Loading...
082889-Regular Session298 MINU S City Commission, Sanford, Florida 19 89 The City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida, met in Regular Session in the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on August 28, 1989. Present: Mayor-Commissioner Bettye D. Smith Commissioner Whitey Eckstein Commissioner Robert B. Thomas Commissioner A.A. McClanahan Commissioner Lon Howell City Attorney William L. Colbert City Manager Frank A. Faison City Clerk Janet R. Donahoe The meeting was called to order by the Chairman. Sheila Belt, representing Partners in Learning, Inc., appeared and introduced Marjorie R. Nelsen, Director of Partners In Learning, Inc. who made a presentation to request funding for the TAPP, After TAPP and PEEK Programs, She said that it was essential that parents are provided the skills, resources and support-vital to the nurturing of their young children in the critical., pre-school period. Partners in Learning has created three programs to address the. needs of parents and children - TAPP, the Teen- Age Preganancy Program based at Crooms School of Choice to provide parent education and support for teen-age pregnant and parenting mothers with children from birth to six months of age; After TAPP which is an extension of TAPP and reaches teen mothers who have either returned to their local school or have dropped out of school; and PEEK WITH BOOKS which provides thirty-six weekly classes to mothers with children from birth to four years. The Chairman thanked Ms. Nelsen for her presentation, stating that the work she was doing was appreciated, but that the City does not have the sources to provide funding, for social services. A Public Hearing was held in accordance with Herald on August 18, 1989, as follows: Au0u~t~----r~;' 19s9 Notice published in the Evening NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in the Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, at 7:00 o'clock P.M'. on August 28, 1989, to consider the adoption of an ordinance by the City of Sanford, Florida , title of which is as follows: ORDINANCE 2050 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1990 OF SAID CITY; SAID ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING PLAN; SAID AMENDMENT CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY LYING NORTH AND EAST OF HIDDEN LAKE SUBDIVISION FROM SR-1AA (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT TO SR-1 (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL); FROM AG (AGRICULTURAL) DISTRICT TO SR-1 (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL); FROM AG (AGRICULTURAL) DISTRICT TO SR-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT, AND FROM SR-I (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT TO SR-1 (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL) MINUTES City Commission, Sanford, Florida August 28 299 19 89 A copy shall be available at the office of the City Clerk. for all persons desiring to examine the same. Ail parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard at said hearing. By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanf'ord, Florida. ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a decision, made with respect to any matter considered at the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of the proceedings, including the testimony' and evidence, which record is not provided by the City of Sanford'. (FS 286.0105) Janet R. Donahoe City Clerk Publish: August 18, 1989 Ordinance No. 2050 entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1990 OF SAID CITY; SAID ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING PLAN; SAID AMENDING CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY LYING NORTH AND EAST OF HIDDEN LAKE SUBDIVISION FROM SR-1AA (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING RESZDENTIAL) DISTRICT TO SR-1 (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT; FROM AG (AGRICULTURAL) DISTRICT TO SR-1 (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT; FROM SR-1 (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL) TO SR-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT; AND FROM. AG (AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO SR-1 (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. introduced and placed on first reading at meeting of August 14, 1989, was next placed on final reading. After being read by title, the Chairman announced that the Commission would hear from those persons present to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the proposed adoption of Ordinance No. 2050. No one appeared. Commissioner Howell moved on the passage and adoption of Ordinance No. 2050. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows: Mayor Smith Commissioner Eckstein Commissioner Howell Commissioner Thomas Commissioner McClanahan Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea Thereupon, the Chairman announced that the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 2050, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1990 OF SAID CITY; SAID ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING PLAN; SAID AMENDING CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY LYING NORTH AND EAST OF HIDDEN LAKE SUBDIVISION FROM SR-1AA (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT TO SR-1 (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT; FROM AG (AGRICULTURAL) DISTRICT TO SR-1 (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT; FROM SR-1 (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL) TO SR-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT; AND FROM AG (AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO SR-1 (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. A Public Hearing was held in accordance with Notice published in the Evening Herald on August 18, 1989, as follows: August 16., '1989 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA 300 City Commission, Sanford, Florida 19 8~ ORDINANCE 2051 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1990 OF SAID CITY; SAID ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING PLAN; SAID AMENDMENT CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION' OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY LYING BETWEEN TERWILLIGER LANE AND RIVERVIEW AVENUE. AND BETWEEN U.S. 17-92 AND NARCISSUS AVENUE FROM AG (AGRICULTURAL) DISTRICT TO MR-1 (MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. A copy shall be available at the office of the City Clerk for all persons desiring to examine the same. Ail parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard at said hearing. By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida. ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a decision made with respect to any matter considered at the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of the proceedings, including the testimony and evidence, which record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS 286.0105) Publish: August 18, 1989 Janet R. Donahoe City Clerk Ordinance No. 2051, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1990 OF SAID CITY; SAID ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING PLAN; SAID AMENDMENT CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY LYING BETWEEN TERWILLIGER LANE AND RIVERVIEW AVENUE AND BETWEEN U.S. 17-92 AND NARCISSUS AVENUE FROM AG (AGRICULTURAL) DISTRICT TO MR-1 (MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. introduced and placed on first reading, at meeting of August 14, 1989, was next placed on final reading. After being read by title, the Chairman announced that the Commission would hear from those persons present to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the proposed adoption of Ordinance No. 2051. No one appeared. Commissioner Thomas moved on the passage and adoption of Ordinance No. 2051. Seconded by Commissioner Howe.ll and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows: Mayor Smith Commissioner Eckstein Commissioner Howell Commissioner Thomas Commissioner McClanahan Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea Thereupon, the Chairman announced that the City Commission of the City of Sanford, FLorida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 2051, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1990 OF SAID CITY; SAID ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING PLAN; SAID AMENq~MENT CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY LYING BETWEEN TERWILLIGER LANE AND RIVERVIEW AVENUE AND BETWEEN U.S. 17-92 AND NARCISSUS AVENUE FROM AG (AGRICULTURAL) DISTRICT TO MR-1 (MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. 