Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDO #21-24_307 E. 2nd Street_RecordedGRANT MALOY, SEMINOLE COUNTY CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER This Instrument Prepared By and Return To: CFN# 2021110137 Bk:10019 Page:555-560(6Pgs) Julie Adams Scofield, AICP REC: 08/19/2021 12:02:40 PM by ciones Historic Preservation Planner RECORDING FEES $0.00 Planning and Development Services Department City Hall 300 North Park Avenue Sanford, Florida 32771 Tax Parcel Identification Number: 25-19-30-5AG-0401-0040. File #: 21-004991 Permit #: COA21-000181 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD OF THE CITY OF SANFORD DEVELOPMENT ORDER No. 21-24 RELATING 307 EAST 2ND STREET AND ISSUING CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS The Historic Preservation Board (HPB) of the City of Sanford issued this Development Order issuing a Certificate of Appropriateness relating to and touching and concerning the following described property: 307 East 2nd Street, which is assigned Tax Parcel Identification Number: 25-19-30-5AG-0401-0040 assigned by the Seminole County Property Appraiser. FINDINGS OF FACT Property Owner: RRFREE, LLC 202 South Sanford Avenue Sanford, Florida 32771 Applicant: Shane Hardenbrook General Manager Celery City Craft 114 S Palmetto Avenue Sanford, Florida 32771 Project: Approval of the HPB for approval of an historic mural ("ghost" mural) on a commercial building relative to property located at 307 East 2nd Street. Requested Development Approval: The Applicant requested approval for approval of an historic mural ("ghost" mural) on a commercial building relative to property located at 307 East 2nd Street. a g e Additional Findings: The property is located at 307 East 2nd Street within the Downtown Commercial Historic District. The masonry vernacular building was constructed in 1930 with that date being determined from the Seminole County Property Appraiser's records. The architectural style is masonry vernacular. The applicant is proposing to restore a Coca Cola wall mural on the west facade facing a vacant lot used for parking. The wall has been partially painted and a faded and illegible rectangular advertisement and a Coca Cola logo in ghost effect are visible. The applicant is proposing to return the rectangular portion to a brick -colored appearance and restore/repaint the Coca Cola sign that is 16'11" long by 5'5" high. The subject wall is partially painted, with "ghost" and remnant signs visible and is located on a side wall. The mural will not detract from the character of the building which has no pedestrian level windows or ornamentation. Indeed, the mural enhances the building and adds visual and historic interest to a blank wall. The walls and roof system appear to be in good condition. The applicant is proposing to clean the building using gentlest means possible and will apply exterior stain, paint and clear coat. No reflective or fluorescent paint is to be used. Hand painted Coca-Cola advertisements were historically found on the sides of buildings at busy cross-roads and high traffic areas, and in 1910 accounted for 25% of the company's total advertising budget. The designs were standardized in the 1920s and became a well-known and remembered aspect, of material culture. The proposed mural is an example of community art connected to southern heritage. A professional artist experienced in building sign restoration will be painting the mural. 2 1 P o 0 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW (a). Pursuant to Section 8.0 of Schedule "S", the HPB has reviewed the proposed Certificate of Appropriateness and all application documentation and matters relating thereto in accordance with the procedures for altering historic landmarks or structures within historic districts as set forth in Schedule "S". (b). Specifically, Schedule "S" provides as follows: (1). A public art application shall be submitted to the City's Public Art Commission after this action by the HPB. (2). Murals may only be installed on previously painted structures. (3). Murals may only be installed on the side and rear walls of buildings. (4). Murals may not cover or detract from significant or character -defining architectural features of a structure. (5). Murals must complement and enhance the structure. (6). Walls on which murals are located must be in good repair with roof, flashing and parapets in good condition.. (7). Walls on which murals are located must be cleaned using gentlest means possible and primed with appropriate paint. (8). Paint utilized in the installation of the mural should be intended for exterior use and will not compromise the integrity of the materials to which it is applied. (9). The use of paint which is reflective, neon or fluorescent installing a mural is prohibited and unlawful. (10). Murals must be located and sized to engage and encourage pedestrian interaction. 31 Pag e (11). Murals must exhibit skilled application standards consistent with sound and generally accepted artistic practices and principles. (12). It is also noted that the City Attorney has reviewed this matter and is of the view that the existing "ghost" Coca Cola mural is a lawful non -conforming use that could be lawfully maintained by the property owner; provided, however, that the Historic Preservation Board approval, as set forth herein, is an appropriate manner in which to implement that decision by means of a development order. (c). To the extent that a conclusion of law as set forth herein also constitutes a factual finding, then such shall be taken to be so as part of this Development Order. (d). The proposed Certificate of Appropriateness is hereby found and determined to comply with the aforestated requirements and provisions. (e). Additionally, the Certificate of Appropriateness sought is hereby found and determined to be consistent with the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan and development of the property as proposed would be consistent with and in compliance to applicable land development regulations and all other applicable regulations and ordinances as set forth in the Code of Ordinances of the City of Sanford. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1). The aforementioned application for a Certificate of Appropriateness is APPROVED; provided, however, In addition to the action taken herein, the proposal will be required to meet standards for public art established by the City and be approved by the Public Art Commission. (2). This Development Order granting approval of a Certificate of 41 Page Appropriateness touches and concerns the aforedescribed property and is subject to code enforcement action in accordance with the controlling provisions of law. As approved and authorized for execution by the Historic Preservation Board of the City of Sanford at its meeting of July 20, 2021. A TTES T. - ILI Traci Houchin, MMC, FORM, City Cl Tammy Ad'r. 'Date: 0 unc pro to G i�wi law Kii? s, HOBtlerl( A 01 26MA 0 1 all III ffi` � ♦ w Mem to July 20, 2021. 5 1 P a �n, c JOINDER AND APPROVAL OF CONDITIONS BY PROPERTY OWNER IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the subject Property Owner has signed and sealed these presents the day and year written below and AGREES to all of the terms and conditions of this Development Order the undersigned named person having full authority tp_Bxecute this document. Effiff-VAM ey, Member , Member STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF SEMINOLE ) RRF Paul ACKNOWLEDGMENT , Member I, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public, in and for said State at Large who is authorized to take acknowledgments, do hereby certify Paul Williams, John L. Delaney and John Williams being duly sworn, acknowledged before me that they executed the foregoing document, said persons b ' personally known e or provided the following for identification: N , on this day that they, being informed of the contents of said instrument, they executed the same voluntarily. Given under my hand and official seal this __q_ day of.JuPp, 2021. Ai 4T K.M IEL R. LEWISublic-State of Floridassion HGG 953832mmission Expiresrch 23, 2024 NOT PUBLIC " commission expires: 6 1 P a g e