122280-Regular Session487
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida December 22, at 7: 00 P. M.
1980
MIDBTATE LEGAL SUPPLY COMPANY
The City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida, met in Regular Session in the
City Hall in the City of Sanfmrd,Florida, on December 22, 1980 at 7:00 o'clock P. M.
Present:
Mayor-Commissioner Lee P. Moore
Commissioner'Julian L. Stenstrom
Commissioner David T. Fart
Commissioner Eddie. O. Keith
City Attorney C. Vernon Mize, Jr.
City Manager W. E. Knowles
City Clerk H. N. Tar~a, Jr.
Commissioner-ElectMilton Smith
The meeting was called, to order by the Chairman.
The City Commission designated Commissioner-Elect Milton E. Smith to fill the unex-
pired, term of Commissioner Morris, who resigned from Seat No. 4 of the City Commission.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office to Commissioner-Elect Milton E.
Smith, who signed thg Oath and Acceptance of Office and was seated as City Commissioner of the
City of Sanford, Florida.
A public hearing was held in accordance with notice published in the Evening Herald
on December 2 and 12, 1980 as follows:
NOTICE~OF PUBLIC HEARING:OF PROPOSED-CHANGES AND
AMENDMENTS IN CERTAIN DISTRICTS AND BOUNDARIES OF
THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AND AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND
USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY
OF SANFORD, FLORIDA.
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held at the
Commission Room in the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, at
7:00 o'clock P. M. on December 22, 1980, to consider changes and amend-
ments to the Zoning Ordinance, and amending the Future Land Use Element
of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Sanford, Florida, as follows:
A portiOn of that certain property lying between Lake Mary
Boulevard and. Airport Boulevard and between U. S. Highway 17-92
and Art Lane extended Northerly is proposed to be rezoned from
PUD (Planned Unit Development) District to districts as fol-
lows:
MR-2 (MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING) DISTRICT:
Beginning at' the most Southerly corner of Lot 1, Block
"E", of HIDDEN LAKE UNIT I-B, according to the Plat thereof as re-
.corded in Plat Book 17, pages 53 and 54, Public Records of Seminole
County, Florida; run N. 45000'00'' E. 190.00'; thence run'~S. 89o11'07''
E. 611.30'; thence run S. 03049'37,, E. 1016.95' to a point on the
Sanford Grant Line; thence run N. 63o56'30" W. along said Sanford
trent Line to a point on the Right-of-Way of Hidden Lake Drive, a dis-
tance of 334.61'; thence run. N. 16013'30'' W. 231.56' along said Right-
of-Way to the P. C. of a curve concave Westerly having a radius of
524.27';~ thence run Northwesterly along said curve through a central
angle of 30043'46'' for an arc length of 281.18'; thence run N. 46°57'16''
W. 414.21 feet to the P.O.B.
AND
All of Block'B as shown on Revised Plat of HIDDEN LAKE
UNIT I-A, Less the Southerly 800 leer thereof, according to the Plat'
thereof as recorded in Plat Book 17, page 99, Public Records of Semi-
nole County, Florida.
GC-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT:
Southerly 800 feet of B'lock B as shown on Revised Plat
of HIDDEN LAKE UNIT l-A,. according tu the Plat thereof as recorded in
'Plat Book 17, page 99, Public Records of Seminole County, Floridk.
Ail parties in interest and citizens shall have mm onnor~nqtv
488
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida December 22, at 7: 00 P. M.
19__
8O
The Chairman announced that the'Commission would hear from those persons present to
speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the proposed rezoning.
No one appeared.
The City Clerk reported, that notices were sent to property owners on November 21,
1980, and the property was posted, on November 20, 1980.
On recommendation of the Planning and. Zoning Commission,.7~'
submitted, at meeting of
December 8, 1980, Commissioner Keith moved, to authorize the City Attorney to prepare the pro-
per ordinance to rezone the property. Seconded. by Commissioner Stenstrom and carried.
A public hearing was held. in accordance with not'icepublished in the Evening Herald
on December 2 and. 12' 1980 as follows:
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING"OF'PROPOSED CHANGES AND
AMENDMENTS' IN CERTAIN DISTRICTS AND BOUNDARIES OF
THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AND AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND
USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY
OF SANFORD, FLORIDA.
