HomeMy WebLinkAbout4793 Rezone 5.77 Acres - 6498 North Ronald Regan BoulevardOrdinance No. 2024-4793
An ordinance of the City of Sanford, Florida providing for the rezoning
of a parcel of real property totaling approximately 5.77 acres in size
located at 6498 North Ronald Reagan Boulevard and assigned Tax
Parcel Identification Numbers 13-20-30-300-0160-0000 and
13-20-30-300-040A-0000 by the Seminole County Property Appraiser
which property is located within the Sanford City Limits (map of the PD
property is attached) from Agriculture (AG) and Restricted Commercial
(RC -1) to Planned Development (PD); providing for findings and intent;
providing for the taking of implementing administrative actions;
providing for the adoption of a map by reference; providing for
conflicts; providing for severability; providing for non -codification and
providing for an effective date.
Whereas, an application has been submitted proposing to rezone real
property generally addressed as 6498 North Ronald Reagan Boulevard from the
Agriculture (AG) and Restricted (RC -1) Commercial zoning districts/classifications to the
Planned Development (PD) zoning district/classification to establish specified uses on
the PD Property; and
Whereas, the fee simple title owners of the real property that is the subject of
this Ordinance are The Christian Sharing Center Inc., of Longwood, which has a large
number of officers and directors, and Dale & Company LLC, of Casselberry, which has 4
managers/members (collectively the "Property Owner"); and
Whereas, the subject real property is assigned Tax Parcel Identification
Numbers 13-20-30-300-0160-0000 and 13-20-30-300-040A-0000, as assigned by the
Seminole County Property Appraiser; and
Whereas, the subject real property is a site 5.77 acres in size and is addressed
as 6498 North Ronald Boulevard and located on the west side of Ronald Reagan
Boulevard between Bedford Road and Tucker Drive; and
Whereas, a Citizens Awareness and Participation Plan (CAPP) meeting was
held on December 12, 2023, and a copy of the CAPP report was provided to the City,
which report has been found to be satisfactory to the City; and
Whereas, according to the PD Master Plan, the Property Owner is proposing
to develop the property into a 79 unit multiple -family community with no commercial
activity; and
Whereas, the proposed development will facilitate new residential
construction, assisting in providing much needed housing to accommodate City growth;
and
Whereas, the subject property is not located within any sub -areas of the City's
Joint Planning Agreement; and
Whereas, the City's Planning and Development Services Department conducted
a thorough review and analysis of the demands upon public facilities and recommended
that the subject rezoning application be approved having determined that the proposal is
technically sufficient and consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan of the City of Sanford, the City's Land Development Regulations
(LDRs), and the controlling provisions of State law; and
Whereas, the City of Sanford Planning and Zoning Commission considered the
rezoning application submitted by the Applicant at its June 6, 2024, meeting and
unanimously recommended that the City Commission adopt an ordinance to rezone the
PD Property from the Agriculture (AG) and Restricted (RC -1) Commercial zoning
districts/classifications to the Planned Development (PD) zoning district/classification to
establish specified uses on the PD Property based on the request being consistent with
2If'z}a�_
the goals, objectives and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan; and
Whereas, the City planning and development staff have determined that the
rezoning request is consistent with the underlying land use and the goals and objectives
of the Comprehensive Plan and recommend approval of this Ordinance; and
Whereas, the City Commission has determined that the proposed rezoning of the
PD Property as set forth in this Ordinance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of
the City of Sanford, the City's LDRs, and the controlling provisions of State law; and
Whereas, the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida has taken all
actions relating to the rezoning action set forth herein in accordance with the
requirements and procedures mandated by State law.
Now, therefore, be it enacted by the People of the City of Sanford, Florida:
Section 1. Legislative findings and intent.
(a). The City Commission of the, City_ of - Sanford hereby adopts and
incorporates into this Ordinance the City staff report and City Commission agenda
memorandum relating to the application relating to the proposed rezoning of the PD
Property as well as the recitals (whereas clauses) to this Ordinance.
(b). The approval set forth in this Ordinance is subject to the specific conditions
that are set forth subsequently in this Ordinance and the Property Owner has agreed that
no requirement herein lacks an essential nexus to a legitimate public purpose and is not
roughly proportionate to the impacts of the proposed use that the City seeks to avoid,
minimize, or mitigate.
(c). The City of Sanford has complied with all requirements and procedures of
Florida law in processing and advertising this Ordinance.
31P'y
(d). This Ordinance is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan of the City of Sanford.
Section 2. Rezoning of property/implementing actions; the Christian
Sharing Center PD.
(a), Upon enactment of this Ordinance the PD Property, as depicted in the map
attached to this Ordinance, shall be rezoned to the Christian Sharing Center PD.
(b). The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to execute any
documents necessary to formalize approval of the rezoning action taken herein with
regard to the Christian Sharing Center PD and to revise and amend the Official Zoning
Map or Maps of the City of Sanford as may be appropriate to accomplish the action taken
in this Ordinance and as set forth herein.
(c). The conditions to be incorporated into the pertinent development order
relating to the action taken in this Ordinance. include the following:
..... .. _ .t iia,.., i .. ..
(1). Pursuant to Section 4.3.G of the City's LDRs, this rezoning
shall expire 3 years from the effective date of this Ordinance if all
improvements have not been completed or an extension granted.
(2). Unless specifically requested and approved on the PD
Master Plan, any required elements missing from or not shown on the
Christian Sharing Center PD Master Plan or associated PD documents
shall comply with and default to the regulations in the City's LDRs.
(3). An engineering plan generally consistent with Article I I I of the
City's LDRs including, but not limited to, a landscape plan and a plan of all
parking improvements, must be provided and approved prior to approval of
any building permit.
(4). The Property Owner shall work with staff to establish
hardscape elements that complement the overall site layout and
architecture such as the following all to the satisfaction of the City:
(i). Architecturally compatible wing walls on all monument
signs fronting Ronald Reagan Boulevard.
(ii). Hardscape elements including decorative pavers,
colored concrete or stamped concrete deemed acceptable
by the City shall be provided at the primary entrances and
pedestrian nodes within the development.
(iii). Established pedestrian connectivity as required shall
be appropriately defined and delineated with landscaping
and hardscaping similar to that which is installed at the
pedestrian nodes and entrances.
(5). A comprehensive signage program meeting the standards of
the City's LDRs shall be required for the entire development.
(6). The Property Owner shall coordinate with LYNX to determine
the possible addition of a bus stop and shelter and/or the extension of bus
or transit services to the site; provided, however, that this condition shall
not delay the issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
(7). The Property Owner shall install a decorative and functional
fountain in all wet retention ponds in accordance with Schedule D of the
City's LDRs.
(8). The Property Owner shall file a Federal Aviation
Administration Form 7460, and such other documents of related effect,
with the Sanford Airport Authority and provide to the City written
acknowledgement of receipt and determination of no objection from the
Sanford Airport Authority prior to any development approvals.
(9). Unless specifically requested and approved on the Christian
Sharing Center PD Master Plan, associated deviation waiver requests,
approved or within the associated PD non -statutory development
agreement, all development shall comply with:
(i). The multiple family housing design guidelines within
Schedule E, Section 16.0 of the City's LDRs.
(ii). Tree mitigation as required by Section 4.2 of the City's
LDRs under the criteria for tree removal, replacement and
relocation.
(iii). Light source setback for site lighting shall be no less
than 75% of the width of the buffers identified on the
Christian Sharing Center PD Master Plan.
(iv). Renderings of the architectural elevations for the
garages shall be provided at the time of development plan
application.
(10). If City staff and the Property Owner are unable to agree to
the details of this Ordinance or the implementing PD non -statutory
61P`,
development agreement in any way, the matter will be submitted to the
Planning and Zoning Commission for resolution at a public hearing, and
the matter will be adjudicated by means of a development order or denial
development order relating thereto.
(11). In agreeing to the above conditions in the subsequent PD
development agreement, the Property Owner shall agree that, in
accordance with the provisions of Section 70.45, Florida Statutes,
pertaining to governmental exactions, the City has not imposed any
prohibited exaction. The term "prohibited exaction" is defined by that
statute to mean "... any condition imposed by a governmental entity on a
property owner's proposed use of real property that lacks an essential
nexus to a legitimate public purpose and is not roughly proportionate to the
impacts of the proposed use that the governmental entity seeks to avoid,
minimize, or mitigate."
Section 3. Incorporation of map and Christian Sharing Center PD Master
Plan for the Christian Sharing Center PD.
The map attached to this Ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed and
incorporated into this Ordinance as a substantive part of this Ordinance establishing the
Christian Sharing Center PD.
Section 4. Conflicts.
All ordinances or part of ordinances in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby
repealed.
Section 5. Severability.
If any section, sentence, phrase, word, or portion of this Ordinance is determined
d..
to be invalid, unlawful or unconstitutional, said determination shall not be held to
invalidate or impair the validity, force or effect of any other section, sentence, phrase,
word, or portion of this Ordinance not otherwise determined to be invalid, unlawful, or
unconstitutional.
Section 6. Non -codification; Implementation.
(a). This Ordinance shall not be codified in the City Code of the City of Sanford
or the City's LDRs; provided, however, that the actions taken herein shall be depicted on
the zoning maps of the City of Sanford by the City Manager, or designee.
(b). The City Manager, or designee, shall implement the provisions of this
Ordinance by means of a non -statutory development agreement which shall be executed
by the Property Owner, or their successor(s) in interest within 60 days of the effective
date of this Ordinance or the PD Property's zoning classification shall revert to an
un -zoned tproperty status. Further, if, pursuant to Section 4.3.G of the City's-LDRs, this
rezoning expires in 3 years from the effective date of this Ordinance due to all
improvements having not been completed or an extension granted; then the property
shall revert to a PD without any land use entitlements except for a permit for a single
family residential structure.
(c). The non -statutory development agreement referenced in Subsection (b).of
this Section shall be and constitute a development order and shall not create contractual
rights of the Property Owner against the City nor contractual obligations of the City to the
Property Owner and, to that end, the Property Owner shall have no contractual rights or
remedies against the City with regard to any land use action of the City.
