HomeMy WebLinkAbout4777 Rezone 9.36 Acres - 2705 Richmond AvenueOrdinance No. 2024-4777
An ordinance of the City of Sanford, Florida providing for the rezoning
of a parcel of real property totaling approximately 9.36 acres in size
located at 2705 Richmond Avenue and assigned Tax Parcel
Identification Number 03-20-31-501-OF00-001A by the Seminole County
Property Appraiser which property is located within the Sanford City
Limits (map of the PD property is attached) from Seminole Couty
Agriculture (A-1) to City Planned Development (PD); providing for
findings and intent; providing for the taking of implementing
administrative actions; providing for the adoption of a map by
reference; providing for conflicts; providing for severability; providing
for non -codification and providing for an effective date.
Whereas, an application has been submitted proposing to rezone real
property generally addressed as 2705 Richmond Avenue from Seminole Couty
Agriculture (A-1) to City of Sanford Planned Development (PD) to establish
office/warehouse with outdoor storage uses on the PD Property; and
Whereas, the subject real property (a site 9.36 acres in size) is located on the
east side of Richmond Avenue and south of State Road 46; and
Whereas, the fee simple title owner of the real property that is the subject of
this Ordinance is ACCG Inc., a Florida corporation ("Property Owner"); and
Whereas, Earl W. Jackson, Jr. is the President of ACCG Inc. while Leon S.
Reed is the Vice President and only other corporate officer of the entity; and
Whereas, the City's CAPP (Citizens Awareness and Participation Plan)
process, which was conducted on January 22, 2024, and was accomplished to the
satisfaction of the City; and
Whereas, the provisions of Exhibit "B" to the 2015 City of Sanford/Seminole
County Joint Planning Agreement (JPA) state that the HIP -TI, High Intensity Planned
Development Airport (Seminole County land use designation) is equivalent to the AIC,
I
Airport Industry and Commerce (City of land use designation) in this specific segment of
State Road 46 and Exhibit "B" describes equivalent future land use designations in the
City and the County comprehensive plans which land use designations have been
deemed equivalent due to their similar intensities and densities of allowable
development, and
and
Whereas, the subject property is not located within any sub -areas of the JPA;
Whereas, the City's Planning and Development Services Department conducted
a thorough review and analysis of the demands upon public facilities and recommended
that the subject rezoning application be approved having determined that the proposal is
technically sufficient and consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan of the City of Sanford, the City's Land Development Regulations
(LDRs), and the controlling provisions of State law; and
Whereas, the City of Sanford Planning and Zoning Commission considered the
rezoning application submitted by the Applicant at its April 4, 2024, meeting and
unanimously recommended that the City Commission adopt an ordinance to rezone the
PD Property from Seminole Couty Agriculture (A-1) to City of Sanford Planned
Development (PD) based on the request being consistent with the goals, objectives, and
policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan; and
Whereas, no additional standards or conditions can be placed upon this type of
rezone, so the rezone is submitted to determine whether or not the request is consistent
with the underlying land use and the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan;
and
21
Whereas, the City planning and development staff have determined that the
rezoning request is consistent with the underlying land use and the goals and objectives
of the Comprehensive Plan and recommend approval of this Ordinance; and
Whereas, the City Commission has determined that the proposed rezoning of the
PD Property as set forth in this Ordinance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of
the City of Sanford, the City's LDRs, and the controlling provisions of State law; and
Whereas, the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida has taken all
actions relating to the rezoning action set forth herein in accordance with the
requirements and procedures mandated by State law.
Now, therefore, be it enacted by the People of the City of Sanford, Florida:
Section 1. Legislative findings and intent.
(a). The City Commission of the City of Sanford hereby adopts and
incorporates into this Ordinance the City staff report and City Commission agenda
memorandum relating to the application relating to the proposed rezoning of the PD
Property as well as the recitals (whereas clauses) to this Ordinance.
(b). The approval set forth in this Ordinance is subject to the specific conditions
that are set forth subsequently in this Ordinance and the property owner has agreed that
no requirement herein lacks an essential nexus to a legitimate public purpose and is not
roughly proportionate to the impacts of the proposed use that the City seeks to avoid,
minimize, or mitigate.
(c). The City of Sanford has complied with all requirements and procedures of
Florida law in processing and advertising this Ordinance.
(d). This Ordinance is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the
31 _
Comprehensive Plan of the City of Sanford.
Section 2. Rezoning of property/implementing actions; the ACCG PD.
(a), Upon enactment of this Ordinance the PD Property, as depicted in the map
attached to this Ordinance, shall be rezoned to the ACCG PD.
(b). The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to execute any
documents necessary to formalize approval of the rezoning action taken herein with
regard to the ACCG PD and to revise and amend the Official Zoning Map or Maps of the
City of Sanford as may be appropriate to accomplish the action taken in this Ordinance
and as set forth herein.
(c). The conditions to be incorporated into the pertinent development order
relating to the action taken in this Ordinance include the following:
(1). Pursuant to Section 4.3.G of the City's LDRs, this rezoning shall
expire 3 years from the effective date of this Ordinance if all improvements have
not been completed or an extension granted.
(2). Unless specifically requested and approved on the PD Master Plan,
any required elements missing from or not shown on the ACCG PD Master Plan
or associated PD documents shall comply with and default to the regulations in
the City's LDRs.
