030882-Regular Session MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
March 8 at 7:00 P. M.
~9 82
The City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida, met in Regular Session in the
City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, on March 8, 1982 at 7:00 o'clock P. M.
Present:
Mayor-Commissioner Lee P. Moore
Commissioner Milton E. Smith
Commissioner Edward A. Yancey
Commissioner David T. Fart
Commissioner Eddie O. Keith
Acting City Attorney Frank C. Whigham
City Manager W. E. Knowles
City Clerk H. N. Tamm, Jr.
Absent: City Attorney William L. Colbert
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman.
A public hearing was held in accordance with notice published in the Evening Herald
on February 16 and 26, 1982, as follows:
NOTICE OF pUBLIC HEARING OF PROPOSED CHANGES AND
AMENDMENTS IN CERTAIN DISTRICTS AND BOUNDARIES OF
THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AND AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND
USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY
OF SANFORD, FLORIDA.
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held at the
Commission Room in the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, at
7:00 o'clock P. M. on March 8, 1982, to consider changes and amend-
ments to the zoning Ordinance, and amending the Future Land Use Ele-
ment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Sanford, Florida, as
follows: ~
A portion of that certain property lying east of and abutting
Americana Boulevard and Rolling Hills Boulevard and between
Airport Boulevard and the easterly extension of Lake Mary
.Boulevard is proposed to be rezoned from MR-1 (Multiple-Fami-
ly Residential Dwelling) District to SR-2 (Mobile Home Resi-
dential Dwelling) District. Said property being more particu-
larly described as follows:
Parcel "A" That part of the Sanford '(Moses E. Levg) Grant and t~at 1lt. of Govt. Lots
in Sec. 12, Tw~ 20S, Rge 30E, Sen~o~e Countg, FL being described as
Commence at the.NW cot. of Sec; 12, Twp 20S, Rge 30E, Seminole Co. FL t~ence run S 89°
10' SD" ~ along the N l~ne of said Sec, 12, for 1499~60 ft; thence run S 01031, ll"W
a d~stance of 3623.52 ft. for a POB; thence run S 89010'50" E, ~araJTel with the N 3~ne
of said Sec..12 for 375.00 ft.; t~ence run N 01°31'11" E for 600.52 ft. to a l>Oint being
$~tuated 2874.6 ft'. E and 2023 ft S of the NW cot o~ said Sec. 22; thence run S 89°20'50"
E, parallel with the N line 'of said Sec- 12, for 736.79 ft. to a point on the E line of
Government Lot 1; thence mun S 00053'43" W along the E line of said Government Lot 1;
for 1834.20 ft. to the SE cor of said Covdrnment Lot 1. and the NE cot of Government. Ix>t 2;
thence run S 00°56'04" W, along the E 2~ne of sa~d Government Lot 2, for 1322.09 ft. to
a point on the NLY ROW line 'of y~ke Mar~ Blvd, a_s described in O.~3~k. lO05,p~ 147I,Public
~ecord$ of Se~nole COuntg, FL; thence run N 89u13'39" W, along said ROW lin; for 600.14
ft. to the point of curvature of a circular curve concave SL]f, having a radius of 550.00
ft; thence, through a central angle of 32044'34", run SWLY along the arc of sa~'d curve
for 314.31 ft to the point of tangencg; thence, continuing along said ROW, run S 58001'47"
W for 405.02 ft. to a point on the SWLY boundar~ l~ne of that certain ROW and utiJit9
easement recorded in O.R. Bk 1170~ Pp. 619-640, Pub Records of Seminole C.ountg, FL; thence
mun N 31°18'~7" W along said ~oundarg line, for 145.62 ft. 'to the point of curvature of
a circular curve concave Elg having a radius of 485.33 ft, thence .through a central angle
of 42022 '47", run NIu along the arc of said curve for 350.37 ft to ~he po~n~ -of tangencg;
thence, continuing along said boundarg line, run N 10003'00'. E for 155.50 £t to the point
of curvature of a circular curve concave Wl~ having a radius of 207.11 ft; thence,' through
a central angle of 39054'57", run Nlg along the arc of said curve £or 144.27 ft to the
point of tangencg; thence, continuing along said Swig boundarg line, run N 29052'37" W
for 354.75 ft to a ?oint of intersection with a c~rcular curve concave Nl9 having a
radius of 488.38 ft and a radial bearing of N 25°45'02'' W; thence through a central angle
of 49°33'15'', run Wi~ along the arc of said curve and sa~d SwI~ boundarg line for 422.39
ft; thence, del~arting said Swig boundarg line, run N 06°52'12" W for 96.47 ft to a point
on the Nwlg boundarg line of said ROW and Utilitg easement as recorded in O.R. Bk ll.70,Pp
619-640, Public records of Seminole Countg, Fi, said ~oint 'being situated on a circular
curve concave Niu havin~ a r~,~ n~ ~n~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _~.._~ ~___..__ = .... o
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
March__8__at 7:00 P. M.
