HomeMy WebLinkAbout883-Glatting Jackson W.O. 09 WORK ORDER
FOR
PROFESSIONAL PLANNING, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL, ARCHITECHTURAL AND
ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT
(RFPS 00/01 - 08)
WORK ORDER NO.: 09
PURCHASE ORDER NO.:
PROJECT:
CITY:
CONSULTANT:
JACKSON)
(For billing purposes only, to be assigned by
CITY after execution.)
Ft. Mellon Park Final Site Plan
SANFORD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF FLORiDA
GLATTING JACKSON KERCHF. R ANGLIN LOPEZ RINEHART~ INC (GLATTING
Execution of the Work Order by CITY shall serve as authorization for the CONSULTANT to provide for the
above project, professional services as set out in the Scope of Services attached as Exhibit "A," to that certain
Agreement between the CITY and the CONSULTANT and further delineated in the specifications, conditions and
requirements stated in the following listed documents which are attached hereto and made a part hereof.
ATTACHMENTS:
[ ] DRAWINGS/PLANS/SPECIFICATIONS
[X] SCOPE OF SERVICES
[ ] SPECIAL CONDITIONS
The CONSULTANT shall provide said services pursuant to this Work Order, its attachments and the above-
referenced Agreement, which is incorporated herein by reference as if it had been set out in its entirety. Whenever
the Work Order conflicts with said Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail.
TIME FOR COMPLETION: The work authorized by this Work Order shall be commenced upon issuance
of a Notice to Proceed by CITY and shall be completed within ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) calendar
days.
METHOD OF COMPENSATION:
(a) This Work Order is issued on a:
[X] FIXED FEE BASIS
[ ] TIME BASIS METHOD WITH A NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT
[ ] TIME BASIS METHOD WITH A LIMITATION OF FUNDS AMOUNT
(b) Compensation is based on a "Fixed Fee Basis" with a Not-to-Exceed Amount, then the
CONSULTANT shall perform all work required by this Work Order for a sum not exceeding $ Sixty five thousand
seven hundred and fifty-nine dollars, ($65,759.00). In no event shall the CONSULTANT be paid more than the
Fixed Fee Amount.
Payment to the Consultant shall be made by the CITY in strict accordance with the payment terms of the
above-referenced Agreement.
It is expressly understood by the CONSULTANT that this Work Order, until executed by the CITY,
does not authorize the performance of any services by the CONSULTANT and that the CITY, prior to its
execution of the Work Order, reserves the right to authorize a party other than the CONSULTANT to perform
the services called for under this Work Order if it is determined that to do so is in the best interest of the CITY.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this Work Order
on this c~
ATTEST:
dayof c~]~
Sharon K. Lamantia, Secretary
(CORPORATE SEAL)
ATTEST:
By:
Date:
,20Oc~ for the pur~
~ses stated herein.
JANE[DOUGHERTY
Clerk to the
City Commission
Sanford, Florida.
CITY COMMISSION
D, F A
Brady Lessard, M.~YOR
Date: '[/'Z 5--A g--.
GLATTING
~ACKSON
KERCHER
ANGLIN
LOPEZ
RINEHART
David L. Barth
Jay H. Exum
Jack E Glattmg
Carey S Hayo
Jay ]K. Hood
Timothy T Jackson
William C. Kercher, Jr.
Walter M Kulash
Sharon K. Lamantia
S. P. aymond Lopez
John H. Percy
John E Ranehart
Gregory A. Bryla
Dawd R. Claus
Charles E Cobble
Michael R. Cochran
Jeflhey S Collins
Pdchard E. Durr, Jr
Bruce C. Hall
David M. Kumer
Frank A Jaskiewicz
Gaff D. Lacey
William D Lites
Edward J. McKinney
Thomas J. McMacken. Jr.