(3). A development/engineering plan prepared and sealed by a licensed
Florida professional engineer meeting the requirements of the City's LDRs must
be submitted and approved prior to any construction on site. With regard to this
requirement, a separate development/engineering plan is required for each
parcel, outparcel, or phase proposed for development within the ACCG PD.
41Pa-e
(4). All permitted uses shall be consistent with permitted uses allowed in
the RI -1, Restricted Industrial, zoning district/classification, and all conditional
uses, except for outdoor storage, will require a separate application.
(5). The property owner shall install a decorative and functional fountain
in all wet retention ponds in accordance with Schedule "D" of the City's LDRs.
(6). If City staff and the property owner are unable to agree to the details
of this Ordinance or the implementing PD non -statutory development agreement
in any way, the matter will be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission
for resolution at a public hearing, and the matter will be adjudicated by means of a
development order or denial development order relating thereto.
(7). In agreeing to the above conditions in the subsequent PD
development agreement, the property owner shall agree that, in accordance with
the provisions of Section 70.45, Florida Statutes, pertaining to governmental
exactions, the City has not imposed any prohibited exaction. The term "prohibited
exaction" is defined by that statute to mean "... any condition imposed by a
governmental entity on a property owner's proposed use of real property that
lacks an essential nexus to a legitimate public purpose and is not roughly
proportionate to the impacts of the proposed use that the governmental entity
seeks to avoid, minimize, or mitigate."
.W
Section 3. Incorporation of map and ACCG PD Master Plan for the ACCG
The map attached to this Ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed and
incorporated into this Ordinance as a substantive part of this Ordinance establishing the
51 -
ACCG PD.
Section 4. Conflicts.
All ordinances or part of ordinances in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby
repealed.
Section 5. Severability.
If any section, sentence, phrase, word, or portion of this Ordinance is determined
to be invalid, unlawful, or unconstitutional, said determination shall not be held to
invalidate or impair the validity, force or effect of any other section, sentence, phrase,
word, or portion of this Ordinance not otherwise determined to be invalid, unlawful, or
unconstitutional.
Section 6. Non -codification; Implementation.
(a). This Ordinance shall not be codified in the City Code of the City of Sanford
or the City's LDRs; provided, however, that the actions taken herein shall be depicted on
the zoning maps of the City of Sanford by the City Manager, or designee.
(b). The City Manager, or designee, shall implement the provisions of this
Ordinance by means of a non -statutory development agreement which shall be executed
by the property owner, or their successor(s) in interest within 60 days of the effective
date of this Ordinance or the PD Property's zoning classification shall revert to an
un -zoned property status. Further, if, pursuant to Section 4.3.G of the City's LDRs, this
rezoning expires in 3 years from the effective date of this Ordinance due to all
improvements having not been completed or an extension granted; then the property
shall revert to a PD without any land use entitlements except for a permit for a
single-family residential structure.
6 1 P a - e
(c). The non -statutory development agreement referenced in Subsection (b).
of this Section shall be and constitute a development order and shall not create
contractual rights of the property owner against the City nor contractual obligations of the
City to the property owner and, to that end, the property owner shall have no contractual
rights or remedies against the City with regard to any land use action of the City.
(d). The City has not waived any rights or remedies by taken the action set forth
herein or in the implementing development agreement and any successive development
orders and reserves any and all rights and remedies available to the City under
controlling law including, but not limited to, the protections under the laws pertaining to
sovereign immunity and, further, all matters set forth herein may be enforced by any
code enforcement process available to the City under the provisions of controlling law.
Attest:
Section 7. Effective Date.
This Ordinance shall take effect upon enactment.
Passed and adopted this 13th day of May, 2024.
City Commission of the City of
Sanford, Florida
Traci Houchin, MMC, FCRM $:- �" Art Woodruff
City Clerk5)L.3k4 " Mayor
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency.
Pilliam. Colbertity , CAttorney
A CA
rNf o
4S �� •
�ST. I FLORIDA
Business Impact Estimate
This form should be included in agenda packet for the item under which the proposed ordinance
is to be considered, and must be posted on the City's website by the time notice of the proposed
ordinance is published.
Planned Development Rezone of Property Address 2705 Richmond Avenue:
The City is of the view that the following exception(s) to the Business Impact Estimate
requirement, that are checked off in a box below, apply to the above -referenced proposed
ordinance. Although, the City is implementing the procedure required by statutory law to
ensure that no inadvertent procedural issue could impact the enactment of the proposed
ordinance.
0 The proposed ordinance is required for compliance with Federal or State law or
regulation;
❑ The proposed ordinance relates to the issuance or refinancing of debt;
❑ The proposed ordinance relates to the adoption of budgets or budget
amendments, including revenue sources necessary to fund the budget;
❑ The proposed ordinance is required to implement a contract or an agreement,
including, but not limited to, any Federal, State, local, or private grant, or other
financial assistance accepted by the
❑ The proposed ordinance is an emergency ordinance;
❑ The ordinance relates to procurement; or
0 The proposed ordinance is enacted to implement the following:
a. Part II of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, relating to growth policy, county and
municipal planning, and land development regulation, including zoning,
development orders, development agreements and development permits;
b. Sections 190.005 and 190.046, Florida Statutes, regarding community
development districts;
c. Section 553.73, Florida Statutes, relating to the Florida Building Code; or
d. Section 633.202, Florida Statutes, relating to the Florida Fire Prevention Code.
