022486-Regular Session MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
February 24:
341
19 86
i
The City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida, met in Regular Session in
the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. on February 24, 1986.
Present: Mayor-Commissioner Bettye D. Smith
Commissioner John Y. Mercer
Commissioner Milton E. Smith
Commissioner David T. Farr
Commissioner Bob Thomas
City Attorney William L. Colbert
City Manager Frank A. Faison
City Clerk H. N. Tamm, Jr.
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman.
A Public Hearing was held in accordance with notices authorized at meeting of
February 10, 1986, to consider the condemnation of structures or buildings on Condemnation
Group No. 81, Report Numbers 85-1146 through 85-1151. The Chairman announced that the
Commission would hear from property owners or representatives thereof. A review of the
reports was as follows:
REPORT NO. ADDRESS OWNER
85-1146
85-1147
85-1148
85-1149
85-1150
85-1151
512 Celery Avenue
1009 W. 8th Street
811 Orange Avenue
1016 E. 9th Street
801 Bay Avenue
419 E. 3rd Street
No one appeared.
Queen E. Gaines
Ethel Mae Fleming
Harold and Emily King
James Jones Heirs
Rosa L. Johnson Life Estate
Franklin D. Caldwell, et al
After consideration, Commissioner Farr moved that finding the buildings under
Condemnation Report Numbers 85-1146 through 85-1151 to be unsanitary, unsafe and
delapidated, that said structures be condemned and the owners given 90 days in which to
repair or demolish said structures; and if the structures are not repaired or demolished
within 90 days, to authorize the City to demolish same and levy a lien against the property.
Seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Smith
Commissioner Farr
Commissioner Thomas
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
The next item of business was the continuation, from meeting of February 10, 1986,
of a consideration of a request for private use of a part of the right-of-way of Maple
Avenue for construction of a circular concrete driveway, for residence located at 701 West
Third Street.
Commissioner Mercer moved to approve same.
carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Seconded by Commissioner Smith and
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Smith
Commissioner Farr
Commissioner Thomas
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
The next item of business was presentation of Resolution No. 1446, and Service
Award to Augustus "Buster" Brown, former Foreman in the Sewer Division, retiring from the
City on January 31, 1986 with 28 years and five months of service. Commissioner Farr moved
on the passage and adoption of Resolution No. 1446. Seconded by Commissioner Smith and
carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Smith
Yea
Yea
:54'2
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
February 24,
19 86
Commissioner Farr
Commissioner Thomas
Mayor Smith
Resolution No. 1446 was read in full and adopted.
figures as follows:
Yea
Yea
Yea
Said resolution being in words and
RESOLUTION NO. 1446
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
THANKING AND COMMENDING AUGUSTUS "BUSTER"
BROWN FOR HIS SERVICE TO THE CITY OF SANFORD
AS AN EMPLOYEE IN THE SEWER AND WATER
DIVISIONS OVER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN TWENTY-
EIGHT YEARS.
WHEREAS, AUGUSTUS "BUSTER" BROWN was employed by the City
as a Laborer in the Sewer Division on August 16, 1957; and
WHEREAS, AUGUSTUS
Water Division on December 15,
"Crew Leader" on June 20, 1977,
"BUSTER" BROWN was transferred to the
1959, and was subsequently promoted to
and to "Foreman" on August 28, 1978,
and served in that capacity until his retirement on January 31, 1986;
and
WHEREAS, AUGUSTUS "BUSTER" BROWN has received numerous
commendations for a job well done during his employment with the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY
OF SANFORD, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1: That the City of Sanford, Florida, thanks and
commends AUGUSTUS "BUSTER" BROWN for over twenty-eight years of
service to the people of the City of Sanford in his capacity as an
employee in both the Sewer and Water Divisions of the City, and
extends to him its best wishes for the future.
SECTION 2: That this Resolution be recorded in the
official minutes of the City of Sanford, Florida, and that a copy be
presented to AUGUSTUS "BUSTER" BROWN.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of February, A.D. 1986.
