Loading...
022486-Regular Session MINUTES City Commission, Sanford, Florida February 24: 341 19 86 i The City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida, met in Regular Session in the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. on February 24, 1986. Present: Mayor-Commissioner Bettye D. Smith Commissioner John Y. Mercer Commissioner Milton E. Smith Commissioner David T. Farr Commissioner Bob Thomas City Attorney William L. Colbert City Manager Frank A. Faison City Clerk H. N. Tamm, Jr. The meeting was called to order by the Chairman. A Public Hearing was held in accordance with notices authorized at meeting of February 10, 1986, to consider the condemnation of structures or buildings on Condemnation Group No. 81, Report Numbers 85-1146 through 85-1151. The Chairman announced that the Commission would hear from property owners or representatives thereof. A review of the reports was as follows: REPORT NO. ADDRESS OWNER 85-1146 85-1147 85-1148 85-1149 85-1150 85-1151 512 Celery Avenue 1009 W. 8th Street 811 Orange Avenue 1016 E. 9th Street 801 Bay Avenue 419 E. 3rd Street No one appeared. Queen E. Gaines Ethel Mae Fleming Harold and Emily King James Jones Heirs Rosa L. Johnson Life Estate Franklin D. Caldwell, et al After consideration, Commissioner Farr moved that finding the buildings under Condemnation Report Numbers 85-1146 through 85-1151 to be unsanitary, unsafe and delapidated, that said structures be condemned and the owners given 90 days in which to repair or demolish said structures; and if the structures are not repaired or demolished within 90 days, to authorize the City to demolish same and levy a lien against the property. Seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows: Commissioner Mercer Commissioner Smith Commissioner Farr Commissioner Thomas Mayor Smith Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea The next item of business was the continuation, from meeting of February 10, 1986, of a consideration of a request for private use of a part of the right-of-way of Maple Avenue for construction of a circular concrete driveway, for residence located at 701 West Third Street. Commissioner Mercer moved to approve same. carried by the vote of the Commission as follows: Seconded by Commissioner Smith and Commissioner Mercer Commissioner Smith Commissioner Farr Commissioner Thomas Mayor Smith Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea The next item of business was presentation of Resolution No. 1446, and Service Award to Augustus "Buster" Brown, former Foreman in the Sewer Division, retiring from the City on January 31, 1986 with 28 years and five months of service. Commissioner Farr moved on the passage and adoption of Resolution No. 1446. Seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows: Commissioner Mercer Commissioner Smith Yea Yea :54'2 MINUTES City Commission, Sanford, Florida February 24, 19 86 Commissioner Farr Commissioner Thomas Mayor Smith Resolution No. 1446 was read in full and adopted. figures as follows: Yea Yea Yea Said resolution being in words and RESOLUTION NO. 1446 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, THANKING AND COMMENDING AUGUSTUS "BUSTER" BROWN FOR HIS SERVICE TO THE CITY OF SANFORD AS AN EMPLOYEE IN THE SEWER AND WATER DIVISIONS OVER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN TWENTY- EIGHT YEARS. WHEREAS, AUGUSTUS "BUSTER" BROWN was employed by the City as a Laborer in the Sewer Division on August 16, 1957; and WHEREAS, AUGUSTUS Water Division on December 15, "Crew Leader" on June 20, 1977, "BUSTER" BROWN was transferred to the 1959, and was subsequently promoted to and to "Foreman" on August 28, 1978, and served in that capacity until his retirement on January 31, 1986; and WHEREAS, AUGUSTUS "BUSTER" BROWN has received numerous commendations for a job well done during his employment with the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA: SECTION 1: That the City of Sanford, Florida, thanks and commends AUGUSTUS "BUSTER" BROWN for over twenty-eight years of service to the people of the City of Sanford in his capacity as an employee in both the Sewer and Water Divisions of the City, and extends to him its best wishes for the future. SECTION 2: That this Resolution be recorded in the official minutes of the City of Sanford, Florida, and that a copy be presented to AUGUSTUS "BUSTER" BROWN. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of February, A.D. 1986. Ms. Sara Jacobson appeared to request consideration of recommendation for improvements for the park between 8th Street and 9th Street on Park Avenue be tabled until plans are completed. The Commission next considered an appeal of a decision made by the Historic Preservation Board, of a denial of a certificate of appropriateness for a new building for the downtown library to be constructed at the southwest corner of the intersection of Palmetto Avenue.and Commercial Street. Ms. Jean Rhein, Library Services Director, Seminole County Public Library System, appeared to present a construction schedule for five new libraries in Seminole County and the renovation of Sanford's existing library, and renderings of the proposed site for the new Sanford Library. Ms. Rhein explained the 1982, $7,000,000 Bond issue had been approved by the Seminole Board of County Commissioners for a five-year schedule for the construction and renovation of the five libraries. Ms. Rhein reported the architect took into consideration the existing library building and nearby contemporary buildings in designing MINUTES City Commission, Sanford, Florida February 24 343 the new structure. Also, that an average of 500 people visit the library on a daily basis and 15,000 to 20,000 items are used monthly. John Dragash, architect, appeared to present drawings of the library prototype with 12,000 square feet, 100 feet wide and 145 feet long, with the main entrance on Palmetto Avenue. Mr. Dragash explained the new building will be approximately two to four feet higher than the existing building. Ms. Rhein submitted a Three (3) Phase schedule for construction over a three (3) year period, and reported that if certificate of appropriateness is not approved by the Commission now, construction plans for the Sanford library will be moved to Phase Three. Commissioner Farr moved to approve the certificate of appropriateness, because the architect is using historic materials; there is a drastic need for a library; North of the property is a two-story building with more modern construction; and, the children need a library. Seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows: Commissioner Mercer Commissioner Smith Commissioner Farr Commissioner Thomas Mayor Smith Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea Cal Conklin, Chairman of the Greater Sanford Development Corporation, appeared to request consideration of a recommendation for the undertaking of a traffic and parking study for the Greater Downtown and Lakefront Area. Mr. Conklin reported that in 1977, this association did a parking and traffic study for the downtown area that established a need for additional parking along Commercial Street and First Street, and that one-way streets might be appropriate. Mr. Conklin explained that it would take time to update the Study and arrange financing, and further, there was no crisis yet, but some land that was available in 1977 was not available now and, on the other hand, the price has gone up since then. Mr. Conklin explained the study would include what land is available to purchase, what needs to be done, and who will pay for it. same. Commissioner Farr moved to authorize Mr. Conklin's committee to seek proposals for Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows: Commissioner Mercer Commissioner Smith Commissioner Farr Commissioner Thomas Mayor Smith Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea The Commission recessed at 8:08 P.M., and reassembled at 8:13 P.M. The next item of business was the consideration of appointments to the Sanford Future Growth Advisory Committee. Commissioner Mercer moved to appoint the nominees as follows: Clyde Long, 141 North Elliott Avenue Storm Richards, 2451 Cedar Avenue Joe Dennison, 305 Dogwood Drive Herbert Cherry, 1407 West 15th Street Anne Wallace, 106 Country Place Seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows: Commissioner Mercer Commissioner Smith Commissioner Farr Yea Yea Yea 19 86 344 'MINUTES City Commission, Sanford, Florida February ~, __ 19 86 Commissioner Thomas Yea Mayor Smith Yea Regarding the terms of office for the nominees of the Sanford Future Growth Advisory Committee, the Commission unanimously agreed to place the names in alphabetical order and designate the term of office beginning with the shortest term in accordance with provisions of Resolution No. 1440. The Commission next considered the EMERGENCY WATER SUPPLY INTERCONNECT AGREEMENT with the City of Lake Mary. Mr. Bill Simmons, Director of Engineering and Planning, suggested an amendment of Section 2. Term. to read as follows: This Agreement shall continue in effect from the date of complete execution and delivery hereof and thereafter until terminated by mutual agreement