____19. 82
run N 15°50'28" E for 956.56 ft to the point of curvature of m circular curve concave
Wi~ having a radius of 755.96 ft; thence, through a central angle of 14°19'17-, run
Nly along the arc of said curve 'for 288.96 ft. to the point of tangencg; thence, con-
timuing a]ong said L~ly boundarg lithe, run N Ol°3l'll'' .E, for 154.99 ft to the POB.
I~SS:
A tract of land lging and being situated in Sec. 12, Twp 20S,: Rge 30E, Seminole County,
FL, and being more particularl~ described as follows: Co~,~ence at the NW cot of Sec. 22,
Twp 20S, Rge 30E, run thence S 89o10'50" E, along the N line of said Sec 12 for 1499.60
ft. to a ~oint;"thence S 01°31'11" W, a distance of 1623.52 ft. to a point; thence
S B9°20'50'' E parallel with the N line of Said'Sec 12, for 80.00 ft. to a point; thence
S 01°31'11'' W for 60.00 ft to the POB; thence run S 89020'50" E parallel with the ~ line
of sa~d Sec. 32 for 455.0~ ft-to a Point; thence run S 01°31'11" W for 101.53 ft. to the
point of curvature of a circular curve concave L%~l~ having a Iadius of 1290.96 ft. and a
central angle of 14°19'17"; run thence Swl9 along the arc of said curve for 322.69 ft. to
a point; thence run S 15o50'25" W for 472.85 ft; thence run lq 74009'32" W for 455.00 ft.
to a point; thence N 15o50'28" E for 471.B5 ft. to the I~oint of curvature of a circular
curve concave Nwl9 having a radius of 335.96 ft. and a central angle of 14°19'17"; thence
run Nel9 along the arc of said curve for 208.96 ft. to a point; thence N 01°31'11" E for
95.97 ft. to the POB. Containing B.7367 acies more or less.
SUBJECT TO: The ROW & ut]Iit9 easement recoiled in O.R. llk 1'170 , pp 619-640, Public Rec-
ords of Seminole Co. FL
The drainage easement recorded in O.R. ~k 370, Pp 570 & 571 Public Records of Seminole
Countg , FL
Containing 70.306 acres more or less.
Ail parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity
to be heard at said hearing.
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida.
H. N. Tamm, Jr.
City .Clerk
Publish: February 16 and 26, 1982.
The Chairman announced that the Commission would hear from those persons present
to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the proposed rezoning.
Gerald Braley, 1943 Green Meadow Lane, Orlando, representing Dreyfus Interstate
Development Corporation, appeared and reported they feel a mobile home park is the best use
of the land, and plan to develop 451 mobile home spaces, with recreation and laundry facili-
ties, vehicle storage and a tot playground.
Bob Gregory appeared and reported he is in the mobile home business, and feels
the proposed mobile home park would be a good use for the property.
David Lance, representing Mobile Home Brokers in Orlando, 2565 Colonial Drive, Or-
lando, appeared to support the proposed rezoning.
Those appearing in opposition were as follows:
Albert Starke, President, Carriage Cove Owners and Tenants Association, appeared
and voiced concern about traffic problems, especially if the easterly extension of Lake Mary
Boulevard is not opened.
Ernest Stewart, 302 Pathway Court, Carriage Cove, Chairman, Carriage Cove Owners
and Tenants Association, appeared to oppose the proposed rezoning. He reported the lack
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
March 8~_at 7~0~ P M_._
1982
Mel Mendich, Scarsdale, New York, General Partner, Mod Properties, appeared and
reported they own 65 to 70 acres contiguous to the property being considered for rezoning,
and feel the proposed development of the property as a mobile home park would adversely affect
their plans for future development of their property.
On recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Commissioner Keith moved
to authorize the City Attorney to prepare the proper ordinance to rezone the property. Secon-
ded by Commissioner Farr and carried.