811' -
(d). The City has not waived any rights or remedies by taken the action set forth
herein or in the implementing development agreement and any successive development
orders and reserves any and all rights and remedies available to the City under
controlling law including, but not limited to, the protections under the laws pertaining to
sovereign immunity and, further, all matters set forth herein may be enforced by any
code enforcement process available to the City under the provisions of controlling law.
Attest:
Section 7. Effective Date.
This Ordinance shall take effect upon enactment.
Passed and adopted this 23rd day of September, 2024.
City Commission' of the City of
Sanford, Florida
Traci Houchin, MMC, FCRMArtl1�Vc
City Clerk Mayor
Approved as to form and legal suff'ciency::_��, �
4�11iam L Colbert, gily At6me r�
�ACA
Business Impact Estimate
This form should be included in agenda packet for the item under which the proposed ordinance
is to be considered, and must be posted on the City's website by the time notice of the proposed
ordinance is published.
Planned Development (PD) Rezone of 6489 N Ronal Reagan Boulevard:
The City is of the view that the following exception(s) to the Business Impact Estimate
requirement, that are checked off in a box below, apply to the above -referenced proposed
ordinance. Although, the City is implementing the procedure required by statutory law to
ensure that no inadvertent procedural issue could impact the enactment of the proposed
ordinance.
❑ The proposed ordinance is required for compliance with Federal or State law or
regulation;
❑ The proposed ordinance relates to the issuance or refinancing of debt;
❑ The proposed ordinance relates to the adoption of budgets or budget
amendments, including revenue sources necessary to fund the budget;
❑ The proposed ordinance is required to implement a contract or an agreement,
including, but not limited to, any Federal, State, local, or private grant, or other
financial assistance accepted by the
❑ The proposed ordinance is an emergency ordinance;
❑ The ordinance relates to procurement; or
❑x The proposed ordinance is enacted to implement the following:
a. Part II of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, relating to growth policy, county and
municipal planning, and land development regulation, including zoning,
development orders, development agreements and development permits;
b. Sections 190.005 and 190.046, Florida Statutes, regarding community
development districts;
c. Section 553.73, Florida Statutes, relating to the Florida Building Code; or
d. Section 633.202, Florida Statutes, relating to the Florida Fire Prevention Code.
1IPage
In accordance with the provisions of controlling law, even notwithstanding the fact that,
an exemption noted above may apply, the City hereby publishes the following information.-
1.
nformation:
1. Summary of the proposed ordinance (must include statement of the public purpose,
such as serving the public health, safety, morals, and welfare):
The proposed ordinance is intended to incorporate the subject property into the City of
Sanford in order to obtain water and sewer for a 79 -unit obtainable housing development.
The proposed use is intended to provide obtainable housing which will benefit the public
health, safety, morals, and welfare of the city as a whole.
2. Estimate of direct economic impact of the proposed ordinance on private, for-profit
businesses in the City:
When annexed into the City, the property will be assed the City of Sanford Millage rate
and will result in additional Revenue to the City.
3. Estimate of direct compliance costs that businesses may reasonably incur:
The applicant will be responsible for all permitting fees.
4. Any new charge or fee imposed by the proposed ordinance:
When annexed into the City, the property will be assessed the City of Sanford Millage
rate in addition to the County Taxes.
5. Estimate of the City's regulatory costs, including estimated revenues from any new
charges or fees to cover such costs:
It is impossible to quantify any potential regulatory costs of the proposed development.
6. Good faith estimate of the number of businesses likely to be impacted by the proposed
ordinance:
It is unknown if any businesses will be impacted by the development of the site.
7. Additional information
Not applicable.
21. Zl9z.
C IVI L ENGINEERS
CENTRAL FLORIDA ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, LLC
INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS
VIA: ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL
July 22, 2024
City of Sanford
Ms. Eileen Hinson, AICP
Planning Director
Planning Division of Development Services
300 N Park Ave
Sanford, FL 32771
RE: Project: The Sharing Commons at Five Points
5.77 Acre Site Comprised of 13-20-30-300-040A-0000 and 13-20-30-300-0160-0000
requested rezone to PD for a 79 Unit Apartment Development
Plan Type: Planned Development Rezone Application #: PDR24-000001
Address:
Parcel #: 13-20-30-300-040A-0000
Ms. Hinson:
Thank you for meeting with us and your suggestions to improve our Plan, also, special
thanks to Commissioner Austin for taking time out of his schedule to sit down with us.
Per the dialog from our initial City Commission meeting regarding the above reference
project we offer the following plan changes.
• Buildings 4 and 5 have been swapped with their respective parking, allowing for
a greater building set back to the West property line. We have provided a 20
foot buffer in this area with covered parking along the West property line.
• All Covered parking will incorporate a full wall on the backside, furthermore the
buffer wall will now line up with that wall. This will give 20 foot of buffer on the
outside of the wall along the property line.
• The 20 foot buffer will remain as much natural as possible, with the addition of
enhanced Landscaping to better buffer the development from the adjoing
neighbors.
• With regards to building 6, one unit was removed from that building and added
to building 4.
1111 N. RONALD REAGAN BOULEVARD • SUITE 101 • LONGWOOD, FLORIDA 32750
PHONE (407) 599-7010 • MAIL@FLORIDAENG.COM
The Sharing Commons at Five Points
Planned Development Rezone Application #: PDR24-000001
July 22, 2024
Page 2 of 2
• Also, one unit was removed from building 1 and added to building 3, this was
done in order to move the entrance slightly to the West to allow for the
driveway to better line up with the drive to the back of the site and create
better access.
• The buffers on the N section of the development have now been increased five
feet to 20 feet also. With the same configuration of the walls in the cover
parking and the moving of the buffer walls to line up with that 20 foot line.
Should you have any questions, please contact me at (407) 595-8021.
Best regards,
Central Florida Engineering Consultants, LLC
dr'/Z��
Russell C. Maynard
Managing Member
Scott Banta and Russel Maynard met with the neighbors from Sunland Estates Lots 36 and 37
following the City Commission meeting of August 12, 2024
• After reviewing the backyard of Lot 37, a flag was set as a reference location for the Screen
wall's closest point to address concerns about a large oak tree between Lot 37 and the
site's property line. It was determined that if the wall on the west side of Building 6 was
pushed back from the corner, there would be ample distance from the tree to minimize root
damage.
o This change has been made on the revised drawing.
• It was also agreed that as much natural area and growth as engineering would allow would
be preserved.
o The attached drawing highlights the natural area to be saved.
To address concerns regarding `Building 6', it has been shifted east.
o This displaced four parking spaces, which were relocated.
o A total of four spaces (three standard and one covered) were eliminated on the east
side of the property, and two regular and one covered space were added, leaving a
net loss of one.
o These changes resulted in two spaces per unit, meeting the City's requirement.
• A few trees along the shared property lines were also identified as possible to be saved.
• Although the project is not a welcome change, collaboration has generated changes to the
plan that increased the comfort level with the neighbors regarding the project.
CITY OF
SjkNFORD o o WS _ RM X
FLORIDA �✓ pppG�O�L�D
Item No.
CITY COMMISSION MEMORANDUM 24268
SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 AGENDA
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission
PREPARED BY: Eileen Hinson, AICP, Director of Planning
SUBMITTED BY: Norton N. Bonaparte, Jr., ICMA-CM, City Manager
SUBJECT: Rezone of 5.77 acres from Agriculture (AG) and Restricted (RC -1)
Commercial to, Planned Development (PD) at project address 6498 North
Ronald Reagan Boulevard.
THIS IS A MATTER INVOLVING THE QUASI-JUDICIAL PROCESS. THUS, COMMISSIONERS MUST
DISCLOSE ALL EX -PARTE COMMUNICATIONS INCLUDING THE NAME OF THE COMMUNICATOR, AND
THE TIME, PLACE AND SUBSTANCE OF THE COMMUNICATION. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS MUST
BE DISCLOSED AND MADE A PART OF THE RECORD BEFORE FINAL ACTION IS TAKEN. A
COMMISSIONER'S INVESTIGATION, SITE VISITS AND RECEIPT EXPERT OPINIONS MUST ALSO BE
DISCLOSED AND MADE A PART OF THE RECORD. PERSONS WHO HAVE OPINIONS CONTRARY TO
THOSE EXPRESSED IN AN ORAL OR WRITTEN EX -PARTE COMMUNICATION MUST BE GIVEN A
REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY TO REFUTE OR RESPOND TO THE COMMUNICATION AT THE HEARING.
THE PARTIES TO THIS PROCEEDING ARE THE CITY STAFF AND THE APPLICANT AND THEY ARE
SUBJECT TO CROSS EXAMINATION AND MUST GIVE THEIR TESTIMONY UNDER OATH. OTHERS WHO
SEEK PARTY STATUS ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO CROSS EXAMINATION. PERSONS ONLY
PARTICIPATING BY PROVIDING COMMENTS ARE NOT SUBJECT TO CROSS EXAMINATION AND ARE
NOT SWORN IN AS EVIDENTIARY WITNESSES. THE QUALIFICATIONS OF CITY STAFF ARE EITHER
PUBLISHED ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE OR SUBMITTED AT THE HEARING.
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:
❑ Unify Downtown & the Waterfront
❑ Promote the City's Distinct Culture
❑ Update Regulatory Framework
❑ Redevelop and Revitalize Disadvantaged Communities
A request to rezone 5.77 acres located at 6498 North Ronald Reagan Boulevard from Agriculture
(AG) and Restricted Commercial (RC -1) to Planned Development (PD) has been received.
The property owners are Christian Sharing Center Inc. and Dale & Company LLC. The applicant,
Daniel Ryan along with the Christian Sharing Center is the applicant., completed the Citizens
Awareness and Participation Plan CAPP meeting that was held December 12, 2023. A copy of the
report is attached, which is satisfactory to the City.
The Affidavit of Ownership and Designation of Agent forms are attached, and other information
is available to ensure that all potential conflicts of interests are capable of being discerned.
FISCAL/STAFFING STATEMENT:
The property owner, assessed tax value, total tax bill, and property status for 2024 is shown below:
Parcel Number
Assessed Value
Tax Bill
Property Status
(2024)
(2024)
13-20-30-300-0160-
$218,248
$1,064
Vacant Commercial
0000
13-20-30-300-040A-
$246,103
$1,200
Single Family
0000
It is the applicant's intent to develop the property into a 79 unit multiple -family community with
no commercial activity. The proposed development will facilitate new residential construction,
assisting in providing much needed housing to accommodate the City of Sanford growth. Thus,
generating additional tax revenue to the City.
