HomeMy WebLinkAbout4637 PD Rezone 21.5 Acres 2485 W. Seminole BlvdOrdinance No. 2021-4637
An ordinance of the City of Sanford, Florida relating to
the rezoning of approximately 21.56 acres of real
property located at 2485 West Seminole Boulevard (Tax
Parcel Identification Numbers 23-19-30-501-0000-0140
and 23-19-30-300-0040-0000) to create the Townes at
Lake Monroe Planned Development (PD) (map of the
property attached); rezoning the property to a PD,
zoning district/classification master plan; providing for
approval of the Townes at Lake Monroe PD Master Plan;
providing for the taking of implementing administrative
actions; providing for conflicts; providing for
severability; providing for non -codification and
providing for an effective date.
Whereas, the Leo C. Trepanier Revocable Trust and Triple B Acquisitions,
LLC are the owners of certain real property which land totals approximately 21.56 acres
in size, which real property is located at 2485 West Seminole Boulevard and is
assigned Tax Parcel Identification Numbers 23-19-30-501-0000-0140 and 23-19-30-
300-0040-0000 by the Property Appraiser of Seminole County; and
Whereas, the sole member of Triple B Acquisitions, LLC is Richard Arenas of Ft.
Myers; and
Whereas, the two parcels are located on the south side of West Seminole
Boulevard, west of Oak Drive and north of an unnamed and unopened right-of-way,
west of Riverview Avenue and is located to the west of the northern portion of Venetian
Bay, a residential planned development within the jurisdictional limits of the City; and
Whereas, the subject property not located within any of the overlay zoning
districts of the 2015 City of Sanford/Seminole County Joint Planning Agreement (JPA)
associated with the downtown and riverfront, but is located within Sub Area 9 of the
JPA and Sub Area 9 dictates that all parcels between the railroad and United States
Highway 17-92 (Seminole Boulevard) from Mellonville Avenue to Interstate Highway 4
will be assigned the future land use designation of WDBD, Waterfront Downtown
Business District, as they are annexed into the City; and
Whereas, on November 8, 2021, the City Commission enacted Ordinance
No. 4635, which annexed the subject property into the City; and.
Whereas, the real property which is the subject of this Ordinance was
assigned the County's SE, Suburban Estates, COM, Commercial, and LDR, Low
Density Residential, land use designations prior to annexation of the subject real
property which land use designation was modified to the City's WDBD, Waterfront
Downtown Business District, land use designation by means of an amendment to the
City's Comprehensive Plan; and
Whereas, as set forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan, the WDBD,
Waterfront Downtown Business District, land use designation is designed to provide
centralized residential, governmental, cultural, institutional, and general commercial
activities within the downtown and waterfront urban area, while preserving the City's
historic character and cultural heritage through context -sensitive design as well as to
provide a planning and management framework for promoting the revitalization,
development and redevelopment of the historic downtown commercial area; and
Whereas, the property owners are requesting that the subject property be
rezoned from Seminole County's R -1A, Single Family Residential, A-1, Agriculture, and
C-1, Retail Commercial Commodities, to the City of Sanford's PD, Planned
Development, zoning district/classification in order to create the Townes at Lake
Monroe PD; and
21 P a g e
Whereas, the property owners are proposing to construct a residential
housing community on the subject property; and
Whereas, the applicant, on behalf of the property owners, is Javier Omana
with CPN, Inc. of Sanford who was responsible for completing the Citizens Awareness
and Participation Plan (CAPP) requirements of the City's Land Development
Regulations (LDRs); and
Whereas, Mr. Omana held a CAPP meeting on July 27, 2021, to the
satisfaction of the City, with 76 invitations being mailed out to owners of properties
within 500' of the subject parcels and the applicant has proposed modifications to the
master plan based on the feedback received from adjacent neighbors and has provided
the City with revised concepts to the plan associated with that input; and
Whereas, on October 7, 2021, the City's Planning and Zoning Commission
held a public hearing and recommended that the City Commission approve this
Ordinance adding a condition that supplemented those conditions recommended by
City staff with said recommendation occurring by means of a vote of 6 to 1 with
Commission Dominick Fiorentino dissenting, citing Policy 1.11.2 of the City's
Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element; and
Whereas, this Ordinance is enacted pursuant to the home rule powers of the
City of Sanford as set forth at Article VIII, Section 2, of the Constitution of the State of
Florida; Chapter 166, Florida Statutes, and other applicable controlling law; and
Whereas, the City Commission of the City of Sanford has taken all actions
relating to the Townes at Lake Monroe PD rezoning action set forth herein in
accordance with the requirements and procedures mandated by State law.
31 P as e
Now, therefore, be in enacted by the People of the City of Sanford, Florida.
Section 1. Legislative findings and intent.
(a). The City Commission of the City of Sanford hereby adopts and
incorporates into this Ordinance, as legislative findings and intent, the above recitals
(whereas clauses).
(b). The approval set forth in this Ordinance is subject to the specific
conditions that are set forth subsequently in this Ordinance and the property owners
have agreed that no requirement herein lacks an essential nexus to a legitimate public
purpose and is not roughly proportionate to the impacts of the proposed use that the
City seeks to avoid, minimize, or mitigate.
Section 2. Rezoning of real property/implementing actions; Townes at
Lake Monroe PD.
(a), Upon enactment of this Ordinance the property, as depicted in the map
attached to this Ordinance shall be rezoned from the zoning classification resulting from
a separate and distinct Townes at Lake Monroe PD consistent with the provisions of
this Ordinance.
(b). The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to execute any
documents necessary to formalize approval of the Townes at Lake Monroe PD rezoning
action set forth herein action taken herein with regard to the Townes at Lake Monroe
PD and to revise and amend the Official Zoning Map or Maps of the City of Sanford as
may be appropriate to accomplish the action taken in this Ordinance.
(c). The conditions to be incorporated into the pertinent development order
relating to the action taken in this Ordinance include the following:
(1). Pursuant to Section 4.3.G of the City's LDRs, this rezoning
4 1 P ,,.i g e
shall expire 3 years from the effective date of this Ordinance if all
improvements have not been completed or an extension granted.
(2). All development shall be consistent with the Townes at Lake
Monroe PID Master Plan, revision dated July 20, 2021, unless otherwise
specifically set forth in any associated development order; provided,
however, that all subsequent development orders shall be consistent with
the provisions of this Ordinance.
(3). Unless specifically requested and approved on the
referenced Townes at Lake Monroe PID Master Plan, any required
elements missing from or not shown on the Townes at Lake Monroe PID
Master Plan shall comply with the City's LDRs.
(4). The final design and location of all driveways and access
points including, but not limited to, cross access locations, shall be
proposed within and shall be subject to City approval as to location and
legal form of document(s) (by the City Attorney) during, the development
plan review and approval process.
(5). A decorative and functional fountain shall be installed in all
wet retention ponds as part of development approval which approval shall
provide for ongoing maintenance requirements and responsibilities upon
the appropriate party, but not the City.
(6). A dog walk area with waste collection receptacles shall be
provided as determined by the City for use by residents of the
development.
51 P ei w e
(7). A comprehensive signage program meeting the standards of
the City's LDRs, shall be required for the entire development including,
but not limited to, the commercial and multiple family residential uses.
(8). Unless specifically requested and approved on the Townes
at Lake Monroe PD Master Plan or the associated Townes at Lake
Monroe PD development agreement, all development shall comply with:
(a). Lighting and pedestrian amenities shall be included to improve
the overall image of the pedestrian network.
(b). A comprehensive landscape design, including landscape and
hardscape elements shall be provided to complement the existing
Riverwalk improvements. The comprehensive landscape design
shall incorporate landscape/hardscape elements to screen any
mechanical equipment/ appurtenances from the public right-of-way.
(9). A preliminary subdivision plan and subdivision improvement
plan shall be submitted and subject to approval by the City with all
construction activity being subject to approval by the City, and a
subsequent subdivision plat being reviewed, approved and recorded, prior
to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy.
(10). The property owner shall install sidewalks, a minimum of 5'
in width, on both sides of the streets.
(11). A school capacity availability letter of determination letter
shall be required from the Seminole County School District prior to the
recording of the final plat.
am
(12). A new traffic study shall be accomplished at the time of
engineering review of the project based on the timing of the original study
not accurately reflecting traffic counts due to the impacts of the COVID-19
pandemic.
(13). If City staff and the property owners are unable to agree to
the details of this Ordinance and its implementing development order in
any way, the matter will be submitted to the Planning and Zoning
Commission for resolution at a public hearing, and the matter will be
adjudicated by means of a development order or denial development
order relating thereto.
Section 3. Incorporation of map and Townes at Lake Monroe PD Master
The map attached to this Ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed and
incorporated into this Ordinance as a substantive part of this Ordinance amending the
Townes at Lake Monroe PD.
Section 4. Conflicts.
All ordinances or part of ordinances in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby
repealed. City staff shall harmonize the approval and actions set forth herein together
which those taken relative to the Townes at Lake Monroe PD with all past actions of the
City relative to the property being hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 5. Severability.
If any section, sentence, phrase, word, or portion of this Ordinance is determined
to be invalid, unlawful or unconstitutional, said determination shall not be held to
invalidate or impair the validity, force or effect of any other section, sentence, phrase,
7 1 P ai ;e
word, or portion of this Ordinance not otherwise determined to be invalid, unlawful, or
unconstitutional.
Section 6. Non -codification; Implementation.
(a). This Ordinance shall not be codified in the City Code of the City of
Sanford or the Land Development Code of the City of Sanford; provided, however, that
the actions taken herein shall be depicted on the zoning maps of the City of Sanford by
the City Manager, or designee.
(b). The City Manager, or designee, shall implement the provisions of this
Ordinance by means of a non -statutory development agreement which shall be
executed by the property owners, or their successor(s) in interest within 60 days of the
effective date of this Ordinance or the Townes at Lake Monroe PD property's zoning
classification shall revert to an un -zoned property status.
Section 7. Effective Date.
This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon enactment.
Passed and adopted this 8t" day of November, 2021.
Attest:
daojq4mAel
Traci Houchin, MMC, ECRM
City Clerk
Approved as to form and legal
William L. Colbert, City Attorney
City Commission
Sanford, Florida
-14
4
A'bod
"m4yof
deppy.
of the City of
8 1 P a, g e
TABLE OF �^������^ �~~�"�"�^�^^�
Page No.
Table ofContents /Figures
i
Appendices
ii
Property Owners /Applicant -Authorized Agent /Consultants
iii
Project Overview
1
Demonstrate Compatibility with Adjacent Land Uses
Q
Demonstrate the Changes inCharacter tothe Surrounding Area
11
Demonstrate the Support and Furthering of City Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies
16
Policies ofthe East Central Florida Strategic Regional Policy Plan
19
Facility Capacity Impact Assessments
21
School Board Assessment
22
Transportation Assessment
23
Conclusion
24
����U���
^^~�~~'^��
1 Location Map 2
2 Aerial Photograph ]
3 Existing Future Land Use Map (Seminole County) 4
4 Existing Zoning Map (Seminole County) S
5 Future Land Use Map (City ofSanford) 6
6 Zoning Map (City ofSanford) 7
Tom/nes atLake Monroe Page|i
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 15,2O21
The following information is provided in support of the Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment:
APPENDiCES
A Property Property Card Printouts
B Affidavit ofOwnership & Designation ofAgent Forms
C Boundary /& Topographic Survey
D Legal Description
E School Impact Analysis
F Traffic Impact Analysis
6 Environmental Assessment Report
H Resolution No. 2O2O-R-7OVacation ofPublic
Townes atLake Monroe Page | ii
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 15,2O21
PROPERTY OWNERS
PARCEL 23-19-30-300-0040-0000
Leo C.TrepanierRevocable Trust
28GClubhouse Blvd.
New Smyrna Beach, FL32168-791D
Attn: Carol J. Castello
T�
/\�P����^N"�/n�TA[DR|""`/""""`E[]AGEl',1T
MattNanzeck
Beazer Homes
151SnuthhaULane, Suite 2OO
Maitland, FL327S1
P:(4O7)362-6819
Email: matthew.wanzeck@beazer.com
[4I I')P[A, N E R:
Javier E.Ornano,QNU-a
[PH,Inc.
1117 E. Robinson Street
Orlando, FL328O1
P:(407)493-9266
Email: jomana@cphcorp.com
Maxwell Spann, PLA
CPH,|nc.
500 West Fulton Street
Sanford, FL 32771
P:(4O7)322-6841
Email: mspann@cphcorp.com
�1�
TT�
Mark Audey
Bio -Tech Consulting, Inc.
3O2SEast South Street
Orlando, FL 32803
P:(4O7)O94-5969
Email: mark@bio-techconsulting.com
PARCEL 14O
Triple BAcquisitions LLC
12OStone Post Rd.
Longwood, FL32779'2745
Attn: Frank |oppu/o,Jr.
�1 V! L E N G i N EE R:
Jeremy Owens, PE
CPH,|nc
50West Fulton Street
Sanford, FL 32771
P:(4U7)322-6841
Email: jowens@cphcorp.com
�j�V�Y{]��
Ralph A. Nieto, PSM
Nieto-Whittaker Surveying, LLC
1728N.Ronald Reagan Boulevard
Longwood, FL3275O
P:(4O7)636'8460
Email: ralph@nietowhittakersurveying.com
T`/\ir|[/T�/\-P[)\DNK'jH,,1EER:
AymanH. As-SaidiPE
Traffic & Mobility Consultants
3101Maguire Boulevard, Suite 2G5
Orlando, Florida 3J8O3
P:(4O7)531-5332
\_
Townes atLake Monroe Page | iii
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 15,2OZ1
���JEC-11'UYVERV\EW
[P|tInc. mnbehalf ofMatt WanzeckBeazer Homes (Authorized Agent), respectfully requests a Large
Scale Future Land Use Amendment for the subject site located southwest of the intersection of Seminole
Boulevard and Oak Drive (FIGURE I f& 2\. The site is 21.56± acres in size' with parcel identification
numbers 23-I9-30-300-0040'000 and 23-19-30-501-0000-0140. The site is currently located in
unincorporated Seminole County. AnAnnexation application has been submitted concurrently with this
application, and isbeing processed bythe City ofSanford.
The existing County Future Land Use designations are SE: Suburban Estates, COM: Commercial, and LDA:
Low Density Residential 3\.The site's current County zoning designations are AA: Agriculture, C-
1: Retail Commercial, and R-1A:Single Family Dwelling (fIGURE4). City ofSanford maps are attached tn
delineate City Future Land Use designations and Zoning in proximity to subject site (FIGURE 5 and
The Applicant desires to change the Future Land Use designation to Waterfront Downtown Business
District (0DBD), and rezone the property to Manned Development (PD) in order to obtain the
entitlements for the desired Townes at Lake Monroe (Townes) community of attached single-family
residential homes /tom/nhomnes\and associated amenities.
We provide the following additional documents in support of the applications:
• Application Fee:
* Property Appraiser's Property Card Printout /%\
w Affidavit ofOwnership & Designation ofAgent Forms B)
• Boundary & Topographic Survey (APPENDIX C)
* Legal description b4PPENDIXD\
• School Impact Analysis (APPENDIX E)
• Traffic Impact Analysis (with approved Traffic Methodology) (APPENDIX F)
* Environmental Assessment Report (APPENDIX G)
p Resolution No. 2020-R-70 Vacation of Public Right -Of -Way (APPENDIX H)
-------'----------�---------�-------Townes at Lake Monroe --- ----------P---|1
age
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
Approximate
'te
Project
Location ocation
V/
"k,
Approximate
Project Location
21.66 Acres
Sanford
1- incri � i muc
D_a I a_, 1118 12 11 1 N
Rholo Date: N.A
Projer.1 lvu816504
Bic�'(DA�,sf GIs: JOG
LOCATION MAP
TONES AT LAKE MONROE
SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 19 SOUTH, RANGE 30 EAST
SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA
;,)[I d Po I idks
D (rn or: st(a te thf"'< f urn a i Hbi it'/ v, fi "h 4o J nd �'J ses
Future Land Use designations, zoning and existing uses surrounding the subject property are as follows:
N/A
Waterfront/Downtown Business
District (Sanford)
Suburban Estates (Sanford)
N/A
Agriculture (Sanford)
R -IA Single Family
A-1 Agriculture
Lake Monroe
Unnamed and
unimproved 3O' ROW
St. Thomas More
Catholic
Church/Academy
Oak Drive
Single Family
Vacant Government
Owned/Wetland
Townes at Lake Monroe Page 8
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 15, 2021
source: Seminole county w5
Source: Seminole Countv GIS
Townes at Lake Monroe
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 15, 2021
'i-,rasa ? ! cmd Use A/Icw
Page 19
Future Land Use Compatibility N/A— Seminole Boulevard/Lake Monroe.
A ]O wide unnamed, unimproved Suburban Estates k]tv of Sanford) and Waterfront
Downtown Business District (City of Sanford) Future Land Use designations abut the subject site to the
south. The land in which these designations occur is zoned Agriculture and ishome hzthe St. Thomas
More Catholic Church, Priory (Priest Residence) and Academy (kindergarten to 8m grade) located at
G0U/5SORiverview Avenue. The City ofSanford permits houses ofworship and educational facility uses
within the Agriculture zoning district upon approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission of major
conditional use.
Due to the 30' wide and existing uses on the adjacent site (St. Thomas More), compatibility
concerns are minimal. A nominal landscape buffer may be established through the Planned Development
rezone process.
Low Density Residential (Seminole land abuts the subject site tothe east. Alandscape buffer,
appropriate setbacks and building heights will beestablished aspart ofthe Planned Development rezone
process to address compatibility.
The lands immediately west include Future Land Use designation of Public/Quasi-Public (Seminole
County), are vacant/undeveloped, and are mostyxvetonds/foodp|ain. Based on research of public
records, lands are Seminole County surplus.
Due to the vacant, undeveloped and wetlaplaincharacteristics of the adjacent site, compatibility
concerns are minimal. No landscape buffering is proposed.
Townes atLake Monroe Page 110
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June l5,2O21
�ssess11en1 of[un�;is�excyvvitk [omprehensive P|an Gno|�, U'ec1ives and Po|icies
0�mmostratethe[han�esinCharactertmflhesurrouI 4reaaca e)
11 Source: Google Maps
Bar0ut Bac!<ot Lake �V�onroe
VV(D �fe�sLakeNe v!Terrace
�in�|e Fami|y�ubdivision
StThomas ��ore Priory (Pr�es�
Residence)
F|aLandand[o|onizadmn
company~s[e|eryP{antation
SinQ|e Fomi|ySubdivision
Re�aLaShoresApa�ment
Homes
The subject aerial photograph from March of 1994 depicts the Bar Out Back at Lake Monroe
Bar/Restaurant /a commercial establishment) on the northern property boundary along Seminole
Boulevard. The character of the surrounding area was residential (single and multi -family) in nature as
demonstrated by the adjacent VVo|fe/s Lake View Terrace subdivision, Fla Land and Colonization
Company's Celery Plantation subdivision, and the Regatta Shores Apartment Homes,
���������������������
Toxxnesa1Lake k�onroe Page |11
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 1S,ZUZ1
0 Source: Google Maps
BorOut8ackatLnkeK8onnoe
VVo|fe/sLakeVlewTenace
2ing/e F�mi|ySubdivision
VenetianBaySing|eFamily
Subdivision
Rega(�a�hores4pariment
Homes
St.Thomas��uePriory/Phest
Re�idence)
5LThornas��oreCathoUc
Church
F|aLandandCo|onization
[ompanv/�Ce|eryP|ant�tion
S|nQ|e Fmmi|y Subdividon
|nthis aerial photograph from May of20O4 the Bar Out Back atLake Monroe Bar/Restaurant remains, an
increase in single family homes in the surrounding area is evidenced by the addition of the Venetian Bay
subdivision, and the St. Thomas More Church (and stormvvater pond) appear south of the subject
property. The character of the surrounding area continues to be residential (single and multi -family) in
nature.
Townes atLake Monroe Page 112
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 15,2OZ1
0 Source: Google Maps
8arOut Back atLakeK4onnze
VVo|fer'sLake VievmTe/rzce
Sing,|e Fami|y Subdivision
VenetianBay SinQ|eFami/y
Subdivision
Re�attaShoresAparUri enL
Homes
S 1-1 , Thomas K8oro Phory (Priest
Residence)
SLThomas KAoreCatbo|ic
Church
F|aLandand[o|onization
CompenY's Ce|ary P|antation
Sin8!eFami|ySubdi vision
|nthis aerial photograph from November of2O19, the Bar Out Back at Lake Monroe Bar/Restaurant had
been demolished and the land used asastaging ground and material storage for the Seminole Boulevard
construction improvements. The aerial photograph also shows the Venetian Bay subdivision isbuilt out.
The character of the surrounding area continues to be residential (single and multi -family) in nature.
Historically, the area has remained predominantly residential (single and multi -family) with the exception
,
of St. Thomas More Catholic Church and the Bar Out Back on Lake Monroe Bar/Restaurant. The Bar Out
Back was demolished in 2019, and its Commercial Future Lend Use designation will change to a more
Townes atLake Monroe Page | 13
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 1S,2O21
appropriate designation. The change in Future Land Use designationfnom SE: Suburban Estates, COM:
\
Commercial, and LDR: Low Density Residential to VVD8D: Waterfront Downtown Business District is
appropriate for the area and will not negatively impact its character, Compatibility with the adjacent
VVo|fe/s Lake View Terrace Single Family Subdivision to the east will be achieved through landscape
buffering, appropriate setbacks and building heights (through the site design/PD process).
Sonfb/RivcWo&phose37n.�i&Roodwoyhnprvcncntsconstrocubnp/cicct'htersccuionqfBAI±and Oak Dr.
Construction of Phase 3 of the Sanford RiverWalk Trail & Roadway project is expected tubecompleted
this year. Phase 3 consists of the construction of approximately 13,192 linear feet (2.5 miles) of o new
multi -use trail along with trail lighting, parking, hardscape, landscaping and irrigation. Roadway
improvements consist of new streetlights, rounclabouts, landscaping, hardscape and irrigation.
News Release from City of Sanford, —RiverWa|kPhase ] Seawall Groundbreaking Event:
��e�h/nDf��m b/e [e//�c Rbr�� �ag/ono/ Hos��o/ on d/e eus� Az [ounq/ Rood 1S
m/d //���rs/ore � �u �he wes� U/� seavoJ wi//�ro�d� /he n�ces�o/ypro{ccbon m�d
su7�or� fo/d�e p/onned}Yno/ ex�e//z/on P/,o�e � cƒ �o/�brd'� �n�erno�/ono//y omord
w�n/ng R�erN/o8c �hose �� ��s� �ern/no/e Bo��vord bW L1l 27`92) p/onned
000dm�y on� pedc���o/� �oproveme//�� mu/d beg/n /o�rr /n ��e yeo� Des/Qned
uh/��/� con�A/ebs s��e� o/��/�sw urbon�/n pr�/c/p&z� �6e �/verN/ V/ v/0showcoze
und bu��e/�/e c/�y'z e�br� �u //meos� ondp/o/no�e pe6,���on�n� um/kob8/�� o/�d
ohao/�hycom/nuo/�y
Townes atLake Monroe Page 14
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 1S,2O21
/ Thi�l:pojt�,c-bpf/eg�n�/mpo/�onc�c��//�o�emnnecb�yofmonymmmun/��
\
ond /� v�8 be on /nL, egofthe s�o/eu��e hVe m�Jpedes��n oe�wuxi Loco&sd
o/on� booub/u/ Lokr 8Jon/op'ssouLh r\ore /o s�o�e des/gno�edscen/c h/�humK\ t, T
�u�ec� m///p/ov/de o/�r of�he mos��n�bne 6�ka ondpe�es�r/on expe//a/,ces seCf) n� �o
none /n �or�b� ����ng res d ood vi"�Roa o sVec�ocu/oI Fiorf� h/t un/gyo
onduncpo//e6vvo�erwo��gh�//ere/n�onfbrd/
^Thazeou'u8gxzundbozok/ngevents/gn����hscd) n/,dourporNert/n:cs(o/en�/no
w/od�-c/oss omen/�y' �he �nr�brd 8/vmkVo8iNV�sn phosc � /s conq/���� �h� �u�ec�
w/8/ co&zpu/��u/�zrd (o o dc6
° �u�dn's Amges/ ��/ond shooe0ne 4/ on /n��/nudnoo/ ovw�� w��n/ng b�z nnd
pcdesrion/ro8t fsK/vec
�/hbp/o�'c/w�0prov���hu/�cxusbe�m�o/n�m�ymu///m:do/connecbon�indu�ng
�unRo8onJK/cp/onnc�7o�n�por/obonO�en�e��av�/opm�n��rm/no/son�Yo/us/o
[oun�y7ir8�>s�amo/�dIR42�on�/'4
° 7hepn7��c� u�/con//�c�mony com/nux/bes �o vo�ous �our�m c&s�no�ons /ndu�ng
�he Ctnt'o/ Ror�/o Zoo o/�d /nony p/is(/ne und ow/ord m/��n��g porks ond sp�ngs cƒ
Rb//do
The approval and subsequent development of Townes will be appropriately timed with the completion of
the Riverwalk Phase 3Trail and Roadway Project. Sidewalk connections tothe Trail will provide Townes
residents direct access tothis regional public recreation facility. Townes residents will benefit from this
connection not only for its recreation value, but for the opportunity to have improved access to the LYNX
and 3unRai|transportation systems.
In addition, the approval and subsequent development ofTownes is appropriately timed tn provide
needed housing for the slated redevelopment of Seminole Towne Center, a major retail and commercial
project to undergo substantial improvements to continue to serve the north Seminole County and City of
Sanford market,
Townes atLake Monroe Page 15
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 15,JU21
""P, IC'[ ( OFOPCP I I 21�'16ive P,aft �^rd
she sui"JpOrt arfd FtIrLhcrirlg, cff Plan and Pkflkpc!s
Goals, Objectives and Pokies of the, 01-y's Conprehe�nsive, Plan a,q-)j:)orted I.)r furthered by
d"11- Pr",-,")pOse'd applicat-ion ��we as fdlows:
GOAL FLU I
VVIANAGE LAIP40 USEDISTRUBUTION AND PROWS1044 OF SFRV1CFS AND FACILIIIES. THF
S)HP-1-1- FIRCIV"CTE PJ4 0 L,',VAL� U`-iEs H"'I P"N
S,�-,,,CJA� '- LY. P, N1 L., L 1)1' -4J, -':I,,\ E AF -C; LP(AL,LL %4AV%J4 LQ, VY! I
THLA4 (JUA "-L': AQ[L, TINILL'Y'
The proposed project helps implement the stated Goal given the City's projected population of
68,681 by 2025 (City of Sanford Comprehensive,Plan) through provision of residential units with
centralized infrastructure (potable water and sewer).
C),RJF-CT1VF F1.1) 1.11; (WDRD,�, Tn7,,
Wh IR -
n "ip'1 7,, r r - nag n fr-m, ,:-vwanr': f,r :,rca f - 'N-,, 1"Ir,
carrrm",qc ui ;4,r -J 0 -on fvt,-4p. Lj�-.,L
.4Ki S i7t
FI-df-ve -irmriz:rl,,Oo-ea Kt, ThF
istc-1
L-"wNIL fi.AAJ D
d"'C' S, c "nir c, h-, C Yz--J Ig rf."Al ,
Tov""Ick "rle for
The proposed project furthers this objective by providing quality housing stock along the Sanford
waterfront. The project is both a redevelopment and infill project: it replaces a
retail/entertainment establishment and provides an infill project (within the utility service area of
the City of Sanford). Additionally, the project provides housing stock to the increasing north
Seminole County population.
Townes at Lake Monroe
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 15, 2021
Page 116
OBJECTIVE FLU 1. 15 Prevent Pro0foration of Urban Sprain; and Oeveiop Efficient System.-;
forCoordinating the T7ming and Staging of Puat and Private Deve4opment, Tete City sh, f
or,.x tinue lo orifc. ,,-;:* adopteal LDfRs w-hicti r�r-quire %'r' a. p-ti,opc, fJ L�js &L, ar-k- - , lal, t�e - b
- y
Q, ely vvj,
iu-qut-Sne! pibliz, fazAkies. %vate", and 't," --Pjrvlces. a"dctpuatie, ,"itorrrlwatur
vA,,)%te cfisrvFat amIal-rarr-n;,I.s wasUe Triaraqem,-r-4.7hr- and' sfie plar
shall prr;vIde a ur Me,,,ci syF.tem k*irnnOrdnaI,,qq thr- effnr?eevr timir q nNisFnn,
aric", of puh-RC and" privatf., Cle-vr-,40n;7 en; in rnderr t-- abaFe-,jribar, zpraw ard
xislirQ irfrastru-cl,dry all no VW,, ale'velopinfort if, 11 b,-cquii-umj t---, hoick tp to tt,.e
xiHig c*rAral lef and w stewaat�rsystu-rn.
iy st-,airn,,,ivq"air I-D-,R�F� 'A'4, ;'h irdt,,�-Jp- star -lards requiring req-sisif;e publir,
":icl pC.,vd,,T.nJ %ritri Vse "I-1pect"! of na%, c,,%,r ek-ipniort. 7V�;- Cly`s 1-DRz shall
or%tif ,�Jc to it"'Clude pm—fotna-ric-a stan"Jard"'s 'illy t Vtf- loMwkon, tFr,[,,g ar-d of
be vv' `!,'I P)Lbiic; facikiu,-�i ari servk�is Irl ufde� tf.-� pre,�ant Hhe
p,,r�41fe-allian :-,I L,.=T-baq s:)ray.1 Vinci arhieve lar l Fit U avni :5praw)
-Sh, it -01 h,a tljr-,ner a-atr-:,, 4hrouph I -DR,, indt, arg
i" rte. s b v reac.
w�L C�
4 , t
frpw develcipxn iomt up to "i e ,—, Ity"-- uy,,,,,.Stng Cort, ilkl L"I"I'l,
The subject project is located within the City of Sanford's urban service area and the project will
be annexed within the City's jurisdictional boundaries. The City will provide potable water and
sewer treatment services.