Douglas A. Metzger
John J. Moore 111
Timothy R Palermo
Troy E Russ
Jodi L R. unnann
Kelley J. Samuels
Peter C. Sechler
Nathan E Silva
Laura K.Wur ner
Ronald L. Urbaniak
G Wade Walker
Gary E Warner
Community
Planning
33 East Pine Street
Orlando, Florida 32801
P: 407 843 6552
F: 407 839 1789
www. glatting.com
License # EB 0005812
Exhibit A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Professional Planning, Landscape Architectural,
Architectural and Engineering Services
City of Sanford: RFPS 00/01 - 8
WORK ORDER NO.: 09
Ft. Mellon Park - Final Site Plan
Glatting Jackson Project No. 16871.0
August 1,2002
The Glatting Jackson team is pleased to provide this scope of services to the City of
Sanford, hereinafter referred to as City.
1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
1.1
The project is the Final Site Planning of Ft. Mellon Park in Sanford as a first step
toward a full construction document. The planned vision for the park was initially
depicted at a conceptual level in the Downtown Plan. Ft. Mellon Park is bounded
by Seminole Boulevard, Sanford Avenue, First Street and San Juan Avenue. The
Western portion of the site from Sanford Avenue has been included in a separate
RFQ for the development ora Conference Center by Seminole County. The Client
is the City and Owner of Ft. Mellon Park.
1.2
The Client desires to retain Glatting Jackson to assist as the Project Landscape
Architect to develop more detailed Site Plan drawings for the park, including the
following specific criteria:
1.21 Hotel Conference Center. Westem end ofPark is reserved for a Hotel
Conference Center by Others. The Plan will include the most recent available footprint
for this development.
1.22 Community Center Recreation Activities. Eastern end of the Park is
envisioned as a Community Center with neighborhood recreational facilities as
shown in the Downtown Plan. The Site Plan for this area will be developed with
capabilities based on need.
1.23 Museum Expansion. The Design shall include capability for expansion of
the Sanford Museum.
1.24 Grand Park Space. The Final Site Plan shall include park amenities including
strolling paths, band shell pavilion, landscape and park amenities as described in
the Downtown Plan.
1.25 Lake CarolaJSite Drainage. The Final Site Plan shall outline solutions for
Glaning Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
Page I of 4
2.0
PART
2.1
site drainage and general site infrastructure. This shall include the requirement of
Lake Carola to be redeveloped as an expanded landscape feature, possibly
hardscaped, and with the capability of accepting up to 80% of the stormwater from
the Hotel/Conference Center site.
1.26 Cost Estimates and Phasing. The Final Site Plan shall include schematic
level cost estimates, and a summary of Phasing Options based on review with the
Client. The concluded Final Site Plan and Cost Estimates are intended to be at
sufficient detail to begin Construction Documents on a selected Phase 1 (which
may actually include the entire park) as a next step.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
I - Base Information, Meetings and Programming
Project Management and Coordination of Subconsuitants - Glatting Jackson
shall manage the project with the Client and coordinate the work of subconsultants.
Additional professionals working under direct contract to Glatting Jackson shall
include:
2.2
2.3
Nodarse & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical
WBQ Design & Engineering Civil Engineering
PEC, Inc. Surveying
Meetings - Glatting Jackson shall meet with the Client up to five (5) times to review
progress and status of the project. This shall include a team Kick Off Meeting,
programming discussions with City Staff project team and review of interim design
submittals. Additional meetings shall be provided as an additional service to this
agreement.
Base Material - Glatting Jackson shall obtain basic survey and soils information
necessary to support the work according to the attached scopes of service for the
geotechnical, civil engineer and survey subconsultants. (Attachments A, B, and C)
The Client shall provide any other available background information on site
utilities, infrastructure, buildings, Hotel/Conference Center plans, or other
program/expansion requirements.
PART II - Final Site Design
2.4
Infrastructure Evaluation - Glatting Jackson will coordinate the work of WBQ
in evaluating the infrastructure/utility issues necessary to support the site. This
evaluation shall be primarily focused on stormwater issues necessary to
accommodate the plan, and 80% of the Conference Center site. This evaluation
shall include review of soil and survey data, volume calculations, and a pre-
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
Page 2 of 4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
application meeting with St. John's River Water Management District to determine
the proposed permitting criteria for the site.
Deliverable: Based on the Final Site Plan, the team shall produce a technical
memorandum outlining options for stormwater management and recommendations
for further study if applicable. Additionally, the team shall produce construction
documents to a schematic level, showing proposed ponds, water and wastewater
lines and shall prepare a preliminary opinion of probable cost.