In accordance with the provisions of controlling law, even notwithstanding the fact that,
an exemption noted above may apply, the City hereby publishes the following information:
1. Summary of the proposed ordinance (must include statement of the public purpose,
such as serving the public health, safety, morals, and welfare): Not Applicable
2. Estimate of direct economic impact of the proposed ordinance on private, for-profit
businesses in the City:
Not Applicable
3. Estimate of direct compliance costs that businesses may reasonably incur: Not
Applicable
4. Any new charge or fee imposed by the proposed ordinance:
Not Applicable
5. Estimate of the City's regulatory costs, including estimated revenues from any new
charges or fees to cover such costs:
Not Applicable
6. Good faith estimate of the number of businesses likely to be impacted by the proposed
ordinance:
Not Applicable
7. Additional information (if any, but may wish to include the methodology used to derive
information for #1 and #2, above. For example: City staff solicited comments from
businesses in the City as to the potential impact of the proposed ordinance by contacting
the chamber of commerce, social media posting, direct mail or direct email, posting on
City website, public workshop, etc. You may also wish to include efforts made to reduce
the potential fiscal impact on businesses based on feedback from businesses. You may
also wish to state here that the proposed ordinance is a generally applicable ordinance
that applies to all persons similarly situated (individuals as well as businesses) and,
therefore, the proposed ordinance does not impose costs only upon businesses.):
Not Applicable
Z appG0o �[D
Y OF
' -
SJ�NFORD WS_ RM X
FLORIDA Item No. 7-A-3
CITY COMMISSION MEMORANDUM 24-123
MAY 13, 2024 AGENDA
To:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission
PREPARED BY: Eileen Hinson, AICP - Planning Director
SUBMITTED BY: Norton N. Bonaparte, Jr., ICMA-CM, City Me
SUBJECT: Rezoning; 9.36 Acres; A-1, Agriculture (Semil
Development (City); 2705 Richmond Avenue;
THIS IS A QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTER AND, AS 1
DISCLOSURE OF ALL EX -PARTE COMMUNICATIOVEQ1
SITE VISITS AND EXPERT OPINIONS REGARDIN
ORDINANCE No. 202414'764 FOR MANDATORY
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:
❑ Unify Downtown & the Waterfront
❑ Promote the City's Distinct Culture
❑ Update Regulatory Framework
❑ Redevelop and Revitalize Disadvantaged Communities
SYNOPSIS:
) To PD, Planned
No. 2024-4777
JGH, REQUIRES
NVESTIGATIONS,
S MATTER. SEE
A request to rezone 9.36 acres from Agriculture, (A-1) (Seminole County) to Planned
Development (PD) (City of Sanford) located at 2705 Richmond Avenue has been received.
The property owner is ACCG, Inc. and the application was made on behalf of the property owner.
A CAPP (Citizens Awareness and Participation Plan) meeting was held on January 22, 2024 and
a copy of the report is attached, which has been found to be satisfactory to the City.
The affidavit of ownership and designation of agent forms are attached, and other information is
available to ensure that all potential conflicts of interest are capable of being discerned.
FISCAL/STAFFING STATEMENT:
The property owner, assessed tax value, total tax bill, and property status for 2023 is shown below:
Parcel Number
Property Owner
Assessed Value
2( 023)20231
Tax Bill
03-20-31-501-01700-001A
ACCG Inc
$335,792
$5,764
The applicant is seeking to establish an office/warehouse with outdoor storage uses on the subject
property. The proposed development will facilitate new non-residential construction and generate
additional tax revenue for the City.
BACKGROUND:
The 9.36 -acre site is located on the east side of Richmond Avenue and South of State Road 46.
The subject property is currently zoned Agriculture (A-1) (Seminole County), with a Future Land
Use Designation of High Intensity Planned — Airport (HIP -AP) (County).
According to the PD Master Plan, the applicant is proposing a warehouse/office project consisting
of two buildings with outdoor storage. Building One is 17,000 square feet in size and is intended
to be used for wholesale distribution and storage, with 3,200 square feet of office space. The PD
Master Plan shows an area dedicated for a future Phase 2; however, no details are provided at this
time.
The Master Plan allows for a maximum building height of 50'. Due to the proximity of the subject
property to the Airport and the adopted interlocal agreement, the developer shall file a Federal
Aviation Administration Form 7460 and provide to the City written acknowledgement of receipt
and determination of no objection from Sanford Airport Authority prior to any development
approvals. The PD Master Plan also identifies specific development standards. Any development
standards not identified on the PD Master Plan shall be required to meet RI -1, Restricted Industrial,
zoning district/classification standards.
All new development shall be required to address infrastructure needs, provision of services,
development phasing, and development intensity and land use compatibility as part of an
integrated design scheme which includes very detailed strategies and techniques for resolving
development impacts.
