The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDO #21-01_1101 Park Avenue_RecordedGRANT MALOY, SEMINOLE COUNTY CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER CFN# 2021051193 Bk:9906 Page:474-482(9Pgs) REC: 04/19/2021 3:59:47 PM by hdevore RECORDING FEES $78.00 This Instrument Prepared By and Return To: Julie Adams Scofield, AICP Historic Preservation Planner Planning and Development Services Department City Hall 300 North Park Avenue Sanford, Florida 32771 Tax Parcel Identification Number: 25-19-30-5AG-1303-0060. File * 20-009090 Permit #: COA20-000316 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD OF THE CITY OF SANFORD DEVELOPMENT ORDER NO. 21 -01 RELATING TO 1101 PARK AVENUE AND ISSUING CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS The Historic Preservation Board (HPB) of the City of Sanford issued this Development Order issuing a Certificate of Appropriateness relating to and touching and concerning the following described property: 1101 Park Avenue, which is assigned Tax Parcel Identification Number: 25-19-30-5AG-1303-0060 by the Seminole County Property Appraiser. FINDINGS OF FACT Property Owners: Kelah N. Clarke and H. Michael Deneka (As Co -Trustees) 1101 Park Avenue Sanford, Florida 32771-2851 Applicant: Kelah N. Clarke 1101 Park Avenue Sanford, Florida 32771-2851 Project: Approval of the HPB to construct a single story rear addition, 400 square feet in size, relative to property located at 1101 Park Avenue. Requested Development Approval: The Applicant has requested approval of the HPB to construct a single story rear addition, 400 square feet in size, relative to 11 P a g e property located at 1101 Park Avenue. Additional Findings: The proposed structure and work are compatible with and are located in the City's Residential Historic District. The primary structure located on the property is a colonial revival style single family home built, based upon the records of the Seminole County Property Appraise, in 1925. The 2 -story main structure is flanked by 1 -story additions, and there is a small porch addition to the rear fagade. The exterior wall material is metal siding, but the building retains architectural integrity. The Property Owners have applied for approval to construct a single -story addition to the rear, 400 square feet in size, replacing paired windows and adding an exterior entrance on the north elevation of the addition. The proposal shows an impact to an upper story window, but revised plans maintains the window. The addition would not be visible from the primary street. The project also includes removing screening from the existing rear addition on the south side. The proposed addition will comply with all applicable setback requirements. The scale, massing, and architectural elements of the proposed addition are compatible with the property and are similar to the contributing structures in the historic district. The one- story addition is in the back and clearly discerned as an addition and could be removed without harm to the essential form and integrity of the property. The proposed wood siding matches the original wood siding on the house. The Property Owners propose to construct a hipped roof with architectural shingles to match the house. The existing windows are wood windows with various configurations—the main house with 311, 4/1 and 5/1 lites, and the windows on the addition are 6/6. The existing windows will be 2 1 P a g e relocated to the new outside walls and a wood door to the addition will be custom built to match the existing front entrance door. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW (a). Pursuant to Section 8.0 of Schedule "S" of the City's Land Development Regulations (LDRs), the HPB has reviewed the proposed Certificate of Appropriateness and all application documentation and matters relating thereto in accordance with the procedures for altering historic landmarks or structures within historic districts as set forth in Schedule "S" of the City's LDRs. (b). With regard to the application of Schedule "S" of the City's LDRs, the requirements thereof provide as follows to include the Secretary of the Interior's Guidelines: (1). The setback requirements which apply to both principal and accessory structures are as followings: (A). Front yard: 25'. (B). Rear yard: 2'. (C). Side yard: 5'; except when a side yard is located adjacent to a street, in which case 7.5'. (2). New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. (3). New work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the architectural integrity of the property and its 31Page environment. (4). New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the environment would be unimpaired. (5). To maintain the predominant scale and proportion of the historic district, new buildings, additions and alterations shall be designed to ensure that all elements of the building fagade are aligned with the fagade elements of the neighboring structures (e.g. windows, doors, etc.) (6). Building features within new construction shall be compatible with the color, material, and character of the property, neighborhood and immediate environment. (7). Board trim at corners and around openings shall not exceed 6" except at the front door surround which may be any size or configuration. (8). For new construction, additions and alterations, the wall finish most acceptable for the architectural style shall be utilized. (9). The following materials are generally acceptable for principal and accessory structures within the historic districts: (A). Wood clapboard, wood shingle, wood drop siding, wood board and batten siding or equal as determined by the Board. 4 1 P a g e (B). Brick, stucco; and stone or cast stone. (10). Any and all additions that are sided with aluminum or vinyl or other simulated cladding shall be clad with materials to match the original historic structure in size, profile, shape, color, orientation and texture. (11). Principal building roof shape and materials shall be consistent with the style of the structure. (12). All pitched roof planes shall match in material, shape, texture, design, dimension, color, and other identifying features. (13). Principal building roof shape and materials shall be consistent with the style of the structure. (14). Roofs clad with red cedar or white oak shingles; or with galvanized steel, or asphalt shingles are consistent with most styles in the historic district. (15). All new windows shall have mullion profiles similar to contributing structures. (16). If single hung or double hung windows are placed in groupings, a 4" to 6" trim piece shall separate the windows. (17). If a window contains divided lites, true muntins or simulated true -divided lites (where a wood frame is glued to the exterior of the glass with a very high bond (VHB) adhesive system) shall be used. 5 1 P a g e (18). If double pane windows are installed, an internal shadow bar shall also be used between the glasses. (19). Inserted or removable grilles and flat grilles that do not replicate the profile and characteristics of the original window are prohibited on the exterior of the windowpane. (20). The interior of the windowpane may have an inserted or removable grille provided that the grille is not flat and has a profile. (21). Windows and doors shall be glazed in clear glass with no more than 10% daylight reduction. (22). The use of reflective glass and reflective film is prohibited on all buildings. (23). Rectangular windows shall be casement and single or double hung; circular and hexagonal windows may be fixed or pivot. (24). Doors with modern designs, flush or sliding glass doors, or any type of door that is inappropriate to the style or period of the structure are prohibited. (c). To the extent that a conclusion of law as set forth herein also constitutes a factual finding, then such shall be taken to be so as part of this Development Order. (d). The proposed Certificate of Appropriateness is hereby found and determined to comply with the aforestated requirements. (e). Additionally, the Certificate of Appropriateness sought is hereby found and determined to be consistent with the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan and 6 1 P a g e development of the property as proposed would be consistent with and in compliance to applicable land development regulations and all other applicable regulations and ordinances as set forth in the Code of Ordinances of the City of Sanford. (1). The aforementioned application for a Certificate of Appropriateness is APPROVED based on the finding that the proposed new construction is consistent with the purpose and intent of Schedule "S" of the City's LDRs and complies with the specific guidelines contained in of Schedule "S" of the City's LDRs. (2) . This Development Order granting approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness touches and concerns the aforedescribed property and is subject to code enforcement action in accordance with the controlling provisions of law. Done and Ordered on the latest date written below. As approved and authorized for execution by the Historic Preservation Board of the City of Sanford at its meeting of January 20, 2021. HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD OFT E CITY OF SANFORD W. Traci Houchin, MMC, FCRM, City Clerk Tainm vy Agni Ch it Date: Uncpro tune 46Jahuary20,20211. 77 tiu)Wa6a W*ead, HPB Clerk I INFINIFI 7 1 P tia g c IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the subject Property Owners have signed and sealed these presents the day and year written below and AGREE to all of the terms and conditions of this Development Order the undersigned named persons having full authority to execute this document. A TTES T - Witness # 1. 'e Printed Name: Witness 2. Printed Name: XELAH N. CLARKE AND H. MICHAEL VENEKA Kelah N. Clarke, Co -Trustee V ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF ftME-5, COUNTY OF-ft-M`TN0L-E---) eka, Cb -Trustee, This instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me by means of M -/physical presence or o online notarization, thisA , JL� d a y of 4anUffy-, 2021, KefatrN--=ke-and— H. Michael Deneka. They are personally known to me or L__] produced as identification. (Signature of Notary Public) Print Name: ('d,tn' Akv,A� . Notary Public, State of -FI o-r-ida V 'tt- Commission No,: ,Ian ? , My Commission Expires:__I -31 �0, (' 81 P CART E.ABELIL NOTARY PUBLIC Commonwealth of Virginia Reg. #226982 -IJ38A .3 WIND ousu t YFIATOV Finig•liv 10 r$iravrriOMMo") JOINDER AND APPROVAL OF CONDITIONS BY PROPERTY OWNERS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the subject Property Owners have signed and sealed these presents the day and year written below and AGREE to all of the terms and conditions of this Development Order the undersigned named persons having full authority to execute this document. A TTES T.• Witness # I Printed Name: 4cy Witness # 2 Printed Name: STATE OF FLORIDA KELAH N. CLARKE AND H. MICHAEL DENEKA 4-Wl- a ?,� K61ah N. Clarke, Co -Trustee H. Michael Deneka, Co -Trustee ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF SEMINOLE ) This instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me by means of X physical -e7 "I NAr-t'46 presence or o online notarization, this /-/— day of 4anttsfy, 2021, Kelah N. Clarke*im& 4 1,5 They I efe, personally known to me or j produced as identification 8111 a ge C. (Sig be of Nota rf Public) I Print me: Notary Public, 9falW—of Florida Commission No.: 6 6 23*7649 My Commission Expires: it JALLS Notary POO State of f 10 10ri(dwO Commission 9 GG 234756 A My Comm. Expires Aug 31, 2021 Bonded ths National Notary Assn. PROPRNP-40. 40-arqW — — — — 8111 a ge C. (Sig be of Nota rf Public) I Print me: Notary Public, 9falW—of Florida Commission No.: 6 6 23*7649 My Commission Expires: s t• ., t 1:t'a.ii s11t� ,;e: �tUl•tM ��Jt. ;i!.•. 'Of:_ � .. • .. .e �: (i'�7.'4: ii6F�YWji ✓,Vf+��s��Civ .