Site Plan Alternatives - Based on initial survey, drainage and infrastructure
information, as well as programming input from the Client and the Steering
Committee, Glatting Jackson shall develop up to three (3) alternative layouts for
Ft. Mellon Park. Glatting Jackson shall review these plans one (1) time with the
Client and one (1) time with the Steering Committee £or the purpose of identifying
preferred aspects of the various plans. We do not anticipate making revisions to the
Site Plan Alternatives during this review process. If revisions or additional
alternatives are requested by the Client, they shall be provided as an additional
service.
Deliverable: Three (3) hand drawn plans of Ft. Mellon Park at a scale
approximately 1 "=100~ over a computer survey base.
Preliminary Final Site Plan - Based on review of the preliminary site plan
alternatives, Glatting Jackson shall develop a preliminary preferred Final Site Plan.
Glat~ing Jackson shall review this draft plan one (1) time with the Client for the
purpose of confirming preferred aspects of the plan and identifying phasing
options. A preliminary opinion of cost shall be developed at this level.
Deliverable: One (1) plan of Ft. Mellon Park at a scale of approximately l"=100'
over a computer survey base. Some items, such as hardscape, will be generated on
AutoCAD, other items, such as landscape, shall be hand drawn. Draft Schematic
Level Cost Estimate.
Final Site Plan - Based on review of the draft Final Site Plan, the Final Site Plan
will be prepared in AutoCAD for use in the schematic Engineering Construction
drawings and as a base for a final Illustrated Plan.
Deliverable: AutoCAD based Site Plan of the Park. Final Site Plan shall be
incorporated into Schematic Engineering Documents outlined in 2.4. Schematic
Opinion of Probable Cost will be provided with identified Phase I development
plan cost also estimated.
Supportive Graphic Illustrations - Glatting Jackson shall produce limited (as
defined below) elevation, sketch and plan graphics to describe the design ideas.
These graphics will be made available to the Client in print form and to the public
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
Page 3 of 4
3.0
(viathewebsite).
Deliverable: Products include: a hand illustrated plan rendering of the park at a
scale of approximately 1'=100', up to two (2) perspective sketches of the park, and
one to two (1-2) other illustrated details or diagrams to describe the park. These
graphics will be presented in a 30"x42" presentation poster.
ASSIGNED PERSONNEL
The following personnel from Glatting Jackson will be assigned to this project, and
will have the responsibilities described:
William C. Kercher, Jr. -
Peter C. Sechler -
Jeffrey Figueras Manuel-
4.0 COMPENSATION
4.1
4.2
4.3
Principal-In-Charge
Project Manager/Landscape Architect 5
Landscape Designer 2
The fee for Parts I and 11 shall be a lump sum of the following parts, including
direct expenses and is broken down as follows.
Part I - The fee for Part 1 shall be billed as a lump sum of Twenty two thousand,
one hundred thirty two dollars ($22,132.00), including direct expenses.
Part II - The fee for Part II shall be billed as a lump sum of Forty three thousand,
six hundred and twenty seven dollars ($43,627.00), including direct expenses.
Part III - The fee for Additional Services, shall be billed using the attached
Hourly Rate Schedule or as an agreed upon fixed fee.
4.4 Hourly Rate Schedule / Other Direct Costs - Please refer to the attached Hourly
Rate Schedule for hourly rate charges and for information concerning other direct costs.
4.5 Subconsultant Fees - Fees for subconsultants working on this project under direct
contract with Glatting Jackson are listed below. These fees are included in the fees
detailed above.
Nodarse & Associates Geotechnical $ 2,275.00
WBQ Design and Engineering Civil Engineer 18,899.00
PEC, Inc. Surveying 9,850.00
4.6 Retainer - No retainer will be required.
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
Page 4 of 4
ProjectName: Ft. Mellon Park Final Site Plan
Project Number: 16871.0
GLATTING JACKSON KERCHER ANGLIN LOPEZ RINEHART, INC.
HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE
Principal 3 $200 Ecologist 3 $105
Principal 2 $175 Ecologist 2 $85
Principal 1 $150 Ecologist I $65
Planner 4 $125 Landscape Architect 4 $125
Planner 3 $105 Landscape Architect 3 $105
Planner 2 $85 Landscape Architect 2 $85
Planner 1 $65 Landscape Designer 2 $75
Transportation Engineer 4 $150 Landscape Designer 1 $65
Transportation Planner 5 $150 G1S Specialist 2 $85
Transportation Planner 4 $125 GIS Specialist 1 $65
Transportation Planner 3 $105 Graphic Artist 2 $85
Transportation Planner 2 $85 Graphic Artist 1 $65
Transportation Planner 1 $65 Administrative Assistant $50
Ecologist 4 $125 Technician $50
Increase In Hourly Rates - Glatting Jackson shall conduct a review of hourly rates on an annual basis
and may, upon notification to the Client, increase such rates in our sole discretion.
Other Direct Costs - Other direct costs incurred in completing the scope of services are included in the
fees for each part of the Scope of Services detailed in the Agreement. Other direct costs may include, but
are not limited to, costs for reproduction, printing, photocopying, photography, courier services,
automobile mileage and other expenses. Direct costs for any Additional Services shall be negotiated
under separate agreement.
Application Fees- All application, filing, and permit fees, including, without limitation, all fees to local,
regional and state governments and agencies, shall be paid by the Client directly to the appropriate agency
at the required time.
Client Initials_~
Glatting Jackson Initials
Glattlng ,Jackson Kercher A nglin Lopez Rinehart, lnc
rev February 2001
~REgDENT
Leila Nodarse,ZE.
SENIOR RCE PI~SEDENT
Michael PreJm,
VICE PRESIDENTS
Richard Acree,
Darlene Bradley
Daniel Dunham,
Da.eli HanechJ, RE.
Sylvia Jammal
Fouad MasrJ, RE.
Daniel Stan f~ll,
David Twedell
Sandra Winkler
!
!
!
1030 N. Orlando AVenue
Su~eA
Winter Po~ FL 32789
Phone: 407148.6110
Fax: 407J4g.h112
nodan~@nodarS~com
Attachment A
July 18, 2002
Project No. W02-G-276
9DARSE
Geotechnicol, Environmentol Consulting & Moteriols Engineering
Mr. Peter C. Sechler
Glatting Jackson, Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
33 East Pine Street
Orlando, Florida 32801
Proposal to Provide a Preliminary Subsurface Exploration and
Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation
Fort Melon Park Improvements
Sanford, Florida
Dear Mr. Sechler:
Nodarse & Associates, Inc. (N&A) is pleased to present this proposal for providing a
preliminary subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering evaluation for the
above-referenced project. The purpose of the exploration is to obtain geotechnical
engineering data to assist in site development at the above-referenced site. This proposal
outlines our understanding of the project, presents a recommended scope of services, and
contains a time and cost estimate for providing those services.
SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project site is approximately 18 acres in size and is bordered to the north by
Seminole Boulevard, to the south by First Street, to the west by Sanford Avenue and to
the east by San Juan Avenue in Sanford, Florida. Based on supplied information, it is
our understanding that improvements are proposed for the existing Fort Melon Park in
Downtown Sanford. It is also our understanding that the western portion of the site may
include a County Convention Center. The remainder of the site will primarily consist
of "green areas" with some recreational courts and minor facilities. Lake Corolla,
located toward the central portion of the site, may be expanded/improved to
accommodate additional stormwater from site development.
PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES
The proposed scope of services is based on the supplied information and our experience
in the area with sites and projects similar to this one. Our exploration is planned to
include the following:
BUILD ON OUR EXPERIENCE
JACKSONVILLE · ORMOND BEACH · TAMPA · WEST PA~ BEACH · WINTER PARK
Glatting Jackson, Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
Nodarse & Associates, Inc. Project No. W02-G-276
Page 2
Allow up to two (2) days for a senior engineering technician to perform a site
reconnaissance, stake boring locations, coordinate underground utility clearance
at the site, perform about eighteen (18) hand auger borings to depths of about 6
feet throughout the site, and muck probing, if necessary.
Mobilize mud bug drilling equipment and crew to the site.
Perform two (2) machine auger borings to depths of about 12 feet adjacent to
Lake Corolla. Also obtain one (1) soil sample for laboratory permeability
testing.