No additional staffing is anticipated if the land use amendment is approved.
BACKGROUND:
The two parcels, totaling 5.77 -acres, are located on the west side of Ronald Reagan Boulevard
between Bedford Road and Tucker Drive. The properties are currently zoned AG, Agriculture and
RC -1, Restricted Commercial with the Future Land Use designations of LDR-SF, Low Density
Residential Single -Family and NC, Neighborhood Commercial.
The applicant has requested to rezone to Planned Development (PD) to establish a single -use,
multi -family residential development. A breakdown of the development is further analyzed as
follows.
The Multifamily Portion:
The PD Master Plan proposes nine buildings at a maximum two stories in height and a maximum
building height of 35'. In addition to the apartment buildings the applicant is proposing to include
`a clubhouse. As part of the PD, the applicant has provided elevation rendering's as shown below:
Proposed Clubhouse
i i'
Proposed Apartment Buildings
,a W. ,. @: , ,,g — r .r==t=:..,.., _.._. ._..._ . -a -. 'k'u' -... i;'.:i.!^ Yi
G- ,pr.M F-777406 F77
The following is a table of development standards obtained from the PD Master Plan. Reductions
and variations to the specifically noted minimum code standards are provided to show staff's
position as it relates to the proposed reduction of standards presented in the PD proposal as part of
the negotiated PD non -statutory development agreement.
Requirement Required Provided Applicant Explanation Staff Support
.(Yes/No) ____
550 square
Minimum 700 square feet. None given. Yes.
Living Area feet. A 21.4%
reduction.
50% to be
The buildings are 2
Maximum of
stories in height and the
35' and no
top of the ridge is up to
Building Height more than 2-
Up to 35 feet 35' above grade. Yes.
stories
Rooflines are varied with
adjacent to
a mix of roof lines to
single-family.
establish variety in height
to the development.
and create visual interest.
50% to be
The applicant has provided a separate memorandum describing the project and the deviations
requested, which has been attached to this report. The applicant requests deviation from the
following standards in Schedule E of the City's Land Development Regulations (LDRs), Section
16.0, Multiple -Family Housing Design Guidelines.
shared over
This project provides
50% open the whole
50% open space and a
Open Space
development
clubhouse, a playground, Yes
space. and includes
and a large mew internal
ponds and
to the development.
buffers.
Requested reduction
based on the irregular
shape of the property.
Buffer Adjacent
25 feet
The applicant proposes a
To Single-
100 feet A 75%
6 -foot masonry wall with Yes
Family (West)
reduction.
enhanced landscaping
and as a transition has
provided single story
covered parking where
abutting single-family.
West Setback
25 feet
Requested reduction
Adjacent To
50 feet A 50%
based on the irregular Yes
Single -Family
reduction.
shape of the property
The applicant has provided a separate memorandum describing the project and the deviations
requested, which has been attached to this report. The applicant requests deviation from the
following standards in Schedule E of the City's Land Development Regulations (LDRs), Section
16.0, Multiple -Family Housing Design Guidelines.
Requirement
The entry shall
be gated
Parking
Units per
building
Garage and
Storage
Required
The entry
shall be gated.
In addition, a
minimum
four (4) foot
masonry wall
shall be
constructed
along all
property lines
that are not
required to
have a visual
screen Per
Schedule J
There should
be no more
than an
average often
spaces of
uninterrupted
parking,
whether in
driveways or
open parking
areas.
No more than
8 dwelling
units per
building.
50% of
dwelling units
shall have
garages
accessed
directly from
the dwelling
unit (40
garages are
required)
Detached
garages are
required at a
rate of 20% of
the total units.
Provided
No Gate. A
wall will be
provided
Up to 16
Spaces under
covered
parking
Up to 16
units per
building.
A 100%
increase.
0 direct
access
garages.
However,
50 detached
garages
provided.
That equates
to 63% of
the units
having
covered
parking.
BalconyAll units are 0
required to
Deviation Explanation Staff Support
(Yes/No)
None Yes
They provided covered
parking structures
ranging from 7 covered
stalls up to 16 stalls.
This project consists of 7
buildings containing a
range of 5 units up to 16
units per building.
The applicant is
providing more covered
parking than required and
strategically placed them
to lessen the impact on
the abutting single/family
No Explanation
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes. Staff
supports the
Requirement Required Provided Deviation Explanation Staff Support
(Yes/No)
have a porch deviation as
or balcony 79 there is more
in total than sufficient
areas for
recreation
over and
above what is
required by
code.
Staff has reviewed the requested deviations and generally agrees with the applicant. Staffs position
is the applicant has provided reasonable alternatives and justifications to support the requests.
It should also be noted that a traffic study was submitted by a traffic engineer detailing the trip
generation anticipated by the proposed development and the required upgrades to the existing
transportation infrastructure because of this development.
LEGAL REVIEW:
The City Attorney may or may not have reviewed the staff report and the specific analysis provided by
City staff but has noted the following that should be adhered to in all quasi-judicial decisions.
Section 166.033, Florida Statutes, as amended in the 2022 Legislative Session, in Chapter 2021-224,
Laws of Florida (deriving from Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill Number
1059) provides as follows (please note emphasized text):
"166.033 Development permits and orders. —
(1) Within 30 days after receiving an application for approval of a development permit or
development order, a municipality must review the application for completeness and issue a letter
indicating that all required information is submitted or specifying with particularity any areas that are
deficient. If the application is deficient, the applicant has 30 days to address the deficiencies by
submitting the required additional information. Within 120 days after the municipality has deemed the
application complete, or 180 days for applications that require final action through a quasi-judicial
hearing or a public hearing, the municipality must approve, approve with conditions, or deny the
application for a development permit or development order. Both parties may agree to a reasonable
request for an extension of time, particularly in the event of a force majeure or other extraordinary
circumstance. An approval, approval with conditions, or denial of the application for a development
permit or development order must include written findings supporting the municipality's decision. The
timeframes contained in this subsection do not apply in an area of critical state concern, as designated
in s. 380.0552 or chapter 28-36, Florida Administrative Code.
(2)(a) When reviewing an application for a development permit or development order that is
certified by a professional listed in s. 403.0877, a municipali may not request additional
information from the applicant more than three times, unless the applicant waives the limitation
in writing.
(b) If a municipality makes a request for additional information and the applicant submits the
required additional information within 30 days after receiving the request, the municipality must
review the application for completeness and issue a letter indicating that all required information has
been submitted or specify with particularity any areas that are deficient within 30 days after receiving
the additional information.
(c) If a municipality makes a second request for additional information and the applicant submits the
required additional information within 30 days after receiving the request, the municipality must
review the application for completeness and issue a letter indicating that all required information has
been submitted or specify with particularity any areas that are deficient within 10 days after receiving
the additional information.
(d) Before a third request for additional information, the applicant must be offered a meeting to
attempt to resolve outstanding issues. If a municipality makes a third request for additional information
and the applicant submits the required additional information within 30 days after receiving the request,
the municipality must deem the application complete within 10 days after receiving the additional
information or proceed to process the application for approval or denial unless the applicant waived
the municipality's limitation in writing as described in paragraph (a).
(e) Except as provided in subsection (5), if the applicant believes the request for additional
information is not authorized by ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal authority, the municipality, at
the applicant's request, shall proceed to process the application for approval or denial.
(3) When a municipality denies an application for a development permit or development order,
the municipality shall give written notice to the applicant. The notice must include a citation to
the applicable portions of an ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal authority for the denial of
the permit or order.
(4) As used in this section, the terms "development permit" and "development order" have the same
meaning as in s. 163.3164, but do not include building permits.
(5) For any development permit application filed with the municipality after July 1, 2012, a
municipality may not require as a condition of processing or issuing a development permit or
development order that an applicant obtain a permit or approval from any state or federal
a encu unless the agency has issued a final agency action that denies the federal or state permit
before the municipal action on the local development permit.
(6) Issuance of a development permit or development order by a municipality does not create any
right on the part of an applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create
any liability on the part of the municipality for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain
requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions
-
that result in a violation of state or federal law. A municipality shall attach such a disclaimer to the
issuance of development permits and shall include a permit condition that all other applicable state or
federal permits be obtained before commencement of the development.
(7) This section does not prohibit a municipality from providing information to an applicant
regarding what other state or federal permits may apply."
The above -referenced definition of the term "development permit" is as follows:
"(16) 'Development permit' includes any building permit, zoning permit, subdivision approval,
rezoning, certification, special exception, variance, or any other official action of local government
having the effect of permitting the development of land." (Section 163.3164(16), Florida Statutes).
The term "development order" is defined as follows and as can be seen, refers to the "granting, denying,
or granting with conditions [of] an application":
"(15) `Development order' means any order granting, denying, or granting with conditions an
application for a development permit." (Section 163.3164(15), Florida Statutes).
Thus, if this application is denied, a denial development order must be issued which must cite to the
applicable portions of each ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal authority supporting the denial of the
application. For example, if a goal, objective, or policy of the Sanford Comprehensive Plan were to be
the basis for a denial, then such goal, objective or policy must be part of the motion proposing the
denial. A denial development order would be drafted to implement the actions of the City Commission
in the event of such occurrence. Accordingly, any motion to deny must state, with particularity, the
basis for the proposed denial.
The City Commission has also expressed its desire for all who vote against the majority decision to
express the rationale for their vote regarding all matters.
When voting on matters such as whether to recommend approval of an amendment to the City's
Comprehensive Plan or the enactment of, or amendment to, a land development regulation, those
matters are legislative in nature and not quasi-judicial matters.
The City Commission moved to continue the first reading of Ordinance No. 2024-4793, to July 22,
2024, at the June 24, 2024, City Commission meeting, with a four to one vote.
The City Clerk posted the 2nd Public Hearing in the Sanford Herald on June 26, 2024.
The City Commission moved to continue the first reading of Ordinance No. 2024-4793, to August 12,
2024, at the July 22, 2024, City Commission Meeting.
