1419 CDBG FY 2011-2012 Action PlanW 9
Letter Of Transmittal
Date: August 5, 2011
To: Jan Dougherty, City Clerk
City of Sanford, FL
300 N. Park Ave.
Sanford, FL 32771
Re: City of Sanford Annual Action Plan 2011 -2012
CPH Job # S06119
�h
500 West Fulton Street:'
Sanford, Florida 3277'
P.O. Box 2808
Sanford, Florida 32772 -2$08
Phone: 407.322.684f -.."
Fax: 407.330.0639 ;z
www.cpliengineers.com ,
WE ARE SENDING YOU THE ATTACHED ITEM(S):
NO. OF COPIES
DESCRIPTION
1
Copy of the Annual Action Plan
THESE ITEMS ARE TRANSMITTED AS INDICATED BELOW:
X For Your Use
As Requested
REMARKS:
For Review and Comment
For Bids Due
COPY TO: File SIGNED: Brady Lessard
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
=187 7-1
www.sanfordfl.gov
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY OF SANFORD
POST OFFICE BOX 1788
SANFORD, FL 32772 -1788
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
CITY HALL
300 NORTH PARK AVENUE
SANFORD, FL 32771 -1244
TELEPHONE
407.688.5001
FACSIMILE
407.688.5002
CITY COMMISSION
• .JEFF TRIPLETT
MAYOR
MARK M
DISTRICT 1
VELMA H. WILLIAMS
DISTRICT 2
RANDY.IONES
DISTRICT 3
PATTY MAHANY
DISTRICT 4
THOMAS GEORGE
INTERIM CITY MANAGER
•
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION
August 10, 2011
Mr. Gary Causey, Director
Community Planning and Development
US Department of Housing and Urban Development
Charles E. Bennett Federal Building
400 W. Bay Street, Suite 1015
Jacksonville, FL 32202
ATTENTION: Ms Lugia C. Milanese, Community Planning and
Development Representative
SUBJECT: Submission of: City of Sanford
2011— 2012 One -Year Action Plan
Dear Mr. Causey:
Enclosed you will find three (3) binders of the above subject plans. As required,
one (1) of the submitted plans contains the original signature of the Mayor, (and is
marked "Original') the other two (2) binders contain copies of the plan with copies
of the original signatures. The required submission of a compact disk of the plans
is located in the pocket of the binder that is marked "Original ".
If you have any questions, please call Mr. Andrew Thomas, Senior Project
Manager at 407 - 688 -5132.
Sincerely,
Jeff R
Mayor
0 SECTION 1: Forms
TABLE OF CONTENTS ANNUAL ACTION PLAN
Standard Form 424 91.220 ( a) ........................................... ........................... #1 -2
Certifications91. 225 .................................................................................. .......................... #3 -11
SECTION 2: Narrative Responses
ExecutiveSummary 91.220 ( b) ........................................................... ............................... #12 -14
CitizenParticipation 91.200 (b) .......................................................... ............................... #15 -16
Resources91.220 (c) (1) and (c) (2) ................................................... ............................... #16 -17
Annual Objectives 91.220 (c) ( 3) ........................................................ ............................... #17 -18
Description of Activities 91.220 (d) and (e) ....................................... ............................... #18 -21
Geographic Distribution/Allocation Priorities 91.220 (d) and ( f) ....... ............................... #22 -27
Annual Affordable Housing Goals 91.220 ( g) .................................... ............................... #27 -29
PublicHousing 91.220 (h) .................................................................. ............................... #29 -30
• Homeless and Special Needs 91.220 ( i) ............................................... ............................... #31 -32
Barriers to Affordable Housing 91.2200) ................................................... ............................ #32
Other Actions 91.220 ( k) ..................................................................... ............................... #32 -34
CDBG 91.220 (1) (1) ........................................................................... ............................ #35
HOME 91.220 (1) (2) is not applicable as the City of Sanford is neither a participating jurisdiction nor
a member of a home consortium.
HOPWA 91.220 (1) (3) Housing Opportunities for People With Aids ( HOPWA), is not applicable. The
City of Orlando is the HOPWA grantee for the Orlando- Kissimmee - Sanford Metropolitan Statistical Area
(MSA)
SECTION 3: Appendices
Appendix A Summary of Citizen Comments
Appendix B Public Hearings (Ads, Agenda, Minutes)
Appendix C CDBG Substantial Amendment
0 Appendix D Project/Activity Sheets
•
•
•
A " V
kA"�q y` f-i i.
Complete the fellable fields (blue cells) in the table below. The other items are pre - filled with values from the Grantee
Information Worksheet.
SF 424
The SF 424 is part of the CPMP Annual Action Plan. SF 424 form fields are
included in this document. Grantee information is linked from the 1 CPMP.xls
document of the CPMP tool.
Date Submitted 08/10/2011 Applicant Identifier
Type of Submission
Date Received by state N/A State Identifier
Pre-application
_ Application
Federal Identifier
Date Received by HUD 08/10/2011
❑ Construction ❑ Construction
® Non Construction ❑ Non Construction
A pplicant Information
J urisdiction City of Sanford, Florida
UOG Code 122574
Street Address Line 1: 300 N. Park Avenue
Organizational DUNS: 064796089
Street Address Line 2
Organizational Unit C (Municipal
City: Sanford Florida
Department: Office of City Manager
ZIP: 32771 Count : U.S.A.
Division: Office of City Manager
Employer Identification Number (EIN):
County: Seminole
59- 6000425
Program Year Start Date: 10/01/2011
A pplicant Type:
Specify Other Type if necessary:
Local Government: Township
Specify Other Type
Program Funding
U.S. Department oll
Housing and Urban Develo men
Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers; Descriptive Title of Applicant Project(s); Areas Affected by
Project(s) (cities, Counties, localities etc.); Estimated Funding
Community Development Block Grant
14.218 Entitlement Grant
DBG Project Titles Public Services, Public Facilities and
Improvements, Economic Development, Code Enforcement,
Housing Rehabilitation, and Planning/Administration
Description of Areas Affected by CDBG Project(s)
City of Sanford
$CDBG Grant Amount $404,880 $Additional HUD
Grant(s) Leveraged Describe
Additional Federal Funds Leveraged $320,108
outhBuild
Additional State Funds Leveraged
Locally Leveraged Funds
Grantee Funds Leveraged
$Anticipated Program Income
Other (Describe)
Total Funds Leveraged for CDBG -based Project(s) $320,108
Home Investment Partnerships Program
14.239 HOME
HOME Project Titles
Description of Areas Affected by HOME Project(s)
HOME Grant Amount Additional HUD Grant(s) Leveraged Describe
Additional Federal Funds Leveraged
Additional State Funds Leveraged
Locally Leveraged Funds
Grantee Funds Leveraged
Anticipated Program Income
Other (Describe)
otal Funds Leveraged for HOME -based Project(s)
SF 424
Page 1
Version 2.0
�J
•
•
Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS
14.241 HOPWA
HOPWA Project Titles
Description of Areas Affected by HOPWA Project(s)
$ HOPWA Grant Amount Additional HUD Grant(s) Leveraged I Describe
Additional Federal Funds Leveraged
Additional State Funds Leveraged
Locally Leveraged Funds
Grantee Funds Leveraged
$Anticipated Program Income
Other (Describe)
Total Funds Leveraged for HOPWA -based Project(s)
Emergency Shelter Grants Program
14.231 ESG
ESG Project Titles
Description of Areas Affected by ESG Project(s)
ESG Grant Amount Additional HUD Grant(s) Leveraged 7escribe
Additional Federal Funds Leveraged
Additional State Funds Leveraged
Locally Leveraged Funds
Grantee Funds Leveraged
$Anticipated Program Income
Other (Describe)
Total Funds Leveraged for ESG -based Project(s)
Congressional Districts of:
Applicant Districts I Project Districts
3rdDistrict,and 7 District I 3rd District, and 7th District
Is application subject to review by state Executive
Order 12372 Process?
Is the applicant delinquent on any federal debt? If
"Yes" please include an additional document
explaining the situation.
® This application was made available to the
Yes state EO 12372 process for review on State
Clearinghouse August 13, 2010
❑ Program is not covered by EO 12372
No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Program has not been selected by the state
N/A for review
Person to be contacted regarding this application
First Name: Andrew
Middle Initial:
Last Name: Thomas
Title: Senior Project Manager
Phone: 407 - 688 -5132
Fax: 407 - 688 -5002
eMail :andrew.thomas @sanfordfl.gov
Grantee Website:
Other Contact:
http://www.ci.sanford.fl.us/
Signature of Authorized Representative
Date Signed
Thomas J. G orge
Interim City Manager
ugust 01, 2011
SF 424 Page 2 Version 2.0
CERTIFICATIONS
In accordance with the applicable statutes and the regulations governing the consolidated plan
regulations, the jurisdiction certifies that:
Affirmatively Further Fair Housing -- The jurisdiction will affirmatively further fair housing, which
means it will conduct an analysis of impediments to fair housing choice within the jurisdiction, take
appropriate actions to overcome the effects of any impediments identified through that analysis, and
maintain records reflecting that analysis and actions in this regard.
Anti - displacement and Relocation Plan -- It will comply with the acquisition and relocation
requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970,
as amended, and implementing regulations at 49 CFR 24; and it has in effect and is following a residential
antidisplacement and relocation assistance plan required under section 104(d) of the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, in connection with any activity assisted with funding
under the CDBG or HOME programs.
Drug Free Workplace -- It will or will continue to provide a drug -free workplace by:
Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution,
dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace
and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition;
2. Establishing an ongoing drug -free awareness program to inform employees about —
(a) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
(b) The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug -free workplace;
(c) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and
(d) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations
occurring in the workplace;
Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be
given a copy of the statement required by paragraph 1;
Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph I that, as a condition of
employment under the grant, the employee will -
(a) Abide by the terms of the statement; and
(b) Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal
drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such
conviction;
5. Notifying the agency in writing, within ten calendar days after receiving notice under
subparagraph 4(b) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction.
Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title, to every grant
officer or other designee on whose grant activity the convicted employee was working, unless the
Federal agency has designated a central point for the receipt of such notices. Notice shall include
the identification number(s) of each affected grant;
L�
• 6. Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar days of receiving notice under
subparagraph 4(b), with respect to any employee who is so convicted:
(a) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including
termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; or
(b) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or
rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health,
law enforcement, or other appropriate agency;
7. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug -free workplace through
implementation of paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.
Anti - Lobbying -- To the best of the jurisdiction's knowledge and belief:
No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person
for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of
Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in
connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the
making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension,
continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or
cooperative agreement;
• 2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person
for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of
Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in
connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, it will complete and
submit Standard Form -LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its
instructions; and
It will require that the language of paragraph I and 2 of this anti - lobbying certification be
included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants,
and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall
certify and disclose accordingly.
Authority of Jurisdiction -- The consolidated plan is authorized under State and local law (as
applicable) and the jurisdiction possesses the legal authority to carry out the programs for which I t is
seeking funding, in accordance with applicable HUD regulations.
Consistency with plan -- The housing activities to be undertaken with CDBG, HOME, ESG, and
HOPWA funds are consistent with the strategic plan.
Section 3 -- It will comply with section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, and
implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 135.
SignaturgAuthorized OoFial Date
• Title
9
Specific CDBG Certifications
The Entitlement Community certifies that:
Citizen Participation -- It is in full compliance and following a detailed citizen participation plan that
satisfies the requirements of 24 CFR 91.105.
Community Development Plan -- Its consolidated housing and community development plan identifies
community development and housing needs and specifies both short-term and long -term community
development objectives that provide decent housing, expand economic opportunities primarily for
persons of low and moderate income. (See CFR 24 570.2 and CFR 24 part 570)
Following a Plan -- It is following a current consolidated plan (or Comprehensive Housing Affordability
Strategy) that has been approved by HUD.
Use of Funds -- It has complied with the following criteria:
1. Maximum Feasible Priority. With respect to activities expected to be assisted with CDBG
funds, it certifies that it has developed its Action Plan so as to give maximum feasible priority to
activities which benefit low and moderate income families or aid in the prevention or elimination
of slums or blight. The Action Plan may also include activities which the grantee certifies are
designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because
existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community,
• and other financial resources are not available);
2. Overall Benefit. The aggregate use of CDBG funds including section 108 guaranteed loans
during program year(s) , (a period specified by the grantee consisting of one, two,
or three specific consecutive program years), shall principally benefit persons of low and
moderate income in a manner that ensures that at least 70 percent of the amount is expended for
activities that benefit such persons during the designated period;
Special Assessments. It will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements
assisted with CDBG funds including Section 108 loan guaranteed funds by assessing any amount
against properties owned and occupied by persons of low and moderate income, including any fee
charged or assessment made as a condition of obtaining access to such public improvements.
However, if CDBG funds are used to pay the proportion of a fee or assessment that relates to the
capital costs of public improvements (assisted in part with CDBG funds) financed from other
revenue sources, an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to the
public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds.
The jurisdiction will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted with
CDBG funds, including Section 108, unless CDBG funds are used to pay the proportion of fee or
assessment attributable to the capital costs of public improvements financed from other revenue
sources. In this case, an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to
the public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds. Also, in the case of
properties owned and occupied by moderate - income (not low- income) families, an assessment or
charge may be made against the property for public improvements financed by a source other
than CDBG funds if the jurisdiction certifies that it lacks CDBG funds to cover the assessment.
i
Excessive Force -- It has adopted and is enforcing:
A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its
jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non - violent civil rights demonstrations; and
A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or
exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such non - violent civil rights demonstrations
within its jurisdiction;
•
Compliance With Anti - discrimination laws -- The grant will be conducted and administered in
conformity with title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC 2000d), the Fair Housing Act (42 USC
3601 - 3619), and implementing regulations.
Lead -Based Paint -- Its activities concerning lead -based paint will comply with the requirements of 24
CFR Part 35, subparts A, B, J, K and R;
Compliance with Laws -- It will comply with applicable laws.
Signatu� /Authorized Qfficial Date
P 1n i��r G�s� /rlca>rt�ty'
Title
OPTIONAL CERTIFICATION
CDBG
Submit the following certification only when one or more of the activities in the action plan are designed
to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency as specified in 24 CFR
570.208(c):
The grantee hereby certifies that the Annual Plan includes one or more specifically identified
CDBG- assisted activities which are designed to meet other community development needs having
a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health
or welfare of the community and other financial resources are not available to meet such needs.
Signature /Authorized Official Date
Title
•
Specific HOME Certifications
The HOME participating jurisdiction certifies that:
Tenant Based Rental Assistance -- If the participating jurisdiction intends to provide tenant -based rental
assistance:
The use of HOME funds for tenant -based rental assistance is an essential element of the
participating jurisdiction's consolidated plan for expanding the supply, affordability, and
availability of decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable housing.