Barbara Hughes, Seminole County Extension Agent-Ho~e Economics, appeared to request
a waiver to use a mobile trailer sign for two weeks in each month, for the next 12 months
to advertise free educational programs for the public at the Agricultural Extension Center,
with the sign to be at the entrance to the County Agricultural Center, off 17-92, on county
property. The City Manager reported that the City Code does not permit use of a mobile trail
er sign as requested. Commissioner Yancey moved to table consideration of the request until
meeting of March 22, 1982, and authorize the City Manager to discuss same with Ms. Hughes,
to try to work out a solutiOn. Seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried.
William Hutchison, Attorney, 230 North Park Avenue, representing The Law Company,
appeared and asked the City to adopt a resolution approving the concept of a iow income hous-
ing project to be located north of Seminole High School, said project to be financed by the
issuance of a three million dollar tax-exempt bond issue through the City with The Law Com-
pany acting as a public housing agency instrumentality of the City for the purpose of financ-
ing this project.
Dudley Morris, Wichita, Kansas, appeared and reported this federally subsidized
housing project would have elderly, handicapped and family unit,s, and be managed by a full
time manager and a maintenance person would be on site.
Commissioner Fart moved and Commissioner Smith seconded the adoption of the fol-
lowing Resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 1324
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE INTENT OF TIlE C1TY OF SANFORD,
FLORIDA TO PROVIDE A METHOD OF BOND FINANCING OF A CERTAIN
IIOUSING PROJECT AND EXPRESSING THEIR INTENT TO CONSENT TO
CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS TO BE h~DE BY THE UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF UOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT.
WUEREAS, the City of Sanford, Florida (the "City") has determined
that there exists a shortage of safe and sanitary housing for persons of low
income and elderly, handicapped and disabled persons of low income in the City
of Sanford; and
WIlEREAS, such shortage will be partially alleviated by the development
by a private owner of a low-income housing project known as Georgia Arms (which
shall be subject to ad valorem real estate tax) to consist of approximately..90
units (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, in order to finance the development of the housing project,
the City has been informed that a non-profit corporation to be known as the Sanford-
Georgia Arms IIousing Development Corporation, Inc, (the "Corporation") will issue
its obligations in the approximate amount of $3,000,000; and
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida.
March 8 at 7:00 P. M.
WHEREAS, this City Co~ission has been informed that it is necessary
that the Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") determine that the
Corporation, when created, will constitute an "instrumentality" of the City and
will constitute ~ "public housing agency" solely for the purposes of Section 316)
of the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, and HUD Regulations 24 C.F.R.,
Part al1, Subpart A, for the purpose of financing the aforementioned housing project
through the issuance of its obligations; and
WHEREAS, the City, based upon its present knowledge of the arraqgements,
intends to approve the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Corporation,
to approve the financing of the Project and to accept ~ne aforesaid determination
of HUD;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Commission of the City
of Sanford, Florida, a lawful quorum of which is duly assembled, as follows:
SECTION 1. The members of the City Co~ission for and on behalf
of the City hereby express their intention to approve at a later date, by appropriate
Resolution, the Articles of Incorporation and By-laws of a non-profit corporation
to be known as the Sanford-Georgia Arms Housing Development Corporation, Inc.,
which Corporation will finance the development of the Project, which financing
this City Commission also intends to approve.
SECTION 2. The members of this City Commission for and on behalf
of the City hereby express their intention to approve and consent, by appropriate
Resolution or Ordinance, to the determination to be made by HUD that the Corporation
will, when created,-constitute an "instrumentality" and a "public housing agency"
within the meaning of applicable law, as hereinabove set forth. The City of
Sanford shall not be liable for any repayment of the obligations.
SECTION 2. The subsequent actions described by Sections 1 and
2 are subject To execution of instruments in form and substance acceptable to
the Commissioners which will assure that the Project will not become exempt
from ad valorem real estate taxes for a period continuing until retirement
of the obligations of the Corporation issued to permanently finance the
Project or thirty (30) years, whichever shall be longer. The Sanford City
Conmission may consent to this property being tax exempt at any future date.
SECTION 4. All Resolutions and orders or parts thereof in
conflict herewith are, to the extent of such conflict, hereby repealed, and
this Resolut$on shall take effect from and after its passage, the public
welfare requiring it.
SECTION 5. That it is found and determined that all formal
actions of this City Commission concerning and relating to the adoption of
this Resolution were taken in an open meeting of the members of this City
Commission and that all deliberations of the members of this City Commission
and of its committees, if any, w~ich resulted in such' formal action were taken
in meetings open to the public, in full compliance with all legal requirements.
The roll being called on the question of adoption of the Resolution,
the vote thereon resulted as follows:
AYES: all 5 members; unanimous
~AYS: none
ABSIENTIONS: none
The presiding officer thereupon declared said Resolution
adopted and approved in open meeting.
Adopted and approved March 8, 1982.
Mayor
CITY OF sANFoRD, FLORIDA
ATTEST:
CLERK, City of'Sanford, Florida
(SEAL)
.19 82
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
March 8 at Z_t00 P~_~_1982
Don Smith, representing A-1 Block Company, appeared to support a request to store
two steel silom On their property between Third and Fourth Streets and west of Persimmon Ave-
nue. Commissioner Fart moved to approve same for period not to exceed six months,~at which
time the silos will be made a part of the plant. Seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried.
Recommendation dated March 5, 1982 submitted from the Planning and Zoning Commis-
sion as follows:
RECOMMENDAT IONS
1.
Recommend approval to rezone from AD (Agricultural District) to
MI-2 (Medium Industrial District) the property generally described
as located east of Mellonville Ave. extended; south of Silver Lake
Drive and north of Pineway. The planned use of the property is
for an Industrial Park. ReP.-Tom McDonald.
Approved a final plat for a group housing project, "The Country
Place", for twelve (12) single-family dwellings, located at
119 Upsala Rd. in the SR-1A zoned district represented by Ken-
neth Steeves for Gallamore Homes. He will request to give money
in lieu of for the open space requirements.
Letter submitted from W. E. Adamson, 900 Silver Lake Drive, as follows:
UNITED HOME SERVICES OF FLORIDA
INCORPORATED
"
W.E. ADAMSON TELEPHONE
President 203 EAST THI RD STREET (305) 322-FOOD
SANFORD, FLORIDA 32771
February 26, 1982
Honorable Lee Moore
Mayor of Sanford
Sanford, FL 32771
Dear Mayor Moore:
The writer is a resident of 900 Silver Lake Drive, Sanford,
Florida, and while this property is in Seminole Country and
not Tn the city, I own and control seven pieces of real
estate in the city of Sanford. Therefore, ! respectfully
ask that the City Commission consider the contents of this
letter very carefully.
In the coming weeks the City Zoning Board will be approached
for a change of zoning for eighty acres immediately across
the street from 900 Silver Lake Drive. The Silver Lake area
is made up of distinctive residential properties. This pro-
posed zoning change will be from agricultural to industrial.
The owners of the eighty acres have received the endorsement
of the Greater Sanford Chamber of Commerce with a proviso
that extra care should be made as to maintaining the aesthetics
of the surrounding residential community.
Mrs. Adamson and I have worked diligently and with loving care
with respect to the upkeep of our property on Silver Lake Drive.
An industrial park immediately across the street from same
would have a tremendous adverse affect on our property's value.
Therefore, I would ask the City Commissioners and the City
Zoning Board to consider any development after a change of
zoning, if same comes to pass, to ask the developer to include
a maintenance and upkeep plan in their overall plans (s~ch as
an industrial park) offering policing of the vari'ous businesses
in the park as to the upkeep of their properties. I have been
advised that the city has site plan approval, and this will take
care of the problem. Certainly, site plan approval does not allow
for any continuing inspection of the properties.
Such an industrial park concept could allow for an entrance to be
at the Mellonville Road/Silver Lake Drive area near the new Rush
Hampton plant with no access from Silver Lake Drive and in fact
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida.
March 8 at 7:00 P. M.
1982
I recognize the need for Sanford to have good industrTal
tax Paying propertTes.. However, the last decade has
proven that we must also be sensitive to the quality of
life for our citizens who help make for the economy of
the city as a whole.
Thank you for your ki.nd consideration.
WEA/jsn
' e
Commissioner Smith moved toc~anthorlz a public hearing to be held March 22, 1982 to consider
Item No. 1. Seconded by Commissioner Yancey and carried.
On recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Commissioner Fart moved
to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the plat of The Country Place. Seconded
by Commissioner Keith and carried.
Commissioner Fart moved to remove from table, consideration of re-appointments
to the Central Examining Board. Seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried.