The City Clerk published notice of the continued first reading of Ordinance No. 2024-4793 in the
Sanford Herald on July 28, 2024.
The City Commission approved the first reading of Ordinance No. 2024-4793, with the conditions for
the developer to move building six and increase the buffer to 20 percent, on August 12, 2024.
The City Clerk published notice of the 2nd Public Hearing in the Sanford Herald on Sunday, August
18, 2024.
The City Commission continued the second reading of Ordinance No. 2024-4793 to September 9,
2024, at the August 26, 2024, City Commission Meeting for the developer to find additional
alternatives that will work with the existing neighborhood.
The City Commission moved to continue the 2nd reading of: Ordinance No. 2024-4793, per the
applicant, to September 23, 2024, at the September 9, 2024, City Commission Meeting.
The City Clerk published notice of the continued 2nd Public Hearing in the Sanford Herald on Sunday,
September 15, 2024.
RECOMMENDATION:
On June 24, 2024, upon a recommendation from staff, the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended that City Commission adopt Ordinance No. 2024-4793, a request to rezone of 5.77
acres at project address 6498 North Ronald Reagan Boulevard from Agriculture (AG) and
Restricted Commercial (RC -1) to Planned Development (PD) to be consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall conduct a public hearing to
determine if the proposed rezoning is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the City's
Comprehensive Plan, Joint Planning Agreement, and the Lake Mary Boulevard Corridor Study.
The following conditions should be considered to accompany any approval in an associated
Development Order:
1. Pursuant to Section 4.3.G of the City's LDRs, this rezoning shall expire three years from
the effective date of the PD Ordinance if all required infrastructure improvements have not
been completed or an extension granted.
2. Unless specifically requested and approved on the PD Master Plan, any required elements
missing from or not shown on the PD Master Plan or associated PD documents shall
comply with and default to the regulations in the City's LDRs.
3. An Engineering Plan generally consistent with Article III of the City's LDRs, including a
landscape plan and all parking improvement must be provided and approved prior to
approval of any building permits.
4. The applicant shall work with staff to establish hardscape elements that complement the
overall site layout and architecture such as the following:
a. Architecturally compatible wing walls on all monument signs fronting Ronald
Reagan Boulevard.
b. Hardscape elements including decorative pavers, colored concrete or stamped
concrete deemed acceptable by the City shall be provided at the primary entrances and
pedestrian nodes within the development.
c. Established pedestrian connectivity as required shall be appropriately defined and
delineated with landscaping and hardscaping similar to that which is installed at the
pedestrian nodes and entrances.
5. A comprehensive signage program meeting the standards of the City's LDRs shall be
required for the entire development.
6. The property owner shall coordinate with LYNX to determine the possible addition of a
bus stop and shelter and/or the extension of bus or transit services to the site; provided,
however, that this condition shall not delay the issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
7. The Property Owner shall install a decorative and functional fountain in all wet retention
ponds in accordance with Schedule D of the City's LDRs.
8. Due to the proximity of the subject property to the Airport and the adopted interlocal
agreement, the developer shall file an FAA Form 7460 and provide to the City written
acknowledgement of receipt and determination of no objection from Orlando -Sanford
International Airport prior to any development approvals.
9. Unless specifically requested and approved on the PD Master Plan, associated deviation
waiver request, approved or the associated PD Development Order, all development shall
comply with: _
a. The Multiple Family Housing Design Guidelines within Schedule E, Section 16.0
of the City's LDRs.
b. Tree mitigation per Section 4.2 of the City's LDRs, Criteria For Tree Removal,
Replacement And Relocation.
c. Light source setback for site lighting shall be no less than 75% of the width of the
buffers identified on the PD Master Plan.
d. Renderings of the Architectural Elevations for the garages shall be provided at the
time of Development Plan application.
10. If City staff and the property owner are unable to agree to the details of PD in any way, the
matter will be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission for resolution at a public
hearing, and the matter will be adjudicated by means of a development order or denial
development order relating thereto.
The Planning and Zoning Commission added an 1 lth condition to require a six-foot vinyl fence
between the east stormwater ponds and the residence of Carriage Cove.
Additional comments or recommendations may be presented by staff at the meeting.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
"I move to adopt Ordinance No. 2024-4793, with additional conditions that the developer will
move building six and increase the buffer to 20 percent."
Attachments:
L Project Information Sheet
2. Aerial Map
3. Zoning Map
4. Affidavit of Ownership
5. CAPP Meeting Report
7. Business Impact Statement
8. Ordinance No. 2024-4793
PROJECT INFORMATION — 6498 NORTH RONALD BOULEVARD
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONE
Requested Action
Proposed Use:
Project Address:
Current County Zoning
Existing Land Use:
Tax Parcel Numbers:
Site Area:
Rezone of 5.77 acres from Agriculture (AG) and Restricted (RC -1) Commercial
to, Planned Development (PD) at project address 6498 North Ronald Reagan
Boulevard.
Multi -family
6498 North Ronald Boulevard
AG, Agriculture and RC -1, Restricted Commercial
Vacant Commercial, Single Family
13-20-30-300-0160-0000 & 13-20-30-300-040A-0000
5.77 acres
Property Owners: Christian Sharing Center Inc.
600 North Highway 17-92, Suite 130
Longwood, FL 32750
Dale & Company LLC
1080 Crystal Bowl Circle
Casselberry, FL 32707
Applicant/Agent: Daniel Ryan
Christian Sharing Center Inc.
600 North Highway 17-92, Suite 130
Longwood, FL 32750
Phone: (407) 496-6406
Email: dan.ryan@thesharingcenter.org
CAPP Meeting: A CAPP (Citizens Awareness and Participation Plan) meeting was held on
December 12, 2023.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPLIANCE REVIEW
Planning staff has reviewed the request and has determined the use and proposed improvements to be consistent
with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
Current Future Land Use: Low -Density Residential -Single -Family (LDRSF) and
Neighborhood Commercial (NC)
Proposed Future Land Use: City of Sanford General Commercial (GC)
x
. ir, Y—
If � k&T,'01ORT
In- f
DOWNING SM
int -Vyt4 bRWE
vc—
RT
SITE
'k
El
LU
A
Luiz
jo
AAM
z 167
Uj
NO
P 71
KD41 P C E
S'' i � 3 i ,x tom• v �.. _ �r7'�i�'! •� i?..�...�' t6i- :r.L
f41�7
As
CAWY UAC COURT L
6498 North Ronald Reagan Boulevard
_d
IL P
13-20-30-300-040A-0000 & sHADES
13-20-30-300-0160-0000!-Lp.KER4
Zoning
Sanford
AG (Agriculture)
SR -2 (Mobile Home Residential)
RC -1 (Restricted Commercial)
Seminole County
A-1 (Agriculture)
R -IA (Single -Family Dwelling)
CS (convenience Commercial)
PID (Planned Development)
or
VXE/N�
F/,/00,0 0
Fez
?01 V10" V/
rmo� V//j V//.,O.�,ii
".,.O,
�j
CIVIL ENGINEERS
CENTRAL FLORIDA ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, LLC
INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS
Bridging Communities: Proposal for Affordable Workforce Housing
The Sharing Commons at 5 Points
We seek to address the need for additional workforce housing with this Land Use Change
Request from Neighborhood Commercial (pid 040A) and Agriculture (pid 0160) to General
Commercial. We are seeking this change to a compatible Land Use, in order to allow for
the Sharing Center's 79 -unit apartment complex, aiming to help fill the gap in more
affordable options amidst rising market rates.
Like other communities, Sanford, a city of history and progress, faces a challenge of
affordability. At the heart of this proposal is the essence of community. It recognizes that
affordable housing is not just about brick and mortar; it is about creating spaces where
Lives intertwine, where dreams find fertile ground to grow. This proposed 79 -unit apartment
complex is more than just structures — it is a promise to bridge the gap, to bring together
diverse backgrounds and aspirations under one roof.
The Sharing Commons at Five Points symbolizes hope, bridging divides and offering
stability and dignity to those who keep Sanford thriving. It's not just a Land Use change; it's
a commitment to change lives. It's about recognizing that the true wealth of a city lies not
just in its buildings but in the strength of its community. Let this proposed 79 -unit
apartment complex stand as a testament to Sanford's unwavering spirit, its resilience, and
its commitment to building a future where all can thrive.
1111 N. RONALD REAGAN BOULEVARD • SUITE 101 • LONGWOOD, FLORIDA 32750
PHONE {407} 599-7010 • MAIL@FLORIDAENG.COM
p uj
0
r
�s
C3
c�
�
�
Q
0
r
Five Points Village Community Meeting 12/12/2023
+ Traffic
o Why can't there be a traffic light put in to help alleviate traffic issues?
o Traffic is already bumper to bumper.
o There have been accidents in this area due to the amount of traffic and the blind curve.
o People are already using Tucker Road as a cut through, and the apartments will add
more cars.
■ Will construction add to that traffic with the crews using Tucker to get around
traffic also?
o Will there be a turn lane into the complex or will people have to pass it and then do a U-
turn.
o There is already a lot of noise from the cars from Ronald Reagan and 17-92 and this
complex will just add more noise.
+ Trees/Wildlife
o What will happen to the power lines already in the easement between houses and the
vacantland?
■ There is already power and spectrum issues whenever there are storms.
■ Will the apartments use the current power grid?
+ Can the power grid be updated to accommodate the new apartments?
o What will happen to the Gopher turtles that currently live on the property as they are a
protected species?
o How much of the tree line will have to be cut to build the town house apartments?
■ Will there be permits pulled to cut down the trees?
■ Oxygen comes from the trees and there is concern with so many trees being
taken down.
o What will happen to the animals and rodents that currently live in the woods?
■ Who will pay for the pest control for the rats and snakes that will relocate to the
current homes when the land gets cleared?
■ There are kids and animals that live in the neighborhood and what happens if
they get bit?
o Will the land clearing cause flooding for the current residents?
o Can we keep some of the trees to use as a buffer between the wall and the houses?
+ Wall
o How high will the wall be around the apartments?
■ Is 6 foot the maximum/minimum the wall can be or can it be higher as kids can
scale over a 6 foot wall pretty easily.
o How close to the current property lines will the wall be built?
o Can the wall be built first?