Ms. Sara Jacobson appeared to request consideration of recommendation for
improvements for the park between 8th Street and 9th Street on Park Avenue be tabled until
plans are completed.
The Commission next considered an appeal of a decision made by the Historic
Preservation Board, of a denial of a certificate of appropriateness for a new building for
the downtown library to be constructed at the southwest corner of the intersection of
Palmetto Avenue.and Commercial Street.
Ms. Jean Rhein, Library Services Director, Seminole County Public Library System,
appeared to present a construction schedule for five new libraries in Seminole County and
the renovation of Sanford's existing library, and renderings of the proposed site for the
new Sanford Library. Ms. Rhein explained the 1982, $7,000,000 Bond issue had been approved
by the Seminole Board of County Commissioners for a five-year schedule for the construction
and renovation of the five libraries. Ms. Rhein reported the architect took into
consideration the existing library building and nearby contemporary buildings in designing
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
February 24
343
the new structure. Also, that an average of 500 people visit the library on a daily basis
and 15,000 to 20,000 items are used monthly.
John Dragash, architect, appeared to present drawings of the library prototype
with 12,000 square feet, 100 feet wide and 145 feet long, with the main entrance on Palmetto
Avenue. Mr. Dragash explained the new building will be approximately two to four feet
higher than the existing building.
Ms. Rhein submitted a Three (3) Phase schedule for construction over a three (3)
year period, and reported that if certificate of appropriateness is not approved by the
Commission now, construction plans for the Sanford library will be moved to Phase Three.
Commissioner Farr moved to approve the certificate of appropriateness, because the
architect is using historic materials; there is a drastic need for a library; North of the
property is a two-story building with more modern construction; and, the children need a
library. Seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried by the vote of the Commission as
follows:
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Smith
Commissioner Farr
Commissioner Thomas
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Cal Conklin, Chairman of the Greater Sanford Development Corporation, appeared to
request consideration of a recommendation for the undertaking of a traffic and parking study
for the Greater Downtown and Lakefront Area. Mr. Conklin reported that in 1977, this
association did a parking and traffic study for the downtown area that established a need
for additional parking along Commercial Street and First Street, and that one-way streets
might be appropriate. Mr. Conklin explained that it would take time to update the Study and
arrange financing, and further, there was no crisis yet, but some land that was available in
1977 was not available now and, on the other hand, the price has gone up since then. Mr.
Conklin explained the study would include what land is available to purchase, what needs to
be done, and who will pay for it.
same.
Commissioner Farr moved to authorize Mr. Conklin's committee to seek proposals for
Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Smith
Commissioner Farr
Commissioner Thomas
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
The Commission recessed at 8:08 P.M., and reassembled at 8:13 P.M.
The next item of business was the consideration of appointments to the Sanford
Future Growth Advisory Committee. Commissioner Mercer moved to appoint the nominees as
follows:
Clyde Long, 141 North Elliott Avenue
Storm Richards, 2451 Cedar Avenue
Joe Dennison, 305 Dogwood Drive
Herbert Cherry, 1407 West 15th Street
Anne Wallace, 106 Country Place
Seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Smith
Commissioner Farr
Yea
Yea
Yea
19 86
344
'MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
February ~,
__ 19 86
Commissioner Thomas Yea
Mayor Smith Yea
Regarding the terms of office for the nominees of the Sanford Future Growth
Advisory Committee, the Commission unanimously agreed to place the names in alphabetical
order and designate the term of office beginning with the shortest term in accordance with
provisions of Resolution No. 1440.
The Commission next considered the EMERGENCY WATER SUPPLY INTERCONNECT AGREEMENT
with the City of Lake Mary. Mr. Bill Simmons, Director of Engineering and Planning,
suggested an amendment of Section 2. Term. to read as follows:
This Agreement shall continue in effect from the date of
complete execution and delivery hereof and thereafter until
terminated by mutual agreement or upon 60 day written notice
by either party.