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held at the'
Commission Room in the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, at
7:00 o'clock P. M. on December 22, 1980, to consider .changes and amend-
ments to the Zoning Ordinance, and amending the Future Land Use Element
of the Comprehensive Plan of the"City of Sanford, Florida, as follows:
A portion of that certain property lying between Lake Mary
Boulevard and Airport Boulevard. and between U.S~ Highway 17-92
and. Art Lane extended Northerly is proposed to be rezoned from
PUD (Planned Unit Development) District to districts as follows:
SR - ] (SINGLE-F~MILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING) DISTRICT:
!
Co~ence at the North 1/4 corner of Section 11, Township 20 South·
Range 30 East· thence South 89° 08' 20" East, along the North line of
said Section 11, a distance of 1381.60 feet; thence South O0° ]3' 29"
East, 1361.68 feet to the point of beginhing of the tract herein de-
scribed; thence continue South O0° 13' 29" East, 538.06 feet; thence
South 25° 43' 46"~West, 722.70 feet; thence North 63° 59'44" West,
200.00 feet; thence South 25° 43' 46" West, 721.90 feet; thence North
63° 59' 44" West, 99.10 feet; thence South 25° 43' 46" West, 400.00.
feet; thence North 78o 35' 19" West, 1400.00 feet; thence South 01° 30'
48" East· 1200.00 feet to a point 400.00 feet Northerly of the North
right of way of Lake Mary Boulevard when measured at right angles there-
to; thence Westerly to a point on the Easterly right of way of Hidden
Lake Drive, said point being 400.00 feet Northerly~ of the North right of
way of Lake Mary Boulevard ~hen measured at right angles thereto; thence
Northerly along the Easterly right of way of Hiddea ~ake Drive '.to the
intersection of said right of way with the South line of the Sanford
Grant; thence South 63° 59' 44" East· along said Grant line· 334.61 feet;
thence North 03° 49' 37" West, 1016.95 feet; thence South 89° 11' 07"
East, 238.70.feet; thence North 09° 59' 07" West, 426.83 feet; thence
North 28° 3~' 18" West, 728.47. feet; thence South 58° 00' 54" West,'
.650.00 feet; thence North 42° 21' 48" West along the Easterly bound-
aries of Hidden Lake Units 1-B and 1-C as recorded in Plat Book 17,
Pages 53 through 56 of the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida,
160.OD feet; thence North 07° 39' 00" West, continuing along the East-
erly boundary of said Unit l-C ~nd along the Easterly boundar~ of ~id-
den Lake Unit 1-D as recorded in Plat Book 17, Pages 57 and 58 of said
Public Records, 895.00 feet; thence East, along the South boundary of
Hidden Lake, Phase II,.Unit l, as recorded in Plat Bn,n~ pa' ~=~0 ~r
489 ~
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanfo~, ~lorida December 22, al: 7: 00 P. M.
29° 47' 36" West, 391.67 feet; thence North 02° 04' 50" West, 210.32
feet; thence North 66° 10' 14" East, 352.78 feet; thence North 07° 20'
00"' East, 210. OD feet; thence North 14° 17' 53" East, 149.60 feet;
thence North 29° 13' 24" West, 8D.O0 feet; thence South 89° 09' 46"
East,departing said Easterly boundaries and along the North line of
the aforesaid Section ll, a distance of 150.DO feet; thence South
O0° 50' 14" West, 1,362.03 feet; thence South 89° 09' 46" East,
parallel with the North line of the NW 1/4 of said Section ll, a
distance of 3,353.75 feet to the Point of Beginning.
MR - 1 (MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING) DISTRICT:
Begin at a point on the South line of Section 2, Township 20
South, Range 30 East, said point being South 89° 08' 20" East, 617.76
feet from the South 1/4 corner of said Section 2; thence South 89° 08'
2D" East, along the South line of said Section 2, a distance of 763.84
feet; thence 'South O0° 13' 29" East, 1361.68 feet; thence North 89° 09'
46" West, parallel with the South line of the SW 1/4 of said Section 2,.
a distance of 3,353.75 feet; thence North O0° 50' 14" East, 1,362.03
feet; thence South 89° 09' 46" East, along the South line of said Sec-
tion 2, a distance of 251.19 feet; thence North 45° 59' 52" West,
297.92 feet; thence North 44° ll' 17" East, 165.06 feet; thence North
45° 52' 23" West, 659.91 feet; thence No~th 44° 00' 15" East, 827.85
feet; thence South 46~ 03' 43" East, 783.91 feet3 thence North 43° 31'
04" East, 397.08 feet; thence Easterly along the Southerly right of
way.of Onora-Grapeville Road {Airport Boulevard} and along the arc of
a curve, concave NOrtheasterly, having a central angle of 42° 47'49"
· ,
a radius of 1949.86 feet; a tangent bearing of' South 46° 28' 56" East,
a distance of 1456.44 feet to the point of tangency; thence South 89°
16' 45" East, continuing along said right of way, 162.81 feet; thence
South O0° 43' 00" We?,t, 620.58 feet; to the Point of Beginning.