+ Meeting
o Who gets the mail notices for these type meetings?
o The timeframe for today's meeting was not good for people to be able to attend after
work.
o No one from the mobile home park got the letter.
o When is the next meeting and who can they contact at the City of Sanford to complain
about this development?
■ They have already talked to the County Commissioners about the single-family
homes being built and they feel like they were not heard, especially by
Commissioner Zembower.
• It seemed like it was just lip service and went in one ear and out the
other as the County Commissioners already had their minds made up
before the meeting started.
• Crime/Security
o Will there be security on site?
o Will the lights from the apartments shine into the backyards of the current houses?
o How high up will the apartments be as there is concern about people being able to see
into the windows and showers of the homes.
o Drugs are already an issue in the area and these apartments will bring more drugs and
crime to the area.
■ There have been drug deals that have gone on in front of the church.
o The homes are going to be devalued due to the increased crime and drugs.
o What will stop these apartments from turning into slums like the ones off Sunland?
■ Those apartments started out looking nice but after 6 months turned into high
areas of drugs and crime.
■ Those residents throw trash into the yards of the homeowners and have torn
down the wall that was built.
■ We moved to this area to get away from apartments like that one and now you
are building a second one.
■ What will stop the new apartments from being just as bad as those?
o There are already people who are coming into the backyards so this will bring more
unwanted attention to the area.
o Will all these units be section 8 housing as that will bring in even more drugs and crime
to the area?
• Additional
o When will construction begin?
■ With the construction of the single-family homes starting next year will both
builds be going on at the same time or will they be back-to-back so there is
nonstop stop construction for the next few years?
o Will there be multiple families allowed to rent one of the units?
o Will the current sewer and water be shared with the apartments?
SANFORD AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND DESIGNATION OF AGENT
CITY OF
FLORIDA
w .sanfordff,gw
Please use additional sheets as needed, if any additional sheets are attached to this document, please sign here and note below:
1. Ownership
I, Nina Yon
Tax Parcel Number(s): 13-20-30-300-040A-0000
Address of Property: CR 427, Sanford, FL 32773
for which this rezoning
, hereby attest to ownership of the property described below:
II. Designation of Applicant's Agent (leave blank if not applicable)
application is submitted to the City of Sanford.
As the owner/applicant of the above designated property for which this affidavit is submitted, I designate the below named individual
as my agent in all matters pertaining to the application process. In authorizing the agent named below to represent me, or my
company, 1 attest that the application Is made in good faith and that all information contained in the application is accurate and
complete to the best of my personal knowledge.
Applicant's Agent (Print); Daniel Ryan Signature:Agent Address: Address: 600 N. Hwy 17-92, suite 130, Longwood, FL 32750 .�
Email: dan.ryan@thesharingcenter.org Phone: 407-496-6406 Fax:
Ill. Notice to Owner
A. All changes in Ownership and/or Applicant's Agent prior to final action of the City shall require a new affidavit. If ownership
changes, the new owner assumes all obligations related to the filing application process.
B. If the Owner intends for the authority of the Applicant's Agent to be limited in any manner, please indicate the limitations(s)
below. (i.e.: limited to obtaining a certificate of concurrency; limited to obtaining a land use compliance certificate, etc.)
The owner of the real property associated with this application or procurement activity is a (check one)
❑ Individual ❑ Corporation o Land Trust ❑ Partnership ❑ Limited Liability Company
11 Other (describe): 501 C3 Not for profit
1. List all natural persons who have an ownership interest in the property, which is the subject matter of this petition, by name and
address.
2. For each corporation, list the name, address, and title of each officer, the name and address of each director of the corporation;
and the name and address of each shareholder who owns two percent (2%) or more of the stock of the corporation. Shareholders
need not be disclosed if a corporation's stock are traded publicly on any national stock exchange.
3. In the case of a trust, list the name and address of each trustee and the name and address of the beneficiaries of the trust and the
percentage of interest of each beneficiary. If any trustee or beneficiary of a trust is a corporation, please provide the information
required in paragraph 2 above.
Name of Trust:
4. For partnerships, including limited partnerships, list the name and address of each principal in the partnership, including general
or limited partners. If any partner is a corporation, please provide the information required in paragraph 2 above.
5. For each limited liability company, list the name, address, and title of each manager or managing member; and the name and
address of each additional member with two percent (2%) or more membership interest. If any member with two percent (2%) or
more membership interest, manager, or managing member is a corporation, trust or partnership, please provide the
information required in paragraphs 2, 3 and/or 4 above.
Name of LLC:
6. In the circumstances of a contract for purchase, list the name and address of each contract purchaser. If the purchaser is a
corporation, trust, partnership, or LLC, provide the information required for those entities in paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and/or 5 above.
Name of Purchaser:
Date of Contract:
NAME
TITLE/OFFICE1TRUSTEE
OR BENEFICIARY
ADDRESS
% OF
INTEREST
Nina Yon
President & CEO
600 N. Hwy 17-92, suite 130. Longwood FL 32750
0
Gail Bittman
Board Chair
600 N. Hwy 17-92, suite 130. Longwood FL 32750
0
Steve Reed
Past Chair
600 N. Hwy 17-92, suite 130. Longwood FL 32750
0
Ron Davoii
Vice -Chair External
600 N. Hwy 17-92, suite 130. Longwood FL 32750
0
Michelle Smith
Vice -Chair Internal
600 N. Hwy 17-92, suite 130. Longwood FL 32750
0
Michael Heald
Treasurer
600 N. Hwy 17-92, suite 130. Longwood FL 32750
0
Mary Sherris
Secretary
600 N. Hwy 17-92, suite 130. Longwood FL 32750
0
(Use additional sheets for more space.)
7. As to any type of owner referred to above, a change of ownership occurring subsequent to the execution of this document, shall be
disclosed in writing to the City prior to any action being taken by the City as to the matter relative to which this document pertains.
8. 1 affirm that the above representations are true and are based upon my personal knowledge and belief after all reasonable inquiry. I
understand that any failure to make mandated disclosures is grounds for the subject rezone, future land use amendment, special
exception, or variance involved with this Application to become void or for the submission for a procurement activity to be non-
responsive. I certify that I am legally authorized to execute this Affidavit and to bind the Applicant or Vendor to the disclosures
herein.
4/3/2023
Date
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF s—inole
Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me by Nina Yon
on this 4th day of April 2023
Signature of Notary Public
Personally Known X OR Produced Identification
Type of Identification Produced
Affidavit of ownership - January 2015
Owner, Agent, Applicant Signature
Print, Type or Stamp Name of Notary Public
40 " Alb MICKY L. MYRICK
iviY CONIN,IISSION tt HH 19097Q
%OF0. EXPIRES: December 10, 2025
.a AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND DESIGNATION
39x"js;;
vAYvf.o nfordrl.0ov
Please use additional sheets as needed. If any additional sheets are attached to this document, please sign here and note below:
1. Ownership
1. Dale & Company LLC
, hereby attest to ownership of the property described below:
Tax Parcel Number(s): 13-20-30-300-0160-000
Address of Property: 6498 N. Ronald Reagan Blvd, Sanford, FL 32773
for which this rezoning
application is submitted to the City of Sanford.
II. Designation of Applicant's Agent (leave blank if not applicable)
As the owner/applicant of the above designated property for'which this affidavit is submitted, I designate the below named individual
as my agent in all matters pertaining to the application process. In authorizing the agent named below to represent me, or my
company, I attest that the application is made in good faith and that all information contained in the application is accurate and
complete to the best of my personal knowledge.
Applicant's Agent (Print): Daniel Ryan Signature: ("1.1 -r- —
Agent Address: 600 N. Hwy 17-92, suite 130, Longwood, FL 32750
Email: dan.ryan@thesharingcenter.org Phone: 407-496-6406 Fax:
til. Notice to Owner
A. All changes in Ownership and/or Applicant's Agent prior to final action of the City shall require anew affidavit. If ownership
changes, the new owner assumes all obligations related to the filing application process.
B. If the Owner Intends for the authority of the Applicant's Agent to be limited in any manner, please indicate the limitations(s)
below. (i.e.: limited to obtaining a certificate of concurrency; limited to obtaining a land use compliance certificate, etc.)
The owner of the real property associated with this application or procurement activity is a (check one)
o Individual o Corporation o Land Trust o Partnership Qrtimited Liability Company
o Other (describe):
1. List all natural persons who have an ownership interest In the property, which is the subject matter of this petition, by name and
address.
2. For each corporation, list the name, address, and title of each officer; the name and address of each director of the corporation;
and the name and address of each shareholder who owns two percent (2%) or more of the stock of the corporation. Shareholders
need not be disclosed if a corporation's stock are traded publicly on any national stock exchange.
3. In the case of a trust, list the name and address of each trustee and the name and address of the beneficiaries of the trust and the
percentage of interest of each beneficiary. If any trustee or beneficiary of a trust is a corporation, please provide the information
required in paragraph 2 above.
Name of Trust:
4. For partnerships, including limited partnerships, list the name and address of each principal in the partnership, including general
or limited partners. If any partner is a corporation, please provide the information required in paragraph 2 above.
5. For each limited liability company, list the name, address, and title of each manager or managing member; and the name and
address of each additional member with two percent (2%) or more membership interest. If any member with two percent (2%) or
more membership interest, manager, or managing member is a corporation, trust or partnership, please provide the
information required in paragraphs 2, 3 and/or 4 above.
Name of LLC: Dale & Company LLC
6. In the circumstances of a contract for purchase, list the name and address of each contract purchaser. If the purchaser is a
corporation, trust, partnership, or LLC, provide the information required for those entities in paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and/or 5 above.
Name of Purchaser: The Christian Sharing Center
Date of Contract: 12-28-2022
NAME TITLE/OFFICE/TRUSTEE ADDRESS % OF
OR BENEFICIARY INTEREST
M 08(p C�Dlqil 2011
u
�I !
(Use additional sheets for more space.)
7. As to any type of owner referred to above, a change of ownership occurring subsequent to the execution of this document, shall be
disclosed in writing to the City prior to any action being taken by the City as to the matter relative to which this document pertains.
