102687-Regular SessionMINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
001
O_ c_tober 26,
The City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida, met in Regular Session in the
City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. on October 26, 1987.
Present:
Mayor-Commissioner Bettye D. Smith
Commissioner Whitey Eckstein
Commissioner A. A. McClanahan
Commissioner John Y. Mercer
Commissioner Bob Thomas
Acting City Attorney Ned Julian
City Clerk H.N. Tamm, Jr.
Absent:
City Manager Frank Faison
City Attorney William L. Colbert
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman.
A Public Hearing was held in accordance with Notice published in the Evening
Herald on October 6 and 16, 1987, as follows:
September 25, 1987
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING OF PROPOSED CHANGES AND
AMENDMENTS IN CERTAIN DISTRICTS AND BOUNDARIES OF THE
THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA.
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in
the Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford,
Florida, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on October 26, 1987, to
consider changes and amendments to the Zoning Ordinance of
the City of Sanford, Florida, as follows:
A portion of that certain property lying between State Road
46 and Narcissus Avenue is proposed to be rezoned from AD
(Agricultural) District to RI-1 (Restricted Industrial)
District. Said property being more particularly described
as follows:
Lots 30 (Less North 125 ft of East 150 ft.) and Lot 31
(Less West 228 ft. of the North 125 ft.) and Lot 32 and
Lot 33 (Less West 100 ft.) in Florida Land and'
Colonization Company's Celery Plantation. Plat Book 1,
Page 129 of the Public Records of Seminole County,
Florida.
Ail parties in interest and citizens
opportunity to be heard at said hearing.
shall have an
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford,
Florida.
ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a
decision made with respect to any matter considered at the
above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of
the proceedings, includin~ the testimony and evidence,
which record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS
286.0105)
Publish:
October 6 and 16, 1987.
H. N. Tamm, Jr.
City Clerk
The Chairman announced that the Commission would hear from those persons present
to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the proposed rezoning.
The City Clerk reported Notice was sent to the owner, Continental Equity, Ltd.
Partnership No. 6 et al, on September 25, 1987, and the ad was published on October 6 and
16, 1987.
Mrs. William Jimenez, 3309 Narcissus Ave and Thomas Jiminez, 371 San Roque spoke
against the rezoning of said property because of no drainage, heavy traffic and desire to
keep the area rural.
Michael Spinos, 1655 Augusta Way, Casselberry, Florida spoke in favor of rezoning
said property.
19 ,87
002 MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
October 26:
19 87
The City Engineer reported that the Planning and Zoning Commission had
recommended the rezoning.
Commissioner Mercer moved to authorize the City Attorney to prepare the proper
Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the
ordinance for same.
Commission as follows:
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
A Public Hearing was held in accordance with Notice published in the Evening
Herald on October 6 and 16, 1987, as follows:
September 25, 1987
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING OF PROPOSED CHANGES AND
AMENDMENTS IN CERTAIN DISTRICTS AND BOUNDARIES OF THE
THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA.
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in
the Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford,
Florida, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on October 26, 1987, to
consider changes and amendments to the Zoning Ordinance of
the City of Sanford, Florida, as follows:
A portion of that certain property lying West of and
abutting Bevier Road and lying between SCL RR and West
16th Street is proposed to be rezoned from AD
(Agricultural) District to RI-1 (Restricted Industrial)
District. Said property being more particularly described
as follows:
Ail of Block 26, 39 and 42, and that part of Blocks 23, 27,
38 and 43 lying South of railroad, all in M.M. Smith's
Subdivlsxon, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in
Plat Book 1, Page 55, Seminole County, Florida, Public
Records.
Ail parties in interest and citizens
opportunity to be heard at said hearing.
shall have an
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford,
Florida.
ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a
decision made with respect to any matter considered at the
above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of
the-proceedings, including the testimony and evidence,
which record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS
286.0105)
Publish:
October 6 and 16, 1987.
H. N. Tamm, Jr.
City Clerk
The Chairman announced that the Commission would hear from those persons present
to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the proposed rezoning. No one appeared.
The City Clerk reported Notice was sent to the owner, Evergreen Enterprises,
Inc., on September 25, 1987, and the ad was published on October 6 and 16, 1987.
The City Engineer reported that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended
the rezoning of said property.
Commissioner Mercer moved to authorize the City Attorney to prepare the proper
ordinance for same. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the
Commission as follows:
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
October 26,
003
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Mayor Smith announced a Public Hearing to consider the Collection System Project
and the alternatives considered, reasons for selecting the recommended plan, environmental
impact, project costs and estimated user charges necessary to plan and implementation.
A Public Hearing was held in accordance with Notice published in the Evening
Herald on September 4 and 25, 1987 as follows:
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE is hereby given that the City of Sanford will hold
a public hearing on Monday, October 26, 1987 at 7:00 p.m.
in Commission Chambers, City Hall, 300 North Oak Avenue,
Sanford, Florida. In accordance with the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, as amended and Chapter 17-50,
Florida Administrative Code, the City of Sanford has
completed wastewater planning activities pertaining to
separation of the combined storm/sanitary sewer system.
As part of these activities, the City has investigated
various alternatives as described in the City of Sanford
Collection System Study for the Combined Sewer Area. The
recommended alternative is construction of a new vacuum
sewer system for conveyance of the sanitary waste water
flows and rehabilitation of the existing combined sewers
for storm water flows. The purpose of this public hearing
is to present the alternatives considered, reasons for
selecting the recommended plan, environmental impact,
project costs and estimated user charges necessary for
plan implementation. The hearing will provide interested
parties an opportunity to better understand the project
and grant interested citizens, environmental groups, and
representatives from local and state agencies the
opportunity to ask questions and express opinions
regarding the alternatives studied and the recommended
plan. A copy of the Collection System Study will be
available for public review at the Public Information
Depository located adjacent to the Utility Director's
office in Sanford City Hall. This notice is given
pursuant to 40 CFR 25 and Chapter 17-50 FAC.