'MINUTES City Commission/Sanford, Florida Aug,~st 28 301 19 89 A Public Hearing was held in accordance with Notice published in the Evening Harold on August 18, 1989, as follows: August 16, 1989 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in the Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on August 28, 1989, to consider the adoption of an ordinance by the City of Sanford, Florida , title of which is as follows: ORDINANCE 2052 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 4, ANIMALS AND FOWLS, SECTION 4,11 OF THE SANFORD CITY CODE TO REGULATE THE DISTANCE FROM DWELLINGS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. A copy shall be available at the office of the City Clerk for all persons desiring to examine the same. Ail parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard at said hearing. By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida. ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a decision made with respect to any matter considered at the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of the proceedings, including the testimony and evidence, which record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS 286.0105) R. Donahoe City Clerk Publish: August 18, 1989 Ordinance No. 2052, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 4, ANIMALS AND FOWLS, SECTION 4-11 OF THE SANFORD CITY CODE TO REGULATE THE DISTANCE FROM DWELLINGS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. introduced and placed on first reading final reading. After being read by title, the Chairman would hear from those persons present to speak in favor proposed adoption of Ordinance No. 2052. No one appeared.. Commissioner Howell moved on the passage and adoption of Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows': Mayor Smith Commissioner Eckstein Commissioner Howell Commissioner Thomas Commissioner McClanahan of meeting of August 14, 1989 was next placed on announced that the Commission of, or in opposition to, the Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea Ordinance No. 2052. Sanford, Florida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 2052, entitled: Thereupon, the Chairman announced that the City Commission of the City of 302 MINU S City Commission, Sanford, Florida August 28 19 89 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA~ AMENDING CHAPTER 4, ANIMALS AND FOWLS, SECTION 4-11 OF THE SANFORD CITY CODE TO EGULATE THE DISTANCE FROM DWELLINGS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. A Public Hearing was held in Herald on August 18, 1989, as follows: accordance with August 16, 1989 Notice published in the Evening NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in the Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on August 28, 1989, to consider the adoption of an ordinance by the City of Sanford, Florida , title of which is as follows: ORDINANCE 2053 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 11, SECTION 11-30 (d), KEEPING OF JUNK CARS, PARTS AND DEBRIS WITHIN THE CITY OF SANFORD; EXCEPTION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. A copy shall be available at the office of the City Clerk for all persons desiring to examine the same. All parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard at said hearing. By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida. ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a decision made with respect to any matter considered at the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of the proceedings, including the testimony and evidence, which record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS 286.0105) ganet R. Donahoe City Clerk Publish: August 18, 1989 Ordinance No. 2053, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 11, SECTION 11-30(d), KEEPING OF JUNK CARS, PARTS AND DEBRIS IN WITHIN THE CITY OF SANFORD; EXCEPTION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. introduced and placed on first reading at meeting of August 14, 1989, was next placed on final reading. After being read by title, the Chairman announced that the Commission would hear from those persons present to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the proposed adoption of Ordinance No. 2053. William Balzar, 222 Bradshaw Avenue, Sanford, Florida, appeared and asked who would determine whether or not it was a junk car. The City Attorney explained that the City Code defines junk cars. No one else appeared. Commissioner McClanahan moved on the passage and adoption of Ordinance No. 2053. Seconded by Commissioner Eckstein and carried by the vote of' Commission as follows: City Commission, Sanford, Florida S August 28 303 19 Rq Mayor Smith Commissioner Eckstein Commissioner Howell Commissioner Thomas Commissioner McClanahan Yea Yea Yea Nay Yea Thereupon, Sanford, Florida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 2053, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 11, SECTION 11-30(d), KEEPING OF JUNK CARS, PARTS AND DEBRIS IN WITHIN THE CITY OF SANFORD'; EXCEPTION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. A Public Hearing was held in accordance with Notice published Herald on August 18, 1989, as follows: August 16, 1989 the Chairman announced that the City Commission of the City of in the Evening NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in the Commission Room at %he City Hall in the City of S&nford, Florida, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on August 28, 1989, to consider the adoption of an ordinance by the City of Sanford, Florida , title of which is as follows:' ORDINANCE 2054 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 6, BUILDING, SECTION 6-16 THROUGH 6-18 TO PROVIDE FOR POSTING AND PUBLICATION AS AN ADDITIONAL METHOD OF NOTICE TO OWNER IN CONDEMNATION MATTERS; AND CREATING SECTION 6-20 OF THE SANFORD CITY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR EMERGENCY POWERS FOR CASES INVOLVING IMMINENT DANGER TO KUMAN LIFE OR HEALTH; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. A copy shall be available at the office of the City Clerk for all persons desiring to examine the same. All parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard at said hearing. By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida. ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a decision made with respect to any matter considered at the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of the proceedings, including the testimony and evidence, which record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS 286.0105) ~anet R. Donahoe City Clerk Publish: August 18, 1989 Ordinance No. 2054, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA-, AMENDING CHAPTER 6, BUILDINGS, SECTION 6-16 THROUGH 6-18 TO PROVIDE FOR POSTING AND PUBLICATION' AS AN ADDITIONAL METHOD OF NOTICE TO OWNER IN CONDEMNATION MATTERS; AND CREATING SECTION 6-20 OF THE SANFORD CITY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR EMERGENCY POWERS FOR CASES INVOLVING IMMINENT DANGER TO HUMAN LIFE OR HEALTH; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABII~ITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. introduced and placed on first reading and. meeting of August 14, 1989, was next placed on second reading. After being read by title, the Chairman announced that the Commission would hear from those persons present to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the proposed adoption of Ordinance 2054. No one appeared. 