GC- 2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT:
Begin at the intersection of the Southeasterly right of way of
Clarendon Avenue, as shown on Plat of Avondale, recorded in Plat Book
3, Pag.e 94 of the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida, with
the Southwesterly right of way of Onora-Grapeville Road {Airport
Boulevard}; thence South 36° 47' 30" East, along the Southwesterly
right of way of Onora-Grapeville Road {Airport Boulevard) 1029.44
feet to a point of curveature; thence continue along said Southwest-
erly right of way and along the arc of a curve, concave Northeaster-
ly and having a central angle of 09° 41' 26", a radius of 1949.86
feet, a distance of 329.78 feet; thence South 43° 31' 04" West,
397.08 feet; thence North 46° 03' 43" West, 1032.00 feet; thence
North 37° 49' 33" East, 489.99 feet; thence North 36°'47, 30" West,
276.00 feet; thence North 53° 12' 30" East, 57.40 feet to the Point
of Beginning. --
Begin at a point North 63° 59' 44" West, 900.00 feet from the
Westerly right of way of U.S. Highway No. 17 and 92, and North 25°
43' 46" East, 1447.40 feet from the South line of the Sanford Grant;
thence North 78° 35' 19" West, 14DD.DO feet; thence South 01°'30' 48"
East, 1200.00 .feet to a point 4DO feet Northerly of the North right
of way of'Lake Mary Boulevard when measured at right angles thereto;
thence Westerly to a point, on the Easterly right of way of Hidden
19 ·80
9O
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida December 22, at 7: 00 ?. M.
19 80
along said Northerly right of way, to a point North 63° 59' 44"
West, 1160.63 feet from the West right of way of U.S. Highway No.
17 and 92 and South li° 00' 16" West, 173.01 feet from the South
line of the SanfordGrant; thence North ll° 00' 16" East, 173.01
feet; thence North ~25° 43' 46" East, 290.00 feet; thence South 63°
59' 44" East, 200.00 feet; thence North 25° 43' 46" East, 241.40 feet;
thence South 63° 59' 44" East, 560.63 feet; thence North 25° 43' 46"
East, 100.00 feet'; therce South 63° 59' 44" East, 400.00 feet; thence
North 25° 43' 46" East, along the West right of way of U.S. Highway
17 and 92, a distance of 50.00 feet; thence North 63° 59' 44" West,
250.00 feet; thence North 25° 43' 46'' East, .56.00 feet; thence North
63° 59' 44" West, 636.00 feet; o thence North' 25~ 43' 46" East, 710.00
feet; thence North 63° 59' 44" West; 14.00 feet l~o the Point of Begin-
ning.
All parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity
to be heard at said. hearing.
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida.
H. N. Ta~m~, Jr.
City Clerk
Publish:
December 2 and. 12, 1980.
The Chairman announced, that the Commission would hear from those persons present to
speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the proposed rezoning. No one appeared..
The City Clerk reported that notices were sent to property owners on November 21,
1980, and the property was posted on November 20, 1980.
On recommendation of the Planning and. Zoning Commission, submitted at meeting of
December 8, 1980, Commissioner Stenstrom moved to authorize the City Attorney to prepare the
proper ordinance to rezone the property. Seconded by Commissioner Fart and carried.
Requests submitted for time extensions on condemnations as follows:
Group Report Min Housing Code
No. No. Address Owner Insp Recotmaends
57 80-940 1301 W. llth St. Eugene Rose 90 Days
58 80-950 1022 W. 12th St. E.L. Blacksheare 90 Days
58 80-957 410 E. 25th P1 Creighton Turner 90 Days
57 80-933 415-415~ E 6th St Elizabeth Paige final 90 Days
53 79-904 500 E 5th St Ruth J. Allen final 90 Days
Recommended. by the City Manager.
On recommendation of the City Manager, Commissioner Keith moved to authorize same.