The City/Seminole County Joint Planning Agreement (JPA) compatibility standard applies in
cases such as this one. Per Exhibit B of the JPA, the HIP -AP County land use designation is
equivalent to the AIC City land use designation in this specific segment of State Road 46. Exhibit
B describes equivalent future land use designations in the City and the County comprehensive
plans. The designations have been deemed equivalent due to their similar intensities and densities
of allowable development.
The City AIC land use designation is a high-intensity mixed use policy for managing lands
comprised of the Orlando Sanford International Airport and adjacent lands capable of supporting
a variety of residential rental properties and commercial and industrial uses. AIC is intended to
encourage the expansion of industrial land and provide additional areas for mixed-use
development that would be compatible with airport operations. The land use mix in AIC is intended
to provide a full range of urban services and facilities including:
• Industrial and Business Parks.
• Office Complexes.
• Commercial and retail developments.
• Service and hotel use; and
• Medium to high density multifamily residential developments, where located in
accordance with Comprehensive Plan requirements.
Per Exhibit D of the JPA, the subject property is not located within any sub -areas of the JPA.
All lands in this area annexed by the City subsequent to the JPA have received the land use
designations of AIC, the City's equivalent designations from HIP -AP. City and County
comprehensive plan policies for this area are very similar. The City's densities and floor areas are
slightly less intense than the County's. This area is developing rapidly, consistent with both the
City and the County's comprehensive plan policies and corridor standards. The County and City,
working together, have been successful in minimizing urban sprawl, providing affordable housing
opportunities and targeting industrial and commercial growth in this area. Both the County and
the City will continue to ensure that the area is developed consistent with their mutually agreed
upon standards and policies. This area should be reserved for target industry and Airport
supporting development as there is limited vacant acreage available on which target industry will
site. Single-family and low or medium density residential developments are not compatible within
this area.
The City's CAPP requirement is designed to focus attention on the importance of citizen
participation early in the planning process and its relationship to completing a successful
development project in Sanford. A CAPP meeting was conducted at which time the applicant
provided a concept plan for indoor storage and indoor manufacturing, wholesale distribution, and
office. The proposed uses within the PD are in line with its underlying land use of AIC and the
JPA.
On April 4, 2024, upon a recommendation from staff, the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended that City Commission approve on first reading a request to rezone 9.36 acres at
project address 2705 Richmond Avenue from A-1 (County) to PD (City) to be consistent with the
City's Comprehensive Plan.
LEGAL REVIEW:
It must be noted that the mandatory provisions of Ordinance No. 2024-4764 apply to this matter
and contain processes and procedures such as those relating to ex parte communications and quasi-
judicial proceedings.
Section 166.033, Florida Statutes, as amended in the 2022 Legislative Session, in Chapter 2021-
224, Laws of Florida (deriving from Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House
Bill Number 1059) provides as follows (please note emphasized text):
"166.033 Development permits and orders. —
(1) Within 30 days after receiving an application for approval of a development
permit or development order, a municipality must review the application for
completeness and issue a letter indicating that all required information is submitted
or specifying with particularity any areas that are deficient. If the application is
deficient, the applicant has 30 days to address the deficiencies by submitting the
required additional information. Within 120 days after the municipality has deemed
the application complete, or 180 days for applications that require final action
through a quasi-judicial hearing or a public hearing, the municipality must
approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application for a development
permit or development order. Both parties may agree to a reasonable request for
an extension of time, particularly in the event of a force majeure or other
extraordinary circumstance. An approval, approval with conditions, or denial of the
application for a development permit or development order must include written
findings supporting the municipality's decision. The timeframes contained in this
subsection do not apply in an area of critical state concern, as designated in s.
380.0552 or chapter 28-36, Florida Administrative Code.
(2)(a) When reviewing an application for a development permit or
development order that is certified by a professional listed in s. 403.0877, a
municipality may not request additional information from the applicant more
than three times, unless the applicant waives the limitation in writing.
(b) If a municipality makes a request for additional information and the applicant
submits the required additional information within 30 days after receiving the
request, the municipality must review the application for completeness and issue a
letter indicating that all required information has been submitted or specify with
particularity any areas that are deficient within 30 days after receiving the
additional information.
(c) If a municipality makes a second request for additional information and the
applicant submits the required additional information within 30 days after receiving
the request, the municipality must review the application for completeness and
issue a letter indicating that all required information has been submitted or specify
with particularity any areas that are deficient within 10 days after receiving the
additional information.
(d) Before a third request for additional information, the applicant must be offered
a meeting to attempt to resolve outstanding issues. If a municipality makes a third
request for additional information and the applicant submits the required additional
information within 30 days after receiving the request, the municipality must deem
the application complete within 10 days after receiving the additional information
or proceed to process the application for approval or denial unless the applicant
waived the municipality's limitation in writing as described in paragraph (a).
(e) Except as provided in subsection (5), if the applicant believes the request for
additional information is not authorized by ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal
authority, the municipality, at the applicant's request, shall proceed to process the
application for approval or denial.
(3) When a municipality denies an application for a development permit or
development order, the municipality shall give written notice to the applicant.
The notice must include a citation to the applicable portions of an ordinance,
rule, statute, or other legal authority for the denial of the permit or order.
(4) As used in this section, the terms "development permit" and "development
order" have the same meaning as in s. 163.3164, but do not include building
permits.