Ail interested parties are hereby notified that if a
person decides to appeal any decision made by 'the City
Commission with respect to any matter considered at such
public hearing, he or she may need to ensure that a
verbatim record of the proceeds is made, which record
includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal
is to be based.
CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA
FRANK A. FAISON
City Manager
Publish: September 4 and 25, 1987.
Bill Simmons, City Engineer introduced Paul Porter, Executive Vice President and
Jim Branch, Vice President of Conklin, Porter and Holmes, Inc., Engineers.
Jim Branch reported on the Collection Study Combined Sewer Area for the City of
Sanford, as follows:
Good Evening, Mayor Smith, members of the City Commission and general public. My
name is Jim Branch and I am a Vice-President at Conklin, Porter & Holmes - Engineers, Inc.
This is the public hearing for the City of Sanford Collection System Study - Combined Sewer
area, which was advertised in the Sanford Herald on September 4th and 25th, 1987. With me
is Paul Porter, Executive Vice-President of Conklin, Porter & Holmes - Engineers, Inc.
The purpose of this public hearing tonight is to present the results of the
completed study for separation of combined sewers in the central area of the City of
Sanford. This 'discussion will present the alternatives considered for sewering the 315
19 87
OO4
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
October 26, 19 87
acre area, the reasons for selecting the recommended plan, the recommended plan and
associated environmental impact, and estimated projects costs. This hearing will also
provide interested parties and the public an opportunity to better understand the project
and will grant interested citizens, environmental groups, and representatives from local
and state agencies the opportunity to ask questions and express opinions regarding the
alternatives studied and the recommended plan. On October 15, 1987, the final draft of the
City of Sanford Collection System Study - Combined Sewer Area was placed in the public
information depository located adjacent to the Utility Director's office in City Hall for
public review.
II. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
One objective of these studies is to document public reaction, evaluate public
input, and make modifications or adjustments in the program based on public participation.
Therefore, at the conclusion of the presentation, we will solicit and welcome any public
comments and try to answer any questions.
III. BACKGROUND
The study area, which consists of approximately 315 acres in the City of Sanford
between French and Park Avenues and Second and Twentieth Streets, contains large diameter
sewers which drain the streets and other impervious areas and also carry the sanitary
sewage waste to the sewage collection system. The bulk of the homes and businesses in the
study areas as well as the existing sewers were constructed prior to 1972 per review of the
City of Sanford records, old engineering plans, and old (1958-1968) aerial photographs.
During low flow periods (no rainfall or minor rainfall occurring), the sanitary sewage
wastes are collected in the east-west sanitary sewer pipe along 2nd street and flow to the
wastewater treatment plant. During higher flow periods (moderate to severe rainstorms),
the storm water and a certain portion of sanitary sewer wastes as well, are carried out
through the storm sewer system and discharged into Lake Monroe at four locations. Due to
the presence of these four combined sewer overflows into Lake Monroe, The Florida
Department of Environmental Regulation has 'mandated by Consent Order (written legal
agreement) between the City and the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation that
these overflows be eliminated by December 30, 1995.
COnklin, Porter & Holmes - Engineers, Inc., under contract from the City of
Sanford, developed studies detailing alternatives to eliminate the combined sewers and to
provide separate sanitary sewer service to the study area. This study summarizes that
work, does cost effective analyses on the various alternatives, and presents a recommended
solution to the problem of elimination of combined sewers and sewering of the area in
Sanford.
IV. COLLECTION SYSTEM STUDY
In order to qualify for State and Federal funding for the removal of the combined
sewers and overflows in the City of Sanford, a study was made to make sure that this
particular area of the City meets the requirements for funding for a new collection system.
An eValuation of the existing combined sewer area has been made to determine the two key
factors relative to its eligibility for funding of a new collection system.
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
005
October 26,
19 87
1. A determination that the bulk of the sanitary sewage flows were in existence
before October 1972 (date for the adoption of the Clean Water Act), and
2. Determination that the continued use of system as is would result in a
degradation of water quality in the receiving waters of Lake Monroe as well as
violation of the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation Consent Order.
The scope of this study was limited to the combined sewer system separation
eligibility for construction funding for a new collection system and does not include other
aspects of collection system rehabilitation, which had previously been evaluated and
discussed in the sewer system evaluation surveys (SSES) conducted previously for the City
sewer system; nor does it address any further restoration of the storm water system within
the study area.
Existing City mapping,, aerial photographs taken prior to 1987, and aerial
photographs taken very recently, were used to determine that two-thirds of the sanitary
sewage flow presently generated in the study area was present prior to 1972. This was done
by a house count on the aerial photographs, which showed that the bulk (more than two-
thirds) of the existing homes and businesses within the study area existed there prior to
1972. This study, supporting maps, and aerial photography were submitted to the Florida
Department of Environmental Regulation in Tallahassee for their review and approval.
V. SEPARATION ALTERNATIVES
In addition to a determination that the study area meets the collection system's
study requirements, five alternatives for the elimination of these combined sewer overflows
were considered, including the option of taking no action. These 'alternatives were
reviewed as to technical feasibility, initial and life cycle costs, and abilitY to meet. the
desired objective. Cost data including past bidding histories, contractor and outside
consultant estimates, and the Engineer's opinion of probable cost were used in the
generation of both initial and life cycle costs for each of the alternatives.
