HomeMy WebLinkAbout4792 FLU 5.77 Acres - 6498 Ronald Reagan Blvd.Ordinance No. 2024-4792
An Ordinance of the City of Sanford, Florida amending the City of
Sanford Comprehensive Plan, as previously amended; providing for
amendment of the Future Land Use Map of the Future Land Use
Element of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan relative to
certain real property, approximately 5.77 acres in size, owned by
Christian Sharing Center Inc. and Dale & Company LLC (Tax Parcel
Identification Numbers 13-20-30-300-0160-0000 and 13-20-30-300-
040A-0000), said property being addressed as 6498 North Ronald
Reagan Boulevard; providing for the future land use designation to
be amended from Low -Density Residential -Single -Family (LDRSF)
and Neighborhood Commercial to General Commercial (GC);
providing for legislative findings and intent; providing for
assignment of the land use designation for the property; providing
for severability; providing for ratification of prior acts of the City;
providing for conflicts; providing for codification and directions to
the code codifier and providing for an effective date.
Whereas, the fee simple title owners of the real property that is the subject of
this Ordinance are The Christian Sharing Center Inc., of Longwood, which has a large
number of officers and directors, and Dale & Company LLC, of Casselberry, which has
four managers/members (collectively the "Property Owner"); and
Whereas, the subject real property is assigned Tax Parcel Identification
Numbers 13-20-30-300-0160-0000 and 13-20-30-300-040A-0000, as assigned by the
Seminole County Property Appraiser; and
Whereas, the subject real property is a site 5.77 acres in size and is addressed
as 6498 North Ronald Boulevard and located on the west side of Ronald Reagan
Boulevard between Bedford Road and Tucker Drive; and
Whereas, a Citizens Awareness and Participation Plan (CAPP) meeting was
held on December 12, 2023, and a copy of the CAPP report was provided to the City,
which report has been found to be satisfactory to the City; and
Whereas, the applicant's request is to amend the future land use designation
currently assigned to the subject property from Low -Density Residential -Single -Family
(LDRSF) and Neighborhood Commercial to General Commercial (GC); and
Whereas, the Property Owner also has submitted a companion application to
rezone the subject property from the Agriculture (AG) and Restricted (RC -1)
Commercial zoning districts/classifications to the Planned Development (PD) zoning
district/classification; and
Whereas, the City of Sanford's Planning and Zoning Commission, as the
City's local planning agency, held a public hearing on June 6, 2024, to consider
amending the Future Land Use Map of the Future Land Use Element of the City of
Sanford Comprehensive Plan and recommended approval of the proposed Future Land
Use Map amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for the subject property; and
Whereas, Section 163.3187, Florida Statutes, relates to the amendment of
adopted local government comprehensive plans and sets forth certain requirements
relating to small scale amendments, and which are related to proposed small scale
development activities and provides, among other things, that such amendments may
be approved without regard to statutory limits on the frequency of consideration of
amendments to the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan; and
Whereas, the City of Sanford has complied with all requirements and
procedures of Florida law in processing this amendment to the City of Sanford
Comprehensive Plan including, but not limited to, Section 163.3187, Florida Statutes;
and
Whereas, the City of Sanford has complied with Florida's Community
Planning Act which was amended during the 2021 Legislative Session by the passage
of Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House
21
Bill Number 59 (initially codified as Chapter Number 2021-195, Laws of Florida) to
require every city and county within the State "to include in its comprehensive plan a
property rights element" (Section 163.3177(6)(i)1, Florida Statutes).
Now, therefore, be it enacted by the People of the City of Sanford, Florida:
Section 1. Legislative Findings and Intent.
(a). The City of Sanford has complied with all requirements and procedures of
Florida law in processing and advertising this Ordinance.
(b). The City Commission of the City of Sanford adopts the recitals (whereas
clauses) of this Ordinance as legislative findings.
(c). This Ordinance is internally consistent with the goals, objectives and
policies of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Sanford and the proposed
Comprehensive Plan amendment does not trigger any urban indicators and adoption of
this amendment will discourage the proliferation of urban sprawl within the City of
Sanford.
Section 2. Amendment to Future Land Use Map; Incorporation of Maps,
Sketches and Legal Descriptions.
(a). The Future Land Use Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plan of the City
of Sanford and the City's Future Land Use Map is hereby amended by changing the
future land use designation from Low -Density Residential -Single -Family (LDRSF) and
Neighborhood Commercial to General Commercial (GC) regarding the real property
which is the subject of this Ordinance as set forth herein.
(b). The property which is the subject of this Comprehensive Plan amendment
is assigned Tax Parcel Identification Numbers 13-20-30-300-0160-0000 and 13-20-30-
300-040A-0000 by the Seminole County Property Appraiser.
31;x, 1 1'-
(c). Any maps, sketches and legal descriptions attached to this Ordinance are
hereby ratified and affirmed and incorporated into this Ordinance as a substantive part
of this Ordinance, but the land which is the subject of this Ordinance consists of Tax
Parcel Identification Numbers 13-20-30-300-0160-0000 and 13-20-30-300-040A-0000
as assigned by the Seminole County Property Appraiser.
Section 3. Implementing Administrative Actions. The City Manager, or
designee, is hereby authorized to implement the provisions of this Ordinance as
deemed appropriate and warranted.
Section 4. Ratification of Prior Actions. The prior actions of the City
Commission and its agencies in enacting and causing amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan of the City of Sanford, as well as the implementation thereof, are
hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 5. Severability. If any section, sentence, phrase, word, or
portion of this Ordinance proves to be invalid, unlawful or unconstitutional, it shall not be
held to impair the validity or effect of any other action or part of this Ordinance.
Section 6. Conflicts. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict
herewith are hereby repealed.
Section 7. Scrivener's Errors. Typographical errors and other
matters of a similar nature that do not affect the intent of this Ordinance, as
determined by the City Clerk and City Attorney, may be corrected with the
endorsement of the City Manager, or designee, without the need for a public
hearing.
Section 8. Codification/Instructions to Code Codifier. It is the intention of
the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida, and it is hereby ordained that the
41
provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the codified version of
the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan and/or the Code of Ordinances of the City of
Sanford, Florida in terms of amending the Future Land Use Map of the City.
Section 9. Effective Date. The small scale Comprehensive Plan
amendment set forth herein shall not become effective, in accordance with Section
163.3187(5)(c), Florida Statutes, until 31 days after the enactment of this Ordinance. If
challenged within 30 days after enactment, the small-scale amendment set forth in this
Ordinance shall not become effective until the State land planning agency or the
Administration Commission, respectively, issues a final order determining that the
subject small-scale amendment is in compliance with controlling State law; provided,
however, that this Ordinance shall not take effect until the annexation ordinance
annexing the property that is the subject of this Ordinance is final.
Passed and adopted this 12th day of August, 2024.
Attest: City Commission of the City of
Sanford, Florida / / _
By:1Ohq(1ft1, W, FC��Y :,•B
Traci Houchin, MMC, FCRM , :.;;. -Art:odruff
City Clerk~Mayor:`'{t
Approved as to form and legality: <� y
By:, _, a
William L. Colbert, Esquire
City Attorney
�Pp1FORp �
u
fsT.1811 •' �'
Business Impact Estimate
This form should be included in agenda packet for the item under which the proposed ordinance
is to be considered, and must be posted on the City's website by the time notice of the proposed
ordinance is published.
Comprehensive Plan Amendment of the Future Land Use Map designation of 6489 N
Ronal Reagan Boulevard:
The City is of the view that the following exception(s) to the Business Impact Estimate
requirement, that are checked off in a box below, apply to the above -referenced proposed
ordinance. Although, the City is implementing the procedure required by statutory law to
ensure that no inadvertent procedural issue could impact the enactment of the proposed
ordinance.
❑ The proposed ordinance is required for compliance with Federal or State law or
regulation;
❑ The proposed ordinance relates to the issuance or refinancing of debt;
❑ The proposed ordinance relates to the adoption of budgets or budget
amendments, including revenue sources necessary to fund the budget;
❑ The proposed ordinance is required to implement a contract or an agreement,
including, but not limited to, any Federal, State, local, or private grant, or other
financial assistance accepted by the
❑ The proposed ordinance is an emergency ordinance;
❑ The ordinance relates to procurement; or
❑x The proposed ordinance is enacted to implement the following:
a. Part II of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, relating to growth policy, county and
municipal planning, and land development regulation, including zoning,
development orders, development agreements and development permits;
b. Sections 190.005 and 190.046, Florida Statutes, regarding community
development districts;
c. Section 553.73, Florida Statutes, relating to the Florida Building Code; or
d. Section 633.202, Florida Statutes, relating to the Florida Fire Prevention Code.
11Page
In accordance with the provisions of controlling law, even notwithstanding the fact that,
an exemption noted above may apply, the City hereby publishes the following information:
1. Summary of the proposed ordinance (must include statement of the public purpose,
such as serving the public health, safety, morals, and welfare):
The proposed ordinance is intended to incorporate the subject property into the City of
Sanford in order to obtain water and sewer for a 79 -unit obtainable housing development.
The proposed use is intended to provide obtainable housing which will benefit the public
health, safety, morals, and welfare of the city as a whole.
2. Estimate of direct economic impact of the proposed ordinance on private, for-profit
businesses in the City:
When annexed into the City, the property will be assed the City of Sanford Millage rate
and will result in additional Revenue to the City.
3. Estimate of direct compliance costs that businesses may reasonably incur:
The applicant will be responsible for all permitting fees.
4. Any new charge or fee imposed by the proposed ordinance:
When annexed into the City, the property will be assessed the City of Sanford Millage
rate in addition to the County Taxes.
5. Estimate of the City's regulatory costs, including estimated revenues from any new
charges or fees to cover such costs:
It is impossible to quantify any potential regulatory costs of the proposed development.
6. Good faith estimate of the number of businesses likely to be impacted by the proposed
ordinance:
It is unknown if any businesses will be impacted by the development of the site.
7. Additional information
Not applicable.
CITY OF
10111,FST
FLORIDA
CITY COMMISSION MEMORANDUM 24-209
AUGUST 12, 2024 AGENDA
To:
PREPARED BY:
SUBMITTED BY:
SUBJECT:
WS_ RM X
Item Nol . A 1�
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission
Eileen Hinson, AICP, Director of Planning
Norton N. Bonaparte, Jr., ICMA-CM, City Manager
Amend the Future Land Use from Low -Density Residential -Single -Family
(LDRSF) and Neighborhood Commercial to General Commercial (GC) on
5.77 acres at project address 6498 North Ronald Reagan Boulevard.
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:
❑ Unify Downtown & the Waterfront
❑ Promote the City's Distinct Culture
❑ Update Regulatory Framework
❑ Redevelop and Revitalize Disadvantaged Communities
SYNOPSIS:
A request to amend the Future Land Use from Low -Density Residential -Single -Family (LDRSF)
and Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to General Commercial (GC) on 5.77 acres at project address
6498 North Ronald Reagan Boulevard has been received.
The property owners are Christian Sharing Center Inc. and Dale & Company LLC. The applicant,
Daniel Ryan with the Christian Sharing Center is the applicant who completed the Citizens
Awareness and Participation Plan CAPP meeting that was held December 12, 2023. A copy of the
report is attached, which is satisfactory to the City.
The Affidavit of Ownership and Designation of Agent forms are attached, and other information
is available to ensure that all potential conflicts of interests are capable of being discerned.
FISCAL/STAFFING STATEMENT:
The property owner, assessed tax value, total tax bill, and property status for 2024 is shown below:
Parcel Number
Assessed Value
Tax Bill
Property Status
(2024)
(2024)
13-20-30-300-0160-
$218,248
$1,064
Vacant Commercial
0000
13-20-30-300-040A-
$246,103
$1,200
Single Family
0000
It is the applicant's intent to develop the property into a 79 unit multiple -family community with
no commercial activity. The proposed development will facilitate new residential construction,
assisting in providing much needed housing to accommodate the City of Sanford growth. Thus,
generating additional tax revenue to the City.
No additional staffing is anticipated if the land use amendment is approved.
BACKGROUND:
The two parcels, totaling 5.77 -acres, are located on the west side of Ronald Reagan Boulevard
between Bedford Road and Tucker Drive. The properties are currently zoned AG, Agriculture and
RC -1, Restricted Commercial with the Future Land Use designations of LDR-SF, Low Density
Residential Single -Family and NC, Neighborhood Commercial.
The applicant is seeking to amend the Future Land Use designation from Low -Density Residential -
Single -Family (LDRSF) and Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to General Commercial (GC)
Its important to note that Ronald Reagan Boulevard is classified as a Minor Arterial road and a
commercial corridor. The subject property is surrounded by single-family to the west and north,
mobile home park to the east, and a vacant property to the south which is under review to be
developed as a commercial kennel.
Comprehensive Plan
Staff has outlined relevant Goals, Objectives, and Policies (GOP's) that support the proposed land
use amendment:
Objective FLU 1.1: Implement the Future Land Use Map Series. The City shall adopt and
implement the Future Use Map (FLUM) series in the Future Land Use Element goals of the
Comprehensive Plan. The maximum density and Floor Area Ratio for the General Commercial
future land use is as follows:
LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
MAP SYMBOL
DENSITY/INTENSITY
(MAXIMUM)
General Commercial, Office
GC
0.50 FAR
Policy FLU 1.3.6: Designate General Commercial Development (GC). The General
Commercial (GC) areas are designated on the Future Land Use Map for purposes of
accommodating community -oriented retail sales and services; highway -oriented sales and
services; and other general commercial activities.
The General Commercial designation generally shall be located in highly accessible areas adjacent
to major thoroughfares which possess necessary location, site, and market requirements. The
maximum intensity of General Commercial development measured as a floor area ratio is 0.50.
All new development within General Commercial designated areas shall be required to comply
with performance criteria.
The General Commercial area is not generally intended to accommodate manufacturing,
processing, or assembly of goods, sales and service of heavy commercial vehicle and equipment,
or related services or maintenance activities; warehousing; uses requiring extensive outside
storage; or other activities which may generate nuisance impacts, including glare, smoke or other
air pollutants, noise, vibration or major fire hazards, or other impacts generally associated with
more intensive industrial uses.
The provision of residential must result in a no net increase in demand for public facilities (not
including schools) greater than that which would be required for general commercial uses. The
City will coordinate with the School Board regarding residential development within this district
as required in the Public -School Facilities Element to ensure the availability of adequate school
facilities.
It should be noted that if the property were zoned GC -2, the applicant would be allowed multi-
family up to 20 dwelling units per acre. The corresponding General Commercial (GC -2) zoning
classification allows up to 20 dwelling units per acre. The applicant is proposing 13.7 units per
acre.
Staff finds the requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment to be consistent with the City of
Sanford Comprehensive Plan.
LEGAL REVIEW:
This matter is not a quasi-judicial matter as amendments to local government comprehensive plans
are legislative in nature. If a proposal to amend the City's Comprehensive Plan is to be
recommended for denial, it would be appropriate to state the reason for such a recommendation to
be considered by the City Commission - such as the proposal is internally inconsistent with a goal,
objective or policy of the Comprehensive Plan or inconsistent with controlling State law or the
like. When lands are subject to the provisions of the City/County JPA; the City is bound to adhere
to the provisions of the JPA. Also, Section 171.062, Florida Statutes, pertaining to the effects of
annexations or contractions, anticipates that cities will expeditiously incorporate annexed
properties into their comprehensive plans and land development regulations upon being located
within the city limits of the annexing municipality.
The City Commission approved the first reading of Ordinance No. 2024-4792, with a three to two
vote on June 24, 2024.
The City Clerk published notice of the 2nd Public Hearing in the Sanford Herald on June 26, 2024.
The City Commission continued the 2nd Public Hearing of Ordinance No. 2024-4792 to July 22,
2024, on July 8, 2024.
The City Commission continued the 2nd Public Hearing of Ordinance No. 2024-4792 to August
12, 2024, on July 22, 2024.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff finds that the small-scale land use amendment is appropriate and suitable for the subject site
and is compatible with the surrounding land uses and is consistent with the City of Sanford
Comprehensive Plan, Joint Planning Agreement, East Lake Mary Small Area Study, and Chapter
163 of Florida Statutes.
At the June 6, 2024, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting per the recommendation of Staff,
the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended the City Commission adopt Ordinance No.
2024-4792, to amend the Future Land Use from Low -Density Residential -Single -Family (LDRSF)
and Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to General Commercial (GC) on 5.77 acres at project address
6498 North Ronald Boulevard.
Additional comments or recommendations may be presented by staff at the meeting.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
"I move to adopt Ordinance No. 2024-4792."
Attachments: Project Information Sheet
CPA Map
Site Aerial Map
Affidavit of Ownership
CAPP Report
Traffic Impact Analysis
School Capacity Letter
Ordinance No. 2024-4792
yFORp
c�0
FST. 18�� • •
WS_ RM X
Item Nol . A
CITY COMMISSION MEMORANDUM 24209
AUGUST 12, 2024 AGENDA
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission
PREPARED BY: Eileen Hinson, AICP, Director of Planning
SUBMITTED BY: Norton N. Bonaparte, Jr., ICMA-CM, City Manager
SUBJECT: Amend the Future Land Use from Low -Density Residential -Single -Family
(LDRSF) and Neighborhood Commercial to General Commercial (GC) on
5.77 acres at project address 6498 North Ronald Reagan Boulevard.
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:
❑ Unify Downtown & the Waterfront
❑ Promote the City's Distinct Culture
❑ Update Regulatory Framework
❑ Redevelop and Revitalize Disadvantaged Communities
SYNOPSIS:
A request to amend the Future Land Use from Low -Density Residential -Single -Family (LDRSF)
and Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to General Commercial (GC) on 5.77 acres at project address
6498 North Ronald Reagan Boulevard has been received.
The property owners are Christian Sharing Center Inc. and Dale & Company LLC. The applicant,
Daniel Ryan with the Christian Sharing Center is the applicant who completed the Citizens
Awareness and Participation Plan CAPP meeting that was held December 12, 2023. A copy of the
report is attached, which is satisfactory to the City.
The Affidavit of Ownership and Designation of Agent forms are attached, and other information
is available to ensure that all potential conflicts of interests are capable of being discerned.
F'ISCALISTAFFING STATEMENT:
The property owner, assessed tax value, total tax bill, and property status for 2024 is shown below:
Parcel Number
Assessed Value
Tax Bill
Property Status
(2024)
(2024)
13-20-30-300-0160-
$218,248
$1,064
Vacant Commercial
0000
13-20-30-300-040A-
$246,103
$1,200
Single Family
0000
It is the applicant's intent to develop the property into a 79 unit multiple -family community with
no commercial activity. The proposed development will facilitate new residential construction,
assisting in providing much needed housing to accommodate the City of Sanford growth. Thus,
generating additional tax revenue to the City.
No additional staffing is anticipated if the land use amendment is approved.
BACKGROUND:
The two parcels, totaling 5.77 -acres, are located on the west side of Ronald Reagan Boulevard
between Bedford Road and Tucker Drive. The properties are currently zoned AG, Agriculture and
RC -1, Restricted Commercial with the Future Land Use designations of LDR-SF, Low Density
Residential Single -Family and NC, Neighborhood Commercial.
The applicant is seeking to amend the Future Land Use designation from Low -Density Residential -
Single -Family (LDRSF) and Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to General Commercial (GC)
Its important to note that Ronald Reagan Boulevard is classified as a Minor Arterial road and a
commercial corridor. The subject property is surrounded by single-family to the west and north,
mobile home park to the east, and a vacant property to the south which is under review to be
developed as a commercial kennel.
Comprehensive Plan
Staff has outlined relevant Goals, Objectives, and Policies (GOP's) that support the proposed land
use amendment:
Objective FLU 1.1: Implement the Future Land Use Map Series. The City shall adopt and
implement the Future Use Map (FLUM) series in the Future Land Use Element goals of the
Comprehensive Plan. The maximum density and Floor Area Ratio for the General Commercial
future land use is as follows:
LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
MAP SYMBOL
DENSITY/INTENSITY
(MAXIMUM)
General Commercial, Office
GC
0.50 FAR
Policy FLU 1.3.6: Designate General Commercial Development (GC). The General
Commercial (GC) areas are designated on the Future Land Use Map for purposes of
accommodating community -oriented retail sales and services; highway -oriented sales and
services; and other general commercial activities.
The General Commercial designation generally shall be located in highly accessible areas adjacent
to major thoroughfares which possess necessary location, site, and market requirements. The
maximum intensity of General Commercial development measured as a floor area ratio is 0.50.
All new development within General Commercial designated areas shall be required to comply
with performance criteria.
The General Commercial area is not generally intended to accommodate manufacturing,
processing, or assembly of goods, sales and service of heavy commercial vehicle and equipment,
or related services or maintenance activities; warehousing; uses requiring extensive outside
storage; or other activities which may generate nuisance impacts, including glare, smoke or other
air pollutants, noise, vibration or major fire hazards, or other impacts generally associated with
more intensive industrial uses.
The provision of residential must result in a no net increase in demand for public facilities (not
including schools) greater than that which would be required for general commercial uses. The
City will coordinate with the School Board regarding residential development within this district
as required in the Public -School Facilities Element to ensure the availability of adequate school
facilities.
It should be noted that if the property were zoned GC -2, the applicant would be allowed multi-
family up to 20 dwelling units per acre. The corresponding General Commercial (GC -2) zoning
classification allows up to 20 dwelling units per acre. The applicant is proposing 13.7 units per
acre.
Staff finds the requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment to be consistent with the City of
Sanford Comprehensive Plan.
LEGAL REVIEW:
This matter is not a quasi-judicial matter as amendments to local government comprehensive plans
are legislative in nature. If a proposal to amend the City's Comprehensive Plan is to be
recommended for denial, it would be appropriate to state the reason for such a recommendation to
be considered by the City Commission - such as the proposal is internally inconsistent with a goal,
objective or policy of the Comprehensive Plan or inconsistent with controlling State law or the
like. When lands are subject to the provisions of the City/County JPA; the City is bound to adhere
to the provisions of the JPA. Also, Section 171.062, Florida Statutes, pertaining to the effects of
annexations or contractions, anticipates that cities will expeditiously incorporate annexed
properties into their comprehensive plans and land development regulations upon being located
within the city limits of the annexing municipality.
The City Commission approved the first reading of Ordinance No. 2024-4792, with a three to two
vote on June 24, 2024.
The City Clerk published notice of the 2nd Public Hearing in the Sanford Herald on June 26, 2024.
The City Commission continued the 2nd Public Hearing of Ordinance No. 2024-4792 to July 22,
2024, on July 8, 2024.
The City Commission continued the 2nd Public Hearing of Ordinance No. 2024-4792 to August
12, 2024, on July 22, 2024.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff finds that the small-scale land use amendment is appropriate and suitable for the subject site
and is compatible with the surrounding land uses and is consistent with the City of Sanford
Comprehensive Plan, Joint Planning Agreement, East Lake Mary Small Area Study, and Chapter
163 of Florida Statutes.
At the June 6, 2024, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting per the recommendation of Staff,
the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended the City Commission adopt Ordinance No.
2024-4792, to amend the Future Land Use from Low -Density Residential -Single -Family (LDRSF)
and Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to General Commercial (GC) on 5.77 acres at project address
6498 North Ronald Boulevard.
Additional comments or recommendations may be presented by staff at the meeting.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
"I move to adopt Ordinance No. 2024-4792."
Attachments: Project Information Sheet
CPA Map
Site Aerial Map
Affidavit of Ownership
CAPP Report
Traffic Impact Analysis
School Capacity Letter
Ordinance No. 2024-4792
PROJECT INFORMATION -- 6498 NORTH RONALD BOULEVARD
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Requested Action:
Proposed Use:
Project Address:
Current County Zoning:
Existing Land Use:
Tax Parcel Numbers:
Site Area:
Amend the future land use from Low -Density Residential -Single -Family
(LDRSF) and Neighborhood Commercial to General Commercial (GC) on 5.77
acres at project address 6498 North Ronald Boulevard.
Multi -family
6498 North Ronald Boulevard
AG, Agriculture and RC -1, Restricted Commercial
Vacant Commercial, Single Family
13-20-30-300-0160-0000 & 13-20-30-300-040A-0000
5.77 acres
Property Owners: Christian Sharing Center Inc.
600 North Highway 17-92, Suite 130
Longwood, FL 32750
Dale & Company LLC
1080 Crystal Bowl Circle
Casselberry, FL 32707
Applicant/Agent: Daniel Ryan
Christian Sharing Center Inc.
600 North Highway 17-92, Suite 130
Longwood, FL 32750
Phone: (407) 496-6406
Email: danxyan@thesharingcenter.org
CAPP Meeting: A CAPP (Citizens Awareness and Participation Plan) meeting was held on
December 12, 2023.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPLIANCE REVIEW
Planning staff has reviewed the request and has determined the use and proposed improvements to be consistent
with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
Current Future Land Use: Low -Density Residential -Single -Family (LDRSF) and
Neighborhood Commercial (NC)
Proposed Future Land Use: City of Sanford General Commercial (GC)
V.
t: 50 EXETT+ER COURT
I Ir
e. ' �y '~.a / yy,,,,.. ��'.I9L..t1'; E � i_ �y •��" 1M���. 1-�. � }'
'S = gp;IpppCIRCIFCOURT �`��
31
LUI
' Rn MIT
DOWNING STREET
Lie.,
��ug i'" , +.�;' ✓ � it a �+
e.
�F.yp�
pRNE § Pet ` ;fa.e',
r`' ew a WndN
16
SITE.w
WLh'6�
may4:.r �y %
Ale
0.
1 m
MON OEsHARBOR+PLA�,CE.
n.
J
AA
f �
,
Z
xx h }
-t i. .,v. „ y°`+ • 93 tib
RIDGE PLACE
;moi
}{°C �� • CANARY LAKE COURTS
Site s,, !�Y
6498 North Ronald Reagan Boulevard;
'� ' ' ? j
13-20-30-300-040A-0000 & �' � -
b s 1w. F ��y r , .. SWE:S CREST
13-20-30-300-0160-0000 ;��*�TUCKERtANE
�r
Asia
Five Points Village Community Meeting 12/12/2023
• Traffic
o Why can't there be a traffic light put in to help alleviate traffic issues?
o Traffic is already bumper to bumper.
o There have been accidents in this area due to the amount of traffic and the blind curve.
o People are already using Tucker Road as a cut through, and the apartments will add
more cars.
■ Will construction add to that traffic with the crews using Tucker to get around
traffic also?
o Will there be a turn lane into the complex or will people have to pass it and then do a U-
turn.
o There is already a lot of noise from the cars from Ronald Reagan and 17-92 and this
complex will just add more noise.
• Trees/Wildlife
o What will happen to the power lines already in the easement between houses and the
vacant land?
■ There is already power and spectrum issues whenever there are storms.
■ Will the apartments use the current power grid?
• Can the power grid be updated to accommodate the new apartments?
o What will happen to the Gopher turtles that currently live on the property as they are a
protected species?
o How much of the tree line will have to be cut to build the town house apartments?
■ Will there be permits pulled to cut down the trees?
■ Oxygen comes from the trees and there is concern with so many trees being
taken down.
o What will happen to the animals and rodents that currently live in the woods?
■ Who will pay for the pest control for the rats and snakes that will relocate to the
current homes when the land gets cleared?
■ There are kids and animals that live in the neighborhood and what happens if
they get bit?
o Will the land clearing cause flooding for the current residents?
o Can we keep some of the trees to use as a buffer between the wall and the houses?
• Wall
o How high will the wall be around the apartments?
■ Is 6 foot the maximum/minimum the wall can be or can it be higher as kids can
scale over a 6 foot wall pretty easily.
o How close to the current property lines will the wall be built?
o Can the wall be built first?
• Meeting
o Who gets the mail notices for these type meetings?
o The timeframe for today's meeting was not good for people to be able to attend after
work.
o No one from the mobile home park got the letter.
o When is the next meeting and who can they contact at the City of Sanford to complain
about this development?
■ They have already talked to the County Commissioners about the single-family
homes being built and they feel like they were not heard, especially by
Commissioner Zembower.
• It seemed like it was just lip service and went in one ear and out the
other as the County Commissioners already had their minds made up
before the meeting started.
• Crime/Security
o Will there be security on site?
o Will the lights from the apartments shine into the backyards of the current houses?
o How high up will the apartments be as there is concern about people being able to see
into the windows and showers of the homes.
o Drugs are already an issue in the area and these apartments will bring more drugs and
crime to the area.
■ There have been drug deals that have gone on in front of the church.
o The homes are going to be devalued due to the increased crime and drugs.
o What will stop these apartments from turning into slums like the ones off Sunland?
■ Those apartments started out looking nice but after 6 months turned into high
areas of drugs and crime.
■ Those residents throw trash into the yards of the homeowners and have torn
down the wall that was built.
■ We moved to this area to get away from apartments like that one and now you
are building a second one.
■ What will stop the new apartments from being just as bad as those?
o There are already people who are coming into the backyards so this will bring more
unwanted attention to the area.
o Will all these units be section 8 housing as that will bring in even more drugs and crime
to the area?
• Additional
o When will construction begin?
■ With the construction of the single-family homes starting next year will both
builds be going on at the same time or will they be back-to-back so there is
nonstop stop construction for the next few years?
o Will there be multiple families allowed to rent one of the units?
o Will the current sewer and water be shared with the apartments?
4,M,SXKF0RD AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND DESIGNATION OF AGENT
� , FLORIDA
w .sanfordfl.gov
Please use additional sheets as needed. If any additional sheets are attached to this document, please sign here and note below:
I. Ownership
1 Nina Yon
, hereby attest to ownership of the property described below:
Tax Parcel Number(s): 13-20-30-300-040A-0000
Address of Property: CR 427, Sanford, FL 32773
for which this rezoning and land use change application is submitted to the City of Sanford.
II. Designation of Applicant's Agent (leave blank if not applicable)
As the owner/applicant of the above designated property for which this affidavit is submitted, I designate the below named individual
as my agent in all matters pertaining to the application process. In authorizing the agent named below to represent me, or my
company, I attest that the application is made in good faith and that all information contained in the application is accurate and
complete to the best of my personal knowledge.
Applicant's Agent (Print): Daniel Ryan Signature:
Agent Address: 600 N. Hwy 17-92, suite 130, Longwood, FL 32750
Email: dan.ryan@thesharingcenter.org Phone: 407-496-6406 Fax:
111. Notice to Owner
A. All changes in Ownership and/or Applicant's Agent prior to final action of the City shall require a new affidavit. If ownership
changes, the new owner assumes all obligations related to the filing application process.
B. If the Owner intends for the authority of the Applicant's Agent to be limited in any manner, please indicate the limitations(s)
below. (i.e.: limited to obtaining a certificate of concurrency; limited to obtaining a land use compliance certificate, etc.)
The owner of the real property associated with this application or procurement activity is a (check one)
❑ Individual ❑ Corporation ❑ Land Trust ❑ Partnership ❑ Limited Liability Company
e Other (describe): 501 C3 Not for profit
1. List all natural persons who have an ownership interest in the property, which is the subject matter of this petition, by name and
address.
2. For each corporation, list the name, address, and title of each officer; the name and address of each director of the corporation;
and the name and address of each shareholder who owns two percent (2%) or more of the stock of the corporation. Shareholders
need not be disclosed if a corporation's stock are traded publicly on any national stock exchange.
3. In the case of a trust, list the name and address of each trustee and the name and address of the beneficiaries of the trust and the
percentage of interest of each beneficiary. If any trustee or beneficiary of a trust is a corporation, please provide the information
required in paragraph 2 above.
Name of Trust:
4. For partnerships, including limited partnerships, list the name and address of each principal in the partnership, including general
or limited partners. If any partner is a corporation, please provide the information required in paragraph 2 above.
For each limited liability company, list the name, address, and title of each manager or managing member; and the name and
address of each additional member with two percent (2%) or more membership interest. If any member with two percent (2%) or
more membership interest, manager, or managing member is a corporation, trust or partnership, please provide the
information required in paragraphs 2, 3 and/or 4 above.
Name of LLC:
6. In the circumstances of a contract for purchase, list the name and address of each contract purchaser. If the purchaser is a
corporation, trust, partnership, or LLC, provide the information required for those entities in paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and/or 5 above.
Name of Purchaser:
Date of Contract:
NAME
TITLE/OFFICE/TRUSTEE
OR BENEFICIARY
ADDRESS
% OF
INTEREST
Nina Yon
President & CEO
600 N. Hwy 17-92, suite 130. Longwood FL 32750
0
Gail Bittman
Board Chair
600 N. Hwy 17-92, suite 130. Longwood FL 32750
0
Steve Reed
Past Chair
600 N. Hwy 17-92, suite 130. Longwood FL 32750
0
Ron Davoli
Vice -Chair External
600 N. Hwy 17-92, suite 130. Longwood FL 32750
0
Michelle Smith
Vice -Chair Internal
600 N. Hwy 17-92, suite 130. Longwood FL 32750
0
Michael Heald
Treasurer
600 N. Hwy 17-92, suite 130. Longwood FL 32750
0
Mary Sherris
Secretary
600 N. Hwy 17-92, suite 130. Longwood FL 32750
0
(Use additional sheets for more space.)
7. As to any type of owner referred to above, a change of ownership occurring subsequent to the execution of this document, shall be
disclosed in writing to the City prior to any action being taken by the City as to the matter relative to which this document pertains.
8. 1 affirm that the above representations are true and are based upon my personal knowledge and belief after all reasonable inquiry. I
understand that any failure to make mandated disclosures is grounds for the subject rezone, future land use amendment, special
exception, or variance involved with this Application to become void or for the submission for a procurement activity to be non-
responsive. I certify that I am legally authorized to execute this Affidavit and to bind the Applicant or Vendor to the disclosures
herein.
