The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDO #21-28_302 Oak Avenue_RecordedThis Instrument Prepared By and Return To: Julie Adams Scofield, AICP Historic Preservation Planner Planning and Development Services Department City Hall 300 North Park Avenue Sanford, Florida 32771 Tax Parcel Identification Number: 25-19-30-5AG-0505-0010. Case #: 21-005373 Permit#: COA21-000194 GRANT MALOY, SEMINOLE COUNTY CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER CFN# 2021130488 Bk:10059 Pg:1895-1900(6Pgs) REC: 10101/2021 3:32:43 PM by jeckenroth RECORDING FEES $52.50 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD OF THE CITY OF SANFORD DEVELOPMENT ORDER No. 21-28 RELATING TO 302 OAK AVENUE AND ISSUING CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS (FURTHER REVISIONS) The Historic Preservation Board (HPB) of the City of Sanford issued this Development Order issuing a Certificate of Appropriateness relating to and touching and concerning the following described property: 302 Oak Avenue, which is assigned Tax Parcel Identification Number: 25-19-30-5AG-0505-0010 assigned by the Seminole County Property Appraiser. FINDINGS OF FACT Property Owners: Michelle M. Solano and Leah K. Solano 302 Oak Avenue Sanford, Florida 32771-1882 Applicant: Steve Delacerda Total Service Contracting, Inc. 1250 Swiss Court Deltona, Florida 32738 Project: Approval of the HPB to permit alterations with regard to property located at 302 Oak Avenue. Requested Development Approval: The Applicant requested approval of the HPB to permit alterations with regard to property located at 302 Oak Avenue. Additional Findings: The structure located on the subject property was built in I I P a g e 1887 and is located in the Sanford Residential Historic District. The contributing Folk Victorian/frame vernacular structure has been clad with synthetic siding, but generally retains architectural integrity. The property owners have received approval to place solar panels on the roof, visible from the street and to demolish an enclosed back porch addition. The roof line and chimneys, porch elements, windows and doors are remaining character -defining features for the property. A photo taken in 1987 shows porches screened in, but the railing and brackets are slightly different from those currently in place. Since the photo was taken, a pierced header has been replaced with a solid board. Front porch maintenance has been deferred and in response, the following is proposed: (1). Removal of the existing porch railing on both the first and second floors, replacing with standard wood deck railing. (2). Removal of the the screen panels located on the first floor. (3). Repair of floor joists as needed. (4). Installation of new 1" x 6" tongue and groove floor decking on both floors. (5). Installation of new 1" ceiling plank on both floors. (6). Replacement of a new wood bracket to address a missing bracket. (7). Removal of a "false" header beam and moving brackets up to address the removal. The existing porch railing is a distinctive and character defining feature of the Victorian era house, and is in character with the style of the building. Pictorial evidence shows a very similar design in place in 1987 although the actual construction date is not known. 2 1 P a g e The design is shown slightly modified in a 2002 photograph of the present configuration. Repair or replication appears to be a reasonable solution. Replicating and replacing the missing bracket supports the goal to retain original or historic features, but the purpose of removing the header and raising them is not clear in the application. The proposed treatment for floor and ceiling repair/replacement meet the criteria. of Schedule "S" of the City's Land Development Regulations (LDRs). At the hearing, the request for the following work was withdrawn by the Property Owner: replacement of the existing first and second floor porch railing with a standard wood rail kit and the repair of porch ceilings and floors to match existing conditions. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW (a). Pursuant to Section 8.0 of Schedule "S" of the LDRs, the HPB has reviewed the proposed (as modified) Certificate of Appropriateness and all application documentation and matters relating thereto in accordance with the procedures for altering historic landmarks or structures within historic districts as set forth in Schedule "S" of the City's LDRs. (b). Specifically, Schedule "S" of the City's LDRs provides as follows: (1). The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved (2). The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. (3). Porches and porch features that are in good condition or repairable and are in character with the style and period of the building shall be retained. 3 1 P a g e (4). Porches and porch features shall be repaired so they match the originals in materials, size and configuration. (5). Replacement of existing porches with a design or materials not in character with the style and period of the building is prohibited. (6). Porch flooring shall be wood, tongue and groove and must match original porch flooring in size, shape, orientation and texture. (7). Porch flooring shall be oriented perpendicular to the building's fagade, or shall match the original orientation (8). Replacement porch flooring shall be keyed in so the repair when completed is not visible. (9). New porch elements, such as, by way of example only and not as a limitation, balusters and columns, brackets, trim, and architectural embellishments shall be compatible with the style and period of the building and shall be substantiated by physical and/or pictorial evidence of the subject property. (c). To the extent that a conclusion of law as set forth herein also constitutes a factual finding, then such shall be taken to be so as part of this Development Order. (d). The proposed Certificate of Appropriateness is hereby found and determined to comply with the aforestated. (e). Additionally, the Certificate of Appropriateness sought is hereby found and determined to be consistent with the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan and 4 1 P a g e 4'evelopment of the property as proposed would be consistent with and in compliance to .- .All plicable land development regulations and all other applicable regulations and (1). The aforementioned application for a Certificate of Appropriateness is Development Order granting approval of a Certificate of MGM= 94T, In rem M. As approved and authorized for execution by the Historic Preservation Board of the City of Sanford at its meeting of August 18, 2021. U) If /I I Traci Houchin, IMMC, FCRM, City Clerk Ta hi mYhi, Chair Date: �A?l I< -nc pro tbh'c'foA'ugust 18, 2021. G i had'p i s) HF lerk ADDITIONAL S,',IdNATUR�' BLOCK FOLLOWS: 5 111 a g c JOINDER AND APPROVAL OF CONDITIONS BY PROPERTY OWNERS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the subject property owners have signed and sealed these presents the day and year written below and AGREE to all of the terms and conditions of this Development Order the undersigned named persons having full authority to execute this document. ATTEST.• OA Witness # 1 PrIted Name: C*O-VA VW Wit ess # 2 Pri ed Nam JAKE -5,MtMor> STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF SEMINOLE ) elle ..I'�, X. Solano lcm'N'L ISTA 4 4 ZrIIT, l4: ii I, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public, in and for said State at Large who is authorized to take acknowledgments, do hereby certify that Michelle M. Solano and Leah K. Solano, being duly sworn, acknowledged before me that they executed the foregoing document, said persons being personally known to me, on this day that they, being informed of the contents of said instrument, he executed the same voluntarily. Given under my hand and official seal this w�rw ;r = Viwopw+a•o F.�is0�21!lQ21H W4.8q 251� day of August, 2021. C_ NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: Oct 6 1 P a g e F i I � ! .... .. ��yt�,�•i�'!✓'Kw"'4?"000i��iyyy�,,,��4r,s�� Qi 4431 tar�4v l y�A'40 limiv CPK;q;ua y unairr«`d . '� �iiBt•AO +i5i tu}Ert�dttCi�ra:3 L`'�-: j� ,'�+ �•