Commissioner Mercer moved to approve the agreement as amended. Seconded by
Commissioner Smith and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Smith
Commissioner Farr
Commissioner Thomas
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
On recommendation of the City Manager, Commissioner Farr moved to authorize the
renewal of the Harcar Aluminum Products Co. lease of'a portion of Well Field property on
Highway 17 & 92 to be used for parking purposes adjacent to the Harcar offices.
Commissioner Smith and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Smith
Commissioner Farr
Commissioner Thomas
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Seconded by
The Commission considered a request from Francis Lugo for Veteran's exemption of a
occupational license for lawn maintenance. Commissioner Farr moved to approve same.
Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Smith
Commissioner Farr
Commissioner Thomas
Mayor Smith
The City Manager reported receipt of letter dated February 24, 1986, from
Southeast Bank extending until March 31, 1986, for closing an agreement in the amount of
$8,000,000 to finance wastewater facilities. Commissioner Smith moved to table same.
Seconded by Commissioner Farr and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Smith
Commissioner Farr
Commissioner Thomas
Mayor Smith
The City Manager submitted a tabulation of bids for a City of Sanford Newsletter,
as follows:
MINUTES
· City Commission, Sanford, Florida
February 24,
345
19 86
..... ~ebrue~. J]o .1~116_
__ _C!_LY ~f3eo_f_~rd
IIiL_TabulJt Lan_,
85/86-~
III
' I
__ It~tl &2
_ Bidder Item It.e~_ Item Total &r_-~a ?~_t~'l 0Dtie~fl 11
I II i. II
I~ (~,
c.,.. ~h~~':' ' ' ' ''
' I ' ~ ,
, ,,~, ,:~,~d. ,.~I~:"~! ~ ,
i~:-,.
"'" '~'~ " ~[~ " ',~.~ !~i' '
Franklin i223 il.e) ~[.i., ~ 'Jl~ 10;('' O ( :b~ I ~,&
: '' t ~ il ; " '.: : ~ .~ : :
I lnnlnentt Jln Rid ''' '~ .......... ~"V~' : ' ' :~ ~ jj ~ '
,r ~ , , ; . ; ~ . . · ; ; . .
N~ct.r Pr. cc ~4 h ~ ' ~ ;l'~h., ~n &l~h~t~n ~1,: ~t nh 1:~" ~1 ;; .:
..- .., · ....
.... t ' il' 'ii.'
Print ; ::: ~.; , ~ .... ,, i~ :,
~ ~3:'0..~) ~ ~o7, )o : i, )o:()o ~,~~OO ~5~:. ,) i~3~:.b,
T..n~--.~;~, ~1~ i' .~,[ . := ~I 'i ;' ' ~ . : :
~ i ; ~ i i~' =: '~ I . I I
The Prlntlna ~ . ' : ~ ~= : J ~ ,i~ :
~,~-, !~..~) ii' ~ ' ~'~ ' '
. . ': ~oo. oo~i ~,,OJ(o ioOc " ' . :
,; .,~ ~4g~.,~u i~7~:,,, il!
, . ,.. ,i . ,, ,,j~, , iii
,;: ,, ;. . ~ .~ .~ ,j I , I i
;" i ~ 'Iii ' '
3
4
6
7
8
10
Il
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
21
22
On recommendation of the Director of Administrative Services, Commissioner Smith
moved to accept the low bid meeting specifications in the amount of $2,480 from Master Press
for producing 10,000 quarterly City Newsletters and to authorize a transfer from Contingency
to provide for same. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the
Commissioner as follows:
Commissioner ~Mercer
CommiSsioner Smith
' CommiSsioner Farr
Commissioner Thomas
Mayor~Smith
Yea · ·
Yea
Yea ......
Yea
Yea
The City Manager submitted tabulation of bids for T-Shirts, as follows:
346
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida February 2~,
19 86
CITY OF SANFORD
RECREATION & PARKS DEPARTMENT
' MEMORANDUM~ DATE~
TOg City Manager~~j
FROM: Recx~.ation Super~nt. eRdent
February 20, 1986
SUBJECT: 'T-Shirt' Bid recommendation (Youth Baseball & Youth Softball)
Superintendent recommends accepting Thompson's SPorting
Goods bid as lowest bid meeting specifications on T-Shirts.