4/3/2023
Date
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF Seminole
Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me by Nina Yon
on this 4th day of April 2023
Signature of Notary Public /P)
Personally Known X OR Produced Identification
Type of Identification Produced
Affidavit of Ownership - January 2015
Owner, Agent, Applicant Signature
Print, Type or Stamp Name of Notary Public
vtirrnnrvw�.:rvt;;.,ry w, �vi:.T+-:�
MICI{Y L. MYRICI{
%1Y COMMSSION P HH 19097Q
?°Fn�a EXPIRES: December 10, 2025
. CITY OF
I SANFORD AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND DESIGNATION OF AGENT
f 10410A
v .sanfordfl.gov
Please use additional sheets as needed. If any additional sheets are attached to this document, please sign here and note below:
I. Ownership
1 Dale & Company LLC hereby attest to ownership of the property described below:
Tax Parcel Number(s): 13-20-30-300-0160-000
Address of Property: 6498 N. Ronald Reagan Blvd, Sanford, FL 32773
for which this rezoning and land use change application is submitted to the City of Sanford.
II. Designation of Applicant's Agent (leave blank if not applicable)
As the owner/applicant of the above designated property for which this affidavit is submitted, I designate the below named iridividual
as my agent in all matters pertaining to the application process. In authorizing the agent named below to represent me, or my
company, I attest that the application is made in good faith and that all information contained in the application is accurate and
complete to the best of my personal knowledge.
Applicant's Agent (Print): Daniel Ryan Signature: 1\.
Agent Address: 600 N. Hwy 17-92, suite 130, Longwood, FL 32750
Email: dan.ryan@thesharingcenter.org Phone: 407-496-6406 Fax:
III. Notice to Owner
A. All changes in Ownership and/or Applicant's Agent prior to final action of the City shall require a new affidavit. If ownership
changes, the new owner assumes all obligations related to the filing application process.
B. If the Owner intends for the authority of the Applicant's Agent to be limited in any manner, please indicate the limitations(s)
below. (i.e.: limited to obtaining a certificate of concurrency; limited to obtaining a land use compliance certificate, etc.)
The owner of the real property associated with this application or procurement activity is a (check one)
o Individual o Corporation o Land Trust o Partnership rx"Limited Liability Company
o Other (describe):
I. List all natural persons who have an ownership interest in the property, which is the subject matter of this petition, by name and
address.
2. For each corporation, list the name, address, and title of each officer; the name and address of each director of the corporation;
and the name and address of each shareholder who owns two percent (2%) or more of the stock of the corporation. Shareholders
need not be disclosed if a corporation's stock are traded publicly on any national stock exchange.
3. In the case of a trust, list the name and address of each trustee and the name and address of the beneficiaries of the trust and the
percentage of interest of each beneficiary. If any trustee or beneficiary of a trust is a corporation, please provide the information
required in paragraph 2 above.
Name of Trust:
4. For partnerships, including limited partnerships, list the name and address of each principal in the partnership, including general
or limited partners. If any partner is a corporation, please provide the information required in paragraph 2 above.
5. For each limited liability company, list the name, address, and title of each manager or managing member; and the name and
address of each additional member with two percent (2%) or more membership interest. If any member with two percent (2%) or
more membership interest, manager, or managing member is a corporation, trust or partnership, please provide the
information required in paragraphs 2, 3 and/or 4 above.
Name of LLC: Dale & Company LLC
6. In the circumstances of a _contract for purchase, list the name and address of each contract purchaser. If the purchaser is a
corporation, trust, partnership, or LLC, provide the information required for those entities in paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and/or 5 above.
Name of Purchaser: The Christian Sharing Center
Date of Contract: 12-28-2022
NAME TITLE/OFFICEITRUSTEE ADDRESS % OF
OR BENEFICIARY INTEREST
M E20A 1080
�t
(Use additional sheets for more space.)
7. As to any type of owner referred to above, a change of ownership occurring subsequent to the execution of this document, shall be
disclosed in writing to the City prior to any action being taken by the City as to the matter relative to which this document pertains.
8. 1 affirm that the above representations are true and are based upon my personal knowledge and belief after all reasonable inquiry. I
understand that any failure to make mandated disclosures is grounds for the subject rezone, future land use amendment, special
exception, or variance involved with this Application to become void or for the submission for a procurement activity to be non-
responsive. I certify that I am legally authorized to execute this Affidavit and to bind the Applicant or Vendor to the disclosures
herein.
v3/ate
ate Owner, Agent, Applicant Signature
H&914 Igor 1i ccvnpa,y i, c ,
STATE OF FLORIDA A'
COUNTY OF 5<- qL(( tv 0 �—
Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me byPikk A•(Akeda,A
on this 3 day of t-PdZ I L_, 20 (j .
SignaQtureo XW
C'��
Personally Known OR Produced Identification
Type of Identification Produced
Affidavit of Ownership - January 2015
Print, Type or Stamp Name of Notary Public
DEBORAH L, BAUER
t' NOTARY FAX •:T"E C,' "LCRIOA
COY -MISSION' Z'435151
�h�' �� N!y Cammsscn � •e. �it�5/i024
C I VIL ENGINEERS
CENTRAL FLORIDA ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, LLC
INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS
Bridging Communities: Proposal for Affordable Workforce Housing
The Sharing Commons at 5 Points
We seek to address the need for additional workforce housing with this Land Use Change
Request from Neighborhood Commercial (pid 040A) and Agriculture (pid 0160) to General
Commercial. We are seeking this change to a compatible Land Use, in order to allow for
the Sharing Center's 79 -unit apartment complex, aiming to help fill the gap in more
affordable options amidst rising market rates.
Like other communities, Sanford, a city of history and progress, faces a challenge of
affordability. At the heart of this proposal is the essence of community. It recognizes that
affordable housing is not just about brick and mortar; it is about creating spaces where
Lives intertwine, where dreams find fertile ground to grow. This proposed 79 -unit apartment
complex is more than just structures — it is a promise to bridge the gap, to bring together
diverse backgrounds and aspirations under one roof.
The Sharing Commons at Five Points symbolizes hope, bridging divides and offering
stability and dignity to those who keep Sanford thriving. It's not just a Land Use change; it's
a commitment to change lives. It's about recognizing that the true wealth of a city lies not
just in its buildings but in the strength of its community. Let this proposed 79 -unit
apartment complex stand as a testament to Sanford's unwavering spirit, its resilience, and
its commitment to building a future where all can thrive.
1111 N. RONALD REAGAN BOULEVARD SUITE 101 • LONGWOOD, FLORIDA 32750
PHONE (407) 599-7010 MAIL @FLORIDAENG.COM
P W
N
11-'
O
l0
00
W
(`ry
(D
ll//"\
Co,
Q 1
o
iv
j�
i
� fin' �
•'��\
I��\
C
I�
-
I
V
ID
w
Lon
r
rh
j �
\
N
10
t
i
' v
i
(D
m n
Z Q)
c a
cl
1
uj
CCC III
v
G
CL
CL
J
Five Points Village
City of Sanford, Florida
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
Prepared for:
The Sharing Center
600 N YUS Highway 17-92, Suite 130
Longwood, FL 32750
Prepared by:
PTG
Premier Traffic Group
PremierTrafficGroup@gmail.com
350 E Crown Point Road, Suite 1100
Winter Garden, FL 34787
April 2024
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This traffic analysis is being conducted to assess the impact of the proposed Five Points Village
79 townhome development located north of CR 427/N Ronald Reagan Boulevard approximately
200 feet southwest of Carriage Cove Way/Bedford Road in the City of Sanford, Florida. The
analysis included a determination of project trip generation, a review of existing and projected
roadway and intersection capacity and a review of access operations.
The results of the traffic analysis are summarized as follows:
• The proposed development will generate a total of 581 daily trips of which 47 and 55 will
occur during the AM and PM peak hour, respectively.
• Access to the site will be provided via a right-in/right-out access driveway connection
onto CR 427/N Ronald Reagan Boulevard.
• An analysis of the study roadway segments indicates that the study roadway segments
currently operate adequately within their adopted Level of Service standard and are
projected to continue to do so upon buildout of the proposed development.
• An analysis of the study intersections indicates that the study intersections currently
operate adequately within their adopted Level of Service standard and are projected to
continue to do so upon buildout of the proposed development.
• The existing southbound left turn lane at the CR 427 and Meeting Place intersection and
the exiting northbound left turn storage lane length at the CR 427 and Bedford Road
intersection were analyzed to be adequate in length to accommodate the proposed
development.
Based on the analyses conducted, approval of the proposed project is requested from a
transportation perspective since the project does not adversely impact any of the study roadway
segments or intersections.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that I am a Professional Engineer properly registered in the State of Florida practicing with
Premier Traffic Group a dba of Karma Consultancy, LLC. and that I have supervised the preparation and
approve the evaluation, findings, opinions, conclusions, and technical advice hereby reported for:
PROJECT: Five Points Village
LOCATION: City of Sanford, Florida
I acknowledge that the procedures and references used to develop the results contained in
these computations are standard to the professional practice of Transportation Engineering as
applied through professional judgment and experience.
NAME: Vasu T.`PqryJ,
P.E. #: Flori4A N9. 7 JJ'j�P.
DATE: A �itTl f..:�'�� 5�• e�
.790
ylr
SIGNATURE. `
C,' fiC ORO-
IIltl���
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................1
1.1 Data and Methodology................................................................................................................................1
1.2 Study Area.........................................................................................................................................................2
1.3 Planned and Programmed Improvements............................................................................................2
2.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS.................................................................................... 3
2.1 Roadway Segment Analysis........................................................................................................................3
2.2 Intersection Capacity Analysis...................................................................................................................3
3.0 TRIP GENERATION........................................................................................................... 5
3.1 Trip Generation...............................................................................................................................................5
3.2 Trip Distribution/Assignment....................................................................................................................5
4.0 PROJECTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS................................................................................ 7
4.1 Background Traffic Projection...................................................................................................................7
4.2 Roadway Segment Analysis........................................................................................................................7
4.3 Intersection Capacity Analysis...................................................................................................................8
4.4 Turn Lane Analysis.........................................................................................................................................9
5.0 STUDY CONCLUSIONS...................................................................................................11
Appendix A: Preliminary Concept Plan
Appendix B: Methodology Coordination
Appendix C: Seminole County CMS
Appendix D: Traffic Volumes
Appendix E: Existing Intersection Analysis Output
Appendix F: Historical Trends Analysis
Appendix G: Projected Intersection Analysis Output
Appendix H: Turn Lane Analysis
I
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Existing Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis..........
Table 2: Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis ........................
Table 3: Trip Generation.....................................................................
Table 4: Projected Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis......
Table 5: Projected Intersection Capacity Analysis ....................
Figure 1: Project Location Map..........
Figure 2: Trip Distribution Map..........
............................................................................................... 3
............................................................................................... 4
............................................................................................... 5
............................................................................................... 8
9
LIST OF FIGURES
11
..........................................1
.......................................... 6
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The proposed Five Points Village 79 townhome development is located north of CR 427/N
Ronald Reagan Boulevard approximately 200 feet southwest of Carriage Cove Way/Bedford
Road in the City of Sanford, Florida. Figure 1 depicts the site location and the surrounding
transportation network. Access to the site will be provided via a right-in/right-out access
driveway connection onto CR 427/N Ronald Reagan Boulevard. A preliminary concept plan is
included in Appendix A.
1.1 Data and Methodology
Data used in the analysis consisted of site plan/development information provided by the
Project Engineers, AM and PM peak hour intersection traffic counts obtained by PTG and
roadway segment traffic volumes obtained from Seminole County and the Florida Department
of Transportation (FDOT). The analysis was conducted in accordance with the Traffic Impact
Analysis (TIA) Methodology Memorandum prepared for the project. A copy of the methodology
coordination is provided in Appendix B.
i
I
If e'wy Blvd
Esporta Fonesjo
Y/4k04 -v. f�y.v ovy oNd
f ei'eb i
f
f 9w.
-AM
Ui.e M, ftp � k
Flo
WE Dg i� w4
e4
� t✓tmr�;
o ,
�� wrm v <•
1 -mile ---____—
,,.,C.
Semmole Countyn
�•r. Records Center ``�*•'•
%%% a ElokeNWy�Nd E
, •C�
Figure 1: Project Location Map
Traffic Impact Analysis Five Points Village
1 April 2024
i
M. 1r,N ••
Figure 1: Project Location Map
Traffic Impact Analysis Five Points Village
1 April 2024
1.2 Study Area
The study facilities to be considered in the analysis are listed below. The study area was derived
by identifying the roadway segments within a 1 -mile radius and major intersections within a 1/4 -
mile radius as discussed in the Seminole County Traffic Impact Guidelines dated 05/07/2023.
Study Segments
• 059: CR 427 from Sanford Avenue to Sunland Drive
• 060: CR 427 from Sunland Drive to County Home Road
• 337: CR 427 from Keyes Court to E Lake Mary Boulevard
• 150: Lake Mary Boulevard from Country Club to US 17-92
• 150b: E Lake Mary Boulevard from US 17-92 to SR 417 Ramps
• 152: E Lake Mary Boulevard from CR 427 to Marquette Avenue
• 151 a: E Lake Mary Boulevard from SR 417 Ramps to CR 427
• 62a: CR 427 from Silkwood Court to US 17-92
• 344: US 17-92 from CR 427 to Lake Mary Boulevard
• 345: US 17-92 from Lake Mary Boulevard to Airport Boulevard
Study Intersections
• CR 427/N Ronald Reagan Boulevard and Carriage Cove Way/Bedford Road
• CR 427/N Ronald Reagan Boulevard and Meeting Place
• CR 427/N Ronald Reagan Boulevard and Project Access
1.3 Planned and Programmed Improvements
Based on discussions and review of data documented by FDOT, Seminole County and MetoPlan
Orlando, there are no pertinent roadway capacity improvements that were planned and
programmed within three (3) years of the project buildout.
Traffic Impact Analysis Five Points Village
2 April 2024
2.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
Existing conditions in the vicinity of the site were analyzed to establish a baseline for the traffic
conditions prevailing in the vicinity of the proposed development. The analysis included a review
of the existing roadway segment capacities and an analysis of the intersection operations at the
study intersections.
2.1 Roadway Segment Analysis
Table 1 summarizes the existing roadway segment capacity analysis for study segment. The
existing roadway segment conditions were analyzed by comparing the existing traffic volumes
observed on the study roadway segments to the service volumes at the adopted Level of Service
(LOS) standard for the roadway segments. The LOS data was obtained from the latest Seminole
County Transportation Management System Spreadsheet, excerpts of which are included in
Appendix C.
Table 1: Existing Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis
Seg ID
Roadway
Segment Location
Lanes
PH Dir
Capacity
Existing
Vol
Comm
Trips
Total Vol
LOS Stnd
Met?
59
CR 427
Sanford Ave to Sunland Dr
4D
42,560
24,403
126
24,529
Yes
60
CR 427
Sunland Or to County Home Rd
4D
42,560
26,024
1109
27,133
Yes
377
CR 427
Keyes Court to E Lake Mary Blvd
4D
42,560
29,531
306
29,837
Yes
150
Lake Mary Blvd
Country Club to US 17-92
4D
42,560
21,311
2273
23,584
Yes
150b
E Lake Mary Blvd
US 17-92 to SR 417 Ramps
4D
42,560
20,902
4923
25,825
Yes
152
E Lake Mary Blvd
CR 427 to Marquette Ave
4D
42,560
21,311
2273
23,584
Yes
151a
E Lake MaryBlvd
SR 417 Ramps to CR 427
4D
42,560
20,005
9335
29,340
Yes
62a
CR 427
Silkwood Ct to US 17-92
4D
42,560
14,889
0
14,889
Yes
344
US 17-92
CR 427 to Lake Mary Blvd
4D
48,000
22,744
466
23,210
Yes
345
US 17-92
Lake Mary Blvd to Airport Blvd
4D
48,000
22,744
0
22,744
Yes
The analysis indicates that the study roadway segments currently operate adequately within
their adopted Level of Service (LOS) standard.
2.2 Intersection Capacity Analysis
Table 2 summarizes the results of the existing intersection capacity analysis. The existing
intersection capacity analysis was conducted for the AM and PM peak hour using the Synchro
Traffic Impact Analysis Five Points Village
3 April 2024
software and the methods of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). The turning movement
count data and the existing AM and PM peak hour Turning Movement Volumes are the are
included in Appendix D. It should be noted that the raw turning movement counts were not
adjusted to peak season volumes using a seasonal adjustment factor obtained from the FDOT
Traffic Online website as the traffic conducted were conducted during the peak season.
Table 2: Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis
Intersection
Control
Time
EB
WB
NB
SB
Period
Delay LOS
Delay LOS
Delay LOS
Delay LOS
CR 427 & Bedford Rd
Stop
AM
38.9 E
50.6 F
0.1 A
0.2 A
PM
1 45.4 E
106.8 F
0.2 A
1.0 A
CR 427 & Meeting PI
Stop
AM
-- --
28.4 D
0.0 A
0.0 A
PM
-- --
35.4 E
0.0 A
0.1 A
The analysis indicates that the study intersections operate adequately during the AM and PM
peak hour period. It should be noted that minor street approaches of the CR 427 and Bedford
Road intersection experiences Level of Service F conditions which is a function of the stop -
controlled side street approaches to the CR 427 mainline. The detailed Synchro worksheets are
included in Appendix E.
Traffic Impact Analysis Five Points Village
4 April 2024
3. 0 TRIP GENERATION
To determine the impact of this development, an analysis of its trip generation characteristics
was conducted. This included a determination of the trips to be generated as well as their
distribution and assignment to the surrounding roadways. The estimated project buildout is
2026.
3.1 Trip Generation
Table 3 summarizes the trip generation analysis conducted using information published by the
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in the Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition.
The calculation indicated that the proposed development would generate a total of 581 daily
trips of which 47 and 55 will occur during the AM and PM peak hour, respectively.
The ITE Trip Generation graphs are included as part of the Methodology Memorandum in
Appendix B.
Table 3: Trip Generation
ITE
Code
Land Use
Size
Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Rate
Trips Rate
Enter
Exit Total Rate
Enter
Exit
Total
220
Multi -Family (Low -Rise)
79 DUs
7.36
581 0.6
1 11
1 36 47 0.69
35
20
1 55
Note: ITE Trip generation equation used as the R -squared value is greater than 0.7
3.2 Trip Distribution/Assignment
The trip distribution pattern was derived using historically available traffic counts, knowledge of
the travel pattern in the area and engineering/planning judgement.
Figure 2 provides the trip distribution developed for this project. Using this trip distribution
pattern, project trips were assigned to the surrounding study roadway network.
Traffic Impact Analysis Five Points Village
5 April 2024
� .rrrr +� �•v
IIIA' �,tT'�`� • `��,` i '.
fro ' SR,,.
emieconole CanCounlyter. „
Nrk R
h*°Y,yY Glvd;` E take M E lak
Fes° ♦ a»
Esporta t••i1neIi
® W Lx/:f �lpY.a Y.,Ary 6iVA v.`j ♦♦
1 Lry�yv �
SITI
a c j
t �
S A
/�,Y ♦ ^x e►��9 Shsle�c
yx,i,,
i
P � ♦ > lilfanr In 0'•l .4n!xm
a
%
siA �
t
Spring 'ricadNs
Seveiiiy Adventist♦
Q`i(S ♦,, III iryN i n
j
Figure 2: Trip Distribution Map
Traffic Impact Analysis Five Points Village
6 April 2024
4.0 PROJECTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
An analysis of projected conditions was conducted to determine the proposed development's
impact on the roadway segment capacities and to evaluate the operations of the study
intersections. The project buildout year for the analysis is 2026.
4.1 Background Traffic Projection
Projected traffic volumes consist of background traffic combined with site generated traffic.
Typically, background traffic volumes are determined by expanding existing peak hour traffic
volumes to the buildout year using an annual growth rate. A historical trend analysis was
conducted based on the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) data obtained from the MOT
Traffic Online website in the vicinity of the project (see Appendix F). The trend analysis
indicated negligible growth, therefore a nominal annual growth rate of 2% was utilized for the
analysis. This growth rate was applied to the existing traffic volumes as appropriate in order to
determine the projected background volumes in the project buildout year.
4.2 Roadway Segment Analysis
Table 4 summarizes the results of the projected study roadway segment capacity analysis. The
Projected roadway segment conditions were analyzed by comparing the projected traffic
volumes on the study segments to their respective service volumes at the adopted Level of
Service (LOS) standard.
The total projected traffic volume is composed of background traffic and project trips. Projected
background traffic was estimated using the annual growth rate discussed in the previous
section.
Traffic Impact Analysis Five Points Village
7 April 2024
Table 4: Projected Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis
Seg ID
Roadway
Segment Location
Lanes
PH Dir
Capacity
Trip
Dist
project Vol
Total Vol
LOS Stnd
Met?
59
CR 427
Sanford Ave to Sunland Dr
4D
42,560
60%
349
26,216
Yes
60
CR 427
Sunland Dr to County Home Rd
4D
42,560
40%
232
27,817
Yes
377
CR 427
Keyes Court to E Lake Mary Blvd
4D
42,560
30%
174
31,477
Yes
150
Lake Mary Blvd
Country Club to US 17-92
4D
42,560
15%
87
22,677
Yes
150b
E Lake Mary Blvd
US 17-92 to SR 417 Ramps
4D
42,560
20%
116
22,272
Yes
152
E Lake Mary Blvd
CR 427 to Marquette Ave
4D
42,560
5%
29
22,619
Yes
151a
E Lake Mary Blvd
SR 417 Ramps to CR 427
4D
42,560
15%
87
21,292
Yes
62a
CR 427
Silkwood Ct to US 17-92
4D
42,560
20%
116
15,898
Yes
344
US 17-92
CR 427 to Lake Mary Blvd
4D
48,000
60%
349
24,458
Yes
345
US 17-92
Lake Mary Blvd to Airport Blvd
4D
48,000
15%
87
24,196
Yes
wore: iorai vol = zuz4 rxtsrmg vol x II+(z%x j years),/ + Protect vol
The analysis indicates that the study roadway segments currently operate adequately within
their adopted Level of Service (LOS).
4.3 Intersection Capacity Analysis
Table 5 summarizes the results of the projected intersection capacity analysis. The projected
intersection capacity and operational analysis was conducted using the Synchro software and
the methods of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) and was performed for the AM and PM
peak hours. The projected volumes for the intersection capacity and operations analysis were
calculated as previously discussed.
Projected background traffic was estimated using the annual growth rate as previously
discussed. The projected peak hour volumes are also provided Appendix D.
Traffic Impact Analysis Five Points Village
8 April 2024
Table 5: Projected Intersection Capacity Analysis
Intersection
Control
Time
EB
WB
NB
SB
Period
Delay LOS
Delay LOS
Delay LOS
Delay
LOS
CR 427 & Bedford Rd
Stop
AM
45.0
E
71.0
F
0.1
A
0.2
A
PM
59.4 F
162.8 F
0.3 A
1.0
A
CR 427 & Meeting PI
Stop
AM
--
--
36.7
E
0.0
A
0.2
A
PM
-- --
42.1 E
0.0 A
0.3
A
CR 427 & Project Access
Stop
AM
15.7
C
--
-
0.0
A
0.0
A
PM
11.9 B
-- --
0.0 A
0.0
A
The analysis indicates that the study intersections are projected to continue to operate
adequately during both the AM and PM peak hour period. The CR 427 and Bedfrod Road minor
street approaches will continue to operate at Level of Service F conditions. The Synchro analysis
worksheets are included in Appendix G.
4.4 Turn Lane Analysis
CR 427 and Meeting Place Intersection
A review was conducted to assess the adequacy of the existing exclusive southbound left turn
storage lane length at the CR 427 and Meeting Place intersection. The review was conducted to
ensure that sufficient storage is available to serve the projected traffic volumes.
Total Turn Lane Length Required = Vehicular Deceleration Distance + Queue Storage
Deceleration @ 45 mph = 185' (incl. 50' taper), per FDOT Design Standards, (see Appendix H)
Queue = 95th percentile queue from Synchro = 0.1 vehicles, use 2 vehicles for queue = 50'
Total Turn Lane Length Required = 185' + 50' = 235' (incl. 50' taper)
Existing turn lane length = 300' (incl. 50' taper)
In summary, based on this analysis the existing exclusive southbound left turn storage lane
length at the CR 427 and Meeting Place intersection is adequate in length to accommodate the
proposed development.
CR 427 and Bedford Road Intersection
A review was conducted to assess the adequacy of the existing exclusive northbound left turn
storage lane length at the CR 427 and Bedford Road intersection. The review was conducted to
ensure that sufficient storage is available to serve the projected traffic volumes.
Total Turn Lane Length Required = Vehicular Deceleration Distance + Queue Storage
Traffic Impact Analysis Five Points Village
9 April 2024
Deceleration @ 45 mph = 185' (incl. 50' taper), per FDOT Design Standards, , (see Appendix H)
Queue = 95th percentile queue from Synchro = 0.2 vehicles, use 2 vehicles for queue = 50'
Total Turn Lane Length Required = 185' + 50' = 235' (incl. 50' taper)
Existing turn lane length = 340' (incl. 50' taper)
In summary, based on this analysis the existing exclusive northbound left turn storage lane
length at the CR 427 and Bedford Road intersection is adequate in length to accommodate the
proposed development.
Traffic Impact Analysis Five Points Village
10 April 2024
5. 0 STUDY CONCLUSIONS
This traffic analysis is being conducted to assess the impact of the proposed Five Points Village
79 townhome development located north of CR 427/N Ronald Reagan Boulevard approximately
200 feet southwest of Carriage Cove Way/Bedford Road in the City of Sanford, Florida. The
analysis included a determination of project trip generation, a review of existing and projected
roadway and intersection capacity and a review of access operations.
The results of the traffic analysis are summarized as follows:
• The proposed development will generate a total of 581 daily trips of which 47 and 55 will
occur during the AM and PM peak hour, respectively.
• Access to the site will be provided via a right-in/right-out access driveway connection
onto CR 427/N Ronald Reagan Boulevard.
• An analysis of the study roadway segments indicates that the study roadway segments
currently operate adequately within their adopted Level of Service standard and are
projected to continue to do so upon buildout of the proposed development.
• An analysis of the study intersections indicates that the study intersections currently
operate adequately within their adopted Level of Service standard and are projected to
continue to do so upon buildout of the proposed development.
• The existing southbound left turn lane at the CR 427 and Meeting Place intersection and
the exiting northbound left turn storage lane length at the CR 427 and Bedford Road
intersection were analyzed to be adequate in length to accommodate the proposed
development.
Based on the analyses conducted, approval of the proposed project is requested from a
transportation perspective since the project does not adversely impact any of the study roadway
segments or intersections.
Trac Impact Analysis Five Points Village
11 April 2024
APPENDIX
Appendix A: Preliminary Concept Plan
m v .. z w v m„v� -fa<
y m m
N n
Y.
o �
IN ti
IN
s
g !
S
F
v
bnxne.�nu��¢m —
CENTRAL FLORIDA ENL7NEERINC CONSULTANTS, LLC
0"N Gg—g-(wd Numiq
LdgweG, flwl 32—
(wr)sue vmn
se=
mAwWG ME
MASTER PLAN
FIVE POINTS VILLAGE, PD
City of Sanford, Florida
�
I
Novo
M VE
HM ,9 'x3
V Er
I m
N
In A
Y
—
o
1
mm
A
} L
�E • �
TUCKER DR.
c
N
4
66' ROW
m
i f � Y -I
R R A R A R R j
i
3
m v .. z w v m„v� -fa<
y m m
N n
Y.
o �
IN ti
IN
s
g !
S
F
v
bnxne.�nu��¢m —
CENTRAL FLORIDA ENL7NEERINC CONSULTANTS, LLC
0"N Gg—g-(wd Numiq
LdgweG, flwl 32—
(wr)sue vmn
se=
mAwWG ME
MASTER PLAN
FIVE POINTS VILLAGE, PD
City of Sanford, Florida
wv rz ma
M VE
Z5
S [
m
mm
�
�E • �
e bN >��
c
m
i f � Y -I
R R A R A R R j
i
3
m v .. z w v m„v� -fa<
y m m
N n
Y.
o �
IN ti
IN
wqg
Y
+�
g !
S
F
v
bnxne.�nu��¢m —
CENTRAL FLORIDA ENL7NEERINC CONSULTANTS, LLC
0"N Gg—g-(wd Numiq
LdgweG, flwl 32—
(wr)sue vmn
se=
mAwWG ME
MASTER PLAN
FIVE POINTS VILLAGE, PD
City of Sanford, Florida
wv rz ma
Appendix B: Methodology Coordination
PTC
Premier T rafr:o Group
METHODOLOGY MEMORANDUM
RE: Five Points Village, City of Sanford
Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology
03/15/2024
Job # 24159
The following is a methodology outline for the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the above -referenced
project. In general, the TIA will conform to the methodology requirements and guidelines documented by
the City of Sanford, Seminole County and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT).
Project Description
This traffic analysis is being conducted to assess the impact of the proposed Five Points Village residential
development located north of CR 427/N Ronald Reagan Boulevard approximately 200 feet southwest of
Carriage Cove Way/Bedford Road in the City of Sanford, Florida. The proposed project comprises 79
Townhomes. Figure 1 depicts the site location and the surrounding transportation network.
■
i
I
I
Espona hlaesyo
I
tab, f
1
1
;♦
1 -mile -----
Figure 1: Project Location Map
Site Access
Access to the site will be provided via a right-in/right-out access driveway connection onto CR 427/N
Ronald Reagan Boulevard. Attachment A provides the preliminary site plan.
Mailing: 15155 W Colonial Drive, # 784852, Winter Garden, FL 34787 1 Physical: 350 E Crown Point Road, Suite 1100, Winter Garden, FL 34787
PremierTrafficGroup@amail.com I C 321-948-9594
.
`♦ Scnunole counlrQ
J♦r:. Record, censor
LLhS
♦,♦ E lake, MM M'vd E lake,
C� v e,�,�vY
♦ L�
Ree.
e,-„!
1/4 -mile
♦♦
'
1
1
ED
1
;
1
;
,/
t
SITE
!
1
♦♦♦
I
�
aP��F
ars,_
/
r
- ---
r
�
I
i
r
1 -mile -----
Figure 1: Project Location Map
Site Access
Access to the site will be provided via a right-in/right-out access driveway connection onto CR 427/N
Ronald Reagan Boulevard. Attachment A provides the preliminary site plan.
Mailing: 15155 W Colonial Drive, # 784852, Winter Garden, FL 34787 1 Physical: 350 E Crown Point Road, Suite 1100, Winter Garden, FL 34787
PremierTrafficGroup@amail.com I C 321-948-9594
Five Points Village
Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology
03/15/2024
Page 2 of 3
Trip Generation
Table 1 summarizes the trip generation analysis conducted using information published by the Institute
of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in the Trip Generation Manual, 77th Edition. The calculation revealed that
the proposed development will generate a total of 581 daily trips of which 47 and 55 will occur during the
AM and PM peak hour, respectively. The ITE Trip Generation graphs are included for reference in
Attachment B.
Table 1: Trip Generation
ITE
Code
Land Use
Size
Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Rate
Trips Rate
Enter
Exit
Total Rate
Enter
Exit
Total
220
Multi -Family (Low -Rise)
79 DUs
7.36
581 0.6
11
36
47 0.69
35
1 20
1 55
Trip Distribution
The trip distribution pattern was derived using existing traffic counts and knowledge of the traffic patterns
in the area to develop a distribution pattern. The trip distribution map is provided in Figure 2. Using this
trip distribution pattern, project trips were assigned to the surrounding study roadway network.
Supporting traffic data is provided in Attachment C.
- ® -----— �Nlrom Blvd
Com ARd
Seminole Counly
i (>�rk Rewrds Center
i! kwy Blvd %% E Lake M E Lake
O�y % .n
Esporta Flnesy�
W � � -. „.- Me Mary Blvd r s ; i
® i - -
1..
_ tyke Annie
D+ qty Roae HT~
I
Clyde
r.. —: Dr r' Blur/ L
ad.!e Cr
eeIg-W.y
1 S SITE 0 H 1 "'e—way
AP
1 0� Qeaa o g z.. vole w.y
shales /
4
e a
� ' nrrsrr Ln dv; ealem T40
5
%
Spring Mead% -s j
Severity Advenlist%`, aQo�
0 _ o.,„ay
rrye,Ln
NRonald Rea90"
1 -mile
Figure 2: Trip Distribution Map
Five Points Village
Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology
03/15/2024
Page 3 of 3
Study Area
The study facilities to be considered in the analysis are listed below. The study area was derived by
identifying the roadway segments within a 1 -mile radius and major intersections within a 1/4 -mile radius
as discussed in the Seminole County Traffic Impact Guidelines dated 05/07/2023.
Study Segments
• 059: CR 427 from Sanford Avenue to Sunland Drive
• 060: CR 427 from Sunland Drive to County Home Road
• 377: CR 427 from Keyes Court to E Lake Mary Boulevard
• 150: Lake Mary Boulevard from Country Club to US 17-92
• 150b: E Lake Mary Boulevard from US 17-92 to SR 417 Ramps
• 152: E Lake Mary Boulevard from CR 427 to Marquette Avenue
• 151 a: E Lake Mary Boulevard from SR 417 Ramps to CR 427
• 62a: CR 427 from Silkwood Court to US 17-92
• 344: US 17-92 from CR 427 to Lake Mary Boulevard
• 345: US 17-92 from Lake Mary Boulevard to Airport Boulevard
Study Intersections
• CR 427/N Ronald Reagan Boulevard and Carriage Cove Way/Bedford Road
• CR 427/N Ronald Reagan Boulevard and Meeting Place
• CR 427/N Ronald Reagan Boulevard and Project Access
Projected Conditions Analysis
The projected conditions analysis will be conducted within the following framework:
• Counts: Traffic counts will be obtained during the AM and PM peak period and adjusted using a
peak season factor as necessary.
• Growth Factors: Growth factors, derived from historical traffic volume data, and committed trips
will be applied to existing traffic counts to develop projected/buildout background traffic
volumes.
• Analysis Periods: Analyses will be performed for existing (2024) and projected/buildout conditions
(2026).