Eligible Activities and Costs -- it is using and will use HOME funds for eligible activities and costs, as
described in 24 CFR § 92.205 through 92.209 and that it is not using and will not use HOME funds for
prohibited activities, as described in § 92.214.
Appropriate Financial Assistance -- before committing any funds to a project, it will evaluate the
project in accordance with the guidelines that it adopts for this purpose and will not invest any more
HOME funds in combination with other Federal assistance than is necessary to provide affordable
housing.
• Signature /Authorized Official Date
Title
Ej
• ESG Certifications
The Emergency Shelter Grantee certifies that:
Major rehabilitation /conversion -- It will maintain any building for which assistance is used under the
ESG program as a shelter for homeless individuals and families for at least 10 years. If the jurisdiction
plans to use funds for rehabilitation (other than major rehabilitation or conversion), the applicant will
maintain any building for which assistance is used under the ESG program as a shelter for homeless
individuals and families for at least 3 years.
Essential Services and Operating Costs -- Where assistance involves essential services or maintenance,
operation, insurance, utilities and furnishings, it will provide services or shelter to homeless individuals
and families for the period during which the ESG assistance is provided, without regard to a particular site
or structure as long as the same general population is served.
Renovation -- Any renovation carried out with ESG assistance shall be sufficient to ensure that the
building involved is safe and sanitary.
Supportive Services -- It will assist homeless individuals in obtaining appropriate supportive services,
including permanent housing, medical and mental health treatment, counseling, supervision, and other
services essential for achieving independent living, and other Federal State, local, and private assistance.
Matching Funds -- It will obtain matching amounts required under 24 CFR 576.51.
Confidentiality -- It will develop and implement procedures to ensure the confidentiality of records
pertaining to any individual provided family violence prevention or treatment services under any project
assisted under the ESG program, including protection against the release of the address or location of any
family violence shelter project except with the written authorization of the person responsible for the
operation of that shelter.
Homeless Persons Involvement -- To the maximum extent practicable, it will involve, through
employment, volunteer services, or otherwise, homeless individuals and families in constructing,
renovating, maintaining, operating facilities, and providing services assisted through this program.
Consolidated Plan -- It is following a current HUD - approved Consolidated Plan or CHAS.
Discharge Policy - - -- It has established a policy for the discharge of persons from publicly funded
institutions or systems of care (such as health care facilities, foster care or other youth facilities, or
correction programs and institutions) in order to prevent such discharge from immediately resulting in
homelessness for such persons.
HMIS — It will comply with HUD's standards for participation in a local Homeless Management
Information System and the collection and reporting of client -level information.
Signature /Authorized Official Date
0 Title
0
HOPWA Certifications
The HOPWA grantee certifies that:
Activities -- Activities funded under the program will meet urgent needs that are not being met by
available public and private sources.
Building -- Any building or structure assisted under that program shall be operated for the purpose
specified in the plan:
1. For at least 10 years in the case of assistance involving new construction, substantial
rehabilitation, or acquisition of a facility,
2. For at least 3 years in the case of assistance involving non - substantial rehabilitation or repair of a
building or structure.
Signature /Authorized Official Date
Title
•
• APPENDIX TO CERTIFICATIONS
INSTRUCTIONS CONCERNING LOBBYING AND DRUG -FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS:
A. Lobbying Certification
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this
transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for
making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code.
Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of
not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
B. Drug -Free Workplace Certification
By signing and /or submitting this application or grant agreement, the
grantee is providing the certification.
The certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance is placed
when the agency awards the grant. If it is later determined that the grantee
knowingly rendered a false certification, or otherwise violates the requirements
of the Drug -Free Workplace Act, HUD, in addition to any other remedies
available to the Federal Government, may take action authorized under the Drug -
Free Workplace Act.
3. Workplaces under grants, for grantees other than individuals, need not be
• identified on the certification. If known, they may be identified in the
grant application. If the grantee does not identify the workplaces at the
time of application, or upon award, if there is no application, the grantee
must keep the identity of the workplace(s) on file in its office and make
the information available for Federal inspection. Failure to identify all
known workplaces constitutes a violation of the grantee's drug -free
workplace requirements.
Workplace identifications must include the actual address of buildings
(or parts of buildings) or other sites where work under the grant takes
place. Categorical descriptions may be used (e.g., all vehicles of a mass
transit authority or State highway department while in operation, State
employees in each local unemployment office, performers in concert
halls or radio stations).
If the workplace identified to the agency changes during the performance
of the grant, the grantee shall inform the agency of the change(s), if it
previously identified the workplaces in question (see paragraph three).
6. The grantee may insert in the space provided below the site(s) for the
performance of work done in connection with the specific grant:
•
•
Place of Performance (Street address, city, county, state, zip code)
Check _ if there are workplaces on file that are not identified here.
The certification with regard to the drug -free workplace is required by 24 CFR part 24, subpart F.
Definitions of terms in the Nonprocurement Suspension and Debarment
common rule and Drug -Free Workplace common rule apply to this
certification. Grantees' attention is called, in particular, to the following
definitions from these rules:
"Controlled substance" means a controlled substance in Schedules I
through V of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812) and as
further defined by regulation (21 CFR 1308.11 through 1308.15);
"Conviction" means a finding of guilt (including a plea of nolo
contendere) or imposition of sentence, or both, by any judicial body
charged with the responsibility to determine violations of the Federal or
State criminal drug statutes;
• "Criminal drug statute" means a Federal or non - Federal criminal statute
involving the manufacture, distribution, dispensing, use, or possession of
any controlled substance;
"Employee" means the employee of a grantee directly engaged in the performance of
work under a grant, including: (i) All "direct charge" employees; (ii) all "indirect charge"
employees unless their impact or involvement is insignificant to the performance of the
grant; and (iii) temporary personnel and consultants who are directly engaged in the
performance of work under the grant and who are on the grantee's payroll. This
definition does not include workers not on the payroll of the grantee (e.g., volunteers,
even if used to meet a matching requirement; consultants or independent contractors not
on the grantee's payroll; or employees of subrecipients or subcontractors in covered
workplaces).
00 N op
a) II y
a�
gem oE�ti�
Second Program Year
Action Plan
FY 2011 -2012
Narrative Responses
Annual Action Plan includes the SF 424 and is due every year no less than 45 days prior to the
start of the grantee's program year start date. HUD does not accept plans between August 15
and November 15.
On October 1, 2011 the City of Sanford, Florida will receive $404,880 in Community
Development Block Grant funds as a second year entitlement city under the Jacksonville HUD
Office CPD.
In order to receive these funds in FY 2010, the city was charged with the task of developing and
implementing a 5 year Consolidated Planning Document 2010 -2014 and an Annual Action plan
detailing program activities for 2010 -2011. For year 2010 -2011 the City of Sanford received
$485,388 for the purpose of improving the lives of its citizens through community and
neighborhood development objectives.
A thirty day comment period for the 2011 -2012 One -Year Action Plan began June 20, 2011, and
if any comments were received, they were made to the Office of the City Manager until 5:00
p.m., July 20, 2011. During this period, the One Year Action Plan was in draft form and was
available for public review at the Office of the City Manager, City Hall 300 N. Park Avenue,
Sanford, Florida 32771. A variety of forums are available for citizens to comment on the draft
FY 2011 -12- Action Plan; verbal comments accepted at advertised public hearings, and e -mail
and written comments sent as instructed below. If any public comments were received, they were
forwarded to the City Commissioners prior to their August 8, 2011 meeting for final approval of
the 2011 -2012 One -Year Action Plan.
Contact person: Mr. Andrew Thomas, Sr. Project Manager, Office of the City Manager, City
Hall, Sanford, Florida, 32771. Telephone: 407 - 688 -5132. E -mail address:
andrew.thomas@sanfordfl.gov
•
• Executive Summary 91.220(b)
1. The Executive Summary is required. Include the objectives and outcomes identified in the
plan and an evaluation of past performance.
Program Year 2- Action Plan Executive Summary:
Located close to downtown Sanford, and partly within the CRA are two predominantly and
historically African - American neighborhoods that comprise the City's designated target area:
Goldsboro and Georgetown areas. Collectively, they contain the majority of the City's older,
deteriorating housing stock.
In the past, the City's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding allocation in
partnership with Seminole County's CDBG Program had been utilized within the City's
target areas. These specific neighborhoods will continue to be addressed due to the lack of
adequate resources and the need to establish self- sufficiency among its population.
The total funding allocation for the City of Sanford's FY 2011 -2012 CDBG Program is
$404.880 which represents a 16.5% funding decline from FY 2010 -2011. The funding deficit
will present new challenges for the city in its commitment to fulfill its community
development objectives and goals.
Fifteen percent of the CDBG Program funding is allocated to Public Services. Although
limited funding for public services has always been an issue, the challenge this year will be
in allocating its limited public service funds due to the 15% cap for ever expanding service
demands.
Florida's local governments continue to experience greatly reduced revenues as a result of;
the state of its economy, decreased ad valorem and other taxes, declining property values
which experts say have "not hit bottom yet" high vacancy rates in housing due to another
year of home foreclosures, loss of jobs, and the closing of businesses, resulting in a reduction
in revenues, consumer spending, and other factors due to the severe fallout of national and
local economies.
While some nationally based economists' state "signs of recovery have begun ", the national
housing crisis continues and is actually spreading to previously more stable housing markets
as noted: to cities such as Denver, Colorado and Cincinnati, Ohio. These areas are now
experiencing local property value declines and higher unemployment. The three foremost
hardest hit states such as Nevada, California and Florida continue to feel severe economic
effects, well into its third year of decline. The City of Sanford likewise continues to be
deeply affected by this volatile economy.
During this first year of implementation of the Community Development Block Grant, the
City has determined that it wants to reprogram funds into projects it has deemed necessary to
receive additional funding. The Youth Build Facility Rehabilitation and Senior Housing
Rehabilitation Programs will therefore be the recipients of this additional funding as a result
of the City's first substantial change amendment.
12
Citizen input was sought at public hearings held at the Sanford City Hall on May 31, 2011,
and July 5, 2011 which took place during the public comment period on the proposed Action
Plan. A public solicitation process was utilized to solicit potential CDBG projects. The July
5` meeting provided local citizens and organizations with information relevant to proposed
program parameters and project development in draft form.
On August 8, 2011, the Sanford City Commission approved the FY 2011 -12 Action Plan.
Authorization shall be granted for the Mayor to sign the attached Grantee Certifications and
the Application for Federal Assistance (Form 424) and direct the Office of the City Manager
to transmit the plan to the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (U.S. HUD).
The following activities constitute the use of funds for the second Program Year (2011 -2012)
for the CDBG Program:
•
The listing of proposed projects in the One Year Action Plan provides details on each of the
above program activities.
•
13
Performance Measurement
The following depicts the Objectives, Outcome Categories, Outcome Indicators, and
Outcome Measures for 2011 -2012 activities:
M hvlrx�
Services for youth
Suitable Living
Availability/
#of persons assisted with new or
300P
Environment
Accessibility
improved access to a service
Services for Seniors
Suitable Living
Availability/
# of persons assisted with new or
300P
Environment
Accessibility
improved access to a service
Clearance and
Suitable Living
Sustainability
# lots cleared /possible available for
6U
Demolition
Environment
Safe and decent housing
Hopper Academy
Suitable Living
Availability/
# of persons assisted with new or
1200P
Environment
Accessibility
improved access to a service
Home Improvement
Decent Housing
Affordability
# of houses rehabilitated to maintain
13H
Minor Rehabilitation
safe, sanitary, and decent housing stock
Senior Citizen Housing
Decent Housing
Affordability
# of houses rehabilitated to maintain
5H
Rehabilitation
safe, sanitary, and decent housing stock
Past Performance
On September 30, 2011, the City of Sanford will be completing its first year of CDBG
fundng under its 2010 -14 Consolidated Planning Document. The city was challenged with
setting up programs for the first time. As in the case of all new entitlment communies,
Sanford has spent its first year organizing, planning and scheduling for the successful
implementation of its CDBG Program. By all accounts Sanford will see a dramatic increase
in it's level of CDBG activities and participation during its second ProgamYear.
The City of Sanford has addhered to goals and objectives established in its 2010 -14
Consolidated Planning Document.
C:
14
Citizen Participation 91.220(b)
2. Provide a summary of the citizen participation and consultation process (including efforts to
broaden public participation in the development of the plan.
•
The City of Sanford continues to collaborate with local and regional non - profit organizations
offering services such as; health services, social and fair housing service agencies, including
those focusing on services to children, elderly persons, persons with disabilities, persons with
HIV /AIDS and their families, and chronically homeless persons. In addition the city will
coordinate its service delivery programs with regional private and governmental health,
mental health, and service agencies.
Efforts made to broaden the process
The City, through its ongoing public participation/consultation process, continually seeks to
broaden this process by involving new or incipient nonprofit organizations in its various
programs and by continuing its efforts to provide information to residents. Public hearings
were held in the Commission Chambers at Sanford City Hall on May 31, 2011 and July 5,
2011.
• On July 5, 2010 a Public Hearing was held in the Commission Chambers of Sanford City
Hall to receive public comment on the proposed Program Year 2, Action Plan.
• The City Commission approved the plan on August 8, 2011 for submission to the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development.
As previously mentioned, this process included holding public hearings during which
community input was sought through the solicitation of ideas and program priorities at both
public hearings; review of the proposed program goals and objectives, making available
technical assistance; advertising the availability of funds; and providing a thirty -day public
comment period of the FY 2011 -12 One -Year Action Plan document. Residents and local
and regional agencies were encouraged to attend the aforementioned public hearings and
were notified in the following manner: neighborhood organizations, the city's website,
commission level involvement and local newspaper advertisements.
Excellent attendance at the city's first public hearing held on May 31, 2011 at 7:00 PM at
Sanford, City Hall brought community advocates, residents of the city and Seminole County,
as well as regional and local service agencies together in one room. The following non - profit
organizations were represented:
1. Homeless Services Network of Central Florida (provide housing and services for
homeless persons- continuum of care for Seminole County)
15
Pro-rarn Goals for Public Hearin-s
Announcement of funding availability
Public Hearings
May 15, 2011
Gather public input
May 31 -July 5, 2011
Development of program priorities
May 31, 2011
Receive comments concerning draft
documents during public comment
June 20, 2011 -July 20, 2011
Final Commission Approval
August 8, 2011
As previously mentioned, this process included holding public hearings during which
community input was sought through the solicitation of ideas and program priorities at both
public hearings; review of the proposed program goals and objectives, making available
technical assistance; advertising the availability of funds; and providing a thirty -day public
comment period of the FY 2011 -12 One -Year Action Plan document. Residents and local
and regional agencies were encouraged to attend the aforementioned public hearings and
were notified in the following manner: neighborhood organizations, the city's website,
commission level involvement and local newspaper advertisements.
