Loading...
11.09.95AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD Meeting November 9, 1995 City Hall City Commission Conference Room 300 N. Park Avenue Sanford, Florida 4:30 P.M. I. Call to Order and Roll Call II. Excused /Unexcused Absences III. Welcome New Members - Catheryn Welch IV. Approval of Minutes October 12, 1995 V. Applications for Certificate of Appropriateness COMMERCIAL a) 217 South Park Avenue (Sobik's Subs) - Signage & Site Plan Review - Previously Tabled b) 101 East First Street (First Union Bank) - ATM Lighting c) 204 N. Park Avenue Suite 104 - Hanging Sign d) 120 South Park Avenue - Planters and Landscaping e) 105 East First Street (McCrory's) - Facade Renovation VI. Applications for Certificate of Appropriateness RESIDENTIAL a) 308 East Fifth Street - Exterior Renovations - Previously Tabled b) 207 East Tenth Street - Exterior Renovations - Previously Tabled c) 506 Palmetto Avenue - Remodel Proposal d) 609 Magnolia Avenue - Re -roof with 5V Crimp e) 911 Palmetto Avenue - Block in Basement Window Openings f) 607 Oak Avenue - Replace Windows & Install 6' Stockade Fence g) 823 Park Avenue - Relocate Front Door and Window to Original Location h) 1116 Magnolia Avenue - Install Lattice Wall & Vines VII. Acknowledgement of Minor Review Committee Actions a) 500 South Oak Avenue - Rebuild Porch Overhang b) 301 South Oak Avenue - Re -roof c) 118 Sanford Avenue - Construct Stairs and Landing d) 120 South Park Avenue - Revised Parking Plan VIII. Meeting with Sanford Post Master - Mr. Tom Pierce IX. Review Draft Amendments to Schedule S Regarding Mailboxes and Newspaper Receptacles - Endorsement X. HPB Review Schedule XI. Code Enforcement Actions XII. Newspaper Receptacle Update XIII. Goldsboro District National Register Nomination Update XIV. National Preservation Conference Report XV. Other Business ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a decision made with respect to any matter considered at the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of the proceedings, including the testimony and evidence, which record is not provided by the City of Sanford, (FS 286.0105). Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the Personnel Office ADA Coordinator at 330 -5626 48 hours in advance of the meeting. ADDENDUM TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD AGENDA November 9, 1995 VI. Applications for Certificate of Appropriateness RESIDENTIAL i) 1104 South Magnolia Avenue - Install 6' Privacy Fence MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY COMMISSION CONFERENCE ROOM CITY HALL NOVEMBER 9, 1995 4:30 P.M. I. Call to Order and Roll Call: The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Laura Sollien at 4:40 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Paul Porter Don Moore Helen Stairs Michael Skat Laura Sollien Margaret Frison Jerry Mills Kimberly Capucille Cathryn Welch Chris Cranias II. MEMBERS ABSENT: Buck Mullins OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Pierce, Sanford Post Master Andrew VanGaale, Associate Planner Jay Marder, Director of Planning and Development Marion Anderson, Recording Secretary III• Welcome New Members: Laura Sollien welcomed Cathryn Welch to the Board. IV. MINUTES: Mr. Skat noted that he was opposed to the motion to approve the installation of a pool and the screened enclosure for 407 Magnolia Avenue, on October 12th. Mr. Moore noted that the Walking Tour Brochure List and not the Walking Tour Brochures, is out of date. With the noted changes, Mr. Skat moved to approve the Minutes as amended. Seconded by Mr. Moore. All in favor. Motion carried. V. Applications for Certificates of Appropriateness: COMMERCIAL: a) 217 South Park Avenue ( Sobik' s Subs) - Signage & Site Plan Review - Previously Tabled: Barkley Smith was present representing Sobik's Subs. Mr. Skat moved to approve contingent upon the sign complying with the Codes (18" high) and that Staff review the existing signage; and if Fina is maxed out on signage, then they will have to make room. Seconded by Mrs. Welch. Mr. Smith explained that the sign material, Accrasteel, is not a steel but a polymer, basically the same material that the Fina signs are made of. Mr. Skat amended his motion that the sign be 18 11 x3' with Staff to review the total signage, and if the total signage is exceeded, then the sign doesn't go up. Seconded by Mrs. Welch. Mr. Moore opposed to the motion. All others in favor. Motion carried. b) 101 East First Street (First Union Bank) - ATM Lighting: No representative. Mr. Porter moved for approval. Seconded by Mr. Cranias. All in favor. Motion carried. c) 204 N. Park Avenue Suite 104 - Hanging Sign: Scott J. Gilger was present for representation. He explained that the size of the sign will be 3x2, have a rustic look and would be doublesided, green with two gold stripes. MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING OF NOVEMBER 9, 1995 PAGE 2 The sign will be approximately 14' above the canopy. Mr. Mills abstained from voting because he was not sure the applicant could advertise architectural design services without being licensed as a registered architect. Mr. Mills stated that he would research this. Don Doer, architect, stated that the problem with the State Board of Architecture would be with the