• Projected Conditions Traffic. Project buildout traffic volumes will be added to the future
background traffic volumes to obtain total project/buildout traffic volumes.
• Roadway Analysis: Roadways segments will be evaluated using the Seminole County service
volume capacities, as applicable.
• Intersection Analysis: Intersection capacity analysis will be performed using the latest operational
analysis procedures documented in the Highway Capacity Manual as applied using the Synchro
software.
• Turn Lane Analysis: Turn Lane analysis will be performed for all the site access driveways based on
Section 1.3 of the Seminole County Public Works Engineering manual (dated 07/24/2013) and
designed based on FDOT requirements.
Traffic Impact Study Report
The traffic report prepared will summarize the study procedures, analyses and recommendations.
END
Attachment A
Preliminary Site Plan
ti m
m
�N
_
zi
I I
N�
-CENTRAL FLORIDA ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, LLC
ow
xaaev 1,
msm. im
�m ww(lmlrsue
a na.mmal>e°.aam ®I+. am
°RAMS °u MASTER PLAN
FIVE POINTS VILLAGE, PD
City of Sanford. Florida
m. K
I
I
NM ,9 •x3
D
'
N
W
S TUCKER DR.
66' ROW
� O
•G �
pppp
Irf
-
ao
ti m
m
�N
nl'
i
;@"k
a
-CENTRAL FLORIDA ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, LLC
ow
xaaev 1,
msm. im
�m ww(lmlrsue
a na.mmal>e°.aam ®I+. am
°RAMS °u MASTER PLAN
FIVE POINTS VILLAGE, PD
City of Sanford. Florida
m. K
.w a :mz
Attachment B
Trip Generation Information
Land Use: 220
Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise)
Description
Low-rise multifamily housing includes apartments, townhouses, and condominiums located within
the same building with at least three other dwelling units and that have two or three floors (levels).
Various configurations fit this description, including walkup apartment, mansion apartment, and
stacked townhouse.
• A walkup apartment typically is two or three floors in height with dwelling units that are accessed
by a single or multiple entrances with stairways and hallways.
• A mansion apartment is a single structure that contains several apartments within what appears
to be a single-family dwelling unit.
• A fourplex is a single two-story structure with two matching dwelling units on the ground and
second floors. Access to the individual units is typically internal to the structure and provided
through a central entry and stairway.
• A stacked townhouse is designed to match the external appearance of a townhouse. But, unlike
a townhouse dwelling unit that only shares walls with an adjoining unit, the stacked townhouse
units share both floors and walls. Access to the individual units is typically internal to the
structure and provided through a central entry and stairway.
Multifamily housing (mid -rise) (Land Use 221), multifamily housing (high-rise) (Land Use 222),
affordable housing (Land Use 223), and off -campus student apartment (low-rise) (Land Use 225)
are related land uses.
Land Use Subcategory
Data are presented for two subcategories for this land use: (1) not close to rail transit and (2)
close to rail transit. A site is considered close to rail transit if the walking distance between the
residential site entrance and the closest rail transit station entrance is 1/2 mile or less.
Additional Data
For the three sites for which both the number of residents and the number of occupied dwelling
units were available, there were an average of 2.72 residents per occupied dwelling unit.
For the two sites for which the numbers of both total dwelling units and occupied dwelling units
were available, an average of 96.2 percent of the total dwelling units were occupied.
The technical appendices provide supporting information on time -of -day distributions for this
land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or the trip
252 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 3 Wei
generation resource page on the ITE website (https://www.ite.org/technical-resources/topics/trip-
.....................................................................................
and -parkin, generation/).
For the three sites for which data were provided for both occupied dwelling units and residents,
there was an average of 2.72 residents per occupied dwelling unit.
It is expected that the number of bedrooms and number of residents are likely correlated to the
trips generated by a residential site. To assist in future analysis, trip generation studies of all
multifamily housing should attempt to obtain information on occupancy rate and on the mix of
residential unit sizes (i.e., number of units by number of bedrooms at the site complex).
The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, the 2010s, and the 2020s in British
Columbia (CAN), California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, Ontario (CAN), Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina,
South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and Washington.
Source Numbers
188, 204, 237, 300, 305, 306, 320, 321, 357, 390, 412, 525, 530, 579, 583, 638, 864, 866, 896, 901,
903, 904, 936, 939, 944, 946, 947, 948, 963, 964, 966, 967, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1036, 1047, 1056,
1071,1076
ECrr General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 000-399) 253
Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise)
Not Close to Rail Transit (220)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 22
Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 229
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
6.74 2.46-12.50 1.79
Data Plot and Equation
4000
X
3000
X
X
N �
Lu X �X
N
CL
F 2000 ^------------------- ........:...........
.................
F X X
X
X
X:
X
1000
X
X
X
X
0 0 100 200 300 400 500
X = Number of Dwelling Units
X Study Site Fitted Curve — — — — - Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 6.41(X) + 75.31 R'= 0.86
254 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 3 WE
Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise)
Not Close to Rail Transit (220)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 49
Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 249
Directional Distribution: 24% entering, 76% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
0.40 0.13-0.73 0.12
Data Plot and Equation
N
C
W
N
d
H
300
200
X
............
100
X
Z /
/ X
x
�l
X
0 0 1000
X = Number of Dwelling Units
X Study Site Fitted Curve
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.31(X) + 22.85
— — — — - Average Rate
Rz= 0.79
2000
,`er General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 000-399) 255
/
/
/
X
/
/
/
/
/
X
....................../_......._.
--
X
Y/
X
/
X
X
/
/
X
/
X/
X
Z /
/ X
x
�l
X
0 0 1000
X = Number of Dwelling Units
X Study Site Fitted Curve
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.31(X) + 22.85
— — — — - Average Rate
Rz= 0.79
2000
,`er General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 000-399) 255
Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise)
Not Close to Rail Transit (220)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 59
Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 241
Directional Distribution: 63% entering, 37% exiting
venicie i rip veneration per uweiiing unit
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
0.51 0.08-1.04 0.15
uata clot ana
500 I
400
300
c
W
c
F
F
200
100
uation
X
X
X
X X
X
K
X
/1
° 0 1000
X = Number of Dwelling Units
X Study Site Fitted Curve
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.43(X) + 20.55
- - - - - Average Rate
Rz= 0.84
2000
256 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 3 WE 7'
i
i
i
/X:
/1
° 0 1000
X = Number of Dwelling Units
X Study Site Fitted Curve
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.43(X) + 20.55
- - - - - Average Rate
Rz= 0.84
2000
256 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 3 WE 7'
Attachment C
Area Traffic Counts
x
[7 �
H 11
O r
Cn
C/)
�HC(nn
F3 II II II
H
H n] cn (7
zHMO
G) i n .g
H010
zxza
H dy
H F< C J
x�Kd
K '.b y `•
Ll W t7
AHC II
N H y
O H
H z
tJ H y
H ['j r
zn
m
Cf) rnHCl)
H H
Z II II H
JyHxF-3
x1XH[7
d H ;U •
xxd
ro
rol�tn u
HxlxlrJ
O H
U) Cn Cl)
F< H F3 F3
[7 H H
inHH�
C7 C7 ;U
xl N
H
x II II H
w
CD 7
z0H
CNCL']
>zz
r0y
C x
w FG
CJ
Cn
H
H
H
C�7
N N N N N N N N N N N N I K
Oo0000oOOOOO I t'J
NN W.A(n m JO 10 CD N) I
I
I
F-` H H H H N N N N N NN 1
6l d>6101m CD ONN W W N I
N N W Cil N (n (JI O O O O O i
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C7
O O O O O O O O O O o O I H
(-1 n7nn7�C]C]C]FJ C]h7 (� I
I
zzzzzzzzzzzzId
I w
I CJ
J J JNNOOH`H i—F- I n
N N1.0 O H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 H
O O O O O O O O O O O O I H
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
1 z
I H
w � O cn to cn cn to In Cn cn Cn I d
I H
I
H HHHHHH I CJ
NOD NNNOOHHNNH I n
.11.AIt, cn�cncn00000 I H
O O O O O O O O O O O O I H
00000000000010
Iz
a
1 �
1x
ro
I �
10 to to to 10 to to to to w w w
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
C) O O O o O O O o 0 0 o I ;U
iw
I N
(n N cii (n (n in (n o (n (n (n (n I b
OIN IO N(I7 W 016110 .A .� W 1 O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ;U
1 H
I hl
HNNNH H Hi �rl
N OO U7 J(n W ON I n
IH
100 NON O J 1 O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 'u
to
H
H
C7
N
O
J
J
I
(7
;U
N
J
x
x
G)
z
m
H
Q
Cl)
I
H
J
N
R
Cn
t'7
z
0
r
M
m
X
ro
E
O
ro
O
Cf)
H
tJ
r
H O
H
O Cl)
N ro
N O t7
xl t+7
�
°zn
H z
nCnH
� H
r�0
H 'TJ
H
CA H1
d H y
'o Cn Cl)
m 10
1000
0N;j
U11
H H y
C+7 H
O
z
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N I �<
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Di
OOHH I--'--'h-'HH HHHNNN I ,>1
N IO OHN w U701J W LOO H`N I 'o
Cn
H
H
N
J
0
O
co
I
r
x
C
C7
n
0
C
z
H
FG
J
J
I
H
z
0
r
M
H
NzrJ
C) C/)
N ro
NOl7
� lel
Hyy
to H ;d
z0zz
n Cn H
ry0
HN
H
W H
C7H�
� ro
1000
0102
H1F-I�
nH
M H
0
z
x �
I
I
y
W NNW W NNNN Io Io IoW W W I
O to to W W O N.P. 0 m 61 W N N I
F-3 ray
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
0 r
O O o O o O O o O O O O O O O 1 H
�V
I
�
nnron10�x�nronrotnnro 1
W
I
C/)
HcCnn
�Dl
II II II
zzzzztlCJL]tUL=it]L]tJL7L=7 I C7
I H
G) N C) X
H H H H H Ol Ol m OD IO to to to lO w I n
H Oro
WUIUIJJ(.JIt. (nloNlolo(nJ W 1 H
5� C7C.,'
0000000000000001 H
H l7H
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 1
z
xCJI{d
1
J
N
>N
dye II
NH �3
W C/) (n co cn :4:E S- :2 5;:E S-.':2 1 0
O
CAH
NH;L4'
L'
HHF Ht -I (n Ln V7lO11OlOIOIONOD I n
.7
HN Ly
`
JIt, .Am -.3 W lo(n W J JLI) (n O1 1 H
Cn
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O I H
[J
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
CnmF3U]
I z
II 11
I N
Z
'-i H M y
wx"m
.
Nmt
I
ry
I x
II
HPd�
n0
H ',zJ ;d N
W W WIO 1.0 IO IO l0 l0 10 10 1 10 10 10 I n
O HH
I
L-jLAw
J01000000000000001 O
CA U]U]
W to N 000000000000 I
C I-3 1-31-3
L'7HH
UU)jF3F-3y
I t7
t J t_?
...
I rJ
�
N Cn (n (n Cn Cn (n Cn U1 Cn (n (n (n N (n I '.TJ
CJ
HI-Ili NW0a-X,wNNI NHH I n
y
IH
N II II H
J(n lO OIW IQ Ln W 016110 A A W I O
W
N O1 N 000000000000 I iil
CD
z 0 H
cxam
r0 H
I H
I
EDE tC
N
N W W N IO W W W N N Cn Cn Cn
J JJ W W.A .A .A W W I O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 h7
C2]
W
H
H
H
N
Cn
H
H
N
J
0
O
co
I
r
x
C
C7
n
0
C
z
H
FG
J
J
I
H
z
0
r
M
H
NzrJ
C) C/)
N ro
NOl7
� lel
Hyy
to H ;d
z0zz
n Cn H
ry0
HN
H
W H
C7H�
� ro
1000
0102
H1F-I�
nH
M H
0
z
r
y0
N z o
O W�0,
Nro
N O 0
7J LTJ
(n H ;a
°zzx
H z
n (n y
r>0
H tTl
H
�yH�I
',c1 W Zn
� ro
ro00
Orox
HF11-iy
n y
LTJ H
O
z
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N I K
w n
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I m
H O
O O O h` H H H H H H F- H H N N N I .>
y (--
-.J N ko CD H N W.A U161 J 00 lfl O H N I
.. y
K
C:) ••
CD
x
I
o J
I
J J
ftj d
HHF--'F'HH F--- H F,FN NN I
N W N H N N.A .P 61 M O O lO N N I
I I
('?
61W O F-' O J J F� w w O N U161 O O I
F-3 ry
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O I d
r Cn
L�
O O O o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 y
> M
00
n
nonnnnronronnn iwnti
z
Cl)
O
(n
r
�3CCl) n
t�
II II II
t+J t J L 1 L 1 C 1 C J t+7 L�] t�7 tai t 7 t�] t�J t�] t+i t�7 I C7
H
H ro wn
zH�Jo
HH HH I [ay
C
�] rx] ("j x
SOI OIN (n 6161 C31 (t CD l00010NN I n
d
HOro
WWMJUlMMMiOpOOornoo 1 y
$� .x z C'
0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o I H
H 0 y
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0
O
H K M
I
�C L'7 K C7
KxJ�
I
D>- N
H
xJ cn �] II
`L"L::2':E:EF,�.5'.`L'S'.,F.,�
OHH
H�
�Z
F, y �+
Lay F.3 'Sj
(S1J JOl (56161) J W w OOoo0 I n
0
H.. Lay r
W o.A.P WHH Lo .r, CII O Cn Ulo 00 I y
:r
(/2
O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 H
H
0000000000000000 i 0
0
U) m F-3 Un
II II H
N
Z
I
L7
ro
xxd..
ro
1x
�
I
v
ro Mu
�
I�
H .ro '.-d']
lfl (D W W Flo C010 -,o CO to w ko low ko I n
OH
. . . I y
gvMLay�o
OJ61Q70000000000001 O
C/)Mm
10W1flN000000000000 I 'O
Ky 1-33
Ly H H
Cal LTi �7
I
Cn Cn Ln UI UI UI I Cn Cn (JI I
Cn CI UI CII (n CII U
n CI
m X ��
NNHF NN w JI P W NNH NF -1H I n
y
Iy
PIN II II H
PJ(n 10 O1 (b lfl N(n W 616110 A A W I O
w
HU761Cn000000000000 I ZI
CDzo
Cxal�
LL�OH
I H
�x
I
I hJ
[n t{
H H H NHNNH I
[J
WOO 6I.AJJJJF-BOO .P .n .Pww I n
1-3
�7
N F-' N W UI H H 6161 W J J J OO I O
O O O O O Cl O O O O O O O O O O I ;d
C1
W
H
7CH
y
H
tJ
r
y0
N z o
O W�0,
Nro
N O 0
7J LTJ
(n H ;a
°zzx
H z
n (n y
r>0
H tTl
H
�yH�I
',c1 W Zn
� ro
ro00
Orox
HF11-iy
n y
LTJ H
O
z
r
y0
H
OV]�
N O u
x y ro
C/) H W
zzx
H z
>yy
r�vo
y hl
H
W y
dy�y H
n
� ro
ro00
Orox
7drJy
y H
n y
tJ H
0
z
NN NN NN N N N N N N I IC
U] n
000000000000 I m
H 0
F- H H H H H H H H N N N I>
H a
N N wa, Nm JO Io CD
z
F-3
K
J ..
X-
J
h
I
H l6
I
V7 J
ftj u
I
y
UI Cn(n Cn(n 016101 J 0161
n
Ul U7 H N c0 .A to to O W to m I
F-3 rx]
000000000000
O r
000000000000
n
oNnonnnmmnnnl
H
m
i
z y
O a
C/)
r x
yCCAn
t� z
HII II II
z zzzzzzzzzz d
to x
H hi C/I n
O
G: rJ n
(n Ln Ln Ln 016161 6161) I n
y 0 tid
cn H NI'D Irl �D �10 W wm I y
N
:2: x z a
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 H
H Cly
000000000000 1 O
y 1-14 m
I z
xCJ�<tj
I
7 6 L'7
y
y tJ
O
Uy� II
r
N H H
I
N
H
N
��Hz
i�
Hy a
I N
L7y�N
I n
H'.M
Iy
tl
00(D 00000000 I O
FG
Mm y CA
I z
Fa y
I
b7
II II H
N
Z
I
C
0 Co �3 �
d
�xHM
n
d H ;U �•
xl
xxd
I >F
I
ro �i t l 11
1 h]
J
x1�y
I
H;U 7d 'TJ
i6 io io�o ko 1�0iowao Co 6000 I n n
0 H
I y
W
WC]C+W
0000000000001 O
m
OCA V)
000000000000 I
C7HHy
F3 �
Co H>1
AHy
I d
tJ tJ xl
I
io io io kD io io io io ko ko w I
m x CA
wto to to to co WW c0 co co I n
N II II H
koioiowioioiow W io I O
W
00000000 000 I
Oatm�
z0�3
cxam
�zz
roy
Iy
a�x
t J
I
I K]
[J
NNNNI-'.A.A.A 1-100 I n
:
'�J
.A 07 ao N Cn Cl OD l 0
00000000 000 1 xJ
tJ
co
y
H
F-3
N
r
y0
H
OV]�
N O u
x y ro
C/) H W
zzx
H z
>yy
r�vo
y hl
H
W y
dy�y H
n
� ro
ro00
Orox
7drJy
y H
n y
tJ H
0
z
x
H n7
G)
co
�3 CD n
� II II II
H
H h] Cn n
z H M O
OF30ro
�xzc
H C7 F3
H K L7
x�Kd
t+7 ;d N
�LIJ
HEn II
N H H
O H
H C-
F' H C
H [] r
in `
Cn 61 H Cn
H H
z I II H
y H x
;aXHm
u H "a I.
xxd
ro
KK
0 H
i1 c co wtw
K H H H
LTJ H H
�-3
cnHH�
�o tJ
N oEn
H
PIN II II H
w
O z O H
Cxa�
�zx
rOH
Lzx
to K
tJ
tJ
Cn
H
H
H
tJ
NNNNNNNNNNN I K Cn n
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I M H 0
F-
+F - F- -' HHHHHNNN I .> H c
N W.PC7161JCAl00HN i �7 C+] z
.. y
K
J ••
J
I H l0
I rn J
I
N N N N N N w w w w w l I I
N O H W 6110 N.P H O O I
000 Ui O U7000Ln C17 I d (n h7
O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0
L'7nnonnnnnnn I H
I z H
O c
r x
� z
ro
wwwwwwww Ww I u Cn H
I H to x
I ,71 C 1
I m 0
N N N N N N W W W W I n rJ
NOF - ' W 6110 m 1 HO 1 H N
OOO (JI C) U1000 U1 I H
O O O O O O O O O o 0 1 0
Iz
1
IH ro
H
O
i d �
1 H x
I tJ
I H
I H ;i7
00 0000000010 K
I Z
I [b
I N C
d
n
I � I
I x •�
I N
I hi J
I � `
to l0 to w,,6 l0 to bo N CA W I n
00000000000 I 0 C+7
00000000000 I ;o .P
ID
(7
I d
i rJ
I'D 0�10 w O ko i
�o io io w w io I C7
io io �o io �o io I O
000o OO I U
H H H H
N N N O
Cb (b N •A I
000 0 1 �1
H H R H H H I
H•AX •P HO i n
I H
Ut JOOJ O H I O
0 0 0 Co 0 0 i W
11
r
HO
H
o En
NOu
to y xJ
0 O
�zz
nCnH
t7'>0
HtJ
H
Cf) H
U H
H H
zi m Cn
t� ro
ro00
Oroz
w m F3
H H
Cxj H
C+7 H
0
z
N NNNNNNNNNNN I F< (n n
000000000000 I tJ H O
HH`HHHHF--`NHNNN I 'y H a
HN W.ACn01�IN(00HN I 'o LJ z
.. y
K
H
N z u
O N >
N O 0
°x °z tNJ
H z
nCnH
r�P0
H 11
H
W H
U7 3
ynz
m ro
y 11 ftl 0F3
nH
tJ H
0
z
x �
I
I
C7
I
y H
(n (n (n cn cn a1 o1 1
(')
U'i UIH N(w w C) w mO .P l0 l0Ol0 d> 1
y ry
OOOO00000000 I C7
p r
O o 0 Co 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 H
I
n1JnnnnnnmC)nn I
(A
I
HCcnn
y
IH
HroU]n
1 z
zHtJ0
I tJ
G] rJ n:K
Ln (n cn Cnm mm mdlJ I n
H Ohl
(n H- N) ko X,(Dw W (0 01 1 H
E x z a
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I H
H 0 y
O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
H K tJ
I z
xC1 CC7
1
�7
KLl
I
oC7
>tJ
U y W II
FO
I K7
1-3 C
I tJ
tJHD�l
I n
H •• tJ r
I H
Cn •
I H
[J
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Cn rn F-3
I z
F3 y
I
II II H
I N
Z
I
TSH xF3
0H'0•-
xxd
�
1x
I
ro t�J t�J 11
:UN
1010(0(0(0(0(0 l0 co co 0o co I n
0tJ
mJ o
000000000000 1 0
(n(n(n
o00000000000 1 x1
F<G 3HH
N H H
7y tJ
to to l0 to w w w to l0ww I
10 l0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 I n
F3
. . . . . I H
x II II H
to to to to to to l0 10 to w kD I 0
W
00000000 000
oCrJ�
z 0 H
cxam
N O H
I H
CN=
I
I n7
(/] K
HHHHHHNN NHH I
tJ
NNNNH.AIt, .p N00 I n
�J
.0 Cl L11 J N �I O F--` .P I O
00000000 000 I
CJ
Cl)
H
H
H
tJ
H
N z u
O N >
N O 0
°x °z tNJ
H z
nCnH
r�P0
H 11
H
W H
U7 3
ynz
m ro
y 11 ftl 0F3
nH
tJ H
0
z
x
� H
n
H FTJ
O r
.. n
W
HHCcnn
H II II II
H ftl U]n
zHMO
c')ron:4
H O ro
H x C7 F3
H K LJ
m
m
>M
U H C II
N H H
O H
H z
~ LTJ �3
H • LTJ r
W
co m F3 co
� II II H
z
�HxH
W H LTJ
C7Hw
xxo
ro
KK
�t-I m II
H ;U xl "lj
O H
x1 L1 m w
W W W
KH3 3H
LJ H H
c
inF3HH�
L7 r� z
z • L1
m x �o En
H
x u II H
w
C)
z0H
cxcL�
roH
cn K
[�7
LXJ
W
H
H
H
m
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N I K
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I LJ
O O O H N H H H H H F- H H N N N I .•Y
J00 lO OHNW "A 0101 J CO 100 HN I 'o
I
1
WW W W W W W W W oA.A Ln U7.A
U1 U1 N F -•F -`NO W �]N Ul O F- M W M I y
J.P J W H 0000 d>�,DO.A H lO J I 'y
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l d
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o I H
onnnmmnnnnnnnnnnI
z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z l d
I H
I `x1
HF-•HHHHHF�HNNNNNNN I Lam]
J J m Cn Ul M U7 m OO HN UI U7 W H I n
OOJ W Ln C) o Cn Cn W 100JOlOW I H
N O Ul Cn U1 O 000001 O O Ln Cn UI I H
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
1
I H
I
in in in V] Cn in V] V] W Zn (n (n w W w (n I d
I H
I �
J J OI(n N m OF OI OOH N OF Ln W H W I n
w J w M U1 O O U1 U1 w 10 O J O lO W I H
070 N 070700000 U1 O O U7 U1 U1 I H
000000000000000010
I z
0
I �F
Ix
I
I n7
H H H H H H H H H H I
H w w N O O O O O OlO IO W w N00 I n
COO O 10 U7 Ul U7 Ul N 07000000 I O
HN J CO 000000000000 1 ;1J
r..
1 11
Cn U7 Cn OF Ul Ul cn U7 Cn Cn (n Ln Ul Ul 1J1 (n I ',b
10 07 01 10 0 00 0 10 10 U7��.nN�T I n
I H
oH•HcncncnH.cmcnco,Arnrnrnw I O
w10J.p00000000000o I :�
IH
I N
H H H H H H H H F-• H H N H H H F-' I
w W H H N N N NF ---.A.0 .P O H 00 1 n
. I H
0010101 .D OD OO N UI J N J W;z, I O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O I W
n
0
C
z
H
K
x
H
Nz0
O Cn b
N to
NOu
`xJ L J
xHro
H y
wHZJ
Oox
z z m
H z
n co H
� H
r�0
H
W H
C7 H
H H
n
xJ [n to
L-7 ro
ro00
Oroz
H H >
n H
LTJ H
0
z
x
C) H
H hm
O r
�cCl)n
H II II II
H ny Cl) n
zHt•70
GlhlQX
H O 10
:2xza
H d H
H K t+7
xtJKl7
y tJ••
;Uy� II
N H H
H t•7 H
Ham• r�r
t']
Cn rn H Cn
H H
Z II II H
�HCC�
xxHr�
CJHx1••
xxo
homtK+i II
Hx1 ;U �J
0 H
in w cn
KHHH
L'7H H
(AHHy
tJ tJ;tl
tJ x'a En
H
x II II H
w
C) a h]
Cxat�
�zx
NOH
azx
DIz
Cn K
t7
z1
tJ
Cn
H
H
H
tJ
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N I K
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 M
O O O F- H H H H H H H H H N N N I
J m lO O H N wIrl (.n 0I J W(OOHN I
I
I
OJCn (77 .p N61 �A JCn OI CA W N Nl0 I
(nOU7000(n(nOUI(nCD Ln(nLn W I
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 H
z%�zz2i%.2,7,z%.zzzzzz i C7
I ;A
H NHHHHHHHHHNHHHH I ti]
(O(O J JmmOmW W mO JmmN 1 C]
(n CD Ln(n(nooCnOo(n(no(n(no I H
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I H
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
I z
I H
in (n Cn in U] W Cn w Cn (n (n (n in (n CA Zn I d
H00 OOJJ010�071OJ ODJ 610l O1.P I C7
000cncn0(noo(nocn(noocn I H
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o I H
O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 O
1z
m
I �F
Ix
I
I
(0 m o m (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o I CZ
. I H
O J OI C0000000000000 1 0
(0 W(0 N o 00000000000 I 'O
I N
(n (-n (-n Ln N(n(n Cn(n Cn(n Cn(n(n V1 Ln I
NN H H NN W .A XA W NN H I Ci
.0 J(n(001 N(ON N w OI OI(O .A .P W I O
H(n Ol Cn O 000 o o 000000 I 'U
I H
Him
(n (n M (n .A (P P N .P Vi VF N W M N I n
HNA JNUI(010 F-'6101NH W HUl I O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I W
C)
0
a
z
H
K
H
Nzt7
O Cl) b
N00
Hyy
Cl) H ;a
OON
�zz
nCnH
r>0
H n7
H
w H
U H
Hoz
xi Cn (D
L-1 ro
ro00
ONz
HH
C) H
t'7 H
O
z
H
O co >
NO l7
xHro
H 'Jy •.>y
Cl) y ;j
,roOZm
H z
>Hy
r>0
y N
H
to H
0 F-3
ynz
� ro
ro00
Oroz
y H
ny
L'7 H
O
z
NNNNNNNNNNN I FG
Cn n
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I m
H 0
F' F-• F' F- F-• F- F-• H N N N I 'v
y C
N W ." 1n M -I W IO O H N I ',J
N z
.. y
K
J ..
�
J
I
v J
'fl y
N N N N N N W W W W W I
I I
n
N O H W 6110 N.A N O O I
F-3 by
000cnocnOoocnUl I d
fn hi
00000000000 F3
r
07 �
i
M
G)
mnnnnnnnnnn1
H
co
I
z F3
O a
In
r
C Cf)
�
;U II II II
zzzzzzzzzz I d
z H
HrJCnn
I ,o
tJ
G) h] n
NNNNNN W W W W I n
z
y0ro
NOF -'W 6110N r, C) I y
:E x z a
0001n O (P 0001n I H
H CJ
00000000000 1 0
y FC n
1 z
xt=iKd
1
ro
H
K;U�`
I
y CJ
O
U � II
y
H
O H
I F -I
'>
1-' a
I m
C 1
my>
I n
H'•Nr
Iy
Cn1.
H
m
0 0 0 Co 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
'o
Cn6,y(n
1 z
k
y y
I
II II
N
W
Z �H
i
YH xH
cJ
UXHti
d H ;U—
n
xxd
I �
z
roNM II
1 ro
N
I >
J
H �J .Fd �' J
10 l0 l0 10 10 lO lO ao Oo Co N I n
O H
I H
;UmmL o
o000000000o I O
Cn
Cncn(n
OO0000o0000 17a
m
F<yHy
�
CJ H H
10
UO
CnHy�
I d
•
m
to to l0 16 l0 16 I .�
16/6/016 1010 1 n
y
. . I y
I H
WII
0000 00 I
z0F3
Cxa
F'
'yzz
NNN O
r O HI
y
a9x
NWN c I
7
O O O O
Cn 1{
HNNN H H I
CJ
H .A .A .fA H O I n
�
IH
;U
cn�oo� 0H I O
0000 00 1 7o
to
y
H
0
H
m
H
O co >
NO l7
xHro
H 'Jy •.>y
Cl) y ;j
,roOZm
H z
>Hy
r>0
y N
H
to H
0 F-3
ynz
� ro
ro00
Oroz
y H
ny
L'7 H
O
z
Appendix C: Seminole County CMS
a .H
a.
o ,c
CD
C7
CD
O'
0
4D
O N
CD N
� N
� O
O N
C N
CCD
a
H
0
z
b
rTl
0
CD
C)
r�
CD
I
ri'
va
CDw
a
CD
0
o'
0
DD
0
�n
CD
O "d
CCD q
,t 0
CD
N 00
CCD O
CD Oma,
0
o,
czD o o
a
CD `< H
o
LA N Q\
LA O
N O 01 N
�l \O O •P
0
0
T
o
o
CCD
czD
aCD
co
H
CD
c
CL
h
d
y
o
4�1
W
N
0
O
�
N
00
O\
N
(.A
l0
O
ON
czD o o
a
CD `< H
o
LA N Q\
LA O
N O 01 N
�l \O O •P
0
0
T
CD
a
a'
CD
5
J
W
H
0
o
o
CCD
CD
c
CL
h
d
00
4�1
W
N
Q\
O
CD
a
a'
CD
5
J
W
H
0
o �
CD
C7
CD
0 0
CD
CD
ti �
C N
CDN
CD
O N
C N
a
a
y
0
CD
0
b
iTl
p
W
CD
0
CD
C�
0
M
as
0
0
OQ
CL
n
0
0
0
o'
0
�-n
CD
O
p
O
N UC
�t CD
CD
C
CD 0
0 "
0
a rn
i
ez
w
m
o
o
czD
a
�
CD
`�
y
a
r
a
—
y
mh
w
h
(D
LA
N
w
N
—
CD
N
N
Ch
W
Q\
W
O
00
ol�
O
O
P.
m
a
or
CD
C�
w
00
00
00
0"
0
H
0
0
0
czD
a
CD
`�
y
a
r
a
—
y
mh
w
h
(D
0o
N
-P
N
N
—
CD
�O
N
Ch
W
Q\
W
O
00
a
or
CD
C�
w
00
00
00
0"
0
H
0
o
o
czD
a
CD
—
y
mh
N
cn
a1
00
O1
-11.
O
O
a
or
CD
C�
w
00
00
00
0"
0
H
0
I
n
N
J
W
W
N
J
cn
f:
a O O
P CL r
CD
H
`.�. 0
o
J O O
�O O O \O
00 to O J
W
N
z
N O O
r = p
H
O
O
O
CDD
~�
H
CD
0
.
o
OCi
N
O
O
00
O
110
a O O
P CL r
CD
H
`.�. 0
o
J O O
�O O O \O
00 to O J
W
N
z
N O O
r = p
H
O
a..H
o �
C7
o'
Cr,
W CD
O
CD N
CD
N
O N
C N
P.
CD
a
H
O
z
O
b
tTj
p
CD
O
0
C)
O
M
ao
CD
It
a
0
0
c�
0
o'
O
�-n
CDO
O w
N -11 CDm
CCD ~
O
OCD
N
C
0 �
CLCD rn
moo
>�.�
>
CD
'.
H
o
5
Y
w
o 4�1
0
0
0
cNii
0
oho
N
�
O
W
r +
00
00
01
00
O
O
O
\O
w
CN
a
moo
>�.�
>
CD
'.
o
5
Y
w
o 4�1
0
0
0
cNii
0
oho
N
�
O
W
00
00
w
.p
v,
I
�4ooC)
>
'.
5
Y
C�
3
0
0
0
0
.r
00
00
O
O
O
O
O
O
z
C
a-'
CD
N
J
O
H
0
o �
w d
�:t. (-Do �
o
c N
CD
N
� N
� O
O N
C N
CD
cr
0
0
p
m
aCD
'C3
n n �
� � N
N N �
w v, v,
N O C\ w
W C\ O —
9
HE
5
5
T
�
�CD
CD
ar
Q
r
(]
p�
N
O
n
ON
(71,
Oo
OW
O
vNi
N
O
O
O
O
5
T
�
�CD
CD
ar
Q
r
(]
p�
N
O
n
ON
(71,
Oo
O
O
N
z
CD
K
0
n
0
t�J
CD
(T4
n
(D
0
0
0
C
0
o w
C UQ
CD CD
CCDD U,
W
CIt
CD 0
CD
N
moa
aCD
CD
H
�at"a
H
0
�
CD
�'
C7
0
to
Ch
N
00
W
00
O
O
Ch
a1
J
ol�
N
O
N
CDoo
aCD
CD
H
0
�
CD
�'
C7
0
00
W
th
-P
Ch
ON
F --
00
O
O1
W
N
�o
W
N
Vi
O CD
O
N
O
w
Ch
o\
O
O
(h
moo
aCD
0
�
00
W
th
-P
Ch
ON
F --
00
O
O1
O
-A
H
0
C C,-
o �
F--1
OA
c'D
� O
CD
a�
CD N
O N
0
O
O N
CDC N
a
CL
cr
CDz
b
rTj
Pl
0 o o
a
N
`C
A N 00
N O O 00
ON
Uh
a
0 o o
a
n �
CD
J N �
O\ LA 00
J O1 00
-, O O %�O
9
C
J
N
y
O
b
i�
K
cn
CD0
CDO
CD
CD
R.
n
O
K3
C3
0
o'
O
�-n
CD
d �-d
C OD
O O
li
,D w
CD 0
CD oma,
O O r-
a cD
o
w
N ONi
01 �O
O O
v,
0
NO
O
r-
w
�.