Excellent attendance at the city's first public hearing held on May 31, 2011 at 7:00 PM at
Sanford, City Hall brought community advocates, residents of the city and Seminole County,
as well as regional and local service agencies together in one room. The following non - profit
organizations were represented:
1. Homeless Services Network of Central Florida (provide housing and services for
homeless persons- continuum of care for Seminole County)
15
2. Rescue Outreach Mission (men's shelter and women's and children's homeless
shelter).
3. Recovery House of Sanford (transitional housing for men recovering from alcohol
and drug addiction).
4. Habitat for Humanity (housing opportunities for low income)
This plan concurs with the information presented in the approved FY 2010 -14 Consolidated
Planning Document underscoring its program goals and objectives for implementation. As
previously stated, the current Consolidated Plan utilized information drawn from a number of
other plans, documents, and web sites in order to coordinate and collate data gathering in
support of developing local program goals and the allocation of CDBG funding. These include:
the Housing Element of the City of Sanford's 2009 updated Comprehensive Plan, the
Community Redevelopment Agency's collaborated Master Redevelopment Plan, East Central
Florida Regional Planning Council resources, Regional Continuum of Care and , the 1990 and
2000 Census of Population and Housing Data, the Florida Housing Finance Corporation, and
University of Florida Shimberg Center for Housing Studies.
The publication of the proposed One -Year Action Plan for a 30 -day public comment period
started on June 20, 2011 and ended July 20, 2011.
Comments received on the plan were categorized, examined by Sanford Officials and
submitted to HUD along with this Action Plan in summary format.
3. Provide a summary of citizen comments or views on the plan.
Any Citizen Comments received have been summarized and placed in Appendix A.
4. Provide a written explanation of comments not accepted and the reasons why these
comments were not accepted.
Any comments received were responded to within a 15 day period in conformance with the
Citizen Participation Plan. The explanation of "whether or not" the comments have been
either accepted or denied have been included. Accommodation was attempted at meeting all
serious housing and community development needs expressed to the City. The limited funds
received for CDBG eligible activities preclude the city from addressing all but the direst
needs at this time. Consequently, some comments, although accepted and considered, cannot
always be met with funding initiatives. However; public comments and concerns have and
will continue to be included in the planning process for development of long term goals and
objectives.
Resources 91.220(c)(1)) and (c)(2)
5. Identify the federal, state, and local resources (including program income) the jurisdiction
expects to receive to address the needs identified in the plan. Federal resources should
include Section 8 funds made available to the jurisdiction, Low - Income Housing Tax Credits,
and competitive McKinney -Vento Homeless Assistance Act funds expected to be available to
address priority needs and specific objectives identified in the strategic plan.
40
The City of Sanford, Florida will receive $404,880 in CDBG funds for Program Year 2011-
+ 12.
The following table illustrates funding directly to the City as well as area wide benefit funds
available to city residents for housing programs, homeless prevention, Section 8 vouchers,
public housing and other program resources.
6. Explain how federal funds will leverage resources from private and non federal public
sources.
Prior to receiving funding as an entitlement city, Sanford partnered with Seminole County
Government for Community Development Block Grant funds. This partnership has fostered a
high level of inter - governmental cooperation and coordination. As the City of Sanford's
program becomes more seasoned (now in its second year), a much greater emphasis will be
placed on recommendations for projects that contain a fair amount of leveraged funding.
Annual Objectives 91.220(c)(3)
*If using the CPMP Tool: Complete and submit the Summary of Specific Annual Objectives
Worksheets or Summaries.xls
7. Provide a summary of specific objectives that will be addressed during the program year.
A summary of specific Second Year (Program Year 2011 -2012) objectives appears below:
Homeless Objectives
• Possible future partial funding for operating expenses for homeless service delivery.
Special Needs Objectives
• Provide opportunities for senior citizens and youth to receive support services
• Provide facility improvements for local services distribution
• Increase access for improved job skills, training and increased self sufficiency.
Community Development Objectives
• Target area public facility improvements.
L
I Seminole County Housing Assistance funds (HOME & SHIP) are available to eligible City of Sanford residents.
17
1.
City of Sanford
CDBG
$ 404,880
2.
Public Housing Authorities - Sanford and
Seminole County
Section 8 Voucher Program
$ 2,500,000
3.
City of Sanford- Community Improvement
De artment
LIHEAP
$ 1,514,3830
4.
City of Sanford
YouthBuild
$ 320,108
5.
Seminole County
Emergency Shelter Funds (ESG)
$ 85,877
6.
Seminole County
HOME Funds
$ 841,569
6. Explain how federal funds will leverage resources from private and non federal public
sources.
Prior to receiving funding as an entitlement city, Sanford partnered with Seminole County
Government for Community Development Block Grant funds. This partnership has fostered a
high level of inter - governmental cooperation and coordination. As the City of Sanford's
program becomes more seasoned (now in its second year), a much greater emphasis will be
placed on recommendations for projects that contain a fair amount of leveraged funding.
Annual Objectives 91.220(c)(3)
*If using the CPMP Tool: Complete and submit the Summary of Specific Annual Objectives
Worksheets or Summaries.xls
7. Provide a summary of specific objectives that will be addressed during the program year.
A summary of specific Second Year (Program Year 2011 -2012) objectives appears below:
Homeless Objectives
• Possible future partial funding for operating expenses for homeless service delivery.
Special Needs Objectives
• Provide opportunities for senior citizens and youth to receive support services
• Provide facility improvements for local services distribution
• Increase access for improved job skills, training and increased self sufficiency.
Community Development Objectives
• Target area public facility improvements.
L
I Seminole County Housing Assistance funds (HOME & SHIP) are available to eligible City of Sanford residents.
17
• Public and emergency services for at -risk populations.
• Eliminate slum and blighting influences in low income communities
Housing Objectives
• Provide opportunity for affordable housing in -fill construction on cleared vacant lots
• Provide homeowner occupied housing rehabilitation assistance to Senior Citizens
• Home Improvement (minor rehabilitation)
Description of Activities 91.220(d) and (e)
*If not using the CPMP Tool: Complete and submit Table 3C
*If using the CPMP Tool: Complete and submit the Projects Worksheets and the Summaries
Table.
8. Provide a summary of the eligible programs or activities that will take place during the
program year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the strategic
plan.
Describe the outcome measures for activities in accordance with Federal Register Notice
dated March 7, 2006, i.e., general objective category (decent housing, suitable living
environment, economic opportunity) and general outcome category
(availability /accessibility, affordability, sustainability).
J
FE:3
9 The following projects listed below provide details on each of the proposed program activities.
Public Services - $60,000
It is the city's intent to use $60,000 of its CDBG funds in offering services through the RFP
process to indentify and select local non - profit organizations interested in providing support
services and program delivery in the following categories:
Youth Services - $30,000
This public service program will provide a wide range of supportive services to enhance
and improve the general welfare of low to moderate income youth with a preference to
serving those youth residing in the target areas.
Services for Senior Citizens - $30,000
This program will provide supportive services to improve, health, safety and general
welfare of low and moderate income senior citizens
Public Facilities - $100,000
Hopper Academy Improvements $ 100,000
In Program Year 2, the City will continue to fund improvements to this public facility for
the local provision of a wide variety of supportive services.
Code Enforcement _$18,000
Clearance and Demolition - $18,000
Clear and demolish unsafe, dilapidated structures from low income areas.
Affordable Housing/Housing Rehabilitation - $ 80,000
Provide funding for senior citizen homeowner occupied housing to rehabilitate homes for
Senior Citizens.
Home Improvements (Minor Rehabilitation - $ 65,906
This program is intended to provide opportunities for minor home improvements for eligible
homeowner occupied housing units.
Planning /Administration - $ 80,974
These funds pay expenses for general planning and administration of the
CDBG grant for the City to include program oversight and monitoring
activities.
0
19
Goals and objectives to be carried out during the action plan period are indicated by placing a check in
the following boxes.
•
•
®
Oh
assisting homeless persons
®
improving the safety and
❑
job creation and retention
obtain affordable housing
livability of neighborhoods
❑
assisting persons at risk of
®
eliminating blighting
❑
establishment, stabilization
becoming homeless
influences and the
and expansion of small
deterioration of property
business (including micro -
and facilities
businesses)
®
retaining the affordable
®
increasing the access to
®
the provision of public
housing stock
quality public and private
services concerned with
facilities
employment
®
increasing the availability of
❑
reducing the isolation of
❑
the provision of jobs to
affordable permanent
income groups within areas
low - income persons living
housing in standard
through spatial de-
in areas affected by those
condition to low - income and
concentration of housing
programs and activities
moderate - income families,
opportunities for lower
under programs covered by
particularly to members of
income persons and the
the plan
disadvantaged minorities
revitalization of
without discrimination on
deteriorating
the basis of race, color,
neighborhoods
religion, sex, national origin,
familial status, or disability
❑
increasing the supply of
❑
restoring and preserving
❑
availability of mortgage
supportive housing which
properties of special
financing for low income
includes structural features
historic, architectural, or
persons at reasonable rates
and services to enable
aesthetic value
using non - discriminatory
persons with special needs
lending practices
(including persons with
HIV /ADDS) to live in
dignity and independence
❑
providing affordable
❑
conserving energy
❑
access to capital and credit
housing that is accessible to
resources and use of
for development activities
job opportunities
renewable energy sources
that promote the long -term
economic social viability
of the community
20
9. Describe the outcome measures for activities in accordance with Federal Register Notice
dated March 7, 2006, i.e., general objective category (decent housing, suitable living
environment, economic opportunity) and general outcome category
(availability /accessibility, affordability, sustainability).
Youth Services
Economic
Sustainability
#of persons assisted with new or
300P
Opportunity
improved access to a service
Services for Seniors
Suitable Living
Availability/
# of persons assisted with new or
300P
Environment
Accessibility
improved access to a service
Clearance and
Suitable Living
Sustainability
# lots cleared /possible available for
6U
Demolition
Environment
Safe and decent housing
Hopper Academy
Suitable Living
Availability/
# of persons assisted with new or
1200P
Environment
Accessibility
improved access to a service
Home Improvement
Decent Housing
Affordability
# of houses rehabilitated to maintain
13H
Minor Rehabilitation
safe, sanitary, and decent housing stock
Senior Citizen Housing
Decent Housing
Affordability
# of houses rehabilitated to maintain
5H
Rehabilitation
safe, sanitary, and decent housing stock
•
21
0 Geographic Distribution/Allocation Priorities 91.220(d) and (f)
10. Describe the geographic areas of the jurisdiction (including areas of low income families
and /or racial /minority concentration) in which assistance will be directed during the next
year. Where appropriate, the jurisdiction should estimate the percentage of funds the
jurisdiction plans to dedicate to target areas.
Map 1 below indicates the highest concentration of racial /minority concentration of the African -
American population which is predominately located in the two (2) target areas consisting of
Goldsboro and Georgetown. Data based on U.S. Census 2000 and 2009 website:
http: / /factfinder.census.gov/
•
•
Map 1: City of Sanford
Consolidated Plan 2010 -2014
Percent African American by
22
Map2 below indicates the highest concentration of racial /minority concentration of the Hispanic
• population which has a high predominance in the two (2) target areas consisting of Goldsboro
and Georgetown. Data based on U.S. Census 2000 and 2009 website:
http://factfinder.census.gov/
•
•
Map 2: City of Sanford N Prepared By
CPH Engineers
and
Choice Consulting
Consolidated Plan 2010 -2014 Services L.L.C.
Percent Hispanic by 00 111 Jury
p ! 0 1,0 2.000 Feet Data Based
on
U.S. Census 2000 & 2009
Block Group within the CDBG Target Areas ' ' ' ' ' http : //factflnder.census.govI.
23
q / MEDICAL PLAZA OR" FU LTON'ST L�rON ST �
W,COMMERCIAL ST,
t w d
.. -'ST ST W$R 46 i� t • W1ST,STZ
Y 2
r i 7 W 2ND $T�a�v "' -Q :n 0 W 2ND $T I ._ W ZND ST
r
1J Z� O ,.i l r
—s —� o G —1 }}{ --- --f - - ttt -
a ar
w 4TH ST� � IIRDST
a AwaT�H
a �_� —._.
•� ��� Z - _ f z
a
F VJ STH $T a – a __. W 5TH ST G
y
�—
0
r
o h
� w sr
tl STS _� ° 9 r ' '• .
W 7TH ST m• w /TH ST
j ---- 111 --- „T
. i 1 t # "" ] WPTH ST
j W 9TH ST7 LN s
a a � > W9TH Si > W9TM SF
Q f ST 1 a
y II r.,� 1 �� � W W 10� ST
MCCRAC RD Oj
•' _.m 1 <N 76 W 11tH ST
> z ! rosT... ,12TH 5T
< i --
_w
J ;+
iy } =HST.,_
0 it-
Li
"W 14TH ST i
�
114TH ST
JI
STH ST �¢ 1. " !. l C +-- -� ` ( ° w 15TH ST --
n 1 11 1 biro . rz 'r'll I I{—
} a � w 6TH ST
}{{ C I
a W1i THS
G a a N W IFTH ST y'J 18TH ST
1 A
; W 19TH ST
Y
V 20TH
O p CIFi.\ ..
Z, {r o2 it f. zrNe sr o
��,E`
a
�SFMilDC� I _ - --
Lake Monroe t
a j
FULONST Q�' f C O ••
w ..
s� i > w z
z J` a.
t { t
1w 1ST ST z . ., / S; ST w t .o a o
} =a a a
E 1
I` (11 - a' �. ' � .e: =� ( > `�� - 3 ° � � lilili �� z z
1 WJNDST �
z, s >
( a •n • U
�.W 3RD ST ?:. iEr .I E'ROST / ¢t . U - z z w. E 2ND ST
- t
�. -W 4TH ST i E 4TH. ST s :.k " U �'c+..,: 7 '..4 Ia€ w w,- G , r �, •? ..
a $ O O. O j E 4TH ST 1
I •
w W 5TH ST ( E 5TH ST w
w •' ' � U j Z { i
? w:
a k 'aT, ¢] a w I ¢ a N w >.
'w - 6TH ST "a - -L. m E'6TH ST .� R G� Z < a c
J u
O
k �
W 77H S ` '� ,- r E7TH ST .a i s m , ••••�
i
W 87H S7 • � � �E 8TH ST >
— a
YJ 9TH ST --1 E 9TH S{ w a
a a w
s �.
w 19TH sT' n E -toTH S >
w w y ` �
Ji t -
r W, `
11TH ST - E 11THST 0
1- w .. • : y
W 12TH ST E 12TH ST.
:CELERY AVE fi •'- �- o
• .) w `+ _ U.. - ..µ - ..mar J
+� W 13TH ST • s E 13TH ST a
O�.
E 14TH ST SAN LANTA CIR:.