304 MINU S City Commission, Sanford, Florida August 28 19 89 Commissioner Thomas moved on the passage and adoption of Ordinance No. 2054. Seconded by Comissioner Howell and carried by the vote of the. Commission as follows: Mayor Smith Commissioner Eckstein Commissioner Howell Commissioner Thomas Commissioner McClanahan Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea Thereupon, the Chairman announced that the City Commission of the Sanford, Florida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 2054, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA., AMENDING CHAPTER 6, BUILDINGS, SECTION 6-16 THROUGH 6-18 TO PROVIDE FOR POSTING AND PUBLICATION AS AN ADDITIONAL METHOD OF NOTICE TO OWNER IN CONDEMNATION MATTERS; AND CREATING SECTION 6-20 OF THE SANFORD CITY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR EMERGENCY POWERS FOR CASES INVOLVING IMMINENT DANGER TO HUMAN LIFE OR HEALTH; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. City of A Public Hearing was held in accordance with Notice published in the evening Herald on August 18, 1989, as follows: August 16, 1989 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA Notice is hereby gz'ven that a Public Hearing will be held in the Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on August 28, 1989, to consider the adoption of an ordinance by the City of Sanford, Florida , title of which is as follows: ORDINANCE 2055 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 11, GARBAGE, TRASH, WEEDS AND SOLID WASTE, SECTION 11-12 (a) SCHEDULE OF REFUSE COLLECTION FEES, OF THE SANFORD CITY CODE TO INCREASE THE REFUSE RATE FOR EACH SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. A copy shall be available at the office of the City Clerk for all persons desiring to examine the same. All parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard at said hearing. By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida. ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a decision made with respect to any matter considered at the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of the proceedings, including the testimony and evidence, which record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS 286.0105) ~anet R. Donahoe City Clerk Publish: August 18, 1989 City Commission, Sanford, Florida S 305 Ordinance No. 2055 entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 11, GARBAGE, TRASH, WEEDS AND SOLID. WASTE, SECTION 11-12 (a) SCHEDULE OF REFUSE COLLECTION FEES, OF THE SANFORD CITY CODE TO INCREASE THE REFUSERATE FOR EACH SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. introduced and placed on final reading. After being read by title,, the Chairman announced would hear from those persons present to speak in favor of, or proposed adoption of Ordinance No. 2055. No one appeared.. Commissioner McClanahan mc.red on the passage and adoption of Ordinance No. 2055. Seconded by Comissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows: first reading at meeting of August 14, 1989, was next placed on that the Commission in opposition to, the Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea Mayor Smith Commissioner Eckstein Commissioner Howell Commissioner Thomas Commissioner McClanahan of the City of Thereupon, the Chairman announced that the City Commission Sanford, Florida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 2055, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER tl, GARBAGE, TRASH, WEEDS AND SOLID WASTE, SECTION 11-12 (a) SCHEDULE OF REFUSE COLLECTION FEES, OF THE SANFORD CITY CODE TO INCREASE THE REFUSE RATE FOR EACH SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY CONFLICTS AN'D. EFFECTIVE DATE. A Public Hearing was held in accordance with Notice published in the Evening Herald on August 18, 1989, as follows: August 16, 1989 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in the Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on August 28, 1989, to consider the adoption of an ordinance by the City of Sanford, Florida , title of which is as follows:' ORDINANCE 2056 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2 ADMINISTRATION, SECTION 2- 33 DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION AND PARKS OF THE CITY CODE TO REORGANIZE SAID DEPARTMENT INTO THE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND FACILITIES MAINTENANCE AND THE DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL AFFAIRS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. A copy shall be available at the office of the City Clerk for all persons desiring to examine the same. Ail parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard at said hearing. By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida. ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a decision made with respect to any matter considered at the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of the proceedings, including the testimony and evidence, which record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS 286.0105) City Commission, Sanford, Florida 19 89 Ordinance No. 2056, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA AMENDING CHAPTER 2 ADMINISTRATION, SECTION 2-33 DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION AND PARKS OF THE CITY CODE TO REORGANIZE SAID DEPARTMENT INTO THE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND FACILITIES MAINTENANCE AND THE DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL AFFAIRS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. introduced and placed on first reading at meeting of August 14, 1989, was next final reading. After being read by title, the Chairman would hear from those persons present to speak in favor proposed adoption of Ordinance No. 2056. No one appeared. Commissioner Eckstein moved on the passage and adoption of Ordinance No. 2056. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows: placed on announced that the Commission of, or in opposition to, the Mayor Smith Commissioner Eckstein Commissioner Howell Commissioner Thomas Commissioner McClanahan Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea Thereupon, the Chairman announced that the City Commission of the Sanford, Florida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 2056, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA AMENDING CHAPTER 2 ADMINISTRATION, SECTION 2-33 DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION AND PARKS OF THE CITY CODE TO REORGANIZE SAID DEPARTMENT INTO THE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND FACILITIES MAINTENANCE AND. THE DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL AFFAIRS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. City of A Public Hearing was held in accordance with Notice published Herald on August 18, 1989, as follows: August 15, 1989 .... NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA in the Evening Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in the Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on August 28, 1989, to consider the adoption of an ordinance by the City of Sanford, Florida , title of which is as follows: ORDINANCE 2057 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, CLOSING, VACATING, AND ABANDONING A PORTION OF MANGOUSTINGE AVENUE LYING BETWEEN SCL RR R/W AND WEST 7TH STREET AND BETWEEN OLEANDER AVENUE AND OLIVE AVENUE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. A copy shall be available at the office of the City Clerk for all persons desiring to examine the same. Ail parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard at said hearing. By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida. ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a decision made with respect to any matter considered at the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of the proceedings, including the testimony and evidence, which record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS 286.0105) City Commission,'~'anford, Florida 307 19 on Ordinance No. 2057, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, CLOSING, VACATING, AND ABANDONING A PORTION OF MANGOUSTINE AVENUE LYING BETWEEN SCL RR R/W AND WEST 7TH STREET AND BETWEEN OLEANDER AVENUE AND OLIVE AVENUE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. introduced and placed on first reading at meeting of August 14, 1989, was next placed on final reading. After being read by title, the Chairman announced that the Commission would hear from those persons present' to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the proposed adoption of Ordinance No. 2057.. No one appeared. Commissioner McClanahan moved on the passage and adoption of Ordinance No. 2057. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows: Mayor Smith Commissioner Eckstein Commissioner Howell Commissioner Thomas Commissioner McClanahan Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea Thereupon., the Chairman announced that the City Commission of the City of Sanford, FLorida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 2057, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, CLOSING, VACATING, AND ABANDONING A PORTION OF MANGOUSTINE AVENUE LYING BETWEEN SCL RR R/W AND WEST 7TH STREET AND BETWEEN OLEANDER AVENUE AND OLIVE AVENUE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. The next item of business was discussion of proposed reuised Regulations, recommended by the Cemetery Advisory Committee, as follows: Cemetery CITY OF SANFORD RECREATION & PARKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM: FROM: Dire c~ ~~~z/.. TO: City DATE: August 15, 1989 SUBJECT: Update of cemetery regulations The Cemetery Advisory Committee and staff have spent time reviewing the current cemetery regulations. The revisions included are updates of the regulations adopted by the City Commission 4/19/82. cemetery Staff recommends regulations. City Commission approval of cemetery JRJ/lt Attachment: Municipal Cemetery Regulations MINU S City Commission, Sanford, Florida August 28 19 89 CITY OF SANFORD MUNICIPAL CEMETERY REGULATIONS SECTION I. BURIAL AND CEMETERY LOT PURCHASE A) Eligible Purchasers: To be eligible for purchase of cemetery lots or spaces in the Sanford Municipal Cemetery, one must be a resident of the City of Sanford. This is interpreted to mean one must reside within the city limits of Sanford. REVISED TO READ: To be eligible for purchase of cemetery lots or spaces in the Sanford Municipal Cemetery, one must be a resident of the City of Sanford or property owner in the City of Sanford. B) Eligible for Burial: To be eligible for burial in the Sanford Municipal Cemetery, one must: * Be owner of record; or * Be given permission by owner of record or their legally appointed probater of the family estate or executor of the deceased. C) Method of 9rave Locations for Burial: Assuming all conditions in Section B are met, when need arises for use of owned cemetery spaces, the owner of the record must: * Contact the City of Sanford Recreation and Parks Department and request grave layout; and * Designate actual space for burial; or have funeral home handling arrangements contact City of Sanford with information. D) Funeral Arrangements: Families must make all arrangements with funeral Director in regards to: * All arrangements directly related to burial procedures; and * Opening ~and closin~ of graves. E) Burial Regulations: Those companies or individuals responsible for actually opening and closing of graves: Shall be liable for any damage done to monuments, markers, turf, shrubbery and water lines or irrigation systems which are damaged in process of performing their duty. The company responsible for opening and closing graves shall be considered "sub-contractors" of the funeral home. Therefore, in case of damages to property, the Funeral Director shall be held responsible. All graves for adult burials shall be a minimum of 4'3" in depth and shall provide a covering of fill not less than 18" on top of the vault; compacted to ground level. .kBSOLUTELY NO MOUNDING OF GRAVES WILL BE ALLOWED. ADDITIONAL ITEM: 4. Cremations allowed provided owner gives permission to bury ashe~. MINUTES City Commission, Sanford, Florida 309 19 ~89 SECTION II. VETERAN BURIALS A) Free burial for veterans following circumstances: will be provided under the Deceased must be a resident of the City of Sanford; Or must be resident of Seminole County with active membership in a local veteran organization in the City of Sanford. (Excluded are non-residents out-of-county, or out-of-state person). SECTION III. COST OF CEMETERY SPACES A) The Sanford City Commission at their discretion may set an equitable value on the price of cemetery spaces. Prices are $350.00 per grave space as established July 11, 1983. 2. Baby spaces in Lakeview are $15.00 per grave space. * Prices include perpetual care. SECTION IV. CEMETERY LOT MAINTENANCE A) perpetual Care: Ail spaces purchased from the City of Sanford after November I4, 1960 are under the Perpetual Care Program. ADD: ~ Purchase of Perpetual Care: Lot owners who purchased cemetery lots or spaces prior to November 14,"1960, ma~ wis~ to purchase perpetuaI care. Th~ City of Sanford has established the followin~ formula for determinin~ cost to cemetery lot owners for the purchase of perpetual care: Number of spacgs X $350.00 minus amount originally paid for th~ lot at time of purchase equals amount of perpetual care cost. It should be noted that the number of spaces shall be determined b~ ~he size of the cemetery lot and not accordin~ to number of burials. c) Annual Care Annual Care is available to lot owners who purchased cemetery spaces prior to the Perpetual Care Program. The cost is $18.00 per year. SECTION V. MONUMENT AND MARKERS A) Monument Dealers: Ail monument dealers must be duly licensed in the City of Sanford prior to any work being performed in the Municipal Cemetery. B) Procedures for Installin~ Monuments and Marker~: Notify Recreation office at 330-5687 any day, Monday through Friday, at least 24 hours in advance of work being done. MINU ES ..... City Com missib'h,--S~16riaa August 28 19 89 2. When contacting office: Give the secretary the approximate time and date the marker will be set; Give the exact location where the marker will be set. (If unknown ask the secretary to verify the location) Give the exact dimensions of the marker. The location of marker will be designated by 12" wooden stakes set by Superintendent of Parks. Monument contractor must stay within the staked boundaries. 3. Work can be performed only during the following days: * Monday through Friday, 7:00 AM - 4:00 PM. Absolutely no setting of markers will be allowed on Saturdays, Sundays or Holidays. ANY VIOLATION SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION BY CITY OF SANFORD. C) Specifications of Marker Foundations: Ail markers must be placed in uniform fashion in compliance with cemetery regulations and upon approval of Superintendent of Parks. Concrete foundation of marker bases shall be: * Six (6) inch thickness of concrete; and * One (1) inch overhang around perimeter of marker; and * Twenty-four (24) inch pilings on four (4)corners of base. 2. Bases for Marble, Granite Slabs: Twenty-four (24) inch pilings at six (6) points, one (1) at each long side. Width of base shall be four (4) inch of concrete completely around base with thickness being six (6) inch of concrete throughout. 3. Inspection: Ail foundations must be inspected and approved by Superintendent of Parks before markers can be set. SECTION VI. MISCELLANEOUS A) No work on lots may be started in cemetery without approval of Superintendent. B) No changes in regulations can be made without approval of City Manager. REVISED TO READ: B) No chan~es in regulations can be made without approval of city Commission. C) Burial of two bodies in one grave will not be permitted. ADD: ~ All burials must be in vaults. E) Only concrete or metal vaults will be allowed. REVISED TO READ: E) Only concrete vaults will be allowed. F) No persons will be allowed to remove plants or shrubs, either wild or cultivated, from cemetery property. REVISED TO READ: F) No person, s will be allowed to remove plants or shrubs, either wild or cultivated, on cemetery property without MINUTES City Commission, Sanford, Florida ~ugust 28 19 89 G-~-- No person will be allowed to plant plants or shrubs, either '" wild or cultivated, on cemetery property without permission from Superintendent of Parks. H) After conclusion of funeral, all flowers, wreaths, and vases will be allowed a seven (7). day viewing period. On the eighth day, all such items must be removed by family, relatives, etc. or cemetery maintenance crews. I) The City of Sanford, or their representatives, will not be held responsible for wreaths, flowers, vases, etc.; or other items missing or removed from premises. This report has been respectfully prepared by the Cemetery Advisory Committee. Chairman / / Commissioner Eckstein moved to approve the Revised Cemetery Regulations, with the clarification of Section II. Veteran Burials, that the burial space is free, not the burial itself. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried, by vote of the Commission as follows: Mayor Smith Commissioner Eckstein Commissioner Howell Commissioner Thomas Commissioner McClanahan Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea The next item of business was a memo from Principal Deputy Administrative Office dated July 24, 1989, to the City Manager that the street commonly known as "Kennel Road" is shown on the plat as an unnamed street. Further, that the Seminole County Planning Technical Supervisor has asked Seminole County Board County Commissioners to name the portion North of S.R. 46 "North Kennel Road", and has asked the City of Sanford to name the portion South of S.R. 46 and North of Jewett Lane "South Kennel Road". On recommendation of the City Manager, Commissioner McClanahan moved to authorize the City Attorney to prepare the proper ordinance to designate South Kennel Road as requested. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by vote of the Commission as follows: Mayor Smith Commissioner Eckstein Commissioner Howell Commissioner Thomas Commissioner McClanahan Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea The next item of business was review of the status of the Holiday Inn lease, continued from the meeting of August 14, 1989. The City Manager submitted a letter dated MINUTES 312 .... -City commission, Sanford, Florida August 28 19 89 August 28, 1989 from the City Attorney to the City Manaqer, as follows: STENSTROM, McINTOSH, JT3~,~_&N, COLBERT, WHIGI:LA~ & SIMA/ONS, P.A. ATTORNEYS ANO COUNSELLORS AT LAW August 28, 1989 RECEIVED AUG 8 1989 CLT¥ OF SANFOR~ SANFORD. FLORIDA Mr. Frank Faison City Manager, City of Sanford P.O. Box 1778 Sanford, Florida 32772-1778 Re: Holiday Inn Lease Dear Frank: The purpose of this letter is to advise you and the City Commission of the status of the Holiday Inn matter and to request authority from the City Commission to take legal action. Since my report at the City Commission meeting on August 14, several things have occurred: 1) Attorney Doug Chunn representing Great Southern Savings & Loan called and in the course of the conversation advised that a foreclosure suit had been filed by Great Southern. This was the first direct contact that I, or to the best of my knowledge, any member of the City st~aff had with Great Southern or any one representing it; 2) I received a letter from attorney Chunn responding to our prior correspondence to Great Southern (a copy has been furnished to you previously ) . Basically, Mr. Chunn indicated Great Southern did not want to be involved in any dispute between the City and Seminole Isle Properties and took issue with our position regarding lack of notice; 3) I received a telephone call from Bill Hutchison advising that Mr. Schoettelkotte had been served with a foreclosure complaint. At this point, it appears that the Great' Southern loan is in default by the failure of Seminole Isle Properties to make timely payments on the loan. ~The lease with the City is in default by the failure of Seminole Isle Properties to make timely rent and loan payments. And, although the City has not yet been served, it appears that a mortgage foreclosure suit is pending. Based on the factors described above, I recommend that the City Commission authorize us to defend any suit filed against the City by Great Southern including the filing of any defenses and counterclaims available to the City. In the event the City is served, I further recommend that we be authorized to file by cros s-c laim, or other appropriate pleadings, an action to terminate the lease. Finally, I recommend, in the event we litigate with Seminole Isle Properties that we be authorized to ask the Court to appoint a receiver as provided by paragraph XIV of the lease to operate the facility during any litigation. MINUTES City Commission, Sanford, Florida August 28 313 19 89 i I In my opinion the actions described above are necessary to protect the City and the public's interest in the property. It does not rule out the possiblity of Great Southern, Holiday Isle and the City coming to some type of amicable resolution of the issues and default status of the agreements. It does permit us to attempt to put the City into the best defense posture possible under the circumstances. As always, if you or any member of the City Commission have guestions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, STENSTROM, McINTOSH, JULIAN COLBERT 7iGHAM & SIMMONS P.A. w~olbsr~ .... jeb Commissioner Eckstein asked the City Attorney what were the duties and cost of a Receiver to the City. The City Attorney replied take over the operation and staffing entitled to expenses which come out that the Receiver answers of the Holiday Inn. That of Holiday Inn Revenue, to the Court and can the Receiver would be but that he had the responsibility to operate, manage and report' to the Court and all parties, and was subject to Court approval. That the Receiver could pay monies on the outstanding balance on the mortgage or monies to the City for back rent. Commissioner Eckstein asked if the Receiver should be appointed for a certain time period and/or should the City look in the areas of its own buyer, rather than having a Receiver appointed. The City attorney referred to the lease, wherein the City may apply to the Court and ask the Court to appoint a Receiver. The City Attorney explained how apuointment of a Receiver could occur in that Great Southern could ask for one, the City could ask under its lease, provision, and Holiday Isle Properties, under re-organization via bankruptcy, could ask. Jeff Blackstone, representing the Holiday Inn appeared and stated that the Holiday Inn was in the process of obtaining total refinancing, by way of a short-term bridge financing venture, and that he would have a letter of intent from two different lenders within the next two days, and, also; they are negotiating with an individual interested in coming on as a partner. He stated that the mortage company had not responded to them, that they had sent a proposal, but had received no answer. They hoped that the proposal would be accepted and were waiting to see what would happen. Mayor Smith informed Mr. Blackstone that despite those measures the City still had to protect and act in its best interests. The City Attorney stated he reluctantly but forcefully recommends the measures outlined in paragraph 7 of his letter to the City Manager dated August 28, 1989, as set forth previously. Commissioner Thomas moved to authorize the City Attorney to defend any suit filed against the City by Great Southern, including the filing of any defenses and counterclaims available to the City. In the event the City is served, authorize the City Attorney to file by cross-claim, or other appropriate pleadings, an action to terminate the lease. In the event the City litigates with Seminole Isle prouerties, authorize the City Attorney to ask the Court to appoint a receiver as provided by paragraph XIV of the lease to operate 314 MINU S City Commission, Sanford, Florida August 28 19 89 the facility during any litigation'. Seconded by Commissioner Howell and vote of the Commission, as follows: Mayor Smith Commissioner Eckstein Commissioner Howell Commissioner Thomas Commissioner McClanahan Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea carried by the Parks Parks The A. Department). Department, next item. of business was consideration of: TABULATION OF BID 988/89-68 Groveview Park Memo and Tabulation of Bid submitted as follows: CITY OF SANFORD RECREATION & PARKS DEPARTMENT Handball Courts from Director of (Recreation and Recreation and MEMORANDUM ,~ FROM: Dir r ~ TO: City Manager ~ SUBJECT: City of Sanford Bid Handball Courts DATE: #88/89-68 (Groveview Park) August 15, 1989 Director recommends awarding of bid for handball courts (Groveview Park) in amount of $39,697.00 to ·Alexander Construction Services; Lake Mary, Fl. as low bidder and meeting specifications. Big Oak Construction, Inc. withdrew their bid. See attached letter. JRJ/lt Copy: Walt Shearin Attachment: letter from Big Oak Construction [landba 11 Courts ) TITLE ~.