Bids were as follows:
1) Thompson's Sporting Goods /'~x
Regular cut Youth
Adult
2) Denmark Sporting Goods
Regular cut Youth - $5.30
3) The Pass
Regular cut
Adult - $5.70
Youth - $3.75
Adult - $3.95
(Price submitted based on factory rejects - not acceptable.)
4) Farm Emblems
Bid incomplete - not acceptable.
5) Sports Promotions
Regular - $4.97 each
Total purchae;
330 Youth Shirts ~$4.15 ...... - ...... $1369.50
150 Adult Shir~s ~4.75--- $712.50
al $ 2,o82.00~
On recommendation of the Director of Recreation and Parks, Commissioner Mercer
moved to accept the low bid meeting;specifications in the amount of $2,082 from Thompson's
Sporting Goods for the purchase of T-Shirts for Youth Baseball and Youth Softball. Seconded
by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Commissioner Mercer Yea
Commissioner Smith Yea
Commissioner Farr Yea
Commissioner Thomas Yea
Mayor Smith Yea
On motion of Commissioner ThomaS, seconded by Commissioner Farr and carried by the
vote of the Commission as f°'llow~:'
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Smith
Commissioner Farr
Commissioner Thomas
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
February 24,
347
Ordinance No. 1801, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
TO ANNEX WITHIN THE CORPORATE AREA OF THE
CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, UPON ADOPTION OF
SAID ORDINANCE, A PORTION OF THAT PROPERTY
LYING SOUTH OF AND ABUTTING THE INTERSECTION
OF SANFORD AVENUE AND S. R. 427; SAID
PROPERTY BEING SITUATED IN SEMINOLE COUNTY,
FLORIDA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VOLUNTARY
ANNEXATION PROVISIONS OF SECTION 171.444,
FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY,
CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
was introduced and placed on first reading.
A Public Hearing was held in accordance with Notice published in the Evening
Herald on January 30, February 6, 13 and 30, 1986, as follows:
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE
ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF
SANFORD, FLORIDA.
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in
the Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford,
Florida, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. on February 24, 1986, to consider
the adoption of an ordinance by the City of Sanford, Florida,
as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1797
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
TO ANNEX WITHIN THE CORPORATE AREA OF THE
CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, UPON ADOPTION OF
SAID ORDINANCE, A PORTION OF THAT PROPERTY
LYING BETWEEN ORLANDO DRIVE (U.S. HIGHWAY 17
& 92), FLORIDA STREET (WEST 27TH STREET) AND
VACATED "THE CROSSING" STREET; SAID PROPERTY
BEING SITUATED IN SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA,
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION
PROVISIONS OF SECTION 171.044, FLORIDA
STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CON-
FLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, there has been filed with the City Clerk of the
Sanford, Florida, a petition containing the names of the
City of
property owners in the area described hereinafter requesting
annexation to the corporate area of the City of Sanford,
requesting to be included therein; and
Florida, and
WHEREAS, the Property Appraiser of Seminole County,
Florida, having certified that there is one property owner in the area
to be annexed and that said property owner has signed the Petition for
Annexation; and
WHEREAS,
described hereinafter
corporate
it has been determined
is reasonably compact and
areas of the City of Sanford, Florida,
that the property
contiguous to the
and it has further
been determined that the annexation of said property will not result
in the creation of any enclave; and
WHEREAS, the City of Sanford, Florida, is in a position to
provide municipal services to the property described herein, and that
the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida, deems it in the
best interest of the City to accept said petition and to annex said
property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF
19 86
348
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
February 24
]9 2t6
SANFORD, FLORIDA;
SECTION 1: That the property described below situated in
Seminole County, Florida, be and the same is hereby annexed to and
made a part of the City of Sanford, Florida, pursuant to the voluntary
annexation provisions of Section 171.044, Florida Statutes:
Parcel 1: Lot 45, Amended Plat Druid Park,
according to the plat thereof as recorded in
Plat Book 7, Page 5, Public Records of
Seminole County, Florida;
Parcel 2: Lot 46 and 1/2 of Vacated Street
Adjacent on SW, Amended Plat Druid Park,
according to the plat thereof as recorded in
Plat Book 7, Page 5, of the Public Records of
Seminole County, Florida.