Seconded by Commissioner Stenstrom and carried over dissenting vote of Commissioner Fart.
Request for 90 day use of a mobile trailer sign submitted from Cavalier Motor Inn,~
3200 South Orlando Drive, to advertise Food and. Entertainment Specials. Commissioner Sten-
strom moved to authorize same. Seconded by Commissioner Keith and carried over dissenting
vote of Co~r~nissioner Fart.
Consideration next given to memo dated December 17, 1980, from the Building Official
to the City Clerk, stating that membership terms for the Central Examining Board expire as of
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida December 22, at 7: 00 P. M.
19 80
491 1
MIDS'I'A'f~; LEGAL ~UFPLY GOMPAN¥
A1 Porzig P.O. Box 51'
JosephSpaulding
2307 Oak Avenue
Leon Steinmeyer, Sr.
215 South Oak Avenue
Roosevelt Green
Rt. 2, Box 136-A
Commissioner Keith moved to re-appoint said members to the Central Examining
Board. Seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried.
On motion of Commissioner Farr, seconded by Commissioner Stenstrom and carried,
Ordinance No. 1544, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1097 OF SAID CITY, SAID
ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING PLAN; SAID AMENDMENT
CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN
PROPERTY LYING EAST OF U.S. HIGH~4AY 17-92 AND
BETWEEN AIRPORT BOULEVARD AND THE OLD ORLANDO
HIGHWAY FROM PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT)
DISTRICT TO MR-2 (MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DWELLING) DISTRICT, AND GC-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL)
DISTRICT, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS
AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
was introduced, placed on first reading and read in full.
A public hearing was held in accordance with notice published in the Evening Her.
ald on December 12, 1980 as follows:
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION
OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA.
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be heir at the
Commission Room in the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, at
7:~00 o'clock P. M. on December 22, 1980, to consider the adoption of
an ordinance by the City of Sanford, Florida, title of which is as fol-
lows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1541
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
RELATING TO THE REGULATION OF THE PURCHASE OF
PERSONAL PROPERTY CONSISTING OF PRECIOUS METALS
BY SECONDHAND DEALERS WITHIN THE CITY OF SANFORD;
PROVIDING FOR KEEPING OF CERTAIN RECORDS BY SUCH
D~LERS; PROHIBITING THE DISPOSAL OF CERTAIN PER-
SONAL PROPERTY CONSISTING OF PRECIOUS METALS WITH-
IN TEN DAYS OF RECEIPT OF SAME; PROVIDING FOR THE
FILING OF CERTAIN REPORTS WITH THE CHIEF OF POLICE;
PROHIBITING THE TRANSACTION OF BUSINESS INVOLVING
PRECIOUS METALS WITH MINORS; PROVIDING FOR THE
ARRANGEMENT OF PRECIOUS METALS IN SUCH A MANNER
AS TO FACILITATE INSPECTION; PROVIDING FOR PEN-
ALTIES~ SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE
DATE.
A copy shall be available at the Office of the City Clerk for all
persons desiring to examine the same.
Ail parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity
to be heard at said hearing.
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida,
H. N. Tamm, Jr.
City Clerk
Publish: December 12, 1980.
492
MINUTES.
City Commission, Sanford, Florida December 22, at 7: 00 P. bi.
19 80
746 Baywood Circle
Sanford, Florida, 32771
Dec. 17, 1980
To: Sanford City Commission
Reference: Proposed Ord. 1Skil - Purchasing precious metals within the
City limits.
I have read the proposed ordinance ~1541 and would like to present
this letter for your consideration when the second reading is voted upon.
I am a precious metal dealer who resides in.the county but conducts
business Within the.Sanford City limits and Volusia County. I am
licensed in both areas and fully comply wi~h State law requiring the
reporting of purchases to the Sheriff's Dept. of the respective counties.
This new ordinance, although its intentions are good, will have
a two-fold effect upon the small~inessmen'like myself.
First, it requires that I hold the precious metals I buy for 10
days. The price'of gold changes sometimes as much as $100.00 or more
during this period. If this law is enacted it will take the small
businessman out.of the realm of a business buying at~a set percentage
of profit, and makes him a speculator on the gold market.
Since this is my only source of income, I personally do nat wish
to speculate with my family livelihood. .'
Secondly, I have approximately $1,000 capital wi%h which I buy
.gold. I buy and sell every few days at a given percent of profit and
hopefully make $800.00 per month at which time I ~ay my monthly bills and
start over again.