W
,I $ 14TH STf E.i4TH ST rMARA + O i PLUMOSA DR •¢' z W 15TH ST z LD
E 16TH ST O ' VALENCIA ST 16TH ST a �
NORTH ST r iST•DR •�•
N
w �
Ell TH ST �. ROS ALIA DR c�F RANDOLPH ST-
C -
W 18TH ST `p' +° E 18TH STS ' S S�
- - t ESC AM BIA D .Z . F
E ST O �F,�,� , IPALOMA AVE -,.. -- - ---�T1 _ -y - O ,�j 0 C
W 19TH ST 'Qy -` CATALINA DR COURT ST
R
\ > t i
• The following activities are offered on a City -wide basis to income - eligible households, and are
not limited to any specific geographic areas:
• Services for Seniors
• Services for Youth
• Senior Citizen Homeowner Occupied Housing Rehabilitation
• Youth Build
• Home Improvement (minor rehabilitation)
• Clearance & Demolition
In Program Year 2 as an entitlement city, Sanford has programmed and dedicated at least 29% of
its CDBG allocation to target areas of the City, and will expend over 96% of the grant in support
of low and moderate income residents.
Census Tract Data for Targeted Areas
0
Sanford city
020101
1
539
707
76
Sanford city
020101
2
457
827
55
Sanford city
020102
2
298
414
72
Sanford city
020102
3
293
509
58
Sanford city
020102
4
285
463
62
Sanford city
020201
2
277
470
59
Sanford city
020202
3
606
1006
60
Sanford city
020202
4
727
1322
55
Sanford city
020302
1
1324
2094
63
Sanford city
020401
1
504
819
62
Sanford city
020401
2
537
683
79
Sanford city
020500
1
525
681
77
Sanford city
020500
2
1491
1925
78
Sanford city
020500
3
204
282
72
Sanford city
020500
4
843
979
86
Sanford city
020600
2
33
33
100
Sanford city
020806
1
704
1117
63
Sanford city
020901
5
2293
3402
67
Sanford city
020902
1
485
778
62
Sanford city
020902
2
894
1502
60
Sanford city
021000
1
67
120
56
11. Describe the reasons for allocation priorities, the rationale for allocating investments
geographically with the jurisdictions during the next year, and identify the obstacles to
. addressing un- served needs.
26
The census tract data provides the specific data used to identify and target low income
• households and neighborhoods. The maps and narrative above provide detailed information
concerning Sanford's most needy households. These neighborhoods require a high percentage of
public services and infrastructure improvements therefore; the projects selected for the 2nd` year
and the goals and objectives and future projects identified for the next five years will be
expended to improve their respective quality of life.
Obstacles to meeting underserved needs
The major obstacle to meeting the City's underserved needs continue to be the lack, and
reduction of financial resources, including Federal (HOME) and State (SHIP) support. Local
resources have lessened significantly recently due to reduced ad valorem and other revenue, due
to the current major recession as well as a 16.5% reduction of CDBG funding. The lack of
available developable, vacant, residentially -zoned land will continue to put constraints on the
City's ability to provide affordable housing. Although housing prices have decreased
significantly due to the high foreclosure rate, many low /mod households are currently priced out
of ownership due to unemployment and under - employment.
Annual Affordable Housing Goals 91.220(g)
*If not using the CPMP Tool: Complete and submit Table 3B Annual Housing Completion
Goals.
*If using the CPMP Tool: Complete and submit the Table 3B Annual Housing Completion
Goals.
12. Describe the one -year goals for the number of homeless, non - homeless, and special -needs
households to be provided affordable housing using funds made available to the jurisdiction
and one -year goals for the number of households to be provided affordable housing through
activities that provide rental assistance, production of new units, rehabilitation of existing
units, or acquisition of existing units using funds made available to the jurisdiction. The
term affordable housing shall be defined in 24 CFR 92.252 for rental housing and 24 CFR
92.254 for homeownership.
Based on survey results, the City is providing funding for affordable housing as Home
Improvement Minor Rehabilitation and as Sr. Citizen Housing Rehabilitation. These
programs are intended to increase safe and decent housing stock and increase livability of
local neighborhoods.
•
27
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
i OMB Approval No. 2506 -0117
(Exp. 4/30/2011)
Table 3B
ANNUAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLETION GOALS
•
•
Grantee Name:
Expected Annual
Actual
Resources used during the period
Sanford, Florida
Number of Units
Annual
Program Year: 2
To Be Completed
Number of
CDBG HOME ESG
HOPWA
Units
Com leted
Homeless households
E] El El
El
Non - homeless households
❑ ❑ ❑
❑
Special needs households
❑ ❑ ❑
❑
Total Sec. 215 Beneficiaries*
❑ ❑ ❑
❑
Af exi units
1:1 El
E]
new units
❑ ❑
❑
Rehabilitation of existing units
❑ ❑ ❑
❑
Rental Assistance
❑ ❑
❑
Total Sec. 215 Affordable
❑ ❑ ❑
❑
Rental
0 HIM
Aexisting units
1:1 El
ew units
❑ ❑
Rehabilitation of existing units
18 units
® ❑
Homebuyer Assistance
❑ ❑
❑
Total Sec. 215 Affordable
18 units
❑ ❑ ❑
❑
Owner
OWNER GOALS (Sec. 21;
Acquisition of existing units
❑ ❑
❑
Production of new units
❑ ❑
❑
Rehabilitation of existing units
❑ ❑ ❑
❑
Rental Assistance
❑ ❑
❑
W:3
U
Homebuyer Assistance
❑
❑
❑
Combined Total Sec. 215
❑
❑
❑
❑
Goals*
OVERALL HOUSING
GOALS
(Sec. 215 + Other Affordable
Housin )
Annual Rental Housing Goal
❑
❑
❑
❑
Annual Owner Housing Goal
18 units
®
❑
❑
❑
Total Overall Housing Goal
18 units
®
❑
❑
❑
Public Housing 91.220(h)
13. Describe the manner in which the plan of the jurisdiction will help address the needs of
public housing and activities it will undertake during the next year to encourage public
housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in
homeownership.
The City will not be undertaking any activities to address the needs of public housing during
the 2011 -2012 Program Year. The City will provide moral and political support where
• necessary to assist the housing authorities in their attempts to provide clean, safe, and
sanitary housing to their residents.
14. If the public housing agency is designated as "troubled" by HUD or otherwise is performing
poorly, the jurisdiction shall describe the manner in which it will provide financial or other
assistance in improving its operations to remove such designation during the next year.
Both Public Housing Authorities (PHAs) in the County (the Seminole County Housing
Authority and the Housing Authority of the City of Sanford) have both public housing units
and Section 8 vouchers. The Sanford Housing Authority has been designated as "troubled ".
The Sanford Housing Authority experienced internal management problems, which led to the
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development conducting an onsite assessment during
the period of February 22 — March 5, 2010, the assessment revealed the following:
• The SHA is financially insolvent
• The physical condition of the housing units is extremely poor
• The current leadership and management has not demonstrated they are capable of
successfully managing the agency
The Financial and Management Assessment Report was released to the SHA and the City of
Sanford in May 2010. The Assessment precipitated more direct involvement by City of Sanford
Officials in matters pertaining to the SHA operations. Following receipt of the Report over the
• next two months, a series of joint meetings were held between the SHA Board of Commissioners
29
and City Officials to discuss the scope of the situation and explore possible solutions. One
• outcome of the meetings was the resignation of the SHA Executive Director. Also, due to
unrelated matters the Chairman of the SHA Board resigned. To stabilize the agency a contract
was entered into with the Orlando Housing Authority (OHA) to assume the administrative
responsibility for day to day operations in August of 2010.
•
•
Due to the poor condition of many of the units which affected the occupancy rate resulting in
units being offline, the income was significantly lower than operating cost. On September 24,
2010, the Board of Commissioners of the Sanford Housing Authority passed a resolution
authorizing OHA to submit a demolition application to HUD for demolition of five of SHA six
properties. Also the Board approved the submission of application to HUD seeking emergency
capital funding for the relocation of the residents from the five complexes representing
approximately 380 units of the 480 units owned by the Sanford Housing Authority. The
applications were approved and relocation commenced. As of June 30, 2011, 326 households of
the 331occupied units have been relocated.
In the remaining property which contains 100 units mold has impacted a number of the
properties and approximately 30 of the units are offline and need of remediation.
In January of 2011, the Tenants Association filed a lawsuit to block the demolition and
relocation of tenants from two of the complexes. Currently 5 tenants remain.
Current no. of Section 8 tenants
Sanford
404
Seminole Comm flotisill'.
368
Households on Section 8 waiting list
23
480
Current no. of Public Housing units
106
30
Households on Public Housing waiting list
1,172
294
Est. need for additional rental assistance
300
$3,000,000
Est. funding need for additional units
$60,000,000
NA
Est. need for down payment assistance for
Public Housing residents
-
2,500
Each of the two Public Housing Authorities have at least one public housing resident on their
own Boards of Commissioners. The Seminole County Housing Authority also has an advisory
board made up of public housing residents, which meets quarterly to help in their strategic
planning and development of their Annual Plan. The Sanford Housing Authority has a resident
advisory board that meets twice annually to advise on their Annual Plan and also meets to give
updates on the PHA's capital fund. In addition Sanford has assigned a senior staff member and
one commissioner to act as a liaison between the housing agency administration and the city in
an effort to keep all lines of communication open.
The investigation by the HUD Inspector General Office is still underway as well as a forensic
audit of the FY 2009 budget.
The City of Sanford is working with OHA and the Board of the Sanford Housing Authority to
revisit the public housing needs in the City of Sanford and explore possible options.
30
• Homeless and Special Needs 91.220(i)
15. Describe, briefly, the jurisdiction's plan for the investment and use of available resources
and describe the specific planned action steps it will take over the next year aimed at
eliminating chronic homelessness.
Sanford Officials recognize the seriousness of homelessness within the City. With limited
CDBG funds available to the City to pursue its own needs, priorities, objectives and goals,
the City does not have the CDBG financial capability to address homeless needs on a large
scale basis.
The following Homeless Programs are presently funded and are active projects /activities
within Seminole County but most importantly in Sanford: The Supportive Housing Program
(delivered by the Homeless Services Network of Central Florida through the Continuum of
Care), The Shelter Plus Care Program (through Seminole County), The Emergency Shelter
Grant Program (through Seminole County) and Housing Opportunities for Persons with
AIDS (through the City of Orlando (designated as program administrator for all residents in
Seminole County, Orange County, Osceola County, and the City of Orlando).
In addition, from its ESG Program, the County funds assistance to two local emergency
homeless shelters which includes SafeHouse of Seminole, a local shelter for victims of
domestic violence for operation and maintenance expenses, and to Rescue Outreach Mission
(Goldsboro target area) to its homeless men's shelter and its homeless women's and
children's shelter for operation and maintenance expenses. This assistance allows the shelters
• to assist a greater number of homeless individuals and families. Each shelter also has
transitional housing programs to provide longer term shelter while assisting homeless
individuals and families to gain self - sufficiency (job training, education, etc.), and to
eventually procure market housing.
Other federal partners that also provide homeless assistance include: the Department of
Health and Human Services, the Department of Education, the Department of Labor, the
Department of Veterans Affairs, the Department of Agriculture, and the Interagency Council
on Homelessness
16. Describe specific action steps to address the needs of persons that are not homeless
identified in accordance with 91.215(e).
While the City of Sanford does not directly receive State of Florida SHIP Funds its income
eligible residents are encouraged to apply for assistance under the Seminole County Housing
Programs as funding becomes available. Special needs populations which include elderly,
frail elderly, physically disabled and families and persons experiencing economic downturns
are at the greatest risk of being able to retain decent affordable housing or of becoming
homeless.
•
31
17. Homelessness Prevention — Describe planned action steps over the next year to address the
individual and families with children at imminent risk of becoming homeless.
Seminole County is taking the lead on prevention of homelessness for over 1700 homeless
children in its jurisdiction. During the last two program years, the county has partnered with
agencies and organizations funded through the Continuum of Care of Central Florida for
supportive housing programs and homeless prevention services.
With its limited CDBG funds, the City will not be able to take a major role as sole source
provider but will continue to consider services and projects that support homeless prevention
on a case by case basis.
Resource Services of Central Florida's transitional housing project however; other regional
and county programs are also available for special needs populations and " at risk persons" to
avail themselves of housing opportunities support and job training services to ensure at
higher more satisfying quality of life.
Barriers to Affordable Housing 91.2200)
18. Describe the actions that will take place during the next year to remove barriers to
affordable housing.
The Sanford Comprehensive Plan Housing Element Section raises the following comments
concerning potential barriers to affordable housing within the city limits "Potential
Impediments to Meeting Demand ". The potential hurdles include limited funding for
affordable housing, implementation of policies promoting urban infill and redevelopment,
and development regulations which make housing development more expensive housing.
The City Commission does have the power to waive, discount, or defer impact fees for
affordable housing. These programs should be reviewed for success and potential for
improvement.
Other Actions 91.220(k)
19. Describe the actions that will take place during the next year to address obstacles to meeting
underserved needs, foster and maintain affordable housing, evaluate and reduce the number
of housing units containing lead -based paint hazards, reduce the number of poverty -level
families develop institutional structure, enhance coordination between public and private
agencies (see 91.215(a), (b), (i), (j), (k), and (l)).
Addressing Obstacles to Meeting Underserved Needs
The City of Sanford will fund the following programs to address obstacles in meeting unmet
or underserved needs:
• Support Services for Senior Citizens
• Support Services for Youth
• Senior Citizen Homeowner occupied housing rehabilitation
• Home Improvement- Homeowner occupied Minor Rehabilitation
•
32
The City has fostered vital partnerships with Seminole County and area wide agencies to also
• address its residents underserved in housing and supportive services.
Seminole County housing programs provide the following benefits to City low income
residents through their State Housing Initiative Partnership (SHIP).
• Homeownership counseling is provided to all households approved for SHIP ownership
assistance. Counseling is provided pre- and post - purchase, with specific focus on
household budgeting, home maintenance, and foreclosure prevention.
• A Foreclosure Prevention Program is funded annually under the SHIP Program to assist
very low and low income households when facing foreclosure. Up to $5,000 is provided
to assist with mortgage arrears and to prevent foreclosure for salvageable mortgages.
Additional Agencies providing local housing assistance include:
1. Habitat for Humanity in Seminole County,
2. GoldenRule Housing & Community Development Corporation (specializing in
Affordable Housing for lower income people).
3. Rescue Outreach Mission (men's shelter and women's and children's homeless
shelter),
4. Housing Authority of the City of Sanford (public housing),
5. Brothers Keepers, Inc.( a substance abuse non - profit service organization),
6. Recovery House of Sanford (transitional housing for men recovering from alcohol
and drug addiction), and
7. The Center for Affordable Housing (non - profit CHDO of Seminole County).
Private Industry
The housing delivery system in Sanford has traditionally been the domain of both the public and
private sectors. A robust residential market, particularly for suburban single - family construction,
spurred growth of the development community until 2007, when the economy downturned. The
projected number of households residing in the city is expected to grow at a much reduced rate
by 2015 as evidenced by the widespread housing slump and foreclosure vacancy rates. The city
will continue to encourage private and public partnerships in the provision of affordable housing
for Sanford.
