HomeMy WebLinkAbout205 CPH-Amendment 85-83F-3 Ji 1 4h" 111 Jj 14 h' h
TO THE
AGREEMENT FOR CONTINUING SERVICES
FOR A CAPACITY RERATING STUDY
I
1:14
CPH ENGINEERS, INC.
This Agreement made on the 30Y4- day of "-Md-kCL, 2005 between the CITY OF
SANFORD, FLORIDA (hereinafter called the CITY) and CPH ENGINEERS, INC. (hereinafter called
the ENGINEER), is mutually agreed upon and declared an authorized Amendment to an
Agreement date December 7, 1983, between the parties, herein setting forth the scope, terms and
conditions of the work herein authorized.
In case of any conflict between this Amendment and the aforementioned Agreement of December
7, 1983, this Amendment shall govern for the work described herein.
SECTION I
�MOJ1141!k1
1.1 Introduction
The Sanford North Water Reclamation Facility (SNWRF) is currently operating
under FIDEP Operations Permit No. FLA0020141 which expires on April 7, 2008.
The SNWRF serves the City's residential, commercial, light industrial and rural
areas. The facility is classified as a "Secondary Treatment plus Filtration" Facility
using the activated sludge process and meets all Class I Reliability criteria. The
activated sludge system is designed and operated as a "complete -mix" activated
sludge process and uses a fine bubble ceramic disc aeration system to meet
mixing and oxygenation requirements and demands.
The unit operations and processes employed at the facility are divided into the
following categories:
■ Primary Treatment - including an Influent Structure with two mechanically
cleaned barscreens (1/4 -inch spacing), back-up manual barscreen, a multi-
directional odor control system, and two "vortex" type grit chambers.
■ Secondary Treatment- "Complete -mix" activated sludge process including
aeration of the mixed liquor with fine bubble ceramic diffuser, final
clarification, and disinfection through the addition of "bulk" sodium
hypochlorite.
■ Tertiary Treatment - including tertiary filtration (dual media traveling bridge
and DynaSand), chemical feed systems and high level disinfection.
■ Biosolids Treatment- including sludge thickening (belt thickeners), aerobic
digestion and sludge dewatering (belt filter presses).
■ Flow Equalization - including flow equalization in open, lined detention
basins and disinfection by chlorination.
N
In general, these unit operations and processes specifically treat the liquid and
solids trains to produce both an effluent that is acceptable for disposal to either the
reclaimed water distribution system or the St. Johns River and a "stabilized"
biosolids product that is acceptable for land application.
On January 31, 2005, the City of Sanford has received bids from local contractors
to build the "new" Sanford South Water Resource Center (SSWRC) on the
southeast side of the City. Wharton -Smith, Inc. of Lake Monroe, Florida was the
low, responsible, responsive bidder. Value engineering of the proposed treatment
facility is currently on-going to reduce costs and a Project Award should be made
by the end of March 2005. Following said Award, the Agreement between the City
and Contractor should be signed within three months followed by a Notice to
Proceed (NTP) with construction of the facility. The contract time to complete
construction of the SSWRC is approximately five hundred forty (540) consecutive
calendar days. In the interim, the current SNWRF will have to meet the wastewater
management needs of the City. Therefore, to ensure that the SNWRF has enough
treatment capacity, per FDEP regulations, to meet the service area wastewater
demands and to ensure that the City can continue to issue general permits and
accept wastewater flows as development continues throughout the City of Sanford,
a rerating of the SNWRF is required.
A meeting between the City of Sanford, CPH Engineers, Inc. and the Central District
of the FDEP occurred on February 7, 2005 concerning the rerating of SNWRF. The
District indicated that they would support a temporary increase in the permitted
capacity of the SNWRF to 8.0 MGD, until completion of the SSWRC, as long as a
detailed evaluation and rerating study was generated to support the proposed
increase.
1.2 Purpose
This Amendment work is to generally provide professional engineering services to
support a request by the City of Sanford, to the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection, to rerate the Sanford North Water Reclamation Facility
from its present permitted capacity of 7.3 MGD to a higher capacity (8.0 MGD) on
an Annual Average Daily Flow (AADF) basis, while maintaining treatment
capabilities. This request shall be supported by the findings and results of a
detailed process evaluation of the SNWRF and actual "full-scale" operation of the
facilities and processes at elevated flow conditions for a three month period.
The ENGINEER shall provide all services required to complete each task in
accordance with regulatory requirements in effect on the date of execution of the
Agreement to the extent of the scope of work as defined and set out in this
Amendment. The ENGINEER shall perform professional services as hereinafter
stated in accordance with good engineering practices.
SECTION 2
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
2.1 Professional Engineering Services
Under this Agreement, the ENGINEER shall provide the following professional
engineering services for the preparation of a Capacity Rerating Study to support a
permit application requesting an increase in the permitted capacity of the Sanford
North WRF The program elements include the following:
2.1.1 Data Collection
A. Collect operational data, As -Built Drawings, pertinent shop drawings, and
evaluate the completeness and relevancy of the data with respect to the
rerating assignment.
2.1.2 System Evaluation
A. Evaluate system characteristics and process components with respect to
rerating process equipment as follows:
1. Evaluate data to establish actual wastewater flows and characteristics
and compare them to the original design criteria.
2. Evaluate the removal efficiency and headloss characteristics of
various unit operations and processes.
3. Evaluate the capacity of the Master Lift Station based upon the
original design with respect to actual peak flow characteristics and
recommend new design parameters for peak pumping capacity.
4. Evaluate the performance capability of the biological treatment
system and compare actual operational data with the original design
basis.
5. Evaluate secondary clarifier operation based on established
hydraulic and solids loading criteria and define the limitations of
the equipment.
6. Evaluate the tertiary filtration system based upon published data,
actual facility experience and hydraulic calculations.
7. Evaluate the capacity of the disinfection system based on actual
dosages and residuals.
8. Evaluate the sludge stabilization and thickening system based
upon current regulations.
9. Evaluate the capacity of the Transfer Pump Station based upon
the original design and the equalization effect of the wetwell.
10. Evaluate the capacity of the Reclaimed Water Distribution Pump
Station based upon the original design.
2.1.3 Hydraulic Analysis
A. Evaluation of the hydraulic constraints within the treatment system and
yard piping using process limited flow rate(s). The hydraulic analysis will
be conducted in conjunction with Class I Reliability requirements.
2.1.4 Generation of a Capacity Rerat,in-q Study Report (CRSR)
A. Preparation of a report to present the methods, considerations, stress
test results, recommendations and conclusions of the Capacity Rerating
Study Report (CRSR). Three (3) "draft" copies of the CRSR will be
provided to the City staff for review and comment.
B. Upon revision and authorization to proceed, the Engineer will provide the
Owner with five (5) "final" copies of the CRSR.
2.1.5 Meeting with FDEP
A. Preliminary Project Meeting with FDEP
B. Pre -Application Meeting with FDEP to review data and conclusions of the
CRSR and determine additional permitting information required, if any.
2.1.6 Final Documentation
A. Prepare and submit the necessary documentation to FDEP to support the
rerating of the Sanford North WRF.
2.1.7 FDEP Permitting of the SNWRF
A. Prepare the FDEP Operations Permit Modification Application, permitting
forms and all required documentation and ancillary materials for the
capacity rerating of the Sanford North Water Reclamation Facility and
assist the City in permitting the project with FDEP.
B. Pre -Application Meeting with FDEP to review the Permit Application and
determine if any additional permitting information is required.
C. Assist the City in responding to requests from the FDEP for additional
information (RAI's) concerning the proposed improvements.
n.
SECTION 3
SUPPLEMENTARY SERVICES OF THE ENGINEER
3.1 If authorized by the CITY, the ENGINEER shall furnish or obtain from others,
supplementary services of the following types which will be paid for by the CITY as
an additional cost as outlined in Section 5.
3.2. Additional services due to significant changes in the scope of the Project including,
but not limited to, changes in size, complexity, project characteristics and/or
requirements, additional permitting requirements required by FDEP or due to time
delays in initiating or completion of the work as described herein.
3.3. Except as otherwise provided herein, services or additional costs associated with
revising previously accepted studies, reports, or other documents prepared by the
ENGINEER when such revisions are due to causes beyond the ENGINEER's
control.
3.4. Additional services resulting from public protests, administrative hearings, additional
meeting with the regulatory agencies or similar matters.
3.5. Preparing to serve and/or serving as an Expert Witness for the CITY in any
litigation, public hearing, condemnation proceeding, right-of-way or easement
acquisition or negotiation, or other legal / administrative proceeding.
3.6. Additional engineering services required by revisions to regulations (after the date
of this Amendment) as applicable to the U.S. EPA, Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP), or other regulatory agency requirements.