Perform visual classification and required laboratory testing of the soil samples
obtained from the borings. Laboratory testing may include grain size and/or
organic content analysis to verify visual classification of soil types. Laboratory
testing will also include one (1) falling head permeability test on a soil sample
obtained adjacent to Lake Corolla.
· Analyze the field and laboratory data to develop preliminary geotechnical
engineering recommendations for future site development.
The exploration will be supervised by a qualified geotechnical engineer registered in the
state of Florida, and the results of the exploration will be presented in a geotechnical
engineering report. This report will address the following items:
· Existing site conditions.
· Exploration, testing and sampling methods.
· Subsurface soil conditions encountered and soil classifications.
· Depth to groundwater at the time of the exploration and estimated seasonal high
groundwater levels.
· A preliminary geotechnical engineering evaluation of the general suitability of
the soil and groundwater conditions for future development.
PROJECT SCItEDULE
Based on our present schedule, we are prepared to mobilize to begin the field operations
on this project within about three (3) to five (5) days of your authorization to proceed.
We anticipate the field portion of the study to be completed in approximately two (2) to
Glatting Jackson, Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
Nodarse & Associates, Inc. Project No. W02-G-276
Page 3
three (3) days. Engineering analysis, necessary laboratory work, and report preparation
should be completed within approximately one (1) to two (2) weeks after the completion
of field work.
ESTIMATED COSTS
For budgetary planning, we can perform the described geotechnical services for a lump
sum of $2,275.00. In computing this budget figure, we have assumed the site is
accessible to our field crew, that we have right of entry to the site, and that we will not
experience excessive delays due to rubble at borehole locations or for other reasons
beyond our control. If such conditions are encountered that could cause the cost of the
exploration to exceed the budget figure, we will notify the client and obtain approval for
the additional work before we proceed.
AUTHORIZATION
To authorize us to proceed with this project, please execute and return to us a copy of
the attached Proposal Acceptance Sheet. Authorization should be indicated by the
person or firm responsible for payment of our invoice. Please note the attached
Acceptance Sheet forms a part of this proposal and that our terms are "Net 30 Days."
CLOSURE
N&A appreciates the opportunity to submit this proposal, and we look forward to
working with you on this project. If you have any questions or if we can provide any
additional information, please feel free to call us at your convenience.
Sincerely,
NODARSE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
'as N. Jammal, E.I.
Project Engineer
Richard G. Acree, P.E.
Senior Geotechnical Engineer
Vice President
Attachment: Agreement
Attachment B
~"Design & Engineering
July 15, 2002
Mr. Pete Sechler, Project Manager
Glattmg, Jackson, Kercher, Anglin, Lopez & Rhinehart, Inc.
33 E. Pine Street
Orlando, Florida 32801
Re~
Civil Engineering Services Proposal
Fort Mellon Park- Schematic Design
Dear Pete:
WBQ De. sign & .Engineering, Inc. is pleased to present this proposal for additional professional civil
engmeenng sermces. Our scope of services and proposed fees are attached. We look forward to
working w/th you on this project.
Sincerely,
WBQ Design & Engineering, Inc.
Derek Burke, P.E.
President
Enclosures
201 N. Magnolia Avenue · Suite 200 · Orlando, FL 32801
(407) 839-4300 · Fax: (407) 839-1621 · E-mail: wbq@wbq.com
FORT MELLON PARK
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
CML ENGINEERING SERVICES
GENERAL DESCRIPTION
WBQ will provide the following services:
· General analysis of existing site, including review of survey and soils data for
suitability for planned redevelopment.
· Detailed analysis of Lake Carolla for the purpose of modification of lake to
accommodate 80% of required Stormwater Runoff volume and treatment
requirement for the planned Seminole Conference Center site.
· Schematic Engineering drawing showing general stormwater/drainage approach
for site, including general pipe sizing.
· Informal review with SJRWMD to discuss proposed improvements for the site,
including Lake Carolla.
· Sttmmary Memorandum outlining solutions, schematic level opinion of cost, and
permitting issues.
Il.