SECTION 2: That upon this ordinance becoming effective,
the property owners and any resident on the property described herein
shall be entitled to all the rights and privileges and immunities as
are from time to time granted to residents and property owners of the
City of Sanford, Florida, as further provided in Chapter 171, Florida
Statutes, and shall further be subject to the responsibilities of
resident or ownership as may from time to time be determined by
the governing authority of the City of Sanford, Florida, and the
provisions of said Chapter 171, Florida Statutes.
SECTION 3: If any section or portion of a section of this
ordinance proves to be invalid, unlawful or unconstitutional, it shall
not be held to impair the validity, force or effect of any other
section or part of this ordinance.
SECTION 4: That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in
conflict herewith be and the same are hereby revoked.
SECTION 5: That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon its passage and adoption.
A copy shall be available at the Office of the City Clerk
for all persons desiring to examine the same.
All parties in interest and citizens shall have an
opportunity to be heard at said hearing.
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford,
Florida.
ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a
decision made with respect to any matter considered at
the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim
record of the proceedings, including the testimony and
evidence, which record is not provided by the City of
Sanford. (FS 286.0105)
H. N. Tamm, Jr.
City Clerk
Publish: January'30, February 6, 13 and 20, 1986.
Ordinance No. 1797, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
TO ANNEX WITHIN THE CORPORATE AREA OF THE
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
February_24,
19 86
CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, UPON ADOPTION OF
SAID ORDINANCE, A PORTION OF THAT PROPERTY
LYING BETWEEN ORLANDO DRIVE (U.S. HIGHWAY 17
& 92), FLORIDA STREET (WEST 27TH STREET) AND
VACATED "THE CROSSING" STREET; SAID PROPERTY
BEING SITUATED IN SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA,
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION
PROVISIONS OF SECTION 171.044, FLORIDA
STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CON-
FLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
introduced and placed on first reading January 27, 1986, was next placed on final reading.
After being read by title, the Chairman announced that the Commission would hear from those
persons present to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the proposed annexation. No one
appeared.
Commissioner Farr moved on the passage and adoption of Ordinance No. 1797.
Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Smith
Commissioner Farr
Commissioner Thomas
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Thereupon, the Chairman announced that the City Commission of the City of Sanford,
Florida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 1797, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
TO ANNEX WITHIN THE CORPORATE AREA OF THE
CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, UPON ADOPTION OF
SAID ORDINANCE, A PORTION OF THAT PROPERTY
LYING BETWEEN ORLANDO DRIVE (U.S. HIGHWAY 17
& 92), FLORIDA STREET (WEST 27TH STREET) AND
VACATED "THE CROSSING" STREET; SAID PROPERTY
BEING SITUATED IN SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA,
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION
PROVISIONS OF SECTION 171.044, FLORIDA
STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CON-
FLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
Commissioner Mercer moved to approve Minutes of January 27, February 6, 10, and
17, 1986. Seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried by the vote of the Commission as
follows:
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Smith
Commissioner Farr
Commissioner Thomas
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Report submitted from the Planning and Zoning Commission that there are no
recommendations to the City Commission from the Planning and Zoning Commission from the
meeting on February 20, 1986.
Gerry Gross appeared to appeal the denial by the Planning and Zoning Commission on
February 20, 1986, of the site development plan for the Harbor Front Village Project.
The City Attorney reported that in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article
8, Section 7, states "The City Commission upon receipt of a site development plan appeal
shall within thirty (30) days, take action either disapproving or approving such site
development plan application." and that the appeal does not have to be in writing.
