Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20 Towne Center Cir - 95-000062 (1995) (RED LOBSTER) (NEW RESTURANT) DOCUMENTSZuNE DATE CONTRACTOR V fSA.I ( U J 1aADDRESS M C PHONE # 3 91-SY6 3 LOCATI( OWNER ADDRE,c SUBDIVISION: PERMIT # _ LOT NO. JOB f BLOCK: COST $G Sc) SQUARE FEET: a FEE $ '/' d 7J MODEL: STATE NO. PHONE # i/6-710?Y( -156 n PLUMBING CONTRACTOR i L ' l i I' I ) FEE 39 ADDRESS PHONE # r GJ O ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR FEE ADDRESS PHONE # MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR \,l /11 S i FEE $ I ADDRESS PHONE # MISCELLANEOUS CONTRACTOR ADDRESS SEPTIC TANK PERMIT NO. SOIL TEST REQUIREMENTS (_) FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION REQUIREMENTS () ARCH I7ECTURALAPPROVAL DATE: OCCUPANCY CLASS: INSPECTIONS 1TYPEDATEOKREJECTBYI FEE $ ENERGY SECT. EPI: n 6 41 96--,5--74 CERTIFICA E OF OCCU ANCY ISSUED # / DATE: FINAL DATE t5 x DANBAR FIRE PROTECTION, INC. P. 0. BOX 1235 SEFFNER, FL 33584-1235 HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS FOR RED LOBSTER SANFOF:D FL FILE NUMBER: 1208-95 DATE: 11\28\95 DESIGN DATA - OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: ORDINARY GROUP 1 DENSITY: 18 gpm/sq. ft. AREA OF APPLICATION: 1500 sq. ft. COVERAGE PER SPRINKLER: 120 sq. ft. NUMBER OF SPRINKLERS CALCULATED: 13 sprinklers TOTAL SPRINKLER WATER FLOW REQUIRED: 249.5 gpm TOTAL WATER REQUIRED (including hose): 349.5 gpm FLOW AND PRESSURE (@ BOR): 349.5 gpm @ 49.5 psi SPRINKLER ORIFICE SIZE: 1\2 inch NAME OF CONTRACTOR: DANBAR FIRE PROTECTION,INC. DESIGN/LAYOUT BY: SAMUEL T.SECKMAN AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION: LOCAL4CONTRACTORCERTIFICATIONNUMBER: 924751000191 CALCULATIONS BY HASS COMPUTER PROGRAM (LICENSE # 8001H 21 ) HRS SYSTEMS, INC. AMT. A?JrrA n7T t Date: 11/28/1995 JOB TITLE: RED -LOB WATER SUPPLY DATA SOURCE STATIC NODE PRESS. TAG (PSI) 51 65.0 SPRINKLER SYSTEM H`.CDRAULIC ANALYSIS RESID. FLOW PRESS. @ PSI) (GPM) 55.0 1400.0 AGGREGATE FLOW ANALYSIS: AVAIL. TOTAL PRESS. @ DEMAND PSI) GPM) 64.2 349.5 TOTAL FLOW AT SOURCE TOTAL HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE AT SOURCE OTHER HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCES TOTAL DISCHARGE FROM ACTIVE :SPRINKLERS NODE ANALYSIS DATA NODE TAG ELEVATION FT) 1 12.8 2 13.0 3 13.0 4 13.0 5 13.0 6 13.0 7 13.0 8 13.0 9 12.8 10 12.8 11 13.9 12 13.9 13 13.9 14 13.9 15 13.9 16 13.9 17 13.9 18 12.8 19 12.8 20 14.3 21 14.3 22 14.3 23 14.3 24 14.3 25 12.8 26 12.8 27 14.6 28 14.6 29 12.8 30 12.8 31 14.4 32 14.4 33 12.8 I 17 0 NODE TYPE K= 5.60 K= 5.60 K= 5.60 K= 5.60 K= 5.60 K= 5.60 K= 5.60 K= 5.60 K= 5.60 K= 5.60 K= 5.60 K= 5.60 K= 5.60 PRESSURE PSI) 18.7 16.3 11.3 10.6 10.4 10.5 10.9 13.7 14.7 18.9 17.4 10.9 10.4 10.3 10.4 11.1 14.4 18.7 19.6 18.3 15.7 15.5 15.6 18.7 26.5 21.0 20.7 26.3 27.6 21.8 21.6 28.2 29.3 77 7 Page 1 RED-LOBS.SDF REQID PRESS. PSI) 49.9 349.5 GPM 100.0 GPM 0.0 GPM 249.5 GPM DISCHARGE GPM) 18.9 18.2 18.1 18.1 18.5 18.5 18.1 18.0 18.1 18.6 22.2 22.1 22.1 SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 2 Date: 11/28/1995 RED-LOBS.SDF JOB TITLE: RED -LOB NODE TAG ELEVATION NODE TYPE PRESSURE DISCHARGE FT) PSI) (GPM) 35 13.9 - - - - 22.4 - - - 36 13.9 - - - - 30.6 - - - 37 12.8 - - - - 31.7 - - - 38 12.8 - - - - 22.4 - - - 39 13.0 - - - - 23.1 - - - 40 13.0 - - - - 34.0 - - - 41 12.8 - - - - 34.9 - - - 42 12.8 - - - - 35.1 - - - 43 4.0 - - - - 40.7 - - - 44 4.0 - - - - 44.4 - - - 45 4.0 - - - - 44.7 - - - 46 4.0 - - - - 45.8 - - - 47 4.0 - - - - 45.9 - - - 48 3.0 - - - - 42.9 - - - 49 3.0 - - - - 46.9 - - - 50 4.0 - - - - 49.9 - - - 51 4.0 SOURCE 49.9 249.5 SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 3 Date: 11/28/1995 RED-LOBS.SDF JOB TITLE: RED -LOB PIPE DATA PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) FT) SUM. NODES FT) K) PSI) GPM) F.L./FT PSI) Pipe: 1 49.5 1.380 PL 0.70 PF 2.3 1 12.6 0.0 18.7 0.0 10.6 120 FTG 2T PE 0.1 2 13.0 0.0 16.3 0.0 0.183 TL 12.70 PV 0.8 Pipe: 2 1,t9.5 1.380 PL 27.00 PF 4.9 2 13.0 0.0 16.3 0.0 10.6 120 FTG PE 0.0 3 13.0 5.6 11.3 18.9 0.183 TL 27.00 PV 0.8 Pipe: 3 30.6 1.380 PL 10.00 PF 0.8 3 13.0 5.6 11.3 18.9 6.6 120 FTG PE 0.0 4 13.0 5.6 10.6 18.2 0.075 TL 10.00 PV 0.3 Pipe: 4 1_2.4 1.380 PL 10.00 PF 0.1 4 13.0 5.6 10.6 18.2 2.7 120 FTG PE 0.0 5 13.0 5.6 10.4 18.1 0.014 TL 10.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 5 5.7 1.380 PL 9.00 PF 0.0 5 13.0 5.6 10.4 18.1 1.2 120 FTG PE 0.0 6 13.0 5.6 10.5 18.1 0.003 TL 9.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 6 23.8 1.380 PL 10.00 PF 0.5 6 13.0 5.6 10.5 18.1 5.1 120 FTG PE 0.0 7 13.0 5.6 10.9 18.5 0.047 TL 10.00 PV 0.2 Pipe: 7 42.3 1.380 PL 14.00 PF 2.7* 7 13.0 5.6 10.9 18.5 9.1 120 FTG T PE 0.0 8 13.0 0.0 13.7 0.0 0.137 TL 20.00 PV 0.6 Pipe: 8 42.3 1.380 PL 0.70 PF 0.9 8 13.0 0.0 13.7 0.0 9.1 120 FTG T PE 0.1 9 12.8 0.0 14.7 0.0 0.137 TL 6.70 PV 0.6 Pipe: 9 42.3 2.635 PL 12.00 PF 0.2 9 12.8 0.0 14.7 0.0 2.5 120 FTG T PE 0.5 17 13.9 0.0 14.4 0.0 0.006 TL 28.47 PV 0.0 Pipe: 10 49.5 2.635 PL 12.00 PF 0.2 1 12.8 0.0 18.7 0.0 2.9 120 FTG T PE 0.0 10 12.8 0.0 18.9 0.0 0.008 TL 28.47 PV 0.1 Pipe: 11 44.4 1.380 PL 1.05 PF 1.1 10 12.8 0.0 18.9 0.0 9.5 120 FTG T PE 0.5 11 13.9 0.0 17.4 0.0 0.150 TL 7.05 PV 0.6 Pipe: 12 4.4.4 1.380 PL 31.00 PF 6.4 11 13.9 0.0 17.4 0.0 9.5 120 FTG 4E PE 0.0 12 13.9 5.6 10.9 18.5 0.150 TL 43.00 PV 0.6 Pipe: 13 2:5.9 1.380 PL 10.00 PF 0.6 12 13.9 5.6 10.9 18.5 5.6 120 FTG PE 0.0 11 1 7 O C C In A 10 1 n nC TT. 1 n nn D11 n 1) SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 4 Date: 11/28/1995 RED-LOBS.SDF JOB TITLE: RED -LOB PIPE DATA cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HQ Q FT) SUM. NODES FT) K) PSI) GPM) F.L./FT PSI) Pipe: 14 7.8 1.380 PL 10.00 PF 0.1 13 13.9 5.6 10.4 18.1 1.7 120 FIG PE 0.0 14 13.9 5.6 10.3 18.0 0.006 TL 10.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 15 1.0.2 1.380 PL 10.00 PF 0.1 14 13.9 5.6 10.3 18.0 2.2 120 FIG PE 0.0 15 13.9 5.6 10.4 18.1 0.010 TL 10.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 16 28.2 1.380 PL 10.00 PF 0.6 15 13.9 5.6 10.4 18.1 6.1 120 FIG PE 0.0 16 13.9 5.6 11.1 18.6 0.065 TL 10.00 PV 0.2 Pipe: 17 46.9 1.380 PL 14.00 PF 3.3 16 13.9 5.6 11.1 18.6 10.1 120 FIG T PE 0.0 17 13.9 0.0 14.4 0.0 0.165 TL 20.00 PV 0.7 Pipe: 18 89.2 1.380 PL 1.05 PF 3.8 17 13.9 0.0 14.4 0.0 19.1 120 FIE T PE 0.5 18 12.8 0.0 18.7 0.0 0.544 TL 7.05 PV 2.5 Pipe: 19 89.2 2.635 PL 12.00 PF 0.7 18 12.8 0.0 18.7 0.0 5.2 120 FIE T PE 0.6 24 14.3 0.0 18.7 0.0 0.023 TL 28.47 PV 0.2 Pipe: 20 93.9 2.635 PL 12.00 PF 0.7 10 12.8 0.0 18.9 0.0 5.5 120 FIG T PE 0.0 19 12.8 0.0 19.6 0.0 0.026 TL 28.47 PV 0.2 Pipe: 21 35.1 1.380 PL 1.50 PF 0.7 19 12.8 0.0 19.6 0.0 7.5 120 FIG T PE 0.6 20 14.3 0.0 18.3 0.0 0.097 TL 7.50 PV 0.4 Pipe: 22 35.1 1.380 PL 27.00 PF 2.6 20 14.3 0.0 18.3 0.0 7.5 120 FIG PE 0.0 21 14.3 5.6 15.7 22.2 0.097 TL 27.00 PV 0.4 Pipe: 23 12.9 1.380 PL 10.00 PF 0.2 21 14.3 5.6 15.7 22.2 2.8 120 FIG PE 0.0 22 14.3 5.6 15.5 22.1 0.015 TL 10.00 PV 0.1 Pipe: 24 9.1 1.380 PL 10.00 PF 0.1 22 14.3 5.6 15.5 22.1 2.0 120 FIG PE 0.0 23 14.3 5.6 15.6 22.1 0.008 TL 10.00 PV 0.0 Pipe: 25 31.2 1.380 PL 34.00 PF 3.1 23 14.3 5.6 15.6 22.1 6.7 120 FIG T PE 0.0 24 14.3 0.0 18.7 0.0 0.078 TL 40.00 PV 0.3 Pipe: 26 120.5 1.380 PL 1.50 PF 7.1 24 14.3 0.0 18.7 0.0 25.8 120 FIG T PE 0.6 7c 10 0 n n 7L c n n n OA O MY cn ow A c SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 5 Date: 11/28/1995 RED-LOBS.SDF JOB TITLE: RED -LOB PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG QGPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HQ Q FT) SUM. NODES FT) K) PSI) GPM) F.L./FT PSI) Pipe: 27 120.5 2.635 PL 12.00 PF 1.2 25 12.8 0.0 26.5 0.0 7.1 120 FTG T PE 0.0 29 12.8 0.0 27.6 0.0 0.041 TL 28.47 PV 0.3 Pipe: 28 129.0 2.635 PL 12.00 PF 1.3 19 12.8 0.0 19.6 0.0 7.6 120 FTG T PE 0.0 26 12.8 0.0 21.0 0.0 0.046 TL 28.47 PV 0.4 Pipe: 29 28.3 1.380 PL 1.80 PF 0.5 26 12.8 0.0 21.0 0.0 6.1 120 FTG T PE 0.8 27 14.6 0.0 20.7 0.0 0.065 TL 7.80 PV 0.2 Pipe: 30 28.3 1.380 PL 81.00 PF 5.7 27 14.6 0.0 20.7 0.0 6.1 120 FTG T PE 0.0 28 14.6 0.0 26.3 0.0 0.065 TL 87.00 PV 0.2 Pipe: 31 28.3 1.380 PL 1.80 PF 0.5 28 14.6 0.0 26.3 0.0 6.1 120 FTG T PE 0.8 29 12.8 0.0 27.6 0.0 0.065 TL 7.80 PV 0.2 Pipe: 32 148.8 2.635 PL 12.00 PF 1.7 29 12.8 0.0 27.6 0.0 8.8 120 FTG T PE 0.0 33 12.8 0.0 29.3 0.0 0.060 TL 28.47 PV 0.5 Pipe: 33 100.7 2.635 PL 12.00 PF 0.8 26 12.8 0.0 21.0 0.0 5.9 120 FTG T PE 0.0 30 12.8 0.0 21.8 0.0 0.029 TL 28.47 PV 0.2 Pipe: 34 28.2 1.380 PL 1.60 PF 0.5 30 12.8 0.0 21.8 0.0 6.1 120 FTG T PE 0.7 31 14.4 0.0 21.6 0.0 0.065 TL 7.60 PV 0.2 Pipe: 35 28.2 1.380 PL 83.40 PF 6.6 31 14.4 0.0 21.6 0.0 6.1 120 FTG 4ET PE 0.0 32 14.4 0.0 28.2 0.0 0.065 TL 101.40 PV 0.2 Pipe: 36 28.2 1.380 PL 1.60 PF 0.5 32 14.4 0.0 28.2 0.0 6.1 120 FTG T PE 0.7 33 12.8 0.0 29.3 0.0 0.065 TL 7.60 PV 0.2 Pipe: 37 177.0 2.635 PL 12.00 PF 2.4 33 12.8 0.0 29.3 0.0 10.4 120 FTG T PE 0.0 37 12.8 0.0 31.7 0.0 0.083 TL 28.47 PV 0.7 Pipe: 38 72.5 2.635 PL 12.00 PF 0.5 30 12.8 0.0 21.8 0.0 4.3 120 FTG T PE 0.0 34 12.8 0.0 22.2 0.0 0.016 TL 28.47 PV 0.1 Pipe: 39 32.2 1.380 PL 1.10 PF 0.6 34 12.8 0.0 22.2 0.0 6.9 120 FTG T PE 0.5 1 rz 11 0 n n 10 n n n n nol my 0 in Dw n 7 SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 6 Date: 11/28/1995 RED-LOBS.SDF JOB TITLE: RED -LOB PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VE1j(FPS) HW(C) FT) SUM. NODES FT) K) PSI) GPM) F.L./FT PSI) Pipe: 40 32.2 1.380 PL 82.00 PF 8.3 35 13.9 0.0 22.4 0.0 6.9 120 FTG 4ET PE 0.0 36 13.9 0.0 30.6 0.0 0.083 TL 100.00 PV 0.3 Pipe: 41 32.2 1.380 PL 1.10 PF 0.6 36 13.9 0.0 30.6 0.0 6.9 120 FTG T PE 0.5 37 12.8 0.0 31.7 0.0 0.083 TL 7.10 PV 0.3 Pipe: 42 209.2 2.635 PL 12.00 PF 3.2 37 12.8 0.0 31.7 0.0 12.3 120 FTG T PE 0.0 41 12.8 0.0 34.9 0.0 0.113 TL 28.47 PV 1.0 Pipe: 43 110.2 2.635 PL 12.00 PF 0.2 34 12.8 0.0 22.2 0.0 2.4 120 FTG T PE 0.0 38 12.8 0.0 22.4 0.0 0.005 TL 28.47 PV 0.0 Pipe: 44 40.2 1.380 PL 0.70 PF 0.8 38 12.8 0.0 22.4 0.0 8.6 120 FTG T PE 0.1 39 13.0 0.0 23.1 0.0 0.125 TL 6.70 PV 0.5 Pipe: 45 40.2 1.380 PL 81.00 PF 10.8 39 13.0 0.0 23.1 0.0 8.6 120 FTG T PE 0.0 40 13.0 0.0 34.0 0.0 0.125 TL 87.00 PV 0.5 Pipe: 46 40.2 1.380 PL 0.70 PF 0.8 40 13.0 0.0 34.0 0.0 8.6 120 FTG T PE 0.1 41 12.8 0.0 34.9 0.0 0.125 TL 6.70 PV 0.5 go Pipe: 47 2419.5 2.635 PL 1.0 PF 0.2 41 12.8 0.0 34.9 0.0 1_4.7120 FTG_ - - PE 0.0 42 12.8 0.0 35.1 0.0 0.156 TL 1.00 PV 1.4 Pipe: 48 249.5 4.260 PL 20.00 PF 1.8 42 12.8 0.0 35.1 0.0 5.6 120 FTG 2ETCB PE 3.8 43 4.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 0.015 TL 117.44 PV 0.2 Pipe: 49 24-:9.5 4.026 PL 6.00 PF 0.3 43 4.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 6.3 140 FTG E PE 3.5 44 4.0 0.0 44.4 0.0 0.015 TL 19.30 PV 0.3 Pipe: 50 24:9.5 4.026 PL 6.00 PF 0.3 44 4.0 0.0 44.4 0.0 6.3 140 FTG E PE 0.0 45 4.0 0.0 44.7 0.0 0.015 TL 19.30 PV 0.3 Pipe: 51 24:9.5 4.026 PL 45.00 PF 1.1 45 4.0 0.0 44.7 0.0 6.3 140 FTG TG PE 0.0 46 4.0 0.0 45.8 0.0 0.015 TL 74.26 PV 0.3 Pipe: 52 24:9.5 8.071 PL 150.00 PF 0.1 46 4.0 0.0 45.8 0.0 1.6 140 FTG E PE 0.0 n' 7 n n n n nr- 0 n n n nnl T'T 171 on n1i n n SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 7 Date: 11/28/1995 RED-LOBS.SDF JOB TITLE: RED -LOB PIPE DATA (cont.) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS. END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 53-24.9.5 8.071 PL 6.00 PF 0.0 47 -4.0 0.0 45.9 0.0 1.6 140 FTG E PE -3.0 48 3.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 0.001 TL 29.94 PV 0.0 Pipe: 54 F'IXED PRESSURE LOSS DEVICE 49 3.0 0.0 46.9 0.0 4.0 psi, 249.5 gpm 48 3.0 0.0 42.9 0.0 Pipe: 55-24:9.5 8.071 PL 6.00 PF 0.0 49 3.0 0.0 46.9 0.0 1.6 140 FTG E PE 3.0 50 -4.0 0.0 49.9 0.0 0.001 TL 29.94 PV 0.0 Pipe: 56 -249.5 8.071 PL 8.00 PF 0.0 50 -4.0 0.0 49.9 0.0 1.6 140 FTG T PE 0.0 51 -4.0 SRCE 49.9 (N/A) 0.001 TL 54.55 PV 0.0 NOTES: 1) Calculations were performed by the HASS 6.0.0 computer program under license no. 8001H 21 granted by HRS Systems, Inc. 2193 Ranchwood Dr., N.E. Atlanta, GA 30345 2) The system has been balanced to provide an average imbalance at each node of 0.001 gpm and a maximum imbalance at any node of 0.066 gpm. 3) Velocity pressures are printed for information only, and are not used in balancing the system. Maximum water velocity is 25.8 ft/sec at pipe 26. 4) PIPE FITTINGS TABLE Pipe Table Name: STANDARD.PIP PAGE: A MATERIAL: S40 HWC: 120 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet in) E T L C B G A D Ell Tee LngEll ChkVly BfyVly GatVly A1mChk DPVly 1.380 3.00 6.00 2.00 7.00 6.00 1.00 10.00 10.00 4.026 10.00 20.00 6.00 22.00 12.00 2.00 20.00 10.00 8.071 18.00 35.00 13.00 45.00 12.00 4.00 35.00 27.00 PAGE: K MATERIAL: S40 HWC: 120 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet in) E T L C B G A D Ell Tee LngEll ChkVly BfyVly GatVly A1mChk DPVly 2.635 8.24 16.47 5.49 19.22 9.61 1.37 13.73 13.73 SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 8 Date: 11/28/1995 RED-LOBS.SDF JOB TITLE: RED -LOB 4.260 13.17 26.33 7.90 28.97 15.80 2.63 26.33 13.17 SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Date: 11/28/1995 JOB TITLE: RED -LOB WATER SUPPLY CURVE 120+ 110+ 100+ 90+ P 80+ R E S S 70+ U 60+ P S I 50+ X 40+ 30+ 20+ LEGEND X = Required Water Supply 49.94 psi @ 349.5 gpm 10+ 0 = Available Water Supply 64.23 psi @ 349.5 gpmIif Page 9 RED-LOBS.SDF 55.0 psi @ 1400 gpm Flow Test Point 0++-+---+----+-----+------+--------+--------+---------+-----------+ 400 600 800 1000 1200 1.400 1600 1800 2000 FLOW (GPM) CITY OF SANFORD ` FIRE -DEPARTMENT FEES FOR SERVICES PHONE #: 407-322-4952 DATE: % $ PERMIT #: r BUSINESS NAME:Lp STc ADDRESS: 590 7o.—rn e- < G^ %P e- G • i PHONE NUMBER:( ) PLANS REVIEW TENT PERMIT BURN PERMIT REINSPECTION TANK PERMIT FIRE SYSTEM 0 ep AMOUNT COMMENTS: /,1S7,91I /1: e-sarj- Fees must be paid to Sanford Building Department, 300 N. Park Avenue, Sanford, Florida. Phone # 330-5656. Proof of payment must be made to Sanford Fire Prevention before any further services can take place. Sanford Fire Prevention I certify that the above information is true and correct and that I will comply with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of Sanford, Florida. Applicants Signature CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA APPLICATION FOA BUI1,40ING PERMIT 0 H v J- U a v 0 a x 0 PERMIT ADDRESS 20 %;-VwfE- CE,0 —1 joL Cal.,&, 5 PERMIT NUMBER Total Contract Price of Job Describe Work —,Z:;4-57ZUA—, , Type of Construction Number of Stories Occupancy: Residential Number of Dwellings Commercial Total Sq. Ft. 8260 Flood Prone (YES) (NO Zoning Industrial LEGAL DESCRIPTION (please attach printout from Seminole County) TAX I.D. NUMBER OWNER :2.ea W 5'-,,_ PHONE NUMBER ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP TITLE HOLDER ADDRESS CITY IF OTHER THAN OWNER) BONDING COMPANY ADDRESS CITY ARCHITECT ADDRESS _ CITY MORTGAGE LENDER ADDRESS CITY STATE STATE STATE STATE ZIP ZIP ZIP ZIP CONTRACTOR DAWBW— F11? R/—,kCT/&4n T4C . PHONE NUMBER ($Q)d,,C4 -On(. ADDRESS _1;C/0$ Mtt014.E Vl A 111 ST. LICENSE NUMBER 9z4751cOQ/9/ CITY EFFiUf.2 STATE rGptZ/qp ZIP 3,:?s5? 4- Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do the work and installations as indicated. I certify that no work or installation has commenced prior to the issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet standards of all laws regulating construction in this jurisdiction. I understand that a separate permit must be secured for ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, SIGNS, POOLS, ETC. OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT: I certify that all the foregoing information is accurate and that all work will be done in compliance with all applicable laws regulating construction and zoning. A COPY OF THE RECORDED COPY OF THE: NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WILL BE POSTED ON THE JOB SITE WITH PERMITS NO LATER THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED. FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOU PAYING TWICE FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. NOTICE: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. ACCEPTANCE OF PERMIT IS VERIFICATION THAT I WILL NOTIFY THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF FLORIDA LIEN LAW, FS713. 13 ro Z 10 m m o n 0) Signature of Owner/Agent & Date Signature of Contractor & Date O O K S7fvi14ELT, 5ECkMA" M 0! u, N N Type or Print Owner/Agent Name T or Print Contractor's Name v 1< Z a IC a 3 o Z . rl H fA -1 0 w i. C O u 0 a U) a) a 0 (1) >1 ZI'll E. x B 11 m o Signature of Notary & Date Je;,(OfficialSeal)BLIC STATE 0 FLOP NOTARYPU, I MY COMMISSION # CC416424 0 EXPIRES: June 26, 1999 CAo aApplication Approved BY: Date: 0 FEES: Building X)O RaKdI, Police Fire a Open Space Ropact Applic tion N PERMIT VALIDATION: CHECK CASH DATE / / BY _ v ORIGINAL ( BUILDING) YELLOW (CUSTOMER) PINK (COUNTY TAX FF CE) GOLD (CO. ADM THIS APPLICATION USED FOR WORK VALUED $2500.00 OR MORE DanBar Fire Protection, Inc. CERT.924751000191 FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS P.O. Box 1235 Seffner, FL. 33584 Phone (813) 664-0796 NOVEMBER 20, 1995 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Samuel T. Seckman has been authorized to pick up the permit for Perkins Restaurant in Spring Hill. The authorization comes from W.H. Dowdy, president of Danbar Fire Protection, Inc. THANK YOU W.H. DOWDY Executed this :3 G Day of HD 1995 DANBAR FIRE PROTECTION, INC. W.H. DOWDY r Pn. PRESIDEN Sworn to and subscribed before me this1,3Q''-hDay of L(Lov . 1995 NOTARY SEAL) RONDAM. BAER j NOTARY PUBLIC C) q 9. MY COMMISSION /CC507889 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:--6 J• i EXPIRES: November 5. 19" Rf... Bonded Thru Notary Public Unft- tare adopp DATE STARTED: - — /("o CITY OF SAIVFORD. FLORIDA Request for Finai Inspection for,' Certificate .of Occupancy • bc ADDRESS:: b (,j r-(5, C' -C C The BuildingDepartment has pPprepared a certificate of occupancy for the above location and is requesting a final inspection by yourdepartment. After your inspection, please come to the Building Department to ,,@R.%, sign -off on the Certificate of Occupancy, or submit a certificate of occupancy addendum if it has been denied. Your prompt attention will be appreciated. Thank you. DISTRIBUTION: Engineering Department Fire Public Works Utilities/Cross Connection Zoning a- OWNER:/%fir / ADDRESS: 20 DATE: REASON FOR DISAPPROVAL: CONDITIONAL AGREEMENT: FIRE DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS 6 7-r UTILITIES ENGINEE ING DATE STARTED: I q1 (?(p CITY OF SANFORD. FLORIDA Request for Final Inspection for". Rerfificatte n1 Occupancy ADDRESS: The Building Department has prepared a certificate of occupancy for the above location and is requesting a final inspection by your department. After your inspection, please come to the Building Department to sign -off on the Certificate of Occupancy, or submit a certificate of occupancy addendum if it has been denied. Your prompt attention will be appreciated. Thank you. DISTRIBUTION: Engineering Department Fire Public Works Utilities/Cross Connection Zoning 1 ADDRESS:. DATE STARTED:_ 1 CITY OF SANFORD. FLORIDA Request for Final Inspection for*. Rertificatte of -Occupancy cglsq C r The Building Department has prepared a certificate of occupancy for the above location and is requesting a final inspection by your department. After your inspection, please come to the Building Department to sign -off on the Certificate of Occupancy, or submit a certificate of occupancy addendum if it has been denied. Your prompt attention will be appreciated. Thank you. DISTRIBUTION: Engineering Department Fire Public Works wo Utilities/Cross Connection Zoning DATE STAWrED MY OF SANFORD. FLORIDA Request for Final Inspection for* ,*.. Rertificatte .nf Occupancy ADDRESS: ab 1 toC The Building Department has prepared a certificate of occupancy for the above location and is requesting a final inspection by your department. After your inspection, please come to the Building Department to sign - off on the Certificate of Occupancy, or submit a certificate of occupancy addendum if it has been denied. Your prompt attention will be appreciated. Thank you. DISTRIBUTION: Engineering Department Fire Public Works Utilities/ Cross Connection L/ Zoning S(' k Pam- crt S U-. re -F c DATE STAW..rED: CITY OF SANFORD. FLORIDA Request for Final inspection for*: Rertifiicaleaf Occupancy ADDRESS: 0 2-loe-* The Building Department has prepared a certificate of occupancy for the above location and is requesting a final inspection by your department. After your inspection, please come to the Building Department to sign -off on the Certificate of Occupancy, or submit a certificate of occupancy addendum if it has been denied. Your prompt attention will be appreciated. Thank you. DISTRIBUTION: Engineering Department Fire Public Works Utilities/Cross Connection Zoning,/ 3120 L cb S4.p 01/26/1996 14:37 4073283198 HAl_EY CONSTRUCTION PAGE 02 01-25-1996 02:12PM FROM GMRI DESIGN/CONST TO 93293198 P.02 DARKEN RESTAURANTS Fled Lobster* The Olive Garden' January 25, 1996 City of Sanford Building Department - City Hall Sanford, FL 32771 Attention: Arlene Re: Red Lobster #0848 Seminole Town Center Mall Sanford, FL Dear Arlene. 763 At this time Haley Construction is applying for pre -power in order to test the electrical equipment. Darden Restaurants does understand the building can not be occupied until the Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 4071245.4606. Sincerely, Chris Fortmueller Project Manager L C. Bruce Peck (Darden Restaurants) IDickSims (Haley Construction) / Z STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ORANGE Sworn ta before me this 25th day of January, 1996. i er, ry PubTic ' o'T', a Its* No CC'*CCft c b 6900 lake Ellvnor Drive • P. O. BOY 99?OOF4ro 32830 3330 • (407) 265 a000 01/26/1996 14:37 4073283198 HALEY CONSTRUCTION PAGE 03 01-25-1996 02:11PP1 PROP] GMR1 DESIGN/CONST TO 93283198 P.01 DARDEN RESTAURANTS GMRI RED LOBSTER OLIVE GARDEN Design/Construction Dept. P. Q. Box 593330 Orlando, FL 32859-3330 Fax Cover Sheet DATE: 1/22/96 TO: Haley conemd1on Dick Sims FROM: Chris Fortmueller GMRI Design RE: Sanford Power Dick, TIME: FAX: 31t • 319 °v PHONE: 407/245- 4606 FAX: 407/245-5293 Attached is the motorized letter you requested. I'll send you the original, but hopefully they will accept the fax. Let me know if you need anything else. Thanks c. Bruce Peck APPLICATION•FOR BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA DATE 1 3\ - \ o To the Building Official: The undersigned hereby applies following described world: OWNER nC' C1 a G\'S C'./ i1\ _ CS' rL PERMIT N0.'I for a permit for the CD .i cSC `J J 3C .Sqbo ADDRESS ('-\ o,n 3a42;' 1 NATURE OF WORK ] t, \ a O` q f lam— l k L`rr\\na LEGAL DESCRIPTION-rpx \---SmtZ 0d • APPLICANT'S NAME ("- S1pi C-0. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS APPLICANT'S PHONE NUMBER VALUATION 1 I 1a c, FEE f43 FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE MECHANICS' LIEN LAW CAN RESULT IN THE PROPERTY OWNER PAYING TWICE FOR BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS Building O icial I certify that the above infor- mation is true and correct and that I will comply with all applicable codes and ordinances 7d;M, th of Sanlord, FL. t Applicant' s Yignature State No. TG Ai CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT PERMIT NUMBER DATE Lp PERMIT ADDRESSC< C C Total Contract Price of Job: l (, Total Sq. Ft. De cribe Wo k \ \_ ^ 1 Q ` C_5 f1(1 CY(\ 'V 0. ( C(1 \ \ lAM\Y10 Type o Canstruc ion: c` Flood Prone: (YES) (NO) nIC Change of Use From: {llp- Change of Use To: Number of Stories: Number of Dwellings: (IC_ Zoning: Occupancy: Residential Commercial _ Industrial LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (please attach printout from Seminole County) TAX I. D. NUMBER: \Ck OWNER G,,Z, (e 5 ( PHONE NUMBER: ADDRESS , c 11Z ttt• _ e 1pC' t`\ v± CITY STATE l" ZIP CONTRACTOR ADDRESS ARCHITECT D ADDRESS n O. CITY Cx PHONE NUMBER : (' y1n -\ 1''at4 STATE }L ZIP LICENSE NO. STATE Z I P •.... , r*t. t--*tr. t*****,r,r***w*,r**c******,r**,rrt********•t***********,r**,r*****rt,r,r,trt***w***trrt**w***t SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, REMOVAL OR THE RELOCATION OF TREES AND ADVERTISING SIGNS. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANYTIME AFTER THE WORK IS COMMENCED. ALL PLANS FOR THE BUILDING WHICH ARE REQUIRED T7 BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CONTAIN A STATEMENT THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE ARCHITECT'S OR ENGINEER'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLANS AND SPEC'S COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE'MINIMUM BUILDING CODES. NOTICE: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, :state agencies, or federal agencies. The named Contractor/Owner Builder to whom the permit is issued shall have the responsibility for supervision, direction, management, and control of the construction activities on the project for which the building permit was issued. SIGNATU DATE 0 APPLICATION APPROVED BY: FEES: Building Open Space Other Radon Road Impact DATE DATE: Police Fire Application PERMIT VALIDATION: CHECK CASH DATE BY THIS APPLICATION USED FOR WORK VALUED UNDER $2500.00: 5) ORIGINAL (BUILDING) YELLOW (CUSTOMER) PINK (COUNTY TAX OFFICE) GOLD (COUNTY ADMIN.). ART• KRAFT ZESIGN COMPANY ZINC. Electric Sign Fabrication a Installation a Maintenance February 1, 1996 City of Sanford Building Division P.O. Box 1788 Sanford, FL 32772-1778 RE: Red Lobster/Darden Restaurants 20 Town Center Circle, Sanford, FL To Whom It May Concern: Please accept this as authorization for Donna Lindsay to sign any and all necessary papers on be- half of myself and Art -Kraft Sign Co., Inc. for the wall signage and monument sign at the above referenced location. Any questions should be directed to Ms. Lindsay at (407) 727-7324. Thank you in advance. In l+ Billy, License Holder ET0000 95 State of Florida I County of Brevard The 'orrroirg instrument o .N iowledged before me th)s FA, 19 J EY - —. .. aj Who `zis :'UCed a nn as ic': ng"filcatiion and whn d;J;did not) take an oath. li o). it 4— (Notary signabze) We Hart CC 254691 6934 Sonny Dale Drive • W. Melbourne, Florida 32904 • (407) 727-7324.723-7171 • FAX 951-2466 J A N- 3 1- 9 6 W E D 1 3 4 1 P . 0 2 pare 32-1.9--30--5M R -2600-0000 name GMRI INC addl add2 1.751 DIRECTORS ROW csz ORE-AND09 FL 32809 pad nbad act own td dor £1 g -- )re/late --- 32 10 NOTE. RED L013STER 6111E LEGAL TRACT 26 PB 49 PGS 27 THRU 29 CLJRRE-N'C 96 date 01/31/96 jval land $952, 493 a9rc extra feat bldg cast value income total just value $952,493 exemptions --- exmp--amt yr tax due 10,41,44 e&i G)ENINOLE TOWNE CE.N1"ER REPLAT NO 2 SALES SU 6W 05/95 02919 1733 $11202,90() I 00 land 03 01./17/96 bl.dg chg ROS 01/23/96 Note, Leg, Sale, Bld/Land/x£, Prmt, Amd10, Comm, Hist, Other Roll, Fwd, Main Menu, 1EXIT3 Count: *0' <Repl.ace> APPLICATION'FOR SUILpING PERMIT CITY OE SAEVFDRD, FLORIDA DATE f -3- PERMIT NO. To the Building Official: The undersigned hereby applies for a permit for the following described work: n n OWNER ADDRESS n _ _ n NATURE OF WORK S ' aV.c`o,\\ \ -Gi"T LEGAL DESCRIPTION CXX 52(,ocs- o APPLICANT' S NAME `C( - `p • Stic r) 0-0 - , APPLICANT'S ADDRESS -\Ve- Lve APPLICANT' S PHONE NUMBER L{p,7) VALUATION \ XL rj Cj FEE FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE MECHANICS' LIEN LAW CAN RESULT IN THE PROPERTY OWNER PAYING TWICE FOR BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS I certify that the above infor- mation is true and correct and that I will comply with all a licable codes nd ordinances of t ity o ; lanrd,,,,, FL. Building Xljricial Applicant's Sig ature State No. !TGC 7lTS DARDEN RESTAURANTS Ne0 lobstbr' '^ The Qlrve (i.imen• PROPERTY OWWER'S CONSENT For Slga installations i, Sum Cuaidc , Agent for Darden Restaurants Inc- pn)Pcrty oMacf o! Red Lobster 0848, Sanford, Florida do bereby tivc Cbwgler Sim ConjpLq j ;jS;oo tp eruct a 1ip ai fire afar cn0wed location. Cbandler Signs has recievrd Aardm's approval to have Art Mf SiV1_stui.st pa the iastallation. Sworn t before me this A ay of 1 e Mil e-- Notary ublic AScat 3+oature 5'1vpL O-1416 .SaJo. 2 tea, Maiilo= Addgvu 401 • Mt;7 Tdgbone ?(=bar COMM Ja nu a rY ...1•496 ,,, Ct :vl / ''• o CC qp Q n: r O Of 5900 Lake Entow r)r.vo , o n a.., io,n_ 0 I CO?TAWO 43WS CITY"OF-SANFOR P'O`JBOX'1788'i----', AtiF6415,, FL 32772L) I)SINESS N.AME:.,., '_CTC_N8'i:,'. 3867 1 -0- " 4, ' A 0 D k CIT C 1-4:R/CLASS 96 0407 ELECTRICAL SPECIAL T(,T-l;CONTR/;.EC-ISTERED SUE DATE 11/17/1)!) LXPIRATION DATE 1 41- .1-7 lE E NILTY i.,T AL S. (,'CC -UP* LIC L I-TY OF WEST MELUORUNE Z7 SC ii l et Y:"! i 19 9 5 -19 9 6 BRE VARD COUNTY ROD NORTHCUTT, Tax Collector, Brevard County. OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE Titusville. Florida 3278O 1tI[S„LC'.T TII COUNTY ZONING RESTRIC,IDN$ aCCUtINI NIIIADF. 11 EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 30, 1996LICENSEPERIODOCTOBER1, 1995 • SEPTEMBER 30, 1998IFY, YEAR - APRIL 1, 1998 • SEPT. 30. 1996 ONLY.) ISSUED PURSUANT AND WITH ZONINGTO FLORIDATHESLIMES AND BREVARp COUNTY ORLICENSESHOULDBEDISPLAYEDONPREMISESCERTIFYCOMPLIANCEWITHZONINGOROTHERLAWS. THIS LICENSE MUST BE POSTED CAS UOUS Y I DOES NOTSTATUTEBUSINESSSPXXAlOUSLYWPLACEOf THE PERSONIS). OR ENTITY BELOW: 11 II DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT INC 89996 1995 MFG. LICENSE AMT. 5 MRREILLYTESDONALD RETLLY 32.00 6934'SONNY DALE DR UNI T 0 W MELBOURNE FL IS LICENSED AS INDICATED FOR 32904 THE FOLLOWING LOCATION: P0000489 6934 SONNY DALE DRUNIT0 AMOUNT DUE ON THIS TRANSACTION: $ W I-IFLH-)I)RNF OwNEO BY: ART KRAFT SIGN CO INC RCT. NUM DATE BATCH AMT, PAIDCORPORATION (PRIVATE) 425267 950920 4045UPONACHANGEOFOWNERSHIPORLOCATION, 32.008LICENSESHOULDBETRANSFERREDWITHIN30DAYS. NOTIFY TAX COLLECTOR UPON CLOSING OF BUSINE S5 e AC- 2951515 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION ELECT CONTRACTORS LICENSING BD 10/14/94 E0000195 5E0 THE REG. ELECTRICAL SPECIALTY CONTR NAMED BELOW HAS REGISTERED Fg pR E UNDERTHEpR?i I SIQ OF. Cy PT R DUTDODR S I Gad 'SPEC I AL I S AR EXPIRING A t, 1 A R E I L L Y T D' O N'A L•-,D.'- H:- '... i ART— KRAFT ISG A nnn nr :T. h ' - - tvvcJCAI1LC.:LrANC: PALM BAY. ;Fls,;:32905 i LAWTON CHILES GEO E STU T, JR. GOVERNOR DISPLAY IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE SECRETARY, .B.P.R. i` I 10/ 14/94 2951515 AUDITCONTROLNO. LICENSE NO. BATCH NO. AMOUNT PAID ET 0000195 94009520 $0.00 ELECT CONTRACTORS LICENSING SD 1940 N. MONROE ST. TALLAHASSEE FL 32399-0771 LICENSEE SIGNATURE r w.uET CARD- fOLO HERE -1 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION ELECT CONTRACTORS LICENSING BD REG. ELECTRICAL SPECIALTY CONTR. REILLY, DONALD H ART— KRAFT SIGN CO INC OUTDOOR SIGN SPECIALIST HAS PAID THE FEE REOUIRED T( HAPTER 489 F.S., FOR TFj YEAR EXPIRING AU 11 9 9 6 LAWTON CHILES GEO E STU T, JR. GOVERNOR SEC ETARY, .B.P.R. CW;ODUCER Poe & Brown 100 Rialto Place, #215 J6,Albourne, FL 32901 INSURED DATE(MM/DD/YY) i, ....................... ' 11/02/95 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. COMPANY AWestfield Companies COMPANY BF C C I MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY C COMPANY D COVERAGES, — THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POI IC:IFS I IkArrA clanWM RAAV WAVP RCCA1 Dcni ircn RV DAin 1 Al — Art Kraft Sign Cc Inc Robert Reilly 6934 Sonny Dale Drive Melbourne, FL 32904 CO TYPETYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE DATE(MM/DD/YY) OLICY EXPIRATION DATE(MM/DD/YY) LIMITS A GENERAL LIABILITY CWP3544960 09/24/95 09/24/96 GENERAL AGGREGATE s5OO, OOO X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILIT CLAIMS MADE a OCCUR PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG S5 O O, 0 0 0 PERSONAL 6 ADV INJURY s5 0 0, 0 0 0 EACH OCCURRENCE s5 O O, 000OWNER'S&CONTRACTOR'SPRO7 FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) s5 0 , 0 0 0 ME EXP (Any one person) COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT s5 0 0 0 s500, 000 A I AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY X ANY AUTO CWP3544960 09/24/95 09/24/96 ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS BODILY INJURY Per person) X HIRED AUTOS X ' NON -OWNED AUTOS BODILY Pe accident) RY PROPERTY DAMAGE GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY -EA ACCIDENT OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY: ANY AUTO EACH ACCIDENT AGGREGATE A EXCESS LIABILITY CWP3544960 09/24/95 09/24/96 EACH OCCURRENCE l 000 000 X UMBRELLAFORM AGGREGATE OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM B WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY 24040 12/_t1/94 12/31/95 STATUTORY LIMITS EACH ACCIDENT 10 0 0 0 0 THE PROPRIETOR/ INCLHPARTNERS/EXECUTIVE DISEASE -POLICY LIMIT s5 0 O 0 0 0 DISEASE -EACH EMPLOYEE 10 O 006OFFICERSARE: EXCL OTHER CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANGELLATIQN SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE City of Sanford, Licensing EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL Division 10 _ DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, P.O. BOX 11788 BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY Sanford, FL 32772 OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPAN IT AGENTS OR BEPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE I ACORD 25S (3);l.. ot:1. M`63 2 2: _ MD;7<`'-O.A(ARD EARPn I[)N'1999- P.'.,jNS:URANISSUE DATE (MM/DO/YY) CERTIFI. OCE fF.Ll 12 0 8 9 5 M,ttual THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS I` NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, fnsuralltc COMpUnI EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. IUCER 687 ATTENTION CERTIFICATE HOLDER: If you have any questions, Poe & Brown Inc please contact MELODY MORGAN 1-800-226-3224, 100 Rialto P1 Ste 215 2601 Cattlemen Road, Sarasota, FI 34232-6249 Melbourne FL 32901-3074 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURED ART KRAFT SIGN COMPANY INC Company Letter A FCCI MUTUAL 6934 SONNY DALE DR Company Letter B: MELBOURNE FL 32904-2244 Company Letter C: AC THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOT WITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS, AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. CO LTF TYPE IN INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE DATE ( I/ IM/DDIYY) POLICY EXPIRATION DATE ( MMIDD/ YY) ALL LIMITS IN THOUSANDS GENERAL LIABILITY COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS MADE QOCCURK.CE OwNEES \ CONTRACTORS IIIOTECTM GENERAL AGGREGATE PRODUCTS•COMP/ OPS AGGREGATE PERSONAL & ADVERTISING INJURY EACH OCCURRENCE FIRE DAMAGE ( ANY ONE FIRE) MEDICAL EXPENSE ( ANY ONE PERSON AUTOMOBILELIABILITY ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS HIRED AUTOSmut NON -OWNED AUTOS GARAGE LIABILITY FC( Insurance U 11 t / Company CSLBODILY INJURY IPERPERSON) ODILY INJURYJUURY PER ACCIDENT) PROPERTY DAMAGE EXCESSLIABILITY OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY 001-WC96A- 24040 01/101/96 01/01/97 STATUTORY 100 ( EACH ACCIDENT) 500 (DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT) 100 (DISEASE - EACH EMPLOYEE) OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/RESTRICTIONS/SPECIAL ITEMS 3CERTlNCASE ''%?''iiiiiii'' i:?>.`>»»>'3i:i ?::< LANGEILATlON, .. LICENSING DIV REQISTRATION CERT SEC C I TY OF SANFORD P O BOX 11788 SANDFORD FL 32772-1778 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO SEND 10 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT. BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABIL- ITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVE. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE/ Q J(:14N-3 1 -96 W E D 1 3: 4 1 P . 0 2 pare 3?.--.1.9--30-5HZ 2600-0000 name GIhRI INC addl add2, 1.751 DIRECTORS ROW csz ORLANn09 FL 32809 pad hbad act own td dor f1q -- )re/late ---- 92 10 NOTE: RED I.:CHSTER fS11'E~ LEGAL. TRACT 26 FIB 49 PGS 27 TWRU 29 CURRENT 96 date 01/31/96 jval land $952,493 agrc extras feat bldg coast value income total just value $952,493 exemptions exmp--amt yr tax dUe 10,41r.44 e&i G)EMINOLE TOWNE: CEN'CER REPLAT NO 2 SALES SOU SW 05 /95 02919 17:33 $11282, 900 1 00 land 03 01 / 17 / 96 bl, dg chg ROS 01/23/96 Note, Leg, Sale, 8Id/land/ x f, Prmt, Amd10, Comm, I- ist, Other Rol 1, Fwd, Main Menu, CE.XITI Count: * 0 <Replace> ART• KRAFT 7ESIGN COMPANY MINC. Electric Sign Fabrication • Installation • Maintenance February 1, 1996 City of Sanford Building Division P.O. Box 1788 Sanford, FL 32772-1778 RE: Red Lobster/Darden Restaurants 20 Town Center Circle, Sanford, FL To Whom It May Concern: Please accept this as authorization for Donna Lindsay to sign any and all :necessary papers on be- half of myself and Art -Kraft Sign Co., Inc. for the wall signage and monument sign at the above referenced location. Any questions should be directed to Ms. Lindsay at (407) 727-7324. Thank you in advance. Si are3y„ Donald H. Reilly, License Holder ETO 00195 State of Florlda / County of Brevard The foregoing instrument was acknowledged afore me this 19 ILhy vlh.', has F. c aced a _. V ' , . cc U a • -'. a^..•',, r' C1 n 1 nL 1.:.j ^:u d. iiCi i34e 8n Ontll. Ncta 7 signature Katie Hart G c5 u91 PUkTM HAW 6teie tr:: WMYC f o M 8 CC 6934 Sonny Dale Drive • W. Melbourne, Florida 32904 • (407) 727-7324 • 723-7171 • FAX 951-2466 CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA PERMIT NO. ()10' ( DATE THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES; FOR A PERMIT TO INSTALL THE FOLLOWING H.A.R.V. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT: OWNER'S NAME & 0 q _ ADDRESS OF JOB MECHANICAL CONTR. /9!/31 ' C-AAJ %,44c= X S54FF RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL/,C Subject to rules and regulations of Sanford mechanical code. NATURE OF WORK FUEL B.T.U. INPUT OUTPUT -- VALUATION ff APPLICATION FEE AL COMPETENCY CARD NO. Mechanical Alk CITY OF SANFORD FIRE -DEPARTMENT FEES FOR SERVICES PHONE #: 407-322-4952 DATE: PERMIT #: BUSINESS NAME: ADDRESS: C-1) PHONE NUMBER:( ) PLANS REVIEW BURN PERMIT TANK PERMIT COMMENTS: AMOUNT TENT PERMIT REINSPECTION FIRE SYSTEM Fees must be paid to Sanford Building Department, 300 N. Park Avenue, Sanford, Florida. Phone # 330-5656. Proof of payment must be made to Sanford Fire Prevention before any further services can take place. 1 Sanford i e Prevention I certify that the above information is true and correct and that I will comply with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of Sanford, Florida. J p Signature NOV 09 '95 03:43PM CAPTIVE-AIREiORLP.NDO P.9 Fire System Parts List 11/08/95 Job Names Rn LOHBTBR SANFORD FL Job Numbers 70069 Locations SANFORD, PL P.M. Tags F.S. Drawings RLKLEFT PCL-350/350 Tank(s) Distributor CAB QC QZ Ttaa CAB # Manu! 0 Doacription sunnlied Buoolied Ch 2 3 PCL-350 PCL-330 3.50 13ALLON CYLINDER 2 2 5 MB-OEMI MB-OEMI MOUNTING BRACSET t/ 2 UTILITY CABINET 1 7 MB-P2 M2-P2 CONTROL HEAD MOUNTING 1 BRACK&T 1 9 MCH-M MCH-M CYLINDER CONTROL HEAD 1 1 10 MS-DPDT MS-DPDT mrCROSWITCH - DOUBLE POLE - i 4 1: NL-D1 NL-D1/NL-P TIP NOZZLE - DUCT (SAME AS - NL-P) 4 1 13 NL-02 NL-D2 TIP#765 NOZZL:3 - DUCT - 1 6 15 NL-A NL-A TIP#723 NOZZL:3 - PLENUM - 6 2 18 NLS-R NLS-R TIP#7256 NOZZL:3 - APPLIANCE - 3WIVi?L) 2 4 19 NL-F2 NL-?'2 NOZZL:3 - APPLIANCE - 4 2 20 NL-F1.25 XL-F1.25 NOZZL)3 - APPLIANCE - 2 19 26 QS-3/8 77285 3/8" QUICX SEAL - 19 4 27 QS-1/2 77287 1/2" QUICK SEAL - 4 7 28 PLK-25 FLK-25 FUSIBLE LINK KIT - 7 4 29 FL-350 FL-350 350 013GREE ?USIBLE LINK - 4 3 30 FL-300 FL-500 500 Di3GREE FUSIBLE LINK - 3 1 32 MGV2 MGV2 2" Mechanical Gas Valve - 1 1 33 RPS-M RP$-M REMOTE' PULL STATION -- 1 3 34 MCP -ISO -I MCP-150 CORNER PULLEY - (INSIDE - HOOD) 3 12 34 MCP-150-0 MCP-150 CORNER PULLEY - (OUTSIDE 10 HOOD) 2 4 39 ELB-45 CHROMI: PLATED ELBOW - 45 - DEG 4 v Page 1 v a 0 Q z aJ CE 0 w Of H Q w n. Cl E 0- 0 z DRAWING NUMBERt RLKLEF-T.dat Job Ito Job Name, RED LOBSTER K-BUILDING LEV T Street, City, State Zip: Drawn By; AJC System S;ze, PCL-350/350 Tank System - Total Sys teri FP = 24.50 Contact NQmei MAX FP = 26.00 Contact Phone #, ( > Hood 1 8' 6' Long x 54' Wide x 30' High Duct 1 Size: 16' x 16' Hoot! 2 13' 0' Long x 54' Wide x 30' Fligh Duct 1 S;ze: 10' x 14' Duct 2 Size: 10' x 14' Hood 3 13' 0' Long x 54' Wide x 30' H;gh Duct I S;zeo 10' x 14' Duct 2 Size- 10' x 14' NOTES FIELD I'll't UKIJF'S AS SHOWN SLEEVING, ELBOWS, TEES, AND NOZZLES SUPPLIED BY CAS RELOCATE NOZZLES IF FLOW PATTERN IS BLUCKED BY SHELVING, SALAMANDERS, ETC. MAXIMUM 9 ELBOWS 1N SUPPLY LINE. MINIMUM 72 INCHES OF AGENT LINE FROM TANK TU FIRST NUZZLE. IF APPLICABLE, PRE -PIPED CHARBROILER DROPS ARE SHIPPED LOUSE. FACTORY PIPING EXTENDS A MAXIMUM OF 6' ABOVE THE 1OP [IF THE HOOD. APPLIANCE DIMENSIONS LISTED REPRESENT THE COOKING SURFACE SIZE, NOT THE OVERALL APPLIANCE S[ZE. THIS FIRE SYSTEM COMPLIES WITH U.L. 300 REQUIREMENTS FACTORY PIPING FIELD PIPING I I ; I I I 1 t z 9 D—A t to I I I I I i 2.0' MECHANICAL GAS VALVE MGV w O Q L Q J O W a• H crkw,u 0 NTIZZU tf)rT mw LUGLD1< IT U) Q REM OASM 9 ZQTm to J de 0 1 y^ m J u.t-+pFr.pV^J FI i Fu.f1 UY 1 1II] arty nwc arm rani W llC Fla M; tC f/t f A17MRC,WIMM sm tntltd MIL1^ M FOR tNR i Mu WKL X A~ur M QI AG AM" FALL i A MYtm vL ponR4Ktt4R40MItto-MAMN S Pm FUME tMntem M OOOI WMYM m"TtD nom ssru niKvw5ftfi "K=m natw M Mau Cm Smim a w in .t • MItnav M= AMYG R z Mw a, - v,t.At rot-vm aarmall Towrw v+m W.O.l itbt rto orr a 2-v"m mII11CO. MO t1Qa Ft fJw UA FAA tang r.1n to v" e[ r / - rlll%1l rg W1WAwepjuI1RE m tATM 1- rCl.-VWU5 rAIGw trilim[71 P PCI 2012AI al l ON CTI 1QA 3 PCI.-750/230 CALL[" c*jm t Sr16 M-QRVq-A TALK )OMYR6 1TiIC I 7 Itl-P2 COAtLL MCN i011iTf6 1?AlLi7 e MC-laliEtIR1TIG ACnnJNllt CTi11 9 LLCWNngI,MMW CTLTRMR COVIQDL K 10 1K SrFWAWCPWVIMN SQQE PULE iL-M IQZI.E FasumLi (ir 9rm IL-12 DICI NUME (Af RTGT) LL-23 DICE muzzLE or R7(A) W-A m2n[ ItSomy ur R7CA H." MZZIE MSOULT (TIP I?= N_-W Tffi1LE ASSMKT alp 97i4) R_S-R MWZI.E ASSMKV (TIP 1134) 14L-f'2 M22EE ASSE)DLLT (Tr 1770 tt-rIZSNML.0 1LiCDO1I (T8 9718) W-R tMILE 1Kmmy tlr v?m w r"IFU3TSLE LAL M 2 9 M X ME IIANE 13R 3a sm MIGnS nxFmF LIW I4N MUCOWICAL tdS VRLV6 TJT/ CMIRt0111 an VTLVE 33 APS PAMPULE MLL SUTXW 3.50 GAL IAW I C6) 1D a 3.50 GAL IAW O 0 z Q J O M H Q I w H a a N V m to m m 0 0z r----------i I I 3/8' PIPING 1 I I 6.00 L _ _ 39.00 - ICED # I 66M S teoner L x 30.00' r---------- I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I 713.00 1 1 1 1 11 I 1 15" I II 1 I 1 I I I L-------- JI I 3/0' PIPING r'i n— --- I El I 00 oNL-f Ponge 14.00' I. x 241)0' N;gh Prora+rty 1 I L_---_---_-- e I I I I I 1 f I 1 I I 1 I I I I J I 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 I CnNVIDCTUgN Oven 37.00' L x 38A0' D 1 1 r--------------------t I I VIM 3SVHd-£ I 15' 1 IVNIN2131 H1IA I I Q321U1-3Sd-PMl1d0 1 a I 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I MUD t t I I I 1 E I I I 1 I I I I I I 11 I I II I I I Il' 1 1 SMdld .8/E 1 1 v I I I I I I I) l 00'Sil I I ' 00 ZZ 00.6 L I 00'8/-----__ 00 E I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 2 1 I j - L-------------------------------- I:IINVEYUR uvt.nb 42.90' L x 40.00' D 9MdId .8/E 0 Gas Rodlant Char-13rolter 44AD' L x 24-00' D 00'61 r-------- 1-------------------- I II 1 I II 1 I I I 1 15' I I 1 1l' I to 1 1 1 I Nldid .B/E 1 1 I 1 11 I I I DOW 1 I 1 i I 1 1 1 1 I( 11 1 I I I I I I 11 I I II 1 1 1 15" 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 115" I I I I I II 11' II IIEl II I 1 1 I I fi I{ II II I 1 I--- 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I! I 1 I L-----J L J L------I 1 00'0t•—100*91 0091 00'91 Wirt J NII11D M 3 1"- D 1 1 1 9Nldld . 8/E 00* 02 ILS- rLS- Cas Rudlnnt Chnr-Broiler 44. 00' L x 24.00' D 00' 00 StoaMer 4. 00' L x 30A0' 5NIdid A/£ 00' 91 00'91— 00'91— IIVL- fi'I NL-f IL-F B Pyro Chem,, Inc. PCL-240/350/550 RESTAURANT KITCHEN FIRE SUPPRESS-40N SYSTEM TECHNICAL MANUAL COMPONENTS DESIGN INSTALLATION MAINTENANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS Pepe Subeec General Information 1-1 General Information Components 2-1 Cylinders & Valves Valve Rebuilding Equipment VT-1 Wet Valve Tool 2-2 Cylinder Bracketing Extinguishing Agent MCH Control Head ECH Control Head 2-3 MB-P2 Mounting Bracket PAC-10 PAC-200 2-4 Detection Equipment FLK-1 FLK-1 A FLH-1 2-5 Fusible Links Thermal Detectors RPS-M Remote Pull Station GVSO Shut Off Valves 2-6 EGVSO Gas Shut Off Valves MCP-1 Corner Pulleys CP-1 Corner Pulleys 2-7 Tee Pulley MS-SPDT Micro Switch MS-OPOT Micro Switch SM-120124 Solenoid Monitor 2-8 Pipe and Fittings Straight Nozzles Swivel Nozzles 2-9 Components List 1 Revision Date 1 11/1/94 1 11/1/94 1 11/l/94 1 11/1/94 1 11/1/94 1 11/1/94 1 11/1/94 dkF1tF` - 1 11/1/94 Desion 3-1 Duct Protection 1 NL-P NL.D2 NL-D3 3-2 Plenum Protection 1 3-3 Appliance Protection 1 Range Coverage 3-4 Griddle Coverage 1 Deep Fat Fryer Coverage 3-5 Radiant Charbroiler Coverage 1 Synthetic Rock Charbroiler Coverage Natural Class 'A' Charbroiler Coverage 3-6 Upright Broiler Coverage 1 Chain Broiler Coverage Open Top Chain Broiler Coverage 3-7 Open Top Chain Broiler Coverage 1 Wok Coverage 3-8 Cylinder Sizing 1 Main Supply Line Piping 3-9 Branch Line Piping 2 Understanding Equivalent Piping PCL-240 Main Supply Limits LimPCL-350 Main Supply its PCL-550 Main Supply Limits 3-10 Branch Piping Limitations 2 One Nozzle Duct Branch Two Nozzle Duct Branch One Nozzle Plenum Branch One Nozzle Appliance Branch Two Nozzle Appliance Branch 3-11 Three Nozzle Appliance Branch 1 11/1/94 11/1/94 11/1/94 11/1/94 11/1/94 2/1 /95 11/1/94 Pape Subject Revision Date 3-1 1 Four Nozzle Range Branch 1 11/1/94 PCL-240 Typical Piping Layout 3-12 PCL-350 Typical Piping Layout PCL-550 Typical Piping Layout 3-13 Detector Placement 1 11/1/94 Exhaust Ducts Cooking Appliances Installation 4-1 General 1 11/1/94 Cylinder Installation Control Head Installation - Single Cylinder 4-2 Multiple Cylinder Control Head Installation 1 1 1 // /94 4-3 Multiple Cylinder Control 1 1 1 /1 /94 Head Installation (cont.) 4-4 Fusible Link Detector Installation 1 1 1 /1 /94 Fusible Links Without Hangers 4-5 Fusible Links With Hangers 1 1 1 /1 /94 4-6 Thermal Detector Installation 1 11/1/94 Setting The Control Head MCH Control Head ECH Control Head 4-7 Solenoid Monitor Installation 1 11/1/94 In A Detection Circuit 4-8 When Used As A Reset Relay 1 11/1/94 Remote Pull Station Installation 4-9 Mechanical Gas Shut Off Valve Installation 1 11/1/94 Valve Installation 4-10 Electrical Gas Shut Off Valve Installation 1 11/1/94 Tee Pulley Installation 4-11 Miniature Switch Installation 1 11/1/94 Pipe and Nozzle Installation 4-12 System Checkout After Installation 1 11/1/94 4-13 System Checkout After Installation (cont.) 1 1 1 /l /94 Maintenance 5-1 General 1 11/1194 Maintenance After Discharge Cleanup After Discharge Recharge After Discharge Piping and Nozzles 5-2 System Reset 1 11/1/94 Regular System Maintenance 6 Month Maintenance Annual Maintenance Hydrostatic Testing ULEX 3830 REVISED 2/1 /95 Part Number 315-420904 Chapter 1--Genera Page 1 Rev.' CHAPTER I General Information INTRODUCTION The Pyro Chem, Inc. Restaurant Fire Suppression System is of the pre- engineered type as defined by NFPA-17A Standard for Wet Chemical Extinguishing Systems and is designed to provide fire protection for restaurant cooking appliances, hoods, and ducts. Installation and maintenance of the system must conform to the limitations detailed in this manual and be performed by an Authorized Pyro Chem, Inc. dealer. The Pyro Chem, Inc. System utilizes a wet chemical agent specifically designed to suppress restaurant cooking area fires. The system provides automatic actuation and can be manually actuated through a remote mechanical pull station. Upon actuation, the system discharges a pre- determined amount of agent to the duct, plenum, and cooking appliances. The agent acts to suppress fires in three ways: 1.The chemical chain reaction causing combustion is interrupted by both the agent itself and the resulting steam formation. 