The "no action" alternative was discarded as not meeting the project requirement
of elimination of the combined sewer overflows into waters of the state as well as
providing a continued threat to public health and welfare through back-ups of the combined
sewage into the streets during times of high rainfall. An alternative involving
construction of a gravity sewer system within the alleyways with a large number of sanitary
sewage lift stations and shallow gravity lines was considered, but was eliminated due to
the difficulty of locating available sites for the lift stations and the extreme difficulty
of constructing gravity sewers with the many obstructions present in the alleyways. The
options of constructing new sanitary and new storm systems both in the streets and the
alleyways between houses were considered, preliminary engineering done to locate the sewer
and estimate the costs of such an option, and cost estimates provided. These options were
found to be extremely expensive due partially to the amount of .street restoration that
would be required. Please note that a large number of the streets within this study area
are brick streets and brick street restoration is extremely expensive. The remaining
alternative - construction of a vacuum sewer system with vacuum pipes laid within the
alleyways - was found to be the most cost effective and implementable alternative. The
attached table, which has been reproduced as an exhibit for this meeting, lists the cost
006 MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
October 26, 19 87
effective comparison for each of the alternatives which were compared on an' equivalent
life cycle cost basis.
VI. VACUUM SEWER SYSTEM
Based upon the determination that the study area meets the requirements for a new
collection system and the analysis present in this report, we recommend that the City
install a vacuum sewer system within the combined sewer overflow area, eliminate connection
of the storm lines to the 2nd street sanitary sewage collection system, remove sanitary
sewer laterals for the existing combined sewer, and utilize the existing combined sewer as
a storm sewer alone. At some late date, repairs and expansion/reconstruction of the old
storm sewer system should be accomplished to eliminate street flooding within the downtown
area. Based upon the information provided to us by outside consultants, our physical
review of vacuum sewer systems elsewhere, and upon literature review, we feel that the
vacuum sewer alternative would be the most flexible to meet the requirement for the
elimination of the combined sewers. The vacuum sewer force mains, which do not need to
follow a specific horizonal alignment, should be able to be constructed around obstructions
in the already congested alleyways and thus reduce somewhat construction costs.
Vacuum sewer systems are not conventional sewer system. Although the
construction costs is lower, they require a good deal of operation and preventive
maintenance. They are considered an innovative and alternative technology and as such,
qualify for increased federal funding.
VI. ECONOMIC IMPACT
The collection- system study for the combined sewer area of the City of Sanford as
completed and submitted to the Department of Environmental Regulation and as on record
with the City of Sanford for review by the public, contains detailed, preliminary cost
estimates for construction of the various sewer alternatives. Briefly, the selected
alternative - that of construction of a vacuum sewer system in the combined sewer area - is
estimated to have a capital cost of $5,685,289 and a present worth cost life cycle of
$6,654 177. Note that Federal and State funding are being sought to pay a major portion
of the construction costs of the facilities.
The 201 Plan adopted in February 1985 and updated in July 1986 included costs for the
separation of the combined sewer system. Monthly user charges for all of the improvements
including plant work, sewer rehabilitation, effluent disposal and combined sewer
separation were estimated at $20 to $22 per customer per month in the 201 Plan.
COST EFFECTIVE SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVES
Alternative:
1. No action
2. Lift Stations & Gravity System
3. New Gravity & Storm Lines in the Roads
4. New Gravity Sewer in Roads & Rehabilitate
Storm System in Alleys
5. Vacuum Sewers in the Alleys & Rehabilitate
Storm System in Alleys
Capital/Life cycle Cost
Not Feasible
Not Feasible
$9,337,287 / $9,331,855
$8,674,825 / $8,669,303
$5,685,289 / $6,659,177
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
007
October 26, 19 87
VIII. CLOSING
This is completion of our presentation. We would like now to open us the floor
to any comments or questions by the Mayor, City Commission, and then the floor.
DISCUSSION
Commissioner Mercer asked if these are the grant eligible funds and the balance
to come Out of bonds issue. Bill Simmons responded that this particular project was not
figured in the bonds issued, but will fall within the validated bond issue limit. We will
have a better notion when we open bids on some of our reclaimed water systems, because
there are some very large bid items coming up on that. If you will recall this is .a
project which was originally planned to be done in the early 1990's and it was pulled
forwarded because of the availability of grant money which will be no longer available at
the later time. Commissioner Mercer asked if this would come out of a subsequent bond
issue. Bill Simmons stated that that would probably be the case unless the City receives
some extremely low bids on the basic reclaimed water system.
Commissioner McClanahan asked about the monetary amount of $22.00 per household.
Jim Branch replied that the $22.00 was per customer per month. Commissioner McClanahan
asked if this in addition to what is being paid now. Jim Branch replied that would be a
monthly user charge for sewer only. Jim Branch stated this was not on top of what is being
charged at present.
Bill Simmons stated this is the amount used in the 201 Plan which goes back to
1986 which talks about the total cost per household per customer associated with the
improvements envisioned in the 201 Plan. Paul Porter stated that it was to be a total
cost per month for the 201 Plan, it is not a raise, but all of the things to be
accomplished in the 201 Plan plus operation costs, divided by the number of customers for
an average cost per customer cost of $20 to $22.00. A good bit of it has already been
incorporated into the bond issue which is already in effect.
Mayor Smith stated the important point is the City is going to have to do this at
one time or another, one way or the other, and is a lot better to it with some grant money.
Commissioner Thomas asked the life cycle of this system. Jim Branch stated in
actuality the sewers that are put in have a longer life, but for costing a life of twenty
years was estimated.
The Chairman announced that the Commission would hear from those persons present
to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the proposed Collection Study - Combined Sewer
Area. No one appeared.
Commissioner Eckstein asked if the maintenance on this high state of the art
technology is that something we ought to consider during the twenty year life cycle. Jim
Branch stated very definitely. This system is much more complex than a gravity system, it
takes more people more adept to run it properly. This is definitely a factor, and in
doing the life cycle cost, a lot of money is added for the maintenance.