( .Cr,:w.~,' ) NUMBER ss/89-6s ENING DATE 7-25-89 STING TIME/DATE FROM: OPENED BY: wait Shear~ TABULATED BY: Jim Jerni Walt Sh VERIFIED BY: .PAGE_ OF · ' Two ttandba 1 ' Start/ ' ' ' BIDDERS TERMS Courts . End lexander Constructim , 8t~ .~'5~ · :er"ic.r~Sy.a~e nar , Fl. t $39'697'00 ~ ()ak Construction . ;,mford, Fl. $22,380.00 60 days .. (WSthdr, w bid lorne[stone Bull. ding 8/1~//// 4yste,ns $41 ,O72.00 / 10/1 Shoemaker Construct~o~ ford, Fl. N/B MINUTES City Commission, Sanford, Florida 19_ 89 in amount of 1,000.00 Renovation. Commissioner. McClanahan moved A. Request from Burke, Bales & Mills Associates for payment of Invoice No. 4, for Architectural Services on Cultural Arts Center Alexander Construction Service, and B. to authorize payment of invoice. Commissioner Thomas and carried by vote of the Commission as follows: to accept the low bid in amount of $39,697.00 from Seconded by Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea consideration of an Engineering Contract for Mayor Smith Commissioner Eckstein Commissioner Howell Commissioner Thomas Commissioner McClanahan The next item of business was "Site 10" Final Engineering Design. On recommendation of the City Manager, Commissioner Thomas moved to authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment %27 to the Consulting Engineering Contract with Conklin, Porter & Holmes, with said Amendment %27 estimated to cost $408,671.26. Seconded by Commissioner McClanahan and Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea carried by vote of the Commission as follows: Mayor Smith Commissioner Eckstein Commissioner Howell Commissioner Thomas Commissioner McClanahan The next item of business was consideration of request from Shaun Briggs to fund amount of $5185.00, and of $5,000.00 to in approximate in estimated amount to authorize funding of Beachfront ~Enhancement and Seconded by Commissioner McClanahan and carried by Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea consideration of renewal of Excess Worker's Memo submitted from the Personnel Director as follows: design of Beachfront Enhancement and Protection fund preparation of detailed engineering drawings $10,000.00. Commissioner Howell moved Protection in amount up to $5,185.00. vote of the Commission as follows: Mayor Smith Commissioner Eckstein Commissioner Howell Commissioner Thomas Commissioner McClanahan The next item of business was Compensation and Claims Handling. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL: AUGUST 23, 1989 MEMORANDUM VIA: FROM: SUBJECT: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION CITY MANAGER ~ P~RSORNF~ DIR~C'I~R~~ CLARIFICATION OF REQUEST TO RENEW "EXCESS WORKER'S COMPENSATION" INSURANCE AND CLAIMS HANDLING The purpose of this memorandum is to provide clarification regarding the request to review the City's "Excess Worker's Compensation" insurance and claims handling which was discussed at the City Commission work session of August 21, ,.pt989 (Agenda Item 2.A.). At the work session, concern was focused on the apparen~ increase in employer liability in the event of civil suit for "negligence" types of claims. .................................. MINU S City Commission, Sanford, Florida As outlined previously, the current level of civil liability was stated as $100,000 while the proposed level was stated as increasing %o $850,000. As a result of inquiry to the League of Cities service representative~'~K~t--Heyman, it was determined that the original telephone quote was misunderstood to be $850,000 and should have been ~150,000 instead. The correct renewal scenario is as follows: EXCESS INSURANCE C"JRRENT PROPOSED Employers Reinsurance Corp. (Sponsored by Florida League of Cities) $175,000 for each accident or illness ~5,000,000 $100,000 for each suit $1,000,000 PROVIDER RETENTION FOR Municipal Self Insurers Fund (Sponsored by Florida League of Cities) w/c C IM UMBRELLA COVERAGE $150,000 for each accident or illness w/c CLAIM CIVIL SUIT LIABILITY $10,000.000 $150,000 for each suit CIVIL SUIT UMBRELLA COVERAGE $1,0o0,000 $25,936 PREMIUM $29,701 CLAIMS HANDLING CURRENT Insurance Servicing & Adjusting PROVIDER Co. (ISAC). $10,125 PREMIUM PROPOSED Insurance Servicing & Adjusting Co. (ISAC) $10,125 CURRENT PROPOSED $36,061 $39,826 ANALYSIS: In terms of overall need and cost effectiveness, this type of coverage has already paid for itself as evidenced by FY 88/89 exposure. The proposed scenario reduces the City's vulnerability from $175,000 to $150,000 for Worker's Compensation injury or disease. On the other hand, the proposed scenario will increase the City's vulnerability from $100,000 to $150,000 in the event of civil suit for "negligence" types of claims. As stated at the August 21st work session, there has only been one (1) such type claim in Florida in the last (10) years. It should also be reaffirmed that the current worker's compensation portfolio is no longer available through the Florida League of Cities. RECOMMENDATION: In view of the clarification regarding the civil suit liability coupled with the doubling in umbrella coverage from $5,000,000 to $10,000,000 with only slight premium increase, it is recommended that the City Commission approve the proposed scenario as outlined and authorize the City Manager to execute this agreement to be effective October 1, 1989. TM/jr cc: Finance Director File MINUTES City Commission, Sanford, Florida August 28 19 89 On recommendation of the City Manager, Commissioner McClanahan moved to authorize the Mayor to execute the insurance amount of $29,701.00. Seconded Commission, as follows: Mayor Smith Commissioner Eckstein Commissioner Howell Commissioner Thomas Commissioner McClanahan renewal agreement with Florida League of Cities in by Commissioner Eckstein and carried by vote of the Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea The next item of business was 6onsideration of renewal of Health & Life Insurance for Fiscal Year 89/90. On recommendation of the City Manager, Commissioner McClanahan moved to authorize the Mayor to execute the agreements. Seconded by Commissioner Eckstein and carried by the vote of the Commission, as follows: Mayor Smith Commissioner Eckstein Commissioner Howell Commissioner Thomas Commissioner McClanahan Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea The next item of business was consideration of Mill Creek/Cloud Branch Drainage Basins Preliminary Engineering. On recommendation of the City Manager, Commissioner Thomas moved to authorize the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 4 to contract with Conklin, Porter and Holmes, in estimated amount of $98,695.56. Seconded by Commissioner Howell and carried by vote of the Commission, as follows: Mayor Smith CommisSioner Eckstein Commissioner Howell Commissioner'Thomas Commissioner McClanahan The next item o~f business was Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea consideration of road improvements. On recommendation of the City Manager,_Commissioner McClanahan moved to award Change Order to Orlando Paving Company paving contract for milling, leveling, and overlaying portions of four streets in approximate amount of $91,827.00. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by vote of the Commission as follows: Mayor Smith Commissioner Eckstein Commissioner Howell Commissioner Thomas Commissioner McClanahan Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea The next item of business was consideration of request from the Grand Romance to use Memorial Park as an alternative dock~ Commissioner Thomas moved to authorize same for one year, with the stipulation that the City of Sanford be listed as "additional insured" on Grand Romance's insurance. Seconded by Commissioner Howell and carried by vote of the Commission as follows: Mayor Smith Commissioner Eckstein Commissioner Howell Commissioner Thomas Commissioner McClanahan Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea ........ M!NU S City Commission, Sanford, Florida August 28 19 89 Consideration was next given to request from City of Lake Mary to support a public road from Lake Mary Boulevard to US 17-92, along Hospital Road as extended. Commissioner McClanahan moved to support' same and to authorize the City Attorney to prepare the proper resolution of support. by vote of the Commission as follows: Mayor Smith Commissioner Eckstein Commissioner Howell Commissioner Thomas Commissioner McClanahan Seconded by Commissioner Eckstein and carried Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea On motion of Commissioner Thomas, seconded by Commissioner Howell, and carried by vote of Commission as follows: Mayor Smith Commissioner Eckstein Commissioner Howell Commissioner Thomas Commissioner McClanahan Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea Resolution No. 1561 was adopted. Said Resolution being in words and figures, as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 1561 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $4,365,000 CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, WATER AND SEWER REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1989; AUTHORIZING THE NEGOTIATED SALE OF SUCH BONDS; AUTHORIZING THE DISTRIBUTION AND EXECUTION OF A PRELI- MINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE OF THE BONDS; APPOINTING A PAYING AGENT AND REGISTRAR; APPROVING THE FORM OF AND. AUTHORIZING EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF AN ESCROW DEPOSIT AGREEMENT; APPOINTING AN ESCROW HOLDER; PROVIDING CERTAIN OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE OF SUCH BONDS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Sanford, Florida (the "Issuer" or the "City"), has by Resolution No. 1423 adopted on October 7, 1985, as amended and supplemented by Resolution No. 1487 adopted on July 25, 1986 (collectively, the "Resolution"), authorized the issuance of not to exceed $25,000,000 City of Sanford, Florida, Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds (the "Bonds") for the purpose of financing the cost of additions, extensions, supplements or replacements of the water and sewer systems of the City (the "System"); and WHEREAS, the Issuer has previously issued $16,975,000 of such Bonds; and WHEREAS, on August 26, 1987, the Issuer issued its $3,795,000 City of Sanford, Florida, Water and Sewer Revenue Bond Anticipa- tion Notes, Series 1987, which mature October 1, 1989; and WHEREAS, .the Issuer desires to issue an additional $4,365,000 of Bond.s (the "Series 1989 Bonds") to refund such bond anticipa- tion notes; and WHEREAS, the proceeds of the Series 1989 Bonds are to be used to (i) refund the $3,795,000 City of Sanford, Florida, Water and MINUTES City Commission, Sanford, Florida Augu_~t 319 19 gq. Sewer Revenue Bond Anticipation Notes, Series t987 (the "Refunded Notes"), which were issued to acquire and construct additions, extensions and improvements to the System (the "Series ]987 Pro- jects''), (ii) make a deposit to the special account in the Reserve Fund established for the benefit of the Series ]989 Bonds, (iii) pay the costs of issuance of the Series 1989 Bonds, and (iv) pay accrued interest on the Series 1989 Bonds; and WHEREAS, the Issuer now desires to authorize the issuance of its Series 1989 Bonds, to authorize the execution and distribution of a Preliminary Official Statement in connection with the issu- ance of the Series 1989 Bonds, to establish the Reserve Require- ment for the Series 1989 Bonds, and to take certain other action in connection with the issuance and sale of the Series ]989 Bonds; and WHEREAS, all capitalized undefined terms used herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Resolution; NOW, .THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA: , SECTION 1. The issuance of the $4,365,000 of the Series 1989 Bonds by the City is hereby approved upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Resolution. The proceeds of the Series 1989 Bonds will be used to refund the Refunded Notes, which refunding is hereby approved. SECTION 2. The Series 1989 Bonds shall be dated, shall bear interest payable at the times, shall mature and shall be subject to redemption as provided in subsequent proceedings of the Issuer. The use of the proceeds of the Series 1989 Bonds shall be as pro- vided in the Preliminary Official Statement relating to the Series 1989 Bonds and in the Resolution. SECTION 3. The Series 1989 Bonds shall be issued under and secured by the Resolution and shall be in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit "A", with such additional changes and insertions therein as conform to the subsequent proceedings of the Issuer, subject to all provisions of the Resolution.. SECTION 4. The Reserve Requirement for the Series 1989 Bonds is the lesser of (i) 125% of the Average Annual Bond Service Requirement on the Series 1989 Bonds, (ii) the Maximum Bond Ser- vice Requirement on the Series 1989 Bonds, or (iii) 10% of the proceeds of the Series 1989 Bonds, which amount shall be deposited to the special account in the Reserve Fund established for the benefit of the Series 1989 Bonds. SECTION 5. Citizens and Southern Trust Company (Florida), National Association, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida is hereby appointed City Commission, Sanford, Florida August 28 19 89 SECTION 6. The form of the Escrow Deposit Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "B" is hereby approved. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute such agreement on behalf of the Issuer. The Agreement shall be in substantially the form attached hereto with such changes, insertions and omissions as may be approved by the officers executing such agreement and the execution of the Agreement by such officers shall be conclusive evidence of such approval. SECTION 7. Citizens and Southern Trust Company (Florida), National Association, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida is hereby appointed Escrow Holder pursuant to the terms of the Escrow Deposit Agree- ment. SECTION 8. The distribution by the Underwriter of the Preli- minary Official Statement, in substantially the form presented to the Issuer at its meeting at which this resolution is adopted and on file with the Issuer, is hereby approved, with such additional changes, insertions and omissions as may be made and approved by officers of the Issuer, the execution of a certification of their approval to be conclusive evidence of any such approval. SECTION 9. With respect to any Series 1989 Bonds for which the Issuer intends on the date of issuance thereof for the inter- est thereon to be excluded from gross income for purposes of Federal income taxation: (A) The Issuer shall not use or permit the use of any proceeds of the Series 1989 Bonds or any other funds of the Issuer, directly or indirectly, to acquire any securities or obli- gations, and shall not use or permit the use of any amounts received by the Issuer with respect to the Series 1989 Bonds in any manner, and shall not take or permit to be taken any other action or actions, which would cause any Series 1989 Bonds to be an "arbitrage bond" within the meaning of Section 148, or "feder- ally guaranteed" within the meaning of Section 149(b), of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), or otherwise cause interest on the Series 1989 Bonds not to be excluded from gross income for purposes of federal income taxa- tion. (B) The Issuer shall at all times do and perform all acts and things pe~nitted by law and the Resolution which are necessary or desirable in order to assure that interest paid on Series 1989 Bonds will be excluded from gross income for purposes of federal income taxes and shall take no action that would result in such interest not being so excluded. (C) The Issuer shall pay or cause to be paid to the United