or upon 60 day written notice by either party. Commissioner Mercer moved to approve the agreement as amended. Seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows: Commissioner Mercer Commissioner Smith Commissioner Farr Commissioner Thomas Mayor Smith Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea On recommendation of the City Manager, Commissioner Farr moved to authorize the renewal of the Harcar Aluminum Products Co. lease of'a portion of Well Field property on Highway 17 & 92 to be used for parking purposes adjacent to the Harcar offices. Commissioner Smith and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows: Commissioner Mercer Commissioner Smith Commissioner Farr Commissioner Thomas Mayor Smith Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea Seconded by The Commission considered a request from Francis Lugo for Veteran's exemption of a occupational license for lawn maintenance. Commissioner Farr moved to approve same. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows: Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea Commissioner Mercer Commissioner Smith Commissioner Farr Commissioner Thomas Mayor Smith The City Manager reported receipt of letter dated February 24, 1986, from Southeast Bank extending until March 31, 1986, for closing an agreement in the amount of $8,000,000 to finance wastewater facilities. Commissioner Smith moved to table same. Seconded by Commissioner Farr and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows: Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea Commissioner Mercer Commissioner Smith Commissioner Farr Commissioner Thomas Mayor Smith The City Manager submitted a tabulation of bids for a City of Sanford Newsletter, as follows: MINUTES · City Commission, Sanford, Florida February 24, 345 19 86 ..... ~ebrue~. J]o .1~116_ __ _C!_LY ~f3eo_f_~rd IIiL_TabulJt Lan_, 85/86-~ III ' I __ It~tl &2 _ Bidder Item It.e~_ Item Total &r_-~a ?~_t~'l 0Dtie~fl 11 I II i. II I~ (~, c.,.. ~h~~':' ' ' ' '' ' I ' ~ , , ,,~, ,:~,~d. ,.~I~:"~! ~ , i~:-,. "'" '~'~ " ~[~ " ',~.~ !~i' ' Franklin i223 il.e) ~[.i., ~ 'Jl~ 10;('' O ( :b~ I ~,& : '' t ~ il ; " '.: : ~ .~ : : I lnnlnentt Jln Rid ''' '~ .......... ~"V~' : ' ' :~ ~ jj ~ ' ,r ~ , , ; . ; ~ . . · ; ; . . N~ct.r Pr. cc ~4 h ~ ' ~ ;l'~h., ~n &l~h~t~n ~1,: ~t nh 1:~" ~1 ;; .: ..- .., · .... .... t ' il' 'ii.' Print ; ::: ~.; , ~ .... ,, i~ :, ~ ~3:'0..~) ~ ~o7, )o : i, )o:()o ~,~~OO ~5~:. ,) i~3~:.b, T..n~--.~;~, ~1~ i' .~,[ . := ~I 'i ;' ' ~ . : : ~ i ; ~ i i~' =: '~ I . I I The Prlntlna ~ . ' : ~ ~= : J ~ ,i~ : ~,~-, !~..~) ii' ~ ' ~'~ ' ' . . ': ~oo. oo~i ~,,OJ(o ioOc " ' . : ,; .,~ ~4g~.,~u i~7~:,,, il! , . ,.. ,i . ,, ,,j~, , iii ,;: ,, ;. . ~ .~ .~ ,j I , I i ;" i ~ 'Iii ' ' 3 4 6 7 8 10 Il 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 21 22 On recommendation of the Director of Administrative Services, Commissioner Smith moved to accept the low bid meeting specifications in the amount of $2,480 from Master Press for producing 10,000 quarterly City Newsletters and to authorize a transfer from Contingency to provide for same. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commissioner as follows: Commissioner ~Mercer CommiSsioner Smith ' CommiSsioner Farr Commissioner Thomas Mayor~Smith Yea · · Yea Yea ...... Yea Yea The City Manager submitted tabulation of bids for T-Shirts, as follows: 346 MINUTES City Commission, Sanford, Florida February 2~, 19 86 CITY OF SANFORD RECREATION & PARKS DEPARTMENT ' MEMORANDUM~ DATE~ TOg City Manager~~j FROM: Recx~.ation Super~nt. eRdent February 20, 1986 SUBJECT: 'T-Shirt' Bid recommendation (Youth Baseball & Youth Softball) Superintendent recommends accepting Thompson's SPorting Goods bid as lowest bid meeting specifications on T-Shirts. Bids were as follows: 1) Thompson's Sporting Goods /'~x Regular cut Youth Adult 2) Denmark Sporting Goods Regular cut Youth - $5.30 3) The Pass Regular cut Adult - $5.70 Youth - $3.75 Adult - $3.95 (Price submitted based on factory rejects - not acceptable.) 4) Farm Emblems Bid incomplete - not acceptable. 5) Sports Promotions Regular - $4.97 each Total purchae; 330 Youth Shirts ~$4.15 ...... - ...... $1369.50 150 Adult Shir~s ~4.75--- $712.50 al $ 2,o82.00~ On recommendation of the Director of Recreation and Parks, Commissioner Mercer moved to accept the low bid meeting;specifications in the amount of $2,082 from Thompson's Sporting Goods for the purchase of T-Shirts for Youth Baseball and Youth Softball. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows: Commissioner Mercer Yea Commissioner Smith Yea Commissioner Farr Yea Commissioner Thomas Yea Mayor Smith Yea On motion of Commissioner ThomaS, seconded by Commissioner Farr and carried by the vote of the Commission as f°'llow~:' Commissioner Mercer Commissioner Smith Commissioner Farr Commissioner Thomas Mayor Smith Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea MINUTES City Commission, Sanford, Florida February 24, 347 Ordinance No. 1801, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, TO ANNEX WITHIN THE CORPORATE AREA OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, UPON ADOPTION OF SAID ORDINANCE, A PORTION OF THAT PROPERTY LYING SOUTH OF AND ABUTTING THE INTERSECTION OF SANFORD AVENUE AND S. R. 427; SAID PROPERTY BEING SITUATED IN SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION PROVISIONS OF SECTION 171.444, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. was introduced and placed on first reading. A Public Hearing was held in accordance with Notice published in the Evening Herald on January 30, February 6, 13 and 30, 1986, as follows: NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA. Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in the Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. on February 24, 1986, to consider the adoption of an ordinance by the City of Sanford, Florida, as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 1797 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, TO ANNEX WITHIN THE CORPORATE AREA OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, UPON ADOPTION OF SAID ORDINANCE, A PORTION OF THAT PROPERTY LYING BETWEEN ORLANDO DRIVE (U.S. HIGHWAY 17 & 92), FLORIDA STREET (WEST 27TH STREET) AND VACATED "THE CROSSING" STREET; SAID PROPERTY BEING SITUATED IN SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION PROVISIONS OF SECTION 171.044, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CON- FLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, there has been filed with the City Clerk of the Sanford, Florida, a petition containing the names of the City of property owners in the area described hereinafter requesting annexation to the corporate area of the City of Sanford, requesting to be included therein; and Florida, and WHEREAS, the Property Appraiser of Seminole County, Florida, having certified that there is one property owner in the area to be annexed and that said property owner has signed the Petition for Annexation; and WHEREAS, described hereinafter corporate it has been determined is reasonably compact and areas of the City of Sanford, Florida, that the property contiguous to the and it has further been determined that the annexation of said property will not result in the creation of any enclave; and WHEREAS, the City of Sanford, Florida, is in a position to provide municipal services to the property described herein, and that the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida, deems it in the best interest of the City to accept said petition and to annex said property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF 19 86 348 MINUTES City Commission, Sanford, Florida February 24 ]9 2t6 SANFORD, FLORIDA; SECTION 1: That the property described below situated in Seminole County, Florida, be and the same is hereby annexed to and made a part of the City of Sanford, Florida, pursuant to the voluntary annexation provisions of Section 171.044, Florida Statutes: Parcel 1: Lot 45, Amended Plat Druid Park, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 5, Public Records of Seminole County, Florida; Parcel 2: Lot 46 and 1/2 of Vacated Street Adjacent on SW, Amended Plat Druid Park, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 5, of the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida. SECTION 2: That upon this ordinance becoming effective, the property owners and any resident on the property described herein shall be entitled to all the rights and privileges and immunities as are from time to time granted to residents and property owners of the City of Sanford, Florida, as further provided in Chapter 171, Florida Statutes, and shall further be subject to the responsibilities of resident or ownership as may from time to time be determined by the governing authority of the City of Sanford, Florida, and the provisions of said Chapter 171, Florida Statutes. SECTION 3: If any section or portion of a section of this ordinance proves to be invalid, unlawful or unconstitutional, it shall not be held to impair the validity, force or effect of any other section or part of this ordinance. SECTION 4: That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby revoked. SECTION 5: That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. A copy shall be available at the Office of the City Clerk for all persons desiring to examine the same. All parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard at said hearing. By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida. ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a decision made with respect to any matter considered at the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of the proceedings, including the testimony and evidence, which record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS 286.0105) H. N. Tamm, Jr. City Clerk Publish: January'30, February 6, 13 and 20, 1986. Ordinance No. 1797, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, TO ANNEX WITHIN THE CORPORATE AREA OF THE MINUTES City Commission, Sanford, Florida February_24, 19 86 CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, UPON ADOPTION OF SAID ORDINANCE, A PORTION OF THAT PROPERTY LYING BETWEEN ORLANDO DRIVE (U.S. HIGHWAY 17 & 92), FLORIDA STREET (WEST 27TH STREET) AND VACATED "THE CROSSING" STREET; SAID PROPERTY BEING SITUATED IN SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION PROVISIONS OF SECTION 171.044, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CON- FLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. introduced and placed on first reading January 27, 1986, was next placed on final reading. After being read by title, the Chairman announced that the Commission would hear from those persons present to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the proposed annexation. No one appeared. Commissioner Farr moved on the passage and adoption of Ordinance No. 1797. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows: Commissioner Mercer Commissioner Smith Commissioner Farr Commissioner Thomas Mayor Smith Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea Thereupon, the Chairman announced that the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 1797, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, TO ANNEX WITHIN THE CORPORATE AREA OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, UPON ADOPTION OF SAID ORDINANCE, A PORTION OF THAT PROPERTY LYING BETWEEN ORLANDO DRIVE (U.S. HIGHWAY 17 & 92), FLORIDA STREET (WEST 27TH STREET) AND VACATED "THE CROSSING" STREET; SAID PROPERTY BEING SITUATED IN SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION PROVISIONS OF SECTION 171.044, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CON- FLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. Commissioner Mercer moved to approve Minutes of January 27, February 6, 10, and 17, 1986. Seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows: Commissioner Mercer Commissioner Smith Commissioner Farr Commissioner Thomas Mayor Smith Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea Report submitted from the Planning and Zoning Commission that there are no recommendations to the City Commission from the Planning and Zoning Commission from the meeting on February 20, 1986. Gerry Gross appeared to appeal the denial by the Planning and Zoning Commission on February 20, 1986, of the site development plan for the Harbor Front Village Project. The City Attorney reported that in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article 8, Section 7, states "The City Commission upon receipt of a site development plan appeal shall within thirty (30) days, take action either disapproving or approving such site development plan application." and that the appeal does not have to be in writing. Mr. Gross reported the Planning and Zoning Commission denied the site development plan because Planning and Zoning questioned their jurisdiction outside of the lease and concern for parking, however, the parking revisions show more than ample parking on Lot 7. Mr. Bill Simmons, Director of Engineering and Planning, reported he endorsed the 350 MINUTES City Commission, Sanford, Florida F~bruary 24, 19 86 revised parking based on the requirement of 52 spaces for 14,000 square feet of commercial building. Mr. Gross assured the City Attorney that the plans presented to the City Commission were the same plans presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission, with no changes or revisions. There was discussion of pull-thru spaces for boats and trailers. Mr. John Smith explained that the parking outside of the lease are alternative desi~ for the City to consider and asked the Commission to approve the site development plan within his lease. John Morris, Chairman of Planning and Zoning Commission, appeared and stated the site