On motion of Commissioner Thomas, seconded by Commissioner Mercer and carried by
the vote of the Commission as follows:
OO8
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
October 26,
19 87
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Resolution 1493 was
follows:
read and adopted. Said resolution being in word
RESOLUTION NO. 1493
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, APPROVING
THE SANFDRD COLLECTION SYSTEM STUDY FOR THE COMBINED
SEWER AREA AND AGREEING TO IMPLEMENT THE PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Sanford has conducted planning activities to
determine the cost-effective, environmentally sound, and implementable plan for
separation of the. combined storm/sanitary sewer .system; and
'WHEREAS, 'the Sanford Collection System 'Study for the Combined Sewer
Area is completed; and
WHEREAS, the regulatory agencies require adoption of the Collection
System Study to maintain eligibility for the construction grants programs; and
WHEREAS, the City of Sanford warrants that it has the necessary legal
authority to own and operate its wastewater treatment and collection facilities
as provided in the Collection System Study and has the necessary legal
authority -to implement equitable user charges, and sewer use ordinance, alt in
accordance with applicable federal and state'regulations and guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the City of Sanford further warrants that it has the
necessary financial, institutional, and managerial resources to construct,
operate, .and maintain the facilities;
NOW THEREFORE LET tT BE RESOLVED by the City of Sanford, Florida:
That the Sanford-Collection System Study for the Combined Sewer
Area is hereby approved in its final form including, but not
limited to, the determination that the selected plan for
separation of the combined storm/sanitary -sewer system is
construction of a separate vacuum wastewater collection system
with rehabilitation of the combined sewers for stormwater flow.
It is the..intent of the City of Sanford to construct, opera,e,
and maintain such facilities in accordance with applicable State
and Federal requirements, if said facilities are approved and
funded by'the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation
and/or the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Sanford,
Florida, this 26%h day of. ~rtnhp- , 1987.
CITY COMMISSION DF THE
CII~{ OF SANFORD, FLORIDA
gayo~', Be'ct.ye .Stol th '
I Henry N. 7amm, Jr., City Clerk for the City of Sanford, Florida, do
hereby certify that the Resolution Number!~9_q is true as passed and adopted
by the City Commission of the City of SanforU, Florida, on
, 1987
and
figures
as
MINUTES 009
City~ ' -uommission, Sanford, Florida October 26, 19 87
On motion of Commissioner Thomas, seconded by Commzssxoner'---~--'~ercer an~ carr
the vote of the Commission as follows:
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Ordinance No. 1900, entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 1900
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1097 OF SAID CITY; SAID
ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING PLAN; SAID AMENDMENT
CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN
PROPERTY LYING BETWEEN SANFORD AVENUE AND
PALMETTO AVENUE AND BETWEEN 25TH STREET (GENEVA
AVENUE-STATE ROAD 46) AND 25TH PLACE EXTENDED
EASTERLY FROM RC-1 (RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL)
DISTRICT TO GC-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND
EFFECTIVE DATE.
was introduced and placed on first reading.
On motion of Commissioner Thomas, seconded by Commissioner McClanahan and carried
by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Ordinance No. 1903, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1097 OF SAID CITY; SAID
ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING PLAN; SAID AMENDMENT
CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN
PROPERTY LYING SOUTH OF AND ABUTTING NARCISSUS AVENUE
BETWEEN KENNEL ROAD AND AIRPORT BOULEVARD EXTENDED
NORTHERLY FROM AD (AGRICULTURAL) DISTRICT TO RI-1
(RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL) DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
was introduced and placed on first reading.
On motion of Commissioner Mercer, seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by
the vote of the Commission as follows:
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Ordinance No. 1904, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1097 OF SAID CITY; SAID
ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING PLAN; SAID AMENDMENT
CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN
PROPERTY LYING WEST OF AN ABUTTING BEVIER ROAD
AND LYING BETWEEN SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD
AND WEST 16TH STREET FROM AD (AGRICULTURAL)
DISTRICT TO RI-1 (RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL)
DISTRICT; -PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS
AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
was introduced and placed on first reading.
On motion of Commissioner Mercer, seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by
010
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
October 26--,19 87
the vote of the Commission as follows:
Commissioner Eckstein
CommissiOner Mercer
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Ordinance No. 1906, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1873 WHICH ESTABLISHED THE
HENRY.SHELTON SANFORD MEMORIAL LIBRARY AND MUSEUM
BOARD BY INCREASING THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE BOARD
FROM FIVE TO NINE MEMBERS, PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
was introduced and placed on first reading.
A public Hearing was held in accordance with Notice published in the Evening
Herald on October 16, 1987, as follows:
SePtember 29, 1987
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE
ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF
SANFORD, FLORIDA
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in
the Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford,
Florida, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on October 26, 1987, to
consider the adoption of an ordinance by the City of Sanford,
Florida, title of which is as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1882
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CiTY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
CLOSING, VACATING AND ABANDONING ANY RIGHT OF
THE CITY AND THE PUBLIC IN AND TO A PORTION OF
MULBERRY AVENUE LYING BETWEEN WEST 6TH STREET AND
SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY
RESERVING A 15 FOOT NORTH/SOUTH UTILITY EASEMENT
ALONG AN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE; PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
A copy shall be available at the Office of the City Clerk for
all persons desiring to examine the same.
Ail parties in interest and citizens
opportunity to be heard at said hearing.
shall have an
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford,
Florida.
ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a
decision made with respect to any matter considered at the
above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of
the proceedings, including the testimony and evidence,
which record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS
286.0105)
Publish:
October 16, 1987
H. N. Tamm, Jr.
City Clerk
Ordinance No. 1882, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
CLOSING, VACATING AND ABANDONING ANY RIGHT OF THE
CITY AND THE PUBLIC IN AND TO A PORTION OF
MULBERRY AVENUE LYING BETWEEN WEST 6TH STREET AND
SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY RESERVING
A 15 FOOT NORTH/SOUTH UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG AN
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
final reading.
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
lng
01!
October 26_~___ 19 87
After being read by title, the Chairman announced that the Commission would
hear from those persons present to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the proposed
adoption of Ordinance No. 1882. No one appeared.
Commissioner McClanahan moved on the passage and adoption of Ordinance No. 1882.
Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Thereupon, the Chairman announced that the City Commission of the City of Sanford,
Florida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 1882, entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 1882
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
CLOSING, VACATING AND ABANDONING ANY RIGHT OF THE
CITY AND THE PUBLIC IN AND TO A PORTION OF
MULBERRY AVENUE LYING BETWEEN WEST 6TH STREET AND
SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY
RESERVING A 15 FOOT NORTH/SOUTH UTILITY EASEMENT
ALONG AN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE; PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
A Public Hearing was held in accordance with Notice published in the Evening
Herald on September 18 and 25, October 2 and 9, 1987, as follows:
September 15, 1987
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE
ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF
SANFORD, FLORIDA
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in
the Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford,
Florida, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on October 12-, 1987, to
-consider the adoption of an ordinance by the City of Sanford,
Florida, title of which is as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1889
General Description of the.area to be annexed and map is as
follows:
A portion of that certain property lying between
State Road 46 and Narcissus Avenue and lying 'West
of and abutting Rand Yard Road.
· . ( /
~ ANNEXATION
.-.
~ complete description and a copy of tho ordinance shall be
available at the Off~ce of the City Clerk for all persons
des~rin~ to oxam~ne the samo.
012
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
October 26,
19 87
Ail parties in interest and citizens
opportunity to be heard at said hearing.
shall have an
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford,
Florida.
ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If .a person decides to appeal a
decision made with respect to any matter considered at the
above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of'
the proceedings, including the testimony and evidence,
which record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS
286.0105)
H. N. Tamm, Jr.
City Clerk
Publish: September 17 and 24, and October 1 and 8, 1987
Ordinance No. 1889, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, TO
ANNEX WITHIN THE CORPORATE AREA OF THE CITY OF
SANFORD, FLORIDA, UPON ADOPTION OF SAID ORDINANCE, A
PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY LYING BETWEEN STATE
ROAD 46 AND NARCISSUS AVENUE AND LYING WEST OF AND
ABUTTING P~AND YARD ROAD; SAID PROPERTY BEING
SITUATED IN SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION PROVISIONS OF SECTION
171.044, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECT DATE.
introduced and placed on first reading at meeting of September 14, 1987 was next placed on
final reading. After being read by title, the Chairman announced that the Commission would
hear from those persons present to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the proposed
adoption of Ordinance No. 1889.
The City Engineer recommended to table this annexation pending annexation of
Lot 44.
Bob Seigler, Seigler Realty representing the owner appeared and agreed with
tabling action.
commissioner McClanahan moved to table said Public Hearing and Second Reading and
Adoption of Ordinance No. 1889. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of
the CommisSion as follows:
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Thomas
· Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
A Public Hearing was held in accordance with Notice published in the Evening
Herald on October 2, 9, 16 and 23, 1987, as follows:
September 29, 1987
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE
ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF
SANFORD, FLORIDA
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in
the Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford,
Florida, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on October 26, 1987, to
consider the adoption of an ordinance by the City of Sanford,
Florida, title of which is as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1891
General Description of the area to be annexed and map is as
follows:
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
013
nctober 26, 19 87
A portion of that certain property lying between
Jewett Lane and West 5th Street and abutting the
Easterly ROW of Airport Boulevard and a portion
of that certain property lying between Jewett
Lane and West 5th Street and abutting the
Westerly ROW of Airport Boulevard.
A complete description and a copy of the ordinance shall be
available at the Office of the City Clerk for all persons
desiring to examine the same.
Ail parties in interest and citizens
opportunity to be heard at said hearing.
shall have an
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford,
Florida.
ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a
decision made with respect to any matter considered at the
above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of
the .proceedings, including the testimony and evidence,
which record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS
286.01.05)
H. N. T amm, Jr.
City Clerk
Publish: October 2, 9, 16, and 23, 1987
Ordinance No. 1891, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, 'FLORIDA TO
ANNEX WITHIN THE CORPORATE AREA OF THE CITY OF
SANFORD, FLORIDA, UPON ADOPTION OF SAID ORDINANCE,
A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY LYING BETWEEN
JEWETT LANE AND WEST 5TH STREET AND ABUTTING THE
EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF AIRPORT BOULEVARD AND A
PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY .LYING BETWEEN
JEWETT LANE AND WEST 5TH STREET AND ABUTTING THE
~STERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF AIRPORT BOULEVARD; SAID
PROPERTY BEING SITUATED IN SEMINOLE COUNTY,
FLORIDA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VOLUNTARY
ANNEXATION PROVISIONS OF SECTION 171.044, FLORIDA
STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND
EFFECTIVE DATE.
introduced and placed on first reading at meeting of September 28, 1987 was next placed on
final reading. After being read by title, the Chairman announced that the Commission would
hear from those persons present to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the proposed
adoption of Ordinance No. 1891. No one appeared.
Commissioner Thomas moved on the passage and adoption of Ordinance No. 1891.
Seconded by Commissioner Mercer and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
014
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
October 26~ 19 87
Thereupon, the Chairman announced that the City Commission of the City of
Sanford, Florida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 1891, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA TO ANNEX
WITHIN THE CORPORATE AREA OF THE CITY OF SANFORD,
FLORIDA, UPON ADOPTION OF SAID ORDINANCE, A PORTION OF
THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY LYING BETWEEN JEWETT LANE AND WEST
5TH STREET AND ABUTTING THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF
AIRPORT BOULEVARD AND A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY
LYING BETWEEN JEWETT LANE AND WEST 5TH STREET AND
ABUTTING THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF AIRPORT BOULEVARD;
SAID PROPERTY BEING SITUATED IN SEMINOLE COUNTY,
FLORIDA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION
PROVISIONS OF SECTION 171.044, FLORIDA STATUTES;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE
DATE.
A Public Hearing was held in accordance with Notice published in the Evening
Herald on October 16, 1987, as follows:
October 5, 1987
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE
ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF
SANFORD, FLORIDA
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in
the Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford,
Florida, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on October 26, 1987, to
consider the adoption of an ordinance by the City of Sanford,
.Florida, title of which is as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1895
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
CHANGING THE NAME OF PARK AVENUE BETWEEN MATTIE
STREET AND WYLLY AVENUE PRESENTLY DEFINED WITHIN
THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, TO PRINCETON
AVENUE.