Fscy FLU 1.15-2. Require Public Water and,'Or Wastewater Systems for New Devvelopment.
F r�i c., r t f� re,,,.- e- I ".,-) h -,ii ^3: n ,.i perm 1, :�i p ry"I f -,,.17, ef - r', !i-v,,q rr P n i n r. 11, . d ii tor" !S 7, e ,'r:.„ 1 -
rt P,xns- tte
The subject project will be serviced by the City of Sanford's potable water and sewer treatment
facilities.
Policy FLU 1 -16.3 -Execute Vaivkntary Arim-xatfon, T�-se
a vttn S,��rnlr,-jLc Gf,24 pmvidc- a f XLLz
4y IC i
U�-,E,• pohr-y vvflhin tl t CIA,NR !, L. s.'� P',,Urr-ig Aru,si-
yy
J ancl
a -Irexa�kv-- Pcria,ire
�
4:,f trte (:JAF.i
in, with saiti inl,*»,tlocai wit;
the Cnar irabic x.- S, a`o
h
ftjt,,srr- iarlrl i card! —ningf n that is
frcir, the VJV r-atlUit"O.
i,iep arr,-,idwcrr te.�zf--,rtng in
The subject parcels encompassing the Townes project are being annexed into the City of Sanford
from unincorporated Seminole County. The subject project will comply with corresponding
Comprehensive Plan, zoning and applicable Land Development Code criteria.
Townes at Lake Monroe Page 117
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 15, 2021
Policy FLU 2.2.5. Redevetopment of Waterfront and Historic Downtown. The Cit,,
shal,
ue rrlawiagu V TL lei, evudoprrsert uol; Lake taa4e-rfron�, and doveri`zoval h�soCIC tr'
C"an!5"Ste-rit w4t-, the C;rrprehen- ive Plan, plarmrq i:IhAze-, -zlntalil direrll
higheF,, vvith lora' h5slf,-.,rca! esspecia,,",'Iy areas al:3ng fne- vw,,,ivearf�-ont or
I ar -. a h IL
,;%i thir� anz djaoen, I , t,,' e Dc-fwntr n, area. The C 4y zma I c�CIPV("L fto c lordaale pub'ic and prival Ou
rQI:StJIJf,VQI�13 I'R, (:Elssary to irdtravu nee-Pxi ,,rrt rt., duvu loplyvu, rip., .vi lhi'n P'le svv a, ata
y 8.;t1aH .:;orlllnuu tz.} ana.yzo for
tne- doiv--ilown ".v-aterfrort czrridor at-,nnq Lake Wiorrrie- The s?lah hi:i on achilevir-t9 a rnrxre-
and 7--ich-mes residiartial, r,., .,.i i� CSF iii ic�lo5�
ar-tivit--es. Th -3 Lake Nionrce corTidor rsde-vr�-csPqffl-an-, SIaI OCIIIURLO 1.,:� crrpnaC,;,Zo cez-,-ign rneasures
:3 IJTI�QLC WQUD[IfOrlt LICplie(z_-pr-riert 1-,@tl�orr by
ullb;t,,r •dvt-?gr .-'md a "nix of
The subject project is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; it is an infill project and will
be served by central services (potable water and sewer). Additionally, the project is situated within
the Lake Monroe corridor and it will promote a unique pedestrian friendly development.
Policy rLU 2-2.7: Promote Urban 1,r-fift Re -development. '1`iu CAC .inait_vi=ag�hc,
rf..rliRVRInF.,rmenil C4 piirre-, 17 M'Ot-1,r� -,Arc,
f. q,
rerne:ai-,r�- awp,-i- --nna 7%Jrr,,.."idv
use"-," cif�,).,,Nar, tff-T
s
.. LA G A! Q nit: fic,
81Q
irt"Ir-Oit- z -z car fl -m -y' 18rt that. "u lyptca,i
--nt ff7rrns ir adidit-1-1, zheFr lar .l Amd ,ated
or -r- m-vv'RV' V e area vwirhr vpeni a i f Jr -w-4,1112, .Jrartr-r Ftl'k�, th a z ire [-,,e I �R57-ial I-' o 111,-
Ine :�W�7a"15 r;t 3--, --1 %VrO7�rla, FO-alf h�� pe-rrnitie�� Y�*hir, an,,y i;rir-,I t',frie
The subject project is located within the urban service area and it is a redevelopment/infill project.
Utilities will be provided by the City of Sanford.
Townes at Lake Monroe Page 18
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 15, 2021
a 15t r" [ r'J
Policies of the East. CerVtTal Fk)C-ida SIA-atr:.3gir RegJoral Policy suppoP-t¢�.'.,d oifu�thered
�Yl/ the pr(: p(DSEd a(�-_)pkation af-e a.,, foHows:
Policy 3.3 Promote innovative design for development in harmony with natural resources.
The project will be designed in harmony with on-site wetlands and avoid and/or minimize impacts
to the greatest extent possible. Additionally, Townes will have use of the Sanford Riverwalk as
part of off-site amenity package to be enjoyed by the project's residents.
Policy 3.9 Development should avoid or properly mitigate adverse impacts to listed species.
The project does not impact any listed species.
Policy 3.10 Wildlife management and conservation areas should be protected from encroachment.
The project does not encroach onto any referenced areas.
Policy 4.3 Support emerging economic centers that are located in the most appropriate areas, such as
along transit corridors or in existing or planned employment centers.
The project wilt provide housing stock opportunities for the emerging Sanford Downtown area and
the Seminole Towne Center (undergoing redevelopment).
Policy 5.3 Promote a multi -modal transportation system that provides for the safe, efficient and cost
effective movement of people and goods.
The project will be located 1.5+1- miles from the SunRail Sanford Station and less than one mile
from the Lynx bus station at Central Florida Regional Hospital. Refer to LYNX SunRail Connections
Brochure, page 20.
Policy 5.24 Encourage the development of sidewalks to establish greater connectivity
Internal sidewalks will be provided with direct access to the RiverWalk Trail.
Townes at Lake Monroe Page 19
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 15, 2021
Thom. Jr Pkwy
AAA
Headtivanos
01'�t"—"'0
"
S'.01. at, Serial S.Cu, LY
College Admin Uild
YNX,I� . unRoil Ca nnectkms Biochwe
Source: LYNX Website
Townes at Lake Monroe
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 15, 2021
Ctntral 5aminole County C",., FlabR Intal 21d02. Services Bulidmg FaM1 Hnith Cmw
5znfu F C,vu r
Subject Property
Page 20
19c I-
'"0
0—
Ox
F.gWks
v,� ;r;v/,';""
O'b"F.W"
u.bal'.
C";
M= SR.N
,�W
prima
I
01—
QwrSo----------
O OC
0
Cutiu 2a5
1.00,
Z-41,
ONAII
1— M" A lha
0
Source: LYNX Website
Townes at Lake Monroe
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 15, 2021
Ctntral 5aminole County C",., FlabR Intal 21d02. Services Bulidmg FaM1 Hnith Cmw
5znfu F C,vu r
Subject Property
Page 20
19c I-
0—
Ox
v,� ;r;v/,';""
irfrilHG U. "m
C";
Source: LYNX Website
Townes at Lake Monroe
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 15, 2021
Ctntral 5aminole County C",., FlabR Intal 21d02. Services Bulidmg FaM1 Hnith Cmw
5znfu F C,vu r
Subject Property
Page 20
[omp|e1ion c�Oa�aandIna/ya�s Requine/ments
Potable Water
LOS: 144 gallons/person/day
144 gallons/person/day x 270 = 38,880 gallons per day
Sanitary Sewer
LOS: 115 gallons/person/day
115 gallons/person/day x 270 = 31,050 gallons per day
Solid Waste
LOS: 4.Zpou Road Landfill)
4.2pnunds/caoitn/6ayx27O=1,1S4pounds/day
LOS: 4`3poundu/capita/day(County Central Transfer Station)
4.3 pounds/capita/day x 270 = 1,161 pounds/day
Stormwater
The proposed stormwater ponds will be designed to meet the St Johns River Water Management
District (SJRWMD) and City of Sanford criteria for wet detention and will be permitted through
both SURVVK8D and the City of Sanford. The ponds will be designed to provide the pre -post
discharge for the 25 -year, 24-hour event and provide the volume compensation for the 100 -year
flood plain displacement.
Recreation and Open Space
LOS 4acres ofrecreation lan population
4acres ofrecreation |an population x.27=1I0acre ufrecreation land
LOS: 0.05 miles ofmulti-use tnails/1'OOUpopulation
O.OSmiles ofmulti-use trai|s/1,000population x.27=O.013Smiles ofmulti-use trails
*Calculations assume 2.Gpersons per unit x1O4units =27Opersons
Townes atLake Monroe Page 121
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 1S,2O3I
F -
i t
N Capadty [Ynpacl
Schoo� 1B,o,,ird Assc 1 ABnen.}
A School Impact Analysis, dated March 15, 2021, was obtained from Seminole County Public Schools
(SOPS), Facilities Planning Department (APPENDIX E).
The project will generate approximately 28 students, as follows:
ELEMENTARY
MIDEILt 8CHOOL
SCHOOL STUDENTS
STUDENTS
GENERATED
GENERATED
0.106 per unit 0.051 per unit
13 6
*Student generation rate per Seminole County Public Schools data.
X
Total Students
Townes at Lake Monroe Page 122
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 15, 2021
[omp|etiono|andAna|ysi� Requirements
Fac#�ty��pacity|ro�ac1�saessmer�s
Trunsporta6unAsoessrnen1
The Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Traffic Mobility Consultants, dated ]uk/ 2020is attached
(APPENDIX F).
Townes atLake Monroe Page 123
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 15,2021
CONCLUSION
The requested Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment from SE: Suburban Estates, COM: Commercial,
and LDR: Low Density Residential (Seminole County) to WDBD: Waterfront Downtown Business District is
justified for the following reasons:
m The Amendment isconsistent with the City's land use policies;
* The proposed Future Land Use designation iscompatible with the surrounding Future Land Use
designations;
m The proposed attached single family residential homes (townhomnes) are compatible with
surrounding uses. Compatibility with the adjacent VVo|fe/s Lake View Terrace Single Family
Subdivision lothe east will be achieved through landscape buffering, appropriate setbacks and
building heights;
=
During the rezoning process City staff will review the application to ensure that the proposed
development complies with the City's development policies, and achieves the desired
compatibility;
• The Amendment does not increase, promote nrextend urban sprawl;
• The proposed infill project discourages urban sprawl by providing a cohesive, well-planned
community where its residents will enjoy ease of access to integrated support services;
" The Amendment increases taxable value ofthe property;
= The subject project will be 'designed to enable the safe use of multiple modes of transportation'
by providing a direct sidewalk connection tothe Seminole Trail. This connection will enable its
residents toutilize the Lynx and SunRmi|systems;
• The proposed project has included consideration for elimination or minimization of any potential
environmental impacts;
= The proposed project m/i|| be designed as a cohesive community with regard toarchitecture,
landscaping, and signage. A master stornnxvater system will be designed to accommodate
drainage for the entire project site;
w The Amendment does not create urban sprawl and utilizes City services;
°
The Amendment implements Downtown Waterfront Business District goals and objectives; and
�
The Amendment provides residential units that may service needs for projected population
increases.
Townes at Lake Monroe Page 124
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
JuneI5,2021
APPENDIX A
Property Appraiser's Property Card Printouts
Townes at Lake Monroe Page 125
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 15, 2021
12/22/2020
SOPA Parcel View; 23-19-30-300-0040-0000
proiselYy Record Card
1t Parcel:
23-19-30-300-0040-0000
$2,780.22
y11 2 Property Address:
17-92 HWY SANFORD, FL 32771
q�u
Parcel Information
Value Summary
Parcel 23-19-30-300-0040-0000
2021 Working
2020 Certified
Oviner(s) TREPANIER LEO C REV TRUST
- Trust
Values
Values
Property Address 17-92 HWY
Valuation Method
Cost/Market
Cost/Market
SANFORD, FL 32771
$0.00
,7-F-
C/O - 1 CASTELLO, - I I I - 1 1 CAROL . - T
Number of Buildings
0
0
C/O CASTELLO, CAROL T
Does i,ic'r INCLUDE Not) Ad Valoreni
Assessments
286 CLUB HOUSE BLVD
Depreciated Bldg Value
NEW SMYRNA, FL 32168-7910
SEC 23 TWP 19S RGE 30E
Subdivision Name
Depreciated EXFT Value
Tax District 01
Land Value (Market)
$199,823
$199,823
DOR Use Code: 0030 -VACANT WATERFRONT
OF S 1/4 SEC POST RUN W 350 FT N TO
Land Value Ag
Exemptions
Just/tlarket Value
$199,823
$199,823
Portability Adj
':axes
Save Our Homes Adj
$0
$0
7,((, ka, §1 o r; r Amendment I Adj
$0
$0
Assessment Value
P&G Adj
$0
$0
ROAD DISTRICT
Assessed Value
$199,823
$199,823
Arn0L1rttVJth0Ut,S0H:
1
$2,780.22
lTax
q�u
I
$2,780.22
Save Cur i-iornes Savings:
$0.00
,7-F-
Does i,ic'r INCLUDE Not) Ad Valoreni
Assessments
Legal Description
SEC 23 TWP 19S RGE 30E
BEG 1518 FT W & 705 FT N
OF S 1/4 SEC POST RUN W 350 FT N TO
S RW 17-92 SELY ALONG RNV TO PT N
OF BEG S TO BEG (LESS RD)
':axes
Taxing Authority
Assessment Value
Exempt Values
Taxable Value
ROAD DISTRICT
$199.823 $0
$199,823
SJWM(Saint Johns Water Management)
$199,823 $0
$199,823
FIRE
$199,823 $0
$199,823
COUNTY GENERAL FUND
$199,823 $0
$199,823
Schools
$199,823 $0
$199,823
Sales
Description
Date
Book Page
Amount Qualified
Vac/Imp
CORRECTIVE DEED
12/1/2003
05120 1953
$100 No
Vacant
WARRANTY DEED
11/1/2003
qLa 1957
$600,000 No
Vacant
WARRANTY DEED
9/1/1998
2L6L
$100,000 Yes
Vacant
not
Method Frontage
Depth Units
Units Price
Land Value
ACREAGE
16.18 $19,000.00
$199,823
Building Information
htto.,;-//n.qr(,,Pltlptnilq.qr.n;;fI nm/Pqrr.PlDt-t;;ilPrinti-rPrip.nrilvq,,ny?Pin=g.11qinionnndn(innn
12122/2020
SOPA Parcel View: 23-19-30-300-0040-0000
i Permits
Permit # Description Agency Amount CO Date Permit Date
No Permits
I Permit data does not originate from the Seminole county Property Appraisers office. For dat.11s or questions concern" a permit, please contact the building department of the Us district In which the property Is located.
Extra Features
Description Year Built Units Value New Cost
No Extra Features
Zoning
Zoning Zoning Description Future Land Use FutureLandUseDescription
SE Suburban Estates
httc)s:IlDarceidetails.SCDafl.oralParcolDetailPrinterFCiendlv.asnx?PID=23193030O00400000 917
12/22/2020 SCPA Parcel View: 23-19-30-501-0000-0140
https:Hparceldetails.scpafl.org/ParceIDetailPrinterFriendly.aspx?PiD=23193050100000140 1/2
Prop
Record Card
jg�rty.
Parcel: 23-19-30-501-0000-0140
I: �IAOY « 0�,QA Property Address: W SEMINOLE
Cx'
BLVD SANFORD,
FL 32771
Parcel Information
Value Summary
Parcel 23-19-30-501-0000-0140
2021 Working
2020 Certified
Cwrier(s): TRIPLE B ACQUISTITIONS LLC
Values
Values
Property Address i W SEMIBLVD
SANFORD, FL 32771
Valuation Method
Cost/Market
Cost/Market
120 STONE POST RD
Number of Buildings
0
0
%4ailing 1 LONGWOOD, FL 32779-2745
Depreciated Bldg Value
Subdivision Name WOLFERS LAKE VIEW TERRACE
Tax District 01
Depreciated EXFT Value
DOR Use Code; 10 -VAC GENERAL -COMMERCIAL
Land Value (Market)
$470,274
$470,274
Exemptions
Land Value Ag
Jl t I rk e _11", Values
$470,274
$470,274
Portability Adj
'd n I
I. a k 0 M c'� r% 1, c'),
#
Save Our Homes Adj
$0
$0
Amendment I Adj
$0
$0
P&G Adj
$0
$0
Assessed Value
$470,274
$470,274
Tax AriicuntwithoutSOH:
$6,543.11
$6,543.11
$0.00
gal Description
LOTS 14 TO 22&24&25&N 112 OF VACD ST ADJ ON S & VACD ST ADJ ON W
WOLFERS LAKE VIEW TERRACE
PB 10 PG 66
Taxes
Taxing Authority
Assessment Value
Exempt Values
Taxable
Value
ROAD DISTRICT
$470,274
$0
$470,274
SJWMI(Saint Johns Water Management)
$470,274
$0
$470,274
FIRE
$470,274
$0
$470.274
COUNTY GENERAL FUND
$470,274
$0
$470,274
Schools
$470,274
$0
$470.274
Sales
Description Date
Book
Page Amount
Qualified
Vac/Imp
SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED 6/1/2014
$476,000
No
Improved
CERTIFICATE OF TITLE 1/1/2014
08202
Olin: $100
No
Improved
CERTIFICATE OF TITLE 10/1/2013
03143
1828 $100
No
Improved
QUIT CLAIM DEED 4/1/2002
04382
1348 $100
No
Improved
QUIT CLAIM DEED 1/1/2002
04382
1316 $100
No
Improved
')UIT CLAIM DEED 2/1/1997
03202
0544 $100
No
Improved
WARRANTY DEED 1211/1996
03181
0-664 $600,000
No
Improved
WARRANTY DEED 7/1/1988
L) I 2nfi
2659 $67.500
No
Improved
WARRANTY DEED 1/111986
01702
0554 $100
No
Improved
https:Hparceldetails.scpafl.org/ParceIDetailPrinterFriendly.aspx?PiD=23193050100000140 1/2
12/22/2020 SCPA Parcel View: 23-19-30-501-0000-0140
WARRANTY DEED 611/1985 n l 45 F2
$410,000
No
Improved
Land
Method Frontage Depth Units
Units Price
Land
Value
FRONT FOOT & DEPTH 100.00 134,00
$262.65
S7,643
FRONT FOOT & DEPTH 156.00 400.00
0
$262.65
$18,192
SQUARE FEET 128502
$5.25
$404,782
FRONT FOOT & DEPTH 100.00 190.00
0
$262.65
$30,730
FRONT FOOT & DEPTH 33.00 153.00
$262,65
$8,927
Building information
Permits
Permit # Description
Agency
Amount CO Date
Permit Date
08836 2485 W SEMINOLE BLVD: ELECTRICAL - COMMERCIAL-Temporary Power to Construction
County
$41,482
6120/2019
Trailer [WOLFERS LAKE VIEW TERRACE]
01496 ELECTRICAL
County
$2,000
218/2019
21065 DEMO
County
$25,000
1/17/2019
05477 FLAG POLE
County
$1,525
6/512014
01545 2 FIRE WALLS TO SEAL OFF SECTION OF BUILDING AND MISC REPAIRS BAR OUT BACK
County
$1,000
2/21/2014
02490 DEMO.
County
5300
41512013
02489 DEMOLITION.
County
5300
4/5/2013
04105 REROOF; PAD PER PERMIT 2481 NW US HWY 17-92
County
$5.000
5124/2011
02017 REMODEL & REPLACE BATH FIXTURES
County
5700
3/1712009
00245 2 WINDOWS A DOUBLE DOOR AND RAMP
County
$1,800
1/13/2009
Page 1 of 2 (19 items) 1 3
Permit data docs not originate from the Senninoic County Pfafwny Appraiser's office. For cietaRt of ci cora—lf; a p.ro,11, plan. contact the Wiring d.p.Arnent of the fee
district In which ite property is
locart'd.
Extra Features
Description Year Built Units
Value
New Cost
No Extra Features
Zoning
Zoning Zoning Description Future Land Use
Futurel-andUseDescription
COM
Commercial
https:llparceldetails.scpafl.org/ParcelDetailPrinterFriendly.aspx?PID=231930501O0000140 2/2
APPENDIX
Affidavit of Ownership & Designation of Agent Forms
Townes atLake Monroe Page26
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 15,2U21
CITY OF
-rF RD
S AN
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES DEPARTMENT
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND DESIGNATBON OF AGENT
P
-lease use addillionef sheeis as needed. If any additional sheets are aftched to tiffs document, please sign. here and note below:
1. Ownership
Carol J. Casiefllo, Trustee, Leo C. Trepalies Revocable, Trust
nereby aftest to ownership oil ihe property described beiov
T-Ln,x Parcel tiuriiber(s).- 23-19-30-300-0040-0000
Address or Property: Seminole BK;d. Sanfr-rd, FL 332771
F.;
for vvilich this application is submitted to the City of Sanford.
11.0asignation orf App3icant's Algent jh?ave blank If not aha pIlicable)
As t1he 012vneriappjfcant of ffhe above deshgnaked, pro�r&tv for Y,,Mcch this affld3vit is submitted, i designate the bielow narinsd individual
as , y agent ;r7 all rnalberss permining, to ':he application pro -cess, in, authiodzing tt-ie agent nanned belowto reDresent rile, orlrV
company, l ailest that the aprpkat(on -is Made in good faith ind that all informakm contained in the apfplicFtri is accumte and
conplate to the bt of nny personai %novVied1ge.
Siqnatura
Appilcan't's Agera fpri,YQ: Maii ',,Nanzeck, Beaze? Horgles
Agent,Address;_151 Southahall Lane, ke 200, Maitland,. FL'32751
(407) 362-6819 Fax:
IF. Pv'offw- to Chviler
A '" , - - lorto'T -it, -. Sio-V r
At 'Cil L
I chang'es in owrie", ship arid/or Appif 'tins Agent pl: inal actlGn of 'he C - shall require an new affidavil ership
changges, thenew vAmer assumes all obii9alions related, to the filing applfcalioni process.
B. H "he ewner �ntoends for €9c author ivv of lihe Appfical"Ws Age. -"t 10 be ',Uniied In any inpnn-ar, p,.a2se indicate the lirnitallconsils)
cmiled, 10 a ofooncunencv; flimited 1,o obtaininga:0,7'a use con p'fance r-sr-;fcaie' etc.)
rhe 0wvnqr of ths neat proparty aissoclated 1,01h lbhF am- t
M Ucation or profurarnan' activiqf Is a 4::t%a:one)
U �i,ldividuaf n Corporart "'n u Liand T;*ijct 0 Paiffnershlp o L.hv,,RP-dd!,J;Fbii1ty Company
L-1 04her (deqcriba): RvvciC8b1k--- Trust
t-. UW allnatumi rson v""'hc' have, an ov"neFsHP interes, in the- Properiv, which is ;h -a- ...Syed rnat;er of this by narrie ard
— -
address.
For each!�.ar-vqmt at
i ;qn, ,
H , 1[he name, address, and de of each oAcsr, 'he narne and address of eacin, d'ffe'Gior of the =TKrabian;
_rd the Paine and a6dress of each shaneholderwho vuvrs Iwo Percent f2%) or r-sors of the stc-ck of the corporai'v*0n. -Shareholders
vd not he dGeri ased if a corponation's sto&' are traeled pub1frIly oq any national st'oclk exdh.ange.
a. in ttle Case of atrust, list "he 6a4e and address of each i-istae and, d-te naine and address of the beneficiafies of the trust and the
percentage of iritarest of each beneficiarv. If any trustee or 'bene"Ficia-r-y of a tr'u'st is a corporation, please provide the infbqration
required in pariiigraph 2 above.
Narna of Trust: Leo C. Trepanier Revocable Trust
4. For partnesme and address of Pach principal in the p.--�dnership, inelud� g
inciuding limiled partnerships, list Via n, 11 general
or Hmited paflnerz. if any partner is a C.,01 Poraflon, pone prowe Vie information required in paragraph 2 above.
5. For each gniKed lit Hie manna, address, and tifloof each rnanzigm or rnmaghg nambeG and to tome and
address of each addiflonRl member wff.h Pa percent (2111'6) or more membarship interest. if any inurnber with hvo percent (2%) or
more: rnefnbersbp interest, rmanager, or managing rnernber is a oorpnration, trist or parInership, please provide dhe information
required in paragraphs 2, 3 and/or 4 above.
5. In the Circumstances of a �2,0 LttL
g,,2 ff')ILILIrchase, Fist the and nddress of eaac*h Conbract purrhpser, df the Purchner is a
oorpnration, trust, parinership, or UQ pmvida the information rajAnd Rr Use erk-ities in paragr2phs 2, 3, ; andlor 5abovs.
Name of Pumhaser:
Date of Contract:
NAME
TiTUF.10FMCEaRU8TEE_
ADDRESS
OF
iaerR,7rc, me Urelt S"he the S'.'C"Fri and subscrfbad bakwe rue, by,,,,,
OR BEN EFICIARY
preseace or mWe noWmW on TaZyMy d :T7L&1RL_ , M2( ke caid patsan d.fld 1,ake an
MTEREST-
dWy swarn by nx an oath, s -aid fuitw,,r, deposdng and dying fl ,,al has mad the fowegoing and �htai the
qtatmnenls and
-galions con�.,ainsd, herein are true and Colreat.
caro� Jean Caste!fo
Trustee/Bpnefldary
285 ClUbhOUSta Blvd., NeW SM5'Ma BaZ_rlil, FL 321681
firal V 15 2 ;a'
Fubl�f;; State
111(X,ARY PUUK)
(AMx NWarial Seall
ape Amu No
P&kd p,aIatn '--`Z5 aw -0 7
(Use ocUltinal sintiets f'orrrtcre
7. As U) any type of ovmer n-,ferrerd U.r abfve', as dmne of ol(vnershp ('.)courrixg subscquent to of Balis dcrcurnem shFfl bs,
c'isclosed in writing to the City 1.�"Jur 1c, vmyacAion N,�ing tFbaen by Te CQ as I Om mWIr mbbe W YOU Ws dammmM parlbs.
G. 1 ammi amt OF-, above repnasentai"ons are him and am based upon nW personat WmAdge 2nxl beffef F&er p1l reasonahle dnqulry.
WaMond hat any Wum to make amiWold disolsaures is grounds ,or the aubje,
excapftn, or vavisnc�e irvcived ',sfth 1his )'4jplr;allon tri beconne Void Or Pbr the as pmwrernent ado, W be nw-
:e,$Ponsive. E carLify IM I am Agwy a0mBed to exeute Affidavit arid to the Pkpp-iioanl orVendw ioWe dscfosufas
hwun.
L
-J
was waAffIg-s"A AlpHcant BignaWre
STATE OF F6,Q2ZQQA-
6,41'r
C 0 U N T Y 1) F f,!a1-1 P,1r I Ei
i NiEREBY CERTWY 1Jh,,,-,tre.u,n this dalv belpre roe 211 officar duly Waked A opklis afld f. ,t
ackno,,,v;edqrnarfts,
ensonaHy i:nown to me Or r�o Produced
-N"�-d.aas
,.deritiilicean
iaerR,7rc, me Urelt S"he the S'.'C"Fri and subscrfbad bakwe rue, by,,,,,
oneatis of
preseace or mWe noWmW on TaZyMy d :T7L&1RL_ , M2( ke caid patsan d.fld 1,ake an
oath and was Mst
dWy swarn by nx an oath, s -aid fuitw,,r, deposdng and dying fl ,,al has mad the fowegoing and �htai the
qtatmnenls and
-galions con�.,ainsd, herein are true and Colreat.
VWTN ESS nW A n d a tid of 5 cia see i n Ih P Cou rAy �,�i nd Sta Le la, S t a ror—a W WA/ _6Jay o f
202ft-
TV
firal V 15 2 ;a'
Fubl�f;; State
111(X,ARY PUUK)
(AMx NWarial Seall
ape Amu No
P&kd p,aIatn '--`Z5 aw -0 7
AMWtl
Please use additional sheets as needed. If any additional sheets are attached to this document, please sign here and note below:
1. Ownership
1, Frank S. loppolo, Jr., Manager & Member, Triple 8 Acquisitions, LLC , hereby attest to ownership of the property described below:
Tax Parcel Number(s): 23-19-30-501-0000-0140
Address of Property. Seminole Blvd., Sanford, FL 32771
for which this application is submitted to the City of Sanford,
II. Designation of Applicant's Agent (leave blank if not applicable)
As the owner/applicant of the above designated property for which this affidavit is submitted, I designate the below named individual
as my agent in all matters pertaining to the application process. In authorizing the agent named below to represent me, or my
company, I attest that the application is made in good faith and that all information contained in the application is accurate and
complete to the best of my personal knowledge.
