailto:WGonzalez@universalengineering.comj Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 10:06 AM To: Arthur D. Love; Rick Wood; {Paul Campbell at Kephart - Architect of Record}; dave.aldrich@sanfordfl.gov; {Jesse Garland at Kephart - Architect of Record}; { Lee Crest - Site Contractor}; lisa.antonini@sanfordfl.gov; Thomas Honea; Donnie Phillips; iboyles@cphcorp.com; Jim Woods Cc: Darwing J. Lopez; Manuel Irizarry; Fred J. Schmalzer; Dawn Naylor; Rosie Housein; Bailes John Subject: Re: The Spanos Corporation ---Low 28 Day All floors were filled with no voids. Building F 1 st-4th levels. Wayne Gonzalez Threshold Inspector Universal Engineering Sciences 3532 Maggie Boulevard Orlando, FL 32811 Cell: 321-287-1537 Dispatch: 407-422-8378 From: Jim Woods <Lwoods@aespanos.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 8:48:28 AM To: Arthur D. Love; Rick Wood; {Paul Campbell at Kephart - Architect of Record}; dave.aldrich@sanfordfl.eov: {Jesse Garland at Kephart - Architect of Record}; { Lee Crest - Site Contractor}; lisa.antonini@sanfordfl.eov: Thomas Honea; Donnie Phillips; iboyles@cphcom.com Cc: Darwing J. Lopez; Manuel Irizarry; Fred J. Schmalzer; Dawn Naylor; Rosie Housein; Bailes John; Wayne Gonzalez Subject: Re: The Spanos Corporation ---Low 28 Day Mimecast Attachment Protection has deemed this file to be safe, but always exercise caution when opening files. John Bailes- We had the end lift infrared tested today and all cells were full. We will need to do the infrared testing on on the 3rd lift as well based on attached report. Wayne Gonzalez- Can we please schedule the infrared for the 3rd lift of Bldg F. While you are here we should do the 4th Lift just in case. Please call me to schedule. Thanks, Jim Woods Project Manager The Spanos Corporation 2701 Rocky Point Drive, Suite 180 Tampa, Florida 33607 Cell: 912-210-1368 Office: 813-288-0008 Email: iwoodsPagsl2anos.com From: Arthur D. Love<alove@universaleneineerins.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 7:02 AM To: Rick Wood; (Paul Campbell at Kephart - Architect of Record); dave.aIdrich @sanfordfl.eov: (Jesse Garland at Kephart - Architect of Record); ( Lee Crest - Site Contractor); Jim Woods; lisa.antonini@sanfordfl.eov; Thomas Honea; Donnie Phillips; ibovles@cphcorp.com Cc: Darwing J. Lopez; Arthur D. Love; Manuel Irizarry; Fred J. Schmalzer; Dawn Naylor; Rosie Housein Subject: The Spanos Corporation ---Low 28 Day Please find attached file containing The Spanos Corporation- Lake Monroe Apartments, Sanford, test results. These results are low for 28 day test, so we recommend contacting your Structural Engineer of Record for further recommendations. NOTE: This is a courtesy email ....the signed / sealed copies shall follow after a formal review process. Arthur Love Lab Results Construction Services Dept. Office ext: 23332 E- mail: ALove(&-UniversalEnQineerinQ.com Website: www.universalengineering.com EDUNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. 3532 Maggie Blvd. I Ortando. FL 32811 Tel: ( 407) 423-0504 1 Fax: (407) 423-3106 UNIVERSAL. Wo koPde No.: 9457936 o CT 052119 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Lab Issue: May30 2Date1stIssue: May 30, 2019 Geotechnical Engineering I Facilities Consulting I Environmental Services91ConstructionMaterialsTestingandInspectionIBuildingCodeCompliance 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 33607 Structural Element: Cell Fill iSee i of t ISample From: Concrete Truck Sample Location: Elevator Pit at Building F (Permit Number 17-1586) - Sampled at NE comer of Elevator Pit 5th Lift _ ISample By Jose Rodriguez On 05/21/2019 At Lab On or Before: 05/23/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: E.W. Young Construction Inc. Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days { Truck Load: 2.00 cu yds. j I Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days I Cumulative Quantity: 2.00 cu yds. T _ Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete !' Water Added at Site: 10 gals Total Placement for the Day: 2.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 643 Time Batched: 12:38 PM Ticket No.: 1459494 Time Sampled: 1:37 PM Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: Nis Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy I Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 8.75 inches I Ambient Temp: 89 °F I Concrete Temp: 91 °F Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test X-Sect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) Lab Tech 1'G' 05/29/2019 8 3.39 3.46 3.43 11.73 16,470 1,400 AJA 2'G' 06/18/2019 28 3.38 3.40 3.39 11.49 29,870 2,600 AJA 3'G' 06/18/2019 28 3.44 1 3.37 1 3.41 1 11.59 1 28.745 1 2.480 1 - AJA 4'G' 06/18/2019 28 3.36 1 3.41 1 3.39 1 11.46 1 27,445 1 2.395 1 2,490 AJA Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the speed strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder 'D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable -'E'- Excluded From Average = G'- Good Condition Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified only If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Note Test In compliance with approved plans and specifications Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used cka -tL Technielans AJA Angel Ayala To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised March 2019 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No.: 0110.1800758.0000 Date Typed: June 17, 2019 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date I Type of Report 9457517-1 05/17/2019 1 Grout Prism Test Specimens Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (1) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 O.'gCHMqVii. Nsg :F Fred Schmalzer 38 e - a 2019.06.27 TAM F R°" 12:48:56-04'00' ON Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2016 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Geotechnical Engineering I Facilities Consulting I Environmental Services Construction Materials Testing and Inspection I Building Code Compliance 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9457517-1 CT 051719 WorkorderNo.: 9457517 Lab No.: 19P089-C Date 1st Issue: May 28. 2019 Client The Spanos Corporation Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 33607 Structural Element: Elevator Shaft Sample Location: Building F, Permit #17-1584 - Sampled at Final Lrft of Elevator Shaft Set#1 of 1 From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Cesar Contreras On 05/17/2019 ; At Lab On or Before: 05/21/2019Sample General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: Lee Crest Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days i Truck Load: 3.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days t Cumulative Quantity: 3.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer. Concrete b Water Added at Site: N/A - _^ -_-, Total Placement for the Day: 3.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 6533 Time Batched: 12:13 PM Ticket No.: 1459404 Time Sampled: 12:50 PM Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: N/S Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 7.00 inches Ambient Temp: 90 OF I Concrete Temp: 87 OF Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test X-Sect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) Lab Tech 1-G' 05/24/2019 7 3.17 3.24 3.21 10.27 15,095 1,470 BCC 2'G' 06/14/2019 28 3.25 3.32 3.29 10.79 34.390 3,187 AJA 3'G' 06/14/2019 28 3.23 3.29 3.26 10.63 34,565 3,252 AJA 4'G' 06/14/2019 28 3.24 3.30 3.27 10.69 33,690 3,152 3,200 AJA Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average = G% Good Condition Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified only If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Note Test In compliance with approved plans and specifications Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used Lab Technicians AJA Angel Ayala AL Arthur Love BCC Brayan Candelaria Maldonado To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication o/ statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. UNIVERSAL LOCATIONS: Atlanta ENGINEERING SCIENCES Daytona Beach Fort Myers Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Fort Rye Geophysical Services • Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Gainesville Building Inspection • Plan Review • Building Code Adminisuation Jacksonville Miami July 12, 2019 Ocala City of Sanford OH Pallm andoCoast adquorters) PO Box 1788 Panama city Sanford, Florida 32772 Pensacola Rockledge Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official Sarasota St. Petersburg Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments Tifton 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 West Palm Beach Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 UES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 23 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of June 10, 2019 through June 16, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of June 10, 2019 through June 16, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document arse not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verged on any electronic copies. FJS/dkn City of sanforo City of Santoro The Spanos Corporation The spans Corporation The Spanos Corporation The Spanos Corporation CPH, Inc. (Corporate) Lee Crest Kephart Kephart Aldrich, Dave Antonin!, Usa Woods, Jim Gillespie, Hardy Jensen, Chuck Homea, Kent Boyles, Irene Lee Crest Garland, Jesse Campbell, Paul Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 U141110J1 dtscHi,, Fred Schmalzer 2019.07.15 14:17:33-04'00' dave.aldrich®sanforofl.gov Usa.AntDn1nl0Sanfordfl.9ov Jwoods@agspartos.com hg10esPie@agspanos.carl cJensenQagsparoseom Momea®agsparm.corn Jo.leegrotrp3200gmail.com Jesseg0krplarto0m pauWkephart.com Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. - Orlando, FI 32811 • (407) 423-0504 • (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO.23 Addressee: City of Sanford Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: July 12, 2019 PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. SPEC.I'%L INSPECTol'ON-SLOG: Added This Summary Period: 0 Resolved This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: a SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): 1 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: 3 to 3 DAILY ,REI?ORTS- . Daily Report No. Inspection Date Inspector(s) Reports No. of Pages Page No(s). 52 6/11/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 4 to 4 53 6/12/2019 Wayne Gonzalez 1 5 to 5 Total Number of Pages This Summary: 5 For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 ermitting Agency: City of Sanford Rention: Mr. Dave Aldrich ermit No.: See Below) Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG Project Name: Lake Monroe Apartments Project Address: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard Sanford, ; E 17-1584 F 17-1585 Period: 6/10/19-6/16/19 0110.1 SIL No. Date sumo. Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location Description IS.I. Engineer of Record Response 2S.I. Date Closed SUM No. 1 5/24/19 FJS) Rev. 6111119 FJS) 20 Rev.- 22 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Northeast Comer of Elevator Pit, 2n0 Lift The 2"ay average compressive strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Report 9451977-1, 190546, cast on 4/26/2019). The wrong structural mix FJS Resolved per correspondence from John M. Bailes, P.E. with Advanced Structural Design on 5/12119. FJS 6/12119 22 was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix. 2 6/12/19 22 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Shaft, Bldg. F, 3rd The 28-day average compressive FJS Lift, South Wall strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Report 9456604-1, 190997, cast on 5/14/2019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix IThe Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. 2The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Docs #1632149 Page 1 of 1 WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 52 (1/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 6/11/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9462374-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1582 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Sheathing LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building C, 601 Marbella Lane -Walls ELEVATION: Level 3, 4 Ins ection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawincis Approved Shop Drawings vN N 0 M G Q0z Notes Roof/Floor Truss_ Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. O 0 0 _ Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. O 0 I Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O O 0I. ! Trusses inspected undamaged. Truss gusset plates undamaged. Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. 0 O 01, — 0 1 r 0 ' — 0 O Truss plate provided for bearing on CMIJ. Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. 1 O O 1 0 jMechanical O connections conform to uplift value. N EliIMechanicalconnectionsproperlyinstalled. Mechanical connections properly nailed. O O Fastener used comply with structural drawings. r Overbuilt areas properly fastened_. Wood Framing ' Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. i Foundation O OHO O 1 O 01 0 0 ! O t0 r--- sole plate is properly fastened. O O 0 Wall Sheathing is specifiedand thickness. O 0 Roof Sheathing is s ecifiedtype and thickness. specifiedtypeSheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. Sheathing nailing_lype/pattem per structural drawing. Sheathing inspected undamaged. O O O O O Flo 0 0 O _ 0 Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" Gip. 0 Sheathing edges properly blocked. Continuous load path CLP hold down rods Installed p ( ), ( ) ' per approved drawings. O 0 CLP installed at specified locations. O O of CLIP has specified plate washer size/thickness. i ^ O O 0 CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. 0 OCLIP diameter per approved drawings. O 0 Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. O O O 0 — I Load bearing wall studs are proper sizelspacing. 0 Shear walUload bearing walls properly blocked. O O 0 . Top plate properly spliced. _ Top and bottom plate property nailed per structural drawings. Top floor headers have proper sizetbearing. O 10 O O 1 O 0 O 0 ~ — Headers strapped per structural drawings. 0 Jack - King jacks installed per structural drawings. Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O I O I FO: Ledgersareproperdimensions/fastened per plans. O 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw UNIVERSAL a] ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO: Thomas Kent Honea Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 53 (1/1) INSPECTION DAILY REPORT PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 06/12/2019 SITE ADDRESS: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 WORK ORDER NO: 9463273 LOCATION: Building F, 301 Marbella Lane; Elevator Walls: 1 st-4th Levels PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation PERMIT NO.: 17-1585 FIELD CONTACT: Scope of Work THERMAL IMAGING Building F, 301 Marbella Lane; Elevator Walls: 1st4th Levels On the above date, the UES representative was scheduled to take a Thermal Image of the elevator walls on Building F,1 st4th Levels. No voids were detected. Threshold Inspector: Wayne Gonzalez UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Ce tochnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code AdmlNstradon. Compliance Impaction & Han Review UNIVERSAL LOCATIONS: Atlanta09ENGINEERINGSCIENCES Daytona Beach Fort Myers Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Fort Pierce Gainesville Geophysical Services • Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Jacksonville Building Inspection • Plan Review • Building Code Administration Miami July 12, 2019 Ocala Orlando (Headquarters) City of Sanford Point Coast PO BOX 1788 Panama City Sanford, Florida 32772 Pensacola Rockledge Sarasota Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official St. Petersburg Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments Tifton 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 West Palm Beach Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 UES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 24 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of June 17, 2019 through June 23, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of June 17, 2019 through June 23, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. FJS/dkn City of Sanford Aldrich, Dave City of Sanford Aftnini, Usa The Spanos Corporation Woods, Jim The Spanos Corporation Gillespie, Hardy The Spanos Corporation Jensen, Chuck The Spanos Corporation Homea, Kent CPH, Inc. (Corporate) Boyles, Irene Lee Crest Lee Crest Kephart Garland, Jesse Kephart Campbell, Paul Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 41011 Fred Schmalzer 38 4 TAT[ F 2019.07.15 14:17:07-04'00' iiiy 1HA ..a dave.aklrich@sanfordfl.gov Usa.AntoninloSanfordfl.gov jvroodstkpagsparos.com hgillesple0agspanos.com cjensen®agspanos.eom thomea0a9spanos.com lboyles0cphcorp.com jo.leegroup320@gmail.com jesseg@kephart.com patdc@kepharLcom Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. - Orlando, FI 32811 • (407) 423-0504 • (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO.24 Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: July 12, 2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. SPECI'ALINSPECdT10Nr L' OG: Added This Summary Period: 1 Resolved This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: a SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): 1 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: 3 to 3 SPECIAL INSPECTION SUMMARY: 2 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: 4 to 5 DAILY4'IREP'GWT•,S- Daily Report No. Inspection Data Inspector(s) Reports No. of Pages Page No(s). 54 6/18/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 6 to 6 55 6/19/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 7 to 7 iotai rvumoer of Pages This summary: r For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG SIL No. Date sum No. Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location Description IS.I. Engineer of Record Response 2S.1. Date Closed SUM No. 1 5/24119 20 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Northeast Comer of Elevator The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 6112/19 22 FJS) Rev.- Pit, 2"d Lift strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the from John M. Sailes, P.E. with Rev. 6111119 22 specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Report 9451977-1, 190546, cast on Advanced Structural Design on 5/12/19. FJS) 4/26/2019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Ma. 2 6/12119 22 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Shaft, Bldg. F. 3rd The 28-day average compressive FJS Lift, South Wall strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Report 9456604-1, 190997, cast on 5114/2019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix. 3 6/26119 24 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Pit, Bldg. F. Northeast The 28-day average compressive FJS Comer. 50' Lift strength of 2,490 psi did not meet the specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Report 9457936-1, 19P148, cast on 5/2112019). The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. 2The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Docs #1632149 3This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 UNIVERSAL Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Construction Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Inspection -Plan Review* Building Code Administration SPECIAL INSPECTION LIST (SIL) ITEMS SUMMARY NO.24 Items Recorded from 6/17/2019 to 6/23/2019) Special Inspection Summary List - Page 1 of 1- Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 SIL NO. 3 !ADDED) — Inspector Fred J. Schma/zer, Observed On 6126119 Structural Element: Cell Fill Location: Building F, Permit 17-1585 - Elevator Pit, Northeast Corner Elevation: 5th Lift Description: The 28-day average compressive strength of 2,490 psi did not meet the specified strength of 3,000 psi LIES Report 9457936-1, 19P148, cast on 5/2112019). Attachments: UES Report 9457936-1 (1 Page) For the mutual protection of Universals clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. 3532 Maggie Blvd. - Orlando, FI 32811 - (407) 423-0504 - (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com i 0110.1800758.000UNIVERSALWokorderNo.: 9457936 CT 052119 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Date LabNo.: 1st Issue: Mayay3030, 2019Geotechnical Engineering I Facilities Consulting I Environmental Services Construction Materials Testing and Inspection I Building Code Compliance 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando; FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 I Compressive Strength of *SIL 3 Attachment (1/1)* Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C- 1019) Client Thl Spanos Corporation Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL US 92 8 West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Cell Fill Sample Location: Elevator Pit at Building F (Permit Number 17-1586) - Sampled at NE comer of Elevator Pit 5th Lift Seth of 1 ISample From: Concrete Truck I Sample By: Jose Rodriguez On 05/21/2019 At Lab On or Before: 05/23/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: E.W. Young Construction Inc. Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 2.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 2.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: 10 gals Total Placement for the Day: 2.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 643 Time Batched: 12:38 PM Ticket No.: 1459494 Time Sampled: 1:37 PM Mix Design:; 30550000 Admixture: N/S Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Alt Content: N/A Slump: 8.75 inches Ambient Temp: 89 °F I Concrete Temp: 91 OF Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date I Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dlmen. 1 in) Actual Dlmen. 2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area ( in') Max Compressive Load ( Ibs) Test Compressive Strength( psl) Average psi) Lab Tech 1' G' 05/29/2019 8 3.39 3.46 3.43 11.73 16,470 1,400 AJA 2'G' 06/18/2019 28 3.38 3.40 3.39 11.49 29.870 2.600 AJA 3'G' j 06/18/2019 28 3.44 3.37 3.41 11.59 28,745 2,480 AJA 4-G- 06/18/2019 28 3.36 3.41 3.39 11.46 27.445 1 2,395 2,490 A I Remake Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average = G'- Good Condition Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified only If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Note ITest in compliance with approved plans and specifications Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used AJA To establish a mutual protection to Urdversars Wiens, Me Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as contidentfal property of our clients and authorization fir publication or statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding umoersars reports is reserved pending our wdffen approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in lull, w/Mout the wditen approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 or 1 Revised March 2019 WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS RA /9 /11 PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 6/18/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9464180-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1583 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Sheathing LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building D, 501 Marbella Lane: Floor ELEVATION: Level 4 InsDection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings o i 3.1 N Ea Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. Truss oa' 0 O o 0 Q 3 Notes I layout conforms to approved engineering package.. O O 0 Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O 0 ~ Trusses inspected undamaged. r O O O OITrussgussetplatesundamaged. O 0 Truss inspected to have minimum bearing_ O 0— Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. ^ O O 0. Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. 01 0 , IMechanical connections conform to uplift value. 6 ` O0 OMechanical connections properly installed! O I f _ Mechanical connections properly nailed. O 01 Fastener used comply with structural drawings. O 0 O Overbuilt areas property fastened. O 0: OWood__ Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. 0, — — OOFoundation sole plate is properly fastened. O O O O 0101 WallSheathingisspecifiedtypeandthickness. — Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O 0 i Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O 0 0 Sheathing nailing type/pattem per structural drawing. 0 01 OSheathing inspected undamaged. ~_ O O 0 OT rRoof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" Gip. O 0 — 0OSheathing edges properly blocked.__ 0 p — Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. r----- 0 — OCLP installed at specified locations. 01 O 1 0 I CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. 0: CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. 0 CLP diameter per approved drawings. O 0 ear Studs are proper size/spacing. O I Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. O Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. O 0 Top plate property spliced. O p0 j Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. r O of-0 Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. OkO- 0! Headers strapped per structural drawings. O 13 Jack - King jacks installed per structural drawings. 0 OWood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. ! O 0 Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. r i-0100 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES ® NO COMMENTS: UNIVERSAL THRESHOLDINSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw 113 ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO Kent Honea Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Plan Review WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS Sri /1 /11 PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 6/19/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9464437-1 L,0QATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1583 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Sheathing LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building D, 501 Marbella Lane: Walls ELEVATION: Levels 1, 2 Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings vN N N 11 aZfd Q a 0 0 z Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. --` _ O ! 0-1-0- , 0 Truss layout_ conforms to approved engineering package. O 0 ' Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. 1 ; . 0 ; Trusses inspected undamaged. 0 ; Truss gusset plates undamaged. I 0,010. Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. O 10 Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. 1 ' 0 ' Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. 1 , 0 ' Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. 0 Mechanical connections properly installed. 0 Mechanicalconnections properly nailed. 1 O ! 0 ' Fastener used comply with structural drawings. - 0,0 Overbuilt areas properly fastened. O ; ' 0 Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. O 0 , Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. O , 1 0 , Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. _ O ' O 01 O I Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. j i ,0-,. _ Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings_ O 10 ' Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. 0 ` - Sheathing inspected undamaged. Y ! ® Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" clip. I O 1 ; , 0 ' Sheathing edges properly blocked. 1, 0 1 Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. 0 CLP installed at specified locations. i 0 CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. I ; 0 CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O ;_ ; 0 ICLP diameter per approved drawings. - r ~ O ; 1 • 0 Shear Studs are aciner size/sp proper4- --- ---p p- 9 Load bearing wall studs are proper- size/spacing..---- i 0 Shear wallAoad bearing walls properly blocked. 1 0 Top plate properly spliced. j O 1 1 - - _. _._... - _ _ -- _ -- • _ Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. O 0 i Top floor headers have proper size/bearing.- i ; ! 0 Headers strapped per structural drawings. 1 O 1 ! O 10. Jack - King jacks installed per structural drawings. i i 0. Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. - O O 0 - Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. 01 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw UNIVERSAL a] ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO ' Kent Honea Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Plan Review UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No.: 0110.1800758.0000 Date Typed: May 28, 2019 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (LIES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date Type of Report 9451977-1 04/26/2019 Grout Prism Test Specimens Report 9455902-1 05/24/2019 In -Place Density Test Report 9455902-2 05/24/2019 In -Place Density Test Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (3) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 SCHll q G;; Fred J. s'_ Schmalzer 38 - It 7^M > = 2019.06.02 19:28:29-04'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This Item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universals clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL LOCATIONS: Atlanta Daytona BeachEDENGINEERINGSCIENCESFortMyers Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Fort Pierce Gainesville Geophysical Services - Construction Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Jacksonville Building inspection -Plan Review - Building Code Administration Miami November 27, 2019 Ocala Orlando (Headquarters) City Of Sanford Palm Coast PO Box 1788 Panama City Pensacola Sanford, Florida 32772 Rockledge Sarasota Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official St. Petersburg Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments Tifton 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 West Palm Beach Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1S84 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 UES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 41 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of November 11, 2019 through November 17, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the "Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of November 11, 2019 through November 17, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalker, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document am not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. FJS/dkn City of Sanford Aldrich, Dave City of Sanford Antonini, Usa The Spanos Corporation Woods, Jim The Spanos Corporation Gillespie, Hardy The Sp— Corporation Jensen, Chuck The Spanos Corporation Homea, Kent CPH, Inc. (Corporate) Boyles, Irene Lee Crest Lee Crest Kephart Garland, Jesse Kephart Campbell, Paul Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 2019.12.04c % M - 4-111-:,09:43 -051 00 dave.akirlch@sanfordfl.gov Usa.AntonIN@Sanfordfl.gov Jvroodshagspanos.com hglllesple@agspanos.com cJensen@agspanos.mm tttomea*agspanos.com IboylesOcphoorp.eom Jo.6'egroup3200gmall.com Jesseglkephartcorn pauic@kephartoom Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. - Orlando, FI 32811 - (407) 423-0504 - (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO.41 Addressee: City of Sanford Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: November 27, 2019 PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Oubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG: Added This Summary Period: 0 Resoled This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: 0 SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): 1 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: 3 to 3 DAILY REPORTS: Daily Report No. Inspection Date Inspector(s) Reports No. of Pages Page No(s). 90 11/13/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 4 to 4 Total Number of Pages This Summary: 4 For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG ermitting Agency: City of Sanford Project Name: Lake Monroe Apartments pdate Period: 11/11/19-11/17/19 ttention: Mr. Dave Aldrich Project Address: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard ermit No.: See Below) Ci /State/Zi : Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 JProject No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-IS83 Building F 17-158S SIL No. Date SUM No Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location Description S.I. Engineer of Record Response S.I. Date Closed sum No. 1 5/24/19 20 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Northeast Corner of Elevator The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 6/12/19 22 FJS) Rev.- Pit, 2n0 Lift strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with Rev. 22 specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Advanced Structural Design on 11/19 Report 9451977-1, 190546, cast on 6112119. FJS) 4/26/2019). The wrong structural ma was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix. 2 6/12119 22 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Shaft, Bldg. F, 3rd The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 8/16/19 32 Lift, South Wall strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Advanced Structural Design on Report 9456604-1, 190997, cast on 6/12119. 5/14/2019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rods Pump Mix. 3 6/26/19 24 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Pit, Bldg. F, Northeast The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 8/16/19 32 Comer. 5"' Lift strength of 2,490 psi did not meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Advanced Structural Design on Report 9457936-1, 19P148, cast on 6/12/19. 5/21/2019). IThe Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. 2The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Does #1632149 3This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 90 0/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation DATE: 11/13/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9706025-1 BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1582 FIELD CONTACT: FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Framing LOCATIONIGRID LINES: Building C, 601 Marbella Lane ELEVATION: Level 1, 2, 3 Inspection was Performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings vN N N C. Q p U 0 Z Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. 0 Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. O O 0 Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. 0 Trusses inspected undamaged. 0 Truss gusset plates undamaged. O O Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. O 0 O Truss plate provided for bearing on CMIJ. O O O 0 Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. O 0 O Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. O O 0 O Mechanical connections properly installed. O O O 0 Incomplete at CLP locations. Mechanical connections properly nailed. O 0 O Fastener used comply with structural drawings. 0 Overbuilt areas properly fastened. O 0 O Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. O 0 O Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. 0 O Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O 0 O Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. 0 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O 0 O Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. 0 Sheathing inspected undamaged. O 0 O Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" Gip. O 0 Sheathing edges properly blocked. 0 Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. O 0 CLP installed at specified locations. 0 CLP has specified plate washer sizetthickness. 0 CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O 0 CLP diameter per approved drawings. O O 0 Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. O 0 O Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. 0 Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. 0 Top plate properly spliced. O 0 O Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. O O 0 O Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. 0 Headers strapped per structural drawings. 0 Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. 0 O FOR response received for unit door openings. Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O 0 O Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. 0 O NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) 0 IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? 0 YES O NO THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw FIELD COPIES TO: Kent Honea, Donnie Phillips UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services I DATE• 11/13/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9706025-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Framing LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building C, 601 Marbella Lane ELEVATION: I oval 1 9 3 17 COMMENTS: In -Progress BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1582 FIELD CONTACT: FIELD PHONE: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO • pKentHonea, Donnie Phillips Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection113BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Wan Review UMAY 3 CITY OF SANFORD 2017 BUILDING & FIRE PREVENTION PERMIT APPLICATION Application No: Y Y, psce. 6 0 Documented Construction Value: S 2 2 4-2 -23 Job Address: 2205 W. Seminole Blvd. , Sanford, Fla. 32771 Historic District: Yes No Parcel ID: 26-19-30-300-003A-0000 Residential Commercial Type of Work: NewiO Addition Alteration Repair Demo Change of Use Move Description of Work: Construct Bu ldin "F" a 56 Unit 4-Stor iJ L Apartment Building. Plan Review Contact Person: Rollo E . Christensen Title: Project Manager Phone:813/288-0008 Fax: 813/288-9112 Email: rchristensen@agspanos.com i Property Owner Information Name The Spanos Corporation Phone: 813/288-0008 Street: 2701 Rocky Point Drive /Suite #100 Resident of property? JCity, State Zip: Tampa, Florida 33607 Contractor Information Name The S anos Corporation Phone: 813/288-0008 Street: 2701 Rock, Point Drive / Suitt- #100 Fax: Al R/9RR-9119 City, State Zip: Tampa, Florida 33607 State License No.:-MC1515592 Architect/Engineer Information Name: KEPHART Phone: 303/832-4474 Street: 2555 Walnut Street City, St, Zip: Denver, Colorado 80205 Bonding Company: Address: Fax: E-mail: _jesseg(akephart.com Mortgage Lender: Address: s'•2, y G 16 6 /_off l / - -r; 2 91 8W 1'1/_0 WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do the work and installations as indicated. I certify that no work or installation has commenced prior to the issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet standards of all laws regulating construction in this jurisdiction. I understand that a separate permit must be secured for electrical work, plumbing, signs, wells, pools, furnaces, boilers, heaters, tanks, and air conditioners, etc. FBC 105.3 Shall be inscribed with the date of application and the code in effect as of that date: 51" Edition (2014) Florida Building Code Revised: June 30, 2015 Permit Application 0• 56• x Pp, ,/ , , 096.29 = W'" 60, 832.24 0• 56- x p,D W 374.9 = 209994.4 0• 56• x 280.43 159704.08 159704.08 15004.08 x 20• 3040.816 15,704.08 15004.08 39140.82 u- 12,563.26 00 F 4/ vaS.sZ io% Sje $0.2. 3 0 V 3O O O O O O O .. . L ". • 0• * 25- + 17,232- + 36,229.5 + 003-c000Onl-o.o.. 53, 487-1 * 539486.5 x 1.5 % 802•`45 * It NOTICE: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. Acceptance of permit is verification that I will notify the owner of the property of the requirements of Florida Lien Law, FS 713. The City of Sanford requires payment of a plan review fee at the time of permit submittal. A copy of the executed contract is required in order to calculate a plan review charge and will be considered the estimated construction value of the job at the time of submittal. The actual construction value will be figured based on the current [CC Valuation Table in effect at the time the permit is issued, in accordance with local ordinance. Should calculated charges figured off the executed contract exceed the actual construction value, credit will be applied to your permit fees when the permit is issued. OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT: I certify that all of the foregoing information is accurate and that all work will be done in compliance with all applicable laws regulating construction and zoning. s z , ' S7/z1 A64-1 Signature of O /Agent IDate Signature of C tractor/Agent I Date Owner/Agent is V Personally Known to Me or Produced ID Type of ID Print Con r/Agent's Name Signature of Notary-S Florida ate Contractor/Agent is Personally Known to Me or Produced ID Type of ID BELOW IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Permits Required: Building [ Electrical [3" Mechanical Plumbing— Gas Roof Construction Type: Occupancy Use: Ae L Flood Zone: Total Sq Ft of Bldg: f.2_ Min. Occupancy Load: N # of Stories: New Construction: Electric - # of Amps Plumbing - # of Fixtures e2! Fire Sprinkler Permit: Yes No # of Heads APPROVALS: ZONING: ENGINEERING: COMMENTS: UTILITIES: Fire Alarm Permit: Yes No WASTE WATER: FIRE: BUILDING: (/— / 7•- /y Revised: June 30, 2015 Permit Application mportant roints The BVD is pot intended to apply to alterations or repairs to existing buildings. Because the scope of alterations or repairs to an existing building varies so greatly, the Square Foot Construction Costs table does not reflect accurate values for that purpose. However, the Square Foot Construction Costs table can be used to determine the cost of an addition that is basically a stand-alone building which happens to be attached to an existing building. In the case of such additions, the only alterations to the existing building would involve the attachment of the addition to the existing building and the openings between the addition and the existing building. For purposes of establishing the Permit Fee Multiplier, the estimated total annual construction value for a given time period (1 year) is the sum of each building's value (Gross Area x Square Foot Construction Cost) for that time period (e.g.,1 year). The Square Foot Construction Cost does not include the price of the land on which the building is built. The Square Foot Construction Cost takes into account everything from foundation work to the roof structure and coverings but does not include the price of the land. The cost of the land does not affect the cost of related code enforcement activities and is not included in the Square Foot Construction Cost. Square Foot Construction Costs 8, h. ` rouip (2015-International Building ,Code) ' :: IA IB IIA IIB IIIA 11113 IV VA VB ' 1 Assembly, theaters, with stage 229.26 221.37 216.01 207.16 194.94 189.29 200.61 178.00 171.48 1 Assembly, theaters, without stage 210.11 202.22 196.86 188.01 175.94 170.29 181.46 158.99 152.48 2 Assembly, nightclubs 179.28 174.08 169.68 162.81 153A8 149.24 157.08 138.97 134.26 2 Assembly, restaurants, bars, banquet halls 178.28 173.08 167.68 161.81 151.48 148.24 156.08 136.97 133.26 3 Assembly, churches 212.12 204.22 ' 198.87 190.01 178.14 172.49 183.47 161.20 154.68 3 Assembly, general, community halls, libraries, iuseums 176.94 169.04 162.69 154.83 141.96 137.30 148.28 125.01 119.50 4 Assembly, arenas 209.11 201.22 194.86 187.01 173.94 169.29 180.46 156.99 151.48 t Business 182.98 176.21 170.40 161.91 147.69 142.14 155.55 129.66 123.97 Educational 194.27 187.38 182.00 173.88 1 162.37 154.12 167.88 141.89 137.57 1 Factory and industrial, moderate hazard 109.64 104.60 98.57 94.77 85.03 81.17 90.78 71.30 66.75 2 Factory and Industrial, low hazard 108.64 103.60 98.57 93.77 85.03 80.17 89.78 71.30 65.75 1-1 High Hazard, explosives 102.63 97.58 92.55 87.75 79.22 74.36 83.76 65A8 N.P. 1234 High Hazard 102.63 91.58 92.55 87.75 79.22 74.36 83.76 65AB 59.94 1-5 HPM 182.98 176.21 170.40 161.91 147.691 142.14 155.55 129.66 123.97 1 Institutional, supervised environment 183.95 177.72 172.57 165.30 152.29 148.15 165.39 136.43 132.19 2 Institutional, hospitals 307.93 301.16 295.35 286.86 271.68 N.P. 1 280.50 253.65 N.P. 2 Institutional, nursing homes 213.36 206.59 200.78 192.29 179.07 N.P. 185.93 161.04 N.P. a Institutional, restrained 208.19 201.43 195.62 187.12 174.39 167.85 180.76 156.37 148.68 d Institutional, day care facilities 183.95 177.72 172.57 165.30 152.29 148.15 165.39 136.43 132.19 A Mercantile 133.57 128.37 122.97 117.10 107.27 104.03 111.38 92.75 89.05 1-1 Residential, hotels 185.63 179.39 174.24 166.97 153.72 149.58 167.06 137.86 133.61 1-2 Residential, multiple family 155.74 149.50 144.35 137.09 124.57 120A3 137.17 108.71 104.47 0 Residential, one- and two-family ° 145.23 141.28 137.64 134.18 129.27 125.87 131.94 120.96 113.85 t4 Residential, carelassisted living facilities 183.95 177.72 172.57 165.30 152.29 148.15 165.39 136A3 132.19 i-1 Storage, moderate hazani 101.63 96.58 90.55 86.75 77.22 73.36 82.76 63A8 58.94 3-2 Storage, low hazard 100.63 95.58 90.55 85.75 77.22 72.36 81.76 63.48 57.94 1 Utility, miscellaneous 1 78.63 74.24 69.76 66.20 1 59.84 55.88 63.23 47.31 45.09 a. Private Garages use Utility, miscellaneous b. For shell only buildings deduct 20 percent c. N.P. = not permitted d. Unfinished basements (Group R-3) = $21.00 per sq. ft. Y I IF CITY OF SANFORD MAY 3 2017 i : BUILDING & FIRE PREVENTION PERMIT APPLICATION Application No. 7 Documented Construction Value: S 3, 843, 264. 23 Job Address: 2205 W. Seminole Blvd. , Sanford, Fla. 771 Historic District: Yes No Parcel ID: 26-19-30-300-003A-0000 Residential Commercial Type of Work: Newig Addition Alteration Repair Demo Change of Use Move Description of Work: Construct Building "F", a 56 Unit, 4-Story Apartment Building. Plan Review Contact Person: Rollo E . Christensen Title: Project Phone:813/288-0008 Fax: 813/288-9112 Email: rc,hr;stensen@agspanos.cum Property Owner Information Name The Spanos Corporation Phone: 813/288-0008 Street: 2701 Rocky Point Drive /Suite #100 Resident of property? JCity, State Zip: Tampa, Florida 33607 Contractor Information Name The Spanos Corporation Phone: 813/288-0008 Street: 2701 Rocky Point Drive / Su; te #100 Fax: Al 1.12RR-9119 City, State Zip: Tampa, Florida 33607 State License No.: .x3GC1515592 ArchitectlEngineer Information Name: KEPHART Phone: 303/832-4474 Street: 2555 Walnut Street City, St, Zip: Denver, Colorado 80205 Bonding Company: Address: Fax: E-mail: _jessegkephart.com Mortgage Lender: Address: WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do the work and installations as indicated. I certify that no work or installation has commenced prior to the issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet standards of all laws regulating construction in this jurisdiction. I understand that a separate permit must be secured for electrical work, plumbing, signs, wells, pools, furnaces, boilers, beaters, tanks, and air conditioners, etc. FBC 105.3 Shall be inscribed with the date of application and the code in effect as of that date: 51" Edition (2014) Florida Building Code Revised: June 30. 2015 Permit Application NOTICE: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. Acceptance of permit is verification that I will notify the owner of the property of the requirements of Florida Lien Law, FS 713. The City of Sanford requires payment of a plan review fee at the time of permit submittal. A copy of the executed contract is required in order to calculate a plan review charge and will be considered the estimated construction value of the job at the time of submittal. The actual construction value will be figured based on the current [CC Valuation Table in effect at the time the permit is issued, in accordance with local ordinance. Should calculated charges figured off the executed contract exceed the actual construction value, credit will be applied to your permit fees when the permit is issued. OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT: I certify that all of the foregoing information is accurate and that all work will be done in compliance with all applicable laws regulating construction and zoning. 22 z s'/zl AA (I Signature of 0 /Agent Date Signature of C tractor/Agent I Date Owner/Agent is V Personally Known to Me or Produced ID Type of ID 14z,. n b Ga.- l L, Print Con r/Agent's Name Signature of Notary-S Florida ate Contractor/Agent is Personally Known to Me or Produced ID Type of ID BELOW IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Permits Required: Building Electrical Mechanical Plumbing Gas Roof Construction Type: Total Sq Ft of Bldg: Occupancy Use: Min. Occupancy Load: Flood Zone: of Stories: New Construction: Electric - # of Amps Plumbing - # of Fixtures Fire Sprinkler Permit: Yes No # of Heads Fire Alarm Permit: Yes No APPROVALS: COMMENTS: ZONIN 4/ re l t UTILITIES: ENGINEERING: FIRE: WASTE WATER: BUILDING: Revised: June 30, 2015 Permit Application BP822U06 CITY OF SANFORD 12/05/17 Estimated Fees Listing -- Summary Totals 12:21:41 Application type NEW OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL Job description NEW Reference location . . Fee Description Amount O1-APPLCTN FEE -BUILDING 25.00 O1-BLDG PLAN REVIEW 17235.00 PERMIT FEES - BUILDING PERMIT - NEW/ALTE 40255.00 Press Enter to continue. F3=Exit F7=Print summary Total F12=Cancel 57515.00 IMPACYEE STATEMENTTFENTBUILDINGAPPLICATIONI#: 1 8-10000345 DATE: April 05, 2018 BUILDING PERMITNUMBER: 18-10000345 UNIT ADDRESS: W SEMINOLE BLVD 2205 26-19-30-300-003A-0000 TRAFFIC ZONE- 022 JURISDICTION• SEC: TWP: RNG: SUF: SUBDIVISION: PARCEL: PLAT BOOK: PLAT BOOK PAGE: BLOCK: TRACT: LOT: OWNER NAME: ADDRESS: APPLICANT NAME: THE SPANOS CORPORATION ADDRESS: 2701NROCKYPOINTDRSTE100 TAMPA FL 33607 LAND USE: 56 APT UNITS / BLDG F TYPE USE: WORK DESCRIPTION: CITY-SANFORD SPECIAL NOTES: 2205 W SEMINOLE BLVD / BLDG F / 56 APT UNITS / LAKEMONROEAPARTMENTSFEEBENEFIT RATE '---- UNIT ---------- TYPE------------- DISTSCHEDRATE------------------------------- CALC UNITS UNIT TOTAL DUE TYPE ROADS-ARTERIALS Apartment* ROAppDS- COLLECTORS FIREaRESCUE* LIBRARY Apartment* SCHOOLS PAR Apartment* LAWENFORCE DRAINAGE CO -WIDE ORD N/A 435. 00 N/A .00 CO -WIDE ORD CO -WIDE ORD 54.00 N/ A 21100. 00 N/AP A 1 N/A CK NO. y1J f DATE V.1, - ZJZ 56.000 dwl unit 24,360.00 56.000 dwl unit .00 00 56.000 dwl unit 3,024.00 56.000 dwl unit 117,600.00 00 00 AMOUNT DUE 144, 984:00 PERSONS ARE ADVISED THAT THIS IS A STATEMENT OF FEES DUE UNDER THE SEMINOLE COUNTY ROAD, FIRE/RESCUE, LIBRARY AND/OR EDUCATIONAL ISSUANCE OF ABUILDINGPERMIT. TORAPPEALRTHELCALCULATIONTO ANNYY OFITHESABOVE MENTIONED IMPACTOWNER, MUST BE EXERCISEDBYFILINGAWRITTENREQUESTWITHIN45CALENDARDAYSOFTHEDATEABOVE, BUT NO LATER THAN CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCYOROCCUPANCY. THE REQUEST FOR REVIEW MUST MEET THEREUIREMENTSOFTHECOUNTYLANDDEVELOPMENTCODE. COPIES OF RULESGOVERNINGAPPEALSMAYBEPICKEDUP, OR REQUESTED, FROM THE BUSINESSOFFICE• 1101 EAST FIRST STREET, SANFORD FL, 32771; 407-665-7356. PAYMENT SHOULD BE MADE TO: SEMINOLE COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT OR CITY OF SANFORD 1101 EAST FIRST STREET SANFORD, FL 32771 OBLD DIYERTUBEROEROFDIEAETHECOUNTYUIILNGPMINMATTHTOPLEFTOTHSSTTMENT. THIS STATEMENT IS NOLONGER VALID IF A BUILDING PERMIT IS NOT ISSUED WITHIN 60 CALENDAR DAYSFROMTHEDATEABOVE Dt'L311VJ t,:l'J.'x VL'' LfA1Vt''VlCL Application Tracking Action Log Inquiry 1L/ u5/ 1-i 12:55:09 Application . . . . . . . . : 17 00001585 Address . . . . . . . . . . : 2205 W SEMINOLE BLVD Application type . . . . . . : NEW 5 & MORE FAMILY AI'MLDMISGS Revision/Path/Step/Seq/Agency: A 01 00 UTIL UTILITY DEPARTMENT Action date . . . . . . . . : 11/29/17 Action type : PRC PLAN REVIEW COMPLETE Action by . . . . . . . . . : RB RICHARD BLAKE Time spent 1.20. Date/Time/User added 11/29/17 8:57:42 BLAKER Comments water impact fee fIENSIMM Sewer impact fee %v09N===Mx1,, Press Enter to continue. F3=Exit F8AIn/Out Status F12=Cancel 00) Gl t t Print Y Y Bottom BP200103 CITY OF SANFORD 5/03/18 Application Inquiry - Fees 09:46:30 Application number: 17 00001585 Property . . . . : 2205 W SEMINOLE BLVD BDG F Fee Class/Type/Description Trans amt Amt due A AF O1-APPLCTN FEE -BUILDING 25.00 A BR 01-BLDG PLAN REVIEW 17232.00 00 A F1 01-FIRE INSPECT -NEW CONST 2642.30 2642.30 P PF PERMIT FEES 36229.50 36229.50 A ZA O1-BLDG DCA SURCHARGE 534.87 534.87 A ZB 01-BLDG DBPR SURCHARGE 802.30 802.30 Struct Permit Insp 000000 BLCA00 Bottom Credit fees due: .00 Revenue fees due: 45908.97 Total due: 45908.97 Press Enter to continue. F3=Exit Fll=Change view F12=Cancel F10=Amt billed INSPECTION SEQUENCE BP# 17-1585 ADDRESS: 2205 W. Seminole Blvd. BUILDING PERMIT Min Max Inspection Description 10 Footer / Setback Stemwall 10 Slab / Mono Slab Lintel / Tie Beam / Fill / Down Cell Sheathing — Walls 20 Sheathing — Roof 30 Roof Dry In 40 Frame 50 Insulation Rough Firewall Screw Pattern 60 Drywall / Sheetrock Lath Inspection Building Ceiling Air Barrier Insulation Roof Com'l) Building Ceiling Grid Final Roof Final Stucco / Siding Final Insulation Final Firewall Final Door Final Window Final Utility Building Final Screen Structure Final Pool Screen Enclosure Pre -Demo Final Demo Final Single Family Residence 1000 Final Commercial — Final Commercial — Addition / Alteration Final Commercial — Change of Use Final Building (Other) E'4ErCTRICAL PERMIT Min Max Inspection Description 10 Electric Underground Footer / Slab Steel Bond Electric Ceiling Rough Electric Wall Rough 20 Electric Rough Pre -Power Final Temporary Pole 1000 Electric Final BI IT Min Max Inspection Description Rough Plumb 10 Plumbing Underground 20 Plumbing 2"d Rough Plumbing Tubset Plumbing Sewer Plumbing Grease Trap Rough Plumbing Steam / Chill Water Rough 1000 Plumbing Final MECHANIC,AbPERMIT Min Max Inspection Description 10 Mechanical Rough Mechanical Fire Damper Framing Mechanical Ceiling Rough Mechanical Fire Damper Annular Space Mechanical Insulation Wrap Mechanical Fire Damper Angle Light / Water Test Ck Welds Mechanical Grease Duct Wrap 1000 1 Mechanical Final REVISED: June 2014 rroo- CITY OF SANFORD BUILDING AND FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION FIRE PLAN REVIEW SERVICE FEES PHONE: 407.688.5052 FAX: 407.688.5051 DATE: S X /it PERMIT NUMBER: /7 " I su- BUSINESS/PROJEE CT NAME: ADDRESS: [SN jo[»'f CONTACT NAME: PHONE: PLAN REVIEW INFORMATION CONSTRUCTION [ ]C/O [ ] FIRE ALARM [ ] FIRE SPRINKLER []HOOD [ ]PAINT BOOTH [)TANK DOES 20566 REDUCTION IN FIRE IMPACT FEES APPLY: ES NO TOTALFEES:" 2,Cy2- 30 S'Z f 4`y O. O S fill g LAKE MONROE APARTMENTS a& AG S fill > 01 s SANSANFO ZANIES HUD # 067-3551 G i 7d g COPYRIGHT 02017 r406 CITY OF SANFORD MAY 1 2017 BUILDING & FIRE PREVENTIONf1 PERMIT APPLICATION zD, /Sa /9 t7 Application No. Documented Construction Value: S 3, 843, 264. 23 Job Address: 2205 W. Seminole Blvd. , Sanford, Fla. 32771 Historic District: Yes No Parcel ED: 26-19-30-300-003A-0000 Residential Commercial Type of Work: New ig Addition Alteration Repair Demo Change of Use Move Description of Work: Construct Building "F", a 56 Unit, 4-Story `TYPi- Z Apartment Building. Plan Review Contact Person: Rollo E . Christensen Title: Project Manager Phone:813/288-0008 Fax: 813/288-9112 Email: rcbristensen@agspanos.cam Property Owner Information Name The Spanos Corporation Phone: 813/288-0008 Street: 2701 Rocky Point Drive /Suite #100 Resident of property? JCity, State Zip: Tampa, Florida 33607 Contractor Information Name The Spanos Corporation Phone: 813/288-0008 Street: 2701 Rocky Point Drive / St d fe #100 Fax: R1 19 City, State Zip: Tampa, Florida 33607 State License No.: .=1515592 Architect/Engineer Information Name: KEPHART Phone: 303/832-4474 Street: 2555 Walnut Street Fax: City, St, Zip: Denver, Colorado 80205 E-mail: jessegfkepbart.com Bonding Company: Address: Mortgage Lender: Address: WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR'PROPERTY. A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do the work and installations as indicated. I certify that no work or installation has commenced prior to the issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet standards of all laws regulating construction in this jurisdiction. I understand that a separate permit must be secured for electrical work, plumbing, signs, wells, pools, furnaces, boilers, heaters, tanks, and air conditioners, etc. FBC 105.3 Shall be inscribed with the date of application and the code in effect as of that date: 51° Edition (2014) Florida Building Code Revised: June 30. 2015 Permit Application NOTICE: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. Acceptance of permit is verification that I will notify the owner of the property of the requirements of Florida Lien Law, FS 713. The City of Sanford requires payment of a plan review fee at the time of permit submittal. A copy of the executed contract is required in order to calculate a plan review charge and will be considered the estimated construction value of the job at the time of submittal. The actual construction value will be figured based on the current [CC Valuation Table in effect at the time the permit is issued, in accordance with local ordinance. Should calculated charges figured off the executed contract exceed the actual construction value, credit will be applied to your permit fees when the permit is issued. OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT: I certify that all of the foregoing information is accurate and that all work will be done in compliance with all applicable laws regulating construction and zoning. 2Z , r 2J A6l'1 signature of 0 /Agent Date Signature of C tractor/Agent Date Owner/Agent is V Personally Known to Me or Produced ID Type of ID Print Contract r/Agent's Name T Signature of Notary-S Florida ate Contractor/Agent is Personally Known to Me or Produced ID Type of ID BELOW IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Permits Required: Building Electrical Mechanical Plumbing[] Gas Roof Construction Type: Occupancy Use: Flood Zone: Total Sq Ft of Bldg: Min. Occupancy Load: # of Stories: New Construction: Electric - # of Amps Plumbing - # of Fixtures Fire Sprinkler Permit: Yes No # of Heads Fire Alarm Permit: Yes No APPROVALS: ZONING: UTILITIES: -0 V2 WASTE WATER: ENGINEERING: COMMENTS: FIRE: BUILDING: Revised: June 30, 2015 Permit Application CITY OF SANFORD MAY 3 12017 1 BUILDING & FIRE PREVENTION PERMIT APPLICATION Application No: Documented Construction Value: $ 3, 843, 264. 23 Job Address: 2205 W Seminole Blvd. ,Sanford, Fla. 32771 Historic District: Yes No Parcel ID: 26-19-30-300-003A-0000 Residential Commercial Type of Work: New ig Addition Alteration Repair Demo Change of Use Move Description of Work: Construct Building "F", a 56 Unit, 4-Story Apartment Building. Plan Review Contact Person: Rollo E . Christensen Title: Project Manager Phone:813/288-0008 Fax: 813/288-9112 Email: rchristensen@agananos.com Property Owner Information Name The Spanos Corporation Phone: 813/288-0008 Street: 2701 Rocky Point Drive /Suite #100 Resident of property? JCity, State Zip: Tampa, Florida 33607 Contractor Information Name The Spanos Corporation Phone: 813/288-0008 Street: 2701 Aoaky point Drive / Suite #100 Fax: R13f ERR-9119 City, State Zip: Tampa, Florida 33607 State License No.: .MC1515592 Architect/Engineer Information Name: KEPHART Phone: 303/832-4474 Street: 2555 Walnut Street Fax: City, St, Zip: Denver, Colorado 80205 E-mail: jessgg@kepb—aazt.com Bonding Company: Address: Mortgage Lender: Address: WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do the work and installations as indicated. I certify that no work or installation has commenced prior to the issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet standards of all laws regulating construction in this jurisdiction. I understand that a separate permit must be secured for electrical work, plumbing, signs, wells, pools, furnaces, boilers, beaters, tanks, and air conditioners, etc. FBC 105.3 Shall be inscribed with the date of application and the code in effect as of that date: 51" Edition (2014) Florida Building Code Revised: June 30, 2015 7/ / Permit Application NOTICE: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. Acceptance of permit is verification that I will notify the owner of the property of the requirements of Florida Lien Law, FS 713. The City of Sanford requires payment of a plan review fee at the time of permit submittal. A copy of the executed contract is required in order to calculate a plan review charge and will be considered the estimated construction value of the job at the time of submittal. The actual construction value will be figured based on the current ICC Valuation Table in effect at the time the permit is issued, in accordance with local ordinance. Should calculated charges figured off the executed contract exceed the actual construction value, credit will be applied to your permit fees when the permit is issued. OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT: I certify that all of the foregoing information is accurate and that all work will be done in compliance with all applicable laws regulating construction and zoning. Signature of 0 /Agent Date Signature of C tractor/Agent I Date Owner/Agent is V.-Personally Known to Me or Produced ID Type of ID Print Contra r/Agent's Name T Signaturc of Notary-S Florida ate Contractor/Agent is Personally Known to Me or Produced ID Type of ID BELOW IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Permits Required: Building Electrical Mechanical Plumbing Gas Roof Construction Type: Occupancy Use: Total Sq Ft of Bldg: Min. Occupancy Load: Flood Zone: of Stories: New Construction: Electric - # of Amps Plumbing - # of Fixtures, Fire Sprinkler Permit: Yes[] No # of Heads APPROVALS: ZONING: ENGINEERING: COMMENTS: UTILITIES: FIRE: Fire Alarm Permit: Yes No WASTE WATER: BUILDING: Revised: June 30, 2015 Permit Application qv- , VI CITY OF SANFORD MAY 3 12017 t1 BUILDING & FIRE PREVENTION PERMIT APPLICATION Application No: Documented Construction Value: $ 3, 843, 264.23 Job Address: 2205 W. Seminole Blvd. , anford, Fla. 32771 Historic District: Yes No Parcel ID: 26-19-30-300-003A-0000 Residential Commercial Type of Work: New J2 Addition Alteration Repair Demo Change of Use Move Description of Work: Construct Building "E", a 56 Unit, 4-Story Apartment Building. Plan Review Contact Person: Rollo E . Cbristensen Title: Project Manager Phone: 813/288-0008 Fax: 813/288-9112 Email: rchri s tensen(dagspanos . cam Property Owner Information Name The Spanos Corporation Phone: 813/288-0008 Street: 2701 Rocky Point Drive /Suite #100 Resident of property? JCity, State Zip: Tampa, Florida 33607 Contractor Information Name The Spanos Corporation Phone: 813/288-0008 Street: 2701 Ro ky Point Drive / quite #100 Fax: Ri 3/7RR-9119 City, State Zip: Tampa, Florida 33607 State License No.: .=1515592 ArchitectlEngineer Information Name: KEPHART Phone: 303/832-4474 Street: 2555 Walnut Street City, St, Zip: Denver, Colorado 80205 Bonding Company: Address: Fax: E-mail: jesseg@kephart.com Mortgage Lender: Address: WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do the work and installations as indicated. I certify that no work or installation has commenced prior to the issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet standards of all laws regulating construction in this jurisdiction. I understand that a separate permit must be secured for electrical work, plumbing, signs, wells, pools, furnaces, boilers, heaters, tanks, and air conditioners, etc. FBC 105.3 Shall be inscribed with the date of application and the code in effect as of that date: 5t° Edition (2014) Florida Building Code Revised: June 30, 2015 Permit Application NOTICE: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. Acceptance of permit is verification that I will notify the owner of the property of the requirements of Florida Lien Law, FS 713. The City of Sanford requires payment of a plan review fee at the time of permit submittal. A copy of the executed contract is required in order to calculate a plan review charge and will be considered the estimated construction value of the job at the time of submittal. The actual construction value will be figured based on the current [CC Valuation Table in effect at the time the permit is issued, in accordance with local ordinance. Should calculated charges figured off the executed contract exceed the actual construction value, credit will be applied to your permit fees when the permit is issued. OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT: I certify that all of the foregoing information is accurate and that all work will be done in compliance with all applicable laws regulating construction and zoning. AA 40 • 2: z s'/zi/at Signature of O /Agent Date Signature o tractor/Agent Date Owner/Agent is V Personally Known to Me or Produced ID Type of ID Print Contract r/Agent's Name Signature of Notary-S Florida ate Contractor/Agent is Personally Known to Me or Produced ID Type of ID BELOW IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Permits Required: Building Electrical Mechanical Plumbing Gas Roof Construction Type: Occupancy Use: Total Sq Ft of Bldg: Min. Occupancy Load: Flood Zone: of Stories: New Construction: Electric - # of Amps Plumbing - # of Fixtures Fire Sprinkler Permit: Yes No # of Heads Fire Alarm Permit: Yes No APPROVALS: ZONING: UTILITIES: ENGINEERING: FIRE: COMMENTS: WASTE WATER: BUILDING: Revised: June 30, 2015 Permit Application LOCATIONS: UNIVERSAL Arlene Daytona Beach ENGINEERING SCIENCES Fort Myers Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Fort Pierce Jacksonville Geophysical Services • Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Jacksonville Building Inspection • Plan Review • Building Code Administration Miami December 6, 2019 Ocala Orlando (Headquarters) City of Sanford Palm Coast PO Box 1788 Panama city Pensacola Sanford, Florida 32772 Rockledge Sarasota Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official St. Petersburg Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments Tifton 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 West Palm Beach Building A/aubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 UES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 42 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of November 18, 2019 through November 24, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the "Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of November 18, 2019 through November 24, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmaller, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. FJS/dkn Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 WU Nu n ry' 4• . 