8. 1 affirm that the above representations are true and are based upon my personal knowledge and belief after all reasonable inquiry. I
understand that any failure to make mandated disclosures is grounds for the subject rezone, future land use amendment, special
exception, or variance involved with this Application to become void or for the submission for a procurement activity to be non-
responsive. I certify that I am legally authorized to execute this Affidavit and to bind the Applicant or Vendor to the disclosures
herein.
�/ate Owner, Agent, Applicant Signature
H&O
STATE OF FLORIDA
For '
COUNTY OF
Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me by PA_. i()^( f�jAkeA"
on this day of )V -PA I L 20 a 3
Signature o / aP l
Personally Known OR Produced Identification
Type of Identification Produced
Affidavit of Ovinership - January 2015
Print, Type or Stamp Name of Notary Public
DEBORAHL,BAUER
F nOr�3Y F 7.1c1121
,� C- URN
hk'' Bf' h!y Ce em;ssc� cA; e. t 024
Lumbert
Dan Ryan
The Sharing Center
600 N Highway 17-92
Longwood, FL 32750
RE: Christian Sharing Center Environmental Assessement.
Lumbert Environmental was retained to conduct an environmental assessment on property owned by
the Christian Sharing Center. This property is located on Ronald Reagan Blvd., Sanford, Florida and
consists of two parcels totaling +/-5.54 acres.
Parcel 1. 2.67 acres Parcel 13-20-30-300-040A-0000
Owners Christian Sharing Center
600 S US HIGHWAY 17 92 # 130
LONGWOOD, FL 32750-5588
SEC 13 TWP 20S RGE 30E, SE 1/4 OF SW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 WLY OF SR 427
Parcel 2. 2.87 acres Parcel 13-20-30-300-0160-0000
Owners DALE & COMPANY LLC
6498 N RONALD REAGAN BLVD
SANFORD FL 32773
SEC 13 TWP 20S RGE 30E, BEG 216.48 FT E + 918.22 FT S OF NW COR OF SE 1/4
OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 RUN S 83 DEG 41 MIN 42 SEC W 335.27 FT S 1 DEG 18 MIN
18 SEC E 373.05 FT E 324.75 FT TO A PT S OF BEG N TO BEG
Site Description
Parcel 1 is vacant land. The entire site is wooded containing Oak, Black Cherry, Camphor, Ear Pod,
and Sabal Palmetto.
Parcel 2 contains a wooded frame house surrounded by a lawn and a fringe of Oak, Camphor, Ear Pod,
Sabal Palmetto, and Carolina Cherry Laurel.
There are no wetlands on either property.
Soils consist of Astatula-Apopka fine sands and Paola -St. Lucie sands. Groundwater levels are
reported to be over 200 centimeters deep.
These sites contain no suitable habitat for sand skink, scrub jay, or indigo snake. See attached analysis
of other protected species known to be in this region.
The site was walked north to south in transects spaced 25 feet apart to search for gopher tortoise
burrows. There is no evidence of any gopher tortoise occupying this site.
Summary
It is likely that no threatened or endangered plants or animals will be adversely impacted by this
project.
Steven Lumbert
Principal Geologist/Biologist
Lumbert Environmental
406 SW Burnett Lane
Lake City, FL 32024
407 504 9255
slumbertOaol.com
Figure 1: Parcel 1 and 2 Boundary Lines
l�
+7
yHy
bid
>>
(4W
oom
• o
d
>
o
o
o
o o
cn
o
�.
� .
CD
CD P
Ol C,O
(7
iz fDn
N
.
CD
i' O'
M
N
C
0
p
Oo O
.-
�.h
O
}�*
•
CD
O
W
O
OC�yn
0CD
p
�
NCDUQ
NOp�
O�'
coO
•
CyS
'
COD
o
W
H
y
H
cn
y
y
H
H
ITJ
�
>
y
I
I
H
I
i
�-•3
I
I
H
H
H
rA
m
w�
m
0 0
<
cud
°
'
o
w p
w d
o `
`C
CD"'
o d
`�
CD
ua
C� �
k
`CC
n0
V
�CD
� ~
��
O
rD
CA
M
'°u
CD 0.
m o d�
a.G
�
D
ob
Q
CD 0
rA
1=
�
Q
?"
�
°° •
°
C,
a,
Q
Fi ° fm��
�,
CDD
... °
r `�
o
m
o
O
o a
�
'�
rrD
(D
00-
rn
Sv UQ
>E
CL CD
C3
r~D
3
CD
°
X
(D
n
Itl
t3
O
N
CD
o
a
vi
0
`n I't
W
CD
f1.
�`
0.
n
4Tm
n
''d "� •
a'
acs
.
i.�
R
O
i�
H
O
n
0°
n
CD
R-
0-
W.rw.rc.r
o
O
tlG O
O
O
O
O
!y O
0
O<
CD
iZ
CD 'z
GL Z
Z4
� 7-.
O
O
O
O
O
O
-1 O
O
CD
O
Ol
x
x
x�
r
ro
�'
a•
G�
w
o'
o�
wn
R
PCDOl
R
�'
���
cr
CD
A. -
CD
P. �+
a
o�
aC
CD
—
CD
p�
N
0
O
n `
BOO
pa-
O
O
�.
p
CL
0
�.
O
fl
oCD
cr
0
S,
CD
CD
-
0
l�
+7
yHy
bid
0
°
a
CD
w
a
a
0
CDO
M
W
s
CD
b
O
0
n
to
tTjswa
K
CD
CDCD
0CD'
CD 0
CD �'CD
.—.
p'
'�
A
n
�� "�
CD
(D rn
1,
O Sy
3.
CD
a"
°CD
C
p..
CD
�7' 0—
O�
CD °Fitcn
o
•.
~� °
En
0'
�°,
CDCD
w
CD
0
CO
CD
CD
CD
o
`-
°
�
CD,
m
CD
z
En
y
�ITI-]
t�Tjr7
O
�z
y�
��
O
ECD
ITI o
r
C�
oo
CD
co
8
CD
0
CD
CD
IRD
C,0
� "�
r CDsn
CD o
D�
CD
m
CD �.
P
►�
tom-+
CD
Oo
CD 0
CL �
CD
CL o
a.
Y
CCD
°
;.;,CD
CD �.
CD
is
c
O
a s CD
(�q
o N
CD
SZ
NCC
R
¢z
CD
'o
o
co
�C
N
CD
O
CD
CD
V
cn.r
Gn.r4.
In
0 t-IW—.r
h
¢.�
k
k
rt
O
�o CD
CD
CD
CD
`L0
CD
�0
CD
n
c
0 �o
0
0
b
CD
w
�
O
C
C
>
CD
N
N
N
CD
(
D
O
0 C
R
o
0
OD
CD
G
N
ti
O
'-t
•
CD
CD
W
0
CD
0
C')
0
w
a.
a
C
0
Lo
w
0
O
o'
0
•
c4
cv
p,
�C
•
a
�•It
y
�
a
CD
cuCL
P
c�
CD
CD
a
0
0
CD
yoCDp,
A•
a
CD
otTj
CD
na
0
o
�n
�-
b
�
o
c�
C')
0
w
a.
a
C
0
Lo
w
0
O
o'
0
"0 ^'
C1
t0 N
N
N N
O O
N
W A
U)
D)
CD
O
CD
O
T
O
:3.
CL
m
O
N
`J
R -S Rv' ' "S a n
+
0
0
Via.,*
1--- " x
lcJ r'SF4
Y
M
a
�
0
m m
m
o m
y
0 o
'o
o 0 o
m
a
a <
CD
-
3
< d m
<m-
o m
M _ _ _.
m
CD o -
n
m
"
d'
W o
0
� a m
o < v
o y
c
0 2 3 w
°i v v -410
0 D
O
v
o rn o
o
c0
n
A
C
ycn
'0
o 0
v
v
C
CL
o
v m
sv
N
f
d
o
a
CD
(n
0K
o
A
o
'0
r
m
m
m
�,
z
0
�
d
m
0
Cl r- C
_
O N
�
CC
'O G
W
N p
(DD
O
N
N
T
O
d
y
7
O
Cl y
y N
2
Q
O
(n
fa
410
£
N
CD O
?
K
N
d
to
C
ry
y
-I
�3 0
f7
wd
• fn
U,0
fn U)
c O
0 -I
-^�
v D w '0
n Er-
o o
3 'D
n o 3
Cp 3(D
N C^D
O
—
3 N
C`Op' •O
O 0• �C�
N d
C m
3
O
O O CD
N.N.
O N
`G Cj)C
<
fl7 CD n �, '^
7 O
C m
y N a CD
D O
0
m
y.
3
0
N O
N (D
fn
O C
� 00
N
O 7
41
n
j
L]. f S
CD fn .
fn C
`G
3 0
CO 3
N N 0 0.
0.
Z
N i1 O
a O
O N
O. N
n
C N N n CD
LD
N 'p
Uf O
!O" d O
CD
.<
`41<
CD (a O
Pq
m m
�•
d3 N
N
N
N 3
N
O' O N O
N
' m
N N
40j .<
O D lD
:C1 m
O-Oi.'NO
3
O O O_CD j•
N
CS
LN
—N
N 7� N fn
r=
3 SCD
N
.O-.
n
D
d y p O'
W
CL
j'
CD Cl
G;'O A N fn
CD
W
N d
CD O' N
lD
O p
d�
N 3 o N c
C' .Z7
CD
p.
C1 (D
z
CND 3 p• CD
3
j•
N
N O
CCD 3
> 0 O a CD
O
`<
N N
C
O
O
N O C1
W S
N
N
'0 `C
a
00
,NO
D1
N o
O
O
f N
CD
j .n-. m
N
O O ®
O'
<
N
C
O
N O
(O
IIi
(D
•00
C
p
O N 7 N
3
'=Or
W N N
O.
CD f
3
m
rn n
�
@o��m
m 0
O
3
Nfv,W
^�
p
'S
o
<. N O?
A
3'
O
*
N O
O �.
D
O O (qn N
m O. N O. 0-
[n N
N
x O
O CCD CC —
?
N
F
A
C1 C 3 3
N Q
Z
O. 2? p
G) N
S
M N 3
N
tD
CD —
co D)
X
o
CD CD D) ]
<J
CD
CD
O 3 O t4
(D
O
.« CD co
co
O
z
3 N O 2.
N
y
_' (D O' CD
G+
�(.. 0
O
41 N 0�
w
mom_—
O
N
N
CD
_
a Nqm
0
CCD
3
O
Omm0
n
a
O
n
N
0
?�.