Mr. Gross reported the Planning and Zoning Commission denied the site development
plan because Planning and Zoning questioned their jurisdiction outside of the lease and
concern for parking, however, the parking revisions show more than ample parking on Lot 7.
Mr. Bill Simmons, Director of Engineering and Planning, reported he endorsed the
350
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
F~bruary 24, 19 86
revised parking based on the requirement of 52 spaces for 14,000 square feet of commercial
building.
Mr. Gross assured the City Attorney that the plans presented to the City
Commission were the same plans presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission, with no
changes or revisions.
There was discussion of pull-thru spaces for boats and trailers.
Mr. John Smith explained that the parking outside of the lease are alternative desi~
for the City to consider and asked the Commission to approve the site development plan within
his lease.
John Morris, Chairman of Planning and Zoning Commission, appeared and stated the
site plan meets the specifications of the code, however, this Commission declined to pass
judgement on development beyond the area of the lease.
John Carli appeared to support proper parking for the boating public.
Commissioner Mercer moved to approve the site development plan. Seconded by
Commissioner Smith. Commissioner Farr moved to amend the motion for a provision to obtain
proper permits from other government agencies if necessary.
call vote on the amendment as follows:
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Smith
Commissioner Fart
Commissioner Thomas
Mayor Smith
The Chairman called for a roll
Naye
Yea
Naye
Yea
Abstained
The Mayor announced that the amendment did not pass, and called for a roll call
vote on the original motion.
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Smith
Commissioner Farr
Commissioner Thomas
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Abstained
The Mayor announced that the original motion had passed and that she had abstained
from voting in the matter because Mr. John Smith is her son.
The next item of business was the consideration of request for condemnation
extension of 90 days from Johnnie Lee Williams, regarding 1703 West 15th Street,
Condemnation Group 72, Report Number 83-1086. On recommendation of the Building Inspector,
Commissioner Mercer moved to approve a 90 day extension with the stipulation that this
extension will be the absolute final extension. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried
by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Smith
Commissioner Farr
Commissioner Thomas
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
The Commission next considered a request from Mount Moriah Primitive Baptist
Church for exempt license to sell dinners at the church as a fund raising drive on March
1st, 8th and 15th, 1986. Commissioner Thomas moved to authorize same. Seconded by
Commissioner Farr and carried by the vote of the CommiSsion as follows:
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Smith
Commissioner Farr
Commissioner Thomas
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
'ns
FORM 4 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT
LAST NAME--fiRST NAME--MIDDLE NAME
MAIUNG ADDRESS
103 Country Place
Sanford, Florida Seminole
DATEONWHICHVOTE~CURRED
February 24, 1986
NAME OF ~ARD. COUNCIL COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE
City Commission
THE BOARD, COUNCILtCOMMIS$ION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITrEE ON
WHICH i SERVE iS A UNIT OF:
:~ITY O COUNTY [3 OTHER LOCAL AGENCY [3 STATE
NAME OF POLITICAl. SUBDIVISION OR STATE AGENCY
WHO MUST FILE FORM 4
This form is for use by any person =serving on either an appointed or eleCted board, council, commission, authority, or committee,
whether state or local, and it applies equally to members of advisorY ~nd non-advisory bodies who are faced with a voting conflict of
interest.
As the voting conflict requirements for public officers at the local level differ from the requirements for state officers, this form is divided
into two parts: PART A is for use by persons serving on local boards (municipal, county, special tax districts, etc.), while PART B is
prescribed for all other boards, i.e., those at the state level.
PART C of thc form contains instructions as to when and where this form must be filed.
PART A
VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
[Required by Section 112.3143(3), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).]
The Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees PROHIBITS each municipal, county, and other localpublic officer FROM
VOTING in an official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from
knowingly voting in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to the special gain of any principal (other than a government
agency as defined in Section 112.312(2), Florida Statutes) by whom he is retained.
In any such case a local public officer must disclose the conflict:
(a)
(b)
PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of his interest in the matter on which.he is:
abstaining from voting; and
WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by describing the nature of his interest as a public record in this part below.
NOTE: Commissioners ora Community Redevelopment Agency created Or designated pursuant to Section 163.356 or Section 163.357,
Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984), or officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one-acre, one-vote basis are not prohibited from
voting, in such cases, however, the oral and written disclosure of thi'spart must be made.
!, the undersigned local public officer, hereby disclose that on Februar~r 2 4, ,19 8 6
(a) I abstained from voting on a matter which (check one):
- ~ inured to my special private gain; or inured my son's private gain.
..... inured to the special gain of ·
, by whom I am retained.
CE FORM 4 - REV. 1084 PAGE
(b) The measure on which I abstained and the nature of my interest in the measure is a~ follows:
My son is the lessee of this property.
Please see PART C for instructions on when and where to file this form.
PART B
VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR STATE OFFICERS
[Req .uir~ by Section 112.3143(2), Florida Statutes (SumP. q984).]
Each state public officer is permitted to vote in his official capacity on any matter. However· any state officer who votes in his official
capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain or the special gain ofany principal by whom he is retained is required
to disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in Part B below within 15 days after the vote occurs.
I, the undersigned officer of a state agency, hereby disclose that on ,19 :
(a) I voted on a matter which (check one):
__ inured to my special private gain; or
inured to the special gain of
· by whom I am retained.
(b) The measure on which I voted 'and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: .
Date Filed Signature
Please see PART C below for instructions on whcn and where to file this form.
PART C
FILING INSTRUCTIONS
This memorandum must be filed within f'dteen (15) days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the person
responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who shall incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes. This form need not
be fried merely to indicate the absence of a voting conflict.
NOTICE: uNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES§ I ! 2.317 (1~3). A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND M AY
I~E PUNISHED RY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT,
DEMOTION. REDUCTION IN SALARY. REPRIMAND. OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT~ TO EXCEED $$,000.
CE FORM 4 - REV. 10-84 PAGE
FORM 4
MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT
~STNAME--~RSTNAME--MIDDLEHAME
Smith, Bettye D.
MAILINOADDRESS
103 Countr~ ?lace
Sanford, Florida Seminole
DATEONWH~HVO~CURRED
February 24, 1986
NAME OF eOARD. COUnCiL, COMMISSIO~, AUTHORITY. OR COMUlTrEE
City Commission
THE BOARD. COUNCIL,COMMISSION, AUTHORITY. OR COMMITTEE ON
WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF:
~D,~ITY ri COUNTY [3 OTHER LOCAL AGENCY [3 STATE
NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OR STATE AGENCY
City of Sanford
WHO MUST FILE FORM
This form is for use by any person iservi~g on either an appointed or eleCted board, council, commission, authority, or committee,
whether state or local, and it applies equally to members of advisory ~nd non-advisory bodies who are faced with a voting conflict of
interest.
As the voting conflict requirements for public officers at the I°cai level differ from the'requirement~ for state officers, this form is divided
into two parts: PART A is for use by persons serving on Ioc~! beards (municipal, county, special tax districts, etc.), while PART B is
prescribed for all other boards, i.e., those at the state level.
PART C of the form contains instructions RS to when and where this form must be f'ded.
PART A
VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
[Required by Section ! 12.3143(3), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).]
The Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees PROHIBITS each municipal, county, and other localpublic officer FROM
VOTING in an official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from
knowingly voting in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to the special gain of any principal (other than a government
agency as defined in Section 112.312(2), Florida Statutes) by whom he is retained.
in any such case a local public officer must disclose the conflict:
(a) PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of his interest in thc matter on which he is
abstaining from voting; and
(b) WITHIN 15 DAYS AI~FER THE VOTE OCCURS by describing the nature of his interest ns a public record in this part below.
NOTE: Commissioners of a Community Redevelopment Agency created Or designated pursuant to Section 163.356 or Section i 63.357
Florida Statutes (Supp. 19M), or officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one-acre, one-vote basis are not prohibited fron
voting, in such cases, however, the oral and written disclosure of ~ part must be made.