2. The agent cools the fire bringing it below auto -ignition temperature. 3. The agent reacts with hot grease forming a soap -like layer saponification) that helps prevent the escape of combustible vapors, thus preventing re -ignition. The shutdown of fuel and power to all appliances under protected ventilation equipment is required upon system actuation. The shutdown of make-up or supply air is recommended upon system actuation but is not required. Exhaust fan(s) in the ventilation system should remain on during system discharge as they assist the dispersion of chemical through the ventilating system. The system is UL Listed with or without exhaust fan shutdown. TEMPERATURE LIMITATIONS The operating temperature range of the Pyro Chem, Inc. System is 32° F. 0° C.) minimum to 1200 F. (490 C.) maximum. UL LISTING The Pyro Chem, Inc. Restaurant Fire Suppression System has been tested to the UL Standard for Fire Extinguishing Systems For Protection of Restaurant Cooking Areas. UL300 and Listed by Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. ULEX 383 November 1, 199 Chapter 3—System Design Page 3-1 Rev.1 CHAPTER III System Design This section will cover the proper design of the Pyro Chem Res- taurant Fire Suppression System. It is divided into four (4) sections: 1. Nozzle Coverage and Placement. 2. Cylinder Sizing. 3. Piping Limitations. 4. Detector Requirements. Each of these sections must be completed before attempting any installation. SECTION 1 Nozzle Coverage and Placement This section will provide guidelines for determining nozzle type, positioning, and quantity for duct, plenum, and appliance protection. A. Duct Protection The following three (3) nozzles have been developed for the protection of exhaust ducts: 1. Model NL-P. 2. Model NL-D2. 3. Model NL-D3. Each nozzle is approved for use with the exhaust fan dampered, undampered with the fan on, or undampered with the fan off. It is not required that the fan be shut down or the exhaust duct be dampered for the system to operate properly. Each nozzle is approved to protect exhaust ducts of unlimited length. 1. Model NL-P. The Model NL-P nozzle is a one (1) flow point nozzle designed for the protection of exhaust ducts. One (1) or two (2) Model NL-P nozzles can be used on a single duct branch. A single Model NL-P exhaust duct nozzle can protect a square or rectangular duct with a maximum perimeter of 50 inches and a maximum one -side length of 17 inches. It can also protect a round duct with a maximum circumference of 50 inches and a maximum diameter of 16 inches (see Figure 3-1). The nozzle must be installed on the centerline of the duct and aimed directly into the duct opening (see Figure 3-2). Two (2) Model NL-P exhaust duct nozzles can protect a square or rectangular duct with a maximum perimeter of 84 inches and a maximum one -side length of 34 inches. They can also protect a round duct with. a maximum circumference of 84 inches and a maximum diameter of 26.5 inches. When two (2) Model NL-P nozzles are used to protect a single duct, the cross sectional area of the duct must be divided into two equal symmetrical areas. The nozzle must then be installed on the center line of the area it protects and aimed directly into the duct opening (see Figure 3-2.1). 2. Model NL-D2. The Model NL-D2 nozzle is a two (2) flow point nozzle designed for the protection of exhaust ducts. Only one (1) Model NL-D2 nozzle can be used on a single duct branch. A single Model NL-D2 exhaust duct nozzle can protect a square or rectangular duct with a maximum perimeter of 75.5 inches and a maximum one -side length of 25 inches. It can also protect a round duct with a maximum circum- ference of 75.5 inches and a maximum diameter of 24 inches (see Figure 3-1). The nozzle must be installed on the centerline of the duct and aimed directly into the duct opening (see Figure 3-2). 3. Model NL-D3. The Model NL-D3 nozzle is a three (3) flow point nozzle designed for the protection of exhaust ducts. One (1) or two 2) Model NL-D3 nozzles can be used on a single duct branch. A single Model NL-D3 exhaust duct nozzle can protect a square or rectangular duct with a maximum perimeter of 100 inches and a maximum one -side length of 33 inches. It can also protect a round duct with a maximum circum- ference of 100 inches and a maximum diameter of 31.75 inches (see Figure 3-1) The nozzle must be installed on the centerline of the duct and aimed directly into the duct opening (see Figure 3-2). Two (2) Model NL-D3 exhaust duct nozzles can protect a square or rectangular duct with a maximum perimeter of 150 inches and•a maximum one -side length of 66 inches. They can also protect a round duct with a maximum circumference of 150 inches and a maximum diameter of 47.5 inches. When two (2) Model NL-D3 nozzles are used to protect a single duct, the cross sectional area of the duct must be divided into two equal symmetrical areas. The nozzle must then be installed on the centerline of the area it protects and aimed directly into the duct opening (see Figure 3-2.1). K- K-02 K-03 a.2111. SW MAX a.2w- 73.rMAX a.2W100' MAX i L Hr MAM L QV M 10 II f - = Cr MAX M - w.r UkX Ii I' - 2r MAX ar MAX i Lw.r MAX r MAX -J Figure 3-1. Duct Nozzle Coverage Limitations. ULEX 383( November 1, 1991 Cha I pter 3—System Design Page 3-2 Rev11 03 — 100• MAX ULE7C 31l30 Novi mbar 1, 1994 I I. Duct Nozzle Coverage Chart MAXIMUM MAXIMUM NOZZLE SIDE PERIMETER FLOW POINTS NL-P 2 x NL-P 17" 34" 50' 84' 1, NL-D2 25" 75' NL-D3 33 100' 2 x NL-D3 66" I50" I i wit i L — Figure 3-2. Single Nozzle Placement In Duct. Figure 3-2.1. Dual Nozzle Placement In Duct. NOTE: A SINGLE DUCT BRANCH CAN ONLY SUPPORT: 1) A Single NLP 2) A Single NLD2 3) A Single NLD3 4) Two NLP's 5) Two NLD3's B. Plenum Protection The Model NL-A nozzle is a one (1) flow point nozzle that has been developed to protect the plenum section of the exhaust hood. Only one (1) Model NL-A nozzle can be used on a single plenum branch. A single Model NL-A can protect a plenum (with single or V-Bank filters) with rectangular dimensions of 8' x 4' or less. Larger plenums can be protected by dividing the hazard area so that each nozzle protects an area of 8' x 4' or less (see Figure 3-3). The nozzle(s) must be located at the center of the V-Bank width or centered between the filter width when used with a single bank filter plenum. It must be within 4" of the wall it is mounted against (see Figure 3-4), or within 4" of the edge of the protected zone. Figure 3-3. Plenum Coverage Limitations, Model NL-A Nozzle. A Chapter 3—System Desig Page 3• Rev C. Appliance Protection H FILTERS —• Figure 3-4. Model NL-A Plenum Nozzle Placement. 1. Range Coverage. The Model NL-F1.25 is a 1.25 flow point nozzle that is used for range top protection. The maximum range top area that can be protected by a single NL-F1.25 nozzle is 12" x 30". See Figure 3-5. a. Nozzle Location. The nozzle must be located- on the longest centerline of the protected zone. The nozzle must be located not more than 9" from the center of the protected zone. Figure 3-5. Model NL-F1.25 Range Nozzle Placement. Figure 3-6. Model NL-F1.25 Range Nozzle Aiming. NOTE Nozzle shall be located anywhere in the shaded rea and imed at ie center f the rotected Dne. ULPX 38: November 1, 19! Chapter 3—System Design Page 3-4 Rev.1 Nozzle Height: The nozzle must be mounted 40' to 50" above the cooking surface. b. Nozzle Aiming. The tip of the Model NL-F1.25 nozzle has two flat areas designed to assist aiming. The nozzle must be positioned so that these flat areas are parallel to the longest side of the protected zone. See Figure 3-6. 2. Griddle Coverage. The Model NL-R nozzle is a one (1) flow point nozzle that is used for griddle protection. The maximum griddle area that can be protected by a single NL-R nozzle is 30" x 30". The nozzle must be located over the griddle cooking surface, no more than six (6) inches from the edge of the protected zone. The nozzle must be aimed at the center of the protected zone. The nozzle must be mounted 24" to 50' above the cooking surface. See Figure 3-7. NOTE Nozzle shall be located anywhere in the shaded area and aimed at the center of the protected zone. Figure 3-7. Model NIL-R Nozzle Placement, Griddle. 3. Deep Fat Fryer Coverage. The Model NL-F2 nozzle is a two (2) flow point nozzle that is used for the protection of a single vat of a deep fat fryer. The maximum area that can be protected by a single NL-F2 nozzle is: 1. Cooking Area: 14.75" x 14.00" 2. Integral Drip Board: 14.75" x 7.5" The nozzle must be located over the cooking surface and aimed at the center of the protected zone. The nozzle must be mounted 30" to 50' above the top surface of the deep fat fryer (see Figure 3-8). The tip of the Model NL-F2 nozzle has two flat areas designed to assist aiming. The nozzle must be positioned so that these flat areas are parallel to the longest side of the protected zone. See Figure 3-8.1. NOTE Nozzle shall be located anywhere in the shaded area and aimed at the center of the protected zone. 11 14' COOKING AREA Figure 3-8. Model NL-F2 Nozzle Placement, Deep Fat Fryer. Figure 3-8.1. Model NL-F2 Nozzle Aiming. Lj ULEX 3830 November 1, 1994 Chapter 3 - System oesigr Paps 3-4- Rev. - 3.1. Deep Fat Fryer Coverage. The Model NL-F2 nozzle is a two (2) flow point nozzle that is used for the protection of a single vat of a deep fat fryer. The maximum area that can be protected by a single NL-F2 nozzle is: 1. Cooking Area: 18" x 18" 2. Integral Drip Board: 18" x 9.75" The nozzle must be located within 11.875" of the center of the longest side, and within 7" of the center of the shortest side of the cooking surface and aimed at the center of the protected zone. The nozzle must be mounted 30" to 42" above the to, surface of the deep fat fryer (see Figure 3-81). The tip of the Model NL-F2 nozzle has two flat areas designed to assist aiming. The nozzle must be positioned so that these flat areas are parallel to the longest side of the protected zone. See Figure 3-8.1. NOTE Nozzle shall be located anywhere in the shaded area and aimed at the center of the protected zone. Figure 3-8.L Model NL-F2 Nozzle Placement, Deep Fat Fryer. NOTE For installations that require the use of the Model NL-F2 nozzle to protect a deep fat fryer in accordance with Deep Fat Fryer Coverage shown here (See Figure 3-8.2), the following additional restrictions apply to the main supply line piping: 1. Minimum length, linear: 8 feet 2. Miminum lentgh, equivalent: 14.1 feet 3. Minimum system flow points: 4 4. Minimum branches (total): 3 ULEX 38: April 1, 19 Chapter 3—System Design Page 3-5 Rev.1 4. Radiant Charbroiler Coverage. NOTE A radiant charbroiler is distinguished by the use of gas or electrically heated metal strips (radiants) that are used for cooking. The Model NIL-R nozzle is a one (1) flow point nozzle that is used to protect either gas or electrically fueled radiant charbroilers. The maximum area that can be protected by a single NL-R nozzle is 25' x 25". The nozzle must be located over the cooking surface and aimed at the center of the protected zone. The nozzle must be mounted 24" to 50" above the cooking surface. See Figure 3-9. NOTE Nozzle shall be located anywhere in the shaded area and aimed at the center of the protected zone. 24--301 Figure 3-9. Model NIL-R Nozzle Placement, Radiant Charbroiler. 5. Synthetic Rock Charbroiler Coverage. NOTE A synthetic rock charbroiler is distinguished by the use of lava, pumice, or synthetic rocks that are used for cooking. The Model NL-F2 nozzle is a two (2) flow point nozzle that is used for the protection of either gas or electrically fueled synthetic rock charbroilers. The maximum fuel depth shall not exceed two (2) layers of lava, pumice, or synthetic rocks. The maximum area that can be protected by a single NL-F2 nozzle is 25" x 25". The nozzle must be located over the cooking surface and aimed at the center of the protected zone. The nozzle must be mounted 30" to 50" above the cooking surface (see Figure 3-10). The tip of the Model NL-F2 nozzle has two flat areas designed to assist aiming. The nozzle must be positioned so that these flat areas are parallel to the longest side of the protected zone. See Figure 3-8.1. NOTE Nozzle shall be located anywhere in the shaded area and aimed at the center of the protected zone. 0- Figure 3-10. Model NL-F2 Nozzle Placement, Synthetic Rock Charbroiler. 6. Natural Class "A" Charbroiler Coverage. NOTE A Class "A' charbroiler is distinguished by the use of charcoal, mesquite chips, chunks, and/or logs that are used for cooking. The Model NL-A nozzle is used for the protection of Class A' charbroilers with a maximum fuel depth of six (6) inches. The maximum area that can be protected by a single NIL -A nozzle is 20' x 24". The nozzle must be located over the cooking surface and aimed at the center of the protected zone. The nozzle must LILEX 3830 November 1, 1994 Chapter 3—System Design Page 3-6 Rev.1 be mounted 15" to 35" above the cooking surface. See Figure 3-11. NOTE Nozzle shall be located anywhere in the shaded area and aimed at the center of the protected zone. s- Figure 3-11. Model NIL -A Nozzle Placement, Class "A" Charbroiler. 7. Upright Broiler Coverage. The Model NL-UB nozzle is a one-half (W flow point nozzle that is used for upright broiler protection. Two (2) Model NL-UB nozzles are commonly used for this application. The purpose of using two nozzles is to distribute the chemical evenly between the cooking surface (on top) and the drip pan (below). For upright broilers that have no drip pan, a single Model NL-UB nozzle can be used. The maximum area that can be protected by a pair of NL-UB nozzles (or a single NL-UB nozzle when no drip pan is present) is 30' x 34". One nozzle must be positioned in the front entrance of the broiling chamber and aimed at the diagonal corner. The nozzle will be positioned above the cooking surface. If necessary, the second nozzle must be installed above the front edge of the grease drip pan and aimed at its midpoint. See Figure 3-12. ION Figure 3-12. Model NIL-UB Nozzle Placement, Upright Broiler. 8. Chain Broiler Coverage. Two types of chain broilers are commonly used; open and closed top. Each is protected in a different manner. a. Closed Top Chain Broiler Coverage. The Model NL-UB nozzle is a one-half (1/2) flow point nozzle that is used for closed top chain broiler protection. Two (2) Model NL-UB nozzles are commonly used for this application. The purpose of using two nozzles is to distribute the chemical evenly between the cooking surface (on top) and the drip pan (below). For closed top chain broilers that have no drip pan, a single Model NL- UB nozzle can be used. The maximum area that can be protected by a pair of NL-LIB nozzles (or a single NL-UB nozzle when no drip pan is present) is 30" x 34". One nozzle must be positioned in the front entrance of the broiling chamber and aimed at the diagonal corner. The nozzle will be positioned above the cooking surface. The second nozzle (if necessary) must be installed above the front edge of the grease drip pan and aimed at its midpoint. See Figure 3-13. ULEX 3830 November 1, 1994 4 Chapter 3—System Desig Page 3- Rev. 9. Wok Coverage. 30' 34' i Figure 3-13. Model NL-UB Nozzle Placement, Closed Top Chain Broiler. b. Open Top Chain Broiler Coverage. The Model NL-A nozzle is a one (1) flow point nozzle that is used for open top chain broiler protection. The maximum area that can be protected by an NL-A nozzles is 32" x 34". The nozzle must be located over the opening and aimed at the center of the protected zone. The nozzle must be mounted 10" to 22" above the cooking surface. See Figure 3-14. NOTE Nozzle shall be located anywhere in the shaded area and aimed at the center of the protected zone. Figure 3-14. Model NL-A Nozzle Placement, Open Top Chain Broiler. The Model NL-R nozzle is a one (1) flow point nozzle that is used for wok protection. A single NL-R nozzle can cover a single wok of 14" to 24" in diameter. The nozzle must be mounted 40" to 50" above the cooking surface at a radius of 12" from the center of the wok, regardless of wok diameter. The nozzle must be aimed at the center of the protected zone. See Figure 3-14.1. NOTE Nozzle shall be located anywhere in the shaded area and aimed at the center of the protected zone. 24• Dim. Figure 3-14.1. Model NIL-R Nozzle Placement, Wok. ULEX 31 November 1, 1E Chapter 3—System Design Page 3-8 Rev.1 SECTION 2 Cylinder Sizing After determining the number and type of nozzles required to protect the duct, plenum, and cooking appliances, the total number of system flow points can be determined. The sum of all required nozzles' flow points is used to determine the size and quantity of cylinders required. MAXIMUM CYLINDER FLOW POINTS Flow Points Cylinder 8 PCL-240 13 PCL-350 20 PCL-550 For systems requiring more than twenty (20) flow points, any combination of cylinders can be used provided the total flow point requirements are met. EXAMPLE If a system requires twenty-six (26) flow points, the following combinations of cylinders can be used: 1. 1 x PCL-550 and 1 x PCL-240 (28 FP total) 2. 2 x PCL-350 (26 FP total) NOTE: Cylinders cannot be manifolded together. Each cylinder must be piped separately. SECTION 3 Piping Limitations Pyro Chem Restaurant Fire Suppression System piping limitations are divided into two categories; Main Supply Line Piping Limitations and Branch Line Piping Limitations. 1. Main Supply Line Piping. The main supply line is a run of pipe from the cylinder to the hazard area. In general, it is a straight run of pipe that runs through tees. Branch piping is connected to the side outlet of these tees. The main supply line of the Pyro Chem Restaurant Fire Suppression System utilizes either straight line or split piping to simplify system installation. Straight line piping is distinguished by the fact that the main supply line is a straight run of pipe that flows through tees. When straight line piping is used, the main supply line cannot run into the branch of a tee. Split piping is distinguished by the fact that the main supply line runs into the branch of the first tee, splitting the main supply line in two. The main supply line can only be split once (as described above). When split piping is used, no branch piping can be connected to the main supply line before it is split. In split piping systems, the entire main supply line, including both sides of the split, cannot exceed the piping limitations outlined in this chapter. In addition, the equivalent lengths of the main MAIN SUPPLY LINE PIPE TOTAL LINEAR FEET = 4.0' TOTAL FITTING EQUIVALENT = 14.2' TOTAL EQUIVALENT FEET = 18.2' Figure 3-15. Example of Equivalent Piping. ART3 or r na ULEX 3830 November 1, 1994 Chapter 3-System Desig Page 3- Rev. A supply line must be balanced to within +/-10% on either side of the splitting tee. The difference in flow points on each side of the splitting tee cannot exceed one flow point. 2. Branch Line Piping. Branch piping is used to connect the discharge nozzles to the main supply line. This piping is connected to the side outlet of main supply line tees. The last branch is connected to an elbow at the end of the main supply line. There are seven (7) types of branch piping: 1. One (1) Nozzle Duct Branch. 2. Two (2) Nozzle Duct Branch. 3. One (1) Nozzle Plenum Branch. 4. One (1) Nozzle Appliance Branch. 5. Two (2) Nozzle Appliance Branch. 6. Three (3) Nozzle Appliance Branch. 7. Four (4) Nozzle Range Branch. UNDERSTANDING EQUIVALENT PIPING Piping limitations in this chapter are given in both linear and equivalent lengths. Linear piping is the actual length of straight pipe used on either the main supply line or a branch. Equivalent piping is equal to the total linear pipe used on either the main supply line or a branch plus the equivalent length of any fittings used on either the main supply line or a branch. See Figure 3-15. Equivalent Piping = (Linear Piping) + Total Equivalent Length of Fittings Used) All pipe fittings develop a pressure loss which can be equated to the loss through a specific length of straight pipe. This loss is the equivalent length of the fitting. See Table 3-1. TEE TEE VWON 4S• go. FLOW we OR PPE Sar ELBOW ELBOW THROUGH OVTLET COLAINGS a/a, 0.e u 0.E U 0.0 1/2' 0.e V to 3.4 0.4 Table 3-1. Pipe Fitting Equivalent Lengths In Feet. An example of the total equivalent piping calculation for a typical branch is illustrated by Figure 3-15. NOTE The only acceptable types of piping which can be used with the Pyro Chem System are black pipe, stainless steel, or chrome plated pipe. Galvanized pipe cannot be used. MAIN SUPPLY LINE PIPING LIMITATIONS 1. Model PCL-240. Main supply line piping limitations for the PCL-240 are given by Table 3-2. The maximum length of main supply line between the first and last branch tee is 16 feet. Examples of acceptable piping configurations are shown in Figure 3-16. MAX MAX. LENGTHS AM. LENGTHS MAX PPC now MET FEET V[RITCAL SECTION DIA. POWs LINEAR I EOM, LPNCAR EGUHV. M- S.40W a/v a 11 ae a 7 e' li A Table 3-2. Model PCL-240. Main Supply Line Piping Limitations. NOTE For installations that require the use of the Model NL- F1.25 nozzle, the following additional restrictions apply: 1. Minimum length, linear: 5.5 feet 2. Minimum length, equivalent: 12 feet 3. Minimum system flow points: 3 4. Minimum branches (total): 3 2. Model PCL-350. Main supply line piping limitations for the PCL-350 are given by Table 3-3. The maximum length of main supply line between the first and last branch tee is 30 feet. Examples of acceptable piping configurations are shown in Figure 3-17. MAX MAX LENGTHS va LENGTHS VAX PPE now CrErr SECTION IN PONTS IUEAR EOW OUV. ME MA:. 3,00,. ais• q a3 ea a 7 e' LYr Table 3-3. Model PCL-350. Main Supply Line Piping Limitations. NOTE For installations that require the use of the Model NL- F1.25 nozzle, the following additional restrictions apply: 1. Minimum length, linear: 5.5 feet 2. Minimum length, equivalent: 12 feet 3. Minimum system flow points: 3 4. Minimum branches (total): 3 3. Model PCL-550. Main supply line piping limitations for the PCL-550 are given by Table 3-4. The maximum length of main supply line between the first and last branch tee is 35 feet. Examples of acceptable piping configurations are shown in Figure 3-18. MAX. MAX LE/IGTIO rl LD1G•NS NAAX PPC now PELT HT2T VERTICAL SECTION dA. P T R LINEAR V. YAn S.Por yt p S a T NT I - Table 3-4. Model PCL-550. Main Supply Line Piping Limitations. ULEX 38 February 1, 19 a Chapter 3-System Design Page 3-10 Rev. 2 NOTE For installations that require the use of the Model NL-F1.25 nozzle, the following additional restrictions apply: 1. Minimum length, linear: 5.5 feet 2. Minimum length, equivalent: 12 feet 13. Minimum system flow points: 3 4. Minimum branches (total): 3 BRANCH PIPING LIMITATIONS There are seven (7) types of branches used on the Pyro Chem Restaurant Fire Suppression System: 1. One (1) Nozzle Duct Branch. 2. Two (2) Nozzle Duct Branch. 3. One (1) Nozzle Plenum Branch. 4. One (1) Nozzle Appliance Branch. 5. Two (2) Nozzle Appliance Branch. 6. Three (3) Nozzle Appliance Branch. 7. Four (4) Nozzle Range Branch. NOTE: A range branch is any branch that contains four NL-F1.25 nozzles only. Any branch that contains less than four NL-F1.25 nozzles, or NL-F1.25 nozzles in combination with any other nozzle(s) is considered an appliance branch. When using the PCL-240, the total of all duct, plenum, appliance, and range branch piping cannot exceed 25 linear feet and 55 equivalent feet. When using the PCL-350, the total of all duct, plenum, appliance, and range branch piping cannot exceed 35 linear feet and 100 equivalent feet. When using the PCL-550, the total of all duct, plenum, appliance, and range branch piping cannot exceed 45 linear feet and 125 equivalent feet. Branch piping limitations are applicable to all cylinder sizes (i.e., PCL-240, PCL-350, and PCL-550). All branch piping must be % diameter black, chrome plated, or stainless steel pipe. 1. One Nozzle Duct Branch Piping Limitations. The one nozzle duct branch is a run of %" pipe which connects the main supply line to a single duct nozzle. A one nozzle duct branch can support the following combinations of nozzles: 1. 