38 m TAM3 •. any,:: ,c ipjn,1111 H1.A` N City of Sanford Aldrich, Dave dave.aldrich0sanfordfl.gov City of Sanford Antonini, Usa Usa.AntonlNoSanfordfl.gov The Spanos Corporation Woods, Jim pmods0agspanos.com The Spares Corporation Gillespie, Hardy hgilles"agspanos.com The Spanos Corporation Jensen, Chuck c)e —Oagspanos.00m The Spanos Corporation Homea, Kent awm@agspanos.com@agspanos.com CPH, Ins (Corporate) Boyles, Irene Iboyles0cphcorp.com Lee Crest Lee Crest o.kegroup3200gmail.com Kephart Garland, Jesse esseg0kepharLcom Kephart Campbell, Paul pauWkepharLcom 2019.12. 24:22 16 05'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. • Orlando, FI 32811 • (407) 423-0504 • (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO.42 Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: December 6, 2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. SPECIAL INSPECTIOrNxLOG;: Added This Summary Period: 0 Resoloed This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: 0 SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): j, Sheet(s) Page No(s).: to D'AILrtAdF*-0.P_ W4T*S4 Daily Report No. Inspection Date Inspector(s) Reports No. of Pages Page No(s). 91 11/20/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 4 to 4 92 11/22/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 5 to 5 Total Number of Pages This Summary: 5 For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG SIL No. Date SUM No Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location Description S.I. Engineer of Record Response S.I. Date Closed SUM No. 1 5/24/19 FJS) 20 Rev.- F 17-1585 Cell Fill Northeast Comer of Elevator Pit, 2n0 Lift The 28-day average compressive strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the FJS Resolved per correspondence from John M. Bailes, P.E. with FJS 6/12/19 22 Rev. 6111119 22 specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Report 9451977-1, 190546, cast on Advanced Structural Design on 6112119. FJS) 42612019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator rill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rods Pump W. 2 6/12/19 22 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Shaft, Bldg. F, 3rd The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 8/16/19 32 Lift, South Wall strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Advanced Structural Design on Report 9456604-1, 190997, cast on 6/12119. 5/142019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix. 3 626M9 24 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Pit, Bldg. F, Northeast The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 8/16/19 32 Comer. 51^ Lift strength of 2,490 psi did not meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Advanced Structural Design on Report 9457936-1, 19P148, cast on 6/12/19. 5212019). The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. 2The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Docs #1632149 3This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS PRQJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 11/20/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9707319-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1583 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Truss Engineering LOCATIONIGRID LINES: Building D, 501 Marbella Lane ELEVATION: Roof Inspection was Performed by: Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings v N 1; G. N Qo00z Notes Roof/Floor Truss, Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. O I O , 0 of Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. off 1 ® (« Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. 0 i I Trusses inspected undamaged. 1 _ ._ ....... _._..-- -•-.._. r0 0 ; Truss gusset plates undamaged. O 0 1 1 w Truss inspected to have minimum bearing._- 1 0 t O- Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU_ 1 0 1 O A Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. 0 j ; Mechanical connections conform to uplift value_ -- -. I , O O_ I 01 _ - •, _ _ ._ _ to ! I Mechanical connections -prope-dy installed. 0 Mechanical connections properly nailed. _ + O 1 O 0, + Fastener used comply with structural drawings. O I O 01 Overbuilt areas properly fastened. -- -1 O r O ` 01 _ Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. O j Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. - - -O 0 Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O 0Wall Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. - Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. W- -- 0 ' 0 1 + O O 0 Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. 0 0 0 0 inspected undamaged. - - -' _-. 0fSheathingRoofSheathinginstalledwtih0.125 inch gap and "H" Gip. O j O 0 I - iSheathing edges properly blocked - - -- -- - O (r O ® 1 ._ _ _.._. _.. _......_.--. _._ - Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. ? 1010 ; ICLP installed at specified locations. O I O I 0 1 CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. O I 0 , jCLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. 0-1-0 O30 iCLP diameter per approved drawings.`_ _ -_ O0 } ® _ i Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. O O O I 0` Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. IShearwall/ load bearing walls propertyblocked _ I O 1 ' 0 _ rr _ Top plate pertyropspliced. - _ O O O 0 Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. _' O O O 0 Top floor headers have size/bearing. 0 ; 0 proper 1 0Headers strapped perstructuraldrawings._ O 0 O Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings_— 0 1 O to 1 0 Wood notching boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. _ _ 1 ' 0 _ r- - ^ Ledgers are proper dimensions/ fastened per plans. 1 ! O O I 0 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES O NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO: Kent Honea, Donnie Phillips p Consultants In: GeotechnicalEngineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 92 0/11 PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 11/22/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9707788-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1583 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Continuous Load Path Rods LOCATIONIGRID LINES: Building D, 501 Marbella Lane ELEVATION: Level 1, 2, 3, 4 Inspection was performed b : 0 Contract Drawincis Approved Shop Drawings vN N n N i-1 N Qp00Z Notes Roof/Floor Truss tWood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. I Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. Y 1 0 Truss orientation conforms to engineering package_ _ - 0 { - Trusses inspected undamaged. I 0 Truss gusset plates undamaged. ON I Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. O Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. 0. 01 - Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. 0 I 0j` Mechanical connections conform to uplift value Mecharncal connections properly Installed. i 0 O Mechanical connections properly nailed. Y O 0 - Fastener used comply with structural drawings. O !O 0 ( _ Overbuilt areas properly fastened. 1 0 Wood Framing i Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. I Foundation is fastened. 1 O . 0 0soleplateproperly I Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O _ { 01 Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O 0 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. 1 r 0 1 rSheathing nailing type/pattem per structural-- drawing. I 0 Sheathing inspected undamaged. 0 Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" clip. j ; j 0 Sheathing edges properly blocked. - Continuous O } I 010, 7 r - load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings- ( 0 ICLP installed at specified locations. - 0 CLP has specified plate washer sizetthickness. 1 34I 0,01 CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. I 0 LLO ®p CLP diameter per approved drawings. Shear Studs are size/spacing._ p ^( p 1 0 proper _ Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing - - -- - Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked Top plate properly spliced. O 0 ---,_ ---- r _ 0! to00 - Top and bottom plate properly nailed structural drawings. 0 Top floor headers have proper sizetbearing. O I O 01 0 Headersstrappedperstructuraldrawings. O LO Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. O 0 - -- - Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O 1 0 0 lLedgersareproperdimensions/fastened per plans. I j 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES 0 NO COMMENTS: CLP Rods in taut condition; tightened after building loaded. THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw UNIVERSAL 113ENGINEERINGSCIENCESFIELD COPIES TO • p T. Honea, D.Phllll S Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review Project No: 0110.1800758.0000UNIVERSALRportNo.: 9429206-1 CT 011119 WorkorderNo.: 9429206 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Lab No.:19L518-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US_92_&_West 1st _Street, _Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Footing -- M Sample Location: BLDG B - Sampled at SW Comer Set# 1 of fiSample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Diego Mendoza On 01/11/201 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times General__ Contractor: The Spanos Corporation specified Strength: 3000 psi (d 28 days Subcontractor: , Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Truck No.: 606 r Time Batched:_3:24 AM Ticket No.: 1848579 !( Time Sampled: 4:10 AM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: N/A 1 Weather Condition: Clear i Field Test Results 9 At Lab On or Before: 01/14/2019 Placement Information Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Cumulative Quantity: 20.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 245.00 cu yds. Air Content: N/A Slump: 6.00 inches Ambient Temp: 47 OF I Concrete Temp: 64 OF Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dlmen. 1 in) Actual Dimen. 2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area ( in') Max Compressive Load ( Ibs) Test Compressive Strength( psi) Average psi) 1 01/14/2019 3 3 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 11,950 950 2 01/18/2019 7 3 02/08/2019 28 4 02/08/2019 28 5- H- 02/08/2019 28 J- Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the speed strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable -'E'- Excluded From Average To establish a mutual protection to Universers clients, the PUbOc and ourselves. all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients end authorization Ibr pubfcadon or statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universars reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the wrllten approval of Universal Engineering Sclences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ReportNo.: 9429206 3 CT 011119 WorkorderNo.: 9429206 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Lab No.:19L520-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade Sample Location: BLDG B - Sampled at SE Comer Set# 3 of 5 Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Diego Mendoza On 01/11/2019 ^ r At Lab On or Before: 01/14/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information I General Contractor. The Spanos Corporation I Specified Strength: 3000 psi ® 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. I Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi ® 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 110.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete I Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 245.00 cu I yds. Truck No.: 602 Time Batched: 4:35 AM Ticket No.: 1848588 I Time Sampled: 5:20 AM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: N/A Weather Condition: Clear Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 6.50 inches I Ambient Temp: 46 OF I Concrete Temp: 64 OF Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimon. in) Test X-Sect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psl) Average psi) 1 01/14/2019 3 3 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 13,445 1,070 2 01/18/2019 7 3 02/08/2019 28 1- 4 02/08/2019 28 1- 5'H- 02/08/2019 28 1 - I - I - J- Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the speed strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average To establish a mutual protection to Unhrersers clients, the Public and ourselves, ell reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorhation for pubfication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universals reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced. except in full, without the wdden approval of Universal Englneadng Sciences. 1 of t Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9429206-5 CT 011119 WorkorderNo.: 9429206 Lab No.: 191-522-C Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade i Sample Location: BLDG B - Sampled at 75' W Of NE Corner Set# 5 of 5 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck Isample By: Diego Mendoza On 01/11/2019 At Lab On or Before: 01/14/2019 I General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corporation Specified Strength: 3000 psi ® 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 220.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete ( Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 245.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 607 Ticket No.: 1848599 Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: N/A Time Batched: 5:59 AM Time Sampled: 6:45 AM Weather Condition: Clear Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 7.50 inches Ambient Temp: 48 °F Concrete Temp: 66 °F Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dlmen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psl) Average psi) 1 01 /14/2019 3 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 15.040 1,190 2 01/18/2019 7 3 02/08/2019 28 4 02/08/2019 28 5'H- 02/08/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the speed strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the speed strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H-- Hold Cylinder -10'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E-- Excluded From Average To establish a mutual pmtecdon to Universsrs clients, the Pubic and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts hom or regarding Untversars reports Is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in lull, without the wdlten approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of'! Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ReportNo.: 9429206-2 CT 011119 WorkorderNo.: 9429206 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Lab No.:19L519-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionE9BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole_ Co_u_n_ty_, FL 32771 Structural Element: Footing i i Sample Location: BLDG B - Sampled at NE Corner JSet# 2 of 5 Sample From: Concrete Truck _ r Sample By Diego Mendoza On 0111112019 A^ t Lab On or Before: 01/14/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor. The Spanos Corporation Subcontractor: Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Truck No.: 298 Ticket No.: 1848583 Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: NIA Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Water Added at Site: N/A Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Cumulative Quantity: 60.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 245.00 cu yds. Time Batched: 3:57 AM Time Sampled: 4:35 AM Weather Condition: Clear Field Test Results ~ ~' Air Content: N/A Slump: 7.00 inches Amblent Temp: 47 °F I Concrete Temp: 64 °F Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 In) Actual Dimen.2 In) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 01/14/2019 3 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 12.200 970 2 01/18/2019 7 3 02/08/2019 28- 4 02/08/2019 28- 5-H' 02/08/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concreteacceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'-Hold Cylinder D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average To establish a mutual protection to Unlverssrs cents, the Pubic and ourselves, an reports are submitted as confidential property of our cents and authorization for pub#cation of statements. condusions or extracts bom or regarding Unlversars reports Is reserved pending our wAtten approval. This report she# not be reproduced. except In fun, without the wdtien approval of Universe/ Enqlineedng Sdences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9429206-4 CT 011119 WorkorderNo.: 9429206 Lab No.: 191-521-C Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL_ 32_7_71 Structural Element: Slab on Grade Sample Location: BLDG B -Sampled at Center BLDG_ Set# 4 of 5 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Diego Mendoza On 01/11/2019 I At Lab On or Before: 01/14/2019 f General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor. The Spanos Corporation Specified Strength: 3000 psi ® 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: i Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi ® 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 160.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete I Water Added at Site: N/A i Total Placement for the Day: 245.00 cu 1 yds. Truck No.: 622 Time Batched: 5:10 AM Ticket No.: 1848593 Time Sampled: 6:05 AM I Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: NIA Weather Condition: Clear Field Test Results Air Content: NIA Slump: 7.50 inches Ambient Temp: 446 F Concrete Temp: 68 °F Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimon. in) Test X-Sect. Area (In') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 01/14/2019 3 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 13,310 1,050 2 01/18/2019 7 3 02/08/2019 28 4 02/08/2019 28 5'H' 02/08/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concreteacceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the speed strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note 1.'H'- Hold Cylinder -'D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Pubic and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universals reports is reserved pending our written appreval. This report shag not be reproduced, except in full, without the wrttlen eppreval of Universal Engineedng sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2010 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9758.0000 Workorder No: 404746-404746-4 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection93BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Bailey Gant 2701 N Rocky Point Drive Suite 100 Date Tested: 09/13/2018 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Apartment Pad B (PERMIT NUMBER 17-1581) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill Tho toctc KAInw moot tho QrO/ minimum rmmnartinn renuirament. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. I - Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 9 50 Feet North From Southeast 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 96.7 6.2 97 Pass Corner of Pad 10 50 Feet South Northeast Corner 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 96.5 7.1 96 Pass of Pad 11 10 Feet South Northwest Corner 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 97.2 6.0 97 Pass of Pad 12 10 Feet North From Southwest 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 96.9 6.6 97 Pass Corner of Pad To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 03 UNIVERSAL UWo korder No: 94047 603758.0000 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 09/13/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Structure (PERMIT NUMBER 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Storm Inlet Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvae of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 7 S67 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 100.3 5.6 100 Pass 8 S67 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 97.7 6.4 98 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UESPr 110.18007UNIVERSALDateTypedtNo.: January 02, 201900 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection23BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3632 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (LIES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. I Date I Type of Report 9421308-1 1 12/03/2018 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (1) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 gCHMq',. Fred Schmalzer 38 e - TATE 2019:01.04 F 09:41:19-05'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verifJed on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 Project No: 011.1800758.000UNIVERSALReportNo.: 9421308-11 CT 120318 WorkorderNo.: 9421308 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Lab No.: 18K325-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Date 1st Issue: December 11, 2018 Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEGBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 , Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Elevator Pit Wall Sample Location: Pad B Elevator Pit Wall - Sampled at Southeast Corner of Elevator Pit wall ISt# 1 of 1 Sample from: Concrete Truck Sample By: Bailey Gant On 12/03/2018 — At Lab On or Before: 12/05/2018 - General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corporation Subcontractor: Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Truck No.: 622 Ticket No.: 1847591 Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: xYREx Specified Strength: 3000 psi Q 28 days Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Water Added at Site: N/A Time Batched: 1:45 PM Time Sampled: 2:24 PM Weather Condition: Heavy Rain _ Field Test Results Truck Load: 7.00 cu yds. Cumulative Quantity: 7.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 7.00 cu yds. Air Content: N/A Slump: 7.00 inches Ambient Temp: 73 OF I Concrete Temp: 83 OF Unit Weight: N/A Other Results/Comments: PERMIT NUMBER: 17-1581 Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dlmen.1 In) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test X-Sect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psl) Average psi) 1 12/10/2018 7 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 31,806 2,520 2 12/31/2018 28 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 48,505 3.841 3 12/31/2018 1 28 1 5 1 4.00 1 4.02 4.01 12.63 46,540 3,685 4 12/31/2018 28 1 5 1 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 47,360 3,750 3,760 5'H' 12/31/2018 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H-- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences I of 1 Revised May 2018 8.0000DESProjectNo.: 0UNIVERSALDateTyped: January03, 2019 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date Type of Report 9423404-1 12/05/2018 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (1) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 Fred Schmalzer 30 - 2019.01.04 TAM F Rom" 09:41:30-05'00' S10N, . Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9423404-1 CT 120518 Wo rkorderNo.: 9423404 Lab No.: 18K401-C Date 1st Issue: December 13, 2018 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Elevator Sample Location: Elevator Pit Wall, Building C - Sampled at Southest Corner of Elevator Pit Set# 1 of 1 ISample From: Concrete Truck Isample By: Bailey Gant On 12/05/2018 At Lab On or Before: 12/06/2018 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information___ General Contractor: The Spanos Corporation Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 3.00 cu yds. ~ T Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days I Cumulative Quantity: 3.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 3.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 284 Ticket No.: 1135213 Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: xPEXADD Time Batched: 1:18 PM Time Sampled: 3:07 PM i Weather Condition: Sunny Field Test Results Alf, Content: N/A Slump: 5.00 inches Ambient Temp: 59 °F I Concrete Temp: 73 OF Unit Weight: NIA Other Results/Comments: PERMIT NUMBER: 17-1582 Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 In) Avg. Dimon. in) Test X-Sect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psl) Average psi) 1 12/12/2018 7 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 28,965 2,290 2 01/02/2019 28 5 4.01 4.00 4.01 12.63 48,980 3,878 3 01/02/2019 28 1 5 1 4.02 1 4.00 1 4.01 1 12.63 1 49,285 3,902 4 01/02/2019 28 5 1 4.01 1 4.00 1 4.01 1 12.63 1 48,945 3.890 5'H' 01/02/2019 28 H77 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un4estable = E'- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure 771 Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universals dients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shaft not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. t of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No.: 0110.1800758.0000 Date Typed: January 02, 2019 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (LIES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date Type of Report 9393155-1 07/23/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9400025-1 08/22/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9402858-1 08/31/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9404746-1 09/13/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9404746-2 09/13/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9404746-3 09/13/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9404746-4 09/13/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9404746-5 09/13/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9405403-1 09/17/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9405403-2 09/17/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9406366-1 09/24/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9406366-2 09/24/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9406366-3 09/24/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9406366-4 09/24/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9406743-1 09/25/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9406743-2 09/25/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9406743-3 09/25/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9406743-4 09/25/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9406745-1 09/28/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9406746-1 10/01/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9406747-1 10/03/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9406748-1 10/05/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408698-1 10/08/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408701-1 10/11/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408702-1 10/12/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408702-2 10/12/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408704-1 10/16/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408704-2 10/16/2018 In -Place Density Test Report For the mutual protection of Universals clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2016 9408705-1 10/17/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408705-2 10/17/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408706-1 10/18/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408708-1 10/22/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408709-1 10/23/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408709-2 10/23/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408711-1 10/25/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408711-2 10/25/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408711-3 10/25/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408713-1 10/29/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408713-2 10/29/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408713-3 10/29/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408713-4 10/29/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408713-5 10/29/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408714-1 10/30/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408714-2 10/30/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408714-3 10/30/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408715-1 10/31/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408715-2 10/31/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408715-3 10/31/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408716-1 11/01/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408716-2 11/01/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408716-3 11/01/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408716-4 11/01/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9408716-5 11/01/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9410211-1 10/04/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9417735-1 11/07/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9417735.2 11/07/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9417735-3 11/07/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9418002-1 11/13/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9418002-2 11/13/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9418042-1 11/08/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9418042-2 11/08/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9418042-3 11/08/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9418047-1 11/15/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9418047-2 11/15/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9418048-1 11/16/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9418048-2 11/16/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9418048-3 11/16/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 94180484 11/16/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9418048-5 11/16/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9418049-1 11/19/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9418051-1 11/21/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9418051-2 11/21/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9420361-1 11/26/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9420519-1 11/27/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9420519-2 11/27/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9420519-3 11/27/2018 In -Place Density Test Report For the mutual protection of Universals clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 9420519-4 11/27/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9420692-1 11/28/2018 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9420897-1 11/29/2018 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9421228-1 12/03/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9421228-2 12/03/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9421232-1 12/07/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9421308-1 12/03/2018 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9421398-1 12/01/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9421398-2 12/01/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9421398-3 12/01/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 94213984 12/01/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9422129-1 12/13/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9422129-2 12/13/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9422132-1 12/18/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9422132-2 12/18/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9422132-3 12/18/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9422133-1 12/19/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9422133-2 12/19/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9422133-3 12/19/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9423404-1 12/05/2018 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (96) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 oXdSCHMq Fred Schmalzer q41. J 38 8 = 2019.01.04 TATE F a"09:39:34-05'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verJfied on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universals clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 9WorkorderNo: 393155-193155-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEaBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Victor Martinez Date Tested: 07/23/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Compacted Subgrade @ West Seminole Blvd (17-92)--(PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Native Reference Datum: 0 = Top of Native The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Tyne of Test: Field: ASTM D-6938 Nuclear Gauge Method Laboratory: AASHTO T180 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 1 East Bound Turn Lane Sta 57+00 0-1 ft 107.7 11.3 104.8 13.2 97 Pass 2 East Bound Turn Lane Sta 54+00 0-1 ft 107.7 11.3 105.5 12.5 98 Pass 3 East Bound Turn Lane Sta 51+00 0-1 ft 107.7 11.3 106.5 15.1 99 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universars reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 940058.0000 Workorder No: 9400025-1025-1ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection EDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In - Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 08/22/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Roadway and Curb (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Limerock Reference Datum: 0 = Top of Base Course Tvoe of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: AASHTO T180 Modified Proctor Depth requirement is 5.00 inches The highlighted tests below do not meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Note: Retest aendina client's authorization Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Limerock Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction Depth or No. Location of Test LBR pcf) N pcf) inch) Fail 1 Highway 17-92 South Bound 120.7 9.5 114.8 15.6 95 _77 5.2.5 Fail Direction ( Roadway): Station 61+ 50 2 Highway 17-92 South Bound 120.7 9.5 106.1 16.9 88 5.00 Fail Direction ( Curb): Station 61+50 Remarks: 3 lifts of 5 inches to be followed by 2 inches of asphalt To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 0110. 1800758.0000 9WorkorderNo: 402802858-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Victor Martinez Date Tested: 08/31 /2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Base (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Limerock Reference Datum: 0 = Top of Base Course The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvoe of Test: Field: ASTM D-6938 Nuclear Gauge Method Laboratory: AASHTO T180 Modified Proctor Depth requirement is 15.00 inches Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Limerock Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction Depth or No. Location of Test LBR pcf) pcf) inch) Fail 1 Highway 17-92 Lane Widening: 120.7 9.5 118.2 13.1 98 5.25 Pass Sta 62+00 1 st lift 5" 2 Highway 17-92 Lane Widening: 120.7 9.5 121.9 11.6 101 10.00 Pass Sta 61+50 2nd lift 10" Remarks: Off Site. Base was tested in 2 different locations because contractor already had 16" of Base placed and nuke gauge only can test 12". Base Depth was checked for a total of 15.50" total. These are retests from 8-22-18. To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL LIES Project No: 94047 800758.0000 Workorder No: 9404746-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 09/13/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: 15" RCP Storm Pipe (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 1 Pipe Run 66 S65 to S67 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 98.6 5.3 99 Pass 2 Pipe Run 66 S65 to S67 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 98.3 5.9 98 Pass 3 Pipe Run 66 S65 to S67 1+2 ft 1 100.0 13.0 99.1 4.7 99 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL LIES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 9WorkorderNo: 404746-204746-2 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionE9BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 09/13/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: 18" RCP Storm Pipe (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvne of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test I Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 4 Pipe Run 68 S67 to S69 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 98.7 5.3 99 Pass 5 Pipe Run 68 S67 to S69 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.5 4.4 100 Pass 6 Pipe Run 68 S67 to S69 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 99.1 5.5 99 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves. all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9408 1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9408715-2 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 10/31 /2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Apartment Pad C (PERMIT NUMBER: 17-1582) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 5 25 Feet West and 10 Feet North 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 99.3 7.9 99 Pass From SE Corner of Pad 6 25 Feet West and 10 Feet South 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 98.5 8.4 98 Pass From NE Corner of Pad 7 25 Feet East and 10 Feet South 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 99.2 7.3 99 Pass From NW Corner of Pad 8 25 Feet East and 10 Feet North 1 +2 ft 100.0 13.0 98.8 7.7 99 Pass From SW Corner of Pad 9 25 Feet East and 10 Feet North 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 105.4 12.4 96 Pass From SW Corner of Pad 10 25 Feet East and 10 Feet South 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 104.7 11.9 96 Pass From NW Corner of Pad 11 25 Feet West and 10 Feet South 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 105.1 9.7 96 Pass From NE Corner of Pad 12 25 Feet West and 10 Feet North 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 106.2 8.2 97 Pass From SE Corner of Pad Remarks: 2+3 Is Mixed with Clay and Soil per John Lee Crest To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 94081800758.0000 Workorder No: 9408715-3 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3632 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106. In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 10/31/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Structures (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Storm Inlet Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvoe of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 13 Structure 67 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 99.1 7.9 99 Pass 14 Structure 67 4+5 ft 100.0 13.0 99.4 8.2 99 Pass 15 Structure 67 5+6 ft 100.0 13.0 98.5 7.6 98 Pass 16 Structure 65 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 99.4 8.5 99 Pass 17 Structure 65 4+5 ft 100.0 13.0 98.3 9.3 98 Pass 18 Structure 69 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 98.4 8.0 98 Pass 19 Structure 69 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 98.7 7.7 99 Pass 20 Structure 69 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 97.7 8.6 98 Pass 21 IStructure 69 1 3+4 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 97.5 1 9.5 1 98 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9408 1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9408716-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 11 /01 /2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tvoe of Test: Area Tested: Sanitary Pipe Run 8 Inch PVC 106 LF Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 S2 To S10 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 98.9 11.1 99 Pass 2 S2 To S10 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.5 10.2 100 Pass 3 S2 To S10 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 99.1 9.7 99 Pass 4 S2 To S10 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 99.4 9.3 99 Pass 5 IS2 To S10 1 3+4 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 98.6 1 10.3 1 99 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 94081800758.0000 Workorder No: 9408715-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 10/31 /2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Apartment Pad B (PERMIT NUMBER: 17-1581) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 25 Feet West and 10 Feet South 3+4 ft 109.3 11.8 106.1 11.2 97 Pass From NE Corner of Pad 2 25 Feet West and 10 Feet North 3+4 ft 109.3 11.8 107.2 10.6 98 Pass From SE Corner of Pad 3 25 Feet East and 10 Feet North 3+4 ft 109.3 11.8 105.9 11.5 97 Pass From SW Corner of Pad 4 25 Feet East and 10 Feet South 3+4 ft 109.3 11.8 106.4 9.9 97 Pass From NW Corner of Pad Remarks: Note: Apartment B 3+4 Fill was removed and replaced with a clay and fill mixture per John Lee Crest To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9408714-1 Report Date: 01/02/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Bailey Gant 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 10/30/2018 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tvoe of Test: Area Tested: Sanitary Structure (PERMIT Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Sanitary Structure The tests helow meet the 98% minimum compaction reauirement. Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 T2 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 98.1 9.5 98 Pass 2 T2 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 97.6 10.2 98 Pass 3 T2 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 99.2 7.9 99 Pass 4 T2 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 98.5 8.3 98 Pass 5 G 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.9 7.8 100 Pass 6 G 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 99.4 7.4 99 Pass 7 G 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 99.1 7.6 99 Pass 8 IG 3+4 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 99.6 1 6.7 1 100 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9 800758.0000 Workorder No: 408708714-2 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 10/30/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: East Pond Wall (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Tvt)e of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test I Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) N PC() N Fail 9 Center of East Pond Wall 0+1 ft 107.7 11.3 103.2 11.6 96 Pass 10 Center of East Pond Wall 1+2 ft 107.7 11.3 103.9 10.7 96 Pass 11 Center of East Pond Wall 2+3 ft 107.7 11.3 104.2 9.6 97 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL LIES Project No: 9408 1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9408714-3 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 10/30/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: South Pond Wall (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Tvoe of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. I Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 12 15 Feet East From West End of 0+1 ft 107.7 11.3 105.3 8.4 98 Pass all 13 15 Feet East From West End of 1+2 ft 107.7 11.3 105.7 7.1 98 Pass all 14 15 Feet East From West End of 2+3 ft 107.7 11.3 104.1 9.7 97 Pass wall 15 15 Feet West From East End of 0+1 ft 107.7 11.3 103.4 11.4 96 Pass wall 16 15 Feet West From East End of 1+2 ft 107.7 11.3 104.5 8.4 97 Pass wall 17 15 Feet West From East End of 2+3 ft 107.7 11.3 104.9 7.7 97 Pass wall To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves. all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 91800758.0000 Workorder No: 40808713-5 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 10/29/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Sanitary Pipe Run 8 Inch Pipe 129 LF (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvae of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. I Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture N Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 20 T2 To G 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 97.9 9.8 98 Pass 21 T2 To G 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.3 7.7 99 Pass 22 T2 To G 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 98.8 9.4 99 Pass 23 T2 To G 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 99.4 6.8 99 Pass 24 T2 To G 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 99.1 6.9 99 Pass 25 IT2 To G 4+5 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 98.4 1 8.0 1 98 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves. all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 91800758.0000 Workorder No: 40808713-4 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0604 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 10/29/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm RCP Pipe Run 30 Inches 180 LF (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvrae of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. I Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 14 S45 To S47 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 99.4 11.6 99 Pass 15 S45 To S47 4+5 ft 100.0 13.0 99.6 11.2 100 Pass 16 S45 To S47 5+6 ft 100.0 13.0 98.5 10.5 98 Pass 17 S45 To S47 6+7 ft 100.0 13.0 98.2 12.4 98 Pass 18 S45 To S47 7+8 ft 100.0 13.0 98.6 10.9 99 Pass 19 IS45 To S47 8+9 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 99.3 9.6 99 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 90110. 1800758.0000 Workorder No: 40808713-3 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionE9BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Testst Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 10/29/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm RCP Pipe Run 30 Inches 300 LF (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvae of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. I Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture soil Compaction Pass or Fail 9 S43 To S41 2+3 It 100.0 13.0 98.7 10.4 99 Pass 10 S43 To S41 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 99.2 10.6 99 Pass 11 S43 To S41 4+5 ft 100.0 13.0 100.4 9.7 100 Pass 12 S43 To S41 5+6 ft 100.0 13.0 100.6 9.2 101 Pass 13 S43 To S41 6+7 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 99.2 11.1 99 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9 1800758.0000 Workorder No: 40808713-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 10/29/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm RCP Pipe Run 15" 120 LF PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvne of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test I Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 1 S34 To S36 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 99.5 8.6 100 Pass 2 S34 To S36 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 99.2 9.0 99 Pass 3 S34 To S36 4+5 ft 100.0 13.0 98.8 8.8 99 Pass 4 S34 To S36 5+6 ft 100.0 13.0 98.5 1 9.6 1 98 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universars clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 91800758.0000 Workorder No: 40808713-2 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 10/29/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tvae of Test: Area Tested: Storm RCP Pipe Run 15 Inches 110 Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method LF (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 5 S65 To S67 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 98.4 9.3 98 Pass 6 S65 To S67 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 99.1 8.3 99 Pass 7 S65 To S67 4+5 ft 100.0 13.0 99.2 8.4 99 Pass 8 S65 To S67 5+6 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 98.6 1 7.9 1 99 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves. all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL LIES Project No: 0110. 1800758.0000 9WorkorderNo: 40808711-3 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 10/26/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Structure (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Storm Inlet Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 3 S45 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.1 10.4 99 Pass 4 S45 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 98.3 11.1 98 Pass 5 S45 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 98.7 9.6 99 Pass 6 S45 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 99.2 10.1 99 Pass 7 IS45 4+5 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 99.3 1 9.6 1 99 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 91800758.0000 Workorder No: 40808711-2 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 10/25/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: South Wall of Pond Wall (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Footing The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Tvoe of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 2 50 Feet West From East End of 0-1 ft 107.7 11.3 105.9 10.6 98 Pass South Wall To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3632 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 LIES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9408711-1 Report Date: 01/02/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Bailey Gant 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 10/25/2018 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: East Wall -Pond Wall (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Footing Thp tasty halew meet the 950% minimum comnaction reauirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 1 50 Feet South From North End of 0-1 ft 107.7 11.3 106.7 11.1 99 Pass Wall To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization forpublication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL LIES Project No: 9758.0000 Workorder No: 408709-208709-2 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 10/23/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Pipe Run S46 30 Inch RCP Pipe (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 7 S45 To S47 1-2 ft 100.0 13.0 99.4 7.1 99 Pass 8 S45 To S47 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.1 7.7 99 Pass 9 S45 To S47 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 100.3 6.8 100 Pass 10 S45 To S47 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 98.5 8.2 98 Pass 11 IS45 To S47 2+3 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 99.3 1 7.5 1 99 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 9WorkorderNo: 408709-108709-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date: 01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation LIES Technician: Bailey Gant 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 10/23/2018 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: East Wall (PERMIT NUMBER: 18- 2508) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction reauirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 75 Feet South From North End of 0+1 ft 107.7 11.3 105.7 8.6 98 Pass East Wall 2 75 Feet South From North End of 1+2 ft 107.7 11.3 104.5 8.8 97 Pass East Wall 3 75 Feet South From North End of 2+3 ft 107.7 11.3 105.1 7.9 98 Pass East Wall 4 140 Feet South From North End 0+1 ft 107.7 11.3 104.3 9.3 97 Pass of East Wall 5 140 Feet South From North End 1+2 ft 107.7 11.3 105.2 7.4 98 Pass of East Wall 6 140 Feet South From North End 2+3 ft 107.7 11.3 103.8 9.0 96 Pass of East Wall To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL LIES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 9WorkorderNo: 408708708-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 10/22/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: North Wall (PERMIT NUMBER: 18- 2508) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Tvoe of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. I Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 50 Feet East From West End of 2+3 ft 107.7 11.3 103.8 9.4 96 Pass Wall 2 150 Feet East From West End of 2+3 ft 107.7 11.3 103.5 8.7 96 Pass Wall 3 250 Feet East From West End of 2+3 ft 107.7 11.3 104.8 7.9 97 Pass Wall 4 50 Feet East From West End of 3+4 ft 107.7 11.3 104.5 8.0 97 Pass Wall 5 150 Feet East From West End of 3+4 ft 107.7 11.3 105.1 7.3 98 Pass Wall 6 250 Feet East From West End of 3+4 ft 107.7 11.3 107.8 7.1 100 Pass Wall 7 50 Feet East From West End of 4+5 ft 107.7 11.3 105.3 6.9 98 Pass Wall 8 150 Feet East From West End of 4+5 ft 107.7 11.3 104.5 7.6 97 Pass Wall 9 250 Feet East From West End of 4+5 ft 107.7 11.3 105.7 7.4 98 Pass Wall 10 50 Feet East From West End of 5+6 ft 107.7 11.3 103.9 8.4 96 Pass Wall 11 150 Feet East From West End of 5+6 ft 107.7 11.3 104.3 7.8 97 Pass Wall 12 250 Feet East From West End of 5+6 ft 107.7 11.3 104.6 7.3 97 Pass Wall To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves. all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9408706 0758.0000 Workorder No: 9408706-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 10/18/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: North Wall Near Pond (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM 0-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 50 Feet East From West end of 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.6 10.4 100 Pass Wall 2 150 Feet East From West end of 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 97.6 12.9 98 Pass Wall 3 250 Feet East From West end of 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 96.9 11.6 97 Pass Wall 4 50 Feet East From West end of 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 97.3 10.2 97 Pass Wall 5 150 Feet East From West end of 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 97.8 11.8 98 Pass Wall 6 250 Feet East From West end of 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 98.2 9.5 98 Pass Wall To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 94087 800758.0000 Workorder No: 9408705-2 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 10/17/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tvae of Test: Area Tested: Apartment Pad A (PERMIT NUMBER: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method 17-1580) Material: Fill Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 9 25 Feet West From SE Corner of 4+5 ft 110.2 11.4 106.8 10.2 97 Pass Pad 10 25 Feet East From NW Corner of 4+5 ft 110.2 11.4 108.2 9.6 98 Pass Pad 11 Center of Pad 4+5 ft 110.2 11.4 106.4 9.2 97 Pass 12 25 Feet West From SE Corner of 5+6 ft 110.2 11.4 108.9 8.2 99 Pass Pad 13 25 Feet East From NW Corner of 5+6 ft 110.2 11.4 107.6 9.3 98 Pass Pad 14 Center of Pad 5+6 ft 110.2 11.4 107.4 8.8 97 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL LIES Project No: 9408705 0758.0000 Workorder No: 9408705-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection93BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 10/17/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: 30" RCP Storm Pipe (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvne of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. I Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 S45 To S43 1-2 ft 100.0 13.0 99.1 7.9 99 Pass 2 S45 To S43 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 98.7 8.3 99 Pass 3 S45 To S43 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 100.2 7.2 100 Pass 4 S45 To S43 1 +2 ft 100.0 13.0 99.3 7.9 99 Pass 5 S43 To S41 1-2 ft 100.0 13.0 98.2 9.6 98 Pass 6 S43 To S41 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 98.6 9.0 99 Pass 7 S43 To S41 0+1 It 100.0 13.0 99.4 7.6 99 Pass 8 IS43 To S41 1+2 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 99.1 1 8.5 1 99 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9410.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9408704-2 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionE] Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 10/16/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tvrae of Test: Area Tested: Bike Path Covering S53 Pipe Run Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Limerock Reference Datum: 0 = Top of Base Course The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Depth requirement is 8.00 inches Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Limerock Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction Depth or No. Location of Test LBR pcf) M pcf) inch) Fail 4 Center of Bike Path (S53 Pipe 120.7 9.5 119.8 9.4 99 8.25 Pass Run) Remarks: Per John (Lee Crest) This Is area they repaired. To establish a mutual protection to Universars clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 LIES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9408716-4 Report Date: 01/02/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Bailey Gant 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 11/01/2018 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Type of Test: Area Tested: Storm Pipe Run 24 Inches RCP Pipe Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method 145 LF (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction reauirement. Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 15 S50 To S54 Existing 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 98.6 7.5 99 Pass 16 S50 To S54 Existing 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 100.1 7.2 100 Pass 17 S50 To S54 Existing 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 99.3 8.0 99 Pass 18 S50 To S54 Existing 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 98.8 7.9 99 Pass 19 IS50 To S54 Existing 3+4 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 98.6 7.6 99 Pass Remarks: Underneath Bike Path To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL LIES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 9408WorkorderNo: 9408716-5 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionI]] Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 11 /01 /2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Structure (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Storm Inlet Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvne of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 20 Structure S61 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 98.5 6.9 98 Pass 21 Structure S61 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 98.9 7.2 99 Pass 22 Structure S61 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 99.3 6.8 99 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL LIES Project No: 9410.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9410211-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEaBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 10/04/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Apartment Pad A (PERMIT NUMBER: 17-1580) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Tvae of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 1 25 Feet West From SEC of Pad 1+2 ft 110.2 11.4 107.1 11.9 97 Pass Retest 2 25 Feet East From SWC of Pad 1+2 ft 110.2 11.4 106.7 12.4 97 Pass Retest 3 Center of Pad Retest 1+2 ft 1 110.2 1 11.4 1 107.5 1 9.9 1 98 1 Pass Remarks: Retested from date 1013118 To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 0110. Workorder No: 9417735-17735-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 11/07/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tvoe of Test: Area Tested: East Pond Wall (PERMIT NUMBER: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method 18-2508) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 1 Center of East Pond Wall 3+4 ft 107.7 11.3 103.2 10.2 96 Pass 2 Center of East Pond Wall 4+5 ft 107.7 11.3 105.1 9.5 98 Pass 3 Center of East Pond Wall 5+6 ft 107.7 11.3 104.3 9.0 97 Pass 4 Center of East Pond Wall 6+7 ft 1 107.7 1 11.3 1 104.9 1 8.3 1 97 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 941758.0000 Workorder No: 9417735-27735-2 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 11/07/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: South Pond Wall (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Tyne of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 5 15 Feet East from West End of 3+4 It 107.7 11.3 105.2 7.8 98 Pass Wall 6 15 Feet East from West End of 4+5 ft 107.7 11.3 105.8 7.5 98 Pass Wall 7 15 Feet East from West End of 5+6 ft 107.7 11.3 105.3 8.5 98 Pass Wall 8 15 Feet East from West End of 6+7 ft 107.7 11.3 104.6 10.4 97 Pass Wall 9 15 Feet Wes from East End of 3+4 ft 107.7 11.3 105.5 8.0 98 Pass Wall 10 15 Feet Wes from East End of 4+5 ft 107.7 11.3 106.2 7.4 99 Pass Wall 11 15 Feet Wes from East End of 5+6 It 107.7 11.3 105.3 7.9 98 Pass Wall 12 15 Feet Wes from East End of 6+7 ft 107.7 11.3 106.1 8.7 99 Pass Wall To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 941758.0000 Workorder No: 9417735-37735-3 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 11 /07/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Pool Deck (PERMIT NUMBER: 17- 1580) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Top of Fill Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor The highlighted tests below do not meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Note: Retest pending client's authorization Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 13 Center of Pool Deck 0-1 ft 109.3 11.8 100.3 16.4 92: WF.ail Remarks: Area was yeilding. Too wet needs to dry. To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review. 3532 Masutie Blvd. Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0604 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9416002-1 Report Date: 01/02/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Bailey Gant 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 11/13/2018 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tvlae of Test: Area Tested: Apartment Pad A (PERMIT NUMBER: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cyl it 17-1580) Material: Fill Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified i i Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Method Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 25 Feet West From Southeast 6+7 ft 109.3 11.8 107.1 10.4 98 Pass Corner 2 25 Feet West From Southeast 7+8 ft 109.3 11.8 108.4 9.8 99 Pass Corner 3 25 Feet West From Southeast 8+9 It 109.3 11.8 106.6 10.7 98 Pass Corner 4 Center of Pad 6+7 ft 109.3 11.8 106.3 11.1 97 Pass 5 Center of Pad 7+8 It 109.3 11.8 106.5 11.5 97 Pass 6 Center of Pad 8+9 ft 109.3 11.8 104.2 12.6 95 Pass 7 25 Feet East From NorthWest 6+7 It 109.3 11.8 107.7 8.8 99 Pass End of Pad 8 25 Feet East From NorthWest 7+8 It 109.3 11.8 105.9 10.1 97 Pass End of Pad To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 3 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maaaie Blvd. Orlando. FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9418002-2 Report Date: 01/02/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation LIES Technician: Bailey Ga 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 11/13/201 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tvoe of Test: Area Tested: Lift Station (PERMIT NUMBER: 18- Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cy 2508) Material: Backfill Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Sanitary Structure The tests helow meet the ga% minimum compaction reauirement. nt 8 inder Method Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) I Fail 9 Lift Station WW L 2 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.6 10.8 100 Pass 10 Lift Station WW L 2 1+2 It 100.0 13.0 99.1 12.2 99 Pass 11 Lift Station WW L 2 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 98.5 12.6 98 Pass 12 Lift Station WW L 2 3+4 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 100.1 11.4 1 100 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending ourwritten approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 011 Workorder No: 940 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/1 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection93BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maagle Blvd. Orlando. FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 1800758.0000 04-1 t2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Bailey G I ni 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 10/16/2018 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tvt)e of Test: Area Tested: North Wall Near Pond (PERMIT Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive C ) lii NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Fill Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified I PI Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Footing The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction reouirement. Method Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 50 Feet East of West End of Wall 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 100.4 9.6 100 Pass Footer 2 150 Feet East of West End of 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 101.2 8.5 101 Pass Wall Footer 3 250 Feet East of West End of 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.2 10.9 99 Pass Wall Footer To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property bf our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our Writtentten approval. Page 1 ES Project No: UNIVERSAL uWo korder No: 9408702 2758.0000 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3632 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 10/12/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: 15" RCP Storm Pipe (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvne of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 4 S32 To S34 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.3 9.4 99 Pass 5 S32 To S34 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 100.1 8.6 100 Pass 6 S32 To S34 1 +2 ft 100.0 13.0 98.7 10.2 99 Pass 7 S32 To S34 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 99.3 8.2 99 Pass 8 S32 To S34 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 99.5 9.0 100 Pass 9 S32 To S34 4+5 ft 100.0 13.0 ' 99.1 8.6 99 Pass 10 S32 To S34 5+6 ft 100.0 13.0 98.9 9.5 99 Pass 11 S32 To S34 6+7 ft 100.0 13.0 99.6 7.9 100 Pass 12 S34 To S36 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.8 7.6 100 Pass 13 IS34 To S36 1 0+1 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 100.2 1 7.3 100 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universars clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9408702-1758.0000 Workorder No: 9408702-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3632 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 10/12/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Apartment Pad A (PERMIT NUMBER: 17-1580) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 1 25 Feet West From SE Corner of 5+6 ft 110.2 11.4 109.4 8.2 99 Pass Pad 2 25 Feet East From NW Corner of 5+6 It 110.2 11.4 107.8 7.5 98 Pass Pad 3 Center of Pad 5+6 ft 1 110.2 1 11.4 1 107.1 1 7.4 1 97 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9 08701-1758.0000 Workorder No: 408701-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 10/11/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tvne of Test: Area Tested: Storm Structure (PERMIT NUMBER: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method 18-2508) Material: Backfill Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Storm Inlet Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Test No. I Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture N Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 S63 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.8 9.0 100 Pass 2 S63 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 101.2 8.6 101 Pass 3 S63 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 100.7 7.9 101 Pass 4 S63 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 99.5 7.3 100 Pass 5 S63 4+5 ft 100.0 13.0 99.1 8.3 99 Pass 6 IS63 1 5+6 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 100.2 1 7.6 1 100 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9 800758.0000 Workorder No: 408608698-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionE9BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 10/08/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Apartment Pad A (PERMIT NUMBER 17-1580) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Tvt,e of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test I Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 1 25 Feet West Frowm SE Comer 3+4 ft 110.2 11.4 106.6 9.0 97 Pass of Pad 2 25 FeetEast Frowm NW Corner 3+4 ft 110.2 11.4 105.8 9.4 96 Pass of Pad 3 Center of Pad 3+4 ft 1 110.2 1 11.4 1 106.1 1 8.6 1 96 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 uWo korder No: 940674g00758.0000UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3632 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 10/05/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Apartment Pad A (PERMIT NUMBER 17-1580) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Tyne of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 1 25 Feet East From SW Corner of 2+3 ft 110.2 11.4 107.4 10.2 97 Pass Pad 2 25 Feet Westt From NE Corner of 2+3 ft 110.2 11.4 108.1 9.6 98 Pass Pad 3 Center of Pad 2+3 ft 1 110.2 1 11.4 1 106.8 1 10.6 1 97 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9406747-1758.0000 Workorder No: 9406747-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Bailey Gant 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 10/03/2018 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Building Pad A (PERMIT NUMBER 17-1580) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The toctc halnw moat tho Qfi% minimum nmmnactinn renuirement. Tvae of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 1 25 Feet West From Southeast 1+2 ft 110.2 11.4 101.9 18.6 92 i Fail Corner of Pad 2 25 Feet West From Southwest 1+2 ft 110.2 11.4 102.4 17.8 93 F..ail Corner of Pad 3 lCenter of Pad 1+2 ft 1 110.2 1 11.4 1 102.3 1 16.7 93, Fail Remarks: Area had clay on it. To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 90110. 406746-1758.0000 Workorder No: 9406746-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionE9BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 10/01/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Apartment Pad A (PERMIT NUMBER 17-1580) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill Tvae of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor The highlighted tests below do not meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Note: Retest pending client's authorization Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 1 Center of Pad A 1+2 ft 110.2 11.4 102.5 18.2 T" 93 7 Ftia l. Remarks: Area tested is yielding. I noticed the roller going over pad and the ground move. Stood on surface and it felt spongy. To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9758.0000 Workorder No: 406745-106745-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date: 01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEaBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 09/28/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Type of Test: Area Tested: Apartment Pad B (PERMIT NUMBER: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method 17-1581) Material: Fill Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 1 10 Ft North From SWC of Pad 3+4 ft 107.7 11.3 102.9 7.4 96 Pass 2 10 Ft South From NWC of Pad 3+4 ft 107.7 11.3 103.5 6.9 96 Pass 3 50 Ft North From SEC of Pad 3+4 ft 107.7 11.3 104.2 5.9 97 Pass 4 50 Ft South From NEC of Pad 1 3+4 ft 1 107.7 1 11.3 1 103.8 1 6.5 1 96 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9758.0000 Workorder No: 406743-406743-4 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionE9BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3632 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 09/25/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Structure (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Storm Inlet Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvae of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 15 S57 0+1 ft 110.2 11.4 108.6 7.9 99 Pass 16 S57 1+2 ft 110.2 11.4 109.2 7.3 99 Pass 17 S57 2+3 ft 110.2 11.4 107.9 9.2 98 Pass 18 S57 3+4 ft 110.2 11.4 108.2 9.6 98 Pass 19 S59 0+1 ft 110.2 11.4 108.5 8.2 98 Pass 20 S59 1+2 ft 110.2 11.4 108.4 7.6 98 Pass 21 S59 2+3 ft 110.2 11.4 108.9 6.9 99 Pass 22 IS59 3+4 ft 1 110.2 1 11.4 1 109.1 1 7.4 1 99 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9410.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9406743-3 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection93BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 09/25/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: 24" RCP Storm Pipe (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvae of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 8 S59 To S63 0-1 ft 110.2 11.4 109.1 7.4 99 Pass 9 S59 To S63 0+1 ft 110.2 11.4 108.7 8.4 99 Pass 10 S59 To S63 1+2 ft 110.2 11.4 109.9 7.1 100 Pass 11 S59 To S63 2+3 ft 110.2 11.4 109.5 7.7 99 Pass 12 S59 To S63 3+4 ft 110.2 11.4 108.6 8.7 99 Pass 13 S59 To S63 4+5 ft 110.2 11.4 109.2 6.6 99 Pass 14 IS59 To S63 5+6 ft 1 110.2 1 11.4 1 108.7 1 7.5 1 99 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL LIES Project No: 90110. 406743 0758.0000 Workorder No: 9406743-2 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection93BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 09/25/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: 18" RCP Storm Pipe (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvrae of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. I Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 2 S57 To S59 0-1 ft 110.2 11.4 108.3 9.2 98 Pass 3 S57 To S59 0+1 ft 110.2 11.4 108.5 8.6 98 Pass 4 S57 To S59 1+2 ft 110.2 11.4 109.1 7.6 99 Pass 5 S57 To S59 2+3 ft 110.2 11.4 108.6 7.9 99 Pass 6 S57 To S59 3+4 ft 110.2 11.4 109.3 7.5 99 Pass 7 IS57 To S59 4+5 ft 1 110.2 1 11.4 1 108.8 1 8.3 1 99 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9406743-1758.0000 Workorder No: 9406743-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEaBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 09/25/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: North East Side Wall -Footing PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Footing The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tyne of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test I Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 1 Retest 70 Feet South From North 0+1 ft 110.2 11.4 107.7 7.4 98 Pass End of Wall Remarks: Retest From 9124118 To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL LIES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 94063WorkorderNo: 9406366-4 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 09/24/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Structure (PERMIT NUMBER 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Storm Inlet Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvoe of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 12 S55 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.1 6.5 99 Pass 13 S55 1 +2 ft 100.0 13.0 99.3 7.1 99 Pass 14 S55 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 100.4 5.8 100 Pass 15 S55 3+4 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 100.1 1 6.0 1 100 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universars clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9406366-3758.0000 Workorder No: 9406366-3 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date: 01 /02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection93BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 09/24/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: 15" RCP Storm Pipe (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM 0-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 6 Between S55 and S57 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.5 7.3 100 Pass 7 Between S55 and S57 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 100.2 6.5 100 Pass 8 Between S55 and S57 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 99.2 7.7 99 Pass 9 Between S55 and S57 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 99.6 5.9 100 Pass 10 Between S55 and S57 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 98.7 7.4 99 Pass 11 JBetween S55 and S57 4+5 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 98.9 6.6 99 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9758.0000 Workorder No: 406366-206366-2 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Bailey Gant 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 09/24/2018 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Northeast Side Wall (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill Tvae of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor The highlighted tests below do not meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Nnta• Ratact npndinn r_lipnt's authori2ation Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 5 70 Feet South from North End of 0+1 ft 110.2 11.4 102.7 7.1 Wall Remarks: Area was slightly yielding. Crew will rework on Tuesday 9125118 To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL LIES Project No: 90110. 406366 0758.0000 Workorder No: 9406366-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3632 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 09/24/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Apartment Building B (PERMIT NUMBER: 17-1581) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Tvne of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 1 10 Ft North From SWC 2+3 ft 110.2 11.4 109.2 6.7 99 Pass 2 10 Ft South From NWC 2+3 ft 110.2 11.4 108.5 7.4 98 Pass 3 50 Ft North From SEC 2+3 ft 110.2 11.4 108.1 6.3 98 Pass 4 50 Ft South From NEC 2+3 ft 1 110.2 1 11.4 1 107.7 1 7.3 1 98 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL LIES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 9405403WorkorderNo: 9405403-2 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection23BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 09/17/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Apartment Pad C (PERMIT NUMBER: 17-1582) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Top of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Tvrae of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. I Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 6 25 Feet North From Southwest 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 96.9 7.9 97 Pass Corner of Pad 7 25 Feet Souh From Northeast 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 97.2 6.7 97 Pass Corner of Pad 8 25 Feet South From Northwest 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 97.6 6.2 98 Pass Corner of Pad To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 94 0758.0000 Workorder No: 94054035403-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 09/17/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Apartment Pad B (PERMIT NUMBER 17-1581) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Top of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 10 Feet North From Southwest 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 99.3 6.9 99 Pass Corner of Pad 2 10 Feet South From Northwest 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 98.6 6.3 99 Pass Corner of Pad 3 50 Feet North From Southwest 1 +2 ft 100.0 13.0 97.4 7.1 97 Pass Corner of Pad 4 50 Feet South From Northeast 1 +2 ft 100.0 13.0 97.8 6.5 98 Pass Corner of Pad To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 uWo korder No: 940474600758.0000 4047 605758.0000UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 09/13/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Apartment Pad C (PERMIT NUMBER: 17-1582) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. I Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 13 25 Feet North From Southwest 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 97.4 5.6 97 Pass Corner of Pad 14 25 Feet South From Northwest 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 97.9 4.9 98 Pass Corner of Pad 15 25 Feet South From Northeast 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 96.6 6.3 97 Pass Corner of Pad 16 25 Feet North From Southeast 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 98.4 5.7 98 Pass Corner of Pad To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL LIES Project No: 9410.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9404746-4 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 09/13/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tvae of Test: Area Tested: Apartment Pad B (PERMIT NUMBER: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method 17-1581) Material: Fill Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 9 50 Feet North From Southeast 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 96.7 6.2 97 Pass Corner of Pad 10 50 Feet South Northeast Corner 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 96.5 7.1 96 Pass of Pad 11 10 Feet South Northwest Corner 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 97.2 6.0 97 Pass of Pad 12 10 Feet North From Southwest 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 96.9 6.6 97 Pass Corner of Pad To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 90110. 4047 800758.0000 Workorder No: 9404746-3 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionE] Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 09/13/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Structure (PERMIT NUMBER 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Storm Inlet Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvne of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) N Fail 7 S67 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 100.3 5.6 100 Pass 8 S67 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 97.7 6.4 98 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves. all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our wdtten approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9422132-1758.0000 Workorder No: 9422132-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date: 01 /02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 12/18/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Pipe Run RCP Pipe 15 Inch 30 LF (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvne of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 S79 To S81 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.2 11.2 99 Pass 2 S79 To S81 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.8 9.7 100 Pass 3 S79 To S81 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 98.9 10.4 99 Pass 4 S79 To S81 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 99.1 11.4 99 Pass 5 S79 To S81 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 99.4 10.9 99 Pass 6 IS79 To S81 4+5 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 98.7 11.8 99 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9422132-2 Report Date: 01/02/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Bailey Gant 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 12/18/2018 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Pipe Run 30 Inch RCP Pipe 80 LF Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 7 S30 To S38 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 98.9 11.6 99 Pass 8 S30 To S38 0+14t 100.0 13.0 98.5 12.4 98 Pass 9 S30 To S38 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 99.3 10.3 99 Pass 10 S30 To S38 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 98.9 12.0 99 Pass 11 S30 To S38 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 99.6 9.9 100 Pass 12 IS30 To S38 4+5 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 99.1 9.6 99 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9410.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9422132-3 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 12/18/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Pipe Run 24 Inch RCP Pipie 245 LF Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvoe of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 13 S32 To S30 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.6 10.2 100 Pass 14 S32 To S30 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.4 10.1 99 Pass 15 S32 To S30 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 100.2 9.7 100 Pass 16 S32 To S30 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 100.8 9.0 101 Pass 17 S32 To S30 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 99.9 9.3 100 Pass 18 IS32 To S30 4+5 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 100.2 8.8 100 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UWo korder No: 94221 300758.0000UNIVERSALESProjectNo: 0110.18 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 12/19/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Curb 400 LF Left Curb 435 Right Curb (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Stabilization Reference Datum: 0 = Top of Stabilization The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvoe of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Depth requirement is 12.00 inches Test No. Location of Test LBR Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Stab. Pass or Fail 1 Left Curb 100 Ft South From 110.3 11.2 109.4 13.6 99 12.50 Pass US17/92 Entrance 2 Right Curb 100 Ft South From 110.3 11.2 108.8 14.2 99 12.50 Pass US17/92 Entrance 3 Leftt Curb 375 Ft South From 110.3 11.2 110.2 12.6 100 12.25 Pass US17/92 Entrance 4 Right Curb 405 Ft South From 110.3 11.2 109.1 13.2 99 12.00 Pass US17/92 Entrance Remarks: Entry way from 17192 Entrane To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9422133-2 Report Date: 01/02/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation LIES Technician: Bailey Gant 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 12/19/2018 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Pipe Run RCP Pipe 30"15 LF PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction reauirement. Tyne of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 5 S71 To S73 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.2 11.6 99 Pass 6 S71 To S73 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.3 12.2 99 Pass 7 S71 To S73 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 100.3 10.6 100 Pass 8 S71 To S73 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 99.1 10.9 99 Pass 9 S71 To S73 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 98.8 13.1 99 Pass 10 S71 To S73 4+5 ft 100.0 13.0 99.5 10.8 100 Pass 11 IS71 To S73 1 5+6 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 100.2 1 10.2 1 100 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 ES Proect No: 0110. UNIVERSAL UWo korder No: 9422133 3758.0000 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 12/19/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Pipe Run 30 Inches 130LF PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvae of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 12 S63 To S69 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 99.1 11.2 99 Pass 13 S63 To S69 4+5 It 100.0 13.0 99.3 11.4 99 Pass 14 S63 To S69 5+6 ft 100.0 13.0 98.3 12.2 98 Pass 15 1S63 To S69 1 6+7 It 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 100.1 1 9.9 1 100 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing a Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Elevator Sample Location: Elevator Pit Wall, Building C - Sampled at Southest Comer of Elevator Pit Set# 1 of 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Bailey Gant On 12/05/2018 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times General Contractor: The Spanos Corporation Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Truck No.: 284 Time Batched: 1:18 PM Ticket No.: 1135213 Time Sampled: 3:07 PM Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: xPEXADD Weather Condition: Sunny Field Test Results Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9423404-1 CT 120518 WorkorderNo.: 9423404 Lab No.: 18K401-C Date 1st Issue: December 13, 2018 At Lab On or Before: 12/06/2018 Placement Information Truck Load: 3.00 cu yds. Cumulative Quantity: 3.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 3.00 cu yds. Air Content: N/A I Slump: 5.00 inches Ambient Temp: 59 °F I Concrete Temp: 73 eF Unit Weight: NIA Other Results/Comments: PERMIT NUMBER: 17-1582 Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dlmen.l in) Actual Dimen.2 In) Avg. Dlmen. in) Test X-Sect. Area (In') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 12/12/2018 7 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 28,965 2,290 2 01 /02/2019 28 3 01 /02/2019 28 4 01 /02/2019 28 5'H' 01/02/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% or the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D-- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured 8 Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as 00111,dentral properly of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, oondusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our wifften approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in lull, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9422129-2758.0000 Workorder No: 9422129-2 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0604 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Bailey Gant 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 12/13/2018 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Pipe Run RCP 24 Inch Pipe 35 LF (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction reauirement. Tvae of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 9 S39 To S41 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.5 8.7 100 Pass 10 S39 To S41 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.1 9.8 99 Pass 11 S39 To S41 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 99.1 9.3 99 Pass 12 S39 To S41 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 98.7 10.2 99 Pass 13 S39 To S41 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 98.6 11.6 99 Pass 14 IS39 To S41 4+5 ft 1 100.0 13.0 99.3 10.7 99 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universars clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9422129-1 Report Date: 01/02/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Bailey Gant 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 12/13/2018 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Type of Test: Area Tested: Storm Pipe Run 30 Inches 300 LF Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 S41 To S22 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.6 9.9 100 Pass 2 S41 To S22 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 98.7 10.8 99 Pass 3 S41 To S22 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 99.2 10.2 99 Pass 4 S41 To S22 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 99.6 9.3 100 Pass 5 S41 To S22 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 98.6 10.9 99 Pass 6 S41 To S22 4+5 ft 100.0 13.0 98.6 9.7 99 Pass 7 S41 To S22 5+6 ft 100.0 13.0 99.7 8.7 100 Pass 8 IS41 To S22 1 6+7 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 99.3 1 9.5 1 99 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 90110. 4213 800758.0000 Workorder No: 9421398-4 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 12/01/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Structure (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Storm Inlet Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvae of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 9 S71 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.2 10.9 99 Pass 10 S71 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 99.5 10.9 100 Pass 11 S71 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 98.7 12.2 99 Pass 12 IS71 1 3+4 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 99.4 1 11.6 1 99 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9421398-3 Report Date: 01/02/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation LIES Technician: Bailey Gant 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 12/01/2018 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Type of Test: Area Tested: Sanitary Pipe Run PVC Pipe 24 LF Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum comoaction requirement. Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 7 Lift Station WW L2 to E 4+5 ft 100.0 13.0 98.6 12.4 99 Pass 8 Lift Station WW L2 to E 5+6 ft 100.0 13.0 99.1 11.6 99 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential properly of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9421398-2 Report Date: 01/02/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Bailey Gant 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 12/01/2018 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Type of Test: Area Tested: Sanitary Structure (PERMIT Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Sanitary Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction reauirement. Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 5 Structure E 4+5 ft 100.0 13.0 98.7 12.9 99 Pass 6 Structure E 5+6 ft 100.0 13.0 98.4 13.2 98 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 90110. 4213 800758.0000 Workorder No: 9421398-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 12/01 /2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Lift Station (PERMIT NUMBER: 18- 2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Sanitary Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 1 Lift Station WW L2 8+9 ft 100.0 13.0 99.7 11.1 100 Pass 2 Lift Station WW L2 9+10 ft 100.0 13.0 98.6 ' 11.6 99 Pass 3 Lift Station WW L2 10+11 ft 100.0 13.0 99.2 10.9 99 Pass 4 Lift Station WW L2 11+12 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 99.4 1 11.4 1 99 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 , Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Elevator Pit Wall Sample Location: Pad 8 Elevator Pit Wall - Sampled at Southeast Comer of Elevator Pit wall Set# 1 of 1 rSample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Bailey Gant On 12/03/2018 General Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corporation Subcontractor: Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Truck No.: 622 Ticket No.: 1847591 Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: XYREX Specified Strength / Sampling Times Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Water Added at Site: N/A Time Batched: 1:45 PM Time Sampled: 2:24 PM Weather Condition: Heavy Rain Field Test Results Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9421308-1 CT 120318 WorkorderNo.: 9421308 Lab No.: 18K325-C Date 1st Issue: December 11, 2018 At Lab On or Before: 12/05/2018 Placement Information Truck Load: 7.00 cu yds. Cumulative Quantity: 7.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 7.00 cu yds. Air Content: N/A I Slump: 7.00 inches Ambient Temp: 73 OF I Concrete Temp: 83 OF Unit Weight: N/A Other Results/Comments: PERMIT NUMBER: 17-1581 Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dlmen.1 in) Actual Dlmen.2 in) Avg. Dimon. in) Test X-Sect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psl) Average psi) 1 12/10/2018 7 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 31,806 2,520 2 12/31/2018 28 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 48,505 3,841 3 12/31/2018 28 5 4.00 4.02 1 4.01 1 12.63 46,540 3,685 1- 4 12/31/2018 28 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 47,360 3,750 3,760 5'H' 12/31/2018 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H-- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un4estable = E'- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified I I If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped to Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our wrilten approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval or Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 90110. 421232-1758.0000 Workorder No: 9421232-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date: 01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionlilBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3632 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 12/07/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Grease Traps (PERMIT NUMBER: 18 2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Sanitary Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 1 S7 0+1 ft 109.3 11.8 107.7 9.7 99 Pass 2 S7 1+2 ft 109.3 11.8 108.3 9.0 99 Pass 3 T8 0+1 It 109.3 11.8 108.6 8.7 99 Pass 4 IT8 1 1+2 It 1 109.3 1 11.8 1 108.1 1 8.6 1 99 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 90110. 4212 800758.0000 Workorder No: 9421228-2 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionE9BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 12/03/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tyne of Test: Area Tested: Storm Pipe Run RCP Pipe 30 Inch Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Pipe 15 LF (PERMIT NUMBER: 18- 2508) Material: Backfill Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 4 S71 To Endwall Pond 1 1-2 ft 100.0 13.0 98.1 11.9 98 Pass 5 S71 To Endwall Pond 1 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 97.6 12.9 98 Pass 6 S71 To Endwall Pond 1 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 98.6 12.2 99 Pass 7 S71 To Endwall Pond 1 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 98.8 11.5 99 Pass 8 S71 To Endwall Pond 1 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 99.4 11.3 99 Pass 9 S71 To Endwall Pond 1 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 99.6 10.6 100 Pass 10 IS71 To Endwall Pond 1 4+5 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 97.9 1 13.4 98 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 90110. 4212 800758.0000 Workorder No: 9421228-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEaBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3632 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 12/03/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Structure (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Storm Inlet Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 1 S71 4+5 ft 100.0 13.0 99.3 10.4 99 Pass 2 S71 5+6 ft 100.0 13.0 99.6 9.9 100 Pass 3 S71 6+7 ft 100.0 13.0 98.5 10.4 98 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL tuENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structurat Element: Slab on Grade Sample Location: Elevator Pit Apartment C - Sampled at Northeast Side of Elevator Pit Slab Set# 1 of 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Bailey Gant On 11/29/2018 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times General Contractor: The Spanos Corporationt Specifled Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Truck No.: 606 - Time Batched: 12:09 PM Ticket No.: 1647519 Time Sampled: 1:14 PM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: N/S Weather Condition: Sunny Field Test Results Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9420897-1 CT 112918 WorkorderNo.: 9420897 Lab No.: 18K186-C Date 1 st Issue: December 07, 2018 At Lab On or Before: 12/01/2018 Placement Information Truck Load: 6.00 cu yds. Cumulative Quantity: 6.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 6.00 cu yds. Air Content: N/A Slump: 4.00 inches Ambient Temp: 61 OF I Concrete Temp: 69 -F Unit Weight: NIA Other Results/Comments: PERMIT NUMBER 17-1582 Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dlmen.2 In) Avg. Dimon. in) Test X-Sect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 12/06/2018 7 5 4.00 4.03 4.02 12.69 34,815 2,740 2 12/27/2018 28 5 4.01 4.02 4.02 12.69 63,985 5,041 3 12/27/2018 1 28 5 4.01 1 4.02 4.02 1 12.69 64,685 5,096 4 12/27/2018 1 28 5 4.01 1 4.02 4.02 1 12.69 64,525 5,084 5,070 5'H' 12/27/2018 1 28 I - I - I- Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un4estable -*El- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 -Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 -Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report snag not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineedng Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3632 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing U_ S 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford_ , Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade Sample Location: Elevator Pit Slab, Building A - Sampled at Elevator Pit SW Corner of Pit. Set# 1 of 1 ,Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Bailey Gant On 11/28/2018 General Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corporation Subcontractor: Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Truck No.: 208 Ticket No.: 1847488 Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: XYPEX Specified Strength / Sampling Times Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Water Added at Site: N/A Time Batched: 3:38 PM Time Sampled: 4:47 PM Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9420692-1 CT 112818 WorkorderNo.: 9420692 Lab No.: 18K163-C Date 1 st Issue: December 06, 2018 At Lab On or Before: 11/29/2018 Placement Information Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Cumulative Quantity: 10.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 10.00 cu yds. Air Content: N/A I Slump: 4.50 inches Ambient Temp: 57 OF I Concrete Temp: 69 °F Unit Weight: NIA Other Results/Comments: PERMIT NUMBER: 17-1680 Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 In) Actual Dlmen.2 in) Avg. Dimon. in) Test X-Sect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 12/05/2018 7 5 4.02 4.00 4.01 12.63 35,205 2,790 2 12/26/2018 28 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 58,955 4,668 3 12/26/2018 1 28 1 5 1 4.00 1 4.03 1 4.02 1 12.69 1 58,130 4,580 4 12/26/2018 28 1 5 4.02 1 4.00 1 4.01 1 12.63 1 57,760 4,573 4,610 5'H' 12/26/2018 28 1 - I - I - I - I - Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H-- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = V- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Stump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as conhdonnal property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts hom or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report snap not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9420519-4 Report Date: 01/02/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Bailey Gant 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 11/27/2018 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West list Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tvoe of Test: Area Tested: Center of West Wall Pond #1 Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Footing The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 18 Center of West Wall 153 North of 0-1 ft 107.7 11.3 104.2 8.3 97 Pass South End of Wall To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 942058.0000 Workorder No: 9420519-3519-3ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection 23BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In - Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 11/27/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Southwest Pond Wall Pond #1 PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Tvne of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 4 15 Feet East From West End of 0+1 ft 107.7 11.3 105.6 8.4 98 Pass Wall 5 15 Feet East From West End of 1+2 ft 107.7 11.3 105.4 8.2 98 Pass Wall 6 15 Feet East From West End of 2+3 ft 107.7 11.3 104.7 9.3 97 Pass Wall 7 15 Feet East From West End of 3+4 ft 107.7 11.3 104.6 7.9 97 Pass Wall 8 15 Feet East From West End of 4+5 ft 107.7 11.3 105.1 9.6 98 Pass Wall 9 15 Feet East From West End of 5+6 ft 107.7 11.3 104.9 9.7 97 Pass Wall 10 15 Feet East From West End of 6+7 ft 107.7 11.3 104.5 9.5 97 Pass Wall 11 15 Feet Westt From East End of 0+1 ft 107.7 11.3 104.2 10.1 97 Pass Wall 12 15 Feet Westt From East End of 1+2 ft 107.7 11.3 105.1 7.8 98 Pass Wall 13 15 Feet Westt From East End of 2+3 ft 107.7 11.3 105.7 8.4 98 Pass Wall 14 15 Feet Westt From East End of 3+4 ft 107.7 11.3 105.2 9.2 98 Pass Wall 15 15 Feet Westt From East End of 4+5 ft 107.7 11.3 104.9 8.7 97 Pass Wall 16 15 Feet Westt From East End of 5+6 ft 107.7 11.3 103.8 9.6 96 Pass Wall 17 15 Feet Westt From East End of 6+7 ft 107.7 11.3 104.6 8.8 97 Pass Wall To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9420.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9420519-2 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection91BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 11/27/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Southwest Wall Pond #1 Footing PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Footing The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 2 15 Feet East of West End of Wall 0-1 ft 107.7 11.3 106.3 8.0 99 Pass 3 15 Feet West of East End of Wall 0-1 ft 107.7 11.3 105.7 8.7 98 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9420.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9420519-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 11/27/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Elevator Pit Building Pad C (PERMIT NUMBER: 17-1582) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Footing The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. yoe of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 1 Center of Pad C Elevator Pit 0-1 ft 112.3 13.0 109.7 11.4 98 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 90361-1 58.0000 Workorder No: 420361-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 11/26/2018 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Elevator Pit Material: Native Reference Datum: 0 = Top of Native The tests helnw meet the 95% minimum compaction reauirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 1 Building A Elevator Pit (PERMIT 0-1 ft 109.3 11.8 108.8 7.8 100 Pass NUMBER: 17-1580) 2 Building B Elevator Pit (PERMIT 0-1 ft 109.3 11.8 107.7 6.7 99 Pass NUMBER: 17-1581) To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 941800758.0000 Workorder No: 941808048-5 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection 03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In - Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 11/16/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Northwest Wall Near Pond 1 PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 15 Center of NW Wall 0+1 ft 107.7 11.3 103.4 9.6 96 Pass 16 Center of NW Wall 1+2 ft 107.7 11.3 103.8 10.3 96 Pass 17 Center of NW Wall 2+3 ft 107.7 11.3 104.2 9.7 97 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 941758.0000 Workorder No: 9418049-18049-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 11/19/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Parking Lot Between Apartment pads B and C (PERMIT NUMBER: 18- 2508) Material: Stabilization Reference Datum: 0 = Top of Stabilization The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvl2e of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Depth requirement is 12.00 inches Test No. Location of Test LBR Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Stab. Pass or Fail 1 25 Feet West and 25 Feet North 110.7 11.6 109.3 10.6 99 12.50 Pass of SE Corner of Parking Lot 2 25 Feet West and 100 Feet North 110.7 11.6 109.7 10.2 99 12.25 Pass of SE Corner of Parking Lot 3 25 Feet East and 25 Feet North 110.7 11.6 110.2 9.9 100 12.00 Pass of SW Comer of Parking Lot 4 25 Feet East and 100 Feet North 110.7 11.6 108.7 12.8 98 12.25 Pass of SW Comer of Parking Lot To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property o/our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 94WorkorderNo: 9418051-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 11 /21 /2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Pond Wall (PERMIT NUMBER: 18- 2508) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Tyne of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 Center of West Wall 153 Feet 1+2 ft 107.7 11.3 103.7 9.6 96 Pass North From South End of Wall 2 Center of West Wall 153 Feet 2+3 ft 107.7 11.3 104.4 9.0 97 Pass North From South End of Wall 3 Center of West Wall 153 Feet 3+4 ft 107.7 11.3 104.7 8.8 97 Pass North From South End of Wall 4 Center of West Wall 153 Feet 4+5 ft 107.7 11.3 103.9 9.4 96 Pass North From South End of Wall 5 Center of West Wall 153 Feet 5+6 ft 107.7 11.3 104.6 9.2 97 Pass North From South End of Wall 6 Center of West Wall 153 Feet 6+7 ft 107.7 11.3 105.2 7.9 98 Pass North From South End 7 Center of Northwest Wall 3+4 ft 107.7 11.3 104.9 8.6 97 Pass 8 Center of Northwest Wall 4+5 ft 107.7 11.3 105.1 8.2 98 Pass 9 Center of Northwest Wall 5+6 ft 107.7 11.3 105.8 7.9 98 Pass 10 Center of Northwest Wall 6+7 ft 107.7 11.3 104.3 9.2 97 Pass 11 West Wall 15 Feet North From 5+6 ft 107.7 11.3 105.2 8.0 98 Pass South End 12 West Wall 15 Feet South From 5+6 ft 107.7 11.3 104.7 8.5 97 Pass North End 13 West Wall 15 Feet North From 6+7 ft 107.7 11.3 104.8 9.2 97 Pass South End 14 West Wall 15 Feet South From 6+7 ft 107.7 11.3 105.1 8.3 98 Pass North End To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9418051-2 Report Date: 01/02/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation LIES Technician: Bailey Gant 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 11/21/2018 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tyne of Test: Area Tested: Pond Wall Footer (PERMIT Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Footing The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction reouirement. Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 15 Center of West Wall 153 Feet 0-1 ft 107.7 11.3 104.3 9.9 97 Pass North of South End To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL LIES Project No: 941800758.0000 Workorder No: 941808048-4 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection 03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In - Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 11/16/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Northwest Wall (PERMIT NUMBER: 18- 2508) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Footing The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 14 Center of NW Wall 0-1 ft 107.7 11.3 102.9 12.2 96 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9418048-3 Report Date: 01/02/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Bailey Gant 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 11/16/2018 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tvne of Test: Area Tested: Sanitary Structure (PERMIT Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Sanitary Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 8 Structure E 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.4 11.6 99 Pass 9 Structure E 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 98.3 12.2 98 Pass 10 Structure E 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 99.2 11.1 99 Pass 11 iStructure E 1 3+4 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 100.2 1 9.3 1 100 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universars clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 941800758.0000 Workorder No: 941808048-2 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection E9BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In - Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 11/16/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Sanitary Pipe Run (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. I Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 4 Lift Station to Structure E 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 97.9 10.6 98 Pass 5 Lift Station to Structure E 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 98.5 10.2 98 Pass 6 Lift Station to Structure E 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 99.1 9.8 99 Pass 7 Lift Station to Structure E 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 99.4 9.2 99 Pass 12 Lift Station to Structure E 3+4 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 99.3 10.4 99 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9 1800758.0000 Workorder No: 41808048-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection 03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In - Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 11/16/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Lift Station (PERMIT NUMBER: 18- 2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Sanitary Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvne of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 1 WW L 2 4+5 ft 100.0 13.0 99.7 10.9 100 Pass 2 WW L 2 5+6 ft 100.0 13.0 98.9 11.2 99 Pass 3 WW L 2 6+7 ft 100.0 13.0 99.3 10.1 99 Pass 13 WW L 2 7+8 ft 0.0 1 0.0 1 99.1 1 9.8 1 0 Fail To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 0110. Workorder No: 9418047-28047-2 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEaBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 11/16/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Wall on West Side of Pond (17/92) Entrance (PERMIT NUMBER: 18- 2508) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Tvoe of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 3 15 Feet North From Southend of 0+1 ft 107.7 11.3 104.3 9.6 97 Pass West Wall 4 15 Feet North From Southend of 1+2 ft 107.7 11.3 103.8 10.6 96 Pass West Wall 5 15 Feet North From Southend of 2+3 ft 107.7 11.3 103.8 10.5 96 Pass West Wall 6 15 Feet North From Southend of 3+4 ft 107.7 11.3 105.1 8.6 98 Pass West Wall 7 15 Feet North From Southend of 4+5 ft 107.7 11.3 104.8 9.6 97 Pass West Wall 8 15 Feet South From Northend of 0+1 ft 107.7 11.3 104.1 9.9 97 Pass West Wall 9 15 Feet South From Northend of 1+2 ft 107.7 11.3 104.4 9.5 97 Pass West Wall 10 15 Feet South From Northend of 2+3 ft 107.7 11.3 103.9 10.4 96 Pass West Wall 11 15 Feet South From Northend of 3+4 ft 107.7 11.3 104.6 9.2 97 Pass West Wall 12 15 Feet South From Northend of 4+5 ft 107.7 11.3 104.2 9.6 97 Pass West Wall To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9418047-1 Report Date: 01/02/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Bailey Gant 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 11/16/2018 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Wall on West side of Pond (17/92) Entrance (PERMIT NUMBER: 18- 2508) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Footing The tests below meet the 95% minimum comoaction requirement. Tvoe of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test I Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 1 15 Feet North From South End of 0-1 ft 107.7 11.3 103.4 11.6 96 Pass West Wall 2 15 Feet South From North End of 0-1 ft 107.7 11.3 104.3 10.6 97 Pass West Wall To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL LIES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 94WorkorderNo: 9418042-38042-3 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection93BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos.Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 11/08/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Sanitary Structure (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Sanitary Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tyne of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test I Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 9 Structure 1 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 98.2 12.6 98 Pass 10 Structure 1 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 100.5 11.8 100 Pass 11 Structure 1 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 99.7 11.1 100 Pass 12 Structure 1 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 100.2 9.9 1 100 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 uWo korder No: 941804200758.0000UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 11/08/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Sanitary Pipe Run 8 Inch PVC Pipe 279 LF (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 1 G to 1 0-1 It 100.0 13.0 99.3 10.3 99 Pass 2 G to 1 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 100.2 9.0 100 Pass 3 G to 1 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 99.1 9.4 99 Pass 4 IG to 1 2+3 It 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 98.5 1 10.4 1 98 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9418042-2 Report Date: 01/02/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation LIES Technician: Bailey Gant 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 11/08/2018 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tvne of Test: Area Tested: Sanitary Pipe Run 8 Inch PVC Pipe Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method 215 LF (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction reauirement. Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 5 G to E 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 97.9 11.4 98 Pass 6 G to E 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.4 10.9 99 Pass 7 G to E 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 99.6 9.6 100 Pass 8 1G to E 1 2+3 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 98.6 1 10.6 1 99 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9410.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9408716-2 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 11 /01 /2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Pipe Run 30 Inch RCP Pipe 130 LF (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 6 S63 To S69 1-2 ft 100.0 13.0 97.9 9.4 98 Pass 7 S63 To S69 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 98.2 7.5 98 Pass 8 S63 To S69 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 98.5 8.7 98 Pass 9 S63 To S69 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 99.2 8.1 99 Pass 10 IS63 To S69 2+3 It 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 100.2 9.1 100 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9408 1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9408716-3 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/02/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 11/01/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Pipe Run 15 Inch RCP Pipe 40 LF (PERMIT NUMBER: 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test I Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) N pcf) Fail 11 S63 To S61 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.9 7.3 100 Pass 12 S63 To S61 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.6 7.1 100 Pass 13 S63 To S61 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 99.2 7.8 99 Pass 14 S63 To S61 2+3 ft 100.0 1 13.0 1 100.7 1 6.7 1 101 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No.: 0110.1800758.0000 Date Typed: January 04, 2019 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (LIES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date Type of Report 9422136-1 12/24/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9422138-1 12/26/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9422139-1 12/27/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9422139-2 12/27/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9422140-1 12/28/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9422141-1 12/31/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9427367-1 12/29/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9427367-2 12/29/2018 In -Place Density Test Report 9427367-3 12/29/2018 In -Place Density Test Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 Fred Schmalzer0•` G 38f 8 ''= a 2019.01.07 TATE f a R° .. ` 08:06:56-05'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Attachments (9) rh For the mutual protection of Universals clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 ES Project No: UNIVERSAL uWo korder No: 9422136 0758.0000 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/04/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection93BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 12/24/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Structures Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Storm Inlet Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 S73 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.3 11.9 99 Pass 2 S73 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 99.4 12.6 99 Pass 3 S73 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 99.4 11.1 99 Pass 4 S73 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 100.1 10.2 100 Pass 5 S49 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.3 12.0 99 Pass 6 S49 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 98.7 11.9 99 Pass 7 S49 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 100.2 10.3 100 Pass 8 S49 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 99.4 10.4 99 Pass 9 S79 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.1 11.4 99 Pass 10 S79 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 99.1 10.6 99 Pass 11 S79 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 98.6 10.6 99 Pass 12 S79 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 100.1 10.9 100 Pass 13 S79 4+5 ft 100.0 13.0 98.7 12.2 99 Pass 14 IS79 5+6 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 100.5 1 11.3 1 100 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universars reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 0110. 1800758.0000 9WorkorderNo: 422122138-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/04/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Bailey Gant 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 12/26/2018 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tvpe of Test: Area Tested: Storm Structure Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Material: Backfill Laboratory: ASTM 01557 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Storm Inlet Structure Tha tactc halnw moat tha 9Ao/ minimum cmmnactien renuirement. Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fall 1 S30 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.1 9.9 99 Pass 2 S30 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 100.0 8.4 100 Pass 3 S30 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 99.5 9.4 100 Pass 4 S30 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 99.6 9.1 100 Pass 5 S30 4+5 ft 100.0 13.0 98.9 10.2 99 Pass 6 S30 5+6 ft 100.0 13.0 99.3 8.8 99 Pass 7 S30 6+7 ft 100.0 13.0 99.2 9.5 99 Pass 8 S38 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.2 8.7 99 Pass 9 S38 1=2 ft 100.0 13.0 98.3 9.8 98 Pass 10 S38 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 99.3 8.2 99 Pass 11 S32 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 101.3 7.9 101 Pass 12 S32 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 99.3 9.0 99 Pass 13 S32 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 100.1 8.2 100 Pass 14 S32 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 99.1 8.7 99 Pass 15 S32 4+5 ft 100.0 13.0 99.3 7.7 99 Pass 16 S32 5+6 ft 100.0 13.0 99.2 7.9 99 Pass 17 S32 6+7 ft 100.0 13.0 98.3 9.6 98 Pass 18 S32 7+8 ft 100.0 13.0 98.5 9.0 98 Pass 19 S28 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.2 9.9 99 Pass 20 S28 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 98.6 10.2 99 Pass 21 S28 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 98.2 11.5 98 Pass 22 S28 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 99.2 7.7 99 Pass 23 S28 4+5 ft 100.0 13.0 99.2 8.4 99 Pass 24 S28 5+6 ft 100.0 13.0 99.3 10.2 99 Pass 25 S28 6+7 ft 100.0 13.0 99.4 9.0 99 Pass 26 IS28 1 7+8 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 99.3 1 9.6 1 99 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universars reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 94221 800758.0000 Workorder No: 9422139-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/04/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection03'Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0604 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 12/27/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: East Wall Repair Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Footing The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Tvoe of Test: Field: ASTM 0-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 1 Center of Far East Wall 0-1 ft 107.7 11.3 106.7 10.4 99 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9422139-2758.0000 Workorder No: 9422139-2 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/04/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection93BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Bailey Gant 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 12/27/2018 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: East Wall- Pond 1 Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill ThP tPcts helow meet the 95% minimum comnaction reouirement. Tvoe of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 2 Center of Far East Wall 0+1 ft 107.7 11.3 104.9 9.3 97 Pass 3 Center of Far East Wall 1+2 ft 107.7 11.3 105.3 9.2 98 Pass 4 Center of Far East Wall 2+3 ft 107.7 11.3 105.6 8.9 98 Pass 5 Center of Far East Wall 3+4 ft 107.7 11.3 105.9 7.9 98 Pass 6 Center of Far East Wall 4+5 ft 107.7 11.3 106.2 7.7 99 Pass 7 Center of Far East Wall 5+6 ft 107.7 11.3 105.4 9.4 98 Pass 8 lCenter of Far East Wall 6+7 ft 1 107.7 1 11.3 1 106.2 1 7.9 1 99 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and ` authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9422140-1758.0000 Workorder No: 9422140-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/04/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection01BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 12/28/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Structures Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Storm Inlet Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvae of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 S26 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.3 11.8 99 Pass 2 S26 1 +2 ft 100.0 13.0 98.4 11.3 98 Pass 3 S26 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 101.3 8.3 101 Pass 4 S26 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 99.5 13.2 100 Pass 5 S26 4+5 ft 100.0 13.0 99.7 7.4 100 Pass 6 IS26 5+6 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 99.5 1 12.6 1 100 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universars clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universals reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9422141-1758.0000 Workorder No: 9422141-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/04/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection91BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 12/31/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Structure Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Storm Inlet Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tyne of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 1 S24 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.8 11.3 100 Pass 2 S24 1 +2 ft 100.0 13.0 99.7 11.4 100 Pass 3 S24 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 100.0 9.9 100 Pass 4 S24 3+4 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 100.3 1 9.5 1 100 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9758.0000 Workorder No: 427367-127367-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/04/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection93BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 12/29/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Pipe Run RCP Pipe 18 Inches 90LF Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 S28 To S26 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.6 11.3 100 Pass 2 S28 To S26 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.1 11.7 99 Pass 3 S28 To S26 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 99.2 12.4 99 Pass 4 S28 To S26 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 98.4 12.2 98 Pass 5 S28 To S26 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 98.6 11.9 99 Pass 6 S28 To S26 4+5 ft 100.0 13.0 99.3 11.9 99 Pass 7 S28 To S26 5+6 ft 100.0 13.0 99.3 10.5 99 Pass 8 IS28 To S26 6+7 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 1 99.1 1 11.3 1 99 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 EaUNIVERSAL uWo korder No: 942736 02758.0000 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/04/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Bailey Gant Date Tested: 12/29/2018 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Pipe Run RCP 30 Inch Pipe 15LF Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvoe of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 9 S47 To S49 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.2 12.2 99 Pass 10 S47 To S49 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.5 11.9 100 Pass 11 S47 To S49 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 98.6 12.6 99 Pass 12 S47 To S49 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 98.6 12.8 99 Pass 13 IS47 To S49 3+4 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 99.3 10.8 99 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9427367-3 Report Date: 01/04/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation LIES Technician: Bailey Gant 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 12/29/2018 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Pipe Run 15 Inch Pipe 120 LF Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvae of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 14 S24 TO S26 0-1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.2 10.4 99 Pass 15 S24 TO S26 0+1 ft 100.0 13.0 99.2 11.2 99 Pass 16 S24 TO S26 1+2 ft 100.0 13.0 99.4 11.5 99 Pass 17 S24 TO S26 2+3 ft 100.0 13.0 98.7 10.4 99 Pass 18 S24 TO S26 3+4 ft 100.0 13.0 99.5 12.3 100 Pass 19 IS24 TO S26 4+5 ft 1 100.0 1 13.0 98.9 10.9 99 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universars reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 LOCATIONS: UNIVERSAL Atlanta Daytona Beach91ENGINEERINGSCIENCESFortMyers Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Fort Pierce Gainesville Geophysical Services • Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Jacksonville Building Inspection • Plan Review • Building Code Administration Miami January 17, 2019 Ocala Orlando (Headquarters) City of Sanford Palm Coast PO BOX 1788 Panama City Pensacola Sanford, Florida 32772 Rockledge Sarasota Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official St. Petersburg Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments on 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 West Palm BeachWest Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 UES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 3 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of January 7, 2019 through January 13, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the "Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of January 7, 2019 through January 13, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be vedried on any electronic copies. FJS/dkn Oty of Sanford Aldrich, Dave Oty of Sanford Antonini, Usa The Spanos Corporation Woods, Jim The Spanos Corporation Gillespie, Hardy The Spanos Corporation Jensen, Chuck The Spares Corporation Homea, Kent CPH, Inc. (Corporate) Boyles, Irene Less Crest Pounders, Allen Kephart Garland, Jesse Kephart Campbell, Paul Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 t SCnmurau,r Fred SchmalzerNaHMA JFEMaF ;F'P c 2019.01.18 rA 09:50:00-05'00' a nuun ^'J dave.aklrk hosanfordll.gov Usa.Antonlnl@Sanforde.gov jvroodsoagspanos.com hg1flesple0a9sparas.com cjensen@agspanos.corn thomea@agspanos.com Iboyles0cphoorp.com leeuesmPs®gmall.com jesMOkephart.com patdcOkephart.00m Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. - Orlando, FI 32811 - (407) 423-0504 - (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO.3 Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: January 17, 2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. SPEC A...N,;SPEC I,ON LO G Added This Summary Period: 0 Resoled This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: 0 SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): 1 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: 3 to 3 nr01l Y RFEP ,RTiSI.'! 3. Daily Report No. Inspection Date Inspector(s) Reports No. of Pages Page No(s). 6 1/10/2019 Eric DeVuyst 1 4 to 4 7 1/11/2019 Antonio Ramirez, Jr. 1 5 to 5 Total NUm4er or Pages mis summary: ro, of For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG SIL No. Date SUM No. Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location Description IS I Engineer of Record Response 2 S.I. Date Closed SUM No. The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. 2The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Docs #1632149 3This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 1/10/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9429079-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1581 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS 8t TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Concrete Slab Reinforcement and Post Tension Inspection LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building B ELEVATION: Level 1 Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings a> U a Q o Q U z Notes Fo_rmwork —1 Formwork properly braced at turndowns and edges of slabs 0 No standing water 0 I Debris removed M 0 0 — Vapor barrier provided, lapped properly (taped) and not tom 0— 0 Pest control sprayed 0 I Reinforceeme--ntt i Reinforcement is correct size at proper spacing 010 j Reinforcement has proper lap lengths 01010 Welded wire fabric has correct gauge thickness, spacing and elevation199P9 O 01 ded wire fabric placed with flat sheets (no rolled sheets) Zkie wir 0 fabric has a minimum of one square+two inches lap 0 Construction and expansion joint reinforcement correct at proper locations 0 Edge of Slab reinforcement details provided 0 Wall dowels are of proper size, spacing and lap length 0 Reinforcement properly chaired 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REOUIRED? O YES ® NO COMMENTS: Slab reinforcement and post tension inspection. THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Eric DeVuyst UNIVERSAL FIELD COPIES TO: 13 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Plan Review CONCRETE PLACEMENT THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 7 (1/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 1/11/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9429208-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1581 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Slab on Grade LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building B ELEVATION: Level 1 Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings CONCRETE PLACEMENT do o 0 a a L) Notes _ Slump taken at truck after first few yards 01010 Concrete Temperature does not exceed 95 degrees Fahrenheit 01010 Water is not added to mix at the jobsite y O 0 O 0 OConcreteisnotover90minutesofagebeforeplacement Concrete is not permitted to drop freely over reinforcement, causing segregation _ r! _ O O 0113 O 0Allconcreteisproperlyvibrated No cold joints O 0 01010Testingagencyhasmadecompressivestrengthcylinders Curing Compound type and application conform to specifications 0 Finishing complies with specifications r r 0 OSawcutcontroljointscutwithin12hours ._ 0Formworkcleanofdebris~ r Reinforcement held in position 0 M r _ 0ConcretePlacement ("' see 1 below "') 0 10SlumpSpecifications ("' see 2 below "') y 1— Concrete Placement: 320.00 Cubic Yards of Mix Design No. 30090000 3000.00 psi concrete placed. Time of Placement Start: 1/11/2019 4:00:00 AM Finish: 1/11/2019 9:00:00 AM 2' Slump (inches) = 5 Slump Specifications = 4.00 to 6.00 inches) NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Antonio Ramirez U N I V E R S A L FIELD COPIES TO: KENT ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review U N I V E RSA L ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9430154-2 CT 011519 WorkorderNo.: 9430154 Lab No.: 191-571-C Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 &_West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 I-. Structural Element: Slab on Grade ._._ Sample Location: Club House - Sampled at 10 ft E by 15 It N of SW Comer I Set# 2 of 3 Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Manuel Cartagena Torres On At Lab On or Before: 01/17/2019 I 01/15/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times - Placement Information `- General Contractor: The Spanos Corp Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load_10.00 cu yds. i Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi ® 28 days 1 Cumulative Quantity: 60.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 120.00 cu I yds. Truck No.: 273 Tlme Batched: ,i 4 AM Ticket No.: 1848648 Time Sampled: 5:55 AM 111 i Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: N/A I Weather Condition: Party Cloudy Fialri Tact Racults Air Content: N/A Slump: 7.00 inches Ambient Temp: 52 OF I Concrete Temp: 69 OF Unit Weight: NIA Other Results/Comments: (PERMIT NUMBERAT-1580) Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dlmen.t in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimon. In) Test X-Sect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psl) Average psi) 1 01/18/2019 3 3 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 7.605 600 2 01 /22/2019 7 3 02/12/2019 28 4 02/12/2019 28 5 02/12/2019 28 6'H' 02/12/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H-- Hold Cylinder = D-- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E-- Excluded From Average 7771 oa 1 To establish a mutual protection to Universars clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for pubfcedon of statements, conclusions or extracts hom or regarding Universafs reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 GUNIVERSALENGINEERINGSCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9430154-1 CT 011519 WorkorderNo.: 9430154 Lab No.: 191-570-C Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing U_ S 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Footing Sample Location: Club House - Sampled at North Side of Footing Set# 1 of 3 Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Manuel Cartagena Torres On (At Lab On or Before: 01/17/2019 L01/15/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information —_ General Contractor. The Spanos Corp Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days I Cumulative Quantity: 10.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete i Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 120.00 cu yds. i Truck No.: 602 Time Batched: 4:29 AM Ticket No.: 1848644 Time Sampled: 4:55 AM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: NIA 1 Weather Condition Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 6.50 inches Ambient Temp: 52 OF I Concrete Temp: 67 °F Unit Weight: NIA Other Results/Comments: (PERMIT NUMBER:17-1580) Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dlmen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dlmen. in) Test X-Sect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 01/18/2619 3 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 9,410 750 2 01 /22/2019 7 3 02/12/2019 28 4 02/12/2019 28 5 02/12/2019 28 6'H' 02/12/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H-- Hold Cylinder = D-- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average Fi To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Pubic and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for pubicaion of statements, conclusions or extracts hom or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written apprevel. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 Project No: 0110. 1800758.00UNIVERSALReportNo.: 9430154-3 CT 000519 WorkorderNo.: 9430154 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Lab No.:19L572-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection93BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3632 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P:.407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade Sample Location: Club House - Sampled at 20 It W by 10 It S of NE Corner Set# 3 of 3 Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Manuel Cartagena Torres On At Lab On or Before: 01/17/2019 01/15/2019 General Information _ General Contractor. The Spanos Corp Subcontractor: Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Truck No.: 606 Specified Strength / Sampling Times Specified Strength: 3000 psi ® 28 days Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi ® 28 days Water Added at Site: N/A I Time Batched: 6:10 AM Ticket No.: 1848651 Time Sampled: 6:58 AM MIx Design: 30090000 Admixture: NIA Weather Condition_ Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Placement Information Truck Load: 10.60 cu yds. Cumulative Quantity: 110.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 120.00 cu yds. Air Content: N/A I Slump: 6.50 inches Ambient Temp: 51 OF I Concrete Temp: 69 OF Unit Weight: N/A Other Results/Comments: (PERMIT NUMBERA7.1680) Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimon. in) Test X-Sect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 01/18/2019 3 3 4.01 4.00 4.01 12.63 6,915 550 2 01 /22/2019 7 3 02/12/2019 28 4 02/12/2019 28 5 02/12/2019 28 6-H- 02/12/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average To establish a mutual protection to Unfversers clients, the Pubic and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and euthodzadon for pubficadon of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universals reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UESPr ect 0758.0UNIVERSALDateTyped: No.: JJan ary16, 201900 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date Type of Report 9429933-1 01/15/2019 In -Place Density Test Report 9429933-2 01/15/2019 In -Place Density Test Report 9429933-3 01/15/2019 In -Place Density Test Report 9430490-1 1 01/15/2019 In -Place Density Test Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (5) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 HMA,,,i Fred Schmalzerwasc .c'. 38 s 2019.01.18 TXM F IaNla 1 G:59:54-05'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universals clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9429933-1758.0000 Workorder No: 9429933-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/16/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 01/15/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Building Pad D (Permit Number 17- 1583) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Tyne of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 SE Corner Of Pad 0+1 ft 112.3 13.0 111.8 7.6 100 Pass 2 SW Corner Of Pad 0+1 ft 112.3 13.0 112.8 9.5 100 Pass 3 NW Corner Of Pad 0+1 ft 112.3 13.0 110.5 8.1 98 Pass 4 NE Corner Of Pad 0+1 ft 112.3 13.0 111.7 9.1 99 Pass 5 Center Of Pad 0+1 ft 1 112.3 1 13.0 1 113.3 7.9 101 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9429933-2 Report Date: 01/16/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 01/15/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Biluding E (Permit Number 17-1584) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Tyne of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 6 NE Corner Of Pad 1+2 ft 112.3 13.0 112.1 8.8 100 Pass 7 NE Corner Of Pad 1+2 ft 112.3 13.0 111.4 8.3 99 Pass 8 SE Corner Of Pad 1+2 ft 112.3 13.0 110.2 7.8 98 Pass 9 SW Corner Of Pad 1+2 ft 112.3 13.0 111.7 8.0 99 Pass 10 ICenter Of Pad 1+2 ft 1 112.3 1 13.0 1 109.9 7.0 98 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9429933-3758.0000 Workorder No: 9429933-3 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/16/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionE9BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Repolrt Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 01/15/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tvoe of Test: Area Tested: Storm Pipe (Permit Number 18-2508) Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 11 S-22 to S-21A 30" RCP 3+4 ft 109.3 11.8 109.8 9.7 100 Pass 12 S-22 to S-21A 30" RCP 4+5 ft 109.3 11.8 108.7 8.3 99 Pass 13 S-21A to S-20 30" RCP 0-1 ft 109.3 11.8 109.0 8.8 100 Pass 14 S-21A to S-20 30" RCP 0+1 ft 109.3 11.8 108.1 9.3 99 Pass 15 S-21A to S-20 30" RCP 1+2 ft 109.3 11.8 110.7 9.5 101 Pass 16 S-21A to S-20 30" RCP 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 108.1 8.0 99 Pass 17 S-21A to S-20 30" RCP 3+4 ft 109.3 11.8 107.2 7.7 98 Pass 18 S-21A to S-20 30" RCP 4+5 ft 109.3 11.8 108.5 8.0 99 Pass 19 S-21A to S-20 30" RCP 5+6 ft 1 109.3 1 11.8 1 109.1 8.7 100 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 90 58.0000 Workorder No: 430490-190-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/16/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection93BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Alonzo Albert Date Tested: 01/15/2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tvoe of Test: Area Tested: STORM STRUCTURE (PERMIT Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method NUMBER# 18-2508) Material: Backfill Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Storm Inlet Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 S - 20 0+1 ft 109.3 11.8 108.1 6.2 99 Pass 2 S - 20 1 +2 ft 109.3 11.8 110.4 6.5 101 Pass 3 S - 20 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 107.4 6.8 98 Pass 4 S - 20 3+4 ft 109.3 11.8 109.4 7.1 100 Pass 5 S - 20 4+5 ft 109.3 11.8 110.9 7.4 101 Pass 6 S - 20 5+6 ft 109.3 11.8 108.2 7.9 99 Pass 7 S - 21A 0+1 ft 109.3 11.8 107.3 6.7 98 Pass 8 S - 21A 1+2 ft 109.3 11.8 109.4 7.0 100 Pass 9 S - 21A 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 111.5 7.3 102 Pass 10 S - 21A 3+4 ft 109.3 11.8 108.0 7.8 99 Pass 11 S - 21A 4+5 ft 109.3 11.8 109.5 8.2 100 Pass 12 IS - 21A 5+6 ft 1 109.3 1 11.8 107.1 1 8.5 1 98 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 V N I V E RSA L ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No.: 0110.1800758.0000 Date Typed: January 16, 2019 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date Type of Report 9429933-1 01/15/2019 In -Place Density Test Report 9429933-2 01/15/2019 In -Place Density Test Report 9429933-3 01/15/2019 In -Place Density Test Report 9430490-1 1 01/15/2019 In -Place Density Test Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (5) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 d 11CHMq i"7 t, r Fred Schmalzer 4'O vG NBF •, f1 'c 2019.01.18388 F = TATE 1 G:59:54-05'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 GUNIVERSAL UWo korder No: 942993300758.0000 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/16/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Date Tested: 01 /15/2019 Type of Test: Area Tested: Building Pad D (Permit Number 17- Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method 1583) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 SE Corner Of Pad 0+1 ft 112.3 13.0 111.8 7.6 100 Pass 2 SW Comer Of Pad 0+1 ft 112.3 13.0 112.8 9.5 100 Pass 3 NW Corner Of Pad 0+1 ft 112.3 13.0 110.5 8.1 98 Pass 4 NE Corner Of Pad 0+1 ft 112.3 13.0 111.7 9.1 99 Pass 5 Center Of Pad 0+1 ft 1 112.3 1 13.0 1 113.3 7.9 101 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 ES Proect No: UNIVERSAL uWo korder No: 9429933 2758.0000 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/16/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection93BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Biluding E (Permit Number 17-1584) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Date Tested: 01/15/2019 Tvt)e of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 6 NE Corner Of Pad 1+2 ft 112.3 13.0 112.1 8.8 100 Pass 7 NE Corner Of Pad 1+2 ft 112.3 13.0 111.4 8.3 99 Pass 8 SE Corner Of Pad 1+2 ft 112.3 13.0 110.2 7.8 98 Pass 9 SW Corner Of Pad 1+2 ft 112.3 13.0 111.7 8.0 99 Pass 10 ICenter Of Pad 1+2 ft 1 112.3 1 13.0 1 109.9 7.0 98 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 ES Proect No: UNIVERSAL uWo korder No: 9429933 3758.0000 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/16/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 01/15/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tyne of Test: Area Tested: Storm Pipe (Permit Number 18-2508) Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 11 S-22 to S-21A 30" RCP 3+4 ft 109.3 11.8 109.8 9.7 100 Pass 12 S-22 to S-21A 30" RCP 4+5 ft 109.3 11.8 108.7 8.3 99 Pass 13 S-21A to S-20 30" RCP 0-1 ft 109.3 11.8 109.0 8.8 100 Pass 14 S-21A to S-20 30" RCP 0+1 ft 109.3 11.8 108.1 9.3 99 Pass 15 S-21A to S-20 30" RCP 1+2 ft 109.3 11.8 110.7 9.5 101 Pass 16 S-21A to S-20 30" RCP 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 108.1 8.0 99 Pass 17 S-21A to S-20 30" RCP 3+4 ft 109.3 11.8 107.2 7.7 98 Pass 18 S-21A to S-20 30" RCP 4+5 ft 109.3 11.8 108.5 8.0 99 Pass 19 S-21A to S-20 30" RCP 5+6 ft 1 109.3 1 11.8 1 109.1 1 8.7 1 100 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL LIES Project No: 94 0 58.0000 Workorder No: 9430490-190-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/16/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation LIES Technician: Alonzo Albert 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 01/15/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: STORM STRUCTURE (PERMIT NUMBER# 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Storm Inlet Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvae of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 S - 20 0+1 ft 109.3 11.8 108.1 6.2 99 Pass 2 S - 20 1+2 it 109.3 11.8 110.4 6.5 101 Pass 3 S - 20 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 107.4 6.8 98 Pass 4 S - 20 3+4 ft 109.3 11.8 109.4 7.1 100 Pass 5 S - 20 4+5 ft 109.3 11.8 110.9 7.4 101 Pass 6 S - 20 5+6 ft 109.3 11.8 108.2 7.9 99 Pass 7 S - 21A 0+1 ft 109.3 11.8 107.3 6.7 98 Pass 8 S - 21 A 1 +2 ft 109.3 11.8 109.4 7.0 100 Pass 9 S - 21 A 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 111.5 7.3 102 Pass 10 S - 21A 3+4 ft 109.3 11.8 108.0 7.8 99 Pass 11 S - 21 A 4+5 ft 109.3 11.8 109.5 8.2 100 Pass 12 IS - 21 A 5+6 ft 1 109.3 1 11.8 1 107.1 1 8.5 1 98 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 ES Project No: 0110. 18 GUNIVERSAL uWo korder No: 942993400758.0000 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date: 01 /17/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 01 /16/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Type of Test: Area Tested: Building Pad D (Permit Number 17-1583) Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Material: Fill Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction reauirement. Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 SE Coner Of Pad 1+2 ft 112.3 13.0 112.1 8.4 100 Pass 2 SW Coner Of Pad 1+2 ft 112.3 13.0 111.3 7.1 99 Pass 3 NW Coner Of Pad 1+2 ft 112.3 13.0 111.7 7.7 99 Pass 4 NE Coner Of Pad 1+2 ft 112.3 13.0 113.3 8.8 101 Pass 5 ICenter Of Pad 1+2 ft 1 112.3 1 13.0 1 111.0 1 6.9 99 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 uWo korder No: 942993402758.0000UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/17/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 01/16/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tyne of Test: Area Tested: Storm Pipe (Permit Number 18-2508) Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 6 S-73 to S71 30"RCP 6+7 ft 109.3 11.8 109.9 8.5 101 Pass 7 S-73 to S71 30"RCP 7+8 ft 109.3 11.8 110.5 9.0 101 Pass 8 S-73 to S71 30"RCP 8+9 ft 109.3 11.8 108.7 8.0 99 Pass 9 S-73 to S71 30"RCP 9+10 ft 109.3 11.8 109.0 9.2 100 Pass 10 S-73 to S71 30"RCP 10+11 ft 109.3 11.8 109.8 9.5 100 Pass 11 S-73 to S71 30"RCP 11+12 ft 109.3 11.8 108.3 7.7 99 Pass 12 S-73 to S71 30"RCP 12+13 ft 109.3 11.8 109.1 8.1 100 Pass 13 S-73 to S71 30"RCP 13+14 ft 1 109.3 1 11.8 1 108.5 8.6 99 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universars reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 Project No: 0110. 1800758.0000UNIVERSALReportNo.: 9429206 CT 011119 9429206 ENGINEERING SCIENCES WorkoLab rNo.:119L518-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection E9BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing HQ 07 R. Woet 1 et Cfraat Ctanfnrri Caminnla (ru inty FI 37771 Structural Element: Footing Sample Location: BLDG B - Sampled at SW Corner Set# 1 of 5 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck I Sample By: Diego Mendoza On 01/11/2019 At Lab On or Before: 01/14/2019 General Information SDecIfied Strenoth / Semolina Times Placement Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corporation Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 20.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 245.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 606 Time Batched: 3:24 AM Ticket No.: 1848579 Time Sampled: 4:10 AM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: NIA Weather Condition: Clear Field Test Results Air Content: N/A I Slump: 6.00 inches Ambient Temp: 47 OF I Concrete Temp: 64 OF Unit Weight: NIA Other Results/Comments: (PERMIT NUMBER: 17-1581) Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen. 1 in) Actual Dlmen. 2 in) Avg. Dlmen. in) Test XSect Area ( in') Max Compressive Load ( Ibs) Test Compressive Strength( psl) Average psi) 1 01/14/2019 3 3 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 11,950 950 2 01/18/2019 7 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 22,305 1,770 3 02/08/2019 1 28 1 - 4 02/08/2019 1 28 5' H' 02/08/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable : E-- Excluded From Average To establish a mutual protection to Universal's dients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication or statements, conclusions or extracts Irom or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade Sample Location: BLDG B - Sampled at Center BLDG Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 94292064 CT 011119 WorkorderNo.: 9429206 Lab No.: 191-521-C Set# 4 of 5 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck Isampie By: Diego Mendoza On 01/11/2019 JAt Lab On or Before: 01/14/2019 General Information Soecified Strenath / Semolina Times Placement Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corporation Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 160.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 245.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 622 Time Batched: 5:10 AM Ticket No.: 1848593 Time Sampled: 6:05 AM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: N/A Weather Conditlon: Clear Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 7.50 inches Amblent Temp: 446 F Concrete Temp: 68 OF Unit Weight: N/A Other Results/Comments: (PERMIT NUMBER: 17-1581) Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 In) Actual Dlmen.2 in) Avg. Dimon. In) Test XSect. Area (In') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 01 /14/2019 3 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 13,310 1,050 2 01/18/2019 7 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 27,535 2,180 3 02/08/2019 28 4 02/08/2019 28 5'H' 02/08/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note W- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E-- Excluded From Average To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universals reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval or Universal Engineering Sciences. I of I Revised May 2018 3 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Footing Sample Location: BLDG B - Sampled at NE Comer Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9429206-2 CT 011119 WorkorderNo.: 9429206 Lab No.: 191-519-C Set# 2 of 5 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck Isampie By: Diego Mendoza On 01/11/2019 JAt Lab On or Before: 01/14/2019 nanaral Infnrmatlnn Soeclfled Strenoth / Samollno Times Placement Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corporation Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 60.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 245.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 298 Time Batched: 3:57 AM Ticket No.: 1848583 Time Sampled: 4:35 AM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: NIA Weather Condition: Clear Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 7.00 inches Amblent Temp: 47-Fl Concrete Temp: 64 -F Unit Weight: N/A Other Results/Comments: (PERMIT NUMBER: 17-1581) Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dlmen.1 in) Actual Dlmen.2 in) Avg. Dimon. in) Test X-Sect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psl) Average psi) 1 01/14/2019 3 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 12.200 970 2 01/18/2019 7 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 21,095 1,670 3 02/08/2019 28 4 02/08/2019 28 5'H' 02/08/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universals reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade Sample Location: BLDG B - Sampled at 75' W Of NE Corner Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9429206-5 CT 011119 Workorde rNo.: 9429206 Lab No.: 191-522-C Set# 5 of 5 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck I Sample By: Diego Mendoza On 01/11/2019 JAt Lab On or Before: 01/14/2019 r:anaral Infnrmntlnn Snecified Strenath / Samnlina Times Placement Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corporation Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 220.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 245.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 607 Time Batched: 5:59 AM Ticket No.: 1848599 Time Sampled: 6:45 AM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: N/A Weather Condition: Clear Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 7.50 inches Ambient Temp: 48 °F Concrete Temp: 66 OF Unit Weight: N/A Other Results/Comments: (PERMIT NUMBER: 17-1581) Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dlmen.1 in) Actual Dlmen.2 In) Avg. Dlmen. in) Test X-Sect. Area (In') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psl) Average psi) 1 01 /14/2019 3 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 15,040 1,190 2 01/18/2019 7 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 26,835 2,130 3 02/08/2019 28 4 02/08/2019 28 5'H' 02/08/2019 1 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H-- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E-- Excluded From Average To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shell not be reproduced, except in lull, without the written approval of Universal Engineering sciences. I of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL tuENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade Sample Location: BLDG B - Sampled at SE Comer Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9429206-3 CT 011119 WorkorderNo.: 9429206 Lab No.: 191-520-C Set# 3 of 5 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck I Sample By: Diego Mendoza On 01/11/2019 JAt Lab On or Before: 01/14/2019 oenerai information General Contractor: The Spanos Corporation Subcontractor: Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Truck No.: 602 Ticket No.: 1848588 Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: N/A specineo strengtn / samptmg i imes Specified Strength: 3000 psi ® 28 days Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi ® 28 days Water Added at Site: N/A Time Batched: 4:35 AM Time Sampled: 5:20 AM Weather Condition: Clear Field Test Results riacement rmormaaon Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Cumulative Quantity: 110.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 245.00 cu yds. Air Content: N/A Slump: 6.50 inches Amblent Temp: 46 -F I Concrete Temp: 64 -F Unit Weight: NIA Other Results/Comments: (PERMIT NUMBER: 17-1581) Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimon. in) Test X-Sect. Area (In') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psl) Average psi) 1 01/14/2019 3 3 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 13,445 1,070 2 01/18/2019 7 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 25,675 2,030 3 02/08/2019 28 4 02/08/2019 28 5'H' 02/08/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H-- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder. Un-testable = E-- Excluded From Average To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property or our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without Me written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No.: 0110.1800758.0000 Date Typed: January 17, 2019 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date IType of Report 9429934-1 01/16/2019 In -Place Density Test Report 9429934-2 01/16/2019 In -Place Density Test Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (2) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 HMq Fred Schmalzer 38E 8 TAME F _ 2019.01.18 11:02:06-05'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This Item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universals clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3632 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9430154-3 CT 011519 WorkorderNo.: 9430154 Lab No.: 191-572-C Date 1st Issue: January 21, 2019 Sample Location: Clubhouse - Sampled at 20 it W by 10 It S of NE Comer I Set# 3 of 3 Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Manuel Cartagena Torres On At Lab On or Before: 01/17/2019 01/15/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corp Specified Strength: 3000 psi ® 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi ® 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 110.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 120.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 606 Time Batched: 6:10 AM Ticket No.: 1848651 Time Sampled: 6:58 AM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: NIS Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 6.50 inches Amblent Temp: 51 OF I Concrete Temp: 69 OF Unit Weight: NIA Other Results/Comments: (PERMIT NUMBER:17-1580) Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dlmen.l in) Actual Dlmen.2 In) Avg. Dimon. In) Test X-Sect Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 01/18/2019 3 3 4.01 4.00 4.01 12.63 6,915 550 2 01/22/2019 7 5 3.99 4.01 4.00 12.57 20,985 1,670 3 02/12/2019 28 4 02/12/2019 28 5 02/12/2019 28 6'H' 02/12/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average Note I Test Results represent the Structural Element specified If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 fish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, Me Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publicedon of statements, ir extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sclences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade Sample Location: Clubhouse - Sampled at 10 it E by 15 ft N of SW Comer Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9430154-2 CT 011519 Wo rkorderNo.: 9430154 Lab No.: 191-571-C Date 1st Issue: January 21, 2019 ISet# 2 of 3 Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Manuel Cartagena Torres On IAt Lab On or Before: 01/17/2019 01/15/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corp Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 60.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 120.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 273 Ticket No.: 1848648 Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: N/S Time Batched: 4:49 AM Time Sampled: 5:55 AM Weather Condition: Partly Cl Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 7.00 inches Ambient Temp: 52 °F I Concrete Temp: 69 OF Unit Weight: N/A Other Results/Comments: (PERMIT NUMBER:17-1580) Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.l In) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimon. in) Test X-Sect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 01/18/2019 3 3 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 7,605 600 2 01/22/2019 7 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 23,125 1,830 3 02/12/2019 28 4 02/12/2019 28 5 02/12/2019 28 6'H' 02/12/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder -'D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable 'E'- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Forth Conforms With ASTM C-39 ablish a mutual protection to Universal's dients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property or our dients and authorization for publication of statements, s or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. t of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL Project No: 9430154-1 T 0115ReportNo.: 9430154-1 CT 011519 9430154 ENGINEERING SCIENCES WorkoLab rNo.: 1191-570-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Date 1st Issue: January 21, 2019 Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Footing Sample Location: Clubhouse - Sampled at North Side of Footing Set# 1 of 3 Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Manuel Cartagena Torres On At Lab On or Before: 01/17/2019 + 01/ 15/2018 nanaral Information Specified Strenath / Semolina Times Placement Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corp Specified Strength: 3000 psi (d 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 10.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 120.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 602 Time Batched: 4:29 AM Ticket No.: 1848644 Time Sampled: 4:55 AM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: N/S Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A I Slump: 6.50 inches Ambient Temp: 52 OF I Concrete Temp: 67 -F Unit Weight: NIA Other Results/Comments: (PERMIT NUMBERA7-1580) Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dlmen. l in) Actual Dimen. 2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test X- Sect Area ( in') Max Compressive Load ( Ibs) Test Compressive Strength( psl) Average psi) 1 01/18/2019 3 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 9,410 750 2 01/22/2019 7 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 24,890 1,970 3 02/12/2019 28 4 02/12/2019 28 5 02/12/2019 28 6' H' 02/12/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note W- Hold Cylinder = D-- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E-- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 oblish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, s or extracts hom or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. loft Revised May 2018 a 105--w•s (c Project No: 58.0000UNIVERSALReportNo.: 94319 9-1 CT 0112319 WorkorderNo.: 9431929 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Lab No.:19L850-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionE9BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Stab on Grade Sample Location: Building E Elevator pit(Permit #17-1584)-Center of pad - Sampled at Building E Elevator pad Set# 1 of 1 I Sample From: Concrete Truck I Sample By: Dijon Davis On 01/23/2019 At Lab On or Before: 01/24/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corp Specified Strength: 3000 psi ® 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. I Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi ® 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 10.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 10.00 cu yds. , Truck No.: 287 Time Batched: 1:49 PM Ticket No.: 117146 Time Sampled: 2:34 PM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: N/A Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Stump: 5.00 inches Ambient Temp: 69 eF I Concrete Temp: 80 OF Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dlmen.1 In) Actual Dlmen.2 in) Avg. Dlmen. In) Test XSect. Area (In') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psl) Average psi) 1 01/30/2019 7 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 23,705 1,880 2 02/20/2019 28 3 02/20/2019 28 4 02/20/2019 28 5'1-1' 02/20/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven(?) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable -*E*- Excluded From Average Fi To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports ere submitted as confidential property of our dients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of t Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No.: 0110.1800758.0000 Date Typed: January 21, 2019 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (LIES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date Type of Report 9429206-1 01/11/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9429206-2 01/11/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9429206-3 01/11/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9429206-4 01/11/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9429206-5 01/11/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9429935-1 01/17/2019 In -Place Density Test Report 9429936-1 01/18/2019 In -Place Density Test Report 9429936-2 01/18/2019 In -Place Density Test Report 9431386-1 01/18/2019 In -Place Density Test Report 9431386-2 01/18/2019 In -Place Density Test Report 9431408-1 01/19/2019 In -Place Density Test Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 Fred Schmalzer 2019.02.01 1*4':0R25-05'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 For the mutual protection of Universals clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Footing Sample Location: BUILDING B - Sampled at SW Comer Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9429206-1 CT 011119 WorkorderNo.: 9429206 Lab No.: 191-518-C Date 1st Issue: January 21, 2019 Set# 1 of 5 ISample From: Concrete Truck Isample By: Diego Mendoza On 01/11/2019 JAt Lab On or Before: 01/14/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corporation Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi ® 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 20.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 245.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 606 Time Batched: 3:24 AM Ticket No.: 1848579 Time Sampled: 4:10 AM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: N/S Weather Condition: Clear Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 6.00 inches Ambient Temp: 47 -F I Concrete Temp: 64 -F Unit Weight: NIA Other Results/Comments: (PERMIT NUMBER: 17.1581) Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.l in) Actual Dlmen.2 In) Avg. Dimon. in) Test X-Sect Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psl) Average psi) 1 01/14/2019 3 3 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 11,950 950 2 01/18/2019 7 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 22,305 1,770 3 02/08/2019 1 28 1 - 4 02/08/2019 28 1 - 5'H' 02/08/2019 28 1 - Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder - D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure U 0 F1 Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual pmtecdon to Universals dients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our dients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 Pro ct No: 0110.1800758.0000UNIVERSALReprtNo.: 9429206-2 CT 011119 WorkorderNo.: 9429206 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Lab No.:19L519-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Date 1st Issue: January 21, 2019 Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionE9BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens - ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Footing r Sample Location: BUILDING B - Sampled at NE Corner Set# 2 of 51Sample From: Concrete Truck Isample By: Diego Mendoza On 01/11/2019_ - JAt Lab On or Before: 01/14/2019 General Information Specified Strennth / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corporation Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days - Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 60.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 245.00 cu Time Batched: 3:57 AM yds. Truck No.: 298 Ticket No.: 1848583 Time Sampled: 4:35 AM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: N/S Weather Condition: Clear Field Test Results Air Content: N/A I Slump: 7.00 inches Ambient Temp: 47 -F I Concrete Temp: 64 -F Unit Weight: N/A Other Results/Comments: (PERMIT NUMBER: 17-1581) Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dlmen.1 In) Actual Dlmen.2 in) Avg. Dimon. in) Test X-Sect Area (In') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psl) Average psi) 1 01/14/2019 3 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 12,200 970 2 01/18/2019 7 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 21,095 1,670 3 02/08/2019 1 28 1 - 4 02/08/2019 28 1 - 5'H' 02/08/2019 28 1 - Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H-- Hold Cylinder = D-- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E-- Excluded From Average Note I Test Results represent the Structural Element specified If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure PKIII on _®_ as Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property, of our clients and authorization for publication or statements, conclusions or extracts hom or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our wrfften approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9429206-3 CT 011119 WorkorderNo.: 9429206 Lab No.: 191-520-C Date 1st Issue: January 21, 2019 Structural Element: Slab on Grade r Sample Location: BUILDING B - Sampled at SE Comer Set# 3 of 5 Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Diego Mendoza On 01/11/2019 At Lab On or Before: 01/14/2019 General Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corporation Subcontractor: Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Truck No.: 602 Ticket No.: 1848588 Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: N/S specillea strengtn / sampung Times Specified Strength: 3000 psi ® 28 days Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Water Added at Site: N/A Time Batched: 4:35 AM Time Sampled: 5:20 AM Weather Condition: Clear Field Test Results Placement information Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Cumulative Quantity: 110.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 245.00 cu yds. Air Content: N/A I Slump: 6.50 inches Ambient Temp: 46 OF I Concrete Temp: 64 -F Unit Weight: N/A Other Results/Comments: (PERMIT NUMBER: 17-1681) Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dlmen.2 In) Avg. Dlmen. in) Test X-Sect Area (In') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 01/14/2019 3 3 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 13,445 1,070 2 01/18/2019 7 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 25,675 2,030 3 02/08/2019 1 28 1 - 4 02/08/2019 28 1 - 5'H' 02/08/2019 28 1 - I - I - I - I - 4— Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note W- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E-- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A w Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes tTy Molded per C-31 - Yes L Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universals dients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade SamDle Location: BUILDING B - Sampled at Center BLDG Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9429206-4 CT 011119 WorkorderNo.: 9429206 Lab No.: 191-521-C Date 1st Issue: January 21, 2019 Set# 4 of 51Sample From: Concrete Truck ISample By: Diego Mendoza On 01/11/2019 iAt Lab On or Before: 01/14/2019 1 General Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corporation Subcontractor: Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Truck No.: 622 Ticket No.: 1848593 Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: N/S Specified Strength / Sampling Times Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Water Added at Site: N/A Time Batched: 5:10 AM Time Sampled: 6:05 AM Weather Condition: Clear _ Field Test Results Placement Information Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Cumulative Quantity: 160.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 245.00 cu yds. Air Content: N/A Slump: 7.50 inches Amblent Temp: 446FConcreteTemp: F 68 OF Unit Weight: NIA Other Results/Comments: (PERMIT NUMBER: 17-1581) Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dlmen.l In) Actual Dlmen.2 In) Avg. Dlmen. In) Test X-Sect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psl) Average psi) 1 01 /14/2019 3 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 13,310 1,050 2 01/18/2019 7 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 27,535 2,180 3 02/08/2019 1 28 1 - 4 02/08/2019 1 28 1 - 5'H' 02/08/2019 1 28 1 - Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D-- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure EI 09 _®_ Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as Confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universars reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade Sample Location: BUILDING B - Sampled at 75' W Of NE Corner Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9429206-5 CT 011119 WorkorderNo.: 9429206 Lab No.: 191-522-C Date 1st Issue: January 21, 2019 Set# 5 of 5 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Diego Mendoza On 01/11/2019 At Lab On or Before: 01/14/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corporation Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 220.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 245.00 cu Time Batched: 5:59 AM yds. Truck No.: 607 Ticket No.: 1848599 Time Sampled: 6:45 AM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: NIS Weather Condition: Clear Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 7.50 inches Ambient Temp: 48 OF I Concrete Temp: 66 -F Unit Weight: NIA Other Results/Comments: (PERMIT NUMBER: 17-1581) Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual DImen.l in) Actual Dlmen.2 In) Avg. Dimen. in) Test X-Sect. Area (In) Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psl) Average psi) 1 01/14/2019 3 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 15,040 1,190 2 01/18/2019 7 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 26,835 2,130 3 02/08/2019 28 4 02/08/2019 28 5-H' 02/08/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H-- Hold Cylinder = W- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = V- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure E N71 00 as Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential properly or our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9429935-1758.0000 Workorder No: 9429935-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/21/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 01/17/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tvae of Test: Area Tested: Storm Pipe (Permit Number 18-2508) Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fall 1 S-67 to S-69 18 " RCP 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 109.0 7.8 100 Pass 2 S-67 to S-69 18 " RCP 3+4 ft 109.3 11.8 110.1 8.7 101 Pass 3 S-67 to S-69 18 " RCP 4+5 ft 109.3 11.8 109.5 8.3 100 Pass 4 S-67 to S-69 18 " RCP 5+6 ft 109.3 11.8 108.4 7.7 99 Pass 5 S-67 to S-69 18 " RCP 6+7 ft 109.3 11.8 110.5 9.0 101 Pass 6 S-71 to S-69 30 " RCP 0-1 ft 109.3 11.8 107.7 7.5 99 Pass 7 S-71 to S-69 30" RCP 0+1 ft 109.3 11.8 108.1 7.9 99 Pass 8 S-71 to S-69 30" RCP 1+2 ft 109.3 11.8 107.2 6.9 98 Pass 9 S-71 to S-69 30" RCP 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 108.6 8.0 99 Pass 10 S-71 to S-69 30" RCP 3+4 ft 109.3 11.8 108.8 8.8 100 Pass 11 S-71 to S-69 30" RCP 4+5 ft 109.3 11.8 109.5 8.5 100 Pass 12 S-71 to S-69 30" RCP 5+6 ft 109.3 11.8 110.0 9.2 101 Pass 13 S-71 to S-69 30" RCP 6+7 ft 109.3 11.8 108.9 7.4 100 Pass 14 S-71 to S-69 30" RCP 7+8 ft 1 109.3 11.8 110.7 9.5 101 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 ES Project No: 0110. UNIVERSAL uWo korder No: 9429936 0758.0000 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/21/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation LIES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 01/18/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Building Pad F (Permit Number (17- 1586) Material: Fill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Fill The tests below meet the 95% minimum comoaction reouirement. Tvae of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 SW Coner Of Pad 1+2 ft 111.5 11.3 111.2 8.6 100 Pass 2 SE Coner Of Pad 1+2 ft 111.5 11.3 112.9 7.7 101 Pass 3 NE Coner Of Pad 1+2 ft 111.5 11.3 110.2 7.1 99 Pass 4 NW Coner Of Pad 1+2 ft 111.5 11.3 110.7 8.0 99 Pass 5 ICenter Of Pad 1+2 ft 1 111.5 1 11.3 1 111.8 9.2 100 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 ES Project No: 0110. UNIVERSAL uWo korder No: 9429936 2758.0000 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/21/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection93BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Date Tested: 01/18/2019 Tvoe of Test: Area Tested: Storm Structure (Permit Number 18- Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method 2508) Material: Backfill Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Storm Inlet Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 6 S-41 0+1 ft 109.3 11.8 109.7 8.8 100 Pass 7 S-41 1 +2 ft 109.3 11.8 108.8 8.0 100 Pass 8 S-41 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 108.3 8.6 99 Pass 9 S-41 3+4 ft 109.3 11.8 107.7 7.9 99 Pass 10 S-41 4+5 ft 109.3 11.8 107.1 7.3 98 Pass 11 S-41 5+6 ft 109.3 11.8 109.1 9.7 100 Pass 12 S-41 6+7 ft 109.3 11.8 109.0 8.6 100 Pass 13 S-45 5+6 ft 109.3 11.8 109.2 9.1 100 Pass 14 S-45 6+7 ft 109.3 11.8 109.3 9.7 100 Pass 15 S-45 7+8 ft 109.3 11.8 109.9 10.1 101 Pass 16 S-45 8+9 It 109.3 11.8 110.0 9.3 101 Pass 17 S-45 9+10 ft 109.3 11.8 108.2 8.9 99 Pass 18 S-45 1 10+11 ft 1 109.3 1 11.8 1 109.1 1 9. 1 100 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9431386-1758.0000 Workorder No: 9431386-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/21/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Christopher Gonzalez 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 01/18/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tvoe of Test: Area Tested: Storm Pipe (Permit Number 18- Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method 2508) Material: Backfill Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 S-30 to S-28 (18" RCP) 0-1 ft 109.3 11.8 107.4 8.8 98 Pass 2 S-30 to S-28 (18" RCP) 0+1 ft 109.3 11.8 108.0 9.0 99 Pass 3 S-30 to S-28 (18" RCP) 1+2 ft 109.3 11.8 108.4 7.9 99 Pass 4 S-30 to S-28 (18" RCP) 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 106.8 7.6 98 Pass 5 S-30 to S-28 (18" RCP) 3+4 ft 109.3 11.8 109.0 9.0 100 Pass 6 S-30 to S-28 (18" RCP) 4+5 ft 109.3 11.8 108.5 8.7 99 Pass 7 S-30 to S-28 (18" RCP) 5+6 ft 109.3 11.8 107.3 8.4 98 Pass 8 S-30 to S-28 (18" RCP) 6+7 ft 109.3 11.8 108.0 7.8 99 Pass 9 S-20 to S-18 (30" RCP) 0-1 ft 109.3 11.8 108.3 8.6 99 Pass 10 S-20 to S-18 (30" RCP) 0+1 ft 109.3 11.8 107.2 10.0 98 Pass 11 S-20 to S-18 (30" RCP) 1+2 ft 109.3 11.8 110.1 10.2 101 Pass 12 S-20 to S-18 (30" RCP) 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 106.9 8.4 98 Pass 13 S-20 to S-18 (30" RCP) 3+4 ft 109.3 11.8 109.4 9.6 100 Pass 14 S-20 to S-18 (30" RCP) 4+5 ft 1 109.3 1 11.8 1 108.4 1 9.0 99 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 ES Project No: UNIVERSAL uWo korder No: 94303186 2758.0000 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/21/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Christopher Gonzalez Date Tested: 01/18/2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Structure (Permit Number 18- 2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Storm Inlet Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvoe of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 15 S-34 0+1 It 109.3 11.8 108.6 9.2 99 Pass 16 S-34 1+2 ft 109.3 11.8 107.1 8.0 98 Pass 17 S-34 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 109.0 9.4 100 Pass 18 S-34 3+4 ft 1 109.3 1 11.8 1 108.0 1 7.2 1 99 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL LIWo korder No: 9431/408 0758.0000 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/21/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3632 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Fernando Montalvo Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Date Tested: 01/19/2019 Tvrae of Test: Area Tested: Storm Structure (Permit Number 18- Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method 2508) Material: Backfill Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Storm Inlet Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 S 43 0+1 ft 109.3 11.8 109.6 8.8 100 Pass 2 S-43 1+2 ft 109.3 11.8 108.9 8.0 100 Pass 3 S 43 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 110.2 9.1 101 Pass 4 S-43 3+4 ft 109.3 11.8 108.5 7.8 99 Pass 5 S-43 4+5 ft 109.3 11.8 107.2 7.4 98 Pass 6 S-43 5+6 ft 109.3 11.8 109.0 8.6 100 Pass 7 S-43 6+7 ft 109.3 11.8 110.7 9.3 101 Pass 8 S-43 7+8 ft 1 109.3 1 11.8 1 108.0 1 7.9 1 99 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 1 GUNIVERSALENGINEERINGSCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No.: 0110.1800758.0000 Date Typed: January 23, 2019 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (LIES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date Type of Report 9430154-1 01/15/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9430154-2 01/15/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9430154-3 01/15/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (3) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 1SCHMAG''' Fred Schmalzer 38 a - 2019.02.01 TATE f , L ` 4'0'8=:48-05'00' rirr„0 tl„ti.. , Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verbled on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universals clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9430154-1 CT 011519 WorkorderNo.: 9430154 Lab No.: 191-570-C Date 1st Issue: January 21, 2019 Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Footing Sample Location: Clubhouse - Sampled at North Side of Footing Set# 1 of 3 Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Manuel Cartagena Torres On At Lab On or Before: 01/17/2019 01 /15/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corp Specified Strength: 3000 psi (d 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 10.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 120.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 602 Ticket No.: 1848644 Mix Deslan: 30090000 Admixture: ws Time Batched: 4:29 AM Time Sampled: 4:55 AM Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 6.50 inches Ambient Temp: 52 OF I Concrete Temp: 67 OF Unit Weight: NIA Other Results/Comments: (PERMIT NUMBER:17-1580) Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.l in) Actual Dimen.2 In) Avg. Dimon. In) Test X-Sect Area (In') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psl) Average psi) 1 01/18/2019 3 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 9,410 750 2 01/22/2019 7 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 24,890 1.970 3 02/12/2019 28 4 02/12/2019 28 5 02/12/2019 28 6'H' 02/12/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un4estable E'- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our wdtten approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 Project No: UNIVERSAL ReportNo.: 94301154 2 CT 01111519 WorkorderNo.: 9430154 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Lab No.:19L571-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Date 1st Issue: January 21, 2019 Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionE9BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade Sample Location: Clubhouse - Sampled at 10 ft E by 15 ft N of SW Comer Set# 2 of 3 Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Manuel Cartagena Torres On At Lab On or Before: 01/17/2019101/15/2019 General Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corp Subcontractor: Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Truck No.: 273 Ticket No.: 1848648 Mix Deslan: 30090000 Admixture: N/S Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 60.00 cu yds. Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 120.00 cu yds. Time Batched: 4:49 AM Time Sampled: 5:55 AM Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy_ _ Field Test Results Air Content: N/A I Slump: 7.00 inches Ambient Temp: 52 -F I Concrete Temp: 69 -F Unit Weight: N/A Other Results/Comments: (PERMIT NUMBER:17-1580) Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 In) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimon. in) Test X-Sect Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psl) Average psi) 1 01/18/2019 3 3 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 7,605 600 2 01 /22/2019 7 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 23,125 1,830 3 02/12/2019 28 4 02/12/2019 28 5 02/12/2019 28 6'H' 02/12/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder 'D'- Defective Cylinder, Un4estable -IV- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified if an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure U r 71 U Sao® Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universals reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9430154-3 CT 011519 WorkorderNo.: 9430154 Lab No.: 191-572-C Date 1st Issue: January 21, 2019 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade ~ Sample Location: Clubhouse - Sampled at 20 it W by 10 It S of NE Comer Set# 3 of 3 Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Manuel Cartagena Torres On At Lab On or Before: 01/17/2019 01/15/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corp Specified Strength: 3000 psi ® 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 110.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 120.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 606 Time Batched: 6:10 AM Ticket No.: 1848651 Time Sampled: 6:58 AM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: NIS Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 6.50 inches Ambient Temp: 51 OF I Concrete Temp: 69 OF Unit Weight: NIA Other Results/Comments: (PERMIT NUMBER:17-1580) Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 In) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimon. in) Test X-Sect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (lbs) Test Compressive Strength(psl) Average psi) 1 01/18/2019 3 3 4.01 4.00 4.01 12.63 6,915 550 2 01/22/2019 7 5 3.99 4.01 4.00 12.57 20,985 1,670 3 02/12/2019 28 4 02/12/2019 28 5 02/12/2019 28 6-H- 02/12/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UESPrUNIVERSALDaaTypedt No.: Joan ary30, 201900 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection 03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. I Date I Type of Report 9429943- 1 1 01/29/2019 In -Place Density Test Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments ( 1) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 sCHMq>,, r ENS, •Ffj' Fred Schmalzer 4 38 a 2019.02.01 TAM F 14': 44 36-05'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verNied on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universals clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 03 UNIVERSAL uWo korder No: 94299 300758.0000 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/30/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 01/29/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Structure ( Permit Number 18- 2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Storm Inlet Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 S-47 0+1 ft 109.3 11.8 109.9 8.8 101 Pass 2 S-47 1+2 ft 109.3 11.8 108.8 11.1 100 Pass 3 S-47 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 110.3 9.7 101 Pass 4 S-47 3+4 ft 109.3 11.8 108.5 9.4 99 Pass 5 S-47 4+5 ft 109.3 11.8 109.9 9.0 101 Pass 6 S-47 5+6 ft 109.3 11.8 108.5 8.8 99 Pass 7 S-47 6+7 ft 109.3 11.8 109.0 8.6 100 Pass 8 S-22 0+1 ft 109.3 11.8 109.6 9.9 100 Pass 9 S-22 1+2 ft 109.3 11.8 110.5 9.3 101 Pass 10 S-22 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 109.1 8.5 100 Pass 11 S-22 3+4 ft 109.3 11.8 109.7 9.5 100 Pass 12 S-22 4+5 ft 109.3 11.8 110.3 10.5 101 Pass 13 S-22 5+6 ft 109.3 11.8 109.8 8.4 100 Pass 14 S-26 5+6 ft 109.3 11.8 108.0 8.1 99 Pass 15 S-30 7+8 ft 1 109.3 1 11.8 1 107.9 1 7.7 1 99 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL Dat Project No.: January 22, 2 19DateTyped: January 22, 2019 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionE] Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (LIES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date Type of Report 9429937-1 01/21/2019 In -Place Density Test Report 9429937-2 01/21/2019 In -Place Density Test Report 9431634-1 01/21/2019 In -Place Density Test Report 9431634-2 01/21/2019 In -Place Density Test Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (4) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 011III irill"I sC"MAC Fred Schmalzer 3 a - 2019.02.01 TATE F RSA 14':09-! 05-05'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universals clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidentla/ property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 94299 800758.0000 Workorder No: 9429937-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/22/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 01/21/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Elevator Pit from Building D (Permit Number 17-1583) Material: Native Reference Datum: 0 = Top of Native The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Tvoe of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) N Fail 1 Center of Elevator Pit 0-1 ft 109.3 11.8 109.3 8.1 100 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9429937-2 Report Date: 01/22/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 01/21/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tvae of Test: Area Tested: Elevator Pit from Building E (Permit Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Number 17-1584) Material: Native Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Top of Native The tests below meet the 95% minimum compaction requirement. Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 2 Center of Elevator Pit 0-1 ft 109.3 11.8 108.5 7.7 99 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 LIES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9431634-1 Report Date: 01/22/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 01/21/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Roadway (North Side Entrance) Permit Number 18-2508) Material: Stabilization Reference Datum: 0 = Top of Stabilization The tests below meet the 98% minimum comoaction reauirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-6938 Nuclear Gauge Method Laboratory: AASHTO T180 Modified Proctor Depth requirement is 12.00 inches Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Stab. Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test LBR pcf) pcf) Fail 1 STA 10+00 110.7 11.6 111.2 10.6 100 12.75 Pass 2 STA 13+00 110.7 11.6 112.0 11.2 101 12.25 Pass Remarks: (Permit Number 18-2608) To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 90110. 758.0000 Workorder No: 431634-231634-2 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:01/22/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Repolrt Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Structure (Permit Number 18- 2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Storm Inlet Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Date Tested: 01 /21 /2019 Tvt)e of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture N Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 3 S-36 0+1 ft 109.3 11.8 109.4 8.8 100 Pass 4 S-36 1+2 ft 109.3 11.8 108.9 8.3 100 Pass 5 S-36 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 109.2 7.7 100 Pass 6 S-36 3+4 ft 109.3 11.8 107.3 9.0 98 Pass 7 S-39 0+1 ft 109.3 11.8 110.0 9.5 101 Pass 8 S-39 1+2 ft 109.3 11.8 109.9 8.1 101 Pass 9 S-39 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 108.6 7.9 99 Pass 10 S-18 0+1 ft 109.3 11.8 109.6 8.1 100 Pass 11 S-18 1+2 ft 109.3 11.8 108.1 8.8 99 Pass 12 S-18 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 107.7 9.0 99 Pass 13 S-18 3+4 ft 1 109.3 1 11.8 1 107.1 1 7.3 1 98 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 DES Project No.: 000UNIVERSAL DateTyped: January 30, 2019 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd.,CMando,FL 32811 P: 407A23.0504 F: 407A233106 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation Attn: Jim Woods 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing, US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (LIES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/ or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below. of Work this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie S. Housein (extension 23078). Attachments ( 1) RH e VIS Mat jov atjovSincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. COA No. 00000549 Fred Schmalzer 2019. 02.01 14: 11:05-05'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This Item has been electronically signed and sealed by using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. 3532 Maggie Boulevard - Orlando, FI 32811 - (407) 423-0504 - Fax (407) 423-3106 Visit us on the web at www.UniversalEn-gineeringcom. I ED UNIVERSAL r.s Ewen Client: The Spanos Corporation Project Name: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing Sample Location: Stockpile Intended Use: Backfill Material Description: Orange & Tan -Brown Sand with Silt Sampled By: FM Date Sampled: January 14, 2019 125 120 115 110 ua Q 100 95 90 85 0 Project Number: 0110.1800758.0000 Lab Sample No.: 19-P0061 Work Order No.: 9422151 Area Covered: N/A Date Plotted: January 17, 2019 Tested By: ECV Date Tested: January 16, 2019 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Test Method: ASTM D1557 Method A Maximum Dry Density, pcf: 111.5 Optimum Moisture, %: 11.3 Passing 3.5" Sieve, %: 100 AASHTO T-89 (LL): N/A Passing No. 4 Sieve, %: 100 AASHTO T-90 (PI): N/A Passing No. 200 Sieve, %: 8.7 AASHTO M-145 (class.): N/A 00% Saturation for avity Equal to: 55 2.70 2.75 5 10 15 20 25 30 Moisture Content (%) Sampled according to AASHTO T 002. Proctor plotted by software package. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. LOCATIONS: UNIVERSAL Atlanta Dayton Beach ENGINEERING SCIENCES Fort Myers Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Fort Pierce Gainesville Geophysical Services • Construction Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Jacksonville Building Inspection • Plan Review • Building Code Administration Miami January 25, 2019 Ocala Orlando (Headquarters) City of Sanford Palm Coast PO Box 1788 PensacolaPensacola Sanford, Florida 32772 Rockledge Sarasota Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official St. Petersburg Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments Tifton 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 West Palm Beach Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 UES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 4 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of January 14, 2019 through January 20, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the "Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of January 14, 2019 through January 20, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. FJS/dkn City of Sanford Aldrich, Dave City of Sanford Antonini, Usa The Spumes Corporation Woods, Jim The Spanos Corporation Gillespie, Hardy The Spanos Corporation Jensen, Chuck The Spanos Corporation Homes, Kent CPH, Inc (Corporate) Boyles, Irene Lee Crest Lee Crest Kephart Garland, Jesse Kephart Campbell, Paul Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 nnlnnel All Fred Schmalzer yense tw F 2019.02.01 5:46:59-05'00' dave.akirich0sardordfl.9ov Usa.AntDnlnl®San(ordfl.gov Jwoods0agspanos.com h9illesple0agspanos.aom cjensen®a9spanos.aom thomea0agspams.com Iboylesocpheorpeom o.leegroup320®9mail.aom esse9Okepfwrt.com paulcOkephamcom Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. - Orlando, FI 32811 - (407) 423-0504 - (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO.4 Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: January 25, 2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. Added This Summary Period: 0 Resolved This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: 0 SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): 1 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: 3 to 3 DAILY REPORTS: Daily Report No. Inspection Date Inspector(s) Reports No. of Pages Page No(s). 8 1/15/2019 Antonio Ramirez, Jr. 1 4 to 4 9 1/16/2019 Antonio Ramirez, Jr. 2 5 to 6 10 1/18/2019 1 Michael Felshaw 1 7 to 7 Total Number of Pages This Summary: Q For the mutual protection of Universals clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG SIL No. Date SUM No Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location Description S.I. Engineer of Record Response 2S.1. Date Closed SUM No. IThe Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. 2The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Docs #1632149 3This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 CONCRETE PLACEMENT THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 8 0/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 1/15/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9430156-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1580 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS 8t TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Slab on Grade LOCATIONIGRID LINES: Clubhouse ELEVATION: Level 1 Inspection was performed by: ® Contract Drawings O Approved Shop Drawings CONCRETE PLACEMENT d d a p j 0 Z Notes Slump taken at truck after first few yards p Concrete Temperature does not exceed 95 degrees Fahrenheit p Water is not added to mix at the jobsite 0 Concrete is not over 90 minutes of age before placement 0 Concrete is not permitted to drop freely over reinforcement, causing 0 segregation All concrete is properly vibrated 0 No cold joints 0 Testing agency has made compressive strength cylinders 01010 Curing Compound type and application conform to specifications I p Finishing complies with specifications 0 Sawcut control joints cut within 12 hours m Formwork clean of debris 0 Reinforcement held in position 0 Concrete Placement (•" see 1 below •••) p Slump Specifications ('•' see 2 below ••') p I• Concrete Placement: 120.00 Cubic Yards of Mix Design No. 300090000 3000.00 psi concrete placed. Time of Placement Start: 1/15/2019 4:00:00 AM Finish: 1/15/2019 9:00:00 AM 2' Slump (inches) = 5 Slump Specifications = 4.00 to 6.00 inches) NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Antonio Ramirez UNIVERSAL FIELD COPIES TO: kENT 113 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review MASONRY THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 9 0 /2) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation DATE: 1/16/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9430627-1 BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1581 FIELD CONTACT: FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: CMU Walls LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building B / Elevator Shaft ELEVATION: Level 1 (1st Lift) Inspection was Performed by: 0 Contract Drawings O Approved Shop Drawings Per Project Plans, Specifications and Approved RFI's. vW N a t E Q p 0 Q Z Notes Masonry APPROVED GROUT MIX DESIGN 0101010 REBAR CLEARANCE 01010 REBAR CONDITION O 0 REBAR DOWEL PROTRUSION O 010 O REBAR NUMBER/QUANTITY O O 0 O REBAR SIZE/DIAMETER/TYPE O O 0 REBAR FASTENING 0 REBAR SPACING 0 O REBAR LAP SPLICES 0 O BLOCK CELL CLEANLINESS O 0.0 BLOCK CLEANOUTS 0 O BLOCK CONDITION O O 0 O BLOCK HEAD & BED JOINTS 0 0 0 0 BLOCK PLACEMENT O O 0 BLOCK PLUMBNESS 0 O BLOCK REINFORCEMENT 010 0 BLOCK SIZE/TYPE/GRADE O O 0 O MORTAR JOINT REINFORCEMENT 0 O EMBEDDED ITEMS O 1310.0. JOINT LOCATIONS 01010 GROUTAGE 01010 GROUT CONSOLIDATION O 10 Ila GROUTSLUMP 01010 Plans References & RFI's Date(s) Pour Information: N/A Cubic Yards of Mix Design No. n/a N/A set(s) of N/A Grout Prisms Slump (inches) = n/a (Slump specifications = N/A to N/A psi concrete placed. N/A inches). 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Antonio Ramirez FIELD COPIES TO • Kent UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Coda Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review MASONRY THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 9 (2/2) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation DATE: 1/16/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9430627-2 BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1581 FIELD CONTACT: FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: CMU Walls LOCATIONIGRID LINES: Building B / Elevator Shaft ELEVATION: Level 1 (1st Lift) Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawincis Approved Shop Drawings Per Project Plans, Speclflcatlons and Approved RFI's. c m d n t E p 0 (j Z Notes Masonry APPROVED GROUT MIX DESIGN 01010 REBAR CLEARANCE O 1310 REBAR CONDITION O 1310 REBAR DOWEL PROTRUSION O 0 O REBAR NUMBER/QUANTITY O O 0 O REBAR SIZE/DIAMETER/TYPE O O 0 REBAR FASTENING 0 REBAR SPACING O 0 REBAR LAP SPLICES O 0 BLOCK CELL CLEANLINESS 0 BLOCK CLEANOUTS O 0 O BLOCK CONDITION 0 BLOCK HEAD & BED JOINTS O 0.0 BLOCK PLACEMENT 0 BLOCK PLUMBNESS O 0 BLOCK REINFORCEMENT O 010 BLOCK SIZE/TYPE/GRADE O 010 MORTAR JOINT REINFORCEMENT 0 EMBEDDED ITEMS O 0 JOINT LOCATIONS O 0 GROUT AGE 0 O GROUT CONSOLIDATION 0 O GROUT SLUMP 0 Plans References & RFI's Date(s) Pour Information: 3.00 Cubic Yards of Mix Design No. 30550000 1.00 set(s) of 4.00 Grout Prisms Slump (inches) = 5 (Slump specifications = 4.00 to 3000.00 psi concrete placed. 6.00 inches). 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Antonio Ramirez FIELD COPIES TO • Kent UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review MASONRY THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 10 0/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation DATE: 1/18/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9431224-1 BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1581 FIELD CONTACT: FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Wall, Lintel LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building B, Elevator ELEVATION: Level 2 Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings Per Project Plans, Specifications and Approved RFI's. v H c to d m . aatE Q is 0 0 z Notes Masonry APPROVED GROUT MIX DESIGN 01010 0 REBAR CLEARANCE O 0 REBAR CONDITION 0 REBAR DOWEL PROTRUSION 0 REBAR NUMBER/QUANTITY 0 REBAR SIZE/DIAMETER/TYPE O 0 REBAR FASTENING O 0 REBAR SPACING 0.0 0 REBAR LAP SPLICES 0 BLOCK CELL CLEANLINESS 0 BLOCK CLEANOUTS O 0 O BLOCK CONDITION O 0 O BLOCK HEAD & BED JOINTS O O 0 BLOCK PLACEMENT 1 0 BLOCK PLUMBNESS 0 O BLOCK REINFORCEMENT O O 0 O BLOCK SIZE/TYPE/GRADE O O 0 MORTAR JOINT REINFORCEMENT O 0 EMBEDDED ITEMS O 0 JOINT LOCATIONS 01010 0 GROUT AGE O O 0101 GROUT CONSOLIDATION O O 0 GROUT SLUMP 010101 Plans References & RFI's Date(s) Pour Information: N/A Cubic Yards of Mix Design No. N/A set(s) of N/A Grout Prisms Slump (inches) _ (Slump specifications = N/A to N/A psi concrete placed. N/A inches). 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw FIELD COPIES TO • Kent UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnlcal Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection113BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Wan Review UNIVERSAL Atlanta09ENGINEERINGSCIENCES Daytona Beach Fort MyersFMConsultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Fort Pierce Gainesville Geophysical Services • Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Jacksonville Building Inspection • Plan Review • Building Code Administration Miami February 6, 2019 Ocala Orlando ( Headquarters) City of Sanford Palm Coast PO Box 1788 Pcity PeensnsaccoolaSanford, Florida 32772 Rockledge Sarasota Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official St. Petersburg Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments Tifton 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 west Palm Beach Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 UES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 6 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of January 28, 2019 through February 3, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the " Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of January 28, 2019 through February 3, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. FJS/ dkn City of Sanford Aldrich, Dave City of Sanford Antonini, usa The Spa nos Corporation Woods, Jim The Sparos Corporation Gillespie, Hardy The Spanos Corporation Jensen, Chuck The Sl— Corporation Homes, Kent CPH, Inc. (Corporate) Boyles, Irene Lee Crest Lee Crest Kephart Garland, Jesse Kephart Campbell, Paul Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 H Fred Schmalzer F 2019. 02.07 07: 33:43-05'00' dave. aIdrkh .gov U0AmmnW 0Sanfordn.gov hvoo.aom holBrsOke oom Iboyles@cphmrp.com oJeewoup9200w alLoom esse9OkephaR.00m pauk)CkepharLcan Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. • Orlando, FI 32811 - (407) 423-0504 • (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO.6 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: February 6, 2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Oubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. SPA' EC AAL INSPECTION LOG - Added This Summary Period: 0 Resolved This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: 0 SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): 1 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: 3 to 3 iDrA1=YR.FPi VRTT.S- - ITIV• V, Daily Report No. Inspection Date Inspector(s) Reports No. of Pages Page Nola). 12 1/28/2019 Antonio Ramirez, Jr. 2 4 to 5 13 1/29/2019 Antonio Ramirez, Jr. 1 6 to 6 14 1 1/30/2019 1 Michael Felshaw 1 7 to 7 15 1 2/1/2019 1 Antonio Ramirez, Jr. 4 8 to 11 Total Number of Pages This Summary: 11 For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG Permitting Agency: City of Sanford Proect Name: Lake Monroe Apartments pdate Period: 1/28/19-2/3/19 Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich Project Address: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard Permit No.: (See Below) Ci /State2i : Sanford Seminole County, Florida 32771 ro ect No.: 0110.1800762.0000 BulaUq A/Qubhouse 17-ISIm Building C 17-1592 Building E I7•t584 8ulldl 8 17-IsBI BuiWi D 17-1s83 eulldl f l7•IS85 SIL No. Date SUM No. Bldg. Permit Structural Element LocationDescription S I Engineer of Record Response t S.I. Data Closed sum No. IThe Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Docs 01632149 This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 MASONRY THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 12 0/2) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 1/28/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9432478-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1581 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: Jim Woods CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: 813-288-0008 FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: 1.) CMU Wall Reinforcement LOCATION/GRID LINES: 1.) Building B / Elevator Shaft ELEVATION: 1.) Level 4 Ins ection was Performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings v c m m Per Project Plans, Specifications and Approved RFI's. t E Q o 0 ci Z Notes Masonry !APPROVED GROUT MIX DESIGN O : O O . REBAR CLEARANCE 0 O REBAR CONDITION O M O REBAR DOWEL PROTRUSION O O 0 REBAR NUMBER/QUANTITY O O O REBAR- SIZE/DIAMETER/TYPE 0 REBAR FASTENING O O REBAR SPACING 1 m 1 REBAR LAP SPLICES 0 O BLOCK CELL CLEANLINESS O M.O. BLOCK CLEANOUTS O O M BLOCK CONDITION 0 : O BLOCK HEAD & BED JOINTS O ' 0 . 0- BLOCK PLACEMENT O ; M ' O ' BLOCK PLUMBNESS O O ' 0 O BLOCK REINFORCEMENT 0 BLOCK SIZ_E/TYPE/GRADE 0 O 0 MORTAR JOINT_ REINFORCEMENT a. O EMBEED IDDTEMS -- 13 , O ; 0 : O JOINT LOCATIONS GROUT AGE GROUT CONSOLIDATION , M. iGROUT SLUMP O O O 0 ; Plans References & RFI's Date(s) Pour Information: N/A Cubic Yards of Mix Design No. n/a N/A psi concrete placed. N/A set(s) of N/A Grout Prisms Slump (inches) = n/a (Slump specifications = N/A to N/A inches). NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES M NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Antonio Ramirez UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES02FIELDCOPIESTO • Kent Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Wan Review CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 17 /7/91 PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 1/28/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9432478-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1583/17-1584 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: Jim Woods CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: 813-288-0008 FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: 2.0.) Stem Wall LOCATION/GRID LINES: 2.) Building D / Elevator Pit 3.) Building Elevator Pit ELEVATION: 243.) Foundation Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings N N d y aU Q o U U Z Notes Formwork jFormwork properly braced at turn downs and edges of slabs 0-0. No standing water 0 1 Debris removed 0 : Vapor barrier provided, lapped properly (taped) and not torn 0,10 Pest control sprayed 0.0 Reinforcement Reinforcement is correct size at proper spacing 0.0 :a Reinforcement has proper lap lengths 0 Welded wire fabric has correct gauge thickness, spacing and elevation 010 Welded wire fabric placed with flat sheets (no rolled sheets) 0 Welded wire fabric has a minimum of one square+two inches lap 0-0 ' Construction and expansion joint reinforcement correct at proper locations • 0 Edge of Slab reinforcement details provided 0' Wall dowels are of proper size, spacing and lap length 0 Reinforcement properly chaired 21.0 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Antonio Ramirez V N' V E R S A L FIELD COPIES TO: KENT ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review POST TENSION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 11A 11/11 PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 1/29/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9432560-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1582 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: PT Slab on Grade & Footings LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building C ELEVATION: Level 1 Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings v m aZi d aUN t E o U 0 z Notes Formwork Tendons, sheathing and anchors are of acceptable quality 0 Correct number of tendons are installed 0 Tendons are properly located and spaced 0 Tendons have proper high/low c.g. with (1/4 inch tolerance for slabs / 1/2 0 inch for beams) Tendons have correctly shaped, smooth profiles (no reverse curvature) 0 Tendon support bars and chairs are properly secured and located 0 Horizontal sweeps are mild or hairpins have been added 0 Tendon clearances at openings and sleeves are proper 0 Stressing anchors are securely fastened and greased 0 Tears and exposed ends have been repaired with cut sheathing and 0 waterproof tape Proper anchor end layouts 0 Tendon/rebar mats are in proper layers 0 Mild Hairpins installed at anchors 0 Reinforcement Bursting steel 0 Note: See "Cast -In -Place Deck Threshold Inspection" report for formwork, additional mild reinforcement and concrete placement. NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES ® NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Antonio Ramirez UNIVERSAL FIELD COPIES TO: KENT 113 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Wan Review CONCRETE PLACEMENT THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 1/30/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9432818-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1582 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS 8t TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Slab On Grade LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building C ELEVATION: Foundation Inspection was performed by: ® Contract Drawings O Approved Shop Drawings CONCRETE PLACEMENT a QGUUz Notes Slump taken at truck after first few yards a: Concrete Temperature does not exceed 95 degrees Fahrenheit 0.0 Water is not added to mix at the jobsite 010 - p Concrete is not over 90 minutes of age before placement I Q ' p : Q Concrete is not permitted to drop freely over reinforcement, causing 0.0 10 segregation All concrete is properly vibrated i EI No cold joints O O O Testing agency has made compressive strength cylinders rQ M Curing Compound type and application conform to specifications Q i , - p Finishing complies with specifications Q - p ; Sawcut control joints cut within 12 hours p Formwork clean of debris Q ` Q I (a Reinforcement held in position Q ; Q Concrete Placement ("' see 1 below •••) p Q Slump Specifications ("' see 2 below "') O *Will Monitor Laboratory Testing for CompressiveStrength. 1' Concrete Placement: N/A Cubic Yards of Mix Design No. 30090000 3000.00 psi concrete placed. Time of Placement Start: 1/30/2019 4:00:00 AM Finish: 1/30/2019 8:00:00 AM 2• Slump (Inches) = Comment Slump Specifications = 3.00 to 5.00 inches) s NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES 0 NO COMMENTS: Slump(inches)-'7.00,'6.50, 4.50, •7.50,'6.00 THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw UNIVERSAL FIELD COPIES TO: Kent ENGINEERING SCIENCESa] Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Wan Review MASONRY THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 15 0/4) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 2/1/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9433474-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1582 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: CMU Walls Reinforcement LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building C ELEVATION: Level 1 Ins ection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings N N Per Project Plans, Specifications and Approved RFI's. N U CL t E Q o 0 0 z Notes Masonry APPROVED GROUT MIX DESIGN O O 0 REBAR CLEARANCE 0 REBAR CONDITION O 0 REBAR DOWEL PROTRUSION 0 REBAR NUMBER/QUANTITY O 0 REBAR SIZE/DIAMETER/TYPE 0 REBAR FASTENING 0 REBAR SPACING 0 REBAR LAP SPLICES 0 BLOCK CELL CLEANLINESS 0 BLOCK CLEANOUTS O O BLOCK CONDITION 0 O BLOCK HEAD & BED JOINTS 0 BLOCK PLACEMENT 0 BLOCK PLUMBNESS O O 0 BLOCK REINFORCEMENT O 0 BLOCK SIZE/TYPE/GRADE O O 0 O MORTAR JOINT REINFORCEMENT 0 EMBEDDED ITEMS 0 JOINT LOCATIONS 0 GROUT AGE 0 GROUT CONSOLIDATION 0 GROUT SLUMP O O O 0 Plans References & RFI's Date(s) Pour Information: N/A Cubic Yards of Mix Design No. n/a N/A psi concrete placed. N/A set(s) of N/A Grout Prisms Slump (inches) = n/a (Slump specifications = N/A to N/A inches). 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES 0 NO COMMENTS: UNIVERSALTHRESHOLDINSPECTOR: Antonio Ramirez E] ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO kENT Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Plan Review MASONRY THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 15 (2/4) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 2/1/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9433474-2 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1582 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: CMU Walls LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building C ELEVATION: Level 1 Inspection was erformed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Orawin s v c to m Per Project Plans, Specifications and Approved RFI's. E Q o 0 0 z Notes Masonry APPROVED GROUT MIX DESIGN O O 0 REBAR CLEARANCE O O 0 O REBAR CONDITION 0 REBAR DOWEL PROTRUSION 0 O REBAR NUMBER/QUANTITY O 0 REBAR SIZE/DIAMETER/TYPE O O 0 REBAR FASTENING O O 0 REBAR SPACING O O 0 O REBAR LAP SPLICES 0 O BLOCK CELL CLEANLINESS O 0 O BLOCK CLEANOUTS 0 BLOCK CONDITION O 0 BLOCK HEAD & BED JOINTS 0 BLOCK PLACEMENT O O 0 BLOCK PLUMBNESS 0 O BLOCK REINFORCEMENT O 0 BLOCK SIZE/TYPE/GRADE 0 O MORTAR JOINT REINFORCEMENT 0 O EMBEDDED ITEMS O 0 O JOINT LOCATIONS 0 O GROUT AGE 0 GROUT CONSOLIDATION O O 0 GROUT SLUMP O O 0 Plans References & RFI's Date(s) Pour Information: 5.00 Cubic Yards of Mix Design No. 30550000 3000.00 psi concrete placed. 1.00 set(s) of 4.00 Grout Prisms Slump (inches) = 5 (Slump specifications = 4.00 to 6.00 inches). 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES 0 NO COMMENTS: UNIVERSALTHRESHOLDINSPECTOR: Antonio Ramirez ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO • kENT Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Wan Review CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 15 13/41 PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 2/1/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9433474-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1585 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Elevator Pit Slab LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building F ELEVATION: Foundation Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings O Approved Shop Drawings N y GU Q o 0 U z Notes Formwork Formwork properly braced at turn downs and edges of slabs O 0 No standing water O 0 Debris removed O 0 Vapor barrier provided, lapped properly (taped) and not torn O 0 Pest control sprayed O O 0 Reinforcement Reinforcement is correct size at proper spacing O 0 Reinforcement has proper lap lengths O 0 Welded wire fabric has correct gauge thickness, spacing and elevation O 0 Welded wire fabric placed with flat sheets (no rolled sheets) O O 0 Welded wire fabric has a minimum of one square*two inches lap O O O 0 Construction and expansion joint reinforcement correct at proper locations O O O 0 Edge of Slab reinforcement details provided O O 0 Wall dowels are of proper size, spacing and lap length O 0 Reinforcement properly chaired O O 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REOUIRED? YES ® NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Antonio Ramirez UNIVERSAL FIELD COPIES TO: Kent ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review CONCRETE PLACEMENT THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 15 (4/4) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 2/1/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9433474-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1585 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Elevator Pit Slab LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building F ELEVATION: Foundation Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings CONCRETE PLACEMENT E mU t561 a a 0 Q 0 z Notes Slump taken at truck after first few yards 0 Concrete Temperature does not exceed 95 degrees Fahrenheit 0 Water is not added to mix at the jobsite 0 Concrete is not over 90 minutes of age before placement 0 Concrete is not permitted to drop freely over reinforcement, causing O O 0 O segregation All concrete is properly vibrated 0 No cold joints 0 Testing agency has made compressive strength cylinders O 0 Curing Compound type and application conform to specifications 0 Finishing complies with specifications O 0 Sawcut control joints cut within 12 hours O O 0 Formwork clean of debris 0 Reinforcement held in position 0 Concrete Placement ("' see 1 below •••) O O 0 Slump Specifications ("` see 2 below •••) 0 I• Concrete Placement: 7.00 Cubic Yards of Mix Design No. 30090000 3000.00 psi concrete placed. Time of Placement Start: 2/1/2019 2:00:00 PM Finish: 2/1/2019 3:00:00 PM 2`•• Slump (inches) = 5 Slump Specifications = 4.00 to 6.00 inches) NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Antonio Ramirez UNIVERSAL FIELD COPIES TO: Kent ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Plan Review UNIVERSAL DES Project No.: February 20190DateTyped: February 04, 2019 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection93BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (LIES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date I Type of Report 9429946-1 02/01/2019 In -Place Density Test Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (1) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 9SCHM,4 Fred Schmalzer 313 e = 2019.02.12 TATE F 10:22: 58-05'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This Item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universals clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2016 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 90110. 758.0000 Workorder No: 429946-129946-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date: 02/04/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEGBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3632 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 02/01/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Sanitary Pipe (Permit Number 18- 2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 1 to S-10 8"PVC 0-1 ft 109.3 11.8 109.7 7.7 100 Pass 2 1 to S-10 8"PVC 0+1 ft 109.3 11.8 110.2 8.0 101 Pass 3 1 to S-10 8"PVC 1+2 ft 109.3 11.8 108.7 8.3 99 Pass 4 1 to S-10 8"PVC 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 108.1 8.7 99 Pass 5 1 to S-10 8"PVC 3+4 ft 109.3 11.8 110.0 8.0 101 Pass 6 S-10 to S-7 8"PVC 0-1 ft 109.3 11.8 109.6 8.1 100 Pass 7 S-10 to S-7 8"PVC 0+1 ft 109.3 11.8 108.6 7.7 99 Pass 8 S-10 to S-7 8"PVC 1+2 ft 109.3 11.8 110.2 8.7 101 Pass 9 S-10 to S-7 8"PVC 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 108.1 7.1 99 Pass 10 S-10 to S-7 8"PVC 3+4 ft 109.3 11.8 109.0 7.2 100 Pass 11 K to M 8"PVC 0-1 ft 109.3 11.8 109.4 9.0 100 Pass 12 K to M 8"PVC 0+1 ft 109.3 11.8 108.3 8.6 99 Pass 13 K to M 8"PVC 1+2 ft 109.3 11.8 108.3 7.6 99 Pass 14 K to M 8"PVC 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 106.9 7.0 98 Pass 15 IK to M 8"PVC 3+4 ft 1 109.3 1 11.8 1 108.1 1 8.5 1 99 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UESProj ectUNIVERSALDateTyped: No February 07, 2.0190 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. I Date I Type of Report 9433911-1 1 02/06/2019 In -Place Density Test Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (1) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 SCHA4q Fred Schmalzer 382019.02 12 TAM f 10: 21:49-05'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2016 UNIVERSAL uWo korder No: 94339 800758.0000 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date: 02/07/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection19BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 LIES Technician: Fernando Montalvo Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Structure (Permit Number 18- 2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Native The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Date Tested: 02/06/2019 Tyne of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 S-11 4+5 ft 111.5 11.3 111.7 9.7 100 Pass 2 S-11 5+6 ft 111.5 11.3 110.3 7.7 99 Pass 3 S-11 6+7 ft 111.5 11.3 111.9 8.0 100 Pass 4 S-11 7+8 ft 111.5 11.3 110.1 7.5 99 Pass 5 S-7 0+1 ft 111.5 11.3 112.0 9.0 100 Pass 6 S-7 1+2 ft 111.5 11.3 111.1 8.7 100 Pass 7 S-7 2+3 ft 111.5 11.3 110.7 8.1 99 Pass 8 S-7 3+4 ft 111.5 11.3 111.3 8.4 100 Pass 9 S-7 4+5 ft 111.5 11.3 111.1 7.9 100 Pass 10 S-7 5+6 ft 111.5 11.3 112.2 9.3 101 Pass 11 S-7 6+7 ft 111.5 11.3 111.0 7.2 100 Pass 12 S-7 7+8 ft 111.5 11.3 110.6 7.0 99 Pass 13 S-1 0+1 ft 111.5 11.3 111.6 8.8 100 Pass 14 S-1 1+2 ft 111.5 11.3 111.2 8.3 100 Pass 15 S-1 2+3 ft 111.5 11.3 110.1 7.7 99 Pass 16 S-1 3+4 ft 111.5 11.3 110.6 7.3 99 Pass 17 S-3 0+1 ft 111.5 11.3 111.5 8.5 100 Pass 18 S-3 1+2 ft 111.5 11.3 112.6 9.2 101 Pass 19 S-3 2+3 ft 111.5 11.3 110.6 8.0 99 Pass 20 S-3 3+4 ft 1 111.5 1 11.3 1 110.2 1 7.9 1 99 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9429206-4 CT 011119 WorkorderNo.: 9429206 Lab No.: 191-521-C Date 1 st Issue: January 21, 2019 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole _ County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade i Sample Location: BUILDING B - Sampled at Center BLDG Set# 4 of 5 Isample From: Concrete Truck I Sample By: Diego Mendoza On 01/11/2019 T , At Lab On or Before: 01/14/2019 General Information Specified Strength I Sampling Times _Placement Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corporation I Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days ^ Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 160.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete , Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 245.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 622 Time Batched: 5:10 AM Ticket No.: 1848593 Time Sampled: 6:05 AM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: N/S ; Weather Condition: Clear, -- Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 7.50 inches Ambient Temp: 446FConcroteTemp: of 68017 Unit Weight: NIA Other Results/Comments: (PERMIT NUMBER: 17-1581) Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.l In) Actual Dlmen.2 in) Avg. Dimon. in) Test X-Sect Area (in) Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psl) Average psi) 1 01/14/2019 3 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 13.310 1,050 2 01/18/2019 7 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 27,535 2,180 3 02/08/2019 28 1 5 1 4.02 4.00 1 4.01 1 12.63 49.170 3,893 4 02/08/2019 28 1 5 1 4.01 4.00 1 4.01 12.63 52,170 4,131 4,010 5'H' 02/08/2019 28 1 - I - I - Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H-- Hold Cylinder = D-- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our dients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is teserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in lull, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. t of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9429206-5 CT 011119 WorkorderNo.: 9429206 Lab No.: 191-522-C Date 1st Issue: January 21, 2019 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 I Structural Element: Slab on Grade Sample Location: BUILDING B - Sampled at 75' W Of NE Corner Set# 5 of 5 ISample From: Concrete Truck Isample By: Diego Mendoza On 01/11/2019 At Lab On or Before: 01/14/2019_ General Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corporation Subcontractor: Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Times Placement Information Specified Strength: 3000 psi ® 28 days Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi ® 28 days Water Added at Site: N/A Truck No.: 607 Time Batched: 5:59 AM Ticket No.: 1848599 Time Sampled: 6:45 AM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: Nis Weather Condition: Clear Field Test Results Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Cumulative Quantity: 220.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 245.00 cu yds. Air Content: N/A Slump: 7.50 inches Ambient Temp: 48-Fl Concrete Temp: 66 °F Unit Weight: N/A Other Results/Comments: (PERMIT NUMBER: 17-1581) Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dlmen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimon. in) Test XSect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psl) Average psi) 1 01 /14/2019 3 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 15.040 1,190 2 01/18/2019 7 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 26,835 2,130 3 02/08/2019 28 5 4.00 1 4.02 1 4.01 1 12.63 1 49,075 3,886 4 02/08/2019 28 1 5 4.00 1 4.01 1 4.01 1 12.63 1 48,995 3,879 3,880 5'H' 02/08/2019 28 1 - I - I - I - I - 7— Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H-- Hold Cylinder D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C71 procedure HID" on I 0 F1 Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universal's dients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property or our dients and authorization /or publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shalt not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval or Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 Project No: 0110. UNIVERSAL ReportNo.: 9429206 3 CT 011119 Wo rkorderNo.: 9429206 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Lab No.:19L520-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Date 1 st Issue: January 21, 2019 Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionIDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade Sample Location: BUILDING B - Sampled at SE Comer Set# 3 of 5 ISample From: Concrete Truck ISample By: Diego Mendoza On 01/11/2019 At Lab On or Before: 01/14/2019 General Information Specifled Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corporation Specified Strength: 3000 psi Q 28 days I Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi ® 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 110.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete I Water Added at Site: N/A i Total Placement for the Day: 245.00 cu t yds. I Truck No.: 602 Ticket No.: 1848588 I Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: N/S Time Batched: 4:35 AM Time Sampled: 5:20 AM Weather Condition: Clear Field Test Results Air Content: N/A I Slump: 6.50 inches Ambient Temp: 46 °F I Concrete Temp: 64 °F Unit Weight: NIA Other Results/Comments: (PERMIT NUMBER: 17-1581) Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.l in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimon. in) Test X-Sect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 01/14/2019 3 3 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 13,445 1.070 2 01/18/2019 7 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 25,675 2,030 3 02/08/2019 1 28 1 3 1 3.99 1 4.01 1 4.00 1 12.57 51,775 4,120 4 02/08/2019 1 28 5 1 4.01 4.00 1 4.01 1 12.63 4,134 4,130 5'H' 02/08/2019 1 28 I - I - I - 52,205 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note W. Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 8 C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property or our dients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universals reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of t Revised May 2018 TIERRA February 8, 2019 City of Sanford 300 N. Park Ave. Sanford, FL. 32771 Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich CBO, MCP -Building Official RE: Summary of Threshold Inspection Services Sanford Airport Phase 2 Terminal B Outbound Building Permit No. 18-3941 Sanford, FL Tierra Project No. 5111-18-052 Dear Mr. Aldrich: Tierra Inc. has been performing threshold inspection services on the structural load bearing components for the referenced project. These services were performed in accordance with the Threshold Inspection Plan and were coordinated through Walbridge's on site construction team. This report summarizes our activity between January 1, 2019 and January 31, 2019. During this period, our representatives have inspected subgrade soils, formwork, reinforcing steel placement and concrete placement and consolidation in the following general locations: Mezzanine Deck Beams Wall Welded and Bolted Connections Foundations Based on our observations it is our opinion the described structural load bearing components have been found to be constructed in a substantial accordance with the approved project plans and specifications and *%h%bb&1QJ1Ary RFI's issued by the Structural Engineer of Record. We have attached our rear.'s 9&W§o'AArmK 6jpg steel observation reports for your record. e nett( F ubwtted TEE- 11 r OQ'' • Fr1 aJi • r No • Lr Spec9gJ 61k! r,1001897 flflltt CC George Speake. Jr. Jennifer Taylor itavlorta)osaa.net Diane Crews dcrewsAosaa.net Darrel Presley Darrel.Presl" aSanfordfl.nov Steve Florey Steve.FiorevO-Sanfordfl.nov Greg Fischer ofischer(8lwalbridae.com 591 Susan B. Britt Court • Winter Carden, FL 34787 Phone (407) 877-1354 • Fax (407) 654-7347 Florida Certification No. 6486 UESProjVN, V E R S A L Da a Typedt No.: February14, 2.019 0ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (LIES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. I Date I Type of Report 9433916- 1 02/13/2019 In -Place Density Test Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments ( 2) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 CH Aggr. Fred Schmalzer 38 8 1= 2019.02.15 VIS f a 13: 31:12-05'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This Item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universals clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 ES Project No: UNIVERSAL UWo korder No: 9433916-1 . 0000 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date: 02/14/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 02/13/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Sanitary Stucture (Permit Number 18- 2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Sanitary Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvoe of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM 01557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 Structure M 0+1 ft 111.5 11.3 112.2 8.8 101 Pass 2 Structure M 1+2 ft 111.5 11.3 111.8 8.5 100 Pass 3 Structure M 2+3 ft 111.5 11.3 111.0 9.1 100 Pass 4 Structure M 3+4 ft 111.5 11.3 110.4 7.9 99 Pass 5 Structure U2 0+1 ft 111.5 11.3 111.4 9.0 100 Pass 6 Structure U2 1+2 ft 111.5 11.3 111.1 8.3 100 Pass 7 Structure U2 2+3 ft 111.5 11.3 110.2 7.7 99 Pass 8 Structure U2 3+4 ft 111.5 11.3 110.0 7.3 99 Pass 9 Structure U9 0+1 ft 111.5 11.3 111.7 8.6 100 Pass 10 Structure U9 1+2 ft 111.5 11.3 110.8 8.0 99 Pass 11 Structure U9 2+3 ft 111.5 11.3 112.9 7.9 101 Pass 12 Structure U9 3+4 ft 111.5 11.3 110.8 7.6 99 Pass 13 Structure S10 0+1 ft 111.5 11.3 111.3 9.3 100 Pass 14 Structure S10 1+2 ft 111.5 11.3 111.9 8.4 100 Pass 15 Structure S10 2+3 It 111.5 11.3 110.2 7.7 99 Pass 16 Structure S10 3+4 ft 111.5 11.3 110.0 8.0 99 Pass 17 Structure G 4+5 ft 111.5 11.3 111.2 7.1 100 Pass 18 Structure T 9 0+1 ft 111.5 11.3 111.8 9.0 100 Pass 19 Structure T 9 1+2 ft 111.5 11.3 111.3 7.6 100 Pass 20 IStructure T 9 2+3 ft 1 111.5 1 11.3 110.6 7.0 1 99 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No.: 0110.1800758.0000 Date Typed: February 13, 2019 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date Type of Report 9430154-1 01/15/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9430154-2 01/15/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9430154-3 01/15/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9433914-1 1 02/11/2019 In -Place Density Test Report 9433915-1 1 02/12/2019 In -Place Density Test Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 gc"MA'S' Fred Schmalzer TA e _- 2019.02.15 13:32:10-05'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Attachments (7) rh For the mutual protection of Universals clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Footing- _ Sample Location: Clubhouse - Sampled at North Side of Footing Set# 1 of 3 TSample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Manuel Cartagena Torres On 01/15/2019 General Information _ Specified Strength / Sampling Times r General Contractor: The Spanos Corp - Specified Strength: 3000 psi Q 28 days Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi Q 28 days Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Truck No.: 602 Time Batched: 4:29 AM Ticket No.: 1848644 Time Sampled: 4:55 AM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: N/S Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results _ Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9430154-1 CT 011519 WorkorderNo.: 9430154 Lab No.: 191-570-C Date 1st Issue: January 21, 2019 At Lab On or Before: 01/17/2019 Placement Information Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Cumulative Quantity: 10.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 120.00 cu yds. Air Content: N/A I Stump: 6.50 inches Ambient Temp: 52 -F I Concrete Temp: 67 OF Unit Weight: N/A Other Results/Comments: (PERMIT NUMBER:17-1580) Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 In) Avg. Dimen. In) Test X-Sect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psl) Average psi) 1 01/18/2019 3 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 9,410 750 2 01/22/2019 7 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 24,890 1,970 3 02/12/2019 28 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 1 12.63 51,905 4,110 4 02/12/2019 28 5 4.02 4.01 4.02 12.69 52,845 4,164 5 02/12/2019 28 5 4.02 4.00 4.01 12.63 51,030 4,041 4,110 6-H- 02/12/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an Indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note W- Hold Cylinder = D-- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E-- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms Nth ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universals reports is mserved pending out wnften approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in fug, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford_ , Seminole County, FL 3277.1 _ Structural Element: Slab on Grade - Sample Location: Clubhouse - Sampled at 10 ft E by 15 ft N of SW Comer Set# 2 of 3 Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Manuel Cartagena Torres On 01/15/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times General Contractor: The Spanos Corp Specified Strength: 3000 psi ® 28 days Subcontractor: i Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi ® 28 days Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Truck No.: 273 Time Batched: 4:49 AM Ticket No.: 1848648 Time Sampled: 5:55 AM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: Nis Weather Condition: Party Cloudy Field Test Results Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9430154-2 CT 011519 WorkorderNo.: 9430154 Lab No.: 191-571-C Date 1st Issue: January 21, 2019 At Lab On or Before: 01/17/2019 Placement Information Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Cumulative Quantity: 60.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 120.00 cu yds. Air Content: N/A I Slump: 7.00 inches Ambient Temp: 52 -F I Concrete Temp: 69 OF Unit Weight: NIA Other Results/Comments: (PERMIT NUMBERA7.1580) Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dlmen.1 In) Actual Dlmen.2 In) Avg. Dimon. in) Test XSect, Area (In') Max Compressive Load (lbs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 01/18/2019 3 3 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 7,605 600 2 01 /22/2019 7 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 23,125 1,830 3 02/12/2019 28 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 1 12.63 52,205 4,134 4 02/12/2019 28 5 4.01 4.01 4.01 12.63 52,975 4,195 5 02/12/2019 28 5 4.01 4.01 4.01 12.63 53,300 4,220 4,180 6-1-1- 02/12/2019 28 RemaAcs Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H-- Hold Cylinder = D-- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E-- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universal's dients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication or statements, condusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending out written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in fug, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing ° Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9430154-3 CT 011519 WorkorderNo.: 9430154 Lab No.: 191-572-C Date 1st Issue: January 21, 2019 Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade Sample Location: Clubhouse - Sampled at 20 R W by 10 R S of NE Comer Set# 3 of 3 ;Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Manuel Cartagena Torres On At Lab On or Before: 01/17/2019 01 /15/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: The Spanos Corp Specified Strength: 3000 psi ® 28 days 1 Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi ® 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 110.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 120.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 606 Time Batched: 6:10 AM Ticket No.: 1848651 Time Sampled: 6:58 AM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: NiS Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy_ Field Test Results ~ Air Content: N/A Slump: 6.50 inches Ambient Temp: 51 °F I Concrete Temp: 69 OF Unit Weight: NIA Other Results/Comments: (PERMIT NUMBER:17-1580) Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dlmen.1 in) Actual Dlmen.2 In) Avg. Dimon. In) Test XSect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psl) Average psi) 1 01/18/2019 3 3 4.01 4.00 4.01 12.63 6,915 550 2 01/22/2019 7 5 3.99 4.01 4.00 12.57 20,985 1,670 3 02/12/2019 28 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 1 12.63 45,585 3,609 4 02/12/2019 28 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 42,910 3,398 5 02/12/2019 28 5 4.00 4.00 4.00 12.57 43,665 3,475 3.490 6-1-1- 02/12/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified If en air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protecdion to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universals reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in lull, without the written eppmval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 uWo korder No: 943391400758.0000UNIVERSALESProjectNo: 0110.18 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date: 02/13/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 02/11/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Pipe ( Permit # 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvne of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 S-3 to S-5 18" RCP 0-1 ft 111.5 11.3 111.3 7.9 100 Pass 2 S-3 to S-518" RCP 0+1 ft 111.5 11.3 112.5 8.7 101 Pass 3 S-3 to S-5 18" RCP 1+2 ft 111.5 11.3 110.8 8.0 99 Pass 4 S-3 to S-5 18" RCP 2+3 ft 111.5 11.3 111.2 8.4 100 Pass 5 S-3 to S-5 18" RCP 3+4 ft 111.5 11.3 111.7 8.6 100 Pass 6 S-3 to S-5 18" RCP 4+5 ft 111.5 11.3 110.3 7.1 99 Pass 7 S-5 to S-7 24" RCP 0-1 ft 111.5 11.3 112.1 9.7 101 Pass 8 S-5 to S-7 24" RCP 0+1 ft 111.5 11.3 112.5 10.1 101 Pass 9 S-5 to S-7 24" RCP 1+2 ft 111.5 11.3 111.7 9.4 100 Pass 10 S-5 to S-7 24" RCP 2+3 It 111.5 11.3 110.6 8.8 99 Pass 11 S-5 to S-7 24" RCP 3+4 ft 111.5 11.3 111.0 8.0 100 Pass 12 S-5 to S-7 24" RCP 4+5 ft 111.5 11.3 110.8 9.2 99 Pass 13 S-5 to S-7 24" RCP 5+6 ft 111.5 11.3 110.3 7.8 99 Pass 14 S-7 to S-9 30" RCP 0-1 ft 111.5 11.3 111.7 9.9 100 Pass 15 S-7 to S-9 30" RCP 0+1 ft 111.5 11.3 111.4 9.5 100 Pass 16 S-7 to S-9 30" RCP 1+2 It 111.5 11.3 112.5 10.6 101 Pass 17 S-7 to S-9 30" RCP 2+3 ft 111.5 11.3 111.0 9.1 100 Pass 18 S-7 to S-9 30" RCP 3+4 ft 111.5 11.3 110.8 8.7 99 Pass 19 S-7 to S-9 30" RCP 4+5 ft 111.5 11.3 109.9 8.3 99 Pass 20 S-7 to S-9 30" RCP 5+6 ft 111.5 11.3 109.2 7.9 98 Pass 21 S-7 to S-9 30" RCP 6+7 ft 111.5 11.3 110.5 8.0 99 Pass 22 S-7 to S-9 30" RCP 7+8 ft 1 111.5 1 11.3 1 111.5 1 8.6 1 100 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9433 1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9433915-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:02/13/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3632 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Date Tested: 02/12/2019 Tyne of Test: Area Tested: Storm Pipe ( Permit Number 18-2508) Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 S-14 to S-16 15" RCP 0-1 ft 111.5 11.3 111.3 8.0 100 Pass 2 S-14 to S-16 15" RCP 0+1 ft 111.5 11.3 112.7 9.2 101 Pass 3 S-14 to S-16 15" RCP 1+2 ft 111.5 11.3 111.7 8.7 100 Pass 4 S-14 to S-16 15" RCP 2+3 ft 111.5 11.3 110.2 7.7 99 Pass 5 S-14 to S- 16 15" RCP 3+4 ft 111.5 11.3 110.1 7.1 99 Pass 6 S-14 to S- 12 15" RCP 0-1 ft 111.5 11.3 111.6 9.0 100 Pass 7 S-14 to S- 12 15" RCP 0+1 ft 111.5 11.3 112.1 7.7 101 Pass 8 S-14 to S- 12 15" RCP 1 +2 ft 111.5 11.3 110.6 8.4 99 Pass 9 S-14 to S- 12 15" RCP 2+3 ft 111.5 11.3 109.9 7.9 99 Pass 10 S-14 to S- 12 15" RCP 3+4 ft 111.5 11.3 111.1 8.7 100 Pass 11 S-32to S- 30 24" RCP 5+6 ft 111.5 11.3 110.6 7.7 99 Pass 12 S-32to S- 30 24" RCP 6+7 ft . 111.5 11.3 110.8 7.2 99 Pass 13 S-32to S- 30 24" RCP 7+8 ft 111.5 1 11.3 1 111.1 8.3 100 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universars clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9434857-1 CT 020519 WorkorderNo.: 9434857 Lab No.: 19M172-C Date 1st Issue: February 13, 2019 Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Shear Wall Sample Location: Elevator Pit Building F ( Permit Number 17-1585) - Sampled at Center j Set# 1 of 1 ISample From: Concrete Truck ' Sample By: Fernando Montalvo On 02/05/2019 :At Lab On or Before: 02/07/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: E.W Young Construction Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 4.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: ! Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days I Cumulative Quantity: 4.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: _N/A y -_.- Total Placement for the Day: 4.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 298 Time Batched: 12:39 PM Ticket No.: 1849284 Time Sampled: 1:32 PM Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: N/S Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Stump: 6.50 inches I Ambient Temp: 76 °F I Concrete Temp: 82 OF Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dlmen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimon. In) Test XSect. Area (In') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psl) Average psi) 1 02/12/2019 7 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 28,400 2,250 2 03/05/2019 28 3 03/05/2019 28 1- 4 03/05/2019 28 1- 5'H' 03/05/2019 28 1- Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D-- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E-- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authodzation for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universars reports is reserved pending our wriNen approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 art Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9436 1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9436514-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date: 02/13/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Jorge L Rodriguez Date Tested: 02/12/2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Storm Structure Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Native The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tyne of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 S-14 0+1 ft 111.5 11.3 109.8 8.3 98 Pass 2 S-14 1+2 ft 111.5 11.3 112.2 9.0 101 Pass 3 S-14 2+3 ft 111.5 11.3 110.7 9.4 99 Pass 4 S-16 0+1 ft 111.5 11.3 112.9 8.8 101 Pass 5 S-16 1+2 ft 111.5 11.3 111.8 9.7 100 Pass 6 S-16 2+3 ft 1 111.5 1 11.3 1 109.5 1 9.2 1 98 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 1800758.0000 9WorkorderNo: 43333919-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:02/19/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 02/18/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Saitary Pipe ( Permit Number 18- 2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvt)e of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 E to R 8" PVC 0-1 ft 111.5 11.3 111.9 8.8 100 Pass 2 E to R 8" PVC 0+1 ft 111.5 11.3 111.4 9.2 100 Pass 3 E to R 8" PVC 1 +2 ft 111.5 11.3 112.2 9.7 101 Pass 4 E to R 8" PVC 2+3 ft 111.5 11.3 111.0 8.3 100 Pass 5 E to R 8" PVC 3+4 ft 111.5 11.3 110.7 8.5 99 Pass 6 E to R 8" PVC 4+5 ft 111.5 11.3 110.2 7.7 99 Pass 7 E to R 8" PVC 5+6 ft 111.5 11.3 109.9 7.1 99 Pass 8 G to 18" PVC 0-1 ft 111.5 11.3 112.0 9.0 100 Pass 9 G to 18" PVC 0+1 ft 111.5 11.3 112.8 8.7 101 Pass 10 G to 18" PVC 1+2 ft 111.5 11.3 111.5 8.4 100 Pass 11 G to 18" PVC 2+3 ft 111.5 11.3 110.8 7.9 99 Pass 12 G to 18" PVC 3+4 ft 111.5 11.3 110.3 7.2 99 Pass 13 IG to 18" PVC 4+5 ft 1 111.5 1 11.3 1 109.5 1 7.0 1 98 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential properly of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universals reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page t UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9433918-1 Report Date: 02/19/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 02/15/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Type of Test: Area Tested: Sanitary Pipe (Permit Number 18- Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method 2508) Material: Backfill Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 T-2 to T-9 8"PVC 0-1 ft 111.5 11.3 112.2 9.0 101 Pass 2 T-2 to T-9 8"PVC 0+1 ft 111.5 11.3 111.7 9.3 100 Pass 3 T-2 to T-9 8"PVC 1+2 ft 111.5 11.3 110.4 8.3 99 Pass 4 T-2 to T-9 8"PVC 2+3 ft 111.5 11.3 110.1 8.0 99 Pass 5 T-9 to T-8 8"PVC 0-1 ft 111.5 11.3 111.6 8.7 100 Pass 6 T-9 to T-8 8"PVC 0+1 ft 111.5 11.3 111.0 8.4 100 Pass 7 T-9 to T-8 8"PVC 1+2 ft 111.5 11.3 110.8 7.7 99 Pass 8 T-9 to T-8 8"PVC 2+3 ft 1 111.5 1 11.3 1 110.5 1 7.1 1 99 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 GUNIVERSALENGINEERINGSCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9431263-1 CT 011819 WorkorderNo.: 9431263 Lab No.: 191-747-C Date 1st Issue: January 29, 2019 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 _ Structural Element: Elevator wall Sample Location: Elevator Shaft Building A (Permit Number 17-1580) - Sampled at NE Comer of Elevator Wall 2nd Lift Set# 1 of 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck _ample By: Fernando Montalvo On 01/18/2019 At Lab On or Before: 01/26/2019 General Information General Contractor: E.W. Young Construction Subcontractor: Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Truck No 604 Ticket No.: 1456010 I Mix Design: 30550000_^ Admixture: N/S Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information_ _ Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 3.00 cu yds. 1 I Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 3.00 cu yds. Water Added at Site: 10 gals _ ; Total Placement for the Day: 3.00 cu yds. Time Batched: 1:11 PM Time Sampled: 2:30 PM I l Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 8.50 inches I Ambient Temp: 71 OF I Concrete Temp: 82 °F Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimon. in) Test X-Sect. Area (In') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 01/26/2019 8 3.32 3.36 3.34 11.16 24,340 2,180 2 02/15/2019 28 3.32 3.34 3.33 11.09 45,665 4,118 3 02/15/2019 28 3.31 1 3.32 3.32 10.99 36,970 3,364 4 02/15/2019 28 1 - 3.32 1 3.34 3.33 11.09 46,620 4,204 1 3,900 Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential properly of our clients and authorization for publication of stalements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the wrfften approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2010 GUNIVERSALENGINEERINGSCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No.: 0110.1800758.0000 Date Typed: February 19, 2019 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date Type of Report 9431263-1 01/18/2019 Grout Prism Test Specimens Report 9433918-1 02/15/2019 In -Place Density Test Report 9433919-1 02/18/2019 In -Place Density Test Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (3) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 affill,Hl,rbq,,, Fred J. EA - Schmalzer388 = r TAM 2019.02.21 08.41.03 05 00 Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universars clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 AtlaUNIVERSALAtlanta Daytono91ENGINEERINGSCIENCESFortMymaehFoMyersConsultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Fort Pierce Gainesville Geophysical Services • Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Jacksonville Building Inspection • Plan Review • Building Code Administration Miami March 8, 2019 Ocala Orlando ( Headquarters) City Of Sanford Palm Coast PO Box 1788 Panama City Pensacola Sanford, Florida 32772 RockSmaledge Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official St. Petcaburyp Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments on 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 West Palm Beach WestBuilding A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 UES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 9 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of February 26, 2019 through March 3, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the " Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of February 25, 2019 through March 3, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmaker, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be venried on any electronic copies. FJS/ dkn City of Sanford Aldrich, Dave City of Sanford Antonini, Lisa The Spanos Corporation Woods, Jim The Spanos Corporaton Gillespie, Hardy The Spanos Corporation Jensen, Chuck The Spanos Corporation Homea, Kent CPH, Inc. (Corporate) Boyles, Irene Lee Crest Lee Crest Kephart Garland, Jesse Kephart Campbell, Paul Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 n„ loco,,,,.. I H^7 Fred Schmalzer TM s 2019.03.08 12: 56:19-05'00' daveaktrkhosanfordB. gov Usa. Antoninl®SanfordB.gov woods* agsparas.com hgi! Wspie ispanos.com cjensen0agspanos. com thorneapagspanos. com Iboyles6cphcorp corn joJeegroup32009mall. mm jesseg0kephart. com paulc@Mphart com Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. • Orlando, FI 32811 • (407) 423-0504 • (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO.9 Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: March 8, 2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. SPECAL INSP_.EION LfOGt Added This Summary Period: 0 Resohed This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: 0 SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): 1 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: 3 to 3 Daily Report No. Inspection Date Inspector(s) Reports No. of Pages Page No(s). 19 2/25/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 4 to 4 20 2/27/2019 Michael Felshaw 2 5 to 6 iotai Numoer or rages mis summary: i^: v For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG Permitting Agency: City of Sanford Project Name: Lake Monroe Apartments pdate Period: 2/25/19-3/3/19 Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich Project Address: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard Permit No.: See Below) i /State2i : City/St. Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 JProject No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 SIL No. Date SUM No Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location Description S.I. Engineer of Record Response S.I. Date Closed SUM No. The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. The Special Inspector, Fred J. Sehmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Does #1632149 3 This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 11 of 1 MASONRY THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 19 0/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 2/25/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9438540-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1582 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: Jim Woods CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: 813-288-0008 FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Wall, Lintel LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building C - Elevator ELEVATION: Level 4 Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings vm N Per Project Plans, Specifications and Approved RFI's. atE is j Z Notes Masonry APPROVED GROUT MIX DESIGN O O O LREBAR CLEARANCE O 1 , 0 REBAR CONDITION ^ - _. _ _ .-•-_-- ll 1 0' REBAR DOWEL PROTRUSION REBAR NUMBER/QUANTITY _ _ --- _- i 0 i , 0 O 0 ; O REBAR SIZE/DIAMETER/TYPE 0 0 0, O 7 REBAR FASTENING O ¢ 0 . O O 0 REBAR LAP SPLICES _ _ _ _ 0 O _ 8LOCK CELL CLEANLINESS i E16, ®.0 BLOCK CLEANO_U_TS_ - r O r0 0 O_ f-.-....__..—._—_._. BLOCK CONDITION O BLOCK HEAD & BED JOINTS t 01 O BLOC_K PLACEMENT -_ ___._-•- -- _._ _---•--. O 0 , , BLOCK PLU_MBNESS_~ I O 10BLOCKREINFORCEMENT _ • .___._ r-- O_ O- BLOCKSIZE/TYPE/GRADE O 0If_( i MORTAR JOINT R_EIN_FOR_CEMENT 0 0 j EMBEDDED ITEMS O®'.-. JOINT LOCATIONS 0 GROUT AGE _.__ O w i GROUT CONSOLIDATION i L O O 0_1- ___.__.._._._ .-_...... GROUTSLUMP...._.__. O O I 0 ( Plans References & RFI's Date(s) Pour Information: N/A Cubic Yards of Mix Design No. N/A psi concrete placed. N/A set(s) of N/A Grout Prisms Slump (inches) _ (Slump specifications = N/A to N/A inches). 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCESEEIFIELDCOPIESTOT.Honea Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing -Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Wan Review MASONRY THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 20 0/2) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 2/27/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9438970-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1582 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Wall, Lintel LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building C - Elevator ELEVATION: Level 5 Inspection was performed by: M Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings vm N a Per Project Plans, Specifications and Approved RFI's. t E a p Z Notes Masonry (APPROVED GROUT MIX DESIGN O O 1 0. 1-0.b AREBAR CLEARANCE O a 0 I 0 REBAR CONDITION f O 0 0 I DOWEL PROTRUSIONREBAR 0to-, NUMBERIQUANTITY _____.._...._ 1--- REBAR i 0O4---I•--- I REBAR SIZE/DIAMETER/TYPE 0 1 7 - REBAR FASTENING 0 0 1 0 b _ -_ .. _ _..._- _ . REBAR SPACING I ' ® 1011 REBAR LAP SPLICES T O b 0 0 J BLOCK CELL CLEANLINESS BLOCK CL_EANOUTS O ' ® O 1 _ . -. •—_ _. _ _. ____. , _. _ ._. 1 ® t r BLOCK CONDITION -- - - - - - O 0 ' BLOCK HEAD & BED NTSp 0 ! —. .. _ JOI BLOCKPLACE*M_6 BLOCK PLUMBNESS y. O O 0 . - I BLOCK REINFORCEMENT 0 O_' BLOCK SIZE/TPE/GRADE Yj-O MORTAR JOINT REINFORCEMENT j - — j ® 1 0 ; l. f-PEMBEDDEDITEMSJOINT LOCATIONS _ - s, , I ®, GROUT CONSOLIDATION 0 0,.. 17 ., ®Y... .. _-_ __ • _. ,..___ .._ . _. GROUT SLUMP O_ Plans References & RFI's Date(s) Pour Information: N/A Cubic Yards of Mix Design No. N/A psi concrete placed. N/ A set(s) of N/A Grout Prisms Slump ( inches) _ (Slump specifications = N/A to N/A inches). 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES 113FIELDCOPIESTO • T.Honea Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review POST TENSION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 0117111ply]1 PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 2/27/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9438970-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1583 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Slab On Grade LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building D ELEVATION: Foundation Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings v c m N a w t E 13 c v Z Notes Formwork Tendons, sheathing and anchors are of acceptable quality ' 10, i Correct number of tendons are installed 0 010,10,' Tendons are properly located and spaced ; ' r0j I _ _ Tendons have high/low c.g. with (1/4 inch tolerance for slabs / 1/2 . . proper 0 inch for beams) ! Tendons have correctly shaped, smooth profiles (no reverse curvature) ! 0 . ! Tendon support bars and chairs are properly secured and located 1 1 , 0 . I 1 Horizontal sweeps are mild or hairpins have been added ,1110 Tendon clearances at openings and sleeves are proper ; 10 I 1 Stressing anchors are securely fastened and greased -- _ 1 I 0 ! TearSand exposed ends have been repaired with cut sheathing and ! ( : 0 ; waterproof tape Proper anchor end layouts , j 0 ; ; I Tendon/rebar mats are in proper layers i -` - Mild ! Hairpins installed at anchors 1 i ! ; 0 ReinforcementBursting steel — •'" "` ' " '- ••- •_. _ _..__ _ _ _ a Q_I 10. Note: See " Cast -In -Place Deck Threshold Inspection" report for formwork, additional mild reinforcement and concrete placement. 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw UNIVERSAL FIELD COPIES TO: T.Honea ENGINEERING SCIENCES 113 ConsultantsIn: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 0taUNIVERSALDaytona BeachEDENGINEERINGSCIENCESFortMyers Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Fort erce Gaineesville Geophysical Services • Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Jacksonville Building Inspection • Plan Review • Building Code Administration Miami March 5, 2019 Ocala Orlando (Headquarters) City of Sanford Palm Coast Panama City PO Box 1788 Pensacola Sanford, Florida 32772 Rockledge Sarasota Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official St. Petersburg Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments Tifton West Palm Beach 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 UES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 8 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of February 18, 2019 through February 24, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the "Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of February 18, 2019 through February 24, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalker, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. FJS/dkn City of Sanford Aldrich, Dave City of Sanford Antonini, Usa The Spanos Corporation Woods, Jim The Spanos Corporation Gillespie, Hardy The Spanos Corporation Jensen, Chuck The Spanos Corporation Homea, Kent CPH, Inc. (Corporate) Boyles, Irene Lee Crest Lee Crest Kephart Garland, Jesse Kephart Campbell, Paul Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 k H44r i. s° Fred Schmalzer B _ 2019.03.08 a 12:57:52 -05 00 dave.aklrlchosanfordfl.gov Usa.Anbonlni@Sanfordfl.gov woods@agspanos.com hgIllesple"spanos.com clensen0agspanos.twrn thomeapagspanos.com iboyles0cphcorp.com Io.leegroup3200gmail.com ksseg0kephart.aom paukOkephart.com Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. • Orlando, FI 32811 • (407) 423-0504 • (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO.8 Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: March 5, 2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. SPECIAL INSPE ON YO`G} Added This Summary Period: 0 Resoled This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: 0 SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): 1 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: 3 to 3 DAIL YiR`•EPO.R TcS.: Daily Report No. Inspection Data Inspector(s) Reports No. of Pages Page No(s). 18 2/19/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 4 to 4 Total Number of Pages This Summary: F 4! For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG Permitting Agency: City of Sanford Project Name: Lake Monroe Apartments JUpdate Period: 2/18/19-2/24/19 Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich Project Address: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard Permit No.: See Below) Ci /State2i : Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 lProiect No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 SIL No. Date SUM No. Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location Description IS.I. Engineer of Record Response 2S.I. Date Closed SUM No. IThe Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. 2The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Docs #1632149 3This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 MASONRY THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 2/19/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9437435-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1582 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Wall, Lintel LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building C - Elevator ELEVATION: Level 3 Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings O Approved Shop Drawings vm N Per Project Plans, Specifications and Approved RFI's. N U n t E o 0 3 z Notes Masonry APPROVED GROUT MIX DESIGN O O O 0 REBAR CLEARANCE O 0 REBAR CONDITION O O 0 REBAR DOWEL PROTRUSION 0 REBAR NUMBERIQUANTITY O 0 O REBAR SIZE/DIAMETER/TYPE O O 0 O REBAR FASTENING 0 REBAR SPACING O O 0 O REBAR LAP SPLICES 0 BLOCK CELL CLEANLINESS 0 O BLOCK CLEANOUTS O O 0 O BLOCK CONDITION O 0 BLOCK HEAD & BED JOINTS 0 BLOCK PLACEMENT 0 O BLOCK PLUMBNESS O 0 BLOCK REINFORCEMENT 0 O BLOCK SIZE/TYPE/GRADE O O 0 MORTAR JOINT REINFORCEMENT O 0 EMBEDDED ITEMS O O 0 JOINT LOCATIONS O 0 GROUT AGE O 0 GROUT CONSOLIDATION O 0 GROUT SLUMP O 0 Plans References & RFI's Date(s) Pour Information: N/A Cubic Yards of Mix Design No. N/A psi concrete placed. N/A set(s) of N/A Grout Prisms Slump (inches) _ (Slump specifications = N/A to N/A inches). 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES 0 NO COMMENTS: UNIVERSALTHRESHOLDINSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw 113 ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO • T.Honea Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Wan Review t[ GUNIVERSALENGINEERINGSCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No.: 0110.1800758.0000 Date Typed: March 08, 2019 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date IType of Report 9441500-1 03/07/2019 In -Place Density Test Report 9441500-2 03/07/2019 In -Place Density Test Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (3) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 SCH S Fred Schmalzer 38 8 - 2019.03.11 TAM f 0NM-% 15:08:41-04'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universals clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UES Project No: 758.0000VN1VERSALWorkorderNo: 9441500-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date: 03/08/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection01BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 03/07/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Parking Lot between Apartment Pads D & E (Permit number 18-2508) Material: Limerock Reference Datum: 0 = Top of Base Course The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-6938 Nuclear Gauge Method Laboratory: AASHTO T180 Modified Proctor Depth requirement is 8.00 inches Test No. Location of Test LBR Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction N Limerock Depth inch) Pass or Fail 1 25ft E and 100Ft N of the SW 120.7 9.5 123.3 12.0 102 8.50 Pass Corner Of Parking lot 2 25ft E and 25Ft N of the SW 120.7 9.5 122.2 11.9 101 8.00 Pass Corner Of Parking lot 3 25ft W and 100Ft N of the SE 120.7 9.5 122.9 12.6 102 8.75 Pass Corner Of Parking lot 4 25ft W and 25Ft N of the SE 120.7 9.5 121.4 13.4 101 8.25 Pass Corner Of Parking lot To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 V N IVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9441500-2 Report Date: 03/08/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 03/07/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tyne of Test: Area Tested: Roadway( Permit Number 18-2508) Field: ASTM D-6938 Nuclear Gauge Method Material: Stabilization Laboratory: AASHTO T180 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Top of Stabilization Depth requirement is 12.00 inches The tests below meet the 98% minimum comaaction reauirement. Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Stab. Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test LBR pcf) pcf) Fail 5 STA.27+00 47 108.8 8.4 109.4 8.7 101 12.50 Pass 6 STA.30+00 47 108.8 8.4 108.4 7.6 100 12.25 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UESProject 011UNIVERSALDateTyped: No . March 8, 2019 0000 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd., Orlando,Fl. 32811 P: 407A23ASO4 F: 407A23.3106 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation Attn: Jim Woods 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing, US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering. Sciences, Inc. (LIES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below. Scope of Work Work Order No. Type of Report 9433921 Limerock Bearing Ratio We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie S. Housein (extension 23078). Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. COA No. 00000549 00\ 1$CHMq'; all Fred Schmalzer e 2019.03.11 rAm F Mot 15:08:29—04'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Attachments (1) Vice President - Construction Services RH STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by using a Digital Signature. Printed copies or this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. 3532 Maggie Boulevard - Orlando, FI 32811 - (407) 423-0504 - Fax (407) 423-3106 Visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com. J 1000 REPORT ON LIMEROCK BEARING RATIO (FM 5-515) i'T. TT 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Moisture Content (%) 130 125 120 115 c1a L Gf a/ 110 3 c 0 105 100 95 90 0 Project No.: 0110.1800758. Lab Sample No.: 19-L0218 Work Order No.: 9433921 Date Plotted: February 27, 2019 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Max. Dry Density, pcf: 108.8 Optimum Moisture, %: 8.4 Passing 3.5 Inch, W 100 Passing No. 4, W 100 Passing No. 200, W 8.5 Required LBR: 40 LBR Value: 47 Status': Pass Date Sampled: 2/20/2019 Sampled By: F.M. Date Molded: 2/25/2019 Molded By: A.C.V. Date Compressed: 2/27/2019 Compressed By: A.C.V. Note 1: According to FOOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bride Constriction "Under tolerance in Bearing Value Requirements" for a specified value of 40. there is an under tolerance of 5. Therefore, a LBR value of 35 or greater is acceptable unless other specifications dictate no under tolerance allowed. Note 2: Sampled according to AASHTO T 002 5 10 15 20 25 30 Note 3: This report shall not be reproduced, except Moisture Content (%) Client: The Spanos Corporation91ProjectName: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing Sample Location: 30' South x 45' West of Structure S24, between Bldg. Pads D & E Intended Use: Stabilized Subgrade UNIVERSAL Material Description: Brown Sand with Silt wa rawwu anwcn 3532 Maggie Boulevard, Orlando, Florida 32811 Phone 407-423-0504 Fax 407-423-3106 www.universalengineedng.com 011UNIVERSALDateTyped: ectNo.: March 118, 20119 000 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd.,Orlando,Fl. 32811 P: 407A23.0504 F: 407A233106 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation Ann: Jim Woods 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing, US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (LIES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/ or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below. JGOPe Of YYOrK of and Gradation We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any contact the undersigned or Rosie S. Housein (extension 23078). Attachments ( 2) RH do not hesitate to Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. COA No. 00000549 Fred Schmalzer 2019. 03.20 12: 37:22-04'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. 3532 Maggie Boulevard • Orlando, FI 32811 • (407) 423-0504 • Fax (407) 423-3106 Visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com. op UNIVERSAL LIES Project No: ENGINEERING SCIENCES LIES Report No: Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Work Order No: Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Plan ReviewE93532MaggieBIvd,Orlando FL 32811 P: 407A23.0504 F: 407A23.3106 Date Typed: Report On Marshall Asphaltic Concrete Extraction & Gradation ASTM DS444 & D6307) Client: THE SPANOS CORP Project: LAKE MONROE APARTMENTS Location Of Placement: ROADWAY STATION #11+00 Producer: RANGER Plant No: N/A Asphalt Concrete Type: S-III Mix Design No: 17 RGN S-3 Ticket No: 462085 Asphalt Temp "F N/A Sampled By: DD Date Sampled: 2/20/2019 Tested By: JL Date Tested: 3/6/2019 0110.1800758.0000 1657502 9437654 3-18-19 Sieve Size Percent Passing Sieve Mix Design Target 1" 100 3/4" 100 100 1/2" 100 100 3/8" 97 98 4 74 80 10 47 59 40 26 34 80 10 16 200 5.5 6.0 Asphaltic Content(° Total Mix) 5.23 6.0 Note: The test results are to report the asphalt concrete type and mix design of the bituminous material delivered to the project and placed at the above referenced location To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. UNIVERSALLIES Project No: ENGINEERING SCIENCES LIES Report No: Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Work Order No: Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie 81vd,0riancb,FL 32811 P: 407A23.OSO4 F: 407A23.3106 Date Typed: Report On Marshall Asphaltic Concrete Extraction & Gradation ASTM DS444 & D6307) Client: THE SPANOS CORP Project: LAKE MONROE APARTMENTS Location Of Placement: ROADWAY, STATION 24+00 Producer: RANGER Plant No: N/A Asphalt Concrete Type: S-III Mix Design No: 17 RGN S-3 Ticket No: 462104 Asphalt Temp OF 320 Sampled By: KM Date Sampled: 2/21/2019 Tested By: JL Date Tested: 3/11/2019 0110.1800758.0000 1657506 9437655 3-18-19 Sieve Size Percent Passing Sieve Mix Design Target 1" 100 3/4" 100 100 1/2" 100 100 3/8" 97 98 4 76 80 10 49 59 40 27 34 80 9 16 200 4.6 6.0 Asphaltic Content(° Total Mix) 5.43 1 6.0 Note: The test results are to report the asphalt concrete type and mix design of the bituminous material delivered to the project and placed at the above referenced location To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No.: 0110.1800758.0000 Date Typed: March 20, 2019 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date Type of Report 9441508-1 03/19/2019 In -Place Density Test Report 9441508-2 03/19/2019 In -Place Density Test Report 9441508-3 03/19/2019 In -Place Density Test Report 9441508-4 1 03/19/2019 In -Place Density Test Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (4) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 SCHMq r,,, aSe .,s Fred Schmalzer 38 8 = 42019.03.21 TAM F 14:00:15-04'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9441508-1 Report Date: 03/20/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 03/19/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Type of Test: Area Tested: Roadway (Permit Number 18-2508) Field: ASTM D-6938 Nuclear Gauge Method Material: Stabilization Laboratory: AASHTO T180 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Top of Stabilization Depth requirement is 12.00 inches The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Stab. Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test LBR pcf) pcf) Fail 1 STA.33+00 47 108.8 8.4 110.2 11.4 101 12.25 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9 800758.0000 Workorder No: 441541508-2 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:03/20/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionE9BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 03/19/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Roadway (Permit Number 18-2508) Material: Limerock Reference Datum: 0 = Top of Stabilization The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tyne of Test: Field: ASTM D-6938 Nuclear Gauge Method Laboratory: AASHTO T180 Modified Proctor Depth requirement is 8.00 inches Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Limerock Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction Depth or No. Location of Test LBR pcf) pcf) inch) Fail 2 STA.27+00 120.7 9.5 122.0 11.6 101 8.50 Pass 3 STA.30+00 120.7 9.5 121.6 12.2 101 8.25 Pass 4 STA.33+00 120.7 9.5 121.1 12.9 100 8.50 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9441508-3 Report Date: 03/20/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 03/19/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tyne of Test: Area Tested: Terwilliger Lane ( Permit Number 18- Field: ASTM D-6938 Nuclear Gauge Method 2508) Material: Stabilization Laboratory: AASHTO T180 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Top of Base Course Depth requirement is 12.00 inches The tests below meet the 98% minimum comaaction requirement. Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Stab. Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test LBR pcf) pcf) Fail 5 STA.37+22 47 108.8 8.4 110.1 10.9 101 12.50 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 0 110. 1800758.0000 9WorkorderNo: 441541508-4 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date: 03/20/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 03/19/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Sanitary Structure (Permit Number 18 2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Sanitary Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 6 Structure Q 0+1 ft 111.5 11.3 112.1 8.8 101 Pass 7 Structure Q 1+2 ft 111.5 11.3 111.4 8.3 100 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL OadAanta Daytona Beach02ENGINEERINGSCIENCESFortMyers Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Fort Pierce Gainesville Geophysical Services • Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Jacksonville Building Inspection • Plan Review • Building Code Administration Miami March 22, 2019 Own Orlando (Headquarters) City of Sanford Palm Coast PO Box 1788 Panama City Pensacola Sanford, Florida 32772 Rockledge Sarasota Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official St. Petersburg Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments Tifton 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 West Palm Beach Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 UES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 11 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of March 11, 2019 through March 17, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the "Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of March 11, 2019 through March 17, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. FJS/dkn City of Sanford Aldrich, Dave City of Sanford Antonini, Usa The Spanos Corporation Woods, Jim The Spanos Corporation Gillespk, Hardy The Spanos Corporation Jensen, Chuck The Spanos Corporation Homea, Kent CPH, Inc. (Corporate) Boyles, Irene Lee Crest Lee Crest Kephart Garland, Jesse Kephart canoe, Paul Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 o'gci+;tt+a, Fred J. Schmalzer B 2019.03.24 TA1E F •F a A`2< 08:49:39-04'00' dave aldrlchOsanforde.gov Usa.Antonlnl®Sanforde.gov Jwoods@agspanos.corn hgleespW0agspanos.corn c)ensen0agspanos.mn thornea0agspanos.com Iboyksecolicorpoom JoJeeiimup320@9mall.com lesseg0kephartoom paukOkepharLcom Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. • Orlando, FI 32811 • (407) 423-0504 • (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com w THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO. 11 Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: March 22, 2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. CS"PECNOLIOEMCTiIGNj120`G Added This Summary Period: 0 Resoled This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: 0 SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): 1 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: 3 to 3 Daily Report No. Inspection Date Inspector(s) Reports No. of Pages Page No(s). 22 3/11/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 4 to 4 23 3/13/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 5 to 5 Total Number of Pages This Summary: For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG ermitting Agency: City of Sanford Project Name: Lake Monroe Apartments Update Period: 3/11/19-3/17/19 ttention: Mr. Dave Aldrich I Project Address: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard ermit No.: See Below) City/State/Zip: Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Building A/Ctubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Buildin D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 SIL No. Date SUM No. Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location Description S I Engineer of Record Response 2 S.I. Date Closed SUM No. The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. 2The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Does #1632149 3 This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 MASONRY THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 22 (1/11 PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 3/11/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9442465-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1583 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: Jim Woods CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: 813-288-0008 FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Wall, Lintel LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building D Elevator (501 Marbella Lane) ELEVATION: Level 1 Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings O Approved Shop Drawings vGI N Per Project Plans, Specifications and Approved RFI's. t E 0 0 2 Notes _ Masonry !APPROVED GROUT MIX DESIGN 1 } O o ' 0 i REBAR CLEARANCE 0 O I 0 REBAR CONDITION O 10 O t REBAR DOWEL PROTRUSION l h . 0 ' REBAR NUMBER/QUANTITY O 0J o REBAR SIZE/DIAMETERYP /TE to 0 O - REBAR FASTENING O ! o i 0 ' REBAR SPACING 10_ i _ ; REBAR LAP SPLICES ' 0 0 ! O toBLOCKCELLCLEANLINESS 0 0 ! BLOCK CLEAN_OUTS O BLOCCO _KNDITION 1 t00 .. _. ._ ._. "-._- _ ._`_ .- a BLOCK HEAD & BED JOINTS - ,-' li O 0 O r i' ®I 3 O I 0 O _ _ _=.-_ J.....__ ...... - r BLOCKREINFORCEMENT I BLOCK BLOCK SIZE/ TYPE/GRADE 0 0 Of MORTAR JOINT REINFORCEMENT-- O_._ o 0 ! EMBEDDED ITEMS Of O o l 0 JOINT LOCATIONS ' of GROUT AGE O i 0 I GROUT CONSOLIDATION ; O I p O 0 O .Y O O ® __.._ _ _ _...... -.__ . _ rGROUT SLUMPPlansReferences & RFI's Date(s) Pour Information: N/A Cubic Yards of Mix Design No. N/A psi concrete placed. N/A set(s) of N/A Grout Prisms Slump (inches) _ ( Slump specifications = N/A to N/A inches). 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) o IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES 113 FIELDCOPIESTO ' T.Honea Consultants In. Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Plan Review MASONRY THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 23 0/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 3/13/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9443051-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1583 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT- The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Wall, Lintel LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building D. 501 Marbella Lane / Elevator ELEVATION: Level 2 Inspection was Performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings v c m m Per Project Plans, Specifications and Approved RFI's. N U — t E Q o U U z Notes Masonry APPROVED GROUT MIX DESIGN I _ I 0 REBAR CLEARANCE O ®- B-AR CONDITION b 1.0J. 0. REBAR DOWEL PROTRUSION O :0 REBAR NUMBER/QUANTITY I 0 01 REBAR SIZE/DIAMETER/TYPE REBAR FASTENING O' l ®Y REBAR SPACING + _ , 0 I REBAR LAP SPLICES I O ; 0 BLOCK CELL CLEANLINESS O 0 I BLOCK CLEANOUTS O BLOCK CONDITION 0 BLOCK PLACEMENT_ O! 0 I O BLOCK PLUMBNESS _._._._._--------_-.----.-__-- OO :. 0f0 BLOCK REINFORCEMENT r0 O 0 i O i- BLOCK SIZE/TYPE/GRADE i ; 0 , i MORTAR JOINT REINFORCEMENT 1 1 0 ; O EMBEDDED ITEMS ------ - . r -- ---- - ._ -- - -. . — - _ Y O I 4 i ®1._.. JOINT LOCATIONS O ; 0 : OUTAGE to 0j._ GROUT CONSOLIDATION 4 0 GROUT SLUMP O i O , . e -- Plans References & RFI's Date(s) Pour Information: N/A Cubic Yards of Mix Design No. N/A psi concrete placed. N/A set(s) of N/A Grout Prisms Slump (inches) _ (Slump specifications = N/A to N/A inches). 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES113FIELDCOPIESTO • Kent Honea Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Wan Review 3 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No.: 0110.1800758.0000 Date Typed: March 25, 2019 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date Type of Report 9441510-1 03/21/2019 In -Place Density Test Report 9443159-1 03/14/2019 1 Grout Prism Test Specimens Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (2) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 NBC •.Ij% Fred Schmalzer 38 8 = , 2019.03.28 TATE F c Rcm 08:22:51-04'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and seated by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 94415 800758.0000 Workorder No: 9441510-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:03/25/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 03/21/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Sanitary Pipe (Permit Number 18- 2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tyne of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 1 W10 to W9 8" PVC 0-1 ft 111.5 11.3 111.2 8.0 100 Pass 2 W10 to W9 8" PVC 0+1 ft 111.5 11.3 110.4 7.7 99 Pass 3 W 10 to W9 8" PVC 1 +2 ft 111.5 11.3 110.0 7.2 99 Pass 4 IW10 to W9 8" PVC 2+3 ft 111.5 11.3 112.2 7.8 101 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL Project No: 94431 9-1 CT.0314ReportNo.: 9443159-1 CT 031419 ENGINEERING SCIENCES worko abrNoNo.: 119N294-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Date 1 st Issue: March 22, 2019 Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection EDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Shear Wall Sample Location: Building D (Premit Number 17-1583) - Sampled at Second Lift NE Comer of Elevator Pit___ Se 1 of 1 1Sample From: Concrete Truck_ -Sample By.Femando Montalvo On 03/14/2019 At Lab On or Before: 03/18/2019 J General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Timees——T- Placement Information _ General Contractor: E.W Young Construction j Specified Strength: 3000 psi Q 28 days I Truck Load: 3.00 cu yds. 1 Subcontractor: , Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi Q 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 3.00 cu yds. t _ Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete I Water Added at Site: N/A i Total Placement for the Day: 3.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 273 i Ticket No.: 1850437 Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: Nis Time Batched: 9:06 AM Time Sampled: 10:30 AM Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy _ Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 9.00 inches I Ambient Temp: 73 °F I Concrete Temp: 81 °F Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen. 1 in) Actual Dimen. 2 in) Avg. Dimon. in) Test XSect. Area ( in') Max Compressive Load ( Ibs) Test Compressive Strength( psi) Average psi) 1 03/21/2019 7 3.31 3.34 3.33 11.06 24,880 2,250 2 04111 /2019 28 3 04/11/2019 28 4 04/11/2019 28 Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports Is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except In full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 DES Project No.: .0000UNIVERSALDateTyped: March 27, 2019 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. I Date I Type of Report 9441513-1 1 03/26/2019 In -Place Density Test Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (1) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 pjSCHMA',. Fred Schmalzer 38 S = 2019.03.28 TATE f a 08:21.30-04'00' ii, IONAL„ Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verired on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 94415 800758.0000 Workorder No: 9441513-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date: 03/27/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Sanitary Pipe (Permit Number 18- 2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Date Tested: 03/26/2019 Tvae of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) N Fail 1 W2 to W10 8" PVC 0-1 ft 111.5 11.3 111.3 7.7 100 Pass 2 W2 to W10 8" PVC 0+1 ft 111.5 11.3 110.5 7.1 99 Pass 3 W2 to W10 8" PVC 1+2 ft 111.5 11.3 111.9 8.0 100 Pass 4 1W2 to W10 8" PVC 2+3 ft 111.5 11.3 109.7 6.7 98 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 No.: rc2220000UNIVERSAL Date Typed: Mh,0019 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd.Oriando, FL 32811 P: 407A23A504 F: 407A233106 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation Ann: Jim Woods 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing, US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed -construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below. Scope of Work Work Order No. Type of Report 9437656 Extraction and Gradation We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie S. Housein (extension 23078). Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. COA No. 00000549 Fred Schmalzer B - 2019. 03.28 08:23: 23-04'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Attachments (1) Vice President - Construction Services RH STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This Item has been electronically signed and sealed by using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. 3532 Maggie Boulevard - Orlando, FI 32811 - (407) 423-0504 - Fax (407) 423-3106 Visit us on the web at www.UniversalEn-gineering.com. UNIVERSALLIES Project No: ENGINEERING SCIENCES113 UESReport No: Consultants in: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Tlxeshold Inspection Work Order No: Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3S32 Maggie Blvd. O lando,Fl. 32811 P: 407A23.0504 F: 407A23.3106 Date Typed: Report On Marshall Asphaltic Concrete Extraction & Gradation ASTM D5444 & D6307) Client: THE SPANOS CORP Project: LAKE MONROE APARTMENTS Location Of Placement: ROADWAY Producer: RANGER Plant No: N/A Asphalt Concrete Type: S-III Mix Design No: 17 RGN S-3 Ticket No: 462117 Asphalt Temp OF 290 Sampled By: CC Date Sampled: 2/22/2019 Tested By: 1L Date Tested: 3/8/2019 0110. 1800758.0000 1659141 9437656 3- 22-19 Sieve Size Percent Passing Sieve Mix Design Target 1" 100 3/ 4" 100 100 1/ 2" 100 100 3/ 8" 97 98 4 73 80 10 38 59 40 30 34 80 9 16 200 4.7 6.0 Asphaltic Content(% Total Mix) 5.10 6.0 Note: The test results are to report the asphalt concrete type and mix design of the bituminous material delivered to the project and placed at the above referenced location To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. DES Project No.: .0000UNIVERSALDateTyped: March 26, 2019 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date Type of Report 9438522-1 02/25/2019 1 Grout Prism Test Specimens Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (1) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 aSCHMq Sic Fred Schmalzer 38 8 - 2019.03.28 TAM f 08:22.39-04'00' iirr S/CNdA-` Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 , Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Cell Fill Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9438522-1 CT 022519 WorkorderNo.: 9438522 Lab No.: 19M786-C Date 1 st Issue: March 05, 2019 Sample Location: Building C Permit Number 17-1582 - Sampled at SW Comer of Elevator Pit Se 1 of 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck TSample By: Fernando Montalvo On 02/25/2019 _ At Lab On or Before: 02/27/2019 — L.. _ - - 2/27/ - 9 - General Information _ _ _ _ _ Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information_ General Contractor: E.W Young Construction Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 3.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 3.00 cu yds. I Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete _Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 3.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 284 Time Batched: 12:07 PM Ticket No.: 1457082 Time Sampled: 1:10 PM Mix Design: 30550000— `Admixture: Nis -Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 9.00 inches Ambient Temp: 73 °F I Concrete Temp: 79 °F Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 03/04/2019 7 3.30 3.46 3.38 11.42 31,485 2.760 2 03/25/2019 28 3.31 3.33 3.32 11.02 37,460 3.399 3 03/25/2019 28 3.32 1 3.36 1 3.34 1 11.16 1 35.030 1 3,139 4 03/25/2019 28 3.31 1 3.34 1 3.33 1 11.06 1 42.680 1 3,859 3,470 Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universars reports Is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except In full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No.: 0110.1800758.0000 Date Typed: March 21, 2019 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date Type of Report 9437683-1 02/20/2019 Grout Prism Test Specimens Report 9441509-1 03/20/2019 In -Place Density Test Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (2) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 Fred Schmalzer 38 8 = 2019.03.28 S,at4A,. ,,, 08:22:26-04'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9437683-1 CT 022019 WorkorderNo.: 9437683 Lab No.: 19M632-C Date 1st Issue: February 28, 2019 Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Cell Fill 1 Sample Location: Third Floor Stair Tower (Permit # 17-1582) -Sampled at Southeast Corner of Wall Set# 1 of 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck 'Sample By: DiJon Davis On 02/20/2019 At Lab On or Before: 02/21/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: The spanos Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 3.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: I Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 3.00 cu yds. i Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete ,Water Added at Site: N/A _ - Total Placement for the Day: 3.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 2843 Time Batched: 8:37 AM Ticket No.: 1202802 Time Sampled: 9:55 AM Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: N/S Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 4.50 inches I Ambient Temp: 70 °F I Concrete Temp: 76 °F Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area (in2) Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 02/27/2019 7 3.31 3.34 3.33 11.06 25,650 2,320 2 03/20/2019 28 3.31 3.34 3.33 11.06 39,840 3,602 3 03/20/2019 28 3.32 3.33 3.33 1 11.06 38,210 3,455 4 03/20/2019 28 1 - 3.35 3.33 1 3.34 1 11.16 38,240 3,427 3,500 Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our dients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universars reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9441509-1758.0000 Workorder No: 9441509-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:03/21/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 03/20/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Sanitary Structure ( Permit Number 18-2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Sanitary Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Type of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 1 Structure W2 0+1 It 111.5 11.3 111.6 8.0 100 Pass 2 Structure W2 1+2 It 111.5 11.3 111.0 7.8 100 Pass 3 Structure W2 2+3 It 111.5 11.3 110.3 6.4 99 Pass 4 Structure W2 3+4 ft 111.5 11.3 109.5 7.1 98 Pass 5 Structure W 10 0+1 ft 111.5 11.3 111.3 7.4 100 Pass 6 Structure W 10 1+2 It 111.5 11.3 110.3 8.3 99 Pass 7 IStructure W 10 2+3 ft 1 111.5 1 11.3 1 109.E 1 7.9 1 98 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UESPr 011UNIVERSALDateTypedtNo.: March 28, 20189 000 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date Type of Report 9441514-1 03/27/2019 In -Place Density Test Report 9441514-2 03/27/2019 In -Place Density Test Report 9444015-1 03/20/2019 Grout Prism Test Specimens Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (3) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 NSC Fred Schmalzer 38 8 - 2019.03.29TATEf 12.24.49-04'00' Rod P j` Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9441514-1 Report Date: 03/28/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 03/27/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Tvoe of Test: Area Tested: Storm Structure (Permit Number 18- Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method 2508) Material: Backfill Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Storm Inlet Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction reouirement_ Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 1 Structure S-59 4+5 ft 111.5 11.3 110.2 7.0 99 Pass 2 Structure S-59 5+6 ft 111.5 11.3 110.9 6.7 99 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9441514-2 Report Date: 03/28/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 03/27/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Type of Test: Area Tested: Sanitary Structure (Permit Number 18 Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method 2508) Material: Backfill Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Bottom of Sanitary Structure The tests below meet the 98% minimum comoaction requirement. Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density pcf) Optimum Moisture Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture Soil Compaction Pass or Fail 3 Structure Q 2+3 ft 111.5 11.3 110.1 7.4 99 Pass 4 Structure Q 3+4 ft 111.5 11.3 111.3 7.2 100 Pass 5 Structure Q 4+5 ft 111.5 11.3 109.5 6.9 98 Pass 6 Structure W9 0+1 ft 111.5 11.3 112.3 8.0 101 Pass 7 Structure W9 1+2 ft 111.5 11.3 111.3 7.5 100 Pass 8 IStructure W9 2+3 ft 1 111.5 1 11.3 1 110.7 1 7.1 1 99 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 GUNIVERSALENGINEERINGSCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9444015-1 CT 032019 WorkorderNo.: 9444015 Lab No.: 19N432-C Date 1st Issue: March 28, 2019 Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Shear Wall Sample Location: Building D (Permit Number 17-1583) - Sampled at 3rd Lift SW Comer of Elevator Pit__ Set# 1 of 11 Sample From: Concrete Truck - , _ Sample By: Fernando Montalvo On 03/20/2019 At Lab On or Before:-03/22/2019 General Information _ _ Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information r General Contractor: E.W. Young Construction Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 3.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 3.00 txt yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 3.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 273 Time Batched: 12:21 PM Ticket No.: 1850559 Time Sampled: 1:22 PM Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: Nis Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 8.75 inches Ambient Temp: 69 °F I Concrete Temp: 79 °F Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 03/27/2019 7 3.32 3.36 3.34 11.16 25.960 2,330 2 04/17/2019 28 3 04/17/2019 28 4 04/17/2019 28 Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. N-ot,l`rest Results represent the Structural Element specified If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019. Grout Boxes were used To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL Project No: 9410.1800 ReportNo.: 9444730-2 CT CT 032332319 9444730 ENGINEERING SCIENCES worko abrNo.: 119N519-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Date 1 st Issue: April 01. 2019 Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection EaBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade Sample Location: Building E, Permit #17-1584 - Sampled at 10' S/ 12' W from NE Comer of Slab_ Set# 2 of 6 Sample From: Concrete Truck -. Sample By: Cesar Contreras On 03/23/2019 At Lab On or Before: 03/25/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information _ General Contractor: E.W. Young Construction .Y_ Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. ^ , Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 70.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 280.00 cu Truck No.: 208 i Ticket No.: 1681572 i Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: Nis Time Batched: 3:08 AM Time Sampled: 4:15 AM Weather Condition: Partly CI Field Test Results yds. i I Air Content: N/A Slump: 6.00 inches I Ambient Temp: 53 °F I Concrete Temp: 69 °F Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen. 1 in) Actual Dimen. 2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area ( in') Max Compressive Load ( lbs) Test Compressive Strength( psi) Average psi) 1 03/30/2019 7 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 34,945 2.770 2 04/20/2019 28 3 04/20/2019 28 4 04/20/2019 28 5' H' 04/20/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the speed strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = O'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable --E'- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified and I TIT., air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure HN 00 1 oo -= n --- Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM 0-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universars dients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our dients and authorization for publication of statements, conduslons or extracts from or regarding Unlimrsars reports Is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except In 14p, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 Project No: 0110.18758.0000UNIVERSALReportNo.: 94447 000 CT 032319 ENGINEERING SCIENCES WorkorderNoLabNo.: 119N518-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Date 1 st Issue: April 01, 2019 Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection 93BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100. Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing yyUS 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County,_ FL 32771_ Structural Element: Footing Sample Location: Building E, Permit #17-1584 - Sampled at SW Comer Set# 1 of 6 Sample From: Concrete Truck Sa`mrp'l'e'By: Cesar Contreras On 03/23/2019 Concrete __.1._ .—-- . .. _ __. __. At Lab On or Before: 03/25/2019 i 2._ r. ef .:.,.. ._ General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: E.W. Young Construction — I Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Y Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 10.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 280.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 650 Ticket No.: 1681566 Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: N/S Time Batched: 2:13 AM Time Sampled: 3:15 AM Weather Condition: Partly Cl Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 6.50 inches Ambient Temp: 52 OF I Concrete Temp: 65 OF Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen. 1 in) Actual Dimen. 2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area ( in") Max Compressive Load ( Ibs) Test Compressive Strength( psi) Average psi) 1 03/30/2019 7 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 32,300 2,560 2 04/20/2019 28 3 04/20/2019 28 4 04/20/2019 28 5' H' 04/20/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the speed strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified onl I I If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to UMversars clients, the Public and oursehes, ell reports are submitted as Confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication or statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Unhrersars reports is reserved pending our written approval This report shall not be reproduced, except in AX, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9441517-1 Report Date: 04/02/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 04/01/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Type of Test: Area Tested: Sanitary Pipe (Permit Number 18- Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method 2508) Material: Backfill Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction reauirement. Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) N Fail 1 Q to W2 8" PVC 1+2 ft 111.5 11.3 110.3 7.7 99 Pass 2 Q to W2 8" PVC 2+3 ft 111.5 11.3 110.9 7.0 99 Pass 3 Q to W2 8" PVC 3+4 ft 111.5 11.3 111.9 8.0 100 Pass 4 lQ to W2 8" PVC 4+5 ft 1 111.5 1 11.3 1 111.0 1 7.1 1 100 1 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering " Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services " Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No.: 0110.1800758.0000 Date Typed: April 02, 2019 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (LIES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date Type of Report 9441517-1 04/01/2019 In -Place Density Test Report 9444730-1 03/23/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9444730-2 03/23/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9444730-3 03/23/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9444730-4 03/23/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9444730-5 03/23/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9444730-6 03/23/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 9CHMq 2.;, se .. Fred Schmalzer 44-38 8 - 2019.04.03 SfONA- 10:53:38-04'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Attachments (7) rh For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 EaUNIVERSAL ReportNo.: 94447 003 CT 032319 ENGINEERING SCIENCES WorkoNoLabrNo.: 19N520-C Consultants In- Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Date 1 st Issue: April 01, 2019 Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade Sample Location: Building E, Permit #17-1584 - Sampled at 86 S/ 30' W from NE Comer of Slab_ Seth 3 of 6 Sample From: Concrete Truck , - - Sample By: Cesar Contreras On 03/23/2019 At Lab On or Before: 03/25/201 General Information _ _ _ Specified Strength / Sampling Times _ _ _ Placement Information General Contractor: E.W. Young Construction ,T Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. 1 Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days I Cumulative Quantity: 110.0( cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A 1 Total Placement for the Day: 280.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 604 I Ticket No.: 1457831 Mix 30090000 Admixture: Nis Time Batched: 3:42 AM Time Sampled: 4:45 AM Weather Condition: Partly CI Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 6.25 inches Ambient Temp: 520F1 Concrete Temp: 65 OF Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen. 1 in) Actual Dimen. 2 in) Avg. Dimon. in) Test XSect. Area ( in') Max Compressive Load ( Ibs) Test Compressive Strength( psi) Average psi) 1 03/30/2019 7 5 4.01 4.03 4.02 12.69 37.365 2,940 2 04/20/2019 28 3 04/20/2019 28 4 04/20/2019 28 5' H' 04/20/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average Note ITest Results represent the Structural Element specified onl I I if an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Unlversars clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements. conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universers reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ReportNo.: 9444730 5 CT 032319 ENGINEERING SCIENCES WorkoNoLabrNo.: 19N5 2-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Date 1st Issue: April 01, 2019 Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection IaBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade Sample Location: Building E. Permit #17-1584 - Sampled at_60' S/ 155' W from NE Corner of Slab Set# 5 of 6 Isample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Cesar Contreras On 03/23/2019 At Lab On or Before: 03/25/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: E.W. Young Construction + Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 210.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 280.00 cu I I _ Truck No.: 604 Ticket No.: 1457840 i Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: NIS Time Batched: 5:32 AM Time Sampled: 6:15 AM Weather Condition: Partly CI Field Test Results yds. Air Content: N/A Slump: 6.75 inches I Ambient Temp: 53 °F I Concrete Temp: 67 °F Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen. 1 in) Actual Dimen. 2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area ( in') Max Compressive Load ( Ibs) Test Compressive Strength( psi) Average psi) 1 03/30/2019 7 5 4.01 4.02 4.02 12.69 30,935 2,440 2 04/20/2019 28 3 04/20/2019 28 4 04/20/2019 28 5" H' 04/20/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified onl I I If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM G172 - Yes Ii) J dI Air Content Performed per ASTM G173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C -Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes i aMolded per -Yes er ASTM C-31 -Unknown InitiallyCureddperLd Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universars dients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shag not be reproduced, except In tuft, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ReportNo.: 9444730-4 CT 032319 9444730 ENGINEERING SCIENCES worko abrNo.: 119N521-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Date 1 st Issue: April 01, 2019 Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade Sample Location: Building E. Permit #17-1584 - Sampled at 40' S/ 65' W from NE Comer of Slab Set# 4 of 6, Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Cesar Contreras On 03/23/2019 At Lab On or Before: 03/25/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: E.W. Young Construction Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days l Cumulative Quantity: 180.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A ! Total Placement for the Day: 280.00 cu i yds. Truck No.: 618 i Time Batched: 5:00 AM Ticket No.: 1457837 Time Sampled: 5:45 AM Mix Design_ 30090000 - Admixture: - - _ Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 7.00 inches I Ambient Temp: 53 °F I Concrete Temp: 65 °F Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 03/30/2019 7 5 4.01 4.02 4.02 12.69 30.705 2,420 2 04/20/2019 28 3 04/20/2019 28 4 04/20/2019 28 5'H' 04/20/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. H•- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable _ E'- Excluded From AverageENoteNoteTestResultsrepresenttheStructuralElementspecifiedonlIIIfanairtest was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our dients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universals reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except In full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9444730-6 CT 032319 WorkorderNo.: 9444730 Lab No.: 19N523-C Date 1st Issue: April 01, 2019 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Walk way inside pad j l _ Sample Location: Building E, Permit #17-1584 - Sampled at 91' W/ 35' S_from NE Comer Set# 6 of 6 Sample From: Concrete Truck `- ` _Sample By: Cesar Contreras On 03/23/2019^ At Lab On or Before: 03/25/2019 _ a General Information _ r General Contractor: E.W. Young Construction Subcontractor: Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Truck No.: 606 i Ticket No.: 1850647 Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: Nis Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information_ _ Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days - Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days ! Cumulative Quantity: 260.00 cu yds. Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 280.00 cu yds. Time Batched: 7:43 AM Time Sampled: 8:30 AM Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 5.75 inches I Ambient Temp: 54 OF I Concrete Temp: 69 °F Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test X-Sect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 03/30/2019 7 5 4.01 4.02 4.02 12.69 35,045 2,760 2 04/20/2019 28 3 04/20/2019 28 4 04/20/2019 28 5'H' 04/20/2019 1 28 1- 1 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average Note I Test Results represent the Structural Element specified and I I If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and oursehres, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions of extracts from or regarding Universals reports Is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No.: 0110.1800758.0000 Date Typed: April 01, 2019 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date IType of Report 9439734-1 03/01/2019 1 Grout Prism Test Specimens Report 9441515-1 03/28/2019 In -Place Density Test Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (2) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 r4a:eNSF .F^ Fred Schmalzer 38 a - 2019.04.03 TAM F 10: 54:18-04'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9439734-1 CT 030119 WorkorderNo.: 9439734 Lab No.: 19M936-C Date 1st Issue: March 13, 2019 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Cell Fill Sample Location: Building C (Permit Number 17-1582) - Sampled at Elevator Shaft/ Top Lift/ 4th Floor Set# 1 of 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck ^ T Sample By: Adrian Garcia On 03/01/2019 t Lab On or Before: ^03106/20199 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times + Placement Information General Contractor: E.W. Young Construction Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 2.00 cu yds_ Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 2.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: _ A Total Placement for the Day: 2.00 cu yds. i Truck No.: 276 Time Batched: 12:20 PM Ticket No.: 1850043 Time Sampled: 1:20 PM j Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: Nis Weather, Condition: Partly Cloudy_ Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 8.75 inches Ambient Temp: 81 °F I Concrete Temp: 85 °F Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area (in2) Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 03/11/2019 10 3.31 3.34 3.33 11.06 29,935 2,710 2 03/29/2019 28 3.31 3.34 3.33 11.06 39,300 3,553 3 03/29/2019 28 3.32 1 3.34 1 3.33 1 11.09 39,745 3,584 4 03/29/2019 1 28 3.32 1 3.36 1 3.34 1 11.16 37,755 3,383 3,510 Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified onl I If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization forpublication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except In full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revlsed May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 Workorder No: 9441515-1 Report Date: 04/01/2019 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 03/28/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Sanitary Pipe (Permit Number 18- 2508) Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction reauirement. Tvoe of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) pcf) Fail 1 Q to W2 8"PVC 0-1 ft 111.5 11.3 111.8 8.5 100 Pass 2 Q to W2 8"PVC 0+1 ft 111.5 11.3 110.8 8.0 99 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No.: 0110.1800758.0000 Date Typed: April 03, 2019 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date Type of Report 9441234-1 03/05/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9441234-2 03/05/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9441234-3 03/05/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9441234-4 103/05/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9441234-5 1 03/05/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9441234-6 1 03/05/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (6) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 j.SCHMq •,,. Nsf .F Fred SchmalzerJc. 38 8 2019.04.09 ipTArE F _ 06 : 46:46-04'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 Project No: 011. 18758.0000UNIVERSALReportNo.: 944/23400 CT 030519 WorkorderNo.: 9441234 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Lab No.: 19NO17-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Date 1 st Issue: March 13, 2019 Geophysical Services • Materials Testing - Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Footing Sample Location: Building Slab D (Permit Number 17-1583) - Sampled at 15Ft N 10 Ft E on the E Footing Set# 1 of 6TSample From: Concrete Truck i! Sample By: Femando Montalvo On 03/05/2019 At Lab On or Before: 03/06 — - J General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: E.W Young Construction Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds._j Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 10.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 280.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 607 Ticket No.: 1850100 Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: Nis Time Batched: 2:56 AM Time Sampled: 3:10 AM Weather Condition: Partly CI Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 8.50 inches Ambient Temp: 62 °F I Concrete Temp: 77 °F Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (lbs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 03/12/2019 7 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 26,340 2,090 2 04/02/2019 28 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 50,960 4,035 3 04/02/2019 28 5 1 4.00 1 4.01 1 4.01 1 12.63 1 52,250 4,137 4 04/02/2019 28 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 50,345 3,986 4,050 5'H' 04/02/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H-- Hold Cylinder = D-- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable -*E*- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified and I I If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes IL I I Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - NoilU1 Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A 14 = Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 -Yes Molded per C-31 -YesnInitiallyCuredperASTM C-31 -Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to UnivefUrs clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Unh ersars reports Is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sclences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9441234-2 CT 030519 WorkorderNo.: 9441234 Lab No.: 19NO18-C Date 1st Issue: March 13, 2019 Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Fooling Sample Location: Building Slab 0 (Permit Number 17-1583) - Sampled at 10Ft N 10 Ft W on the N Footing _ Set# 2 of 6 TSample From: Concrete Truck i Sample By: Fernando Montalvo On 03/05/2019 At Lab On or Before: 03/06/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: E.W Young Construction 1 Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days , Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: I Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days ' Cumulative Quantity: 60.00 cu yds. i Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A ; Total Placement for the Day: 280.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 646 i Time Batched: 3:26 AM Ticket No.: 1850105 Time Sampled: 3:55 AM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: N/S Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 6.50 inches Ambient Temp: 62 °F I Concrete Temp: 72 °F Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test X-Sect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 03/12/2019 7 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 26,880 2,130 2 04/02/2019 28 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 52,105 4,126 3 04/02/2019 1 28 5 1 4.00 1 4.01 1 4.01 1 12.63 1 49.090 3,887 4 04/02/2019 28 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 49,030 3,882 3,970 5'H' 04/02/2019 28 I - Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = 0'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified onl If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to UniversaPs clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our dients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universars reports is reserved pending our written approval This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9441234-3 CT 030519 WorkorderNo.: 9441234 Lab No.: 19NO19-C Date 1st Issue: March 13, 2019 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing y` US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford,_ Seminole County, FL 32771- Structural Element: Slab on Grade Sample Location: Building Slab D (Permit Number 17-1583) - Sampled at 10Ft N 15 Ft W on the NW Coner Of Slab Set# 3 of 6 Isampie From: Concrete Truck ~ !Sample By: Fernando Montalvo On 03/05/2019 JAt Lab On or Before: 03/06/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: E.W Young Construction Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 110.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete ++ Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 280.00 cu 1 yds. Truck No.: 606 Ticket No.: 1850111 Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: Nis Time Batched: 4:05 AM Time Sampled: 4:22 AM Weather Condition: Partly CI Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 6.00 inches I Ambient Temp: 62 °F I Concrete Temp: 74 OF Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 03/12/2019 7 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 23,960 1,900 2 04/02/2019 28 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 44,565 3,529 3 04/02/2019 28 1 5 1 4.00 1 4.01 1 4.01 1 12.63 1 45.000 3,563 4 04/02/2019 28 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 47,575 3,767 3,620 5'H• 04/02/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H•- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified and I I If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes y Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or G231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM G143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 -Yes Molded per C-31 -.YesonInitiallyCuredperASTM C-31 -Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our dients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universals reports Is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 Project No: 011. 1800758.0000UNIVERSALReportNo.: 9441234-4 CT 030519 WorkorderNo.: 9441234 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Lab No.: 19N020-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Date 1 st Issue: March 13, 2019 Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade Sample Location: Building Slab D (Permit Number 17-1583) - Sampled at 10Ft E 5 Ft S on the SE Coner Of Slab Set6 Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Fernando Montalvo On 03/05/2019 At L t/ 4 of ab On or Before: 03/06/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: E.W Young Construction Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. ^ 1 Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 160.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 280.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 602 I Ticket No.: 1850116 i Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: NIS Time Batched: 5:03 AM Time Sampled: 5:23 AM Weather Condition: Partly Cl Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 8.50 inches Ambient Temp: 61 -F I Concrete Temp: 72 -F Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen. 1 in) Actual Dimen. 2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test X- Sect. Area ( in') Max Compressive Load ( lbs) Test Compressive Strength( psi) Average psi) 1 03/12/2019 7 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 27,560 2,180 2 04/02/2019 28 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 53,330 4,223 3 04/02/2019 1 28 1 5 1 4.00 1 4.01 1 4.01 1 12.63 1 53.460 4,233 4 04/02/2019 1 28 5 1 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 48,260 3.821 4,090 5' H' 04/02/2019 1 28 1 - I - Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = O'- Oefective Cylinder, Un-testable = E-- Excluded From Average Note I Test Results represent the Structural Element specified onl I I If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes II} I fled I Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 • No LII. Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 -Yes aInitiallyCuredperASTMC-31 -Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 r Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9441234-5 CT 030519 WorkorderNo.: 9441234 Lab No.: 19N021-C Date 1st Issue: March 13, 2019 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade Sample Location: Building Slab D (Permit Number 17-1583) - Sampled at 15Ft S 10 Ft W on the SW Coner Of Slab _ ^ Set# 5 of 6 Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Fernando Montalvo On 03/05/2019 At Lab On or Before: 03/06/2019 General Information General Contractor: E.W Young Construction Subcontractor: Supplier: Maschmever Concrete iTruck No.: 298 Ticket No.: 1850121 Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: NIS Specified Strength / Sampling Times Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Water Added at Site: N/A Time Batched: 5:31 AM Time Sampled: 5:57 AM Weather Condition: Partly CI Field Test Results Placement Information _ Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Cumulative Quantity: 210.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 280.00 cu yds. Air Content: N/A Slump: 7.25 inches I Ambient Temp: 60 OF I Concrete Temp: 73 °F Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 03/12/2019 7 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 22,230 1,760 2 04/02/2019 28 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 55,125 4,365 3 04/02/2019 28 1 5 1 4.00 1 4.01 1 4.01 1 12.63 1 52,635 4,168 4 04/02/2019 28 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 53,305 4,221 4,250 5-H' 04/02/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average Note lTest Results represent the Structural Element specified onl I I If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 -Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 -Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universars clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions of extracts from or regarding Universers reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except In full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ReportNo.: 944/23406 CT 030519 WorkorderNo.: 9441234 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Lab No.: 1 9N022-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Date 1 st Issue: March 13, 2019 Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionEDBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade Sample Location: Building Slab D (Permit Number 17-1583) - Sampled at 10Ft W 15 Ft N on the NW Coner Of Slab _^ J Set# 6 of 6 Sample From: Concrete Truck r M_ Sample By: Fernando Montalvo On 03/05/2019 At Lab On or Before: 03/06/2019 - General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information i General Contractor: E.W Young Construction Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. i Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 260.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 280.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 622 Ticket No.: 1850132 Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: Nis Time Batched: 7:44 AM Time Sampled: 8:05 AM Weather Condition: Partly Cl Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 7.00 inches I Ambient Temp: 59 °F I Concrete Temp: 72 °F Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (lbs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 03/12/2019 7 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 26,970 2.140 2 04/02/2019 28 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 54,435 4,310 3 04/02/2019 28 1 5 1 4.00 1 4.02 1 4.01 1 12.63 1 56,150 4,446 4 04/02/2019 28 5 1 4.02 4.00 4.01 12.63 55,540 4,398 4,390 5-H" 04/02/2019 28 I - Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H-- Hold Cylinder = D-- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified onl I I If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes ILi I Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 -Yes Molded per C-31 -YesnInitiallyCuredperASTM C-31 -Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universals reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL OC: Atlanta Atlanta09ENGINEERINGSCIENCES Daytona Beach Fort Myers Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Fort Pierce Gainesville Geophysical Services • Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection lackaonville Building Inspection • Plan Review • Building Code Administration Miami April 5, 2019 Ocala Orlando (Headquarters) City of Sanford Palm Coast PO Box 1788 Panama City Pensacola Sanford, Florida 32772 Rockledge Samsom Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official St. Petersburg Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments Tifton 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 West Palm Beach Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17.1585 UES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 12 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of March 18, 2019 through March 24, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the "Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of March 18, 2019 through March 24, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. FJS/dkn City of Sanford Aldrich, Cave City of Sanford Antonini, Usa The Spares Corporation Woods, Jim The Spines Corporation Gillespie, Hardy The Spares Corporation Jensen, Chuck The Spares Corporation Homes, Kent CPH, Inc. (Corporate) Boyles, Irene Lee Crest Lee Crest Kephart Garland, Jesse Kephart Campbell, Paul Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 Fred Schmalzer c H4,,_ 2019.04.09 07:09:26-04'00' daveaktrkri@sanfordfl.gov Usa.Antonlnl@Sanfordfl.gov twoodsoagspanos.com hgipesoe®agspanos.com cJensen0a0panos.eom demea0agspanos aom Iboyies*cphoorp— Io.lee9roup32009ma1l.com less"Okeptwrt.aom pauk*kephart.com Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. • Orlando, FI 32811 - (407) 423-0504 - (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineedng.com THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO.12 Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: April 5, 2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. SPECIAL INSP.ErCTONIikKG, Added This Summary Period: 0 Resoled This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: 0 SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): 1 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: 3 to 3 Daily Report No. Inspection Date Inspector(s) Reports No. of Pages Page No(s). 24 3/18/2019 Antonio Ramirez, Jr. 1 4 to 4 25 3/22/2019 Michael Felshaw 2 5 to 6 26 1 3/23/2019 1 Antonio Ramirez, Jr. 1 7 to 7 Total Number of Pages This Summary: L. At 1 For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG Permitting Agency: City of Sanford Project Name: Lake Monroe Apartments JUpdate Period: 3/18/19-3/24/19 ttention: Mr. Dave Aldrich Project Address: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard ermit No.: See Below) Ci /State2i : Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 IlProject No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 SIL No. Date SUM No Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location Description S.I. Engineer of Record Response S.I. Date Closed SUM No. The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. 2The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Does #1632149 3This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 MASONRY THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 24 0/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 3/18/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9443757-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1583 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: CMU Walls Reinforcement LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building D, 501 Marbella Lane / Elevator Shaft ELEVATION: Level 3 Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract DraWn s Approved Shop Drawings v c al m a Per Project Plans, Specifications and Approved RFI's. t E o 0 0 Z Notes Masonry (APPROVED GROUT MIX DESIGN i (0 1 0 IREBAR CLEARANCE O 0 , ; REBAR CONDITION JLO 1 ; 0 1l-. I REBAR DOWEL PROTRUSION 1 _. I • 0 ; REBAR NUMBER/QUANTITY O 0 SIZE/DIAMETER/TYPE 4REBAR REBAR FASTENING T O O 1 0; REBAR SPACING 0 REBAR LAP SPLICES - -- BLOCK CELL CLEANLINESS 1 O jBLOCK CLEANOUTS~ 1 0 O BLOCK CONDITION 0 0 . -0 : BL_OC_K HEAD & BED JOINTS _ _ _ _ BLOCK PLACEMENT _ - - , 1 0 !- - -_» - _+_ _ BLOCK PLUMBNE_SS _ _ _ BLOCK_ REINFORCEMENT^ `-- '---+--• - _ ._-- 0.0 O 00 { BLOCK SIZEITYPE_/GRAD_E _ ,_- —_ _ _ -- .--•• •- I-O O 0 _ _. _ -- --• . _... _.__ . _ MORTAR JOINT REINFORCEMENT - — _~ __ y 1 j 0 t-o0 EMBEDDED ITEMS JOINT LOCATIONS O-L® I O,- O O • 0 i GROUTA_GE _ - r 0 0 : 0 i 00GROUTCONSOLIDATION GROUT SLUMP j 01 0 10,01 Plans References & RFI's Date(s) Pour Information: N/A Cubic Yards of Mix Design No. n/a N/A psi concrete placed. N/A set(s) of N/A Grout Prisms Slump (inches) = n/a (Slump specifications = N/A to N/A inches). 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Antonio Ramirez UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCESEEIFIELDCOPIESTOKent Consuttants tn: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Plan Review MASONRY THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 25 0/2) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 3/22/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9444536-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1583 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: City of Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Wall, Lintel LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building D. 501 Marbella Lane ELEVATION: Level 4 Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawincis O Approved Shop Drawings aN N Per Project Plans, Specifications and Approved RFI's. t E p Z NotesC3 Masonry IAPPROVED GROUT MIX DESIGN O O : 0 - REBAR CLEARANCE 0.0 0 REBAR CONDITION i REBAR DOWEL PROTRUSION 10 O 0 O - - - REBAR NUMBER/QUANTITY O i 0.0 O REB_AR_SI_ZE/DIAMET_ ER/TYPE i _.-. _...-..-.w_...-. OREBARFASTENING O. ® O -_. REBAR SPACING O 010 REBAR LAP SPLICES BLOCK CELL CLEANLINESS O O_ , 0 O i O O_ 1 0 O _ BLOCK_CLEANO_UT_S fi i O i 0 BLOCK CONDITION _---__ _- `-----__- ----_ B_LOCKH_EAD_&BED JOINTS -- O 0 O 0 0-t010 r_ tBLOCKPLACEMENT _. BLOCK PLUMBNESS I O 1 i 0 1 ' 0_ 1 BLOCK_REINFORCE_MENT_ 0-- 10BLOCKSIZE/TYPE/GRADE O , OMRTAR_JOINT REINFORCEMENT_- - - - — 1 0 1 BEDDEDIT_EMS 0 -_ u O 0 OT___-___ IJOINT LOCATIONS O O 1 O 1 0 GROUT AGE GROUT CONSOLIDATION q I 0 r j 0 GROUT SLUMP j 0 , ; 0 1 Plans References & RFI's Date(s) Pour Information: N/A Cubic Yards of Mix Design No. N/A psi concrete placed. N/ A set(s) of N/A Grout Prisms Slump ( inches) _ (Slump specifications = N/A to N/A inches). 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES E] FIELDCOPIESTO • Kent HOnea Consultants In: GeotechnicalEngineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review POST TENSION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS I2-MbP1 1 PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 3/22/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9444536-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1584 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: City of Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Slab On Grade LOCATIONIGRID LINES: Building E, 401 Marbella Lane ELEVATION: Foundation Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings O Approved Shop Drawings G N N d a U Q o U U_ z Notes Formwork Tendons, sheathing and anchors are of acceptable quality T 0. 0! Correct number of tendons are installed 0 1 : Tendons are properly located and spaced 1 ia Tendons have proper high/low c.g. with (1/4 inch tolerance for slabs / 1/2 1 1 1 0 j i inch for beams) rfendons have correctly shaped, smooth profiles (no reverse curvature)' I I I Tendon support bars and chairs are properly_ secured and located O ; ° 0 t T Horizontal sweeps are mild or hairpins have been added ! O 0: 0 Tendon clearances at openings and sleeves are proper Stressing anchors are securely fastened and greased ' a . Tears and exposed ends have been repaired with cut sheathing and 0 ; I iwaterproof tape ; Proper anchor end layouts 10 1 Tendon/rebar mats are in proper layers Mild Hairpins installed at anchors ( 0 Reinforcement I ... r .. _ ._.. _ .. .. Bursting steel.-^_ O ` O_' O i 0 i i 1 Note: See "Cast -In -Place Deck Threshold Inspection" report for formwork, additional mild reinforcement and concrete placement. 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw UNIVERSAL FIELD COPIES TO: KentHOnea ENGINEERING SCIENCESEDConsultantsIn: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Plan Review CONCRETE PLACEMENT THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 26 (1/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 3/23/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9444815-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1584 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: City of Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Slab on Grade LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building E, 401 Marbella Lane ELEVATION: Level 1 Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings CONCRETE PLACEMENT 10 a a t E a o ci 8 z Notes Slump taken at truck after first few, yards 0 Concrete Temperature does not exceed 95 degrees Fahrenheit 101 Water is not added to mix at the jobsite i , ; 01 Y Concrete is not over 90 minutes of age before placement I : I 0 ; ' Concrete is not permitted to drop freely over reinforcement, causing O segregation 70Allconcreteisproperlyvibratedi ; 0.0 No cold joints i '.0 ' Testing agency has made compressive strength cylinders 1 0 : ; Curing Compound type and application conform to specifications Finishing 0 ' 4 ~ complies with specifications 0 Sawcut control joints cut within 12 hours 0: Formwork clean of debris 0 i ; Reinforcement held in position 010,01 Concrete Placement ("' see 1 below "') i : 10 2 "') 1SlumpSpecifications ("' see below i 0 1"' Concrete Placement: 280.00 Cubic Yards of Mix Design No. 30090000 3000.00 psi concrete placed. Time of Placement Start: 3/23/2019 3:00:00 AM Finish: 3/23/2019 9:00:00 AM 2"' Slump (inches) = 5 Slump Specifications = 4.00 to 6.00 inches) NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? Cl YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Antonio Ramirez UNIVERSAL FIELD COPIES TO: Donnie Phillips ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Ran Review UNIVERSAL Dat Project No.: 0110.1800758.0000 Date Typed: April 15, 201903ENGINEERINGSCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date Type of Report 9443159-1 03/14/2019 Grout Prism Test Specimens Report 9446907-1 04/04/2019 4• x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9446907-2 04/04/2019 4" x 8• Cylinder Test Specimens Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (4) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 FHf se Fred Schmalzer 38 8 1 2019. 04.17 TAB IF: R0R10AO` 13:33:03-04'00' IONXV Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCESEDConsultantsIn: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9443159-1 CT 031419 WorkorderNo.: 9443159 Lab No.: 19N294-C Date 1 st Issue: March 22, 2019 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 _ Structural Element: Shear Wall Sample Location: Building D (Premit Number 17-1583) - Sampled at Second Lift NE Corner of Elevator Pit __ J Set# 1 of 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Fernando Montalvo On 03/14/2019 At Lab On or Before: 03/18/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: E.W Young Construction Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 3.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 3.00 cu yds. I Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 3.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 273 Time Batched: 9:06 AM i Ticket No.: 1850437 Time Sampled: 10:30 AM Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: NIS Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 9.00 inches I Ambient Temp: 73 °F I Concrete Temp: 81 OF Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (lbs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 03/21/2019 7 3.31 3.34 3.33 11.06 24.880 2,250 2 04/11/2019 28 3.33 3.31 3.32 11.02 42,305 3.839 3 04111 /2019 28 1 3.30 3.32 1 3.31 1 10.96 42,855 1 3,910 4 04/11/2019 28 1 - 1 3.31 3.35 1 3.33 1 11.09 44,130 1 3,979 3,910 Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note iTest Results represent the Structural Element specified onl I I If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universars reports Is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except In lull, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL1ENGINEERINGSCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection3BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9446907-1 CT 040419 WorkorderNo.: 9446907 Lab No.: 19N859-C Date 1 st Issue: April 12, 2019 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade I Sample Location: Building Pad F (Permit Number 17-1585) - Sampled at 15 Ft N 10 Ft W on the NW Comer Of Pad Set# 1 of 2 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck ISample By: Fernando Montalvo On 04/04/2019 At Lab On or Before: 04/05/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: E.W Young Subcontractor: Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Truck No.: 287 Ticket No.: 1850967 Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: Nis Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Water Added at Site: N/A Time Batched: 6:39 AM Time Sampled: 7:10 AM Weather Condition: Partly Cl Field Test Results Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Cumulative Quantity: 250.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 280.00 cu yds. Air Content: N/A Slump: 6.50 inches Ambient Temp: 61 OF I Concrete Temp: 77 OF Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 04/11/2019 7 5 4.01 4.01 4.01 12.63 28,425 2,250 2 05/02/2019 28 3 05/02/2019 1 28 1- 4 05/02/2019 28 1- 5'H• 05/02/2019 28 1- Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D•- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified onl I l an alr test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universars clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universars reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the w itten approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 Project No: UNIVERSAL ReportNo.: 944690772 CT 040419 ED ENGINEERING SCIENCES WorkoNoLabrNo.: 19N860-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Date 1st Issue: April 12, 2019 Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 1 Structural Element: Slab on Grade r , Sample Location: Building Pad F (Permit Number 17-1585) - Sampled at 15 Ft S 10 Ft W on the SW Corner Of Pad Set# 2 of 2 Isample From: Concrete Truck Isample By: Fernando Montalvo On 04/04/2019 lAt Lab On or Before: 04/05/2019 General Information Specified Strength I Sampling Times Placement Information i General Contractor: E.W Young Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 260.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 280.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 607 Ticket No.: 1850968 Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: NIS Time Batched: 6:49 AM Time Sampled: 7:45 AM Weather Condition: Partly Cl Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 6.25 inches Ambient Temp: 61 OF I Concrete Temp: 79 °F Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen. 1 in) Actual Dimen. 2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area ( in') Max Compressive Load ( Ibs) Test Compressive Strength( psi) Average psi) 1 04/11/2019 7 5 4.03 4.01 4.02 12.69 28,050 2,210 2 05/02/2019 28 3 05/02/2019 28 4 05/02/2019 28 5' H' 05/02/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder _ D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable : E'- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified and I If an alr test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C39 To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as conridential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universers reports Is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 E9UNIVERSAL Date Typed: No.: April 18 0Z07588.0000 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date I Type of Report 9444015-1 03/20/2019 1 Grout Prism Test Specimens Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (1) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 G£NgE .,P. Fred Schmalzer 2019.04.25 TATE F 13:49:03-04'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verired on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9444015-1 CT 032019 WorkorderNo.: 9444015 Lab No.: 19N432-C Date 1st Issue: March 28, 2019 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 8, West 1 st Street,_ Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771- Structural Element: Shear Wall _.._+ ~_ -. --_ . - Y~ . Y~ •_-.Yl. • _ . Sample Location: Building D (Permit Number 17-1583) - Sampled at 3rd Lift SW Comer of Elevator Pit _ J ISet# 1 of 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck - _Sample By: Fernando Montalvo On 03/20/2019 At Lab On or Before: 3/22/20197 General Information General Contractor: E.W. Young Construction Subcontractor: Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Tuck No.: 273 - r Ticket No.: 1850559 Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: Ws Times Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Water Added at Site: N/A Time Batched: 12:21 PM Time Sampled: 1:22 PM Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Placement Information a Truck Load: 3.00 cu yds. Cumulative Quantity: 3.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 3.00 cu yds. Air Content: N/A Slump: 8.75 inches Amblent Temp: 69 °F I Concrete Temp: 79 °F Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (lbs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 03/27/2019 7 3.32 3.36 3.34 11.16 25.960 2,330 2 04/17/2019 28 3.35 3.33 3.34 11.16 31,055 2,783 3 04/17/2019 28 3.36 1 3.32 3.34 1 11.16 1 32,190 1 2.884 4 04/17/2019 28 3.34 1 3.30 1 3.32 1 11.02 1 33,430 1 3,034 2.900 Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified and I I If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019. Grout Boxes were used To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential properly of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universals reports Is reserved pending our written approval. This report she# not be reproduced, except in fud, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 3 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No.: 0110.1800758.0000 Date Typed: Apri122, 2019 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date Type of Report 9444730-1 03/23/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9444730-2 03/23/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9444730-3 03/23/2019 4" x 8' Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9444730-4 03/23/2019 4' x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9444730-5 03/23/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9444730-6 03/23/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (6) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 se Fred Schmalzer TATE`F 2019.04.25 13:48:33-04'00' e„,nuitit . Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This Item has been electronically signed and seated by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and seated and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9444730-1 CT 032319 WorkorderNo.: 9444730 Lab No.: 19N518-C Date 1st Issue: April 01, 2019 Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Footing Sample Location: Building E, Permit #17-1584 - Sampled at SW Comer Set# 1 of 6 Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Cesar Contreras On 03/23/2019 At Lab On or Before: 03/25/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: E.W. Young Construction Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity. 10.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 280.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 650 Time Batched: 2:13 AM f Ticket No.: 1681566 Time Sampled: 3:15 AM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: Nis I Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy i Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 6.50 inches Ambient Temp: 52 °F I Concrete Temp: 65 °F Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 03/30/2019 7 5 4.00 4.02 4.01 12.63 32,300 2,560 2 04/20/2019 28 5 4.01 4.00 4.01 12.63 53,705 4,252 3 04/20/2019 1 28 1 5 1 4.01 1 4.01 1 4.01 1 12.63 1 52.905 4,189 4 04/20/2019 28 1 5 1 4.02 1 4.00 4.01 1 12.63 1 52,365 4,146 4.200 5'H' 04/20/2019 28 1 - I - I - I - I - Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified onl I I If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universals reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shad not be reproduced, except In full, without the written approval of universal Engineering Sciences. I of I Revised May 2018 000UNIVERSALProjectNo: 94447 0-2 CT.0323ReportNo.: 9444730-2 CT 032319 ENGINEERING SCIENCES worko abNo.: 119N519-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Date 1st Issue: April 01, 2019 Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford,_ Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade Sample Location: Building E, Permit #17-1584 -.Sampled at IV S/ 12' W from NE Comer of Slab Set# 2 of 6 Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Cesar Contreras On 03/23/2019 At Lab On or Before: 03/25/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information _ General Contractor: E.W. Young Construction Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 70.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A i Total Placement for the Day: 280.00 cu t yds. Truck No.: 208 Time Batched: 3:08 AM Ticket No.: 1681572 Time Sampled: 4:15 AM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: NIS Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 6.00 inches Ambient Temp: 53 OF I Concrete Temp: 69 OF Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 03/30/2019 7 5 4.00 4.01 4.01 12.63 34,945 2,770 2 04/20/2019 28 5 4.02 4.00 4.01 12.63 58,475 4,630 3 04/20/2019 28 1 5 1 4.01 4.00 4.01 1 12.63 1 58,155 4,605 4 04/20/2019 28 1 5 1 4.02 4.00 1 4.01 1 12.63 56,380 4,464 4,570 5'H' 04/20/2019 28 1 - I - I - I - Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = O'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable : E-- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified onl I Tif an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts tram or regarding Universars reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, witrout the written approval of Universal Engineering sciences. 1 of 11 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9444730-3 CT 032319 WorkorderNo.: 9444730 Lab No.: 19N520-C Date 1st Issue: April 01, 2019 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade Sample Location: Building E, Permit #17-1584 - Sampled at 85' S/ 30' W from NE Comer of Slab Set# 3 of 6 Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Cesar Contreras On 03/23/2019 At Lab On or Before: 03/25/2019 General Information _ _ Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: E.W. Young Construction Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 daysT Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days i Cumulative Quantity: 110.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 280.00 cu t yds. Truck No.: 604 Time Batched: 3:42 AM Ticket No.: 1457831 Time Sampled: 4:45 AM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: Nis Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 6.25 inches I Ambient Temp: 52 °F I Concrete Temp: 65 OF Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 03/30/2019 7 5 4.01 4.03 4.02 12.69 37,365 2,940 2 04/20/2019 28 5 4.02 4.01 4.02 12.69 54,785 4,316 3 04/20/2019 28 5 4.01 4.03 1 4.02 1 12.69 56,785 4,474 4 04/20/2019 28 5 4.03 4.01 4.02 12.69 55,165 4,346 4.380 5'H' 04/20/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H•- Hold Cylinder = D-- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified and I I H an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure n Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protecdon to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts horn or regarding Universars reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except In full, without the wAtten approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9444730-4 CT 032319 WorkorderNo.: 9444730 Lab No.: 19N521-C Date 1st Issue: April 01, 2019 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 StructuralElement: Slab onGrade Sample Location: Building E,_Pe_rmit #17-1584 - Sampled at 40' S/ 65' W from NE Comer of Slab Set# 4 of 6 Sample From: Concrete Truck _ ^ ` Sample By: Cesar Contreras On 03/23/2019 At Lab On or Before: Tk5T264 General Information _ Specified Strength / Sampling Times _ Placement Information Truck Load: 10.00 cu GeneralContractor: E.W. Young Construction Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days I yds — Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days I Cumulative Quantity: 180.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 280.00 cu i yds. Truck No.: 618 Time Batched: 5:00 AM I l Ticket No.: 1457837 Time Sampled: 5:45 AM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: Nis Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 7.00 inches Ambient Temp: 53 OF I Concrete Temp: 65 °F Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen. 1 in) Actual Dimen. 2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area ( in') Max Compressive Load ( lbs) Test Compressive Strength( psi) Average psi) 1 03/30/2019 7 5 4.01 4.02 4.02 12.69 30,705 2,420 2 04/20/2019 28 5 4.03 4.01 4.02 12.69 52,715 4,153 3 04/20/2019 28 1 5 1 4.01 4.03 1 4.02 1 12.69 1 50.610 3,987 4 04/20/2019 28 1 5 1 4.02 1 4.02 J 4.02 1 12.69 1 50,460 3,976 4.040 5' H' 04/20/2019 28 1 - I - I - I - I - I - Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder : D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified onl I I If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Unlversars reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 Project No: 0110.1800758.0000UNIVERSALReportNo.: 9444730 5 CT 032319 ED ENGINEERING SCIENCES 444730WorkoLab rNo.:19N522-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Date 1st Issue: April 01, 2019 Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade i Sample Location: Building E, Permit #17-1584 - Sampled at 60' S/ 155' W from NE Corner of Slab Set# 5 of 6 Sample From Concrete Truck_ Sample By: Cesar Contreras On 03/23/2019 JAtt Lab On or Before: 03/25/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: E.W. Young Construction _T Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. f Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days j Cumulative Quantity: 210.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A I Total Placement for the Day: 280.00 cu I yds. Truck No.: 604 Time Batched: 5:32 AM Ticket No.: 1457840 Time Sampled: 6:15 AM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: N/S Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 6.75 inches I Ambient Temp: 53 OF I Concrete Temp: 67 OF Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen. 1 in) Actual Dimen. 2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test X- Sect. Area ( in') Max Compressive Load ( Ibs) Test Compressive Strength( psi) Average psi) 1 03/30/2019 7 5 4.01 4.02 4.02 12.69 30,935 2,440 2 04/20/2019 28 5 4.03 4.01 4.02 12.69 49,420 3,894 3 04/20/2019 28 5 1 4.02 4.01 1 4.02 12.69 1 50,665 3,992 4 04/20/2019 28 1 5 1 4.02 4.02 1 4.02 12.69 49,395 3,892 3,930 5' H' 04/20/2019 28 1 - I - I - J - Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H-- Hold Cylinder = D'- Detective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified onl I I If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universers clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universars reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 000UNIVERSALProjectNo: 94447 0-6 CT.0323ReportNo.: 9444730-6 CT 032319 ENGINEERING SCIENCES workorderNoabNo.: 119N523-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Date 1st Issue: April 01, 2019 Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection EaBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Walk way inside pad Sample Location: Building E, Permit #17-1584 - Sampled at 91' W/ 35' S from NE Comer Set# 6 of 6 Sample From: Concrete Truck YSample By: Cesar Contreras On 03/23/2019 , At Lab On or Before: 03/25/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: E.W. Young Construction Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 260.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 280.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 606 Time Batched: 7:43 AM Ticket No.: 1850647 ! Time Sampled: 8:30 AM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: N/S j Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 5.75 inches I Ambient Temp: 54 °F I Concrete Temp: 69 °F Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen. 1 in) Actual Dimen. 2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area ( in') Max Compressive Load ( Ibs) Test Compressive Strength( psi) Average psi) 1 03/30/2019 7 5 4.01 4.02 4.02 12.69 35,045 2.760 2 04/20/2019 28 5 4.01 4.03. 4.02 12.69 53,255 4,196 3 04/20/2019 28 5 4.01 4.01 1 4.01 1 12.63 48,920 3.874 4 04/20/2019 28 5 4.00 4.02 1 4.01 1 12.63 52,560 4,162 4.080 5' H' 04/20/2019 28 I - I - Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified onl I I If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Pub/k and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and euthorizatton for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Unhrersars reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in fud, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 E9UNIVERSAL Da a Typedt No.: April 2302019.0000 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date Type of Report 9444879-1 03/25/2019 1 Grout Prism Test Specimens Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (1) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 I It III 111"i j.SCHMA r44•JGENBr...;Fred Schmalzer Pse = , 2019.04.25 TWE F R°" 13:48:17-04'00' i ONA Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer,. P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9444879-1 CT 032519 WorkorderNo.: 9444879 Lab No.: 19N559-C Date 1 st Issue: April 02, 2019 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Cell Fill Sample Location: Elevator Walls - Sampled at Elevator D_Final Top 2' lift Set# 1 of 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck - _ Sample By_ Victor Martinez On 03/25/2019 At Lab On or Before: 03/26/2019 , General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Information_ General Contractor: Lee Crest w + _ Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Placement Truck Load: 3.00 cu yds.1 Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 3.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Y` Water Added at Site. N/A _ ! Total Placement for the Day: 3.00 cu yds. 1 Truck No.: 273 Time Batched: 12:25 PM I Ticket No.: 1850678 Time Sampled: 1:29 PM Mix Design: 3055000 Admixture: WS Weather Condition Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 10.00 inches Ambient Temp: 79 OF I Concrete Temp: 86 °F Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psl) Average psi) 1 04/01/2019 7 3.50 3.60 3.55 12.60 27.890 2,210 2 04/22/2019 28 3.49 3.56 3.53 12.42 38,645 3,112 3 04/22/2019 28 3.52 1 3.58 3.55 12.60 38,665 3,069 4 04/22/2019 28 1 3.54 1 3.58 3.56 12.67 40,395 3,188 3,120 Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified onl I I if an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universers reports Is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except In full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1011 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL DES Project No.: , 0758.0000 April 2DateTyped: April 92019 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing , Threshold Inspection E!3 Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date I Type of Report 9445564- 1 03/29/2019 1 Grout Prism Test Specimens Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments ( 1) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 0. SCH Fred Schmalzer 38 6 - 2019.04.30 TATE F 13: 24:39-04'00' ONV `p Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be veriFed on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universals clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 r- Structural Element: Cell Fill Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9445564-1 CT 032919 WorkorderNo.: 9445564 Lab No.: 19N677-C Date 1st Issue: April 08, 2019 Sample Location: Building D - Sampled at Elevator Pit Elev. 46' to 50' J ISet# 1 of 1 I Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Jean Cartagena On 03/29/2019 At Lab On or Before: 04/02/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: Willscot Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 3.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: E.W. Young Construction Inc. Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 3.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 3.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 440 Time Batched: 2:29 PM Ticket No.: 1458083 Time Sampled: 3:40 PM Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: Nis Weather Condition: Sunny Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 8.00 inches I Ambient Temp: 78 °F I Concrete Temp: 79 OF Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimon. in) Test X-Sect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 04/05/2019 7 3.27 3.29 3.28 10.76 21,355 1,990 2 04/26/2019 28 3.30 3.28 3.29 10.82 33,930 3,136 3 04/26/2019 28 3.32 3.29 3.31 1 10.92 34,285 3,140 4 04/26/2019 28 3.31 3.30 1 3.31 1 10.92 33,945 3,109 3.130 Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified onl I I If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019. Grout Boxes were used To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universals reports is reserved pending our written appmvel. This report shall not be reproduced, except in lull, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No.: 0110.1800758.0000 Date Typed: April 30, 2019 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date IType of Report 9451084-1 04/22/2019 Grout Prism Test Specimens Report 9451086-1 04/22/2019 Grout Prism Test Specimens Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (2) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 CEN3g •c<'Fred Schmalzer 38 8 - 2019.05.01 R°°A 13:13:01-04'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL Project No: 945101800758.0000 422ReportNo.: 9451084-1 CT 042219 ENGINEERING SCIENCES WorkoNoLabrNo.: 1190 68-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Date 1 st Issue: April 30, 2019 Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Cell Fill Sample Location: Elevator Pit Premit Number 17-1584 - Sampled at 1ST Lift on the NW Coner of pit Set# 1 of 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Fernando Montalvo On 04/22/2019 At Lab On or Before: 04/23/2H General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: E.W YOUNG Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 6.00 cu yds. CONSTRUCTION Subcontractor: Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Truck No.: 648 Ticket No.: 1851425 Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: N/S Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Water Added at Site: N/A Time Batched: 2:10 PM Time Sampled: 3:05 PM Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Cumulative Quantity: 6.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 6.00 cu yds. Air Content: N/A Slump: 9.00 inches I Ambient Temp: 81 °F I Concrete Temp: 84 °F unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen. 1 in) Actual Dimen. 2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area ( in') Max Compressive Load ( Ibs) Test Compressive Strength( psi) Average psi) 1 04/29/2019 7 3.34 3.40 3.37 11.36 21,825 1,920 2 05/20/2019 28 3 05/20/2019 28 4 05/20/2019 28 Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified ont I I If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL Project No: 945100110.1800758.0000 422ReportNo.: 9451086-1 CT 042219 9451086 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Work Lab rNo.: 1190369-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Date 1st Issue: April 30, 2019 Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionE0BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Cell Fill Sample Location: Elevator Pit Premit Number 17-1585 - Sampled at Second Lift on SE Comer of the Elevator Pit 1 Set# 1 of 1 I Sample From: Concrete Truck I Sample By: Fernando Montalvo On 04/22/2019 1 At Lab On or Before: 04/23/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: E.W. YOUNG Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 6.00 cu yds. CONSTRUCTION Subcontractor: j Truck No.: 646 Ticket No.: 1851425 1 Mix Design: 30550000 Concrete Admixture: N/S Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Water Added at Site: N/A Time Batched: 2:10 PM Time Sampled: 3:30 PM Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Cumulative Quantity: 6.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 6.00 cu yds. Air Content: N/A Slump: 9.00 inches I Ambient Temp: 81 °F I Concrete Temp: 84 eF Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 04/29/2019 7 3.30 3.36 3.33 11.09 25.995 2,340 2 05/20/2019 28 3 05/20/2019 28 4 05/20/2019 28 Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note I Test Results represent the Structural Element specified onl B an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Unh srsars reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without Me written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of i Revised May 2018 i UNIVERSAL tuENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 1 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 1 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9446907-2 CT 040419 Workorde rNo.: 9446907 Lab No.: 19N860-C Date 1 st Issue: April 12, 2019 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade Sample Location: Building Pad F_ (Permit Number 17-1585)y Sampled at 15 FtrS 10 Ft W on the SW Corner Of Pad Set# 2 of 2 Sample From: Concrete Truck ~ Sample By: Fernando Montalvo On 04/04/2019 - At Lab On or Before 04/05/2019 General Information _ _ _ Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: E.W Young Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 260.00 cu yds. i Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site- N/A Total Placement for the Day: 280.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 607 Time Batched: 6:49 AM Ticket No.: 1850968 Time Sampled: 7:45 AM i Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: NIS Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results 1 Air Content: N/A Slump: 6.25 inches Ambient Temp: 61 °F Concrete Temp: 79 °F Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 04/11/2019 7 5 4.03 4.01 4.02 12.69 28,050 2,210 2 05/02/2019 28 5 4.02 4.00 4.01 12.63 49,885 3,950 3 05/02/2019 28 1 5 1 4.01 4.01 4.01 1. 12.63 48,625 3,850 4 05/02/2019 28 1 5 1 4.02 4.00 4.01 11 12.63 51,675 4,092 3,960I5'H' 05/02/2019 28 1 - I - 11 - Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D-- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E-- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified onl If an air test'was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 - Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 - Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No.: 0110.1800758.0000 Date Typed: May 06, 2019 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date Type of Report 9447158-1 04/05/2019 Grout Prism Test Specimens Report 9451977-1 04/26/2019 Grout Prism Test Specimens Report 9451983-1 04/26/2019 Grout Prism Test Specimens Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (3) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 SCHMq„` Fred Schmalzer 38 8 t- 2019.05.07 TAM F ON13 : 37.08-04'00' pinSIA-.` Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This Item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies., For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 Project No: 0 58.0000UNIVERSALReportNo.: 94471 t8-1 CT 040519 ENGINEERING SCIENCES worko abNo.: 94471519N9178C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Date 1 st Issue: April 15, 2019 Geophysical Services a Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Cell Fill Sample Location: BUILDING (E) -Sampled at ELEVATOR PIT (ELV. 0" TO 10'6") _ _ Setif 1 of ample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Jose Rosario, Vega On 04/05/2019 « IAt Lab On or Before: 04/10/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information _ General Contractor: WILLSCOT Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days - ,Truck Load: 3.00 cu yds. . Subcontractor: E.W. YOUNG Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days i Cumulative Quantity: 3.00 cu yds. CONSTRUCTION, INC i Supplier Maschmeyer Concrete Water_ Added at Site: N/A .,_ ,+ Total Placement for the Day: 3.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 4403 Time Batched: 3:01 PM I i Ticket No.: 1458262 Time Sampled: 4:00 PM Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: N/S Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 5.50 inches I Ambient Temp: 82 OF I Concrete Temp: 88 °F Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen. 1 in) Actual Dimen. 2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area ( in') Max Compressive Load ( lbs) Test Compressive Strength( psi) Average psi) 1 04/12/2019 7 3.31 3.34 3.33 11.06 17,515 1,580 2 05/03/2019 28 3.32 3.36 3.34 11.16 34,270 3,071 3 05/03/2019 28 3.34 3.32 1 3.33 1 11.09 35,890 3,236 4 05/03/2019 28 3.34 3.36 1 3.35 1 11.22 35,605 3,173 3,160 Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified ant If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Cell Fill Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9451977-1 CT 042619 WorkorderNo.: 9451977 Lab No.: 190546-C Date 1st Issue: May 06, 2019 Sample Location: Elevator - Permit number 17-1585 - Sampled at NE Comer Of Elevator pit 2nd lift Set# 1 of 11JSamp1e From Concrete Truck Sample By: Fernando Montalvo On 04/26/2019 At Lab On or Before: 04/30/2019 General Information _ Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: E.Y. Young Construction Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days ~Truck Load: 6.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days ; Cumulative Quantity: 6.00 cu yds. Supplier: M_aschmeyer_Con_crete _ Water Added at Site: N/A _ = Total Placement for the Day: 6.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 653 — - Time Batched: 12:50 PM Ticket No.: 1458820 Time Sampled: 1:10 PM Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: N/S Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 9.00 inches I Ambient Temp: 81 °F I Concrete Temp: 85 °F Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimon. in) Test XSect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 05/03/2019 7 3.34 3.30 3.32 11.02 18,250 1,660 2 05/24/2019 28 3 05/24/2019 28 4 05/24/2019 28 Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified and If an air test was not completed, that deviates horn C31 procedure Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements. conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universars reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced. except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9451983-1 CT 042619 WorkorderNo.: 9451983 Lab No.: 190547-C Date 1 st Issue: May 06, 2019 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Cell Fill Sample Location: Elevator - Permit number 17-1584 - Sampled at SW Corner of Elevator pit 3rd Lift Set# 1 of 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Fernando Montalvo On 04/26/2019 JAt Lab On or Before: 04/30/2019 General Information _ Specified Strength / Sampling Times_ _ _Placement Infor_matio_n General Contractor: E.W. Young Construction Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 6.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 6.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A _ _ _ Total Placement for the Day: 6.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 653 r Time Batched: 12:10 PM i Ticket No.: 1458820 Time Sampled: 2:00 FM Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: Nis Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy I Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 9.00 inches I Ambient Temp: 82 °F I Concrete Temp: 85 OF Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 05/03/2019 7 3.37 3.33 3.35 11.22 19,835 1.770 2 05/24/2019 28 3 05/24/2019 28 4 05/24/2019 28 Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified and If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, condusions or extracts from or regarding Universals reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No.: 0110.1800758.0000 Date Typed: May 03, 2019 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (LIES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date IType of Report 9446907-1 04/04/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report 9446907-2 04/04/2019 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (2) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 SCH Fred Schmalzerra : vC F •'I"s 33 8 - + 2019.05.07 TATE F 13:39:30-04'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This Item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universals clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 Project No: 0110.18758.0000UNIVERSALReportNo.: 944690700 CT 040419 WorkorderNo.: 9446907 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Lab No.: 1SN859-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Date 1 st Issue: April 12, 2019 Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade i Sample_ Location: Building Pad_ F (Permit Number 17-1585) - Sampled at 15 Ft N 10 Ft W on the NW Corner Of Pad Set# 1 of 2 Samm pleFrom: Concrete Truck ' r : Sample By: Fernando Montalvo On 04/04/2019 At Lab On or Before: 04/05/2019 General Information _ _ _ Specified Strength I_Sampling _Times _ _ Placement Information General Contractor E.W Young _ r Specified Strength -3000 psi @ 28 days + Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. - - Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days ' Cumulative Quantity: 250.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 280.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 287 ^ - Time Batched: 6:39 AM T f Ticket No.: 1850967 Time Sampled: 7:10 AM i I Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: N/S — Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 6.50 inches Ambient Temp: 61 -F I Concrete Temp: 77 °F Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen. l in) Actual Dimen. 2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area ( in') Max Compressive Load ( Ibs) Test Compressive Strength( psi) Average psi) 1 04/11/2019 7 5 4.01 4.01 4.01 12.63 28,425 2,250 2 05/02/2019 28 5 4.02 4.01 4.02 12.69 49,850 3,928 3 05/02/2019 28 1 5 1 3.99 1 3.98 1 3.99 1 12.50 1 46,205 3,695 4 05/02/2019 28 3 4.00 4.00 4.00 12.57 47,430 3,774 3,800 5- 1-1- 05/02/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, 8 is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H•- Hold Cylinder = O'- Defective Cylinder. Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified onl I I If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Sampled per ASTM C-172 - Yes Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes Molded per C-31 -Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 -Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universals: reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of l Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL Wo korderNo.: 9457936 0758.0000 ReportNo.: 9457936-1 CT 052119 ENGINEERING SCIENCES L Issue: MayDate1stIssue: May 30, 2019 Geotechnicol Engineering I Facilities Consulting I Environmental ServicesEConstructionMaterialsTestingandInspectionIBuildingCodeCompliance 3632 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testi g 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100. Tampa, FL U.S 9 Wes 1st Street. Sanford, Seminole • ounry, FL 32771 33607 L Structural Element: Cell Fill ~ Sample Location: Elevator Pit at Building F (Permit Number 17-1586) - Sampled at NE comer of Elevator Pit 5th lift Sew of 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck sample By: Jose Rodriguez On 05/21/2019 At Lab On or Before: 05/23/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: E.W. Young Construction Inc. Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 2.00 cu yds7-7Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 2.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: 10 gals Total Placement for the Day: 2.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 643 Time Batched: 12:38 PM Ticket No.: 1459494 Time Sampled: 1:37 PM Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: N/S Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 8.75 inches Ambient Temp: 89 °F I Concrete Temp: 91 °F Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.lI (in) Actual Dlmen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test X-Sect. Area (in')- Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psl) Average psi) Lab Tech 1'G' 05/29/2019 8 3.39 3.46 3.43 11.73 16.470 1,400 AJA 2-G- 06/18/2019 28 3.38 3.40 3.39 11.49 29,870 2,600 AJA 3'G' 06/18/2019 28 3.44 1 3.37 1 3.41 1 11.59 1 28,745 1 2,480 1 - AJA 4-G- 06/18/2019 28 3.36 1 3.41 1 3.39 1 11.46 1 27.445 1 2.395 1 2,490 AJA Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder 'D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average = G'- Good Condition Note Test Resutts represent the Structural Element specified only If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Note Test In compliance with approved plans and specifications Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used Lab Technicians AJA Angel Ayala To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential properly of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, condusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our wAlten approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revlsed March 2019 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG ermitting Agency: City of Sanford Project Name: Lake Monroe Apartments 1UPdate Period: 6/17/19-6/23/19 Mention: Mr. Dave Aldrich Project Address: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard ermit No.: See Below) City/State/Zip: Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1SBO Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Buildin D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 SIL No. Date SUM No Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location Description S.I. Engineer of Record Response 2S.1. Date Closed SUM No. 1 5/24119 FJS) Rev. 6111119 FJS) 20 Rev.- 22 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Northeast Comer of Elevator Pit, 2n0 Lift The 2"ay average compressive strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Report 9451977-1, 190546, cast on 4126/2019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator fill FJS Resolved per correspondence from John M. Bailes, P.E. with Advanced Structural Design on 5/12119. FJS 6112119 22 cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mnr. 2 6/12/19 22 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Shaft, Bldg. F, 3rd Lift, South Wall The 28-day average compressive strength of 2.640 psi did not meet the FJS specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Report 9456604-1, 190997, cast on 5/14/2019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix 3 6/26/19 24 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Pit, Bldg. F, Northeast Comer. 501 Lift The 28-day average compressive strength of 2,490 psi did not meet the FJS specified strength of 3,000 psi (UES Report 9457936-1, 19P148, cast on 5/2112019). The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. 2The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Does #1632149 3This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Inspection • Plan Review • Building Code Administration May 2, 2019 City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhotse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 UES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 15 Dear Mr. Aldrich: LOCATIONS: Atlanta Daytona Beach Fort Myers Fort Pierce Gainesville Jacksonville Miami Ocala Orlando (Headquarters) Palm Coast Panama City Pensacola Rockledge Sarasota St. Petersburg Tampa Tifton West Palm Beach As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of April 15, 2019 through April 21, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of April 15, 2019 through April 21, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be vedrred on any electronic copies. FJS/dkn City of Sanford Aldrich, Dave City of Sanford Antonini, Usa The Spanos Corporation Woods, Jim The Spanos Corporation Gllllesple, Hardy The Spans Corporation Jensen, Chuck The Spanos Corporation Homea, Kent CPH, Inc. (Cote) Boyles, trene Lee crest Lee Crest Kephart Garland, Jesse Kephart campbdl, Paul Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 podogCH nibry`'i Fred Schmalzer aNaF •'•,,.P 4 . a 2019.05.03 12:26:48-04'00' dave.aldrkfi0sanfordfl.9ov Usa.AntonlnloSantoMf I.gov woodsoa9spanos.aom hgUlesple"spans.com c)ensen0agspar os.eom IboYlesl p— o.leegroup32009mall.corn esseg®kepartcom paukk0kephart. com Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. • Orlando, FI 32811 • (407) 423-0504 • (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO.15 Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: May 2, 2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Gubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. N Added This Summary Period: 0 Resoled This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: 0 SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): 1 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: 3 to 3 I^D'tAl''LYrREPO;rRTtS: Daily Report No. Inspection Date Inspector(s) Reports No. of Pages Page No(s). 31 4/16/2019 Antonio Ramirez, Jr. 1 4 to 4 Total Number of Pages This Summary: For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG Permitting Agency: City of Sanford Project Name: Lake Monroe Apartments pdate Period: 4/15119-4/21/19 Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich Project Address: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard Permit No.: See Below) City/State/Zip: Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 1Proiect No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-IS83 Building F 17-1585 SIL No. Date SUM No. Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location Description IS.I. Engineer of Record Response 2 S.I. Date Closed SUM No. The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. 2The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Does #1632149 3This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 MASONRY THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 31 0/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 4/16/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9450170-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1584 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: CMU Walls Reinforcement LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building E, 401 Marbella Lane / Elevator Shaft ELEVATION: Level 2 Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings vN N Per Project Plans, Specifications and Approved RFI's. t E a p 8 Z Notesv Masonry iAPPROVED GROUT MIX DESIGN O El- 7 _- REBAR CLEARANCE REBAR CONDITION 1 ' 0 REBAR DOWEL PROTRUSION O _ ® REBAR NUMBER/QUANTITY _ _ REBAR SIZE/DIAMETER/TYPE — O t Ea a 03 REBAR FASTENING REBAR SPACING - - -_..__ . _..- -.-- CI (0 ; O IO .—_— .. _ .- _. REBAR LAP SPLICES^ O O ® BLOCK CELL CLEANLINESS BLOCK CLEAN_OUTS M O ® O - BLOCK CONDITION O 1 0 ____ BLOCK HEAD 8 BED JOINTS r 1 1 0 1 0 1 BLOCK PLACEMENT 1 0 ! 0 + y BLOCK PLUMBNESS O I ' 0 '• O rBLOCK REINFORCEMENT BLOCK SIZE/TYPE/GRADE --- -' - 1 -- 0 I 1 O 10.840 MORTAR JOINT REINFORCEMENT __ -- OO (a i O EMBEDDED ITEMS 0 1 r0 OJOINTLOCATIONS GROUT OHO ® o O 0AGEO GROUT CONSOLIDATION O ' O f- ' la rGROUT SLUMP~- - 1 "0 ; Plans References & RFI's Date(s) Pour Information: N/A Cubic Yards of Mix Design No. n/a N/A psi concrete placed. N/A set(s) of N/A Grout Prisms Slump (inches) = n/a (Slump specifications = N/A to N/A inches). 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Antonio Ramirez UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCESEDFIELDCOPIESTO • Donnie Phillips Consultants ln.Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophyskal Services . Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Plan Review UNIVERSAL DES Project No.: 0110.1800758.0000 MayDateTyped: May 09, 2019 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection03BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date I Type of Report 9452610-1 04/30/2019 1 Grout Prism Test Specimens Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (1) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 j SCHMq%;. Fred Schmalzer 313 e - 2019.05.10 TATE F Ya 06:33:21-04'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This Item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL Project No: 94520110.1800758.0000 430ReportNo.: 9452610-1 CT 043019 452610 ENGINEERING SCIENCES WorkorderNoLabNo.: 190639-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Date 1st Issue: May 08, 2019 Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection E9BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Cell Fill Sample Location: #17-1584 BLDG E ELEVATOR LEVEL 4 WALL LINTEAL - Sampled at WEST WALL Set# 1 of 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck ^ Sample By: Alonzo Albert On 04/30/2019 At Lab On or Before: 05/02/2019 General Information Specified Strength I Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: THE SPANOS Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 3.00 cu yds. CORPORATION I i Subcontractor: plier: Maschmeyer Concrete Truck No.: 215 Ticket No., 1458878 Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: WS Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Water Added at Site: N/A Time Batched: 9:11 AM Time Sampled: 10:30 AM Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Cumulative Quantity: 3.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 3.00 cu yds. Air Content: N/A Slump: 9.50 inches Ambient Temp: 78 °F I Concrete Temp: 85 OF Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen. t in) Actual Dimen. 2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. IArea (in') Max Compressive Load ( lbs) Test Compressive Strength( psi) Average psi) 1 05/07/2019 7 3.36 3.32 3.34 11.16 17,570 1,570 2 05/28/2019 28 3 05/28/2019- 4 05/28/2019 1 28 Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified and Han air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication or statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universars reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 UNIVERSAL DES Project No.: a,00758.0000 My 13DateTyped: May 132019 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection EEIBuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (LIES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date I Type of Report 9453328- 1 05/03/2019 1 Grout Prism Test Specimens Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments ( 1) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 0 SCHMgl se ,._ Fred Schmalzer 38 e 1- 2019.05.14 TATE R° i. 10:22:45-04'00' o„ SICNA. -`\ Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This Item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, end ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9453328-1 CT 050319 WorkorderNo.: 9453328 Lab No.: 190741-C Date 1 st Issue: May 13, 2019 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 _ Structural Element: Cell Fill Sample Location: Building E Elevator PitPernit number #17-1584 - Sampled at SE Comer Of Elevator Pit Building E level 5 Set# 1 of 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Fernando Montalvo On OS/03/2019 At Lab On or Before: 05/09/2019- General Information General Contractor: E.W. Young Construction Subcontractor: SUDDIIer: Maschmever Concrete Truck No.: 643 Ticket No.: 1459020 Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: N/A Times Placement Information Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi Q 28 days Water Added at Site: N/A Time Batched: 11:32 AM Time Sampled: 12:40 PM Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Truck Load: 2.00 cu yds. Cumulative Quantity: 2.00 cu yds. Total Placement for the Day: 2.00 cu yds. Air Content: N/A Stump: 9.00 inches Ambient Temp: 82 OF I Concrete Temp: 85 °F Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimon. in) Test XSect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(pst) Average psi) 1 05/10/2019 7 3.34 3.37 3.36 11.26 22.880 2,030 2 05/31 /2019 28 3 05/31 /2019 1 28 4 05/31 /2019 1 28 Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified onl I If an alr test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used To establish a mutual protecilon to Universers Giants, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts hom or regarding Unlversars reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shaft not be reproduced, except In full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 LOCATIONS: UNIVERSAL DaytonaBeachgoENGINEERINGSCIENCESFortMyers Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Fort Pierce Gainesville Geophysical Services • Construction Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Jacksonville Building Inspection • Plan Review - Building Code Administration Miami May 21, 2019 Ocala Orlando (Headquarters) City of Sanford Palm Coast PO Box 1788 Panama city Pensacola Sanford, Florida 32772 Rockledge Sarasota Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official St. Petersburg Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments Tifton 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 West Palm Beach Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 UES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 16 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of April 22, 2019 through April 28, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of April 22, 2019 through April 28, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be veered on any electronic copies. FJS/dkn City of Sanford Aldrich, Dave City of Sanford Antonini, Usa The Spanos Corporation Woods, Jim The Spans Corporation Gillespie, Hardy The Spans Corporation Jensen, Chuck The Spans Corporation Homes, Kent CPH, Inc. (Corporate) Boyles, Irene Lee Crest Lee crest Kephart Garland, Jesse Kephart Campbell, Paul Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 o ...... Fred Schmalzeroa"' SCHMq. s ENne '•.,,p" 2019.05.22 07:12:04-04'00' dave.aldrich®sanfordB.gov Usa.AntoninfOSanfordf I.gov jwoods@agspanos.com hgillespletiltagspanos.com clensen0a9spanos.eom thomea0agspanos.com lboyles*cphcorpeom p.leegroup3200gmail.com Jesseg0keptwrt.com pa"kepharLcom Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. • Orlando, FI 32811 • (407) 423-0504 • (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO.16 Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: May 21, 2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. LSPEAL INSECTION WO.W Added This Summary Period: 0 Resolved This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: 0 SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): 1 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: 3 to 3 BlAI' WOREPOR1S Daily Report No. Inspection Data Inspector(s) Reports No. of Pages Page No(s). 