HomeMy WebLinkAboutDO #21-35_507 Oak AvenueGRANT MALOY, SEMINOLE COUNTY
CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER
CFN# 2021166196 Bk:10129 Pg:155-160(6Pgs)
REC: 12/21/2021 3:30:40 PM by cjones
RECORDING FEES $52.50
This Instrument Prepared By and Return To:
Julie Adams Scofield, AICP
Historic Preservation Planner ---- ---
Planning and Development Services Department
City Hall
300 North Park Avenue
Sanford, Florida 32771
File #: 21-006915
Permit #: COA21-000249
Tax Parcel Identification Number: 25-19-30-5AG-0704-006A.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD OF THE CITY OF SANFORD DEVELOPMENT
ORDER No. 21-35 RELATING TO 507 OAK AVENUE AND ISSUING
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
l`Q The Historic Preservation Board (HPB) of the City of Sanford issued this
Development Order issuing a Certificate of Appropriateness relating to and touching
and concerning the following described property: 507 Oak Avenue, which is assigned
Tax Parcel Identification Number: 25-19-30-5AG-0704-006A assigned by the Seminole
County Property Appraiser.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Property Owner: TA Ventures LLC, a Florida limited liability company.
1601-1 North Main Street
# 3159
Jacksonville, Florida 32206-4453
Applicant: Trevor A. Bartley
Bartley Construction, LLC.
1967 Brantley circle
Clermont, Florida 34711
(Seabree Clemonds also appeared).
Project: Approval of the HPB to add a front porch and replace front doors with
regard to property located at 507 Oak Avenue.
Requested Development Approval: The Applicant requested approval of the HPB
to add a front porch and replace front doors with regard to property located at 507 Oak
I I P a g e
Avenue.
Additional Findings: The project is located at 507 Oak Avenue in the Sanford
Residential Historic District. The frame vernacular building was constructed in 1894 (as
evidence by 1986 survey research) and has been added to and significantly modified.
The building originally faced 5th Street and in 1929 was rotated as a whole to face Oak
Avenue and moved south on the lot to make room for the public library. The applicant
received approval at the October HPB meeting to remove aluminum siding and replace
the existing aluminum windows with wood windows.
The applicant is now proposing to add a front porch with hipped roof, wood columns
and railing, tongue and groove ceiling and decking, to build new wood steps with
handrails, and to replace the front doors with similar wood doors.
No photographs have been located showing a porch on this building. However, the
Sanborn maps depict a porch on the east and south elevations. The proposed porch
roof, tongue and groove ceiling and decking, and railings meet the criteria of Schedule
"S" of the City's Land Development Regulations (LDRs). The porch roof will be finished
with shingles to match the main roof and porch fascia and trim will also match the main
roof. The proposed replacement double wood doors are similar to the doors currently in
place which were installed in 2006. They are compatible with the style and period of the
building.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
(a). Pursuant to Section 8.0 of Schedule "S" of the City's LDRs, the HPB has
reviewed the proposed (as modified) Certificate of Appropriateness and all application
documentation and matters relating thereto in accordance with the procedures for
2 1 P a g e
altering historic landmarks or structures within historic districts as set forth in Schedule
"S" of the City's LDRs.
(b). Specifically, Schedule "S" of the City's LDRs provides as follows:
(1). Porch flooring shall be wood, tongue and grove, and must
match original porch flooring in size, shape, orientation and texture.
(2). Porch flooring shall be oriented perpendicular to the
building's fagade, or shall match the original orientation.
(3). New porch elements, such as, by way of example only, and
not as a limitation, balusters and columns, brackets, trim and
architectural embellishments shall be compatible with the style and
period of the building and shall be substantiated by physical and/or
pictorial evidence of the subject property.
(4). Porch additions shall have a roof type that is either similar to
the existing roof or is in character with the style and period of the
............... . .
(5). Windows and doors shall be glazed in clear glass with no
more than 10% daylight reduction.
(6). The use of reflective glass and reflective film is prohibited on
all buildings
(7). Only when a change is appropriate to the style and period of
the building shall doors be relocated, enlarged, reduced or
introduced.
(8). Doors with modem designs, flush or sliding glass doors, or
3 1 P a g e
any type of door that is inappropriate to the style or period of the
structure are prohibited and unlawful.
(c). To the extent that a conclusion of law as set forth herein also constitutes
a factual finding, then such shall be taken to be so as part of this Development Order.
(d), The proposed Certificate of Appropriateness is hereby found and
determined to comply with the aforestated.
(e). Additionally, the Certificate of Appropriateness sought is hereby found and
determined to be consistent with the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan and
development of the property as proposed would be consistent with and in compliance to
applicable land development regulations and all other applicable regulations and
ordinances as set forth in the Code of Ordinances of the City of Sanford.
(f). This is a development order and shall not create contractual rights of the
property owner against the City nor contractual obligations of the City to the property
owner and, to that end, the property owner shall have no contractual rights or remedies
against the City with regard to any land use action of the City.
(g). The City has not waived any rights or remedies by taken the action set
forth herein or any successive development orders and reserves any and all rights and
remedies available to the City under controlling law including, but not limited to, the
protections under the laws pertaining to sovereign immunity.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1). The aforementioned application for a Certificate of Appropriateness is
APPROVED.
4 1 P a g e
(2). This Development Order granting approval of a Certificate of
Appropriateness touches and concerns the aforedescribed property and is subject to
code enforcement action in accordance with the controlling , provisions of law.
As approvedand authorized for execultion, by the Historic Preservation Board of
the City of Sanford at its meeting of November 17, 2021.
EU-1IMA
ras,, HHB Clerk
0
T. I
r
IM
17,2021.
5 1 P a o e
ENMRAZI[i 1211 �1 i
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the subject property owner has signed and sealed
these presents, the day and year written below and AGREES to all of the terms and
conditions of this Development Order the undersigned named persons having full
authority to execute this document.
UXL
Witness # I
Printed,;Name-,Ldm�,d �01PTO
1'9
4&
4itnes-s # 2
Printed Name:
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF SEMINOLE )
TA VENTURES LLC
Trevor Bartley, Member
o
Austin Cummings, Member
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of 0 physical
presence or 0 online notarization, this INday of December, 2021 by Trevor Bartley and
Austin Cummings. They are personally k
'0y =Notaryftb4c State of F"a
12 INN _'ea
41� - A Seabree 0 Clernonds
as identification. ;y W C
My ComAsftn HH 109292
Expires
:.Pi'� 1 '3 5
xpires 031E025
0
,17
NOTARY PUBLIC
My commission expires: q
6 1 P a g e