A copy shall be available at the Office of the City Clerk for
all persons desiring to examine the same.
Ail parties in interest and citizens
opportunity to be heard at said hearing.
shall have an
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford,
Florida.
ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a
decision made with respect to any matter considered at the
above meeting or hearing,, he may need a verbatim record of
the proceedings, including the testimony and evidence,
which record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS
286.0105)
Publish:
October 16, 1987.
H. N. Tamm, Jr.
City Clerk
Ordinance No. 1895, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
CHANGING THE NAME OF PARK AVENUE BETWEEN MATTIE
STREET AND WYLLY AVENUE PRESENTLY DEFINED WITHIN
THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, TO PRINCETON AVENUE.
introduced and placed on first reading at meeting of September 28, 1987 was next placed on
final reading. After being read by title, the Chairman announced that the Commission would
hear from those persons present to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the proposed
adoption of Ordinance No. 1895. No one appeared.
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
015
October 26~__
19 87
Commissioner Mercer moved on the passage and adoption of Ordinance No.
Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
1895.
Thereupon, the Chairman announced that the City Commission of the City of
Sanford, Florida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 1895, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
CHANGING THE NAME OF PARK AVENUE BETWEEN MATTIE
STREET AND WYLLY AVENUE PRESENTLY DEFINED WITHIN THE
CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, TO PRINCETON AVENUE.
A Public Hearing was held in accordance with Notice published in the Evening
Herald on October 16, 1987, as follows:
September 29, 1987
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE
ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF
SANFORD, FLORIDA
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in
the Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford,
Florida, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on October 26, 1987, to
consider the adoption of an ordinance by the City of Sanford,
Florida, title of which is as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1896
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1097 OF SAID CITY; SAID
ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING PLAN; SAID AMENDMENT
CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN
PROPERTY LYING BETWEEN 17-92 AND FLAMINGO DRIVE
AND BETWEEN COLLINS DRIVE AND COUNTY ROAD 427
FROM AD (AGRICULTURAL) DISTRICT TO GC-2 (GENERAL
COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY,
CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
A copy shall be available at the Office of the City Clerk for
all persons desiring to examine the same.
Ail parties in interest- and citizens
opportunity to be heard at said hearing.
shall have an
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford,
Florida.
ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a
decision made with respect to any matter considered at the
above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of
the proceedings, including the testimony and evidence,
which record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS
286.0105)
H. N. Tamm, Jr.
City Clerk
Publish: October 16, 1987.
Ordinance No. 1896, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1097 OF SAID CITY; SAID
ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING PLAN; SAID AMENDMENT
CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN
PROPERTY LYING BETWEEN 17-92 AND FLAMINGO DRIVE AND
BETWEEN COLLINS DRIVE AND COUNTY ROAD 427 FROM AD
(AGRICULTURAL) DISTRICT TO GC-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL)
DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND
EFFECTIVE DATE.
016
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
October 26,.._19 87
introduced and placed on first reading at meeting of October 12, 1987 was next placed on
final reading. After being read by title, the Chairman announced that the Commission would
hear from those persons present to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the proposed
adoption of Ordinance No. 1896. No one appeared.
Commissioner Thomas moved on the passage and adoption of Ordinance No. 1896.
Seconded by Commissioner McClanahan and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner ThOmas
Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Thereupon, the Chairman announced that the City Commission of the City of Sanford,
Florida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 1896, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1097 OF SAID CITY; SAID
ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING PLAN; SAID AMENDMENT
CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN
PROPERTY LYING BETWEEN 17-92 AND FLAMINGO DRIVE AND
BETWEEN COLLINS DRIVE AND COUNTY ROAD 427 FROM AD
(AGRICULTURAL) DISTRICT TO GC-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL)
DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND
EFFECTIVE DATE.
A Public Hearing was held in accordance with Notice published in the Evening
Herald on October 16, 1987, as follows:
September 29, 1987
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE
ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF
SANFORD, FLORIDA
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in
the Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford,
Florida, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on October 26, 1987, to
consider the adoption of an ordinance by the City of Sanford,
Florida, title of which is as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1897
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1097 OF SAID CITY; SAID
ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING PLAN; SAID AMENDMENT
CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN
PROPERTY LYING WEST OF AND ABUTTING BEVIER ROAD
AND LYING BETWEEN JEWETT LANE AND SCL RR FROM AD
(AGRICULTURAL) DISTRICT TO RI-1 (RESTRICTED
INDUSTRIAL) DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY,
CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
A copy shall be available at the Office of the City Clerk for
all persons desiring to examine the same.
Ail parties in interest and citizens
opportunity to be heard at said hearing.
shall have an
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford,
Florida.
ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a
decision made with respect to any matter considered at the
above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of
the proceedings, including the testimony and evidence,
which record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS
286.0105)
H. N. Tamm, Jr.
City Clerk
Publish: October 16, 1987.
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
017
October 26,
19 87
Ordinance No. 1897, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1097 OF SAID CITY; SAID
ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING PLAN; SAID AMENDMENT
CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN
PROPERTY LYING WEST OF AND ABUTTING BEVIER ROAD AND
LYING BETWEEN JEWETT LANE AND SCL RR FROM AD
(AGRICULTURAL) DISTRICT TO RI-1 (RESTRICTED
INDUSTRIAL) DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR S EVERAB IL ITY,
CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
introduced and placed on first reading at meeting of October 12, 1987 was next placed on
final reading. After being read by title, the Chairman announced that the Commission would
hear from those persons present to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the proposed
adoption of Ordinance No. 1897. No one appeared.
Commissioner Mercer moved on the passage and adoption of Ordinance No. 1897.
Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Thereupon, the Chairman announced that the City Commission of the City of Sanford,
Florida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 1897, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORI DA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1097 OF SAID cITy; SAID
ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING PLAN; SAID AMENDMENT
CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN
PROPERTY LYING WEST OF AND ABUTTING BEVIER ROAD AND
LYING BETWEEN JEWETT LANE AND SCL RR FROM AD
(AGRICULTURAL) DISTRICT TO RI-1 (RESTRICTED
INDUSTRIAL) DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY,
CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
A Public Hearing was held in accordance with Notice published in the Evening
Herald on October 16, 1987, as follows:
October 13, 1987
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE
ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF
SANFORD, FLORIDA
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in
the Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford,
Florida, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on October 26, 1987, to
consider the adoption of an ordinance by the City of Sanford,
Florida, title of which is as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1901
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING SECTION 16-12 OF THE SANFORD CITY CODE,
SAID SECTION RELATING TO SCHEDULE OF OCCUPATIONS
AND LICENSE TAXES BY AMENDING THE FEE OF THE
TELEGRAPH COMPANY FROM $375.00 TO $50.00;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND
EFFECTIVE DATE.
A copy shall be available at the Office of the City Clerk for
all persons desiring to examine the same.
Ail parties in interest and citizens
opportunity to be heard at said hearing.
shall have an
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford,
Florida.
ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a
decision made with respect to any matter considered at the
above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of
018
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
October 26,
19 87
the proceedings, including the testimony and evidence,
which record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS
286.0105)
H. N. Tamm, Jr.
City Clerk
Publish: October 16, 1987.
Ordinance No. 1901, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING SECTION 16-12 OF THE SANFORD CITY CODE,
SAID SECTION RELATING TO SCHEDULE OF OCCUPATIONS
AND LICENSE TAXES BY AMENDING THE FEE OF THE
TELEGRAPH COMPANY FROM $375.00 TO $50.00;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE
DATE.
introduced and placed on first reading at meeting of October 12, 1987 was next placed on
final reading. After being read by title, the Chairman announced that the Commission would
hear from those persons present to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the proposed
adoption of Ordinance No. 1901. No one appeared.
Commissioner Eckstein moved on the passage and adoption of Ordinance No. 1901.
Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Thereupon, the Chairman announced that the City Commission of the City of
Sanford, Florida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 1901, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AMENDING SECTION 16-12 OF THE SANFORD CITY CODE,
SAID SECTION RELATING TO SCHEDULE OF OCCUPATIONS
AND LICENSE TAXES BY AMENDING THE FEE OF THE
TELEGRAPH COMPANY FROM $375.00 TO $50.00;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE
DATE.
The Commission considered the Petition for Annexation from Stanley H. Sandefur,
Trustee for a portion of that certain property lying between State Road 46 (Geneva Avenue
and vacated SCL RR and lying West of and abutting Brisson Avenue. Said Petition was tabled
from the meeting of August 24, 1987. The City ~ttorney requested said annexation be tabled
for 30 days.
CommiSsioner McClanahan moved to table said annexation to November 23._ 1987.
Seconded by Commissioner Eckstein and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
The Commission considered the Petition for Annexation from Gerald and Beryl E.
Van Houtte for a portion of that certain property lying approximately 1500 feet South of
State Road 46 lying between Beardall Avenue and SCL RR ROW. Said Petition was tabled from
meeting of October 12, 1987. Recommended by the City Manager.
Commissioner McClanahan requested the petitioner or his representative be
requested to appear before the Commission and moved to table said annexation to November
~?g, 1987. Seconded by Commissioner Eckstein and carried by the vote of the Commission as
follows:
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
019
October 26,
19 87
l
Commissioner Eckstein
Contmissioner Mercer
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
The Commission considered the Petition for Annexation from Benjamin L. Pay and
Kian Moon Kwan for a portion of that certain property lying North of and abutting State
Road 46 and lying between Rand Yard Road and Kennel Road, more particularly described as
follows:
Lot 44, Florida Land & Colonization Co.'s Celery
Plantation, as recorded in the Public Records of
Seminole County, Florida in Plat Book 1, Page 129.
Commissioner McClanahan moved to authorize the City Attorney to prepare the
proper ordinance to annex same. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of
the Commission as follows:
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
A request was next submitted from Randall and Josephine Gates for a variance from
provisions of Section 4-43 of the Sanford City Code restricting the number of dogs or cats
permitted within the premises of a single family dwelling at 601 Briarcliffe Avenue.
Petitioner's attorney, William J. Sheaffer, requested said variance to be tabled
to meeting of November 9, 1987.
Commissioner Mercer moved to authorize same.
carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
The meeting was recessed from 8:00 p.m. to 8:15 p.m.
The Mayor called the meeting back to order.
The Commission considered the Residential Care Facilities ordinance. Commissioner
Mercer moved to authorize said ordinance.be referred to the Planning and Zoning-Commission
for Public Hearing and their recommendations. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried
by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
The Commission next considered the request fro~ Captain Harley Hoy to dock a
paddlewheel boat along the seawall at Fort Mellon Park on a temporary basis during the
Golden Age Games.
Commissioner Mercer moved to deny said request. Seconded by Commissioner ~ckstein
and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
020
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
October 26, 19 87
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
The Commission considered a request from Marion Cameron to use a detached unit at
1019 Magnolia Avenue as rental property. Commissioner Mercer moved to deny said request.
Seconded by Commissioner Eckstein and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
On request of Wes Rinker, the Commission delayed consideration of the use of the
Municipal Stadium for concerts.
Commissioner Thomas moved to appoint Ron Fiorelli and Albert Fitts to the
Historical Preservation Board and accepted with regrets the resignation of Vivienne Sweeney
and John Puder. Seconded by Commissioner Eckstein and carried by the vote of the
Commission as follows:
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Commissioner McClanahan moved to reappoint Winifred "Bill" Gielow and Cal Conktin
to the Historical Preservation Board. Seconded by Commissioner Eckstein and carried by the
vote of the Commission as follows:
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Commissioner Mercer moved to appoint Tommie Peterson, Edward Yancey, B.L.