2
N O O
Q
CD
N
0-
.0
fD
N
O
CD O. CD
N
CD
C1
U)
D)
CD
O
CD
O
T
O
:3.
CL
m
Soil Map—Seminole County, Florida
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
6
i
Astatula-Apopka fine sands, 0
to 5 percent slopes
2.2
36.8%
124
Paola -St. Lucie sands, 0 to 5
percent slopes
1.3
22.0%5
34
Urban land, 0 to 2 percent
slopes
2.4
41.3%
Totals for Area of Interest
5.9
100.0%j
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/26/2024
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3
Seminole County Public Schools
School Impact Analysis
School Capacity Determination
(Non -Binding)
To: Dan Ryan, The Christian Sharing Center, Inc `407-260-9155 " dan.rvan(c)thesharingcenter.org
Eileen Hinson, AICP, City of Sanford " 407-688-5147 " Eileen. Hinson(o)sanfordfl.gov
From: Jordan Smith, AICP, PP, Facilities Planner, Seminole County Public Schools
Date: March 20, 2024
RE: Sharing Common (Sanford)
Seminole County Public Schools (SCPS), in reviewing the above request, has determined that if approved, the FLUM
designation and/or zoning will generate school age children.
Description: Proposed Rezone from AG, Agriculture and RC -1, Restricted Commercial to PD, Planned
Development and Comprehensive Plan Amendment from LDRSF, Low Density Residential Single Family to
MDR, Medium Density Residential of +/5.77 acres generally located ADJACENT TO 6498 N. Ronald Reagan
Boulevard (for Find My School reference) within the jurisdiction of the City of Sanford. The applicant is requesting a
change to the zoning to allow a maximum of 79 multi -family residential units, to be developed within the proposed
land use and zoning designations.
Parcel ID (s) #: 13-20-30-300-040A-0000, 13-20-30-300-0160-0000
This review and evaluation is performed on proposed future land use changes, rezones and conditional uses, unplatted
parcels, or projects that have not received final entitlement approval. This evaluation does not guarantee that the
developments subject to this declaration are exempt from, or determined to meet the school concurrency requirements
effective as of January 1, 2008. Changes in enrollment, capacity, any newly platted developments, and any subsequent
final development approvals may affect the provision of concurrent school facilities at the point of final subdivision
approval, including the potential of not meeting statutory concurrency requirements based on future conditions.
Based on information received from the jurisdiction and the application for the request, SCPS staff has summarized the
potential school enrollment impacts in the following tables:
CSA Capacity:
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT ON STUDENT GENERATION BY CSA
AFFECTED CSAs
CSA E-10
CSA M-1
CSA H-1
CAPACITY
2,660
5,732
7,739
3 -YEAR PROGRAM CAPACITY
-
-
-
ENROLLMENT
2,132
4,535
6,599
AVAILABLE CAPACITY
528
1,197
1,140
SCALD RESERVATIONS TO DATE
503
602
805
SIA - Sharing Commons
14
6
8
REMAINING CAPACITY 1 11 � 589
hops Uscmincleschools sharepoint eom/sitcs'Aacilitiesplanning/Shued DnarmenWNew• Directorievi'IanningfDecelorment tracking/0 SIAsIS1A 2024Rd-06_SIA Sharing Commonsf.Notice- Sharing Commons door
Comments CSA Evaluation:
At this point, the students generated at the three CSA levels would be able to be accommodated without exceeding the
adopted levels of service (LOS) for each CSA by school type, or there is adjacent capacity to meet LOS as allowed by
interlocal agreement. Any planned expansions/additions in the current five-year capital plan would provide additional
student capacity to relieve the affected schools is reflected in this review.
Zoned School Enrollment: For informational purposes, the below table indicates the analysis based on the individual
school zones within the CSA under current conditions. At this point, the potential students generated WILL be able to
be accommodated without exceeding the adopted Levels of Service (LOS) for the currently zoned schools. Any
planned expansions/additions that would provide additional student capacity contained in the current five-year capital
plan and scheduled to be completed within the next three years are included in this review.
ZONEDSCHOOL
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
Region 3
Hamilton
Midway
Pine Crest
CSA E-10
CAPACITY
2,660
754
1,046
860
2,660
3 -YEAR PROGRAM CAPACITY
2,682
3,917
6,599
AVAILABLE CAPACITY
-
ENROLLMENT
2,132
658
804
670
2,132
AVAILABLE CAPACITY 1
528
96
242
190
528
SCALD RESERVATIONS TO DATE
503
1821
2081
185
503
SIA - Sharing Commons 1
14
-
-
1
14
REMAINING CAPACITY 1110- 9610 24210 190 11
Region 3 Elementary Schools include Hamilton, Midway, and Pine Crest
ZONEDSCHOOL
MIDDLE SCHOOLS
Greenwood Lakes
Markham Woods
Millennium
Sanford
CSA M-1
CAPACITY
1,268
1,260
1,757
1,447
5,732
3 -YEAR PROGRAM CAPACITY
2,682
3,917
6,599
AVAILABLE CAPACITY
-
ENROLLMENT
943
882
1,336
1,374
4,535
AVAILABLE CAPACITY
325
378
421
73
1,197
SCALD RESERVATIONS TO DATE
27
1821
2081
185
602
SIA -Sharing Commons
6
- I
1
1
6
REMAINING CAPACITY 10 292 10 19610 21310 (112) Q 589
ZONEDSCHOOL
HIGH SCHOOLS
Lake Mary
Seminole
CSA H-1
CAPACITY
2,805
4,934
7,739
3 -YEAR PROGRAM CAPACITY
-
ENROLLMENT
2,682
3,917
6,599
AVAILABLE CAPACITY
123
1,017
- 1,140
SCALD RESERVATIONS TO DATE
17
788
805
SIA - Sharing Commons
8
-
8
REMAINING CAPACITY 0 9810 2291 10 327
httpsl/scminnlcschools sharcpoint.coralsitc.Jfaciliticsl'lanning/Sharcd DocumcnisNcw Dircctorics/t'lanninWDcrdopmcnt tracking/0 SlAsISIA 2024G4.06_SIA Sharing Commo-No icc- Sharing CommonsAmx
Terms and Definitions:
Capacity: The amount of satisfactory permanent student stations as calculated on the date of the second FDOE count
in October of the current school year. The number of students that can be satisfactorily accommodated in a room at any
given time and which, is typically a lesser ,percentage of the total number of student stations. NOTE: Capacity is ONLY
a measure of student stations, not of enrollment.
Concurrency Service Area (CSA): A geographic unit promulgated by the School Board and adopted by local
governments within which the level of service is measured when an application for residential development is reviewed
for school concurrency purposes. The CSA listed represents the area that the capacity is considered and student
assignment may be in a CSA adjacent to the project.
Enrollment: For the purposes of concurrency review, the enrollment level is established each year as per Public School
Interlocal Agreement Section 12.4 A, which sets the level on the date of the second full time equivalent (FTE) survey for
FDOE, generally taken in mid-October.
Programmed 3 Year Additions: New permanent school capacity within the CSA, which will be in place or under actual
construction within the first three years of the current SCPS Capital Improvement Plan.
Remaining Capacity: The capacity available for future development after the addition of any programmed capacity and
less the reserved capacity.
Reserved Capacity: The total number of student stations reserved in the respective CSA's that are assigned to projects
via a SCALD certificate.
School Size: For planning purposes, each public school district must determine the maximum size of future elementary,
middle and high schools. Existing school size is determined solely through FISH data. Seminole County Public Schools
has established the sizes of future schools (with the exception of special centers and magnet schools) as follows:
i) Elementary: 780 student stations
ii) Middle: 1500 student stations
iii) High: 2,800 student stations
School Attendance Zone: The established geographic area that identifies school assignments pursuant to Board Policy
for each District school or region of schools, other than county wide magnet schools. Students shall attend the school(s)
serving their residential or regional attendance zone unless otherwise permitted by Board Policy
Students Generated by Project: is determined by applying the current SCPS student generation rate (calculated in the
2017 Impact Fee Study) to the number and type of units proposed. The number of units is determined using information
provided by the jurisdiction and/or from the applicant's request. If no actual unit count is provided the unit count is then
estimated based on the maximum allowable density under the existing/proposed future land use designation. Eventual
Student assignment may not be to the school in closest proximity to the proposed residential development.
Utilization: A State Board Rule prescribed percentage of student stations that a room (and proportionately, a school
and school district) can satisfactorily accommodate at any given time. From a school/campus analysis perspective,
"utilization" is determined as the percentage of school enrollment to capacity. Current DOE established K-12 utilization
factors are as follows:
Elementary 95%, Middle 90%, High 95%
Imps Hsaninoleschaals sharepoint con✓siics/faciliricsPl=ning/Shated Do n cnts/Ncw Dirnrtorics91hanning4)nclopmcnt IracklntV0 SIAVSIA 20242-1-06SIA Sharing CammonsNoticc- Sharing Connnons docc
c-
!�
a
y
w!