Nonprofit Organizations
There are a small number of nonprofits operating within Sanford for the express purpose of
providing social and community development services. The City values these partnerships and
takes an active interest in the service delivery to its citizens. As stated earlier; the primary social
service provider to Sanford citizens is the countywide Meals on Wheels Program. Types of
services offered include congregate meals, social programs, housing repair (Weatherization
Program), transportation (for the disabled and senior citizens), nutrition (food bank and
commodities), and home services (personal care, homemaking, companionship, etc), toddler,
preschool and afterschool nutrition program. This organization greatly assists in filling the gap of
services for the City's highest risk population.
The Homeless Services Network of Central Florida works with homeless service agencies and
advocacy groups, interested individuals, to provide grant application funding in the support of
33
activities for the homeless. This coalition offers all nonprofits who serve the homeless population
the opportunity to share information and resources and to coordinate activities in a manner that
best meets the needs of their client population in a continuum of care.
The Seminole County Health Department has no tracking process for lead -based paint. It is
estimated that approximately 36 % (or) 8,635 of the housing units in Sanford were built prior to
1978. Although it is possible that a majority of these contain residual lead -based paint, many
have undoubtedly been repainted many times over, and have therefore have encapsulated any
lead -based paint.
The overall goal of the City is to reduce or eliminate lead -based paint hazards and prevent
childhood lead poisoning. This will be accomplished through a coordinated effort of public and
private sectors. All housing proposed for rehabilitation is screened by the year built to determine
possible LBP hazard. The owner is given the EPA Fact Sheet - Identifying Lead Hazards in Your
Home and the EPA publication - Protect Your Family From Lead In Your Home. During the
feasibility inspection, if the inspector identifies a potential LBP problem, he notifies the owner
and may test the suspect area with a swab or take a sample to be processed through the County
Health Department.
In every program where federal funds are expended on a housing unit, the City incorporates the
current procedures for hazard reduction or LBP abatement guidelines as defined in 24 CFR Part
35.
Actions proposed or being taken to evaluate and reduce lead -based paint hazards
Due to funding limitations, the City, in conjunction with Seminole County occasionally funds
and subsidizes city based affordable housing development. This is accomplished through the
encouragement and development of new affordable units, or the rehabilitation of existing units
built after 1977, as opposed to rehabilitating pre -1978 units, both for renters and homebuyers, in
order to increase the inventory of lead -free housing units. However, since the City and or
Seminole County also accepts and occasionally funds proposals to renovate existing housing
units (sometimes built prior to 1978), all housing units built prior to 1978 will be
comprehensively tested for lead -based paint. If such units contain lead -based paint and are
approved for funding, then they will be dealt with by encapsulating, abating, or clearing the lead -
based paint. Housing units with chipped or peeling lead -based paint will be avoided to the extent
feasible and possible, due to the anticipated expense, and owners of such units will be
encouraged to eliminate any hazards. In all situations, the City will comply with Federal
regulations (24 CFR 35) in dealing with lead -based paint in residential properties. Any treatment
or abatement of lead -based paint will be funded by participating agencies, but closely monitored
by the City and Seminole County.
20. Describe the actions to coordinate its housing strategy with local and regional
transportation planning strategies to ensure to the extent practicable that residents of
affordable housing have access to public transportation.
Transportation services are provided by LYNX a state funded bus service on a tri- county basis
(Seminole, Orange, and Osceola) including the city of Sanford.
•
34
CDBG 91.220(1)(1)
1. Identify program income expected to be received during the program year, including:
• amount expected to be generated by and deposited to revolving loan funds;
• total amount expected to be received from each new float funded activity included in this
plan; and
• amount expected to be received during the current program year from a float funded
activity described in a prior statement or plan.
No Program Income is anticipated for FY2011 -2012.
2. Program income received in the preceding program year that has not been included in a
statement or plan.
Not applicable, 2010 was the first year for the city as an entitlement jurisdiction.
3. Proceeds from Section 108 loan guarantees that will be used during the year to address the
priority needs and specific objectives identified in its strategic plan.
Not applicable, the city does not have a Section 108 Program.
4. Surplus funds from any urban renewal settlement for community development and housing
activities.
Not applicable
S. Any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the planned use has not been
included in a prior statement or plan.
Not applicable
6. Income from float funded activities.
Not applicable
7. Urgent need activities, only if the jurisdiction certifies.
The City does not have any Urgent Need Activities
8. Estimated amount of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that benefit persons of low -
and moderate income.
The City of Sanford estimates that 76% of its CDBG funds will be used for direct activities
to benefit low - moderate income persons. 4% will be used for slum and blight removal and
20% percent will be used for planning and administration for the CDBG program which
indirectly benefits the low to moderate income persons it serves. It is anticipated that a grand
total of 96% of the CDBG grant will benefit low- moderate income persons.
HOME 91.220(1)(1)and/or HOPWA 91.220(1)(3)
The City of Sanford does not receive HOME 91.220(1)(1)or HOPWA 91.220(1)(3) funding.
•
35
APPENDICES
•
0
Page 1 of 2
Thomas, Andrew
From: Philpot, Melvin A. [Melvin. Philpot @pgnmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 10:39 AM
To: Thomas, Andrew
Subject: RE: May 31st CDBG Public Hearing
M r. T..
Thank you as well for providing the opportunity for the non - profit advocates to highlight the need for service
related assistance in the community. It goes without saying, that the need is certainly greater than the funds
and I'm sure that it will be truly difficult to determine how best to distribute the funds to those with the greatest
need. Let me begin my comments by articulating that I support all of the organizations that were in attendance
and in some way or manner am connected to them, but as I think of a manner to provide the greatest good with
the available funds, I would like to circle back to my comments at the meeting.
1. 1 believe that funding an organization such as Rescue Outreach Mission is consistent with investing
dollars into an existing organization that has demonstrated performance, helps to mitigate the homeless
problem in the city, assist law enforcement with a viable alternative to incarcerating people who simply
need assistance and providing families with a viable option to rebuilding their lives is money that would
increase the capacity and services that they currently provide. In my opinion, it is impossible to dilute
the funding by investing it in any other manner and is the best way to invest in our homeless problem. I
absolutely heard Ms. Jackson's comments, but in this particular instance, don't support her conclusion.
2. Mr. McQueen also registered an invaluable concern that as well should not go un- noticed as you
consider funding for youth services. Since its inception, Goldsboro Front Porch has been an extremely
valuable hub in the Westside community that has provided an array of services such as housing,
weatherization, senior and youth related programs. Please keep in mind, that Front Porch is a state
supported initiative that operates on a very limited budget that is certainly in jeopardy of being
eliminated and these dollars would go a long way in ensuring that we are able to continue the after
school and summer programs.
I will conclude my comments by highlighting the fact that both of these organizations are directly in the heart of
the targeted area of the city and would benefit tremendously from the CDBG funding. I do remember your
statement about how you would be required to re- disburse unused funds for the youth program by way of an
RFP, but I believe that Goldsboro Front Porch should be considered for primary and not alternative funding.
I am available to continue discussion on both when your schedule permits.
Thanks,
From: Thomas, Andrew [ mailto :Andrew.Thomas @Sanfordfl.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 5:15 PM
To: John Hagen; john @harvesttime.org; vmcqueen @hotmail.com; Susan.Nichols @cffhc.org; Philpot, Melvin A.;
Ernest Hamilton; pseater @habitatseminole.org; rthillery@floridaSPECS.org; Cathy Jackson
• Cc: Rob Heenan; T Beaudry; Terry Beaudry; Thomas, Andrew
Subject: May 31st CDBG Public Hearing
6/3/2011
Page 2 of 2
Good Afternoon,
to I trust and hope everyone had a safe trip home and is in good health.
Thank you for your attendance and participation in last nights CDBG Public Hearing. In
general the comments, questions and suggestions were on target, greatly appreciated and
very helpful in identifying the needs of the community. Based on the collective comments of
the audience there is a growing need for increase services to the homeless population,
transitional housing and increase funding for housing rehabilitation. These three areas were
clearly articulated.
To clarify the status of FY 2010 activities and projects I am forwarding a copy of the status
report I was referencing last night. If you have any questions regarding the status of any 2010
activity or proposed activities for FY 2011 please feel free to contact me.
Cordially,
Andrew
(buAl cu J hoftw.6
Senior Project Manager
Office Of The City Manager
City of Sanford
P.O. Box 1788
Sanford, Florida 32772 -1788
Phone: 407- 688 -5132
Fax: 407-688-5161
Website: www.sanfordfl.gov__
"The significant problems the face cannot be resolved at the same level of thinking - �i , e were at i , hen we
created them. "
Albert Einstein
City Hall Hours: 7:30AM - 5:30PM Monday - Thursday
Closed Fridays and Holidays
PLEASE NOTE: Florida has a very broad public records law. Any written communication to or from
City officials regarding City business is a public record available to the public and media upon request.
Your e -mail communications may be subject to public disclosures.
•
6/3/2011
Page 1 of 2
Thomas, Andrew
From: Thomas, Andrew
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 2:34 PM
To: 'McQueen, Vernon'
Cc: Thomas, Andrew
Subject: RE: CDBG RFP
Hello Vernon,
You are welcome and it was my pleasure to meet with you and Melvin and discuss the wonderful programs that
have been implemented by the Front Porch Council to assist residents in the Goldsboro area. The GFPC youth
program sounds like a much needed service to help prepare our youth for the work world and to instill in them
essential life skills needed for them to grow into competent, productive and caring adults. Pursuant to your
appeal to increase your grant request from $25K to $30K, please note I will consider the $30K request.
Please encourage Ms Miller to contact me if she has any questions regarding the application or the information
requested.
Thank you for taking the time to meet with me and sharing the Front Porch Council success story.
Cordially,
Senior Project Manager
Office Of The City Manager
City of Sanford
Phone: 407- 688 -5132
Fax: 407- 688 -5161
"The pessimist complains about the wind; The optimist expects it to change; The realist adjust the sails"
Author Unknown
City Hall hours are from 7:30AM - 5:30PM
Monday - Thursday
(Closed Fridays and Holidays)
From: McQueen, Vernon [ma ilto:Vernon. McQueen@ pg nma i I com]
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 9:12 AM
To: Thomas, Andrew
Subject: CDBG RFP
Good Morning Sir, I really appreciate the opportunity to sit down and discuss with you CDBG funding for the
GFPC. I had mention seeking 25K. I want to increase that request to 30K in order that we may be able to
provide the kids with some educational trips and summits. Algerine Miller is working on completing the
document and should have it back to you by the end of this week. I explained to her that if she needed any
technical assistance to contact you directly. So if you hear from her you will know who she is. Let me know if
you have any questions and again thanks for the opportunity.
7/29/2011
Page 2 of 2
• Respectfully,
Vernon McQueen
Program Manager
407 - 942 -9661- Office
321 - 262 -6564- Cell
•
7/29/2011
PUBLIC HEARING
May 31, 2011 7:00 PM
City Hall - City Commission Chambers
300 N. Park Ave., Sanford, FL 32771
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program
One -Year 2 " Action Plan (2011 -2012)
October 1, 2011— September 30, 2012
I. Welcome and Introductions Andrew Thomas, Sr. Project Mgr.
II. City of Sanford Managers and Staff
Ms. Terese Beaudry, Managing Member /Principal, Choice Consulting Services, L.L.C.
Mr. Robert Heenan, Managing Member /Principal, Choice Consulting Services, L.L.C.
III. Purpose of the Public Hearing
To ensure the opportunity for citizen participation in the process
To receive public input relative to the development of the 2011 -2012 One -Year Action Plan
To provide the public with an overview of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program planning
process
IV. Overview of CDBG Program
Explain the Annual Action Plan Process
V. CDBG funded Accomplishments for FY2010 -11
Highlights of current year program
VI. Questions and Answers
VII. Format for receipt of Public Comments
Verbal- comments received only at an advertised planned Public Hearing
E -mail comments to Andrew Thomas, and rew.thomas(a),sanfordfl.gov
Mail: comments to: Attn: Andrew Thomas, Sr. Project Manager, Office of the City Manager
300 N. Park Ave., Sanford, FL 32771
VIII. Next Step
June 13, 2011- 30 -day Public Comment Period Begins
July 5, 2011 - Public Hearing on Action Plan
July 12, 2011- 30 Day Public Comment Period expires 5:00 PM
August 8, 2011- Commission Meeting for Action Plan approval and submission to HUD
IX. Adjourn
• Thank you for your involvement in the process, and for your desire to be part of the improvement of the
quality of life for all the citizens of the City of Sanford.
GOOD NIGHT AND TRAVEL SAFELY
LJ
C7
•
0�dm :U•�.. r. �'O��O
� E E ® `o
n m ° .s L E '5 -S Q� '� m a m
gvowrns ®Eor? g..
> c w m m n m£ °
a 3,� `tl '
m E m E b c ai
c m:a ° . .E o
'0 Ew cn'E..Oa•o`UV).smtomaE a0
t y3 ¢ >ovr�" n crz
M ID mLL�� =a�ccicc��aoaQYO- °
m n a�.mamaP 3
m.:
V C man or—° ao� w mm y =n.cv '�0
cl
cc as
Ul
L
T �
Y
N
c
7
0 0
U
LL a) E
t N
z
L
� _O
c
ca
LLI
w m � m 4 m
� IIf>
w
O
¢
Q W
0 co
LL LL
LL
O F
w
D
U) O
y a) o i
Y
t T d
yr a 0
CD E
L c
L
,S a cu
U Q aS
ca
O Q "
o U ca
r
3 c a
a `o
0)(m
3 y
CD
C
c U U
fr a) N
O
a a c
�) m E
ca Z
Q2 c
CL a .
Co
>,O
=CCI C O
O Cn a)
m U v
CD
Q
T O
N (!3
CES d
U Q
N
RS
c Q
CO f
2) rn 3
c a)
z
ara 0 j > (6
Lm =�
0) a) m m FZ
O a) cc -> 0 cc
m w rn
[D a) aa) o c
Y
FD
co
3
ca) a) �6c
La)oa)ac
o a — a C :'
d M Co , Co
a) M=:g . _ C . o
C 3 "0 o 7
E w w E m o
Q) a o � r
X30 >cCD
.n LO.• U a) a) O a)
E o
2 °`o.
m L C T m a
U) COEnc >,
Co
c
cG L
a) U U >
� aJ
Q C
cc cc
�
0- 0 :3 a) - 3
0—
a) > O w h a)
c c p `c p E s
as o 0
a)0 c c CL a)
c v
-a �C5`oo
N� m U C Q
= E 0 0 0 0 0
a o c
�• U) a)
O a 0 -` L
(n cn N
(D C -0 O
L ca C L a)
O T N L O
O C C ca O N C
u) caoEQo0
y �_ C a) X L (Oq
� o E c •
>CL c ° ro� E C
CO O C 2 a) h U n
a) m T a N
� 2ca 0
Q O a) C
of O - O L a
Qooar -cu
3 6 8 o� c v)
QZr- a co Q v
c c
m
r
OD C
m c o.