word "architectural". Design services only would do it, but by using the word "architectural" the applicant would be putting himself in a category without a license. Mr. Cranias moved to approve if the sign can proportionally fit within the guidelines. seconded by Mrs. Stairs. Mr. Porter stated that he has to cut the sign down to not more than 4- square feet. Mr. Mills abstained. All others in favor. Motion carried. d) 120 South Park Avenue - Planters and Landscaping: No representative. Mr. VanGaale passed around some pictures and stated that they would be installing whiskey barrel type planters. Mr. Mills moved to approve. Seconded by Ms. Capucille. All in favor. Motion carried. e) 105 East First Street (Mc.Crory's) - Facade Renovation: Lisa Nason, 900 Magnolia Avenue, was present for representation. She stated that the facade renovation is for the entire McCrory's building. She requested to reserve the right that the previous use has been demonstrated as being used as. a balcony on second floor. Mr. Mills stated that it is not a matter of reserving a right, but it is a matter of discovering what is there and coming back before this Board as to what is to be done. Ms. Nason stated that she would keep the application the way it is; to keep the canopy, in tact, with an identical or coordinated awning. Mr. Mills moved to approve. Seconded by Mr. Skat. All in favor. Motion carried. VI. Applications for Certificate of Appropriateness: Residential: a) 308 East Fifth Street - Exterior Renovations: - Previously Tabled: No representative. Mr. VanGaale stated that he did receive some follow -up information from the State stating that this is a certified rehab project. Mr. Skat moved for approval contingent upon minor review of the colors. Seconded by Mr. Moore. All in favor. Motion carried. b) 207 East Tenth Street Exterior Renovations - Previously Tabled: Because there was no representation and due to the fact that it is hard to get a feel for what the applicants are trying to accomplish, Mr. Skat moved to table. Seconded by Mrs. Stairs. Mr. Mills stated that he would make a valiant attempt, if his schedule allows, to get with Mr. VanGaale and the owner to try to understand what all they have done. He requested that someone familiar with the house accompany him. All in favor. Motion carried. c) 506 Palmetto Avenue Remodel Proposal: Don Doer, 301B Park Ave., Winter Park, was present for representation. He stated that he was requesting approval of the submitted schematic design. He requested approval to start doing some work on the covered porch, MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING OF NOVEMBER 9, 1995 PAGE 3 to take off the lean -to addition and remove the chimney while the final drawings are being prepared. Mr. Mills moved to approve the request with the condition that the architect speak with a structural engineer about the possibility of retaining the chimney from the attic space up. Mr. Skat seconded. During discus.sion, as an alternative, it was decided that the architect would look into duplicating the chimney using the existing materials. Mr. Mills restated his motion and moved to approve as submitted with the condition that the chimney will either be retained from the attic up or rebuilt exactly as it exists, and adding a porch to the back where the lean -to will be removed. All in favor. Motion carried. d) 609 Magnolia Avenue - Re -roof with 5V Crimp: No representative. Mr. Skat moved to approve. Seconded by Ms. Capucille. All in favor. Motion carried. e) 911 Palmetto Avenue - Block in Basement window Openings: No representative. Mr. Mills moved to approve. Seconded by Mr. Moore. All in favor. Motion carried. f) 607 Oak Avenue - Replace Windows & Install 6' Stockade Fence: Suzanna Dean Hill was present for representation. She stated that she has not checked on either the double -hung nor the casement windows. Whatever she decides on will have small panes and would not be aluminum. The stockade fence will be just inside the existing chain link fence. Ms. Capucille moved to approve replacing the jalousie windows with glass windows, of applicant's choosing, as long as they are wood frame and the fence to come to the front corner of the house. Seconded by Mr. Mills. Brady Lasard, 1111 Magnolia, stated that it is important that the Board and citizens understand the restraints on fences. All in favor. Motion carried. g) 823 Park Avenue - Relocate Front Door and Window to Original Location: No representative. Mr. VanGaale stated that the replacement door that was purchased by the owners predates the home. The entrance will face Park Avenue when completed. Mr. Skat moved to approve. Seconded by Mr. Porter. All in favor. Motion carried. h) 1116 Magnolia Avenue - Install Lattice Wall & Vines: Mr. Skat stated that he would like to install a lattice wall on the north side of the property to shield the chain link fence and normal maintenance because the gate has been damaged. Mr. Skat agreed that if at any time the fence is removed, the lattice wall would be removed also. Mr. Cranias moved to approve.. Seconded by Mrs. Stairs. Mr. Skat abstained. All others in favor. Motion carried. ADDENDUM: 1104 Magnolia Avenue.: Mr. VanGaale stated that this item was sent to Code Enforcement last month because conditions of a previous C of A were not met. The applicants are scheduled to go before Code Enforcement on December 12th. He stated that he was hoping to resolve this matter and avoid Code Enforcement action by coming up with a solution. The applicants are proposing to paint the fence: a deep MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING OF NOVEMBER 9, 1995 PAGE 4 rose color and are proposing to paint the house Pine Grove Green. The proposed fence will be behind the chain link fence. Ms. Capucille moved to deny the request for a 6' fence on the front, because the height is over the Code; the fence can be up to 54 11 , it can be wood and can be block on the bottom; and the 6' chain link fence will have to be lowered in the front. Mrs. Welch seconded. Don Moore opposed. All others in favor. Motion carried. The paint color for the fencing was not included in the motion and was not approved. Mr. Cranias stated that due to the growing audience that this Board entertains at each meeting, the residential applications are becoming more intense and there are quite a few more being reviewed. He suggested that the Board be turned into 1) a business district and 2) a residential district. He requested that the Board members consider this. Mr. VanGaale stated that it would be easier to meet twice a month. Mrs. Sollien requested . that this be placed on the next agenda. VII. Acknowledgement of Minor Review Committee Actions:: Mr. Skat moved to approve the Minor Review Committee Actions. Seconded by Mr. Porter. All in favor. Motion carried. VIII. Meeting with Sanford Post Master - Mr. Tom Piercer Toby Troutman, 900 S. Palmetto, asked if the residents of the Historic District had to change their mail boxes to curbside mailboxes. Mr. Pierce stated "no ", they do not. He stated that once the mail boxes are converted, the Post Office takes the position that they can't be taken back to the house. Mr. Pierce stated that he would speak with the mail carriers, that could be identified, that has indicated that residents' mail would be held or their mail will not be delivered because they did not have a curbside receptacle. Mr. Pierce stated that the Post Office has decided not to buy anymore mail boxes for the Historic District. He agreed to listen to citizens, on a case by case basis, who have installed curbside mail receptacles due to indication of Postal Employees. IX. Review Draft Amendments to Schedule: S Regarding Mailboxes and Newspaper Receptacles - Rnrinr sement: Mr. Skat moved to approve the language in the Amendments to Schedule S. Seconded by Ms. Capucille. Mr. Porter stated that he did not think it was necessary, it looks like the language that is in there covers it, that it may tend to limit other things. Mr. Porter stated that it should read "examples include but are not limited to ". Mr. Skat withdrew his motion. Mr. Porter moved to change the language to read "examples include but are not limited to ". Seconded by Ms. Capucille. All in favor. Motion carried. X. HPB Review Schedule: Mr. VanGaale stated that it is a schedule to inform applicants when materials need to be submitted. XI. Code Enforcement Actions: Two issues were sent to Code Enforcement: 914 Park Avenue and 1104 S. Magnolia Avenue. Mr. Angle of 914 Park Avenue is schedule to appear before the Code Enforcement Board on December 12th. 1104 S. Magnolia Avenue has. been issued a new C of A and does not have to appear before Code Enforcement. MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING OF NOVEMBER 9, 1995 PAGE 5 XII. Newspaper Receptacle Update: Mr. VanGaale stated that the City Manager is working with the City Attorney regarding this issue. Mrs. Stairs is to get with Main Street to see if they have any input relative to the placement of newspaper receptacles. XIII. Goldsboro District National Register Nomination Update:. Mr. VanGaale stated that he has very diligently been working on redoing the Goldsboro Historic District Map. He has also contacted the Division of State Department of Historic Resources and two gentlemen will be here on the 14th and 15th to physically walk through the Goldsboro District to take slides, rework the nomination and hopefully get it recognized or registered as a historic district. Mr. VanGaale stated that he would try to get them to walk through Georgetown also. XIV. National Preservation Conference Report: Mr. VanGaale reported that much of the conference was geared towards a taking issue and legal property rights. He visited Grapevine, Texas and found their marketing package very impressive. Grapevine closes off their Mainstreet every year for a Grapevine Festival. The charge is $3.00 and all monies go back into the Downtown Historic Trust Fund. He picked up some information on African American Heritage groups with certain organizations that could be promising for some of our areas. He stated that he has some information on Section 106, which is the National Federal Review for whenever a federal entity works on historic property that is national register listed, they also have to adhere. to local standards. r There being no further business, the meeting adjourned. at 7:20 P.M. FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OT HER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS LAST NA E -FIRST NA IE- MIDDLE NAME MAILING AD RESS 341 N. Maitland Ave Ste 130 MaITLAND FL CITY COUNTY DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED 11/9/95 NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE Historic Preserv Board IHE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE ON WHICH 1 SERVE IS A UNIT OF: X C'I I Y .: COUNTY ' ' OTHER LOCAL AGENCY NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION: City of Sanford MY POSITION IS: i_ ELECTIVE APPOINTIVE WHO MUST FILE FORM 86 This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. The requirements of this law are mandatory; although the use of this particular form is not required by law, you are encouraged to use it in making the disclosure required by law. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES ELECTED OFFICERS: A person holding elective county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whop) he is retained. In either case, you should disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS: A person holding appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which. inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained. A person holding an appointive local office otherwise may participate in a matter in which he has a conflict of interest, but must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision by oral or written communication, whether made by the officer or at his direction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: • You should complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. • A copy of the form should be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. • The form should be read publicly at the meeting prior to consideration of the matter in which you have a conflict of interest IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: • You should disclose orally the nature of' your conflict in the measure before participating. • You should complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST � (-) �1 19 ° I, J `i V , "(u' —� , hereby disclose that on l (a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) inured to my special private gain; or inured to the special gain of , by whom I am retained (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: Mr. Mills abstained from voting because he was not sure the applicant could advertise architectural design services without being licensed as a registered architect. h Date Filed NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317 (1985), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRF DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWIN IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5,000. FORM 813 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR CO UNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS NA LAS LAM -FIRS] ME � N ME NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE � Historic Preservation Board 1 BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE ON MAILING AD LISS WHICH 1 SERVE IS A UNIT OF: 1116 Magnolia Ave X CI fY COUNTY ' 'OTHER LOCAL AGENCY CITY C'OUN'TY NAME OF POLITICAL. SUBDIVISION: Sanford Seminole City of Sanford DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED MY POSITION IS: i,t ELECTIVE X APPOINTIVE 11/9/95 WHO MUST FILE FORM 86 This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. The requirements of this law are mandatory; although the use of this particular form is not required by law, you are encouraged to use it in making the disclosure required by law. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES ELECTED OFFICERS: A person holding elective county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained. In either case, you should disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS: A person holding appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained. A person holding an appointive local office otherwise may participate in a matter in which he has a conflict of interest, but must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision by oral or written communication, whether made by the officer or at his direction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: • You should complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible fol recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. • A copy of the form should be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. • The form should be read publicly at the meeting prior to consideration Of the matter in which you have a conflict of interest IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: • You should disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. • You should complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST I, wl(cr44cz &CA—i , hereby disclose that on (a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) inured to my special private gain; or inured to the special gain of 11/9/95 (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: 1,,q fi l) - o . /- / / -` Date Filed , 19 , by whom I am retained loe- Signature NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317 (1985), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRI: DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWIN IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5,000.