Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987 Sem Co Transportation Impact Fee Moratorium - Ord 1856TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROJECTS Project Name Niles/Improvement Expressway from SR 426 to CR 427/US 17-92 Expressway from CR 427/US 17-92 to I-4 Rinehart Road 2.0 from CR 46-A 4 lane to Lake Mary Blvd. Montgomery Road 1.5 from -SR 434 4 lane to SR 436 Douglas Road/intersection realignment 1.7 from SR 434 4 lane to SR 436 Sand Lake Road 1.5 from County Line Road 4 lane to West Lake Brantley Wekiva Springs Road 2.0 from Hunt Club Blvd 4 lane to SR 434 North Lake Boulevard .6/new from Center Street 2 lane to SR 436 Winter Springs Boulevard 3.3 from Tuskawilla Road 4 lane to SR 426 Chapman Road 1.3 from SR 426 2 lane to SR 434 Winter Park Drive 1.8 from SR 436 4 lane to Seminola Blvd Sunset Drive 1.7/new from SR 436 2 lane to Seminole Blvd Lockwood Road 3.2 from CR 419 2 lane to Orange County Line Mission Road 3.7/new from CR 419 2 lane to SR 434 Grant Line Road 1.9/new from CR 46-A 2 lane to SR 46 Oregon Avenue/Rinehart Road Extension 1.7/new from CR 46A 2 lane to SR 46 McCulloch Road 2.0 from Lockwood Road 2 lane to SR 434 11 DATE 7- ITEM (tH MEMORANDUM AUGUST 20, 1987 TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Engineering and Planning SUBJECT: County Transportation Impact Fee Moratorium Mr. Faison: City of Sanford's Ordinance No. 1856, copy attached, established a six-month moratorium on all transportation impact fees within the municipal limits of the City. This Ordinance was adopted on March 23, 1987 and will therefore expire on approxima- tely September 23, 1987, unless extended by City Commission. The Ordinance also directed that a study be conducted of appropriate transportation impact fees, if any, within the municipal limits of City of Sanford. The transportation element of our new Comprehensive Plan has just been received and is under review by staff. This transpor- tation element forms the basis and contains much of the substance of an appropriate impact fee study. The content and recommen- dations of this transporation element will be summarized and pre- sented together with staff recommendations by separate memorandum prior to the City Commission meeting of August 24, 1987. WAS:mch xc: City Planner DATE �? JY L�`i ITEM _ ORDINANCE NO. 1856 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING A SIX-MONTH MORATORIUM ON ALL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES; ESTABLISHING A TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE STUDY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE AND TERMINATION DATES. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida, has determined it to be in the best interest of the citizens of the City of Sanford, Florida, that a six-month moratorium on all transportation impact fees and a study of said fees be immediately implemented by the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA: SECTION 1. MORATORIUM. That a moratorium of six months is hereby placed upon all transportation impact fees within the municipal limits of the City of Sanford, Florida. During said moratoriuim there shall not be imposed or collected any transportation impact fees on any piece of real property or 1 residential or commercial building within the municipal limits of the City of Sanford, Florida. Said moratorium shall provide the City the opportunity to conduct a study and analysis to determine what should be the amount, if any, of impact fees charged and collected from any real property or development within the municipal limits of the City of Sanford, Florida. During said moratorium no ordinance or resolution shall be passed and enacted within the municipal limits of the City of Sanford, Florida, that places any moratorium on building, construction or occupancy of i structure or that purports to assess a fee or lien against property for transportation impacts unless said ordinance or resolution is approved by the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida. SECTION 2. STUDY. The City Manager of the City of Sanford, Florida, shall immediately commence a study and analysis for the purpose of determining present and projected growth and 1 and use patterns, present and projected transportation needs and hat should be the appropriate transportation impact fees, if ny, within the municipal limits of the City of Sanford, Florida, nd then report back to the City Commission within five (5) onths from the effective date of this ordinance. SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY. If any section or portion of section of this ordinance proves to be invalid, unlawful or nconstitutional, it shall not be held,to impair the validity, orce or effect of any other section or part of this ordinance. SECTION 4. CONFLICTS. That all ordinances or parts of rdinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby evoked. SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE AND EXPIRATION DATES. This rdinance and the moratorium set herein shall take effect mmediately upon the Ordinance's final passage and expire one undred