CD
a
CDCD
y
CD
y
b
w
w
0
C4
CD
cD
N00
N
D1
w
O
O
w
w
N
all
O
CA
w
O
N
v,
0
rd
y
0
w
�.
CD
CDCD
y
a
y
b
w
w
0
C4
CD
cD
N00
N
D1
w
O
O
w
y
0
Appendix D: Traffic Volumes
INTERSECTION TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Inti 1: CR 427 & Carriage Cove Way/Bedford Road
AM Peak Hour
Carriage Cove Wy Bedford Rd
n
c
u
`Background + <Pass -By Vol>+ ( Project Vol) = Total Volume
Meeting PI
2u/0
4O■
- Subject Intersection
'SF applied = 0.92
TRIP DISTRIBUTION %
Source: Premier Traffic Group
'Growth rate applied = 1.04
PROJECTED VOLUMES
N
N
I^
I.
N 73
m N N E-0
49 r�
8� T I
2-
23
23 a
+ N
� N
h
N
n
Note: +/- errors due to rounding
70
N
73
m N
0
m N
F— 0
EJ
47
I 149
EJ
Lam'
8
I
8
T r
2
2
22 --7it
m
23
'SF applied = 0.92
TRIP DISTRIBUTION %
Source: Premier Traffic Group
'Growth rate applied = 1.04
PROJECTED VOLUMES
N
N
I^
I.
N 73
m N N E-0
49 r�
8� T I
2-
23
23 a
+ N
� N
h
N
n
Note: +/- errors due to rounding
Source: Premler Trac Group
INTERSECTION TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Intx 2: CR 427 & Meeting PI
ra
AM Peak Hour
Carriage Cove
Wy _I Bedford Rd
v
Subject Intersection
SITE
u
Access RVR.
Meeting PI
*Background + <Pass -By Vol> + ( Project Vol) = Total Volume
2024 VOLUMES
2026 VOLUMES
N
X11
�
411
IIn
0I0
�In
F— 0
Io I�
15
I2
t� 1 y
16
0
1 T
0
1 T r
0�
o m
0-
0
0�
0�
'SF applied = 0.92
Gra with rate applied = 1.04
TRIP DISTRIBUTION %
PROJECTED VOLUMES
N
II
V �
N
v
+
E—
O
F— O
IV IOO
I� I+
16
0
V
R
+
r
Note: +/- errors due to rounding
Source: Premler Trac Group
INTERSECTION TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Intx 3: CR 427 &Project Access O
AM Peak Hour
I
Carriage Cove Wy Bedford Rd
'Background + <Pass -By Vol> + ( Project Vol) = Total Volume
®-SubjectIntersection
TRIP DISTRIBUTION % PROJECTED VOLUMES
Source: Premler Troffc Group
INTERSECTION TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Intx 1: CR 427 & Carriage Cove Way/Bedford Road O
PM Peak Hour
"Background + <Pass -By Vol> + ( Project Vol) = Total Volume
1:1 - Subject Intersection
TRIP DISTRIBUTION % PROJECTED VOLUMES
Source: Premier Traffic Group
Source: Premier Traffic Group
INTERSECTION TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Int(2-. CR 427 & Meeting PI
PM Peak Hour
O
Carriage Cove Wy I Bedford Rd
® Subject Intersection
a
SITE
V
Access gUgo
Meeting PI
`Background + <Pass -By Vol> + ( Project Vol) = Total Volume
2024 VOLUMES
2026 VOLUMES
o
4,_6
�6
0
0
Io INm I�
0—�
OQ
0
0
o�
'SF applied = 0.92
��-Gr�owthrate applied= 1.04
TRIP DISTRIBUTION %
PROJECTED VOLUMES
N N
W N
m
+ + 6
0
I T
T6
0� I
v
0—� oQ
0� N
Q
+
M
r
Note: +/- errors due to rounding
Source: Premier Traffic Group
Source: Premier Trak Group
INTERSECTION TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Intx 3: CR 427 & Project Access
y
PM Peak Hour
Carriage
Cove Wy I Bedford Rd
n
Subject Intersection
SITE
e
u
Access wao
Meeting PI
'Background + <Pass -By Vol> + ( Project Vol) = Total Volume
2024 VOLUMES
2026 VOLUMES
o
�0
�0
o clOr
E— 0
o0
iI�
Io
Io
0---J,
� T r
0
0�
o M o
0�
0�
v
SF applied = 0.92'Growth
rate applied = 1.04
TRIP DISTRIBUTION %
PROJECTED VOLUMES
o
II
0
�–
a`I"o
0
Io
Io Io
0
�1Tr�
0�
0
100
0+(20)=20
N
II
M
N
Note: +/_ errors due to rounding
Source: Premier Trak Group
�
I
I
I
I
I
�
�i
I
w �
�
15 MINUTE TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
(Cars and Trucks)
DATE:
March 28, 2024 (Thursday)
CITY:
Sanford
LATITUDE: 0
LOCATION:
CR 427 & Carriage Cove Wy/Bedford Rd
COUNTY:
Seminole
LONGITUDE: 0
CR 427
i
CR 427
Carriage Cove Wy
Bedford Rd
TIME
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
N/S
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
E/W
GRAND
BEGIN
L
T
R
U-turn TOTAL
L
T
R
U-turn TOTAL
TOTAL
L
T
I R
I U-turn I TOTAL11
L
I T I
R
U-turn TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
07:00 AM
1
137
4
1
1 143 11
3
280
2
1
286
429
1
0
7
0
8
11 8
0
14
0
22 30
459
07:15 AM
1
171
3
0
175
8
330
2
0
340
515
1
0
7
0
8
15
0
21
0
36 44
559
07:30 AM
3
181
4
0
188
5
306
Z
1
314
502
3
1
8
0
12
16
0
22
0
38 50
552
07:45 AM
0
193
3
0
196
5
333
0
2
340
536
2
0
2
0
4
3
�P12
0
18
0
31 35
571
TOTAL
5
682
14
1
702
21
1,249
6
4
1,280
1,982
7
1
24
0
32
0
75
0
127 159
2,141
08:00 AM
0
213
4
0
217
6
306
1
1
314
531
3
1
7
0
11
7
0
15
0
22 33
564
08:15 AM
0
195
3
0
198
5
317
2
0
324
522
2
1
5
0
8
8
0
15
0
23 31
553
08:30 AM
0
174
4
0
178
5
293
2
1
301
479
2
1
4
0
7
11
0
20
0
31 38
517
08:45 AM
0
160
2
0
162
3
278
0
1
282
444
3
1
3
0
7
8
0
14
0
22 29
473
TOTAL
0
742
13
0
755
19
1,194
5
3
1,221
1,976
10
4
19
0
33
34
0
64
0
98 131
2,107
04:00 PM
3
248
10
0
261
14
210
2
1
227
488
3
0
5
0
8
5
0
11
0
16 24
1 512
04:15 PM
7
249
9
2
267F2!
1
183
2
1
207
474
1
0
3
0
4
4
0
4
0
8 12
486
04:30 PM
6
286
15
0
3070
195
5
2
222
529
3
0
4
0
7
1012023
30
559
04:45 PM
7
297
13
0
3178
190
2
1
211
528
1
1
2
0
4
8
1
13
0
22 26
554
TOTAL
23
1,080
47
2
1,1523
778
11
5
867
2,019
8
1
14
0
23
27
2 1
40
0
69 92
2,111
05:00 PM
1 9
313
15
2
339
1 17
204
1
4
226
565
0
0
6
0
6
717
0
25 31
596
05:15 PM
4
314
12
0
330�1:
209
3
1
231
561
4
0
3
0
7
10
0
22 29
590
05:30 PM
3
285
15
0
303
210
3
3
235
538
1
0
0
0
1
jjj30a2
13
0
21 22
560
05:45 PM
5
274
9
0
2885
175
4
1
195
483
1
0
4
0
5
9
0
13 18
501
TOTAL
21
1,186
51
2
1,2609
798
11
9
887
2,147
6
0
13
0
19
49
0
81 100
2,247
AM Peak
Peak Hour Factor.
0.983
WASAMto
06:15 AM
4
758
14
0
776
24
1,275
5
4
1,308
2,084
9
2
24
0
35
51
0
76
0
127 162
2,246
PM Peak
Peak Hour Factor. 0.965
04AS PM to
05A5 PM
1209
55
2
1,289
72
813
9
9
903
2,192
6
1
11
0
18
34
3
53
0
90 108
2,300
PM
I
I 9
813
72
SouthboundI
9
I
i
I
AM
I 5
1,275
24
4
16
y
v
tJ
AM
._._._._. ---------
PM
._._._._._._._._._._-_-_
I
___F
9S
E
0
3
c
o
V
51
34
a
Carnage Cove Wy
I
4
0
0a'
c
69
71
Seaford
�y
1
2
4
I
11.......24—y__
-----•-------------------
-------
Pi
AM
-
ry
F
T
I
v
0
4
758
14
AM
1
'
2
23
1,209
1
55
PM
North
ound
15 MINUTE TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
(Cars and Trucks)
DATE:
March 28, 2024 (Thursday)
CITY: Sanford
LATITUDE:
0
LOCATION:
CR 427 & Meeting Place
COUNTY. Seminole
LONGITUDE:
0
CR 427
CR 427
Meeting PI
Meeting
PI
TIME
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
N/S
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
E/W
GRAND
BEGIN
TOTAL TOTAL
L T R U-turn TOTAL
L T R U-turn TOTAL TOTAL L T R U-turn TOTAL
L T R U-turn TOTAL
0
142
2
0
144
2
295
0
09740
0
0448
M
0
175
1
0
176
1
35200
353
529
0
0
0534
Z07:00M
M
0
188
3
0
191
2
330
0
0
332
523
0
0
0530
M
0
196
1
0
197
1
348
0
0
349
546
0555
0
707
7
0
708
6
1,325
0
0
1,331
2,039
0
0
0
0 0
10
0
14
0
28 28
2,067
08:00 AM
0
217
2
0
219
2
320
0
0
322
541
0
0
0
0 0
3
0
2
0
5 5
546
08:15 AM
0
198
1
0
199
0
330
0
0
330
529
0
0
0
0 0
4
0
3
0
7 7
536
08:30 AM
0
178
2
0
180
1
308
0
0
309
489
0
0
0
_
0 0
_ _
3
_ _
0
_ _ _
4
_
0
_
7- 7
_ _
496
0845 AM
0
162
3
0
165
3
289
0
0
292
457
0
0
0
0 0
5
0
5
0
10 10
467
TOTAL
0
755
8
0
763
6
1,247
0
0
1,253
2,016
0
0
0
0 0
15
0
14
0
29 1 29
2,045
04:00 PM
0
261
3
0
264
5
220
0
0
225
489
0
0
0
0 0
2
0
2
0
04:15 PM
0
265
2
0
267
4
190
0
0
194
461000
002
0
4
0
467
04:30 PM
0
307
1
0
308
3
209
0
0
212
520
0
0
0
0 0
1
0
2
0
A44
523
04:45 PM
0
317
3
0
320
1
200
0
0
201
521
0
0
0
0 0
1
0
4
0
526
TOTAL
0
1,150
9
0
1,159
13
819
0
0
832
1991
0
0
0
0 0
6
0
12
0
2,009
05:00 PM
0
337
3
0
340
5
217
0
0
222
562
0
0
0
0 0
2
0
2
0
4 4
566
05:15 PM
0
330
4
0
334
3
223
0
0
226
560
0
0
0
0 0
1
0
1
0
2 2
PM
0
303
2
0
305
2
218
0
0
220
525
0
0
0
003
0
0
0
3 3
05:45 PM
0
288
3
0
291
2
183
0
0
185
476
0
0
0
0 0
1
0
2
0
3 3
WS6205:30
TOTAL
0
1,258 1
12
0
1,270
12
841
0
0
853
2,123
0
0
0
0 0
7
0
5
01212
AM Peak
Peak Hour Factor: 0.976
0720 AMto
06:30 AM
0
799
7
0
806
5
1,328
0
0
1,333
2,139
0
0
0
0 0
16
0
12
0
28 28
2,167
PM Peak
Peak Hour Factor: 0.964
04AS PM toPM
0
1,287
12
0
1,299
11
858
0
0
869
2,168
0
0
0
0 0
7
0
7
0
14 14
2,182
OSAS
Southbound
PM
t
1 0
858
11
I
i
AM
1 0
0.
1,328
5
0
t
I
y
I
AM
.72—.—.—.—.-7
PM .—.—.—..
_.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—•—
---F
_
E
0
0
a
I[
16
7
Mee0ng Pt
q
0,gyp
o0
0
0
0
to
71
MeetingPI
3
0
0
0
4
°-------
°
v—
—�PM
7�
AM
�
---------------------------
I
e
0
0
791
7 I AM
1
z
I
1
0
0
1,287
12 PM
I
North ound
2022
PEAK SEASON FACTOR CATEGORY
REPORT
- REPORT TYPE: ALL
CATEGORY: 7700 SEMINOLE COUNTYWIDE
MOCF: 0.93
WEEK
DATES
SF
PSCF
---------------------------------------------
1
01/01/2022 -
01/01/2022
1.00
1.08
2
01/02/2022 -
01/08/2022
1.03
1.11
3
01/09/2022 -
01/15/2022
1.05
1.13
4
01/16/2022 -
01/22/2022
1.03
1.11
5
01/23/2022 -
01/29/2022
1.01
1.09
6
01/30/2022 -
02/05/2022
0.98
1.05
7
02/06/2022 -
02/12/2022
0.96
1.03
* 8
02/13/2022 -
02/19/2022
0.94
1.01
* 9
02/20/2022 -
02/26/2022
0.93
1.00
*10
02/27/2022 -
03/05/2022
0.93
1.00
*11
03/06/2022 -
03/12/2022
0.92
0.99
*12
03/13/2022 -
03/19/2022
0.91
0.98
*13
03/20/2022 -
03/26/2022
0.92
0.99
*14
03/27/2022 -
04/02/2022
0.92
0.99
*15
04/03/2022 -
04/09/2022
0.93
1.00
*16
04/10/2022 -
04/16/2022
0.93
1.00
*17
04/17/2022 -
04/23/2022
0.94
1.01
*18
04/24/2022 -
04/30/2022
0.94
1.01
*19
05/01/2022 -
05/07/2022
0.95
1.02
*20
05/08/2022 -
05/14/2022
0.95
1.02
21
05/15/2022 -
05/21/2022
0.96
1.03
22
05/22/2022 -
05/28/2022
0.97
1.04
23
05/29/2022 -
06/04/2022
0.98
1.05
24
06/05/2022 -
06/11/2022
0.99
1.06
25
06/12/2022 -
06/18/2022
1.00
1.08
26
06/19/2022 -
06/25/2022
1.00
1.08
27
06/26/2022 -
07/02/2022
1.00
1.08
28
07/03/2022 -
07/09/2022
0.99
1.06
29
07/10/2022 -
07/16/2022
0.99
1.06
30
07/17/2022 -
07/23/2022
0.99
1.06
31
07/24/2022 -
07/30/2022
0.98
1.05
32
07/31/2022 -
08/06/2022
0.98
1.05
33
08/07/2022 -
08/13/2022
0.97
1.04
34
08/14/2022 -
08/20/2022
0.97
1.04
35
08/21/2022 -
08/27/2022
0.99
1.06
36
08/28/2022 -
09/03/2022
1.01
1.09
37
09/04/2022 -
09/10/2022
1.02
1.10
38
09/11/2022 -
09/17/2022
1.04
1.12
39
09/18/2022 -
09/24/2022
1.10
1.18
40
09/25/2022 -
10/01/2022
1.16
1.25
41
10/02/2022 -
10/08/2022
1.22
1.31
42
10/09/2022 -
10/15/2022
1.28
1.38
43
10/16/2022 -
10/22/2022
1.23
1.32
44
10/23/2022 -
10/29/2022
1.18
1.27
45
10/30/2022 -
11/05/2022
1.14
1.23
46
11/06/2022 -
11/12/2022
1.09
1.17
47
11/13/2022 -
11/19/2022
1.04
1.12
48
11/20/2022 -
11/26/2022
1.03
1.11
49
11/27/2022 -
12/03/2022
1.02
1.10
50
12/04/2022 -
12/10/2022
1.01
1.09
51
12/11/2022 -
12/17/2022
1.00
1.08
52
12/18/2022 -
12/24/2022
1.03
1.11
53
12/25/2022 -
12/31/2022
1.05
1.13
* PEAK SEASON
23 -FEB -2023 09:11:22 830UPD 5_7700_PKSEASON.TXT
Appendix E: Existing Intersection Analysis Output
HCM 6th TWSC
1: CR 427 & Bedfrod Rd 04/04/2024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.6
Movement
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
T+
T.)
0
)
t T.,
Traffic Vol, veh/h
8
2
22
47
0
70
4
697
13
22
1173
8
Future Vol, veh/h
8
2
22
47
0
70
4
697
13
22
1173
8
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
Storage Length
140
-
140
-
340
-
340
Veh in Median Storage,
# -
0
-
0
-
-
0
-
-
0
Grade, %
-
0
-
0
-
-
0
-
-
0
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles, %
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
9
2
24
51
0
76
4
758
14
24
1275
9
Major/Minor Minor2
Minorl
Majorl
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
1715
2108
642
1460
2105
386
1284
0
0
772
0
0
Stage
1328
1328
-
773
773
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2
387
780
-
687
1332
-
-
-
-
-
Critical Hdwy
7.54
6.54
6.94
7.54
6.54
6.94
4.14
-
-
4.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
6.54
5.54
-
6.54
5.54
-
-
-
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
6.54
5.54
-
6.54
5.54
-
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.52
4.02
3.32
3.52
4.02
3.32
2.22
-
2.22
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
58
51
417
90
51
612
536
839
Stage
164
223
-
358
407
-
-
-
Stage 2
608
404
-
403
222
-
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
-
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
49
49
417
80
49
612
536
839
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
49
49
-
80
49
-
-
-
-
-
Stage1
163
217
-
355
404
-
-
Stage 2
528
401
-
365
216
-
-
-
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
38.9
50.6
0.1
0.2
HCM LOS
E
F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
NBL
NBT
NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLnlWBLn2
SBL
SBT
SBR
Capacity (veh/h)
536
49
256
80
612
839
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.008
0.177
0.102
0.639
0.124
0.029
HCM Control Delay (s)
11.8
93.7
20.7
108.5
11.7
9.4
HCM Lane LOS
B
-
F
C
F
B
A
-
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0
0.6
0.3
2.9
0.4
0.1
-
Traffic Analysis 9:46 pm 04/04/2024 Existing AM Synchro 11 Report
PTG Page 1
HCM 6th TWSC
2: CR 427 & Meeting PI 04/0412024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement
WBL
WBR
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
Lane Configurations
r
fl�
j
tt
Traffic Vol, veh/h
15
11
735
6
5
1222
Future Vol, veh/h
15
11
735
6
5
1222
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
None
-
None
Storage Length
100
0
270
-
Veh in Median Storage,
# 0
-
0
-
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
-
0
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles, %
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
16
12
799
7
5
1328
Major/Minor Minorl
Majorl
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
1477
403
0
0
806
0
Stage 1
803
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2
674
-
-
-
-
Critical Hdwy
6.84
6.94
-
-
4.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.84
-
-
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.84
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.52
3.32
2.22
-
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
117
597
814
Stage 1
401
-
-
-
Stage 2
468
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
-
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
116
597
814
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
116
-
-
-
Stage 1
401
Stage 2
465
-
-
Approach
WB
NB
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
28.4
0
0
HCM LOS
D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
NBT
NBRWBLn1WBLn2
SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h)
116
597
814
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
-
0.141
0.02
0.007
HCM Control Delay (s)
41
11.2
9.5
HCM Lane LOS
-
E
B
A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.5
0.1
0
Traffic Analysis 9:46 pm 04/04/2024 Existing AM Synchro 11 Report
PTG Page 2
HCM 6th TWSC
1: CR 427 & Bedfrod Rd 0410412024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.1
Movement
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
T+
fii
1�
)
0
)
0
Traffic Vol, veh/h
6
1
10
31
3
49
21
1112
52
66
748
17
Future Vol, veh/h
6
1
10
31
3
49
21
1112
52
66
748
17
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
Storage Length
140
-
-
140
340
-
-
340
-
Veh in Median Storage,
# -
0
-
-
0
-
0
-
-
0
Grade, %
-
0
-
-
0
-
0
-
-
0
-
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles, %
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
7
1
11
34
3
53
23
1209
57
72
813
18
Major/Minor Minor2
Minorl
Majorl
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
1618
2278
416
1835
2259
633
831
0
0
1266
0
0
Stage
966
966
-
1284
1284
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2
652
1312
-
551
975
-
-
-
-
Critical Hdwy
7.54
6.54
6.94
7.54
6.54
6.94
4.14
4.14
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
6.54
5.54
-
6.54
5.54
-
-
-
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
6.54
5.54
-
6.54
5.54
-
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.52
4.02
3.32
3.52
4.02
3.32
2.22
-
2.22
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
69
39
585
47
41
422
797
-
545
Stage
273
331
-
174
234
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2
423
227
-
486
328
-
-
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
-
-
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
49
33
585
40
35
422
797
-
545
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
49
33
-
40
35
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 1
265
287
169
227
-
Stage 2
354
220
412
285
-
-
-
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
45.4
106.8
0.2
1
HCM LOS
E
F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
NBL
NBT
NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLnlWBLn2
SBL
SBT
SBR
Capacity (veh/h)
797
49
232
40
258
545
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.029
-
0.133
0.052
0.842
0.219
0.132
HCM Control Delay (s)
9.7
-
89.4
21.4
247.6
22.8
12.6
HCM Lane LOS
A
F
C
F
C
B
-
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.1
0.4
0.2
3.2
0.8
0.5
Traffic Analysis Existing PM Synchro 11 Report
PTG Page 1
HCM 6th TWSC
2: CR 427 & Meeting PI 04/04/2024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh
Movement
0.3
WBL
WBR
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
Lane Configurations
`21
f
t T.)
Stage 1
j
tt
Traffic Vol, veh/h
6
6
1184
11
10
789
Future Vol, veh/h
6
6
1184
11
10
789
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
2.22
None
-
None
Storage Length
100
0
-
Stage 1
270
-
Veh in Median Storage, # 0
-
0
Stage 2
-
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
-
-
0
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles, %
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
7
7
1287
12
11
858
Major/Minor Minorl
Majorl
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
1744
650
0 0
1299
0
Stage 1
1293
-
- -
-
-
Stage 2
451
-
-
-
-
Critical Hdwy
6.84
6.94
4.14
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.84
-
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.84
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.52
3.32
-
2.22
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
78
412
-
529
Stage 1
221
-
-
-
Stage 2
609
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
76
412
529
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
76
-
-
-
Stage 1
221
-
Stage 2
596
-
-
Approach
WB
NB
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
35.4
0
0.1
HCM LOS
E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
NBT
NBRWBLnlWBLn2
SBL SBT
Capacity (vehlh)
76
412
529
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
-
- 0.086
0.016
0.021
HCM Control Delay (s)
-
56.8
13.9
11.9
HCM Lane LOS
-
- F
B
B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.3
0
0.1
Traffic Analysis Existing PM Synchro 11 Report
PTG Page 2
Appendix F: Historical Trends Analysis
CD
CL_
0
CDCL
.Z1 =
D) _
C x
07 a
N S =
N O d
• n 7
CD CD c) a. CD
w O .�
_ =r n
fD A
CD Df CDD N
N
tO O 00
(D
N o 0 0 0
Average Daily Traffic (Vehicles/Day)
O O O O O O
O O O O O O
O O O O O O O
N
O
OD
N
O
N
W _
I o
O
O CD N
Ci CDCD
N = CD
O p,
au m n
O
C
7
N
O
W
W
O T
o Z
R �k
O
0
n
N
4 'Z
Z1 fl1
CD
3
N
Z '
a
C O
L
to
N
n
O O
m �
O 0 0 0 0 0
- N N N
P.N O O W
�
N N N N N
0
Z Z
N W W N N
O
Z
w
o 0 0 0 o
D
C
• D D
• o 0 0 0 0
3
0 0 0 0 0^
'
v
N N N N N
N N•
N,
N N N N N
f'D
O • Co
00. O 01 -P� W N
=
0
0 0
0 00000
CL
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0�-
O T
o Z
R �k
O
0
n
N
4 'Z
Z1 fl1
CD
3
N
Z '
a
C O
L
to
N
n
H
Nzrd
O Cny
N b
N O t7
U
M H W
H � �
Cn y 7d
Ozz
nCl) y
C�0
y rl
H
co F33
CH]
' a Cn Cl)
m ro
r000
0Flzo
;d Fl y
yH>
n y
tl H
O
z
N N N N N N N N N N N N I K
w n
000000000000 I C1
H 0
F-` H H H F- H H H H N N N I>
y a
i" W CnT�IM DC)F-
Z
F3
K
Du ..
x
o
I
J J
�+y t�
HHHHHNNNNNNN I
•,b y
01 01 61 01 0 ooNN W W N
O
NN W Cn OD (n Cn o 0000
y 1-1
000000000000 I C7
n Cn
O t7t
o0000000000o 1 y
;o
m
C�11n11(DnnnI-jnn1n
I
N z
O
1-3CEn0
� t1
;d II II II
zzzZzzzzzzzz I C7
7d
y
I H
L1
HNCnn
I ;U
>
z.HMOm
G)
n
4l�ro
JJ J ODm OOHH F- HF-' I O
>
y 0
mooLooH000000o I y
z
x'zc
000000000000 I H
H 1J
000000000000 1 O
y3 N
I z
W
x�1Kd
I
y
y(1wM
a
cn
H Cn
I
N HH
Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn Cl) Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn I u
o�i
y a
I--`i--'HHHHH I L�T1
l0
C1 y',b
00 OD m m OD O O H H N N H I n
N
H
JP .P �A Ln J Ln U7 0 0 0 0 0 I H
•
in000000000000
I H
R,
Cl
O O O O O O O O O O O O I O
cn rn y cn
I z
cn
y y
I
L7
II II H
i N
H
z
> H x
O
�UH;UL3J
Crl
xxd
I �
H ;U w 1
ko w koI n
K
0 H
I y
;dL'aM;o
000000000000 I O
I
Cn Cn Cn
000000000000
FGyF3H
O
C1 H H
N
'i
7d��Fl
tl
CnCJF3xl
u
En
I
FC
xl C=1
Cn N Cn Cn Cn cn cn Cn cn Cn cn Cn I
y
CI JC '7Jy
NN W �A .P W NNHNHH
m
I y
�h" II II H
61001,6 NCn W 61m LO �P �A W O
W
00000000(D000 I
C:)
z0y
cNC:N
>zx
rt0y
I y
a z x
I
m z
I '=1
Cl) K,'
F-'F'H HHH H I
Cl
NNF-`NOO Ln -1N CO ON I n
y
I y
'�7
W W .A N N t,p ON OOD OJ I O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I W
tl
Cn
H
H
H
Cl
H
Nzrd
O Cny
N b
N O t7
U
M H W
H � �
Cn y 7d
Ozz
nCl) y
C�0
y rl
H
co F33
CH]
' a Cn Cl)
m ro
r000
0Flzo
;d Fl y
yH>
n y
tl H
O
z
Appendix G: Projected Intersection Analysis Output
HCM 6th TWSC
1: CR 427 & Bedfrod Rd 04/04/2024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh
Movement
4.8
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
1556
T+
414
'�
T
0
)
tT->
1389
)1
0
838
Traffic Vol, veh/h
8
2
23
49
0
73
8
747
14
23
1227
8
Future Vol, veh/h
8
2
23
49
0
73
8
747
14
23
1227
8
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
3.52
None
-
2.22
None
-
2.22
None
-
42
None
Storage Length
140
587
-
140
800
340
150
-
340
-
380
Veh in Median Storage,
# -
0
-
-
0
578
-
0
-
-
0
-
Grade, %
-
0
-
-
0
-
0
-
-
0
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles, %
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
9
2
25
53
0
79
9
812
15
25
1334
9
Major/Minor Minor2
Minorl
Majorl
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
1813
2234
672
1556
2231
414
1343
0
0
827 0 0
Stage
1389
1389
-
838
838
-
-
-
-
- - -
Stage 2
424
845
-
718
1393
-
-
-
- -
Critical Hdwy
7.54
6.54
6.94
7.54
6.54
6.94
4.14
4.14 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
6.54
5.54
-
6.54
5.54
-
-
-
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
6.54
5.54
-
6.54
5.54
-
-
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.52
4.02
3.32
3.52
4.02
3.32
2.22
-
2.22
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
49
42
398
77
42
587
509
-
800
Stage
150
208
-
327
380
-
-
-
-
Stage 2
578
377
-
386
207
-
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
-
-
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
41
40
398
67
40
587
509
-
800
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
41
40
-
67
40
-
-
-
-
Stage 1
147
202
321
373
-
Stage 2
491
370
347
201
-
-
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
45
71
0.1
0.2
HCM LOS
E
F
Minor LanelMajor Mvmt
NBL
NBT
NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLnlWBLn2
SBL
SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)
509
41
232
67
587
800
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.017
-
0.212
0.117
0.795
0.135
0.031
-
HCM Control Delay (s)
12.2
-
115
22.6
158.7
12.1
9.6
-
HCM Lane LOS
B
-
-
F
C
F
B
A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.1
0.7
0.4
3.7
0.5
0.1
Traffic Analysis Projected AM Synchro 11 Report
PTG Page 1
HCM 6th TWSC
2: CR 427 & Meeting PI 04/04/2024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.6
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
rj
r
tT->
Conflicting Flow All
)
t
Traffic Vol, veh/h
16
11
768
6
27
1285
Future Vol, veh/h
16
11
768
6
27
1285
Conflicting Peds, 4/hr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
-
None
-
None
Storage Length
100
0
-
270
-
Veh in Median Storage,
# 0
-
0
93
-
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
Stage 2
-
0
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles, %
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
17
12
835
7
29
1397
Major/Minor
Minorl
Majorl
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
1596
421 0
0 842 0
Stage 1
839
- -
- - -
Stage 2
757
- -
- -
Critical Hdwy
6.84
6.94 -
- 4.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.84
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.84
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.52
3.32 -
2.22
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
97
581 -
789
Stage 1
384
-
Stage 2
424
-
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
93
581
789
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
93
-
- - -
Stage 1
384
-
-
Stage 2
408
- -
-
Approach WB
HCM Control Delay, s 35.7
HCM LOS E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
Capacity (veh/h)
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
HCM Control Delay (s)
HCM Lane LOS
HCM 95th °/stile Q(veh
Traffic Analysis Projected AM
PTG
NB SB
0 0.2
NBT NBRWBLnlWBLn2 SBL SBT
93
581
789
- 0.187
0.021
0.037
- 52.4
11.3
9.7
- F
B
A
0.6
0.1
0.1
Synchro 11 Report
Page 2
HCM 6th TWSC
3: CR 427 & Access 0410412024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.3
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
r
Major2
tt
tT4
708
Traffic Vol, vehlh
0
36
0
769
1292
11
Future Vol, veh/h
0
36
0
769
1292
11
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control Stop
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
3.32
None
-
None
0
None
Storage Length
0
0
-
0
-
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
-
0
0
0
Grade, %
0
-
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
0
0
-
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles, %
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
0
39
0
836
1404
12
Major/Minor Minor2
Majorl
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
708
-
0 0
Stage 1
-
- -
Stage 2
-
-
- -
Critical Hdwy
6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
-
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
-
Follow-up Hdwy
-
3.32
-
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
0
377
0
Stage 1
0
-
0
Stage 2
0
-
0
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
-
377
-
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
-
-
- -
Stage 1
Stage 2
-
-
-
Approach
EB
NB
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
15.7
0
0
HCM LOS
C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
NBT EBLn1
SBT SBR
Capacity (vehlh)
377
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
-
0.104
-
HCM Control Delay (s)
15.7
HCM Lane LOS
C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.3
Traffic Analysis Projected AM Synchro 11 Report
PTG Page 3
HCM 6th TWSC
1: CR 427 & Bedfrod Rd 04/04/2024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 7.2
Movement
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
1
0.146
HCM Control Delay (s)
)
T
25.2$392.3
1
t11
HCM Lane LOS
)
+T+
D F
Traffic Vol, veh/h
6
1
10
32
3
51
36
1168
54
69
799
18
Future Vol, veh/h
6
1
10
32
3
51
36
1168
54
69
799
18
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
Storage Length
140
140
-
340
-
340
Veh in Median Storage,
# -
0
-
0
-
-
0
-
-
0
Grade, %
-
0
-
-
0
-
-
0
-
-
0
-
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles, %
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
7
1
11
35
3
55
39
1270
59
75
868
20
Major/Minor
Minor2
Minorl
Majorl
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
1743
2435
444
1963
2416
665
888
0
0
1329
0
0
Stage
1028
1028
-
1378
1378
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2
715
1407
-
585
1038
-
-
-
-
Critical Hdwy
7.54
6.54
6.94
7.54
6.54
6.94
4.14
-
4.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
6.54
5.54
-
6.54
5.54
-
-
-
-
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
6.54
5.54
-
6.54
5.54
-
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.52
4.02
3.32
3.52
4.02
3.32
2.22
-
2.22
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
55
31
561
38
32
403
758
515
Stage 1
251
310
-
152
210
-
-
-
Stage 2
388
204
-
464
306
-
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
-
-
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
37
25
561
-31
26
403
758
515
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
37
25
-
-31
26
-
-
-
-
Stage1
238
265
144
199
Stage 2
312
194
387
261
-
-
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
59.4
162.8
0.3
1
HCM LOS
F
F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
NBL
NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2
SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)
758
37
190 31
223
515
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.052
0.176
0.063 1.122
0.263
0.146
HCM Control Delay (s)
10
122.1
25.2$392.3
26.8
13.2
HCM Lane LOS
B
- F
D F
D
B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.2
0.6
0.2 3.9
1
0.5
Notes
-: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined ": All major volume in platoon
Traffic Analysis Projected PM Synchro 11 Report
PTG Page 1
HCM 6th TWSC
2: CR 427 & Meeting PI 0410412024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
r
+T
)
tt
Traffic Vol, veh/h
6
6
1245
11
22
829
Future Vol, veh/h
6
6
1245
11
22
829
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
-
None
-
None
Storage Length
100
0
2.22
-
270
-
Veh in Median Storage,
# 0
-
0
Stage
-
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
575
-
0
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles, %
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
7
7
1353
12
24
901
Major/Minor Minorl
Majorl
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
1858
683
0 0
1365
0
Stage 1
1359
-
- -
-
-
Stage 2
499
-
-
-
-
Critical Hdwy
6.84
6.94
-
4.14
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.84
-
-
-
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.84
-
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.52
3.32
-
2.22
-
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
65
392
-
499
Stage
204
-
-
Stage 2
575
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
-
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
62
392
499
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
62
-
-
-
-
Stage 1
204
-
-
Stage 2
547
-
-
-
Approach
WB
NB
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
42.1
0
0.3
HCM LOS
E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
NBT
NBRWBLn1WBLn2
SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h)
62
392
499
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
-
0.105
0.017
0.048
HCM Control Delay (s)
-
69.8
14.3
12.6
HCM Lane LOS
-
F
B
B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.3
0.1
0.2
Traffic Analysis Projected PM Synchro 11 Report
PTG Page 2
3: CR 427 & Access 0410412024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh
Movement
0.1
EBL
EBR
NBL
NBT
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
0 0
r
-
tt
tT
- -
Traffic Vol, veh/h
0
20
0
1259
821
35
Future Vol, veh/h
0
20
0
1259
821
35
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
None
0
None
0
None
Storage Length
0
0
-
-
-
-
Veh in Median Storage,
# 0
-
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
0
0
-
Grade, %
0
-
-
0
0
-
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles, %
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
0
22
0
1368
892
38
Major/Minor Minor2
Majorl
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
-
465
0 0
Stage 1
-
-
- -
Stage 2
-
-
-
Critical Hdwy
-
6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
-
-
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
-
3.32
-
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
0
544
0
Stage 1
0
-
0
Stage 2
0
-
0
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
-
544
-
-
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
-
- -
Stage 1
- -
Stage 2
-
- - -
Approach
EB
NB
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
11.9
0
0
HCM LOS
B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
NBT EBLn1
SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)
544
-
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
-
0.04
-
HCM Control Delay (s)
-
11.9
HCM Lane LOS
-
B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.1
Traffic Analysis Projected PM Synchro 11 Report
PTG Page 3
Appendix H: Turn Lane Analysis
IO/1013 5.0— FM ,Ore —,pro/erls�stardarOSVoaO•aY�0030p-s�00301-01.Jgn
14 A �- ^ to D W N C)
y Z, m T ...... dG. T
�o aye a y, _ - - T
G)
ELn
Z
C.