If you pass this ordinance and I buy $1000 worth' of.gold on a
weekend, my profit would be approx. $200.00. To have to hold this
purchase for l0 days would put me out of business the' other 8 days.
This law would limit my income to less than $500.00 a month assuming
the gold price remained the same.
Although it would not affect large dealers who hmve several hundred
thousand dollars to work with and ca~ hold it until the price is up., it
would put me and mmaller dealers like me out of business, because we would
not be able to make a living.
I started the business so that I would not be on unemployment after
I lost my position as a driver. Your ordinance would effectively shut
down myself and others who operate legally, Just to attempt to s~op
crimes. It will not alleviate the criminal element~whc will only
steal the items and move them to an area that does not have..this law or
they will sell it to a dealer who~does not comply with the law.and
who will not maintain records of all sales.
Another section of the ordinance prohibits the removal of the
items from the city limits of Sanford for 10 days.
Since I must take the items ~ buy home with me for safe
keeping and the fact that I live in the county would put me in
violation of the ordinance on every business day.
I hope that this letter will get you .to reconsider the
ordinance in the light of the legitimate small businessman. There
must be other means that law enforcement can use to stop criminal
acts than creating a blanket law that hurts legitimate businessmen
in the area.
If observed from another view the law will not prevent the
crimes and will' make it mo~e difficult for law en$~rcement to
locate the persons selling stolen property since they would take
it to other areas of the state or county to sell it or sell it to
someone they know who buys stolen property.
~, in effect, the only thing I can see that will definitely
happe~ with the passage of this ordinance is to put the small
businessman like myself out of work.
v ,.,~,,~ .~u *~ v~,, e~n~d~r this when votin~ 'on the ordinance.
MINUTES
City CommisJion, Sanford, Florida December 22, at 7: 00 P. M.
1980
MID~TATE LEGAL .qlJPPLY COMPANY
On motion of Commissioner Keith, seconded by Commissioner Farr and. carried, the se-
cond reading of Ordinance No. 1541 was tabled.
A public hearing was held in accordance with notice published in the Evening Herald
on December'~12, 1980, as follows:
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION
OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA.
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held at the
Commission Room in the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, at
7:00 o'clock P. M. on December 22, 1980, to consider the adoption of
an ordinance by the City of Sanford, Florida, title of which is as fol-
lows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1542
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1097 OF SAID CITY, SAID
ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING PLAN; SAID AMENDMENT
CHANGING THE DENSITY CONTROLS AS TO TOWNHOUSE
AND CLUSTER HOMES TO NO-LESS THAN FOUR NOR MORE
THAN EIGHT UNITS; SAID AMENDMENT FURTHER AMEND-
ING THE CRITERIA FOR COMMERCIAL OR RETAIL USE
IN A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; SAID
AMENDMENT FURTHER REQUIRING A MINIMUM AREA OF
ONE HUNDRED CONTIGUOUS ACRES IN SINGLE OWNER-
SHIP FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT; SAID AMEND-
MENT FURTHER'PROVIDING FOR CHANGES IN M~NIMUM
SIDE, REAR AND FRONT YARD REQUIREMENTS AS TO
TOWNHOUSES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS,
AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
A copy shall be available at the Office of the City Clerk for all
persons desiring to examine the same.
All parties in interest and citizens shall~have an opportunity
to be heard at said hearing.
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida.
Publish:December 12, 1980.
H. N. Tatum, Jr.
City Clerk
Ordinance No. 1542, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1097 OF SAID CITY, SAID
ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING PLAN; SAID AMENDMENT
CHANGING THE DENSITY CONTROLS AS TO TOWNHOUSE
AND CLUSTER HOMES TO NO LESS THAN FOUR NOR MORE
THAN EIGHT UNITS; SAID AMENDMENTiFURTHER AMEND~
ING THE CRITERIA FOR COMMERCIAL OR RETAIL USE
IN A PLANNED UNIT~DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; SAID
AMENDMENT FU~HER REQUIRING A MINIMUM AREA OF
ONE HUNDRED CONTIGUOUS ACRES IN.SINGLE OWNER~
SHIP FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT; SAIDAMEND-
MZNT FURTHER PROVIDING FOR CHANGES IN MINIMUM
SIDE, REAR AND FRONT YARD REQUIREMENTS AS TO
TOWNHOUSES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS,
ANDEFFECTIVE DATE.
introduced, placed, on first reading and read. in full at meeting of December 8, 1980, was next
placed, on final reading. After being read. by title, the Chairman announced that the Commis-
sion would hear from those persons present to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the pro-
posed, ordinance. No one appeared..
