062882-Special Session( 304
MINUTES
'City Commission, Sanford, Florida June 28 at 12: O0 Noon
.19 82
The City Commission of the City of. Sanford, Florida, met in. Special Session in
the-City Manager's Conference Room in the City Hall at 12:00 'o'clock Noon on June 28, 1982.
Present: Mayor-Commissioner Lee:P. Moore
Commissioner Milton E. Smith
Commissioner Edward A; Yancey
Commissioner David'T. Fart
Commissioner Edwin O. Keith
City Manager W. E. Knowles
City Clerk H. N. Tamm, Jr.
Absent: City Attorney .William L. Colbert
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, who announced that the purpose of
the meeting was to hear from John A. Mulrennan, Jr., .Ph.D., Director, Office of Entomology,
Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Jacksonville, and Mr. William Opp,
Engineer.
Dr. Mulrennan presented the state program for participation in mosquito control
under Chapter 388, Florida Statutes. He recommended a combination of actions as follows:
1. Use of adultacide.
2. Use of larvacide.
3. Water management - source reduction.
Mr. Opp discussed various options to set up a program county-wide or with other
areas in the county.
The Commission authorized the City Manager to discuss a program with the Seminole
County Administrator, Roger Neiswender. ~...,,
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
M A Y
ATTEST:
js
~. C IT Y~'C~LER~ - ~
' FORM 4 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING C'ONFLICTII
Moore Lee P. = ~sT E' ~ June 28, 1.982
MAILING ADDRESS . I..J AT NAME OF PERSON RECORDING MINUTES
P. O. Box 1697 DOOUNTY H.N. Tamm,
CITY zm COUNTY TITLE OF PERSON RECORDING
Sanford 32771 Seminole ~MUNICmALITY City Clerk
NAME OF AGENCY SPECIFY
City Co~ission ~OTH~R
MEMORANDUM OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN A VOTING SITUATION [Required by Florida Statutes §112.3143
If you have voted in your official capacity upon any measure in which you had a personal, private, or professional inter
your special private gain Or the special private gain of any principal by whom you are retained, please disclose the natd
below.
1. De~ription of the m~ter upon which you vo~d in your official c~acity: Voted in favor of a motJ,
authorize the City Attorney to prepare the proper ordinance to annexi
City, certain property owned by Sunniland Corporation, described as
West 2/3 of NW ~ of SE ~ of Section 18, Township 20 South, Range
31 East, Public Records of Seminole County, Florida.
Description of the personal, private, or professional interest you have in the above matter which inures to your spe
the special private gain of any principal by whom you are retained:
1979) ]
~t which inures to
e of your interest
,on to
into the
iollows:
I am the sole owner, and President of, Sunniland Corporation.
3. Person or principal to whom the special gain described above will inure:
a.[-] Yourself b.[~] Principal by whom you are retained:
SIGNATURE, ~/~
Sunniland Corporation
(NAME)
:iai private gain or
DATE ON WHICH FORM 4 WAS FILED
RESPONSIBLE FOR RECORDING MINUTES OF
THE PERSON
MEETING AT
FILING INSTRUCTIONS
This memorandum must be filed within fifteen (15) days following the meeting during which the voting conflict
responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who shall incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes.
filed merely to indicate the absence of a voting conflict. Florida law permits but does not require you to abstain from
of interest arises; if you vote, however, the Conflict must be disclosed pursuant to the requirements described above.
.d with the person
form need not be
when a conflict
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317 (1979), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOS
GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENS
OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAlqD, OR A CIVIL PENALTy NOT TO EXCEED $5,000.
CE FORM 4 - REV. 12-79
RE CONSTITUTES
[ON FROM OFFICE
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
June 28 at 7:00 P.M. t982
The City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida, met in Regular Session in
the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, on June 28, 1982 a'~.~7:00 o~!iclock P. M.
Present: Mayor-Commissioner Lee P. Moore
Commissioner Milton E. Smith
Commissioner Edward A. Yancey
Commissioner David T. Farr
Commissioner Edwin O. Keith
City Attorney William L. Colbert
Assistant to City Manager Steven D. Harriett
City Clerk H. N. Tatum, Jr.
Absent: City Manager W. E. Knowles
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman.
Statement in amount of $1,170.00 submitted from the City Attorney, for Professional
ServiCe~ for May, 1982. On recommendation of the City Manager, Commissioner Fart moved to
authorize payment of same. Seconded by Commissioner Yancey and carried.
Request for annexation submitted from Sunniland Corporation, Lee P. Moore, President
for property lying between Pine Way and the Seaboard Coast Line Railroad right-of-way and
between Mellonville Avenue and Ingraham Avenue, fur~ther described as follows:
The West 2/3 of the Northwest ~ of the Southeast ~ of
Sect'ion 18, Township 20 South, Range 31 East, Public
Records of Seminole County, Florida.
Commissioner Fart moved to authorize the City Attorney to prepare the proper ordi-
nance to annex said property. Seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried. The Mayor voted
in favor of the motion, and announced that he is the sole owner of Sunniland Corporation,
owner of the property being considered for annexation.