Ln x y _ n Y 3 3 n a o 3 o Z
REVISION
T I "' _ a e t? 1~71 ^ f' rn
-
y n o
2
U)
zo8 Wa A
no ��r meati �°
T
_
Ln rn
rri CO
arn t
a� my T
m
m
n fLn
T
J
m
- -
C _
➢ o o n
> n o m v
p ^ m y I o n 1
l/1 �, xan 1 k yl
0
G1 T
Z O ow�
Ln
ry
2 O nom<m
i1 a� � n➢ D c ...
(/1 a -mc W ? - om <Oa DR ➢_meta DR
a E
AAa nC D '�° A Aa nes Ames nn
EZ
➢ -1 �- — ¢ t, S y n C � ¢ N � y ¢ {� � y
T n
mo
m o ° " y TLn
°
n T A
Q
r I— r^ n r— to n
-- y z 4 T v �— CID
�—
an D
v o m y
o e p
m ^ _ o m
a
o
>
A �
wA '^ A WA '�`➢
� ➢ to lA
w
z urn ➢
yy 4y
W
3 � �
a C
int A
a o^ Z
QNNo�oQ _ n
m
p �m
� 2 co
T
o^ Z O
o�m �
R 4 1n n es o a o
3
o
rn
Q4y4111
Seminole County Public Schools
School Impact Analysis
School Capacity Determination
(Non -Binding) '
To: Dan Ryan, The Christian Sharing Center, Inc * 407-260-9155 * dan.ryan@thesharingcenter.org
Eileen Hinson, AICP, City of Sanford * 407-688-5147 * Eileen. Hinson(d,)sanfordfl.gov
From: Jordan Smith, AICP, PP, Facilities Planner, Seminole County Public Schools
Date: March 20, 2024
RE: Sharing Common (Sanford)
Seminole County Public Schools (SCPS), in reviewing the above request, has determined that if approved, the FLUM
designation and/or zoning will generate school age children.
Description: Proposed Rezone from AG, Agriculture and RC -1, Restricted Commercial to PD, Planned
Development and Comprehensive Plan Amendment from LDRSF, Low Density Residential Single Family to
MDR, Medium Density Residential of +/5.77 acres generally located ADJACENT TO 6498 N. Ronald Reagan
Boulevard (for Find My School reference) within the jurisdiction of the City of Sanford. The applicant is requesting a
change to the zoning to allow a maximum of 79 multi -family residential units, to be developed within the proposed
land use and zoning designations.
Parcel ID (s) #: 13-20-30-300-040A-0000, 13-20-30-300-0160-0000
This review and evaluation is performed on proposed future land use changes, rezones and conditional uses, unplatted
parcels, or projects that have not received final entitlement approval. This evaluation does not guarantee that the
developments subject to this declaration are exempt from, or determined to meet the school concurrency requirements
effective as of January 1, 2008. Changes in enrollment, capacity, any newly platted developments, and any subsequent
final development approvals may affect the provision of concurrent school facilities at the point of final subdivision
approval, including the potential of not meeting statutory concurrency requirements based on future conditions.
Based on information received from the jurisdiction and the application for the request, SCPS staff has summarized the
potential school enrollment impacts in the following tables:
CSA Capacity:
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT ON STUDENT GENERATION BY CSA
AFFECTED CSAs
CSA E-10
CSA M-1
CSA H-1
CAPACITY
2,660
5,732
7,739
3 -YEAR PROGRAM CAPACITY
-
-
-
ENROLLMENT
2,132
4,535
6,599
AVAILABLE CAPACITY
528
1,197
1,140
SCALD RESERVATIONS TO DATE
503
602
805
SIA -Sharing Commons
14
6
8
REMAINING CAPACITY 1 1110 589 T5 327
haps-//scminalcschools sharepoint comlsites'i'aciliticsplanningiSltared Dl mcamf\ew Uircctoricsi lanningMe%clnpment trackinUO SIAs'SIA 20242--06_SIA Sharing Commonsr\oticc - Sharing Commons doer
Comments CSA Evaluation:
At this point, the students generated at the three CSA levels would be able to be accommodated without exceeding the
adopted levels of service (LOS) for each CSA by school type, or there is adjacent capacity to meet LOS as allowed by
interlocal agreement. Any planned expansions/additions in the current five-year capital plan would provide additional
student capacity to relieve the affected schools is reflected in this review.
Zoned School Enrollment: For informational purposes, the below table indicates the analysis based on the individual
school zones within the CSA under current conditions. At this point, the potential students generated WILL be able to
be accommodated without exceeding the adopted Levels of Service (LOS) for the currently zoned schools. Any
planned expansions/additions that would provide additional student capacity contained in the current five-year capital
plan and scheduled to be completed within the next three years are included in this review.
ZONEDSCHOOL
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
Region 3
Hamilton
Midway
Pine Crest
CSA E-10
CAPACITY
2,660
754
1,046
860
2,660
3 -YEAR PROGRAM CAPACITY
2,682
3,917
6,599
AVAILABLE CAPACITY
-
ENROLLMENT
2,132
658
804
670
2,132
AVAILABLE CAPACITY
528
96
242
190
528
SCALD RESERVATIONS TO DATE
503
182
2081
185
503
SIA - Sharing Commons
14
-
-
1
14
REMAINING CAPACITY 10 961E) 24210 190 11
Region 3 Elementary Schools include Hamilton, Midway, and Pine Crest
ZONEDSCHOOL
MIDDLE SCHOOLS
Greenwood Lakes
Markham Woods
Millennium
Sanford
CSA M-1
CAPACITY
1,268
1,260
1,757
1,447
5,732
3 -YEAR PROGRAM CAPACITY
2,682
3,917
6,599
AVAILABLE CAPACITY
-
ENROLLMENT
943
882
1,336
1,374
4,535
AVAILABLE CAPACITY
325
378
421
73
1,197
SCALD RESERVATIONS TO DATE
27
182
2081
185
602
SIA - Sharing Commons
6
-I
1
1
6
REMAINING CAPACITY 0 29210 19610 21310 (112) C) 589
ZONEDSCHOOL
HIGH SCHOOLS
Lake Mary
Seminole
CSA H-1
CAPACITY
2,805
4,934
7,739
3 -YEAR PROGRAM CAPACITY
-
ENROLLMENT
2,682
3,917
6,599
AVAILABLE CAPACITY
123
1,017
- 1,140
SCALD RESERVATIONS TO DATE
17
788
805
SIA - Sharing Commons
8
-
8
REMAINING CAPACITY 10, 98 10 229 10 327
httpsl/scminolcschools shnrcpoint.cum/sitcs/Facililicsplanninl./Sharcd DocumcrosNcw nircctoric-Jl'InnningrDcvclopmcnt tracking/0 SlAs/SIA 202424-06_SIA Shnring CommonJNoticc - Sharing Commons.docx
Terms and Definitions:
Capacity: The amount of satisfactory permanent student stations as calculated on the date of the second FDOE count
in October of the current school year. The number of students that can be satisfactorily accommodated in a room at any
given time and which, is typically a lesser percentage of the total number of student stations. NOTE: Capacity is ONLY
a measure of student stations, not of enrollment.
Concurrency Service Area (CSA): A geographic unit promulgated by the School Board and adopted by local
governments within which the level of service is measured when an application for residential development is reviewed
for school concurrency purposes. The CSA listed represents the area that the capacity is considered and student
assignment may be in a CSA adjacent to the project.
Enrollment: For the purposes of concurrency review, the enrollment level is established each year as per Public School
Interlocal Agreement Section 12.4 A, which sets the level on the date of the second full time equivalent (FTE) survey for
FDOE, generally taken in mid-October.
Programmed 3 Year Additions: New permanent school capacity within the CSA, which will be in place or under actual
construction within the first three years of the current SCPS Capital Improvement Plan.
Remaining Capacity: The capacity available for future development after the addition of any programmed capacity and
less the reserved capacity.
Reserved Capacity: The total number of student stations reserved in the respective CSA's that are assigned to projects
via a SCALD certificate.
School Size: For planning purposes, each public school district must determine the maximum size of future elementary,
middle and high schools. Existing school size is determined solely through FISH data. Seminole County Public Schools
has established the sizes of future schools (with the exception of special centers and magnet schools) as follows:
i) Elementary: 780 student stations
ii) Middle: 1500 student stations
iii) High: 2,800 student stations
School Attendance Zone: The established geographic area that identifies school assignments pursuant to Board Policy
for each District school or region of schools, other than county wide magnet schools. Students shall attend the school(s)
serving their residential or regional attendance zone unless otherwise permitted by Board Policy
Students Generated by Project: is determined by applying the current SCPS student generation rate (calculated in the
2017 Impact Fee Study) to the number and type of units proposed. The number of units is determined using information
provided by the jurisdiction and/or from the applicant's request. If no actual unit count is provided the unit count is then
estimated based on the maximum allowable density under the existing/proposed future land use designation. Eventual
Student assignment may not be to the school in closest proximity to the proposed residential development.
Utilization: A State Board Rule prescribed percentage of student stations that a room (and proportionately, a school
and school district) can satisfactorily accommodate at any given time. From a school/campus analysis perspective,
"utilization" is determined as the percentage of school enrollment to capacity. Current DOE established K-12 utilization
factors are as follows:
Elementary 95%, Middle 90%, High 95%
haps//scminolcschools sharcpoim cam/sires/FnciliticsPlanning/Sltarcd Do rncros[Nm Dirworics/PlnnningfDecclopmcnt tmckinWO SIA.%tSI A 2024f-7-14)6 SIA Staring CommonsNoticc- Sharing Connnons doc.-
City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Site: 6498 North Ronald Reagan Boulevard
Parcel(s): 13-20-30-300-040A-0000 &
13-20-30-300-0160-0000
Proposed Future Land Use: General Commercial (GC)
5.77 Acres
Existing Land Use
Current Future
Land Use
Seminole County Existing Land Use
commercial
Seminole County
Current Future Land
Institutional
Use
Public - Other
�] Commercial
I__ ] Residential - Mobile Home
Low -Density Residential
l� Residential -Single Family
0 Planned Development
Commercial -Vacant
County Owned Public/
(� Other Vacant
Quasi -Public
l� Residential - vacant.i
Recreation
Mo. IE
Sanford Current
Future Land Use
Mobile Home
m 7-1
ROCKY
3F RIDGE
Low Density Res. Single
Family
Neighborhood
a�
Commercial
Sanford Future
Land Use
Mobile Home
Low Density Res. Single
Family
Neighborhood
Commercial
Q General Commercial
Existing Land Use
WYNN'DRiIVE —
- 00�'
F
UJI
o
Qi
/ o�NOVSE
3 COVRC ��
W—
m
Mo. IE
HARBOR
PLACE
;v
m 7-1
ROCKY
3F RIDGE
S
a�
RIDGE
3�
A�� CANARYILAKE
r COURT
Current Future Land Use
WYNN'DRN j Y
00,
F
o 8 N00se `F s
Ld
SE
.0
m
MONROE
HARBOR
�, PLACE
w
m 7-1
ROCKY
3F RIDGE
S
m ROCKY
RIDGE
3 PrACE
��� CANARY
rn.y LAKE'COURT
O
Proposed Future Land Use
Y >
WYNN'DRIVE� W 0 0
U
0 a
F
o 8 N00se `F s
GGD
v
MONROE
HARBOR
� IPL.ACE
�QQ9
O
w
m 7-1
ROCKY
3F RIDGE
�0 PLACE
CANARY -LAKE
COURT
-,'. i R 1. 1 4 "A
COURT. DCETER COU�RT�
e -.'1.; i'y r '`"iY._s'e%e1 „�' �i. . ;� �'• •p ``zz '�� - y�S' � �•� �f' 2 ��
><F �+ �°!C .s ti CI KENT COURT 9i
Y p ROLE -- Z
BA
,,� v'"t'. ��. may[{, �. �• ;. - t;-�- � '
DOWNING STREET
�"
G1�' �• -� iii!. �J� F� �.'F
ikV
TE
N DRNE L }t ,,$
,� e4
w 4
�
w
i"
A,
+�
SI ,
r a.,
oR
J ti tag tag
.i ii.�Yl •A� � C ® 7C
Ism
)t
ZZ MONROE HARE{OR+PLACE,.
(� �$ :f ry
k
INj-
at. :��sec!y,}y °''R.^.•'XI'. W m
I
Al
y ,l ROCKYe RIDGE PLACE
•'Mk _
' CANARYLLAKE COURT � L
Site
6498 North Ronald Reagan Boulevard_
SHADES CREST
t 13-20-30-300-040A-0000 & -
13-20-30-300-0160-0000 ,. °TUCKERVLANE`� Y
r i
_ .r. a;i '�. `7 si �` - . .c .}tw -.. a'�fT: R^ e._. 'MI6 .'-
7CITY OF
,SAIVFORD AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND DESIGNATION OF AGENT
FLORIDA
www.sanfordfl.gov
Please use additional sheets as needed. If any additional sheets are attached to this document, please sign here and note below:
Ownership
Nina Yon
Tax Parcel Number(s): 13-20-30-300-040A-0000
Address of Property: CR 427, Sanford, FL 32773
for which this rezoning and land use change
, hereby attest to ownership of the property described below:
II. Designation of Applicant's Agent (leave blank if not applicable)
application is submitted to the City of Sanford.
As the owner/applicant of the above designated property for which this affidavit is submitted, I designate the below named individual
as my agent in all matters pertaining to the application process. In authorizing the agent named below to represent me, or my
company, I attest that the application is made in good faith and that all information contained in the application is accurate and
complete to the best of my personal knowledge.
Applicant's Agent (Print): Daniel Ryan Signature:
Agent Address: 600 N. Hwy 17-92, suite 130, Longwood, FL 32750
Email: dan.ryan@thesharingcenter.org
III. Notice to Owner
Phone: 407-496-6406 Fax:
A. All changes in Ownership and/or Applicant's Agent prior to final action of the City shall require a new affidavit. If ownership
changes, the new owner assumes all obligations related to the filing application process.
B. If the Owner intends for the authority of the Applicant's Agent to be limited in any manner, please indicate the limitations(s)
below. (i.e.: limited to obtaining a certificate of concurrency; limited to obtaining a land use compliance certificate, etc.)
The owner of the real property associated with this application or procurement activity is a (check one)
❑ Individual ❑ Corporation ❑ Land Trust ❑ Partnership ❑ Limited Liability Company
a Other (describe): 501 C3 Not for profit
1. List all natural persons who have an ownership interest in the property, which is the subject matter of this petition, by name and
address.
2. For each corporation, list the name, address, and title of each officer; the name and address of each director of the corporation;
and the name and address of each shareholder who owns two percent (2%) or more of the stock of the corporation. Shareholders
need not be disclosed if a corporation's stock are traded publicly on any national stock exchange.
3. In the case of a trust, list the name and address of each trustee and the name and address of the beneficiaries of the trust and the
percentage of interest of each beneficiary. If any trustee or beneficiary of a trust is a corporation, please provide the information
required in paragraph 2 above.
Name of Trust:
4. For partnerships, including limited partnerships, list the name and address of each principal in the partnership, including general
or limited partners. If any partner is a corporation, please provide the information required in paragraph 2 above.
5. For each limited liability company, list the name, address, and title of each manager or managing member; and the name and
address of each additional member with two percent (2%) or more membership interest. If any member with two percent (2%) or
more membership interest, manager, or managing member is a corporation, trust or partnership, please provide the
information required in paragraphs 2, 3 and/oro above.
Name of LLC:
6. In the circumstances of a contract for purchase, list the name and address of each contract purchaser. If the purchaser is a
corporation, trust, partnership, or LLC, provide the information required for those entities in paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and/or 5 above.
Name of Purchaser:
Date of Contract:
NAME
TITLE/OFFICE/TRUSTEE
OR BENEFICIARY
ADDRESS
% OF
INTEREST
Nina Yon
President & CEO
600 N. Hwy 17-92, suite 130. Longwood FL 32750
0
Gail Bittman
Board Chair
600 N. Hwy 17-92, suite 130. Longwood FL 32750
0
Steve Reed
Past Chair
600 N. Hwy 17-92, suite 130. Longwood FL 32750
0
Ron Davoli
Vice -Chair External
600 N. Hwy 17-92, suite 130. Longwood FL 32750
0
Michelle Smith
Vice -Chair Internal
600 N. Hwy 17-92, suite 130. Longwood FL 32750
0
Michael Heald
Treasurer
600 N. Hwy 17-92, suite 130. Longwood FL 32750
0
Mary Sherris
Secretary
600 N. Hwy 17-92, suite 130. Longwood FL 32750
0
(Use additional sheets for more space.)
7. As to any type of owner referred to above, a change of ownership occurring subsequent to the execution of this document, shall be
disclosed in writing to the City prior to any action being taken by the City as to the matter relative to which this document pertains.
8. 1 affirm that the above representations are true and are based upon my personal knowledge and belief after all reasonable inquiry. I
understand that any failure to make mandated disclosures is grounds for the subject rezone, future land use amendment, special
exception, or variance involved with this Application to become void or for the submission for a procurement activity to be non-
responsive. I certify that I am legally authorized to execute this Affidavit and to bind the Applicant or Vendor to the disclosures
herein.
4/3/2023
Date
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF Seminole
Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me by Nina Yon
on this 4th day of April 2023
Signature of Notary Public
Personally Known X OR Produced Identification
Type of Identification Produced
Affidavit of Ownership - January 2015
Owner, Agent, Applicant Signature
Print, Type or Stamp Name of Notary Public
=°"RYP°MICIC�Decembcr
5 MY COM
�y EXPIRE
CITY or
SANFORD AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND DESIGNATION OF AGENT
f L0.41RA
v .sanfordfl.gov
Please use additional sheets as needed. If any additional sheets are attached to this document, please sign here and note below:
I. Ownership
I, Dale & Company LLC hereby attest to ownership of the property described below:
Tax Parcel Number(s): 13-20-30-300-0160-000
Address of Property: 6498 N. Ronald Reagan Blvd, Sanford, FL 32773
for which this rezoning and land use change application is submitted to the City of Sanford.
Ii. Designation of Applicant's Agent (leave blank if not applicable)
As the owner/applicant of the above designated property for'which this affidavit is submitted, I designate the below named individual
as my agent in all matters pertaining to the application process. In authorizing the agent named below to represent me, or my
company, I attest that the application is made in good faith and that all information contained in the application is accurate anis
complete to the best of my personal knowledge.
Applicant's Agent (Print): Daniel Ryan Signature:l�
Agent Address: 600 N. Hwy 17-92, suite 130, Longwood, FL 32750
Email: dan.ryan@thesharingcenter.org Phone: 407-496-6406 Fax:
Ill. Notice to Owner
A. All changes in Ownership and/or Applicant's Agent prior to final action of the City shall require a new affidavit. If ownership
changes, the new owner assumes all obligations related to the filing application process.
B. If the Owner intends for the authority of the Applicant's Agent to be limited in any manner, please indicate the limitations(s)
below. (i.e.: limited to obtaining a certificate of concurrency; limited to obtaining a land use compliance certificate, etc.)
The owner of the real property associated with this application or procurement activity is a (check one)
❑ Individual o Corporation o Land Trust o Partnership Zimited Liability Company
❑ Other (describe):
1. List all natural persons who have an ownership interest in the property, which is the subject matter of this petition, by name and
address.
2. For each corporation, list the name, address, and title of each officer; the name and address of each director of the corporation;
and the name and address of each shareholder who owns two percent (2%) or more of the stock of the corporation. Shareholders
need not be disclosed if a corporation's stock are traded publicly on any national stock exchange.
3. In the case of a trust, list the name and address of each trustee and the name and address of the beneficiaries of the trust and the
percentage of interest of each beneficiary. If any trustee or beneficiary of a trust is a corporation, please provide the information
required in paragraph 2 above.
Name of Trust:
4. For partnerships, including limited partnerships, list the name and address of each principal in the partnership, including general
or limited partners. If any partner is a corporation, please provide the information required in paragraph 2 above.
5. For each limited liability company, list the name, address, and title of each manager or managing member; and the name and
address of each additional member with two percent (2%) or more membership interest. If any member with two percent (2%) or
more membership interest, manager, or managing member is a corporation, trust or partnership, please provide the
information required in paragraphs 2, 3 and/or 4 above.
Name of LLC: Dale & Company LLC
6. In the circumstances of a contract for purchase, list the name and address of each contract purchaser. If the purchaser is a
corporation, trust, partnership, or LLC, provide the information required for those entities in paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and/or 5 above.
Name of Purchaser: The Christian Sharing Center
Date of Contract: 12.28.2022
NAME TITLE/OFFICE/TRUSTEE
OR BENEFICIARY
ADDRESS % OF
INTEREST
M b
i0
u y
(Use additional sheets for more space.)
7. As to any type of owner referred to above, a change of ownership occurring subsequent to the execution of this document, shall be
disclosed in writing to the City prior to any action being taken by the City as to the matter relative to which this document pertains.
8. 1 affirm that the above representations are true and are based upon my personal knowledge and belief after all reasonable inquiry. I
understand that any failure to make mandated disclosures is grounds for the subject rezone, future land use amendment, special
exception, or variance involved with this Application to become void or for the submission for a procurement activity to be non-
responsive. I certify that I am legally authorized to execute this Affidavit and to bind the Applicant or Vendor to the disclosures
herein.
t/te Owner, Agent, Applicant Signature
H&911 For 'D*STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF SC (�(( �J0 L
Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me by446't_ i�"(A(�v/ 'h
on this 3 day of k PA f L_ , 20 a 3
Signature o ofa(�U
Pers onally Known OR Produced Identification
Type of Identification Produced
Affdawl of Ovmership - January 2015
Print, Type or Stamp Name of Notary Public
DEBORAH L. BAUER
/£ r NOTARY F J31- P --r- U URIDA
-
y sscn cnG • ik5r024
2
C I V IL EN GIN E E R S
CENTRAL FLORIDA ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, LLC
INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS
Bridging Communities: Proposal for Affordable Workforce Housing
The Sharing Commons at 5 Points
We seek to address the need for additional workforce housing with this Land Use Change
Request from Neighborhood Commercial (pid 040A) and Agriculture (pid 0160) to General
Commercial. We are seeking this change to a compatible Land Use, in order to allow for
the Sharing Center's 79 -unit apartment complex, aiming to help fill the gap in more
affordable options amidst rising market rates.
Like other communities, Sanford, a city of history and progress, faces a challenge of
affordability. At the heart of this proposal is the essence of community. It recognizes that
affordable housing is not just about brick and mortar; it is about creating spaces where
Lives intertwine, where dreams find fertile ground to grow. This proposed 79 -unit apartment
complex is more than just structures — it is a promise to bridge the gap, to bring together
diverse backgrounds and aspirations under one roof.
The Sharing Commons at Five Points symbolizes hope, bridging divides and offering
stability and dignity to those who keep Sanford thriving. It's not just a Land Use change; it's
a commitment to change lives. It's about recognizing that the true wealth of a city lies not
just in its buildings but in the strength of its community. Let this proposed 79 -unit
apartment complex stand as a testament to Sanford's unwavering spirit, its resilience, and
its commitment to building a future where all can thrive.
1111 N. RONALD REAGAN BOULEVARD • SUITE 101 • LONGWOOD, FLORIDA 32750
PHONE (407) 599-7010 • MAIL@FLORIDAENG.COM
W
N
F -A O
lD
00
V 61 U'i
P
W
N
1!—
' tD
roo
ns
\
'a
N
Vin•
I�
i
13
i
iSIIJGi,�
j
QID
ebe
En
N�
I
I I
�
I
I
1
vvv
�=r;rD
Z
I p(Dj
I
Di
m
13
n
Q
S
V�i
'
�
3
i
1
1
Five Points Village
City of Sanford, Florida
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
Prepared for:
The Sharing Center
600 N YUS Highway 17-92, Suite 130
Longwood, FL 32750
Prepared by:
PTG
Premier Traffic Group
PremierTrafficGroup@gmail.com
350 E Crown Point Road, Suite 1100
Winter Garden, FL 34787
April 2024
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This traffic analysis is being conducted to assess the impact of the proposed Five Points Village
79 townhome development located north of CR 427/N Ronald Reagan Boulevard approximately
200 feet southwest of Carriage Cove Way/Bedford Road in the City of Sanford, Florida. The
analysis included a determination of project trip generation, a review of existing and projected
roadway and intersection capacity and a review of access operations.
The results of the traffic analysis are summarized as follows:
• The proposed development will generate a total of 581 daily trips of which 47 and 55 will
occur during the AM and PM peak hour, respectively.
• Access to the site will be provided via a right-in/right-out access driveway connection
onto CR 427/N Ronald Reagan Boulevard.
• An analysis of the study roadway segments indicates that the study roadway segments
currently operate adequately within their adopted Level of Service standard and are
projected to continue to do so upon buildout of the proposed development.
• An analysis of the study intersections indicates that the study intersections currently
operate adequately within their adopted Level of Service standard and are projected to
continue to do so upon buildout of the proposed development.
• The existing southbound left turn lane at the CR 427 and Meeting Place intersection and
the exiting northbound left turn storage lane length at the CR 427 and Bedford Road
intersection were analyzed to be adequate in length to accommodate the proposed
development.
Based on the analyses conducted, approval of the proposed project is requested from a
transportation perspective since the project does not adversely impact any of the study roadway
segments or intersections.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that I am a Professional Engineer properly registered in the State of Florida practicing with
Premier Traffic Group a dba of Karma Consultancy, LLC. and that I have supervised the preparation and
approve the evaluation, findings, opinions, conclusions, and technical advice hereby reported for:
PROJECT: Five Points Village
LOCATION: City of Sanford, Florida
I acknowledge that the procedures and references used to develop the results contained in
these computations are standard to the professional practice of Transportation Engineering as
applied through professional judgment and experience.
NAME: Vasu T.`PRrg4ud„Q� f��,
P.E. #: Florid'' N9.7 �Do
DATE: A rbr..tL'��� SF� Yjj �a
• TW
SIGNATURE: ` )
� C�' F(pR10r • .�
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1
1.1
Data and Methodology................................................................................................................................1
1.2
Study Area.........................................................................................................................................................2
1.3
Planned and Programmed Improvements............................................................................................2
2.0
EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS....................................................................................3
2.1
Roadway Segment Analysis........................................................................................................................3
2.2
Intersection Capacity Analysis...................................................................................................................3
3.0
TRIP GENERATION........................................................................................................... 5
3.1
Trip Generation...............................................................................................................................................5
3.2
Trip Distribution/Assignment....................................................................................................................5
4.0
PROJECTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS................................................................................ 7
4.1
Background Traffic Projection...................................................................................................................7
4.2
Roadway Segment Analysis........................................................................................................................7
4.3
Intersection Capacity Analysis...................................................................................................................8
4.4
Turn Lane Analysis.........................................................................................................................................9
5.0
STUDY CONCLUSIONS...................................................................................................11
Appendix A: Preliminary Concept Plan
Appendix B: Methodology Coordination
Appendix C: Seminole County CMS
Appendix D: Traffic Volumes
Appendix E: Existing Intersection Analysis Output
Appendix F: Historical Trends Analysis
Appendix G: Projected Intersection Analysis Output
Appendix H: Turn Lane Analysis
i
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Existing Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis.........................................................................................................3
Table 2: Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis.......................................................................................................................4
Table3: Trip Generation....................................................................................................................................................................5
Table 4: Projected Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis.....................................................................................................8
Table 5: Projected Intersection Capacity Analysis...................................................................................................................9
Figure 1: Project Location Map............
Figure 2: Trip Distribution Map............
LIST OF FIGURES
11
.......................................................................................1
....................................................................................... 6
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The proposed Five Points Village 79 townhome development is located north of CR 427/N
Ronald Reagan Boulevard approximately 200 feet southwest of Carriage Cove Way/Bedford
Road in the City of Sanford, Florida. Figure 1 depicts the site location and the surrounding
transportation network. Access to the site will be provided via a right-in/right-out access
driveway connection onto CR 427/N Ronald Reagan Boulevard. A preliminary concept plan is
included in Appendix A.
1.1 Data and Methodology
Data used in the analysis consisted of site plan/development information provided by the
Project Engineers, AM and PM peak hour intersection traffic counts obtained by PTG and
roadway segment traffic volumes obtained from Seminole County and the Florida Department
of Transportation (FDOT). The analysis was conducted in accordance with the Traffic Impact
Analysis (TIA) Methodology Memorandum prepared for the project. A copy of the methodology
coordination is provided in Appendix B.
Figure 1: Project Location Map
Traffic Impact Analysis Five Points Village
1 April 2024
••
Sem,nole CQ
Recordx Center _
pWYBAC
•Elaka lA.iry�M E4
•
e
�"�
� "(�'
E*wW
FnneVQ`
t •
V!
�o4M1>rY
Okd
U
'1
�I/die
_
IL
/ d
Q4e
... 1
SM
I
Q E
spnny
Sc:en4li'dayhdvcnlc:\,
SHG
N Rauld Reo9>e
�-
1 -mile
---___--
Figure 1: Project Location Map
Traffic Impact Analysis Five Points Village
1 April 2024
1.2 Study Area
The study facilities to be considered in the analysis are listed below. The study area was derived
by identifying the roadway segments within a 1 -mile radius and major intersections within a 1/4 -
mile radius as discussed in the Seminole County Traffic Impact Guidelines dated 05/07/2023.
Study Segments
• 059: CR 427 from Sanford Avenue to Sunland Drive
• 060: CR 427 from Sunland Drive to County Home Road
• 337: CR 427 from Keyes Court to E Lake Mary Boulevard
• 150: Lake Mary Boulevard from Country Club to US 17-92
• 150b: E Lake Mary Boulevard from US 17-92 to SR 417 Ramps
• 152: E Lake Mary Boulevard from CR 427 to Marquette Avenue
• 151a: E Lake Mary Boulevard from SR 417 Ramps to CR 427
• 62a: CR 427 from Silkwood Court to US 17-92
• 344: US 17-92 from CR 427 to Lake Mary Boulevard
• 345: US 17-92 from Lake Mary Boulevard to Airport Boulevard
Study Intersections
• CR 427/N Ronald Reagan Boulevard and Carriage Cove Way/Bedford Road
• CR 427/N Ronald Reagan Boulevard and Meeting Place
• CR 427/N Ronald Reagan Boulevard and Project Access
1.3 Planned and Programmed Improvements
Based on discussions and review of data documented by FDOT, Seminole County and MetoPlan
Orlando, there are no pertinent roadway capacity improvements that were planned and
programmed within three (3) years of the project buildout.
Traffic Impact Analysis Five Points Village
2 April 2024
2.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
Existing conditions in the vicinity of the site were analyzed to establish a baseline for the traffic
conditions prevailing in the vicinity of the proposed development. The analysis included a review
of the existing roadway segment capacities and an analysis of the intersection operations at the
study intersections.