plan meets the specifications of the code, however, this Commission declined to pass judgement on development beyond the area of the lease. John Carli appeared to support proper parking for the boating public. Commissioner Mercer moved to approve the site development plan. Seconded by Commissioner Smith. Commissioner Farr moved to amend the motion for a provision to obtain proper permits from other government agencies if necessary. call vote on the amendment as follows: Commissioner Mercer Commissioner Smith Commissioner Fart Commissioner Thomas Mayor Smith The Chairman called for a roll Naye Yea Naye Yea Abstained The Mayor announced that the amendment did not pass, and called for a roll call vote on the original motion. Commissioner Mercer Commissioner Smith Commissioner Farr Commissioner Thomas Mayor Smith Yea Yea Yea Yea Abstained The Mayor announced that the original motion had passed and that she had abstained from voting in the matter because Mr. John Smith is her son. The next item of business was the consideration of request for condemnation extension of 90 days from Johnnie Lee Williams, regarding 1703 West 15th Street, Condemnation Group 72, Report Number 83-1086. On recommendation of the Building Inspector, Commissioner Mercer moved to approve a 90 day extension with the stipulation that this extension will be the absolute final extension. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows: Commissioner Mercer Commissioner Smith Commissioner Farr Commissioner Thomas Mayor Smith Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea The Commission next considered a request from Mount Moriah Primitive Baptist Church for exempt license to sell dinners at the church as a fund raising drive on March 1st, 8th and 15th, 1986. Commissioner Thomas moved to authorize same. Seconded by Commissioner Farr and carried by the vote of the CommiSsion as follows: Commissioner Mercer Commissioner Smith Commissioner Farr Commissioner Thomas Yea Yea Yea Yea 'ns FORM 4 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT LAST NAME--fiRST NAME--MIDDLE NAME MAIUNG ADDRESS 103 Country Place Sanford, Florida Seminole DATEONWHICHVOTE~CURRED February 24, 1986 NAME OF ~ARD. COUNCIL COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE City Commission THE BOARD, COUNCILtCOMMIS$ION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITrEE ON WHICH i SERVE iS A UNIT OF: :~ITY O COUNTY [3 OTHER LOCAL AGENCY [3 STATE NAME OF POLITICAl. SUBDIVISION OR STATE AGENCY WHO MUST FILE FORM 4 This form is for use by any person =serving on either an appointed or eleCted board, council, commission, authority, or committee, whether state or local, and it applies equally to members of advisorY ~nd non-advisory bodies who are faced with a voting conflict of interest. As the voting conflict requirements for public officers at the local level differ from the requirements for state officers, this form is divided into two parts: PART A is for use by persons serving on local boards (municipal, county, special tax districts, etc.), while PART B is prescribed for all other boards, i.e., those at the state level. PART C of thc form contains instructions as to when and where this form must be filed. PART A VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS [Required by Section 112.3143(3), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).] The Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees PROHIBITS each municipal, county, and other localpublic officer FROM VOTING in an official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to the special gain of any principal (other than a government agency as defined in Section 112.312(2), Florida Statutes) by whom he is retained. In any such case a local public officer must disclose the conflict: (a) (b) PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of his interest in the matter on which.he is: abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by describing the nature of his interest as a public record in this part below. NOTE: Commissioners ora Community Redevelopment Agency created Or designated pursuant to Section 163.356 or Section 163.357, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984), or officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one-acre, one-vote basis are not prohibited from voting, in such cases, however, the oral and written disclosure of thi'spart must be made. !, the undersigned local public officer, hereby disclose that on Februar~r 2 4, ,19 8 6 (a) I abstained from voting on a matter which (check one): - ~ inured to my special private gain; or inured my son's