On motion of Commissioner Yancey, seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried, Ordi-
nance No. 1605, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
TO ANNEX WITHIN THE CORPORATE AREA OF THE CITY
OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, UPON ADOPTION OF SAID OR-
DINANCE, A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY LY-
ING BETWEEN WEST 26TH STREET AND WEST 27TH STREET
AND BETWEEN ELM AVENUE AND OAK AVENUE; SAID PRO-
PERTY BEING SITUATED IN SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA,
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION PRO-
VISIONS OF SECTION 171.044, FLORIDA STATUTES;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS, AND
EFFECTIVE DATE.
was introduced and placed on first reading and read in full. ~
On motion of Commissioner'~.~r~, seconded by Commissioner Keith and carried, Ordi-
nance No. 1606, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
TO ANNEX WITHIN THE CORPORATE AREA OF THE CITY
OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, UPON ADOPTION OF SAID OR-
DINANCE, A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY
LYING BETWEEN BEVIER ROAD AND AIRPORT BOULEVARD
AND BETWEEN THE SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD
RIGHT OF WAY AND TRUMAN BOULEVARD EXTENDED
WESTERLY; SAID PROPERTY BEING SITUATED IN
SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION PROVISIONS OF SECTION
171.044, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR SEVER-
ABILITY, CONFLICTS, AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
was introduced and placed on first reading and read in full.
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
June 28 at 7:00 P.M. 19 82
A public hearing was held in accordance with notice published in the Evening Herald
June 3, 10, 17 and 24, 1982, as follows:
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION
OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA.
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held at the
Commission Room in the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, at
7:00 o'clock P. M. on June 28, 1982, to consider the adoption of an
ordinance by the City of Sanford, Florida, as follows:
ORDIt~ANCE NO. 1601
AN ORDINAl)CE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
TO ANNEX WITHIN THE CORPORJ%TE AREA OF THE
CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, UPON ADOPTION OF
SAID ORDINANCE, A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN
PROPERTY LYING BETWEEN SILVER LAKE DRIVE AND
NORTH WAY AND BETWEEN SANFORD AVENUE AND THE
SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY;
SAID PROPERTY BEING SITUATED IN SEMINOLE
COUNTY, FLORIDA, IN ACCORDANCE WIP~ THE VOLUN-
TARY ANNEXATIO}I PROVISIONS OF SECTION 171.044,
FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY,
CONFLICTS, AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, there has been filed with the City Clerk of
the City of Sanford, Florida, petitions containing the name of
the property owner in the area described hereinafter requesting
annexation to the corporate area of the City of Sanford, Florida,
and requesting to be included therein; and
WHEREAS, the Property Appraiser of Seminole County,
Florida, having certified that there is one property owner
in the area to be annexed, and that said property owner has
signed the Petition for annexation; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the property
described hereinafter is reasonably compact and contiguous
to the corporate area of the City of Sanford, Florida, and it
has further been determined that the annexation of said pro-
perty will not result in the creation of an enclave; and
WHEREAS, the City of Sanford, Florida, is in a position
to provide'municipal services to the property described herein,
and the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida, deems
it in the best interest of the City to accept said petition
and to annex said property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE P~OPLE oF THE
CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1: That the property as described in Exhibit
attached hereto, situated
in Seminole County, Florida, be and the same is hereby annexed
to and made a part of the City of Sanford, Florida, pursuant
to the voluntary annexation provisions of Section 171.O44,
Florida Statutes.
E X H I B I T "A"
A portion of that certain property lying between Silver Lake Drive and
North Way and between Sanford Avenue and the Seaboard Coast kine Rail-
road right-of-way, further described as follows:
1"~'ot~, the SI~ Corner Of S~ctl0~ 7, T0wn~hip 20 South, Nwl)ge 31 EaSt~ Seminole County, Florida,
run N..~9°58,06,,E, ~lon~ tho South ll~e of said SeCtion 7, ~ distance of 1221,2 fee~, thellCU
run N,OO~13'0,I,,E,, 25 feet for ~ Point of Duglmmin~ thence run N,BpoSB,06,,E,, 117.8B feet
~o the'Westerly r~C~t-of-~y l~ne of Seabonrd Coost Line R~llroad; thence run
,,long Said right-Of-way 378,23 feet; licorice run Northeasterly alon~ . curve concave No~'tlt-
eusterLy having a radius; of 15~?.02 ~oet, ace~tral c~m~le o~' 3t°0?'t3' ' , an utc .dist.)ce
~1.99 teutl :hence run ~ortheasterl~ along . curve concave Northwesterly having a radius
of 859.86 ~eet, a centru]l angle o: 2u35'19'', un arc distance of 3d,85 ~eu:~ a el)o~.d bearing
o~ N.1?°52'22"~., thence run Southwesterly el,rog a cuvv~ concave Novthwu~tex. ly havin~
rudius et .130,13 feet a central angle of .10°23'33P, bi) ~t'c d~stance et 303,~3 ~eet, n chord
Uuarillge°t S,69°4,1'2?.W,,r thencu ~'un S.B9o5~'~3,,~i., 319.74 ~eet, thence run 5.89o59,03,,SV.,
30.I.1~ f et to a point ~171.2 ~t,eC eust of the tlast right-of-way line of Sanl'ord Avenue,
thence run 5.00o~3,0.1,,~,., pnrallol with said viid[t-of-w~y line B75.20 Jeer to t~e point
boginning Containing therein lL,.lBl5 ~c~es, re.ore or lesu. ~ubjeoC to u O~'ainug~ ~mtuement
over the Northerly 40 :~ut th~rooT,
~ARCEL ~
l.'~om the NE O0~ne~ of tl~e S%~ 1/4 of :he SW 1/,I of ~uid Section 7, t'tm S,'89°59'03"%~.~ ~long
the North Line of 'said ~%' l/4 of the MW l/~, n distance of 2U5.5.7 feel thence run S,00°09'
· IO"E., 4-0 f~et fo~ a poit)t of beginning; Lhem. u run S.89059'O3,,iY., 6G feet to a 'point 1171.2
)eb~ Ea~ of the East rt~l~t-of-wuy ].the of Sunford Average, thence re)% S.00o13'O4"~y,,
with s~id right-of-way 337.47 feet; ti)enow l't)ll N.BP°59'O3'*E,, 66 feet; thence ~'un N.O0°13'O4"g.,
337.47 feet to the point of be~tnnin~, Com)tutm,ing Lheroh% 0.Sll~ ~Cro~, more et' less. Subject
~o a Drainage Easement over th~ We~t 15 feet
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
June 28 at 7:00 P.M. 19 82
307
MIDSTATE LEGAL SUPPLY COMPANY
SECTION 2: That upon this ordinance becoming effective
the property owner and any resident on the property described
herein shall be entitled to all the rights and priviledges
and immunities as are from time to time granted to residents
and property owners of the City of Sanford, Florida, and as
are further provided in Chapter 171, Florida Statutes, and shall
further be subject to the responsibilities of residence or
ownership as may from time to time be determined by the
governing authority of the City of Sanford, Florida, and the
provisions of said Chapter 171, Florida Statutes.