Applicants Agent (Print): Matt Wanzeck, Beazer Homes Signature:
Agent Address: 151 Southhall Lane, Suite 200, Maitland, FL 32751
Email: matthew.wanzeck@beazer.com Phone: (407) 362-6819 Fax:
Ill. Notice to Owner
A. All changes in Ownership and/or Applicants Agent prior to final action of the City shall require a new affidavit. If ownership
changes, the new owner assumes all obligations related to the filing application process.
B. If the Owner intends for the authority of the Applicant's Agent to be limited in any manner, please indicate the limitations(s)
below. (i.e.: limited to obtaining a certificate of concurrency; limited to obtaining a land use compliance certificate, etc.)
The owner of the real property associated With this application or procurement activity is a (check one)
o Individual o Corporation o Land Trust o Partnership A Limited Liability Company
o Other (describe):
1. List all natural persons who have an ownership interest in the property, which is the subject matter of this petition, by name and
address.
2. For each corporation, list the name, address, and title of each officer: the name and address of each director of the corporation;
and the name and address of each shareholder who owns two percent (2%) or more of the stock of the corporation. Shareholders
need not be disclosed if a corporation's stock are traded publicly on any national stock exchange.
3. In the case of a trust, list the name and address of each trustee and the name and address of the beneficiaries of the trust and the
percentage of interest of each beneficiary. If any trustee or beneficiary of a trust is a corporation, please provide the information
required in paragraph 2 above.
Name of Trust;
4. For partnerships, including limited partnerships, list the name and address of each principal in the partnership, including general
orlimited partners. If any partner is a corporation, please provide the information required in paragraph 2 above.
5. For each limited liability company, list the name, address, and Uda of each manager or managing member; and the name and
address of each additional member with two percent (2%) or more membership interest. |fany member with two percent (2%)or
more membership interest, monuger, or managing member is a oorporation, trust nrpartnership, please provide the information
required inparagraphs 2.3and/or 4above,
Name ofLLC: Triple B Acquisitions, LLC
6. |nthe circumstances of a. contract for purchase, list the name and address of each contract purchaser. If the purchaser is
corporation, trust, partnership, or LLC, provide the information required for those entities in paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and/or 5 above.
Name ofPurchaser:
Date of Contract'.
NAME
TITLEIOFFICE/TRUSTEE
OR BENEFICIARY
ADDRESS
% OF
INTEREST
Frank S. loppolo, Jr.
Manager & Member
120 Stone Post Rd., Longwood, FL 32779
55%
Michael F. Towers
Member
951 Via Bonita St., Sanford, FL 32771
45%
(Use additional sheets for more spare.)
7. Aatoany type ofowner referred toabove, achange ofownership nccurringeubsequento the execution ufthis document, shall be
disclosed in writing to the City prior to any action being taken by the City as to the matter relative to which this document pertains.
B. |offirm that the above representations are true and are based upon my personal knowledge and belief after all reasonable inquiry. /
understand that any failure to make mandated disclosures is grounds for the subject rezone, future land use amendment, special
oxcepdun, or variance involved with this Application to become void or for the submission for procurement activity to be non-
responsive. | certify that | am legally authorized to execute this Affidavit and to bind the Applicant orVendor tothe disclosures
herein.
~
Date Owner, Agent, Applicant Signature
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF SEKNNULE
administerI HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized to oaths and take acknowledgments,
personally appeared (v 11"who is personally known to me or {} who produced Al 8as identification
and acknowledged before me that s/he executed the same. Sworn and subscribed befor� me by xtoap�- 14Avov1,_W",V1 by means of
physical presence or online notarization on the ( —
_,L day of LrV-A-,f- , 20K,the'said' person did take an oath and was first
duly sworn by me, on oath, said person, further, deposing and saying that s/he has read the foregoing and that the statements and
allegations contained herein are true and correct.
WITNESS myhand and official seal in the County nd State last aforesaid this _�day of
. nuaEFIT MABRx.
Notary Public; ���fH |d — wma�9uh|k��oe/
�JhxNo\aha|S U �y��mm.�p�mmo
�
Printed Name: ��mm�o�oN«GG.'
^m�m^���"�m,'n�w"�u�u ---
2
APPENDN C
Boundary & Topographic Survey
Townes atLake Monroe Page 127
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 1S,2O31
how tl
,�
1.0
ohm; NN
AQ S -
A j
ke j
1
BOR
gg ;11
zz
gum Q
how tl
t!
1 MEC so! 1 i it!
T
1tyo MA!
,�
1.0
ohm; NN
AQ S -
A j
ke j
1
BOR
gg ;11
1
gum Q
I
pt 11
1 §1
1 W
.91 19
OUR AN
0 1fl;
T
of
sq
S, cis v
poll
11
St mom
ism 0
aFV
Aear,QK
L
Svc
is
t!
1 MEC so! 1 i it!
T
1tyo MA!
,�
1.0
ohm; NN
AQ S -
A j
ke j
1
BOR
gg ;11
1
gum Q
I
pt 11
1 §1
1 W
.91 19
OUR AN
0 1fl;
T
of
sq
0
f �S.r
;4T
S
wu
M
CIA
PREPARED FOR. fXW .1 PAM
01A. M
BEAZER HOMES-ORL Nista-W=k Am A UC
LAKE MONROE INN &, BAR OUTBACK Son
&NDO
Nor PLATIM
' .Mtb b I YS-rp-pp--� pcs0-opW
ONKR pU1M2 �
�tua
G+✓ G - •
K
m m
c O D
K p Z �
G � 6
4 ` a €�d G C C C• m �2
C - . '• k 'Y
E _ D ,
�t
• A �` Z � � v //may . `� i�
F f i,ii~
IS'ta G
FZ
G r,
q Iiai " �a
i f p x G{ 4p .f ••f
zif
pp 99 CCpp pypq_
PREPARED FOR.
BEATER HOMES -ORLANDO
LAKE MONROE INN & BAR OUTBACK
110 /
�3
S
E I
ME
.Q
�AgAa t�
aZdg$fEgg2�a�xg
ga£��cii
��8k6A�aSgAAA o
k
Jaix
•
•
•
MMCGMM�N'
2G+GL •G
•
.tea i�iz7lzii
Ell
4,
I
if2iiC'd�GC
�
�
i€ q
•
0
Z�K
a u
dtla
:1
Z
e
o� i •.
s
!
��—zS.7
-if
A
K K m f
e
. LC � . � • s
110 /
�3
S
E I
ME
.Q
�AgAa t�
aZdg$fEgg2�a�xg
ga£��cii
��8k6A�aSgAAA o
k
Jaix
rILiD Bn. BW BAIL l/lS/PB.'0
apAaN Br m+s �Q A41r N Niao•P(hittaker Survo�ing LLC
MW :ro-I9l µr 1]]av w.�aJy.iM Elva,Lwpwnd, lL i.]W
vNaa»c�apaw rnx-lams aiaaasl
SG<E I••3H' 9ifk'T. / M t Ltl Nn ]]N
•
•
•
MMCGMM�N'
2G+GL •G
•
.tea i�iz7lzii
Gk�FhGr.l3 rrRrG' .v" GC nc5"Gaf1� rtil%:
if2iiC'd�GC
rILiD Bn. BW BAIL l/lS/PB.'0
apAaN Br m+s �Q A41r N Niao•P(hittaker Survo�ing LLC
MW :ro-I9l µr 1]]av w.�aJy.iM Elva,Lwpwnd, lL i.]W
vNaa»c�apaw rnx-lams aiaaasl
SG<E I••3H' 9ifk'T. / M t Ltl Nn ]]N
JI
A -1
S
zP
Z
z
>
<
- 15
C)
>
0 0 i 0 0 0 1 r 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
N LA LP 00 to
WOLFER'S LAKE VIEW]TERRACE
PLAT BOOK 10, PG. 66
RIVER VIEW DRIVE 6�6'R�/W\
z
E:
O
OR
z
PREPARED FOR:
BEAZER HOMES -ORLANDO
LAKE MONROE INN & BAR OUTBACK
a
to
0
Z
C
FXW or. ow VAIs 71"IJ 1
Nict um4yi.g LLC
�AW
APPEN[JiX D
Legal Description
Townes atLake Monroe Page 128
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 1S,2O21
NW20-197 August 24, 2020
BEAZER HOMES, LAKE MONROE TOWNHOMES
PARCEL 23-19-30-300-0040-0000
A PORTION OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 19 SOUTH, RANGE 30
EAST, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGIN AT A POINT 1518 FEET WEST AND 705 FEET NORTH OF THE QUARTER SECTION CORNER ON THE
SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 19 SOUTH, RANGE 30 EAST, SEMINOLE COUNTY,
FLORIDA, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF LOT 1, WOLFER'S LAKE VIEW TERRACE,
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, PAGE 66, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS
OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN N89°45'53"W FOR A DISTANCE OF 350.00 FEET; THENCE
RUN N00°14'04"W FOR A DISTANCE OF 2090.60 FEETTO THE SOUTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S.
HIGHWAY 17-92 (SR 15/600) SEMINOLE BOULEVARD PER THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP SECTION 77010, DATED 8-3-2010; THENCE RUN S59°52'42"E
ALONG SAID SOUTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 110.22 FEET TO A PONT OF
CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2818.44 FEET, AN
INCLUDED ANGLE OF 6°13'01", A CHORD BEARING OF S56°46'12"E, AND A CHORD DISTANCE OF 305.67;
THENCE RUN ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 305.82 FEET; THENCE LEAVING
SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN S00°13'51"E ALONG THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF SAID WOLFER'S LAKE
VIEW TERRACE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, PAGE 66, OF THE
PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA FOR A DISTANCE OF 1869.22 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
SAID LANDS CONTAINING 694,830.00 SQUARE FEET OR 15.951 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL 23-19-30-501-0000-0140
A PORTION OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 19 SOUTH, RANGE 30
EAST, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 WOLFER'S LAKE VIEW TERRACE, ACCORDING TO
THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, PAGE 66, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE
COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN N00°1351" W ALONG THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF LOTS 1 THROUGH
13 INCLUSIVE AND THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF LOT 13 OF SAID WOLFER'S LAKE VIEW TERRACE FOR
A DISTANCE OF 1147.64 FEET, TO A POINT BEING THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF LAKE VIEW
DRIVE, A 33 FOOT WIDE R/W AS PER SAID WOLFER'S LAKE VIEW TERRACE AS CURRENTLY VACATED PER
OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 9631 PAGE 1091 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA;
AND THE CENTERLINE OF OAK VIEW DRIVE, A 66' WIDE R/W AS PER SAID WOLFER'S LAKE VIEW
TERRACE, IN WHICH A PORTION IS CURRENTLY VACATED AS PER SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 9631
PAGE 1091; SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE N00°13'51"W ALONG THE
WEST LINE OF SAID LAKE VIEW DRIVE FOR A DISTANCE OF 72157 FEET TO THE SOUTHERN RIGHT-OF-
WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY 17-92 (SR 15/600) SEMINOLE BOULEVARD PER THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP SECTION 77010, DATED 8-3-2010, TO A POINT ON A NOW
TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 2818.44 FEET, AN INCLUDED ANGLE
OF 3°56'14", A CHORD BEARING OF S51°41'34"E, AND A CHORD DISTANCE OF 193.64 FEET; THENCE
RUN ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 193.67 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN S49°4327"E FOR A DISTANCE
OF 544.83 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 22 OF SAID PLAT; THENCE RUN S00°29'14"E ALONG SAID
EAST LINE 105.94' TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 22; THENCE RUN N80°53'29"W ALONG THE
SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 22 FOR A DISTANCE OF 155.07 FEET; THENCE RUN S00°16'59"E ALONG THE
EAST LINE OF LOT 24 OF SAID PLAT FOR A DISTANCE OF 133.91' TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
LOT 24; THENCE RUN 589°5128"W ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OAK VIEW DRIVE OF
SAID PLAT FOR A DISTANCE OF 257.42 FEET; THENCE RUN S00°08'32"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.00' TO
THE CENTER LINE OF SAID OAK VIEW DRIVE; THENCE S89°51'28"W ALONG SAID CENTERLINE FOR A
DISTANCE OF 155.82 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
SAID LANDS CONTAINING 244,228.58 SQUARE FEET, OR 5.607 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
APPENDN E
School Impact Analysis
Townes at Lake Monroe Page 29
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 15, 2021
Seminole County Public Schools
School U00pa^�t Analysis
�
.
School Capacity Determination
To: Matt Young, Beazer Homes
Rebecca Hammock, Seminole County Board of Commissioners
Fnmmo; Richard LeBlanc, AlA, Director, Facilities Planning, Seminole County Public Schools
Date: K4anrh 15'2O21
RE: Townes at Lake Monroe
Seminole County Public Schools /SCPG>, in reviewing the above requent, has determined that if approved, the new
FLUN1designation and/or zoning will have the effect of increasing residential density, and as a result generate additional
school age children.
Description: Proposed Rezone from All, C1, R - 11A to PD of +/-21.54 acres generally located adjacent to 444
Riverview Ave.. Sanford, FL within the jurisdiction of the Seminole County, FL The applicant is requesting a
change tothe FLU and zoning designations tmallow amaximum of124 Single Family Attached residential units, to
bedeveloped within the proposed land use and zoning designations.
Parcel OQ(s) #: 23-19-30-300-0040-0000; 23- 9-30'501-0000'0140
This review and evaluation is performed on proposed future land use changes and rezones, unplatted parcels, or projects
that have not received final entitlement approval. This evaluation does not guarantee that the developments subject to
this declaration are exempt from, or determined to meet the school concurrency requirements effective as of January 1,
3008. Changes in enrollment, ompaoity, any newly platted developments, and any subsequent final development
approvals may affect the provision of concurrent school facilities at the point of final subdivision approval, including the
potential ofnot meeting statutory concurrency requirements based on future conditions.
Based on information received from the jurisdiction and the application for the request,SCPSstaff has summarized the
potential school enrollment impacts in the following tables:
CSA Capacity
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT ON STUDENT GENERATION BY CSA
AFFECTED CSAs
CAPACITY
5,807
5,894
8,627
3 -YEAR PROGRAM CAPACITY
308
-
150
ENROLLMENT
4,871
4,875
7,724
AVAILABLE CAPACITY
1,244
1,019
1,053
SCALD RESERVATIONS TO DATE
396
445
581
Townes at Lake Monroe
13
6
9
Comments CSA Evaluation:
\._ 4dthis point, the students generated at the three CSA levels would be able to be accommodated without exceeding the
adopted levels of service (LOS) for each CSA by school type, or there is adjacent capacity to meet LOS as allowed by
interlocal agreement. Any planned expansions/additions in the current five-year capital plan would provide additional
student capacity tu relieve the afhaubad schools is naOnded in this review.
Zoned School Enrollment: For informational purposes, the below table indicates the analysis based on the individual
_
school zones within the CSA under current conditions. At this point, the potential students generated
/ ��Yetobeacuornrn�dotedm/i�hmuto�����|mgthem��p���Le�e|o�f�ervice(L[}S)�mrthecu�rentiyzon�� b��h
`
sc� Any planned expansions/additions that would provide additional student capacity contained in the current five-
year capital plan and scheduled to be completed within the next three years are included in this review.
SCHOOLSI REGION 11 Bentley 50%1 Crystal Lakel Wicklowl GoIdsboroj,,,;,,'
CAPACITY
2,484
499
879
843
1,102
5,807
ENROLLMENT
2,165
478
704
682
842
4,871
AVAI LABLE CAPACITY
627
21
175
161
260
1,244
SCALD RESERVATIONS TO DATE
3171
79
-
1 396
Townes at Lake Monroe
13j-
-
13
R EMAII N I NG CAPACITY
297
(5 8)
175 161
575]
Region I Elementary Schools includeBentley, Idyllwildeand Wilson
ZONEDSCHOOL
MIDDLE SCHOOLS Markham Woods Greenwood Lakes
CAPACITY 1,260 1,266
Millennium
1,743
Sanford,,'
1,625
0SX, 41
5,894
3 -YEAR PROGRAM CAPACITY
-
-
ENROLLMENT
1,051
998
1,403
1,423
4,875
AVAILABLECAPACITY
- 209
268
340
202
1,019
,SCALD RESERVATIONS TO DATE
681
35
170
172
445,
Townes at Lake Monroe
61
REMAINING CAPACITY
135
233
1701,
30 1'�l 568]
HIGH SCHOOLS
CAPACITY
ZONEDSCHOOL
Seminole
4,868
Lake Mary
2,948
Crooms
811
C$A 10
8,627
3 -YEAR PROGRAM CAPACITY
-
-
150
150
ENROLLMENT
4,303
2,681
740
7,724
AVAILABLE CAPACITY
565,
267,
221
1,053,
SCALD RESERVATIONS TO DATE
5641
171
1
1 581
-
REMAINING CAPACITY 2501 1 1 2421
Terms and Definitions:
Capacity: The amount of satisfactory permanent student stations aacalculated onthe date ofthe second FDOEcount
inOctober ofthe current school year. The number ofstudents that can be satisfactorily accommodated inaroom atany
given time and which, is typically a lesser percentage of the total number of student stations. NOTE: Capacity ioONLY
ameasure ofstudent stations, not ufenrollment.
Concurrency Service Area (CSA): A geographic unit promulgated by the School Board and adopted by local
governments within which the level of service is measured when an application for residential development is reviewed
for school concurrency purposes. THste� repre�ant� �h� �re� t�ot �he o���o�t9 �� r�n�idere� �o� stu�ent
8�men�m��be|n�C���a���u�ntto�hepno]act
Enrollment: For the purposes ofconcurrency review, the enrollment level isestablished each year asper Public School
Interlocal Agreement Section 12'4A,which sets the level onthe date Vfthe second full time equivalent (FTE) survey for
FDOE.generally taken inmid-Ontnbmr.
Programmed 3Year Additions: New permanent school capacity within the CSA, which will beinplace orunder actual
construction within the first three years of the current SCPS Capital Improvement Plan.
Remaining Capacity: The capacity available for future development after the addition of any programmed capacity and
less the reserved capacity.
Reserved Capacity: The total number of student stations reserved in the respective CSA's that are assigned to projects
via SCALD certificate.
School Size: For planning purpomon, each public school district must determine the maximum size of future elementary,
middle and high schools. Existing school size is determined solely through FISH data. Seminole County Public Schools
has established the sizes of future schools (with the exception of special centers and magnet schools) aafollows:
i) 78Ostudent stations
ii\ Middle: 1500 student stations
iii) High: 2,800 student stations
School Attendance Zone: The established geographic area that identifies school assignments pursmanttoBoardPo|iny
for each District school or region of schools, other than county wide magnet schools. Students shall attend the achoo|/o>
serving their residential or regional attendance zone unless otherwise permitted by Board Policy
Students Generated by Project: iodetermined by applying the current GCPSstudent generation rate (calculated inthe
2017 Impact Fee Study) tothe number and type ofunits proposed. The number ofunits imdetermined using information
provided by the jurisdiction and/or from the applicant's request. If no actual unit count is provided the unit count is then
estimated based on the maximum allowable density under the existing/proposed future land use designation. Eventua|
�ent�m�i��w�entn���ol �/� o�use�t �ro�imi�y�m �he t) 'v rami�ent�a� deve!��mom�.
Utilization: A State Board Rule prescribed percentage of student stations that a room (and proportionetnly, e school
and aohou| district) can satisfactorily accommodate atany given time. From a school/campus analysis perspective,
,
"utilization" is determined as the percentage of school enrollment to capacity. Current DOE established K-12utilization
(
factors are aofollows:
Elementary 100%, Middle 90%, High 95%
noc"in""=ew *acung!om^*Sl^susmTo°ne""Lake m"nr"e/N*^cc-smr=ncsmLake
APPENNX F
Traffic Impact Analysis
Townes at Lake Monroe Page 130
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 15, 2021
LAKE MONROE TOWNHOMES
Project N2 20075
July 2020
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
SEMINOLE COUNTY
FLORIDA
Prepared by.,
3101 Maguire Boulevard, Suite 265
Orlando, Florida 32803
www.trafficmobility.com
(407) 531-5332
Beazer Homes - Orlando
151 Southhall Lane, Suite 200
Maitland, Florida 32751
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Proiect Information
Name: Lake Monroe Townhomes
Location: South side of US 17-92, west of Oak Drive
Jurisdiction Seminole County, Florida
Description: 124 Multi -Family Units (Townhomes)
Findings
Trip Generation: 897 Daily Trips / 58 AM Peak Hour Trips / 72 PM Peak Hour Trips
Access Plan: Full Access on US 17-92
Roadway Capacity: All study roadway segments will operate at acceptable level of service
(LOS) at buildout.
Intersection Capacity: The intersection of US 17-92 and Oak Drive will continue to operate
at an adequate LOS at project buildout.
The access driveway will operate at an adequate LOS at project
buildout.
Recommendations
Turn Lane Construct a 180 -foot westbound left turn deceleration lane at the
Improvements: project access driveway on US 17-92.
Lake Monroe Townhomes
Tm
Traffic Impact Analysis Project N2 20075
Traffic & Mobility Consultants Executive Summary
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that I am a Professional Engineer properly registered in the State of Florida
practicing with Traffic & Mobility Consultants LLC, a corporation authorized to operate as an
engineering business, CA -30024, by the State of Florida Department of Professional Regulation,
Board of Professional Engineers, and that I have prepared or approved the evaluations, findings,
opinions, conclusions, or technical advice attached hereto for:
PROJECT: Lake Monroe Townhomes
LOCATION: Seminole County, Florida
CLIENT: Beazer Homes - Orlando
I hereby acknowledge that the procedures and references used to develop the results contained
in these computations are standard to the professional practice of Transportation Engineering
as applied through professional judgment and experience.
THIS ITEM HAS BEEN DIGITALLY SIGNED AND SEALED BY
% t%J11111111 11
XC E IV S��`S
ON THE DATE ADJACENT TO THE SEAL
No 56849
PRINTED COPIES OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDERED
SIGNED AND SEALED AND THE SIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED
ON ANY ELECTRONIC COPIES.
STATE OF
4 0 I
TRAFFIC & MOBILITY
R
CONSULTANTS LLC
101V .til,,,
3101 MAGUIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 265
ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32803
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION CA -30024
AYMAN H. AS-SAIDI, P.E. NO 56849
2.1 Roadway Segment Capacity --------.--------------.------.—.D
2.2 Intersection Capacity ............................................................... ..................................... 4
3.1 Trip Generation ............................................................................................................... 6
3^2 Trip ._—.._—._.__...__—_---.................................
4.1 Roadway Segment Capacity --.-------'--------------------G
4-2 Intersection Capacity ...................................................................................................... 9
4.3 Access Review ............................................................................................................. 11
5.0 STUDY CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................. 12
Appendix A
Conceptual Site Plan
Appendix
Lake Monroe TVwnhomeoMethodology
Appendix
Seminole County E+CData
Appendix
Traffic Counts, Historical Data & Seasonal Factor
Appendix
F1CW1Worksheets - Existing Conditions
Appendix
ITE Information Sheets
Appendix
UUAT@K8odel
Appendix
HCMWorksheets - Projected COndiUOns
Appendix
NCHRPRepod
Appendix J
Exhibit 212-1
Lake Monroe Townhomes
T��chm�m� �
TA&C..-Project Ne 20075
Traffic & Mobility Consultants
Table mfContents i
Table Existing Roadway Capacity Analysis ..............................................
Table 2 Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis ..........................................
Table Trip Generation Analysis .................................................................
Table 4 Projected Roadway Capacity Analysis ...........................................
Figure1Site Location Map ...............................................................................................
Figure 2Existing Intersection Volumes .... ........................................................................
Figure 3Project Trip DisthbUtk]O----------.------~.-----------
TW-
Traffic & Mobility Consultant
—.2
5
—.7
,10
Lake Monroe Townhomes
Traffic Impact Analysis
Project Ny20075
Table of Contents ii
This traffic analysis was conducted to assess the impact of Lake Monroe Townhomes, a
residential community consisting of 124 multi -family dwelling units (townhomes), with buildout
year 2024. The site is located on the south side of US 17-92, west of Oak Drive, in Seminole
County, Florida. Figure 1 depicts the site location and its surrounding transportation network.
Access to the site will be provided via one proposed full access on US 17-92. A conceptual site
plan is included in Appendix A.
The analysis was conducted in accordance with the approved methodology included in Appendix
B. The study facilities considered in the analysis are:
Study Segments (w/in 1 -mile):
• Airport Boulevard
o AIR35 McCracken Road to SR 46
• SR 46
o 54645 Airport Boulevard to CR 15 / Upsala Road
o 54650 US 17-92 to Airport Boulevard
• US 17-92
o U1785 Seminole Boulevard to Oak Drive
o U1790 Oak Drive to CR 15/Upsala Road
Study Intersections (w/in Xmile):
• US 17-92 and Oak Drive
• US 17-92 and Project Access Driveway
Lake Monroe Townhomes
Traffic Impact Analysis
20075 Tm
Project N2 Page I
Traffic 5 Mobility Consukants
\ /N
7 »
Not to s W
\ :J
� � }
2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS
2.1 Roadway Segment Capacity
Existing roadway conditions were analyzed by comparing the existing traffic volumes on the
roadway segments within a 1 -mile study area to the service volumes at the adopted Level of
Service (LOS) standard for the roadway segments, as documented in the Seminole County
Roadway Concurrency Information dated March 27, 2020, included in Appendix C.
The daily roadway segment analyses are summarized in Table 1. The analysis indicates that the
study segments are currently operating at acceptable Levels of Service (LOS).
Table 1
Existing Roadway Capacity Analysis
Seminole County Summary of Roadway Concurrency Information March, 2020
Seminole County Comprehensive Plan's Service Volumes
Lake Monroe Townhomes
Traffic Impact Analysis
Project W- 20075
Traffic 8 Mobility Consultants Page 3
2.2 Intersection Capacity
A capacity analysis was performed to determine the operating conditions at the study intersection
during the AM and PM peak hour. The analysis was conducted using Synchro Software and the
methods of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 6th Edition. Traffic counts for US 17-92 were
obtained from Seminole County, taken February 18, 2020, and taken during the peak season;
therefore, no seasonal adjustments were applied. Due to a roadway closure on Oak Drive at the
intersection of Oak Drive and US 17-92 that is anticipated to last through August, it was agreed
with Seminole County to use a trip generation for the 35 single family residences that reside on
Oak Drive (using ITE trip generation rates) and assign 60% of the trips generated to the
intersection of US 17-92 and Oak Drive. These counts were added as existing traffic. The T -
factor was obtained from FDOT Florida Traffic Online (FTO) historical data and was divided by 2.
Existing intersection volumes are presented in Figure 2. The seasonal factor report for Seminole
County, historical data, and traffic counts are provided in Appendix D.
The results of the intersection analysis, presented in Table 2, indicates that the intersection of US
17-92 and Oak Drive currently operates at an adequate LOS. Detailed analysis worksheets are
included in Appendix E.
Table 2
Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis
Average Delay Expressed in Seconds
Lake Monroe Townhomes
Traffic Impact Analysis
20075 T
Project N2 W Page 4
Traffic & Mobility Consultants
386
�3
US 17-92
<- 1011
�- 8
k
N
Not to Scale
1
M1
�U do �r%I�Iv��If�f��%��J/l,�/(Olf'/ywb6✓f
//d/rA
��/�ia�; /�i„ r,d/ „,�. ,r�.,�:��
3.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC
3.1 Trip Generation
The trip generation analysis was conducted using information published by the Institute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE) in the Trip Generation Manual, 10", Edition. Table 3 summarizes
the resulting trip generation calculation for the site. The ITE information sheets are included in
Appendix F.
Table 3
Trip Generation Analysis
Trip Generation analysis based on ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition.
The ITE equations %ere used when R 2 was greater than 0.75
The development will generate a total of 897 new daily trips of which 58 trips will occur during the
AM peak hour and 45 trips will occur during the PM peak hour.
3.2 Trip Distribution/Assignment
The project trip distribution was estimated based on the Orlando Urban Area Transportation Study
model (OUATS Cost Feasible 2030) and modified to reflect prevailing patterns in the vicinity of
the site. The OUATS model printout is included in Appendix G. The trip distribution is illustrated
in Figure 3.
Lake Monroe Townhomes
Traffic Impact Analysis
20075 T
Project N2 W Page 6
Traffic & MOODY comuhants
Yr�aMmmrl; ;
25°/a
SITE
476
15% 20%
an7oi c&
�1�6r
15 417
16A W2"5ch Sr dti�i d60.
4.0 PROJECTED CONDITIONS ANALYSIS
4.1 Roadway Segment Capacity
Roadway segment analyses were conducted for the study roadway segments using the total
projected daily traffic volumes. Total projected daily traffic volumes were calculated by adding
the existing AADT's with the committed trips and project trips, for project buildout 2024. Projected
roadway conditions were analyzed by comparing the total projected traffic volumes on the study
segments to their respective service volumes at the adopted LOS standard. The projected
roadway segment analyses are summarized in Table 4.
Table 4
Projected Roadway Capacity Analysis
Seminole County Summary ofRoadway Concurrency Information March, 2020 and FOOT Traffic Online Websile
Seminole County Comprehensive Plan's Service Volumes
The analysis indicates that the study roadway segments are projected to continue to operate at
acceptable LOS at project buildout.
Lake Monroe Townhomes
Traffic Impact Analysis
Project We 20075
TWLC Page 8
Traffic & Mobility Consultants
4.2 Intersection Capacity
In order to assess the operations of the study intersections, a capacity analysis was conducted
using the projected traffic volumes and Synchro software using the HCM procedures. Projected
peak hour volumes were determined by adding committed and project trips to existing intersection
volumes. Committed daily trips provided by Seminole County were converted to PM peak hour
with the use of K=0.096 and D=0.568 factors. The projected AM and PM peak hour turning
movement volumes are illustrated in Figure 4.