eighty (180) days from the date of passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 23rd— day of March .D. 1987. ATTEST: DEPUTY QXTY CLERK MAYOR' City of Sanford, Florida. --2-- MEMORANDUM AUGUST 24, 1987 TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Engineering and Planning SUBJECT: County Transportation Impact Fee Moratorium Mr. Faison: This memorandum is in follow-up to my August 20, 1987 memoran- dum. The draft transportation element of our new Comprehensive Plan identifies a number of arterial and collector roads within the North Central Urban Service Area which are either currently inade- quate or are projected to become inadequate between now and 1997. These include the following: Sanford Avenue - CR 427 to Airport Blvd. - Presently Inadequate U.S. 17-92 - Lake Mary Blvd. to Airport Blvd. - Presently Inadequate U.S. 17-92 - CR 427 to SR -46A and from SR 46 to Volusia County Line - Inadequate in 1992 CR 46A - Country'Club Road to U.S. 17-92 - Inadequate in 1992 Airport Blvd. - SR 46 to CR 46A - Inadequate in 1992 CR 15 - U.S. 17-92 to SR 46 - Inadequate in 1997 U.S. 17-92 - CR 46 A to SR 46 - Inadequate in 1997 Although no roadways which are the responsibility of the City of Sanford are identified as becoming inadquate, the above list inclu- des those roads in the North Central Urban Service Area, which are the responsibility of other jurisdictions, which will require improvement to keep up with growth. Most of the County roads listed above are included in the list of roads to be improved by the County road impact fee, however, there is no specific schedule for improvements included in the Ordinance. It is therefore not possible to determine the time- liness of projected improvements and whether these improvements are therefore responsive to the needs of the City. To date, there have been no discussions between the City and County to fix specific schedules, or to otherwise respond to the City's proposal for discussions as contained in the North Central Urban Service Area proposal. The Transportation Element Study essentially validates all road segment improvements contained in the County Transportation Impact Study for the Sanford Urban Area. Based on this information the City Commission could feel justified in not extending the Transportation Impact Fee Moratorium, even though specific schedu- les for improvements are not in hand, and other concerns of the City contained in the North Central Urban Service Area proposal copy attached, have not been responded to. First reading on an ordinance to extend the moratorium must be approved on August 24 if a moratorium extension ordinance is to be adopted before expiration of the present moratorium. WAS:mch DATEr � r� -, �, 7 ITEM `5 o S�n� orct, Flo __ - ridd P.O boa 777E — 32 • 72- , -76 7eee.onone (305) :322-3167 April 9, 1967 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR }3ETTYE D. SMITE Commissioner Fred Streetman, Chairman Board of County Commissioners of Seminole County County Services Building 1101 East First Street Sanford, Florida 32771 Dear Chairman Streetman: RE: URBAN SERVICE PROPOSAL The enclosed proposal is provided for your review. The Sanford City -Commission believes that the recommendations have merit. we would like to have a join workshop meeting with the Board. of County Commissioners to discuss this proposal. Such a meeting would provide an opportunity sor respective Commissioners to present recommenaations and establish policy concurrently in a public format for the mutual benefit o_ our constituency. I look fo=ward to ciscussinc this propcsal in a joint wcrxshop meet inc_ -lease contact me or Fxecutire Secretary dap Donahoe to schedule a �•:orxsaop. (322-21i.!orf_cE, Or - 323-0763 home) Since~eiy, 3et-ve)D. Smi.h Mayor, City of Sar-'ord cc. Cor�.:.:i_si one_ Gle: n ssioner Christensen Com.* issioner R4 rchhoff Cor�.issioners, Sanford Cicv Commission "The Friendly City" For Discussion Purposes Onwv PROPOSAL FOR A NORTE CENTRAL URBAN SERVICE AGREEMENT SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA march 30, 1987 Intent and Purpose The intent and purpose of the North Central Urban Service Agreement is to establish and agree upon responsibilities, service areas and major provision of transportation, potable water and wastewater facilities and services within an area of concern to both Seminole County and City of Sanford. The immediate result of this proposal would be an interlocal agreement and good -faith actions by Seminole County and the City of Sanford. The overall result will be to insure cost effective and coordinated services and avoid inappropriate duplication and overlapping services by both entities that, if not avoided now, would drive up consumer costs to residents of the area. Agreement also regards matters of jurisdiction and the desirable resolution of differences without liticration paid for by taxpayers. General provisions of this pro- posal follow. Urban Service P_rea The North Central Urban Service Area Map illustrates an area of mutual concern to Seminole County and City of Sanford. Tire map is ceneralized_ interlocal a_creements would specify that provisions apply only to Inco=Doraiea areas c_ Sanf crd and unlnco_porated areas of Ses:Inole County. "'-anspc_ tar:. cn with a few notable exceptions, the State of lOrida and Se.T_incle County are responsible -cr the major road network in the ::crth Central arEa. The City O- San-Qrd i5 respflnSible for Certain collector and feeder roads. Seminole County has developed and a oaten a ` =ar_sport.atiom. l.::pact Fee proSrar.:. City Of Sa ford's _ram_spertation planning program re -leets methodologies similar to that employed by Seminole County's Transportation Manacement P_oarara to identify needs and costs The City's pro_ram will be completed within 30 days of this writing. Therefore, for the rst -!me, a con^.