3.7. Additional services in connection with the project including services normally
furnished by the CITY as described in Section 4 herein and services not otherwise
provided for in this Agreement.
"i
SECTION 4
CITY RESPONSIBILITIES
4.1 In addition to the specific responsibilities hereinbefore described, the CITY will:
A. Advise the ENGINEER of his requirements for the Project and designate a
person to act as the CITY's representative with respect to the work to be
performed under this Amendment, and such person shall have complete
authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define the
CITY's policies and decisions pertinent to the work covered by this Amendment.
B. Obtain and provide data requested that is reasonably available on the project
along with operational and maintenance requirements, discharge monitoring
report data, operations data, wastewater, reclaimed water and domestic
biosolids data, wastewater generators and reclaimed water users, and all other
pertinent treatment facility data.
C. Guarantee access to and make all provisions for the ENGINEER to enter upon
public and private lands as required for the ENGINEER to perform his work
under this Amendment.
D. Make all treatment facilities and associated sites accessible for inspection.
E. Examine all studies, reports, sketches, schedules, and other documents
presented by the ENGINEER and render decisions pertaining thereto within a
reasonable time so as not to delay the work of the ENGINEER.
F. Assist in obtaining approval of all governmental authorities having jurisdiction
over the project, and such approvals and consents from such other individuals
or bodies as may be necessary for completion of the Project.
G. Furnish or direct the ENGINEER, in writing, to provide at the CITY's expense,
any subconsultant services not designated in Section 2, if advised by the
ENGINEER and CITY concurs that they are necessary.
1.1
H. Furnish, or direct the ENGINEER, in writing, to provide at the CITY's expense,
necessary additional services as stipulated in Section 3 of this Amendment, or
other services as required.
I. Provide such legal, accounting, financial and insurance counseling services as
may be required for the project, and such auditing services as the CITY may
require.
J. Give prompt written notice to the ENGINEER whenever the CITY observes or
otherwise becomes aware of any defect in the Project.
E
I �
LA =1011 i Is I
71TIT-4-71 H
5.1. Payment for services and expenses of the ENGINEER are to be asset forth below.
The ENGINEER agrees to perform the work outlined in this Agreement for a lump
sum fee as indicated in the following table:
5.2. The OWNER will make prompt monthly payments in response to the ENGINEER's
monthly statements without retention for all categories of services rendered under
this Agreement.
5.3 Charges for the services rendered byprincipals and employees as witnesses in any
litigation, hearing or proceeding will be computed at a rate of $1,200 per day or any
portion thereof (but compensation for time spent in preparing to appear in any such
litigation, hearing or proceeding will be computed in accordance with the payment
method as set forth herein).
5.4 If this Agreement is terminated during prosecution of the services prior to
completion of the services of Section 2, payments to be made in accordance with
Section 5 on account of that and all prior work under this Amendment shall be due
and payable, and shall constitute total payment for services rendered. In addition,
upon termination, the ENGINEER shall be paid for any additional services
authorized and rendered under Section 3.
ILI
SECTION 6
GENERAL CONDITIONS
6.1. Since the ENGINEER has no control over the cost of labor, materials, or equipment
or over any construction method of determining prices, any opinion of probable
construction cost which may be provided in the services of this Amendment are
made on the basis of his experience and qualifications and represent his best
judgment as a design professional familiar with the construction industry, but the
ENGINEER cannot and does not guarantee that the construction cost will not vary
from opinions of probable construction cost prepared by him. Similar limitations
apply to construction schedules reviewed or prepared by the ENGINEER.
6.2. The CITY and the ENGINEER each binds himself and his partners, successors,
executors, administrators and assigns to the other party of this Agreement and to
partners, successors, executors, administrators, and assigns of such other party in
respect to all covenants of this Amendment. Nothing herein shall be construed as
creating any personal liability on the part of any officer or agency of any public body
which may be a party hereto, nor shall it be construed as giving any rights or
benefits hereunder to anyone other than the CITY and the ENGINEER.
11
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this Amendment
the day and year first above written.
ATTEST & SEAL
DATE
ATTEST & SEAL
DATE
12
CITY:
City of Sanford, Florida
TITLE
ENGINEER:
CPH Engineers, Inc.
Benj mi MP Fries
Vice -President
David A. Gierach
President
(2
DATE
12
CITY:
City of Sanford, Florida
TITLE
ENGINEER:
CPH Engineers, Inc.
Benj mi MP Fries
Vice -President
David A. Gierach
President