The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDO #21-30_507 Oak AvenueThis Instrument Prepared By and Return To: Julie Adams Scofield, AICP Historic Preservation Planner Planning and Development Services Department City Hall 300 North Park Avenue Sanford, Florida 32771 Tax Parcel Identification Number: 25-19-30-5AG-0704-006A. Case M 21-006075 Permit #: COA21-000222 GRANT MALOY, SEMINOLE COUNTY CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT a COMPTROLLER CFN# 2022097629 8k:10303 Pg:754-761(8Pgs) REC: 08!24/2022 2:26:36 PM by cjones RECORDING FEES $69.50 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD OF THE CITY OF SANFORD DEVELOPMENT ORDER No. 21-30 RELATING TO 507 OAK AVENUE AND ISSUING CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS The Historic Preservation Board (HPB) of the City of Sanford issued this Development Order issuing a Certificate of Appropriateness relating to and touching and concerning the following described property: 507 Oak Avenue, which is assigned Tax Parcel Identification Number: 25-19-30-5AG-0704-006A assigned by the Seminole County Property Appraiser. FINDINGS OF FACT Property Owner: TA Ventures LLC 1601-1 North Main Street # 3159 Jacksonville, Florida 32206-4453 Applicant: Trevor A. Bartley Bartley Construction, LLC. 1967 Brantley circle Clermont, Florida 34711 (Cray A. Bartley also appeared). Project: Approval of the HPB to remove aluminum siding, replace windows and add a front porch with regard to property located at 507 Oak Avenue. Requested Development Approval: The Applicant requested approval of the HPB I I P a g e �Y F_ __ _� i ..\ . e Y,4 ' R to remove aluminum siding, replace windows and add a front porch with regard to property located at 507 Oak Avenue. Additional Findings: The subject property is located in the Sanford Residential Historic District. The frame vernacular building was constructed in 1894 (as shown in 1986 survey research) and has been added to and significantly modified. The building originally faced 5th Street and, in 1929, was rotated as a whole to face Oak Avenue and moved south on the lot to make room for the public library. Past inappropriate alterations include removal of a wraparound, one story porch, replacement aluminum windows sized differently from the original openings, and addition of aluminum siding. The applicant is proposing the following scope of work: (1). Remove aluminum siding and repair/replace wood siding to match historic material. (2). Replace 17 aluminum windows with JeldWen W-2500 wood double hung, 1/1 lite. (3). Replace one aluminum window on the right (south) elevation (an addition) with a 48" x 24" wood awning window. (4). Replace a second story door on the left (north) elevation with a 37" x 64" wood double hung 1/1 lite window and install siding matching existing to fill the remainder; and reveal a window (possibly door) opening and install a 36" x 60" fixed window on the first floor, left (north) elevation. All windows to be completed with sill and trim per attached sketch. (5). Add a front porch with hipped roof, wood columns and railing, 2 1 P a g e tongue and groove ceiling, and pressure treated 6" deck board. (This request was withdrawn at the hearing and will be submitted as a separate subsequent application). Removing the aluminum siding will significantly restore the historic quality of the house. The proposed wood double hung 1/1 lite windows meet the standards of Schedule "S" of the City's LDRs and are compatible with the style and period of the building. The proposed awning window has a horizontal orientation, but is located on a historic addition/secondary elevation. Schedule "S" of the City's LDRs states that rectangular windows be single or double hung, not fixed, as proposed for the north elevation. Returning the upper story door to a window restores the original appearance. Photographs have not been located showing a porch on this building. However, the Sanborn maps depict a porch on the east and south elevations. The proposed porch roof, ceiling, and railings meet the criteria of Schedule "S" of the City's LDRs, but the proposed porch deck boards, as proposed before withdrawal, did not. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW (a). Pursuant to Section 8.0 of Schedule "S" of the City's Land Development Regulations (LDRs), the HPB has reviewed the proposed (as modified) Certificate of Appropriateness and all application documentation and matters relating thereto in accordance with the procedures for altering historic landmarks or structures within historic districts as set forth in Schedule "S" of the City's LDRs. (b). Specifically, Schedule "S" of the City's LDRs provides as follows: (1). Resurfacing existing historic landmarks or contributing 3 1 P a g e buildings with new material that is inconsistent with the style of the building or was unavailable when the building was constructed, such as artificial stone, brick veneer, asbestos or asphalt shingles, rustic shakes, and vinyl or aluminum siding, is prohibited and unlawful. In cases where artificial siding is currently in place, its removal is not necessary. An owner may retain the material or remove it. If the material is removed, however, it shall be replaced with historically appropriate materials. (2). When siding which is inconsistent with the style of the house is removed, either from the fagade of a building or to re—open an enclosed porch, the original facade and the original fenestration shall be documented prior to the commencement of any rehabilitation construction. (3). If windows or window details are determined to be irreparable, they may be replaced provided that on the primary facades of contributing buildings, replacement windows shall match the existing original windows in size, configuration, material, design and placement. On secondary facades, replacement windows may be of a different design or type provided the windows are consistent with the style of the building. (4). Only when a change is appropriate to the style and period of the building may a window be relocated, enlarged, reduced or 41Paae introduced. (5). When replacing existing windows that are inappropriate to the style and period of the building, they shall be replaced with new windows that are appropriate to the style and period of the building. (6). All new windows shall have mullion profiles similar to contributing structures. (7). If single hung or double hung windows are placed in groupings, a 4" to 6" trim piece shall separate the windows. (8). If a window contains divided lites, true muntins or simulated true -divided lites (where a wood frame is glued to the exterior of the (9). If double paned windows are installed, an internal shadow bar shall also be used between the glasses. Inserted or removable grilles and flat grilles that do not replicate the profile and characteristics of the original window are prohibited on the exterior of the window pane. (10). The interior of the windowpane may have an inserted or removable grille provided that the grille is not flat and has a profile. (11). Windows and doors shall be glazed in clear glass with no more than 10% daylight reduction. (12). The use of reflective glass and reflective film is prohibited on all buildings. 5 1 P a g e (13). Only when a change is appropriate to the style and period of the building shall doors be relocated, enlarged, reduced or introduced. (14). Porch flooring shall be wood, tongue and grove, and must match original porch flooring in size, shape, orientation, and texture. (15) Porch flooring shall be oriented perpendicular to the building's facade, or shall match the original orientation. (16). New porch elements, such as, by way of example only, and not as a limitation, balusters and columns, brackets, trim and architectural embellishments shall be compatible with the style and period of the building and shall be substantiated by physical and/or pictorial evidence of the subject property. (17). Porch additions shall have a roof type that is either similar to the existing roof or is in character with the style and period of the building. (c). To the extent that a conclusion of law as set forth herein also constitutes a factual finding, then such shall be taken to be so as part of this Development Order. (d). The proposed Certificate of Appropriateness is hereby found and determined to comply with the aforestated. (e). Additionally, the Certificate of Appropriateness sought is hereby found and determined to be consistent with the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan and development of the property as proposed would be consistent with and in compliance 6 1 P a g e to applicable land development regulations and all other applicable regulations and ordinances as set forth in the Code of Ordinances of the City of Sanford. (1). The aforementioned application for a Certificate of Appropriateness is (2). This Development Order granting approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness touches and concerns the aforedescribed property and is subject to code enforcement action in accordance with the controlling provisions of law. Done and Ordered on the date first written below. As approved and authorized for execution by the Historic Preservation Board of the City of Sanford at its meeting of October 20�, 2021. ATTEST., HISTORIC PRESERVATION, BOARD OF THE CITY OF SANFORD A A on. (A.'l fAh MAI I I I 1/f Traci Houchin, MMC, FCRM, CTIN, k Chair Tfv` "7- '?."N �, A ate. 1 ,Nuhc pro tunc to October 20, 2021. -i 7-Fv-',-*F-Merrkk ADDITIONAL SIGNATURE BLOCK FOLLOWS: 71 P a g e . . .... . ....... IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the subject property owner has signed and sealed these presents the day and year written below and AGREES to all of the terms and conditions of this Development Order the undersigned named persons having full authority to execute this document. Witness # 1 Printed Name L-A Witness # 2 Printed Name: STATE OF FLORIDA M COUNTY OF SEMINOLE ) I r-11 kyl: 4 1' ! 111 L; I V *3 4 Trevor Bart rey, Member Austin 66mmings, Member A 0 1 vievagal 1, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public, in and for said State at Large who s authorized to take acknowledgments, do hereby certify that Trevor Bartley and Austin Cummings, being duly sworn, acknowledged before me that they executed the foregoing document, said persons being personally known to me, on this day that they, being informed of the contents of said instrument, they executed the same voluntarily. Given under my hand and official seal this 4qi. dajYr My commission expires: 8 111 a cy e