The results of the intersection analysis, summarized in Table 5, indicate the intersection of US
17-92 and Oak Drive will continue to operate at an adequate LOS. The project driveway will
operate at an adequate LOS at project buildout. Detailed analysis worksheets are included in
Appendix H.
Table 5
Projected Intersection Capacity Analysis
Average Delay Expressed in Seconds
Lake Monroe Townhomes
Traffic Impact Analysis
20075
Project N2
Page 9
Traffic & Mobility Consultants
PM Peak
822+{2}=824
(5)
2
0
L-
a.
556+{1}=557
(16)
tU
<- 391 +{1)=392
,�- (8)
<- 386+{1}+(7)=394
� 3
17-92
820+{2}+(27)=849
F> 2+(2)=4
(0 F (0 00
0
<-1014+{2}=1016 E-1011+{2}+(27)=1040
�-- (29) � 8 US 17-92
egen :
Existing + (Committed) + (Project) = Total
Troffk. mbwly
550+{1)+(1 6)=567
6+(2)=8
LOU')
11
04
CV)
L01
At
N
Nol 1. SWC
4.3 Access Review
The development is proposed to be served by one full access driveway on US 17-92. US 17-92
is a 2 -lane road with a posted speed of 35 mph.
A review of the warrants for a left and right turn deceleration lane on US 17-92 at the project
access driveway was conducted to determine if auxiliary turn lanes are necessary to maintain the
integrity of traffic flow and capacity of the road during the peak hours. Accordingly, a westbound
left turn deceleration lane is warranted at the project access driveway. An eastbound right turn
deceleration lane is not warranted. The review was conducted based on the methodology of the
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 457. The results of the
warrant analyses are included in Appendix 1.
Project Access Left Turn Lane
The required lane dimensions are determined based on a design speed of 40 mph and Exhibit
212-1 of the FDOT Design Manual, included in Appendix J.
The calculations for the left turn lane are as follows:
Project Access
Deceleration @ 40mph = 155 feet
Queue = 2 x 25 / 60 x Left Volume = 5/6 * 29 = 24 (use 25 feet)
Left Turn Lane = 155 +25 = 180 feet (includes 50 -foot taper)
Therefore, it is recommended that a 180 -foot westbound left turn deceleration lane
on US 17-92 at the project access driveway be added.
Lake Monroe Townhomes
Traffic Impact Analysis
T
Project N2 20075 A'C-
Traffiv I. Mobility Consultants Page 11
P_111)11�3 1111l ITKONN, 159MR11561 ki
This traffic analysis was conducted to assess the impact of a residential community consisting of
124 multi -family dwelling units (townhomes). The site is located on the south side of US 17-92,
west of Oak Drive, in Seminole County, Florida.
The study included a determination of project trip generation and a review of existing and
projected roadway capacity and intersection operations. The results of the traffic analysis are
summarized as follows:
® The development will generate a total of 897 new daily trips of which 58 trips will occur
during the morning peak hour and 72 trips will occur during the evening peak hour.
® An analysis of roadway segment capacity indicates that the study segments currently
operate adequately and are projected to continue to do so at project buildout.
0 An analysis of the study intersections reveals that the intersection of US 17-92 will
continue to operate adequately at project buildout. The project access driveway will
operate at an acceptable LOS.
® Construct a 180 -foot westbound left turn deceleration lane at the project access driveway
on US 17-92.
The proposed development does not adversely impact traffic capacity and operations on
the network and the adjacent communities.
Lake Monroe Townhomes
Traffic Impact Analysis
Project N2 20075
TA&C
Traffk & Mobility Consulwnts Page 12
APPENDICES
Appendix A
Conceptual Site Plan
- -- --•------- ------
P, R,
- - - - - - - - --- -
A
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
G
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
31
A
* "
�
z
TOWNES AT LAKE MON ROE
p
BEAZER HOMES
J.'
I
�
I
S..inl. C.-ty, Fwdd.
I.. I Q- I R--
—
-
–
A
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
G
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
31
* "
�
z
TOWNES AT LAKE MON ROE
p
BEAZER HOMES
J.'
I
�
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
* "
�
z
TOWNES AT LAKE MON ROE
p
BEAZER HOMES
J.'
I
�
I
S..inl. C.-ty, Fwdd.
I.. I Q- I R--
—
-
–
Appendix B
Lake Monroe Townhomes Methodology
From: Cash, Michael <K4ichae|Iash@SanfordU.gov>
Sent: Monday, April 26i2O211(lO4AK4
To; StephanieK4andeUo
Cc: 2OO75LAKE K4DNROETOVVNHDMES;King, Arnye |FT|KHAR,B|LAL
Subject- RE: 20075 Lake Monroe Townhomes
Good morning Stephanie,
Thank you for the Ribmitt-zfl.The miethodology isacceptable.
Regards,
Mike Cash, CFM
Public Works Engineer
p: 407.688.5087
0 �Aueq 1)
From: Stephanie K8andeUn<om@trafficmobi|ity.com>
Sent: Monday, April 26, 20218:56 AM
To: Cash, Michael <K4ichae|.Cash@SanfordO.gov>
Cc: 2OU75LAKE KAONROETOVVNHOK4E5<2OO75@trafficnnobi1ity.com>
Subject: 2O075Lake Monroe Tovvnhomes
Good Morning,
Attached isthe Methodology that was prepared for Lake Monroe Townhomes. This development will beannexing to
the City. Wanted to get your approval. If you have any questions please let me know.
Thank you,
Stephanie
StephanieK4ande||o
7RAfFIC& MOBILITY CONSULTANTS ilC
31O1Maguire Boulevard, Suite 2GS
Orlando, FL 32803
Office: /4O7\531-5]32Ext 216
Fax: (407) 531-5331
This email originated from "outside" the
organization. Do not click links or open attachments
unless you recognize the sender and know the content
'is safe.
(
\_
1
Mandello
From: Persaud, Vasu < vpersaud @semi nolecou ntyfl.gov>
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 2:28 PM
To: Stephanie Mandello
Cc: 20075 LAKE MONROE TOWNHOMES
Subject: RE: 20075 Lake Monroe Townhomes
Stephanie,
Good afternoon.
After revie)N, this rnethodoiogy addresses thc,, requireinents of the County's'i-rafflc h-npact Study Gk.ftlelines for projects
located in the i; UL., Please consider it apL
-- "o �ed.
Thank you,
Vasu
�A T,
Frcl r) o ( t� io n A I 1 a ivs t
0'1cer1'ng Divisi(on
I S N e t
)cn Ybf dl FL, 32 f71.
---------- -
NV
, � M
I�, I , �1//il
V`
Leo Ilk,
From: Stephanie Mandello [mailto:sm@trafficmobility.com]
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 1:23 PM
To: Persaud, Vasu <vpe rsa ud @semi nolecou ntyfl.gov>
Cc: 20075 LAKE MONROE TOWNHOMES <20075@trafficmobility.com>
Subject: 20075 Lake Monroe Townhomes
Good afternoon Vasu,
1
MEMORANDUM
July 13, 2020
Re: Lake Monroe Townhomes
Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology
Seminole County, Florida
Project W 20075
The following is an outline of the methodology for the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the above
referenced project. The TIA will conform to the methodology requirements and guidelines
documented by Seminole County,
Proiect Description
The subject property is ± 5 acres and consists of parcels 23-19-30-501-0000-0140 and 23-19-30-
300-0040-0000. The applicant is proposing to develop 124 multi -family residential townhome
units. A preliminary conceptual site plan is included in the Attachments.
Proiect Location
The site is located on the south side of US 17-92, west of Oak Drive, in Seminole County, Florida,
as shown in Figure 1.
I;
Figure I- Site Location Map
3101 Maguire Boulevard, Suite 2135, Orlando, Florida 32803 m P: (407) 531-5332 m F: (407) 531-5331 m wwwArafficroobility,com
Lake Monroe Townhomes
Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology
Project N2 20075
July 13, 2020
Page 2 of 4
Project Access
Access to the site is proposed via one (1) full access driveway on US 17-92, as shown in the
preliminary conceptual plan.
Trip Generation
The trip generation analysis was conducted using information published by the Institute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE) in the Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. Table I summarizes
the trip generation analysis. The ITE Trip Generation sheets are included in the Attachments.
Table I
Trip Generation Calculation
The !TE equations %ere used when R 2 was greater than 0.75
The proposed development is projected to generate 897 daily trips, of which 58 trips occur during
the AM peak hour, and 72 trips occur during the PM peak hour.
Lake Monroe Townhomes
Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology
Project NL) 20075
July 13, 2020
Page 3 of 4
Trip Distribution
The project trip distribution was estimated based on the Orlando Urban Area Transportation Study
model (OLIATS Cost Feasible 2030) and modified to reflect prevailing patterns in the vicinity of
the site. The OLIATS model printout is included in the Attachments. The trip distribution is
shown in Figure 2.
N
%
t5i
117
SITE COOL761)
40%
46,
QRST,.
Figure 2 - Trip Distribution
Lake Monroe Townhomes
Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology
Project NL) 20075
July 13, 2020
Page 4 of 4
Study Area
In accordance with Seminole County requirements, all roadway segments within 1 -mile of the
project will be included in the analysis. Additionally, intersections within 1/4 -mile of the project will
be analyzed for AM and PIVI peak operations.
The following segments and intersections will be included in the TIA:
Study Roadways:
• Airport Boulevard
o AIR35 McCracken Road to SR 46
• SR 46
• S4645 Airport Boulevard to CR 151 Upsala Road
• 54650 US 17-92 to Airport Boulevard
US 17-92
o U1785 Seminole Boulevard to Oak Drive
o U1790 Oak Drive to CR 15/Upsala Road
Study Intersections:
• US 17-92 and Oak Drive
• Project Access Driveway
Capacity Analysis
Roadway segment capacity will be analyzed for existing and buildout daily traffic volumes for the
additional net new trips generated by the development. Projected peak hour volumes will be
determined by adding committed and project trips to existing intersection volumes. Committed
daily trips provided by Seminole County will be converted to PM peak hour with the use of K=0.096
and D=0.568 factors. The analysis will be based on Seminole County's adopted service volumes
and capacities, as obtained from the County's latest available traffic data tables, included in the
Attachments.
The study intersections will be analyzed for AM and PM peak hour conditions using the methods
of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 61h Edition. The analysis will be performed for the
existing year and project buildout year (2024). Due to COVID-19 and the reduction of traffic on
the study roadways, historical counts for the study intersections will be obtained. If they are
unavailable, an AADT conversion method will be used, along with counts to calculate the turning
movement volume. However, due to a road closure on Oak Drive at the intersection of Oak Drive
and US 17-92 that is anticipated to last through August 2020, trip generation will be used to
evaluate the turning movements at the intersection.
Report
A TIA report will be prepared outlining and summarizing the methods and findings of the traffic
analysis prepared for the development.
Appendix C
Seminole County E+C Data
Summaty ofRoadway Coneurrency Information
RKEY Roadway Blame From To
ACI -100 —7n–jil—or 4. flu m --osa Avll—e---"—""--,—
Current Traffic Count 8,419
Roadway Link Capacity 19,360
Committed Trips 0
Net Available Ca aci 10941
ACHIO Anchor Rd S.R. 436 W Melody Ln
Current Traffic Count 8,466
Roadway Link Capacity 19,360
Committed Trips 0
Net Available Capacitor 10894
AIR05 Airport Blvd Mellonvilie Ave C.R. 425
Current Traffic Count 7,306
Roadway Link Capacity 19,360
Committed Trips 2,190
Net AvailableCa aciup 9864
AIRI 0 Airport Blvd C.R. 425 U.S. 'i7-92
Current Traffic Count 11,772
Roadway Link Capacity 19,360
Committed Trips 0
Available Capacity 7h588
AIR20 Airport Blvd U.& 17-92 Old Lake Mary Rd
Current Traffic Count 18,415
Roadway Link Capacity 42,560
Committed Trips 0
Net Available Cap ca,�tl 24145
AIR25 Airport Blvd Old Lake Mary Rd C.R. 46-A
Current Traffic Count 17,531
Roadway Link Capacity 42,560
Committed Trips 0
Net Available CaRaci --1 25 029
AIR30 Airport Bivd C.R. 46-A McCraken Rd
Current Traffic Count 6,503
Roadway Link Capacity 19,360
Committed Trips 226
Net Available Capacity 12,631
Friday, March 27, 2020 Page I of 50
This information has been provided by Tony Nelson, P.E. at Seminole County Engineering and is current
information as of the above referenced date,
RKEY Roadway Name From To
X4645 Airport Blvd C.R. 15/Upsaia
rrpt,Tia#k ht '20 1 '35 4
»rrkty 4_8
�,OW
54660 B.R. 461E 25th St. C.R. 425I8anford Ave U.S. 17-92
Current Traffic Count 22,775
Roadway Link Capacity 48,000
Committed Trips 0
Net Available Capacity25 225
..A
84665 S.R. 46/E 25th St. MeHonville Ave C.R. 425/Sanford Ave
Current Traffic Count 24,773
Roadway Link Capacity 48,000
Committed Trips 0
Net AvailableL Cap cty �A23227
J_
54670 S.R.
. 46 Beardall Ave It ellonville Ave
Current Traffic Count 16,249
Roadway Link Capacity 18,270
Committed Trips 2,081
Net Available Cap -60
54675 S.R. 46 S.R. 415 Beardall Ave
Current Traffic Count 12,193
Roadway Link Capacity 18,270
Committed Trips 1,939
Net Available Capacity 4,138
R. 46
S4680 S.Osceola R'd S.R. 415
Current Traffic Count 12,78
Roadway Link Capacity iAln
Committed Trips 1,007
Net Available Capar-a"4476
84685 S.R. 46 C.R. 426 Osceoia Rd
Current Traffic Count 12,195
Roadway Link Capacity 18,270
Committed Trips 0
Net Available Capacity 60755
_
84690 S.R. 46 Volusia County C.R. 426
Current Traffic Count 8.209
Roadway Link Capacity 18,270
Committed Trips 0
Net Available Cap- 10061
Friday, March 27, 2020 Page 40 of 50
This information has been provided by Tony Nelson, P.E. at Seminole County Engineering and is current
information as of the above referenced date.
RKEY
Roadway flame
From
To
!J 7e7o
Mary Blvd
Airport Blvd
Current Traffic Count
ALM
Roadway Link Capacity
48,000
Committed Trips
0
Net Available Ca acit
6&25
UI 770
U.S. 17-92
Airport Blvd
C.R. 46-A
Current Traffic Count
22,192
Roadway Link Capacity
48,000
Committed Trips
0
Net Available Capac!!X
25808
01775
U.S. 17-92
C.R. 46-A
S.R. 46
Current Traffic Count
26,918
Roadway Link Capacity
imN
Committed Trips
0
Net Available Capacity
210 -82 -
LH 780
U.S. '17-92
SR 46
Seminole Blvd
Current Traffic Count 14,152
Roadway Link Capacity 48,000
Committed Trips 0
Net Available Capacity 33,848
,Current'Tr affia Count
Roa I d+wk 4nk Capacity 18.270
U1795 U.S. '17-92 C.R. IS/Upsaia Rd volusia County [Jne
Current Traffic Count 36,226
Roadway Link Capacity 48,000
Committed Trips 35
Net Available Capacity 11 739.
U41,10 U.S. 441/CBT Orange County Line Orange County Line
Current Traffic Count 31,871
Roadway Link Capacity Mmg
Committed Trips 0
Net Available Capacity 16129
VIROG Virginia Ave Tangerine St North St
Current Traffic Count 848
Roadway Link Capacity iglN
Committed Trips 0
Net Available Capaci 18512
Friday, March 27, 2020 Page 47 of 50
This information has been provided by Tony Nelson, P.E. at Seminole County Engineering and is current
information as of the above referenced date.
Appendix D
Traffic Counts, Historical Data & Seasonal Factor
Roadway Count Summary
Start Date: 18 -Feb -20 Start Time: 00:00
Stop Date: 19 -Feb -20 Stop Time: 24:00
County: Seminole Station ID: 349
Location: #349: US 17-92: Seminole Blvd to Oak Dr ( 100'E of Oak Dr)
18 -Feb -20 Eastbound Volume
EndTime
End Time .'
00
01
02
03
04
05
, 06
07
08
09 r
101
11
112
15
13
2
7
4
4
17
80
154
204
150
86
95
30 10 8 5 7 11 52 145 157 144 95
104
119
45
18
6
5
4
17
67
174
g
151
86
88
103
120
00
6
7
5
10
26
89
1941
112
170
136
125
91
Hr Total 47 23 22 25 58 225 593 770 682 516 394
393
EndTime
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
15
112
122
107
96
114
133
96
74
56
38
12
18
30
95
100
114
119
124
136
121
76
44
29
17
23
45
106
118
114
109
120
139
110
49
46
43
19
12
00
112
119
139
96
128
142
96
64
47
30
26
12
HrTotal
425
459
474
420
486
86
423
263
193
140
74
65
24 Hour Total: 7,720
AM Peak Hour Begins: 7:15 AM Peak Volume: 820 AM Peak Hour Factor: 0.92
PM Peak Hour Begins: 17:00 PM Peak Volume: 550 PM Peak Hour Factor: 0.97
18 -Feb -20 Westbound Volume
End Time
00
01
02
03
04
05
6 1
07
08
09
10
11
15
22
13
6
4
6
16
41 1
65
W
90
114
76
30
19
6
2
4
12
20
71,74
118
91
106
95
127
45
17
4
2
1
6
24
73
1
76
114
79
112
00
12
12
12
4
4
26
60
14Z
74
66
88
102
HrTotai
70
35
22
13
28
86
245
345
347
376
376
417
End Time
12
13
14
15
16
17
18 1
19
20
21
22
23
15
122
127
130
142
203
325
172
109
85
52
41
22
30
107
106
146
166
234
252
158
118
70
71
31
18
45
110
137
131
173
223
240
146
101
70
47
24
25
00
106
116
136
166
218
194
97
94
56
49
43
14
Hr Total
445
486
543
647
878
4W
573
422
281
219
139
79
24 Hour Total : 8,083
AM Peak Hour Begins: 11:15 AM Peak Volume: 463 AM Peak Hour Factor: 0.91
PM Peak Hour Begins: 16:45 PM Peak Volume: 1,035 PM Peak Hour Factor: 0.80
18 -Feb -20
Total Volume for All Lanes
End Time
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
15
35
15
13
8
10
33
121
219
310
240
200
171
30 '"
29
14
7
11
23
72
216
256
248
250
190
231
45
35
10
7
5
23
91
247
327
227
200
167
215
00"'
18
19
17
14
30
115
254
313
244
202
213
193
Hr Total
117
58
44
38
86
311
838
1115
1029
892
770
810
End Time
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
15 "'
234
249
237
238
317
458
268
183
141
90
53
40
30
202
206
260
285
358
388
279
194
114
100
48
41
45
216
255
245
282
343
379
256
150
116
90
43
37
00
218
235
275
262
346
336
193
158
103
79
69
26
Hr Total
870
945
1017
1067
1364
1561
996
685
474
359
213
144
24 Hour Total : 15,803
AM Peak Hour Begins: 7:15 AM Peak Volume: 1,206 AM Peak Hour Factor: 0.92
PM Peak Hour Begins: 16:45 PM Peak Volume: 1,571 PM Peak Hour Factor: 0.86
Ha
NziJ
O W �
Wro
ko0U
xH10
H "H -a
0 O
�zr=j
C) In H
> H
r>0 11
H
OHS
H H >
0z
�7 1n In
1000
0 'TJ w
FAH>
n H
IM H
O
z
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN 1 K
I/I CZ
0000000000000440 1 C=J
H 0
.c. Ulm w%D0YNW.taCnChJmlo i w
L'7 z
.. y
K
0
x
o
NYNNNNNwNNNX.CnCna.lb 1
1 I
(~]
Jm w to J m to 1--0-1^ 0mmJ Cyd CSI I
H 'Ti
00000aoa0ooaaaoo 1 0
O U)
00
O0000a000Ooo000o�H
z
�
m
Q
C H
m
i
m z
i O
W
W L~
c cn c•J
�
�
�
w 11 If II
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz i t7
w
H
1 H
N
H ftj in n
I xJ
`
Q 1-10:,'
cnmm41mmmmmNmJJJJJ I n
O
HOro
Cn O NIn x. to J Cn YIo O Cn to to Cn Cn 1 H
:s x z C
H C7H
oaa000aaOa000aOot0
x�LTJ�
i W
H
K U>
I
zHcn
N H H
0
0
ftj
m
�3yC
I
in
m H,1y
CJ1 U701 C71 o1 O10161016161JJJJ J t Ci
'7J
H `• LTi L-'
N m Y .A w N CT Cn 61 W lO m W Y ! H
{n
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 H
a,
lj
00000a000000000010
m
to rn H In
t z
H H
1
H
> II II H
k N
0
I
ti In H >
H
xJSCHt]
Lj
0 H U .
xxc�ro
i
M
K K
1
u>
ro 11
>>
i > H
H xu �u 1
1o1o10 1 0
0 H
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 H
C
"*mM�v
OY00JO1m0000000001 0
li
0Cn co
O O O l4 W 10 N 000000000 I "DC7
K �-3 1-3 H
M H H
7o >
l7
CT1 LTj U
!
�j ....
I ny
.ro LTj
Ln I.n Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn In Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn I
LTJ>C7yin
NNNNNYYNNW.A AWNNY I n
y.............IH
x II 11 H
CJ W W.DJCn49rnmloNCnwmmko 1 0
w
0041 H Ln M Cn O 00000000 1 'o
o C 'Tj
zOH
cxaL-1
>1zx
r 0 H
IH
a:2
i
III
110
In K
I >
LTJ
It.
0 Cn w w Cn Cn lo. t, w to to w w.Ls .A �I n
�y
. . . . . . . . . .
Ln(.n W.l-`s Ma, J to m N N Cn 0 m to 10 1 0
0 0 0 a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 �a
tTi
W
H
H
H
LTj
Ha
NziJ
O W �
Wro
ko0U
xH10
H "H -a
0 O
�zr=j
C) In H
> H
r>0 11
H
OHS
H H >
0z
�7 1n In
1000
0 'TJ w
FAH>
n H
IM H
O
z
2019 PEAK SEASON FACTOR CATEGORY REPORT - REPORT TYPE: ALL
CATEGORY: 7700 SEMINOLE COUNTYWIDE
14-FBB-2020 I5:39:29 830DPD 5 _ 77O0 _2KSEASO0.TXT
M0CF: O.95
WEEK
DATES
SF
pSCF
I
0I/01/20I9 -
0I/05/20I9
I.05
1.11
( �
01/06/2019 -
0I/I2/2018
1.04
1.09
` 3
01/13/2019 -
0I/19/2019
1.02
1.07
4
01/20/20I9 -
0I/26/20I9
1.00
I.05
5
01/27/28I9 -
02/02/20I9
0.99
1.04
^ 5
02/03/2019 -
02/09/20I9
0.97
1.02
* 7
O
1.00
+ �8'
N0 .�5,
1.08
* 9
02/24/20I9 -
03/02/20I9
0.94
0.99
*lU
03/03/2019 -
03/09/20I9
0.94
0.99
*II
03/10/20I9 -
03/I6/2019
0.94
0.99
*I2
03/I7/20I9 -
03/23/2019
0.94
0�99
+I3
03/24/20I8 -
03/30/20I9
0.94
0.99
^14
03/3I/20I9 -
04/06/2019
0.94
O.93
*15
04/07/20I9 -
04/I3/2019
0.94
0.99
^I6
04/14/2019 -
04/20/20I9
0.94
0.99
+I7
04/2I/20I9 -
04/27/20I9
0.95
1.00
+I8
04/28/20I9 -
05/04/2019
0.97
1.02
19
05/05/2019 -
05/II/2019
0.98
1.03
20
05/12/2019 -
05/18/20I9
O.99
1.84
21
05/19/20I9 -
05/25/20I9
I.01
I.06
22
05/26/20I9 -
06/0I/20I9
I.03
1.08
23
06/02/2019 -
06/08/2019
1.04
1.09
24
06/89/20I9 -
06/I5/30I9
1.06
I.12
25
06/16/2019 -
06/22/2019
1.06
1.12
26
06/23/2019 -
06/29/2019
1.06
1.12
27
06/30/20I9 -
07/06/2019
1.06
1.12
28
07/07/2019 -
07/13/20I9
1.06
1.12
29
07/14/20I9 -
07/20/20I9
1.06
1.12
38
07/21/2019 -
07/27/20I9
I.05
1.11
31
07/28/20I9 -
08/03/2019
I.04
1.09
32
08/04/28I9 -
08/I0/2019
1.03
1.08
v]
08/II/20I9 -
88/I7/2019
1.02
1.07
08/18/2019 -
08/24/2019
I.02
1.07
\ j
08/35/20I9 -
08/3I/2019
I.03
I.08
36
09/01/20I9 -
09/07/2019
I.04
1.09
37
09/08/2019 -
09/14/2819
I.05
1.11
38
89/15/20I9 -
09/21/20I9
I.06
1.12
39
09/22/20I9 -
09/28/20I9
1.05
1.11
40
09/29/20I9 -
10/85/20I9
1.03
I.08
41
10/06/2019 -
I0/I2/20I9
I.02
I.07
42
10/I3/2019 -
I0/I9/20I9
1.01
1.06
43
18/20/20I9 -
I0/26/2019
1.01
1.06
44
10/27/2019 -
11/02/2019
1.01
1.06
45
I1/03/2019 -
II/09/20I9
1.02
1.07
46
I1/I0/2019 -
II/I6/2019
I.02
1.07
47
11/17/2019 -
I1/23/20I9
I.03
I.08
48
II/24/28I9 -
II/38/2019
1.83
1.88
49
12/01/20I9 -
I2/07/2019
1.84
1.09
50
12/08/2019 -
I2/I4/2019
I.04
1.09
51
12/15/20I9 -
I2/21/20I9
I.05
1.11
52
12/22/20I9 -
I2/28/20I9
1.04
I.09
53
12/29/20I9 -
12/31/20I9
1.02
1.07
14-FBB-2020 I5:39:29 830DPD 5 _ 77O0 _2KSEASO0.TXT
Appendix E
HCM Worksheets - Existing Conditions
1: Oak Drive &US17-92 20075 Lake MonmTowhomes
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
Lane Configurations
14
I
+
I
F
Traffic Vol, veh/h
820
2
3
388
5
8
Future Vol, veh/h
820
2
3
386
5
8
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
U
O
U
O
O
O
Sign Control
Free
Free
Free
Free
Stop
Stop
RT Channelized
-
None
-
None
-
None
Storage Length
'
'
230
'
150
O
VohinMedian Storage,
# O
-
-
O
O
-
Grade,Y6
O
-
-
O
O
-
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
91
91
92
92
Heavy Vehicles, Y6
2
2
2
2
2
2
MvmtFlmw
891
2
3
424
5
Q
Existing AM
Conflicting Flow All 0
0 893
0 1322
892
Stage -
^ ^
- 892
~
Stage -
- '
- 430
'
ChticaHdwv -
' 4.12
- 842
0,22
Critical HdwySto1 -
- '
' 5.42
'
Critical Hdwy082 -
- -
- 5.42
'
FVUow+upHdwY '
- 2.218
' 3.518
3.318
Pot Cop-1Maneuver '
- 758
- 173
341
Stage '
- -
- 400
-
Stage -
- -
- 056
-
Platoon blocked, Y6 -
-
-
MuvCap'1Maneuver '
- 759
- 172
341
MovCap'2Maneuver '
- -
- 172
'
Stage -
- '
- 400
-
Stage '
- -
- 853
'
HCM Control Delay, s 0
0.1
20
HCM LOS
C
Existing AM
HCM 6th TWSC
1: Oak Drive & US 17-92 20075 Lake Monroe Townhomes
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
Lane Configurations
T-3.
0 1854
570
Stage 1
- - -
F
Traffic Vol, veh/h
550
6
8
1011
3
5
Future Vol, veh/h
550
6
8
1011
3
5
Conflicting Peds, Or
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Free
Free
Free
Free
Stop
Stop
RT Channelized
-
Bone
-
None
-
None
Storage Length
-
-
230
-
150
0
Veh in Median Storage,
# 0
-
-
0
0
-
Grade, %
0
-
-
0
0
-
Peak Hour Factor
97
97
80
80
92
92
Heavy Vehicles, %
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
567
6
10
1264
3
5
Conflicting Flow All
0 0 573
0 1854
570
Stage 1
- - -
- 570
-
Stage 2
- - -
- 1284
-
Critical Hdwy
- - 4.12
- 6.42
6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
- - -
- 5.42
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
- -
- 5.42
Follow-up Hdwy
- - 2.218
- 3.518
3.318
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
- - 1000
- 81
521
Stage 1
- - -
- 566
-
Stage 2
- - -
- 260
-
Platoon blocked, %
- -
-
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
- - 1000
- 80
521
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
- -
- 80
-
Stage 1
- - -
- 566
-
Stage 2
- - -
- 257
-
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 27
HCM LOS D
Existing PM
Capacity (veh/h)
80
521
- - 1000 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.041
0.01
- - 0.01 -
HCM Control Delay (s)
51.9
12
- - 8.6 -
HCM Lane LOS
F
B
- - A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.1
0
- - 0 -
Existing PM
Appendix F
ITE Information Sheets
Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise)
(220)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 29
Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 168
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
7.32 4.45-10.97 1.31
Data Plot and Equation
5,00
4,00
C U 3,00
F-
2,00
1,00
X= Number of Dwelling Units
X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 7.56(X) - 40.86 R2= 0.96
X
0
x
0
0
x
X
X
X
X
0
x
XX
00 100
200
300
400
500
son
X= Number of Dwelling Units
X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 7.56(X) - 40.86 R2= 0.96
KA
Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise)
(220)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 42
Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 199
Directional Distribution: 23% entering, 77% eAting
Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
0.46 0.18-0.74 0.12
300
U)
"0
C:
W
.0- 200
®R
X
XX
X,
X
X x x
100 X X x x
XX
X�E x x x
X
0
F0_0
"96-5
X= Number of Dwelling Units
X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.96 Ln(X) - 0.51 W= 0.90
x
RAultifamily Housing (Low -Rise)
Avg
(220)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 50
Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 187
Directional Distribution: 63% entering, 37% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
0.56 0.18-1.25 0.16
Data Plot and Equation
400
C
W
.0.
;E 300
200
100
X
00 WI-XAV
X Ix
XX X
X X
X
91
MIS
X
X
X
X
X= Number of Dwelling Units
X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.89 Ln(X) - 0.02 W= 0.86
Appendix G
OUATS Model
36
12 2
2 .36
36
36
41,
"JJ,
L
rr
�iS
2
'3
6'
m
64 31
Not to scale
North
-th-
N VI\
q
k
J
+-.� � � j ...�_�� _'.! ' Jj, r l ,y. -i -
Legend:
I Lane per direction 4
7
2 Lanes per direction
3 Lanes per direction
4 Lanes per direction !)J
F
5+ Lanesper direction
ca,
Centroid Connector
I
MetroPtan Orlando 2040 LRTP Model - Lake Monroe Townhomes - P20075 - TAZ 231
Project Distribution - CF2030 OUATS Model - Seminole County
C:\FSUTMS\D5\OUATS,2040\Base\CF2030\P20075\Output\HRLDXY—c3O. NET (Thu 02 Jul 2020
, V171,
00
L
64 31
Not to scale
North
-th-
N VI\
q
k
J
+-.� � � j ...�_�� _'.! ' Jj, r l ,y. -i -
Legend:
I Lane per direction 4
7
2 Lanes per direction
3 Lanes per direction
4 Lanes per direction !)J
F
5+ Lanesper direction
ca,
Centroid Connector
I
MetroPtan Orlando 2040 LRTP Model - Lake Monroe Townhomes - P20075 - TAZ 231
Project Distribution - CF2030 OUATS Model - Seminole County
C:\FSUTMS\D5\OUATS,2040\Base\CF2030\P20075\Output\HRLDXY—c3O. NET (Thu 02 Jul 2020
Not to scale
North
-th-
M
Legend:
I Lane per direction
AA J
2 Lanes per direction
3 Lanes per direction
4 Lanes per direction
IF 5+ Lanes per direction
Centroid Connector
MetroPtan Orlando 2040 LRTP Model - Lake Monroe Townhomes - P20075 - TAZ 231
Project Distribution - CF2030 OUATS Model - Seminole County
C:\FSUTMS\D5\OUATS.2040\Base\CF2030\P20075\Output\HRLDXY—c3O. NET (Thu 02 Jut 2020
Or
rx
CIV
C\I X
2
"ZI
_0
<
CZ)CIV
36
ct,
i ir 21
2
1' 2 r4
2
2
Y"
j 1,
0
C, -1010i 71
i G S
Legend:
I Lane per direction
AA J
2 Lanes per direction
3 Lanes per direction
4 Lanes per direction
IF 5+ Lanes per direction
Centroid Connector
MetroPtan Orlando 2040 LRTP Model - Lake Monroe Townhomes - P20075 - TAZ 231
Project Distribution - CF2030 OUATS Model - Seminole County
C:\FSUTMS\D5\OUATS.2040\Base\CF2030\P20075\Output\HRLDXY—c3O. NET (Thu 02 Jut 2020
H
HCKV Appendix
HCM 6th TWSC
" Oak Drive& US 17-92
Int Delay, s/ve—h
am
0.3
PP,
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
849 4
Future Vol, veh/h
3 394 6 8
849
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
4 3 394 6 8
0
Sign Control
RT Channelized
0 0 0
Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
Storage Length
None "None -None
Veh in Median Storage,
- 230 - 150 0
# o
Grade, %
-
0 0 0
Peak Hour Factor0
0 '
92 92
Heavy Vehicles, %
91 91 92 92
2
Mvmt Flow
2 2 2 2 2
923 4
3 433 7 9
Conflicting Flow A'1'1"
Stage 1
0 927 0 1364 92 5
Stage 2-
925 -
Critical Hdwy
- 439
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
4.12 . 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy stg 2
- - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy
- 5.42 -
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
.
2218 - 3.518 3.318
Stage 1
737 - 163 326
Stage 2
- 386 -
Platoon blocked, %
- 650 -
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
737 - 162 326
Stage 1
- 162 -
Stage 2-
386 -
- 647 -
HCM Control Delay, s 0 110. 1 1"
HCM LOS 21.4
C
Capacity (veh/h)
162
'W
HCM Lane WC Ratio004
.
326
0.027
737 -
HCM Control Delay (s)
28.2
16.3
0.004 -
HCM Lane LOS
9.9
HCM 95th We Q(veh)
D
0.1A
C
0.1
0
2400750 Lake Monroe Townhomes
Projected AM
HCM 6th TWSC
1: Oak Drive & US 17-92
Int Delay, s/veh�o
.3
Lane Configurations
T
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
Traffic Vol, veh/h
567
8 8
1040 5
Future Vol, veh/h
567
8 8
5
1040 5
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
0
0 0
5
Sign Control
RT Channelized
Free
Free Free
0 0
Free Stop Stop
Storage Length
None -
None 'None
Veh in Median Storage,
# 0
- 230
- 150 0
Grade, %
0
0 0
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
97
97 80
0
80 92 92
Mvmt Flow
2
585
2 2
8 10
2 2
1300 5
5
""
ConflictingFlow Al`l0
Stage
age I
593
p 1909 589
Stage 2
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
12
6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy
Pot Cap -I Maneuver
- 2.218
5.42
- 3.518 3.318
Stage I
. 983
- 75 508
Stage 2
-
- 554-
Platoon blocked, %
- 250 -
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
983
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
- 74 508
Stage I
-
- 74 -
Stage 2
-
- 554 -
-
- 248 -
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0. 1 34.8'
HCM LOS
D
Capacity (veh1h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
74
0.073
5'0'8'
0.011
983
HCM Control Delay (s)
57.5
12.2
0.01
HCM Lane LOS
8.7
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
F
0.2
B
0
A
0
9A07C I i- .,
- -0r%,6 mut irue i ownhomes
Projected PM
HCM 6th TWSC
2:
EEPj2ct Access & US 17-g7
Int Delay, s/veh - —0.9
Lane Configurations
T4
Y14111'11�'�M�11' AF-I'Ll
I +
Traffic Vol, veh/h
824
5 8
Y
392 16 29
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
824
5 8
392 16 29
Sign Control
RT Channelized
0
Free
0 0
Free Free
0 0 0
Free Stop Stop
Storage Length
None -
None -None
Veh in Median Storage,
# 0
- 180
- 0
Grade, %
0
- -
0 0
Peak Hour Factor
92
92 92
0
92 92
Heavy Vehicles, %
2
2 2
92
2
Mvmt Flow
896
5 9
2
426 17 32
Conflicting Flow All
0 901
0 1343 899
Stage 1
Stage 2
- -
- 899
Critical Hdwy
-
- 444
Critical Hdwy Stg I
4.12
- 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
-
- 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
2.218
- 5.42
- 3.518 -
3.318
Stage I
754
- 168 338
Stage 2
-
- 397 -
Platoon blocked, %
-
- 646 -
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
754
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
166 338
Stage I
-
166 -
Stage 2
- 397 -
- 638 -
H
-4140 CM Control Delay, S 0
HCM LOS 11 0,2' . ...... 23.1
C
Capacity (veh/h)
— 24 1 7
1
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.198
7 54'
HCM Control Delay (s)
23.1
0.012
HCM Lane LOS
C
HCM 95th %file Q(veh)
0.7
0
,)nn7CZ I -G- IIA_._..
-
--- -- 1, ut; 1 uvvf inomes
Projected AM
HCM 6th TWSC
2: Proiect Access P. US 17-92
2On7l; I L -o AA,-- �- ......
1-11— .."1111VIIJUIj
----------- —
Int Delay, s/veh
Lane Configurations
4
Traffic Vol, veh/h
557
16 29
1016 9
18
Future Vol, veh/h
557
16 29
1016 9
18
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
0
0 0
0
Sign Control
RT Channelized
Free
Free Free
0
Free Stop
0
Stop
Storage Length
None -
None -
None
Veh in Median Storage,
# 0
- 180
- 0
Grade, %
0
- -
0 0
0
Peak Hour Factor
92
92 92
0
92 92
92
Heavy Vehicles, %
2
2 2
2 2
Mvmt Flow
605
17 32
1104 10
2
20
a or"If" allor
Conflicting Flow All
0
0 622
0 1782
614
Stage I
-
Stage 2
-
- 614
Critical Hdwy
-
4,12
. 1168
. 6.42
-
6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg I
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
-
5.42
-
Follow-up Hdwy
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
-
- 2.218
5.42
1518 3.318
-
Stage 1
- 959
90
492
Stage 2
540
Platoon blocked, %
296
-
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
959
87
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
492
Stage 1
-
87
-
Stage 2
540
286
HCM Control Delay, s0 I "I I " 11 71z.� 11 -1 �
HCM LOS 0.2 27
D
Capacity (veh/h) 193 959
g
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.152 - 0.033
HCM Control Delay (s) 27 - 8.9
HCM Lane LOS D A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 01
Projected PM
Project No. 20075
Intersect- take Alonroe Tawnhornes
coon Volumes
z849 82D + 1 849
� 4-2+{21 �4-�_
33
7 394 386 + {1} + (7)
0 394
0 65+11)=6
0
0 0
0 0
0
0 824 822 +{2} c 824
-5) L
8 (8)
0
0 392 391 +{1} 392
0
16` 16 06) _ --
0 0
29 29(29)
0 0
0 0
Project No. 20075 Lake Monroe Townhomes
Intersection Volumes
0 o -----------
16 567 550 + (l) + (16) = 567
2 --8 6 + (2) = 8
0 8
27 1040 loll + {2} + (27) = 1040
0 0 --
2 53+(2)=5
0 0
0 55
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0 -
0
557556+{1}=557
6
16 06)
.0
29 (29)
0
10161014+(2)=1016
0 --0
9
9 -(9)
0
0
18 ---18
(18)
0
0
0
0
0
0
Project No. 20075 sake Monroe Townhomes
�Intersection Volumes
0
0
16
567 550 + (1) + (16) = 567
2
86+(2)=8
0
88
27
1040 1011 + (2) + (27) = 1040
0
0
2
53+(2)=5
0
0
0
55
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 _ _-"" '---
0
557 556 + (1) = 557
16
16 (16)
29
29 (29)
0
10161014+{2)=1016
0
0
9
9 (0)
0
0
18 --18(18)
0
0
0
0
0
0
Appendix I
NCHRP Report
0
11
-21
0
E
3
CD
ZB
0 Volume (VO), veh/h
&-:I:, -,j co
C:) -0 0 CD
- CD C 0 CD 0 0
F
C:
3
G)
0
0
-0
>
r-
3
C:
--i
-
CI
<
5
T
0
M
0.
0
o
<
< 0
<
0
zE
CL
M3
3
r -
0
(a
CD
z
cn
O<
—<
>
z
<
CD
<
0
to
CD
CD
C/)
>
<
<
W
(D
M
CD
=r
cr
CL
(D
M
0
ciro
CL
Al
0
11
-21
0
E
3
CD
ZB
0 Volume (VO), veh/h
&-:I:, -,j co
C:) -0 0 CD
- CD C 0 CD 0 0
F
C:
3
w
0
ro
Right -Turn Volume, veh/h
N) -P+07 co 0 NN0 0 a CD 0 0 0 0
O
O
CD
CD
O0
7
X
0
CL
0
F
E3 co
M 0
— 0
0
(D
CL
0
0
0
CD
0
I
CD
p -0g:
;T,g ' 0
--i CD
G 0
—
> ID
0
0
U) :3
rt 0
3
CD
En
Appendix J
Exhibit 212-1
tan
b twit
4 N
0 uwi
"4 ro b
n
4c�
tNi�
c
O
t
O H
D a
�° a
y
twig
Y
mon
O
tan
O 4
4Air VNi
Umi
� � �
°
n p m
Y
A
O
ro a
z Z
o`
b
Y �
2 2
r
G
N
\
m
a
m
" a rao tea'
CV.
4 to
to
2�
T
h
J
rn
-- 4
2 Y
a
�
d
n
z
m
mroc-
Rrj
^i
r
rn
"i
DO
c
x
z
Z
h
n
rn
m
n'
rt,
(A
m
m
� ry
by
m
ti a
c
ry
a
A
A o 0
O
3
—
V
3 ea
— � a
ay
om
zo
ry 40
� N)
a
N
m
tan
b twit
4 N
0 uwi
"4 ro b
4c�
tNi�
N o
O
t
O H
D a
�° a
twig
mon
O
tan
O 4
4Air VNi
Umi
� � �
°
n p m
Y
A
O
ro a
z Z
o`
b
Y �
2 2
r
G
m
4
4 to
to
-- 4
2 Y
O � 2
n
APPENDIX G
Environmental Assessment Report
Townes at Lake Monroe Page 131
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 15, 2021
Blo-,it ch 00 nsfii'i/ III it ine"!
Environmental and Permitting Services
April 1, 2020
Matt Young
Beazer Homes, LLC
151 Southhall Lane; Suite #200
Maitland, Florida 32751
Proj: Lake Monroe Townhomes — Seminole County, Florida
Section 23, Township 19 South, Range 30 East
(BTC File #230-72)
Re: Environmental Assessment Report
Dear Mr. Young:
During March of 2020, Bio -Tech Consulting, Inc. (BTC) conducted an
environmental assessment of the approximately 21.51 -acre Lake Monroe
Townhomes project site. This site is located on the south side of W. Seminole
Boulevard, just south of Lake Monroe; within Section 23, Township 19 South,
Range 30 East in Seminole County, Florida (Figures 1, 2 & 3). This
environmental assessment included the following elements:
• Review of soil types mapped within the site boundaries;
• Evaluation of land use types/vegetative communities present;
• Field review for occurrence of protected flora and fauna;
• Delineation of on-site wetland communities; and,
• Environmental constraints.
According to the Soil Survey of Seminole County, Florida, prepared by the
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resource Conservation
Service (MRCS), seven (7) soil types exist within the subject site (Figure 4).
These soil types include the following:
Orlando Vero Beach lacksonville Tamna KPV West
Matt Young,- Beazer Homes, LLC
Lake Monroe Townhomes; Seminole County, FL (BTC File #230-72)
Environmental Assessment Report
Page 2ofl] -
• Adarnsville-Sparr fine sand (#2)
• Arents, 0 to 5 percent slopes (#3)
• Basinger and Delray fine sands (#9)
• Basinger, Samsula and Hontoon soils, depressional (#10)
• EauGallie and Immokalee fine sands (#13)
• Felda and Manatee mucky fine sands (#15)
• Myakka and EauGallie fine sands (#20)
The following presents a brief description of each soil type mapped for the subject site:
Adamsville-Sparr fine sand (#2) is a nearly level, somewhat poorly drained soils on low ridges
on the uplands and low knolls on the flatwoods. Typically the surface layer of this soil type is
grayish brown fine sand about 4 inches thick. In most years, the seasonal high water table for this
soil type is at a depth of 12 to 36 inches for up to 6 months. The permeability of Adamsville soil
is rapid. The permeability of Sparr soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and is slow or
moderately slow in the subsoil.
Arents, 0 to 5 percent slopes (43) consists of material dug from several areas that have different
kinds of soils. This fill material is the result of earthmoving operations. This material is used to
fill such areas as sloughs, marshes, shallow depressions, swamps and other low-lying areas above
their natural ground levels, for use in land leveling operations, or as a final cover for sanitary
landfills. Typically the surface layer of this soil type is 30 to 50 inches thick. It is very dark gray,
dark gray, dark grayish brown, and yellowish brown fine sand or sand mixed with discontinuous
strata of grayish brown and light brownish gray loamy material. The high water table for this soil
type varies with the amount of fill material and artificial drainage within any mapped area. In
most years, the high water table is at a depth of 24 to 36 inches for 2 to 4 months. During extended
dry periods, a high water table is not within 5 feet of the surface. The permeability of this soil type
is moderately rapid or rapid.
Basinger and Delray fine sands (#9) are nearly level, poorly drained soils and very poorly drained
soils found in sloughs and poorly defined drainageways. Typically the surface layer of Basinger
soil consists of very dark gray fine sand about 5 inches thick. Typically the surface layer of Delray
soil consists of black fine sand about 12 inches thick. During most years the seasonal high table
for this soil type is within 12 inches of the surface for 6 months or more. The permeability of
Basinger soil is rapid. The permeability of Delray soil is rapid in the upper part and moderate in
the lower part.
Matt Young; Beazer Hames, LLC
Lake Monroe Townhoines; Seminole County, FL (BTC File #230-72)
Environmental Assessment Report
Page 3 of 11
Basinger, Samsula and Hontoon soils, depressional (#10) are nearly level, very poorly drained
soils found in swamps and depressions. Typically, the surface layer of Basinger soil consists of
very dark gray mucky fine sand about 6 inches thick. Typically, the surface layer of Samsula soil
is muck about 30 inches thick. Typically, the surface layer of Hontoon soil consists of dark reddish
brown muck about 18 inches thick. During most years, the undrained areas of the soils in this map
unit are ponded for 6 to 9 months or more. The permeability of this soil unit is rapid.
EauGallie and Immokalee fine sands (#13) are nearly level, poorly drained soils on broad plains
on the flatwoods. During most years, the soils in this map unit have a seasonal high water table
within 12 inches of the surface for I to 4 months. The permeability of EauGallie soil is rapid in
the surface and subsurface layers, moderate or moderately rapid in the sandy part of the subsoil,
and moderately slow in the loamy part of the subsoil. The permeability of Immokalee soil is rapid
in the surface and subsurface layers and moderate in the subsoil.
Felda and Manatee mucky fine sands (#15) are nearly level, very poorly drained soils found in
depressions. Typically, Felda soil has a surface layer of very dark grayish brown mucky fine sand
about 4 inches thick. Typically, Manatee soil has a surface layer that is 19 inches thick. It is black
mucky fine sand in the upper part and very dark gray loamy sand in the lower part. During most
years, undrained areas of the soils in this map unit are ponded for 6 to 9 months or more each year.
The permeability of Felda soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and in the substratum,
and is moderate or moderately rapid in the subsoil. The permeability of Manatee soil is moderately
rapid in the surface layer and moderate in the subsoil.
Myakka and EauGallie fine sands (#20) are nearly level, poorly drained soils found on broad
plains on the flatwoods. Typically, the surface layer of Myakka soil consists of black fine sand
about 5 inches thick. Typically, the surface layer of EauGallie soil consists of dark gray fine sand
about 5 inches thick. During most years the seasonal high table for this soil type is within 12
inches of the surface for I to 4 months. The permeability of Myakka soil is rapid in the surface
and subsurface layers and in the substratum and moderate or moderately rapid in the subsoil. The
permeability of EauGallie soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers, moderate or moderately
rapid in the sandy part of the subsoil and moderately slow in the loamy part of the subsoil.
The Florida Association of Environmental Soil Scientists (FAESS) considers the main components
of Basinger and Delray fine sands (#9), Basinger, Samsula and Hontoon soils, depressional (#10),
and Felda and Manatee mucky fine sands (#15) to be hydric. The FAESS also considers inclusions
present within EauGallie and Immokalee fine sands (#13) and Myakka and EauGallie fine sands
(#20) to be hydric. This information can be found in the Hydric Soils of Florida Handbook, Third
Edition, March 2000.
VRIO-TOICII Call -suiting Inc.
IEtn•irotxmental and Permitting Set -vices
Matt Young,, Beazer Homes, LLC
Lake Monroe Townhoines, Seminole County, FL (BTC File #230-72)
Environmental Assessment Report
Page 4 of 11
LAND USE TYPESNEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES
The Lake Monroe Townhomes project site currently supports five (5) land use types/vegetative
communities. These land use types/vegetative communities were identified utilizing the Florida
Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System, Level III (FLUCFCS, FDOT, January 2004)
(Figure 5). The on-site upland land use types/vegetative communities are classified as Temperate
Hardwoods (425) and Disturbed Lands (740). The on-site wetland/surface water land use
types/vegetative communities are classified as Cypress (621), Wetland Forested Mixed (630), and
Vegetated Non -Forested Wetlands (640). The following provides a brief description of the on-site
land use types/vegetative communities:
Uplands:
425 Temperate Hardwoods
The southern portion of the project site is comprised of forested uplands which are best classified
as Temperate Hardwoods (425), per the FLUCFCS. Vegetation identified within this area includes
camphortree (Cinnamomum camphora), live oak (Quercus virginiana), red cedar (Juniperus
virginiana), slash pine (Pinus elliottii), American elm (Ulmus americana), cabbage palm (Sabal
palmetto), American beautyberry (Callicarpa Americana), brackenfern (Pteridium aquilinum),
poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia), elderberry
(Sambucus nigra), elephant ears (Colocasia esculenta), caesarweed (Urena lobata), geenbrier
(Smilax spp.), St.- Augustinegrass (Stenotaphrum secundatum), lantana (Lantana strigocamara),
common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) and tuberous sword fern (Nephrolepis cordifolia).
740 Disturbed Lands
The northeast comer of the site contains a construction staging area with temporary trailer offices
and construction materials. This area is best classified as Disturbed Lands (740), per the
FLUCFCS. Vegetative species observed within this conmiunity consists of cabbage palm (Sabal
palmetto), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia),
Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense), saltbush (Atriplex pentandra), American pokeweed
(Phytolacca americana) and various herbaceous weed species.
810 -Te- Ch Paorisuffing Inc.
--d Pcrmitting Services
Matt Young; Beazer Homes, LLC
Lake Monroe Townhonzes; Seminole County, FL (BTC File #230-72)
Environmental Assessment Report
Page 5 of 11
Wetlands/Surface Waters:
621 Cypress
A cypress dominated wetland system exists in the northwest comer of the property and is best
classified as Cypress (621), per the FLUCFCS. Vegetative species observed within this
community include bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), American elm (Uhnus a►nericana),
sweetgum (Liquidambar styraefflua), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), red maple (Acer rubrum),
royal fern (Osmunda regalis) and marsh pennywort (Hydrocotyle umbellata).
630 Wetland Forested Mixed
There is a transition from the cypress -dominated forested wetland into a mixed forested wetland
between the uplands to the south and cypress wetlands along the northern boundary. This land use
type/vegetative community would be classified as Wetland Forested Mixed (630), per the
FLUCFCS. Vegetative species observed within this community include American elm (Ulmus
americana), sweetgum (Liquidambar solraciflua), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), red maple
(Acer rubrum), royal fern (Osmunda regalis), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), elderberry
(Sambucus nigra) and marsh pennywort (Hydrocotyle umbellata).
640 Vegetated Non -Forested Wetlands
There is an area void of canopy species surrounded by the cypress wetland located in the north
portion of the site. This land use/vegetative community would be classified as Vegetated Non -
Forested Wetland (640), per the FLUCFCS. Vegetative species observed within these wetlands
include royal fern (Osmunda regalis), water lettuce (Pistia stratoites), common water hyacinth
(Eichhornia crassipes), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), elderberry (Samhticits nigra),
centella (Centella asiatica), nutsedge (Cyperus spp.), duckweed (Lemma valdiviana), marsh
pennywort (Hydrocotyle umbellata) and Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana).
All wetlands within the limits of the subject site have been field delineated using pink "Bio -Tech
Consulting" flagging tape.
Utilizing methodologies outlined in the Florida's Fragile Wildlife (Wood, 2001); Measuring and
Monitoring Biological Diversity Standard Methods for Mammals (Wilson, et al., 1996); and
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FFWCC) Gopher Tortoise Permitting
Guidelines (April 2008 - revised May 2017), an assessment for "listed" floral and faunal species
occurring within the subject site boundaries was conducted on March 16, 2020. The survey, which
Rio -Tech Consullinu Inc.
1--nviroutmental and Permitting Services
Matt Young; Beazer Homes, LLC
Lake Monroe Townhomes; Seminole County, FL (BTC File #230-72)
Environmental Assessment Report
Page d o, f l 1
covered the majority of the subject site's developable area, included both direct observations and
indirect evidence, such as tracks, burrows, tree markings and vocalizations that indicated the
presence of species observed. The assessment focused on species that are "listed" by the FFWCC's
Oficial Lists - Florida's Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern
(December 2018) that have the potential to occur in Seminole County (see attached Table 1).
No plant species listed as "Threatened" or "Endangered" by either the Florida Department of
Agriculture (FDA) or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) was identified on the project site
during the assessment conducted. However, one (1) fern species was identified that is listed as
"commercially exploited" by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
(FDACS). The harvesting of this species, royal fern (Osmunda regalis), for commercial gain, is
not allowed. However, the listing of this species poses no restrictions towards the development of
the subject site. The following is a list of those wildlife species identified during the evaluation of
the site:
Reptiles and Amphibians
American Bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus)
brown anole (1Norops sagrei)
eastern racer (Coluber constrictor)
Florida leopard frog (Lithobates sphenocephalus sphenocephalus)
green anole (Anolis carolinensis)
Birds
American Crow (Corvus cattrinus)
Black Vulture (Coragyps atratits)
Mouming Dove (Zenaida macroura)
Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis)
Mammals
eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus)
eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis)
nine -banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus)
None of the above wildlife species, were identified in the FFWCC's Official Lists - Florida's
Endangered red Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern (December 2018). The
following provides a brief description of wildlife species as they relate to the development of the
site.
A RIO-TeCh 1101 111C.
&Ern-ironmetital and Permitting Services
Matt Young; Beazer Homes, LLC
Lake Monroe Townhoines, Seminole County, FL (BTC File #230-72)
Environmental Assessment Report
Page 7 of I I
Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
State protected by F.A.C. 68A-16.00.2 and federally protected by both the Migratory Bird Treaty
Act (1918) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (1940)
In August of 2007, the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) removed the Bald Eagle from the
list of federally endangered and threatened species. Additionally, the Bald Eagle was removed
from FFWCCs imperiled species list in April of 2008. Although the Bald Eagle is no longer
protected under the Endangered Species Act, it is still protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and FFWCC's Bald Eagle rule (Florida
Administrative Code 68A-16.002 Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus Leuchocephalus).
In May of 2007, the USFWS issued the National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines. In April of
2008, the FFWCC adopted a new Bald Eagle Management Plan that was written to closely follow
the federal guidelines. In November of 2017, the FFWCC issued "A Species Action Plan for the
Bald Eagle" in response to the sunset of the 2008 Bald Eagle Management Plan. Under the
USFWS's management plans, buffer zones are recommended based on the nature and magnitude
of the project or activity. The recommended protective buffer zone is 660 feet or less from the
nest tree, depending on what activities or structures are already near the nest. As provided within
the above referenced Species Action Plan, the USFWS is the regulating body responsible for
issuing permits for Bald Eagles. In 2017, the need to obtain a State permit (FFWCC) for the take
of Bald Eagles or their nests in Florida was eliminated following revisions to Rule 68A-16.002,
F.A.C.. A USFWS Bald Eagle "Non -Purposeful Take Pen -nit" is not needed for any activity
occurring outside of the 660 -foot buffer zone. No activities are permitted within 330 feet of a nest
without a USFWS permit.
In addition to the on-site evaluation for "listed" species, BTC conducted a review for any Audubon
EagleWatch and FFWCC recorded Bald Eagle nests on or within the vicinity of the project site.
This review revealed that there are no Bald Eagle nests through the 2018-2019 nesting season,
within 660 -feet of the Lake Monroe Townhome project site. Thus, no developmental constraints
are expected with respect to Bald Eagle nests.
Wood Stork (Myeteria Americana)
Federally Listed as "Threatened" by USFWS
It should also be noted that the subject site is shown to be located within a Wood Stork Nesting
Colony Core Foraging Area (see Figure 6). The Wood Stork (MycteriaAmericana) is listed as
"Endangered" by both the FFWCC and the USFWS. Wood storks are large, long-legged wading
birds, about 45 inches tall, with a wingspan of 60 to 65 inches. Their plumage is white except for
black primaries and secondaries and a short black tail. The head and neck are largely unfeathered
and dark gray in color. The bill is black, thick at the base, and slightly decurved. Wood Storks
Rio-recit consuiting inc.
Etivir-imenual and Permitting Service,,,
Matt Young; Beazer• Homes, LLC
Lake Monroe Townhoines; Seminole County, FL (BTC File #230-72)
Environmental Assessment Report
Page 8 of 11
are birds of freshwater and estuarine wetlands, primarily nesting in cypress or mangrove swamps.
They feed in freshwater marshes, narrow tidal creeks, or flooded tidal pools as well as roadside
ditches. Particularly attractive feeding sites are depressions in marshes or swamps where fish
become concentrated during periods of falling water levels.
Based on our review of available databases, there is no record of a Wood Stork rookery on the
project site or within close proximity. The USFWS and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USAGE) require that any impacts to on-site ditches and/or wetlands, which would eliminate a
portion of the wood stork foraging habitat, be either mitigated through the purchase of mitigation
credits or recreated elsewhere on-site so that there would be no net loss of wood stork foraging
habitat. Thus, no further action will be required prior to site development related to Wood Storks
unless wetland/surface water impacts are anticipated.
USFWS CONSULTATION AREAS
The USFWS has established "consultation areas" for certain listed species. Generally, these
consultation areas only become an issue if USFWS consultation is required, which is usually
associated with pennitting through the USAGE. The reader should be aware that species presence
and need for additional review are often determined to be unnecessary early in the permit review
process due to lack of appropriate habitat or other conditions. However, the USFWS makes the
final determination.
Consultation areas are typically very regional in size, often spanning multiple counties where the
species in question is known to exist. Consultation areas by themselves do not indicate the
presence of a listed species. They only indicate an area where there is a potential for a listed
species to occur and that additional review might be necessary to confirm or rule -out the presence
of the species. The additional review typically includes the application of species-specific criteria
to rule -out or confirm the presence of the species in question. Such criteria might consist of a
simple review for critical habitat types. In other cases, the review might include the need for
species-specific surveys using established methodologies that have been approved by the USFWS.
The following paragraphs include a list of the USFWS Consultation Areas associated with the
subject site. Also included, is a brief description of the respective species habitat and potential for
additional review:
Big-Temch COFIS HIting Inc.
Esivironmental and Permitting Services
Matt Young,- Beazer Homes, LLC
Lake Monroe Townhomes; Seminole County, FL (BTC File #230-72)
Environmental Assessment Report
Page 9 of 11
West Indian Manatee (Trichechus manatus)
Federally Listed as "Endangered " by USFWS
The subject site falls within the USFWS Consultation Area for the West Indian manatee. Currently
the West Indian manatee is listed as "Endangered" by the USFWS. Manatees are protected under
the Marine Mammal Protection Act, which prohibits the take (i.e., harass, hunt, capture, or kill) of
all marine mammals. Manatees are found in marine, estuarine and freshwater environments. The
West Indian manatee (Trichechus inanatus), includes two distinct subspecies, the Florida manatee
(Trichechus manatus latirostris) and the Antillean manatee (Trichechus nianatus nianatus). While
morphologically distinctive, both subspecies have many common features. Manatees have large,
seal -shaped bodies with paired flippers and a round, paddle -shaped tail. They are typically grey
in color (color can range from black to light brown) and occasionally spotted with barnacles or
colored by patches of green or red algae. The muzzle is heavily whiskered and coarse, single hairs
are sparsely distributed throughout the body. Adult manatees, on average, are about nine feet long
(3 meters) and weigh about 1,000 pounds (200 kilograms). At birth, calves are between three and
four feet long (I meter) and weigh between 40 and 60 pounds (30 kilograms).
No West Indian manatees were observed within the subject site during the wildlife survey
conducted by BTC. Although the subject site is in close proximity to Lake Monroe, which is
utilized by the West Indian manatee, no wetland/surface impacts to this water body are anticipated.
Thus, no suitable habitat for this species will be eliminated and no further action should be required
pertaining to West Indian manatees.
Florida Scrub -Jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens)
Federallv Listed as "Threatened "by USFWS
I
Currently the Florida Scrub -Jay is listed as threatened by the USFWS. Florida Scrub Jays are
largely restricted to scattered, often small and isolated patches of sand pine scrub, xeric oak,
scrubby flatwoods, and scrubby coastal stands in peninsular Florida (Woolfenden 1978a,
Fitzpatrick et al. 1991). They avoid wetlands and forests, including canopied sand pine stands.
Optimal Scrub -Jay habitat is dominated by shrubby scrub, live oaks, myrtle oaks, or scrub oaks
from I to 3 in (3 to 10 ft.) tall, covering 50% to 90 % of the area; bare ground or sparse vegetation
less than 15 cm (6 in) tall covering 10% to 50% of the area; and scattered trees with no more than
20% canopy cover (Fitzpatrick et al. 1991).
No Florida Scrub -Jays were observed on the project site during the cursory survey conducted by
BTC. As no suitable habitat exists within the limits of the site, it is not anticipated that a fon-nal
survey would be required by the USFWS or another agency to determine if any Florida Scrub -Jays
utilize any portions of the site.
B010 -Tech Consulting 111C.
1-invironmental and Permitting Services
Malt Young; Beazer Horner, LLC
Lake Monroe Townhoines; Seminole County, FL (BTC File #230-72)
Environmental Assessment Report
Page 10 of 11
Everglade Snail Kite (Rostritamus sociabilis)
Federally Listed as "Endangered "by USFWS
The subject site falls within the USFWS Consultation Area for the Everglade Snail Kite. Currently
the Everglade Snail Kite is listed as "Endangered" by the USFWS. Everglade Snail Kites are
similar in size to Red -shouldered Hawks. All Everglade Snail Kites have deep red eyes and a
white rump patch. Males are slate gray, and females and juveniles vary in amounts of white, light
brown, and dark brown, but the females always have white on their chin. Everglade Snail Kites
vocalize mainly during courtship and nesting. They may occur in nearly all of the wetlands of
central and southern Florida. They regularly occur in lake shallows along the shores and islands
of many major lakes, including Lakes Okeechobee, Kissimmee, Tohopekaliga (Toho) and East
Toho. They also regularly occur in the expansive marshes of southern Florida such as Water
Conservation Areas 1, 2, and 3, Everglades National Park, the upper St. John's River marshes and
Grassy Waters Preserve.
Although a portion of the project site contains wetlands/surface waters, no Everglade Snail Kites
were observed within the site during the wildlife survey conducted by BTC. As no suitable habitat
exists within the limits of the site, it is not anticipated that a formal survey would be required by
the USFWS or another agency to determine if any Everglade Snail Kites utilize any portions of
the site.
Permitting through Seminole County, the St. Johns Water Management District (SJRWMD) and
the USACE would be required to develop the project site. The site resides in the St. Johns River
(Canaveral Marshes to Wekiva) drainage basin. The wetland limits delineated in Figure 7 have
not been reviewed or approved by any regulatory agencies.
St. Johns River Water Management District
An Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) will be required through the SJRWMD for all wetland
and/or other surface water impacts (both direct and secondary) in association with the proposed
development plan. Impacts to the project's wetland and/or other surface water communities would
be permittable by SJRWMD as long as the issues of elimination and reduction of wetland impacts
have been addressed and as long as the mitigation offered is sufficient to offset the functional
losses incurred via the proposed impacts.
Rlo'Tec h Consulting Inc.
Environmental and Perntitting Service%
Matt Young; Beazer Homes, LLC
Lake Monroe Townhoines; Seminole Coun4FL (BTC File #230-72)
Environmental Assessment Report
Page 11 of 11
United States Army Corps of Engineers
A Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404 Permit may also be required for the project's
wetland/surface water impacts by the USACE as the on-site wetlands are directly connected to
Lake Monroe. As the ERP is no longer ajoint application between the SJRWMD and the USACE,
the Corps will not be notified/copied upon submittal of the ERP application to the District. As
with the District, it is anticipated that all impacts to the project's wetlands communities would be
pern-iittable by the USACE as long as the issues of elimination and reduction of wetland impacts
have been addressed and as long as the mitigation offered is sufficient to offset the functional
losses incurred via the proposed impacts.
The environmental limitations described in this document are based on observations and technical
information available on the date of the on-site evaluation. This report is for general planning
purposes only. The limits of any on-site wetlands/surface waters can only be determined and
verified through field delineation and/or on-site review by the pertinent regulatory agencies. The
wildlife surveys conducted within the subject property boundaries do not preclude the potential
for any listed species, as noted on Table 1 (attached), currently or in the future. Should you have
any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact our office at
(407) 894-5969. Thank you.
Attachments
Regards,
David Holly
Project Manager
1 Rio -Tech Consulting Inc.
1--rivironmcmal and Permitting Services
Rio-Iffieli Consulting Im
1 tivironmental :until Pe rYrittil?g Services
Legend
02 Lake Monroe Townhornes Site
Vt
Em
J
%
Z
Lake Mary Sources: Esri, HERE, Garrnin,IUSGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri
Japan, METI, Esri China (Hongkong),
, Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c)
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Lake Monroe Townhomes Site N Miles
flic-Te.,ch @101"Isuffing Inc. Seminole County, Florida Project #:
Environmental and Permitting Services Figure 1 < E
3025 E. South Street Orlando, FL 32803 Produced By: JDH
Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970 s
mvw.bio-techconsulting.corn Location Map Date: 2/27/2020
Ific..'rech Poe, I'll, s", tuffin g file,,
L Environmental and Permitting Services
3025 E. South Street Orlando, FL 32803
Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970
mvw. bio-techconsulting. corn
Legend
Lake Monroe Townhomes Site (± 21.51 Ac.)
Lake Monroe Townhomes Site
Seminole County, Florida
Figure 2
2018 Aerial Map
300
N
Feet
w E Project #:
S Produced By: JDH
Date: 2/27/2020
Legend
Lake Monroe Townhomes Site
dd r ^
s
s
a
e
-4010
" 0
� n ^
W
00
01
.w
�lv
/ O
y
lA '"' �f,,.er
1�
�
0 J 6,
r
VA
OR
t it ;4 0 �� ■
aJ ,e
71JJl%M/I1��7/r
f nr s
Ai
y m�
t �� an a ue
f '4 lG %r a �a "
yM.
i Lake Monroe Townhomes Site N 1 1000
i
-' e nsuffing [IfIcl. Seminole County, Florida � Feet
Environmental and Permitting Services w E Project #:
3025 E. South Street Orlando, FL 32803 Figure 3 Produced B DH
Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970 Six 5 Topographic Ma s Y:
VAWi.bio-techconsulting.comp Date: 2/27/2020
Ir
If RI" 1"I - Teperf"I (Y"I'll"Isulfifiel, Ific".
Environmental and Permiffing'Services
3025 E. South Street Orlando, FL 32803
Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970
v✓Nwbio-techconsulting.corn
Legend
?=--fl
Lake Monroe Townhomes Site
Seminole County Soils
2: Adamsville-Sparr fine sands
3: Arents, 0 to 5 percent slopes
9: Basinger and Delray fine sands
10: Basinger, Samsula, and Hontoon soils, depressional
13: EauGallie and Immokalee fine sands
15: Felda and Manatee mucky fine sands, depressional
20: Myakka and EauGallie fine sands
Lake Monroe Townhomes Site
Seminole County, Florida
Figure 4
SSURGO Soils Map
300
N Feet
w E Project #:
Produced By: JDH
s Date: 2/27/2020
qs�
Legend
TMOC;1
Lake Monroe Townhomes Site
425, Temperate Hardwoods
621, Cypress
630, Wetland Forested Mixed
640, Vegetated Non -Forested Wetlands
740, Disturbed Lands
I
Lake Monroe Townhomes Site N 280
I I Feet
Rio-'Fecti (1,1011'sulfing I'lle, Seminole County, Florida vv_(� Project #: 230-72
Environm'ontal and Permitting Services E
3025 E. South Street Orlando, FL 32803 Figure 5 Produced By: DPH
Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970 s
mvw.bio-techconsulting.com FLUCFCS Map Date: 3/16/2020
. .... .. ..
01
Rio-'rel,ch consuffing Inc.
Environmental and Permitting Services
3025 E. South Street Orlando, FL 32803
Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970
vAm. bio-techconsulting. com
Legend
k3 G�C1C
Q30r,A Lake Monroe Townhomes Site
Audubon Eaglewatch Permanent 10
330 ft. Eagle Nest Buffer
Lake Monroe Townhomes Site
Seminole County, Florida
Figure 6
Wildlife Review Map
660 ft. Eagle Nest Buffer
Bear Nuisance: 1980-2009
Wood Stork Nesting Colony Core Foraging Areas
620
N I Feet
WE Project #: 230-72
-<�— Produced By: DPH
s Date: 4/1/2020
1'1)." Tech Consulting Inc.
["' i
E vironmental and Permitting Services
3025 E. South Street Orlando, FL 32803
Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970
vpmv.bio-techconsulting.corn
Lake Monroe Townhomes Site
Seminole County, Florida
Figure 7
Wetland Delineation Map
280
N Feet
Project #: 230-72
S Produced By: DPH
Date: 3/16/2020
4
Bios 'wil Consulting life.
l;•srn srsrsrrr7cnt sl
and Permitting Services
Table 1: 1 Potentially Occuring Listed Wildlife and Plant Species in Seminole County, Florida
Scientific Name
Common Name
Federal
Status
State
Status
Lechea cernua
e
Pteronotr, is welaka
bluenose shiner
N
ST
N
Alligator mississippiensis
American alligator
SAT
FT S/A
Dtymarchon corals cou eri
Eastern indigo snake
LT
FT
Ga herus polyhemus
gopher tortoise
C
ST
Lam ro eltis extenuata
short -tailed snake
N
ST
Pituo his melanoleucus mu itus
Florida pine snake
N
SSC
,.
A helocoma coerulescens
Florida scrub -jay
LT
FT
Egretta caerulea
little blue heron
N
ST
E retta tricolor
tricolored heron
N
ST
Falco s arverius paulus
southeastern American kestrel
N
ST
Grus canadensis pratensis
Florida sandhill crane
N
ST
Haliaeetus leucoce halus
bald eagle
N
**
M cteria americana
wood stork
LT
FT
Pandion haliaetus
os re
N
SCC*
Y.<.7-7
Puma concolor coi yi
Florida Panther
LE
FE
Sciurus ni er shermani
Sherman's fox squirrel
N
SSC
Trichechus manatus
West Indian manatee
LE
FE
71Carex
cha manii
Cha man's Sedge
N
T
Centrosema arenicola
Sand Butterfly Pea
N
E
�Urbita okeechobeensis
Okeechobee Gourd
LE
E
_ J. r_
r. . A 1".
AJ
P
-p .......»
Illicium parviflorum
star anise
N
E
Lechea cernua
nodding inweed
N
T
Nolina ato ocar a
Florida Bear ass
N
T
Ohio lossunt palmatum
Hand Fern
N
E
Pecluma plumula
Plume Polypody
N
E
Ptero lossas is ecristata
Giant Orchid
N
T
P cnanthemum floridanum
Florida Mountain -mint
N
T
Salix floridana
Florida willow
N
E
FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS
LE -Endangered: species in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
LT -Threatened: species likely to become Endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
SAT -Endangered due to similarity of appearance to a species which is federally listed such that enforcement personnel have difficulty in attempting to differentiate between the listed
and unlisted species.
C -Candidate species for which federal listing agencies have sufficient information on biological vulnerability and threats to support proposing to list the species as Endangered or
Threatened.
XN-Non-essential experimental population.
N -Not currently listed, nor currently being considered for listing as Endangered or Threatened.
STATE LEGAL STATUS - ANIMALS
FE- Listed as Endangered Species at the Federal level by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service
FT- Listed as Threatened Species at the Federal level by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service
FXN- Federal listed as an experimental population in Florida
FT(S/A)- Federal Threatened due to similarity of appearance
State population listed as Threatened by the FFWCC. Defined as a species, subspecies, or isolated population which is acutely vulnerable to environmental alteration, declining in
jer at a rapid rate, or whose range or habitat is decreasing in area at a rapid rate and as a consequence is destined or very likely to become an endangered species within the
foreseeable future.
SSC -Listed as Species of Special Concern by the FFWCC Defined as a population which warrants special protection, recognition, or consideration because it has an inherent
significant vulnerability to habitat modification, environmental alteration, human disturbance, or substantial human exploitation which, in the foreseeable future, may result in its
becoming a threatened species. (SSC* for Pandion haliaetus (Osprey) indicates that this status applies in Monroe county only.)
N -Not currently listed, nor currently being considered for listing.
** State protected by F.A.C. 68A-16.002 and federally protected by both the Migraton, Bird Treaty Act (1918) and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (1940)
STATE LEGAL STATUS - PLANTS
E -Endangered: species ofplants native to Florida that are in imminent danger of extinction within the state, the survival of which is unlikely if the causes of a decline in the number of
plants continue; includes all species determined to be endangered or threatened pursuant to the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
T -Threatened: species native to the state that are in rapid decline in the number ofplants within the state, but which have not so decreased in number as to cause them to be
Endangered.
N -Not currently listed, nor currently being considered for listing.
APPENDIX H
Resolution No. 2020-R-70 Vacation of Public Right -Of -Way
Townes at Lake Monroe __Page 32
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment
June 15, 2021
I \L.V i L.L. %pvo.,iv
OI:UTION Nti: 2020-R 7.0 $EM7NOL• E •CUi3NTY .1h; It�DA
.; RESOLUT`iQN •: ':
• � •' • �,' : SEM)NEJEE• CULTmi''Y BOARI):4F• COt:tIiTT'Y GOM1t![.ISSIOIVER9 •
-
TAC PiTING AND. ABANDONING THE:HEREIN' DESC.M :PUSL.IC ,
H'T:O)'WAYW PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.:
• - . • WHERI - S,. ctions.:336.09.and 336,1.0, Florida S.tattite§; authorizes: aiic).empowers'the .
Boarii•ofCounty•Cominissioners (the'"Board") to�vaeate.aile�s and'righi-of'ways; anei.`-�-
WHEREAS; "Michael Tower's, `petitioned tiie `Board to 'close, _vacate' and abaud' the'
property-describ'ecl-k.Exiibit A and
.'WHEREAS; "the Nqtiqjlxs' are the' apparent `owrieirs bf record of parcels "acljaceni to the •': '
.: r_.eq ilii ed_ right�of w4y to be vacafed- acid the vacatiori.of suclivoitzori ofilie 4gli't•-of-wap:wiil-not-..'. • " ' '
/1
affect,the right ofconvenient access Qi persons4or.cause.ata parcels tci lie•landlocked*..aiid.
:.WI�EREASf notice was pVbH9he;d ffi-accordarioe with the requirements'of Sections 336:09: '
mid 336.10; •Fl6rida• Statutes;:dnd : .
y : '.-V REAS,.the Boa.'rd Lias determined :tbat'tlie al iafii lent -of tfie-alioye ciesenbed fight
07.wayis.M.Ithe:best:interest ofthe:Coiwtyand the:public;.arici:
.- . •WHEREAS ; all' applicable utility,:oornpnies haveprovdecl letters stating."rio .objection" " :
ioihe request46..vacate;
NOVA THEREFORE; $E •TT'RESOLEDaiy the;Board'of.Copity Commissioners: of ' _ ::: • ,
Serrunole•Co ty.; Flotida;ibat:. : :
Section :1. •: Fin s • The• above recitals are true and: are 'into ` orafed :as• I : lative'
_ _
:: ` : •' .: fiiadngs,
on request a I'etitioner(s}; the Boardfinds,•-detearixiines: anti• cleclat es Haat the: alibye- .'
•�.� : � Vacate and.A.iianddu•Ri�ht�gf'Way::�aseinezit •
:.
View •I7riO.e an
d:Oak I7r'ige � •
•,: � ' `: •„'page I of 2 •
;'..'•= descri'beii'riglit• of way'is:hdrebii closed, vacated and.abandoxietl ;arid'thai=all'rights:in'arid to the.': - ;
same :ombehalf ofthe iaounty: and%the public: afire hereby disalal=d:
"- Section Z:- -This Resohition sh4-becoirie'effective- ori ado tion b the Board.of Coon
. . .. . . . . . .
Co'i�sioners.. _
'2020.-.--
j.-
: me _ : -
:A'Ty.::".BO'ARD'OE G<JUNTSL'CC1NMSSTONERS: '
SEIvI Ot COY iNT i' ORYDA .-004 ee
'
OWER; Chairman
�erk_to the is'r`�d o; a
CQ .
zazn mU iers -of _ ' • :: -
p'Q Q.
x1u'bii A = Sketch of Legal Description.
Authority: Sections 334:09 arid'336:10;'ElQr'ida_S'tat t s. - -
PEClorg
.: T:\Usecsli cgal Secxctary'CSB\Plamiing\2U201ROW Va"gala (Lake Viow.Ih:` agii:0ekpr.) May12(20).doox ;
• :. -
•• � Vacate ancT'Abanddxi•Right-of-:Way:Easement '
• ` • 'T:,ake View I?rive and teak I;rive.
• • • • ' •� • • � • • •:•'Page 2 of 2
` :, , .•'
SKF —H OF �7ESG�tIFT't�?N
' • �' ' • :`� LEGAL ' DESCRXP.TXON:
Aportioh of Oak bdve,(a fid toot itght of.wiy), Wolter Ulie View7eirace,'acc6rdj6Z:ro The
-:Plat ther6f,• atiecorded in Plat 400k•20,page ", of thepubi cfIeeon'is of Setninote county_ -
• Florida, h66g North of tot 33y South df i ct 15 and the. Westerly-eitenslori thereof, 2nd tying ,..
Stluth of a pottibn of Lot 14.of said Wolfees lake View Termce being more pardatady
desatbdd as follows: :
:The Wdstedy pertion'oLOak%0, Wollefs take V;ew•Tetrace, of said Pla0ying West of.the:
following desa bed line; beginning at the NortheastzaYner.of t.6t b of said PlaL'thence itri. - : • " • -
:.. Nbnhp& ent4cL#ar:to•the North right ofwraybne of said Oak ltiew Ddve for a distanu ct•
:•
66.Wfeet and ffie Paint of Temilrius. ,• " ' " '
.: ' -'. : ; ' ' .SxicTfartds%ntatning 20,26L013puarc feet; or 0.236acres, more or less. • . •- • ' ' -
fl 40: 80
`.. .
OR' P iC .SCALE
LOT 15'... / -
. ' : w•' ' ' :. / . :i QT 14" ':: !.: LOT,
WOL
Ls10.�FE 1lEW»
• "T
LAKE �ER •E '
PL BOOK
.J 33'' OO.OD' '(P).
&0.00" P}' - 70(?AO'•�P).
R .
'�•NORTifRMLtIVE .... ' .
.. »
• • tyESTERLY EiciETITtOH'
OF: LOT'.15 ..
-
NT. OF' IERMIPit)S '» ^ • • . ..
»-.. _
-REMAINDER.:OE .....
POR1i0N�•OF�'
E{86'R
AK', •Dki,VE 66, R/
0,26,63:St;uorp (eot,,or 0.236 acrea:� li•
POINT OF BEGINt11NGVF
.:
CORt1ER -OF •LOT' J3 - • • - r » '
I NORTk UNE ' y/
:..i,., LOT 13
:Lo
,. '.. �� r_..
" I
-VOL S =LAKE- VIEW: I ERRACE
PLAT:'BQUK. ib,-PC�,.`.66 i ' s - : % - i ,'_ ,aeBltsVUTtoxs.:
;D / _
• Pe. - PCAT,B00it
I �•" TD' ' Y . / PO PAGE CMTERUNE
..
RIeNt Of WAY
. � , .. ;I.; .. J^ ,t1lillf:i►:t; .�'` ••'. .{Pl.^PUTT' .. ,
1Caa thot this dese'iiption•represented
- . :: � •:.:-�5�'TRY.�s X.O,i4S �1VDTES: •: ; ..:. - ' • •' � ' . •
sJ%lrue and coatet do.the beM of m
- BEARlNOS-BASE4 ON 1Hi£:Na4Tt1 Rjx UNE 0:: aril O.faYF.:ribtiER'S t.AtiE; �.: .+,.: �`" ' aye
In bdief.,7t has teen:prejpored 'tax .'.. . • _ .
. rI FERnA.W..,y RECO%DSD IN 'PEI 19,410 Fs, mvivIX£ —TY, np,I OA • ' v. a� .. .
(AN• ASSU4tA, pATtnH •PEIi,PtAT• iFi£R-£DF).. , �- • ` •,i 0: l «� o arlccWith, the Standards of Pr4ctlde sit forth to .. .
y .• pteq; et7,• F.A,C...puinuont to'Cbopters ¢77 cnd'
^^ ^^ •^.1NIS'i5 NOTA B¢JNDATtY'SURVEY.' .. '.. • • • ^ .. • .:.r ; S .. ,,, :. k`IriyrdC Stainked ect OI O florido'Llcensetdnotofe ..
-S
. THIS Is Yi.SKEtCN
or
THIS Obn,Y.'NO CORNERS NYRE SET,ANO
. - •,••;; ;, „.•�yp•.,o�'f"ppe.r,»thi•s. drowing,•sketch. plot or:NIETC-trITTAtER StRVEYNO ASSVlES NO RESPO9RREEIOnD ACCPTt3�'r••.�i:. oses•oni 'ad is not
-. ;
NAINSM11CAL CLOSURESAWBEARVCS ANDMSTANES SNOYM HEREON -ARE
. . .
- .
`
' SJ"CT t0 FIEtD•VMMAIIOtt: .. - •.^jsi , • . // �/j
ri'ri; : S•r"" 5'/'11 L O .
, •tt•t.:'.'.lR�,N• NIETt)'PSM•60Z5• •PitINT,DATE•`
• • . PAiPARO'J,!'0.4: • ':.' .. •^ `..' .. : •• yHr?1.O 817. ,N/A, oATE:•4qo,--u
, • " y .
OAT4W001) DEVELOPMENT•& CQNSTRUCTit?N: .. ewae,a,N : Nicto-whittDker StuYej'itig LLC . '
'LAKF. ?40NROE TNN'&.BAR OUIBACIC : \HI 1726 N.' Rasa d Rue �Hh-{taegaobd, FL32710
_
DRAWN BY. BPS. - 13-
' SCAtE' 1`.40'• • SNEET :2485 Niy 1T•92NWY SAWORD. 'FLLB'ttia77ii ' .
. .,, ... .' ':: =;,aytts^atativraHweaaxofivAD.cr�n+,a�xewarnuozorr:osas ', . ' • ..
x'tiibit A
::: ; ::. •_ :';" t-of-Wa}�'Easrmenit
;Vacate and Abandon .
' - - • ' - ' :
LW View. Drive and Oak'T7rive:
It Rau utt LCl ttif• GVGVV003LV
:.-. �,: � ••`•..''•• ST{;8TGOF MSCR.TRT%gN.'"..
�j
• - : ••g? • • � - ": : `' ' :. » laireViewDriye(a•33 foot tight of vray}� Woifefs lake•V(ew »
:. • . • " ' :
.�`'. � '; '�.'' .•TetrSce,atcordhtgtottie•Plattherdof,as•recSrtledloPfat.
QO�s \ , 8swk 30 page 65, of t{re PuhliaRecritds of Seminole S purity, ,:
:. ;
J j Piorlda, being more particulatiydescabedis-6tlows:, -
: �i�srsOo, ' • ' oc the pla otf Wo fees landd vdiewTenate als rkorrd d bi �
'P1aEBook;%page.66, of the Publte Iterords of Seminole`. -
..: : di a,' id tvA serttofWn Fjing• ".
e
�A'..�d' "Countxh]a 33.�40o d d
'.. •' .
of to 15 through'24, of said Ifer's Lake•wew
'14t . � �9 '(errite,�yld3:3.DD foot wt� rjght rrf Yiav also lying Sovth of
O
O�c • : ,s
:UA.Hl 27=$2 also ki,oigm as Seminole goulevacd,as '
-3sOD toot wldo itght•ot wayalso
. OG ',ry shctm�n.satd plat; said
' �°
V .` '0
10 ��G ''„ r�o�o h�FRB"North'of Oak Drive (a 6y.DD fnot wi$edBht cf wall{ .as
, : _ qQ• .. refolded iilsald 4}Totfei's ta%.Ylevixesraco apd e
tY to _ Oj ' ?� ' : Westedyettenston of salt{ NaGh'dghf o[vraytlne of Oak
> .:. w to
"Drifre tothe Wpst tine of said takc.Vtew Drive. • ; • "
a •r .. : OR .. Ilidrelo ds ntalning 22,3{3 8SSquare fger ;orq.S .saes, _
W61
to
`SO'.
_,0.
:•
~. yi
.. ., tn ••.. • 5 PS- PIAT BOOK•
¢
tL - �
• , o
'�. " .
PC .PAGE . ..,
O " ••Y (NR) a NON RE
-
:: It f WAY
o
PLAT .. -
'; •"»,... S Wit"
..., .
. ''.•o. .i�rl a.
... ,. . - •.'«o'•,. , .eft.. .
•� .'SiiRVL;I'Q:RS-1YU7'tsS'. • •"...
.-•BEAPMb 8ASE0'ON• THE NORTH R/W UNE OF dAk OHIt+>;10. ,
~ , -•S -
. .
.., .. - . �• ' . .. d: •.. : � �S COi1NiY� .. PtR'PtAT�'
• •TERRACE. AS RECOROED'tti't?8
. ' • • ' ' . tT.Oh1OA. (AH ASSLMED
DAitJlr'
E 'E>r : ': jtas.rs'NOi"A. 80UNOARY'StlRYEY.' .. _
• - TtnS 1S.A SKETCH•OF LitSCRRP .
: r`Ii, TKt,N A.4tY.' NO CORN-P,RS MERE -
• ,. ' ct: • • • .. • '. MES
RRtSPONSIBR� B�EVROO-AOCTrAKCR E TED NATN�ATICAAL.NCXML ES.
. . • n , : , ,• _ ",ALL A � T OISTANES.SHOWI Heff= An SUBJECT TO
$A1cr7rAy'rfm,: {not tnls deeenptton representT:d .
.harcis•Ug(rt and correct td tie beat of my . .
43��F(Qk baa @ :nwtib liPe 5t has
been
e of ocuee eo"t forth in "
" ORTH p ifNE� +- . a' dlutas oni4ravont to'picpten't77 bnd'".
/Y(' s -'Ay 1 eoristq taiutos ,and untess'tt bears- the„stgnohitp
• - • .XESTiW.Y'EXiF7trRON'OF ;;i �tA • .$irRd 1(iO netgji1oFr Hui •seal bf a •Rorldo Uaeneed • .. .
- - • NOirCet RK:tn' Of•,1YItY 1LNE• .. • • _ ' • . �' .. irrVe r'ttirR¢tAapper„this droving, •skoteh. plot dr . .
+"�' �' 'Map ts�foY'b}foY, ptidona!'p ses•onty•on'd d. -Its not '
.. •• - •• ' flAK' 17E2iyE 6f'R • • : • :.. .. � a�*N � • , �tF�.,� ; ..
•WOLFER'S:LAKE MEW TERRACE'
S��"JJJz c?
1r,: °Tat Fi :•NIETD PStd'802 L'' '
.: • ' . : PLAfi QpOK tn,•PG,:.66 .%3,`..: ur •.tr PL3WT,DA7E: , : ” . : :
_ :..:• -
. : - _ . • .., AADA OATEr•</p..
-OAKWOODDE4noPMENT&,•CQNSTRUbnON: oRA BPs ,,,,• N NictcfNvhifiai:er$eLr _S_-gLLC'. '
-L. k ttddNROEitfN&BAROUTBAml : w+v13-3is' . • . p�' tnaN:xandId. ugmDhit•tvaea*64F;327so:'
..2485. NW: E7� 92 N!'/Y:SANFORti. FL. ' suit t :50°• WE= f AF t, PtLcf4077?35SBAa7;t+07)6lGWGI,
- _
'... tlwraota tArsEtnEMrvAo„:�anvra�3aaxs!7tza�crrss+�ta .. - - ,
E7c1ii`bii A
,Vacate• li)d Aiianclon_R.ight. df•Way'E §6iie it
”
Ni w I?rive and.(ak'T3r ve"
0 A S
dando
_ •
Publication Date: 05/2812020
Ad Number:
Insertion Number:
Size:
Color Type:
This E. Sheet(R) is provided as conclusive evidence that the ad appeared in The Orlando Sentinel on the date
. �».._... ..� a
tit c 3 O
t O
:w vF ! 9. 1 j _g i! R R3 iii' F R Fg
IL —0 IL N9 vim
20 h I Ig
0 ax Pr
Fir
C3 to
rl a
g ' sl�id- $im
°tea_°
ell IN
$��aaI
D- ,1 IT• �h 3� fir " J Y.3 `g' =a��� �O a
lt I
S Yi��rgyg�, S�rp7y
gi`<3 $g"";;9� G >y tl'°Mq:' g a�cq_ gg
a ni o a �fF�i}I SRSIRA Z w♦ad e
a�.e._�sc��o
a00•tRH n g Y }111
s >R-,o7oeov nr0-tao < Y am �g� �e .'� gp
ocnorsigzg� $''�3 g$''� jt �$B xax•uaaa+no'>o �_ g'C'$ $...3..i 3�uu �s 8$i��si
a 3 , § 4e .°,y,,. ntvm� 'o ao op m.�y.X�y a _ �yg gg33 `y� 8 g .�D Sig 1 1
.4 1 448- I. w- x^ �'� °�." ���. OA 2m. � � a O 'n e < �i�TM^aR • � � �5 ��g �. 'gi_Y �grg c�y�
000 �sttzc3 a3$ = a�iaomx m° a §3 rs S gg�uc,rs Q Oa . a o■,f°OM. Y' WIis
3�
Omso S y� � 4 ,^ 8�' ^S nm pOH 15 S '� �•ue$ c�.+ .
AWN.
,� _ ^-`�v-" 3 fl n $�� 3 wvc am�v^"m z v 8�n' S g c Y° _ A3. gam•$ '�C^x $'
av o �^ n 3 Laws � :r q 9-w A -mm -a °^n 8 $ bA 3i�= c d 'aa ss g e fig? Rg a�
A z O 5°3 g e g •+m^' m o yTa- 93 R =3# S a +� S g_�
11.
z° ' 7y�aSR:t--! •'9�S'g �a m$� 8 � id8`�s• ;�m•g •"$ ' S33a• ° 7tav+tzo•afl�a`i' S i 9[8 ":3° a..YSi!.y.3°.si $ a »S. 'w•.�:S'i Td•3 rw°�
m ,ry _�
m°�cw°_��o,� pm�,a�°rm�?�_�'p$ #m'9c5g1i g QL�a°x,3 _tee
�]ppr•�O.O @ 400>O x'^3 n 3 as$� jr% ' '. 3" 8_ ({.'7`�•p s >�.e�Msm3S
O j>��;�i�d�•,'i"m(1�9 A 6 k ^ti '"tom T1 alm =O<
zmr a r" �-nac, N, ca v a�#�4a-Sy Mw3��� ��Q� � �� 3 ys'�c�-�E�3 �� �a4 ; S w-mER
8 Qn .,Sj ���c�`�w $ >����a A� ' � �em�'$ I..
'T 'n°
►#' ' -,>� m - I � i $_ ro � $�;fl�+ a '"5^ �O ����:a�$v� °K Oa
T�oS L mm�° 3 ,,Sm.$ n L 3L 3 Na
�.•".�� � 38 >fCga,3,�S���s� � 4§7� ���°g' ����a a �g SAm
5.�_-.g - .3• z..�. �_ B�S 8 -a ° ° EARN
d. °u aa=»ima °ai'mwa° �$��to, E -MM 00
w +qq q tt j ,. $g'O M,
3
5 23 of
— 2 i, -,ea _
ri in-
Ms
a12
t A CO)�T r9 . � 4. Cr"'s � fagla
ai
s5a
7�98•'l S01 Client dame:
Advertiser:
Seminole County Planning Offices o
10.07 Section/Page/zone:
GLJV/D0041FLAm
LW Description:
Lake View &Oak Dr ROW Vacate 6.2
00
m
page indicated. You may not create derivative works, or in any way exploit or repurpose any content. M
I Or
"J1 r IN�" gm
i3e €
S 333R
�S R1 °` roc r iaD�
� c
s P � rr�3 g
s -as 8'Ir�2-1 gS. STs
L 1 19 Eli
IFlp xi
graa l
-1 all::� t
�4g 'say-p
$� �g L a y
ME
RUN -r-
n g 70 S RNO^o'.umm'�a° (n eS�ro y i°ngo
Foo
md
Q Pig
aao� a°�°� iaoacwmM , m v
H
'a
0
y
m
3
C
7
m
0
C
Published Daily
ORANGE County, Florida
ta -offfmois
County Of Cook
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared
lea= Gates who on oath says that he or she is an Advertising
Representative of the ORLANDO SENTINEL, a DAILY newspaper
ORLANDO SENTINEL in ORANGE County, Florida;
CD
published at the
C—
- VOF
that the attached copy of advcrtisement, being a Legal Notice in the matter
:K
of 11150 -Public Hearing Notice, June 9, 2020 Resolution Adopted was
published in said newspaper in the issues of Jun I8,2020.
r—
rn
Affiant further says that the said ORLANDO SENTINEL is a newspaperC')
-J:Y.
C:) r.
Published in said ORANGE County, . Florida,, and that the said newspaper
�
nrn
has heretofore been continuously published in said ORANGE County,
E5
CD �
Florida, each day and has been entered as periodicals matter at the post
f
C=
office in ORANGE County, Florida, in said ORANGE County, Florida, for
a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached
copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he or she has neither
paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount rebate,
commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for
publication in the said newspaper.
Jeremy Gates
Signature of Affiant Name of Affiant
Sworn to and subscnW before me on this 18 day of June, 2020,
by above Affiant, who is personally known to me (X) or who has produced identification
RECEIVED
Signature of Notary Public JUN 2 2 2020
COMMISSION RECORDS
Name of Notary, Typed, Printed, or Stamped
Sold To:
Seminole County Planning Offices - CU.Q0106427
1101 B 1st St Rm 2208
SANFORD, Fl, 32771-1468
Biro:
Seminole County Planning Offices - CU00106427
1101 E 1st St Rm 2208
SANF0RD;-FL;3277I--17468
6694495
VACATING, CLOSING . . AND
ABANDO,NI-NG :UNCUT PORTIONS
OF THE:`PUBLIC *RIGHTS- F;
KNOWN AS. LAKE V IVE
passed '.dad udopWd -a' R6901utlon
.
lsslpniis
.~,_-__ ._- --
day-of JLifie).202M
=
11,01't'F(r.st Street
Sanford, FL :32771
mW94S MR=
tr
L
1Ez11 < RR� fill
If
O a 101, RIN C R b^ psY31f8 °.iS35SR° a .» aac
x 1
g °� y4
¢1111 ilQb;cc
D Tag 9
tj
pp�'gER84%B°@
to t. gggg -M S g. • E%E ¢ iA'83 �< E. °
g�$�Y��Pabikykyg� � YI
b1§13.10210X i _ eh i
�,yyS� b ggg
511
952 -Nall �a m .q s�bN,11
p ytBB& dgg ��del o�a.
OR
E�r��ti
g�A 834���
6
o
C W 3 [�►'!
o ZLU�
o0
� Q "m<� 05ei' o i �'b` ' a ' �,.• � � �
Z Z c'o o '\jy
{Q v d IL
�- 0 0 0 �a dl'J�
O J M fh N WLLJ
3t
Ui W ri a �a c ; d g p
co
T" CO
ll1
V C� Z
W
V G
45
UM
Q
�v 6
AIc
mh no:
IL Z 112p,
IL 119111 11
15M Hill zw ffi
M 21
c 01j:
C Z _ w w Q ±x
�4�
d lm IiI � ������� � �� ���� � ������� a � ��
-wow 'AU -0 cpw�s
SSWOH M3ZVSS
SONNOW 3XV'lXV SBNMOI z
SdVW.&UII.Ln OW HdVUSOIOHcl JVjtj3V Q.
SdVW S11OS'Nrv-id 000i=rssn ON,.q suniru'ONINOZ
9
IL
9
L
UhWAW o
m jp cS3WOH'daZV39 d
30aNOY BWI lV SaNMOI S
LUMNVld U31SM N
Yn
eIlk
RRRR9gg
r € a !
sw
lit
� Y
sSiet:«�Ra�ii�
a^at« 4!g
0
W o
Z
J
k 4c
co
a
a
the �
11+,�
, ]�
Yt
3
#
Y ,
i
;�
��
!
�I
;
•Y
e3
�
'
�ilf
i
�ilf
S3V40H uazvse
3OHNOW aMV*1 JLV SSNMOI
NVId ONrd33N1SN3,kt"1M`1321d
g.
ti
ME
..........
4
Idp-
—
---------"'—'---------^'^---------^
I . — — — — — — — — — — -
2!j
Gig -
It
—u'- I I I
V:j
I{ '
i Si
yY
4
Idp-
—
---------"'—'---------^'^---------^
I . — — — — — — — — — — -
2!j
Gig -
It
—u'- I I I
V:j
i Si
4
Idp-
—
---------"'—'---------^'^---------^
I . — — — — — — — — — — -
2!j
Gig -
It
—u'- I I I
V:j
unawn.vnai ua. V7 ® •tea aWufunS
S3WOH N3Td39 e to
$� tttfit €M° 3011NOW3NV1lt/S3NM01 z
® SN01103SSSOUO+S1d3ON003dVOSONV7
MCL'bft Ql I Al RaA6 ,Ntt :f +aIYJF yYxl+a%al'IM1an aabru lraYJ „la9(blr ML.Vr a'L'Ytd Y
i4rl9LOtun)xra 0.^Ya$(a ttar)iN
ouxcv'w�.Twt7wam*wm®axaut m oaf-ar.a?1�V81.i702iV8�8'AINIH02lAt0Y13?Tti7
�TI�!�S�fin!9N�.K _ N •axa7mo s•�ua,wran lT�n.�'7�7 !TT�T LTV �7
rr1[ atro ro :Ye ow OCNY MO�SA.a' 4OH cia'�• Q
3 [ �aoi aaava3ad
a p $psg$:�L Og
f�tt .Y.}`Ragy� IRP
3pgp$p 9r q Esc Eil�k8 ayp 9 8�yfi�pb a''Y13 i�p. b T 3Y Fg[E" 8
�3apg$ba� $ g3Mt.
Y� 8b�j9 66�`8E$ Yh 5II-y�sp`�#
BSS n k tl a pc k44s r� a� a i dk;e42s k11
E#` '1C�$ $i C�qa � of � abQ• b3 �` �
p $a-iti 7 a ba4 Y a a$�• ¢�y k_.k. s ka i a.
'agb� gag- ggggg;•gYh._«ol; ISy fR7gg�. Pit; 0,111J.16 1$A"gd�i8Y25bbp`$ g 4 4: TiR ; gig
„Z,�.. ya� a 2 h..g$9 by R@;y b pial aiCD:Ring.' +?� � L �aat 3 g}��$j s I�
# = YR$=s 7k' YY'� XS x 3YY� s'-s� n ak " `k =�#, ii a-� a� ¢ y
.✓ v] a C n i9ppk gpk 3 k$r3k.. gpyt13t = b%
'- p; i gbIR �g3<Y i' ,l8lktl2 HIP
$ 7 7 `a �g
C @ ' $ k °q g p a g995gc pY9Y� t$§ gkA ani qg9.. s ill I ill gfill •1t Ya?� , 4
a^X p Sd..�..naap g63w;IY� L=SZD KSk G.aS '� a a{)" ilia TZ T
y 7 �tY@ $4�i Y gK- .6 p,7y np Q_ tli i.p ti4'8
8(-yai g@bb��Ceg b_
6Gg MIA
E p g<
C o $¢ �p $aa` Y ealpl Y 3I5���•$ �k a�E�Q��yr�pp}}tbttt'i� K S{s
p i R a- Y �8�D �^ a: `a^ 7SSe�9�4 $ $ YE ;w� €
HZ O'~ p a r E< a �ec
7 R+ =tlRk$4 7S $� 2 Y7 k$ §° izag q tl Sg ps 3sigsi e3k 'e( d� g§=_a: b g No Ell
a O p Y 1�¢ p n$$a,YY ttY�`i8 kgs nA Yq s g $ s3_ �eBl
< O N .g n - $t b' 1@15 a gum
qq nay k k k SEE
YH :&� kgag6a k $=k kY app n y by n of
g ^Y Y kt9k kk<¢`2 a°fnenggk* Ynatl�kF �kkQQ�gg . Eac g€ q{�raY qy p� �&ra� � �g-°� � y
y Ale $ o.- lb
Nei
� Sa '�k
S 4$ g Y a Y B gg g et o
ItnQSa$ap
Y k# g g$g $ pa gig EMS
p-
ag`- a Yz ag$& a a� $#$
e8 $ E �I «nYY
Tb $ ffi = Ye �3y paag ak 7 E$g g$7 8Y4c' 0.s ^$��ga 32
oil
ESTE $ <" � Y & ?59s JIM 1-1 S d 6f i R YID g$ gg @YF �tE6¢t 9
y _ £ g j = a Sa 4 yd g"S 3� a FSpYp ae'$ k'gag�'I€
3 tn :l E �AjQ"� 3yL t1 H� k5 5 y FYgg�E`7 S b W ggg 4 b
Saar( P}}$E. Rg n I ttyp(k6`�Ay g¢* T$� py
.. Y� i• , j: zg8$!$Aj � 6 w� ���t$ ���$YYY� a3 h �E$ Sig
o Viz' Y k q9$r H �Ya g Y Y ¢ Ili, Hill
Sig �
Ho' 8$a2l 9a $ S $ a Ya$ YE :CR � a
Rix I
-pa F aYe
g sE:low
K S$�3�°
QYS§. d�5�ii $E.4'I tl
.st.am S7 a�� t
t
a' 9
�
map $ $
* .PN
soi
pr •� 9 � I A A` tv� • $ $
a• q I C }.° lY� 't ` � s - 3_..._. ^ ..� - w � ' � try �
�+i O m... ! I t t �s�d R�•� g I s f� I g I� s `y I g I 3 I�! 9 I� I g g
� mi- P-__-CnF6-mr.�FoT:T Zw :—s•s .—'�'m'�---- f i i i i t"n �µ I ! 1 I !
� / 8 tv alma}` a��toos-- _ i Wartm li.fetlaa;r. � i
, to
i.$ ,C S g aVa.asvwaa+m�iauvavn r `'> s � A l�[ j:e
a g g
ry
fo} f luaae ,.,.. �.
F .r
loN
ambeagq%-aro.t 0 Tmr, lai?
�}f 03t1W lO
twrsatunlxva w)wm(m):xb]1/��V,B]1r10�1�3VH��r'!NN��I30v'l3htVO!N7lr�?T�Y'1�{
dttit'LIS•^■Xo•Y•9•1H YPerooa'lt Ret M t xap ap nrrW WA OCN MO-S'lY` OH QRZVaC1
yTTa>��,+s�vrn x
aJi atro ,■oxe oar
-W! 03tNd3t7d
uF
Y. N•y G
00
m IS
W L— j
a
ark :sl; say ass
• %bb 4:, tyi
—
E f= f
P
3 / I
' p f
All
F,Z,,%1zjdL11qm,
R."- • +per ry '' � • �. � a
A
»• uwxn xawac ap•a
Cron-Fpl-pF-Ot 1 1 p Cwt
MUMpM
77
• c«�=
y�i.••
alp �
��4
� •
�
—•
•
W
_
U
z o
a 0
3
A
»• uwxn xawac ap•a
Cron-Fpl-pF-Ot 1 1 p Cwt
MUMpM
�.ti b+aa� •z nn nr:e4ee2e�"ePe"'vi.�eneneni eeH'e
s :
� �
•
M•
n
ttq]'btW't4-Ct-U^KY / Q T v1
> OJ11'Ild 10.V
3
— M/a ,99 3Ala0 M3U a3Ai8 — —
—
— —
99 'Jd '0l X008 1V3d
I 30Vaa3lFM31K 3XVl 6,a331OM
u7
N
I
I I *•11 T
IAi
i
I:qWQ
I
I is i
a
J
n
� 9l��
a �!� •a
? ?
a ?
as
e
Yt`7~
z
`
ay
n
ttq]'btW't4-Ct-U^KY / Q T v1
> OJ11'Ild 10.V
3
lwmm�wl
0 Pre Cast Wal'
MPicket Fence or Black Aluminum Fence
Note Diagram provides Pre -Cast Wall, Picket
Fence orBlack Aluminum Fence locations ao
described inemail toRob Campbell, dated
August 6,2O21.
Townes atLake Monroe
unm
'------
/
LOT
/
|
{
�
/
-_
/CI
u3Tm
'
|
LOT
�
/
-- ' '--
/
�
'
-|
uOTm
-- -- —''
.
!
�
'
0 Pre Cast Wal'
MPicket Fence or Black Aluminum Fence
Note Diagram provides Pre -Cast Wall, Picket
Fence orBlack Aluminum Fence locations ao
described inemail toRob Campbell, dated
August 6,2O21.
Townes atLake Monroe
RE: Townes at Lake Monroe / Approx 22 acres, Sanford
Injunction
Please help,
My wife and I live at 410 Oak Drive, a home that was built when Sanford was
celery farms. But now, uniquely, our home will border within feet on two sides by the
above captioned new development. Any party providing approval for said development
will be considered liable as applicable and we are enlisting your support and help in seeking
an injunction against development for the following reasons:
1.) Our water line, which is legally permitted, lies adjacent in the property to be developed
near the surface and is labeled by the developer as a nature walk and will likely be destroyed
2.) Heavy machinery will be immediately adjacent to our home creating a health hazard from
dust, a nuisance from noise, and physical damage or personal injury from falling oak tree
limbs as we share several large Live Oak trees
3.) We currently enjoy an unobstructed view of Lake Monroe which will be blocked due to the
installation of a 6 ft vinyl fence per the developer thereby diminishing the view and property
value
4.) Development will require the destruction of a natural habitat which includes SO+/- large Live
Oak trees that should be protected
5.) Immediate access provided by Riverview Drive 'pass-thru' runs through a residential
neighborhood which includes a Church, 2 school zones and a Day Care fronting the road.
It can barely handle the traffic now and any new development would create a major hazard
6.) A new development within feet of our property would likely inflict excessive water retention
and power problems to our property
Thank you, cc: Harry Reid, Reverend Marc, Beazer Homes, County Commission,
Dan and Diana Garris cph Corp, City Planning, ISA, Castello, Frank Jr/Sr, Jim Barks, Ch 6 news
* Please Select one
Public Hearing Item
* Name
Robert Campbell
* Address
656 Riverview Ave.
Sanford FL 32771
We ask for your phone number and email so that we may contact you if we have any questions -this is optional.
Phone
(407) 808-0770
Etnall
rob.campbell.ert@gmall.com
Briefly state issue you wish to discuss at meeting:
Would like to present a short ppt presentation at the meeting on 10/7 at 1000 regarding the "Townes at Monroe° development on Seminole blvd.
Page ( i
W
N
N
CSS
b.A
�JJ
4? )
/
W
'0
e
OC
,F r,� ,;.
�,
-�a a � a
al r+ M
� �:�; '� �
c� �g> a:
v� Y � � �
f
r'f '� b I.
i ��� m; i
��� ti itei t�� �.4e,}� ��3�F � � ` x� w
¢ q '.Xp C
� � 4 `� ti 1
�� z� x � t. � t �-'�
� �..� ; 'Kr''�r `�
7'r a % R � i'^ L`
sky � '� sf�°,y� ..M � �
�4 Y � .Ss. i'i4 ..�
3 ��
`� +t s %
��
`34� s �,, 11 � ,��
°` Y ," ,
{ � �
�� �.
� ��
r h � {��
,,�� s � � x
"" �z ' � '�� �,� � � �.
Y S^�
V)
0
S�
IL
4-J
�J
0
a
PARCEL 2519-30300A040-0000
LEO C. THERANIER REVOCABLE TRUST
286 CLUBHOUSE BOULEVARD
NEW SMYRNA BEACH, FL 321684910
ATTN: CAROL T. CASTELLO
PARCEL 23-1930-501-0000-0140
TRIPLE B ACQUISITIONS, LLC
120 STONE POST ROAD
LONGWOOD, FL 32779-2745
LAND PLANNER
CRH, INC.
1117 EAST ROBINSON STREET
ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32801
ATTN : JAVIER E. OMANA, CNU-3
EMAIL: JOMANA@CPHCORP.COM
PHONE: (407) 4250452
FAX
:(407)A-1036
CIVIL ENGINEER
CPH, INC.
500 WEST FULTON STREET
SANFQRD, FLORIDA 32771
ATTN: JEREMY OW ENS, P.E.
EMAIL: JOWENS@CPHCORP.COM
PHONE: (407) 322-6841
FAX: (401) 330-0639
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
CPH, INC.
500 WEST FULTON STREET
SANFORD, FLORIDA 32771
AIiN: MAX SPANN. P.L.A.
EMAIL: MSPANN@CPHCORP.COM
PHONE: (407) 322-6-
FAX:(407)3300639
ARCHITECT
JEFFREY DeMURE+ASSOCIATE'S
5905 GRANITE TAKE DRIVE, # 140
GRANITE BAY. CALIFORNIA 95746
ATTN: CHELSEA RICHARDSON
EMAIL: CRICHARDSON@JDARCH,COM
PHONE:(906) 7833700
Tc)w ses at LaLe Monroe
City of Sanford, Florida
APPLICANT/
AUTHORIZED AGENT
BEAZER HOMES
151 SOUTH HALL LANE, SUITE 200
MAITLAND, FL 32751
ATTR MATT WANZECK
EMAIL: MATTHEW. WANZECK@BEAZER COM
PHONE: (407) 4460276
SURVEYOR
NIETO-WHITTAKER SURVEYING, LLC
1728 NORTH RONALD REAGAN BLVD.
LONGWOOD, FL 32750
ATTN: RALPH A. NIETO. PSM
EMAIL: RALPH@NIETOWHITTAKERSURVEYING.COM
PHONE: (407) 636-8460
TRAFFIC/
YRN—S-PPZIRTATION
ENGINEER
TRAFFIC & MOBILITY CONSULTANTS
3101 MAGUIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 265
ORLANDO, FL 32803
ATTN: AYMAN H. AS-SAIDI, P.E.
EMAIL: AHA@TRAFFICMOBILITY.COM
PHONE: (407) 531-5332
BIOTECH CONSULTING, INC.
3025 EAST SOUTH STREET
ORLANDO, FL 32803
ATTN: MARK PUSLEY
EMAIL: MARK@BIO TECHCONSULTING.COM
PHONE: (497) 894-5969
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONE
MASTER PLAN
2485 W. SEMINOLE BOULEVARD
Parcel ID No.: 23-19-30-300-0040-0000
23-19-30-501-0000-0140
June, 2021
u
._Haut Fl_ a;la
Subject Site
rr_
V
�S.
6.
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
THE SUBJECT SITE IS APPROXIMATELY 21,56± ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
SEMINOLE BOULEVARD AND WEST OF OAK DRIVE,
THE CURRENT ZONING IS-� AGRICULTURE. C-1: RETAIL COMMERCIAL AND RI -A:
SINGLE FAMILY (SEMINOLE COUNTY).
THE CURRENT THE FUTURE LAND USE IS SE: SUBURBAN ESTATES. COM: COMMERCIAL
AND -DR: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (SEMINOLE COUNTY).
ON JUNE 15 & 16, 2021 ANNEXATION AND FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENT APPLICATIONS
WERE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF SANFORD,
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
iT 1/1 a' s[cnox R], iow 1 tx swix. wrvct ]o
arsi (stwoi9/soo)Fsfu xa[ eW�Evwnno i¢.aT'niE n o o[PnaluFxiSmix[saoRi�nou T� wnv
GST, Huixp.E text, rtoa_ P_ uppE^VM_Ly DES K.A Al i.1— RaICE 30
- COVER SHEET
P-2 ZONING,FLU, FLOOD PLAIN, AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH,
SOILS AND UTILITY MAPS
P-3 MASTER PLAN
P-4 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLAN
P-5 LANDSCAPE CONCEPTS *CROSS SECTIONS
P 6 ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPTS
P-7 CONCEPT AMENITY DETAILS
S-1 BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY o13)
$2 BOUNDARY ANO TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY (2 of 3)
S1 BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY (A of 3)
P-1
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
FUTURE LAND USE MAP (Seminole County)
N, -
FLOOD ZONE MAP
ZONING MAP (Seminole County)
.,T,.
SOILS MAP
UTILITY MAP
U)
.g
. :2
z
0
0
0 2i W
0
0 z 2i -
� < YO
7 < T
< F- w
< �
w w
Z 0 w
<� F-, z
0 3:
W T 0
(L
<
W
Z
0
N
Sheet No.
P-2
A
o fio f21
V+XEMONROE $CAL1711
O\`\ ATED ACCESG � � PROJECT BOUNDARY
psIGNAGE '�' AMFNIttAREA
B
� �. LANE MONROE
®v/ �OTxz
_=sE E,U„M S
POSED ZON UG',
EX STING FUTUPE' LAND USE:
POSED PERn ZA. USE:
gDAWo
to (sEMMO EaCOUNtt) �
PO(C"oF FACTOR.)
OR (SEMINOLE COU—)
INGLE FAMILY ESIDENTTAL HOMES ITOWNNOMES) ANO THEIR CUSTOMARY ACCESSORY USES
DENSITY AULOWED,
E2E. IGNT
"PROVIDE
DUFF
o
;
�
� S IRAN
I Im i�
i tots
.1 NO R.Tn
I ime
STREET . o
REAR YARD
.. tO FT LOTS „DFT
1-11 SANE VIEW TERFRAC )
.... tO FT LOTSTR t AND (tA VI M ...1—
j
� was
I _
k
I p
i
I
i
! D UryNAMIGS 11T.-
i
I
RD (EANFORD)
ONINA AG(EANFDRD)
p E Y
_=sE E,U„M S
POSED ZON UG',
EX STING FUTUPE' LAND USE:
POSED PERn ZA. USE:
gDAWo
to (sEMMO EaCOUNtt) �
PO(C"oF FACTOR.)
OR (SEMINOLE COU—)
INGLE FAMILY ESIDENTTAL HOMES ITOWNNOMES) ANO THEIR CUSTOMARY ACCESSORY USES
DENSITY AULOWED,
E2E. IGNT
"PROVIDE
UNTSPERACRE
I" U111
GENAS (INTERIIOR UNIT)/ 52t END UNIT)
ATH=FEDERAL
FLOOD INFORMATION.
vIOED.
-EG
.I.G—ER
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENTAGFNG1 FLOOD RATE INGURANCE MAP PANEL NO. 11, 110-1
HAVING A REVISION DATE 01 SEPTEUDER 28.200T TIE PROPEOFY LIES IN UNGRADED GONE - AN AREA DETERUIRE1
To 'E OUTSIDE
ELF -11 OF E0F1 THE — ANN— CHANCE 1 511111 — 'I All IGIE -AE' HAVING A RACE FLOOD
EFT
PACES PEP UNR(GARAGE AND DIYNEWAYCOUNiAS 2 PARNNGSPACES) PWEOVERFLOW PARKING
E TO DE SDOMITTED WITH CONSTRUCTION PIANS
TIE 'RopoSE, STORM -1 FUNDS GE DESIGNED 10 MEET THE ST, JOHNS R V R —TER —AGSUINN
RIATUR
DISTRICT AND CITY OF 1AN101D
GET C111
'No' AND WILL SE THOUGH E.TU
SJRWMD AND— of SANFORD, THEFPONDSWEI E "SIGNED TO 1-111E THEEEVOSiDISCHARGE FUR THE
STREET . o
REAR YARD
.. tO FT LOTS „DFT
1-11 SANE VIEW TERFRAC )
.... tO FT LOTSTR t AND (tA VI M ...1—
TOWNHOME LOT DETAIL
1..11 V1 oEE Mrx11naan,xs1.-V wM.EV, N—¢g
` �oraA.,,,�nPM„a>�� ua�as.s,r., ��an�nsro����,.ernaE..xwnwu,�,«ou�aE�EPMA,Ea�,o�x�PraM,..
nwE,.r.r,o Nao,ro,axzoxr.w. aes.oaEova.oa,ououor oV�,o�xo vvaM�,. en„rn,nes.:,+""a` Graphic Scale In Feet
zov.rvnn,.n
RIVERVIEWAVE. AT NARCISSUS AVE. TAP
1
1 [
I E`E
1
i
�g I CENTF,AL POND 1 (tl
G1I 1
a I' 16,786, SC SF
1.85 AC -FT -FT 1 s anex I
I
I 1 0 1 ,-
I E
I
1
z I 1
I
I
I 1
I 1 I I
I I j 1 1 1
I I I I(
18 18
6
14
12
o
_
to
10
8
8
2
o
6
mm�
eV
I
2
o
-6
scAIEI 1. 8'VERT
SECTION'A'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I I I” bx I I I I I I I M I I I I I I I I I
J L�Ij
- L iI
_ L_ I I
z �
iv
SCALso .0o zoo
Q ` E. 1° 100'
LE
V< \ une Monaos
.....cess
B
sem: aA. aoNao.
B� �;;�,A\ wn.coc0awsc.
� � e
—, E Tsar
Po..
eo.o � ..
G]
A
PASSIVE & ACTIVE SPACE KEY MAP
FENCE
.o„ * A-11Aa...
6—YL FENCE
,a9 . zo.Uc a,A oA
cAwAcerrt To,
*, ,UI—R1_1',SallU_'S.On. CROSS SECTION A -A'
`O1 ,s co„0P �xn retic.
T—
A' 11AN-115
FC
CROSS SECTION B -B'
,
*IMAM
SEMINOLE BOULEVARD LANDSCAPE BUFFER
SEMINOLE BOULEVARD LANDSCAPE BUFFER
7t Y
TYPICAL BUILDING ELEVATIONS
TYPICAL BUILDING CLUSTER END UNIT PERSPECTIVE
TYPICAL BUILDING CLUSTER FRONT PERSPECTIVE
-1-
TYPICAL BUILDING CLUSTER FRONT ELEVATION
-1-1
TYPICAL POOL CABANA I RESTROOMS
TYPICAL POOL & CABANA AREA
-1--
TYPICAL AMENITY BENCH
-1--
TYPICAL WATER FOUNTAIN
TYPICAL MAIL BOX CENTER
C � t16.z'Roor
55 2'4"E
022' (M)
oosfi44
Rio
<\ \ 60ry �O
qd rse F
LOT 19
IL
n ev' I �Ol
wETLPARCEL "2
al
ANO AREA a LOT 20 '0
VACANT
61 , a >o so moo-
-,' to x�e lOT J ° 31 t W-�tiRPCE LOT 21
G. 6E a
LOT 22
i LOT 16 Io 0 69 E -vE 6
I 55 0
x'^� f a 'W 805329{M(Y
LOT 15 LOT
I. .� LOT IA LOT 25 e, 1
noi0xa2o I
f4:.
POINT 0 _ x OAK NEW DRIVE ulm
BEGINNING 9''�_e - «.0 <w.w a.x ns,
66' R
a�« /W
�" x."ax..a. ..� --
€15a'� s IR-I"S8"
z . z D
LOT , 25'1.66' 4O) -
..G 32" E
N x v 9
LOT 12
PARCEL 1 W I se9'srza"w ss.ez•(,
.. _.._. ... 155 a0'(pS
� I
n
r
VACANT R N LOT n
m
WOODED
>.a<ft to a
LOT To i
z Sm a
PnNU AREA LOi 9
E YlOOCEO
� I I
LOT 8- `
u _
o a LOT I
LOT 6
oUG zoo
LOT s I CRAPRIC SCALE t"=.100'
I I
I
I I
I ` [Ip
POINT OF BEG NENNC PEANRCEPRCEL 2
m �'IWEST 11,00' (1) •••• •""
N 89'45'53"
V R/w x01 OPEN ,�
TIS soft
v„v w SITE
ALI 11 1111 `4 Ill Tl I I
IGG 11.11ITILI IAS .01 11111 -11 — 1111t IC1 D .1 11 1111.1-
1 nuEs. ovfau pMaa xwlusES eE'rwEEu PutcEt , nu° r,.vcEl ].
III
ALTA/NSPS LAND "TITLE
BOUNDARY SURVEY AND
TOPOGRAPHIC x SURVEY
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS & 1211211
nwo v1 *.vt sono acx, or wnr 1 Ll
6 6w[Evn oEEsS axo ”`
IC
seN ax[. rwa oA. x areAl afeoaoI aon. ne PAnf ,m, Poxxc aceenos or
NIH IASI III— Il IAII
si is-<wIII soolar<u°x"ocwxff lI oo' E�:.` o aE�R ;o
0A% "I'LL 11" 11111 .11 ALIIS IIIC 1.11�IIN
E soumwEST / sfcxox 1', 7owx1xc,5 xutx SANT.[ Je
SHEETI OF
N07' VALID WITHOUT
SHEETS 2 & 3
SHEET I- BOUNDARY INFORMATION
SI IEET 2 - TOPOGRAPIC INFORMATION
SHEET 3 - T'OPOGRAPIC INFORMATION
1.1
sumer ut rzCI 11 1 111 IN- SILL—I) mrusu to 1-1
c BE rvfc[ssnav To Lout[ I'll nctxnl rwnl -11.11 or 111 f, , 1I.t[
_
r
c 1 ': S ,� ..
26
owxErts,P nr rexas a<oxo r6oP_ Lx xoT to eE I.Ertxxfo G, txs armxo
coxsuu xc xc. Trus [. sootx STrtEn on,Axc6 fL saeo° ,Or ov< svis�sE+
H
MM L
TS IS I Si
5'�.
-I,i'a+.;
xo
oI—xcn -IS —1
IS
'-Inx
T Jnr
ofrxxc a ux[ e[o ww. a65[av[o ou Tr[
°ar snE_ A
SA,
A.xECWEafo ,noxuu[xTae nx wx xF.
-
_ os2
Fri WiC
20
/
uIll 641 111F
011
U-6 x�r of 11 [
=4
ti 66'€ i�
jj 3 [
T 53 5r
iIn[auu L t try nu. _,,CC To xE roMwuaus w a a t.
x
oa oTr Eus, w< e11 r s us[o As9as5 1C =lLATE m5 SUnvfv rzs xaxttuetoxs
11
wntu+o Duns. �P or ix.11 _LA x6w trws e[T"E wun xiox wntEx urvf ou wnwri un
811 ILAW,
xin[o 1, 1., suavttoa, info wr AITox snE u+o xor LACj,C Al
mE ont or nns wxr[v_
uuP/oR,wxc snowx nfx°[ax s to BN sPuv[o nt n x a o
a Pa cT o,s unnt. Evorn rxwTs 5 i/wur uifarztx[[icnc[LorrovEf oaAw nnnns owE�� x0
e
10 o
-A•—
s„m t Paoo[a.. cwnn xs x,.ea ,.cats _ oo EL[.aT ox or e t[[t. c, ana n.uoox,a +. .raofo
1111 Al
or is Prt'ono c/I. of °%w IIAL Ery nrc. ttoo s.
PNMT Opa EG NNNG PMN CE CEL 2
G SREE
—
.._.
�c PER OE COMMENCEMENT
��T� P,.•no..E oAI .w..E o,0axl1 oEo.
ALTA/NSPS LAND "TITLE
BOUNDARY SURVEY AND
TOPOGRAPHIC x SURVEY
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS & 1211211
nwo v1 *.vt sono acx, or wnr 1 Ll
6 6w[Evn oEEsS axo ”`
IC
seN ax[. rwa oA. x areAl afeoaoI aon. ne PAnf ,m, Poxxc aceenos or
NIH IASI III— Il IAII
si is-<wIII soolar<u°x"ocwxff lI oo' E�:.` o aE�R ;o
0A% "I'LL 11" 11111 .11 ALIIS IIIC 1.11�IIN
E soumwEST / sfcxox 1', 7owx1xc,5 xutx SANT.[ Je
SHEETI OF
N07' VALID WITHOUT
SHEETS 2 & 3
SHEET I- BOUNDARY INFORMATION
SI IEET 2 - TOPOGRAPIC INFORMATION
SHEET 3 - T'OPOGRAPIC INFORMATION
u
BOUNDARYSURVEY AND
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
vip
so
so
i5 c
O
SHEET 30T3
,., VALID WITHOU 1.
SHEETS I&2
"
SHEET -1NF
1UNDARYIoR—I.N
'S 'T
_ HFI, - lOPOGRAPICINloR.AUoN
LIFET3 _ I DPOGRAPIC INFORMATION
6 -97C -E- S
LEGEND AND ABBREKAWNS
W 8
1-2
wl
NO VERTICAL DATA
IN THIS AREA
COLLECTED WI -24
�
oh�
0ff1
9
PARCELh..
EL 20 20
PAL
WETLAND AREA
WOODED
� ut" %
ele
LOT 11
ha
L
wl 161 OT 16
15
LOT 22
7 wi-
GT.
LOT 15
vy.
13
w -12 L
LOT '�O.
T
LOT 23
'LOT 2
Loa . .........
otio _ _ST-
wl lo// �_ �`
BOUNDARY SURVEY AND
U
N
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
�g 1�
41-
11
.......................
L. -Sig -d ly z
BBE80.55d9]GJ41 E...
SHEET 2 OF 3
NOT VALID WITHOUT
SHEET'S I & 3
SHEETI -BOUNDARY INFORMATION
SHEET2. I"OPOGRAPIC INFORMATION
SHEET 3 - TOPOGRAPIC INFORMATION
CITY OF WS RM X
i
SkNFORD
FLORIDA Item No."�
CITY COMMISSION MEMORANDUM 21.241
NOVEMBER 8, 2021 AGENDA
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission
PREPARED BY: Eileen Hinson, AICP — Planner Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Norton N. Bonaparte, Jr., City Manager
SUBJECT: Application to Rezone approximately 21.56 acres from Seminole County's
R -IA, Single Family Residential, A-1, Agriculture and C-1, Retail
Commercial Commodities to City of Sanford PD, Planned Development for
the Townes at Lake Monroe at project address 2485 W Seminole Boulevard.
THIS IS A QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTER AND, AS SUCH, REQUIRES
DISCLOSURE OF ALL EX -PARTE COMMUNICATIONS, INVESTIGATIONS,
SITE VISITS AND EXPERT OPINIONS REGARDING THIS MATTER.
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:
❑ Unify Downtown & the Waterfront
❑ Promote the City's Distinct Culture
❑ Update Regulatory Framework
❑ Redevelop and Revitalize Disadvantaged Communities
SYNOPSIS:
A request to change the zoning of approximately 21.56 acres from. Seminole County's R -IA,
Single Family Residential, A-1, Agriculture and C-1, Retail Commercial Commodities to City of
Sanford PD, Planned Development for the Townes at Lake Monroe at project address 2485 W.
Seminole Boulevard has been received,
F'ISCALISTAFFING STATEMENT:
According to the Property Appraiser's records, the two properties are vacant, with an assessed tax
value and total tax bill for 2020 shown below:
Parcel Number
Assessed Value (2020)
Tax Bill (2020)
Property Status
23-19-30-300-0040-0000
$199,823
$2,780
Vacant Waterfront
23-19-30-501-0000-0140
$470,274
$6,543
Vacant — Commercial
If the amendment is approved and subsequently developed, the property will continue to be
assessed the City's millage rate for the proposed use.
No additional staffing anticipated if the amendment is approved.
-• r
The 21.56 -acre property is located on the southwest side of East Seminole Boulevard and Oak
Avenue just south of Lake Monroe. The property owners are Triple B Acquisitions, LLC and Leo
C Trepanier Revocable Trust. The applicant is Javier Omana with CPH, Inc. who was responsible
for completing the Citizens Awareness and Participation Plan (CAPP) requirements of the City's
LDRs. The Affidavit of Ownership and Designation of Agent forms are attached and other
information is available in order to ensure that all potential conflicts of interests are capable of
being discerned.
The property is currently assigned the R -IA, Single Family Residential, A-1, Agriculture, C-1,
Retail Commercial Commodities zoning classification/district under the Seminole County's Land
Development Code (LDCs) with the underlying future land use designations of SE, Suburban
Estates; COM, Commercial and LDR, Low Density Residential under the County's
Comprehensive Plan.
The applicant has submitted a petition for annexation to bring the property into the City of Sanford
in order to receive City services. Upon annexation, the site will maintain its current land uses as
assigned by Seminole County, until an amendment is processed to incorporate the property into
the City's Comprehensive Plan. In addition to the annexation and in conjunction with this rezone,
the applicant has submitted a request to amend the Comprehensive Plan from Seminole County's
land use classifications of SE, Suburban Estates; COM, Commercial and LDR, Low Density
Residential Future Land use to the City of Sanford's WDBD, Waterfront Downtown Business
District.
The property is not located within any of the overlay zoning districts associated with the downtown
and riverfront; however, it is located within Sub Area 9 of the 2015 City of Sanford/Seminole
County Joint Planning Agreement. Sub Area 9 dictates that all parcels between the railroad and
US 17-92 from Mellonville Avenue to 1-4 will be assigned the Future Land Use designation of
WDBD, Waterfront Downtown Business District as they are annexed into the City.
As outlined in the City's Comprehensive Plan, the WDBD is designed to provide centralized
residential, governmental, cultural, institutional, and general commercial activities within the
downtown and waterfront urban area, while preserving the City's historic character and cultural
heritage through context -sensitive design. The designation provides a planning and management
framework for promoting the revitalization, development and redevelopment of the historic downtown
commercial area. The purpose of the WDBD is to:
• Generate a revitalization effort that attracts private sector investment and strengthens
the City's economy;
• Establish the district as a Regional center;
• Strengthen public/private partnerships;
• Enhance the livability of North Seminole County by encouraging improved
residential, retail, educational, cultural and entertainment opportunities; and
• Provide the framework for redevelopment and infill.
The applicant has submitted a request to rezone the property from Seminole County's R- I A, Single
Family Residential, A-1, Agriculture, C-1, Retail Commercial Commodities zoning
classification/di strict to a City of Sanford PD, Planned Development to establish a proposed 04 -
unit single Family attached, residential development.
A rezoning of the property to PD to establish the proposed attached Single Family Residential use
(townhomes) as specified on the Townes at Lake Monroe PD Master Plan provides the improved
residential component to enhance the livability of North Seminole County in accordance with the
requirements of the WDBD future land use designation and is consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan in that regard. The consistency review of the request with the goals, objective
and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan predominantly assesses whether the request is
consistent with the intended designation, discourages urban sprawl, creates neutral or minimal
concurrency impacts and has minimal impacts to natural systems.
Policy 1. IL 2 of the Future Land Use Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan: The City shall
apply performance criteria objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan to developments
and all new development shall comply with the following criteria, all of which shall be
implemented through mandatory site plan review of new development:
0 Parking Provisions: New development within the WDBD shall be served by
adequate parking resources. New development shall provide off-street parking
sufficient to serve each proposed new development either on site or through the
provision of a shared parking agreement.
• Urban Design Amenities: Proposed new development shall provide a higher
level of urban design amenities including landscaping, compatible signage, and
pedestrian linkages together with a broader mix of land uses attractive to potential
users of the downtown area.
0Mix of Land Uses: Achieve a higher level of urban design amenities
together with a broader mix of land uses attractive to potential users of the
downtown and waterfront area.
As the project is proposed as Townhomes, each lot will provide parking in the form of garages and
tandem driveways. In addition, the area adjacent to the amenity area is proposed with additional
parking for guests and overflow parking in addition to parking for those utilizing the amenity
space. The townhome use is an appropriate transitional use, meeting the requirements of the higher
density and more urban form, while maintaining the single-family element that surrounds the
property on the east and the south.
Policy FLU 1. IL 3 of the Future Land Use Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan: The City
shall establish aesthetic cohesiveness in the City's Lake Monroe Waterfront Corridor and Historic
Downtown District through an architectural design program. The City shall continue to enforce
the City's LDRs to enhance the identity design, and vitality of the Lake Monroe waterfront
commercial area and the Commercial Historic District. The Lake Monroe Waterfront Corridor and
Historic Commercial District shall continue to be part of an architectural design program that shall
be coordinated closely with the public and private special interest groups concerned with
promoting the central traditional neighborhood.
The Master Plan as shown minimizes impacts to wetland and flood areas as well as proposes a
creative architectural element to the townhomes proposed.
Given the urban character encouraged within the WDBD and while considering the impacts to the
neighboring subdivision and the environs that surround the site, staff finds the proposed attached
single family development and associated master plan to be consistent with the criteria noted
above, previous approvals and the goals, objectives and policies set forth in the City's
Comprehensive Plan.
A Citizens Awareness and Participation Plan (CAPP) was held on Tuesday, July 27, 2021, from
6:30 to 8:30 PM. A total of 76 invitations were mailed out including all the owners of properties
within 500 feet of the subject parcels. A CAPP report is attached. In addition, the applicant has
proposed modifications to the master plan based on the feedback received from adjacent neighbors
and has provided revised concepts to the plan associated with that input, which are included as an
attachment to this report.
In addition, additional attachments include submittals from nearby property owners including
emails and a PowerPoint presentation that was mailed in and later presented at the P&Z. The
presentation given to the P&Z included a few additional slides; however, the packet contains that
which was provided to the P&Z.
The item was presented for consideration to the Planning and Zoning Commission on October 7,
2021. Lengthy testimony was given by the adjacent neighbors and other interested parties as well
as a presentation by the applicant Javier Omana. After hearing the testimony and presentations,
the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended the City Commission approve the request to
Rezone approximately 21.56 acres from Seminole County's R -1 A, Single Family Residential, A-
1, Agriculture and C-1, Retail Commercial Commodities to City of Sanford PD, Planned
Development for the Townes at Lake Monroe at project address 2485 W Seminole Boulevard
subject to a Development Order containing all recommendations of staff and the following
additional condition:
The action was by a vote of 6 to 1, Dominick Fiorentino dissenting, citing Future Land Use Policy
1.11.2, stating the development does not provide for a mix of land uses needed along Lake Monroe.
LEGAL REVIEW:
The City Attorney has not reviewed the staff report and the specific analysis provided by City
staff, but has noted the following: Section 166.033, Florida Statutes, provides as follows (please
note emphasized text):
"(1) When reviewing an application for a development permit that is certified by
a professional listed in s. 403.0877, a municipality may not request additional
information from the applicant more than three times, unless the applicant waives
the limitation in writing. Before a third request for additional information, the
applicant must be offered a meeting to attempt to resolve outstanding issues. Except
as provided in subsection (4), if the applicant believes the request for additional
information is not authorized by ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal authority,
the municipality, at the applicant's request, shall proceed to process the application
for approval or denial.
(2) When a municipality denies an application for a development permit,
the municipality shall give written notice to the applicant. The notice must
include a citation to the applicable portions of an ordinance, rule, statute, or
other legal authority for the denial of the permit.
(3) As used in this section, the term "development permit" has the same
meaning as in s. 163.3164, but does not include building permits.
(4) For any development permit application filed with the municipality after
July 1, 2012, a municipality may not require as a condition of processing or issuing
a development permit that an applicant obtain a permit or approval from any state
or federal agency unless the agency has issued a final agency action that denies the
federal or state permit before the municipal action on the local development permit.
(5) Issuance of a development permit by a municipality does not in any way
create any right on the part of an applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal
agency and does not create any liability on the part of the municipality for issuance
of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the
obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in
a violation of state or federal law. A municipality shall attach such a disclaimer to
the issuance of development permits and shall include a permit condition that all
other applicable state or federal permits be obtained before commencement of the
development.
(6) This section does not prohibit a municipality from providing information to
an applicant regarding what other state or federal permits may apply."
The above -referenced definition of the term "development permit" is as follows:
"(16) 'Development permit' includes any building permit, zoning permit,
subdivision approval, rezoning, certification, special exception, variance, or any
other official action of local government having the effect of permitting the
development of land." (Section 163.3164(16), Florida Statutes).
Thus, if this application is denied, a denial development order must be issued which must cite to
the applicable portions of each ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal authority supporting the
denial of the application. For example, if a goal, objective or policy of the Sanford Comprehensive
Plan were to be the basis for a denial, then such goal, objective or policy must be part of the motion
proposing the denial. A denial development order would be drafted to implement the actions of
the Planning and Zoning Commission in the event of such occurrence. Accordingly, any motion
to deny must state, with particularity, the basis for the proposed denial.
The term "development order" is defined as follows and, as can be seen, refers to the "granting,
denying, or granting with conditions [ofl an application":
"(15) 'Development order' means any order granting, denying, or granting with
conditions an application for a development permit." (Section 163.3164(15),
Florida Statutes).
The City Commission approved the first reading of Ordinance No. 4637 on October 25, 2021, with
modifications to be considered on second reading as follows:
1. The applicant shall remove the sidewalk/trail along the east to limit the removal of the
existing trees and reduce the impervious in the natural buffer.
2. Staff shall work with the applicant to add additional trees to fill in any gaps in the existing
buffer created by the installation of the fence.
3. That the separation between townhomes be increased to 25 feet not 20 feet as requested in
the waivers for the project.
The City Clerk published notice of the 2°a Public Hearing in the Sanford Herald on October 31,
2021.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommend the City Commission adopt an ordinance
rezoning approximately 21.56 acres from Seminole County's R -IA, Single Family Residential, A-
1, Agriculture and C-1, Retail Commercial Commodities to City of Sanford PD, Planned
Development for the Townes at Lake Monroe, a proposed 104 unit attached single family
townhome development at project address 2485 W. Seminole Boulevard based on consistency
with the goals, objectives and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan, subject to annexation
and land use amendment, and subject a development order containing the following conditions as
recommended by staff-
1 . Pursuant to Section 4.3.G of the City's LDRs, this rezoning shall expire 3 years
from the effective date of this Ordinance if not all improvements have been
completed or an extension granted.
2. All development shall be consistent with the Townes at Lake Monroe PD Master
Plan, revision dated July 20, 2021, unless otherwise specifically set forth in any
associated development order; provided, however, that all subsequent development
orders shall be consistent with the provisions of this Ordinance.
3. Unless specifically requested and approved on the referenced PD Master Plan, any
required elements missing from or not shown on the PD Master Plan shall comply
with the City's LDRs.
4. The final design and location of all driveways and access points including, but not
limited to, cross access locations, shall be proposed within and shall be subject to
City approval during, the development plan review and approval process.
5. A decorative and functional fountain shall be installed in all wet retention ponds as
part of development approval which approval shall provide for ongoing
maintenance requirements and responsibilities upon the appropriate party, but not
the City.
6. A dog walk area with waste collection receptacles shall be provided as determined
by the City for use by residents of the development.
7. A comprehensive signage program meeting the standards of the City's LDRs, shall
be required for the entire development including, but not limited to, the commercial
and multiple family residential uses.
8. Unless specifically requested and approved on the Townes at Lake Monroe PD
Master Plan or the associated PD Development Order, all development shall
comply with:
a. Lighting and pedestrian amenities shall be included to improve the overall
image of the pedestrian network.
b. A comprehensive landscape design, including landscape and hardscape
elements shall be provided to complement the existing Riverwalk
improvements. The comprehensive landscape design shall incorporate
landscape/hardscape elements to screen any mechanical equipment/
appurtenances from the public right of way.
9. A preliminary subdivision plan and subdivision improvement plan shall be submitted,
subject to approval by the City with all construction activity being subject to approval by
the City, and a subsequent subdivision plat being reviewed, approved, and recorded, in any
certificates of occupancy.
10. The Owner shall install a minimum of 5 -foot wide sidewalks on both sides of the streets.
11. A School Capacity Availability Letter of Determination letter shall be required from the
Seminole County School District prior to the recording of the final plat.
12. If City staff and the property owner are unable to agree to the details of this Development
Order in any way, the matter will be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission
for resolution at a public hearing, and the matter will be adjudicated by means of a
development order or denial development order relating thereto.
And the following additional conditions as added at the Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting:
13. A new traffic study shall be accomplished at the time of Engineering Review of the project
based on the timing of the original study not accurately reflecting traffic counts.
In agreeing to the above conditions, the property owner will agree that, in accordance with the
provisions of Section 70.45, Florida Statutes, pertaining to governmental exactions, the City has
not imposed any prohibited exaction. The term "prohibited exaction" is defined by that statue to
mean ". . . any condition imposed by a governmental entity on a property owner's proposed use
of real property that lacks an essential nexus to a legitimate public purpose and is not roughly
proportionate to the impacts of the proposed use that the governmental entity seeks to avoid,
minimize, or mitigate."
SUGGESTED MOTION:
"I move (approve/deny/approve with conditions) to adopt Ordinance No. 4637."
Attachments: 0).
Project Information Sheet.
(2).
Site Zoning Map.
(3).
Site Aerial Map.
(4).
Citizen Awareness and Participation Plan Report
(5).
Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment dated June 15, 2021
o Table of Contents / Figures/Appendices
o Property Owners / Applicant -Authorized Agent / Consultants
o Project Overview
■ Location Map
■ Aerial Photograph
■ Existing Future Land Use Map (Seminole County)
■ Existing Zoning Map (Seminole County)
■ Future Land Use Map (City of Sanford)
■ Zoning Map (City of Sanford)
o Demonstrate Compatibility with Adjacent Land Uses
o Demonstrate the Changes in Character to the Surrounding Area
o Demonstrate the Support and Furthering of City Plan Goals, Objectives
and Policies
o Policies of the East Central Florida Strategic Regional Policy Plan
o Facility Capacity Impact Assessments
o School Board Assessment
o Transportation Assessment
o Conclusion
o Appendices
A. Property Appraiser's Property Card Printouts
B. Affidavit of Ownership & Designation of Agent Forms
C. Boundary & Topographic Survey
D. Legal Description
E. School Impact Analysis
F. Traffic Impact Analysis
G. Environmental Assessment Report
H. Resolution No. 2020-R-70 Vacation of Public Right -Of -Way
(11).
Reduced copy of the Townes at Lake Monroe PD Master Plan, Revised July 20, 2021.
(12).
Email from Mr. Rob Campbell
(13).
Revised Amenity Exhibit per neighbor Input
(12).
Letters from Dan and Diana Garris containing concerns about the development
(13).
Email to the City from Mr. Rob Campbell and PowerPoint slides proposed for presentation
(14).
11 x 17 Copy of the Townes at Lake Monroe PD Master Plan, Revised July 20, 2021.
(15).
Ordinance No. 4637
T:\Development Review\03-Land Development\2021\2485 W. Seminole Blvd\Rezone\CC\CC Memo - 2485 W
Seminole Blvd - PDRZ.docx
PROJECT INFORMATION — 2485 W. SEMINOLE BOULEVARD
PD REZONE
Proposed Use
Project Address:
Current County Zoning:
Equivalent City Zoning:
Proposed Zoning:
Existing Land Use:
Tax Parcel Numbers:
Site Area:
Property Owners
Applicant/Agent:
Rezone approximately 21.56 acres from Seminole County's R -IA, Single Family
Residential, A-1, Agriculture and C-1, Retail Commercial Commodities to City of
Sanford PD, Planned Development for the Townes at Lake Monroe
Single Family Attached – Townhomes
2485 W. Seminole Boulevard
R -IA, Single Family Residential, A-1, Agriculture, C-1, Retail Commercial
Commodities
SR -IA, Single Family Residential, AG, Agriculture, RC -I, Restricted Commercial
PD, Planned Development
Vacant
23-19-30-501-0000-0140 and 23-19-30-300-0040-0000
21.56 acres
Triple B Acquistitions LLC
120 Stone Post Road
Longwood, FL 32779-2745
Javier Omana - CPH, Inc.
1117 E. Robinson Street
Orlando, FL 32801
Trepanier Leo C Rev Trust
C/O Castello, Carol T
286 Club House Blvd
New Smyrna, FL 32168-7910
Phone: (407) 425-0452
Email: jomana@cphcorp.coi-n
CAPP Meeting:
A CAPP meeting was held on July 9, 2021. A copy of the report is attached.
ZoninE
Future Land Use
Current Use
North
N/A
N/A
Lake Monroe
South
R -IA (County)
LDR
Single Family Residential
AG (City)
East
R -IA
LDR
Single Family Residential
West
A -I
PUBC
Conservation/Vacant
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPLIANCE REVIEW
Planning staff has reviewed the request and has determined the use and proposed improvements to be consistent
with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
Current Future Land Use
Proposed Future Land Use
IND, Industrial
1, Industrial
TADevelopment Review\03-Land Devclopnieilt\2021\3851 E Lake Mary Blvd\Rezone\PZC\Project Info - 3851 E Lake Mary Blvd - Rezone.doc