The Building Official reported that William Halback, E. C. Harper, Jr., George Mili~
and Bobby Harvey are willing to serve another term if re-appointed. Commissioner Yancey
moved to re-appoint said members for two year terms to expire April, 1984. Seconded by Com-
missioner Fart and carried.
Commissioner Yancey moved to remove from table, consideration of w~er conservation
measures. Seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried.
The City Manager submitted a memo dated March 3, 1982, from the City Engineer/
Utility Director, as follows:
MEMORANDUM
MARCH 3, 1982
TO:
CITY MANAGER
FROM:
CITY ENGINEER/UTILITY DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: WATER CONSERVATION
SUMMARY-
"Typical Customers" could reduce their water, sewer, and
electric bills in a range from $3.64 per month to $15.13 per month.
The City of Sanford could "save" in water and ~sewer expan-
sion cost from $112,950 to $555,000.
The City of Sanford could theoretically collect from $103,400
to $435,600 in water, sewer, and drainage connection and control
charges without adding additional plant capacities.
BRIEFLY:
Based on 90% of all residents being totally equipped with
· water saving devices and affecting a reduction of their water
usage the typical savings on a average combined water and electric
City Commission, Sanfopd, Florida_
March 8 at 7:00 P. M.
?227
MIDSTATE LEGAL ~tJiaPLY ~OMPANY
Details based on a 'Itypical household"
10% WATER SAVING
20% WATER.SAVING
AREA WATER TAX SEWER ELECTRIC TOTAL WATER
GOLDSBORO .46 .05 .24 2.89 3.64 .92
MAYFAIR .51 .05 .26 3.47 4.29 1.02
HIDDEN LAKE .75 .08 5.52 6.35 1.49
COUNTRY CLUB .49 .05 .24 3.30 4.08 .98
IDYLLWILDE .89 .09 6.58 7.56 1.79
Average $5.18
TAX SEWER ELECTRIC TOTAL
.09 .47 5.77 7.25
.10 .51 6.94 8.57
.15 11.03 12.67
.10 .49 6.59 8.16
.18 13.16 15.13
'Average $10.36
As this concept is pursued, there are additional savings
to the City.
If 90% of the residential customers took full advantage
of the water saving fixtures, there would be an estimated re-
duction of water demand by 380,000 gallons (6.85% of average).
In capital costs this equals to $456,000 at the wastewater
plant (based on advanced waste treatment, AWT) and $19,000 at
the water plant. Even if only 40% of the City's customers use
these saving devices the capital costs equals to $108,000 and
$4950 reSpectiVely. This' means' the total capital savings
could be from $112,950 to $555,000.
In reality these figures are somewhat only theoretical
because water supply and treatment facilities are deSigned
and constructed using additional criteria, whereby you never
put in ½ a well, etc..
There is a real cost benefit, however,~when one considers
that with a certain capacity you could service~more customers
if each used less. These figures are interesting. Based on a
reduction in demand of from 90,000 gallons per day to 380,000
gallons per day, this equates to 188-792 equivalent housing
units; each paying $550 in water, sewer, and drainage connec-
tion and control charges. In money that is $103,400 to
$435,600.
Commissioner Yancey moved to authorize the City Attorney to prepare the proper ordinance
to require water conservation measures in new construction, effective immediately. Seconded
by Commissioner Smith and carried.
The Mayor reported he will be unable to attend the East Central Florida Regional
Planning Council Metropolitan Planning Organization meeting on March 25, 1982 in the Orange
County Commission Chambers. Commissioner Smith was appointed as the Mayor's representative
to attend sai~d meeting..- ~
On motion of Commissioner Fart, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried,
Minutes of February 22, 1982 were approved.
On motion of Commissioner Fart, seconded by Commissioner Yancey and carried,
Vouchers for the month of February, 1982 were approved, as follows:
General Fund, Flagship Bank of Seminole-DT, Voucher No. 8396 through 8404.
Refuse Collection and Disposal Fund, Flagship Bank of Seminole, DT1, Voucher
Nos. 214 through 219.
Water and Sewer Revenue Fund, Flagship Bank of Seminole, DT1, Voucher Nos.
2033 through 2038.
TES
City COmmission, Sanford, Florida. March 8 at 7:00 P. M. 19. 82
MIDSTfiT~ T.R~AT. ~IIDPT.Y ~OMPA~¥
Firemen's Relief and Pension Fund, Flagship Bank of. Seminole, DTI, Voucher
No. 416.