494
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, l~loricla December 22, at 7: 00 P. M.
19 80
MILI~TA'I't~ LEGAL ~SUPPLY GOMPANY
Thereupon, the Chairman annoUnced that the City Commission of the City of Sanford,
Florida, had passed and. adopted said Ordinance No. 1542, entitled.:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1097 OF SAID CITY, SAID
ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING PLAN; SAID AMENDMENT
CHANGING THE DENSITY CONTROLS AS TO TOWNHOUSE
AND CLUSTER HOMES TO NO LESS THAN FOUR NOR MORE
THAN EIGHT UNITS; SAID AMENDMENT FURTHER AMEND-
ING THE CRITERIA FOR COMMERCIAL OR RETAIL USE
IN A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; SAID
AMENDMENT FURTHER REQUIRING A MINIMUM AREA OF
ONE HUNDRED CONTIGUOUS ACRES IN SINGLE OWNER-
SHIP FOR A PLANNED UNIT%DEVELOPMENt; SAID AMEND-
MENT FURTHER PROVIDING FOR CHANGES IN MINIMUM
SIDE, REAR AND FRONT YARD REQUIREMENTS AS TO
TOWNHOUSES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS,
AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
On motion of Commissioner Stenstrom, seconded by Commissioner Keith and carried,
Minutes of December 3, 1980 were approved. ..
Requests for annexation of property lying north of and abutting Jewett Lane and. be-
tween Jerry Avenue and Airport Boulevard. were submitted from property owners as follows:
James L. Hutchings, S & H Fabricating & Engineering, Inc., and
Barbara J. Hutchings:
East one-half of Lot 70, M. M. Smith's Subdivision,
Plat Book 1, page 55, Section 26 Township 19 Range
30, Seminole County, Florida.
S & H Fabricating & Engineering, Inc., Donald W. Hutchings:
South 75 feet of the West 123.09 feet, Block 80,
M. M. Smith's Subdivision, according to the Plat
thereof as recorded in Plat Book 1, page 55, Pub-
lic Records of Seminole County, Florida.
Commissioner Stenstrom moved to authorize the City Attorney to prepare the proper
ordinance to annex the property owned by Donald Hutchings, S & H. Fabricating & Engineering,
Inc. Seconded by Commissioner Farr and carried.
Commissioner Farr moved, to authorize the City Attorney to prepare the proper ordi-
nance to annex property owned by James L. Hutchings, S & H Fabricating & Engineering, Inc.,
and. Barbara J. Hutchings. Seconded by Commissioner Keith and carried..
Commissioner Stenstrom moved to authorize transfer in amount of $55.45 from Conting.
ency for replacement and repair *of a portion of a fence at 618 Elm Avenue, damaged when a
tree limb fell on it. Seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried.
Request submitted for two street lights on North Mangoustine, and. on reconm~endation
of the City Manager, Commissioner Stenstrom moved to authorize installation of same. Second-
ed by Commissioner Keith and carried.
On recommendation of the City Manager, Commissioner Farr moved to authorize use of
the Civic Center with alcoholic beverages, after payment of proper fees as follows:
a. December 23, 1980 - Paulucci Birthday Party.
b. December 31, 1980 - Countdown Enterprise Promotion Agency.
Seconded by Commissioner Keith and carried.
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida December 22, at 7:00. P. M.
19 80
MIDSTATE LEGAL SUPPLY COMPANY
rick Temperly will not jeopardize the borrow pit permit issued to the City by Seminole County.
Said property described as follows:
West 20 feet of the East ~ of the SW~ of the S~ less the
South 695.2 feet; and the west 20 feet of 'the East ~ of the
NW~ of the SW~ lying S of SR 46, both in Section 16 Town-
ship 20S, Range 32E, Seminole County, Florida.·
Commissioner Fart moved to authorize the City Attorney and the City Manager to ob-
tain from Seminole County, further information necessary to suPport this letter, Seconded by
Commissioner Keith and carried.
Commissioner Keith moved to declare as surPlus, and offer for sale, the approximate-
ly one-quarter acre described above, and to authorize the City Manager to complete a compar-
able sales analysis to arrive at a fair market price. Seconded by Commissioner Farr and. car-
ried.