ASSEMBLE DATA
WBQ will review existing site data for the study area, including hydrologic data, flooding
history, and documentation of hydraulic structures. In addition, WBQ will assemble data and
information from coordination meetings with the City of Sanford. Field reconnaissance will
be performed to verify the extent and condition of the stormwater basins and the flood
control structures in the study area. The data collected will be used as the basis for the
stormwater management plan. Soils and survey data, provided by others, will be reviewed
and the data incorporated into the engineering analysis.
III. MEETINGS/COORDINATION
IV.
WBQ will attend 4 meetings with the client and/or jurisdictional agencies and 4 meetings
with the design team to coordinate activities and discuss project direction. The meetings
include a pre-application meeting with St. Johns River Water Management District to
determine the proposed permitting criteria for the site.
SITE STORMWATER OPTIONS
WBQ will identify stormwater flow patterns and develop a drainage basin map for the study
area including Lake Carolla. A maximum of two stormwater management options will be
developed. The intent is to provide attenuation and treatment of stormwater for the
1
development of the park. In addition, 80% of the runoff that will be generated from the
proposed Sanford Conference Center will be managed in Lake Carolla, if feasible. WBQ will
generate preliminary drainage calculations in accordance with City of Sanford design
standards and St. Johns River Water Management District criteria. These preliminary
drainage calculations will include treatment volume calculations and detention pond sizing.
WATER AND SEWER OPTIONS
WBQ will identify a maximum of two options for wastewater collection, potable water
supply and site fire protection. WBQ will review as-built data provided by the City of
Sanford and field survey data. An analysis of flow demand and existing treatment capacities
will be completed. Recommendations for upgrades to supply sources will be provided if
necessary.
VI. EXHIBITS AND DOCUMENTS
WBQ will document the results of the stormwater analysis in a brief Technical
Memorandum. The Memorandum will identify opportunities and constraints related to
stormwater management strategies for future development, and alternative stormwater
management strategies as applicable. The Memorandum will also provide recommendations
for areas of further study and analysis.
Construction documents will be developed to a schematic level. Proposed ponds and storm
structures will be shown together with preliminary pipe sizes. Water supply and wastewater
collection lines will be shown. A preliminary opinion of probable cost for site development
will be developed based on the schematic construction documents.
The following items are clarifications to this proposal:
1. The terms and conditions of this proposal are valid for 12 months.
2. Public meetings are not included.
3. Review fees required by the City Building Department are not included. Submittal/Review
fees to the permitting agencies are also not included.
4. Permitting is not included.
5. Survey and geotechnical information will be provided to WBQ.
2
planners
Attachment C
PEC
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC,
July 23, 2002
JUL 2. 4
, C,l~ting Jackson
~nglin Lopez Rinehart~'lnc.
Mr. Peter Sechler
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart Inc.
33 East Pine Street
Orlando, Florida 32801
PSDW4-CS
Dear Mr Sechler:
Re: Fort Mellon Park, Phase 2
Professional Engineering Consultants, Inc. (PEC) is pleased to submit our proposal for
professional surveying and mapping services in connection with the above referenced site.
We propose to perform a boundary and topographic survey of the site. The project site is
defined as Mellon Park being bounded by Sanford Avenue, First Street, Sna Juan Avenue and
Seminole boulevard.
The boundary survey will locate all above ground improvements. The location survey will
include the adjacent streets and seawall. A legal description of the site will be prepared of the
project site. The topographic survey will establish elevations on the site. Two site benchmarks
Mil be established. Elevations will be based on mean sea level relative to Seminole County
benchmarks. All trees will also be located. Utility inverts will be measured and other
underground utilities will be surveyed based on the above ground markings of the utility
locating agencies.
The survey will then be merged with the previous survey to culminate in a signed and sealed
boundary survey manuscript and CADD file of the entire Mellon Park block. The survey will
also include the topography of the small pond/lake bottom.
We are prepared to commence immediately, upon notice to proceed, and anticipate completion
of the survey of this assignment within ten (10) working days. We propose to perform the
boundary survey for $ 9,850.00 dollars. Thank you for the opportunity of submitting this
proposal.
Very truly yours,
fi~FESSIONAL EN .GINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC.
~Yavid A. White, P.S.M.
Vice President
' ~, ,~=.--8~2 ' FA>'~07849 9401