!, the undersigned local public officer, hereby disclose that on Febru~.ry 2 4, ,19 8 6 :
(a) I abstained from voting on a matter which (check one):
x inured to my spec~] private gain; or inured my son's private gain.
, , inured to the special gain of
· by whom ! am retained.
CE FORM 4- REV. 10-~4 F
(b) The measure on which I abstained and thc nature of my interest in the measure is as follows:
My son is the lessee of this property.
Date F~led' / - Signature
Please see PART C for instructions on when and where to file this form.
PART B
VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR STATE OFFICER8
[Required by Section i 12.3143(2), Florida Statutes (Sump. 1984).]
Each state public officer is permitted to vote in his official capacity on any matter. However, any state officer who votes in his official
Capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain or the special gain of any principal by whom he is retained is required
to disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in Part B below within 15 days after the vote occurs.
I, the undersigned officer of a state agency, hereby disclose that on ,19 --.
(a) ! voted on a matter which (check one):
inured to my special private gain; or
inured to the special gain of
· by Whom I am retained.
(b) The measure on which ! voted and the ttature of my interest in the measure is as follows:
Date Filed Signature
Please see PART C below for instructions on when and where to file this form.
PART C
FILING INSTRUCTIONS
This memorandum must be filed within fifteen (! 5) days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the person
responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who shah incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes. This form need not
be filed merely to indicate the absence of a voting conflict.
NOTICE: uNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES ~ 112.317( I ~3). A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUI RED DISCLOSU RE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY
BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT. REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT,
DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND. OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5,000.
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
February 24,
35t
1986
Mayor Smith Yea
The Commission considered a request from Campbell-Lossing Post 53, Inc. for exempt
license to hold two (2) carnivals, March 3rd through 8th, and March 18th through 23rd, 1986,
and a Turkey Shoot, March 15th through 16th, 1986, immediately to and behind the Post home
located at 3506 Orlando Drive. Commissioner Farr moved to authorize same. Seconded by
Commissioner Smith and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Smith
Commissioner Farr
Commissioner Thomas
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Commissioner Mercer reported the Mayfair CoUntry Club lease was transferred to the
current operators, the lessee was given five years until Marcb___~%._1986 to complete items
within the lease and he believes the lessee is in violation of the lease as follows:
SectiOn 3. Conditions.
Subsection (3): Taxes. The Lessee shall deliver to the Lessor within (30)
thirty days after the payment of any taxes, assessments or other impositions, the receipts
or duplicate copies thereof showing payment thereof.
As far as we know, he has paid the taxes, or at least the City hasn't been
notified otherwise.
Subsection (16): Five Year Improvement Program.
I. Staffing.
D. Head Professional.
4. Starters & Rangers. No ranger - violation.
II. Course Maintenace.
B. Special Programs - Golf Course.
3. Rebuilding of closed bunkers that were on original design -
violation.
4. Re-dragging and beautifying existing lakes - violations
5. Tree planting program to outline fairways, ~19, #11, ~12, #13 -
violation, it's worse.
6. Converting existing range into first class practice and
teaching facility - violation.
IV. Golf Activities.
B. Redecorate and restock pro shop to compete with better pro
shops in the area - violation.
V. ~xpand Food and Beverage Program. - violation.
Subsection (17): Statements as to Lessee's Receipts. - violation.
Subsection (18): Auditor's Annual Certificate. - violation.
Subsection (21): Use By Local Residents. - violation.
The Commission directed the City Manager to make a review over the last five
years. Discussion of same to be placed on the agenda for the Workshop of March 10, 1986.~
Commissioner Mercer reported public support to extend "February Clean Up - Fix Up
Month" through March and same was authorized. Commissioner Farr suggested more tables and
benches with backs are needed in downtown mall area for the elderly, and also, more trash
cans, and same was taken under consideration.
The City Attorney reported having filed motion to reconsider of re-hearing in
regards to the Yankee Lake property, which will take place with Judge Waddell in Melbourne
at 10 o'clock A.M. on March 26, 1986.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
!!ATTEST: