The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDO #21-04_310 Elm Avenue_RecordedThis Instrument Prepared By and Return To: Julie Adams Scofield, AICP Historic Preservation Planner Planning and Development Services Department City Hall 300 North Park Avenue Sanford, Florida 32771 \� Tax Parcel Identiflcation Number: 25-19-30-5AG-0507-0030. Case #: 21-000647 Permit* COA21-000011 GRANT MALOY, SEMINOLE COUNTY CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER CFN# 2021054266 Bk:9912 Page:11014106(6Pgs) REC: 04/26/2021 11:51:02 AM by cjones RECORDING FEES $52.50 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD OF THE CITY OF SANFORD DEVELOPMENT ORDER No. 21-04 RELATING TO 310 ELM AVENUE AND ISSUING CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS The Historic Preservation Board (HPB) of the City of Sanford issued this Development Order issuing a Certificate of Appropriateness relating to and touching and concerning the following described property: 310 Elm Avenue, which is assigned Tax Parcel Identification Number: 25-19-30-5AG-0507-0030 assigned by the Seminole County Property Appraiser. FINDINGS OF FACT Property Owners: Gerie E. Vogt and Kimberly M. Parr 310 Elm Avenue Sanford, Florida 32771 Applicant: Gerie E. Vogt 761 Rantoul Lane Lake Mary, Florida 32746-4249 Project: Approval of the HPB to construct an attached deck with regard to property located at 310 Elm Avenue. Requested Development Approval: The Applicant requested approval of the HPB to construct an attached deck with regard to property located at 310 Elm Avenue. Additional Findings: The subject property is located in the Sanford Residential Historic District. 111,alge :Z I "_j 3 0• CY fy k 0- s '-,Cot Of"A i ;orf.! Fit 'Jis't'A. qq Oj 'i twollcill 03 i ;orf.! Fit 'Jis't'A. qq Oj The frame vernacular structure was built in about 1910. In 2009 the building was converted to office use, and site improvements, including a handicap ramp on the south side of the building was approved. When the building was returned to single-family use the ramp was removed and replaced with an attached deck and railing. There is no record of a building permit or certificate of convenience being issued for the deck. There is also an attached deck on the rear of the building that has been issued a certificate of convenience (minor review). In 2021, the deteriorated decks were replaced entirely. The property owners are seeking after the fact approval to install a wood deck,160 square feet in size, with railings attached to the south side of the structure. Schedule "S" of the City's Land Development Regulations (LDRs) and the recent resolution adopted by the HPB relating to administrative reviews allow for detached decks not visible from the street to be approved as minor reviews. Though positioned closer to the back of the building, the proposed deck is visible from Elm Avenue. An outdated survey attached shows a fence obstructing view of the deck, but there is no intent or interest to replace the fence. The project meets applicable lot development standards. Schedule S of the City's LDRs does not provide clear standards for decks. Generally, decks without railings are proposed for back yards and are approved through a minor review if setback requirements are met and no character defining features are impacted. Because this deck and railing is attached and visible from the street, it is similar to a porch, though lacking a roof. The intent of Schedule S of the City's LDRs is that all additions, including porches, be in character with the style, scale and materials of the primary structure, and 21Pagc .±t .00 0 A P01 L :06 '�Wh 10 N., MA W!rli .. 'i 'i«': n)!OW 1, 9MIDAM 1SIamumqA n SaU Wo clan . . w I'm-, ..:Iii t.", irfib `:1' '(! 11 i K! 4 QUIT: 11 . n 1 k, o! Fri, ' in AHmET mCm c: oervael iaj3?rj pniibi.--, ;r A WWI W "SA rv&W no ova V sv 7 Amb 30 A Yija;, }o -%".) i 11 0010 Mum Inu) :,o s jlUo ljq!, -nche;, - j 68F.M30 bum . ':And A mump Y& ov ON "Immmy MY lo em? rum so "i Uekidl.tp- ;-,! -,-! 6 1061K oil YW:W 1.00110 "embsoq ycm T awak a 0 1 "M RA v st j1Gqk A u lyme , , ;n. -f; ;c : i I Ahjd 'it! shnWe axr in wob P" 1MACIM !',WO W110 40' -Y 41, b weim 1000 1 APUM DsvoqqF A -, A SOL SLOSMA WOSQd WS e0vAst gi)MA0 0 XOM K W W )0 NCO!&" OPS, Hs WA4 YyAQ vJ w F! QW, . lo mvp� AT M 1 f Ur vy, i1 F3 -009se-1 bid 1: � ul "i i " -- -, :. .� �! on) now [SAW'. that they be attached in a way that does not obscure or damage defining architectural features. The proposed wood deck does not obscure architectural features, and could be removed without damaging the original structure, however it is a "modern feature" not strongly related stylistically to the house. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW (a). The conclusions of law in the prior Certificate of Appropriateness are hereby ratified and affirmed. (b). Pursuant to Section 8.0 of Schedule "S" of the City's LDRs, the HPB has reviewed the proposed Certificate of Appropriateness and all application documentation and matters relating thereto in accordance with the procedures for altering historic landmarks or structures within historic districts as set forth in Schedule "S" of the City's LDRs. (c). Specifically, Schedule "S" of the City's LDRs provides as follows: (1). Setbacks apply to both principal and accessory structures. (2). Residential lot development shall have the following setbacks: (1). Front yard: 25'. (ii). Rear Yard: 2'. (iii). Side Yard: 50 . (iv). When a side yard is located adjacent to a street: 7.5'. (3). Replacement of existing porches with a design or materials not in character with the style or period of the building are 31Pa—c qgmsb 1: "wow ion IM W i; lif L3iLVOA 011AUS1iAIS 9upal 0 tot! .095 ., jSS ?,,-x()V, T .<,;ijj aim Sw-411qClqqA io, A! n, vial ',c: ,i%;o,%)l:.,:;c,-, art i' f-, E,.! Y I I �i*Y f:. ) . u ; -;., E i 143 10 osj! 01 H.11jay"? !o SWOM W rd iii ;ua ae KA Tait OWN 7VIONC, as aeWl:i Ll':!(33 -'vi�,' M In W My tno A 6 Oj qjesb 5 Nov ael onq gAW W :)d! 10 bl"eq 10 31ya act by ww l6dr, A lu; prohibited. (4). New porch elements, such as, by way of examples only and not as a limitation, balusters and columns, brackets, trim and architectural embellishments shall be compatible with the style and period of the building and shall be substantiated by physical or pictorial evidence of the subject property. (5). Porch additions shall have a roof type that is either similar to the existing roof or is in character with the style and period of the building. (d). To the extent that a conclusion of law as set forth herein also constitutes a factual finding, then such shall be taken to be so as part of this Development Order. (e). The proposed Certificate of Appropriateness is hereby found and determined to comply with the aforestated. (f). Additionally, the Certificate of Appropriateness sought is hereby found and determined to be consistent with the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan and development of the property as proposed would be consistent with and in compliance to applicable land development regulations and all other applicable regulations and ordinances as set forth in the Code of Ordinances of the City of Sanford. �-r NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1). The aforementioned application for a Certificate of Appropriateness is APPROVED subject to the condition that the railing be appropriate to the style of the house, as determined by the Historic Preservation Officer, with any dispute as to that 41 11a e bnf,-- aif�- too h: a i i� ic - to; Ope wh rhW; Mormw ed AW i i:; 1 ii :., i i; \! el f-,; kc! " :- j �! i .; ! , .,:;6!.j 1 ad i I c ; "t, I n,, i ;:i ,) f ! i'....'j.3 ;),-: i *'., 1, l I r, i 'I :•c :--.! -If�-Nnhtl ,* ; 1F."'11 'k. , � . " e) 04 to Meq ills Aye add r1h,"v (,I yNOW-i -.5 r! also t jwqcpk lo ci -!i bna On inshm-00 ad bw-, i Wdswiqup isma K; bns sponuaw STWO'. SAVII CAST 1-1 1; lot rjnwSDW:qS E61: 01 Sjubloyp Q YwK, OrIj Mll rmohnuo �."!! Cid n Lru� ;wGic, adlwsaal� NOT m matter being brought before the HP B for resolution by means of an additional development order, (2). This Development Order granting approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness touches and concerns the aforedescribed property and is subject to code enforcement action in accordance with the controlling provisions of law. Done and Ordered on the date first written below. As approved and authorized for execution by the Historic Preservation Board of the City of Sanford at its meeting of February 17, 2021. A TTES T: HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD OF THE CITY OF SANrf RD KIRWISMIRMT fim�yg��M ,Run, W�jj 111 IWI MR, Run,", i C ai it to FbIbruary 17, 2021. 5 � i' , 0 ma, W n to 0 10 k;volqqe q -a r, '--' I �; 1.:i two !0 ONArvins PHO Anc-, -m� a ti's :Al no ...0 =30 "Ody neam AWW0 ON y! WMasse W! bonjuldVa T"Va bsVO!qq, 0. to 6rolaro al ':- ; labiss 10 j7'i ST. I ON A", ........... F --R J, I FINNOW conditions of this Development Order the undersigned named persons having full U'ro"INTIZ in Witness # 1 Printed"Nw-afrne: -41- 'Yj ess # 2 > ed N a me ik RIOI-91 M/TKAJAMM/ 01MRAM, MIMM-11 MIMMaNMIM11,111 0 : 1 III �II IT I IIIII I IIIIII FAr a OR I *��JJMM=wl MiffIIIIIIII! V11IIIIII! III 111 11 I I I I I ! I I I I •1 11 ! 1 !11•1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 M i 15-1111110001MME Given under my hand and official sea[ this, :2 (0 da of-F(§Uru,pry, 2021. OT—A—RY PUBLIC 0sw;%,,4v fly commission expires: orY "e, Nox, Pub: Can o� F Icx 7da '-, f GG 239' ok a Nip 6 0 �1 mv nfS SO LAW L I.-- � "'Cl b;'i! r)rl) ..c. i...' . 'ok", 'S v w Aj Wwaq VeSM -�rlv.vj Kam uEl"Mal in Smf L in a Jim do won c 1 m�'- �S it bed list 0 1J. f.'fi -10'ieci Los yION! A. -nn An AS&