1 x Model NL-P Nozzle. 2. 1 x Model NL-D2 Nozzle. 3. 1 x Model NL-D3 Nozzle. One nozzle duct branch piping limitations are given by Table 3-6. MAX. MAX. LENGTH MM Wpana MAIL PW rLow FEETFEET VEIRICAL SECTON OLA. rOr+TS ur X X Q O 0Duallawei, Table 3-5: Dud Branch Piping Limitations. 2. Two Nozzle Duct Branch Piping Limitations. The two nozzle duct branch is a run of pipe which connects the main supply line to two duct nozzles. A two nozzle duct branch can support the following combinations of nozzles: 1. 2 x Model NL-P Nozzle. 2. 2 x Model NL-D3 Nozzle. Two nozzle duct branch piping limitations are given by Table 3-5.1. MAX LIAZ LENGTM MIN LENGTHS MAX. me now rEET r[LT VOtTICAL SECTION MA. POINTS LKAR I COW. LKAR I EOLN_ qME 2 N"6- yr 6 S 22 o O a• jval &a I Table 3-5.1. Duct Branch Piping Limitations. 3. One Nozzle Plenum Branch Piping Limitations. The one nozzle plenum branch is a run of %" pipe which connects the main supply line to a plenum nozzle. A single plenum branch can support only one flow point. Plenum branch piping limitations are given by Table 3-6. NAY. MAIL TH7 UK LENGTHS VAX. FLOW rTPEELT PELT vETTICAL SECTION DI MINTS R OW L. EOUIV R nezw Table 3-6. Plenum Branch Piping Limitations. 4. One Nozzle Appliance Branch Piping Limitations. The one nozzle appliance branch is a run of %" pipe which connects the main supply line to a single appliance nozzle. A one nozzle appliance branch can support a maximum of two ( 2) flow points. One nozzle appliance branch piping limitations are given by Table 3-7. MAX MAX. LENGTHS MIN. VTD MAY. rK FLOW FUT RET VERTCAL SEC110N DW om LNIEM CaUV. LKM OW. FUSE KrnA i Awwai/r E S a 0 O O' aneA Table 3-7. One Nozzle Appliance Branch Piping Limitations. 5. Two Nozzle Appliance Branch Piping Limitations. The two nozzle appliance branch is a run of pipe which connects the main supply line to two appliance nozzles. A two nozzle appliance branch can support a maximum of four ( 4) flow points. Two nozzle appliance branch piping limitations are given by Table 3-7.1. MAIL MAIL LD4110 Lea LENGTH MAX, rK FLOW FEET FELT VOTICAL SECTIONrow LKAR OW. 2 Wa Aw.«• 7/r a D O O O' IL Table 3-7.1. Two Nozzle Appliance Branch Piping Limitations. ULEX 3830 February 1, 1995 Chapter 3—System Desigr Page 3-1' Rev." 4 6. Three Nozzle Appliance Branch Piping Limitations. The three nozzle appliance branch is a run of %" pipe which connects the main supply line to three appliance nozzles. A three nozzle appliance branch can support a maximum of five (5) flow points. Three nozzle appliance branch piping limitations are given by Table 3-7.2. MAX X. LENGTHS WIN, LDIGTIt7 VA%. preROM FEET MET vpITICAL SECTION DIA. POINTS GAR EGW. Mm GW. Rnt 3 nsAftAK O1 W ie O O O' a - Table 3-7.2. Three Nozzle Appliance Branch Piping Limitations. 7. Four Nozzle Range Branch Piping Limitations. NOTE: These limitations apply to branches that utilize four Model NL-F1.25 nozzles. No other types of nozzles, or combina- tions of nozzles, may be used on a four nozzle branch. The four nozzle range branch is a run of pipe which connects the main supply line to four NL-F1.25 nozzles and five (5) flow points only. The four nozzle range branch piping limitations are given by Table 3-8. MAX. tux. .ENGTMS MIK LENGTHS MAX PVC ILOM rm I rM VERTICAL SECTION DIA. PONTS 14AR COW -NEAR EGLAV FM A NOS 3V S 10 11 O O O• Rug. Br—h Table 3-8. Range Branch Piping Limitations. 1 K-P 0 IDUCT7 I -F2 K-P 1. FRYER) i DUCT) V Q K-F2 FRYER) r'fjJ-F(.25 I r• r¢ NL-F1. S I NL-R L c5 K-R K-F1.25 (RANGE) v NL i DDLE) K-A LPL oom w Kai K-A lP1FMlII K-03 1I f DUCl1 IT K—R I K-R GRDDID K-D3 DUCT) K-F2 LE TRYER) jK-A U'LE]JUfrO I K-02 a muc,n 1 K-FUS K-R IGRDDLE) NL-A K-R PLENUAD 3/8. MAae SURLY L EE NOTE This is not a complete list of all possible config- urations. Others will be acceptable provided they conform to the limitations shown in this chapter. K-A 1 PIDJUMO l K-R GRDDLE) K-F2 Figure 3-16. Model PCL-240. Examples Of Acceptable Piping Configurations. LILEX 3& November 1, 19! Chapter 3—System Design Page 3-12 Rev.1 NOTE m1; rx This is not a complete list of all possible 4 ; 1 configurations. Others will be acceptable provided tDAM - they conform to the limitations shown in this chapter. x-rt r d v ., rb -+u ia1us Nri-fits V.Y K-fV3 sAHW K-A Y mKuc n ? a 11rao x-rt owros own r.,' , Ia-A a FLDA,s. pia-ous r L-rus 9 b K-rus x_A /L-Hti MJ4= 111 1 K-" LUCDUCT)x 1 1 I 4 i K-ft 1DOCNAIsO T 6,CK-A GUNM r 3 tO O1D x-A uLx_AJV _ Olr]A" o,c K-0amuch -z c- x-A aaw.so y vLLDADL .. x-n FRYEM 9 IL MU13 r -%L- US MV_, K.-VO QLVVWU Vr MAO/ s my Lw 3/6 11IIA19" UW--------- Figure 3-17. Model PCL-350. Examples of Acceptable Piping Configurations. L-7 N.Ittti• w,,,O IArAOlO4Y x-utmorn 9 r' K Kulrhos OIICT IL-ta 01M1 Vm 1 ADO 11 9 1ow11woso. vinos NOTE This is not a complete list of all possible configurations. Others will be acceptable provided they conform to the limitations shown in this chapter. OL-03 1, MIN IOMIr11MOO K-1 K 1 IUD Vr IMM rimy UZ an O11N101 LIK ------'-- Figure 3-18. Model PCL-550. Examples Of Acceptable Piping Configurations. K.{t OtOAaO ULEX 3830 November 1, 1994 Chapter 3—System Desigr Page 3-1': Rev.! In SECTION 4 Detector Placement Detectors are required over cooking appliances and in the duct(s) of protected ventilation hoods. Detectors shall be located in the plenum area of the ventilation hood. 1. Exhaust Duct(s). Each exhaust duct must have at least one (1) detector installed in the center of the duct entrance or at a maximum of 12 feet into the duct, centered. See Figure 3-19. 2. Cooking Appliance(s). Each cooking appliance with a continuous cooking surface not exceeding 48' x 48' shall be protected by one (1) detector. Cooking appliances with a continuous cooking surface exceeding 48' x 48' shall be protected by one 1) detector per 48' x 48' cooking area. Detectors used for cooking appliances must be located within the perimeter of the protected appliance toward the exhaust duct side of the appliance. The detector should be located in the air stream of the appliance to enhance system response time. If a cooking appliance is located under a duct opening where a detector has been mounted, it is not necessary to utilize an additional detector provided the duct detector is not more than 12' into the duct opening. If two (2) appliances are located under a duct opening where a detector has been mounted, it is not necessary to utilize an additional detector provided the duct detector is not more than 12' into the duct opening. See Figure 3-19. APPLIANCE APPLIANCE APPLIANCE APPLIANCE COVERED COVERED COVERED COVERED BY BY BY BY DETECTOR DETECTOR DETECTOR DETECTOR A B B C Figure 3-19. Proper Detector Placement. ULEX 383 November 1, 199 Chapter 4—System Installatior Page 4-' Rev.' L CHAPTER IV System Installation GENERAL This chapter will detail the basic information necessary for proper installation of the Pyro Chem Restaurant Fire Suppression System. However, before attempting any installation it is necessary to attend a Factory Certification Training Class and become Certified to install the Pyro Chem Restaurant Fire Suppression System. Because it is impossible to completely understand every aspect of an intricate pre- engineered system simply by reading the Technical Manual, Pyro Chem, Inc. will not be responsible for system installations or maintenance performed by any non -Certified person(s). Pipe and fittings for the discharge piping, conduit (EMT), pipe straps, pipe hangers, mounting bolts, and other miscellaneous equipment are not furnished as part of the Pyro Chem Restaurant Fire Suppression System. These items must be furnished by the installer. Before attempting any installation, unpack the entire system and check that all necessary parts are on hand. Inspect parts for damage. Verify that cylinder pressure is within the acceptable range as shown on the gauge. CYLINDER INSTALLATION The cylinder and valve assembly is shipped with an anti - recoil plug in the valve discharge port. CAUTION The anti -recoil plug must remain in the valve discharge port until the discharge piping is connected to the valve. The cylinder must be mounted vertically with the discharge port facing either left or right. The Models PCL-240 r%1 to a IN ED and PCL-350 cylinders must be mounted using a Model MB- 15 Mounting Bracket Kit. The Model PCL-550 cylinder must be mounted using a Model MB-1 Mounting Bracket Kit. The bracket must be securely anchored to the wall using bolts or lag screws. The wall to which the bracket is attached must be sufficiently strong to support the cylinder. The bracket should never be fastened to dry wall or similar material. If this type of wall is encountered, studs must be located and the bracket fastened to them. See Figure 4-1. LAG BOLT TRAP NCH OR ECH CONTROL HEAD r AGENT CYLINDER KEEPER PRl! WALL BRACKET CYLINDER BRACKET — Figure 4-1. Cylinder and Mounting Bracket Installation. CONTROL HEAD INSTALLATION 1. Single Cylinder Installations. For single cylinder system installations the Model MCH/ECH Control Head can be installed directly onto the cylinder valve. When the control head is properly aligned in the desired position, tighten the knurled locking ring to secure the assembly. See Figure 4-2. Figure 4-2. Single Cylinder Installation Using Model MCH/ECH Control Head. Noverr ur" Chapter 4—System Installation Page 4-2 Rev.1 2. Multiple Cylinder Installations. A. Multiple Cylinder Actuation Using MCH/ECH Control Head. The Model MCH/ECH Control Head can be used to pneumatically actuate a maximum of three (3) agent cylinders. When a control head is used for multiple cylinder actuation, it cannot be mounted directly onto a cylinder valve. The control head must be installed remotely using a Model MB-P2 Control Head Mounting Bracket. The bracket must be anchored to the wall using bolts or lag screws. In order to actuate the agent cylinder(s) from a control head, a '/," NPT x 45° '/," flare type fitting (conforming to SAE J513c) must be screwed into the base of the control head actuator. Pneumatic tubing is then used to connect the control head to the valve cap assembly of each agent cylinder valve. See Figure 4-3. NOTE Pneumatic tubing used for remote cylinder actuation shall have an outside diameter of '/," with a minimum wall thickness of 732". This is commonly known as refrigeration -type copper tubing. All tubing fittings shall be of the '/.", 45• flare type conforming to SAE J513c. Compression type fittings are not acceptable. MCH OR ECH CONTROL HEAD OD COPPER TUBING 72' MAX TOTAL FOR 3 CYLINDER ACTUATION 96' MAX TOTAL FOR 1 OR 2 CYLINDER ACTUATION A single Model MCH/ECH Control Head can actuate: 1. One (1) or two (2) agent cylinders with a maximum of eight (8) feet of pneumatic tubing. 2. Three (3) agent cylinders with a maximum of six (6) feet of pneumatic tubing. B. Multiple Cylinder Actuation Using Model PAC-10 or PAC-200 Pneumatic Actuation Cylinder. The Model PAC-10 or PAC-200 Pneumatic Actuation Cylinder must be used if more than three (3) agent cylinders require simultaneous actuation. The Model PAC- 10/200 must be used in conjunction with a Model MCH/ECH Control Head. The control head is mounted on the Model PAC-10/200 valve assembly. The Model PAC-10/200 is shipped complete with a mounting bracket. The cylinder must be mounted vertically with the nameplate facing out. The bracket must be securely anchored to the wall using bolts or lag screws. The wall to which the bracket is attached must be sufficiently strong to support the pneumatic cylinder. The bracket should never be fastened to dry wall or similar material. If this type of wall is encountered, studs must be located and the bracket fastened to them. See Figure 4-4. 450 ;' FLARED TUBING NUT Figure 4-3. Multiple Cylinder Actuation Using Model MCH/ECH Control Head. J' NPT x 45' , ' FLARE TYPE FITTING SAE J513c) c ULEX 3830 November 1, 1994 I 9 ft9 in 7ft0in grade 4ft0in 1 THIS SIGN CONFORMS TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOUTHERN BUILDING CODE, 1994 REV., DESIGN WIND VELOCITY = 110 MPH double sided lighted sign 4" x 4" x 1/4" steel tube modulus = 4.4 inA3 min req = 3.1 inA3 1' 6" diameter x 4' deep concrete embedment NOTE: any shape providing at least 1' 6" of width is acceptable. NOTE: use of properly mixed "Sacrete" or equivalent is acceptable. G Red Lobster" sign by Art Kraft Sign Co. Inc. John J. Orlando, PE 0044089 State of Florida scale: 1/2" = 1' 0" sheet 1 of 2 job 2296 Gztcuiations for ART KRAFT SIGN CO. Red Lobster'" Sign Foundation / Structural Calculations To be installed in the city of Sanford, Seminole County, FL Definition of terms: M=larger sign dimension (ft), N=smaller sign dimension (ft) Cf=Force Coefficient, Vp=Velocity Pressure (#/so Vf=Velocity pressure corrected by force coefficient (#/so F=Wind Load (#), H=Height where an equiv. point force is applied (ft) Mw=Turning moment at base (ft#), P=Load per post (#) b=Width of concrete embedment (ft), S1=allowable soil stress (psf) D=Depth of concrete embedment (ft) Determine wind load and turning moment 94 Rev. to Southern Standard Building Code Design wind velocity (V) = 110 mph M/N= 1.4 Cf= 1.2 At base: Height Hor Dim Vert Dim Ft^2 Vp(#/sf) Cf Vf(#/sf) F(#) ft) (ft) 0-15 9.75 7 68.3 25 1.2 30 0-15 0.0 25 1.2 30 15-20 0.0 26.5 1.2 31.8 20-25 0.0 29.5 1.2 35.4 25-30 0.0 31 1.2 37.2 30-35 31 1.2 37.2 Total 68.3 2. Determine depth of embedment, D in feet design is based on poor soil with an allowable soil stress (Si) of 2000 psf, i.e. loose fine and coarse sand number of posts= 1 Load per post P)= from p. 5-81, Structural Engineering Handbook: D=((1.18*P)/(b*S1))*(1+(SQRT(1+(1.88*b*S1 *H/P)))) assume b (ft)= 1.5 D (ft) =. . 3.4 3. Determine required section modulus in inches cubed from p. 5-82, Structural Engineering Handbook max stress= (P*(H+0.34D)*12)/section modulus max stress < allowable stress allowable stress < 0.66(yield strength) from the Southern Building Code, p.526, for outdoor signs allowable stress < (0.66) (1.33) (yield strength) assume ASTM A37 steel, yield strength = 36000psi required section > (P*(H+0.34D)*12)/31600 Minimum section modulus = 3.1 inA3 Use 4" square x 1/4" wall steel tube, section modulus = 4.4 inA3 2048 0 0 0 0 0 2048 H (ft) 3.5 3.5 2048 Mw(ft#) 7166 0 0 0 0 0 7166 References: Structural Engineering Handbook, GaylordBGaylord edil 9! `Z OSecondedition, McGraw Hill, NY 1979 Ryerson Stock List and Data Book, 1992-93 edition Southern Standard Building Code, 1994 Rev. Mechanics of Materials, Beer and Johnston, McGraw Hill, NY 1981 Z(P/. John J. Orlando, P.E. No. 0044089 State of Florida sheet 2 of 2 aJ c a 3 0 E a44 T[ CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA v.dVVV "` _APPLICATION FOR Aan. BUILDING PERMIT % PERMIT ADDRESS O " PERMIT NUMBER a Total Contract Price of Job3000. Total Sq. Ft. %OOd Describe Work T,,4 c. /7y/ aT u P R Oor% Worm YGASN j.0 G Type of Construction A 00r i46 Flood Prone (YES) (NO) Number of Stories le Number of Dwellings Zoning Occupancy: Residential Commercial Industrial LEGAL DESCRIPTION (please attach printout from Seminole County) TAX I.D. NUMBER OWNER / Q A f jp /ti,q„01 PHONE NUMBER ADDRESS O0 LA L<e'ry 0 CITY QljC 4 1 p STATE ' ZIP y o TITLE HOLDER (IF OTHER THAN OWNER) ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP BONDING COMPANY ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP ARCHITECT ADDRESS CITY MORTGAGE LENDER ADDRESS CITY STATE STATE ZIP ZIP CONTRACTOR /.( L. 1"AA o-cAf;VC PHONE NUMBER 9Cy p.exvo ADDRESS , 2g0 ' S. AJA ST. LICENSE NUMBER CGG 02 3 CITY - 57c, v 1 A 7roVjQ STATE j^ ZIP Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do the work and installations as indicated. I certify that no work or installation has commenced prior to the issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet standards of all laws regulating construction in this jurisdiction. I understand that a separate permit must be secured for ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, SIGNS, POOLS, ETC. OWNER' S AFFIDAVIT: I certify that all the foregoing information is accurate and that all work will be done in compliance with all applicable laws regulating construction and zoning. A COPY OF THE RECORDED COPY OF THE: NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WILL BE POSTED ON THE JOB SITE WITH PERMITS NO LATER THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE PERMIT HAS BEE[J ISSUED. FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOU PAYING TWICE FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. NOTICE: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. ACCEPTANCE OF PERMIT S VERIFICATION THAT I WILL NOTIFY THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY OF THE REQUIREMENTXOVLORIDA LIEN LAW, FS713. w***** y ro Z nSignature of Owner/Agent & Date Signature of Contractor & Date a O iy Type or Print Owner Agent Name Type or Print Contractor's Name I VLo IMASignature o Notary & Dath ignat e df Notary & Date O n Official Seal) ' Official Seal) o C a K KIMBERLYA VICK o My Conxnivilon CC44384$ z 1 O Expires Mar. 07, 1999 x1 sk v Bonded by FWI OF 0-0 800-422-1555 rU Application Appr vAd BY: Date: z 0 n z FEES: Building ' Rid Police Fire m y Open Space Road Impact Cn App i ation i r^ c 0 B H N O PERMIT VALIDATION: CHECK CASH DATE f . p ro y U o a)a ORIGINAL (BUILDING) YELLOW (CUSTOMER) PINK COUNTY TAX OFFICE) GOLD (CO. ADMIN) z w F I THISAPPLICATIONUSEDFORWORKVALUED $2500.00 OR MORE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA PERMIT NO. / 6 _ DATE G 1 —y_ ` S THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO INSTALL THE FOL- LOWING ELECTRICAL WORK: OWNER'S NAME ze:)S-rE—y a r ADDRESS OF JOB_ ELEC. CONTR. ; —Residential Non-residential Subject to rules and regulations of the city and national electric codes. Number AMOUNT Alter tion Addition ReD;bi t Change of Service Residential Commercial Mobile Home Factory Built housing New Residential 0-100 Amp Service 101-200 Amp Service 201 Amp anti above New Commercial Service Application Fee i TOTAL I By signing this application I am stating I will be in compliance with the NEC including Article 110. Section 110.9 and 110-10. ding Official Master Electrician STATE COMPETENCY NO. CITY OF SANFORD FIRE -DEPARTMENT FEES FOR SERVICES PHONE #: 407-3.22-4952 DATE: D S PERMIT #: b BUSINESS NAME: OeC 10A)n ADDRE PHONE NUMBER:( ) r PLANS REVIEW TENT PERMIT BURN PERMIT REINSPECTION TANK PERMIT FIRE SYSTEM AMOUNT ,5 V COMMENTS: //7,S'//)j,r—i,-,, S\/S%e.-n loe Fees must be paid to Sanford Building Department,,300 N. Park Avenue, Sanford, Florida. Phone # 330-5656. Proof of payment must be made to Sanford Fire Prevention before any further services can take place. I certify that the above information is true and correct and that I will comply with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of Sanford, Florida. Sanfo d e Prevention [applicants Signature CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA PERMIT NO. qp-442 s DATE 0 _2C% 9 5 THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO INSTALL THE FOLLOWING H.A.R.V. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT: OWNER'S NAME 1 I {Je n e51- ADDRESS OF JOB 2. t > '}O rn/ Ce h-lp dJ ) (/ MECHANICAL CONTR. Q. di, s R4C RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL Subject to rules and regulations of Sanford mechanical code. NATURE OF WORK FUEL w B.T.U. INPUT OUTPUT I II VALUATION APPLICATION FEE HI ----Master Mechanical COMPETENCY CARD NO. Security Systems LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY 803 South Orlando Avenue r Suite J Winter Park, Florida 32789 Telephone (407) 628.5000 I hereby name and appoint Mel issaax4076284985 Lohman of ADT Seci_Irity Systems to be my lawfl_11 attorney in fact i:tn apply to for, a F ir- (? A l a r, m Per- m i t f o r- work to be perrfor,med at the following location: glno j uJnE Cffn,3AL___i w0_ job address) job name) and to sign my name and do all things necessary to this appointment. 2 —_ License # El-: 0000949 Stephen Calabr,o, certified contr`cictor-) Personally known to me and acknowledged: Sworn to and sl_Ibscr-•ibed before me this dz. of C-'!' , A. D. 19 ZJN N tar-•y F'l_tbli.c, State of Florida MY ColilmiSSiCn Expir-es: po" JOANN E MCGRAWpPl c My Commissbn CC477295 Expires Jul. 30, 1999qBondedbyHAI n, 4 tf 800-422-1555OFFIP` o! Security Systems 803 South Orlando Avenue Suite J Winter Park, Florida 32789 Telephone (407) 628.5000 Fax 407 628 4985 October 26, 1995 Richard ,.'r A. Cohen Sanford Fire Dept. 1303 L. French Pve. Sanford, Florida 32771. RE: RED LOBSTER 0848 — SEMINOLE= TOWNE CENTER ADT request approval to install a Focus 200 FACP, with r,nect ons to the de devices: 1__ duct dc_ise„I;or^sone ':J_ite'r'flow, n r ..y G .ease refe7 o =fie •r''awi toi i.vo _ iecr, _. c one- an r.(J. s, .t_irn. '7 t -- vici_ locations. Please ` G 1, ta C r--P''—=Ct !-+ c_d -- 5 t 5 0 FJ 1 t h a n U questions. Sincerely, CA Ej Security Systems INTRODUCTION The FOCUS® 200 is a UL Listed burglar and fire alarm system which provides individual point annunciation and customization features. The system monitors 255 points of protection including burglar alarm, fire alarm, holdup alarm, supervisory and other types of points. Burglar alarm protection can be divided into eight separate groups, each with multiple opening and closing schedules. The system is controlled by entering a User ID Code on an English language interactive keypad. FOCUS 200 provides 99 individual User ID Codes to FOCUS 200 The Next Generation MAJOR FEA TURFS 255 Points Of Protection High Security SIM Chip Devices DES Encrypted Communication 99 Passcodes 16 Keypads 8 BA Groups 255 User Privilege Levels 500 Event Buffer Universal Communicator 4,000' RS-485 Bus Listed for Life Safety Meets ADA Requirements UL Listed FM Listed CSFM Listed ULC Listed maintain a high degree of security and an audit trail of the most recent 500 events. The 500 NFPA71, NFPA72 event buffer can be viewed on the keypad or UL609, UVI I, UL636, UL864, output to a local printer. Unique to the UL1610, U.16FOCUS200isADT's exclusive Sensor Interface Module (SIM) technology which utilizes a microchip manufactured inside BY DESIGN security and fire alarm 'devices. Each of the 255 devices reports as a unique point. Each Specifically designed to meet the requirements device has a factory generated identification of Commercial, Banking, Retail and Industrial number on a microchip hermetically sealed customers, the FOCUS 200 provides inside 'the device. 