711
�
5
5
{
ONE
iif
--
;L
l
I o
Cn 5 I F,
arx✓mza tt�av�ot.w a.�a�smeuw�our,en
y I 1 t
m
� 2 �
I
r
I
W
ib:
tt
N
1
f
I n
° O
..a
r
u1 411;48:19
A
AM
0
-i
y I 1 t
m
� 2 �
I
r
I
f
I n
441 al. a
>
pi
q
D
-1
t
N
8
Ore. a
11AB:n naa
I
I
9
t
I
o
t
8
° $ lip. g $
1j,1111 J
�€M g #jil Res
R o
t
vlermza,,:aa.25 a+n s�T�""a'""''•",
I
Fa
O
j
m
I
0
° $ lip. g $
1j,1111 J
�€M g #jil Res
R o
t
vlermza,,:aa.25 a+n s�T�""a'""''•",
�
o
i
i
$
m
d
�
T�
C'
:fffil02411:48�
M
O
!P
I
z
$
G
m
c
II
:fffil02411:48�
M
I!! ebeg-j' v ggp :S�geS8�9; o i
;aK-
a.s= rias sz�y i' IF•4
gSs�gSa-Y
baa _Ns
- Q - I
21j5JA' 31
a„• A
'A S
3 y
�'SB s,-
9�"•¢�'j�5'g �� " 3�gZ O
--
s Sr3-n 2 w .iyT 3c3�a_n 3�$Y yY Y" 5( 0 1 C7 O V 1
p]7p EY 3 �8- '..� 3
8"N3.'ne�ml
s` ¢ 44 g�no8Rr g "$mj
§ o
�.$ S
° '-' 4 =35 R%fx 3•l%9 eRlA� N 0
a i1 i His,!
sa Rxe et o = w
0
o�
a �
0
m
cr
" v
IP -
m U. 4. t ze;v9 o i���, i
X 3o N 'a 0 3a -'on§s my
i'o m•�° gor. moo$ m2 :yam Nog
r -m = NAR 'eRS- <Snioa .°gown^ 'a� `®
rn
moRI
F- 3 r"1: 3 r7
3
m
of
�-
F
-CENTRAL FLORIDA ENDNEERING CONSULTANTS, LLC
U DGgh-%y - [oM P9oxiq
-q— M "
F. M"2r. (an 599-rJ�a
ei wr�ottr°9vl0.rpmn 0 xc b199
°RiWNG IU ASTER PLAN COVER SHEET
THE SHARING COMONS
AT FIVE POINTS, PD
City of Sanford. Florida
4q 11 .1]]2
S TUCKER DR.
66' ROW
BEE
,=
SLE
up
NpWJ f 4CSN 6i. 3 z
LY 'y `'q mat a aao
c.
-- ---83-- pp ---- -- - - --- -- —C _. _ --- ---
�_
z It
tc—
_ x
m m _
Q
I
as
mamc
r
a�•
� _nom
°RANQG"'E MASTER PLAN
THE SHARING COMONS
AT FIVE POINTS, PD
of Sanford, Florida
mm >
AM .9 'x3 v o
o HER
H
_
R
e�sN
i m
..
i
Y
z�
9 _._
,� •g
es
o
BEE
,=
SLE
up
NpWJ f 4CSN 6i. 3 z
LY 'y `'q mat a aao
c.
-- ---83-- pp ---- -- - - --- -- —C _. _ --- ---
�_
z It
tc—
_ x
m m _
Q
I
�N m
it—
a2
r
-CENTRAL FLORIDA ENGINEERINGCONStILTANTS,LLC
Z."7«w' °
i.�. w"'�'°a�. iw+l�'p1a'City
°RANQG"'E MASTER PLAN
THE SHARING COMONS
AT FIVE POINTS, PD
of Sanford, Florida
mm >
o HER
R
e�sN
i m
..
=�
5: �4 s$
es
o
�N m
it—
a2
r
-CENTRAL FLORIDA ENGINEERINGCONStILTANTS,LLC
Z."7«w' °
i.�. w"'�'°a�. iw+l�'p1a'City
°RANQG"'E MASTER PLAN
THE SHARING COMONS
AT FIVE POINTS, PD
of Sanford, Florida
1
11 -'r
RMJ°=CENTRAL
17:a+rRK.F"`"°%"'D
n
v
IL
X
> O
THE SHARING COMONS
M ;u
Ln
;
-0 2 to
>m =
> r•1
O
-1
Z m
IN
�
1
: g�
to
RMJ°=CENTRAL
17:a+rRK.F"`"°%"'D
n
1111"G °ZHASTER PLAN COVER SHEET
■
IIIC Re,G. Rxgm BW�d� 101
THE SHARING COMONS
;
/�
O
AT FIVE POINTS, PD
IN
�
h
: g�
5rY`
on•e n..ew. Iw>I JOFNO
�•• ¢�°w (�� JJ^-�+
wet • N4iEvgon4m m M XI)J
City of Sanford, Florida
W
OV
N
0
W V
0
O
O
A
O
D
O
O
O
t:d
a
w M
W
O O
W
O
O
\
r ci
O
0
0
r
V
I�
V 1
RMJ°=CENTRAL
17:a+rRK.F"`"°%"'D
FLORIDA ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, LLC
1111"G °ZHASTER PLAN COVER SHEET
■
IIIC Re,G. Rxgm BW�d� 101
THE SHARING COMONS
;
/�
fl
AT FIVE POINTS, PD
IN
�
h
: g�
5rY`
on•e n..ew. Iw>I JOFNO
�•• ¢�°w (�� JJ^-�+
wet • N4iEvgon4m m M XI)J
City of Sanford, Florida
Arp 1E XPl
V CO4C
I
I
TUCKER DR,ye
OW E 6eJ fa.
66' R -�F Foam
_ g( F
7 " V
r a �
- e2
g ram miHza x� n • - /fcZ+( N4
@
11
TIM FLORIDA ENONEERING CGNSULTANTS, LLC
11M nnF MASTER PLAN
a•..er
IN m
"-a
I�
VlL4 °x•t"9"`""9-"'""-"'9
THE SHARING COMONS
�N
iwco•"+�
��>�"'a
AT FIVE POINTS, PD
oor
!� a r�
_ �.. m
_ ao
City of Sanford. Florida
sae
s
tc
ZA —
o a—
a � `
5 a a 5
ZP
N
o
--
EL
@
11
TIM FLORIDA ENONEERING CGNSULTANTS, LLC
11M nnF MASTER PLAN
a•..er
IN m
"-a
I�
VlL4 °x•t"9"`""9-"'""-"'9
THE SHARING COMONS
�N
iwco•"+�
��>�"'a
AT FIVE POINTS, PD
n
nx., (w>) sos-m+o
•ww.aMedm•,a ® xn 1T)l
City of Sanford. Florida
sae
M Iz A9
EL
v
;i
`f
\ Cy 4�,•N / 0 i F�Bi rp �$ 4�� ���8 or E
1911,
ERR
• - M n � � 'i, q' o � K —a—��
, . S .
cl
A Pp—
zz Z-
ai
zp
it
t
�� � mxaecm>uzm _ 4R
ti s f i aa.eCENTRAL RORiDA ENgNEERINq CONSULTANTS, LLC oaAwnc nn[ MASTER PLAN
la THE SHARING COMONS
;p�„kns3210 AT FIVE POINTS, PD
City of Sanford, Florida
v EL
TUR"DR. � -su a � .o •f tm� ♦f o ��-rAi .�It� ��w
,;,�
fid
;i
`f
\ Cy 4�,•N / 0 i F�Bi rp �$ 4�� ���8 or E
1911,
ERR
• - M n � � 'i, q' o � K —a—��
, . S .
cl
A Pp—
zz Z-
ai
zp
it
t
�� � mxaecm>uzm _ 4R
ti s f i aa.eCENTRAL RORiDA ENgNEERINq CONSULTANTS, LLC oaAwnc nn[ MASTER PLAN
la THE SHARING COMONS
;p�„kns3210 AT FIVE POINTS, PD
City of Sanford, Florida
m a c
n�
NO.O
N s
4■ Offiffi I L
������.� �■■IAI■■I i■■1111��-J�I■lll��. j:, �I'
�: ��®r�� ' JIG-.��Qs.-'-_n�i�,�::'.•1. ..
.�
a
fill
+�
--1
W jl
�CENIRAL FLORIDA ENGINEERINGCONSULTANiS,FLC
wbg-9-ildff—�
ORA�� "E MASTER PLAN
THE SHARING COMONS
AT FIVE POINTS, PD
City of Sanford, Florida
-- -
ss
�gm
•
?, .�.� ^P=z
TUCKER DR.�°
66' ROW
- gL YW
L= - L
m •- g to -
:� ^•� TiN y
v 1
o
G
ig -
m -
=o0
zz
m a c
n�
NO.O
N s
4■ Offiffi I L
������.� �■■IAI■■I i■■1111��-J�I■lll��. j:, �I'
�: ��®r�� ' JIG-.��Qs.-'-_n�i�,�::'.•1. ..
.�
p
a
fill
+�
�CENIRAL FLORIDA ENGINEERINGCONSULTANiS,FLC
wbg-9-ildff—�
ORA�� "E MASTER PLAN
THE SHARING COMONS
AT FIVE POINTS, PD
City of Sanford, Florida
��
4z
�gm
•
?, .�.� ^P=z
_�c'��e Vii.
- gL YW
L= - L
m •- g to -
:� ^•� TiN y
e a a
� �� E
o
G
ig -
m -
=o0
zz
° a a a_ a'
St
zA
1 d v'•
p
a
fill
+�
�CENIRAL FLORIDA ENGINEERINGCONSULTANiS,FLC
wbg-9-ildff—�
ORA�� "E MASTER PLAN
THE SHARING COMONS
AT FIVE POINTS, PD
City of Sanford, Florida
1
L
c�
z4
3msK
---------- -- ----
dy
O Z O
o• o.
N = N
O 011 G
+ D n ITT
f
3 c'
C13
TDC
!I
s
N C
m
cn
O m v --1-F
3 =
1
L
c�
z4
— — -
---------- -- ----
- -
u, z
WA.4 nu MASTER PLAN
THE SHARING COMONS
AT FIVE POINTS, PD
City of Sanford, Florida
N = N
O 011 G
odv.a M
f
TUCKER OR.
66' Row
+ y
'
CD m
CT
+ m F.
m
\
ti
i
71
a`
�1 ani
�
I •s §' �
���
%
aCD
Cg
1
L
c�
z4
r�
!1
;�
;8
-
CENTRAL RGROA ENgNEEPoNG CONAATANTS, LLC
`" `'`'"° `"""""'
vr. Iw*1 sw-nio
WA.4 nu MASTER PLAN
THE SHARING COMONS
AT FIVE POINTS, PD
City of Sanford, Florida
N = N
O 011 G
odv.a M
f
m (D O7
O y C
CD m
CT
+ m F.
4
(D
aCD
Cg
a Q
--
o s
z
C
N
in
Z
�
�
� a
a
J
L
!1
;�
r 'w
CENTRAL RGROA ENgNEEPoNG CONAATANTS, LLC
`" `'`'"° `"""""'
vr. Iw*1 sw-nio
WA.4 nu MASTER PLAN
THE SHARING COMONS
AT FIVE POINTS, PD
City of Sanford, Florida
odv.a M
J