On recommendation of the City Manager, Commissioner Farr moved, to amend the City Pol
icy on Holidays, as follows: ~
A. The City Commission sets holidays and determines when
they will be observed..
B. Days listed below are designated as official City holidays:
Ce
New Years January 1st
Memorial Day ..... Last Monday in May
Independence Day ........ ~__... July 4th
Labor Day 1st Monday in September
Thanksgiving Day ..................... 4th Thursday in November
Friday following Thanksgiving Day .... 4th Frid.ay in November
½ Christmas Eve ...... December 24th
Christmas Day .... December 25th
If holidays fall on Saturday, they will be observed, on the
preceeding Friday. If holidays fall on Sunday, they will
be observed on the following Monday.
D. Employees who are required to work an official City holiday
will receive pay for a normal days work and either additional
vacation days, or in some cases, paid compensation.
E. Temporary and part time employees who are not regular employees
will not be paid for official City holidays except when their
normal City duty falls on the holiday.
Fe
Stand-by personnel who are called out on a holiday shall receive
one-half (½) their base pay in addition to the normal holiday pay.
This applies only to thQse employees who normally receive paid
holidays.
Ge
The Refuse crews which work on a holiday shall be paid. their
normal pay for that day and an additional eight (8) hours of
pay at their normal hourly rate. Theyshall not receive extra
vacation d:aysfor working holidays.
When Christmas and. New Years fall on a Tuesday during any given
year, employees will have the preceeding Monday off as well.
When Christmas and New Years fall on a Thursday during any given
year, employees will have the following Friday off as well.
Twenty-four (24) hour personnel working the Monday preceeding a
Tuesday Christmas and New Years or the Friday following a Thurs-
day Christmas and New Years will receive compensation time in
accordance with City Policy (mutual agreement between the depart-
ment head. and. employee).
Seconded by Commissioner Smith and. carried..
MINUTES
CityCo.mmissi6n, San£ord, Florida December 22, at 7: 00 P. M.
19,80
reclassifications as follows:
a) Karen Reynolds from Police Officer D to E, $14,909.42 annual.
b) Carlos Monti from Police officer-'cC
. to D, $14,182.16 annual.
Seconded by Commissioner Stenstrom~and carried.
Memo next submitted, dated. December 16, 1980, from the Building Official to the City
Manager, stating that the property at 800.Elm Avenue, Condemnation Group No. 47, Report No. 80
947, owned by Margeurite Sheehan, has been cleaned up on the outside, the house has been
boarded up and. the electric service disconnected, and recommended that the property be taken
off the condemnation list. On recommendation of the City Manager, Commissioner Farr moved to
remove said. property from the condemnation list. Second. ed by Commissioner Keith and. carried..
The City Manager reported that on December 12, 1980, he had sent a letter to Ms.
Carol A. Cammarasana, regarding Condemnation Report No. 77-814, 320 Oak Avenue, and asking her
to gather all her plans, contractor's estimates, bank name and loan officers who have denied
her request for a construction loan, and then contact the City Manager's Office so he could
help her obtain a mortgage loan. He stated he has received no reply.
The City Manager*rePorted receipt Of a letter from William L. Colbert, Attorney,
Stenstrom, McIntosh, Julian,. CoIbeCt and Whigham, asking to be COnsidered for the City Attor-
ney position. Commissioner Farr stated, he would-like'~to consider an in-house attorney, and
asked the City Attorney and. City Manager to submit a report on the feasibility of same.
The City Manager reported that Gulf Life Insurance has submitted a check in the a-
mount of $26,188.70 for experience premium refund for year ended June 30, 1980, and recommend-
ed that employees with dependent coverage receive a pro-rata share of same, and that the City'
portion be held in the Insurance Reserve Fund. The City Commission authorized same.
The City Manager further stated, that the Insurance carrier had indicated that the
high level of dependent claims since July 1, 1980 will result in a premium increase.
The City Manager submitted, a tabulation of bids for a Police Motorcycle, as follows:
RE: Bid Opening 12/17/80
Harley-Davidson of Altamonte - $5,100-~.- FLH-80 1340CC, Manufactured. Police Package
R. C. Hills Kawasaki
Honda of Orlando -
Yamaha of Seminole -
4,975
6,093.90
4,751
KZ 1000 C4,~ Manufactured Police Package
GL 1000, De~!er equipped, for Police Use
XSll00H, Dealer Equipped for Police Use
bids sent out, ~ returned.