2.1 Roadway Segment Analysis
Table 1 summarizes the existing roadway segment capacity analysis for study segment. The
existing roadway segment conditions were analyzed by comparing the existing traffic volumes
observed on the study roadway segments to the service volumes at the adopted Level of Service
(LOS) standard for the roadway segments. The LOS data was obtained from the latest Seminole
County Transportation Management System Spreadsheet, excerpts of which are included in
Appendix C.
Table 1: Existing Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis
Seg ID
Roadway
Segment Location
Lanes
PH Dir
Capacity
Existing
Vol
Comm
Trips
Total Vol
LOS Stnd
Met?
59
CR 427
Sanford Ave to Sunland Dr
4D
42,560
24,403
126
24,529
Yes
60
CR 427
Sunland Dr to County Home Rd
4D
42,560
26,024
1109
27,133
Yes
377
CR 427
Keyes Court to E Lake Mary Blvd
4D
42,560
29,531
306
29,837
Yes
150
Lake Mary Blvd
Country Club to US 17-92
4D
42,560
21,311
2273
23,584
Yes
150b
E Lake Mary Blvd
US 17-92 to SR 417 Ramps
4D
42,560
20,902
4923
25,825
Yes
152
E Lake Mary Blvd
CR 427 to Marquette Ave
4D
42,560
21,311
2273
23,584
Yes
151a
E Lake Mary Blvd
SR 417 Ramps to CR 427
4D
42,560
20,005
9335
29,340
Yes
62a
CR 427
Silkwood Ct to US 17-92
4D
42,560
14,889
0
14,889
Yes
344
US 17-92
CR 427 to Lake Mary Blvd
4D
48,000
22,744
466
23,210
Yes
345
US 17-92
Lake Mary Blvd to Airport Blvd
4D
48,000
22,744
0
22,744
Yes
The analysis indicates that the study roadway segments currently operate adequately within
their adopted Level of Service (LOS) standard.
2.2 Intersection Capacity Analysis
Table 2 summarizes the results of the existing intersection capacity analysis. The existing
intersection capacity analysis was conducted for the AM and PM peak hour using the Synchro
Traffic Impact Analysis Five Points Village
3 April 2024
software and the methods of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). The turning movement
count data and the existing AM and PM peak hour Turning Movement Volumes are the are
included in Appendix D. It should be noted that the raw turning movement counts were not
adjusted to peak season volumes using a seasonal adjustment factor obtained from the FDOT
Traffic Online website as the traffic conducted were conducted during the peak season.
Table 2: Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis
Intersection
Control
Time
EB
WB
NB
SB
Period
Delay LOS
Delay LOS
Delay LOS
Delay LOS
CR 427 & Bedford Rd
Stop
AM
38.9 E
50.6 F
0.1 A
0.2 A
PM
1 45.4 E
106.8 F
0.2 A
1.0 A
CR 427 & Meeting PI
Stop
AM
-- --
28.4 D
0.0 A
0.0 A
PM
-- --
35.4 E
0.0 A
0.1 A
The analysis indicates that the study intersections operate adequately during the AM and PM
peak hour period. It should be noted that minor street approaches of the CR 427 and Bedford
Road intersection experiences Level of Service F conditions which is a function of the stop -
controlled side street approaches to the CR 427 mainline. The detailed Synchro worksheets are
included in Appendix E.
Traffic Impact Analysis Five Points Village
4 April 2024
3. 0 TRIP GENERATION
To determine the impact of this development, an analysis of its trip generation characteristics
was conducted. This included a determination of the trips to be generated as well as their
distribution and assignment to the surrounding roadways. The estimated project buildout is
2026.
3.1 Trip Generation
Table 3 summarizes the trip generation analysis conducted using information published by the
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in the Trip Generation Manual, 77th Edition.
The calculation indicated that the proposed development would generate a total of 581 daily
trips of which 47 and 55 will occur during the AM and PM peak hour, respectively.
The ITE Trip Generation graphs are included as part of the Methodology Memorandum in
Appendix B.
Table 3: Trip Generation
ITE
Code
Land Use
Size
Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Rate Trips Rate
Enter
Exit
Total Rate
JEnterl
Exit
Total
220
Multi -Family (Low -Rise)
79 DUs
7.36 581 0.6
1 11
36
1 47 0.69
1 35
1 20
1 55
Note: ITE Trip generation equation used as the R -squared value is greater than 0.7
3.2 Trip Distribution/Assignment
The trip distribution pattern was derived using historically available traffic counts, knowledge of
the travel pattern in the area and engineering/planning judgement.
Figure 2 provides the trip distribution developed for this project. Using this trip distribution
pattern, project trips were assigned to the surrounding study roadway network.
Traffic Impact Analysis Five Points Village
5 April 2024
f�
-------- ---
Figure 2: Trip Distribution Map
♦
Seminole County
Records Centel.
E Lako
% %
0
Traffic Impact Analysis Five Points Village
6 ApH12024
4. 0 PROJECTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
An analysis of projected conditions was conducted to determine the proposed development's
impact on the roadway segment capacities and to evaluate the operations of the study
intersections. The project buildout year for the analysis is 2026.
4.1 Background Traffic Projection
Projected traffic volumes consist of background traffic combined with site generated traffic.
Typically, background traffic volumes are determined by expanding existing peak hour traffic
volumes to the buildout year using an annual growth rate. A historical trend analysis was
conducted based on the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) data obtained from the MOT
Traffic Online website in the vicinity of the project (see Appendix F). The trend analysis
indicated negligible growth, therefore a nominal annual growth rate of 2% was utilized for the
analysis. This growth rate was applied to the existing traffic volumes as appropriate in order to
determine the projected background volumes in the project buildout year.
4.2 Roadway Segment Analysis
Table 4 summarizes the results of the projected study roadway segment capacity analysis. The
Projected roadway segment conditions were analyzed by comparing the projected traffic
volumes on the study segments to their respective service volumes at the adopted Level of
Service (LOS) standard.
The total projected traffic volume is composed of background traffic and project trips. Projected
background traffic was estimated using the annual growth rate discussed in the previous
section.
Trac Impact Analysis Five Points Village
7 April 2024
Table 4: Projected Roadway Segment Capacity Analysis
Seg ID
Roadway
Segment Location
Lanes
PH Dir
Capacity
Trip
Dist
Project Vol
Total Vol
LOS Stnd
Met?
59
CR 427
Sanford Ave to Sunland Dr
4D
42,560
60%
349
26,216
Yes
60
CR 427
Sunland Dr to County Home Rd
4D
42,560
40%
232
27,817
Yes
377
CR 427
Keyes Court to E Lake Mary Blvd
4D
42,560
30%
174
31,477
Yes
150
Lake Mary Blvd
Country Club to US 17-92
4D
42,560
15%
87
22,677
Yes
150b
E Lake Mary Blvd
US 17-92 to SR 417 Ramps
4D
42,560
20%
116
22,272
Yes
152
E Lake Mary Blvd
CR 427 to Marquette Ave
4D
42,560
5%
29
22,619
Yes
151a
E Lake Mary Blvd
SR 417 Ramps to CR 427
4D
42,560
15%
87
21,292
Yes
62a
CR 427
Silkwood Ct to US 17-92
4D
42,560
20%
116
15,898
Yes
344
US 17-92
CR 427 to Lake Mary Blvd
4D
48,000
60%
349
24,458
Yes
345
US 17-92
Lake Mary Blvd to Airport Blvd
4D
48,000
15%
87
24,196
Yes
Note: Total Vol = 2024 Existing Vol x [1+(2%x 3 years)] + Project Vol
The analysis indicates that the study roadway segments currently operate adequately within
their adopted Level of Service (LOS).
4.3 Intersection Capacity Analysis
Table 5 summarizes the results of the projected intersection capacity analysis. The projected
intersection capacity and operational analysis was conducted using the Synchro software and
the methods of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) and was performed for the AM and PM
peak hours. The projected volumes for the intersection capacity and operations analysis were
calculated as previously discussed.
Projected background traffic was estimated using the annual growth rate as previously
discussed. The projected peak hour volumes are also provided Appendix D.
Traffic Impact Analysis Five Points Village
8 April 2024
Table 5: Projected Intersection Capacity Analysis
Intersection
Control
Time
EB
WB
NB
SB
Period
Delay LOS
Delay LOS
Delay LOS
Delay
LOS
CR 427 & Bedford Rd
Stop
AM
45.0
E
71.0
F
0.1
A
0.2
A
PM
59.4 F
162.8 F
0.3 A
1.0
A
CR 427 & Meeting PI
Stop
AM
--
--
36.7
E
0.0
A
0.2
A
PM
— --
42.1 E
0.0 A
0.3
A
CR 427 & Project Access
Stop
AM
15.7
C
-
--
0.0
A
0.0
A
PM
11.9 B
-- --
0.0 A
0.0
A
The analysis indicates that the study intersections are projected to continue to operate
adequately during both the AM and PM peak hour period. The CR 427 and Bedfrod Road minor
street approaches will continue to operate at Level of Service F conditions. The Synchro analysis
worksheets are included in Appendix G.
4.4 Turn Lane Analysis
CR 427 and Meetina Place Intersection
A review was conducted to assess the adequacy of the existing exclusive southbound left turn
storage lane length at the CR 427 and Meeting Place intersection. The review was conducted to
ensure that sufficient storage is available to serve the projected traffic volumes.
Total Turn Lane Length Required = Vehicular Deceleration Distance + Queue Storage
Deceleration @ 45 mph = 185' (incl. 50' taper), per FDOT Design Standards, (see Appendix H)
Queue = 951h percentile queue from Synchro = 0.1 vehicles, use 2 vehicles for queue = 50'
Total Turn Lane Length Required = 185' + 50' = 235' (incl. 50' taper)
Existing turn lane length = 300' (incl. 50' taper)
In summary, based on this analysis the existing exclusive southbound left turn storage lane
length at the CR 427 and Meeting Place intersection is adequate in length to accommodate the
proposed development.
CR 427 and Bedford Road Intersection
A review was conducted to assess the adequacy of the existing exclusive northbound left turn
storage lane length at the CR 427 and Bedford Road intersection. The review was conducted to
ensure that sufficient storage is available to serve the projected traffic volumes.
Total Turn Lane Length Required = Vehicular Deceleration Distance + Queue Storage
Traffic Impact Analysis Five Points Village
9 April 2024
Deceleration @ 45 mph = 185' (incl. 50' taper), per MOT Design Standards, , (see Appendix H)
Queue = 951h percentile queue from Synchro = 0.2 vehicles, use 2 vehicles for queue = 50'
Total Turn Lane Length Required = 185' + 50' = 235' (incl. 50' taper)
Existing turn lane length = 340' (incl. 50' taper)
In summary, based on this analysis the existing exclusive northbound left turn storage lane
length at the CR 427 and Bedford Road intersection is adequate in length to accommodate the
proposed development.
Traffic Impact Analysis Five Points Village
10 Apri 1 2024
5.0 STUDY CONCLUSIONS
This traffic analysis is being conducted to assess the impact of the proposed Five Points Village
79 townhome development located north of CR 427/N Ronald Reagan Boulevard approximately
200 feet southwest of Carriage Cove Way/Bedford Road in the City of Sanford, Florida. The
analysis included a determination of project trip generation, a review of existing and projected
roadway and intersection capacity and a review of access operations.
The results of the traffic analysis are summarized as follows:
• The proposed development will generate a total of 581 daily trips of which 47 and 55 will
occur during the AM and PM peak hour, respectively.
• Access to the site will be provided via a right-in/right-out access driveway connection
onto CR 427/N Ronald Reagan Boulevard.
• An analysis of the study roadway segments indicates that the study roadway segments
currently operate adequately within their adopted Level of Service standard and are
projected to continue to do so upon buildout of the proposed development.
• An analysis of the study intersections indicates that the study intersections currently
operate adequately within their adopted Level of Service standard and are projected to
continue to do so upon buildout of the proposed development.
• The existing southbound left turn lane at the CR 427 and Meeting Place intersection and
the exiting northbound left turn storage lane length at the CR 427 and Bedford Road
intersection were analyzed to be adequate in length to accommodate the proposed
development.
Based on the analyses conducted, approval of the proposed project is requested from a
transportation perspective since the project does not adversely impact any of the study roadway
segments or intersections.
Traffic Impact Analysis Five Points Village
11
April 2024
APPENDIX
Appendix A: Preliminary Concept Plan
i�'\\-\\,
reaaea�s���m� tm��e�eee�
Own
9phJ 9f9C4N, � f
B(�a
0
o
4 e'"+y �'�yt �P+L'� \ _ g'' �� •_',mss-L�
�y�sA ����� a � a��'4eB.�lq'•�
m m
a o
Oho ..�
ig
---e ---
_P c
_ _
m
N
Ego
TUCKER DR.
+t
3!Eggg
g 66' ROW
Hip
i�'\\-\\,
reaaea�s���m� tm��e�eee�
Own
9phJ 9f9C4N, � f
B(�a
0
o
4 e'"+y �'�yt �P+L'� \ _ g'' �� •_',mss-L�
�y�sA ����� a � a��'4eB.�lq'•�
m m
a o
Oho ..�
ig
---e ---
_P c
_ _
m
z;;;
Ego
3!Eggg
Hip
tn
m
_
a
Appendix B: Methodology Coordination
PT(;
Premier Traffic Group
METHODOLOGY MEMORANDUM
RE: Five Points Village, City of Sanford
Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology
03/15/2024
Job # 24159
The following is a methodology outline for the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the above -referenced
project. In general, the TIA will conform to the methodology requirements and guidelines documented by
the City of Sanford, Seminole County and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT).
Project Description
This traffic analysis is being conducted to assess the impact of the proposed Five Points Village residential
development located north of CR 427/N Ronald Reagan Boulevard approximately 200 feet southwest of
Carriage Cove Way/Bedford Road in the City of Sanford, Florida. The proposed project comprises 79
Townhomes. Figure 1 depicts the site location and the surrounding transportation network.
Esporna
v W
1
I
�
♦
I� ♦ is
♦
♦%
Sunny hlead�Ys
1 :vrrenVi Q;ry tdsr.Ne��`
Ri
I
waa," 84d
Ewa
% Seminole CoumyQ
Retards Center
E lako Mair E Laka
KI
1
L
1
L..
1 -mile
Figure 1: Project Location Map
Site Access
Access to the site will be provided via a right-in/right-out access driveway connection onto CR 427/N
Ronald Reagan Boulevard. Attachment A provides the preliminary site plan.
Mailing: 151 SS W Colonial Drive, # 784852, Winter Garden, FL 34787 I Physical: 350 E Crown Point Road, Suite 1100, Winter Garden, FL 34787
PremierTrafficGroup@bamail.com I C 321-948-9594
Five Points Village
Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology
03/15/2024
Page 2of3
Trip Generation
Table 1 summarizes the trip generation analysis conducted using information published by the Institute
of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in the Trip Generation Manua(, 11th Edition. The calculation revealed that
the proposed development will generate a total of 581 daily trips of which 47 and 55 will occur during the
AM and PM peak hour, respectively. The ITE Trip Generation graphs are included for reference in
Attachment B.
Table 1: Trip Generation
ITE
Code
Land Use
Size
Daily AM Peak Hour I PM Peak Hour
Rate
Trips Rate
Enter
Exit
Total Rate
Enter
Exit
Total
220
Multi -Family (Low -Rise)
79 DUs
7.36
581 0.6
1 11
1 36
47 0.69
35
20
1 55
Trip Distribution
The trip distribution pattern was derived using existing traffic counts and knowledge of the traffic patterns
in the area to develop a distribution pattern. The trip distribution map is provided in Figure 2. Using this
trip distribution pattern, project trips were assigned to the surrounding study roadway network.
Supporting traffic data is provided in Attachment C.
-19
fir•°" ac,.
/:
I
Esporta Fitnes;
W L4<ru
/ ry8/vd
/
Oke gnnie
! q„ on: '
1
1
1 a
o,
0qy
N Ronald Reagal 9
A d
0 '`
® nam emd
Com MI Rd
Se-in-1.C
eminole County
t lvd N,k Records Center
reM B�1 E Lake M E
® ® y \
Mary Blvd
e \
Figure 2: Trip Distribution Map
K,higan St
c
1 �9
plhNm Or
<_]
�
f`w.r irrA
��
� ��
tr?�eR!+rrCr
endYir
Gay
!a 1
i
Clydesdale C+
IC
nWay
3` F SITE
5
a,
1
a
.:I: Way
9`aQe
�1a�
Shades ^
/
®
n
TO., L.
Y
`
,3OA,nay
Sl
p"�',
Fryrr Ln'
—Wynn
1-mile—�_�_—��_
Figure 2: Trip Distribution Map
K,higan St
Five Points Village
Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology
03/15/2024
Page 3 of 3
Study Area
The study facilities to be considered in the analysis are listed below. The study area was derived by
identifying the roadway segments within a 1 -mile radius and major intersections within a 1/4 -mile radius
as discussed in the Seminole County Traffic Impact Guidelines dated 05/07/2023.
Study Segments
• 059: CR 427 from Sanford Avenue to Sunland Drive
• 060: CR 427 from Sunland Drive to County Home Road
• 377: CR 427 from Keyes Court to E Lake Mary Boulevard
• 150: Lake Mary Boulevard from Country Club to US 17-92
• 150b: E Lake Mary Boulevard from US 17-92 to SR 417 Ramps
• 152: E Lake Mary Boulevard from CR 427 to Marquette Avenue
• 151 a: E Lake Mary Boulevard from SR 417 Ramps to CR 427
• 62a: CR 427 from Silkwood Court to US 17-92
• 344: US 17-92 from CR 427 to Lake Mary Boulevard
• 345: US 17-92 from Lake Mary Boulevard to Airport Boulevard
Study Intersections
• CR 427/N Ronald Reagan Boulevard and Carriage Cove Way/Bedford Road
• CR 427/N Ronald Reagan Boulevard and Meeting Place
• CR 427/N Ronald Reagan Boulevard and Project Access
Projected Conditions Analysis
The projected conditions analysis will be conducted within the following framework:
• Counts: Traffic counts will be obtained during the AM and PM peak period and adjusted using a
peak season factor as necessary.
• Growth Factors: Growth factors, derived from historical traffic volume data, and committed trips
will be applied to existing traffic counts to develop projected/buildout background traffic
volumes.
• Analysis Periods: Analyses will be performed for existing (2024) and projected/buildout conditions
(2026).
• Projected Conditions Traffic: Project buildout traffic volumes will be added to the future
background traffic volumes to obtain total project/buildout traffic volumes.
• Roadway Analysis: Roadways segments will be evaluated using the Seminole County service
volume capacities, as applicable.
• Intersection Analysis: Intersection capacity analysis will be performed using the latest operational
analysis procedures documented in the Highway Capacity Manual as applied using the Synchro
software.
• Turn Lane Analysis: Turn Lane analysis will be performed for all the site access driveways based on
Section 1.3 of the Seminole County Public Works Engineering manual (dated 07/24/2013) and
designed based on FDOT requirements.
Traffic Impact Study Report
The traffic report prepared will summarize the study procedures, analyses and recommendations.
END
Attachment A
Preliminary Site Plan
F
1 � y if
Ti$
�CEEJTRAL FLORIDA ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, LLC auw snnF MASTER PLAN
I,., m :9 � G'i fngne.9nq - Lmtl q nq
till �nx.ae x ed a ma, im ,.0�. 7°�„„ ;,,� FIVE POINTS VILLAGE, PD
City of Sanford, Florida
c
5'
3 -
mmd
='sm
VIM .9 •z3 m
i
.t
--
- TUCKER DR.
9, 66' ROW
�o
m
7p. 3x
go go >$
x
L�
• •
�
sN
3 �
_�
m �� Q��A
v
0
✓�
O
u
\
u
u 11
- --`
IMI u le
1 � y if
Ti$
�CEEJTRAL FLORIDA ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, LLC auw snnF MASTER PLAN
I,., m :9 � G'i fngne.9nq - Lmtl q nq
till �nx.ae x ed a ma, im ,.0�. 7°�„„ ;,,� FIVE POINTS VILLAGE, PD
City of Sanford, Florida
c
5'
3 -
mmd
='sm
7p. 3x
go go >$
x
L�
• •
�
sN
3 �
_�
m �� Q��A
1 � y if
Ti$
�CEEJTRAL FLORIDA ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, LLC auw snnF MASTER PLAN
I,., m :9 � G'i fngne.9nq - Lmtl q nq
till �nx.ae x ed a ma, im ,.0�. 7°�„„ ;,,� FIVE POINTS VILLAGE, PD
City of Sanford, Florida
Attachment B
Trip Generation Information
Land Use: 220
Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise)
Description
Low-rise multifamily housing includes apartments, townhouses, and condominiums located within
the same building with at least three other dwelling units and that have two or three floors (levels).
Various configurations fit this description, including walkup apartment, mansion apartment, and
stacked townhouse.
• A walkup apartment typically is two or three floors in height with dwelling units that are accessed
by a single or multiple entrances with stairways and hallways.
• A mansion apartment is a single structure that contains several apartments within what appears
to be a single-family dwelling unit.
• A fourplex is a single two-story structure with two matching dwelling units on the ground and
second floors. Access to the individual units is typically internal to the structure and provided
through a central entry and stairway.
• A stacked townhouse is designed to match the external appearance of a townhouse. But, unlike
a townhouse dwelling unit that only shares walls with an adjoining unit, the stacked townhouse
units share both floors and walls. Access to the individual units is typically internal to the
structure and provided through a central entry and stairway.
Multifamily housing (mid -rise) (Land Use 221), multifamily housing (high-rise) (Land Use 222),
affordable housing (Land Use 223), and off -campus student apartment (low-rise) (Land Use 225)
are related land uses.
Land Use Subcategory
Data are presented for two subcategories for this land use: (1) not close to rail transit and (2)
close to rail transit. A site is considered close to rail transit if the walking distance between the
residential site entrance and the closest rail transit station entrance is 1/2 mile or less.
Additional Data
For the three sites for which both the number of residents and the number of occupied dwelling
units were available, there were an average of 2.72 residents per occupied dwelling unit.
For the two sites for which the numbers of both total dwelling units and occupied dwelling units
were available, an average of 96.2 percent of the total dwelling units were occupied.
The technical appendices provide supporting information on time -of -day distributions for this
land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or the trip
252 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 3�
generation resource page on the ITE website (https://www.ite.org/technical-resources/topics/trip:
and -parking -generation/).
........................................
For the three sites for which data were provided for both occupied dwelling units and residents,
there was an average of 2.72 residents per occupied dwelling unit.
It is expected that the number of bedrooms and number of residents are likely correlated to the
trips generated by a residential site. To assist in future analysis, trip generation studies of all
multifamily housing should attempt to obtain information on occupancy rate and on the mix of
residential unit sizes (i.e., number of units by number of bedrooms at the site complex).
The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, the 2010s, and the 2020s in British
Columbia (CAN), California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, Ontario (CAN), Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina,
South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and Washington.
Source Numbers
188, 204, 237, 300, 305, 306, 320, 321, 357, 390, 412, 525, 530, 579, 583, 638, 864, 866, 896, 901,
903, 904, 936, 939, 944, 946, 947, 948, 963, 964, 966, 967, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1036, 1047, 1056,
1071,1076
REI General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 000-399) 253
Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise)
Not Close to Rail Transit (220)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 22
Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 229
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
6.74 2.46-12.50 1.79
udLd riUL dna r_yuduUn
4000
301
N
'O
C
W
N
CL
F- 201
F-
101
0 0 100 200 300
X = Number of Dwelling Units
X Study Site Fitted Curve
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 6.41(X) + 75.31
— — — — - Average Rate
R2= 0.86
254 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 3 E
500
Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise)
Not Close to Rail Transit (220)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 49
Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 249
Directional Distribution: 24% entering, 76% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
0.40 0.13-0.73 0.12
Data Plot and Equation
300
200
100
X
X
0 0 1000 2000
X = Number of Dwelling Units
X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - - Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.31(X) + 22.85 R== 0.79
,`u. 7' General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 000-399) 255
i
i
X
xiC �
X
.....
.........
_ ............
X�
X
X
�
X
X,
X
X
0 0 1000 2000
X = Number of Dwelling Units
X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - - Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.31(X) + 22.85 R== 0.79
,`u. 7' General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 000-399) 255
Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise)
Not Close to Rail Transit (220)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 59
Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 241
Directional Distribution: 63% entering, 37% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
0.51 0.08-1.04 0.15
Data Plot and Equation
500
400
U) 300
W
F
F
200
100
X
X
X
-- - - X.. ,X..
X X
X
X
° 0 1000
X = Number of Dwelling Units
X Study Site Fitted Curve
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.43(X) + 20.55
- - - - - Average Rate
Rz= 0.84
2000
256 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 3 Itu.
T,
i
i
X
_...............
_...
------ -- .:-....._.
i
i
i
i
X
i
X ��
X
X
X
i
i
i
i
X
X
° 0 1000
X = Number of Dwelling Units
X Study Site Fitted Curve
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.43(X) + 20.55
- - - - - Average Rate
Rz= 0.84
2000
256 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 3 Itu.
Attachment C
Area Traffic Counts
r
HO
H
N z d
oma
Nro
NO C7
xHb
m H ;3
0z:9
H z
ncnH
r>0
F-3 Fl
H
in H
� H
xo Cn Cf)
N ro
0Oy
H H >
O H
L7 H
O
z
N N N N N N N N N N N N I K m
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co 0 0 0 I m H
H H H H H H H F- F- N N N I> H
HN W.A UI d>J m Io OHN I ' j m
m
C)
I J
rxj u
H H H H H N N N N N N N I
':, y
61010161 OlOONNW WN I I
C)
N N W UI m UI UI 0 0 0 0 0 1
y rxj
O O o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I d n
0 r
O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I H 'u
:d >
I I
O
C)Nnt-jmonn jn in I
to
I N
F-3 c Co n
x1
� II II II
zzzzzzzzzzzz I d ;U
y
I H trwJ
H '-j Cn 0
'Zi H M O
HHH{-'H HH I Clj Gi
O N n2:
J -I -I m m O O F- F -'H H H I n
H OFd
mmlOOH000O000 I H z
C
0000000000 00 I H
H C7H
OOOo o 0000000 1 O
HK m
I z to
x [1 1- 0
I
H z
Hod
I z
>m��
c
pa Cn Lei II
m
F73 W
I
H
m to m m V] Cn Cn m to U] to m i d
o H
H � z
I
HH 4'
F--`HF-'HHRH I l0
M
m y>
mmmmm(D CD H I n N
Ham. syr
.A.c.cIn-lIncnoo0oo I F3
Cp •
000000000000 H fh
[=j
000000000000 1 O
(n 6) H Cl)
I z to
y y
I C1
II II H
� N H
Z
%1XHF3
r
C7HxO•.
xxd
I �
Ix �
ro�F-4u
iftl
HW �o hj
to to to to to to to to to to to to I l7 K
0 H
1 H
lyM m000000000000
I O i
(a En En
000000000000 I $C1
K F3 F-3 F3
O
C1HH
F=j
CnHyy
d
Ci t1 U
N Ut UlLT' LY' Ln N Ut N U7 U7 Ln I 'rI H
C'j'JC jJtn
NN W.P.PW NNHNHH I n ti
y
1 H
x II II H
61 m lO N U W m m"0P P W 1 0
W
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 'O
oChj�
z 0 H
cPIS cm
�zz
r O H
I H
cox
I
z
K
H H H H i --`H F�
[+j
NNHNOO U7 -I U7 W ON I n
�y.
. . . . . . 1 H
jy
W W .A N N 100N Om 0 -I 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 "d
CA
H
H
H
N
r
HO
H
N z d
oma
Nro
NO C7
xHb
m H ;3
0z:9
H z
ncnH
r>0
F-3 Fl
H
in H
� H
xo Cn Cf)
N ro
0Oy
H H >
O H
L7 H
O
z
H
Nzl7
O U) >
N 10
N)0u
xHro
Cn t�3 xO
ozx
H z
C]wH
> H
r>'0
H �l
H
w H
t3 H
Herz
�i ro
1000
O1iz
H H y
C) H
LTi H
0
z
N NNN N N NN N N NN N NN I FC
to
000000000000000 I LTi
H
O O H H H H H H H H H H N N N I>
H
W IoOHN W J�CnM-i W 100H11) 1 ;ii
LTi
J
x
o
x
I
O
I
OD
rj t7
I--'Hh-`HHHI--'HHH I
WNNW WNNN N IO IO IOW co W I
I
C)
O IO IO W W O N.AIrl 00101 W N A I
H ty
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. 0 1 t7
r
0 r
o 0 0 0 0 o O O O o 0 o O O O 1 H
y
hi
I
x
.. G)
c)nroc)roNxM()roc) ftjrnnro I
t=i
W
I
zn• •
H�cCnC)
II II II
zzzzzL+7LT mt-ILTiL=1MDiMm t7
H
i FA
w
H � J to C)
z H LTi O
I tTi
C
Gi FTi C) .x
H H H H N m m m m (D O lfl lO lfl lfl 1 n
t7
H 0 10
w Cn U -_j -_j w .P (n IO N IO Io Cn -1 0D 1 H
`
,'. z r-.
000000000000000 I H
H t7 H
C. 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 O
O
H FG LTi
I z
xLT]Kd
I
w
`•
F✓
dl
K � �
i
LTi � LTi
�
xiyN II
NH H
U) U) U)CnU):E5.:E: :E:z:z:8:8 1 t7
O H
I H
0
1x
10
�z
HH C
1 C1
LTi H y
HHNHHCnCPCnIOI'D OIoO00W I C]
a
H`• LTi r
-_j "I .P m ON -j N I0 Cn 00 �1-I W Cnm 1 H
U)
cn` •
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I H
I
L=7
000000000000000 I 0
F-
W m P-3 (n Wa>H(n
I z
J
H H
I
yII IIH
I N
to
z
I
N
> H "lj F3
xxHLTi
x
t7 H ;0,-
0`•FG
F<FG
1
H "Rd 7o'J
CA N m to l0 ko Lo l0 to %D lfl ID lfl lO to I C)
0 HI
H
"RC1 LTi LTi Zi
Jd> W 0000000000001 O
U]Cn U)
W IO N O 00000000000 I jl
FCHHH
LTi H H
(n
W H '-3
I d
LTi LT7 ',U
I
> ...
1 ni
' a LTi
Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn to Cn Cn N CP Cn CP CP Cn Cn I >
LTi x 'o U)
N F, N N W .P .A W N N H N I C)
H.
. 1 H
N II II H
JNlflm to NCn W O1 O110 ...� W I O
W
U'i M Cn 000000000000 I 'o
CD -I
z 0 H
c x C:m
�zx
H
C :E x
I
L=i z
I 10
U1 tC
H H H 1 ',b
LTi
Ln W W W N N Cn Cn
y
1 H
lJ
N NO ;_ :A �I J J Co Co A C P W W I O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I ',a
LJ
U)
H
7rH
y
H
Lei
H
Nzl7
O U) >
N 10
N)0u
xHro
Cn t�3 xO
ozx
H z
C]wH
> H
r>'0
H �l
H
w H
t3 H
Herz
�i ro
1000
O1iz
H H y
C) H
LTi H
0
z
H
O c
N ro
NOCJ
M H ro
00x
Hzz
nWy
by
r>0
y 11
H
Cl) y
H
C3 H
nz
C7 to CD
� ro
ro00
0 hi U
HHS
n 1-3
M H
0
z
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N I FG
w n
0000000000000000 I L�j
H 0
OOO F-F-`F'h•H F -•F -•F, - HNNN I >
y G"
J M l00HN W.G Ut d>J W IOOHN I ',U
m z
y
C
O ••
F
O
7r
I
O J
I
J J
TJ d
HF-- HHHF-H HF HF'NNHNN I
y
NW JC N H N N.A .P m OU O O Ifl N N I
I I
n
61 W OH OOJ-,J W 7O O U7 070100 I
H t�J
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o I C7
Li En
0 t -I
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 r3
c�
nnnnnnronronnnroCnnro1
m H
C/)
I
z
O
F-3ccnn
i0 II II II
L7 t] [T] C7 L+7 CJ C7 CJ C1 L1 L'] CJ C1 L7 LJ LT] I d
H
I H
b7
HKJ En C)
i �a
ti
z H M O
H H H H I n
c
nN n
m6161U7U7O1d16161Nw00wNN I n
tJ
y Oro
W W 61J076161OO1O,A0000100 I H
`
z C,
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I H
H C7
0000000000000000 1 O
O
H < m
I z
xL�F<r
1
H
`•
H
J
K :� b
1
U y M II
NHy
O H
I H
0
Hz
Iz
N
HH C
tJt✓NHH I C1
mF-3>
m J J 61616161 J J 00\000000 I n
O
H`• Lei L-'
w (D D, •C W H H W x, (ii C) U7 Ln CD O O 1 y
x
cn ` •L
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I H
H
-J
000000000000000010
O
Cn61H(n
I z
H
z u u
i N
•, 7 H x
001 3'0,
ro
PIN xd
I
K K
I
F -I xU '�1 f'J
w w N wlO lO lO lO 110 lO lO lO lO l0 l0 lO I n
O H
I H
;o Lxi L+l;c1
OJ6100000000000000I O
M in in
lD W lD N000000000000 I 'iTl
FG 7-3 7-3 F3
[7 H H
U M
Cf) HH>
I d
L[TJ �-
?
I
>...