-pariso_n between transportation needs perceived by beth entities will be availacle. D«-erent results are __kel_v to be the res:lt of different input data regarding land use and other socioeconomic CnaraCteriSticS. To date, City of Sanford is on record as CCpflsinc Seminole C ou_n=v' S tram_snortation ii^..Z)act fee _roeram based on lack of Ci_y _rp t, d-isacreerae~t over socioecene- r:._.. .data ana resulting _-provements . This proposal recommends that: 1. City of Sanford support and participate in Seminole County transportation impact fee program, and the recently adopted Seminole County Ordinance. 2. Seminole County incorporate City -perceived needs into impact fee program for initial and update versions. Additional streets required could be classified as collectors and could increase fees for North Central District. Potable Water and wastewater The Citv of Sanford is implementing a $30.5M Water and 4,'astewater Master Plan program that includes a Triple -A rated bond issue of $17M for the first phase. The program is based on a 201 Facilities Program that is approved by federal, state and regional agencies. The first phase includes S8.6M of grant -funded construc- tion. The approved service area generally covers areas of the City of Sanford and unincorporated area east of 1-4 and north of the U.S. 17-92/C.R. 427 intersection. The City of Sanford pre- sently provides service to both incorporated and unincorporated areas. Seminole County has developed planning studies that generally reflect proposed services and facilities that would duplicate and overlap City favi li ties. 'Kith the exception of a small area with 1�mited capacity located along County Road 427 between Sanford Avenue and U.S. 17-52, Seminole County ages not now provide ootabie water and wastewater services i n the Ivo=th Central area. This proposal recommends that: 1. Seminole County support and participate in Citv of Sanford water and. Wastewater =ac' -_ties Program with Ivcrth Central Area. 2. City and County agree upon standard procedures and development cui.^e?ines regarding engineering ana financial recuirements. Fire and Rescue Ser,*,ce se -mi noIe County has a}:uressea a desire f or a Fire and Rescue F irst Response agreement C_t_t- of Sanford now cperates two. - ll - eau paed and manned Fire and Rescue Stations and has uaaeted for a _.__rd _ Seminole County now r,a__.tains Fire and Rescue Stasi ons south and west of the Forth Central Urban Service Area, and within ...hi s area east Of Sanforc City _Fir,=ts. This proposal recommends that: 1. City and County agree to join together in a first response agreement to benefit all residents of the area. Demonstration of Good Faith To demonstrate goon -faith the following immediate actions are recomended:. 1. City of Sanford rescinds transportation impact fee moratorium ordinance. 2. Seminole County rescinds present annexation litigation against City of Sanford, and agree, generally, to not oppose right of annexation self determination by land. owners w4thin the North Central Urban Service Area. 3. City of.Sanford and Seminole County agree in principle to a Fire and Rescue First Response program. 4. Seminole County revise General Sanford Estates Draft Development Order/Conditions of Approval to reflect City of Sanford water and sewer service to be used for -entire project on a direct sale to consumer basis. Sumrar%7 ana Conclusion This =roposal reflects a balanced approach to providing urban ser- vices at the local level. Seu,_nole County retainS reSponSibillty for major tra==lc ..i cull -n on wh .1! e C=ty of Sanford prorideS tea- 0r potabl. a water and wast e%.-ater U--i-11-ties in the North Central Urban Service Area. F:a; n will S::ppo=t the other in Meeting their respective responsibilities to residents of the urban service area. Once these responsibilities are agreed upon, interlocal acreemen is be drafted by the responsible ent_ tz-, _ . e. , ransvortation by Seminole Count-, water and sewer by City of r< Saford, and _ire and Rescue first Response by Seminole Count-. ORDINANCE NO. 1884 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, EXTENDING THE MORATORIUM ON ALL TRANSPORTA- TION IMPACT FEES; ESTABLISHING A TRANSPORTA- TION IMPACT FEE STUDY; REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 1856; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Sanford, 'Florida determined it to be in the best interest of the citizens of the City of Sanford, Florida, that a moratorium on all City or County transportation impact fees and a study of said fees be implemented by the City, and enacted Ordinance No. 1856 to provide for same; WHEREAS, the City is greatly concerned about the following: (1) The power of a noncharter county to enact an Ordinance which directly affects citizens and their property rights within an incorporated municipality. (2) The threat of citizens screaming "double taxation" when impact fees are imposed by multiple entities. (3) The validity of underlying data and assumptions that went into the creation of the districts and the priorities for construction and lack of City participation in the data development process. (4) That Ordinance No. 1856 previously adopted by the City and the termination date contained therein will not give the City time to complete and implement its transportation impact fee study_ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA: Section 1: MORATORIUM. That the moratorium upon all City or County transportation impact fees within the municipal limits of the City of Sanford, Florida, is hereby extended. During said moratorium, there shall not be imposed or collected any transportation impact fees on any piece of real property or residential or commercial building within the municipal limits of the City of Sanford, Florida. Said moratorium shall provide the City the opportunity to continue its study and analysis to determine what should be the amount, if any, of impact fees charged and collected from any real property or development within the municipal limits of the City of Sanford, Florida. During said moratorium, no Ordinance or resolution shall be passed and enacted by any governmental authority within the municipal limits of the City of Sanford, Florida, that places any moratorium on building, construction, or occupancy of structure or that purports to assess a fee or lien against property for transportation impact, unless said Ordinance or resolution is approved by the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida. SECTION 2: STUDY. The City Staff shall continue its study and analysis for the purpose of determining present and projected growth and land use patterns, present and projected transportation needs, and what should be the appropriate transportation impact fees, if any, within the municipal limits of the City of sanford, Florida, and then report back to the City Commission before the termination date herein. SECTION 3. REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 1856. Ordinance No. 1856 is here by repealed as of the effective date of this Ordinance. SECTION 4. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption and shall continue to D cPmhPr 34 1987 - PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of Soniamhar A.D. 1987. v MAYOR ATTEST: 'CL z-:ne' ua-ty--c+c=ission or ty of Sanford, Florida. MEMORANDUM AUGUST 20, 1987 TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Engineering and Planning SUBJECT: County Transportation Impact Fee Moratorium Mr. Faison: City of Sanford's Ordinance No. 1856, copy attached, established a six-month moratorium on all transportation impact fees within the municipal limits of the City. This Ordinance was adopted on March 23, 1987 and will therefore expire on approxima- tely September 23, 1987, unless extended by City Commission. The Ordinance also directed that a study be conducted of appropriate transportation impact fees, if any, within the municipal limits of City of Sanford. The transportation element of our new Comprehensive Plan has just been received and is under review by staff. This transpor- tation element forms the basis and contains much of the substance _of an appropriate impact fee study. The content and recommen- dations"of this transporation element will be summarized and pre- sented together with staff recommendations by separate memorandum prior to the City Commission meeting of August 24, 1987. WAS:mch xc: City Planner DATE E2E2 ITEPvl _and use patterns, present and projected transportation needs and That should be the appropriate transportation impact fees, if iny, within the municipal limits of the City of Sanford, Florida, ind then report back to the City Commission within five (5) ionths from the effective date of this Ordinance. SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY. If any section or portion of ► section of this ordinance proves to be invalid, unlawful or inconstitutional, it shall not be held•.to impair the validity, -orce or effect of any other section or part of this ordinance. SECTION 4. CONFLICTS. That all ordinances or parts of )rdinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby revoked. SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE AND EXPIRATION DATES. This ordinance and the moratorium set herein shall take effect immediately upon the Ordinance's final passage and expire one Zundred eighty (180) days from the date of passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of March , A,.D. 198 . ATTEST: DEPUTY TY CLERK MAYOR' City of Sanford, Florida. ORDINANCE NO. 1856 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING A SIX-MONTH MORATORIUM ON ALL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES; ESTABLISHING A TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE STUDY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE AND TERMINATION DATES. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida, has determined it to be in the best interest of the ti citizens of the City of Sanford, Florida, that a six-month moratorium on all transportation impact fees and a study of said fees be immediately implementLed by the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA: - SECTION 1. MORATORIUM. That a moratorium of six months is hereby placed upon all transportation impact fees within the municipal limits of the City of Sanford, Florida_ During said moratoriuim there shall not be imposed or collected any transportation impact fees on any piece of real property or residential or commercial building within the municipal limits of the City of Sanford, Florida. Said moratorium shall provide the City the opportunity to conduct a study and analysis to determine what should be the amount, if any, of impact fees charged and collected from any real property or development within the municipal limits of the City of Sanford, Florida. During said moratorium no ordinance or resolution shall be passed and enacted within the municipal limits of the City of Sanford, Florida, that places any moratorium on building, construction or occupancy of structure or that purports to assess a fee or lien against property for transportation impact, unless said ordinance or resolution is approved by the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida. SECTION 2. STUDY. The City Manager of the City of Sanford, Florida, shall immediately commence a study and analysis for the purpose of determining present and projected growth and ON CA Sanford, .Florid P.O. Sox 1778 — 32772-1778 d Telephone (305) 322-3161 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in the Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on September 14, 1987, to consider the adoption of an ordinance by the City of Sanford, Florida, title of which is as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 188r AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, EXTENDING THE MORATORIUM ON ALL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES; ESTABLISHING A TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE STUDY; REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 1856; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. All parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard at said hearing. By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida. ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC; If a person decides to appeal a decision made with respect to any matter considered at the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of the proceedings, including the testimony and evidence, which record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS 286.0105). H. N amm, Jr. City Clerk Publish: August 28, 1987. "The Friendly City' - 1� oSan f card, 'Izlo P.O. Box 1778 — 32772-1778 Telephone (305) 322-3161 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in the Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on September 14, 1987, to consider the adoption of an ordinance by the City of Sanford, Florida, title of which is as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 188 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, EXTENDING THE MORATORIUM ON ALL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES; ESTABLISHING A TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE STUDY; REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 1856; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. All parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard at said hearing. By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida. ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC; if a person decides to appeal a decision made with respect to any matter considered at the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of the proceedings, including the testimony and evidence, which record is not provided by the City of Sanford. EFS 286.0105). H. N ---Tamm , Jr . City Clerk Publish: August 28, 1987. "The f=riendly City" o� Sanford, F P.O. Box 1778 — 32772-1771 Telephone (305) 322-3161 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY SANFORD, FLORIDA Notice is hereby given that a Public Hea Commission Room at the City Hall in the C at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on September 14, adoption of an ordinance by the City of of which is as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 1861 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, EXTENDING THE MORATORIUM ON ALL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES; ESTABLISHING A TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE STUDY; REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 1856; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. All parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard at said hearing. By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida. ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC; if a person decides to appeal a decision made with respect to any matter considered at the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of the proceedings, including the testimony and evidence, which record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS 286-0105). H. N amm, Jr. CityClerk Publish: August 28, 1987. "The Friendly City" MEMORANDUM AUGUST 24, 1987 TO: City Manager 7/ FROM: Director of Engineering and Planning SUBJECT: County Transportation Impact Fee Moratorium Mr. Faison: This memorandum is in follow-up to my August 20, 1987 memoran- dum. The draft transportation element of our new Comprehensive Plan identifies a number of arterial and collector roads within the North Central Urban Service Area which are either currently inade- quate or are projected to become inadequate between now and 1997. These include the following: Sanford Avenue - CR 427 to Airport Blvd. - Presently Inadequate U.S. 17-92 - Lake Mary Blvd. to Airport Blvd. - Presently Inadequate U.S. 17-92 - CR 427 to SR -46A and from SR 46 to Volusia County Line - Inadequate in 1992 CR 46A - Country'Club Road to U.S. 17-92 - Inadequate in 1992 Airport Blvd. - SR 46 to CR 46A - Inadequate in 1992 CR 15 - U.S. 17-92 to SR 46 - Inadequate in 1997 U.S. 17-92 - CR 46 A to SR 46 - Inadequate in 1997 Although no roadways which are the responsibility of the City of Sanford are identified as becoming inadquate, the above list inclu- des those roads in the North Central Urban Service Area, which are the responsibility of other jurisdictions, which will require improvement to keep up with growth. Most of the County roads listed above are included in the list of roads to be improved by the County road impact fee, however, there is no specific schedule for improvements included in the Ordinance. It is therefore not possible to determine the time- liness of projected improvements and whether these improvements are therefore responsive to the needs of the City. To date, there have been no discussions between the City and County to fix specific schedules, or to otherwise respond to the City's proposal for discussions as contained in the North Central Urban Service Area proposal. The Transportation Element Study essentially validates all road segment -improvements contained in the County Transportation Impact Study for the Sanford Urban Area. Based on this information the City Commission could feel justified in not extending the Transportation Impact Fee Moratorium, even though specific schedu- les for improvements are not in hand, and other concerns of the City contained in the North Central Urban Service Area proposal copy attached, have not been responded to. First reading on an ordinance to extend the moratorium must be approved on August 24 if a moratorium extension ordinance is to be adopted before expiration of the present moratorium. WAS:mch DAT ��%�� ITEM 15 o Sunl (--)rd, PIC) . rlc�d P.0 Baa 1776 — 32772-777F 7eieornane (305) 322-3161 Aril 9, 1967 OFFICE OF TEE MhYOR BETTYE D. SMITE Commissioner Fred Streetman, Chairman Board of County Commissioners of Seminole County County Services Building 1101 East First Street Sanford, Floriaa 32771 Dear Chairman Streetman: RE: URBAN SERVICE PROPOSAL The enclosed proposal is provided for your review. The Sanford City.Comrnission believes that the recommendations have merit. We would like to have a joint workshop meeting with the Board of County Commissioners to discuss this proposal. Sucb a meeting would protide an opportun- mor respective Commissioners to present recommendations and establish policy concurrently in a public format for the =-=Ual nenef it of our constituency. I look =onward to discussing this prcpesal in a joint wcrkshop meetinc. Please contact me or Executive ;ce, Or vr _ Zan Donahoe to schecule a workstzop. (322-3161 off:ceo home) Sincerely, B=ttveJD. S.:ith M -yo_, o= San=cra Cc==,.issioner S-_UrM Commissioner Glenn Co-,eu-.._ss_oner Christensen COmm-SE oner Rirchho=f Cormzissicners, Sanfcrd City Ccmrission "The Friendly City" For D'_scussion Puraoses on!v PROPOSAL FOR A NORTE CENTRAL URBAN SERVICE AGREEMENT SEMINOLE COUrTY, FLORIDA March 30, 1987 Intent and Purpose The intent and purpose of the North Central Urban Service Agreement is to establish and agree upon responsibilities, service areas and major provision of transportation, potable water and wastewater facilities and services within an area of concern to both Seminole County and City of Sanford. The immediate result of this proposal would be an interlocal agreement and good -faith actions by Seminole County and the City of Sanford. The overall result will be to insure cost effective and coordinated services' and avoid inappropriate duplication and overlapping services by both entities that, if not avoided now, would drive up consumer costs to residents of the