Letters submitted from Police Chief Ben E. Butler and Police Lieutenant Lewis D.
Bishop, recommending the City accept the bid. from Harley-Davidson in amount of $5,100'00,
Cormnissioner Keith moved, to accept bid in amount of $5,100.00 from Harley-Davidson,
to purchase two unit~ and. to transfer $5,100.00 from Contingency for the second, unit. Se-
conded by Commissioner Stenstrom and. carried..
The City Attorney submitted, statements for services rend. ered as follows:
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida December 22, at 7:00 P. M.
497
~V'iT'I'I~,TAT'I~. T.~..C. AT, .C;TTPPT.¥
Miscellaneous expenses from May, 1980 to
November, 1980
Huron and Barbara Braxton vs. City of San-
ford., etc.
George A. Speer, Jr. et al vs. City of
Sanford, etc.
William Young, Personal Representative of
Estate of Miriam H. Carson, deceased vs
City of Sanford
$ 103.74
150.00
1,282.45
810.00
$4,376.69
;ommissioner Keith moved to authorize payment of same.
:arried.
Seconded by Commissioner Stenstrom and
The City Manager reported that the Sanford Men's Softball Association, Inc., has
signed, the agreement for use of the Pinehurst Softball Field. from March 15, 1981 through Nov-
ember 30, 1981. Commissioner Stenstrom moved to authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement.
Seconded by Commissioner Fart and, carried..
The City Manager submitted a letter from Unimark-McDonald, Inc., stating that the
;oard of Trustees of the Municipal Police Officer's Retirement Trust Fund and the Board of
Trustees of the Municipal Fire Pension Trust Fund are not covered under the City's Liability
Insurance Policy, because they are most likely separately incorporated entities and not a
"City Board or.a Commission"; and that they will need the Articles of Incorporation or a copy
of the State Act setting up the Civil Service Board to interpret the City's coverage..
Request submitted from Cliff Guillet, Executive DirectOr, East Central Florida R~-
gional Housing Mobility Program, to produce intergovernmental cooperation in the administra-
tion of the Section 8 Existing housing assistance program, and to provide information and. coun-
seling on housing assistance and housing opportunity. Commissioner Stenstrom moved to parti-
cipate and to authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement indicating same. Seconded by
Commissioner Keith and carried.
Letter dated December 12, 1980, submitted from Marilyn L. Blake, as follows:
December 12, 1980
The Honorable Lee P. Moore
Mayor of Sanford
Sanford, Florida 32771
Dear Mayor Moore:
Re: City Industries, Inc.
Hazardous Chemical Waste Storage Area
As the owner of the land occupied by united Solvents of
~498
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, FloridaDecember 22, at 7: 00 P. M.
19 80
A chemical hazard continues to exist approximately one-
quarter mile west of my property and west of Airport
Boulevard and Albright Road in the city.
This is to advise that I intend to'hold the city of'
Sanford strictly liable for all resulting damage to
person and property at my site of ownership by reason
of this continuing hazardous chemical waste storage.
area. I feel the continuation of this operation is
a violation of state and federal laws and regulations.
H.~F, ILyH LUHTZ
Z6z9 HOKHIHGSlb(~
OKLAHbO, FLOKIbA. 32806
The Honorable Lee P. Moore
Page 2
December 12, 1980
You can expect to receive my full cooperation as one
of your industrial citizens.dedicated to abiding all
regulations and laws.
Sincerely,
Marilyn~ L. Blake
/lmb
C#0166347-RRR
cc:
United~Soluents of America, Inc.
C. Vernon Mize, Jr., Esquire
Kenneth W. McIntosh, Esquire
The City Attorney reported that there had been no ruling because the case had been
postponed. He stated that this is a good time to ask SEEDCO to intervene~.and recommended
the City request SEEDCO to come into the case and possibly enter a separate action in their
own name.
The City Manager reported, that he had been inquiring of intervention of SEEDCO for
the past few weeks, and. they say they want to be on the City side.
Commissioner Keith moved to ask SEEDCO to join the City'
s suit against City Chem-
icals Industries, Inc. Seconded. by Commissioner Stenstrom and carried.
The City Attorney stated he felt the City should not be without an attorney, and re-
spectfully urged the Commission to appoint a City Attorney at the January 6, 1981 meeting.
Commissioner Fart moved to appoint an interim attorney i~ediately, Motion died
for lack of a second.
There being no further business,
the meeting was a~djourned.
MAYOR