^ 0
"O
— w
- o
ao
:a
-1
1-- -
LU
�
1
j { I .� I� �., I � �
I v
.�
I
Cl
L LL-
LA 1
M C:
C)
tn < U
E
E
LU
�
1
j { I .� I� �., I � �
I v
.�
I
I�
m
Ch
—A
L
I
LU
~�;
I
I
Z
'�
I � � I � s �
�
r.
I
r ro
2-1
PN
-J
0
Ln
w o
UJ
0 Ul)
K , 1+-
�- d,
U)
v w 0
< EE
.1
j
0 u
f �
�
.-r
j � I J I �, I � �
Yl � ��.
I ` �
I
i I
z
_i
45
LU
��
LU
G :
' �-s+�
m
Lr)
co
CD
—4
Comments From CDBG Public Hearing
May 31 2011— 7:00 PM
• Sanford City Hall
City Commission Chambers
300 N. Park Avenue
Sanford Florida, 32771
The Public Hearing started promptly at 7:00 PM with 11 participants in attendance. Sign -
In Sheet attached. The 11 participants represented the following organizations:
Recovery House of Central Florida (1) Harvest Times International (1)
Goldsboro Front Porch Program (2) Central Florida Family Health Center (1)
Rescue Outreach Mission (1) Habitat for Humanities (2)
Florida S.P.E.C.S. (1) Homeless Services Network (1)
Andrew Thomas Welcomed the public and introduced the consultants, Terese Beaudry
and Robert Heenan of Choice Consulting Services, L.L.C.
Andrew Thomas informed the public of the purpose of the Public Hearing:
➢ To ensure the opportunity for citizens participation in the process
➢ To receive public input relative to the development of the CDBG 2011 -2012 One
Year Action Plan.
To provide the public with an overview of the community Development Block
Grant Planning (CDBG) process
• Andrew Thomas turned the floor over to Ms Beaudry and she explained the Annual
Action Plan process, what we hope to accomplished at the meeting and the timeline for
submission of the Annual Action Plan to HUD.
Andrew Thomas informed the public of the total allocation of funds available for 2011-
2012 which is $404,880.
Next Andrew Thomas provided an overview of current year programs and proposed
program for the 2011 -2012 FY.
The floor was opened for questions:
Question: What will happen with the funds from 2010 -2011 that have not been allocated?
Answer: Some of the funds will be reallocated to existing projects i.e. the YouthBuild
youth employment and training funds will probably be reallocation to the public facilities
for improvements to the facility for YouthBuild. Also, some funds will be put out for RFP.
Question: Will the funds for youth services be available for reprogramming?
Answer: They may be since the intended use was for a program in Georgetown and no
facility has been identified to house the programs.
Question: Can the funds be used for programs in Goldsboro?
• Answer: If the funds are reprogrammed they will be available for programs in
Goldsboro.
May 31. 2011 CDBG Public Hearing Notes
Question: Will the funds for the housing rehabilitation program be increased; $5,000 is
• not enough to do an adequate rehabilitation job on the majority of the houses in
Goldsboro it will take $15 -20 thousand to do an adequate job. It seems better to increase
the grant amount spent on each house to address the total needs rather than a band -aid
piece -meal approach.
Answer: The rehabilitation program is not intended_for major rehabilitation jobs. Most
people have asked for assistance with roof, windows and doors, more along the line of a
weatherization program; the $5, 000 limit will remain for the coming year.
Question: Can monies be set aside for reconstruction projects, say 80,000 to $100,000
each year for the next four years to replace a house a year in the target area.
Answer: Yes we can do reconstruction, however for a neighbor approach it sounds like
you are referring to would require a Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Plan.
Question: Will monies be set aside for homeless services; there is a real need for housing
for homeless families.
Answer: Housing for the Homeless is a priority for HUD and the City of Sanford will
continue it's commitment to assisting the homeless population.
Question: The Front Porch Youth Leadership Program lost it's funding this year, is it
eligible for funding through CDBG funding?
Answer: It sounds like an eligible activity, give me a call and we can talk more about the
program.
• Question: Will the County continue to fund homeless services in the City of Sanford?
Answer: Homeless services although located in the City of Sanford are a countywide
service and as such are eligible for funding through County CDBG monies.
Question: There is a need for assistance with economic development and streetscape on
13 Street and in Goldsboro. Will there be funds allocated for economic development
and landscaping in next years budget?
Answer: That's the purpose of this meeting, to hear what activities and projects the
community think are needed and should be funded next year.
Comment: There is a Seminole County homeless services coalition that is assessing the
scope of the homeless situation in Seminole County and level of services needed. Will
the City of Sanford be participating in the coalition?
Answer: Mr Thomas, I am aware of the coalition and yes the City plans on participating.
Question: Harvest Times International is working with Rescue Outreach Mission to
secure housing for homeless families. Is homeless housing for families an area that can
be funded with CDBG funds and can City CDBG funds be used along with County
CDBG funds.
Answer: Yes housing for homeless families is a priority and yes City and County funds
can be used together for such services.
•
May 31, 2011 CDBG Public Hearing Notes 2
Next Mr Heenan explained the process for Public Comment and the time frame followed
• by an overview of the Annual Action Plan submission process.
There being no further questions the meeting was adjourned at 8:05PM.
Andrew Thomas, Senior Project Manager
Office of City Manager
Recorder
•
May 31, 2011 CDBG Public Hearing Notes
TIMELINE /SCHEDULE
• DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY OF SANFORD
PROGRAM YEAR 2011 -2012 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN (2 ° YEAR OF 5YEARS)
•
Date
Task
May ll
Submit Ad to Sanford Herald for publication in Sunday 5/14/11 Edition
May 14
Advertise (Sanford Herald) the 5/31 Public Hearing
May 31"
Facilitate Public Hearing for Citizen in -put on community needs (distribute and
collect surveys)
City Hall Commission Chambers 7:00 PM
June 8
Send notice of 30 Day Comment Period to Sanford Herald for advertising in the
Sunday June 12 Edition
June 13
30 Day Public Comment Period begins
June 15
Send Notice to Sanford Herald for Advertisement in the Sunday June 19
Edition the 7/5 Public Hearing
Jul 5"
Public Hearing City Commission Chambers 7:OOPM
July 12
30 Day Public Comment Period ends
July 21st
Finalize all Pan and data
July 28th
Submit transmittal to City Clerk for August Commission Agenda
August 8
City Commission to approve submittal of Consolidated and Annual Action
Plans to HUD
August 10
Submit Annual Action Plans to HUD
•
t
PUBLIC HEARING
July 5, 2011 7:00 PM
City Hall City Commission Chambers
300 N. Park Ave., Sanford, FL 32771
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program
One -Year Action Plan (2011 -2012) October 1, 2011 — September 30, 2012
AGENDA
I. Welcome and Introductions Andrew Thomas, Sr. Projects Manager
• City of Sanford Mangers and Staff
• Ms. Terese Beaudry, Managing Member /Principal, Choice Consulting Services, L.L.C.
• Mr. Robert Heenan, Managing Member /Principal, Choice Consulting Services, L.L.C.
II. This public hearing /public meeting will close the public hearing public requirements of the federal
• regulations (24 CFR 91) as they relate to Consolidated Planning, thereby having provided citizen
participation in this process.
III. Purpose of the Public Hearing
■ To ensure the opportunity for citizen participation in the Consolidated Planning Process
■ To receive public comment relative to the proposed activities of the 2011 -2012 Annual Action
Plan
IV. Questions and Answers Andrew Thomas, Sr. Projects Manager
V. Adjourn
Thank you for your involvement in the process, and for your desire to be part of the improvement of the
quality of life for all the citizens of the City of Sanford.
GOOD NIGHT AND TRAVEL SAFELY
C
FIRST RUN PROOF NOTICE FOR LEGAL ADS
• attached is a copy of legal notice that was published
I n The Sanford Herald on 6
20 _ Please check this carefully for corrections
and notify us prior to the next publication date,
V "_ iZ 6 . 20 IL, if corrections
are necessary. The Sanford Herald will not be respon-
sible for any errors not reported for correction after
tae first edition.
THE SANFORD HERALD
Legals@MySanfordHerald.com
PO Box 1667, Sanford, FL 32772 -1667
Ph: 407 - 322 -2611 • Fax: 407- 323 -9408
C]
•
Public Notice of Pubtic'"Odring pnd 30-Day Public Comment
`Petlod,
Citizen Participation
Jnly5, 2011-7.1)O pm
SanfoMc Hy Hall
CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS
300 N. Park Avenue
Seriford; Florftla
Community DevelopmeMta(ock pram (CDBG) Program
Annual Action Plan Program Year 1 /1i- 9/8prp12
Consolidated Plan Amendment First Program Year (2010.2011)
The City of Sanford is developing its Onne -Year 2011 20i 2Ad ion Plan
from the HUD approved 2010- 2014 Frye -Year Consolidated Plan the
City is required to.develop the Annual , fiction Play which describes
the activities that will be undertaken fn the Second Year O the 2070 -
2014:Five4ear Plan.
The U.S, Department of Housings Urban Developmerd for
Program year 2011 (OOfober'1, 2011 through September 30, 2012),,
has estimated an allocation Of $ 40 4,871 in CDBG
of Sanford fundingfor,the City
The following activities are proposed to be undertaken by the City for
the x 2011 2012 CDBG Program Year.
Planning & Administration $ 80,874'
Hopper Academy $100,000 '
Senior Housing Rehabilitation $ 000
Clearance $ 18000
Public Services (Youth Employment and.
Train'ing,bomeless service_ s B Senior
Services o be RFP) $ SQ 730
Home improvmeM (Minor Rehabilitation) $ 55;167
TOTAL
$404,871
The foltoi_ g activvities are Proposed to be re- programmed by the
City for the 2010 -2011 CDBG`Program .Year.
Employment and Training '
Reduce activity funding and - transfer :funds to Youth Build Facility
Rehabilitation, with a Budget Decrease Of 411_450
Youth Build Facility Rehabilitation
increase funding for this activity from Employment and Training, with
a Budget Increase of +$11;450
Services for Seniors
Delete activity and transfer funds to Senior Housing Rehabilitation,
with a Budget Decrease of , $20;0 &1
Senior HoushVAehabfiitation
Increase funding for this activity from Services to Seniors, with .a
Budget increase of +$20,061
Available for viewing and Comments
From Monday June 20 through Wednesday, July 20 ,'2011 a-draft of
the 2011 -2012 One-YearAction Plan andtheAmeod*nt areavaii
able for viewing Monday through- lbursday from 7:30 AM to b:3o
PM at the Office of the City Manager, located at 30&N. Park
Avenue, Sanford, FL 32771. Written public comm% fs,oa the Action
Plan and the Amendment are to tie submifted•tp the t - address
to Andrew Thomas, Senior Project Manager, in writing no later than
5:30 PM; on Tuesday, July 12; 2p11_ Public comments may also be
made by email to: andrew.thomas @sanfordflgovtothe City atthe
above address. The City well respond within? -days to 'any written
1 . comments..
•PUBLIC: HEARING
A public hearing for the purpose of receiving "oral public comment
on the Action Plan will be held on Tuesday July 5, 2011 at 7:00 PM
in 6e City Commission Chambers at Sanford City Ha11:3o0 N. Park
Avenue, Sanford, Florida32771.
Information relative to this hearing may be obtained from the City of
Sanford Senior Project Manager by calling 407 - 688- 5132 - during
business hours of 7:30 AM to 5:30 PM Monday through Thursday.
Non- English speaking persons:requiring language translation:athe
Public Hearing will need to notify the Senior Project Manager of this
need for service at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting.
CRY COMMISSION APPROVAL
The 2011-2012 Annual Action Plan and •Amendment will be consid-
ered by the City Commission at its regularly scheduled Commission
Meeting on Monday August 8, 20.11 for final approval and submis-
sion to HUD. The Annual Action Plan and Amendment are due to
HUD before 5:00 PM on Friday August 12, 2011.
Publish: June 18, 26, July 3, 10, 2011
0304
CD
CD
CD
E .
Mir
u U)!
u E
0-1
W
up
fo
CO
51)
<
1
r6 � � L�
cu
E
1 � I , I �
i !
I
cu o
LLI
ui
fu m
C) Ln
<
C)
ui
LU
LL.
In CO
CD
v
• Comments From CDBG Public Hearing
July 5, 2011 — 7:00 PM
Sanford City Hall
City Commission Chambers
300 N. Park Avenue
Sanford Florida, 32771
The Public Hearing started promptly at 7:00 PM with 2 participants in attendance. Sign -
In Sheet attached. The two (2) participants represented the following organization:
Habitat for Humanities (2)
Andrew Thomas opened the meeting introduced himself and welcomed the public and
introduced the consultants, Terese Beaudry and Robert Heenan of Choice Consulting
Services, L.L.C.
The introductions were followed by an explanation of the purpose of the 2' Public
Hearing. It was noted any comments about the Annual Action Plan beyond the Public
Hearing would have to be put in writing and forwarded to Andrew Thomas, Senior
Project Manager at City Hall; the writing communication could be either email or hard
copy letter.
• Thomas George, Interim City Manager came into the meeting at about 7:10 and he was
introduced and he welcomed the public and thanked them for coming out.
Since the attendance at the meeting was very small the meeting took on an informal
approach. The proposed activities for the 2011 -2012 FY year were reviewed and
considerable discussion was held regarding the proposed Home Improvement program
(minor rehabilitation) as the two representatives from Habitat for Humanities had an
interest in the particulars of the program i.e.
➢ What is the cap on dollar amount per housing unit?
Due to the limited funding the grant funds per unit is capped at $S, 000. The program
is intended to address code violations, roofs, windows, insulation etc. this not a major
rehabilitation program.
➢ What is the target area of the program?
The program will be Citywide with preference being give to the two target areas
Georgetown and Goldsboro
➢ What is the selection process for selecting sub - grantee to administer the program?
The City will issue a RFQ to identify an agency.
➢ Is there a cap on admin cost to administer the program?
The admin cost is capped at 15%
➢ Dose the City have vacant lots that can be donated to Habitat for Humanities for
• new house construction?
July 5, 2011 CDBG Public Hearing Notes
Yes the City has vacant lots and would be interested in exploring possibilities of
partnering with Habitat for Humanities to build infill housing in the target area.
➢ What is the possibility of the allocation for the housing rehabilitation program
being increased if the demand is there?