'fhe FOCUS 200 polls each unparalleled features at a reasonable price. device and only accepts those devices Modular in nature, the FOCUS 200 can'cost- answering with the proper identification effectively meet the needs of a small branch number. Because the ID is sealed inside the bank with fewer than 20 points of protection or device and known only to the FOCUS 200, an expand to cover a 255-point factory or large extremely high degree of internal line security retail facility. is afforded, and device substitution prohibited. a TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS ontrol Unit.Cabinet Dimensions 13-3/4" W-.x 16-3/8" H x 3-7/8" D olor: Warm:Brown 34.9cm x 41.6 cm x 9.8 cm) ontrol Unit Weight 12 Ibs. (5.45 kg) ontrol Unit Electrical Power 120V, 60I4z, Class II (Primary) 16.5V, 60Hz, 50VA or 82VA (Secondary) Backup Battery 12VDC, 7AH Sealed lead -acid (1 or 2-6 wired in parallel for rating up to 42AH) Charge Voltage to Battery (Fuse 173) Fuse: 3.75A, Solid -State Resettable Standby Battery Requirements 4 Hour( 7 AH Battery) 24 Hour (28 AH Battery) 80 Hour (42 AH Battery) ommunication Options With FOCUS 200 DES Encryption via AC, RS-232, SNA/SDLC. niversal Communicator Single or Dual Line FSK ontrol Unit Power Output to RS485 Bus 13.9V nominal. Maximum Current: 1000mA S-485 Bus Fuses: (Fuse F1 & F2) Fuses each: 1.85A, Solid -State Resettable aximum Cable Runs Total RS-485 Bus: 4,000' Per Gateway Trunk: 1,000' Per Device. to Trunk: 100' Sensor Interface Module (SIM) Maximum Line Resistance: 3K ohms Supervisory current: 0.2mA End -of -Line Resistor: 33K ohms, 5%, 1/2W Loop off -normal Retard: 800 mSec oint Interface Device (PID) Maximum Line Resistance: 900 ohms Supervisory current: 3mA End -of -Line Resistor: 3,010 ohms, 1%, 1/2 W Loop off -normal Retard: 800 mSec. nvir runental Operating Temperature Range: 32' F (0° C) to 120° F (49° C) uxiliary Relays RL-1 & RL-2 SPDT, Contacts rated 2A @24 VAC or 24 VDC elay RL-3 (Voltage output) Jumper selectable 12 VDC. @ 200mA --.or -- 22VDC @ OmA rated 2Art @ 24 VAC or 24 VDC eypad 16 Maximum perating Panel Dimensions 8" W x 3"H x 1-1 /2" D olor: Off white body, gray front 20.4cm x 7..7cm x 3.54 cm) eypad Weight 14 oz (40 g) eypad Operating Current 32mA (inactive) 64mA (active) pprovals Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (UL) Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Factory Mutual (FM) California State Fire Marshall (CSFM) Underwriters Laboratories of Canada (ULC) US 200 Complies with UL609, UL611, UL636, UL864, UL1610, IULI635, L NFPA71 and NFPA72 Call ADT Security Systems: 01994 ADT Security Systems USA: 1-900-ADT-4636 L44654X) (5-94/20M) system security Canada: 1-416-226-9221 300 Interpace Parkway Parsippany, NJ 07054-1177 4 P R O D U C T Security Systems 4 Advanced self -diagnostics intelligent supervision in a conventional detector Advanced false alarm immunity assures superior early warning that is unaffected by deceptive phenomena Field replaceable chamber cover economical and fool -proof maintenance Low profile design aesthetically pleasing - Plug-in terminal block easy and convenient mounting I N F O R M A T 1 O N Photoelectric Self -Diagnostic Smoke Detector Conventional 2 wire models: 429AT, 429C, 429CT, 429CST Conventional 4 wire models: 449AT, 449C, 449CT, 449CRT, 449CST, 449CSRT, 449CSST, 449CTE D LISTED CSFM, NY-MEA The ADT, Self -Diagnostic, FOCUS SD Series are conventional photoelectric smoke detectors. These detectors continually monitor their smoke sensitivity and operational status. The FOCUS SD detector's LED will give a visual trouble Indication if the detector drifts out of proper sensitivity range or fails its operational self -diagnostic test. Such breakthrough technology convenience in a conventional detector meets NFPA 72 field sensitivity testing require- ments. Old fashioned test meters and ocher electro- mechanical test devices are very labor intensive and are no longer required. The FOCUS SD Senes technology also allows service personnel to perfcr.m additional advanced diacnostics. iers;:rilty le%-ei arc se---ce required information, indicacec Ov LED feect:ac.<. •s _-•:rve^iencly o:;tained at the detector. The FOCUS SD Series is easily cleaned by simply replacing the chamber cover. Not only is this photoelectric chamber designed for easy maintenance, its patented Labyrinth design prevents false alarms caused by dust. i-lumidity and other deceptive phenomena. An integral cor. _;r.ac:on rate -of -rise and fixed 135=F 57'C) neit sens,:,r <_ ! allable on ail -T' models. Rite-of- nse heat detec:lcn .s accomplished oy an integrated silicon heat sensor ceUcled with a microprocessor. Auxiliary relay or bull[ -in alarm sounder options are also available. conUrueo ADT FOCUS SD Series Smoke Detectors Architectural and Engineering Specifications n :f;++r .,I ,rr1 ,Y,•,!, r I v . .1Lt11 h,: ;'It-AUI 1:. i•I.,IIh•. .r•It rh.l inll•.1; rt•r.+.t•ltlalrt.11 •,+.1•Irr•,n tl .! +.+.,h' .IIa,4 i,: rlr 'I:r iUr I'!lt '••,: ,;,'I•a it+l\ ;f I. III ,)4)(•1. It r1 rt'.Ilhi1,itIf ,,,ifit;rnl11 f)nr111111, A Itt1P.,:,I it:Ir.ir'%l hljht t:1111101VjIt: •.t:r+;t•, .Is rho lu)Fat ••111 ur.e 'If(' 1 ian)h-ipt`t'd phMO 1`110 1: tIt+ :,+n•,:nt) t;hvttl:nt. Wit:n tic .11110t.111t cf II,.jht rota:rar:rl if piloto dio(A:IL:,ILit:•. the icnial l[ itatantj. tit,: nloke s,ullplinij r.1tt: in(:fo..P;e:s Thrcc (3) S61CCCSSIve Snloke it•n;rnO: above tht: st:n;mvlty Settlrcj ..ut required to sound the ol,lrm. The r.lewctor shill have Superior protection ogoins[ f.Ilse alarms roused 7y dust, insects. RF and other deceptive phenomena. ct;nrirntcd •11,1rm shall cause the 11CY'nally flashing power, LED to lr,jit CormilUCuSly and [hc: Optional ;ilorrn r'01•3y (.lvadablc: In 'R" models) to oper,itc. A trouble indication V; Al.;1011aaucally dl,playl:e.1 by :i fla;hing LED every second. INFRA 72 field sensitivity testing requirements shall be met J • :::',: :C :vC operof:1 n %otrjuence. An internal S5 CB horn I.IR-1u,1ble it" 'S" models) emits a steady tone when the lt,•teLCor alarms and a pulsed tone when power polarity isrc,versed. Product Selector Guide tb•,Ir, 'l tr ll'I. Ir+. '+. "::.d t!'r••)!1L', 0. t'! 1..111OI,ll•Irlll:r •! I'. irt•h! I•lll.0 :•.+l,h•• .11:••+,,•Il,,i ,pnl!• lr:,i •• I•.+i 11• III tit:r 1. ll tit : flit:I:lj(_US `,1J St^rr:;.Irt Il,t•:rl I ;r ti•,:.u:tl .h.11l llru+,t:r:.11l kN:r•Itc wrtiUt-It lht: r_•wtl fir .Illy ;t:ll:ralt)n 01 .1(111 rl,:r:1, +.tlth L'Ith r 12 VDC or 2.4 VDC Co llip;10M., p. nit:h C ptn n, tl r.lt a lta . with Auxiliary r'cl,lys shall be Iv,.ulabIc ,-itid ..lrc • l);provctl :,r releasing service. The AD'f FOCUS SD Series draectors shill be c;ulpoed with a hinged cover, a concealed tamper resistant hitch, and insect screens. All wiring terminates in plug-in clamptype screw terminals. The detectors mount to a standard single - gang electrical box, a four inch octaconal, four -inch Square electrical box, or WIRENIOLD No. 5739 fixture box. Smoke Detector Spacing On smooth ceilings (as defined in NFPA 72) spacing of 30 feet 9 I meter:) may `t r.:Sec; 3s a guide. 00icr spicing may be used depending on ce:llnc height, high air movement, and other conditions or response requirements. Consult the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) codes as well as local code requirements for exact application requirements. hloaeiDes,,;r.aror Wire Type Power Designation 5?rl?s Desk,nator F?dlul^.s Number I Description Designator Power 449C Jr.; j A 6/ 12 VDCRt429Cor :eo,acemen::: weer I: V a,nel ;ys:e-• ae:eC:orlFonlyire rvoe Power 0esgnator i.e. 4 -} 9 449CC_ C 12/24 VDC Desigtselor Fea4ue Description End - of -Line Power Supervisory and Built-in end -of -tine relay that also acts as a sensitivity status output. For four •Nlre only. Fail-safe ESensitivity Status relay trips upon loss of power or if smoke detector is outside the approved sensitivity range for more than one day. End -of -line resistor is easily Relayconnected to terminal with no extra wiring, or relay contacts can be connected to a separate trouble loop. Isolated Fixed Temp. Isolated fixed 1351F (57'C) and rate of rise heat detector, independently trips the LED and alarm H and Rate of Rise Heat relay output. Smoke detector activates internal sounder (local alarm) and auxiliary relay, but Detector does not latch. Approved as both single station smoke alarm and system heat detector. Ideal for hotel, motel and dormitory rooms where smoking is allowed. R Auxiliary Relay Used to activate other devices such as elevator recall, door holders, etc. UL Listed for releasing Service. S Built-in Sounder 85db built-in sounder alarms when smoke is detected or when power wiring PO is reversed. SS Built- in Sounder with Sensitivity Status S5db built-in sounder alarms when smoke is deieited or when power wiring polarity is reversed. Also, Output chirps when unit goes outside the approved sensitivity range for more than one day. Resetting detector will silence chirp for one day. until unit is restored to proper sensitivity. T Integrated Fixed Temp. and Rate of Integrated fixed 1351F (57'C) temperature and rate of rise heat detector otters double protection. Rise Heat Detector Either heat detec:or or smoke detector can ;rip and latch LED and alarm relay outputs. Product Specifications Minimvoltage........................................................... 8.5 V 429AT............................................... 6.5 V Ma, ximurn voltage............................................................ 33 V 429AT................................................ 20 V Maximum ripple (peak to peak) ....................................... 10% Typical average standby current ..................................... 70µA 449CTE............................................. m 23 AAlarm Current vire models .... ........... I ... ... .. 50 rrAc 10•+b © 2.4 VDC vire models: 449C. -4. 49CT.... ............................... 15 rnA 443CRT ....... 20 mA 4.49CST, • 4.49CSST ......... 40 mA 4 CS. T. 4-'clCS:ZH 45 mri rrrn 3. 1 + 0.50)•o/ft. l,ax .................. 3.1 - 1.0-',C/fr. as . 11. 70 rmll s.,•1, sstm1 Ocera ling temo. rar•c : CDerating humidity Barge ............... I.................. 0:0 95..b RH Sounder spec; ficatior,s..................................... 85 d6 at 10 ft. Color .................................................. white coverAvhite base with UV inhibitor to prevent yellowing Field wiring size.................................................1. 14 - 24 AWG Heat detector specificarens fixed temperat:; re ................... 135-F. 50 ft. spacing rate of rise ... ....................... 15-F/rrin. 6 > 100 j8.3" C/min. S > -40.6'C AL :uhar, relay contacts 2A 0 28 VCC cr 170 ',. AC ,reds:l%e) Aiarrn :cnc,) crs ........... . ......... 500mA O 36 \,DC (reslstivel Detec:or size ..... Blame:er 6.1 in. 15.5 cm helcnt 1 85 ,n. 4.59 cm elcnc 8 a oz 0 25 kg L:stlr. 9 .................... .... UL 268 r "-r : y lentrDl, rrC :.:C)• .art o 1994 arC:1, :re Cen.l,n of :lit fe..,ns •n :ne ?.CC1LC::ntoinxihcn CL:le:tr ,lit ;rota':cV ,.rider one Jr TCre of :r`e rnm s•.,rt; --mcnIs 4. ; 3 to ). 4.51 7.555 CIrt- events aencr,rg. aT.lre, rC -vu-1 et:re :o ir,v,•,«,riC.4:Ord •., gr\•t.I '1:U-e lnli Security Systems 803 South Orlando Avenue Suite J Winter Park, Florida 32789 Telephone (407) 628.5000 Fax 407 628 4985 BATTERY CALCULATION WORKSHEET DEVICE NUMBER OF DEVICES CURRENT PER DEVICE TOTAL CURRENT ALARM SUPV. ALARM SUPV. CONTROL Porn-" z O C) I 100 1(o 2coo I c e) P n 2 O(A o3Z tie C- Z OS-0 0000-to IUO obotLl TOTAL ALARM & SUPV. CURRENT IN AMPS 31 1y21 ENTER TOTAL SUPV. CURRENT ILIZIH XXXXXXXXXXX ENTER STANDBY TIME (24 OR 60) 2y XXXXXXXXXXX TOTAL SUPV. CURRENT X STANDBY TIME XXXXXXXXXXX 3 u lq ENTER TOTAL ALARM CURRENT 310 XXXXXXXXXXX ALARM TIME IN HOURS(5 MIN = .084 HRS) 0eM XXXXXXXXXXX TOTAL ALARM CURRENT X ALARM TIME XXXXXXXXXXX u F)O Ic TOTAL AMPERE HOURS 3.qq2 BATTERY BACKUP a-4 FIRE -PROTECTIVE SIGNALING CABLE (HNGV) 121 POWER LIMITED FIRE -PROTECTIVE SIGNALING CABLE (H NIR)— Continued - CABLE USA INC, NAPLES FL 33942 E97926 (M) Typo FPLP. CABLEC CONTINENTAL CABLES CO, YORK PA 17405 E63397 (M) Typos FPL. FPLP, Power limited Piro -protective signalling cable. CABLECRAFT INC, MANCHESTER NH 03103 E111385 (M) Power limited fire -protective signaling cable. CANADA WIRE AND CABLE LIMITED, ONTARIO CANADAM3C3J4 E83163 (M) Types FPLP, FPLR. CAROL CABLE CO INC, PAWTUCKET RI 02862 E63490 (M) Types FPL, FPLP, Power limited fire -protective signaling cable. CAROL CABLE CO INC, WOONSOCKET RI 02895 E66267 (M) Types FPL, FPLP, FPLR, Power limited fire -protective signaling cable. CAT WIRE & CABLE CORP, MIAMI FL 33150 E137744 (M) Type FPL, Power limited fire -protective signaling cable. CHAMPLAIN CABLE CORP, WINOOSKI VT 05404 E70096 (M) Types FPL. FPLP. CHESTER CABLE CORP, CHESTER NY 10918 E63370(M) Power limited fire-protectivo signaling cables, Types FPL, FPLP, FPLR. COLEMAN CABLE SYSTEMS INC, NORTH CHICAGO IL60064 E65391 (M) Types FPL, FPLP, FPLR, Power limited fire -protective signaling cable. COMMUNICATION CABLE INC, SILER CITY NC 27344 E100315 (M) Types FPL. FPLP, FPLR. COMMUNICATION CABLE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC, E72845 (M) ATTLEBORO MA 02703 COMPUTER WIRE & CABLE CO INC, LEOMINSTER MA01453 E93420 (M) COMTRAN CORP, WHITINSVILLE MA 01588 E111271 (M) Power limited fire -protective signaling cables, Types FPL, FPLP, FPLR. - CONDUMEX, GRANADA 11520 D F MEXICO E138885 (S) Types FPL, FPLR. CONSOUDATED ELECTRONIC WIRE & CABLE, FRANKLINPARKIL60131 E76400 (M) COOPER INDUSTRIES INC BELDEN DIV, RICHMOND IN47374 E64959 (M) Types FPL FPLP FPLR. DECA CABLES INC, ONTARIO CANADA K8V 5W6 E120816 (M) Type FPL, Power limited fire -protective signaling cables. DENARDO WIRE & CABLE CO INC, FITCHBURG MA01420 E123828 (M) Power Limited Fire Protective Signaling Cable. DOMTECH HOLDINGS INC, ONTARIO CANADA K8V 5R2. E90541 (M) Types FPL, FPLP, Power limited fire -protective signaling cable. EASTMAN WIRE & CABLE CO, PENNSAUKEN NJ 08110 E70388 (M) Types FPL, FPLP and Power Limited Fire -Protective Signaling Cable. LOOK FOR MARK ON PRODUCT 803 South Orlando Avenue Suite J Winter Park, Florida 32789 Telephone (407) 628-5000 Fax 407 628 4985 RED LOBSTER - SEMINOLE TOWNE CENTER 430 TOWNE CENTER BLVD. SCALE 1/16' = I' FCP FOCUS 200 FACP F C A ANNUNCIATOR M DUCT DETECTOR UJ ANSUL CONNECTION SMOKE DETECTOR TAMPER WATERFLOW DINING 611:s WAITING ENTRY WOMEN II MEN DINING BAR AC-6 SERVICE E LOUNGE. KITCHEN N L M AC-4 DINING AC-3 AC-2 DINING AC-1 S I DISHWASHING OFFICE STUR ELEC MECH RECV, ® q CITY OF.SAKPORD. FLORIDA PERMIT NO r `-' — DATE /0 2(O -9S' THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO INSTALL THE FOL- LOWING ELECTRICAL WORK: OWNER'S NAME— ADDRESSPU Ob`>f K O _ OF JOB 1 owns' GeA'r -444 ELEC. CONTR. ROVAl. Ekeekc.s. Residential Non-residentiaL ' Subject to rules and regulations of the city and national electric codes. Number AMOUNT Alteration, Addition, Repair Change of Service Residential Commercial Mobile Home Factory Built Housing New Residential 0-100 Amp Service 101-200 Am Service 201 Amp and above New Commercial 4000 p Service Application. Fee I i TOTAL By signing this application I am stating I will be in compliance vAth the NEC including Article 110, Section 110.9 and 110-10. BuildingOfficial e:icia- STATE COMPETENCY NO. re 13zf =)o Royal Electric Company Of Central Florida, Inc. STATE CERTIFIED ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR LICENSE NUMBER EC0000913 645 NEWBURYPORT AVE., STE. 1000 ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL 32701- 2740 (407) 834-2345 P.O. BOX 4266 WINTER PARK, FLORIDA 32793-4266 FAX 834-1777 a-ro gC-A- -z ' -, 19 9 r DATE) e 12tj dT- SA1.I 9 U t t.0 t rJ4 fi2TM Ll To whom it may concern. I Blake E. Ferguson. authorize the person bearing this letter. whose name and signature are below. to act as my agent in filing application. signing application, and any and all administrative steps necessary for the purposes or approvals for obtaining permits. as needed for: R'ep Loes-ttY2 431Z1 - TswOL:;7 i U c- 9Lv S iirlrc7Y1i0, RcSyu ,D,A 727, 1 My State of Florida Electrical Certification Number is EC 0000913. Sincerely. g &, ' i'; Blake E. Ferguson, President signature of authorized person pp \\ printed name of authorized pers E 'j amt 01t 3 State of Florida, County of S;:emt"JO ue The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this C'T6 9 M Z(_ 0 ; 199— by Blake E. Ferguson. President of Royal Electric Co of Central Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation, on behalf of the corporation who is personally known to me. DANIEL O PETERKIN My Convnission CC36PMAQL (signature of Notary) ** Expires Jun. 09, 1998 Bonded by ANB r I J9, 4IFprRA00-852-b878 I VL l t l (FYJ*4i rJ (printed name of Notary) 0 State of Florida Notary Public Commission Number CC-3 (-`l`t 35 expiration date CL 'v' r I CITY OF SANFORD FLORIDA PERMIT NO DATE THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT TO INSTALL THE FOL- LOWING PLUMBING WORK: OWNER'S NAME t ""t A4'& ' ADDRESS OF JOB J`' ' PLUMBING CONTRI RA& _ Res. _ Comm. Subject to rules and regulations of Sanford plumbing code. Residential: I Number Amount Alteration, Addition, Repair I New Residential: One Water Closet Additional Water Closet Commercial: Fixtures. Floor Drain, Trap— Sewerr Water Piping 3 Gas Piping 1 Factory -built housing Mobile Home Application Fee Minimum Commercial Permit: S25. oo Totel D for Plumber COMPETENCY CARD NO_ Joc l 11 AlPi ne SoF=, x %-x m 1:> ! ri va CorP - 549 N. Gol•d*prod Rd. 9t•. 7 Orlando FL 32807 407 >28 1 —6652 POWER OF ATTORNEY TO: Ple leadedsllteuidalsellf 0060316 to act i 1) my behalf with regard to pulling a plumbing permit for Joseph J. DiPaolo, Jr., State Reg. # RF0060316. oseph J. DiPaolo Jr. Subcribed and Sworn to before me at 64 _— in the State of 4_ this U _ day of 19 Notary Signature:- C=J Printed Name: Seal: t 13Ap13ARA A BUSS My Cprtxrdssbn CC327507 Ezpves Nov. 01, 1997 Bonded by 4A1 s+ f 800-422-1555 CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT / PERMIT ADDRESS JC HOC n Ce>1is. PERMIT NUMBER -A Total Contract Price of Job $1,209,947.00 Total Sq. Ft. 8356 Describe Work Construction of new seafood restaurant Type of Construction VT lInnrntprtprl - Snrinklpr Flood Prone (YES) (NO) Number of Stories 1 Number of Dwellings 1 Zoning pD Occupancy: Residential Commercial g Industrial LEGAL DESCRIPTION (please attach printout from Seminole County) TAX I.D. NUMBER 32-19-30-SMR-2600-0000 OWNER G.M.R.I ADDRESS 59M Zlr PHONE NUMBER 4071245-5611 CITY nrlanrin STATE FL ZIP 32809 TITLE HOLDER (IF OTHER THAN OWNER) ADDRESS CITY BONDING COMPANY ADDRESS CITY None STATE STATE ZIP ZIP ARCHITECT C.R.H.O. Architects, Inc. ADDRESS 195 South "C" Street, Suite 200 CITY Tustin STATE CA ZIP 92681 MORTGAGE LENDER N/A ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CONTRACTOR Haley Construction Company PHONE NUMBER 4071321-5401 ADDRESS 212 Hickman Drive ST. LICENSE NUMBER CaC0515R4 CITY Sanford STATE FL ZIP 39 771 Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do the work and installations as indicated. I certify that no work or installation has commenced prior to the issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet standards of all laws regulating construction in this jurisdiction. I understand that a separate permit must be secured for ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, SIGNS, POOLS, ETC. OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT: I certify that all the foregoing information is accurate and that all work will be done in compliance with all applicable laws regulating construction and zoning. A COPY OF THE RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WILL BE POSTED ON THE JOB SITE WITH PERMITS NO LATER THAN SEV17N (7) DAYS AFTER THE PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED. FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOU PAYING TWICE FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. NOTICE: In addition to the requirements of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that nay be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. ACCEPTANCE OF PERMIT IS VERIFICATION THAT I WILL NOTIFY THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF FLORIDA LIEN LAW, FS713. j J*********************************************tar***** * ***//**//*************************** y ,b Z C;9 D l"n y) G J m a o H 14 Sign of nt & Date SciciInat.ure of Contractor & Date o a '< J 10 Henry B t - En at Darden Res aurants . Inc _+(Z If t -' / GC - r c s z u Type or Print Owner/Agent Name T}+ e- or Print Contra9tor's Name tv a / 0 a si&hature of Not & Dat6 Signature of No a_y &"Date n U w ( Official Seal) (Official SealJ1, I'r ry /a uBr ANNA pILBOD` / O i° commission &449190i; CYNTHIA L. TAYLOR Mya•; MY COMMISSION t CC 282171 •ti2c * Expiros Mar 28. 1999 EXPIRES: May 2, 1997 Elonded by HAI n Za ; ?R,!1Q BOrwbtl ThN Notary Public UFldanvFlmFa ate', P`° 800-422-1555 O o ! OF Flo C Application Approved BY: Date: n Z FEES: Building ()Q Radon 3.5 Police '" Fire M \ Open Space A_)18 Road Impact. Application / 0100 ro w o o PERMIT VALIDATION: CHECK CAST; DATE /G BY o ro m o A a ORIGINAL (BUILDING) YELLOW (CUSTOMER) PINK (COUNTY TAX OFFICE) GOLD (CO. ADMIN) Z a F I THIS APPLICATION USED FOR WORK VALUED $2500.00 OR MORE W",V/W40VTM A L I M B E D P A R i N L R S N I P November 30, 1995 Dick Sims Haley Construction, Inc. 212 Hickman Drive Sanford, FL 32771 Mr. Sims, Ail Thank you for using Trus Joist MacMillan products on the Red Lobster restaurant at the Seminole Town Center shopping plaza. Per your request here is a copy of the jobsite installation review that I did today for the TJS"m open web trusses supplied by Trus Joist MacMillan. I found no problems with the installation of the products. Everything looked good and correct to me. I have enclosed my business card. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, Keith Rundle - Technical Representative Trus Joist MacMillan cc: Chuck Pennell - Trus Joist MacMillan Mick Shultz - Trus Joist MacMillan Gary Winn - City of Sanford Paul Watson - Seminole County Southern Region A 5850 lakehurst Drive, Suite 250-4 A Orlando, Flcrido 32819 A Phone 407.363.1277 A Fax 407.363.1446 had a USA. J FramieWorks. INSTALLATION REVIEW Servicing Salesperson: Keith Rundle Date: 11/3/95 Producing Plant Job No: 7-95-609 National Account Job No: Job Name: RED LOBSTER Job Address: SEMINOLE TOWN CTR. SANFORD, FL. 32772 This Job Includes The ProSuCts Circled. Schedule Delivery Date: w% tl/l.3 Jobsite Contact: Mac Wilson Jobsite Phone: Please return this form to: TRUS JOIST MACMILLAN National Accounts Division 1101 Wood Ridge Center Dr., Ste. #116 Charlotte, N.C. 28217 Tel: 800/242-4854 TJLTM TJSTM TJHTM TJI (9) TJWTm TJMTM MICROLLAMTM / PARALLAMO YES NO See Below For Remarks 1. Has erection bracing been installed properly? 2. Is placement and location of trusses in accordance with approved shop drawings or approved sales presentation drawings, including maximum o.c. spacing and extra trusses? x 3. Are top chords straight within 1/2" accepted tolerances? 4. Are trusses plumb or square with deck? X 5. Has bridging been installed? ( if required ) 6. Is metal "X" bracing in place at bottom bearing locations? 7. Do trusses meet minimum bearing requirements? 8. Are web stiffeners located and nailed properly? tyo Cc 9. Is there any truss damage that can be seen? 10. Have holes been cut in TJI webs properly? NoT Ly 11. Have any field modifications of Trus Joist MacMillan products occurred? 12. Is sheathing nailed properly? X 13. Are MICROLLAM or PARALLAM beams the proper death & thickness? 14. Do MICROLLAM & PARALLAM beams meet min.bearing requirements? REMARKS:yiSlTf j S j= It"jU QS VtE•~; iNST9LLAr7ati uF 2`f r^' t-Dolts Ftn,F nF_T A0 SLKC tr,N 6)k(-K Discussed Trus Joist MacMillan Product Installation with t),'. K t %h j Trus Joist MacMillan Representative: tlA k L,V_ Please Return Within 60 Days To The Above Service Center. Date: at the jobsite. l(-_ 01 a UNIVE.RSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION PROPOSED CHINA COAST RESTAURANT SEMINOLE TOWNE CENTER OUT -PARCEL TOWNE CENTER BOULEVARD SANFORD, FLORIDA PROJECT NO. 17324-012-01 REPORT NO. 44680 Prepared By: Universal Engineering Sciences 3532 Maggie Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32811 407) 423-0504 Consultants in: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences • Construction Materials Testing Offices in: Orlando • Gainesville • Fort Myers • Merritt Island • Daytona Beach • West Palm Beach _ UNIVERSAL i ENGINEERING SCIENCES Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering Environmental Sciences • Construction Materials Testing .January 4, 1994 r— General Mills Restaurants, Inc. 5900 Lake Ellenor Drive P. O. Box 593330 Orlando, Florida 32859-3330 Attention: Ms. Loretta D. Reeves Site Development Administrator Reference: Geotechnical Exploration Proposed China Coast Restaurant Seminole Towne Center Out -parcel Towne Center Boulevard Sanford, Florida Project No. 17324-012-01 Report No. 44680 Dear Ms. Reeves: Offices In: Orlando Gainesville Fort Myers Merritt Island St. Augustine Daytona Beach West Palm Beach Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. has completed the subsurface investigation of the site for the proposed China Coast Restaurant located in an out -parcel at the Seminole Towne Center Mall on Towne Center Boulevard in Sanford, Florida. The scope of our investigation was planned in conjunction with, and was authorized by, you. This report contains the results of our investiclations, an engineering interpretation of these with respect to the project characteristics described to us, and recommendations for foundation design, pavement design, and site preparation. We appreciate the opportunity to have worked with you on this project and look forward to a continued association. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you should have any questions, or if we may further assist you as your plans proceed. Respectfully submitted, UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. Bruce H. Woloshin, P.E. Manger Geo ,chnical inee ' g i ennefh enc , P.E. P.E. No. 37711 //y/ys BHW/RKD:esj Vice President cc: Client (4) 3532 Maggie Blvd. • Orlando, FL 32811 • (407) 423-0504 Project No. 17324-012-01 Report No. 44680 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................ 1 1.1 GENERAL ................................................ 1 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES ............................................ 1 2.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................... 1 2.2 PURPOSE ................................................ 2 2.3 FIELD INVESTIGATION ....................................... 2 2.4 LABORATORY INVESTIGATION ................................ 3 3.0 FINDINGS ..................................................... 4 3.1 SURFACE CONDITIONS ...................................... 4 3.2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .................................. 4 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................ 5 4.1 GENERAL ................................................ 5 4.2 GROUNDWATER CONTROL ................................... 5 4.3 BUILDING AND SIGN FOUNDATIONS ............................ 5 4.4 DUMPSTER PAD PAVEMENTS ................................. 6 4.5 PAVEMENTS .............................................. 6 4.5.1 GENERAL .......................................... 6 4.5.2 LAYER COMPONENTS ................................. 6 4.5.3 STABILIZED SUBGRADE ............................... 7 4.5.4 BASE COURSE ...................................... 7 4.5.5 SURFACE COURSE ................................... 8 4.5.6 EFFECTS OF GROUNDWATER ........................... 9 4.5.7 CURBING ........................................... 9 4.5.8 CONSTRUCTION TRAFFI 1.1 .............................. 9 4.6 SCREENING FOR SOIL CONTAMINATION ........................ 9 4.7 SITE PREPARATION ........................................ 10 4.8 CONSTRUCTION RELATED SERVICES .......................... 11 5.0 LIMITATIONS .................................................. 12 6.0 SUMMARY ................................................... 13 J F Project No. 17324-012-01 Report No. 44680 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A SITE LOCATION MAP ........................................ A-1 APPENDIX B BORING LOCATION PLAN ..................................... B-1 BORING LOGS ............................................. B-2 SOILS CLASSIFICATION CHART ................................ B-3 DESCRIPTION OF LABORATORY TEST PROCEDURES ............... B-4 APPENDIX C IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT ...................................... C-1 CONSTRAINTS AND RESTRICTIONS ............................. C-2 iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 GENERAL Project No. 17324-012-01 Report No. 44680 In this report, we present the results of the subsurface investigation of the site for the proposed China Coast Restaurant in the Seminole Towne Center in Sanford, Florida. We have divided this report into the following sections: SCOPE OF SERVICES - Defines what we did FINDINGS - Describes what we encountered RECOMMENDATIONS - Describes what we encourage you to do LIMITATIONS - Describes the restrictions inherent in this report SUMMARY - Reviews the material in this report APPENDICES - Presents support materials referenced in this report. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES 2.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION We understand you propose to construct a China Coast Restaurant facility on this site, together with associated parking and driveways, a trash/recycling enclosure, and a pylon sign. We were provided with an undated Preliminary Site Plan showing Scheme "D" for the restaurant. The parcel marked "Reserve Tract, 5.21 ac. ±" will be shared with a proposed Olive Garden Restaurant. A separate geotechnical engineering report is being prepared for the Olive Garden Restaurant. We used these documents in preparing our investigation. The proposed China Coast Restaurant is understood to consist of a single -story wood -frame structure with exterior dimensions of about 7,2 by 100 (±) feet. No basement is planned for the building. The structure will be supported by exterior and interior load bearing columns located approximately 181/2 by 211/2 feet on center with maximum loads estimated to be about 13 kips per column. The exterior walls on three sides of the structure are non -load bearing, but will impose a dead load of approximately 1 kip per lineal foot (klf) on the foundation. However, the rear will be load bearing, and several interior bearing walls are located in the rear portion of the building. Structural (combined live and dead) loads for the bearing walls are estimated to be approximately 1,200 to 1,750 pounds per lineal foot. The perimeter foundation stemwalls will serve as low retaining walls, and a wood deck surrounds the structure supported on 12 inches diameter piers. The floor slab is understood to carry a maximum design live load of 100 pounds per square foot (psf). The maximum daily traffic volume used for design of the drive land pavement section consists of 1,000 automobiles and five 18,000 pound equivalent axle loads (1 to 2 heavy trucks). The maximum daily traffic volume used for design of the parking. stall pavement section consists of 100 automobiles per stall and no heavy vehicles. The pavement sections were designed based upon a 20-year se vice life. Page 1 of 13 Pages lug Project No. 17324-012-01 Report No. 44680 The trash enclosure will be a covered or uncovered structure with 9-inch thick reinforced masonry block walls. Enclosures are typically 8-feet high and have exterior plan dimensions of about 12 to 20 feet in width and about 10 feet in depth. The sign will be a low-rise structure that is typically supported by a drilled pier or a spread footing. It is understood that the foundation bearing grade is usually 4 to 6 (±) feet below the adjacent ground surface to achieve sufficient overturning resistance and/or to provide adequate "development" of anchor bolts. Stormwater retention has not been a part of these studies. We have assumed that stormwater retention has been provided by an area -wide stormwater management system. Our recommendations are based upon the above considerations. If any of this information is incorrect or if you anticipate any changes, inform Universal Engineering Sciences so that we may review our recommendations. The site is located in an out -parcel at the Seminole Towne Center, currently under construc- tion in Sanford, Florida. A general location map of the project area appears in Appendix A: Site Location Map. 2.2 PURPOSE The purposes of this investigation were: to investigate the general subsurface conditions at the site; to interpret and review the subsurface conditions with respect to the proposed construction; and to provide geotechnical engineering recommendations for foundation design, pavement design, and site preparation. This report presents an evaluation of site conditions on the basis of traditional geotechnical procedures for site characterization. Our investigation was confined to the zone of soil likely to be stressed by the proposed construction. Our work did not address the potential for surface expression of deep geological conditions, such as sinkhole development related to karst activity. This evaluation requires a more extensive range of field services than performed in this study. We will be pleased to conduct an investigation to evaluate the probable effect of the regional geology upon the proposed construction, if you desire. 2.3 FIELD INVESTIGATION The subsurface conditions were investigated with nine rotary wash borings, advanced to depths of 10 to 15 feet. We performed the Standard Penetration Test in each boring during Page 2 of 13 Pages ur 3.0 FINDINGS 3.1 SURFACE CONDITIONS Project No. 17324-012-01 Report No. 44680 A Universal Engineering Sciences engineer performed a visual site inspection of the subject property to gain a "hands-on" familiarity with the project area. From the site specific topographic information provided and from our site explorations, it is apparent that the site is flat. The site was clear with the exception of scattered weeds at the time of our explorations. We examined U.S.G.S. topographic quadrangle maps for relevant information about the site. 3.2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The boring locations and detailed subsurface conditions are illustrated in Appendix B: Boring Location Plan and Boring Logs. ThE) classifications and descriptions shown on the logs are generally based upon visual characterizations of the recovered soil samples and a limited number of laboratory tests. Also, see Appendix B: Soils Classification Chart, for further explanation of the symbols and placement of data on the Boring Logs. Table 1: General Soil Profile, summarizes the soil conditions encountered. Typical Depth (ft.) 0 - 3 3 - 15* Termination of Deepest Boring TABLE 1 General Soil Profile Soil Descriptions Loose to medium dense, gray to brown SAND SP] Dense to very dense, gray to brown SAND with silt or clay to clayey SAND [SP, SP-SC] Bracketed Text Indicates: Unified Soil Classification Groundwater was not encountered at any of the borings at the time of our field exploration. Page 4 of 13 Pages u i Project No. 17324-012-01 Report No. 44680 drilling according to the procedures of A"TM D-1586, with additional samples taken to provide a continuous soil profile at shallow depths. The basic procedure for the Standard Penetration Test is as follows: A standard split -barrel sampler is driven into the soil by a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of 1 blows required to drive the sampler 1 foot, after seating 6 inches, is designated the penetration resistance, or N-value; this value is an index to soil strength and consistency. The indicated locations and depths of the explorations should be considered approximate. Our drilling crew located the borings based upon estimated distances and relationships to i obvious landmarks, using the proposed site plan and topographic survey provided. Jar samples of the soils encountered will be held in our laboratory for your inspection for 60 days and then discarded, unless we are notified otherwise. 2.4 LABORATORY INVESTIGATION The soil samples recovered from the soil test borings were returned to our laboratory, where a geotechnical engineer visually examined and reviewed the field descriptions. We selected representative soil samples for laboratory testing consisting of four Wash No. 200 sieve analyses. We performed these tests to aid in classifying the soils and to help to evaluate the general engineering characteristics of the site soils. See Appendix B: Boring Logs and Description of Testing Procedures, for further data and explanations. Page 3 of 13 Pages 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 GENERAL Project No. 17324-012-01 Report No. 44680 The following recommendations are made based upon a review of the attached soil test data, our understanding of the proposed construction, and experience with similar projects and subsurface conditions. If the structural loadings, building locations, or grading plans change from those discussed previously, we request the opportunityto review and possibly amend our recommendations with respect to those changes. Additionally, if subsurface conditions are encountered during construction which were not encountered in the borings, report those conditions immediately to us for observation and recommendations. In this section of the report, we present our detailed recommendations for groundwater control, building and sign foundations, dumpster pad pavements, pavements, screening for soil contamination, site preparation, and construction related services. 4.2 GROUNDWATER CONTROL The groundwater table will fluctuate seasonally depending upon local rainfall. The rainy season in Central Florida is normally between June and September. Based upon our review of U.S.G.S. data and regional hydrogeology, our best estimate is that the groundwater table likely was close to the seasonal high level at: the time of our explorations. Slight additional rise is possible; however, this should not be a significant factor for most of the site development. At the retention pond, groundwater control might be necessary during extremely wet periods, during the placement of engineered fill to restore the required grades. In any case, we recommend that the groundwater be maintained at least 2 feet below all earthwork and compaction surfaces. After severe periods of rain, it is likely that surface water will migrate to the top of the dense clayey sand strata. This may result in a periodic perched groundwater condition. If significant amounts of material are not removed to reach final grade, we do not believe that the perched groundwater level will adversely effect the structure or pavements. The existing and estimated seasonal high groundwater tables at each location appear in Appendix B: Boring Logs. We recommend all foundation designs and stormwater retention analysis incorporate the seasonal high groundwater conditions. 4.3 BUILDING AND SIGN FOUNDATIONS We recommend the proposed structures be supported on conventional, shallow spread foundations or a thickened edge monolithic: slab, sized to exert a maximum soil bearing Page 5 of 13 Pages Project No. 17324-012-01 Report No. 44680 pressure of 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf). All foundations should be embedded at least 1.5 feet below lowest adjacent grade (finished surrounding grade, for example). Further, maintain minimum foundation widths of 16 to 24 inches for strip and square r footings, respectively, even though the maximum allowable soil bearing pressure may not i be developed in all cases. We estimate the foundations will have a minimum factor of safety of two against bearing capacity failure. For the foundations designed as recommended and the site prepared according to the recommendations provided later in this report, we estimate that total settlement of less than one -inch, and differential settlement of less than half -inch might occur. 4.4 DUMPSTER PAD PAVEMENTS Dumpster pads and 20 feet in front of the pad should be constructed with 6 inches of Portland cement concrete placed on the subgrade prepared in accordance with the Site Preparation section of this report. ConcretE! should have a minimum 28-day compressive strength of 4,000 psi and have saw cut expansion joints on maximum 12 feet intervals. 4.5 PAVEMENTS 4.5.1 GENERAL We recommend using a flexible pavement section on this project. Flexible pavements combine the strength and durability of several layer components to produce an appropriate and cost-effective combination of available materials. 4.5.2 LAYER COMPONENTS We recommend using a three -layer pavement: section consisting of stabilized subgrade, base course, and surface course placed on top of existing subgrade or a compacted embank- ment. Because traffic loadings are commonly unavailable, we have generalized our pavement design into two groups. The group descriptions and the recommended component thicknesses are presented in Table 2: Pavement Component Recommendations. The structural numbers in Table 2 are based on a structural number analysis with the stated estimated daily traffic volume for a 20-year placement design life and the loadings presented in the Project Description section of this report. Page 6 of 13 Pages Project No. 17324-012-01 Report No. 44680 TA13LE 2 Pavement Component Recommendations Component Thickness (inches) Structural Traffic Group Number Stabilized Base Surface Subgrade Course Course Parking lots - 2.0 6 6 1.5 light duty Parking lots - 2.4 6 8 2.0 heavy duty Parking lots - light duty: auto parking area; 100 cars per day; light panel and pickup trucks; average (gross weight of 4,000 pounds Parking lots - heavy duty: entrance driveways; 1,000 cars per day; 2 trucks or less per day; with gross vehicle weight of 60,000 pounds 4.5.3 STABILIZED SUBGRADE We recommend that subgrade materials be compacted in place according to the requirements in the "Site Preparation" section of this report. Further, stabilize the subgrade materials to a minimum Limerock Bearing Ratio (LBR) of 40 percent as specified by Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) requirements for Type B or Type C Stabilized Subgrade. Further, the stabilized subgrade can be imported material or a blend of on -site soils and imported materials. If a blend is proposed, we recommend that the contractor perform a mix design to find the optimum mix proportions. 4.5.4 BASE COURSE We recommend that the base course be either limerock or soil -cement. Limerock should have a minimum LBR of 100 percent and should be mined from an FDOT approved source. Place limerock in maximum 6-inch lifts and compact -each lift to a minimum density of 95 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density. Page 7 of 13 Pages Project No. 17324-012-01 Report No. 44680 For a soil -cement base, we recommend that the contractor perform a soil -cement design with a minimum seven-day strength of 350 pounds per square inch (psi) on the materials he intends to use. Place soil -cement in maximum 6-inch lifts and compact in place to a minimum density of 95 percent of the Standard Proctor maximum dry density according to specifications in ASTM D-558. Place and finish the soil -cement according to Portland Cement Association requirements. Final review of the soil -cement base course should include manual "chaining" and/or soundings" seven days after placement. Shrinkage cracks will form in the soil -cement mixture and you should expect reflection cracking on the surface course. Perform compliance testing for either limerock or soil -cement to a depth of 1 foot at a frequency of one test per 10,000 square feet, or at a minimum of two test locations, whichever is greater. 4.5.5 SURFACE COURSE In light duty areas where there is occasional truck traffic, but primarily passenger cars, we recommend using an asphaltic concrete, FDOT Type S-III, which has a stability of 1,000 pounds. In heavy duty areas, where truck traffic is predominant, we recommend using as asphaltic concrete, FDOT Type S-III or S-I, which has a minimum stability of 1,500 pounds. Asphaltic concrete mixes should be a current FDOT approved design of the materials actually used. Test samples of the materials delivered to the project to verify that the aggregate gradation and asphalt content satisfies the mix design requirements. Compact the asphalt to a minimum of 95 percent of the Marshall design density. After placement and field compaction, core the wearing surface to evaluate material thickness and to perform laboratory densities. Obtain cores at frequencies of at least one core per 3,000 square feet of placed pavement or a minimum of two cores per day's production. In parking lots, for extended life expectancy of the surface course, we recommend applying a coal tar emulsion sealer at least six months after placement of the surface course. The seal coat will help to patch cracks and voids, and protect the surface from damaging ultraviolet light and automobile liquid spillagE. Please note that applying the seal coat prior to six months after placement may hinder the "curing" of the surface course loading to its early deterioration. L L L Page 8 of 13 Pages 22 i i i Project No. 17324-012-01 Report No. 44680 4.5.6 EFFECTS OF GROUNDWATER One of the most critical influences on the pavement performance in Central Florida is the relationship between the pavement subgrade and the seasonal high groundwater level. Many roadways and parking areas have been destroyed as a result of deterioration of the base and the base/surface course bond. Regardless of the type of base selected, we recommend that the seasonal high groundwater and the bottom of the base course be separated by at least 18 inches. 4.5.7 CURBING We recommend that curbing around the landscaped sections adjacent to the parking lots and driveways be constructed with full -depth curb sections. Using extruded curb sections which lie directly on top of the final asphalt level, or eliminating the curbing entirely, can allow migration of irrigation water from the landscape areas to the interface between the asphalt and the base. This migration often causes separation of the wearing surface from the base and subsequent rippling and pavement deterioration. 4.5.8 CONSTRUCTION TRAFFI Light duty roadways and incomplete pavement sections will not perform satisfactorily under construction traffic loadings. We recommend that construction traffic (construction I. equipment, concrete trucks, sod trucks, garbage trucks, moving vans, dump trucks, etc.) be re-routed away from these roadways or that: the pavement section be designed for these j loadings. 4.6 SCREENING FOR SOIL CONTAMINATION Soil samples collected from the borings were screened in the laboratory by an environmental soils technician for the possible presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the soils. The instrument used was an organic vapor analyzer (OVA) instrument capable of detecting organic vapor concentrations to a threshold of detection of approximately 1 part per million ppm). The instrument was used to screen the vapors collected in the void space within the glass sample jars, above the soil samples and below the lids. None of the samples exhibited contamination within the threshold of detection of the organic vapor analyzer (OVA) instrument used in the screening. Please note that these screenings were performed incidental to the geotechnical exploration. The techniques employed in the sampling do not meet the standards of the practice of environmental due diligence explorations. You may wish to perform a Phase I Environmental Assessment for additional information on potential environmental hazards. Page 9 of 13 Pages Project No. 17324-012-01 Report No. 44680 4.7 SITE PREPARATION We recommend only normal, good practice site preparation procedures. These procedures include: stripping the site of vegetation, proof -rolling and proof -compacting the subgrade, and filling to grade with engineered fill. While dewatering will not be necessary for most of the site, it might become necessary to dewater in the retention basin during extremely wet or rainy periods. A more detailed synopsis of this work is as follows: 1. If required, perform remedial dewatering prior to any earthwork operations. 2. Strip the proposed construction limits of all grass, roots, topsoil, construction debris, and other deleterious materials within and 10 feet beyond the perimeter of the proposed building and in all paved areas. Expect clearing and grubbing to depths of 12 inches. Deeper clearing and grubbing depths may be encountered in heavily vegetated areas where major root systems are encountered. 