area. Agreement also regards matters of jurisdiction and the desirable resolution of differences without litication paid for by taxpayers. General provisions of this pro- posal follow. Urban Service P__ -ea The North Central Urban Service Area Map illustrates an area of mutual concern to Seminole County and City or Sanford. The mao is generalized_ Inter local agreements would specify that provisions apply only to incorporated areas of Sanford and unincorporated areas of Ser:inole Counts . Transoortaticn With a few notable exceptions, the State of Florida and se,-�_nole Countv are responsible for the major road netwcrk in the N,=t_h Ce_ ..ral area. The C= .. ty o= Sanford _s responsible for certain col�lectar and feeaer roars. Seminole County has developer and zccpte a Transportation . npac_ Pee projcra=..C�t1> of Sanfor 's _ranspertat_on planninc rocram reflects methodologies to that e5ip_oved by Seminole County's Transpertctlon Management Procrar., to identify needs and costs. The City's proc=gin wi11 be completed wit._in 30 days of this v=icing. Therefore, for the first -.]me, a comparison_ between transnc_tat:ion needs perce_vec ay bc.=h entities h_=1 be ava_la"--le. D_fferer_t res:._ts are I_kelV to be the result_ of different input data regarding land use a II n� other socsoeconomic character_St_=s. '?'O Cate, C_ -_y o= Sanford is on record as opposing Seminole :oL'ntv's _ransportation IT pact fee _ roc=am base: on lack of C_t}> inn=t' .:isa=reement over socioeconc- aata and resul ring This proposal recommen6s that: 1. City of Sanford support and participate in Seminole Countv transportation impact fee program, and the recently adopted Seminole County Ordinance. 2. Seminole County incorporate City -perceived needs into impact fee program for initial and update versions. Additional streets required could be classified as collectors and could increase fees for North Central District. Potable Water and Wastewater The City of Sanford is implementing a $30.5M Water and Wastewater Master Plan program that includes a Triple -A rated bond issue of S17M for the first phase. The program is based on a 201 Facilities Program that is approved by federal, state and regional agencies. The first phase includes S8.6M of grant -funded construc- tion. The approved service area generally covers areas of the City of Sanford and unincorporated area east of I-4 and north of the U -S. 17-92/C.R. 427 intersection. The City of Sanford pre- sently provides service to both incorporated and unincorporated areas. Seminole County Inas developed planning studies that generally reflect proposed services and facilities that would duplicate and overlap City facilities. With the exception of a small area with _2r,, -,ted Capac'-v located along County Road 427 be -Ween Sanford Avenue and U.S. 17-92, Seminole County does not now provide votable water and wastewater services in the :North Central area. This _roposal recommends that: 1. Seminole County support and participate in Ci -v cf Sanford Water and Wastewater Facilities ?=ocram with Worth Central Asea. 2. City and County agree upon standard procedures avid development guide lines regard=ing engineer -'n= and financial rec-_rements. __re and Rescue Service 5e-:_:iole County has expressed a desire -or a _ _re and Rescue First Response agreement. Ci -:v ofr Sanford now operates -wo _ -lam ecuioned and manned __re and Rescue Stations ana Inas bucceted for a t____ d. Se.u_nole Cou_ : v now. ri.^:. .mains Fire and Rescue Stat' Ons sou --h and we5`. of the Worth Central irban Service Area, and, within t.l.S area east of Sanford City limits- This proposal recommends that: 1. City and County agree to join tooether in a firs` response agreement to benefit all residents of the area. Demonstration of Good Faith To demonstrate good -faith the following immediate actions are recomended:. 1. City of Sanford rescinds transportation impact fee moratorium ordinance. 2. Seminole County rescinds present annexation litigation against City of Sanford, and agree, generally, to not oppose right of annexation self determination by land, owners within the North Central Urban Service Area. 3. City of.Sanford and Seminole County agree in principle to a Fire and Rescue First Response program. 4. Seminole County revise General Sanford Estates Draft Development Order/Conditions of Approval to reflect City of Sanford water and sewer service to be used for entire project on a direct sale to consumer basis. Summary and Conclusion This proposal reflects a balanced approach to providing urban ser- vices at the local level. Seminole County retains responsibility for =major cfrc_,lation while City of San=ora provides major Potable weer and wastewater utilities in the North Central L'rban Service Area. Each will s:pper_ the other in meeting the_r respective respon_ibil_ties to re_=idents of the urban ser:>ice area. Once these resPor_sibilities are agreed upon, interlocal acreemen is should be d=a=ted by the responsible ent_ty, transportation by Se-inole Cou:.ty, water and sewer h)y City of Sanford, and __re and Rescue First Response by Semincle County.