SECTION 3: If any section or a portion of a section
of this ordinance proves to be invalid, un]awful, or unconstitu-
tional, it shall not be held to invalidate or impair the vali-
dity, force, or effect of any section or part of this ordinance.
SECTION 4: That all ordinances or parts of ordinances
in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed.
SECTION 5: That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon its passage and adoption.
A copy shall be available at the Office of the City Clerk for all
persons desiring to examine the same.
Ail parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to
be heard at said hearing.
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida.
H. N. Tamm, Jr.
City Clerk
Publish: June 3, 10, 17 & 24, 1982.
Ordinance No. 1601, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
TO ANNEX WITHIN THE CORPORATE AREA OF THE
CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, UPON ADOPTION OF
SAID ORDINANCE, A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN ,
PROPERTY LYING BETWEEN SILVER lAKE DRIVE AND
NORTH WAY AND BETWEEN SANFORD AVENUE AND THE
SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY;
' SAID PROPERTY BEING SITUATED IN SEMINOLE '~
COUNTY, FLORIDA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VOLUN-
TARY ANNEXATION PROVISIONS OF SECTION 171.044,
FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY,
CONFLICTS, AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
introduced and placed on first reading and read in full at meeting of May 24, 1982, was next
placed on final reading. After being read by title, the Chairmmn announced that the Commis-
sion would hear from those persons present to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the
adoption of the ordinance. No one appeared.
Commissioner Fart moved on the second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 1601.
Seconded by Commissioner Yancey and carried.
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida.
June 28 at 7_.'00 P. _M_.
__].9 82
~MTD.qTATE T,F~AT..qTTPPT.¥ P.~qM'PA~T¥
Thereupon, the Chairman announced that the City Commission of the City of Sanford,
Florida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 1601, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
TO ANNEX WITHIN THE CORPORATE AREA OF THE
CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, UPON ADOPTION OF
SAID ORDINANCE, A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN
PROPERTY LYING BETWEEN SILVER LAKE DRIVE AND
NORTH WAY AND BETWEEN SANFORD AVENUE AND THE
SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY;
SAID PROPERTY BEING SITUATED IN SEMINOLE
COUNTY, FLORIDA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VOLUN-
TARY ANNEXATION PROVISIONS OF SECTION 171.044,
FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY,
CONFLICTS, AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
A public hearing was held in accordance with nOtice published in the EveniBg Herald
on June 3, 10, 17 and 24, 1982, as follows:
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION
OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA.
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held at the
Commission Room in the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, at
7:00 o'clock P. M. on June 28, 1982, to consider the adoption of an
ordinance by the City of Sanford, Florida, as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1602
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
TO ANNEX WITHIN THE CORPORATE AREA OF THE
CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, UPON ADOPTION OF
SAID ORDINANCE, A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN
PROPERTY LYING SOUTH 'OF COLLINS DRIVE AND
EAST OF STATE ROAD 15 & 600; SAID PROPERTY
BEING SITUATED IN SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA,
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VOLUNTARY A}IMEXATION
PROVISIONS OF SECTION 171.044, FLORIDA
STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CON-
FLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, there has been filed with the City Clerk of
the City of Sanford, Florida, .~etitions containing the name
of the property owner in the area described hereinafter re-
questing annexation to the corporate area of the City of
Sanford, Florida, and requesting to be included therein; and
WHEREAS, the Property Appraiser of Seminole County,
Florida, having certified that there is one property owner
in the area to be annexed, and that said property owner has
signed the Petition for annexation; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the property
described hereinafter is reasonably compact and contiguous
to the corporate area of the City of Sanford, Florida, and it
has further been determined that the annexation of said pro-
perty will not result in the creation of an enclave; and
WHEREAS, the City of Sanford, Florida, is in a position
to provide municipal services to the property described herein,
and the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida, deems
it in the best interest of the City ~o accept said petition
and to annex said pzoperty.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE
CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1: That the property a~ described
attached hereto, situated in Seminole County, Florida, be
and the same is hereby annexed to and made a part of the
City of Sanford, Florida, pursuant to the voluntary annexa-
tion provisions of Section 171.044, Florida Statutes.
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
June 28 at
7:00 P._~_,_._19 82
EXHIBIT "A"
A portion of that certain proper~ lying south of, Collins Drive and east of
State Road 15 & 6DO, further described as follows:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Parcel No. 1: 'From the intersection of'zhe'.Southerly line of Block "g" of
S~lan---n-d~-fftes, as recorded in Plat Book 11, Pages 16 through 22, incllusiv~
Public Records of Seminole County, Florida, with the Easterly right of way
line of State Road No. IS and 600, run N.40*S6'02"E. along said fasterlr
rieht of way line 55.14 feet to the poSnt.o£ curvature of a curve concave
No~thwester~)' and having a radius of 299~.93 feet; thence run N0rtheasterll
along the arc of said curve and said Eaiterly right of wa)' line 59.80
feet through a central angle of 01°08'59'' to the point of.beginning; '
thence from a tangent bearing of N.39°47'23"~. continue along the arc of
said cu~ze and said Easterly right of way line 178.00 feet through a
central angle of 05°24'19"; thence leaving said Easterly right of way
line run S._I 41 48 i. 52.85 feet; thence S. S3 40 11 E. 31.65 feet; thenc
N.38°27'Bg"E. 58.00-feet to the Southerly right of way line of Collins
Drive; thence S.43°34'08"E. along said Southerly right of way line 6.S0
feet to the point of curvature of a curve concave Northeasterly and having
a radius of 439.30 feet; thence run 5outheasterly along the'arc of said
curve and 'said Southerly right of way line 68.80 feet through a central
angle of 07°55'41"; thence leaving said Southerly right of.way line run
5.38°27'~9"~. 192.33 feet; thence N.S1°3'2'21"~. 75.00 feet; thence N.61°
05'12"W.' 77.38 feet to the.point of beginning, containing therein 0.6014
acres, more or Ies$.
SECTION 2: That upon this Ordinance becoming effective
the property owner and any resident on the property described
herein shall be entitled to all the.rights and priviledges
and immunities as are from time to time granted to residents
and property owners of the City of Sanford, Florida, and aa
are further provided in Chapter 171, Florida Statutes, and
shall further be subject to the responsibilities of residence
or ownership as may from time to time be determined by the
governing authority of the City of Sanford, Florida, and the
provisions of said Chapter 171, Florida Statutes.
SECTION 3: If any section or a portion of a section of
this ordinance proves to be invalid, unlawful, or unconstitutiona2
it shall not be held to invalidate or impair the validity, force,
or effect of any section or part of this ordinance.
SECTION 4: That all ordinances or parts of ordinances
in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed.
SECTION 5: That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon its passage and adoption.
A copy shall be available at the Office of the City Clerk for all
persons desiring to examine the same.
All parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to
be heard at~?said hearing.
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida.
H. N. Tamm, Jr.
City Clerk
PubliSh: June 3, 10, 17 & 24, 1982.
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
June 28 at 7:00 P.. M.
.19. 82
Ordinance No. 1602, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
TO ANNEX WITHIN THE CORPORATE AREA OF THE
CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, UPON ADOPTION OF
SAID ORDINANCE, A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN
PROPERTY LYING SOUTH OF COLLINS DRIVE AND
EAST OF STATE ROAD 15 & ~00; SAID PROPERTY
BEING SITUATED IN SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA,
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION
PROVISIONS OF SECTION 171.044, FLORIDA STATUTES;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFEC-
TIVE DATE.
introduced and placed on first reading and read in full at meeting of May 24, 1982, was
next placed on final reading. After being read by title, the Chairman announced that the
Commission would hear from those persons present to speak in favor of, or in opposition to,
the adoption of the ordinance. No one appeared.
Commissioner Keith moved on the passage and adoption of Ordinance No. 1602.
Seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried.
Thereupon, the Chairman announced that the City Commission of the City of Sanford,
Florida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 1602, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
TO ANNEX WITHIN THE CORPORATE AREA OF THE
CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, UPON ADOPTION OF
SAID ORDINANCE, A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN
PROPERTY LYING SOUTH OF COLLINS DRIVE AND
EAST OF STATE ROAD 15 & 600; SAID PROPERTY
BEING SITUATED IN SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA,
IN~.:~ ACCORDANCE WITH THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION
PROVISIONS OF SECTION 171.044, FLORIDA STATUTES;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFEC-
TIVE DATE.
A public hearing was held in accordance with notice published in the Evening Herald
on June 18, 1982, as follows:
~qOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION
OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA.
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held at the
Commission Room in the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, at
7:00 o'clock P. M. on June 28, 1982, to consider the adoption of an
ordinance by the City of Sanford, Florida, title of which is as fol-
lows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1603
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCEENO. 1097 OF SAID CITY, SAID
ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING PLAN; SAID AMENDMENT
CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION OF THAT CER-
TAIN PROPERTY LYING NORTH OF AND ABUTTING WEST
FIRST STREET (SR 46) AND BETWEEN TERWILLIGER
LANE AND PERSIMMON AVENUE EXTENDED NORTHERLY
FROM RMOI (MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, OFFICE
AND INSTITUTIONAL) DISTRICT TO GC-2 (GENERAL
COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY,
CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
A copy Shall be available at .the Office of the City Clerk for all
persons desiring to examine the same.
Ail parties in interest and citizens 'shall have an opportunity
to be heard at said hearing.
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
June 28 at 7:00 P. M._19 82
MID~'I'A'rl4 LEGAL ~UPPLY ~J(~MPAINY
Ordinance No. 1603, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1097 OF SAID CITY, SAID
ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING PLAN; SAID AMENDMENT
CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION OF THAT CER-
TAIN PROPERTY LYING NORTH OF AND ABUTTING WEST
FIRST STREET (SR 46) AND BETWEEN TERWILLIGER
LANE AND PERSIMMON AVENUE EXTENDED NORTHERLY
FROM RMOI (MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, OFFICE
AND INSTITUTIONAL) DISTRICT TO GC-2 (GENERAL
COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY,
CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
introduced and placed on first reading and read in full at meeting of June 14, 1982, was
next placed on final reading. After being read by title, the Chairman~announced that the
Commission would hear from those persons present to speak in favor of, or in opposition to,
the adoption of the ordinance. No one appeared.
Commissioner Smith moved on.the passage and adoption of Ordinance No. 1603. Seconde
by Commissioner Yancey and carried.
Thereupon, the Chairman announced that the City Commission of the City of Sanford,
Florida, had passed and adopted.said Ordinance No. 1603, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. '1097 'OF SAID CITY, 'SAID
ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING PLAN; SAID AMENDMENT
CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION OF THAT CER-
TAIN PROPERTY LYING NORTH OF AND ABUTTING WEST
FIRST STREET (SR 46) AND BETWEEN TERWILLIGER
LANE AND PERSIMMON AVENUE EXTENDED NORTHERLY
FROM RMOI (MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL,- OFFICE
AND INSTITUTIONAL) DISTRICT TO GC-2 (GENERAL
COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY,
CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
A public hearing was held in accordance with notice published in the Evening Herald
on June 18, 1982, as follows:
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION
OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA.
Notice is hereby'given that a Public Hearing will. be held at the
Commission Room in the City Hall in the City of Sanford,Florida, at
7:00 o'clock P..M. on JUne 28, 1982, to consider the adoption of an
ordinance by the City of Sanford, Florida, title of which is as ifol-
lows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1604
AN. ORDINANCE' 'OF THE CITY OF SANFORD,~ FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1097 OF SAID CITY, SAID
ORDINANCE BEING A ~ZONING PLAN; SAID AMENDMENT~
CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION OF THAT CER-
TAIN PROPERTY LYING BETWEEN WE:ST FIRST. STREET.
(SR 46) AND WEST SECOND STREET AND BETWEEN
MANGOUSTINE AVENUE AND .AVOCADO AVENUE FROM
RMOI (MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, OFFICE AND
INSTITUTIONAL) DISTRICT TO GC-2 (GENERAL COM-
MERCIAL) DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY,
CONFLICTS, AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
A copy shall be available at the Office of the City Clerk for all
persons desiring to examine the same.
Ail parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity
to be heard at said hearing.
/ 3.12
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
June 28 at 7:00 P. M.
19. 82
MIDSTATE LEGAL SUPPLY COMPANY
Ordinance No. 1604, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1097 OF SAID CITY, SAID
ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING PLAN; SAID AMENDMENT
CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION OF THAT CER-
TAIN PROPERTY LYING BETWEEN WEST FIRST STREET
(SR 46) AND WEST SECOND STREET AND BETWEEN
MANGOUSTINE AVENUE AND AVOCADO AVENUE FROM
RMOI (MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, OFFICE AND
INSTITUTIONAL) DISTRICT TO GC-2 (GENERAL COM-
MERCIAL) DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY,
CONFLICTS, AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
introduced and placed on first reading and read in full at meeting of June 14, 1982, was
next placed on .final reading, After being read by title, the Chairman announced that the
Commission would hear from those Persons present to speak in favor of, or in opposition to,
the adoption of the ordinance. No one appeared.
Commissioner Yancey moved On the passage and adoption of Ordinance No. 1604.
Seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried.
ThereupOn, theChairman announced that the City Commission of the City of Sanford,
Florida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 1604, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1097 OF SAID CITY, SAID
ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING PLAN; SAID AMENDMENT
CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION OF THAT CER-
TAIN PROPERTY LYING BETWEEN WEST FIRST STREET
(SR 46) AND WEST SECOND STREET AND BETWEEN
MANGOUSTINE AVENUE AND AVOCADO AVENUE FROM
RMOI (MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, OFFICE AND
INSTITUTIONAL) DISTRICT TO GC-2 (GENERAL COM-
MERCIAL) DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY,
CONFLICTS, AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
On motion of Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Yancey and carried,
Minutes of June 14 and June 21, 1982 were approved.
The City Manager reported attempts had been made to contact the Seminole County
Administrator, Roger Neiswender, to discuss mosquito control, but he could not be reached.
The City Manager reported he had been unable to contact Bud'Feather, and Mr. Feathe~
had not informed him if he had obtained ownership~ of the.former city property in Lake Mon-
roe Industrial Park.
The Mayor reported that Mr. Feather had discussed by phone, that Attorney William
L. Colbert has in his possession the deeds necessary to transfer ownership of said property,
and he will record them as soon as the City rescinds the authorization to execute the re-
verter clause in REVERTER I Agreement dated November 30, 198t.
Letter submitted from the City Attorney to the City Manager, as follows:
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
June 28___at__7:00 P. M~___19. 82
Stenstrom, Mclntosh, Julian. Colbert
~tlorneys and Counsellors at Law
Doul~as Stenslrom Kenneth W. Mclntosh Ned N. Julian, Jr.
~riIliam'L. Colbcrt frank C.V'higham Clayton D. Simmons
Thomas r_.Whigham.
StrRe 22 flagship Bank
lost Office :Box 1330 Sanford,rlorida 32T/1 (305)322-2171'
June 28, 1982
Mr. Pete Knowles
City Manager
Post Office Box 1778
Sanford, Florida 32771
Dear Pete:
This will confirm my telephone conversation with you Friday
afternoon wherein I advised you that the South Shore Club,
Inc./Robert G. Feather real estate transaction closed in
,escrow at 3:30 P.M. I am holding the documents in escrow
while Mr. Feather appears before the City Commission and asks
them to abate their decision to exercise the rights of re-
verter.
I have prepared a document called Agreement and Reverter.
It reflects my understanding of the spirit and intent of
the tenative agreement reached with Mr. Feather on May 24th,
please.review it and see if you concur (copy attached).
Mr. Feather is supposed to come to my office this afternoon
to sign it.
If the City Commission elects to abate their decision to
exercise the right of reverter I believe a motion would be
in order to instruct the city attorney not to proceed with
the reverter and to authorize the mayor to sign the new
Agreement and Reverter. If the City Commission elects to
proceed with the reverter a motion would be in order to
deny Mr. Feather's request for abatement.
As al.ways if you have any ~uestions or if I may be of
assistance in any way, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
STENSTRO~M~h McINTOSH, JULIAN,
COLBEf~T &/WH. IOHAM, P.A.,.
/pkc
Commissioner Fart moved as follows:
To rescind previous action of June 14, 1982, authorizing
the City Attorney to implement the reverter clause as
set forth in REVERTER I dated November 30, 1981.
To authorize the Mayor to execute, after recording of
transfer to Mr. Feather, a new agreement with Mr. Feather,
with a reverter whereby the property will revert to the
City if construction is not begun within 270 days from
June 1, 1982, and proceeds in accordance with usual
standards of development and without unreasonable delay
to completion of said improvements. Further, the City
to pay Mr. Feather $100,000.00 for the Warranty Deed, if
~hm nr~n~r~v r~vartm to the City.
MINUTES
City commission, Sanford, Florida.
June 28 at 7:00 P.M. 19. 82
MIF~TATF. I.EGAI, ,qIIPPI,Y C,C)MPANY
of the former city property in Lake Monroe Industrial Park, being recorded. Seconded by
Commissioner Smith and carried.
The City Manager submitted a letter from Kelton and Associates, Inc., on the status
of the analysis of possible double taxation in Seminole County, and recommended the Commis-
sion adopt a resolution identifying services rendered by Seminole County which provide no
reat and substantial benefit to property or residents within the City of Sanford. Commis-
sioner Keith moved to adopt Resolution No. 1331. Seconded by Commissioner Yancey and car-
ried. Said resolution being in words and figures as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 1331
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
SANFORD, FLORIDA IDENTIFYING SERVICES RENDERED
BY SEMINOLE COUNTY WHICH PROVIDE NO REAL AND SUB-
STANTIAL BENEFIT TO PROPERTY OR RESIDENTS WITHIN
THE CITY OF SANFORD AND WHICH ARE FINANCED FROM
COUNTYWIDE REVENUES AND AD VALOREM TAXES:
PETITIONING THE BOARD OF COUNTY .COMMISSIONERS OF
SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO DEVELOP APPROPRIATE
MECHANISMS TO FINANCE SUCH SERVICES PURSUANT TO
SECTION 125.01(6)(a) and (7) FLORIDA STATUTES;
DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO TRANSMIT A CERTIFIED
COPY OF THIS RESOLUTION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA:
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE:
WHEREAS, ARTICLE VIII, Section 1 (h) of the 1968 revision to
the Constitution of the State of Florida prohibits the
taxation of property situated within municipalities for
services rendered by the County exclusively for the benefit
of property or residents in the unincorporated area of the
.County; and
WHEREAS, the Florida Supreme Court has determined the
provisions of Article VIII, Section l(h) are self-exeCuting;
and
WHEREAS, the Florida Supreme Court has further interpreted
the aforesaid constitutional prohibition to extend to those
facilities and services which are of no real and substantial
benefit to property or residents situated within
municipalities; and
WHEREAS, Section 125;01(6)(a), Fl'orida Statutes, provides
procedures for the~governzng.body of~a municipality.to
petition the .board of.county commissioners for relief from
above de'scribed conditions'; and'
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
June 28 at 7:00 P. M. __19 82
WHEREAS, Section 125.01(7), Florida Statutes, requires
Boards of County Commissioners to expend all county
revenues, excepting those obtained specially from or on
behalf of a municipal service taxing unzt, special district,
unincorporated area, service area, or program area, for
countywide services, programs and projects; and
WHEREAS, the City of Sanford is conducting a study which
will identify and itemize services rendered by Seminole
County, financed by countywide revenues and ad valorem
'taxes, and which provide no real and substantial benefits to
residents and taxpayers o~ the City of Sanford, NOW,
THEREFORE,.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF sANFORD,
FLORIDA
SectiOn 1. That pursuant to Section 125.01(6)(a) Florida
Statutes, the following services are hereby identified to
the Board of County Commissioners of Seminole County,
Florida, as being rendered specially or exclusively for the
benefit of property or residents in the unincorporated areas
of the County, and/or as being of no real and substantial
benefit to property or residents located within the City of
Sanford, Florida although financed from countywide
revenues.
me
Ail costs related to the County Planning Division
including comprehensive planning, water resource
management, reviews of deve£opment projects in
relation to the County's Land Development Ordinanc'es.
Be
ALI costs related to the County Development Depart-
ment's Land Management and Building Divisions.
Ce
Ail costs of Parks and Recreation Programs/Projects
which provide no real and substantial benefit to
property or residents located within the .incor-
porated ~reas and financed from countywide revenue.
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
June 28 at 7:00 P. M.
.19 82
De
Ail Engineering costs relating to subdivision review
and inspection and design, survey and inspection of
county local road system including graded roads.
ge
Ail Road and Bridge and other non-departmental road
expenditures relating to maintenance and/or construc-
tion of county local road system including both paved
and unpaved roads and road ri~hts-of-way; and all
drainage maintenance or construction related to county
local ,road system.
Fe
Ail costs of Environmental Services Section for inspec-
tion and issuing permits associated with new develop-
ment waste water system tie-in to county system.
ROad Patrol and Investigations as 'Provided by the
Seminole County Sheriff's Office including aPpropriate
payroll, administrative, operating and capital costs.
AI'I costs for construction of fire stations which pro-
vide services to the residents of unincorporated areas.
Ail costs associated with the acquisition, development,
equipment, maintenance and operation of the refuse
collection and disposal unit.
J®
Ail above costs of services to include appropriate pay-
roll overhead, overhead, supervision, administration
and capital costs; including c.osts of Clerk to the
Board,.County Administrator, County attorney, per-
sonnel, purchasing, data processing and other mainten-
ance services, courthouse maintenance, and other
similar direct and indirect costs of providing
services.
Section 2. That the Board of County Commissioners of
Seminole County, Florzda, is hereby petitioned to develop
appropriate mechanisms and take appropriate actzons under
the provisions of Section 1z5.01(6)(a), Florida Statutes, to
finance the aforesaid services, facilities and activities
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
June 28 at 7:00 P. M.
lrom revenues other than those derived from taxation,
assessments, or service charges on property or residents
within the City of Sanford.
Section 3. The Board of County Commissioners of Seminole
County,' Florida, is further petitioned to utilize to the
extent necessary, Florida Statute 129.021 to secure
additional appropriate data from various County Oliicers.
Section 4. The Board of County Commissioners of Seminole
County, Florida, is petitioned to return to the City of
Sanford, the dmount of taxes, service charges and/or other
revenues paid by residents and taxpayers of the City of
Sanford as well as all other~ revenues excepting those
revenues obtained specificaliy from or on behalf o~ a
municipal service taxing unit, special district,
unincorporated area, service area, or program 'area, as set
forth in Florida Statute 125.01(7), to the extent utilized
to finance serviGes-identified in Section 1 of this
Resolution, for Fiscal Year 1982-83, and for each ensuing
Fiscal Year, until such time as alternate financing
mechanisms have been implemented and "double taxation"
conditions have ceased to exist.
Section 5. The City clerk is hereby directed to transmit a
certified copy oi this Resolution to the Board Of County
Commissioners of Seminole County, Florida.
Section 6. This Resolution shall take effect immediately
upon adoption.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA
THIS 28th DAY OF June ., 1982.
MAYOR
ATTEST;
19_ 82
MINUTES
CitY CommissiOn, Sanford, Florida.
June 28 at 7:00 P.M. .19 82
The City Manager reported that terms on the Code Enforcement Board will expire
June 30, 1982 for members as follows:
Leo Scott
Ernest Horrell
Commissioner Yancey moved to re-appoint Mr. Scott and Mr. Horrell to said board for terms
of three years. Seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried.
The City Attorney reported that in adopting O~d~n~fi'ee No. 1590 for redrafting
Chapter 3 of the City Code, Alcoholic Beverages, Section 25 and Section 26, which had been
a part of the code, were inadvertently omitted, and he felt it had been the City's intent
to adopt the complete chapter with amendments. Further, that he recommended the City adopt
an emergency Ordinance to re-enact said Sections 25 and 26.
On motion of Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Yancey and carried,
emergency Ordinance No. 1607, entitled:
AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD,
FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1590 WHICH SUB-
STANTIALLY REWROTE CHAPTER 3 OF THE SANFORD CITY
CODE PERTAINING TO ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES; TO ADD
SECTION 3-23 MAKING IT ILLEGAL TO CONSUME ALCO-
HOLIC BEVERAGES IN PUBLIC PLACES, ON SIDEWALKS,
OR ON STREETS OF THE CITY; TO ADD SECTION 3-24
MAKING IT ILLEGAL TO ENGAGE IN LEWD, LASCIVIOUS
BEHAVIOR IN ESTABLISHMENTS SERVING ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES IN THE CITY; PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES,
SEvERABILITY, CONFLICTS'[ AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
was introduced, read in full and adopted.
The City Manager reported that a Realtor had asked if the City would sell the old
city shop building on West Sixth Street, and he would recommend a sales.~price of at least
the replacement cost of a warehouse on city property.
Commissioner Fart moved to declare the property surplus and no longer of use to
the City, and to authorize the City Manager to obtain an appraisal of the property.
by Commissioner Keith and carried.
follows:
Seconded
The City Manager submitted a report on relocating the Public Works facilities, as
June 22, 1982
MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
Re:
Sanford City Commission
City Manager
Public Works site
Several months ago, the City Commission was'approached with the
propopition of the City selling the Public Works Complex area for
inclusion in the development plans then under consideration. You
asked me to determine the value to the City if such a move was under-
M IN U'TE S
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
June 28 at 7:00 P. M.__i9 82
:319
a)
5 acres of land at $25,000.- to $26,000'.- per acre with
paved access road and utilities at the site -- $127,500.
b)
Existing public works facilities as presently constructed
- including building, vehicle area, shell equipment yard,
fuel island and tanks, etc. -- $303,719.92 (in 1976-77).
Construction index increase January, 1976 to date --- up 61.78%
.... up-dated costs $491,358.00
¢)
d)
Land acquisition
Facilities. replacement
TOTAL
$127,500.00
491,358.00
$618,858.00
Separate from the relocation of the public works facilities,
staff discussion and costs for the relocation of the present
maintenance and parks buildings and areas on West 6th Street
were considered to be combined with the public works complex.
Cost estimates for doing so are:
Land acquistion - 3 acres additional $ 75,500.00
Building replacement (2)
130,000.00
Fencing 5,900.00
$212,400.00
This proposal has not been pursued as the City has
undertaken steps to increase'the security at these two
buildings at their present site.
e) The present public works site, as fenced, is 4.67 acres.
Does the City Commission wish to pursue further the acquisition
of land for the relocation of the public works complex?
On recommendation of the City Manager, the Commission indefinitely tabled same.
The City Manager submitted a request from the Florida League f6r the City to ad-
vertise in the October Conference issue, at a cost in amount of $62.00 for 1/8 page, up
to $300.00 for a full page ad. The Commission declined same.
The City Manager submitted a report on an in-house printing press, as follows:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
June 22, 1982
' City Manager
Assistant to City Manager
In-House Printing Press
Total Printing & Binding Budget:
FY 82-83
$14,918
Checks, minute books, codes supplements, - 3,000
water bills, etc. that would still
require printing by private printing ~ ·
fi rm.
MINUTES
City COmmission, Sanford, Florida
June 28 at 7:00 P. M.19.82
To go in-house printing:
EQUIPMENT COST
Off-set press
Plate burner
Drill-paper cutter
Heavy duty stapler
MAINTENANCE
MATERIALS
Stock, ink, etc. (25% of total amount
of printing)
LABOR
Estimate (25% x $10,O00/yr.)
TRAINING
Initial set-up total:
$ 8,000
1,000
1,500
1,5O0
$12,000
500/yr.
2,979/yr.
2,500
2,500
$}0,479
We are looking at a figure of $20,479 to get started in the printing business with no
guarantee of quality workmanship.
The City presently does all single part form printing it can on our Xerox 2400. The
majority of outside' printing is for multiple part NCR and carbon inter-leaf forms
which is a difficult type of printing. Even though this type printing can be done on
an off-set press, it is complicated and requires an experienced and knowledgeable
printer.
On the surface, it appears that after the initial inves.tment of $20,479, the City
could save money in subsequent years by going to in-house printing. However, I
do not feel this would really be the case.
First, it would be a near impossibility to locate an experienced and trained printer
to work only on a part-time basis to do the type printing the City requires. The
acquisition of personnel to operate the press would be our biggest problem. Note
that the figure of $2,500 for labor is very conservative.
Training a current City employee is not feasible either. A solid year or more is
required, for print training before printers turn their helpers out to do jobs on
their own. I do not feel we could, justify committing an employee full time for a
year's worth of print training to do the job only on a part-time basis.
Other factors also dissuade me from supporting the in-house printing press concept.
There is no tie up of capital funds in equipment, amortization or maintenance of
equipment to contend with if we continue to have Our printing done outside.
Convenience and quality should also be considered, Currently, when we place an
order for printing, we are assured of timely work and a good professional job. If
the printer's press breaks down, they have a back up and the orders continue to be
processed. What would we do with a broken down press and the need of forms mounting
up? Repair of this type of equipment is not consistent. Parts and technicians are
sometimes scarce.
Also, I am sure that various problems arise with certain jobs that only experience
and plain old "know how" can resolve. Our access to technical assistance would be
limited if not non-existent.
In conclusion, I believe that the problems of in-house printing make it clear that
we should' not go into this business. Our limited need of printing does not justify
the investment, maintenance, and the headaches that would accompany the in-house
printing capability. Private enterprise is more suited, equipped and trained to
provide this service to the City.
The City Manager recommended the City not undertake its own printing. ~:
The City Manager reported he will be on vacation June 29 and 30, 1982, and that
Steve Harriett has been appointed Actinz City Manager. The Commission authorized same.
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
June 28 at 7:00 P. M.
321
19 82
MT'"~RTATF, T.F..GAT, RTTPPT.¥ GCIMPA'I~¥
The City Manager submitted a request from Greg Hughes, ~ner of property at 1120
Pecan Avenue, Condemnation Report No. 82-1015, for a 90 day time extension. On recomenda-
tion of the Minim~ Housing Code Inspector and the City Manager, Co~issioner Yancey moved
to authorize same. Seconded by Co~issioner Smith and carried.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
js
CLL K