Perkins, Paul Bodenkircher, Joyce Mikkola as voting members of the Henry Shelton Sanfor(
Memorial Library and Museum Board; and Irma 'Dangleman, Vann Parker, Alfreda Wallace and
Mrs. Phillip Logan as non-voting members of the Library Board until Ordinance No. 1906 is
Seconded by Commissioner Eckstein 'and carried by the vote of the
passed and adopted.
Commission as follows:
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Commissioner Eckstein was appointed liaison to the library board.
The Commission considered the request for right-of-way use of Stenstrom Boulevard
from Suda, Inc. so as to re-landscape the median islands and the parkways at the entrance
to Sanora South and Brynhaven Subdivision.
Commissioner Eckstein moved to authorize said request. Seconded by Commissionez
Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
021
October 26,
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
The City Manager submitted Bid Tabulation ~87-88-02 for the East SR 46 Water
Extension, as follows:
BID TABULATION
DID'TITLE ESR 46 Water Extension ralum~l~rl'~kr~WlllllNltzTl~a~c~lma) OPENED BY: w~t ~h~arin
BID NUMBER ~7188-02 nau=.~n=.~,~m=,*=~=~c;r~ TABULATED flY: p~,,~ u ....
OPENING DATE3n/]s/sTTIME ~.nn p.~m,. . VERIFIED BY: Billy Maqner
POSTING TIME/DATE FROM: / UNTIL / PAGE OF PAGE{S~
I ' II III' IV V
10" PVC Gate Volve Fire
BIDDERS
TERMS
Pipe Valve~ Boxes Hydrant s Fitt inqs
Hughes, Orlando 2% 10th ~ 6,675.00 420.00 520.00 1,248.00 6 wks.
prox
65,846.00 5,334.00 280.00 500.00 ~ 2 - 5
Southeastern
Cas se lberr.~ wks
Ferguson Undergrou£ t 3 wks
Orlando 63,550.00 5,178.00 252.00 ~ 1,691.00
Trans-Florida
Orlando 63,370.00 5,168.60 ' '208.60 490j00 1,224.25 11/17/87
B & B Sales 10/31 63,140.00 ~,9~0.60~ 302.40 516.00 1,229.75 6 wks
Orlando 11/31 65.1flr
Davis
Meter
63,058.00 5',134.00 ~ 499.00 1,255.60 1 wks
Orlando
R£~AaK$: CI£CLED '~ICE INDICATES AUARD
NOT A ~UDGETED PROJECT
Utili.tyTrustAccot~t
On recommendation of the City Manager and the purchaser, Commissioner Mercer
moved to authorize acceptance of low bid meeting specifications as marked.
Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Commissioner McClanahan moved to approved the Minutes of September 28, 1987 and
October 12, 1987. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the
Commission as follows:
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Commissioner McClanahan moved to approved payment of statements Items A 1-8 and B
1-2 as follows:
19 87
022
MINUTES
City Commission. Sanford, Florida
October 26,
19 _87
a. Conk.lint Porter and Holmes statements from
09-05-87 thru 10-02-87:
(1) Engineering Services for Construction of Sludge
Handling Facility ...................... $ tl,931.90
(2) Engineering Services for Construction of Core
Sewer Collection System Rehab .......... $ 3,982.98
(3) Engineering Report for Bond Issue ...... $ 1,285.12
(4) Engineering Services for. Grant Ineligible Sewer
System Repair Work ..................... $ 1,489.10
(5) Engineering Services on Effluent Filtration,
Disinfection, Storage, Pumping and Transmission
Facilities - Amend 913 ................. $ 4,369.02
(6) Engineering Services on Wastewater Effluent Spray
Irrigation Systems ..................... $ 4,501.09
(7) Engineering Services on Vacuum Sewer Design .......
........ $ 34,356.42
(8) Engineering Services on Construction of Incremen-
...... tal--Sewer Collection'-System Rehab~---~';'--$ ..... 2-,726.07 ........................
be
(1)
(2)
DeWitt Excavating, Inc. Payment Requests No. 6 for
09-06-87 thru 10-05-87 for Sewer System
Rehabilitation:
Contrac~ 1 Part 1 (EPA) ................ $ 65,363.34
Contract 1 Part 11 (State) ............. $ 18,505.62
follows:
Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Mercer
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Mayor Smith
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Yea
Recommendations submitted from the Planning and Zoning Commission as follows:
MEMORANDUM
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
OCTOBER 16, 1987
City Manager/~2/
Director of Engineering and Planning ~
Zoning and Arbor Inspector~
Planning and Zoning Meeting of October 15, 1987
RECOMMENDATIONS
After listening to opposition concerning 1) lack of water and
sewer service in the area, 2) inadequate roads to handle the
site and 3) intrusion of an industrial concern into a
rural/residential area, recommended the approval of the
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
023
October 26,
19 87
request to rezone from AD to RI-l, property located on the
southside of Narcissus Avenue, west of Rand Yard Road at 3131
Narcissus Avenue for the purpose of light manufacturing and
office warehouse by a vote of five to one.
Owner: Continental Equity Ltd. Partnership #6
Representative: Michael W. Spinos
Unanimously denied the request for a conditional use in a GC-2
zone for the purpose of a machine shop for property located at
410 E. Mattie Street. The intended tenant manufactures screws
for Mobilite Corporation. A delegation from the neighborhood
presented a petition of 50 names in opposition.
Owner: Bammac
Representative: Gret Yielding
Unanimously approved the site plan for Central Baptist Church,
3101 West 1st Street in an AD zone. The facility will consist
of a sanctuary, classrooms, administrative offices, a gymnasium
and a security residence. There will be no full time school or
daycare on the facilities.
Owner: Central Baptist Church
Representative: Mack LaZenby & Kim Townsend
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned·
.4~ !
Act~ M A
O R
ATTEST:
CITY~ CLERK