The possibility of increasing the allocation this year is very slim as all funds are
allocated to specific programs /activities. If the demand significantly exceed allocated
funding this will be addressed next year.
There being no more questions, the written procedure for public comments after the
closed of the Public Hearing was reviewed again.
The Public Hearing adjourned at 7:45PM
Andrew Thomas, Senior Project Manager
Office of City Manager
Recorder
L�
•
July 5, 2011 CDBG Public Hearing Notes 2
• Proposed Activities for 2011 -2012 CDBG Program Year
The following activities are proposed to be undertaken by the City for the 2011 -2012 CDBG Program Year:
Planning & Administration $ 80,974
Hopper Academy $ 100,000
Senior Housing Rehabilitation $ 80,000
Clearance $ 18,000
Public Services ( Youth Employment and Training, homeless services
& Senior Services to be RFP) $ 60,730
Home Improvement (Minor Rehabilitation) $ 65.167
TOTAL $ 404,871
0
The following activities are proposed to be re- programmed by the City for the 2010 -2011 CDBG Program
Year:
•
Budget
Budget Increase
Decrease
Employment and
Reduce activity funding and transfer funds to Youth
$-11,450
Training
Build Facility Rehabilitation
Youth Build Facility
Increase funding for this activity from Employment
+$11,450
Rehabilitation
and Trainin
Services for Seniors
Delete activity and transfer funds to Senior Housing
- $20,061
Rehabilitation
Senior Housing
Increase funding for this activity from Services to
+$20,061
Rehabilitation
Seniors
•
Annual Plan 2011 -2012 Proposed Project List
• The following projects listed below provide details on each of the proposed
program activities.
Public Services
It is the city's intent to use $60,730 of its CDBG funds in offering services through RFP to
support the needs of its eligible citizens in the following categories:
Youth Employment and Training
This economic improvement program is designed to assist low income youth with
improved job skills for increased opportunities for employment and economic self
confidence and sufficiency.
Services for Senior Citizens
This program will provide supportive services to improve, health, safety and general
welfare of low and moderate income senior citizens
Services for Homeless Persons
This public service program will provide a wide range of supportive services to enhance
and improve the general welfare of homeless persons.
Public Facilities
Hopper Academy Improvements $ 100,000
In Program Year 2, the City will continue to fund improvements to this public facility for
the local provision of a wide variety of supportive services.
Code Enforcement
Clearance and Demolition - $18,000
Clear and demolish unsafe, dilapidated structures from low income areas.
Affordable HousinzWousina Rehabilitation - $ 80,000
Provide funding for senior citizen homeowner occupied housing to rehabilitate homes for
Senior Citizens.
Home Improvements (Minor Rehabilitation) - $ 65
This program is intended to provide opportunities for minor home improvements for eligible
homeowner occupied housing units.
PlanninZ /Administration - $ 80,974
These funds pay expenses for general planning and administration of the
CDBG grant for the City to include program oversight and monitoring
activities.
LJ
Annual Plan 2011 -2012 Proposed Project List
• The following projects listed below provide details on each of the proposed
program activities.
Public Services
It is the city's intent to use $60,730 of its CDBG funds in offering services through RFP to
support the needs of its eligible citizens in the following categories:
Youth Employment and Training
This economic improvement program is designed to assist low income youth with
improved job skills for increased opportunities for employment and economic self
confidence and sufficiency.
Services for Senior Citizens
This program will provide supportive services to improve, health, safety and general
welfare of low and moderate income senior citizens
Services for Homeless Persons
This public service program will provide a wide range of supportive services to enhance
and improve the general welfare of homeless persons.
Public Facilities
Hopper Academy Improvements $ 100,000
• In Program Year 2, the City will continue to fund improvements to this public facility for
the local provision of a wide variety of supportive services.
Code Enforcement
Clearance and Demolition - $18,000
Clear and demolish unsafe, dilapidated structures from low income areas.
Affordable Housinz/Housinz Rehabilitation - $ 80,000
Provide funding for senior citizen homeowner occupied housing to rehabilitate homes for
Senior Citizens.
Home Improvements (Minor Rehabilitation) - $ 65,176
This program is intended to provide opportunities for minor home improvements for eligible
homeowner occupied housing units.
Plannin,a /Administration - $ 80,974
These funds pay expenses for general planning and administration of the
CDBG grant for the City to include program oversight and monitoring
activities.
•
• CDBG SUSTANTIAL AMENDMENT - FY2010 2011 FUNDS
Activities programmed for CDBG FY 2010 -2011 are to be reprogrammed in the
substantial amendment in the following manner:
This information has been advertised and discussed in the City's Public Hearing of July
5, 2011, subject to the citizen comments. (see Appendix B)
U
Budget
Budget
Decrease
Increase
Employment and
Reduce activity funding and transfer funds to Youth
$- 11,450
Training
Build Facility Rehabilitation
Youth Build Facility
Increase funding for this activity from Employment
+$11,450
Rehabilitation
and Training
Services for Seniors
Delete activity and transfer funds to Senior Housing
- $20,061
Rehabilitation
Senior Housing
Increase funding for this activity from Services to
+$20,061
Rehabilitation
Seniors
This information has been advertised and discussed in the City's Public Hearing of July
5, 2011, subject to the citizen comments. (see Appendix B)
U
Project (1) 1 CPMP
Grantee Name: Sanford, Florida
CPMP Version 2.0
Project Name
IPlanning and Administration
Description:
I
JIDISProject#:
11
JUOG Code:
1122574
Planning and administrative support for the CDBG Program.
Location:
Planning /Administration
Select one:
- - - --
Explanation:
Expected Completion Date
Planning and administrative support for the CDBG Program.
9/30/2011
Ob jective Category
0 Decent Housing
0 Suitable Living Environment
0 Economic Opportunity
Outcome Categories
1
❑ Availability/Accessibility
❑ Affordability
2
❑ Sustainability
3
Accompl. Type:
Proposed
Ac compl. T ype:
Proposed
H
+�
Underway
Underway
Complete
Complete
d t Accompl.
Type:
Proposed
Accompl. Type:
Proposed
u
-
Underway
-
-
Underway
�
Complete
Complete
L
a u
Accompl. Type:
Proposed
Accompl. Type:
Proposed
Q
Underway
Underway
Complete
Complete
Proposed Outcome
Performance Measure
Actual
Outcome
21A Gene ral Program Administration 570.206
Matrix Codes
Matrix Codes
Mat rix Cod
M atrix Cod
Matrix Codes
F Source: 'W
Proposed Amt.
Sour
V
Proposed Amt.
i.
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
M
O
Fund Source: 'IF
Proposed Amt.
und So urce: w
Proposed Amt.
- -- —
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
JAund
i
Acco Type:' w
Proposed Units
cc Type:
Proposed Units
- - 01
Actual Units
Actual Units
O
a
Accompl. Type:
Proposed Units
cco mpl. Ty
-
Proposed Units
•
Actual Units
Actual Units
Project (1) 1 CPMP
•
•
N
CD BG
--
•
Proposed Amt.
80,974
Fund Source
--
•
Proposed Amt.
L.
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
Fund Sourc
•
Proposed Amt.
Fund So urce:
•
Proposed Amt.
}
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
>
i
Accompl. Type:
•
Proposed Units
Acco Type:',
•
Proposed Units
Ch
Actual Units
Actual Units
O
L
IL
Accom Typ e:
•
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:
•
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Actual Units
M
Fund Source:
•
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source:
•
Proposed Amt.
L
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
4)
Fu So urce:
•
Proposed Amt.
Fun S
•
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
i
A Type
•
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:
•
Proposed Units
- - --
- --
IM
Actual Units
Actual Units
O
"
a
Accompl. Type:
•
Proposed Units
Accompl. Ty pe:
•
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Actual Units
Fund Source:
•
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source
•
Proposed Amt.
L
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
4)
Fund S ource:
•
Proposed Amt.
Fund So urce:
•
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
i
Accompl. Type:
•
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type
•
Proposed Units
01
Actual Units
Actual Units
O
L
a
Accompl. Type:
•
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:
•
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Actual Units
Ln
Fund Source:
•
Proposed Amt.
Fund Sour
•
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
W
Fund So urce:
•
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source:
•
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
i
Accompl. Type
•
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:
•
Proposed Units
01
Actual Units
Actual Units
O
L
IL
Accomp Type:
_
•
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:
•
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Actual Units
Project (1) 2 CPMP
Project (1) 1 CPMP
Grantee Name: Sanford, Florida
CPMP Version 2.0
•
Project Name
Hopper Academy Im rove
Description:
IDIS Project #:
2
UOG Code: 1122574
Continuation of Improvements to community center located in Georgetown Target Area.
Location:
Georgetown Target Area. 1101
F -
Public Facilities
-
Pine Avenue Sanford, Florida CT Select one:
-
- -- -
201.02 BG 3
Explanation:
11 Rehabilitation to electrical, mechanical and structural areas of the
9/30/2011 facility. To provide increased services to
the young, old, and
Ie roe a egory
low /mod citizens of the Georgetown Target Area.
0 Decent Housing
Suitable Living Environment
0 Economic Opportunity
Outcome Categories 1 Improve quality_ / in crease quantity of neighborhood facilities for low- income persons
21 Availability/Accessibility
❑ Affordability 2
❑ Sustainability
3
11 Public Facilities
Proposed
1
Accompl. Type:
V
Proposed
+�
Underway
Underway
•
O
Complete
Complete
Accompl. Type:
Proposed
Accompl. Type:
Proposed
LA --
u _
Underway
_
Underway
�
Complete
Complete
L
d U
Accompl. Type:
Proposed
Accompl. Type:
Proposed
rJ
Q
- --
Underway
-
Underway
Complete
Complete
Proposed
Outcome Performance
Measure
Actual
Outcome
Improvement in educational, Up -to 1200 people receive
recreational, and social skills. neighborhood facility services.
03E Nei ghborhood Facilities 5 70.201(c)
Matrix Co des
Matrix C odes Matrix Codes
Matri Codes M atrix Codes
C
lw
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source.
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
M
Fund Source:
1 w
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source:
Proposed Amt.
}
--
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
>.
M
11 Public Faciliti
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type: W
Proposed Units
Gt
Actual Units
Actual Units
O
L
Accompl. T
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type: 7W7
Proposed Units
•
Actual Units
Actual Units
Project (1) 1 CPMP
•
•
•
Project (1) 2 CPMP
CDBG
Proposed Amt.
100,000
Fund Source: V
Proposed Amt.
N
-
L.
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
Fund Source:
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source:
Proposed Amt.
0
-- -
Actual Amount
-
Actual Amount
i
11 Public Faciliti v
Proposed Units
1
Accompl. Type:
Proposed Units
IM
Actual Units
Actual Units
O
L
a
Accompl. Type:
-
- -—
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:',
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Actual Units
M
Fund Source_
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source_ •
Proposed Amt.
i
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
Q Fund
Source:
v
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
i
Accompl. Type:
v
Proposed Units
Accomp IW
Proposed Units
IM
Actual Units
Actual Units
O
I
Accompl. Type:
v
Proposed Units
Accomp Ty pe: Aw
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Actual Units
Fund S
V
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source: v
Proposed Amt.
L
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
M
F und Source:
V
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source: W
Proposed Amt.
>-
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
i
Accompl. Type:
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:
Proposed Units
CM
- - -
Actual Units
-
Actual Units
O
L
IL
Acc Type:
_
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:
-
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Actual Units
Ln
Fund Source:
-- -
v
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source:
--
Proposed Amt.
L
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
M
Fund Source:
V
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source:
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
M
Accompl. Type:',
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:'
Proposed Units
C1
Actual Units
- - --
Actual Units
O
L
a
Acc Type:
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Actual Units
Project (1) 2 CPMP
Project (1) 1 CPMP
Grantee Name: Sanford, Florida
CPMP Version 2.0
Project Name:
Homeowner Occupied Housing Minor Rehabilitation
•
Description:
I
11DIS Project #: 13
JUOG Code: 1122574
Homeowner occupied minor housing rehabilitation
Location:
City -Wide
Owner Occupied Housing
Select one:
- -
Explanation:
Expected Completion Date: CDBG funds will be used to provide homeowner occupied housing
9/30/2011 minor rehabilitation.
Ie ive a egory
Decent Housing
O Suitable Living Environment
O Economic Opportunity
Outcome Categories 1 '' Im prove the qua lity o owner ho usin g
❑ Availability/Accessibility
Affordability 2
❑ Sustainability
10 Housing Units
Proposed
13
Acco mpl. Type:
Proposed
y
_
Underway
Underway
•
O
Complete
Complete
t Accompl.
Type:
Proposed
A Type:
1
Proposed
*, Yl
V _
- - - - -- —
Underway
Underway
C Complete
Complete
L O
IL v
A ccompl. Type:
Proposed
A ccompl. Type:
Proposed
v
Q
Underway
Underway
Complete
Complete
Proposed
Outcome Performance
Measure
Actual
Outcome
Maintainenance of safe, sanitary, Improved housing stock and improved
and decent housing and look of neighborhoods.
14A R ehab; Single -Unit Reside 570.202
Matrix Co des
, M atrix Codes Matrix Codes
Matrix Cod es Matrix Cod
CDBG
- - --
Proposed Amt.
Sourc
Proposed Amt.
-
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
M
G7
Fund Source:
Proposed Amt.
Source:
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
JAccom
Actual Amount
M
10 Hou Unit
v
Proposed Units
pl. T
Proposed Units
Of
Actual Units
Actual Units
a
Ac compl. Type:
- -- -
Proposed Units
Type:
Proposed Units
•
Actual Units
Actual Units
Project (1) 1 CPMP
N
CDBG
-
I L v]
Proposed Amt.
65,906
Fun Source:
Actual Amount
i
Proposed Units
Actual Amount
Proposed Units
Q
Fund Source:
L
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Fund Source:
V
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
Actual Units
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
M
Accompl. Type:
V
Proposed Units
13
Acc Type:
Cn
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Actual Units
Proposed Amt.
O
Actual Amount
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
L
a
Accomp Type:
-
V
Proposed Units
Proposed Units
Accompl. T ype:
--
Actual Units
Actual Units
M
Fund Source:
- -
v
Proposed Amt.
Fund So urce:
LVI
i
Actual Amount
4)
Fund Sou rce:
v
Proposed Amt.
Fu So urce:
V
Actual Amount
i
Accompl. Type:
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:
v
IM
Actual Units
O
L
IL --
Accompl. Type:
_ - --
•
Proposed Units
Acco Ty pe:
Actual Units
a
Fun Source: - ,
Proposed Amt.
F und S ource:
VI
i
Actual Amount
M
Fund Source:
Proposed Amt.
Fu Sou rce:
Actual Amount
E
i
Acc Type:
v
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:
V
IM
Actual Units
O
L
Accom T ype :
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:'
v
Actual Units
Ln
Fund Source:
1 w
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source:
-_- _ -
L
•
Actual Amount
M
Fund Source.