Central Paying Account, Flagship Bank of Seminole, DT1, Voucher Nos.
33892 through 34313.
Utility Trust Fund, Flagship Bank of Seminole, Voucher No. 84.
Public Improvement Revenue Bonds, Flagship Bank of Seminole, Voucher Nos.
92 through 94.
Water and Sewer 1953 Sinking Fund, FlagShip of Seminole, Voucher No. 50.
Statement in amount of $13,440.00 submitted from Green and Dycus, C.P.A., for re-
construction and audit of two years Community Development Block Grant funds administered
by the Sanford Housing Authority. On recommendation of the City Manager, and on approval
of the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Commissioner Farr moved to pay
same from Community Development Block Grant funds. Seconded by Commissioner Smith and car-
ried.
On motion of Commissioner Farr, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried, Ordi-
nance No. 1595, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
RESCINDING ORDINANCE NO. 1578, SAID ORDINANCE
ADOPTING A SALARY CLASSIFICATION PLAN EFFECTIVE
APRIL 1, 1982; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; CON-
FLICTS, AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
was introdUCed andl-placed on first reading.
On recommendation of the City Manager, Commissioner Keith moved to authorize pay-
ment in amount of $1,233.33 to Kelton and Associates, Inc., for double taxation study.
Seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried.
Commissioner Yancey moved to authorize salary reclassifications as follows:
Milton Smith'~ Jr., from Maintenance Worker C to D, $9,927.75 annual.
Albert Payne, from Building Inspector E to F, $16,151.10 annual.
Seconded by Commissioner Farr and carried.
Commissioner Smith moved to .authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agree-
ment with the Seaboard Coast' Line Railroad Company to install an-eight inch water main and
a six inch sewer force main under the railroad~crossing on Silver Lake Drive, and to adopt
Resolution No. 1325 for same. Said resolution being in words and figures as follows:
RES.OLUTION NO. 1325
Be it resolved by the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida,
in regular meeting assembled that the Mayor-Commissioner be, and he hereby
is, authorized to enter into an agreement with the SEABOARD COAST LINE
RAILROAD COMPANY, and to ~sign same on behalf of said City whereby said
Railroad Company grants unto said City the right or license to install and
maintain, for the purpose of conducting WATER and SEWAGE two lines of
pipe across the right of way and under the main track of Railroad Company, at
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
March 8 at 7:00 P. M.
19. 82
in said agreement, which agreement is dated January 18, 1982, a copy of which
agreement is filed with this City Commission.
I certify the 'above to be a true and correct copy.
s/ H. N. Tatum, Jr. Clerk
On motion of Commissioner Farr, seconded by Commissioner Keith and carried, Reso-
lution No. 1323 was adopted. Said reso~lution being in words and figures as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 1323
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
SETTING THE FEE SCHEDULE FOR CERTIFICATES OF
REGISTRATION FOR THOSE PLACES SELLING ALCOHOLIC
LIQUORS, WINES AND BEERS WITHIN THE CITY AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Section 3-1 of the Sanford City Code provides for
the establishment of a certificate of registration to all establishments
selling alcoholic liquors, wines and beers within the City,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF
THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
1. The charge for the certificate of registration for
the sale of alcohol liquors, wines and beers within
the'City of Sanford shall be:
(a) Class 1
(b) Class 2
(c) Class 3
(d) Class 4:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(e) Class 5
$ 35.00 per year
$ 50.00 per year
$ 100.00 per year
Less than 50 seating capacity
50 to 100 seating capacity
101 to 150 seating capacity
Over 150 seating capacity
$ 35.00 per year
$ 50.00 per:year
$ 75.00 per year
~.$ 100.00 per year
$ lO0.O0 per year
The holder of any certificate or a new holder of any
certificate wishing to transfer said certificate of
registration to a new owner or to another location
shall first pay to the City of Sanford a transfer fee
of $25°00 for each transfer of a certificate.
This Resolution shall become effective March 8, 1982o
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
March 8 at 7:_00 P. M.
19. 82
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of March, A.D., 1982.
ATTEST:
s/ Lee P, Moore
MAYOR
s/ H. N. Tamm~ Jr.
CITY CLERK
s/ Milton E. Smith
s/ Edward A. "Ned" Yancey
s/ David T. Fart
s/ Eddie O. Keith
As the Ci'ty Co~miss"ion'""'of the'
City of Sanford, Florida
There being no'further business, the meeting was adjourned.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
js