(5) For any development permit application filed with the municipality after July
1, 2012, a municipality may not require as a condition of processing or issuing
a development permit or development order that an applicant obtain a permit
or approval from any state or federal agency unless the agency has issued a
final agency action that denies the federal or state permit before the municipal
action on the local development permit.
(6) Issuance of a development permit or development order by a municipality
does not create any right on the part of an applicant to obtain a permit from a state
or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the municipality
for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill
the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result
in a violation of state or federal law. A municipality shall attach such a disclaimer
to the issuance of development permits and shall include a permit condition that all
other applicable state or federal permits be obtained before commencement of the
development.
(7) This section does not prohibit a municipality from providing information to
an applicant regarding what other state or federal permits may apply."
The above -referenced definition of the term "development permit" is as follows:
"(16) 'Development permit' includes any building permit, zoning permit,
subdivision approval, rezoning, certification, special exception, variance, or any
other official action of local government having the effect of permitting the
development of land." (Section 163.3164(16), Florida Statutes).
The term "development order" is defined as follows and as can be seen, refers to the "granting,
denying, or granting with conditions [of] an application":
"(15) `Development order' means any order granting, denying, or granting with
conditions an application for a development permit." (Section 163.3164(15),
Florida Statutes).
Thus, if this application is denied, a denial development order must be issued which must cite to
the applicable portions of each ordinance, rule, statute or other legal authority supporting the denial
of the application. For example, if a goal, objective or policy of the Sanford Comprehensive Plan
were to be the basis for a denial, then such goal, objective or policy must be part of the motion
proposing the denial. A denial development order would be drafted to implement the actions of
the City Commission in the event of such an occurrence. Accordingly, any motion to deny must
state, with particularity, the basis for the proposed denial.
The City Commission approved the first reading of Ordinance No. 2024-4777 on April 22, 2024.
The City Clerk published notice of the 2"d Public Hearing in the Sanford Herald on May 1, 2024.
RECOMMENDATION:
City staff supports the adoption of Ordinance No. 2024-4777, for the rezoning subject to the
following conditions which should be considered to accompany any approval in an associated non -
statutory development agreement/development order:
1. Pursuant to Section 4.3.G of the City's Land Development Regulations (LDRs), this
rezoning shall expire three years from the effective date of this Ordinance if all
improvements have not been completed or an extension granted. If expiration occurs, the
property will revert to a PD zoning, but without any land use entitlements except for the
construction of a single-family residence.
2. Unless specifically requested and approved on the PD Master Plan, any required elements
missing from or not shown on the PD Master Plan shall comply with the City's LDRs.
3. All permitted uses shall be consistent with permitted uses allowed in RI -1, Restricted
Industrial, zoning district/classification and all conditional uses except for outdoor storage
will require a separate application.
4. A development plan prepared and sealed by a licensed Florida, professional engineer
meeting the requirements of the City's LDRs must be submitted and approved prior to any
construction on site and.
5. A decorative and functional fountain shall be installed in all wet retention ponds as part of
development approval which approval shall provide for ongoing maintenance requirements
and responsibilities upon the appropriate party, but not the City.
6. If City staff and the property owner are unable to agree to the details of this Ordinance or
the non -statutory development agreement/development order in any way, the matter will
be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission for resolution at a public hearing,
and the matter will be adjudicated by means of a development order or denial development
order relating thereto.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
"I move to adopt Ordinance No. 2024-4777."
Attachments: (I).
Project Information Sheet.
(2).
Site Aerial Map.
(3).
Zoning Map.
(4).
Affidavit of Ownership.
(5).
CAPP Meeting Report.
(6).
Trip Generation Memo.
(7).
PD Master Plan.
(8).
Ordinance No. 2024-4777.
�I
' PROJECT INFORMATION -- 2705 RICHMOND AVENUE
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONE
Requested Action: A rezone of 9.36 acres at project address 2705 Richmond Avenue from A-1,
Agriculture (Seminole County) to PD, Planned Development (City of Sanford).
Proposed Use: Office/Warehouse with Outdoor Storage
Project Address: 2705 Richmond Avenue
Current Zoning: Agriculture (A-1)
Proposed Zoning: Planned Development (PD)
Current Land Use: Single Family
Tax Parcel Number: 03-20-31-501-OF00-OOIA
Site Area: 9.36 Acres
Property Owner: ACCG Inc.
130 Bomar Court
Longwood, FL 32750
Applicant/Agent: Earl Jackson
5805 Riverside Drive
Port Orange, FL 32127
Email: ej@accg-inc.com
CAPP Meeting: A CAPP meeting was held on January 22, 2024
Commission District: District 1 — Commissioner Sheena Britton
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPLIANCE REVIEW
Planning staff has reviewed the request and has determined the use and proposed improvements to be consistent with
the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
Future Land Use: HIPAP, High Intensity Planned Development - Airport
Proposed Future Land Use: AIC, Airport Industry and Commerce
Existing Land Use: Single Family
POINT
Site
2705 Richmond Avenue
03-20-31-501-OF00-001A
SITE
Zoning
Sanford
AG (Agriculture)
PD (Planned Development)
RI -1 (Restricted Industrial)
Seminole County
A-1 (Agriculture)
® PD (Planned Development)
N
I -0D,0
I �
�%,ORII) AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND DESIGNATION OF AGENT
1877—
www.sanfordfl.gov
Please use additional sheets as needed. If any additional sheets are attached to this document, please sign here and note below:
I. Ownership
hereby attest to ownership of the property described below:
Tax Parcel Number(s): 03'; ,b - 3 50) - OF 00
o0
Address of Property: vF�05 A;AV,70ka01 A1!G/1 ve_ FL 3--K�33
for which this PD—Re Zo l3 a application is submitted to the City of Sanford.
II. Designation of Applicant's Agent (leave blank if not applicable)
As the owner/applicant of the above designated property for which this affidavit is submitted, I designate the below named individual
as my agent in all matters pertaining to the application process. In authorizing the agent named below to represent me, or my
company, I attest that the application is made in good faith and that all information contained in the application is accurate and
complete to the best of my personal knowledge.
Applicant's Agent (Print): C_�5*py)i Signature: �
Agent Address: 0 S > )c1t r/
Email: Phone: Fax:
III. Notice to Owner
A. All changes in Ownership and/or Applicant's Agent prior to final action of the City shall require anew affidavit. If ownership
changes, the new owner assumes all obligations related to the filing application process.
B. If the Owner intends for the authority of the Applicant's Agent to be limited in any manner, please indicate the limitations(s)
below. (i.e.: limited to obtaining a certificate of concurrency; limited to obtaining a land use compliance certificate, etc.)
The owner of the real property associated with this application or procurement activity is a (check one)
❑ Individual XCorporation o Land Trust o Partnership o Limited Liability Company
❑ Other (describe):
1. List all natural persons who have an ownership interest in the property, which is the subject matter of this petition, by name and
address.
2. For each corporation, list the name, address, and title of each officer; the name and address of each director of the corporation;
and the name and address of each shareholder who owns two percent (2%) or more of the stock of the corporation. Shareholders
need not be disclosed if a corporation's stock are traded publicly on any national stock exchange.
3. In the case of a trust, list the name and address of each trustee and the name and address of the beneficiaries of the trust and the
percentage of interest of each beneficiary. If any trustee or beneficiary of a trust is a corporation, please provide the information
required in paragraph 2 above.
Name of Trust:
4. For partnerships, including limited partnerships, list the name and address of each principal in the partnership, including general
or limited partners. If any partner is a corporation, please provide the information required in paragraph 2 above.
1
5. For each limited liability company, list the name, address, and title of each manager or managing member; and the name and
address of each additional member with two percent (2%) or more membership interest. If any member with two percent (2%) or
more membership interest, manager, or managing member is a corporation, trust or partnership, please provide the information
required in paragraphs 2, 3 and/or 4 above.
Name of LLC:
6. In the circumstances of a contract for purchase, list the name and address of each contract purchaser. If the purchaser is a
corporation, trust, partnership, or LLC, provide the information required for those entities in paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and/or 5 above.
Name of Purchaser:
Date of Contract:
NAME
TITLE/OFFICE/TRUSTEE
OR BENEFICIARY
ADDRESS % OF
INTEREST
NA. jR
t e_
5�os tS:�G✓fide Yl" Yo��r � 5�/0
L-C_.p Litt
(-�
L 2to/a;' Y
t?
(Use additional sheets for more space.)
7. As to any type of owner referred to above, a change of ownership occurring subsequent to the execution of this document, shall be
disclosed in writing to the City prior to any action being taken by the City as to the matter relative to which this document pertains.
I affirm that the above representations are true and are based upon my personal knowledge and belief after all reasonable inquiry. I
understand that any failure to make mandated disclosures is grounds for the subject rezone, future land use amendment, special
exception, or variance involved with this Application to become void or for the submission for a procurement activity to be non-
responsive. I certify that I am legally authorized to execute this Affidavit and to bind the Applicant or Vendor to the disclosures
herein. --%
9 p 301�0&1-3
ate
STATE OF FLOIDA
COUNTY OF A)'b
Sworn to (or affirmed) and s{Iu_bscribed before me by ��7 ? (L kJ-
on this �f� da of r(�t/Ci"N , 20 Cyr vr+e` Notary Public State of Flonos
y : Jeremy David Elliott
s My commission GG 966676
`11-.1i Ate° Expires 0310812024
otary Publ
Perso liy F , OR Produced Identification
Type of Identification Produced 1 �
Affidavit of Ownership - January 2015
Print, Type or Stamp Name of Notary Public
ACCG INC.
"EXPERIENCE YOU CAN TRUST!"
/CCG-INC.COM
COMPLETE CONCRETE PROFESSIONALS
Citizen Awareness and Participation Plan
Proposed Plan Development/ New Construction
2705 Richmond Ave, Sanford F132771
1. Overview
A Neighborhood Meeting for the Proposed Plan Development/ New Construction on the
property located 2705 Richmond Ave, Sanford F132771 took place on Monday, January 22nd,
2022 at the Gators Riverside Grille located in 4255 Peninsula Point, Sanford FL 32771. The
meeting was required as part of the Citizen Awareness and Participation Plan (CAPP) submitted
in conjunction with the Urban Infill Conditional Use application. The Seminole County
Property
Appraiser parcel identification number associated with the subject property is 03-20-31-501-
OF00-001A
2. List of Meeting Invitees
A list of affected parties that were notified of proposed project and invited to attend the
Neighborhood Meeting is provided in Appendix A.
3. Meeting Notice
A copy of the meeting notice is provided in Appendix B
4. Date and Location of the Neighborhood Meeting
Monday, January 22nd, 2022 at the Gators Riverside Grille located in 4255 Peninsula Point,
Sanford FL 32771
5. Meeting Attendance
Three (3) members of the public attended the meeting, not including the applicant. A summary
of those attending is provided bellow. Sign in sheet provided in Appendix C
Beverly Hubbard — Neighbor
Arthur Litka and Treena Kaye — Neighbor
The applicant did not received any additional phone calls or emails regarding this proposal
6. Summary of Concerns
Beverly Hubbard a neighbor had a concern about drainage and how it could potentially affect
her. Arthur Litka also a neighbor wanted to know how much traffic and how loud the trucks
would be. All their concerns were adequately addressed during the meeting.
DOING, DAVID A & KRISTINE E
606 BAYWOOD DR
SANFORD, FL 32773-6208
APIARY HOLDINGS LLC
13232 BELLARIA CIR
WINDERMERE, FL 34786-7401
ST JOHNS RIVER WATER MGMT DIST
C/O VICTORIA M KROGER
PO BOX 1429
PALATKA, FL 32178-1429
SINGH, SHAKUNTLA & SINGH, DILDAR
102 AMBERWOOD CT
LONGWOOD, FL 32779-2144
WASIELEWSKI, THOMAS P TR
9428 EDDINGS RD
ODESSA, FL 33556-9416
3 RICHMOND PARTNERS LLC
6500 THE LANDINGS DR
BELLE ISLE. FL 32812-3526
MOYER. PHILLIP A & HELEN A
5307 SCOTLAND ROUND
STONE MTN. GA 30088-4424
HUBBARD. BEVERLY J
2691 RICHMOND AVE
SANFORD. FL 32773-6532
KENNEDY. IAN & STEPHANIE
1298 PATTERSON TER
LAKE MARY, FL 32746-2224
KAYE, TREENA A & LITKA, ARTHUR H
2700 RICHMOND AVE
SANFORD. FL 32773-6533
Appendix A
NARINESINGH, HARDEO
1568 DESS DR
ORLANDO, FL 32818-5609
GANDHARRY,YADRAM M
2681 REAGAN TRL
LAKE MARY, FL 32746-1813
GANDHARRY,YADRAM M
2681 REAGAN TRL
LAKE MARY. FL 32746-1813
MC LAUGHLIN. JAMES M & NANCY M
2765 RICHMOND AVE
SANFORD. FL 32773-6534
AVILA. ALTAGRACIA
2791 RICHMOND AVE
SANFORD, FL 32773-6534
Appendix B
ACCG INC.
"EXPERIENCE YOU CAN TRUST!"
ACCC-INC_COM
COMPLETE CONCRETE PROFESSIONALS
January 10, 2024
Dear Current Property Owner:
re: Proposed Plan Development.' New Construction
2705 Richmond ave, Sanford Fl 32771
bVe invite you to a neighborhood meeting to review and discuss the proposed plan development
and New Construction for the property located at 2705 Richmond Ave, Sanford FL 32771. The
proposed Plan Development includes the construction of Commercial Offices and Warehousing
complex with outdoor storage. A preliminary site plan concept is provided on the second page of this
notice.
The neighborhood meeting will provide the local community with a venue to discuss the
proposed use and improvements to the property, to provide support for the proposal, or voice any
concerns there may be with the plan. All are welcome. A full-sized copy of the site plan submitted to
the city will be available for review at the neighborhood meeting.
If you are unavailable to attend but have questions to ask or comments to provide, please email
those questions or comments to Earl Jackson at F�7 a c = t>cc,9—m
The meeting will be held at the following location and time:
Location:
Gators Riverside Grille
4255 Peninsula Point, Sanford FL 32771
Date and Time:
Monday January 22� ' , 2024
From 4:00 pm to 6:00 pm.
Sincerely,
✓t r� INC.
Earl Jackson/President
Email: EJ Ac i c.com
Web: Accg-Inc.com
Direct:321-363-6005
1982 SR 44, Ste 171, New Smyrna Beach, FL 32168
,vww.ACCG-INC.com
Page 1
Appendix B (cont'd)
ACCG INC.
"EXPERIENCE YOU CAN TRUST!"
ACCG-IN4Z.COM
COMPLETE CONCRETE PROFES51ONALS
fry
it
■
■
ii
1982 SR 44, Ste 171, New Smyrna Beach, FL 32168
w%vw..ACCG-lNC.com
Page 2
Appendix C
/CCG INC. DATE: January 22. 2024
-EXPERIENCE YOU CAN TRUST.'
ACCs-wC.00M
COMPETE CONCRETE PROFESSiOwIS
MEETING SIGN IN SHEET
NAME
_ ~ ADDRESS`
SIGNATURE
TIME ^j
3 Richmond Partners LLC
6500 The Landings Dr, Belle Isle, FL
!