private gain. ..... inured to the special gain of · , by whom I am retained. CE FORM 4 - REV. 1084 PAGE (b) The measure on which I abstained and the nature of my interest in the measure is a~ follows: My son is the lessee of this property. Please see PART C for instructions on when and where to file this form. PART B VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR STATE OFFICERS [Req .uir~ by Section 112.3143(2), Florida Statutes (SumP. q984).] Each state public officer is permitted to vote in his official capacity on any matter. However· any state officer who votes in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain or the special gain ofany principal by whom he is retained is required to disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in Part B below within 15 days after the vote occurs. I, the undersigned officer of a state agency, hereby disclose that on ,19 : (a) I voted on a matter which (check one): __ inured to my special private gain; or inured to the special gain of · by whom I am retained. (b) The measure on which I voted 'and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: . Date Filed Signature Please see PART C below for instructions on whcn and where to file this form. PART C FILING INSTRUCTIONS This memorandum must be filed within f'dteen (15) days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who shall incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes. This form need not be fried merely to indicate the absence of a voting conflict. NOTICE: uNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES§ I ! 2.317 (1~3). A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND M AY I~E PUNISHED RY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION. REDUCTION IN SALARY. REPRIMAND. OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT~ TO EXCEED $$,000. CE FORM 4 - REV. 10-84 PAGE FORM 4 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT ~STNAME--~RSTNAME--MIDDLEHAME Smith, Bettye D. MAILINOADDRESS 103 Countr~ ?lace Sanford, Florida Seminole DATEONWH~HVO~CURRED February 24, 1986 NAME OF eOARD. COUnCiL, COMMISSIO~, AUTHORITY. OR COMUlTrEE City Commission THE BOARD. COUNCIL,COMMISSION, AUTHORITY. OR COMMITTEE ON WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF: ~D,~ITY ri COUNTY [3 OTHER LOCAL AGENCY [3 STATE NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OR STATE AGENCY City of Sanford WHO MUST FILE FORM This form is for use by any person iservi~g on either an appointed or eleCted board, council, commission, authority, or committee, whether state or local, and it applies equally to members of advisory ~nd non-advisory bodies who are faced with a voting conflict of interest. As the voting conflict requirements for public officers at the I°cai level differ from the'requirement~ for state officers, this form is divided into two parts: PART A is for use by persons serving on Ioc~! beards (municipal, county, special tax districts, etc.), while PART B is prescribed for all other boards, i.e., those at the state level. PART C of the form contains instructions RS to when and where this form must be f'ded. PART A VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS [Required by Section ! 12.3143(3), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).] The Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees PROHIBITS each municipal, county, and other localpublic officer FROM VOTING in an official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to the special gain of any principal (other than a government agency as defined in Section 112.312(2), Florida Statutes) by whom he is retained. in any such case a local public officer must disclose the conflict: (a) PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of his interest in thc matter on which he is abstaining from voting; and (b) WITHIN 15 DAYS AI~FER THE VOTE OCCURS by describing the nature of his interest ns a public record in this part below. NOTE: Commissioners of a Community Redevelopment Agency created Or designated pursuant to Section 163.356 or Section i 63.357 Florida Statutes (Supp. 19M), or officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one-acre, one-vote basis are not prohibited fron voting, in such cases, however, the oral and written disclosure of ~ part must be made. !, the undersigned local public officer, hereby disclose that on Febru~.ry 2 4, ,19 8 6 : (a) I abstained from voting on a matter which (check one): x inured to my spec~] private gain; or inured my son's private gain. , , inured to the special gain of · by whom ! am retained. CE FORM 4- REV. 10-~4 F (b) The measure