3. Proof -roll the subgrade with a heavily loaded, rubber -tired vehicle under the observation of a Universal EngineEring Sciences geotechnical engineer or his representative. Proof -rolling will help locate any zones of especially loose or soft soils not encountered in the soil test borings. Then undercut, or otherwise treat these zones as recommended by the engineer. 4. Proof -compact the subgrade from the surface by a medium weight vibratory roller (a 10-ton roller, for example), until you obtain a minimum density of 95 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D-1557), to a depth of 3 feet below the base of the foundations in the building limits and to a depth of 3 feet below the bottom of the base course in the pavement areas. 5. Test the subgrade for compaction at a frequency of not less than one test per 2,500 square feet per foot of depth improvement in the building area. In paved areas, perform compliance tests on the stabilized subgrade for full depth at a frequency of one test per 10,000 square feet, or at a minimum of two test locations, whichever is greater. 6. Place fill material, as required. The fill should consist of "clean," fine sand with less than 5 percent soil fines. You may use fill materials with soil fines between 5 and 10 percent, but strict moisture control may be required. Place fill in uniform 10- to 12-inch loose lifts and compact each lift to a minimum density of 95 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density. 7. Perform compliance tests within the fill at a frequency of not less than one test per 2,500 square feet per lift in the building areas, or at a minimum of two test locations, Page 10 of 13 Pages Project No. 17324-012-01 Report No. 44680 whichever is greater. In paved areas, perform compliance tests at a frequency of not less than one test per 10,000 square feet per lift, or at a minimum of two test locations, whichever is greater. 8. Test all footing cuts for compaction to a depth of 3 feet. Additionally, we recommend that you test one out of every four column footings, and one test per every 200 lineal feet of wall footing. Note: Very dense, partially cemented sands were encountered between 5 to 10 feet below existing grade. Excavations in this stratum may require significantly more effort than would normally be expected in Central Florida Sand. 4.8 CONSTRUCTION RELATED SERVICES We recommend that the owner retain Universal Engineering Sciences to perform construction materials tests and observations on this project. Field tests and observations include verification of foundation and paviement subgrades by monitoring proof -rolling operations and performing quality assurance tests on the placement of compacted structural fill and pavement courses. The geotechnical engineering design does not end with the advertisement of the construction documents. The design is an on -going process throughout construction. Because of our familiarity with the site conditions and the intent of the engineering design, we are most qualified to address problems that might arise during construction in a timely and cost-effective manner. Page 11 of 13 Pages Ea Project No.. 17324-012-01 Report No. 44680 5.0 LIMITATIONS During the early stages of most construction projects, geotechnical issues not addressed in this report may arise. Because of the natural limitations inherent in working with the subsurface, it is not possible for a geotechnical engineer to predict and address all possible problems. An Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in the Geosciences (ASFE) publication, "Important Information About Your Geotechnical Engineering Report" appears in Appendix C, and will help explain the nature of geotechnical issues. Further, we present documents in Appendix C:: Constraints and Restrictions, to bring to your attention the potential concerns and the basic limitations of a typical geotechnical report. I I Page 12 of 13 Pages Project No. 17324-012-01 Report No. 44680 6.0 SUMMARY In summary, we understand you propose to construct a China Coast Restaurant facility on this site. We have performed field and laboratory investigations to provide geotechnical engineering recommendations for foundation design, pavement design, and site preparation. The soils encountered consist of "clean" sand (less than 5 percent soil fines), in some cases becoming mixed with increasing silt and clay below a depth of approximately 10 to 12 feet. The seasonal high groundwater table may range from approximately 14 feet below ground surface in the majority of the site. We recommend the proposed structure be supported on conventional, shallow spread foundations with allowable soil bearing pressures of 3,000 psf. Pavements should be designed as a function of the anticipated traffic loadings. We recommend using a three -layer pavement sE?ction consisting of stabilized subgrade, base course, and a surface course. All pavemE•nt designs should incorporate the effects of groundwater, irrigated landscape areas, and construction traffic. Screening of the soils for the possible presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) was performed using an organic vapor analyzer (OVA) instrument. None of the samples exhibited contamination within the threshold of detection of the organic vapor analyzer (OVA) i instrument used in the screening. Since the techniques employed in the sampling do not meet the standards of the practice of environmental due diligence explorations, you may wish to perform a Phase I Environmental Assessment for additional information on potential environmental hazards. We recommend only normal, good practice site preparation procedures to prepare the subgrade to support the structures and pavements. We hope this report meets your needs and discusses the problems associated with the proposed development. We would be pleased to meet with you and discuss any geotechnical engineering aspects of the project. Page 13 of 13 Pages APPENDIX A I I .x 27 I l s - d DI c d Trues Lake ten ' 0 —: L7 c ^ ` "° • a 1 ' i, Y; /\ ' fit U i l' /1 I t f 47 I 1 \' I _ e41 .. ( v//' y , o O p (] O O} Q' ^ r = f•1.—'- 0 J' 1000' 2000' SCALE (BEET) TAKEN F?Qbt SANF ORD• FLORIDA 1988'• USGS QUADRANGLE MAP CHINA COAST RESTAURANT SEMINOLE TOWN CENTER SANFORD, FLORIDA UNIVERSAL SITE LOCATION MAP NCIN_PUNG SCIENC_S 0?av+N ?Y: K.K. ' C-TE: 1 2 2C/9" I CHECKED ?Y: 6w OAT-: (IT T NO: 44680 A•1 APPENDIX B LEGEND STANDARD PENETRATION TEST IODATION AUGER BORING LOCATION BORINGS PERFORMED 12/22/94 THIS PUN TAKEN FROM PLAN PROVIDED BY WENT htwuuuJ'yr, 1. 0 c S 9 Z S g E Q a oos 8ZNYw UN 91 UNIVERSAL craN.w taN cN1 Yi 4 B1 so] UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES PROJECTNO.: 17324.012.01 REPORT NO.: 44680 BORING LOG PAGE: B•2.9 V,. PROJECT: CHINA COAST RESTAURANT SEMINOLE TOWN CENTER SANFORD, FLORIDA CLIENT: GENERAL MILLS RESTURANTS, INC. LOCATION: SEE BORING LOCATION PLAN REMARKS: NE = GROUNDWATER NOT ENCOUNTERED BORING DESIGNATION: AB-3 SHEET: 1 Of I SECTION: TOWNSHIP: 19S RANGE: 30E G.S. ELEVATION (h): DATE STARTED: 12/22/94 WATER TABLE (h): NE DATE FINISHED: 12/22/94 DATE OF READING: 12/22/94 DRILLED BY: U.E.S. ORLAN00 EST. W.S.W.T. (Pt): TYPE OF SAMPLING: ASTM D-1452 ATTERBERG K ORGANIC 200 MC LIMITS (FT / CONTEN 95) DAY) % LL PI r- UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES PROJECT NO.: 1732a•O1 2.0t ED BORING LOG REPORT NO.: 44680 1 PAGE: B-2.8 PROJECT: CHINA COAST RESTAURANT BORING DESIGNATION: AB-2 SHEET: 1 of 1 SEMINOLE TOWN CENTER SECTION: TOWNSHIP: 19S RANGE: 30E SANFORD. FLORIDA CLIENT: GENERAL MILLS RESTURANTS. INC. G.S. ELEVATION (tt): DATE STARTED: 1 2/22194 LOCATION: SEE BORING LOCATION PLAN WATER TABLE (ft): NE DATE FINISHED: 12/22/94 REMARKS: NE = GROUNDWATER NOT ENCOUNTERED DATE OF READING: 1 2/22/94 DRILLED BY: U.E.S. ORL: N00 EST. W.S.W.T. (f1): TYPE OF SAMPLING: ASTM 0-145-' S S A BLOWS N Y D(FTH P PER 6' BLOWS/ W.T. B DESCRIFTION L INCREMENT FT.) 0 E L 0 Gray . brown fine SAND (SPJ BORING TERMINATED AT 5.0' 10 1 ATTERBERG 200 MC K 0RG:.r::C lIM1T5 IFT./ CONTEE:;- 1%) I%1 ll PI DAY) V, UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES PROJECT NO.: 17324•012.01 BORING LOG REPORT NO.: 44680 PAGE: 13-2.7 PROJECT: CHINA COAST RESTAURANT SEMINOLE TOWN CENTER SANFORD. FLORIDA CLIENT: GENERAL MILLS RESTURANTS. INC. LOCATION: SEE BORING LOCATION PLAN REMARKS: NE = GROUNDWATER NOT ENCOUNTERED BORING DESIGNATION: AB-1 SHEET: 1 of 1 SECTION: TOWNSHIP: 19S RANGE: 30E G.S. ELEVATION (tt): DATE STARTED: 1 2/22/94 WATER TABLE (tt): NE DATE FINISHED: 12/22/94 DATE OF READING: 1 2122/94 DRILLED BY: U.E.S. ORLAN00 EST. W.S.W.T. (tt): TYPE OF SAMPLING: ASTM D-1452 S S A BLOWS N DEPTH P PER 6' BLOWS/ W.T. M B DESCRIPTION FT.) L INCREMENT FT.) 0 E L 0 Gray - brown fine SAND (SPI BORING TERNIINATED AT 5.0' 10 15 20 i i 25. 30 3 5 J............................................................................................................................................................ I 40 45 j . ... I ATTERBERG K ORGANIC 200 MC LIMITS I%1 M IFT./ CONT'c::- LL I PI DAY) °ri 50 i...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ! .. ... . In PROJECT NO.: 1732a-OI2-Ot UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES PROJECT REPORT NO 44324680 BORING LOG PAGE: B 2.6 PROJECT: CHINA COAST RESTAURANT SEMINOLE TOWN CENTER SANFORD. FLORIDA CLIENT: GENERAL MILLS RESTURANTS, INC. LOCATION: SEE BORING LOCATION PLAN REMARKS: NE = GROUNDWATER NOT ENCOUNTERED BORING DESIGNATION: B-6 SHEET: 1 Of 1 SECTION: TOWNSHIP: 19S RANGE: 30E G.S. ELEVATION (RI: DATE STARTED: 12/22/94 WATER TABLE Ift): NE DATE FINISHED: 12/22/94 DATE OF READING: 1 2/22/94 DRILLED BY: U.E.S. ORLAr100 EST. W.S.W.T. (h): 6.0 TYPE OF SAMPLING: ASTM D-i5B6 S S DEPTH M BLOWS N M ATTERBERG K ORGAr1 C PER 6" (BLOWS/ W.T. DESCRIPTION 200 MC LIMITS (FT./ COr1TE':' FT.) INCREMENT FT.) O DAY( % E L LL PI Loose light yellow - brown fine SAND (SPI 2-2-3 5 2-2-1 3 very loose, brown medium densei S: 2-&-& ...... 1.4................ 2 Medium dense brown clayey SAND (SCI 1 12-20-21 41 dense V very dense 20-30-46 76 Very dense gray - brown fine SAND (SPI 30-34-37 71 10 BORING TERMINATED AT 10.0' 15 20 25 30 35 AA.... UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES PROJECT NO.: 17324.012.01 BORING LOG REPORT NO.: 44680 PAGE: B-2.5 PROJECT: CHINA COAST RESTAURANT SEMINOLE TOWN CENTER SANFORD, FLORIDA CLIENT: GENERAL MILLS RESTURANTS, INC. LOCATION: SEE BORING LOCATION PLAN REMARKS: NE = GROUNDWATER NOT ENCOUNTERED BORING DESIGNATION: B-5 SHEET: 1 of 1 SECTION: TOWNSHIP: 19S RANGE: 30E G.S. ELEVATION (ft): DATE STARTED: 12/22/94 WATER TABLE (ft): NE DATE FINISHED: 12/22/94 DATE OF READING: 1 2/22194 DRILLED BY: U.E.S. ORLANCC EST. W.S.W.T. (ft): 3.0 TYPE OF SAMPLING: ASTM 0.1586 S S A BLOWS N Y ATTERSERG K ORGANICDEPTHMM -200 MC LIMITS FT.) P PER 6- (BLOWS/ W.T. B DESCRIPTION ( aro1 (451 ( FT./ CONTENT L INCREMENT FT.) 0 LL PI DAY) °h E L 0 Medium dense gray - brown fine SAND [SPI 4.6-8 14 C7 Very dense gray - brown fine SAND; with16-20-35 55 5 45.45-45.. 90..... clay (SPI 34-50-100 45-45-45 150 90 gray - brown - red Very dense gray - brown fine SAND (SPI 10 35-45-50 95 BORING TERMINATED AT 10.0' 1 20 2 30 3 5 1 t 732s•O t 2.O 1TNO UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES PROJECT REPORT NO 44680 BORING LOG PROJECT: CHINA COAST RESTAURANT SEMINOLE TOWN CENTER SANFORD. FLORIDA CLIENT: GENERAL MILLS RESTURANTS, INC. LOCATION: SEE BORING LOCATION PLAN REMARKS: NE = GROUNDWATER NOT ENCOUNTERED PAGE: 6.2.4 BORING DESIGNATION: B-4 SHEET: 1 01t SECTION: TOWNSHIP: 19S RANGE: 30E G.S. ELEVATION (ft): DATE STARTED: 1 2/22/94 WATER TABLE (ft): NE DATE FINISHED: 12/22/94 DATE OF READING: 1 2/22194 DRILLED BY: U.E.S. ORLANC, EST. W.S.W.T. (ft): 3.0 TYPE OF SAMPLING: ASTM O.1S35 S S D(FTH A BLOWS N Y PER 6- BLOWS/ W.T. B OESCRIPTION L INCREMENT FT.) 0 E L 0 Loose gray - brown fine SAND (SPI 2.5.5 10 c7 A. 7-14.25 39 dense, gray . brown 5 18-2-2.26 . 48..... Very dense brown fine SAND; with clay (SPI TI 23-43.45 88 i Very dense gray - brown 'ine SAND (SPI 40.60.75 135 red brown I;•` 50:55.80 135 10 I i Medium dense brown fine SAND ISPI 7-8-7 1.....5 I BORING TERMINATED A-- 15.0' i i 20 _ i i 25 i I 1 I ii I................................................ ATTERBERG K ORGAIz 200 MC LIMITS ( FT./ CONT=N 1%) 11 LL 1 PI DAY) 55 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES PROJECT NO.: 17321-012-01 ! ID REPORT NO.: 44680 ! BORING LOG PAGE: 8 2. 3 j PROJECT: CHINA COAST RESTAURANT BORING DESIGNATION: B-3 SHEET: 1 of I SEMINOLE TOWN CENTER SECTION: TOWNSHIP: 19S RANGE: 30E SANFORD. FLORIDA CLIENT: GENERAL MILLS RESTURANTS, INC. G.S. ELEVATION (ft): DATE STARTED: 12/22/94 LOCATION: SEE BORING LOCATION PLAN WATER TABLE Ihl: NE GATE FINISHED: 1 2/2219s RE`IARKS: NE = GROUNDWATER NOT ENCOUNTERED DATE OF READING: 12/22/94 DRILLED BY: U.E.S. ORLANCC, EST. W.S. W.T. (h): 3.0 TYPE OF SAMPLING: ASTM 0-1585 S S A BLOWS N Y ATTERBERG K ORGANIC 200 MC LIMITS F7.)DEPTH P PER 6- (BLOWS/ W.T. B DESCRIPTION (F ./ CON76': L INCREMENT FT.) 0 (51 (1 DAY) °o E L LL PI 50 = . ................... ............... . UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES PROJECT NO.: 17324.012.01 BORING LOG REPORT NO.: 44680 PAGE: 8.2.2 PROJECT: CHINA COAST RESTAURANT SEMINOLE TOWN CENTER SANFORD, FLORIDA CLIENT: GENERAL MILLS RESTURANTS. INC. LOCATION: SEE BORING LOCATION PLAN REMARKS: NE = GROUNDWATER NOT ENCOUNTERED I I BORING DESIGNATION: B-2 SHEET: 1 Of I SECTION: TOWNSHIP: 19S RANGE: 30E G.S. ELEVATION (tt): DATE STARTED: 1 2/22/94 WATER TABLE (h): NE DATE FINISHED: 12/22/94 DATE OF READING: 1 2/22/94 DRILLED BY: U.E.S. ORLAUCO EST. W.S.W.T. (ft): 4.0 TYPE OF SAMPLING: ASTM D•1586 DEPTH FT.) S A M L E BLOWS PER 6' INCREMENT N BLOWS/ FT.) W.T. S Y M 0 L DESCRIPI•ION 200 MC ATTERBERG LIMITS K FT./ DAY) ORGANIC CONTEi•IT LL PI Loose light brown fine SAND (SPI ll i\ 3-4-2 6 3 2-1-2 3 very loose gray - brovin X fa.y..'(SP(............. Medium dense gray • brown fine SAND; with51.2.}.3-.1.6........2g 13-18-18 36 Dense gray - brown fine SAND (SPI 10 1X 33 33-40 25-40-41 73 81 ............................................................................................................................................. very dense 8 Very dense red - brown fine SAND; with silt S? Medium dense gray • brovrn fine SAND (SPI 15 9-10-10.........2 0 BORING T RIMINATED AT 15.0' 20—j II 25 30 3 40 45 1 i I 50 _ I.. I.. ... ......... I......... UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES PROJECT NO.: 17324•012-01 BORING LOG REPORT NO.: 44680 PAGE: B•2.1 PROJECT: CHINA COAST RESTAURANT BORING DESIGNATION: B-1 SHEET: 1 of 1 SEEMINOLE TOWN CENTER SECTION: TOWNSHIP: 19S RANGE: 30E SANFORD. FLORIDA f CLIENT: GENERAL MILLS RESTURANTS, INC. G.S. ELEVATION (ft): DATE STARTED: 12/22/94 I LOCATION: SEE BORING LOCATION PLAN WATER TABLE (ft): NE DATE FINISHED: 1 2122194 REMARKS: NE = GROUNDWATER NOT ENCOUNTERED DATE OF READING: 12!22194 DRILLED BY: U.E.S. ORLAN__ I EST. W.S.W.T. (ft): 4.0 TYPE OF SAMPLING: ASTM D•1SSe 5 S A BLOWS N Y ATTERBERG K ORGA2ID= DEPTH M M 200 MC LIMITS P PER 6' (GLOWS/ W.T. B DESCRI?TION c ( FT./ CONTENT L IN FT.) 0 (, 5) () LL PI DAY) Yo E L Loose gray fine SAND ISPI JA 5.4.5 9 .'. I 1-2-7 9 Z ' --brown - dark brown 5 — i1...1 521 2.t........q z................Dense brown fine SANG; with clay ISPI j very dense, brown - gray j 21- 22-43 65 29. 49.48 97 Very dense red - brown fine SAND; with silt I ISPI 10 l 23-45.45 90 ' . ' . Medium dense gray - brown fine SAND (SPI 8:. 9.:9............. BORING TERMINATED AT 15.0' 20 ...................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................... .. ... . JI 251 l. 40 i 45 I 5 p - I UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES SYMBOLS Number of Blows of a 1404b Weight Faipng SO in. Required to Drive Standard Spoon Or» Fad Weight of Drill Rods S Thin -Wall Shelby Tube UndisWrbed Sampler Used 90% Percent Core Recovery from Rock Rec. Core -Drilling Operations Sample Taken at this Level Sample Not Taken at this Level Change In Soil Strata Free Ground Water Level Seasonal High Ground Water Level RELATIVE DENSITY sand -silt) Very Loose - Less Than 4 Blows/Ft. Loose - 4 - 10 Blows/Ft. Medium - 10 to 30 Blows/Ft. Dense - 30 to 50 Blows/Ft. Very Dense - More Than 50 Blows/Ft. CONSISTENCY clay) Very Soft - Less Than 2 Blows/Ft. Soft - 2 to 4 Blows/Ft. Medium - 4 to 8 Blows/Ft. Stiff - 8 to 15 Blows/Ft. Very Stiff - 15 to 30 Blows/Ft. Hard - More Than 30 Blows/Ft. KEY TO BORING LOGS UNiFIED CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM a,au. MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOLS rMICALNAME9 Q IS • q y Z pr S U ¢ C5 GW Well -graded gravels and gravel -sand mbakans. little or no fines GP Poorly graded gravels and gnavet4ard mixtures, little or no fines is=S C CCwOZ x to w Q GM Silty gravels, grawF-nerd-silt madras GC Clayey gravels, grave"andday mixtures Q O Y V C y O Z cis SW WalFgrnded sands and gravelly sands, little or no tines SP Poorly graded sands and gravelly cards, little or no fines y, SM Silty sands, sand -sift mixtures SC Clayey sands, sand -day mixtures T MIL Inorganic slits, very tiro sends, rock flour, silty or clayey fire sands CL Inorganic days of low to medium plasticity. gravelly days, candy days. silty days, lean days s Q a r- OL Organic sifts and organic silty days of CwZ low plasticity MH Inorganic slits, mlce000ks or a diatomeoeous fine sends or sifts, elastic silks CH Inorganic days or high ftlastlaty, fat 7j< r days OH Organic days of medium to hight7S plasticity Highly Orparrie Soils PT Peal muck and other Idghy organic sills 13r•! on the maserW gating the Sin (75,nm) sieve. PLASTICITY CHART q0 40 20I50741 WNEEN 0 10 18 20 30 40 50 8o 70 80 90 100 1100 UOND Lmff 01) B - 3 I Project No. 17324-012-01 Report No. 44680 DESCRIPTION OF LABORATORY TESTING PROCEDURES WASH 200 TEST The Wash 200 test is performed by passing a representative soil sample over a No. 200 sieve and rinsing with water. The percentage of the soil grains passing this sieve is then calculated. B - 4 r- APPENDIX C IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT More construction problems are caused by site subsur- face conditions than any other factor. As troublesome as subsurface problems can be, their frequency and extent have been lessened considerably in recent years. due in large measure to programs and publications of ASFE/ The Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in the Geosciences. The following suggestions and observations are offered to help you reduce the geotechnical-related delays, cost -overruns and other costly headaches that can occur during a construction project. A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT IS BASED ON A UNIQUE SET OF PROJECT -SPECIFIC FACTORS A geotechnical engineering report is based on a subsur- face exploration plan designed to incorporate a unique set of project -specific factors. These typically include: the general nature of the structure involved, its size and configuration; the location of the structure on the site and its orientation; physical concomitants such as access roads. parking lots, and underground utilities, and the level of additional risk which the client assumed by virtue of limitations imposed upon the exploratory program. To help avoid costly problems, consult the geotechnical engineer to determine how any factors which change subsequent to the date of the_report may affect its recommendations. Unless your consulting geotechnical engineer indicates otherwise, your geotechnical engineering report should not be used: When the nature of the proposed structure is changed. for example, if an office building will be erected instead of a parking garage, or if a refriger- ated warehouse will be built instead of an unre- frigerated one: when the size or configuration of the proposed structure is altered: when the location or orientation of the proposed structure is modified; when there is a change of ownership, or for application to an adjacent site. Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility for problems which may develop if they are not consulted after factors consid- ered in their report's development have changed. MOST GEOTECHNICAL "FINDINGS" ARE PROFESSIONAL ESTIMATES Site exploration identifies actual subsurface conditions only at those points where samples are taken, when they are taken. Data derived through sampling and sub- sequent laboratory testing are extrapolated by geo- technical engineers who then render an opinion about overall subsurface conditions. their likely reaction to proposed construction activity, and appropriate founda- tion design. Even under optimal circumstances actual conditions may differ from those inferred to exist. because no geotechnical engineer, no matter how qualified. and no subsurface exploration program, no matter how comprehensive, can reveal what is hidden by earth, rock and time. The actual interface between mate- rials may be far more gradual or abrupt than a report indicates. Actual conditions in areas not sampled may differ from predictions. Nothing can be done to prevent the unanticipated. but steps can be taken to help minimize their impact. For this reason, most experienced owners retain their geotechnical consultants through the construction stage, to iden- tify variances. conduct additional tests which may be needed, and to recommend solutions to -problems encountered on site. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS CAN CHANGE Subsurface conditions may be modified by constantly - changing natural forces. Because a geotechnical engi- neering report is teased on conditions which existed at the time of subsurface exploration, construction decisions should not be based on a geotechnical engineering report whose adequacy may have been affected by time. Speak with the geo- technical consuluint to learn if additional tests are advisable before construction starts. Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and natural events such as floods, earthquakes or ground- water fluctuations may also affect subsurface conditions and, thus, the continuing adequacy of a geotechnical report. The geotechnical engineer should be kept apprised of any such events, and should be consulted to determine if additional tests are necessary. GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES AND PERSONS Geotechnical engineers' reports are prepared to meet the specific needs of specific individuals. A report pre- pared for a consulting civil engineer may not be ade- quate for a construction contractor, or even some other consulting civil engineer. Unless indicated otherwise. this report was prepared expressly for the client involved and expressly for purposes indicated by the client. Use by any other persons for any purpose, or by the client for a different purpose, may result in problems. No indi- vidual other than the client should apply this report for its intended purpose without first conferring with the geotechnical engineer. No person should apply this report for any purpose other than that originally contemplated without first conferring with the geotechnical engineer. C-1 A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT IS SUBJECT TO MISINTERPRETATION Costly problems can occur when other design profes- sionals develop their plans based on misinterpretations of a geotechnical engineering report. To help avoid these problems, the geotechnical engineer should be retained to work with other appropriate design profes- sionals to explain relevant geotechnical findings and to review the adequacy of their plans and specifications relative to geotechnical issues. BORING LOGS SHOULD NOT BE SEPARATED FROM THE ENGINEERING REPORT Final boring logs are developed by geotechnical engi- neers based upon their interpretation of field logs assembled by site personnel) and laboratory evaluation of field samples. Only final boring logs customarily are included in geotechnical engineering reports. These logs should not under any circumstances be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings. because drafters may commit errors or omissions in the transfer process. Although photographic reproduction eliminates this problem, it does nothing to minimize the possibility of contractors misinterpreting the logs during bid prepara- tion. When this occurs, delays. disputes and unantici- pated costs are the all -too -frequent result. To minimize the likelihood of boring log misinterpreta- tion, give contractors ready access to the complete geotechnical engineering report prepared or authorized for their use. Those who do not provide such access may proceed un- der the mistaken impression that simply disclaiming re- sponsibility for the accuracy of subsurface information always insulates them from attendant liability. Providing the best available information to contractors helps pre- vent costly construction problems and the adversarial attitudes which aggravate them to disproportionate scale. READ RESPONSIBILITY CLAUSES CLOSELY Because geotechnical engineering is based extensively on judgment and opinion, it is far less exact than other design disciplines. This situation has resulted in wholly unwarranted claims being lodged against geotechnical consultants. To help prevent this problem, geotechnical engineers have developed model clauses for use in writ- ten transmittals. These are not exculpatory clauses designed to foist geotechnical engineers' liabilities onto someone else. Rather, they are definitive clauses which identify where geotechnical engineers' responsibilities begin and end. Their use helps all parties involved rec- ognize their individual responsibilities and take appro- priate action. Some of these definitive clauses are likely to appear in your geotechnical engineering report. and you are encouraged to read them closely. Your geo- technical engineer will be pleased to give full and frank answers to your questions. OTHER STEPS YOU CAN TAKE TO REDUCE RISK Your consulting geotechnical engineer will be pleased to discuss other techniques which can be employed to mit- igate risk. In addition, ASFE has developed a variety of materials which may be beneficial. Contact ASFE for a complimentary copy of its publications directory. Published by THE ASSOCIATION OF ENGINEERING FIRMS t RACTICING IN THE GEOSCIENCES 8811 Colesville Road/Suite G 106/Silver Spring, Maryland 20910/(301) 565-2733 8PCRP?03895M/RP2MD 190 I Project No. 17324-012-01 Report No. 44680 CONSTRAINTS AND RESTRICTIONS WARRANTY Universal Engineering Sciences has prepared this report for our client for his exclusive use, in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practices, and makes no other warranty either expressed or implied as to the professional advice provided in the report. UNANTICIPATED SOIL CONDITIONS The analysis and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from soil borings performed at the locations indicated on the Boring Location Plan. This report does not reflect any variations which may occur between these borings. The nature and extent of variations between borings may not become known until excavation begins. If variations appear, we may have to re-evaluate our recommendations after performing on -site observations and noting the characteristics of any variations. CHANGED CONDITIONS We recommend that the specifications for the project require that the contractor immediately notify Universal Engineering Sciences, as well as the owner, when subsurface conditions are 1_. encountered that are different from those prE:sent in this report. No claim by the contractor for any conditions differing from those anticipated in the plans, specifications, and those found in this report, should be allowed unless the contractor notifies the owner and Universal Engineering Sciences of such changed conditions. Further, we recommend that all foundation work and site improvements be observed by a representative of Universal Engineering Sciences to monitor field conditions and changes, to verify design assumptions and to evaluate and recommend any appropriate modifications to this report. MISINTERPRETATION OF SOIL ENGINEERING REPORT Universal Engineering Sciences is responsible for the conclusions and opinions contained within this report based upon the data relating only to the specific project and location discussed herein. If the conclusions or recommendations based upon the data presented are made by others, those conclusions or recommendations are not the responsibility of Universal Engineering Sciences. C - 2 r- I Project No. 17324-012-01 Report No. 44680 CHANGED STRUCTURE OR LOCATION This report was prepared in order to aid in the evaluation of this project and to assist the architect or engineer in the design of this project. If any changes in the design or location of the structure as outlined in this report are planned, or if any structures are included or added that are not discussed in the report, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed and the conclusions modified or approved by Universal Engineering Sciences. USE OF REPORT BY BIDDERS Bidders who are examining the report prior to submission of a bid are cautioned that this report was prepared as an aid to the designers of the project and it may affect actual construction operations. Bidders are urged to make their own soil borings, test pits, test caissons or other investigations to determine those conditions that may affect construction operations. Universal Engineering Sciences cannot be responsible for any interpretations made from this report or the attached boring logs with regard to their adequacy in reflecting subsurface conditions which will affect construction operations. STRATA CHANGES Strata changes are indicated by a definite line on the boring logs which accompany this report. However, the actual change in the ground may be more gradual. Where changes occur between soil samples, the location of the change must necessarily be estimated using all available information and may not be shown at the exact depth. OBSERVATIONS DURING DRILLING Attempts are made to detect and/or identify occurrences during drilling and sampling, such as: water level, boulders, zones of lost circulation, relative ease or resistance to drilling progress, unusual sample recovery, variation of driving resistance, obstructions, etc.; however, lack of mention does not preclude their presence. WATER LEVELS Water level readings have been made in the drill holes during drilling and they indicate normally occurring conditions. Water levels may not have been stabilized at the last reading. This data has been reviewed and interpretations made in this report. However, it must be noted that fluctuations in the level of the groundwater may occur due to variations in rainfall, C - 3 Project No. 17324-012-01 Report No. 44680 temperature, tides, and other factors not evident at the time measurements were made and reported. Since the probability of such variations is anticipated, design drawings and specifications should accommodate such possibilities and construction planning should be based upon such assumptions of variations. LOCATION OF BURIED OBJECTS All users of this report are cautioned that there was no requirement for Universal Engineering Sciences to attempt to locate any man-made buried objects during the course of this exploration and that no attempt was made by Universal Engineering Sciences to locate any such buried objects. Universal Engineering Sciences cannot be responsible for any buried man-made objects which are subsequently encountered during construction that are not discussed within the text of this report. TIME This report reflects the soil conditions at the time of investigation. If the report is not used in a reasonable amount of time, significant changes to the site may occur and additional reviews may be required. C:-4 L KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, INC. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS PROJECT: RED LOBSTER SANFORD, FLORIDA JOB#: 95283 CRITERIA: UNIFORM AND/OR LOCAL BLDG. CODE, LATEST EDITION. MATERIALS: EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED HEREIN CONCRETE: 2,500 PSI AT 28 DAYS. CONCRETE BLOCK: GRADE N, LT. WT. UNITS, ASTM C-90. REINFORCED STEEL: 20,000 PSI (ASTM A615, GRADE 60). STRUCTURAL STEEL: 24,000 PSI (COMPACT) (ASTM A-36). STRUCTURAL PIPE: 22,000 PSI (ASTM A-53, GRADE "B"). PLYWOOD SHEATHING: DOUGLAS FIR, STRUCTURAL 1, P.S. 1-88. GLUED LAM. BEAMS: 2,400 PSI (D.F. COMB. "24F"). LUMBER: GRADE MARKED D.F. PER W.C.L.B. GRDG. RULE 16. SOIL PRESSURE: SEE FOUNDATION PLAN FOR COMPLETE DATA. DESIGN REFERENCES: INCLUDING CHARTS AND TABLES FROM: LUMBER & TIMBER: WOOD STRUCTURAL DESIGN DATA (VOLUME 1), NATIONAL LUMBER MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION STEEL: MANUAL OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION, AISC. CONCRETE BLOCK: CONCRETE MASONRY DESIGN MANUAL, CONCRETE MASONRY ASSOCIATION CONCRETE: ACI DESIGN HANDBOOK dl / j- BY: DATE.. 14084 YORBA STREET - TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 - (714) 838-4960 0 KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, INC. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS b L 9 E??gT p-,- r2-. - f or Lo, Ps rLYw , D NI.sG.C. •Q V.k Morr-:L-- " 2, o rL>ro iq 0 li Li PsF M81 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 • (714) 8384960 SHEET-j oE 13 JOB S253 BY L KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, INC. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SHEET 2- JOB 9s?83 BY ICZ- pt—1 P Z- a0c, 0l n 64 gc, _ Q o o MH I O O cnow 0 O O O V nI e o o rv) > b 0 7 o c4 r eoa o ; Q m I cti 9 m tv o rt1co nvsr C' C1' .a Q KEY PLAN1 N. T r. 07JL0-7_]L OB ars 14081 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 • (714) 838-4960 KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, INC. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 14081 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 - TUSTIN, CAUFORNIA 92680 • (714) 838-4960 SHEET JOB S2 8S BY Ifjy-3q-T,SCD?: KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, INC. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SGk (3•I< IZ.}k 4.-I 1 2 k I.vS = 300.7 SHEET 4' JOB BY 3R ; k' R = qs4' I " 4'-- O, Z3 o, PA i y . , d z lr 8 rt I - ¢• SI ' F 3 3 3 T ^ 3Ikf 9- 2. M81 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 • (714) 038-4960 E 6icle;> S%g x 24 y 1'r> <1v KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, INC. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SHEET 151 JOB gs2U Im 37 3 i oezic Vim- 3 7 I• o S` 3 / Pi Z ors . S = , _ • 02 S I.g K •3 02 3- zx 14081 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 • (714) 838.4960 KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, INC. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS I ¢ z-f •S IS I 22.5 SHEET JOB S2$3 BY t T 04 3-axe w-pi-*' S=31rlk3 Z.%. 17 V¢ 14081 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 • (714) 838-4960 k df-'x'/0 4-x/lro 44 SHEETKENOKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, INC. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS JOB 9S2E3 BY GOI u r l its = r2- = 12.3 H 13 6 le G POST P 7 = I1 I` N S o Pal T Pei X l 1 3 f rA kv' 14081 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 • (714) 638-4960 KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES,INC. STRUCTURAL ENCINEERS 14081 YORBA ST., SUITE 105, TUSTIN. CA. 92680 714) 838-4960 SHEET t JOB J S 2453 SHEAR WALL SCHEDULE MARK ALLOW. SHEATHING AND NAILING ANCHOR BOLTS SILL Pl. NAILING REMARKS SHEAR AT UPPER STORIES AtL264 WT. 3/8' CDX PLYWOOD (BLOCK ALL EDGES) V/ 6d COMMON NAILS t 6' E.N..t 12' FN. 1/2'e A.B. t 2'-9' OR 16d t 6' O.C. OR 5/8'e A.B. t 3'-9' 20d t 8' 3/8' CDX PLYWOOD (BLOCK ALL EDGES) 1/2'e A.B. t I-10' 16d t 4' 384 M/FT. V/ 8d COMMON NAILS t 4' E.N. t 12' FN. DR OR S/B'e A.B. t 2'-7' 20d t 5' 3/8' CDX PLYWOOD (BLOCK ALL EDGES) 1/2'e A.B. t 1'-5' 16d t 3 1/2' O 492 t/FT. V/ 6d COMMON NAILS t 3' EX, t 12' FN. OR OR 5/8'e A.B. t 2'-C' 20d t 4' 3/8' STRUCT. I PLYWOOD (BLOCK ALL EDGES) 1/2'e A.B. t V-3' 16d t 3' U. O 552 B/FT. W/ 8d COMMON NAILS t 3' EX t 12' FN. OR OR 5/81 A.B. t 1'-9' 20d t 4' 3/8' CDX PLYWOOD (BLK. ALL EDGES) 1/2'e A.B. t 1'-1' 16d t 2 1/2' O 636 WT. V/ 8d COMMON NAILS t 2' EN. t 12' Fat OR OR USE 3x FRAMING MEMBERS. 5/8'e A.B. t 1'-6' 20d t 3 1/2' 3/8' CDX PLYVD. BOTH SIDES (BLK ALL EDGES) 1/2'e A.B. t 11' 16d t 2' O 768 B/FT. V/ 8d COMMON NAILS t 4'E.N., t 12'FN. OR DR USE OFFSET PANEL JOINT OR 3X STUD Al JOINT 5/8'e A.B. t V-3' 20d t 3' 8' CDX PLYWOOD BOTH SIDES (BLK ALL EDGES) 5/8'e X 7' LAGO984B/FT V1 8d COMMON NAILS t3' EN, 121N. 5/8'e aB. t V-D' BOLTS t le D.C. USE OFFSET PANEL .DINT DR 3X STUD AT JOINT 3/8' CDX PLYWOOD BOTH SIDES (BLK ALL MS) 5/8'e A.B. t 9' 5/8'e X 7' LAGO1272 $/FT V/ 8d COMMON NAILS t 2' EX, 12'FN. DR BOLTS t 9' D.C. USE 3x FRAMING MEMBERS. 3/4'e &B. t 1'-l' 8' STR. I PLYWOOD BOTH SIDES (BLK ALL. 5/8'e X 7' LAGO464I/FT. DGES) V/ 8d COMMON NAILS t 2' EX t 12' FN. 3/4•0 A.B. t 1'-0' BOLTS t 8' D.C. SE 3x FRAMING MEMBERS. 1/8' PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER OVER VOVEN 1/2•0 A.B. t 4'-C' O 180 B/FT' R VELDED VIRE LATH V/11 GA. X 1 1/2' LONG 16d t B' D.C. 7/16' a HEAD NAILS (OR 16 GA. STAPLES X 7/8' ONG LEGS) t 6' O.C. 5/8'e A.B. t S'-6' O O O o KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, INC. T R QL N NINV STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SHEET JOB q S2 ol m H' Qf 'airLw7 L_K= 1i Zzq-e' le.67--7)•ZGIAj/ X Ictci s-rp. cv>,F-- IG r'r wl 91 /53 Ar1rurtit-JTr) vEi rrrr IijT. Zouc Sw ?.oWr rF.e'l,cF PI St{pr• Er-. pr.crf,casF;'. J£ PAriuR ./- TIFTf Rt'bNF PrGf f7Rif 12r 1. 2.5.1 o4z 'bpi, Xof > 4.% v C 7.1- 2-'7 3 p 'PF V. r'I-Z IJF (Y) 2 X = 12 ` o-rv. ,< = I zl E—tgr-u!iF UPL.1in F16. Iz°S.7P Gc-- z•4 1 3 qv Vrt ITT 21 Sf>< 1.3; - 2.3. r F U -1.4Iy -I.IS WE-T VYt IFT c 4 fl-AT 1 2 %.7_ I t= 1.7 rr' JET - JZorIPL Far 1 bK 21 : 37.6- 17 Pff FIG. I'S•: E) 14081 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 - TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 - (714) 838-4960 KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, INC. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS L ATE(2AL SHEET Io JOB 1752'b3 BY e F L z Iuti9 I q•e 2 I VFW Guo Cf) L I ?l99 ,r 100, 7 _ `3 y1 9l_ 2 '3 #.? 3 + t i 3 3 7) . L ` 2 r 4130 # VN ALL G/ Zzyq sI + $ 7(.312 - 1127-r I_-7 s 19 All 44, 119.C-7r IG a x 1 r (a U/ 4116191CJ OTr'1 SG. s , 3 9 'S r , i qI 317 f2 7&3 261 IL ts e'.4 V3 11-73 tI I 1 1 oo s nG L{f3 t r6s r Jyo 1'1,: P 39.'77 gg9a y cy 17736 L6 S 1(, cµolz _ Z g961 = 147 I 14081 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 • (714) 838-4960 Ear fH e''rr.7 pLYwr l o d L-V o,, 12p Mmzt'e' 791 4b 2A 0 Pz A I(z) —M I I4t, KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, INC. SHEET STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS JOB LATE-(7AL_ BY 6> L wA LI 3' . U S 1-3730 -t 11I a R r1 > 3 x. (.s x I B+ I e.G-? Y- * Tl. M r «t U 4r) 2 A CAWCPY C(,sT G x f x I.E ` o3 /.L) T'ITl — 2 cL-ft/ p iT PIT ii FV_ IGIro li/S 2I' PiFIED fir1rj4l. eel. 5A1.- f- r6 aTrj : 20L-xcf,f, joy. IE"TrtK (v: ZZGSA rI3 22 SX1.r 3397 of L 3 R M -`'7 1-1 , 3 It-1919 - Q, fo v 771 V) F 3 ,( 3,c 0.6r 14081 YORSA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 • (714) 838-4960 KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, INC. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SHEET 1? JOB 783 BY I re7L) H i2,,<Tl 0 t4 (<---f - 'g000 PfF @ 10"*VP. ) le 4:1 13 A F air. F-1"6, 2 0 F7w 30 1, Mc- 14081 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 926M • (714) 8384960 KEN OKAMOTO & ASSOCIATES, INC. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS SHEET 13 JOB Is2% BY Vy— <13--1.6)6'= 7t 3 3.5 . 21 T46-2-13;,s x 5,5 7 44 LA^ v. 14081 YORBA STREET, SUITE 105 • TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 • (714) 838-4960 A U G - 9 5 4 F FK 1 1 c- f- rl ID E N G I N E E R I N (-- P. ID2. a .. ••- ....__ ... •.-cr",.i .-. i-ti' -_ ""'r: ` .. - ;ice-n .. 'Yi':::- - _ FLORIDA ENERGY EFFICIENCY CODE FOR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CHAPTER $ • SIMPLIFIED ANNUAL ENERGY METHOD FORM 801) A-93 ADMINISTERED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS Non-Resldentlal Bulldings ALL CLIMATE ZONES PROJECT NAME S ZONE: 5 AGGRESS: BUILDING CLASS[ FICATION S CITY ZIP CODE: 5^PJA0A'Q BUILDING PERMIT NO.: BUILDER: PERMITTING OFFICE: n OWNER' pb JURISDICTION NO-, BUILDING INFORMATION i WALLS ROOFICEILING _FLOORS DOORS _ GLAS TYPE U AREA TYPE U AREA TYPE ... U AREA TYPE U AREA TYPE U I AREA Conciale (CBS) Under alit: '05 -776 Slabon-grade ' 7S Wood Single. wart (.l3 Wood Irame -7- S nglo As_ombty Raised Wocd Metal Double. wall Wall frame Other: Reimed concrete Insulated Single, roof Insuiat on R•vilue Insulation R•yalue j Insulation A -value Otr,er Oocble, root SYSTEMS INFORMATION AIR CONDITIONER HEATING SYSTEM WATER TYPE EFFICIENCY TONS TYPE EFFICIENCY BTUIH TYPE V^Iiary S Moat Pump 1-12• Contra) a H03t Pump Electric 45.0008twh SEER LD•0 EER I, 6_00C Slvrn „Spf Resisunce Ded• Heat Purrp ad5.0xrerur 1PL S 65,0m 8lulh COP GasWaterCooleda_ , rPLV water cooled _.-- COP Na!ural LK Evapc+utvWY Ceol,rd Flip Evaperativoly =led -- COP LPG PTAC EEA Electric resistance COP of Cm.9orf COP !- IPLV ...... GasrOd (circle are) HRU 2a5.000r3000S0eltuln AFUE Z 225.0001300.0091ulm EtLIGHTINGKW: Duct R-value: 4.2 PRESCRIPTIVE MEASURES (Must be met or exceeded by all buildings.) COMPONENTS SECTION r REQUIREMENTS CHECK Windows 602.4 Maximum of .37 cfm per iinoar fool of operable sash crack. Doors 502.4 Maximum of 1.25 Om poi square foot of door oraa. Joints/Cracks 502.4 To be cautkod, gasketod, wowhorctripped,5r othorrrico soaiod. Reheat 503.3 Supply air restrictod to sot coldthot dock lomper31two to moot bad of worst caso :one. Rosistamo reheat prohibited. rN A Vontilation 03.4 Suppllod with readily accessible ;witch 'or shut -Ott an6or volwre reduction whom vontitation is not roquirod. HVAC .fficioncy 503.4 Minimum of icioncles•Heating: Tables 5-4. 5.5 a 5.6. Cooling: Tablas 5.7A, 5.78, 5-8 3 5.9 Transport Enorgy 503.5 Minimum of 8.0. _ 6alanon 503.3 Provide means for balancing HVAC air systom 6 water distribution system. _ HVAC SAnttots 03.7 Swarms readily accessible manual or avlomafle thermostat for each .system. HVAC Ducts 503.8 Air ducts, Alongs, mec•lianical equlpmont and plonum chambers shall bo mochanicaily attached, sealed, 03.4 insulated and Inslallod in 3ccord3nco with tha critoria of sections 503.0, 533.9 and 503.10. 503.10 Piping lnsuta:ion 503.11 In accordanco with Tab'o 5.10. Wa:er Hitalerti 504.2 Automatic 01OC71C StOrago water h0a:er7 s 15:0 gallams and gas d od•firod storage wator heatora S 75,C00 On^ span moot porformanoo minimums in Tablet S-11. Elocvk > 120 gallons: standby loss < .30.27Nr. Gas a 7S,000, 013, 105,000: E.70, Standby loss 1.30 + 1 l4NL Goa, oil a ISS'000: E1,78, standby loss Y,30 - Mr. Spas 8 heated pools m,.st havo covers. Nen•ecmmoreial pools must have pump limor, Swimming Pools 504.2 r4AfsSpasGasspa6poolhoatersmusthavominlmurnthermalotflcioncyof78%. Hot Waver Pipe 504.4 Piping host foss Is limitod to t 7.5 Btu.'h lineartoot of pipt for recirculating Systems (sae Table 5.12). Insulation Water Fixtures 504.5 Wator Row restricted to maximum of 3 gpm at 80 psig: toilets maximum 3.5 gallon flush. Public lavatory fixture maximum flow of .5 gpm er .5 g3non if has solf•closing valve. Lighting 505.1 Minimum Ballast Efficacy Factors are listed In Table 5-14. CHAPTER 8 COMPLIANCE: i Nrepy cotity rhohte pIN ton: cavrroa oywean uo in COM06an40 Bk, dget (Table 1' 1): with :to Florida E gy , PREPARW BY: TE' S BuildingMSTU/SF: conditionedsq. ft.: hp t?"ar00yCGnity :M u m. k wiltC 0Fb3r{ n C070. OWNENAGENT: _ GATE: Fowow or plans and cororod by is cowl ' Ind ra'.a3 oomp14MO wati !u ComplianceWithChapteir8asderrmstratedbyaPreScriptivaMea5u'eS melnod0logy or by Dual Cafculalion: Flenda Enorgy Co". Botom cansrn,nlon i6 compMOd, this bu1WAg w4 bo impoctod tar 807 2 Supermarkets 8 809.2 Bas'c Features Owpli" A" in.5 co, '0r' Ssa. ' "fill eulLolr+G oFFI AL: 8C7, 3 Restaurants 809.3 Cuaf Catcvlatiotl 8C7. 4 Kitchens Bud e t CATS 6 _ - P=""-e'y^:1GTr +.- 'a"•`.. w- .._e'.'N"174 %P::._ _ Zh :. -: iZ.3' '..`_ PERMIT CHECKED by CHAPTER 5 WORKSHEET FOR ENERGY CALCULATIONS BUILDING DESIGN BY COMPONENT PERFORMANCE APPROACH FORM 500-A-93 Florida Enatgy Efficiency Colo lot Bufidiog CoeatrucliGn HEATING DESIGN Ua — WALLS 1 I COOLING DESIGN OTTV — WALLS wall Surface Winter Type Area, (V U Value 1~1 3g77 ,.V-O& 2Type= x = Type 3 x Type 4 x - Type 5 x = Total n.(. Awiiill 1. Door Surf ice Winter Type Area, III U Valuee o Type 1 x Type 2 x Type 3 x — Total Adoor 3• - Glazing Surface Winter TyPe Area, IN U•Yaluee Type x Type 2 x = Type 3 x = Total Aglazing 5. Total Now r I u• fins 1+3+5 fine 8 line 7 Totals Total 2. = S , 17 Total 4. il Tolal 6 Total ndeii o. s. From Table 5-2: 57 line 2a4+6 D. n Uow Actual 0. Uow Alkwred Wall Surface Summer TDeq IVPO Area, Its U V*Iue Sea Table 77 D,0 Y 2 _ Type 2 x x = Type 3 x x = Type 4 x x = Type 5 x x = Total 1'! Await 10. Total Door Surface Summer TDej Type Area, It' U-Valulq x T4 - Type 1 x Type 2 x x Type 3 x x Total Adoor 1 . Total Totals -' t s40L qL t 11. 72 :A i s; tt72,713. Gleiirig Orion t. Surface OSl= Sheding N, S. E. etc.) Avon, 1t' Coetftct"I .. i, 2 x x i_ Z x -7 Sx ( x 7 x ( x Z— X Total r AQlazing t4.lr - Total 15A. tom 413Summer U Value x ( j;, D C e T r x — } = Total 15B. lino 14 Gi S 11- Total Aow 16. Total Cooling 17. (y I_ 10+ 12+14 11+13+ 1SA+158 OTTVOW = lv j ,73 T hne It fine 16 OTNow Actual F„, m Tare 5-2. a i M M G r HEATING DESIGN Uo — ROOF Roof Surface VAnter Totals Type Area. ft• U Value fY 01Type177E5x Type 2 x Type 3 x Type 4 x Total Aopaque Q roof 19. Total 20. Skylight Suffege Winter TYPO Area. It' U•Value Type 1 x Type 2 x Type 3 x Total Askylight 21. Total 22. 22e J Total Aor 23. fr Total Heating 24. line 19 + 21 09 7 ? line 20 + 22 Of 0Uor = 25. line 24 tine 23 Uor Actual From Table 5.2: e ' ! o Upr Allowed HEATING DESIGN Uo -- FLOOR Floor Surface Winter otata Type rea. ft' U Vel1.' Type 1 x = Type 2 Type 3 x = Type 4 c Total Afioor 33. rt' Toota-t-Heating 34. U01 s _ Ii line 33 Actual From Table 5-2. Uol COOLING DESIGN OTTV — ROOF ill skylights used) Hoot Surfeee Summer T0sgr Totals Type Type 1 Are il' 7 7S U•Vslue (SM Fig. 54) U x x= Type 2 UType3xx = Typed x x = Total Aopa f 26. 770 ' 2 S$ Total 27. T H Skylight Surface Shading Type Area. fill Coefficient Type 1 x 138 x Type 2 x 138 x Type 3 x 138 x Total Askylighl 28. Total 29A_ Summer U-Value A T x { x 1 =Total 298. tine 28 Qq5`-'3TotalAor30 ( Total Coolinn 31. n 26 27 + 2&A 29 Oft or = 32. r Imo 31 line 30 OTtVor Actual From Table 5-2: r , S OTTV01 Allowed HEATING DESIGN Uo AVERAGING• (Sec 50221a)) / UEvn bl o Allowable (lake U values from Table 5-2): Uow A.. (Ime`7) Upt Apt (line 23) Unl Ant Ilirw 3.l) Ar. (4nw 7 + U09-2.3-4 line 33J J U Cnvolopo Actual [use arlual cats atacl t_I v f pc`} jv = UE Alowed x ) U'ow lime 9) Avv oliig5 U'M (brbe 25) Anr Iliio 23) U'pl Im9.3S) Atw (fine 33) AE (lie 7 + line 23 + line 13) = OF OTTVs may not be averaged t+ W 9. rq 0 3 0 CITY OF SANFORD FIRE -DEPARTMENT FEES FOR SERVICES gPHONE #: 407-322-4952 DATE: BUSIN Z ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER: PERMIT #: & G PLANS REVIEW TENT PERMIT BURN PERMIT` REINSPECTION TANK PERMIT TIRE SYSTEM AMOUNT $1 COMMENTS: /'*'--z2n,4 l - I., c -mi - Sq 0/— / Fees must be paid to Sanford Building Department, 300 N. Park Avenue, Sanford, Florida. Phone # 330-5656. Proof of payment must be made to Sanford Fire Prevention before any furtherrther services can take place. vl1 I certify that the above Sanford Fi e Prevention information is true and correct and that I will comply with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of Sa ford, Florida. Appli ants Signatu