L-]
Ut U7 UI U7 UI N U7 UI N U7 U7 U7 U7 U7 U7 N I �p
Cn
n
F3
I H
'h' II II H
�A J U1 \D 0100 lONU7W 010110��W I O
W
OC,I
HU76107000000000000 I ',O
z0H
CxaL�
> z x
r0H
1H
calx
1
Lx7
I
F ?y
-• H N H H H I ',>
L 7
OD N 0 61 • C J J J J H N P. P� A W w I n
y
I y
F�F�NWUlHN0161W WJJJ00 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O I "ill
L1
cn
F -'
Fl
y
y
m
H
O c
N ro
NOCJ
M H ro
00x
Hzz
nWy
by
r>0
y 11
H
Cl) y
H
C3 H
nz
C7 to CD
� ro
ro00
0 hi U
HHS
n 1-3
M H
0
z
W
x
d
n
H h]
O r
G)
to
H c Cf) n
�liuu
H
H�Jmn
ZHCIO
c,)ron:g
HOro
zxza
H d H
H K tl
x�lKd
y Cl ••
y Cl)
N H y
O H
H �z
H H a
tlHy
H • � r
W
to m H to
H H
zuuH
zxHrl
xxd
ro
ro tKl tKl n
0 H
;U L l tl ;c1
�wtn
K H H H
Ll H H
In �3 �3�
Cl Cl ;U
zl tl
tlXxacn
H
x II II H
w
CD
z 0 H
cxC N
�zz
NOH
L"A
Cn K
Cl
tl
F3
H
H
Cl
N N N N N N N N N N N N I K
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Cl
H H H H H H H H H N N N I
HNWx,cn 1 JOD100HN I 'd
I
1
I
CP Cn7 U7 CII V10161m J 6101J I
cn cn HN Io.A 10100 W 1061 I
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 u
O O O O O O O O O O O O I H
n�lnnnnnnrinnn 1
z zzzzzzzzzzld
I H
I t77
I tl
Ul C71 U7 C776161m m61J I n
V1 HN 10.A 10 10 W 10m 1 H
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O I H
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
1 z
I H
I d
I H
1 h7
1 �]
I n
I y
I H
O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 l 0
1z
m
ix
i
I �
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 LDO(b (b CO I n
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 'JO
r'
I rl
kDw w w ww ww lfl lfl I
1ol01010totototo 10w1.0 I O
O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 1 "d
IH
I �l
N N NN.A.P.A H 00 I n
.. W O.(o JCYJJ OH.A I O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 I "o
H
N z u
ocny
13 H
NOl7
Cn H ;3
°x0z�
H z
C) Cl) y
> H
r>0
H11
H
(!� y
d H
ynz
t� ro
ro00
0 Nl o
H I11 -I
n
Cl H
0
z
H
Nzd
ocn�rg
N 10
N O d
xHITI
ro
OON
>HH
r>0
H3 N
CHI) H
dH�
HCiz
�d W W
m ro
1000
011;d
H HH -
n H
[Ti H
0
z
N N N N N N N N N N N I K
w n
0 0 0 0 0 0 Co 0 0 0 0 I m
H 0
H H H H H H H H N N N I>,
H c
N W.,(nm--jmko(DHN I 'u
m z
.. y
K
J ..
H-
J
I
0) J
H
N N N N N N W W W W (A I
I I
C)
NOH Wm kD N.A H00 I
H h]
000(nOcn000Cn(n I d
En '=J
O t-'
00000(D00000 1 H
M ti
•• G']
monnnnnnCinn 1
H
V]
I
z H
O c
C (n C]
N z
;U II II II
tncncnt'ntn�cn��cn 1 d
� H
Hf=iton
I
m
zHMO
I N
0
G) hi n x
NNNNNNW W W W I n
f+i
HOro
NOHWM-,0N.PHO I H
N
:E:='za
OOO U'1 O Ln O0O U7 I H
H d H
O O O O O O O O O O O 1 O
xLK=iKd
;rJ �i `•
1 H
ro
Li
0
OHH
1 H
x
H Fa
�
txj
M
I Ci
H `• t J t''
I H
CnI
H
hO
[i
o0 0000000010
K
cnrnHtn
I z
H H
I
U7
z
I
C
d to H
d
> H x H
7o X H L=i
Ci
�u
xxd`-
I
.A
K K
I
N
roC�� n
I ro
J
F-1
n
W'O tij
to to w 10 10 10 10 00 co W0 1
O H
I H
cn
'aITI 7 d
00000000000 I O
Cil
cn (n C/)
00000000000 I ,j
.c,
KHHH
io
C'i HH
n
�o LM
�nHHy
I d
L�7 C7 �7
1
xJ m
ko LD io io �o io I
[=i X 'a co
io io �o io io io I (�
y
I
x II II H
io �o �o �o �o io I OH
W
o000 0o Iii
CD q hi
z O H
C x a N
H H H H
ZO
N N N O
L>
H
I H
a
00 NITI
N'li
O OOH O
K
H H H H I
C']
H .0 .1�- .A H O I CZ
I H
'j,7
(ft JCOJ OH I O
0 0 0 0 0 0 I w
[�7
W
H
H
H
[Tl
H
Nzd
ocn�rg
N 10
N O d
xHITI
ro
OON
>HH
r>0
H3 N
CHI) H
dH�
HCiz
�d W W
m ro
1000
011;d
H HH -
n H
[Ti H
0
z
x
e
0
0 r
xl y
H Cl) n
H II II II
H r+]CDn
zHMO
c) -jnx
x z C
H d y
y K L]
xr�Kd
y t7
K7J�
M CJ
,ro y� II
N H y
O H
H �z
H Lam] i-3 b
H,• M
to rn H Cn
H y
z0°H
z1XHtJ
PIN xd
ro
ro�� II
O H
KH3 3H
C7 H H
U � �
CnHH�
h7tJ7y
r�x�ov�
y
x II II H
w
O C h9
zOH
CxCM
�zz
r0F3
Czx
�z
to K
C1
t]
y
H
y
tJ
N N N N N N N N N N N N I K
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I m
H H H H H H H H H N N N I
H N w .a V1 m --I w 10 0 H N I 'a
I
I
I
cn 1n cn cn u1 01 D1 01 --1 01 01 �l ,
U7 Ln H N 1D .A 10 10 0 w 10 01 I
O C) C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 d
C) O o O C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 H
to to to [n to Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn to I d
I H
I ;U
I C+7
Cil Cn UlNm 01m mm n
Ul H N lD .A 10 1D W 10 m I y
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O I H
000000000000iz
I H
I
,d
1 �7
1 tJ
In
I y
I H
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D 1 0
1z
u
I �
1x
I rJ
I �
lD lD lD l0 lD l0 l0 lD Cb (b (b (b I C7
000000000000,0
OOO C)OC) C) C)C)C)C)o I ',U
r
I f]
ko l0 to ko C)�10C)ko wC)lfl I >
ko ko ko lD ko ko kow l4 w lfl I C]
. . . . . . 1 y
lD l0 l0 10 lD 10 10 lD w 10 lD I 0
0 0 0C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I�a
1 y
H H H H H H H H H H H I
N N NN F. .A.a H OC) I n
.A(b W N Cn CA -I �, :C 1 O
0 0 0 0 o C) o 0 (D 0 0 I 'o
C)
O
C
z
F3
K
H
N z d
Nro
N O t7
xl C]
x H ro
Cf) y ;o
ozx
H z
n cn H
yy
L, 0
y �]
Cn -J3
CHHy
n
Cl) Cn
[=7 ro
ro00
Oroz
H H y
tJ H
O
z
x
� y
n
y �' J
O r
.. n
Cn
Fgc(nn
H II II II
HNc/)n
zHMO
c)ron:R
y 0 to
Hx C7y
y HG L1
xNKd
FG M
LTJ ;U t+7
zl to
tri II
y Cl)
N H y
O H
H �z
Myy
H,• �r
CnrnyCl)
F3 y
� II II H
z
> H x H
71XHtJ
(7 y U
xxd
KK
ro
11
%d>>
H
0 H
m w w
GF3yy
LJ H H
U)
(nyH�
;tl L 1
L=i X Zl In
H
xuuH
w
o Q ni
z O y
cxct=J
> z x
r0y
Cox
mz
w K
L�7
tJ
W
y
H
H
m
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N I K
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 m
O O O H H H H H H H H H H N N N I >
J O Io OHN WIt. (n 61 J(A 10 O H N I ',U
I
W W W W W W W W W .A .A v Ln .A "I .D I
v U7 N H H N Ow J N v CD H 61 W 61 I
J.A J w H 00006110 CD a, H 10 J I
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1-3
nnnnnt�nnnnnnnnnnl
z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z l d
I H
I .ro
H H H H H H H H H N N N N N N N I L'J
J J 61(71 U761 U761 N H N U7(Il W H W I n
W J W 61 U1 O O U1 U1 W 100 J O 10 W I y
U7 O C11 (51 UIOOOOO U1 OO U1 U1 U1 I H
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1 O
I z
I H`
(n (n win (n Cn to (n CnW(n in inwCnw I d
I H
I ,hJ
H H H H H H H H H N N N N N N N I L'J
J J 61 U7 U161 U7 61 N H NUl Ul w H w I n
W J W d>U7000lUl W 10OJO10w 1 y
U70 U1(n U700000 U700 U7 U1 Ln I H
OOOOOO0000o0000010
Iz
a
I �
Ix
I
nJ
HHF-
`HF -`H HF -'HI -l I
F` W W N 00000010100700 M W I n
W0010 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1000000 I 0
H NJ W 000000000000 I ',U
r
I nJ
w(n(n U7(n(n(n(n(n UI N N N(n(n(n I >
10 m 61 10 N m W 10 ko UI.P 4"", (n 10 61 I n
.I y
OHH U1 U1 U1 H.. 61 U1 O.A 616161 W I 0
W 10 J. IP 000000000000 I 'Jo
1 y
I rJ
H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H I
w W H H N N N N H.P .rl al O H 00 I n
I y
CO U1 6161.P CO CO N U1 J O J W O H.A I O
0 0 Co 0 Co 0 Co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 'd
(n
H
y
L=i
N
W
Lo
O
I
(n
M
x
H
z
O
r
L=]
X
ro
K
Cn
J
r
z
O
nJ
r
x
t'J
K
m
r
c
d
n
0
C
z
y
K
F-3
a
z
ro
H
x
tJ
h7
y0
H
to H
t7y�
ynz
�7 Cn Cn
� ro
ro00
OtJz
F-3 H b
n y
[] H
O
z
x
C7 �
H m
O r
x �
cn
HCcnn
HII II II
H hJ Cf) (i
zHL10
G)mnfk
zmza
H dH
xL1Kl7
L1 ro CJ
xJ (n L7J II
H W
O H H
H
H`• L71
w `
Cn rn H Cn
H H
Z II II H
>H MF3
xuXHN
CJ H 7o `
xxr
K K
O H
cnww
KHHH
L] H H
�a L ]
(nHHy
LJ L] 7y
xi L 1
mxX d n
H
x II u H
w
oam
zOH
cxcr�
�zz
rOH
aux
N
(n K
L71
L1
CD
H
H
H
L1
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N I K
0 o O o o 0 0 0 o 0 0 o O o 0 o I L1
O O O H H H H H H H H H H N N N I>
JOD(OOH N W.ACn O)JOOlDOHN I "U
I
I
.0 Www www ww w w ww W W N 1
O J Ln Cn.lt. N M4, J Ln M W wNN(O I
Ln O Ln 0 0 0 ( l7 Ln O Ln (.n O (j 1 N N N I
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 U
0 0 0 0 0 Co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 �-3
onnnonnnnnmnnftlwnl
z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z l tJ
I xo
HH HHHH1-1 F'H NH F' HH I M
lO lOJJ6l Ol W m w m OOO Jm 0) Ln I n
V7 O Un Ln Cn 0 0 (n O O (n Ln O Ln (n o 1 H
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I H
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Iz
I H
wOtnwwwwin�wwCnCn�ww I d
I H
I �J
NH HHRH H HHH HF --'HHRH I C']
H 0700JJ01 W 001OJ W J616161 .A I C�
000(n(no(noo(nOcn(noo(n I H
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I H
O O O Co O O O O O O O O O O O O I O
Iz
N
I
I
I >E
Ix
I �
I �
oJrnau00000000000010
(OW(ON000000000000 I ;a
WR
I �]
(n Ln Ln V7 Ln Ln U1(n(n(n (51 Ln(n N Cn(n I .�
N N H H N N W.IIf, W N N H N HH I Ci
.AJ(n106107(0 N(n w 6101(O.A.A W I O
H(n dl(n 000000000000 I ' J
1 H
I n
H I �7
Ln Cn m (n j� .A Cp .A (n .A (n (n (n W M N I n
HN.A J(n U7(O(OH6161 N H OD H(n I O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 'O
,T
N z d
O Cn'y
N b
N O t7
x�
Cf) H ;d
°zz
� H H
r>0
H LTJ
H
W H
C7 H
Herz
zU)cn
m ro
ro00
O IJ z
;UhiH
LJ H
O
z
ray
y0
Nzd
O CD�
N ro
NOC7
x H ro
H'.b'Jy
Cn y ,d
zoz�
H z
n ca
yF.3H
r>0
F-3 h]
H
W y
C7 H
H H
oz
,i1 N W
l� ro
o�Pi
Pdh7H
HHy
CZ H
[+] H
0
z
N N N N N N N N N N N I K
(n C)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. I N
H 0
F -F- --- h - F - HF - N NN I >
y C
N W.�,LnMJMWC)F- N) I ',O
0 z
y
K
J ..
J
x
I
N kD
�
�y
I
N N N N N N W W W W W I
I I
N O F� W C) lO N.A H 00 I
y by
000CnOCnOoocncn I d
Cn h7
�l
00000000000 I y
tJ r
00
I
�
�]
L] C]nC)c7c)c)nnnn I
H
m
1
z H
..
o Q-
z
q
q
>crno
;0 II II II
zzzzzzzzzz I d
z H
H
to x
Hh]cnn
N
zHMO
1 C7
O
G:h] n
NNNNNNW W W W I n
z
HOro
NOF�W d>O N.0 F' C- I H
:V4 x zC.
000 Cn CD Cn 000 U7 I H
H 0 y
o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 1
z
xl-�Kd
1
ro
t7 `•
I tJ
I
h7
LK=J��L'7
O
y Cn
NHH
I d
r
O I--,
F�� z
I m
C7
I n
1 H
cn
�
I H
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
K
KU)
rn H
0
F3 y
I
IIH
I N
tp
ZII
1
r
;U�CHC]
xxdh�
1x
1
K K
I
•A
roCJC1 II
I LTJ
N
hy�y
1 0
J
H h]
io io w w io ko koNNNN I CZ
`
�o[=y[=j;o
00000000000 1 O
m
co W co
00000000000 I xd
t1
KF3HH
•
[+7 H H
o �
I7
Cn H F-3 y
I d
....
I h]
LM >C Cn
io w w w io io I C]
H.
. . . 11-3
x II II H
k0l0.10lo l0 l0 1 0
W
0000 00 I ',17
oah]
z0H
cxae�
FJFJm H
N N N O
r O H
I H
C ,M
NNN .p I
E
000 O I h]
in K
HNHN NN
[J
H .A .0 .A F- O I C]
J
C n J N J O H I O
0000 00 I ',o
l�
Cn
y
H
y
t']
ray
y0
Nzd
O CD�
N ro
NOC7
x H ro
H'.b'Jy
Cn y ,d
zoz�
H z
n ca
yF.3H
r>0
F-3 h]
H
W y
C7 H
H H
oz
,i1 N W
l� ro
o�Pi
Pdh7H
HHy
CZ H
[+] H
0
z
Appendix C: Seminole County CMS
K
O
CCD
0
CD
CD
I
a
CDn
CD
0
0
C
CD
p
O
N m
.t to
O —
N 00
C -D O
CLCD
O
Q\
O
G1
O
moo
a
a
C
CD
y
�
w
�
N
a1
N
N
.NP
O
LA
W
00
A
a\
N
(A
,
(-AA
O1
O
G1
O
moo
a
a
y
�
d
00
O
,
(-AA
W
N
O\
O
I
Ol,
O
W
z
C
CD
C�
N
J
D1
W
y
0
o �
d
o.
0
� N
cr �t
O N
CD N
N
Id O
It O N
C N
a
CD
CL
cr
H
It
It
K
cn
CD0
CD
n
0
t=i
as
CD
M
r•
UG
a
r'
0
0
o'
O
C
(D
C
CCD QQ
0
N .p
C O
(D �
a rn
i
es
h
o
o
czD
h
a
a
CD
CD
`<
H
�
H
CD
ts
n
o
�
n
C
�
�
a
�
�
N
N
00
N
N
Ut
O\
O
01
O
O
A
h
z
a
C
CD
C)
m
00
00
00
H
0
o
o
1
CD
CD
H
�
n
C
c
N
00
N
N
�o
N
ch
w
JJ
F-
a\
�
0\
W
O
00
z
a
C
CD
C)
m
00
00
00
H
0
o
o
CD
CD
�
n
C
N
�?
F-
Uh
N
to
01
00
O1
•A
O
O
z
a
C
CD
C)
m
00
00
00
H
0
CD
O
d
O 0
0
CD
Gr �
w CD
� N
O N
CD
O
t O
O N
C N
A
O
CL
O'
H
0
�C
O
P
It
tTj
P,
cn
CD0
CD
C�
0
M
`!
CD
CD
U4
CDA�
p
a
0
CD
on
w
O
O
O' b
O W
C U
(D CD
ItD�-.
CO
CD "r
� O
C1 r -r
0 0
� r
H '
�• n
� N
00 N
P O -1
C\ O 4�1.
C\ O -P
o o o
C H
CL r
'L3 O
W
to 00 N
C% NO O
00 " O �
O\ J O --1
W
W
J
N
v
dt
CCD 0 0
z w
CD
H�
a.p-r
O
V1Oo N
�l , O O
110 O O �10
00 Vi O -1
W
N
J
N
M
CCD 0 0
�C
a r
y w
00 O
J O
v Cn O
Uh O O
H
0
tTj
p
V)
O
O
CD
0
tTj
04
CD
COD
as
a
n
0
0
0
O
CDC
o�
C U
CD CDD
CCD ~
O
I N
O `+
CD
CLCD rn
0
D1
a
X00
0
0
1+
CD
a�
>
CD
H
CD
H
�•
n
0
0 7y
o
W
0
C�
J
O
N
'
O
O
\10
w
a,
i
O
a
w
0
0
1+
CD
a
>
CD
�C
0 7y
o
o
0
N
to
-3
0000
O
N
Cl
Cl
W
O
O
\�o
w
H
0
0
0
CD
>
CD
�C
o
o
0
00
O
00
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
H
0
� d
O n
O �
c N
O N
CD
O N
'c$ O
O N
C N
a
cr
O
0
m
SD
CD
0
CD
0
m
UQ
CD
Q
CD
O
UQ
P�
O
G
�s
CD
o'
0
w
cn
O
'-n
CD
C
0
<D CD
CCD
n O
CD �
O
n
O-• a1
N N \p
J W Ch VA
N O C*l W
W O\ O ..-.
W
J
J
n
ed
.r -
N
FA -
CD
A
a
m
M
000�
o
o
w
W
r
('D
r
te
Z
y
w
C
x
�
A
o
� a
OW
O
O
VNi
O
N
O
W
J
o
o
o
a
w
C
�
N
N
J
�
Cs
J
Cr
Oo
O
O
N
:.
o �
CD
C7
O 0
CD
tr a.
CD
C N
CCD
N
� N
C N
a
a
cr
CD
0
b
't=i
w
CD
0
CD
C)
M
CD
a
CD0
c�
0
0�..
O �
N �
N `l
W
N
C
CLCD aci
N
tz
6
N
a
tz
C
d
P00�
0
0
0
a
`<
H
CD
D
C—
(D
a
r
�
�
y
�
n
7
`c
�7
F N
�
CD
�O
Cly
N
00
w
O
ch
W
00
a1
O
N
all
O
J
N
N
a
tz
C
d
P00�
o
o
CCD
a
`<
H
CD
D
C—
(D
a
r
�
�
y
�
n
7
`c
�7
F N
�
CD
0
N
-.l
W
UN
P
UN
a1
W
O
A
N
CD
W
110
N
O
N
W
Ch
O
N
W
Q\
O
O
LA
O
Ch
H
O
o
o
CCD
`<
H
CD
D
C—
�
n
n
7
`c
�7
F N
�
W
N
-.l
W
UN
P
UN
a1
W
O
O\
O
-P
H
O
a H H
CD
CL
o p
C7
CJ
O 0
CD
tr a.
co
6' N
O N
O
� N
O N
C N
CD
a
CL
H
cn
0
0 0 0
a
a
CD H
� H
0
0+
P N 00
U.) (.n
� rn rn
N O O 00
0 0 0
aCD
(D `C H
a
0
N � �
J N .A
a, N 00
J a\ 00
T
H
0
CD
0
b
i�
K
n �d (')
CD
a CD
CD `C H
n
w
0
N ON1
a\ �
0
C)
C�
cn
0
a
:.
o
o
�
CD
0
a
cr
y
r
n
n
CD
�
n
o
C40
m
CD
P
N
0No
O'
O>
P
N
O
J
O
O
W
W
N
01
O
cn
W
O
N
0
a
:.
y
0
0
�
0
0
n
n
CD
n
o
C40
CD
P
N
0No
O'
N
til
W
J
O
O
W
y
0
Appendix D: Traffic Volumes
INTERSECTION TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Intx 1: CR 427 & Carriage Cove Way/Bedford Road O
AM Peak Hour I
meeung PI
*Background + <Pass -By Vol>+ ( Project Vol) = Total Volume
® - Subject Intersection
TRIP DISTRIBUTION % PROJECTED VOLUMES
Source: Premier Traffic Group
N
N
II
r
N 73
(O
aI0 O
Y
I� IN
7--49
F V y
T
8� T
>
o
2� m
23 v
+ N
� N
N
n
Note: +/-errors due to rounding
Source: Premier Traffic Group
INTERSECTION TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Intx 2: CR 427 Meeting PI O
AM Peak
Hour I
Carriage Cove Wy Bedford Rd
- Subject Intersection
^
N
V
K
U
[SITE AccesS RVRI
Meeting PI
I
*Background + <Pass -By Vol> + ( Project Vol) = Total Volume
2024 VOLUMES
2026 VOLUMES
O �2 LL7 0
O �2 a)
F— 0
1 15
EJ
Lam'
<J 11 L��
16
0 I T
0
I T
0� o m
0�
o m
SF applied = 0.92
LG2rowth rate applied = 1.04
TRIP DISTRIBUTION % PROJECTED VOLUMES
So— Premier Traffic Group
INTERSECTION TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Intx 3: CR 427 & Project Access O
AM Peak Hour
Carriage Cove Wy I Bedford Rd
® Subject Intersection
^
a
u
SITE Access wmo
f,
hMeeting PI
_I–
'Background + <Pass -By Vol> + ( Project Vol) = Total Volume
2024 VOLUMES 2026 VOLUMES
�0 m 4=0
o I2 Io 0 0 Io 0
1 �i �0 �0
0� 0_1, �TI�
0 0� o rr o
'SF applied = 0.92 'Growth rate applied = 1.04
TRIP DISTRIBUTION % PROJECTED VOLUMES
0
0
0
0
� ITS 0� ITS
—> 0 0
100 0+(36)=36
N
V
^
Note: +I- errors due to rounding
Source: prem/er Traffic Group
Source: Premier Trofc Group
INTERSECTION TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Intx 1: CR 427 & Carriage Cove Way/Bedford Road
PM Peak Hour
O
Carriage Cove Wy Bedford Rd
-Subject Intersection
n
e
V
SITE 7ee'ing
PI
'Background + <Pass -By Vol> + ( Project
Vol) = Total Volume
2024 VOLUMES
2026 VOLUMES
�— 49
4a_ 51
coo
E— 3
m E— 3
I
L—'
I yr—}3.2
6
i�31
I T
6
10
10
'SF applied = 0.92
'Growth rate applied = 1.04
TRIP DISTRIBUTION %
PROJECTED VOLUMES
iL
r
N
3
32
�
EIF—
�
v n
N +
N �
r
Note: +/_ errors due to rounding
Source: Premier Trofc Group
INTERSECTION TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Intx 2: CR 427 & Meeting PI O
PM Peak Hour I
Carriage Cove Wy Bedford Rd
Subject Intersection
n
N
V
K
V
SITE Access RURo
Meeting PI
`Background + <Pass -By Vol> + ( Project Vol) = Total Volume
TRIP DISTRIBUTION % PROJECTED VOLUMES
Source: Premier Traffic Group
INTERSECTION TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Intx 3: CR 427 & Project Access O
PM Peak Hour 1
I
Carriage Cove Wy Bedford Rd
'Background + <Pass -By Vol> + ( Project Vol) = Total Volume
D- SubjectIntersection
TRIP DISTRIBUTION % PROJECTED VOLUMES
Source: Premier Traffic Group
f lam° ��la
15 MINUTE TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
(Cars and Trucks)
DATE:
March 28, 2024 (Thursday)
CITY:
Sanford
LATITUDE:
0
LOCATION:
CR 427 & Carriage Cove Wy/Bedford Rd
COUNTY.
Seminole
LONGITUDE:
0
CR 427
i
CR 427
Carriage Cove Wy
j
Bedford
Rd
TIME
NORTHBOUND
11SOUTHBOUND
N/S
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
UW
GRAND
BEGIN
L
T
R
I U-turn I TOTAL11
L
T
R
U-turn TOTAL
TOTAL
L
T
R
U-turn TOTAL
11 L
T
R
U-turn TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
07:00 AM
1
137
4
1
1 143
3
280
2
1
286
429
1
0
7
0
8
11 8
0
14
0
22 30
459
07:15 AM
1
171
3
0
175
8
330
2
0
340
515
1
0
7
0
8
15
0
21
0
36 44
559
07:30 AM
3
181
4
0
188
5
306
2
1
314
502
3
1
8
0
12
16
0
22
0
38 50
552
12,141
07:45 AM
0
193
3
0
196
5
333
0
2
340
536
2
0
2
0
4
13
0
18
0
31 35
571
TOTAL
5
682
14
1
702
21
1,249
6
4
1,280
1,982
7
1
m
0
32
52
0
75
0
127 159
08:00 AM
0
213
4
0
1 217
6
306
1
1
314
531
1 3
1
7
0
11
7
0
15
0
22 33
564
08:15 AM
0
195
3
0
198
5
317
2
0
324
522
2
t
5
0
8
31
553
08:30AM
0
174
4
0
178
5
293
2
1
301
479
2
1
4
0
7
0
31 38
517
08:45 AM
0
160
2
0
162
3
278
0
1
282
444
3
1
3
0
7
JA
0
22 29
473
TOTAL
0
742
13
0
755
19
1,194
5
3
1,221
1,976
10
4
19
0
0
98 131
2,107
04:00 PM
3
248
10
0
261
14
210
2
1
227
488
1 3
0
1 5
0
8
5
0
1 11
0
16 24
512
04:15 PM
7
249
9
2
267
21
183
2
1
207
474
1
0
3
0
4
0
4
0
8 12
486
04:30 PM
6
286
15
0
307
20
195
5
2
222
529
3
0
4
0
7
1
12
0
23 30
559
04:45 PM
7
297
13
0
317
18
190
2
1
211
528
1
1
2
0
4
g27
1
13
0
22 26
554
TOTAL
23
1,080
47
2
1,152
73
778
11
5
867
2,019
8
1
14
0
23
2
40
0
69 92
2,111
05:00 PM
9
313
15
2
339
17
204
1
4
226
565
0
0
6
0
6
7
1
17
0
05:15 PM
4
314
12
0
330
18
209
3
1
231
561
4
0
3
0
7
11
1
10
0
05:30 PM
3
285
15
0
303
19
210
3
3
235
538
1
0
0
0
1
8
0
13
0
FN
05:45 PM
5
274
9
288
15
1754
1
195
483
1
0
4
0
5
4
0
9
0
TOTAL
21
1,186
51
2
1,260
69
798
11
9
887
2,147
6
0
13
0
19
AM Peak
Peak Hour Factor. 0.983
07:15AMto
08:15 AM
4
758
14
0
776
24
1,275
5
4
1,308
2,084
9
2
24
0
35
51
0
76
0
127 162
2,246
PM Peak
Peak Hour Factor: 0.965
04:45 PM to
23
1,209
55
2
1,289
72
813
9
9
903
2,192
6
1
11
0
18
34
3
53
0
90
708
2,300
05:45 PM
Southbound
PM
I
9
813
72
9
I
I
AM I
5
1,275
24
4
._._._._._._._._._._._._
is
y
v
U
AM
PI`4_._._._
i
F
76
._._.__
53
I
E
0
3
c
N
51
34
e
Carr/age
Cove Ky
4
0
0
.o
Bedford
N
�=-
6
9
7
3
o.
1
2
11
24
]
I
._._._.
Pry __._._.
AM
_
n
F
7i
a
�
0
4
758
14 I
AM
I
2
23
1,209
I
55
PM
North
ound
15 MINUTE TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
(Cars and Trucks)
DATE:
March
28, 2024 (Thursday)
CITY: Sanford
LATITUDE: 0
LOCATION:
CR 427 & Meeting Place
COUNTY: Seminole
LONGITUDE: 0
CR 427
j
CR 427
Meeting PI
Meeting PI
TIME
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
N/S
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
E/W
GRAND
BEGIN
TOTAL
L T R U-turn TOTAL
L T R U-turn TOTAL TOTAL L T R U•turn TOTAL
L T R U-turn TOTAL TOTAL
07:00 AM
0
142
2
0
144
2
295
0
0
297
441
0
0
0
0
3
0
4
0
7 7
448
07:15 AM
0
175
1
0
176
1
352
0
0
353
529
0
0
It
0
0
2
0
3
0
5 5
534
07:30 AM
0
188
3
0
191
2
330
0
0
332
523
0
0
0
0
5
0
2
0
7 7
530
07:45 AM
0
196
1
0
197
1
348
0
0
349
546
0
0
00
4
0
5
0
9 9
555
TOTAL
0
701
7
0
708
6
1,325
1 0
0
1,331
2,039
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
14
0
28 28
2,067
08:00 AM
0
217
2
0
219
2
320
0
0
322
541
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
2
0
5 5
546
08:15 AM
0
198
1
0
199
0
330
0
0
330
529
0
0
0
0
0
4
_0---3---
_ 0
_ 7 7__
536
08:30 AM
0
178
2
0
180
309
489
0
0
0
0
1 308 0 0
0
3
0
4
0
7 7
496
12,045
08:45 AM
0
162
3
0
165
3
289
0
0
292
457
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
5
0
10 10
467
TOTAL
0
755
8
0
763
6
1,247
0
0
1,253
2,016
0
0
0
0
0
15
0
14
0
29 29
04:00 PM
0
261
3
10
264
5
220
0
0
225
489
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
4 4
493
04:15 PM
0
265
2rO
267
4
190
0
0
194
461
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
4
0
6 6
467
04:30 PM
0
307
1
308
3
209
0
0
212
520
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
3 3
523
04:45 PM
0
317
3320
1
200
0
0
201
521
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
4
0
5 5
526
TOTAL
0
1,150
9
1,159
13
819
0
0
832
1,991
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
12
0
18 18
2,009
PM
0
337
3too
0
340
5
217
0
0
222
562
00
0566
PM
0
330
40
334
3
223
0
0
226
560
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
2 2
562
PM
E
0
303
2
305
2
218
0
0
220
525
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
3 3
528
PM
0
288
30
291
2
183
0
0
185
476
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
3 3
479
L
0
1,258
12
1,270
12
841
0
0
853
2,123
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
5
0
12 12
2,135
AM Peak
Peak Hour Factor:
0.976
07:30 AM
0830 to AM
0
758
7
0
806
5
1,328
0
0
1,333
2,139
0
0
0
0
0
16
0
12
0
28 28
2,167
PM Peak
Peak Hour Factor: 0.964
0445 PM to
0
1,287
12
0
1,299
11
858
0
0
869
2,168
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
7
0
14 14
2,182
05:45 PM
Southbound
PM
I 0
858
11
0
I
AM
1 0
1,328
5
0
1
1 le
N
LTv
I _._
AM
PM -------
._._Ty
7
0
0
0
a
o
IC
16
7
'^
meeting r1
0
0
0
o
b
T
meetingpi
3
a
0
0
4
0
0
y
_______._._._________.__---
P—__.___-
NI
AM_
_._
.I
40
F
T
a
0
0
799
7
1 AM
1
V
0
0
1,287
12
1 PM
1
I
North ound
2022
PEAK SEASON
FACTOR CATEGORY
REPORT
- REPORT TYPE: ALL
CATEGORY: 7700 SEMINOLE COUNTYWIDE
MOCF: 0.93
WEEK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES
SF
PSCF
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
01/01/2022
- 01/01/2022
1.00
1.08
2
01/02/2022
- 01/08/2022
1.03
1.11
3
01/09/2022
- 01/15/2022
1.05
1.13
4
01/16/2022
- 01/22/2022
1.03
1.11
5
01/23/2022
- 01/29/2022
1.01
1.09
6
01/30/2022
- 02/05/2022
0.98
1.05
7
02/06/2022
- 02/12/2022
0.96
1.03
* 8
02/13/2022
- 02/19/2022
0.94
1.01
* 9
02/20/2022
- 02/26/2022
0.93
1.00
*10
02/27/2022
- 03/05/2022
0.93
1.00
*11
03/06/2022
- 03/12/2022
0.92
0.99
*12
03/13/2022
- 03/19/2022
0.91
0.98
*13
03/20/2022
- 03/26/2022
0.92
0.99
*14
03/27/2022
- 04/02/2022
0.92
0.99
*15
04/03/2022
- 04/09/2022
0.93
1.00
*16
04/10/2022
- 04/16/2022
0.93
1.00
*17
04/17/2022
- 04/23/2022
0.94
1.01
*18
04/24/2022
- 04/30/2022
0.94
1.01
*19
05/01/2022
- 05/07/2022
0.95
1.02
*20
05/08/2022
- 05/14/2022
0.95
1.02
21
05/15/2022
- 05/21/2022
0.96
1.03
22
05/22/2022
- 05/28/2022
0.97
1.04
23
05/29/2022
- 06/04/2022
0.98
1.05
24
06/05/2022
- 06/11/2022
0.99
1.06
25
06/12/2022
- 06/18/2022
1.00
1.08
26
06/19/2022
- 06/25/2022
1.00
1.08
27
06/26/2022
- 07/02/2022
1.00
1.08
28
07/03/2022
- 07/09/2022
0.99
1.06
29
07/10/2022
- 07/16/2022
0.99
1.06
30
07/17/2022
- 07/23/2022
0.99
1.06
31
07/24/2022
- 07/30/2022
0.98
1.05
32
07/31/2022
- 08/06/2022
0.98
1.05
33
08/07/2022
- 08/13/2022
0.97
1.04
34
08/14/2022
- 08/20/2022
0.97
1.04
35
08/21/2022
- 08/27/2022
0.99
1.06
36
08/28/2022
- 09/03/2022
1.01
1.09
37
09/04/2022
- 09/10/2022
1.02
1.10
38
09/11/2022
- 09/17/2022
1.04
1.12
39
09/18/2022
- 09/24/2022
1.10
1.18
40
09/25/2022
- 10/01/2022
1.16
1.25
41
10/02/2022
- 10/08/2022
1.22
1.31
42
10/09/2022
- 10/15/2022
1.28
1.38
43
10/16/2022
- 10/22/2022
1.23
1.32
44
10/23/2022
- 10/29/2022
1.18
1.27
45
10/30/2022
- 11/05/2022
1.14
1.23
46
11/06/2022
- 11/12/2022
1.09
1.17
47
11/13/2022
- 11/19/2022
1.04
1.12
48
11/20/2022
- 11/26/2022
1.03
1.11
49
11/27/2022
- 12/03/2022
1.02
1.10
50
12/04/2022
- 12/10/2022
1.01
1.09
51
12/11/2022
- 12/17/2022
1.00
1.08
52
12/18/2022
- 12/24/2022
1.03
1.11
53
12/25/2022
- 12/31/2022
1.05
1.13
* PEAK SEASON
23 -FEB -2023 09:11:22 830UPD 5 7700 PKSEASON.TXT
Appendix E: Existing Intersection Analysis Output
HCM 6th TWSC
1: CR 427 & Bedfrod Rd 04/0412024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh
Movement
3.6
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
I
T
386
1284
T->
0
772 0 0
it' '
1328
)
i''.