Proposed Amt.
F und So urce:
>
- - - -
Actual Amount
--
M
Accom Type
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:
VI
L
IM
-_- - - - -.
Actual Units
_._. _- __
O
L
a
Accompl. Type:
V
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:
-
Actual Units
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Project (1) 2 CPMP
CPMP Version 2.0 Grantee Name: Sanford, Florida
Project Name lClearance and Demolition
Description: I JIDIS Project #: 14 JU0G Code 1122574
Demolition of unsafe abandoned, vacant residential structures on a spot slum blight basis in the target areas of
Goldsboro and Georgetown.
Matrix Codes
Matrix Codes
Location:
CDBG
Proposed Amt.
Goldsboro and Georgetown Target
Areas.
Other �
4)
Fu So ur ce : w
Select one:
- -- -
Actual Amount
Explanation:
i
Expected Completion Date
Demolition of unsafe abandoned abandoned, vacant residential
Im
9/30/2011
structures on a spot slum blight basis in the target areas of
O
Ie ive egory
Goldsboro and Georgetown. Where possible, the resulting lot if
L
IL
O Decent Housing
buildable, will be offered to non - profits and for profits for in -fill
•
O Suitable Living Environment
construction of affordable housing.
O Economic Opportunity
Outcome Categories
Improve qu ality / inc rease quantity of public improvements fo lower inco pe rsons
❑ Availability/Accessibility
❑ Affordability
2
❑� Sustainability
•
3' _ - __
--
10 Housing Units V
Proposed 6
Acco Type
Proposed
++
Underway
Underway
0
Complete
Complete
�
Acc Typ
V
Proposed
Accompl. Ty
Proposed
v _
- - --
Underway
- -
Underway
C
Complete
Complete
L
a u
Accompl. Type:
Proposed
Accompl. Type:
Proposed
v
a
Underway
Underway
Complete
Complete
Proposed
Outcome
Performance
Measure
Actual
Outcome
Decrease the number of unsafe
Improved look of neighborhoods and a
abandoned structures.
decrease in criminal activity.
04 Clearance and Demolition 570.201(d)
Matrix Codes
Matrix Codes
Matrix Codes
CDBG
Proposed Amt.
L
Actual Amount
4)
Fu So ur ce : w
Proposed Amt.
>.
Actual Amount
i
10 Ho Unit;
Proposed Units
Im
Actual Units
O
L
IL
A ccompl. Type:
Proposed Units
•
Actual Units
Fun S ource:
Fund Source: W
Accompl. Type: 1 w
Accompl. Type: W
sed Amt.
I Amount
sed Amt.
I Amount
sed Units
I Units
sed Units
I Units
Project (1) 1 CPMP
C7
•
•
Project (1)
CPMP
CDBG
Proposed Amt.
18,000
Fund Source:
Proposed Amt.
[V
L
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
0
Fund S ource:
W
Proposed Amt.
Fund So urce:
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
-- -
Actual Amount
M
Accompl. Type:
V
Proposed Units
p
6 Accompl. T
P YP a :
' v
Proposed Units
IT
Actual Units
Actual Units
O
i '
Accompl. T ype:'
Proposed Units
Accom Type:
Proposed Units
IL
Actual Units
-
Actual Units
Fund So urce:
V
Proposed Amt.
Fund Sou rce:
v
Proposed Amt.
M --
L
- -
Actual Amount
- -
Actual Amount
f0
O
Fund Sourc
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source
Proposed Amt.
}
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
M
Acco Typ e:
Proposed Units
Accompl. T
7
Proposed Units
L
IT
Actual Units
Actual Units
O
Ac Type:
IW
Proposed Units
Ac Type:
Proposed Units
IL
-
Actual Units
-1—W]
Actual Units
Fund Source:
V
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source:
Proposed Amt.
L
__ _ - - --
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
0
Fund Sourc
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source
1 w
Proposed Amt.
>-
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
Accompl. Type:',
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:
Proposed Units
IM
- - --
Actual Units
Actual Units
O
z '
Accom Type
Proposed Units
Ac compl. Type:
Proposed Units
IL
__
Actual Units
Actual Units
Fu nd Sour
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source:
V
Proposed Amt.
M
L.
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
M
Fund Source:
v
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source:
]
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
i
Accompl. Type:
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type: w
Proposed Units
C
Actual Units
Actual Units
O
L
Accompl. Type:
Proposed Units
A Type:
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Actual Units
Project (1)
CPMP
Grantee Name: Sanford, Florida
CPMP Version 2.0
Project Name: JSenior
Citizen Homeowner Occupied Housing Rehabilitation
•
Description: I
I IDIS Project #: 15 JU0G Code: 1122574
Senior Citizen homeowner occupied housing rehabilitation.
Location:
City -Wide
Owner Occupied Housing
Select one:
- -
Explanation:
Expected Completion Date: CDBG funds will be used to provide homeowner occupied housing
9/30/2011 rehabilitation for senior citizens age 62 +.
Ie ive egory
Q Decent Housing
O Suitable Living Environment
O Economic Opportunity
Outcome Categories 1 ', Improve the qual o f owner ho using
❑ Availability/Accessibility
21 Affordability 2
❑ Sustainability
3 '
10 Hous U nits
Proposed
5
Accomp Ty pe:
Proposed
4J
Underway
Underway
•
4)
Complete
Complete
t
A ccompl. Type: V
Proposed
Accompl. Ty
Proposed
u _
Underway
Underway
C
Complete
Complete
IL u
Accompl. Type: V
Proposed
Accom Ty
Propose
Q
Underway
Underway
Complete
Complete
Proposed
Outcome Performance
Measure
Actual
Outcome
Maintainenance of safe, sanitary, Improved housing stock and improved
and decent housing and look of neighborhoods.
14A R ehab; Sin gle -Unit R esidential 570.202
Matrix Codes
M atrix Codes • Matrix Codes
Matrix Codes Matrix Codes
CDBG
Proposed Amt.
F und Sou rce:
Proposed Amt.
L
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
W
Fund S ource: V
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source:
Proposed Amt.
- --
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
M
10 Housing Unit 1W
Proposed Units
Accompl. T
Proposed Units
L -
Im
- - - - -- - - --
Actual Units
- __
Actual Units
Accompl. Type:'
Proposed Units
Accompl. Ty
Proposed Units
Is Actual Units
Actual Units
Project (1) 1 CPMP
Proposed Amt.
CDBG
Proposed Amt.
80,000
Fund Source:
VI
Proposed Units
N
L
Actual Units
Actual Amount
Actual Units
Proposed Amt.
Fun Source
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source:
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Actual Amount
Actual Units
Proposed Amt.
>.
Actual Amount
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Proposed Units
i
04 Househol
j 'w
Proposed Units
5 Accompl. Type:',
VI
Proposed Amt.
IM
Actual Amount
Actual Units
Actual Amount
Proposed Units
O
IL
Accomp Type
-_ - -
V
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:
Actual Units
Fund Source:
I
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source
L
M
- -
L.
Actual Amount
M
Fund Source:
V
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source:
}
Actual Amount
M
Accompl. Type:
v
Proposed Units
Accom Ty pe:
! V
C1
Actual Units
O
L
CL
Accompl. Type:
V
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:
Actual Units
Fu nd Sourc
V
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source:
■.
Actual Amount
W
Fund Source:
V
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source:
>
Actual Amount
M
Accompl. Ty pe:
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type�
IM
Actual Units
O
i
CL
Accompl. Type
-
V
Proposed Units
Acco Type:
Actual Units
LrJ
Fund Source
w
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source:
L
Actual Amount
}
Fund Source:
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source:
Actual Amount
i
Accompl. Ty
V
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:
CM
Actual Units
O
L
Accompl. Type:
Proposed Units
Accompl Type:
Actual Units
•
Project (1)
2
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Proposed Units
Actual Units
CPMP
CPMP Version 2.0 Grantee Name: Sanford, Florida
Project Name: JYouth Services
Description: I 11DIS Project #: 16 1 UOG Code: 122574
This public service will be put out for competeive procurment. Employment and Training services for Sanford low /mod
youth.
Location:
City -wide
I Public Services
Select one: -- - -
Complete lComplete
Proposed Outcome Performance Measure Actual Outcome
People assisted with new service Assist 300 people with service.
to produce employment.
05H Empl oyment Train 570.201(e) Matrix Codes
IF
Matrix Cod
Mat C odes
M atrix Codes
Matrix Codes
CDBG Proposed Amt. Fund Sourc Proposed Amt.
s.
(1)
>.
M
Is
O
L
CL
Explanation:
Fund Source: v
Proposed Amt.
Expected Completion Date:
Areas of assistance may include but are not limited to learning how
Proposed Units
9/30/2011
to prepare a resume,
skills training to improve a job interview, how
--
Objective category
to complete a clear,
concise and acceptable job application, and
O Decent Housing
vocational training.
O Suitable Living Environment
* Economic Opportunity
Outcome Categories
1 Im eco nomic opp f or low- i ncome p ers ons
❑ Availability/Accessibility
❑ Affordability
2 - -- - --
- - _ - - - - --
❑✓ Sustainability
3
01 Peopl
v
Proposed
300
Acc ompl. Type:
Proposed
_
- -- - -
Underway
-'
Underway
d
Complete
Complete
E
Accompl. Ty
Proposed
Accompl. Type:
Proposed
IA
-- _ _ _ -
Underway
- _ _
Underway
O
Complete
Complete
a u
Accompl. Typ e: V
Proposed
Ac compl. Type:
Proposed
a
Underway
lUnderway
Complete lComplete
Proposed Outcome Performance Measure Actual Outcome
People assisted with new service Assist 300 people with service.
to produce employment.
05H Empl oyment Train 570.201(e) Matrix Codes
IF
Matrix Cod
Mat C odes
M atrix Codes
Matrix Codes
CDBG Proposed Amt. Fund Sourc Proposed Amt.
s.
(1)
>.
M
Is
O
L
CL
Actual Amount
Fund Source: v
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
01 People V
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Accom Ty pe:
Proposed Units
--
Actual Units
Actual Amount
Fund So urce: _ Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Ac Type:', 1W Proposed Units
_ Actual Units
Accompl. Type w Proposed Units
Actual Units
Project (1) 1 CPMP
CPMP
N
CDBG
a
Proposed Amt.
30000
Fund Source: w
Proposed Amt.
L
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
Fund Source:
V
Proposed Amt.
Fun S ource:
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
M
01 People
Proposed Units
300 Acc ompl. Type :',
Proposed Units
Of
Actual Units
Actual Units
O
L
a
Accompl. Type:
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type: v
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Actual Units
Fund Source:
v
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source:
Proposed Amt.
L
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
W
Fund Source:
v
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source: v
Proposed Amt.
>-
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
i
Ac compl. Type
v
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type: 'w I
Proposed Units
IM
Actual Units
Actual Units
O
IL
Accompl. Type
V
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:'
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Actual Units
Fund Source:
7
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source:
Proposed Amt.
i
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
0
Fund Source:
I
Proposed Amt.
Fund So
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
i
A ccompl. Type
V
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type: V
Proposed Units
Ol
Actual Units
Actual Units
O
L
a
Accompl. Type v
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:'
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Actual Units
Ln
Fun Source:
Proposed Amt.
Fund So urce:
Proposed Amt.
L
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
M
O
Fund Source:
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source:
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
M
Accompl. Type
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:
Proposed Units
Ol
Actual Units
Actual Units
O
L
Accom Type:
V
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Actual Units
•
Project
(1)
2
CPMP
CPMP Version 2.0 Grantee Name: Sanford, Florida
• Project Name Senior Services
Description: I IDIS Project #: 17 JU0G Code: 1122574
This public service will be put out for competeive procurment. Public services to senior citizens on a city -wide basis.
Services limited only to those age 62 +.
Project (1) 1 CPMP
Location:
City -wide
Public Services
�
Select one:
-- --
Explanation:
Expected Completion Date
Areas of assistance may include but are not limited to reduced meal
9/30/2011
costs to shut -ins, subsidized transportation
services, reduced
7e ive a egory
prescription costs.
O Decent Housing
* Suitable Living Environment
O Economic Opportunity
Outcome Categories
Improv the serv for lo / mod incom persons
1 - - - -
❑ Availability/Accessibility
-
❑ Affordability
❑ Sustainability
3
01 People
V
Proposed
300
Accompl. Type:
Proposed
U)
++
Underway
Underway
d
Complete
Complete
•
H
Accom Type:
W
Proposed
Accompl. T ype:
Proposed
u _
Underway
Underway
Complete
Complete
L
IL u
A ccompl. Ty pe:
V
Proposed
Ac compl. Type:
Proposed
u
Q
Underway
Underway
Complete
Complete
Proposed Outcome
Performance Measure
Actual
Outcome
Reduced costs to low /mod seniors
200 people receive service.
for essential services.
05A Senior Services 570 .201(e) Matrix C
Matrix Codes
Matrix C odes
Matrix Codes
Matrix Codes
CDBG 1W
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source:
Proposed Amt.
74 L.
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
W
Fund Source: 1W
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source: 1
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
M 01
People 1W
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:
Proposed Units
IM
- - - - - -
Actual Units
Actual Units
IL
Accompl. Type:
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Actual Units
Project (1) 1 CPMP
•
r:
•
Project (1) Z CPMP
Fund Source:
Proposed Amt.
30000
Fund Source:
V
Proposed Amt.
N
--
L
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
(D
Fund Source:
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source:
Proposed Amt.
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
i
01 People
Proposed Units
300
Accompl. Type:
Proposed Units
C1
Actual Units
Actual Units
O
a
Accompl. Type:
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Actual Units
Fund Source:
V
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source:
Proposed Amt.
M
L
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
M
0
Fund Sou rce:
V
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source:
W
Proposed Amt.
>_
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
i
Accompl. Type_
Proposed Units
Accompl. T
L v
Proposed Units
tM
Actual Units
Actual Units
O
L
a
Accompl. Ty pe:
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Actual Units
Fund Source:
W
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source:
Proposed Amt.
s.
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
M
d
F und Sou rce:
V
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source:
v
Proposed Amt.
>.
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
O
Accompl. Type:
c
Proposed Units
Accompl. Type:
Proposed Units
L
CM
Actual Units
Actual Units
O
d
Accompl. Type:
Proposed Units
Accom Type:
v
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Actual Units
Fu nd Source:
VI
Proposed Amt.
F und Source:
Proposed Amt.
Ln
L
Actual Amount
Actual Amount
W
Fund Source:
Proposed Amt.
Fund Source:
W
Proposed Amt.
>_
Actual Amount
- - - -- -
Actual Amount
i
P YP Accompl. Type
Proposed Units
Accompl. T
V
Proposed Units
Ct
Actual Units
Actual Units
O
L
Accompl. Type:
Proposed Units
Accompl. Typ e:
V
Proposed Units
Actual Units
Actual Units
Project (1) Z CPMP