32812
Apiary Holdings LLC
13232 Bellaria Cir. Windermere. FL
I
34786
Avila, Altagracia
2791 Richmond Ave. Sanford FL
I
4
32773
Doing, David A & Kristine
606 Baywood Dr, Sanford FL 32773
E
Gandharry, Yadram M 12681
I
Reagan Tri, Lake Mary FL 32746
Hubbard, Beverly 1
2691 Richmond Ave, Sanford FL
32773y„�`�
Kaye, Treena A & Litka,
2700 Richmond Ave, Sanford FL
32773
GG"''�!•�`
`f • 1,5
Arthur H
Kennedy. Ian & Stephanie
1298 Patterson Ter, Lake Mary FL
32746
MC Laughlin, lames M &
2765 Richmond Ave. Sanford FL
Nancy M
32773
Moyer, Phillip A & Helen
5307 Scotland Round. Stone Mtn GA
A
30088
Narinesingh. Hardeo
1568 Dess Dr, Orlando FL 32818
i
{
Singh, Shakuntla & Singh,
102 Ambcrwood Ct, Longwood FL
Dildar
32779
Johns River Water
Management Dist C/O
PO Box 1429, Palatka FL 32178
Victoria M Kroger
Wasielewski, Thomas P
9428 Eddings Rd, Odessa FL 33556
TR
`
@WGI
February 28, 2024
Charles Wetzel
Traffic Engineering
140 Bush Loop
Sanford, FL 32773
(407) 665-5677
cwetzel@seminolecountvfl.gov
RE: Sanford Warehouse Trip Generation Memorandum
Dear Mr. Charles Wetzel,
WGI has been retained by ACCG, Inc. to perform a trip generation analysis for the proposed project, per
the Seminole County Guidelines. ACCG, Inc. is proposing to build on a site which is located at the
southeast corner of Brown Road and Richmond Avenue, outside the City of Sanford, Florida in Seminole
County. The development is located between E 25th Street (SR 46) and Moores Station Road. Richmond
Avenue is a County -owned roadway with two lanes.
Development Description & Proposed Site Layout
The proposed development will consist of a 17,000 square foot warehouse, which includes 13,800 square
feet of warehouse space and an additional 3,200 square feet of office which will be an accessory use to
the warehouse. There is one proposed driveway on Richmond Ave offering full access to the site. A site
plan can be seen in Attachment 1 and a site location map can be seen in Attachment 2.
Trip Generation Analysis
ITE's Trip Generation Manual 1111 Edition was used to determine the trip generation volumes. The fitted
curve equation was used following the guidelines in the Trip Generation Handbook which recommends
use of the fitted curve equation when the R2 value is at least 0.75 or the data plot has at least 20 data
points. In this case, the designated land use code 150 meets these criteria, so the fitted curve was applied.
At buildout, the Project is estimated to generate 65 daily vehicle trips, 26 AM peak hour trips, and 29 PM
peak hour trips.
Table 1 below summarizes the estimated trip generation for the Project for a typical weekday.
WGI 1 570 W. Hausman Road Suite 115 San Antonio, TX 78249 1512.582.5569 1 www.wginc.com
@WGI
Land Use
Warehousing
Source: WGI, 2024.
TABLE 1: TRIP GENERATION
Units Daily Total
17 KSF 65
GFA
AM Peak Hour
In Out Total
20 6 26
PM Peak Hour
In Out Total
8 21 29
Notes:
1. ITE Trip Generation (111h Edition) Land Use 150 — Warehouse (AM and PM Peak Hours of Warehouse).
Daily: T = 1.58*X+38.29
AM Peak Hour. T = 0.12*X + 23.62 (77% in, 23% out)
PM Peak Hour: T = 0.12*X + 26.48 (28% in, 72% out)
Summary & Recommendations
The project will include an industrial warehouse with an overall building area of 17,000 SF. Based on ITE's
Trip Generation Manua( 771h edition trip generation rates, the Project is expected to generate 65 net new
daily external vehicle trips, with 26 of those new trips occurring in the AM peak hour, and 29 new trips
occurring in the PM peak hour. According to the Land Development Code of Seminole County Section
10.3, a traffic study will not be required for industrial warehouse developments under 100,000 total square
feet. Since the project falls below this threshold, a traffic study should not be required.
Sincerely,
WGI, Inc.
ySPZE OF7pXgs 1t
1
..+r/
j RAVALIKOSARAIU j
/�,o• 128546 =��
�CENSED•G�t,Q�'
Ravali Kosaraju, PE (TX)
Director, Mobility
Attachments:
Attachment 1— Site Plan
Attachment 2 — Project Location Map
WGI 1 570 W. Hausman Road Suite 115 San Antonio, TX 78249 1512.582.5569 1 www.wginc.com
(OWGI
Attachment 1—Site Plan
WGI 1 570 W. Hausman Road Suite 115 San Antonio, TX 78249 1512.582.5569 1 www.wginc.com
nae'oN H1�1609'oN Moa
um7y .'wwx UZLL oN euwd
IIxCV V�ooBwed wM'R ew.�rve c*unrz ufoya Ntlld N31StlW W
1
wlero
�r dSO 3Sf10H321tlM ON'd 3OIzu0 OiJOdNVS
�'i
@WGI
Attachment 2 — Project Location Map
WGI 1 570 W. Hausman Road Suite 115 San Antonio, TX 78249 1512.582.5569 1 www.wginc.com