773
Traffic Vol, veh/h
8
2
22
47
0
70
4
697
13
22
1173
8
Future Vol, veh/h
8
2
22
47
0
70
4
697
13
22
1173
8
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
3.52
None
-
2.22
None
-
-
None
-
51
None
Storage Length
140
-
536
140
-
-
340
-
223
340
358
407
Veh in Median Storage,
# -
0
-
-
0
-
-
0
403
-
0
-
Grade, %
-
0
Platoon blocked, %
-
0
-
-
0
-
0
-
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles, %
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
9
2
24
51
0
76
4
758
14
24
1275
9
Major/Minor Minor2
Minorl
Majorl
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
1715
2108
642
1460
2105
386
1284
0
0
772 0 0
Stage
1328
1328
-
773
773
-
-
-
-
- - -
Stage 2
387
780
-
687
1332
-
-
-
- -
Critical Hdwy
7.54
6.54
6.94
7.54
6.54
6.94
4.14
4.14 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
6.54
5.54
-
6.54
5.54
-
-
- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
6.54
5.54
-
6.54
5.54
-
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.52
4.02
3.32
3.52
4.02
3.32
2.22
-
2.22 - -
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
58
51
417
90
51
612
536
839
Stage
164
223
-
358
407
-
-
-
- -
Stage 2
608
404
-
403
222
-
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
-
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
49
49
417
80
49
612
536
839
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
49
49
-
80
49
-
-
-
Stage 1
163
217
-
355
404
Stage 2
528
401
-
365
216
-
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
38.9
50.6
0.1
0.2
HCM LOS
E
F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
NBL
NBT
NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLnlWBLn2
SBL
SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)
536
49
256
80
612
839
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.008
-
0.177
0.102
0.639
0.124
0.029
-
HCM Control Delay (s)
11.8
93.7
20.7
108.5
11.7
9.4
HCM Lane LOS
B
-
-
F
C
F
B
A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0
0.6
0.3
2.9
0.4
0.1
Traffic Analysis 9:46 pm 04/04/2024 Existing AM Synchro 11 Report
PTG Page 1
HCM 6th TWSC
2: CR 427 & Meeting PI 04/04/2024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement
WBL
WBR
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
Lane Configurations
r
ll,
)
0
Traffic Vol, veh/h
15
11
735
6
5
1222
Future Vol, veh/h
15
11
735
6
5
1222
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
None
-
None
Storage Length
100
0
270
-
Veh in Median Storage,
# 0
-
0
-
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
-
-
0
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles, %
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
16
12
799
7
5
1328
Major/Minor Minorl
Majorl
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
1477
403
0
0
806
0
Stage 1
803
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2
674
-
-
Critical Hdwy
6.84
6.94
4.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.84
-
-
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.84
-
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.52
3.32
2.22
-
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
117
597
814
Stage 1
401
-
-
-
Stage 2
468
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
-
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
116
597
814
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
116
-
-
-
Stage 1
401
-
Stage 2
465
-
-
-
-
Approach
WB
NB
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
28.4
0
0
HCM LOS
D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
NBT
NBRWBLnlWBLn2
SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h)
-
116
597
814
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
-
0.141
0.02
0.007
HCM Control Delay (s)
-
41
11.2
9.5
HCM Lane LOS
-
-
E
B
A
HCM 95th °/stile Q(veh)
-
-
0.5
0.1
0
Traffic Analysis 9:46 pm 04/04/2024 Existing AM Synchro 11 Report
PTG Page 2
HCM 6th TWSC
1: CR 427 & Bedfrod Rd 0410412024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh
Movement
5.1
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
"I
T-)
633
831
1�
0
)t
tT#
966
)
fr+
1284
Traffic Vol, veh/h
6
1
10
31
3
49
21
1112
52
66
748
17
Future Vol, veh/h
6
1
10
31
3
49
21
1112
52
66
748
17
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
3.52
None
-
2.22
None
-
2.22 -
None
-
39
None
Storage Length
140
422
-
140
-
340
-
331
340
-
234
Veh in Median Storage,
# -
0
-
-
0
-
-
0
486
-
0
-
Grade, %
-
0
-
-
0
-
-
0
-
0
-
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles, %
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
7
1
11
34
3
53
23
1209
57
72
813
18
Major/Minor Minor2
Minorl
Majorl
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
1618
2278
416
1835
2259
633
831
0
0
1266 0 0
Stage
966
966
-
1284
1284
-
-
-
-
- - -
Stage 2
652
1312
-
551
975
-
-
-
-
Critical Hdwy
7.54
6.54
6.94
7.54
6.54
6.94
4.14
4.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
6.54
5.54
-
6.54
5.54
-
-
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
6.54
5.54
-
6.54
5.54
-
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.52
4.02
3.32
3.52
4.02
3.32
2.22
-
2.22 -
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
69
39
585
47
41
422
797
545
Stage
273
331
-
174
234
-
-
-
Stage 2
423
227
-
486
328
-
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
49
33
585
40
35
422
797
545
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
49
33
-
40
35
-
-
- -
Stage 1
265
287
169
227
Stage 2
354
220
412
285
-
- -
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
45.4
106.8
0.2
1
HCM LOS
E
F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
NBL
NBT
NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLnlWBLn2
SBL
SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)
797
49
232
40
258
545
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.029
-
0.133
0.052
0.842
0.219
0.132
HCM Control Delay (s)
9.7
89.4
21.4
247.6
22.8
12.6
HCM Lane LOS
A
F
C
F
C
B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.1
0.4
0.2
3.2
0.8
0.5
Traffic Analysis Existing PM Synchro 11 Report
PTG Page 1
HCM 6th TWSC
2: CR 427 & Meeting PI 04104/2024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.3
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Minorl
r
+I
Conflicting Flow All
)
tt
Traffic Vol, veh/h
6
6
1184
11
10
789
Future Vol, veh/h
6
6
1184
11
10
789
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
-
None
-
None
Storage Length
100
0
-
270
-
Veh in Median Storage,
# 0
-
0
76
-
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
Stage 2
-
0
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles, %
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
7
7
1287
12
11
858
Major/Minor
Minorl
Majorl
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
1744
650 0
0 1299 0
Stage 1
1293
- -
- - -
Stage 2
451
- -
- - -
Critical Hdwy
6.84
6.94 -
- 4.14 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.84
- -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.84
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.52
3.32
2.22 -
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
78
412
529 -
Stage 1
221
-
- -
Stage 2
609
-
- -
Platoon blocked, %
-
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
76
412
529
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
76
- -
- -
Stage 1
221
- -
Stage 2
596
- -
Approach
WB
NB
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
35.4
0
0.1
HCM LOS E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
NBT NBRWBLnlWBLn2
SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h)
76
412
529
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
- 0.086
0.016
0.021 -
HCM Control Delay (s)
- 56.8
13.9
11.9
HCM Lane LOS
- F
B
B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.3
0
0.1
Traffic Analysis Existing PM Synchro 11 Report
PTG Page 2
Appendix F: Historical Trends Analysis
CD
r
d
G
CD7
Q
� D
M 3
7
CD
7
N N C
ha
Er C, CD
CD vQa
0 oo ;a o.
C.)
C CD
O N N D)
m m r. A)
y
n 3 m r.L m
O O CO
0 0 o O
Average Daily Traffic (Vehicles/Day)
N N Co
O O O O O O
O O O O O O O
N
O
Co
N
O
N
Co
� I
rt Cr
CL CD
N C: CD
a
Co
CD o
c
N
O
W
W
n
A O
Cn v
C m
CD N
0) v
v
O O O 00000
N N N N N N-
0) Ui p N 1 O (O 00
N N N N N
n
Z Z Z N W W N N
O
M
o o o o o
• D D D O o 0 0 0
C
o
O o o 6 6
D
v
N N• N,
0 0
3
l"Co 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 CrL
n
A O
Cn v
C m
CD N
0) v
v
H
O Cf) b
N ro
N O t7
',U L
xHro
H � �
H3 H- 3
°zz
ncoH
r�0
H h]
H
to H
t7 F-3
H n z
,h7 in in
� ro
ro00
Orox
,O rlH
H H �
n
L -i H
O
z
N N N N N N N N N N N N I K
En n
000000000000 I L-]
H O
H H H H H H H H H N N N I>
H C
HN W�lACn01J0toCD m I ',u
N z.
F3
00K
C:)
I
J J
hj LJ
H H H H H N N N N N N N I
y
OIOIOIOIOIooNN W W N I
I I
(]
N N W Cn N LnCn 0 0 0 0 0 I
y N
o000000000C�CD I d
n to
O r
000000000000 I H
'U Lei
••
Cl)nronromnnnronron
I
N
J 0
co
r
H C cn n
� II II II
zzzzzzzzzzzz I d
;C7
y
I H
C+7
Z H M O
HHHHF HF I L'7
0
G) 11 n
JJJ WOOOHHHHF I Ci
F3010
OO WCooH000000o I H
z
z x z C
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1"
H CJ H
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
H K t7
I z
b7
xLhK0
I
H
K�MI.
y L]
C
,oCoM 11
H Cn
cncncncncncncncncncncncn I o
I-
oHH
Hz
I H
J
H
I jd
F- H C
H H H N H H H I CJ
l0
L+y F 7>
co co co N co O O H F� N N H I n
N
H '• Lh r
.P .0 "A Cn J CD Cn 0 0 0 0 0 1 H
Cn •
000000000000 I H
R+
LTJ
000000000000 I 0
to m H in
I z
Cf)
H H
I
m
II II H
N
H
z
I
>1 H 'c
0
SCJHHN
C'7
xxd
1
ro
I x
L'7
KK
I
x
H 'T1 '�1 r J
l0 to l0 l0 to to l0 l0 to to CO to I n
K
O H
I H
;o Lit L'];C7
000000000000 I O
1
CDC/)m
000000000000 I ,O
K r3 F-3 H
O
Li] H H
]
Cn H H
I t7
Cf)
L+7 M ;d
I
K
•. •.
I h7
Cn
Ln cn cn cn Cn Cn cn Ln Ln cn Ln Ln I >
H
N x'o co
NN W.P .A W NN F-'NHH I n
m
F-3
I H
7.
x II II H
rnw�oNcnwrnrnio c cw 1 O
W
O O O O O O O O O O O O I io
O C T1
z0F3
Cxam
;vzz
r0H
IH
C x
I
mIIm
mNNHNOO
Cn J C77 W ON I n
yH
'co
",d
W W .A N NlOO N O O J II O
000000000000 I
L+7
Cn
H
H
H
tJ
H
O Cf) b
N ro
N O t7
',U L
xHro
H � �
H3 H- 3
°zz
ncoH
r�0
H h]
H
to H
t7 F-3
H n z
,h7 in in
� ro
ro00
Orox
,O rlH
H H �
n
L -i H
O
z
Appendix G: Projected Intersection Analysis Output
HCM 6th TWSC
1: CR 427 & Bedfrod Rd 04/04/2024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.8
Movement
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
I
Tr
)
T->
+I
)
0
Traffic Vol, veh/h
8
2
23
49
0
73
8
747
14
23
1227
8
Future Vol, vehlh
8
2
23
49
0
73
8
747
14
23
1227
8
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
-
None
Storage Length
140
-
140
340
-
340
-
Veh in Median Storage,
# -
0
-
-
0
-
0
-
0
Grade, %
-
0
-
-
0
-
0
-
0
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles, %
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
9
2
25
53
0
79
9
812
15
25
1334
9
Major/Minor Minor2
Minorl
Majorl
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
1813
2234
672
1556
2231
414
1343
0
0
827
0
0
Stage
1389
1389
-
838
838
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2
424
845
-
718
1393
-
-
-
-
-
-
Critical Hdwy
7.54
6.54
6.94
7.54
6.54
6.94
4.14
4.14
-
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
6.54
5.54
-
6.54
5.54
-
-
-
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
6.54
5.54
-
6.54
5.54
-
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.52
4.02
3.32
3.52
4.02
3.32
2.22
-
-
2.22
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
49
42
398
77
42
587
509
800
Stage
150
208
-
327
380
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2
578
377
-
386
207
-
-
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
-
-
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
41
40
398
67
40
587
509
800
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
41
40
-
67
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
Stage1
147
202
321
373
Stage 2
491
370
347
201
-
-
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
45
71
0.1
0.2
HCM LOS
E
F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
NBL
NBT
NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLnlWBLn2
SBL
SBT
SBR
Capacity (veh/h)
509
41
232
67
587
800
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.017
-
-
0.212
0.117
0.795
0.135
0.031
-
HCM Control Delay (s)
12.2
-
115
22.6
158.7
12.1
9.6
HCM Lane LOS
B
-
F
C
F
B
A
-
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.1
-
0.7
0.4
3.7
0.5
0.1
Traffic Analysis Projected AM Synchro 11 Report
PTG Page 1
HCM 6th TWSC
2: CR 427 & Meeting PI 04/04/2024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh
Movement
0.6
WBL
WBR
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
Lane Configurations)
0 0
r
+1_3�
Stage 1
)
tt
Traffic Vol, veh/h
16
11
768
6
27
1285
Future Vol, veh/h
16
11
768
6
27
1285
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
2.22
None
-
None
Storage Length
100
0
-
270
-
Veh in Median Storage, # 0
-
0
-
-
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
-
-
0
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles, %
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
17
12
835
7
29
1397
Major/Minor Minorl
Majorl
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
1596
421
0 0
842
0
Stage 1
839
-
- -
-
-
Stage 2
757
-
-
-
-
Critical Hdwy
6.84
6.94
-
4.14
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.84
-
-
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.84
-
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.52
3.32
- -
2.22
-
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
97
581
- -
789
Stage 1
384
-
-
-
-
Stage 2
424
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
-
-
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
93
581
789
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
93
-
-
-
-
Stage 1
384
-
Stage 2
408
- -
-
Approach
WB
NB
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
35.7
0
0.2
HCM LOS
E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
NBT
NBRWBLnlWBLn2
SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h)
93
581
789
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.187
0.021
0.037
HCM Control Delay (s)
52.4
11.3
9.7
HCM Lane LOS
F
B
A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.6
0.1
0.1
Traffic Analysis Projected AM Synchro 11 Report
PTG Page 2
HCM 6th TWSC
3: CR 427 & Access 0410412024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh
Movement
0.3
EBL
EBR
NBL
NBT
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
0 - 0
r
-
tt
tI.,
- -
Traffic Vol, veh/h
0
36
0
769
1292
11
Future Vol, veh/h
0
36
0
769
1292
11
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
None
0
None
0
None
Storage Length
0
0
0
-
Platoon blocked, %
-
Veh in Median Storage,
# 0
-
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
0
0
-
Grade, %
0
-
-
0
0
-
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles, %
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
0
39
0
836
1404
12
Major/Minor Minor2
Majorl
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
-
708
0 - 0
Stage 1
-
-
- -
Stage 2
-
-
-
Critical Hdwy
-
6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
-
-
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
-
3.32
-
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
0
377
0
Stage 1
0
-
0
Stage 2
0
-
0
Platoon blocked, %
- -
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
-
377
-
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
-
-
- -
Stage 1
-
-
-
Stage 2
-
-
- -
Approach
EB
NB
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
15.7
0
0
HCM LOS
C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
NBT
EBLn1
SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)
-
377
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
-
0.104
HCM Control Delay (s)
-
15.7
HCM Lane LOS
-
C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
-
0.3
Traffic Analysis Projected AM Synchro 11 Report
PTG Page 3
HCM 6th TWSC
1: CR 427 & Bedfrod Rd 04/04/2024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 7.2
Movement
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
1
T.
'
I
)
tT.
)
+Til
Traffic Vol, veh/h
6
1
10
32
3
51
36
1168
54
69
799
18
Future Vol, veh/h
6
1
10
32
3
51
36
1168
54
69
799
18
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
Storage Length
140
-
-
140
340
-
340
Veh in Median Storage,
# -
0
-
-
0
-
0
-
0
Grade, %
-
0
-
-
0
-
-
0
-
0
-
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles, %
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
7
1
11
35
3
55
39
1270
59
75
868
20
Major/Minor Minor2
Minorl
Majorl
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
1743
2435
444
1963
2416
665
888
0
0
1329
0
0
Stage
1028
1028
-
1378
1378
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2
715
1407
-
585
1038
-
-
-
-
-
-
Critical Hdwy
7.54
6.54
6.94
7.54
6.54
6.94
4.14
-
4.14
-
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
6.54
5.54
-
6.54
5.54
-
-
-
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
6.54
5.54
-
6.54
5.54
-
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.52
4.02
3.32
3.52
4.02
3.32
2.22
-
2.22
-
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
55
31
561
38
32
403
758
-
515
Stage 1
251
310
-
152
210
-
-
-
-
Stage 2
388
204
-
464
306
-
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
-
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
37
25
561
-31
26
403
758
515
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
37
25
-
-31
26
-
-
-
-
Stage 1
238
265
-
144
199
Stage 2
312
194
-
387
261
-
-
-
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
59.4
162.8
0.3
1
HCM LOS
F
F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
NBL
NBT
NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLnlWBLn2
SBL
SBT
SBR
Capacity (veh/h)
758
37
190
31
223
515
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.052
0.176
0.063
1.122
0.263
0.146
-
-
HCM Control Delay (s)
10
122.1
25.2$392.3
26.8
13.2
HCM Lane LOS
B
F
D
F
D
B
-
-
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.2
0.6
0.2
3.9
1
0.5
Notes
-: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon
Traffic Analysis Projected PM Synchro 11 Report
PTG Page 1
HCM 6th TWSC
2: CR 427 & Meeting PI 04/0412024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement
WBL
WBR
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
Lane Configurations
tr
ti
t
t
Traffic Vol, veh/h
6
6
1245
11
22
829
Future Vol, veh/h
6
6
1245
11
22
829
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
None
-
None
Storage Length
100
0
270
-
Veh in Median Storage,
# 0
-
0
-
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
-
0
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles, %
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
7
7
1353
12
24
901
Major/Minor Minorl
Majorl
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
1858
683
0
0
1365
0
Stage 1
1359
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2
499
-
-
-
Critical Hdwy
6.84
6.94
4.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.84
-
-
-
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.84
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.52
3.32
2.22
-
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
65
392
499
Stage 1
204
-
-
-
Stage 2
575
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
-
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
62
392
499
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
62
-
-
-
Stage 1
204
-
Stage 2
547
-
-
-
Approach
WB
NB
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
42.1
0
0.3
HCM LOS
E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
NBT
NBRWBLnlWBLn2
SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h)
62
392
499
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.105
0.017
0.048 -
HCM Control Delay (s)
69.8
14.3
12.6
HCM Lane LOS
-
F
B
B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.3
0.1
0.2
Traffic Analysis Projected PM Synchro 11 Report
PTG Page 2
HCM 6th TWSC
3: CR 427 & Access 04/04/2024
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh
Movement
0.1
EBL
EBR
NBL
NBT
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
0 0
r
tI t
ti-)
- -
Traffic Vol, veh/h
0
20
0
1259
821
35
Future Vol, veh/h
0
20
0
1259
821
35
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
None
0
None
0
None
Storage Length
0
0
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
-
Veh in Median Storage,
# 0
-
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
0
0
-
Grade, %
0
-
-
0
0
-
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles, %
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
0
22
0
1368
892
38
Major/Minor Minor2
Majorl
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
465
-
0 0
Stage 1
-
- -
Stage 2
-
-
Critical Hdwy
6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
-
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy
-
3.32
- -
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
0
544
0
Stage 1
0
-
0
-
Stage 2
0
-
0
Platoon blocked, %
-
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
-
544
-
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
-
-
-
Stage 1
-
Stage 2
-
-
Approach
EB
NB
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
11.9
0
0
HCM LOS
B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
NBT EBLn1
SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)
544
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
-
0.04
HCM Control Delay (s)
11.9
HCM Lane LOS
-
B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.1
Traffic Analysis Projected PM Synchro 11 Report
PTG Page 3
Appendix H: Turn Lane Analysis
6/N/I013 $.0);30 FN m9]Ore <:Wpra/e�ts�sfanEarOsvpalwaYb0300-z�00)01-OI.Egn
A EZ E— d W N +17 O
m .••••.rrl
x 3 3^ o L7
REVISION
INTI I ,^ m I
C
m In
T n o
—
Zo2 "a m _
at
SNP yr- away `^"m3 w - Na =
A m yo, _
ma<W� od
n n p m F n
T
rn
17 O m m
n m o ^
In
Vl .-. xnn 1 xyl
z Ln `' o
m
R W �
U) O oio
i y 1
Dt� N 1 1
z O n-.mcm
a
Ll
F n
T �
.a
`i m o o n UI
In o
Lnrrn
T n
F e a 2
� a
F
R
a
1 0 .
� A
�
N
W 0
s"is
0�
Vwi �
C
o^
2
r C
4 N
m
o m
In
Z
CO
o ^ Z
O
Q
y Q
4
2
N n n
to
dao $
O
O O
W N
y
O
O
O
I
x
Ln
"
4"yQII
a
1 0 .
Seminole County Public Schools
School Impact Analysis
School Capacity Determination
(Non -Binding) '
To: Dan Ryan, The Christian Sharing Center, Inc ` 407-260-9155 ' dan.ryan(�thesharingcenter.org
Eileen Hinson, AICP, City of Sanford * 407-688-5147 * Eileen. Hinson(cDsanfordfl.gov
From: Jordan Smith, AICP, PP, Facilities Planner, Seminole County Public Schools
Date: March 20, 2024
RE: Sharing Common (Sanford)
Seminole County Public Schools (SCPS), in reviewing the above request, has determined that if approved, the FLUM
designation and/or zoning will generate school age children.
Description: Proposed Rezone from AG, Agriculture and RC -1, Restricted Commercial to PD, Planned
Development and Comprehensive Plan Amendment from LDRSF, Low Density Residential Single Family to
MDR, Medium Density Residential of +/5.77 acres generally located ADJACENT TO 6498 N. Ronald Reagan
Boulevard (for Find My School reference) within the jurisdiction of the City of Sanford. The applicant is requesting a
change to the zoning to allow a maximum of 79 multi -family residential units, to be developed within the proposed
land use and zoning designations.
Parcel ID (s) #: 13-20-30-300-040A-0000, 13-20-30-300-0160-0000
This review and evaluation is performed on proposed future land use changes, rezones and conditional uses, unplatted
parcels, or projects that have not received final entitlement approval. This evaluation does not guarantee that the
developments subject to this declaration are exempt from, or determined to meet the school concurrency requirements
effective as of January 1, 2008. Changes in enrollment, capacity, any newly platted developments, and any subsequent
final development approvals may affect the provision of concurrent school facilities at the point of final subdivision
approval, including the potential of not meeting statutory concurrency requirements based on future conditions.
Based on information received from the jurisdiction and the application for the request, SCPS staff has summarized the
potential school enrollment impacts in the following tables:
CSA Capacity:
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT ON STUDENT GENERATION BY CSA
AFFECTED CSAs
CSA E-10
CSA M-1
CSA H-1
CAPACITY
2,660
5,732
7,739
3 -YEAR PROGRAM CAPACITY
-
-
-
ENROLLMENT
2,132
4,535
6,599
AVAILABLE CAPACITY
528
1,197
1,140
SCALD RESERVATIONS TO DATE
503
602
805
SIA - Sharing Commons
14
6
8
REMAINING CAPACITY 1 11 1 (7 589 10 327
hupsHseminalcschools sharepoint com/sitcsfl-acilitiesPlanninglShued Doarmentslew Directories/t'InnningfDevelopment tracking/0 SIAsrSIA 202424-06_SIA Sharing Commonsnmiec - Sharing Commons. docs
Comments CSA Evaluation:
At this point, the students generated at the three CSA levels would be able to be accommodated without exceeding the
adopted levels of service (LOS) for each CSA by school type, or there is adjacent capacity to meet LOS as allowed by
interlocal agreement. Any planned expansions/additions in the current five-year capital plan would provide additional
student capacity to relieve the affected schools is reflected in this review.
Zoned School Enrollment: For informational purposes, the below table indicates the analysis based on the individual
school zones within the CSA under current conditions. At this point, the potential students generated WILL be able to
be accommodated without exceeding the adopted Levels of Service (LOS) for the currently zoned schools. Any
planned expansions/additions that would provide additional student capacity contained in the current five-year capital
plan and scheduled to be completed within the next three years are included in this review.
ZONED SCHOOL
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
Region 3
Hamilton
Midway
Pine Crest
CSA E;-10
CAPACITY
2,660
754
1,046
860
2,660
3 -YEAR PROGRAM CAPACITY
2,682
3,917
6,599
AVAILABLE CAPACITY
-
ENROLLMENT
2,132
658
804
670
2,132
AVAILABLE CAPACITY
528
96
242
190
528
SCALD RESERVATIONS TO DATE
503
182
208
185
503
SIA -Sharing Commons
14
-
14
REMAINING CAPACITY 10 9610 24210 190 11
Region 3 Elementary Schools include Hamilton, Midway, and Pine Crest
ZONEDSCHOOI
MIDDLE SCHOOLS
Greenwood Lakes
Markham Woods
Millennium
Sanford
CSA M-1
CAPACITY
1,268
1,260
1,757
1,447
5,732
3 -YEAR PROGRAM CAPACITY
2,682
3,917
6,599
AVAILABLE CAPACITY
-
ENROLLMENT
943
882
1,336
1,374
4,535
AVAILABLE CAPACITY
325
378
421
73
1,197
SCALD RESERVATIONS TO DATE
27
182
208
185
602
SIA - Sharing Commons
6
-
6
REMAINING CAPACITY Q 29210.- 196FO 21310 (112) Q 589
ZONED SCHOOL
HIGH SCHOOLS
Lake Mary
Seminole
CSA H-1
CAPACITY
2,805
4,934
7,739
3 -YEAR PROGRAM CAPACITY
-
ENROLLMENT
2,682
3,917
6,599
AVAILABLE CAPACITY
123
1,017
- 1,140
SCALD RESERVATIONS TO DATE
17
7881
805
SIA -Sharing Commons
8
- I
8
REMAINING CAPACITY 98 f- 229 O 327
https://.wminolcwhools. shnrcpoint.comlsitcsTaciliticslllanning/Shorcd DocumcrosNcw Dircctoric-JPlnnniniVDcvclopmcnurackh JO SIAs/SIA 20240-4-06 SIA Sharing CommondNoiicc - Sharing Commons.docz
Terms and Definitions:
Capacity: The amount of satisfactory permanent student stations as calculated on the date of the second FDOE count
in October of the current school year. The number of students that can be satisfactorily accommodated in a room at any
given time and which, is typically a lesser percentage of the total number of student stations. NOTE: Capacity is ONLY
a measure of student stations, not of enrollment.
Concurrency Service Area (CSA): A geographic unit promulgated by the School Board and adopted by local
governments within which the level of service is measured when an application for residential development is reviewed
for school concurrency purposes. The CSA listed represents the area that the capacity is considered and student
assignment may be in a CSA adjacent to the project.
Enrollment: For the purposes of concurrency review, the enrollment level is established each year as per Public School
Interlocal Agreement Section 12.4 A, which sets the level on the date of the second full time equivalent (FTE) survey for
FDOE, generally taken in mid-October.
Programmed 3 Year Additions: New permanent school capacity within the CSA, which will be in place or under actual
construction within the first three years of the current SCPS Capital Improvement Plan.
Remaining Capacity: The capacity available for future development after the addition of any programmed capacity and
less the reserved capacity.
Reserved Capacity: The total number of student stations reserved in the respective CSA's that are assigned to projects
via a SCALD certificate.
School Size: For planning purposes, each public school district must determine the maximum size of future elementary,
middle and high schools. Existing school size is determined solely through FISH data. Seminole County Public Schools
has established the sizes of future schools (with the exception of special centers and magnet schools) as follows:
i) Elementary: 780 student stations
ii) Middle: 1500 student stations
iii) High: 2,800 student stations
School Attendance Zone: The established geographic area that identifies school assignments pursuant to Board Policy
for each District school or region of schools, other than county wide magnet schools. Students shall attend the school(s)
serving their residential or regional attendance zone unless otherwise permitted by Board Policy
Students Generated by Project: is determined by applying the current SCPS student generation rate (calculated in the
2017 Impact Fee Study) to the number and type of units proposed. The number of units is determined using information
provided by the jurisdiction and/or from the applicant's request. If no actual unit count is provided the unit count is then
estimated based on the maximum allowable density under the existing/proposed future land use designation. Eventual
Student assignment may not be to the school in closest proximity to the proposed residential development.
Utilization: A State Board Rule prescribed percentage of student stations that a room (and proportionately, a school
and school district) can satisfactorily accommodate at any given time. From a school/campus analysis perspective,
"utilization" is determined as the percentage of school enrollment to capacity. Current DOE established K-12 utilization
factors are as follows:
Elementary 95%, Middle 90%, High 95%
hops /Acininoleschools sharepoint.com/sites/F.iciliticsillanning/Slmred De rnems/New DirectoricA31anningfNvelopmcm tracking/0 SIAsrSIA 2024/2-1-06 SIA Sharing Common"otice - Sharing Commons do ,-
Srt1FORp .�
FST. 181 • ' • '
Business Impact Estimate
This form should be included in agenda packet for the item under which the proposed ordinance
is to be considered, and must be posted on the City's website by the time notice of the proposed
ordinance is published.
Comprehensive Plan Amendment of the Future Land Use Map designation of 6489 N
Ronal Reagan Boulevard:
The City is of the view that the following exception(s) to the Business Impact Estimate
requirement, that are checked off in a box below, apply to the above -referenced proposed
ordinance. Although, the City is implementing the procedure required by statutory law to
ensure that no inadvertent procedural issue could impact the enactment of the proposed
ordinance.
❑ The proposed ordinance is required for compliance with Federal or State law or
regulation;
❑ The proposed ordinance relates to the issuance or refinancing of debt;
❑ The proposed ordinance relates to the adoption of budgets or budget
amendments, including revenue sources necessary to fund the budget;
❑ The proposed ordinance is required to implement a contract or an agreement,
including, but not limited to, any Federal, State, local, or private grant, or other
financial assistance accepted by the
❑ The proposed ordinance is an emergency ordinance;
❑ The ordinance relates to procurement; or
❑x The proposed ordinance is enacted to implement the following:
a. Part II of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, relating to growth policy, county and
municipal planning, and land development regulation, including zoning,
development orders, development agreements and development permits;
b. Sections 190.005 and 190.046, Florida Statutes, regarding community
development districts;
c. Section 553.73, Florida Statutes, relating to the Florida Building Code; or
d. Section 633.202, Florida Statutes, relating to the Florida Fire Prevention Code.
11 Page
In accordance with the provisions of controlling law, even notwithstanding the fact that,
an exemption noted above may apply, the City hereby publishes the following information:
1. Summary of the proposed ordinance (must include statement of the public purpose,
such as serving the public health, safety, morals, and welfare):
The proposed ordinance is intended to incorporate the subject property into the City of
Sanford in order to obtain water and sewer for a 79 -unit obtainable housing development.
The proposed use is intended to provide obtainable housing which will benefit the public
health, safety, morals, and welfare of the city as a whole.
2. Estimate of direct economic impact of the proposed ordinance on private, for-profit
businesses in the City:
When annexed into the City, the property will be assed the City of Sanford Millage rate
and will result in additional Revenue to the City.
3. Estimate of direct compliance costs that businesses may reasonably incur:
The applicant will be responsible for all permitting fees.
4. Any new charge or fee imposed by the proposed ordinance:
When annexed into the City, the property will be assessed the City of Sanford Millage
rate in addition to the County Taxes.
5. Estimate of the City's regulatory costs, including estimated revenues from any new
charges or fees to cover such costs:
It is impossible to quantify any potential regulatory costs of the proposed development.
6. Good faith estimate of the number of businesses likely to be impacted by the proposed
ordinance:
It is unknown if any businesses will be impacted by the development of the site.
7. Additional information
Not applicable.