on which I abstained and thc nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: My son is the lessee of this property. Date F~led' / - Signature Please see PART C for instructions on when and where to file this form. PART B VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR STATE OFFICER8 [Required by Section i 12.3143(2), Florida Statutes (Sump. 1984).] Each state public officer is permitted to vote in his official capacity on any matter. However, any state officer who votes in his official Capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain or the special gain of any principal by whom he is retained is required to disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in Part B below within 15 days after the vote occurs. I, the undersigned officer of a state agency, hereby disclose that on ,19 --. (a) ! voted on a matter which (check one): inured to my special private gain; or inured to the special gain of · by Whom I am retained. (b) The measure on which ! voted and the ttature of my interest in the measure is as follows: Date Filed Signature Please see PART C below for instructions on when and where to file this form. PART C FILING INSTRUCTIONS This memorandum must be filed within fifteen (! 5) days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who shah incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes. This form need not be filed merely to indicate the absence of a voting conflict. NOTICE: uNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES ~ 112.317( I ~3). A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUI RED DISCLOSU RE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT. REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND. OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5,000. MINUTES City Commission, Sanford, Florida February 24, 35t 1986 Mayor Smith Yea The Commission considered a request from Campbell-Lossing Post 53, Inc. for exempt license to hold two (2) carnivals, March 3rd through 8th, and March 18th through 23rd, 1986, and a Turkey Shoot, March 15th through 16th, 1986, immediately to and behind the Post home located at 3506 Orlando Drive. Commissioner Farr moved to authorize same. Seconded by Commissioner Smith and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows: Commissioner Mercer Commissioner Smith Commissioner Farr Commissioner Thomas Mayor Smith Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea Commissioner Mercer reported the Mayfair CoUntry Club lease was transferred to the current operators, the lessee was given five years until Marcb___~%._1986 to complete items within the lease and he believes the lessee is in violation of the lease as follows: SectiOn 3. Conditions. Subsection (3): Taxes. The Lessee shall deliver to the Lessor within (30) thirty days after the payment of any taxes, assessments or other impositions, the receipts or duplicate copies thereof showing payment thereof. As far as we know, he has paid the taxes, or at least the City hasn't been notified otherwise. Subsection (16): Five Year Improvement Program. I. Staffing. D. Head Professional. 4. Starters & Rangers. No ranger - violation. II. Course Maintenace. B. Special Programs - Golf Course. 3. Rebuilding of closed bunkers that were on original design - violation. 4. Re-dragging and beautifying existing lakes - violations 5. Tree planting program to outline fairways, ~19, #11, ~12, #13 - violation, it's worse. 6. Converting existing range into first class practice and teaching facility - violation. IV. Golf Activities. B. Redecorate and restock pro shop to compete with better pro shops in the area - violation. V. ~xpand Food and Beverage Program. - violation. Subsection (17): Statements as to Lessee's Receipts. - violation. Subsection (18): Auditor's Annual Certificate. - violation. Subsection (21): Use By Local Residents. - violation. The Commission directed the City Manager to make a review over the last five years. Discussion of same to be placed on the agenda for the Workshop of March 10, 1986.~ Commissioner Mercer reported public support to extend "February Clean Up - Fix Up Month" through March and same was authorized. Commissioner Farr suggested more tables and benches with backs are needed in downtown mall area for the elderly, and also, more trash cans, and same was taken under consideration. The City Attorney reported having filed motion to reconsider of re-hearing in regards to the Yankee Lake property, which will take place with Judge Waddell in Melbourne at 10 o'clock A.M. on March 26, 1986. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. !!ATTEST: