HomeMy WebLinkAboutOCG 05-2375B - Florida DEPCertified Mail: 7005 1160 0000 2920 7642
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION,
Complainant,
VS.
CITY OF SANFORD,
FACILITY ID. FL0020141,
Respondent.
AIN
N Ai "A Now
OGC FILE NO. 05-2375B
COPY
Ir I Ii, go
The State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection ("Department") and the City
of Sanford ("Respondent") executed a Consent Order in OGC Case No. 05-2375 ("Original Order."),
on January 18, 2006. This Amended Consent Order which amends the Original Consent Order is
entered into between the Department and the Respondent. It is hereby agreed between the parties
that this Amended Consent Order shall amend all of the provisions of the Original Order in its
entirety.
The Department finds and the Respondent admits the following:
1. The Department is the administrative agency of the State of Florida having the power
and duty to protect Florida's air and water resources and to administer and enforce the provisions of
Chapter 403, Florida Statutes, and the rules promulgated thereunder, Title 62, Florida
Administrative Code. The Department has jurisdiction over the matters addressed in this Amended
Consent Order.
2. Respondent is a person within the meaning of Section 403.031(5), Florida Statutes.
3. Respondent is the owner and is responsible for the operation of the Sanford/North
WRF, a 7.3 MGD annual average daily flow (AADF) permitted capacity complete -mix activate
sludge wastewater treatment facility ("Facility") with a 1.0 MGD AADF permitted capacity
discharge (D-001) of dechlorinated effluent to the St. Johns River and chlorinated effluent to a 7.14
MGD AADF permitted capacity slow -rate land application system and a public access irrigation
reuse system. The Facility is located at 1201 West Seminole Boulevard, Seminole County, Sanford,
Florida, Latitude 28' 48' 57" North and Longitude 81' 16' 42" West.
4. The Department finds that the Respondent operates the Facility under Department
permit No. x ,9 FL�,r,_ 029,14,1i yhip p ires on April 7, 2008. A file review conducted on August 22,
a
2005, attached as Exhibit 1, indicates that flow to the plant, wet weather flow, Total Nitrogen,
Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand (CBOD5), and Total Ammonia permit limits were
exceeded. In addition, on'August 9, 2005, a spill of approximately 100,000 gallons of partially
treated wastewater occurred at the Facility's reject pond. This overflow and exceedance of permit
limits are violations of Section 403.161(1)(b), Florida Statutes ("F.S."), and Rule 62-620.300(5),
Florida Administrative Code ("F.A.C.").
5. On September 13, 2005, the Department received a document from the Respondent
entitled "Abbreviated Water Quality Status Report" for the Facility, attached as Exhibit 2. This
document included the following:
a. Water Qualify Issues at the SNWRF
1. Flow to the plant is exceeding the permitted limit.
2. Elevated concentrations and loadings of oil and grease and CBOD5.
I Periods when Nocardia is affecting the secondary treatment process.
4. Reject water recycled from the detention ponds has the potential to convey
algae and other microorganisms into the biological treatment system.
5. A new Pretreatment Ordinance was adopted in September 2004. This new,
Ordinance provides a better system to control illegal discharges of oil, solids, CBOD, and other
pollutants of concern.
AMENDED 2 of 14 OGC File No. 05-2375B
6. Additional disinfection application points were added to the aeration basins,
RAS lines and detention pond return lines in an effort to control Nocardia and algae.
b. Class III Water Quality Issues — SNWRF Wet Weather Discharges
1. The wet weather discharge flow is exceeding the permitted limit due to
extensive rainfall from the hurricanes, low reuse because of significant wet periods and rejection of
substandard effluent.
2. Elevated concentrations of various Class III water quality criteria and
Nitrogen, on an occasional basis, during wet weather discharge to the St. Johns River.
3. An Actiflo pilot unit was utilized to evaluate the effect of the treatment unit
and various chemical coagulants and aids on reducing water quality characteristics of concern with
regard to surface water discharges and reclaimed water characteristics. Pilot testing showed
excellent results.
c. Water Ouality Lmprovement Schedule
1. The City has completed a number of projects and has a number of on-going
projects to improve the utility infrastructure that will have a significant "positive" impact on the
operation of the Sanford Wastewater Management System such as: new influent structure, flow
metering system, odor control, grit removal, electrical controls, storage systems, digester tank
covers, a Class A biosolids management system, etc.
2. A consortium known as the "Tri -Party" is being formed to develop
reclaimed/augmentation water resources in the North Seminole County region to reduce
groundwater withdrawals associated with irrigation. A "high priority" project is the Mill Creek
Reclaimed Water Storage Pond. The development of recharge basins in the Tri -Party Service Area
was determined to be a very useful tool in mitigating the impact of groundwater withdrawals used
for potable water supply at area WTPs. A Tri -Party Agreement for the implementation of these
AMENDED 3 of 14 OGC File No. 05-2375B
infrastructure improvements is almost in place. Upon completion of the Agreement, the engineering
design and permitting will proceed, with construction to proceed at a future date.
3. Phenol removal bench -scale studies began in August 2005 to evaluate
potential systems or chemical additions to remove phenolic compounds from the SNWRF wet
weather discharge to the St. Johns River. The most cost-effective and efficient alternative will be
selected to be incorporated with the ACTIFLO treatment process, which will be installed in FY's
2007-2008.
4. The two (2) new pretreatment employees will take a more active role in
reducing the discharge of pollutants of concern into the City's collection system.
5. Collection System Pollutant Discharge Surveys will begin in October 2005.
The purpose of the program will be to identify potential discharges of pollutants of concern and the
industries, establishments or individuals responsible for the discharges or whether the pollutant are
entering the system through infiltration and inflow.
d. Infiltration/Inflow (VI) Improvements within the City's Wastewater. Collection
System
1. Infiltration and inflow {"I/I"), in older portions of the collection system, are
causing lift stations overflows and increased wastewater flows to the Facility.
2. Excessive oil and grease concentrations are causing sewer overflows.
3. Outside contractors are causing damages to collection lines during
construction of road projects.
4. A number of lift stations have been rehabilitated and other lift stations have
"quick fix" lists for repairs that are being completed. The remainder of the repairs for lift stations
with "quick fix" lists are scheduled to be completed in fiscal year 2007. Some new lift stations and
collection systems will be built and some existing lift stations and collection systems will be
AMENDED 4 of 14 OGC File No. 05-2375B
abandoned. There are currently eleven (11) lift stations without SCADA systems. These lift stations
are scheduled to be retrofitted in fiscal year 2006.
5. The City of Sanford completed a Capacity, Management, Operation and
Maintenance (CMOM) Plan evaluation of the wastewater management collection system in 2004.
The City is maintaining the wastewater collection system as recommended and in accordance with
the CMOM Plan.
6. Existing GIS data must be evaluated and verified and new data collected as
required. Upon collection of all required data, a hydraulic model of the collection and transmission
system will be generated using a non-proprietary simulation package to evaluate the system, which
will allow identification of potential collection system problems and required infrastructure
improvements.
6. In a letter dated February 6, 2006, the Department revised Permit No. FL0020141 to
remove the requirements for monthly monitoring for Total Phenolic Compounds.
7. In a letter dated December 1, 2006, the Respondent requested modifications of
Paragraphs 8 and 10 of the Original Order.
8. On January 22, 2007, the Department verified that the Respondent has installed
SCADA systems on all existing lift stations. All new SCADA units that are installed shall monitor
lift station flows, pressures and transmission main pressure immediately adjacent to the lift stations.
9. Having reached a resolution of the matter the Department and the Respondent
mutually agree and it is
ORDERED:
10. No later than June 30, 2006, Respondent shall complete construction of and place in
service the improvements to the Chemical Application System — Secondary Clarification System.
The system has been temporarily installed and operating. Construction and final installation will be
AMENDED 5 of 14 OGC File No. 05-23758
completed no later than March 1, 2007.
11. No later than February 28, 2008, Respondent shall complete construction of and
place in service the two Actiflo units for treatment of water discharged to the St. Johns River.
12. No later than April 15, 2007, Respondent shall complete construction of and transfer
of wastewater to the Sanford South Water Resource Center.
13. No later than September 30, 2007, Respondent shall complete the improvements to
the collection system infrastructure in regards to infiltration and inflow for the Cypress Avenue
area, Celery Avenue area and George Town area, as referenced in the "Abbreviated Water Quality
Status Report".
14. The following discharge limitations, and other requirements, shall be met:
Table 1: Interim Limit for Flow to Facili
Effluent Limitations Monitoring Requirements
Annual Monthly Weekly Single Monitoring Monitoring
Parameter Units Max/6lin Location Site
Average Average Average Sample Frequency Number
Flow MGD Maximum &0 1 ---- I _-_- __ I continuous INF -2
The effluent discharged from the Facility to the St. Johns River shall comply with the interim limits
in Table 2, below. All of the other parameter limits in the Permit remain the same. The interim
limits shall become effective upon the first day of the month following the effective date of this
Amended Consent Order. The interim limits shall remain in effect until 90 days after the completion
of the improvements to the collection system as referenced in Paragraph 13, above. A copy of the
DMR, DEP Form 62-620.910(10), to be used for reporting the interim limit values is incorporated
herein and attached as Exhibit 3. The analysis and reporting of the interim limits shall be in
accordance with the Permit. These interim limits do not act as State of Florida Department of
Environmental Protection Wastewater Permit effluent limitations or modified Permit limitations,
AMENDED 6 of 14 OGC File No. 05-2375B
nor do they authorize or otherwise justify violation of the Florida Air and Water Pollution Control
Act, Part I, Chapter 403, F.S., during the pendency of this Amended Consent Order.
Table 2: Interim Limits for Wet Weather Discharge to the St. Johns River
All samples shall be grab samples.
The pH shall be not less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 8.5 standard units
and shall be monitored continuously.
amounts.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace
Tests conducted pursuant to this monitoring program shall conform to 62-160,
Florida Administrative Code.
Analyses shall be reported once each month on a Discharge Monitoring Report
(DMR), DEP Form 62-620.910(10). These reports shall be mailed or hand delivered to the
Department of Environmental Protection, Central District Office, 3319 Maguire Boulevard, Suite
232, Orlando, Florida 32803-3767 once each month and must be received by the Department no
later than the 28th day following the end of the reporting period (e.g., the August report would be
due not later than September 28th.)
AMENDED 7 of 14 OGC File No. 05-2375B
Effluent Limitations
Monitoring Requirements
Parameter
Units
Max/Min
Annual
Monthly Weekly
Single
Monitoring
Monitoring
Location Site
Average
Average Average
Sample
Frequency
Number
Flow, to River
MGD
Maximum
2.0
--- ------
----
Continuous
FLW-1
Ammonia, Total
mg/L
Maximum
7.0
11.0
Daily
EFD-1
as N
Nitrogen, Total
mg/L
Maximum
14.0
Daily
EFD-1
BOD, Carbonaceous
mg/L
Maximum
--'T-
35.Q
60.0
Daily
EFD-1
s da , 20C
All samples shall be grab samples.
The pH shall be not less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 8.5 standard units
and shall be monitored continuously.
amounts.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace
Tests conducted pursuant to this monitoring program shall conform to 62-160,
Florida Administrative Code.
Analyses shall be reported once each month on a Discharge Monitoring Report
(DMR), DEP Form 62-620.910(10). These reports shall be mailed or hand delivered to the
Department of Environmental Protection, Central District Office, 3319 Maguire Boulevard, Suite
232, Orlando, Florida 32803-3767 once each month and must be received by the Department no
later than the 28th day following the end of the reporting period (e.g., the August report would be
due not later than September 28th.)
AMENDED 7 of 14 OGC File No. 05-2375B
15. Every calendar quarter after the effective date of this Amended Consent Order,
Respondent shall submit in writing to the Department a report containing information concerning
the status and progress of projects being completed under this Amended Consent Order, information
as to compliance or noncompliance with the applicable requirements of this Amended Consent
Order including construction requirements and effluent limitations, and any reasons for
noncompliance. Such reports shall also include a projection of the work to be performed pursuant
to this Amended Consent Order during the following 3 month period. The reports shall be submitted
to the Department within thirty (30) days following the end of the quarter.
16. In the event of a sale or conveyance of the Facility or of the property upon which the
Facility is located, if all of the requirements of this Amended Consent Order have not been fully
satisfied, Respondent shall, at least 30 days prior to the sale or conveyance of the property or
Facility, (1) notify the Department of such sale or conveyance, (2) provide the name and address of
the purchaser, or operator, or person(s) in control of the Facility, and (3) provide a copy of this
Amended Consent Order with all attachments to the new owner. The sale or conveyance of the
Facility, or the property upon which the Facility is located shall not relieve the Respondent of the
obligations imposed in this Amended Consent Order.
17. Respondent agrees to pay the Department stipulated penalties in the amount of $
250.00 per day for each and every day Respondent fails to timely comply with any of the
requirements of Paragraphs 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 of this Amended Consent Order. A separate
stipulated penalty shall be assessed for each violation of this Amended Consent Order. Within 30
days of written demand from the Department, Respondent shall make payment, of the appropriate
stipulated penalties to "The Department of Environmental Protection" by cashier's check or money
order and shall include thereon the OGC number assigned to this Amended Consent Order and the
notation "Ecosystem Management and Restoration Trust Fund". Payment shall be sent to the
AMENDED 8 of 14 OGC File No. 05-2375B
Department of Environmental Protection, Central District Office, 3319 Maguire Boulevard, Suite
232, Orlando, Florida 32803-3767. The Department may make demands for payment at any time
after violations occur. Nothing in this Paragraph shall prevent the Department from filing suit to
specifically enforce any terms of this Amended Consent Order. Any penalties assessed under this
Paragraph shall be in addition to the settlement sum agreed to in Paragraph 15 of the Original
Order. If the Department is required to file a lawsuit to recover stipulated penalties under this
Paragraph, the Department will not be foreclosed from seeking civil penalties for violations of this
Amended Consent Order in an amount greater than the stipulated penalties due under this
Paragraph.
18. If any event, including administrative or judicial challenges by third parties unrelated
to the Respondent, occurs which causes delay or the reasonable likelihood of delay, in complying
with the requirements of this Amended Consent Order, Respondent shall have the burden of proving
the delay was or will be caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the Respondent
and could not have been or cannot be overcome by Respondent's due diligence. Economic
circumstances shall not be considered circumstances beyond the control of Respondent, nor shall
the failure of a contractor, subcontractor, materialman or other agent (collectively referred to as
"contractor") to whom responsibility for performance is delegated to meet contractually imposed
deadlines be a cause beyond the control of Respondent, unless the cause of the contractor's late
performance was also beyond the contractor's control. Upon occurrence of an event causing delay,
or upon becoming aware of a potential for delay, Respondent shall notify the Department orally
within 24 hours or by the next working day and shall, within seven calendar days of oral
notification to the Department, notify the Department in writing of the anticipated length and cause
of the delay, the measures taken or to be taken to prevent or minimize the delay and the timetable
by which Respondent intends to implement these measures. If the parties can agree that the delay or
AMENDED 9 of 14 OGC File No. 05-2375B
anticipated delay has been or will be caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of
Respondent, the time for performance hereunder shall be extended for a period equal to the agreed
delay resulting from such circumstances. Such agreement shall adopt all reasonable measures
necessary to avoid or minimize delay. Failure of Respondent to comply with the notice
requirements of this Paragraph in a timely manner shall constitute a waiver of Respondent's right to
request an extension of time for compliance with the requirements of this Amended Consent Order.
19. Persons who are not parties to this Amended Consent Order, but whose substantial
interests are affected by this Amended Consent Order, have a right, pursuant to Sections 120.569
and 120.57, Florida Statutes, to petition, for an administrative hearing on it. The Petition must
contain the information set forth below and must be filed (received) at the Department's Office of
General Counsel, 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, MS# 35, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000
within 21 days of receipt of this notice. A copy of the Petition must also be mailed at the time of
filing to the District Office named above at the address indicated. Failure to file a petition within the
21 days constitutes a waiver of any right such person has to an administrative hearing pursuant to
Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes.
The petition shall contain the following information:
(a) The name, address, and telephone number of each petitioner; the Departments Amended
Consent Order identification number and the county in which the subject matter or activity is
located; (b) A statement of how and when each petitioner received notice of the Amended Consent
Order; (c) A statement of how each petitioner's substantial interests are affected by the Amended
Consent Order; (d) A statement of the material facts disputed by petitioner, if any; (e) A statement
of facts which petitioner contends warrant reversal or modification of the Amended Consent Order;
(t) A statement of which rules or statutes petitioner contends require reversal or modification of the
Amended Consent Order; (g) A statement of the relief sought by petitioner, stating precisely the
action petitioner wants the Department to take with respect to the Amended Consent Order.
If a petition is filed, the administrative hearing process is designed to formulate agency
action. Accordingly, the Departments final action may be different from the position taken by it in
this Notice. Persons whose substantial interests will be affected by any decision of the Department
with regard to the subject Amended Consent Order have the right to petition to become a party to
the proceeding. The petition must conform to the requirements specified above and be filed
(received) within 21 days of receipt of this notice in the Office of General Counsel at the above
address of the Department. Failure to petition within the allowed time frame constitutes a waiver of
any right such person has to request a hearing under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes,
and to participate as a party to this proceeding. Any subsequent intervention will only be at the
approval of the presiding officer upon motion filed pursuant to Rule 28-106.205, Florida
Administrative Code.
A person whose substantial interests are affected by the Amended Consent Order may file a
timely petition for an administrative hearing under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes, or
may choose to pursue mediation as an alternative remedy under Section 120.573, Florida Statutes,
before the deadline for filing a petition. Choosing mediation will not adversely affect the right to a
hearing if mediation does not result in a settlement. The procedures for pursuing mediation are set
forth below.
AMENDED 10 of 14 OGC File No. 05-2375B
Mediation may only take place if the Department and all the parties to the proceeding agree
that mediation is appropriate. A person may pursue mediation by reaching a mediation agreement
with all parties to the proceeding (which include the Respondent, the Department, and any person
who has filed a timely and sufficient petition for a hearing) and by showing how the substantial
interests of each mediating party are affected by the Amended Consent Order. The agreement must
be filed in (received by) the Office of General Counsel of the Department at 3900 Commonwealth
Boulevard, MS #35, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000, within 10 days after the deadline as set forth
above for the filing of a petition.
The agreement to mediate must include the following:
(a) The names, addresses, and telephone numbers of any persons who may attend the
mediation;
(b) The name, address, and telephone number of the mediator selected by the parties, or a
provision for selecting a mediator within a specified time;
(c) The agreed allocation of the costs and fees associated with the mediation;
(d) The agreement of the parties on the confidentiality of discussions and documents
introduced during mediation;
(e) The date, time, and place of the first mediation session, or a deadline for holding the first
session, if no mediator has yet been chosen;
(f) The name of each party's representative who shall have authority to settle or recommend
settlement; and
(g) Either an explanation of how the substantial interests of each mediating party will be
affected by the action or proposed action addressed in this notice of intent or a statement clearly
identifying thepetition for hearing that each party has already filed, and incorporating it by
reference.
(h) The signatures of all parties or their authorized representatives.
As provided in Section 120.573, Florida Statutes, the timely agreement of all parties to
mediate will toll the time limitations imposed by Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes, for
requesting and holding an administrative hearing. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the
mediation must be concluded within sixty days of the execution of the agreement. If mediation
results in settlement of the administrative dispute, the Department must enter a final order
incorporating the agreement of the parties. Persons whose substantial interests will be affected by
such a modified final decision of the Department have a right to petition for a hearing only in
accordance with the requirements for such petitions set forth above, and must therefore file their
petitions within 21 days of receipt of this notice. If mediation terminates without settlement of the
dispute, the Department shall notify all parties in writing that the administrative hearing processes
under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes, remain available for disposition of the dispute,
and the notice will specify the deadlines that then will apply for challenging the agency action and
electing remedies under those two statutes.
20. Respondent shall allow all authorized representatives of the Department access to the
]property and facility at reasonable times for the purpose of determining compliance with the terms
of this Amended Consent Order and the rules and statutes of the Department.
21. All submittals and payments required by this Amended Consent Order to be
submitted to the Department shall be sent to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection,
AMENDED 11 of 14 OGC File No. 05-2375B
Program Manager, Wastewater Compliance/Enforcement Section, 3319 Maguire Boulevard, Suite
232, Orlando, Florida 32803-3767.
22. This Amended Consent Order is a settlement of the Department's civil and
administrative authority arising under Florida law to resolve the matters addressed herein. This
Amended Consent Order is not a settlement of any criminal liabilities which may arise under
Florida law, nor is it a settlement of any violation which may be prosecuted criminally or civilly
under federal law.
23. The Department hereby expressly reserves the right to initiate appropriate legal
action to prevent or prohibit any violations of applicable statutes, or the rules promulgated
thereunder that are not specifically addressed by the terms of this Amended Consent Order,
including but not limited to undisclosed releases, contamination or polluting conditions.
24. The terms and conditions set forth in this Amended Consent Order may be enforced
in a court of competent jurisdiction pursuant to Sections 120.69 and 403.121, Florida Statutes.
Failure to comply with the terms of this Amended Consent Order shall constitute a violation of
Section 403.161(1)(b), Florida Statutes. .
25. The Department, for and in consideration of the complete and timely performance by
Respondent of the obligations agreed to in this Amended Consent Order hereby waives its right to
seek judicial imposition of damages or civil penalties for alleged violations through the date of the
filing of this Amended Consent Order as addressed in this Amended Consent Order
26. Respondent is fully aware that a violation of the terms of this Amended Consent
Order mity subject Respondent to judicial imposition of, damages, civil penalties up to $10,000-00
per day per violation, and criminal penalties.
27. Entry of this Amended Consent Order does not relieve Respondent of the need to
comply with applicable federal, state or local laws, regulations or ordinances.
AMENDED 12 of 14 OGC File No. 05-2375B
28. No modifications of the terms of this Amended Consent Order shall be effective until
reduced to writing and executed by both Respondent and the Department.
29. Respondent acknowledges and waives its right to an administrative hearing pursuant
to Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes, on the terms of this Amended Consent Order.
Respondent acknowledges its right to appeal the terms of this Amended Consent Order pursuant to
Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, and waives that right upon signing this Amended Consent Order.
30. This Amended Consent Order is a final order of the Department pursuant to Section
120.52(7), Florida Statutes, and it is final and effective on the date filed with the Clerk of the
Department unless a Petition for Administrative Hearing is filed in accordance with Chapter 120,
Florida Statutes. Upon the timely filing of a petition this Amended Consent Order will not be
effective until further order of the Department.
3/r
DATE
,3/ 7
DATE
Robert P. YeW r
City Manager
City of Sanford
Paul R. Moore, P.E.
Utility Director
City of Sanford
AMENDED 13 of 14 OGC File No. 05-2375B
FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY
DONE AND ORDERED this _Q'?� day of%4.e4 , 2007.
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
ivian PGarfein
Director, Central District
FILED, on this date, pursuant to Section 120.52, Florida Statutes, with the designated Department
Clerk, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
- 3 a.1 r7 --
Clerk Date
Copy furnished to: Lea Crandall, Agency Clerk, Mail Station 35, lea.crandall@a,dep.state.fl.us
.AMENDED 14 of 14 OGC File No. 05-2375B
DORLANDO
-4 011 DA .
(3 pages)
OGC File No.05-2375B
Sanford / North WWTF
Permit NO: FL0020141
Discharge_
Month
Point
Parameter
Result
Limit
Jan -03
D001
Flow An. Avg
1.437 mgd
1.0 mgd
Feb -03
D001
Flow An. Avg
1.639 mgd
1.0 mgd
Mar -03
D001
Flow An. Avg
1.828 mgd
1.0 mgd
Apr -03
D001
Flow An. Avg
1.848 mgd
1.0 mgd
May -03
D001
Flow An. Avg
1.848 mgd
1.0 mgd
Jun -03
D001
Flow An. Avg
1.586 mgd
1.0 mgd
D001
Flow @ INF -2 (An. Avg)
7.43 mgd
7.3 mgd
D001
Total Nitrogen mon avg
16.4 mg/L
12.0 mg/L
Jul -03
D001
Flow An. Avg
1.275 mgd
1.0 mgd
Aug -03
D001
Flow An. Avg
1.099 mgd
1.0 mgd
Sep -03
No exceedences
Oct -03
No exceedences
Nov -03
No exceedences
Dec -03
No exceedences
Jan -04
No exceedences
Feb -04
No exceedences
Mar -04
D001
Total Nitrogen An Avg.
12.4 mg/L
12.0 mg/L
Apr -04
D001
Total Nitrogen An Avg.
12.7 mg/L
12.0 mg/L
Sanford / North WWTF
Permit NO: FL0020141
Discharge
Month
Point
Parameter
Result
Limit
May -04.
D001
Total Nitrogen An Avg.
12.7 mg/L
12.0 mg/L
Jun'04
D001
Total Nitrogen AnAvg.
12`3 mg/L
12,0 mg/L
D001
Stream Stage
0.9 ft
1.2 ft
Jul -04
DDOi
Total Nitrogen AnAvg.
13 mg/L
12.0 mg/L
AuQ'04
Noexoaedenneo
Sep -04
O001
Flow An. Avg
1.655 mgd mgd
1.Omgd mgd
Oct04
D001
Flow An. Avg
2.077nngd mgd
1.Omgd mgd
D001
Flow (|NF-2)An.Avg
7.332mgd mgd
7.3mgdmgd
Nov -04
D001
Flow An. Avg
2.068 mod
1.0 mgd
D001
Flow (INF-2)An.Avg
7.418 mgd
7.3 mgd
Ooc-04
D001
Flow An. Avg
2.068 mgd
1.0 mgd
D001
Flow @|NF-2(An.Avg)
7.511 mgd
7.3 mgd
Jon -05
D001
Flow An. Avg
2.363 mgd
1.0 mgd
D001
CBDD(NYax)atEFD4
54.8 mg/L
40.0 mg/L
D001
Annmonio(K80.Avg.)
5.6 mg/L
4.0 mg/L
D001
Arnmonia(/Vk.Avo.)
6.2 mg/L
5.0 mg/L
D001
Ammonia Max.
10.3 mg/L
7.8 mg/L
D001
Phomph.(K8sm.)
14.6 mg/L
8.0 mg/L
D001
Flow @|NF-2(4n.Avg)
7.536 mgd
7.3 mgd
Sanford / North WWTF
Discharge
Month Point
t*o
Mar-05 D001
D001
Apr -05 D-001
D-001
May -05 D-001
D-001
Permit NO. FL0020141
Parameter
Result
Limit
CBOD max
49.4 mg/L
40.0 mg/L
CBOD mon avg
30.8 mg/L
25.0 mg/L
Flow @ INF -2 (An. Avg)
7.483 mgd
7.3 mgd
Flow An. Avg
2.412 mgd
1.0 mgd
Flow @ INF -2 (An. Avg)
7.492 mgd
7.3 mgd
Flow An. Avg
2.412 mgd
1.0 mgd
Flow @ INF -2 (An. Avg)
7.541 mgd
7.3 mgd
Flow An. Avg
2.412 mgd
1.0 mgd
Flow @ INF -2 (An. Avg)
7.549 mgd
7.3 mgd
Flow An. Avg
3.031 mgd
1.0 mgd
Fecal Coliform max
1500 fcc/100 ml
.800.0 fcc/100 ml
Phenolic Compound
15 ug/l
1.0 ug/L
Flow @ INF -2 (An. Avg)
7.834 mgd
7.3 mgd
D.E*P., — ORLANDO
104,14821
11 11i l�!
MIS 111`111`11 1� 111,1111 1111,111 1
(42 pages)
OGC File No. 05-2375B
t,
ONA
September 9, 2005
of Sanford,
Flo •
. Ufflity Department
RO. Box 1788. 32772-1788
Telephone (407) 330-5640
Ms, Christianne C. Ferraro, P.E.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Central Florida District
3319 Maguire Blvd., Suite 232
Orlando, FL 32803-3767
Re: Sanford North Water Reclamation Facility (SNWRF)
Abbreviated Water Quality Status Report
Dear Ms. Ferraro:
The City of Sanford appreciates the District's assistance in resolving some of the water quality
issues occurring at the above referenced facility. Per your request at our meeting last month in
Sanford, this letter serves as a vehicle to address the City's on-going efforts to resolve various
utility system issues by issuing this "abbreviated" water quality status report for the SNWRF, to
include the following:
* Water quality issues at the SNWRF.
* Meeting the Class III Surface Water discharge limits, when discharging to the St. Johns
River via the wet weather discharge system.
* Minimize infiltration and inflow entering the wastewater collection system during heavy
rainfall events.
Each Item will be discussed with regards to the current condition, corrective actions being taken
by the City and the proposed "action" schedule. This will then be followed by a request for "interim"
permit modification during the period where construction activities, pilot studies, etc, are being
conducted to resolve the system issues described herein.
Additional items addressed in the report include:
* A brief discussion of the current and proposed utility construction projects within the City
of Sanford Wastewater Management System Service Area.
e Additional proposed systems and programs associated With the Tri -Party Team (Sanford,
Lake Mary, Seminole County) that may be able to address additional reclaimed water
disposal options during periods of wet weather.
"The Friendly City"
As always, the City is utilizing all potential resources to resolve these issues, meet all permit
requirements and produce an environmentally safe effluent for beneficial use. As you know, our
collection system in parts of the City is over 100 years old and is in need of some repair or
rehabilitation. Additionally, as growth is moving into the greater Sanford area, we are on the verge
of having to implement a new IW PP to ensure that commercial and light Industrial users are not
conveying significantly high concentrations of various constituents to the SNWRF or SSWRC that
could lead to problems In the treatment of the incoming substrate. A new Pretreatment Ordinance
has just been approved by the City Commission and is in the process of being implemented.
We hope that you find the information provided In this "abbreviated" water quality status report
gives you some Insight Into the efforts that the City and its Consultants are putting forth to resolve
our existing water quality issues as quickly as possible and that the methods or methodologies
selected are "tang -term" solutions, not "quick fixes.
If I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at (407) 330-5640. We
look forward to working with the Department In the resolution of these issues and appreciate your
assistance, cooperation and coordination during this interim period.
Sincerely,
CITY OF SANFORD
6 -15 -
Paul R. Moore, P.E., Utility Director
Enclosures
Cc: Migdalla Hernandez, MSE, Water Resources Engineer
Charlie W. Turner, Plant Coordinator
Benjamin M. Fries, CPH Engineers
SANFORD NORTH WRF
"ABBREVIATED" WATER QUALITY STATUS REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
•... . - I.IMI
Description Aaae Nn.
- 1.0 WATER QUALITY ISSUES AT THE SNWRF ................................ fi
2.0 CLASS III WATER QUALITY ISSUES - SNWRF WET WEATHER DISCHARGES ... 4
3.0 WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE ............................. 9
4.0 INFiLTRATIONIINFLOW (1/1) IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN
THE CITY'S WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM ........................ 19
5.0 INTERIM PERMIT MODIFICATIONS ..................................... 27
APPENDICES
A SCREENING WATER QUALITY SAMPLING
Sanford North Wafer Reclamation FRO - " Abbreviated" Water Quality Status Report I
SECTION I -
WATER QUALITY ISSUES AT THE SMWRF
Since the hurricanes of 2004 the raw wastewater flow at the SNWRF has increased due
to high groundwater table elevations and increased process water requirements. A
synopsis of the water quality, both raw wastewater and "finished" reclaimed water, for the
period between January 2004 and July 2005 is presented In the table below:
September 9, 2005 Water Quality issues at the SMWAF
172
195
161
205
202
213
2.0
V
1.2
1.0
3.0
2.1
Jan '04
6.463
6.613
1.98
237 9.9
Feb '04
Mar'04
6.910
6.750
6,610.
6.462
5.10
0.39
273 8.4
242 5.2
Apr '04
6.060
6.422
1.84
257 5.2
f&y'04
6.01 9
6.445
4.21
260 5.8
Jun '04
5.604
6.409
7.05
246 4,7
Jul '04
6.706
6.417
6.98
156 1
4.5
167
1,6
12.7
0.2
Aug '04
0,438
6.555
20.02
23.2
5.3
147
1.7
5.7
6.6
0.6
0.7
Sep '04
12.217
7.057
14.89
117 5.6
110 1.4
Oct '04
9.266
7.332
1.24
146
5.7
168
0.7
9,7
5.6
Nov '04
7.247
7.418
0,96
173 4.2
178 1.1
Dee 104
Jan '05
6.750
6.750
7.454
7.478
1.84
1.46
224 5.9
245 5.1
208 1.3
214 1.6
Feb '05
8,280
7.426
1.25
277
5.7
240
1.5
7.4
2.2
Mar'05
6. &W
7.434 1
5.50
225
6.0
208
0.6
Apr'05
6.670
7.483
1.31
275 4.1
227 0.5
May'05
6.110
7.491
3.39
237 4.0
248 1 0.5
Jun '06
9.510
7.816
16.71
179 3.9
218
Jul 'OS
8.510
7,967J
6.25
117
3.2
1 282
3.7
-1
September 9, 2005 Water Quality issues at the SMWAF
Sanford North Water Reclamation Facift "Abbravlatar WOW Quality Status !�U_Vrt 2
Rainfall received from the hurricanes in August and September 2004 totaled 34.91 inches
in a total of approximately 30 days. This caused the flows to the SNWRF to increase
significantly which can be seen In the monthly ADF flows for August - October 2004. After
this period in time, the average monthly raw wastewater flow decreased to levels below the
currently permitted capacftyof the SNWRF (7.30 MGD). In the period of June -July2005,
another significantly wet period of approximately 30 days dropped another 22.96 inches
of rain In the local area and the raw wastewater flows increased somewhat due to high
groundwater conditions; however, they are currently dropping back to normal levels.
With respect to water quality conditions at the SNWRF, the following observations have
been Identified:
1. Elevated concentrations and loadings of oil and grease and CBOD,,.
2. There are periods when Nog is is affecting the secondary treatment process.
3. Reject water recycled from the detention ponds has the potential to convey algae
and other microorganisms Into the biological treatment system.
The City of Sanford and its consultants have been taking a "proactive" approach to
identifying the cause of the problems and have been attempting to take "aggressive"
actions to correct these situations. The following actions have been proposed and
implemented with respect to the above issues:
1. Pretreatment Ordinance M ificationa
a. A new Pretreatment Ordinance was adopted In September 2004, This new
ordinance provides a better system to control illegal discharges of oils and
greases, suspended solids, CBOD.., and other pollutants of concern entering the
City of Sanford Wastewater Collection System.
b. Pretreatment Solutions, Inc. has been retained by the City for assistance in
implementing the "new" Pretreatment Ordinance and to conduct pollutant
discharge surveys throughout the service area.
c, Two (2) Pretreatment positions were created by the City of Sanford to provide
enforcement of the "new" Pretreatment Ordinance. One position has been filled
and the employee is currently working and the other position will be filled within
the next thirty (30) days.
September 9, 2005 Water QmIlly Issues at the SNWRF
Sanford North Water Reclamation Facility - "Abbreviated" Water Quallty. Status Report 3
2. Nocardia Influx and Rplect Water
a. The City has been conducting studies to identify methodologies that can be
implemented to minimize the influx of Nocardia into the treatment system and
their impact on the treatment facility. -
b. Additional disinfection application points were added to the SNWRF aeration
basins, RAS lines and Detention Pond return lines in an effort to control
Nocardia and algae.
September 9, 2005 Water Quality Issues at the SNWRF
Sanford North Water Reclamatfon FacUlty - "Abbreviated" Water Quality Status Re ort 4
SECTION 2
CLASS III WATER QUALITY ISSUES 0
SNWRF WET WEATHER D►ISCHAARGES
The City of Sanford has a permitted seasonal discharge, to the St. Johns River, during
periods of wet weather. The annual average daily flow Is limited to 1.00 MGD by permit.
A synopsis of the seasonal discharge water quality, for the period between January 2004
and July 2005, is presented in the table below:
September 9, 2005 Class N Witter Quality Issues - SNWRF War Weather Discharges
S&~North Water Reclamsdw FAOM - '"Abbmiatwr Water Qualft
y Status Report
Flow Rate (MGD)
Month ,'Year BOD, TN U U TSS N11., -N TP
Monthly Anijual (int iL) (mql) (rnUIL) (niglL) Irnill) (inUIL)
Avg. Avg.
'��f��
May `OS 0-000 2,397
Jun 'OS 7.503 3.016
Jul'OS 5.954 3.340
MOM M
2.992 9.5 1 91 6�8 3.5 I.LL 1.4
Avrja . 2.261
Rainfall received from the hurricanes In August and September 2004 totaled 34.91 Inches
in a total of approximately 30 days. This caused the seasonal discharge flows to the St.
Johns River to increase significantly as utility customers were not demanding reclaimed
water and Influent flows to the SNWRF were in an elevated condition due to the high
groundwater table. This is evident when one reviews the seasonal discharge flows for the
period from August - October 2004. After this period in time, the monthly seasonal
discharge flows to normal levels; however, since the permit Is based on an annual average
basis, the AADF flow will not decrease significantly until the August - October 2004
seasonal flows are "cycled" out of the mathematical calculation, In addition, during the
period of June -July 2005, another significantly wet period of approximately 30 days
dropped another 22.96 inches of rain In the local area and the seasonal discharge flows
increased somewhat, again due to low demand for reclaimed water and elevated raw
wastewater flows entering the SNWRF.
With respect to seasonal discharge water quality conditions at the SNWRF, the following
observations have been identified:
1. Elevated concentrations of various Class III water quality parameters, on an
occasional basis, during wet weather discharges to the St. Johns River.
2, Elevated Gjsidl�t and GWtogpodftm counts.
3. Elevated Total Nitrogen concentrations, on an occasional basis, during wet weather
discharges to the St. Johns River.
The City of Sanford has been taking a"proactiva" approach to identifying the cause of the
problems and have been attempting to take "aggressive" actions to correct these
situations. The following actions have been proposed and implemented with respect to the
above issues:
September 9, 2005 Class /if Wow Que/hy Issues - SNYMF Wet Weather Discharges
With respect to seasonal discharge water quality conditions at the SNWRF, the following
observations have been identified:
1. Elevated concentrations of various Class III water quality parameters, on an
occasional basis, during wet weather discharges to the St. Johns River.
2, Elevated Gjsidl�t and GWtogpodftm counts.
3. Elevated Total Nitrogen concentrations, on an occasional basis, during wet weather
discharges to the St. Johns River.
The City of Sanford has been taking a"proactiva" approach to identifying the cause of the
problems and have been attempting to take "aggressive" actions to correct these
situations. The following actions have been proposed and implemented with respect to the
above issues:
September 9, 2005 Class /if Wow Que/hy Issues - SNYMF Wet Weather Discharges
Sanford North Water Reclamation Facility - "Abbreviated" Water 9
WS.M.1 status Report 6
1. Bench -Scale Pilot Teg1bg
a. The City has been conducting "bench -scale" pilot studies at the SNWRF since
2003. -Various coagulants and coagulant aids (polymers) have been tested to
address wet weather discharge water quality Issues, when discharging to the St.
Johns River (Class III Water).
b. Bench -scale testing results have indicated identified -various -coagulants and
coagulant aids that appear to be successful in meeting the objectives of the
study being conducted by the City's Water Resources Engineer.
c. Based on the results of the bench -scale studies, "full-scale" pilot studies were
conducted at the SNWRF to thoroughly test the above -referenced chemicals
that appeared promising in the ability to reduce various Class III water quality
parameters of concern in the SNWRF effluent.
2. Full -Scale Pilot Testing
a. Actiflo-Pilot Testi
I. An Actiflo pilot unit (manufactured by Krijger, Inc.) was utilized for a three-
week period in November 2004 to evaluate the effect of the treatment unit,
and various chemical coagulants and aids, on reducing water quality
characteristics of concern with regard to surface water discharges and
reclaimed water characteristics. The water quality characteristics evaluated
included all related Class III surface water parameters, TSS, turbidity, true
color and Giardia and QnWtoAp
il. The following table presents analytical data from the ACTT FLO testing of the
effluent from the SNWRF. The test results Indicate that the chemical ACH
provided the best performance with regard to keeping the water quality
characteristics of concern below their MCL or required levels.
Pirarnoter
Clieimcal anti Dosage Used in the Tesfiriu
65 PPM 80 ppm 85 PPn1 30 PPM 20 pfins
Alum Fnrric A405 4 ACII ACHIP01Y3111ide
C
September 9, 2005 Class III Water Quelfty Issues - SNWRF Wet Weather DischarVes
Sanford North Water Reclamation Factlity - "Abbreviated" Water Quaff Status Re ort 7
Paramctcr
65 111.1m
Alum
Chemical
80 Ppin
Ferric
and Dosage Used
85 PP;T1
A405
in the Testing
30 pprn
ACH
20 ppin
ACH/Polyarnide
111111111111111111k FF
ERR = Laboratory Error In processing samples and data
III. "Full -Scale" pilot testing showed excellent results using the ACTIFLO
process. Chemical dosages and effluent waterquality parameter excursions
were minimized by using the ACTIFLO process prior to tertiary filtration. Due
to the use of "ballasted -flocculation" In the ACTIFLO treatment scheme, the
required chemical dosages are about fifty percent (50%) of the typical
coagulation/flocculation chemical demand. This chemical savings, on a "full-
scale" basis, equates to approximately $150,000/year.
iv. The City's consultant engineer, CPH Engineers, Inc., is currently performing
the preliminary engineering associated with the addition of two (2) 4.00 MGD
ACTIFLO units, process piping, sludge management modifications, yard
piping modifications, associated equipment,
electdcal/contmls/instrumentation, and SCADA at the SNWRF. One (1)
ACTIFLO unit will be installed in each of the next two fiscal years.
Full-scale chemical application pilot testing was conducted at the SNWRF,
using the coagulants and coagulant aids previously identified, during the
period from March 2004 to June 2004. The process chemicals were injected
into the influent flow to the secondary clarification system to assure that
enough reaction time was provided prior to discharge of the fluid into the
secondary clarification system, thereby enhancing the sedimentation of
solids and precipitation of water quality parameters of concern. The water
quality characteristics evaluated included all related Class III surface water
parameters, TSS, turbidity, true color, phosphorus, nitrates, nitrates, Glardle
and CWtoAporfdium.
September 11, 2005 Class III Water Quality Issues - SNWRF Wet Weather Discharges
Sanford North Water Reclamation FaOfffy - "Abbravlatod" Water Quality Status Report
ii. Fu[ -Sc Chemical Agplication Pilot Testing Results
(1) Test results indicate that all parameters of concern were found to be
below their method detection limit (MDL) with the exception of the copper,
cyanide and phenols.
(2) As was the case with the bench -scale studies, the chemical ACH
appeared to provide the best results with regard to ensuring that all water
quality parameters were below the required Class 111 surface water limits.
(3) Effluent cyanide concentrations were below the Class III water quality
MCL of 5 ug/L and were found to be below the MDL In three (3) of the
seven (7) sampling events conducted during the "full-scale" pilot testing
program.
(4) Nitrate, nitrite and phosphorous were reduced by all coagulants Wilzed
in the "full-scale" pilot testing program. As previously indicated, it
appears that the best results, with respect to these water quality
parameters, were produced through the use of the coagulant ACH.
(5) The only parameter not removed effectively to the Class III surface water
discharge limits, regardless of the coagulant or aid utilized in this series
of testing, was phenol. Therefore, the City is currently addressing the
phenol removal issue along two fronts:
(a) Conducting additional bench -scale pilot studies utilizing other
products/systems to investigate the best cost-effective treatment for
phenol removal.
(b) Collection system investigations to identify the source of the phenols
in the raw wastewater entering the SNWRF and the use of the
Pretreatment Program to control its discharge into said system.
(6) gAirdia and CMtospoddiu were not effectively removed by ACH, a
Harcross polymer, and/or A405 at low dosages. However, further
evaluations of the chemical coagulants Indicated that the use of the
Harcross polymer, at a dosage 4 mg/L, was found to effectively remove
Giardla and QMtQgporidium oocysts to the "proposed" compliance
levels. The City will be conducting additional Giardia, and
CMtogporidium "full-scale" pilot testing when the permanent ACTI FLO
unit is Installed and becomes operational.
September .9, 2003 Class In Water Quality Issues - SKWRF Wet Weather Discharges
Ssnford North Water Reclamatfon FpcOW "Ab
- breviated"WellarQuaft rt Status Repo
L
SECTION 3
WATER QUALITY. IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE
The City of Sanford has a number of very important utility infrastructure improvement
projects currently on-going that will have a significant "positive" impact on the operations
of the Sanford Wastewater Management System currently permitted by FDEP. Some of
the projects are currently under constru ction and will be finished in the near-term whereas
others will be completed within the next eighteen months. All projects identified and
proposed roposed will assist the City in collecting, treating and properly disposing of wastewater
generated within theirservice area. The following is a- list of Utility Projects or current Utility
Programs being implemented, their Intended purpose and starting or completion schedule:
1. Sanford North Primary Treatment System Improvements
a. The SNWRF has been undergoing Improvements to its primary treatment
system over the last twelve months. The improvements include the following:
I. A "new" concrete Influent Structure and associated equipment, piping, and
appurtenances.
ii. A flow metering system for the raw wastewater influent, recycled process
water and associated piping, and appurtenances.
ill. An odor control system for the "new' Influent Structure and Master Lift
Station and associated equipment, appurtenances and ancillaries.
iv. A grit removal system (15.5 MGD capacity) including two 'vortex -type" grit
chambers, air compressors, grit cyclone, grit classification system,
associated equipment, piping and appurtenances.
v. Electrical, controls, instrumentation and SCADA system modifications.
A. Sodium hypochlorite storage and feed facilities (chemical skids and OR -P
control), a chemical feed and storage building and all associated equipment,
piping, and appurtenances.
September 9, 2003 Water Quality Improvements Schedule
Sanford North Water Reclamation Faalli - Abbrevlated" Water Quality Status Report 10
vii. Dechlorination chemical storage and feed facilities and all associated
equipment, piping, and appurtenances.
b. Project "substantial" completion is currently being issued as most of the
_. improvements have been constructed, installed, calibrated and are operational.
The sodium hypochlorite system construction is "substantially" complete, with
the exception of the ORP control system. However, the disinfection system
should be operational within the next four (4) weeks.
c. During this Improvements project, the City has elected to have the Contractor,
— by Change Order, provide, construct and Install the following items: (1) a second
anew" automatically cleaned, fine-barscreen ("/.-inch) to the Influent Structure;
and (2) a dewatering screwand compactor system to collect the screenings from
the Influent Structure. These additional improvements are scheduled to be
completed within the next few months and will facilitate the effective removal of
plastics, rags, grease and other screenable materials from the raw wastewater
and dispose of them, in a dewatered condition, in a dumpster.
2. Sanford North Digestion System Improvements
a. The SNW RF has been undergoing improvements to its aerobic digestion system
over the last four months. The improvements include the following:
I. Addition of flat FRP covers over the two (2) aerobic digesters.
ii. Addition of fume hoods over the Inlet discharge chute of the belt filter
presses.
III. Addition of an inorganic biofiltration system and upstream ammonia scrubber
to collect and treat the malodorous off -gases from the aerobic digestion and
belt filter press systems.
iv. Electrical, controls, instrumentation and SCADA system modifications.
v. Associated yard piping modifications.
b. These improvements are currently being constructed and shoUid be fully
operational within the next two to three months.
— September 9, 2005 Wafer Quality Improvements Schedule
Sanford North Wafer Rw1emation Facility - "Abbmvisiod"WaMrOUNLHZStatus RePort -
3. Sanford Ngrth Improvements - ACT IELO Satern Improverrignt
a. As previously indicated, CPH Engineers, Inc. is currently in the preliminary
design phase for the addition of two (2) 4.0 MGD ACTIFLO treatment units to
be installed at the north end of the SNWRF. The entire treatment system is
being designed to include all civil, environmental,
electrical/controlslinstrumentation and SCADA design components. All of the
infrastructure will be installed initially; however, installation of the ACTIFLO units
will be phased due to budgetary constraints. One unit will be purchased and
installed in each of the next two fiscal years (FY 2006 and FY 2007).
b. The ACTIFLO, units will be utilized for the following purposes:
I. Treatment of the SNWRF effluent being discharged to the St. Johns River
during wet weather conditions.
ii. Pretreatment of the Lake Monroe water being used for augmentation of the
City's reclaimed water system.
c. It is anticipated that the design of the system will be complete by the end of the
current year with construction completed and start-up occurring by September
2006.
4. Sanfprd South WaterResourceCenter (SSWRC) - Phase I
a. Construction of the Sanford South Water Resource Center - Phase I began in '
May 2005 and is expected to be "substantia4r.xQWAW11J_n _December 2006. 4 -
The Project is located In the southeast portion of the City and geneFiflic-o—nsists,
of construction of the following elements:
i. Cast -in-place concrete influent structure to include manual and
mechanical barscreen equipment, a "vortex -type" grit removal system,
and associated equipment, piping, and appurtenances.
ii. A Master Lift Station (triplex system), associated equipment, piping and
appurtenances.
iii. Odor control system for the Influent Structure and Master Lift Station and
associated equipment, appurtenances and ancillaries.
September 9, 2005 Wafer Guatity Improvements Schedule
Sanford North Water Reclamation Facility • "Abbreviated" Water QUAStatus Re ort - - is
iv. Flow Metering Systems for the raw wastewater influent, recycled process
water, reclaimed water, reject water, and sludge flows and associated
piping, equipment and appurtenances.
V. Cast -in-place concrete BloDeNitro Double Ditch (D -Ditch), influent
distributor system, sluice gate, handrailltoeplate, walkways, rotors,
mixers and all associated equipment, piping, and appurtenances.
vi. Return Activated Sludge (RAS) and Waste Activated Sludge (WAS)
pumping systems and associated equipment, piping, and appurtenances,
vil. Tertiary Filtration system (DiscF!Iters), cast -in-place concrete structure,
and associated equipment, piping, and appurtenances.
viii. Cast -in-place concrete chlorine contact chamber, effluent transfer pump
station wetwell and effluent transfer pumps, weir gates, walkways,
handrailltoeplate, and associated equipment, piping, and appurtenances.
ix, A 2.0 MG prestressed concrete Reclaimed Water Ground Storage Tank
and associated equipment, piping, and appurtenances.
X A 2.0 MG prestressed concrete Reject Water Ground Storage Tank and
associated equipment, piping, and appurtenances.
A. A Reclaimed Water Distribution Pump Station Facility, including split -case
centrifugal pumps, building and all associated equipment, piping, and
appurtenances.
xii. A Facility Lift Station (package system) with a submersible pump and
associated equipment, piping, and appurtenances.
xiii. A Chemical Feed Facility for the application of bulk sodium hypochlorite
and aluminum sulfate (alum), Including a concrete block building, the
sodium hypochloifte and alum feed systems (skid mounted), storage
tanks and associated equipment, piping, and appurtenances.
xiv. Sludge Holding Tank, aeration system, walkway, stairs, and associated
equipment, piping, valving and appurtenances.
XV. Solids Handling Facility Building Including a building, three -belt, belt filter
press, polymer feed system, sludge pumping system(s), and associated
equipment, piping, and appurtenances.
September 9, 2005 Water Qualify improvements Schedule
Sanford North Water Rectamadon Facility • "Abbreviated" Water Qu sft Status Ra ort 13
xvi. Operations Building and all associated equipment, piping and
appurtenances, furniture, flooring, laboratory casework, glassware,
chemicals, etc.
xvii. Electrical Buildings and associated equipment, piping, and
appurtenances.
xviii. Emergency generator (outdoorlweatherproofed) and diesel fuel storage
tank and associated equipment, piping, and appurtenances.
Ax. Plant roadway, miscellaneous sitework, and associated yard piping.
xx. Electrical, controls and instrumentation systems.
xxi. Windows-based SCADA system encompassing all of the unit operations
and processes at the Sanford South Water Resource Center.
xxii. Landscaping, signage, fencing, roadway entrance/gate, irrigation system,
stormwater management Improvements, sodding, and miscellaneous
appurtenances and ancillaries.
b. With the addition of this second treatment facility, the City will redirect flows from
various lift stations at the southern end of the service area to the new SSWRC,
thereby reducing the wastewater flow and loadings being conveyed to the
SNWRF.
5, Class" Bios lids Management System
a. The City of Sanford is taking a proactive approach to the treatment and disposal
of biosolids generated from Its treatment facilities by proceeding with the design
and implementation of Class "A" biosolids management systems at both the
SNWRF and SSWRC.
b. SNWR
I. CPH Engineers is currency in the process of providing the design for a sixty
(60) wet ton/day natural gas dryer at the SNWRF, This system will collect
the dewatered sludge from the belt filter presses and pump it over to a
Biosolids Management Building for processing. This building and treatment
system will be located immediately west of the existing aerobic digestion
system. - - -
September9,2005 Water Quality Improvements Schedule
Sanford North Water Reclamation aLfla "Abbreviated" Water Quality Status Re ort U
ii. The Biosollds Management System will consist of an 80 yd'sludge collection
hopper, biosolids dryer (indirect heating) unit and ancillary equipment, and
odor control system (blofilter), condenser unit, oil unit, control system and
other ancillary equipment and systems. The system will process the
dewatered sludge and produce a product that has a dry solids content of at
least ninety percent (90%) and will meet all EPA Part 503 regulations with
respect to the production of a Class "A" biosolids product.
iii. The engineering design is expected to be completed In November 2005, the
system permitted by December 2005 with operation of the system beginning
in August 2006.
c. SSWRC
I. CPH Engineers has begun the preliminary engineering associated with the
addition of a thirty (30) wet ton/day natural gas dryer at the SSWRC. This
system will be installed In the Solids Handling Facility and will receive the
dewatered sludge from the beft filter presses for processing.
ii. The Biosolids Management System will consist of an 60 yd 3 sludge collection
hopper, biosolids dryer (indirect heating) unit and ancillary equipment, and
odor control system (biofifter), condenser unit, oil unit, control system and
other ancillary equipment and systems. The system will process the
dewatered sludge and produce a product that has a dry solids content of at
least ninety percent (90%) and will meet all EPA Part 503 regulations with
respect to the production of a Class "Am biosolids product.
!!I. The engineering design is expected to be completed In January 2006, the
system permitted by March 2006 with operation of the system beginning In
conjunction with the "substantial" and final "completion and start-up of the
SSWRC (December 2006).
6. Mill Creek Reclaimed Water $torage-Pond, Filtratign and Pumping Sy-1to
a. The City of Sanford, Seminole County and the City of Lake Mary have
developed a consortium known as the "Tri -Party" to develop
reclaimed/augmentation water resources in the North Seminole County region
to reduce groundwater withdrawals associated with irrigation. CPH Engineers,
recently completed a report for the Tri -Party members and the St. Johns River
Water Management District (SJRWMD) entitled North Seminole Regional
September 9, 2005 - Water ZZ/Ity Improvements Schedule
Sanford North Water Reclamation Facilit or(
W - "Abbreviated" Water Qua! Status ftp fs
Rgclajmgd Water and Surface Water Au ti Systgm, Expansion,and
012imization$tud (December 2004). The existing reclaimed and augmentation
water system was evaluated to optimize the use of reclaimed water within the
regional system and develop additional resources.
b. One of the projects identified as a "high priority" project due to low reclaimed
water pressures and flows being delivered to Seminole Community College
(SCC) area within Lake Mary, and the Heathrow International Parkway corridor
is the Mill Creek Reclaimed Water Storage Pond, Filtration and Pumping
System. This project will increase the overall reclaimed water system storage
capacity and system reliability which all Td -Party members agree is required.
c. In addition, the development of recharge basins in the Td -Party Service Area
was determined to be a very useful tool in mitigating the impacts of groundwater
withdrawals used for potable water supply at the Greenwood Lakes WTP,
Heathrow WTP, Lake Mary WTP, Sanford Main WTP and Sanford Auxiliary
WTP. Numerous potential recharge basins retrofitted to accept reclaimed water
during various periods throughout the year to recharge to groundwater aquifer
as indicated in the Nollh Seminole Regional Reclaimed Wgiter and Surfao
Water Auamentation Svstem. Exiaarusion-and Optimization Study (De cemb
2004), may be implemented in future years in association with the SJRWMD.
d. The current Mill Creek Project includes the following components:
i. Site work and piping improvements associated with the storage (150 - 200
MG capacity) and withdrawal of reclaimed water in an isolated pond in the
southern end of the City, adjacent to Mill Creek.
ii. A reclaimed water pumping station (triplex system) with an Inlet pond water
filtration system.
iii. Sodium hypochlorite disinfection system,
iv. Pond water filtration system.
v. Electrical, controls, instrumentation and SCADA.
e. A Tri -Party Agreement for the constnjjcUautt lltf II SUI impriwomwts
is. almost in place. .—Upon - hipletion of the Agr-eemwLQPH ERg1rLetr_s.Inc. will
........ .....I
begin fgn"dffi"e.. do
rementioned improvements. It Is
September 9, 2003 water ousay impravements Schedule
Sanford North Water R"famadon Fedilly - "Abbreviated" Water Qualit 16
y Status Rgpotl
anticipated that engineering will proceed in November 2005, permitting of the
improvements will be completed in March 2006 with construction beginning in
the July 2006.
7. Full -Scale Chemical Armlication System- Secondary Clarification System
a. The City installed a polymer injection system in March 2005, as part of the pilot
test described above, to evaluate the ability of various chemicals to enhance the
removal of Class III surface water parameters, TSS, turbidity, true color,
phosphorus, nitrates, nitrates, Giardia and Q_W"s ridium. The system
consists of one (1) chemical feed pump and temporary chemical containers (55 -
gallon drums). The polymer Is currently fed into the secondary clarifier flow
splitter boxes to provide sufficient mixing and reaction contact time prior to
dispersement into the secondary clarifiers.
b. Due to the apparent success of this system, the City is going to make
improvements to the system as follows:
i. Installation of a double wall containment tank (HDLPE) for the storage of
selected polymer.
ii. Addition of a second chemical feed pump to provide Class I Reliability.
ill. Yard piping modifications.
c, These improvements are expected to be installed and completely operational by
November 2005.
ME
kyr-03ROUMUMM
a. The City completed a "Screenihg waterquaWsampfing' in July 2005. Samples
for metals, parasites, and phenolic compounds were collected throughout the
SNWRIF treatment processes (unit operations and processes), utilizing a
hydraulic and detention time sampling program to evaluate the following:
1. Potential "on-site" facility contamination.
ii. Removal efficiencies of various pollutants found in the raw wastewater
entering the SNWRF. '
Septembers, 2= Water Quality Improvements Schedule
Sanford North Water Redernatfon Fe;fft "Abbravlated" Water Ousifty Status Report 17
b. System Documentation Is presented in Appendix A of this "abbreviated" facility
report.
9. Sanford Pretreatment Pro-graffl and Collection System Investigations
a. Pretreatment Solutions, Inc. has been retained by the City for assistance in
implementing the "new" Pretreatment Ordinance and to conduct pollutant
discharge surveys throughout the Sanford Wastewater Management System
Service Area.
b. Pollutant Discharge Surveys-- Collection Sote
i. Collection System Pollutant Discharge Surveys will begin within the Sanford
Wastewater Collection system in October 2005. The purpose of the program
will be to identify potential discharges of pollutants of concern and the
industries, establishments or individuals responsible for said discharges or
whether the pollutant are entering the system through infiltration and Inflow.
H. Samples will be collected during dry and wet weather conditions to provide
an encompassing evaluation of the conditions within the collection system
and to pinpoint the potential source of the pollutants of concern.
iii. The project will being in October 2005 with an anticipated completion date
of December 2008.
c. Two (2) pretreatment positions (Environmental Coordinator and Industrial
Pretreatment Coordinator) were created by the City of Sanford to provide
enforcement of the "new" Pretreatment Ordinance. One position has been filled
and the employee is currently working and the other position will be filled within
the next thirty (30) days. These employees will assist the City in evaluating:
1. Potential problems within the collection system.
ii. Illegal discharges into the collection system.
III. Monitoring of commercial and light industrial users within the service area.
September 9, 2005 RAW Quality improvements Schedule
Sanford North WatarReclamation Facility - _"Abbrevlatad- Water Quality Status Re art fa
I
10. Phenol Removal Studies and Oil and Grease Program
a. Bench -scale pilot studies began in August 2005 to evaluate potential
systems or chemical additions to remove phenolic compounds from the
SNWRF wet weather discharges to the St. Johns River.
b. The most cost-effective and efficient alternative will be selected to be
incorporated with the ACTIFLO treatment process which will be.instalied in
FY's 2006 and 2007.
c. The City issued 380 collection system surveys to all of its commercial and
light Industrial users in June 2005 to evaluate the discharges from said
users.
d. It is the City's intent to provide a more "Intense" evaluate of each of these
site ovisr the next three (3) years in an attempt to control/minimize the
discharge of pollutants of concern into the wastewater collection system
(phenolic compounds, oils and greases, etc.).
e. The two (2) new pretreatment employees loyees will take a more active role, as
stated above, in reducing the pollutants. of -concern, into the City's collection
system.
I
3
September 9, 2403 water Quality Improvements Schedule
Sanford North Wafer Reciamation):aellity - "Abbreviated" Water QualityStatusReport 19
INFILTRATIONIINFLOW (111)
IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE CITY'S
WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM
The City of Sanford has one of the oldest water distribution and wastewater collection
systems in the State of Florida. Therefore, infrastructure improvements in the older
portions of the systems is inevitable. The City's Utility Department annually budgets
approximately $500,000 to replace and/or repair water and sewer lines. The City also
created a "new" utility staff position (Water Resources Engineer) in an effort to evaluate the
City's needs regarding compliance with existing and forthcoming state and federal
environmental regulations. The Water Resources Engineer has been Integral in evaluating
the condition of the utility infrastructure and has perform a CMOM evaluation (2004) as well
as the Pilot Testing previously discussed at the SNWRF.
With respect to the wastewater management collection system, the following observations
have been identified:
1. Excessive oil and grease concentrations are causing sewer overflows.
2. Collection System staff are spending a considerable amount of time cleaning
oillgrease from City's lift station to avoid potential overflows.
3. Outside contractors are causing damages to collection lines during construction of
road projects throughout the area as the population growth expands into the
Sanford area.
4. Infiltration and Inflow (1/1), In older portions of the collection system, are causing lift
stations overflows and increased WRF wastewater flows being conveyed to the
SNWRF due to the high groundwater levels associated with the hurricanes of 2004
and the wet season that we are experiencing. -
The commissioning of the SSWRC will allow the City of Sanford to handle increased flows
being generated within the wastewater collection system from either growth or 1/1.
September 9. 2005 N improvements within the City's Wastewater Collection System
Sanford North Water Reclamation Facift - 'Abbreviated" Water Quality Status Report 20
The City of Sanford has been taking a "proactive approach to identifying the cause of the
problems and have been attempting to take "aggressive" actions to correct these
situations. The following actions have been proposed and Implemented with respect to the
above issues:
1. Fort Mellon Lift Station Rehabilitation
a. The Fort Mellon Lift Station was notorious for overflowing along Seminole
Boulevard during heavy rainfall conditions due to the age of the system,
undersized pumping and conveyance system and III upstream of the lift station.
b. A "now" Fort Mellon Lift Station was designed by CPH Engineers, Inc.,
constructed by Wharton -Smith, Inc. and became operational in March 2003.
The system included the construction of a new triplex lift station, approximately
1,500 linear feet of forcemain, collection system improvements, emergency
generator, and electdcaVcontroisTinstrumentation/SCADA improvements. The
project cost was approximately $657,000.
c. The system has been operating for well over two (2) years and has eliminated
the overflows in this area.
a. Excessive 1/1 has occurred In the wastewater collection system throughout the
Orlando -Sanford International Airport due to the age of the system (former
military base prior to and during World War 11).
b. 1/1 is particularly excessive in the two collection system pipeline running under
the runways at the airport.
c. To reduce the 1/1 in the Airport area and provide more pumping capacity for the
expanding Airport operations, the following infrastructure Improvements have
been made and "final" completion of the Project is expected within the next thirty
(30) days:
1. Rehabilitation of a portion of the existing collection system;
I!. Grouting, removal or abandonment of portions of the collection system.
iii. Construction of now collection system infrastructure
September 9, 2005 L4Improvements within thgCliy,$Wastewater Collection System
Sanford North Water Reclamation !~acuity - "Abbreviated" Water 2UL11& Status Report 2f
iv. Construction of two "new" triplex lift stations (identical in configuration to the
"new" Fort Mellon Lift Station).
3. The Collection System Pollutant Discharge Surveys and the two "new" pretreatment
employees will provide additional assistance in the monitoring and elimination of
significant discharges of oil and grease into the collection system. A key component
with regard to this issue into ensure that restaurants are pumping their grease traps
on a regular basis and not transferring these materials to the collection system and
treatment facilities whereby conveyance and treatment systems are significantly
impacted as well as effluent concentrations of pollutants of concern.
4. Capaci!y, Management, Ooration andMaintenance(CMQM) E!Ian
a. The City of Sanford completed a CMOM Plan evaluation of their wastewater
management collection system in 2004. The following elements were evaluated:
L Proper management, operation and maintenance of the sewer collection
system.
ii. Sewer system capacity.
iii. Steps in place to mitigate the impact of sanitary sewer overflows.
iv. Method used to notify the public and others with potential exposure to
pollutants.
b. The findings of the CIVIOM Plan are presented below:
i. Inspection and Testing Standards meet the overall requirements of the
CIVIOM program.
1I. A "Trouble Report" is completed in the field by the lift Station staff, as
necessary, and problems corrected immediately. A log containing all
situations/issues is kept in the Operations and Maintenance Managers
office.
iii. This City is maintaining the wastewater collection system as recommended
and in accordancewith the CMOM Plan. Data collection of collection system
problems, repairs and maintenance are prepared as described above and in
the following section.
September 9, 2005 IV7 improvements within the City's Wastewater C0116C6011 System
Sanford North Water Reclamation Facility - "Abbreviated" Water Quality Stains Report 22
iv. A System Evaluation and Capacity Assurance Plan (SECAP) is needed to
evaluate peak flow conditions.
c. Oil and Grease
i. It was determined that approximately eighty percent (80%) of the sanitgry
sewer overflows within the Sanford Wastewater Management System
Service Area were caused by oil and grease plugging of the system. The
number of seweroverflows has decreased since the "new" Ft. M61lonville Lift
station was constructed and with the implementation of the City's oil and
grease management program (2003).
ii. The City adopted a new Pretreatment Ordinance in September 2004
establishing fines surcharges for non -compatible pollutants discharged Into
the City's wastewater management collection system. With the addition of
new pretreatment staff, It is anticipated that oil and grease program will take
two (2) to three (3) years to become "fully' and "globally" effective within the
y
service area.
. I WM-
a. A City-wide SCADA system was installed In 1999 for the majority of the utility
system components Within the City of Sanford Water and Wastewater
Management System Service Area. The major lift stations were retrofitted with
these systems. Since this time, the City has been Installing SCADA systems in
all of the remaining lift stations and all new lift stations are required to have
them. The SCADA systems provide the City with the ability to:
I. Monitor the lift stations performance.
!I. Monitor the forcemains.
III. Manage the "preventive- and "corrective' maintenance of the lift stations.
b. This collection of data assists the City with setting up and managing system
priorities, personnel and resources more effectively.
September 9, 2003 bi Improvements within the City's Wastewater Collection System
Sanford North Water Reclamation Fa9ft - "Abbreviated" Water Qu&H!X Status 2jeort 23
6. System Evaluation and Ca ac' Assurancp Plan (SECAP
a. A System Evaluation and Capacity Assurance Plan (SECAP) for the Sanford
Wastewater Management Collection System is needed, based on the results of
the CMOM analysis and Plan to evaluate peak flow conditions within the system.
The Plan Will include flow evaluation during rainy days and a study of the
collection -system -hydraulics.- The following task items and projects must be
completed before the SECAP can be performed and generated-,
I. All of the City lift stations must have SCADA systems installed and the ability
to monitor lift station flows, pressures and transmission main pressure
Immediately adjacent to the lift stations. 'There are currently eleven (11) lift
stations without SCADA systems. These lift stations. are scheduled to be
retrofitted in fiscal year 2006. -
H. Existing GIS data must be evaluated and verified and new data collected as
required. Data shall include, but not be limited to, pipe size, pipe material,
lift station dimensions, pump capacity, horsepowerand TDH (including pump
curves), etc.
b. Upon collection of all of the required data, a hydraulic model of the collection
and transmission system will be generated using a non-proprietary simulation
package (SewerCAD, etc.) to evaluate the system during wet and dry weather
conditions. The results of the computer simulation will allow the City to identify
potential collection system problems and required infrastructure improvements.
I. The City will continue upgrading its GIS system, associated electronic
equipment, and utility computer software library to accelerate the collection
of data required to perform the SECAP. The process of system upgrading
began in 2003 and will continue into 2006. The "proposed" schedule is as
follows:
September 9, 20D5 N improvements within the City's Wastewater Colfwtfon System
�d
Sanford North Water Reclamation Factlit
y - "Abbreviated" Water Quefity Status Report 24
�F—Year
2003 - 2006
Description
Purchase of system hardware, software and electrdnic equipment
2006
Training of utility staff with respect tD electronic equipment and
software systems. Begin GIS data verification, callbratlon and
collection.
2007-2008
Wastewater Collection System GIS database to be completed
2008
Perform the SECAP utilizing the GIS database
2008-
Define Capital Improvement Projects based on SECAP
H. City staff will be trained to use the developed hydraulic model to plan and
evaluate current and future infrastructure improvements required within the
City's wastewater management collection system
. 7. InfiltLWign and Inflow - Collection'Syatem Improvements
* a. Cygresg Avenue Area
L Lift Station information has, identified that a significant amount of I/i is
entering the collection system in the Cypress Avenue area, located
immediately east of the downtown area. The City's 1/1 $ Consultant performed
a study In March 2004 in this area and identified collection system
improvements that needed to be made.
ii. A "quick -fix" list of improvements was provided to City staff and are expected
to be completed by September 2005.
iii. The remainder of the infrastructure improvements in the location will be
corrected during fiscal years 2006 and 2007. The estimated cost for these
improvements and repairs is approximately $800,000 including some lateral
work.
b. Gele[y Avenue Area
i. An 1/1 study was performed in the Celery Avenue area in March 2005 based
on lift station records, during the 2004 hurricanes, indicating a significant 1/1
flow.
September 9, 2005 H improvements within the City's Wastewater CoHectibn System
sanford North water Reclamation FW11ty - "Abbreviated" Water Quality Status Report 25
ii. A "quick -fix" list of improvements was provided to City staff and are currently
being worked on.
Ill. The remainder of the repairs are scheduled to be completed in Fiscal Years
2006 and 2007.
c. George Town Area
1. The George Town area infrastructure is very old and there are numerous 1/1
problems.
!I. An 1/1 study is scheduled to begin and be completed in Fiscal Year 2006.
The 1/1 study findings are to be scheduled for repairs in Fiscal Year 2007.
d. Utility funds will be budgeted every fiscal year to study areas that are know to
have high Ili inputs into the City's wastewater management collection system.
The results of said studies will lead to the generation of a capital improvements
program line item and future budgeting to correct the problem(s).
e. A number of overflows occurred during the hurricanes of 2004. One of the
hardest hit areas was the downtown serviceareathat connects into the vacuum
sewer collection system via nine (9) buffer tank connections. The City received
a mitigation grant thru FEMA to purchase fifty-three (53) stainless steel manhole
covers to minimize stormwater inflow into the system at these sensitive sites.
f. The City of Sanford's Public Works Department will be implementing a "storm
drain cleaning program" in those.areas of the City where wastewater collection
system manholes were installed at a lower elevation than storm drains. This
condition leads to obstruction of storm drains, due to debris collection, thereby
causing a flooding of the roadway and a significant increase in the amount of
inflow to the wastewater collection system through the pick holes in the manhole
covers.
8. Water/Sewer Impact Fees
a. The City of Sanford has recently (August 2005) increased their Water/Sewer
Impact Fee Structure.
September 9, 2005 ki improvements within the City's Wastewater 001/eCdOn SYSIOM
Sanford North Water Reclamation Faclff!X - "Abbreviated" Water 2!!Lff& Status Report 26
b. A portion of the revenues are "earmarked" for Infiltration and Inflow Reduction
Projects throughout the Service Area.
9. Rate Stud
a. The City's Rate Consultant, PRIVIG, will begin evaluating the City's current water
and sewer rate within the next two (2) months and will make recommendations
for adjustment of the rates, as necessary, by March 2006.
b. The City is considering the potential of adding in a CMOM surcharge (visible or
invisible) that could be used to assist in the funding of future 1/1 infrastructure
improvements.
September 9, 2005 b7 improvements within the City's Wastewater Collection System
Sanford North Water Reclematron FsOW - "Abbreviated" Water Quality Status Re ort 27
SECTION 5
INTERIM PERMIT MODIFICATIONS
The City of Sanford is making great strides in 'attempting to resolve issues related to an
aging infrastructure and the increased treatment levels required to meet the "new" Class
III water quality requirements. To resolve these issues, as addressed in this abbreviated
status report, the City of Sanford is asking for assistance from the FDEP with respect to
the application of the following items as infrastructure improvements and modifications of
the treatment systems at the SNWRF and SSWRC are being completed:
1. Interim limits for berAllum, cadmium, copper. lead, selenium. silver, parlide and
CHs (Surface Water Discharge to Class III Waters)
a. The City is currently adding Harcross polymer into the secondary clarifier flow
splitter boxes to control the above referenced water quality constituents. The
program appears to be working effectively as the levels of said constituents are
below the Class III water quality MCL's when the City discharges to the St.
Johns river during wet weather discharges.
b. The City May be able to control this pollutants more effectively when the
ACTIFLO treatment units are installed and become operational
c. The sewer collection system pollutant(s) discharges control are to be handled
by:
Year
Description
2005
Pretreatment Staff hired to handle the existing and future Industrial/categorical
and/or significant user discharges. I
2005-2007
Collection System Pollutant Discharge Surveys will begin within the Sanford
Wastewater Collection system. The purpose of the program will be to Identify
potential discharges of pollutants of concern and the industries, establishments
or Individuals responsible for said discliarges or whether the pollutant are
entering the system through Infiltration and Inflow.
September 9, 2005 Interim Permit Modiffeaffons
SantW North Water Reclamation Facility - "Abbrevlated" Water Quality Status Report 28
2. Interim MCL of 47 uq& for phenolic comgou_nds (Surface Wpter Dischame to Class
III Waters)
a. Water quality data from the pilot tests performed at the SNWRF Indicates that
phenolic compounds cannot be removed, to the levels required for discharge
into Class III waters, by conventional treatment or through the use of the
coagulants/aids (those used in the pilot tests).
b. The City is proposing an interim MCL 47 ug/L for phenolic compounds in the wet
weather discharge to the St. Johns River until the two (2) ACTIFLO treatment
units are Installed, test, calibrated and become fully operational. The City is
beginning to perform additional bench -scale pilottesting to additional chemicals,
measures and methodologies that can be used for the effective removal of
phenolic compounds.
c. The best technology for phenol removal, selected by the City, will be provided
to CPH Engineers, Inc. for their use and evaluation and to be incorporated with
the final design and construction of the ACTIFLO treatmentunits atthe SNWRF.
The ACTIFLO installation will be fully complete, tested and operationally
functional, at full capacity, in Fiscal Year 2007.
d. The City is herein requesting that the interim MCL for phenolic compounds be
extended throughout Fiscal Year 2007.
3. A 2.0 MGQ interim Wet Weather Discharge to The St. JohnsRiver
a. The City of Sanford has a permitted seasonal discharge, to the St. Johns River,
during periods of wet weather. The annual average daily flow Is limited to 1.00
MGD by permit. A synopsis of the seasonal discharge water quality, for the
period between January 2004 and July 2005, was previously presented herein
and Indicates that this permitted flow limit has been exceeded.
b. Rainfall received from the hurricanes in August and September 2004 totaled
34.91 inches in a total of approximately 30 days, This caused the seasonal
discharge flows to the St. Johns River to increase significantly as utility
custorrieri were not demanding reclaimed water and influent flows to the
SNWRF were in an elevated condition due to the high groundwater table. This
Is evident when one reviews the seasonal discharge flows for the period from
August - October 2004. After this period in time, the monthly seasonal
discharge flows to normal levels; however, since the permit Is based on an
annual -average basis, the AADF flow will not decrease significantly until the
September 9, 2005 Interim Permit Modifications
Sanford NWIM Water Reclamation l=aMllty - "Abbreviated" Water Quality Matta Report 29
August - October 2004 -seasonal flows are "cycled" out of the mathematical
calculation. In addition, during the period of June - July 2005, another
significantly wet period of approximately 30 days dropped another 22.96 Inches
of rain in the local area and the seasonal discharge flows increased somewhat,
again due to law demand for reclaimed water and elevated raw wastewater flows
entering the SNWRF.
c. As discussed previously, the City will be performing a SECAP and create a
hydraulic model to evaluate the wastewater collection system III problems. The
City is also budgeting funds annual to study areas where III flows are
significant . Due to the time that Is required to perform collection system 1/1
evaluations, Identify potential repairs or replacements, and budget constraints,
the City of Sanford is respectfully requesting an increase the of the permitted
Wet Weather Discharge to the St. Johns River, on an interim b sis-Ao-20WD
AADF. T i qp- in thek A A M: fI0W,4r;.aA4ptadm_basLjJa requested until
the following evaluations god -projects are completed:
d. Upon installation of the ACTI FLO treatment units at the SNWRF, the City would
like to Investigate the possibility of Increasing, permanently, the wet weather
discharge allocations to the St. Johns River. The request would be submitted
to the Department for review and development of the parameters and sampling
September 9, 2005 interim PtrynitModlftcaUons
Proposed
Project
Description
Conveyance and storage of reclaimed water in a
Completion
Date
Mill Creek Storage Pond,
Filtration
large existing Pond adjacent to Mill Creek to
2006
and
include a pumping station and integral filtration
Pumping System
system, disinfection facilities, etc.
Timacuan Golf Course
Modification of an existing sturnwater pond on the
Reclaimed Water
golf course site to construct a 2.3 MG reclaimed
2006
Storage Ponds
water storage pond
Greenwood Lakes
Construction of a 11.75 MG prestressed concrete
2007
Ground Storage Tank
ground storage tank at the Greenwood Lakessits.
Greenwood Lakes
Modification of the Greenwood Lakes site piping
Recharge
and recharge basins to allow for the discharge of
2007
Basins
reclaimed water.
Greenwood Lakes
Rehabilitation of the existing rapid infiltration
Rapid Infiltration Basins
basins for reclaimed water disposal during wet
2007
wegther r
d. Upon installation of the ACTI FLO treatment units at the SNWRF, the City would
like to Investigate the possibility of Increasing, permanently, the wet weather
discharge allocations to the St. Johns River. The request would be submitted
to the Department for review and development of the parameters and sampling
September 9, 2005 interim PtrynitModlftcaUons
Sanford North Water Peclamatron Factifty - "Abbreviated' Water Ouniny Status Re rt 30
frequency for the full-scale waste load allocation (WLA) analysis. The City
would propose a minimum testing and sampling period of at least one (1) year.
This would allow the generation of sufficient water quality data from surface
water discharges utilizing the ACTIFLO "advanced" treatment technology to
prove that the effluent would have no harmful effects to the receiving water and
could potentially provide a beneficial increase in current river water quality.
4. An interim 14.0 mo/L Annual Ay-eraae Nitroon-L&A
a. After evaluating operational records and the events leading to total nitrogen
Violations in the wet weather discharges to the St. Johns River, it is clear that
many of the violations were caused by Nocardia blooms and related operational
problems during high rain events. Nocardia Is a filamentous bacteria that feeds
on animal fats, oil and grease. The City has been addressing this issue and
working to resolve the issues associated with an influx of Nocardia into the
biological treatment system, including, but not limited to, foaming issues, impact
on the beneficial microorganisms in the activated sludge process and poor
settling in the secondary clarification system. Nocardia outbreaks typically
occurs during cold/cool weather conditions In the fall or winter months.
However, due to the because of the hurricanes of 2004 and the excess flow
being received at the SNWRF due to elevated groundwater conditions this year,
the problem was extended through the spring and summer months.
b. A sample of the biological treatment system aeration basins was collected and
sent to Novozimes Biologicals for a microscopic evaluation of the biological
speciation within the biological reactors. As reported by Novozymes
Biologicals, the major microbial organism within the aeration basins was
determined to be hLoc 116(bridging). The City requested a quotation from
Harcross Chemicals to treat the N_Qca infestation based on the results of the
analysis from Novozymes Biologicals. Unfortunately, the City will have to waft
until cold weather conditions this fall or winter to assess the need for this
treatment.
c. Therefore, the City is requesting an interim increase In the limit for this
parameter until the following projects and studies are completed:
I. The City is attempting to control the impact of the _Nocardia by chlorinating
the RAS flow stream and the surface of the biological treatment system
aeration basins. This procedure began in July 2004 as well as the addition
of a polymer in January 2005. The seasonal discharge from the SNWRF,
with respect to total nitrogen concentrations, have not been exceeded the
September 9, 2005 IMORM Piinmlt Modilkadons
Sanford North Water Reclamation FOS & - "Aftwhited" Water Re& Status Report 31
permitted limit of 12 mg/L since the City started the combination of these two
chemicals. At the current time a nitrate meter is being installed in the
common effluent channel of the tertiary filtration system to monitor this
parameter and to make process changes as needed to control its
concentration. The City requests to complete a total of twelve (12) months
of monitoring ammonia, nitrate and total nitrogen to decide if these two
chemicals will keep the effluent product within the mandatory limits in the
long-term.
ii. The City Is in the process of conducting a "full-scale" pilot study of
Enviroquip's Symbio Process to promote simultaneous nitrification and
denitrification with the biological treatment systems' aeration basins. This
pilot study is expected to begin in November 2006, under the direct
supervision of Enviroquip and CPH Engineers, Inc., and Is anticipated to
conclude In January 2006. If the test is successful, the system will be utilized
on a full-time basis for reduction of TN levels at the SNWRF.
M. The City will waft until cool weather conditions In Fall/Winter 2005 to decide
if the Nocar
is control with heavy dosages of chlorine in Conjunction with
bioaugmentation is necessary to improve the SNWRF seasonal discharge
water quality and to minimize the potential of Nocardia blooms at the facility.
5. An iDWrim CBOD. monthly a rage limit of 36 ma!_ and a maximUm concentration
160 mg/L
a. The CBOD, violations that occurred in January and February 2005 were related
to the lack of proper treatment due to a Nocardia, bloom. This microbial issue
may be resolved once the Ngcardl is controlled primarily through control of its
food source (lactic products) or by chemical action. The City Is asking fora two
(2) year interim level, as indicated above, to collect and review data regarding
treatment improvements after the following process improvement are
implemented:
(1) The implementation of this program includes heavy fines and surcharges
for high strength discharges of CBOD5 and TSS by users within the.
wastewater management collection system. As previously indicated, the
City has hired an Environmental Coordinator as part of its Pretreatment
System expansion (September 2005).
September 9, 2405 Interim Permit Madiftations
Sanford North Water Rectematfon feaffily - "Abbreviated" Mier Qua& Status I?Vpvrt 32
(2) This staff member will be inspecting food related businesses to enforce
this new program and the discharge limitations. The use of fines and
surcharges for high strengths discharges are expected to impact these
business which will result in best management practices being
Implemented regarding the handling of oil, grease, CBOD5 and TSS.
(3) The City has already "kick-started" this program by issuing collection
system surveys to 238 of its commercial users (food related businesses)
in June 2005 to evaluate the discharges from said users. With the
addition of new pretreatment staff, It is anticipated that oil and grease
program will take two (2) to three (3) years to become "fully' and
"globally" effective within the service area.
ii. Nocamb blooms at the SNWRF are controlled.
6. An interim -weekly. and Monthly average Ammonia limit 7 02Q/L and maxit1
concentration of 11 aWj
a. Permit levels were exceeded due to Noca is problems and it is expected to be
under control after the oil1grease program Is Implemented and afterthe Nboa-rdia
bloom are minimized by the methodologies described herein.
b. The City is respectfully requesting a two (2) year interim level for all three
ammonia compliance frequencies.
September 9, 2005 Interim Pemit Madiffcadons
APPENDIX A
SANFORD NORTH
WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY
_. SCREENING WATER QUALITY SAMPLING
PROPOSAL
sy PERFORM
ww PHENOL AND
METALS
SAMPLING AT
RECLAMATION
Prot
Solutions, Incm
j Meadowcross
" • r
{�
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, July 05, 2006
INTRODUCTION
The City of Sanford's Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) is located at 1201 West Seminole
Boulevard. it has a 7.3 mgd annual average daily flow permitted capacity and Is a complete mix
activated sludge domestic wastewater treatment plant consisting of flow equalization, influent
screening, grit removal, aeration, secondary clarification, chemical feed, filtration, chlorination,
followed by dechlorination prior to surface water discharge, with sludge thickening, aerobic
digestion and dewatering of residuals.
On March 20, 2005, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) modified the
Domestic Wastewater Facility Permit # FL0O20141 for the city of Sanford's WRF to include a
monthly monitoring requirement for all calendar months in which surface water discharge
occurred for beryllium, cadmium, copper, lead, selenium, silver, cyanide, total phenolic
compounds, pertachiorophenol, 2,4,6 trichlorophenol, total Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
(PAHs) and 2,4 din9trotoluene.
On May 31, 2005, the Industrial Pretreatment section of the FDEP sent an assessment report for
the City of Sanford's Annual Report covering the period from January 1, 2004 to December 31,
2004 which was submitted to the FDEP on time by May 1, 2005. The assessment noted that the
effluent priority pollutant scan performed on July 22, 2204 indicated that poor removal efficiencies
had resulted in exceedances of the Class In fresh water quality standards for cadmium, lead and
mercury. The assessment also noted that total phenolic compounds, as measured by the 4201
method, should be used as a screening tool rather than a compliance determination with the
Class III fresh water quality standard of 1.0 ugfl. The effluent reported total phenolic compounds
concentration of 598 ugll however concerned the FDEP who is now requiring the City of Sanford
to identify Individual phenolic and cresol species present in the wastewater.
A pian of study to monitor for phenolic species using EPA Method 8270 to identify all phenolic
and cresol species together with other metallic pollutants of concern across the WRF at nine
different points on a total of three separate days was submitted to the FDEP on or before .lune
27, 2005. The following proposal sets out the procedures Intended to perform this sampling.
SAMPLING PROCEDURES
The sampling locations for this project are Indicated on the attached diagram of the WRF.
City of Sanford Sampling Schematic for Metals and Phenolic Compounds
lReled Pond
l--� Chbetna contact uhumber
,
caftedon he from HospulClerkiar
4 1
4
16 3 9 Thickener
AerationBehuPress Tanks GrerifWr
Fier Inguen
influent Structure
4C Po ckrflor
Prmoam Weto— Flume Struck" t
Colbation 11no from Mud Branab
3. FSampling Pfatocol
1. Nine (9) sampling Points W
be collsead
Nine
9
Sampling
(9
p
be 19-*
2 p
AJI phanolic and crew
of
species to be tested using
- t
8270 - EPA Method
Three (3) sampling events
ii
within a week
it is proposed to sample for EPA Method 8270 and all heavy metals of concern mentioned in the
permit modification by a grab sample Procedure, Grab sampling will begin at the influent side of
the WRIF and proceed through the plant at approximate detention times as indicated in Table 1,
below.
Table I Volumes and Detention Times (Based on a flow of 7.3 IVIGD)
Location
Volume (MG)
Detention Time (hours)
Influent Flow to Master Lift Sidon
0.01
Master Lift Sidon
0.025
0.08
Influent Flow to Now Grit Chamber
0.04
Grit Chamber Flow to Biological
Treatment System
0.02
BlotogloW Treatment System
1.526
5.02
Biological Treatment System flow to
Secondary Clarifiers
0.02
Secondary Clarification System
1.889
6.21
Flow from Secondary Clarifiers to
Tertiary Filters
0.02
Tertiary Filtration System
Ueo
0.20
Flow from Tertiary Filter to CCC
0.01
CCC
0.166
0,56
Flow from CCC to Transfer Pump
Station
0.058
0.19
Grab sampling will begin at locations 1A, 15, 1C and 1, (influent sites) which will all be sampled
within 10 minutes of each other.
Sampling will be performed at location 2 (influent flume) approximately 8 minutes later.
Sampling will be performed at location 2A (exit point from aeration tanks) approximately 5 hours
after location 2.
Sampling will be performed at location 3 (influent to fitters) approximately 6 hours, 15 minutes
after location 2A.
-- Sampling will be performed at location 4 (exit from Chlorine Contact Chamber) approximately 45
minutes after location 3.
Sampling will be performed at location 5 (inflow from pond) after all other sampling has been
completed.
The times quoted above are applicable only to an influent flow of 7.3 MGD. The actual influent
flow on the sampling days will be used to recomputed the sampling times using the volumes
shown in Tape 1.
The WRF should be in good working condition with all processes functioning normally and within
engineering specifications at the time of all sampling procedures.
Discharge to the reject pond should not occur during the sampling procedure on any of the three
sampling days. inflow from the pond will be sampled separately on each sampling day in
coordination with WFC' operating personnel.
SAMPLING SCHEDULE AND COSTS
It is proposed to perform the sampling on a SUNDAY, TUESDAY and THURSDAY of the same
week if possible. Sampling will begin at 5:00 AM on the first day during low weekend flow.
Sampling will begirt at 5:00AM on the second day to represent weekday low flow conditions.
Sampling will begin at 12:00 midday on the third day to represent high flow containing domestic
and industriallcommendat flows. Sampling will depend on low rainfall to keep Influent flows within
engineering specifications and plant processing capabilities Including the ability to cease flow
from the reject pond during the sampling period. The week of July 31 to August 4, 2006 Is
targeted as the sampling week for this project, but this may change due to the above factors.
--
AN sample bottles, preservation materials and field data sheets will be supplied by the contract
laboratory (TestAmertca) in advance. The estimated costs are Itemized below.
Procedure Time (hours) Cost
Collect sample containers and distribute to locations 1.0 $100.01
Collect samples at nine points In WRF over 12 hr period 1.5 $150.00
Collect sample containers, paperwork, preserve for delivery 1.5 $150.00
_ Repeat procedure for extra 2 days 8.0 $800.00 -
Four
800.00'Four days hotel expenses at $120 per day $ 480.W
Mileage (estimated 300 miles @ 37c per mile) $111.00
TOTAL $1,791.00
The actual project will require at least five days stay at Sanford and in the Intervening days it Is
proposed to perform more sampling on the Industrial Pretreatment permitted industrial users so
this extra cost will be indirectly passed to these facilities and will not be born by the City.
All sampling procedures are performed In accordance With the FDEP Standard Operating
Procedures for Field Activities Manuel DEP-SOP-001/01 and amendments.
Signed
John R. Pamell
Pretreatment SoltAlons, Inc.
D.E.P. — ORLANDO
EXHIBIT NO.3
DISC]EI.ARGE MONITORING REPORTS
(DMRS)
(33 pages)
OGC File No. 05-2375B
1.4
(u
7e
>
A
2.0
-4.E
0 ji
40.
0 0
Q =.a
0 Vu
CF
42
G4 N
V Ef
41 y
E
0
_q
C>
�r
rn
O
0
z
O
.R
U >
—0
C)
�O
c,
0
2
z m
�8
0
.2
00
0
w GL
00
00
0
j u
Oz
2
IS
0
z
t
00
c)
v 40. '0
0 9 G
1
CN
V) rn V)
Cl)
Z
CL
u
u
0
u
1.4
(u
7e
>
A
2.0
-4.E
0 ji
40.
0 0
Q =.a
0 Vu
CF
42
G4 N
V Ef
41 y
E
0
_q
IV
cn
�wu�ao
�wu�ao
w
M
U.
0
p 0
z z
RR
W
z
�2
LW
cn
O
0
(n cn
O
z
E
9
011
O
K —0
0
S
CL
a
t--
� ei-;
::)
o
0
0.0
a
00
00
0
0 0
0ua 0
00
Z
ao V)
tol tn V)
000
z
f.
000
E:4
Q
a
aU
O
4 AE
t--
o
a
00
00
0
0 0
0ua 0
00
2 0 1104
ao V)
tol tn V)
000
z
f.
000
E:4
Q
a
aU
���
t--
a
00
00
0 0
00
ao V)
tol tn V)
t--
0 0
t--
z
60
0
to -
ri.
zi.
DAILY SAMPLE RESULTS - PART B
Permit Number: FL002014I/ OGC File No. 05-2375B Facility: Sanford/North WWTF
Monitoring Period From: To:
PLANT STAFFING:
Day Shift Operator
Evening Shift Operator
Night Shift Operator
Lead Operator
Class:
CBODS
(MG/L)
Fecal pH (Max)
Coliform
Bacteria
(611100ML)
pH (Min) TRC (For
Disinfect.)
(MG/L)
TSS (MG/L) Turbidity
(NTU)
Ammonia,
Total as N
(MG/L AS
N)
CBODS
(MG/L)
Nitrogen,
Total (MG/L)
80082
74055 00400
00400 50060
00530 00070
00610
80082
00600
ff
EFA -1
EFA -1 EFA -1
EFA -1 EFA -1
EFB-1 EFB-1
EFD-I
EFD-1
EFD-1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Total
Mo. Avg.
PLANT STAFFING:
Day Shift Operator
Evening Shift Operator
Night Shift Operator
Lead Operator
Class:
Certificate No:
Class:
Certificate No:
Class:
Certificate No:
Class:
Certificate No:
0
Name:
Name:
Name:
Name:
DAILY SAMPLE RESULTS - PART B
Permit Number: FL0020141/OGC File No. 05-2375B Facility: Sanford/North WWTF
Monitoring Period From: To:
PLANT STAFFING:
Oxygen, pH (Max) pH (Min)
Dissolved
(DO) (MG/L)
Phosphorus
(MG/L)
TSS (MOIL) TRC (For
Dechlor.)
(MG/L)
TSS (MG/L)
CBOD5
(MOIL)
Water level Rainfall
relative to
mean sea
level (FEET)
Code
00300 00400 00400
00665
00530 50060
00530
80082
82545 46529
Mon. Site
EFD-1 EFD-1 EFD-1
EFD-1
EFD-1 EFD-1
INF -1
INF -1
OTH-1 OTH-2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Total
Mo. Avg.
PLANT STAFFING:
Day Shift Operator
Class:
Certificate No:
Evening Shift Operator
Class:
Certificate No:
Night Shift Operator
Class:
Certificate No:
Lead Operator
Class:
Certificate No:
10
Name:
Name:
Name:
Name:
DAILY SAMPLE RESULTS - PART B
Permit Number: FL0020141/00C Fite No. 05-2375B Facility: Sanford/North WWTF
Monitoring Period From:
To:
PLANT STAFFING:
Flow, Total
through plant
(MGD)
Flow, To D001
(MGD)
Flow, To Site 10
(MGD)
Flow, To Public
Access Reuse
(MGD)
Flow,
Supplemental
surface water
(MGD)
Code
50050
50050
50050
50050
50050
Mon. Site
INF -2
FLW-1
FLW-2
FLW-3
FLW-4
I
Name:
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Total
Mo. Avg.
PLANT STAFFING:
Day Shift Operator
Class:
Certificate No:
Name:
Evening Shift Operator
Class:
Certificate No:
Name:
Night Shift Operator
Class:
Certificate No:
Name:
Lead Operator
Class:
Certificate No:
Name:
11
DAILY SAMPLE RESULTS - PART B
Permit Number: FL0020141/OGC File No, 05-2375B Facility: Sanford/ North WWTF
Monitoring Period From: To:
PLANT STAFFING:
Day Shift Operator
Class:
Benzo(ghi)
i perylene
�i Benzo(k)
fluoranthene
Evening Shift Operator
Recoverable
(effluent)
Recoverable
(effluent)
Name:
Night Shift Operator
Class:
Certificate No:
Name:
Lead Operator
Class:
Certificate No:
Name:
PLANT STAFFING:
Day Shift Operator
Class:
Certificate No:
Name:
Evening Shift Operator
Class:
Certificate No:
Name:
Night Shift Operator
Class:
Certificate No:
Name:
Lead Operator
Class:
Certificate No:
Name:
12
DAILY SAMPLE RESULTS - PART B
Permit Number: FL002014 I/OGC File No. 05-2375B Facility: Sanford/ North WWTF
Monitoring Period From: To:
PLANT STAFFING:
Day Shift Operator
Cyanide, Total
(as CN)
(MG/L)
Dibenzo (ah)
anthracene
(MG/L)
Hardness,
Total (as
CaCO3)
(MG/L)
Indeno
(1,2,3 -Cd)
pyrene (MG/L)
Lead, Total
Recoverable
(effluent)
(UG/L)
Pentachloro
phenol
(UG/L)
Phenanthrene
(MG/L)
Selenium,
Total
Recoverable
(UG/L)
Silver, Total
Recoverable
(UG/L)
Code
00720
34556
00900
34403
01114
39032
34461
00981
01079
Mon. Site
EFD-I
EFD-I
EFD-I
EFD-I
EFD-I
EFD-I
EFD-I
EFD- I
EFD-I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Total
PLANT STAFFING:
Day Shift Operator
Class:
Certificate No:
Name:
Evening Shift Operator
Class:
Certificate No:
Name:
Night Shift Operator
Class:
Certificate No:
Name:
Lead Operator
Class:
Certificate No:
Name:
13
DEP Form# 62-522.900(2)
Form Title Ground Water Monitoring Report
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Effective Date
Central District 3319 Maguire Blvd. Orlando, Florida 32803-3767 DEP Application No.
UINUUNU WATER tK MUNI FUKINUREPOR 1—Certification
Rule 62-522.600(11)
PART I GENERAL INFORMATION
(1) Facility Name Sanford/North WWTF / Seminole Counly
Address
city Zip,
Telephone Number (
(2) The GMS Identification Number 3059MO1119
(3) DEP Permit Number FLA0020141/OGC File No. 05-2375B
(4) Authorized Representative Name
Address
City Zip
Telephone Number (
(5) Type of Discharge
(6) Method of Discharge
Certification
I certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted in this document and all
attachments and that, based on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, I believe that the
information is true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fine and imprisonment.
Date:
Signature of Owner or Authorized Representative
PART 11 QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Sample Organization Comp QAP #
Analytical Lab Comp QAP # /HRS Certification #
*Comp QAP # MRS Certification #
Lab Name
Address
Phone Number
1/13/2003
14
it
C-4
it
cm:,
C-
40.
0 0
.0
0
0
"
40.
re
IE
in
O
en
7a
moa
.00
in
t-
en
0
0 0
-a
z
Ta
tn
.0 ot
0 c 9w
0
t
0
z
0
P
ov
tO
<
0.12
CO)
F.
C-
40.
.0
0
"
0
"
40.
re
7a
moa
.00
0
0 0
-a
0
tn
.0 ot
0 c 9w
0
P
tO
<
0.12
CO)
F.
w
C7
g 0
aCi
<
0
u
a.2
0 42
o' ZZ
—
r=
lu
0
(71
cq
cl
8
00
C7
C7
M
0
00
0.
o
0
C4
co
E
t
0
0
CL
0
z
Q..
.
.......
0
"
40.
re
7a
moa
.00
0
0 0
-a
0
tn
.0 ot
0 c 9w
0
P
tO
<
0.12
CO)
F.
w
C7
g 0
J9
<
0
u
a.2
0 42
o' ZZ
—
N
ti
o
.00
.2
cn
F-
O
fsr
baa
tn
w
O It
ti
o
op
cr
C)
In
0
r-
kn
Q"o
a.
do
C,4
00
C:>
00
C/I
—0
CL
z
40.
iq
2
,
01
:El
Q,
u
u
50
L
L
cn
cr
E
Eli
e
4t
z
'n
-,r
c,
�04
g
CD
0
�q
'a
va
0,
I
z
00
C>
r-
m
Cl
go
Ga
4r
t,
C4
C,
eq
CpQ
C4
p
.63
o
cn
>
•
-L--i
---
J18
00
cl.
NO
00
ED
40.
00
cl.
NO
ED
40.
abi
o
L;
CL
Z z
bb
ad
O
U Ow
00
ad
C)
<D
rr
0 0
tel
oo
<D
r,
o
c-�
o
O'o
lu 4)
C)
kn
In
IT
;cl
F
:2
vai
iz
E
z
;2
4to2
:5
c
00
01%
1-4
00
.12
too
0
01%
1-4
too
0
z
CZ
9
R
U P.
cc
lz
u
o O
z
04
too
0
z
CZ
9
R
U P.
04
rz
IE
E
o
In
CD
V
C)
b
10
C,
'O
I
x
ONO
M
C,
0C40
o0
U
In
CD
C\
CD
kn
C,
0
tl-
04
rq
0
cn
zz
cl
w
as
L—L
I
IO
04
E
00
40.
lu
IN,
E
Eu
40.
lu
m
z
E
UJ
43
Cl)z
CIO
2M
E
.
(I
C4
UO
C=>
n
Off,
�
Ol
ti
t--
C>
Cl)
2
4)
>
CL
z
14
#
:9
.2
40.
=
'2
I
]1
6
=
8
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
o
cn
Ul
u
E
C,
0
00
cn cn
0 Ci
C,
1-0
-0
0
Uawa
G9 y
•
tg
r::
;ii
�u 0
O
70
ro
o
C40) Q
z
U
ull
Cl.
40.
.0
00
CS
s
Cl.
14.
40.
.0
V
V
z
tw
:to::
14.
7,
41
cr
ri
c,
CD
It
kn
1109
'o —
9
C04
-,t
Q1
0,
.4
'n
a
V7
,
s
.
Go
o
CL
z
an
14.
00
40.
40.
Cfl
t=: r
IE
IE
va
Q 0
G.
0
oo
cn
0
>
cL
O
ti p
I
00
40.
78
z z
u
O
Uo
tn
ad
kn
t—
en
o
z
N
I
40.
78
z z
u
Uo
I
ad
iCQ
47
.%
c,
0
cr
v
E
JE
Eli
Z_
V)
41
-C U
'n
p
8
c,
rq
8
G
9
a
CON
FT�Sy00
C�
r-
0
cn
0
00
8
"g8ja""Rl
00
0
r-
t--
C>
00
Go
>
0
as
C-1
cn
L)
U
I
oA
00
.5
oA
42
z z
V
Lu
.E�
15
tg
V.
r
'r.
-r.
a
0
R
a
Or
E
C4
Uir
6
4
C5
r,
W�mc%�Olwo
N
O
0r-
0
0
eq
00
0
0
;4
0
00
C�
W)
C.
0�
CA
O
CL
16
0
z
U
>
18
9
00
9
z
di
O
;T4
Ix
9
z
di
9
E
906
cr
C4
C7,
A
oo
rn
z
0
u
ul
a
F--
I
I
I
I
lu
9
con
00
dpi.
O
CY
pd
cn cn
con
2
O
2
ad
.L:6
In
IE
1p-
E
00
C>
r-
0
ch
o
00
In.
ca
2
RI.
C-
40.
U
0
78
is
C o.
C7
M
Qo
ov
RI.
C-
40.
U
0
78
is
C o.
RI.
n.
O
,u
r
t:
%40
El
le
u
.r u
In
C)
C.
b
w
0%
oo
C>
r�
o
c,
o"o
'Sol
8
8
9
00
P
C�
:2
co
t
0
>
CL
;2
Ij
ri
RI.
Cl.
1-4
—I
40
50
tn
M
o
Z
OD
Cl.
1-4
—I
40
-0
tn
M
W
Z
OD
in
t-
tn
LZ
V
ado.0
o
e4
40 -
Cl.
it
01%
Clq
40
-0
Z
OD
it
01%
Clq
ado.0
M
C
rr
lu
0
w
ID
10
C%
In
m
0
fA
tn
C�
In
C>
0%
C-4
0
CA
it
01%
Clq
42
00
4t
cJ El
78
0
42
00
78
L:
5Hy3�5
tz
o et
42
78
L:
c.
O
VY
aIn
rr
Ei
E
43
11
c,
C-4
00
C>
r-
CD
m
C.
00
10
CL
42
z
cl.
00
.2.2
baa
in
t-
o,
;T4
CL
L
N
40.
C,
cl.
CL
CO)
cr
rG%0
0
o.
to
W
ID
"
00
C)
C>
r-
C,
00
C,
C7,
C'
C>
ON
44CD
C4
C>
00
r,
CD
ti
C)
00
cn
43
1
181
SO
tw
U
0 .2
>
>
1000
>u
cj 4 -.Ci �AWI
0
7g
45 8
TJ t .o E❑.. Z 0 - -S 2 a
0—
0z E
"g
=0
0
> u
0
w00 Q 4;
0 4.
—.� .80 t
v 2"s X Z g 0 g
0%
5 >0 4;
40. -0 0
o E.,
-C,
>
E
g
V) Ei o 40. r-
-a —0 ', g cr
Z - E a! 1!
yN
j 5 O
0 :,:, *0 .2
0
06 0
0 0 m 0
cc "D 0
lu
to
0, o ot
E A
0
0 0 40. g
g a! — -S
o o° o=
a s
o ="a >
cL '0 �r
'3 -a b
0 E
0'4 -S u u >0'
o
S., o
0 '0
z E
52
4. g OM 0
0
E
0
A
72i
ri U15. g t
v
cc 8
'o
CR 04 a: C4 �q
A
-
N "i
E
S
0
Z ow -0 ;! @ 1 ,
z . w z 0 . W) 0
> E
crs
2
on
r
C3.
Ew
940.
0
0
40.
C.4
v
No 0
0
75 E
oq
0
3
U
C/)
.2
0
O
o.0
15
6
z
K
2
.
o
CL
E
-0 -
cr
0
0
>
to
2
0.
=
0 0 C4
o
ac
oom
MEW3
Z5
rA
z
S
ta
0
0
0
> i
0
0
o
ig
rl
-14
o.>,
,
0
_01
V
C's
,u
0
ca 0
SO
tw
U
0 .2
>
>
1000
>u
cj 4 -.Ci �AWI
0
7g
45 8
TJ t .o E❑.. Z 0 - -S 2 a
0—
0z E
"g
=0
0
> u
0
w00 Q 4;
0 4.
—.� .80 t
v 2"s X Z g 0 g
0%
5 >0 4;
40. -0 0
o E.,
-C,
>
E
g
V) Ei o 40. r-
-a —0 ', g cr
Z - E a! 1!
yN
j 5 O
0 :,:, *0 .2
0
06 0
0 0 m 0
cc "D 0
lu
to
0, o ot
E A
0
0 0 40. g
g a! — -S
o o° o=
a s
o ="a >
cL '0 �r
'3 -a b
0 E
0'4 -S u u >0'
o
S., o
0 '0
z E
52
4. g OM 0
0
E
0
A
72i
ri U15. g t
v
cc 8
'o
CR 04 a: C4 �q
A
-
N "i
E
S
0
Z ow -0 ;! @ 1 ,
z . w z 0 . W) 0
0
73
V
7E3 15
>
0
4.
—M 12
ti v �
Li
Z
.2
to
u
>
0
EO
8.
>
-,0,: ) -0
Q
tz
0
E
c -Oa r 0 C4, -8
>
4:3
tz 4) on r
C4
coon
;a o E VO 00
V. C: ` _5 A r - .S
9:4
4 0 mo
CL =
0
Re o
4�
co
44 Q o �.14
t: bo
M=
ODrr m
- v s
0
>, 'o 0, N: 0, . C� Cf)
ci 'r4 J."5- E
> t' 4- pG.
El o
.14
aviwcv Asn v83
tw. -0 A
4
E -m 0--
::
0
4. 'E .0 sa
o22 .�: , -8
o :° 2 �5 Desi , o A -Ei ..8
o -u A �d
0 —u7J N o �r .2 lz -S
'o to > 'S2 - = a -
=v 0.0, s S - 0 tz
0 , ur.
.,a 0 E
14
0
7�4 'o >°
.0 A ts
0 -0 po
0
-00* 0 - > :j _.E , -C �a �s o
,.a 4-
ts 1= :te C
r- to
0 w 0
130,-m C;
t92
or- 114 0
0 bjD
0* -0 7M La ta 0
=sv
0 0
4i .0-0
04 " B
V 04
0 m 0
4.
a 0 W r 4, 4� Aw 0
0
0 4�
0 = `a
2.- g) , - u 'A r.
Ta v
•NC
94 d w .2 0 0 -0
o 6- 0.2,0 a: -G .0 0 -co E
-8 0-8 W.- - sp -g .9-
—ft �20 0- > 4�
— �s — 0- 0
-0-0 R,
2 0 0 'o E 9*9 E 0
4=1 :2 -0 0 4"Y Z
o
> -5 7g a
< g 4a.
.00
10- 0 ti
E
0 0- CZ , m X 0
u 10 C
. V w E
z
0 ui 5.4 = o F� . .. , .2 , - o � s
o 2 A
=
E
CXI
E > e
ED Q.. = :� .Gam Co
C3
.r -0-- 42 0 t 0 00 0 0 A I
A" 0 A -:5
C2wLQ 4;
CL co cc
42C_
0
C�
06.