32 4/22/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 4 to 4 33 4/24/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 5 to 5 34 4/26/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 6 to 6 Total Number of Pages This Summary:[ 6 For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG SIL No. Date SUM No. Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location Description S.I. Engineer of Record Response S.I. Date Closed SUM No. IThe Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. 2The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Docs #1632149 This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily repbrt for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 MASONRY THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 32 (1/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 4/22/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9451105-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1585 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: City of Sanford FIELD CONTACT: Jim Woods CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: 813-288-0008 FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Wall, Lintel LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building F, 301 Marbella Lane -Elevator ELEVATION: Level 2 Ins ection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings cG7 N Per Project Plans, Specifications and Approved RFI's. w t E apC3Uz Notes Masonry APPROVED GROUT MIX DESIGN O O 0 REBAR CLEARANCE O 0 REBAR CONDITION 0 O REBAR DOWEL PROTRUSION O O 0 O REBAR NUMBER/QUANTITY O 0 REBAR SIZE/DIAMETER/TYPE O O 0 REBAR FASTENING O 0 REBAR SPACING O O 0 REBAR LAP SPLICES O 0 O BLOCK CELL CLEANLINESS O 0 O BLOCK CLEANOUTS O O 0 BLOCK CONDITION O O 0 O BLOCK HEAD & BED JOINTS 0 O BLOCK PLACEMENT O O 0 BLOCK PLUMBNESS O 0 O BLOCK REINFORCEMENT O O 0 BLOCK SIZErrYPE/GRADE 0 O MORTAR JOINT REINFORCEMENT O 0 EMBEDDED ITEMS O O 0 JOINT LOCATIONS O GROUT AGE O 0 GROUT CONSOLIDATION O O 0 GROUT SLUMP O O 0 Plans References & RFI's Date(s) Pour Information: N/A Cubic Yards of Mix Design No. N/A psi concrete placed. N/A set(s) of N/A Slump (inches) _ (Slump specifications = N/A to N/A inches). 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES 0 NO COMMENTS: UNIVERSALTHRESHOLDINSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw E] ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO T.Honea Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Erwironmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Wan Review WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 33 0 /1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 4/24/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9451596-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1581 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Sheathing LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building B. 701 Marbella Lane Floor ELEVATION: Level 1 Ins ection was Performed by: 0 Contract Drawings O Approved Shop Drawin s v m a a U 0 z Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. O O O 0 Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. O 0 Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O O O 0 Trusses inspected undamaged. O O O 0 Truss gusset plates undamaged. 0 Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. O 0 Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. O 0 Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. 0 Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. O O 0 Mechanical connections property installed. O O O 0 Mechanical connections properly nailed. O O O 0 Fastener used comply with structural drawings. 0 O Overbuilt areas property fastened. O O O 0 Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. 0 Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. O O O e Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O 0 Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O 0 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O 0 Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. 0 O Sheathing inspected undamaged. 0 O Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" dip. O 0 Sheathing edges properly blocked. O 0 Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. 0 CLP installed at specified locations. O O 0 CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. O 0 CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O 0 CLP diameter per approved drawings. O 0 Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. O 0 Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. O O 0 Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. O O 0 Top plate properly spliced. 0. 0 Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. 0 Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. 0 Headers strapped per structural drawings. 0 Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. 0 Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O 0 Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. 0 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES 0 NO COMMENTS: UNIVERSALTHRESHOLDINSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw a] ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO • Kent Honea Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review MASONRY THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 34 0/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 4/26/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9451979-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1584/1585 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: City of Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Wall, Lintel LOCATION/GRID LINES: 1) Building E. 401 Marbella Lane -Stair 2) Building F, 301 Marbella Lane -Elevator ELEVATION: 1) Level 3 2) Level 2 Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings O Approved Shop Drawings rn CL Per Project Plans, Specifications and Approved RFI's. m c E a o U U z Notes Masonry APPROVED GROUT MIX DESIGN e REBAR CLEARANCE O O 0 REBAR CONDITION O O 0 O REBAR DOWEL PROTRUSION O 0 O REBAR NUMBER/QUANTITY O 0 O REBAR SIZE/DIAMETER/TYPE O 0 O REBAR FASTENING O O 0 O REBAR SPACING O O 0 REBAR LAP SPLICES 0 O BLOCK CELL CLEANLINESS O O 0 BLOCK CLEANOUTS O O 0 O BLOCK CONDITION O 0 BLOCK HEAD & BED JOINTS O O 0 O BLOCK PLACEMENT O O 0 BLOCK PLUMBNESS O O 0 BLOCK REINFORCEMENT 0 O BLOCK SIZE/TYPE/GRADE O O 0 O MORTAR JOINT REINFORCEMENT 0 EMBEDDED ITEMS 0 O JOINT LOCATIONS O O O 0 GROUT AGE O O O 0 GROUT CONSOLIDATION O O O 0 GROUT SLUMP 0 Plans References & RFI's Date(s) Pour Information: N/A Cubic Yards of Mix Design No. N/A psi concrete placed. N/A set(s) of N/A Grout Prisms Slump (inches) _ (Slump specifications = N/A to N/A inches). 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES 0 NO COMMENTS: UNIVERSALTHRESHOLDINSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw E] ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO • Kent Honea Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review LOCATIONS: CATIONS: DaytooDaytona BeachEDENGINEERINGSCIENCESFortMyer Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Fort Pierce Gainesville Geophysical Services - Construction Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Jacksonville Building Inspection - Plan Review - Building Code Administration Miami May 21, 2019 Ocala Orlando (Headquarters) City of Sanford Palm Coon PO Box 1788 Panama city Pensacola Sanford, Florida 32772 Rockledge Sarasota Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official St. Petersburg Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments Tifton 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 West Palm Beach Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 UES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 17 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of April 29, 2019 through May 5, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of April 29, 2019 through May 5, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies o/ this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. FJS/dkn City of Sanford Aldrich, Dave City of Sanford Antonini, Usa The Spanos Corporation Woods, Jim The Spanos Corporation Gllesple, Hardy The Spares Corporation Jensen, (Tuck The Spanos Corporation Homea, Kent CPH, Inc. (Corporate) Boyles. Item Lee Crest Lee Crest Kephart Garland, Jesse Kephart Campbell, Paul Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 sCH Fred Schmalzer a.tsc •sp 2019.05.22 TATE - 1 07:12:24-04'00' daveaktAch@ ssantord114lov Usa.AntonlnloSanfordH.gov woods@agspanos.com hglilesple0agspanos.com c)ensen*agspanos.com thomea0agsparos.com 0oyles0cphoorp com foJeegrc up3200gmall.com esseg0kepharLcom pauicOkephart.com Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. - Orlando, FI 32811 - (407) 423-0504 - (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO.17 Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: May 21, 2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. SPECIAL IN_SP.ECtiT1—QN LOG . Added This Summary Period: 0 Resohed This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: 0 SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): 1 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: 3 to 3 1'D AI'L41f R" P RiTiS .i Daily Report No. Inspection Date Inspector(s) Reports No. of Pages Page No(s). 35 4/29/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 4 to 4 36 4/30/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 5 to 5 37 5/2/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 6 to 6 38 5/3/2019 Michael Felshaw 1 7 to 7 Total Number of Pages This Summary: For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG ermitting Agency: City of Sanford Project Name: Lake Monroe Apartments pdate Period: 4/29/19-5/5/19 ttention: Mr. Dave Aldrich Project Address: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard ermit No.: See Below) Ci /State2i : Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 lProject No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Building A/Clubhouse 17-158D Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Buildin B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 SIL No. Date SUM No Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location Description S.I. Engineer of Record Response S.I. Date Closed SUM No. The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. 2The Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Does #1632149 3This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 35 0/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 4/29/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9452206-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1582 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: Jim Woods CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: 813-288-0008 FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Sheathing LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building C, 601 Marbella Lane ELEVATION: Level 2 Inspection was Performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings Vm Q) w t n E Q a Z Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. O O 0 Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. O O O 0 Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O O 0 Trusses inspected undamaged. O 0 Truss gusset plates undamaged. O O 0 Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. O O 0 Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. O O O 0 Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. O 0 Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. O 0 Mechanical connections properly installed. O O 0 Mechanical connections properly nailed. O O O 0 Fastener used comply with structural drawings. O O 0 O Overbuilt areas properly fastened. O O 0 Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. O O O 0 Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. O O 0 Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O 0 Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O 0 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O 0 O Sheathing nailing type/pattern per structural drawing. 0 Sheathing inspected undamaged. O O 0 O Roof Sheathing installed w ih 0.125 inch gap and "H" clip. O 0 Sheathing edges properly blocked. O 0 Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. O O 0 CLP installed at specified locations. O 0 CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. O O 0 CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O 0 CLP diameter per approved drawings. O 0 Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. O 0 Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. O 0 Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. O O 0 Top plate properly spliced. O 0 Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. O O 0 Top Floor headers have proper size/bearing. O O O 0 Headers strapped per structural drawings. O O 0 Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. 0 Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O 0 Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. O O 0 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES 0 NO COMMENTS: UNIVERSALTHRESHOLDINSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw ED ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO: Kent Honea Consultantsln°GeotechnicalEngineering " Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services " Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration. compliance Inspection & Wan Review MASONRY THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 36 0/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 4/30/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9452543-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1584 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Wall, Lintel LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building E, 401 Marbella Lane -Elevator ELEVATION: Level 4 Inspection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings O Approved Shop Drawings Dm y Per Project Plans, Specifications and Approved RFI's. t E Q Z Notes Masonry APPROVED GROUT MIX DESIGN 0 REBAR CLEARANCE O 0 O REBAR CONDITION O 0 O REBAR DOWEL PROTRUSION 0 O REBAR NUMBER/QUANTITY O 0 O REBAR SIZE/DIAMETER/TYPE 0 REBAR FASTENING O 0 O REBAR SPACING 0 O REBAR LAP SPLICES O 0 O BLOCK CELL CLEANLINESS O O 0 BLOCK CLEANOUTS O 0 O BLOCK CONDITION 0 O BLOCK HEAD & BED JOINTS 0 0 0 0 BLOCK PLACEMENT O O 0 O BLOCK PLUMBNESS O O 0 BLOCK REINFORCEMENT 0 O BLOCK SIZE/TYPE/GRADE O O 0 O MORTAR JOINT REINFORCEMENT 0 O EMBEDDED ITEMS O O 0 JOINT LOCATIONS O 0 GROUT AGE O 0 O GROUT CONSOLIDATION O 0 GROUTSLUMP O O 0 Plans References & RFI's Date(s) Pour Information: 3.00 Cubic Yards of Mix Design No. 30550000 3000.00 psi concrete placed. 1.00 set(s) of 4.00 Grout Prisms Slump (inches) = 9.50 (Slump specifications = 8.00 to 11.00 inches). 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES 0 NO COMMENTS: UNIVERSALTHRESHOLDINSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw E13 ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO • Kent Honea Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Plan Review MASONRY THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 37 0/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE- 5/2/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9453109-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1584 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Wall, Lintel LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building E, 401 Marbella Lane -Elevator ELEVATION: Roof Ins ection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawings Approved Shop Drawings m N N Es Per Project Plans, Specifications and Approved RFI's. CL 9 E 0 3 ci z Notes Masonry APPROVED GROUT MIX DESIGN 0 REBAR CLEARANCE O ; O 0 REBAR CONDITION O O 0 O REBAR DOWEL PROTRUSION O : O i 0 REBAR NUMBER/QUANTITY O 0.0 O REBAR SIZE/DIAMETER/TYPE O 0-0; REBAR FASTENING O 0 REBAR SPACING 0 , REBAR LAP SPLICES O 0 0 O BLOCK CELL CLEANLINESS 0 ( F-- - - - - -- .. . -- . .- . - -- -- I BLOCK CLEANOUTS O j 0 i' BLOCK CONDITION 0 i BLOCK HEAD & BED JOINTS O • O I 0 0. i BLOCK PLACEMENT I-- - .i-r-... _____ . — 0, 0 : BLOCK PLUMBNESS I } O 0 BLOCK REINFORCEMENT i 0 1 O : BLOCK SIZE/TYPE/GRADE O • 0 10,1 I MORTAR JOINT REINFORCEMENT O • O ! 0 ' I EMBEDDED ITEMS 010. rJOINT LOCATIONS 10 1 0; 0 1 i GROUT AGE 1 0 1 0( 0 i 0' GROUT CONSOLIDATION O O , O , 0 GROUT SLUMP i O 0: 0 _ Plans References & RFI's Date(s) Pour Information: N/A Cubic Yards of Mix Design No. N/A psi concrete placed. N/A set(s) of N/A Grout Prisms Slump (inches) _ (Slump specifications = N/A to N/A inches). 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES 0 NO COMMENTS: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES113FIELDCOPIESTO • Kent Honea Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration. Compliance Inspection & Plan Review WOOD CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD INSPECTIONS 38 (1/1) PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 5/3/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9453330-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1580 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS & TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Sheathing LOCATIONIGRID LINES: Building A/Clubhouse, 800 Marbella Lane -Exterior Wall - Bottom Four (4) Feet ELEVATION: Level 1 InsDection was Performed by: 0 Contract Drawincis Approved Shop Drawings m vN N n w o t E v Q z Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. O O 0 Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. O O 0 Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O O 0 Trusses inspected undamaged. O 0 Truss gusset plates undamaged. 0 Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. O 0 Truss plate provided for bearing on CMIJ. O 0 Continuous lateral bracing properly spaced. O O 0 Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. O O 0 Mechanical connections properly installed. O O 0 Mechanical connections properly nailed. 0 Fastener used comply with structural drawings. 0 Overbuilt areas properly fastened. O 0 Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. 0 Foundation sole plate is properly fastened. O O 0 Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O 0 Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O 0 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O 0 O Sheathing nailing type/pattem per structural drawing. O 0 O Sheathing inspected undamaged. 0 Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" clip. O 0 Sheathing edges properly blocked. O O 0 Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. O O 0 CLP installed at specified locations. O O 0 CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. O 0 CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. O 0 CLP diameter per approved drawings. O O 0 Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. 0 Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. 0 Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. O 0 Top plate properly spliced. 0 Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. O 0 Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. O 0 Headers strapped per structural drawings. O 0 Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. O 0 Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O 0 Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. 0 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED O DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) O IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? O YES ® NO COMMENTS: UNIVERSALTHRESHOLDINSPECTOR: Michael Felshaw ED ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO: Kent Honea Consultants In: GeotechnicalEngineering "ErMronmentalSciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing " Threshold Inspection auiiding Code Administration. compliance Inspection & Wan Review UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No.: 0110.1800758.0000 Date Typed: May 21. 2019 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (LIES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. Date Type of Report 9451084-1 04/22/2019 Grout Prism Test Specimens Report 9451086-1 04/22/2019 1 Grout Prism Test Specimens Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (2) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 Q EN3F •F Fred Schmalzer 38 ` 8 = e t _ 2019.05.22 TAW- _ 07.06.00-04'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 V N IVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9451084-1 CT 042219 WorkorderNo.: 9451084 Lab No.: 190368-C Date 1 st Issue: April 30, 2019 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Cell Fill Sample Location: Elevator Pit Premit Number 17-1584 - Sampled at 1 ST Lift on the NW Coner of pit Set# 1 of 1 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck r — - Sample By: Fernando Montalvo On 04/22/2019 At Lab On or Before: 04/23/2019 General Information _ _ Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information_ _ General Contractor: E.W YOUNG Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 6.00 cu yds. CONSTRUCTION 1 I Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 6.00 cu yds. I Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete_ --- Water Added at Site: N/A ^_ - Total Placement for the Day: 6.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 648 w ; Time Batched: 2:10 PM II 1 Ticket No.: 1851425 I Time Sampled: 3:05 PM Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: Nis Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 9.00 inches I Ambient Temp: 81 °F I Concrete Temp: 84 °F Unit Weight- N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimon. in) Test XSect. Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 04/29/2019 7 3.34 3.40 3.37 11.36 21,825 1,920 2 05/20/2019 28 3.35 3.38 3.37 11.32 34,960 3,088 3 05/20/2019 28 3.32 1 3.37 1 3.35 1 11.19 35,680 3,189 4 05/20/2019 28 3.36 1 3.35 1 3.36 1 11.26 35,210 3,127 3,140 Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified and I If an -eIr was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used To establish a mutual protection to Universal's talents, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as Confidential property of our talents and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts horn or regarding Universars reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 43 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Cell Fill Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 ReportNo.: 9451086-1 CT 042219 WorkorderNo.: 9451086 Lab No.: 190369-C Date 1st Issue: April 30, 2019 Sample Location: Elevator Pit Premit Number 17-1585 - Sampled at Second Lift on SE Comer of the Elevator Pit Set# 1 of 1 I Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Fernando Montalvo On 04/22/2019 At Lab On or Before: 04/23/2019 General Information General Contractor: E.W. YOUNG CONSTRUCTION Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 6.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: I Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days I Cumulative Quantity: 6.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: _N/A_ _ j Total Placement for the Day: 6.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 646 Time Batched: 2:10 PM _.._ Ticket No.: 1851425 Time Sampled: 3:30 PM I 1 Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: Nis L Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Stump: 9.00 inches Ambient Temp: 81 OF I Concrete Temp: 84 °F Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen.1 in) Actual Dimen.2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test X-Sect. I Area (in') Max Compressive Load (Ibs) Test Compressive Strength(psi) Average psi) 1 04/29/2019 7 3.30 3.36 3.33 11.09 25,995 2,340 2 05/20/2019 28 3.32 3.35 3.34 11.12 33.955 3.054 3 05/20/2019 1 28 3.34 3.32 3.33 11.09 34,875 3,145 4 05/20/2019 28 3.381 3.32 3.35 11.22 1 34,985 1 3,118 1 3.110 Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified onl H an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Tested in Lab to C39 Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used To establish a mutual protection to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves. all reports are submitted as confidential property of our dients and authodlation for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universars reports is reserved pending our written approval. This report shall not be reproduced, except in lull, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 i, UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No.: 0110.1800758.0000 Date Typed: May 17, 2019 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scope of Work Work Order No. I Date I Type of Report 9454336-1 1 05/09/2019 4- x 8- Cylinder Test Specimens Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (1) fi Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 0SCHfyq ' :•i Fred Schmalzer c 38 8 '- , 2019.05.20 TAM f 14:21:02-04'00' IONn•• Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This Item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL Project No: 9454336 1 CT 0500 ReportNo.: 9454336-1 CT 050919 ENGINEERING SCIENCES WorkoNoLabrNo.: 119 908-C Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Date 1 st Issue: May 17, 2019 Geophysical Services - Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of 4" x 8" Cylinder Test Specimens ASTM C-39) Client The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607 Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Structural Element: Slab on Grade Sample Location: Dumpster Pad - Sampled at 5Ft N 10 E On the Ne Corner of dumpster pad Set# 1 of 1 Sample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Fernando Montalvo On 05/09/2019 At Lab On or Before: 05/13/2019 General Information Specified Strength I Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor: E.W Young Construction Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 10.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 10.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 20.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 656 Time Batched: 6:20 AM Ticket No.: 1459168 Time Sampled: 7:35 AM Mix Design: 30090000 Admixture: N/A Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy Field Test Results Air Content: N/A Slump: 3.50 inches I Ambient Temp: 70 -F I Concrete Temp: 80 OF Unit Weight: NIA Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results Date Tested Age Days Type Of Fracture Actual Dimen. l in) Actual Dimen. 2 in) Avg. Dimen. in) Test XSect. Area ( in') Max Compressive Load ( lbs) Test Compressive Strength( psi) Average psi) 1 05/16/2019 7 5 3.99 4.01 4.00 12.57 38,410 3.060 2 06/06/2019 28 3 06/06/2019 28 4 06/06/2019 28 5- 1-1- 06/06/2019 28 Remarks Cylinders are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D-- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E-- Excluded From Average Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified onl I If an air test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure f 1j Sampled per ASTM C 172 - Yes EaILIli"WJ M Air Content Performed per ASTM C-173 or C-231 - No Unit Weight Performed per ASTM C-138 - N/A r Slump Performed per ASTM C-143 - Yes Concrete Temperature Performed per ASTM C-1064 - Yes jay L Molded per C-31 -Yes Initially Cured per ASTM C-31 -Unknown Capped in Lab to ASTM C-1231 Cured & Tested in Lab per ASTM C-31 & C-39 - Yes This Form Conforms With ASTM C-39 To establish a mutual piotecdon to Universal's clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding UnNersers reports is reserved pending our written approval This report shall not be reproduced, except In full, without the written approval of Universal Engineering Sciences. 1 of 1 Revised May 2018 No.: y220 y .0000UNIVERSAL DateTyped: M2 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection 22BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scone of Work Work Order No. Date I Type of Report 9455899- 1 05/21/2019 In -Place Density Test Report 9456604- 1 05/14/20191 Grout Prism Test Specimens Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 CHliq i Sz° Fred Schmalzer F 2019. 05.23 12: 49:09-04'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Attachments ( 2) rh This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9455899 0758.0000 Workorder No: 9455899-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date:05/22/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection12BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo Date Tested: 05/21/2019 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Water Main Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe The tests below meet the 98% minimum compaction requirement. Tvae of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Maximum Optimum Field Dry Field Soil Pass Test Density Moisture Density Moisture Compaction or No. Location of Test Range pcf) N pcf) N N Fail 1 Water main STA 35+00 0-1 ft 109.3 11.8 108.9 8.0 100 Pass 2 Water main STA 35+00 0+1 ft 109.3 11.8 109.6 7.7 100 Pass 3 Water main STA 35+00 1+2 ft 109.3 11.8 108.3 7.2 99 Pass 4 Water main STA 35+00 2+3 ft 1 109.3 1 11.8 1 107.7 1 8.4 1 99 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 Project No: 0110.1800758.0000 E RAL ReportNo.: 9456604-1 CT 051419 WorkordeMo.: 9456604gJUN,Lab No.: 190997-C Date 1st Issue: May 22, 2019 NINEE.NIING SCIENCES 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 Compressive Strength of Grout Prism Test Specimens ASTM C-1019) Client The Spanos Corporation Project Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, FL US 92 8 West 1 st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 33607 structural Element: Cell Fill Sample Location: Bldg F - I at Elevated snap, t5log t-, sra ua, .VOUt" YYdll S_ e_t_ftt of t ISample From: Concrete Truck Sample By: Jorge L2 Rodriguez On 05/14/2019 JAt Lab On or Before: 05/16/2019 General Information Specified Strength / Sampling Times Placement Information General Contractor, The Spanos Corporation Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Truck Load: 5.00 cu yds. Subcontractor: Mix Design Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Cumulative Quantity: 3.00 cu yds. Supplier: Maschmeyer Concrete Water Added at Site: N/A Total Placement for the Day: 3.00 cu yds. Truck No.: 6433 Time Batched: 10:15 AM Ticket No.: 1459292 Time Sampled: 10:55 AM Mix Design: 30550000 Admixture: N/A Weather Condition: Partly Cloudy c: J Twwa ww..11w Air Content: N/A Slump: 9.50 inches . -Ambient Temp: 79 OF Concrete Temp: 85 °F Unit Weight: N/A Results of Laboratory Testing Test Results 1' G- Date Tested 05/ 21/2019 Age Days 7 Type Of Fracture I Actual Dimen. 1 in) 3. 50 Actual Dimen. 2 in) 3. 45 Avg. Dimen. in) 3. 48 Test XSect. Area ( in') 12. 08 Max Compressive Load ( lbs) 22, 605 Test Compressive Strength( psi) 1. 870 Average psi) Lab Tech BCC 2' G' 06/11/2019 28 3' G' 06/11/2019 28 4- G' 06/11/2019 28 Remarks Grout Prisms are tested at seven (7) days to get an early indication of the potential strength of the concrete, but the seven (7) day results are not to be used for concrete acceptance. When the compressive strength of the concrete has reached 70% of the specified strength, it is a reasonable practice to use this as an indication that 100% of the specified strength will be attained by twenty-eight (28) days. Note H'- Hold Cylinder = D'- Defective Cylinder, Un-testable = E'- Excluded From Average = G'- Good Condition Fan Note Test Results represent the Structural Element specified only If test was not completed, that deviates from C31 procedure Note Test in compliance with approved plans and specifications Tested in Lab to Gay Cured in C-511 Test Not performed per C-1019, Grout Boxes were used Lab Technicians AL Arthur Love 18CC Brayan Candelada Maldonado M ro establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, 00 reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts hom or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written ttenOPPelaThissreport shall not be reproduced, except in lull, without the written approval of Universal 1 of 1 Revised March 2019 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Building Code Administration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 1512 Maanie Blvd. Orlando. FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 UES Project No.: 0110.1800758.0000 Date Typed: May 23, 2019 Construction Materials Testing Services FIELD AND LABORATORY REPORT COVER PAGE Client: The Spanos Corporation 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (LIES) representative(s) performed construction materials testing and/or field inspection services on the above project. Testing results and/or inspection observations are reported on the attached sheets. The contents of this package are summarized below: Scone of Work Work Order No. Date Type of Report 9455900-1 05/22/2019 In -Place Density Test Report We hope this information is sufficient for your immediate needs. it you nave any questions, Pleaac WO "wt I wawa.- ..+ ..•+. •. the undersigned or Rosie Housein (extension 23078). Attachments (1) rh Sincerely, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 5CHMq ; Fred Schmalzer 4Qw. JG 33 8 r; 2019.05.24 13:05:20-04'00' Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. using a Digital Signature. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. For the mutual protection of Universals dients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are suomarea as me connaenabi plupony V1 vu, Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Revised May 2015 UNIVERSAL UES Project No: 9455900 0758.0000 Workorder No: 9455900-1 ENGINEERING SCIENCES Report Date: 05/23/2019 Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services • Materials Testing • Threshold InspectionE2BuildingCodeAdministration, Compliance Inspection & Plan Review 3532 Maggie Blvd, Orlando, FL 32811 - P: 407.423.0504 - F: 407.423.3106 In -Place Density Test Report Client: The Spanos Corporation UES Technician: Fernando Montalvo 2701 N. Rocky Point Drive, Suite 100 Date Tested: 05/22/2019 Tampa, FL 33607 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments, Materials Testing US 92 & West 1st Street, Sanford, Seminole County, FL 32771 Area Tested: Water Main Material: Backfill Reference Datum: 0 = Springline of Pipe Tvae of Test: Field: ASTM D-2937 Drive Cylinder Method Laboratory: ASTM D1557 Modified Proctor IIV-- Test No. Location of Test Range Maximum Density Pcf) Optimum Moisture N Field Dry Density pcf) Field Moisture N Soil Compaction N Pass or Fail 1 Water Main STA: 32+00 0-1 ft 109.3 11.8 109.7 8.6 100 Pass 2 Water Main STA: 32+00 0+1 It 109.3 11.8 108.5 7.9 99 Pass 3 Water Main STA: 32+00 1+2 ft 109.3 11.8 107.0 7.3 98 Pass 4 Water Main STA: 32+00 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 109.1 6.5 100 Pass 5 Water Main STA: 29+00 0-1 ft 109.3 11.8 109.5 7.7 100 Pass 6 Water Main STA: 29+00 0+1 ft 109.3 11.8 109.0 7.4 100 Pass 7 Water Main STA: 29+00 1+2 ft 109.3 11.8 108.3 8.3 99 Pass 8 Water Main STA: 29+00 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 107.7 6.4 99 Pass 9 Water Main STA: 26+00 0-1 ft 109.3 11.8 109.3 8.5 100 Pass 10 Water Main STA: 26+00 0+1 It 109.3 11.8 108.5 7.6 99 Pass 11 Water Main STA: 26+00 1+2 ft 109.3 11.8 107.3 6.8 98 Pass 12 Water Main STA: 26+00 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 107.0 8.1 98 Pass 13 Water Main STA: 23+00 0-1 ft 109.3 11.8 109.5 8.3 100 Pass 14 Water Main STA: 23+00 0+1 ft 109.3 11.8 108.6 7.7 99 Pass 15 Water Main STA: 23+00 1+2 ft 109.3 11.8 108.9 7.3 100 Pass 16 Water Main STA: 23+00 2+3 ft 109.3 11.8 107.5 6.7 98 Pass 17 Water Main STA: 20+00 0-1 ft 109.3 11.8 108.0 8.0 99 Pass 18 Water Main STA: 20+00 0+1 ft 109.3 11.8 107.3 7.6 98 Pass 19 Water Main STA: 20+00 1+2 It 109.3 11.8 108.7 6.9 99 Pass 20 Water Main STA: 20+00 2+3 ft 1 109.3 1 11.8 1 109.0 1 8.6 1 100 Pass To establish a mutual protection to Universals clients, the Public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as confidential property of our clients and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding Universal's reports is reserved pending our written approval. Page 1 UNIVERSAL AtlantatoAtlaED• ENGINEERING SCIENCES Dayton Beach Fort Myers Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Sciences Fon Piette Geophysical Services • Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection Gainesville Jacksonville Building Inspection • Plan Review • Building Code Administration Miami December 23, 2019 Ocala Orlando (I leadquorters) City of Sanford Palm Coast PO Box 1788 Panama City Sanford, Florida 32772 Pensacola Rockledge Sarasota Attention: Mr. Dave Aldrich, Building Official St. Petersburg Tampa Reference: Lake Monroe Apartments Tiflon 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 West Palm Brach Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 UES Project No. 0110.1800762.0000 Threshold Report Summary No. 43 Dear Mr. Aldrich: As scheduled by the General Contractor's on -site representative, inspectors from Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. performed on -site, threshold inspection services for the Lake Monroe Apartments project. This report summarizes our threshold inspection services performed during the inspection period of December 2, 2019 through December 8, 2019. Our inspections were performed in accordance to the permitted documents to include the "Structural Inspection Plan" as developed by the Engineer of Record, the approved construction drawings and specifications. Our special inspector and his duly authorized representative(s) reported their observations as noted on the attached Daily Threshold Reports with all structural non-compliance items noted within the attached Special Inspection Log (SIL). All non-compliance items, or SIL's, previously reported as non-compliance with regard to the plans or specifications, will be reevaluated by our Special Inspector after corrective action was taken by the General Contractor or the deficient conditions have been approved through written approval by the Structural Engineer of Record. During the inspection period of December 2, 2019 through December 8, 2019, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, the construction of all structural load -bearing components comply with permitted documents, with revisions as approved by the Engineer of Record, except as noted on the SIL log. Should you have any questions concerning these reports or desire additional information, please let us know. It is our intent to be a Professional Partner in the successful completion of this noteworthy threshold structure. It is further intended that we will provide accurate, complete, and timely inspection reports. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Fred J. Schmalzer, using a Digital Signature. Printed copies o/ this document ate not considered signed and seated and the signature must be verified on any electronic copies. FJS/dkn City of Sanford Aldrich, Dave City of Sanford Antonini, Lisa The Spanos Corporation Woods, Jim The Spanos Corporation Gillespie, Hardy The Spanos Corporation Jensen, Chuck The Spanos Corporation Homea, Kent CPH, Inc. (Corporate) Boyles, Irene Lee Crest Lee Crest Kephart Garland, Jesse Kephart Campbell, Paul Respectfully Submitted, Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. Certificate of Authorization No. 00000549 ua.wururui. a``ugCHArq ay 2019. 12.30 4v, •E5N38 B •• p /. TAE F 13:17:48 -051 001 ginq, noOM.AL S` dave. aldrich@sanfordfl.gov Lisa. Anoonini@Sanfordfl.gov Moods@agspanos. aorn hglllespie@agspanos. com cjensen@agspanos. aom tbomea@agspanos. corn iboyles@cphcorp. com jo. leegroup320@gmail.com jesseg@kephartcom pauk. @kephartcom Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E. Vice President - Construction Services STATE OF FLORIDA Professional Engineer No. 38818 Special Inspector No. 907 3532 Maggie Blvd. • Orlando, FI 32811 • (407) 423-0504 - (407) 423-3106 visit us on the web at www.UniversalEngineering.com Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Date: December 23, 2019 THRESHOLD REPORT SUMMARY NO.43 Addressee: City of Sanford PO Box 1788 Sanford, Florida 32772 Project: Lake Monroe Apartments 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 See attached report(s) for locations and observations. SPECIAL I.. Ir,.NSPECjT;lO'.NffLOG: Added This Summary Period: 0 Resoloed This Summary Period: 0 Outstanding For The Project: 0 SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG (SIL): 1 Sheet(s) Page No(s).: 3 to 3 DAIL,Y-4i9P-!9P rS--< . Daily Report No. Inspection Date Inspector(s) Reports No. of Pages Page No(s). 93 12/3/2019 Eric DeVuyst 1 4 to 4 Total Number of Pages This Summary: 4 For the mutual protection of Universal's clients, the general public, and ourselves, our reports are submitted as the confidential property of our clients. Accordingly, authorization for reliance upon, or publication of, all or portions of this report is reserved pending our written approval. Page 2 of 2 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. SPECIAL INSPECTION LOG ermitting Agency: City of Sanford Project Name: Lake Monroe Apartments pdate Period: 12/2/19-12/8/19 ttention: Mr. Dave Aldrich Project Address: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard ermit No.: See Below) City/State/Zip: Sanford, Seminole County, Florida 32771 Project No.: 0110.1800762.0000 Building A/Clubhouse 17-1580 Building C 17-1582 Building E 17-1584 Building B 17-1581 Building D 17-1583 Building F 17-1585 SIL No. Date SUM No Bldg. Permit Structural Element Location Description S.I. Engineer of Record Response S.I. Date Closed SUM No. 1 5/24/19 20 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Northeast Comer of Elevator The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 6/12119 22 FJS) Rev.- Pit, 2n° Lift strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with Rev. 22 specified strength of 3,000 psi (LIES Advanced Structural Design on 6111119 Report 9451977-1, 190546, cast on 6114/19. FJS) 4/26/2019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix. 2 6/12119 22 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Shaft, Bldg. F, 3rd The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 8/16/19 32 Lift, South Wall strength of 2,640 psi did not meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with specified strength of 3,000 psi (LIES Advanced Structural Design on Report 9456604-1, 190997, cast on 6/12/19. 5/14/2019). The wrong structural mix was used in the CMU Elevator fill cells. Grout should have been used and not a Pea Rock Pump Mix. 3 6126119 24 F 17-1585 Cell Fill Elevator Pit, Bldg. F, Northeast The 28-day average compressive FJS Resolved per correspondence FJS 8/16/19 32 Comer. 5'" Lift strength of 2,490 psi did not meet the from John M. Bailes, P.E. with specified strength of 3,000 psi (LIES Advanced Structural Design on Report 9457936-1, 1912148, cast on 6/12/19. 5/21/2019). IThe Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges this deficiency. ZThe Special Inspector, Fred J. Schmalzer, P.E., acknowledges resolution to this deficiency. Docs #1632149 3This is a brief summary of the SIL. Refer to the daily report for a detailed description. Page 1 of 1 so VV..V...VV..V.. .....`V..VVL/...V. VV..V.\V 51.E 1/1 PROJECT: Lake Monroe Apartments, Threshold Inspection Services DATE: 12/3/2019 WORK ORDER NO.: 9709014-1 LOCATION: 2205 West Seminole Boulevard, Sanford, Seminole BUILDING PERMIT NO.: 17-1583 County, FL 32771 PERMIT AGENCY: Sanford FIELD CONTACT: CLIENT: The Spanos Corporation FIELD PHONE: FIELD OBSERVATIONS 8t TESTS STRUCTURAL ELEMENT: Wood Studs in Shear Walls LOCATION/GRID LINES: Building 0, 501 Marbella Lane ELEVATION: Level 1 and 2 Ins ection was performed by: 0 Contract Drawincis Approved Shop Drawings c Da) m 4) U U aN O4) U U QZ Notes Roof/Floor Truss Wood species conforms to signed/sealed drawings. 0 Truss layout conforms to approved engineering package. 0 Truss orientation conforms to engineering package. O 0 . Trusses inspected undamaged. 0 Truss gusset plates undamaged. 0 Truss inspected to have minimum bearing. 0 Truss plate provided for bearing on CMU. 0 Continuous lateral bracing property spaced. 0 Mechanical connections conform to uplift value. 0 Mechanical connections properly installed. O 0 Mechanical connections properly nailed. 0 Fastener used comply with structural drawings. 0 Overbuilt areas properly fastened. 0 Wood Framing Foundation sole plate is pressure treated. 0 Foundation sole plate is property fastened. 0 Wall Sheathing is specified type and thickness. O O ' 0 Roof Sheathing is specified type and thickness. 0 Sheathing orientation comply with structural drawings. O O O 0 Sheathing nailing type/pattem per structural drawing. 0 Sheathing inspected undamaged. 0 Roof Sheathing installed wtih 0.125 inch gap and "H" clip. 0 Sheathing edges property blocked. 0 Continuous load path (CLP), (hold down rods) installed per approved drawings. 0 CLP installed at specified locations. 0 CLP has specified plate washer size/thickness. 0 CLP installed with minimum distance allowed from stud pack. i 0 ' CLP diameter per approved drawings. 0 Shear Studs are proper size/spacing. 0 • O Load bearing wall studs are proper size/spacing. O 0 Shear wall/load bearing walls properly blocked. 0 ; Install missing Cat blocks. Top plate property spliced. 0 Top and bottom plate properly nailed per structural drawings. O 0 O Top floor headers have proper size/bearing. O 0 Headers strapped per structural drawings. O 0 Jack -King jacks installed per structural drawings. O 0 Wood notching, boring and cutting per allowable tolerances. O O 0 Ledgers are proper dimensions/fastened per plans. e 0 NO DEFICIENCIES NOTED DEFICIENCIES NOTED (see above notes) IN PROGRESS REINSPECTION REQUIRED? YES la NO COMMENTS: UNIVERSALTHRESHOLDINSPECTOR: Eric DeVuyst 91 ENGINEERING SCIENCES FIELD COPIES TO Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering " Environmental Sciences Geophysical Services Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection ASD- ADVANCED STRUCTURAL DESIGN Threshold Inspection Plan Lake Monroe Apartments Sanford, Florida March 3, 2017 PART 1 - Administration 1.1 Explanation of the Structural Inspection Plan A. This is a Threshold Building as defined by chapter 553 of the Florida Statutes and requires the Owner to retain a Special Inspector. B. The Special Inspector shall inspect the framing shown on the Structural Drawings in accordance with this plan to verify that the work is constructed in substantial accordance with the Contract Documents, except for accepted variations 1. The Contract Documents are defined as the Permitted Drawings, Project Specifications and Recorded Addenda and Amendments. 2. Except as noted, work of this Plan excludes the inspection of elements that do not contribute to the capacity of the Primary Structural Frame. This includes, but is not limited to: railings, fire protection, roofing, glazed window systems, mechanical/electrical systems, architectural components, site work, and OSHA safety provisions or other safety standards that apply during the construction period. Slab -on -grade is specifically included. ' C. Proposals for Special Inspection services shall be separate and independent from proposals for all other Materials Testing and Quality Assurance services. D. The Owner or Enforcing Agency may supplement this plan with additional inspection requirements as deemed necessary during the course at the work. 1.2 Qualifications of the Special Inspector A. The Special Inspector may send an authorized representative under his responsible charge to undertake inspections and site visits. As used in this plan, the term Special Inspector includes his representative, unless indicated otherwise. B. Both the Special Inspector and the representative shall meet the qualifications and standards set forth by Rule Chapter 61g15-35 and Chapter 471 of the Florida Statutes. Resumes of both the Special Inspector and the representative(s) shall be submitted to the Architect and Structural Engineer for review. 1035 S. Semoran Blvd. Suite 1019 Winter Park FL. 32792 Telephone: 407-677-5836 Fax: 407-677-5894 C. The Special Inspector shall provide to th applicable coverages, including Genera Compensation, and Professional Liability described in this Plan. Lake Monroe Apartments Threshold Inspection Plan March 3, 2017 Page 2 of 8 e Owner Insurance Certificate for all I Liability, Automobile, Workmen's specifically covering the inspections 1.3 Responsibilities and Limitations of the Special Inspector A. The Special Inspector is responsible to the Owner and the Enforcing Agency having jurisdiction for this Project. The Special Inspector and the authorized representative shall: 1. Become familiar with the specific structural components and systems they will be inspecting. 2. Develop a thorough knowledge of the applicable Contract Documents, accepted submittals, and governing codes. 3. Exercise good judgment. B. Prior to starting work, the Special Inspector shall provide to the Owner and Structural Engineer a certified affidavit attesting that: 1. He is competent to provide the engineering services for the specific type of structure. 2. He has reviewed the Contract Documents and understands their content and the support conveyed therein. 3. He has the Structural Inspection Plan, understands the intent and intends to comply with its requirements. C. The Special Inspector is responsible for inspecting the structure as previously described. Reports shall identify work performed in general conformance with the Contract Documents, as well as the location and description of any deviations. D. The Special Inspector is responsible for verifying that the work of the Testing Agency complies with the requirements of the Contract Documents. E. The Special Inspector shall visit the site at frequency to satisfy himself that his representative's inspections comply with this Plan. F. The Special Inspector shall dedicate his entire time on -site to the requirements of this plan and shall not perform other work, such as material testing. G. The Special Inspector shall call the Structural Engineer at least once each week to discuss details of the project and to confirm that he has up-to-date sketches and RFI responses. H. The presence of the Special Inspector does not relieve the Enforcing Agency, the Architect or the Structural Engineer of their responsibilities. The Special Inspector shall not make design decisions or interpretations of the Contract Documents. Lake Monroe Apartments Threshold Inspection Plan March 3, 2017 Page 3 of 8 1.4 Reporting A. The Special Inspector shall record progress, working conditions, observations, testing, deviations from the Contract Documents, and any required corrective action. He shall retain the records for a minimum of 7 years after completion of the project. B. The Special Inspector shall immediately notify the Contractor in person, and the Architect and Structural Engineer by telephone, of materials tests, equipment, workmanship or construction that: 1. Does not conform to the Contract Documents, or 2. Is not inspected or tested and cannot be inspected or tested in place. C. The Special Inspector shall keep an exceptions file and review it on a daily basis, updating as exceptions are rectified. If any exceptions are not resolved in a timely manner, the Special Inspector shall issue a non-compliance notice to the Contractor and shall copy the Enforcing Agency, Owner's representative, Architect and Structural Engineer. D. After each inspection, the inspector shall write and sign on Inspection Report. The Report shall include the following: 1. The name and location of Project; name of Inspector; Permit Number; date; working conditions; including weather and temperature; and type and location of work being performed. 2. Details of each inspection, including the presence and activities of the Testing Agency. 3. Note deficiencies in the work and any unusual circumstances affecting the performance of work, including changes in materials or work sequence. Place emphasis on recurring deficiencies. 4. Identify corrections to deficiencies listed in previous reports. Since the Special Inspector does not certify that the Contract 'Documents are in compliance with the Governing Codes, all statements issued shall refer to whether or not completed work is in substantial accordance with the Contract Numbers. 1.5 Contractor Requirements A. The Contractor shall provide the Special Inspector with an office at the construction site that includes, as a minimum, a desk, chair, plan table, plan rack, filing cabinet, telephone, utilities, air conditioning, janitorial service, and access to a fax machine or to the internet. B. The Contractor shall furnish to the Special Inspector copies of all reviewed and approved submittals for structural elements, excluding calculations, in a timely manner. Lake Monroe Apartments Threshold Inspection Plan March 3, 2017 Page 4 of 8 C. The Contractor shall cooperate with and assist the Special Inspector in performing his inspection duties and shall provide him with free access to the work at all times. D. The Inspector shall make spot inspections of work in progress in an effort to detect deviations early. However, this does not relieve the contractor of responsibility for correcting deviations from the Contract Documents discovered at any time. E. In order to assure timely and appropriate inspections, the Contractor shall notify the Special Inspector of construction schedules and planned operations a minimum of 24 hours prior to the time of the inspection. Reinforcing steel inspections shall be scheduled for at least one hour prior to concrete delivery. F. If any of the Contractor's work is not in compliance with the Contract Documents, he may either correct it or submit to the Architect/Engineer a request for acceptance of the deviation. G. Construction that is not inspected and that cannot be inspected may require testing or removal as determined by the Structural Engineer. H. If work is not substantial in accordance with the Contract Documents, or if any construction is not inspected and cannot be inspected, the Special Inspector will not be able to issue a completion statement and the building will not receive a certificate of occupancy. I. Special Inspections do not relieve the Contractor of his responsibility for compliance with the Contract Documents, any statutory or contractual obligations, nor his responsibilities to carry out Quality Control Inspections and Testing. The Contractor has the sole responsibility for any deviations from the Contract Documents and shall bear the cost of any required corrections. While the Special Inspector shall cooperate with the Contractor, he shall neither direct the Contractor's work nor be responsible for his construction means and methods. 1.6 Owner Requirements A. The Owner shall arrange for the Special Inspector to receive all appropriate Contract Documents, including two complete sets of all Architectural and Structural Documents, including Drawings and Specifications, and the Geotechnical Report at the start of construction. He shall also ensure that the Special Inspector receives in a timely manner all Material Test Reports and two copies of all structural changes, revisions, addenda, etc. B. The owner shall retain a Geotechnical Consultant and Testing Agency as required by the Contract Documents. PART 2 — Inspections 2.1 General The following is a general Inspection Plan describing work to be performed by the Special Inspector. The purpose of the Structural Inspection Plan is to provide specific areas for inspection so that the building can be adequately inspected for compliance Lake Monroe Apartments Threshold Inspection Plan March 3, 2017 Page 5 of 8 with the permitted documents. The following are not inspector check lists but point out some critical areas requiring specific attention by the Special Inspector. 2.2 Shallow Foundation Preparation A. The Geotechnical Consultant or Testing Agency retained by the Owner shall monitor and test backfill and compaction operations and shall confirm that subgrade preparation of all shallow foundations complies with the Geotechnical Report and the Contract Documents. He shall furnish the Special Inspector with Daily Reports as well as the Completion Report required by the Contract Documents. 2.3 Slab -on -Grade Preparation A. The Geotechnical Consultant or Testing Agency retained by the Owner shall monitor and test all slab -on -grade backfill and compaction operations to confirm that subgrade preparation complies with the Geotechnical Report and the Contract Documents. He shall furnish the Special Inspector with Daily Reports. B. Verify that subgrade disturbed by other trades is properly recompacted. 2.4 Cast -In -Place Concrete A. The Contractor shall notify the Special Inspector a minimum of 24 hours prior to the placement of any structural concrete. B. Verify that the slab thickness is maintained at slab depressions and steps. C. Inspect reinforcing steel and post -tensioning tendons per the Structural Drawings, supplemented by the Approved Shop Drawings, to verify the following: 1. Reinforcing steel grade, size, quantity, configuration and spacing. 2. Post -tensioning tendon size, quantity, profiles, anchorage and spacing. 3. Bursting steel at anchorage ends and corners for post -tensioning tendons. 4. Tendon sheathing is intact. 5. Reinforcing steel and tendons are adequately supported and tied to resist displacement during concrete pour and that concrete cover is proper. 6. Hooked bars are placed properly. 7. Embedment lengths splice locations and lap splice lengths are acceptable. 8. Report all slab openings larger than 12" and not shown on the Contract Documents to the Architect/Engineer. Check placement of additional reinforcement around openings. Openings through beams are prohibited without prior approval of the Architect/Engineer. 9. Confirm that reinforcing steel surfaces are free of excess rust or other coatings that may adversely affect bonding capacity. Verify that form oil, where used, is applied before reinforcing steel is placed. 10. Verify that tensioning devices have been calibrated. 11.Observe post -tensioning stressing and confirm proper sequence. 12. Compare measured tendon elongations with calculated elongations to verify conformance with tolerances. Lake Monroe Apartments Threshold Inspection Plan March 3, 2017 Page 6 of 8 D. Inspect welded wire reinforcement to verify the following: 1. Wire size and spacing in each direction comply with the Structural Drawings. 2. WWR is adequately supported and tied to resist displacement during concrete pour and that concrete cover is proper. 3. Splices are adequate length and properly tied. 4. WWR surfaces are free of excess rust or other coatings that may adversely affect bonding capacity. E. Check that anchors, embedded conduits, and load carrying embedded items are properly positioned and secured to resist displacement during concreting. Relocation of or modification to structural items due to conflict with reinforcing is prohibited without the approval of the Structural Engineer. F. Verify that sawcut joints are: 1. Provided only where indicated. 2. The proper depth, spacing and location. 3. Provided in the time frame indicated in the Contract Documents. G. Check that all foreign material is removed from forms or excavations prior to concreting. H. Be on site at the start of each concrete pour requiring inspection by this Plan. Remain on site for a sufficient time to confirm that concreting practices are proper and comply with ACI 301, ASTM C94 and other recognized industry standards, including the following: 1. All reinforcing steel corrections are completed prior to casting concrete. 2. The first concrete truck of each type of concrete pour has the proper concrete mix number and strength and that the batch time leaves sufficient time to pour all concrete from the truck. Spot check future trucks. 3. The Testing Agency is on site for each type of concrete pour to test concrete as required by the Contract Documents, including mixing time, temperature, slump, and air content, and reports any concrete delivered that is not as specified. Check that addition of water to the concrete mix in the field complies with the guidelines in the Contract Documents. 4. Concrete is being conveyed from mixer to place of final deposit by recognized industry standards. Concrete is being placed continuously, or in a manner to avoid placing concrete against hardened concrete, resulting in the formation of seams or planes of weakness. 5. Concrete is being consolidated and thoroughly worked around reinforcement, embedded items and into corners of forms, eliminating air or stone packets that may cause honeycombing, pitting or planes of weakness. 6. Spot check that during procedures comply with the contract documents, ACI 308, Standard Practice for Curing Concrete" and other recognized industry standards. Lake Monroe Apartments Threshold Inspection Plan March 3, 2017 Page 7 of 8 I. Inspect Expansion Anchors and Chemical Adhesive for Anchoring Reinforcing Steel and Threaded Rods used to support work described in this plan as follows: 1. Verify hole diameter, depth, location spacing and edge distance and confirm that hole has been thoroughly cleaned as required by manufacturer. 2. Verify that expansion anchors are properly tightened. 3. Verify that the epoxy type is proper for the application, such as paste for horizontal holes. Verify that epoxy mixing and installation comply with manufacturer's requirements. 2.5 Masonry A. Inspect all reinforced masonry per ACI 530, ACI 530.1 and as follows: 1. Spot check that materials are properly stored. 2. Workmanship 3. Unit size, strength, and weight 4. Mortar and grout type, mixing and placement. 5. Placement of reinforcing steel and joint reinforcing, inserts, and anchors and other structural aspects. 6. Check cleanout areas to confirm that cells to be reinforced are clean and free of all foreign material and that vertical bar is tied to dowel. 7. Control joint construction. 8. During grouting, verify that all cells are filled solid and that grout is consolidated as required by the contract documents. if in doubt after completion, check using a hammer. 9. Check connection of side or top of wall to supporting elements. 2.6 Wood framing 1. Inspect sawn lumber members for proper size, species and grade, and adequate bearing on supporting members. 2. Review the construction documents and make sure all the drawings, specifications, shop drawings, addendums, sketches are available and approved by design engineers. 3. Verify proper fastener size, quantity, and locations. 4. Verify layout and fastener spacing for floor, roof and wall sheathing. 5. Verify layout and fastener spacing for shear wall sheathing, including gypsum board and wood panel sheathing as scheduled. 6. Verify connectors and continuous rod systems size, quantity, and locations. 7. Verify that bracing of studs and joists conforms to contract documents and/or shop drawings. 2.7 Pre -Engineered Wood Trusses 1. Inspect trusses for damage after delivery. Verify that trusses have been repaired in accordance with truss manufacturer's details. Lake Monroe Apartments Threshold Inspection Plan March 3, 2017 Page 8 of 8 2. Review the construction documents and make sure all the drawings, specifications, shop drawings, adderidums, sketches are available and approved by design engineers. 3. Verify that trusses have adequate bearing on supporting members and proper connection hardware._ PART 3 - Testing and Submittals 3.1. Material testing a. The testing agency retained by the owner shall perform all tests described in the contract documents and shall provide a report of each test of work described in this plan to the owner. Contractor, architectlengineer and special inspector. b. The special inspector shall review all material test reports upon receipt and shall include in his report any results that do not comply with- the contract documents c. The special inspector may request the owner's representative to authorize additional tests when appropriate. 3.2 Structural submittals a. The special inspector shall review and become familiar with all submittals. The contractor shall provide the special inspector with one copy of all structural submittals, excluding calculations, and all accepted alternates for his record and use. All shop drawings and other submittals referenced in this plan shall contain evidence of review and acceptance by the contractor, architect and structural engineer. Respectfully submitted, Advanced Structural Design, Inc. ilk John M. Bailes, PE Florida License 39923 ENSF cA STATE •'