States Government any amounts required by Section 148(f) of MINUTES City Commission, Sanford, Florida 19 -89 order to insure compliance with the rebate provisions of Section 148(f) of the Code with respect to any Series 1989 Bonds for which the Issuer intends on the date of issuance thereof to be excluded from gross income for purposes of federal income taxation, the Issuer has created the Rebate Fund to be held by the Issuer. The Rebate Fund need not be maintained so long as the Issuer timely satisfies its obligation to pay any rebatable earnings to the United States Treasury; however, the Issuer may, as an adminis- trative convenience, maintain and deposit funds in the Rebate Fund from time to time. Any moneys held in the Rebate Fund shall not be considered Pledged Revenue~ and shall not be pledged in any manner for the benefit of the holders of the Series 1989 Bonds. Moneys in the Rebate Fund (including earnings and deposits therein) shall be held for future payment to the United States Government as required by the Regulations and as set forth in instructions of Bond Counsel delivered to the Issuer upon issuance of such Series 1989 Bonds. SECTION 10. The purchase of municipal bond insurance to irrevocably guarantee the payment of principal and interest on the Series 1989 Bonds is hereby authorized. SECTION 11. All prior resolutions of the Issuer inconsistent with the provisions of this Resolution are hereby modified, sup- plemented and amended to conform with the provisions herein contained and except as otherwise modified, supplemented and amended hereby shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 12. The Mayor, the City Attorney and the City Clerk o r any other appropriate officers of the Issuer are hereby authorized and directed to execute any and all certifications or other instruments or documents required hereby or any other document referred to above as a prerequisite or precondition to the issuance of the Series 1989 Bonds and any such representation made therein shall be deemed to be made on behalf of the Issuer. All action taken to date by the officers of the Issuer in further- ance of the issuance of the Series 1989 Bonds is hereby approved, confirmed and ratified. SECTION 13. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, this 28th day of August, 1989. (SEAL) May6r ~/ ATTEST 322 ....................... MI U ES City Commission, Sanford, Florida ~A_u~us t 28 19 89 The next item of business was consideration of Conditional Contract Award for Additions to Main Water Treatment Plant and Auxiliary Water Treatment Plant. Memo submitted from Director of Engineering and Planning., as follows: August 24, 1989 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: City Manage~.~' Director of Engineering and Planning Recommendation for Conditional Contract Award - Additions to Main Water Treatment Plant and Auxiliary Water 1Treatment Plant Mr. Faison: Bids were opened on August 9, 1989 for the subject contract. Speegle Construction, Inc. was apparent low bidder but within 24- hours declared that a major bid error had occurred and requested to withdraw their bid. This request was subsequently approved upon review of their original bid estimate sheet. Lee Construction Company of Sanford, Florida was second low bidder with a total bid amount of $710,000. The qualifications and bid documents of Lee Construction Company have been reviewed and found acceptable. Furthermore, Lee Construction Company has proposed a $10,000 deduction for utilizing Curry controls for the telemetry system. It is recommended that City Commission approve award of this contract to Lee Construction Company. The contract will be awarded in the amount of $700,000 subject to the following conditions: Proposed telemetry system equipment must be evaluated to verify thau Curry controls will provide a telemetry system in accordance with contract documents. Lee Construction Company must execute all required certifications, documentation, and forms of the contract documents, and provide all information and submittals set forth in the documents and required by regulatory agencies. If, after review, it is found that the proposed Curry controls are not acceptable, City Commission approval to award the contract at the cost of $710,000 will be separately requested. WAS:mca xc: Utility Director City Attorney On recommendation of the City Manager, Commissioner Howell moved to award the contract to Lee Construction Company in amount up to $710,000.00 with conditions set forth in memo. Seconded by Commissioner Eckstein and carried by vote of the Commission as follows: MINUTES City Commission, Sanford, Florida August 28 323 19 89_ Mayor,Smith Commissioner Eckstein Commissioner Howell Commissioner Thomas Commissioner McClanahan Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea The next item of business was consideration of a request from Pam Rogers, d/b/a Pam's Seafood, to waive the two-hour moving requirement for peddlers to sell seafood from a truck from 8:30 AM to 7:30 PM, Monday through Sunday at 1401 South French Avenue. Commissioner Howell moved to deny the request. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows: Mayor Smith Commissioner Eckstein Commissioner Howell Commissioner Thomas Commissioner McClanahan Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea The next item of business was consideration, of a request for game room approval, from Mario Benevides, d/b/a Mario's Game. Room, 3200 South Orlando Drive. Commissioner McClanahan stated he was concerned about the open layout, with teenagers having access to the bar. Mario Benevides came forward to support the request and stated that they have a police officer on premises to ensure that minors are kept' in the game room, that no one was in the parking lot and that no liquor-was brought in. Further, the game room is 1500 square fee¢ and is located where the restaurant was. Commissioner McClanahan moved to table the request, pending legal, opinion from the City Attorney. Seconded by Commissioner Commission as follows: Mayor Smith Commissioner Eckstein Commissioner Howell Commissioner Thomas Commissioner McClanahan The next item of business was Eckstein and carried by vote of the Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea consideration of the request from Lake Jessup Hunting Club to renew Site 10 Out-Lease for Hunting Purposes. The Director of Engineering and Planning reported that the City is preparing to begin an engineering service contract for preparation, of final design and construction documents for installation of a reclaimed water irrigationJagriculture system on Site 10; and that the estimated time for completion of final desi.gn is approximately one year. Further, the Director of Engineering and Planning recommended the lease be extended for one year at the current lease amount of $8,000.00 per year, with statement-in the extension regarding the increased presence of City representatives and consultants on the property during the period of the lease. Commissioner Howell moved to table the request pending discussion/review of the Model Airplane Club request to lease part of Site 10. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by vote of Commission as follows-: Mayor Smith Commissioner Eckstein Commissioner Howell Yea Yea Yea MINU S City Commission, Sanford, Florida August 28 19 8q Commissioner Thomas Yea Commissioner McClanahan Yea Commissioner McClanahan moved to remove table and reconsider same. Motion died for lack of a second. The Commission next considered the following: A. Requests for payment of statements: Lake Jessup Hunt Club's request from (1) From Southern Resources Mapping for surveying services for Reclaimed Water Distribution System Design ............................... $ 5,060.00 (2) From Schemmer Associates for Fire Station 93 Design Contract ....................... $ 3,300.00 (3) From. Conklin, Porter & Holmes for engineering/ consulting engineering services: a. For Wastewater Effluent Spray Irrigation Systems .......................... $ 204.61 b. For Water Quality Studies ........ $ 536.98 For WWTP Tertiary Improvements and Reclaimed Water Distribution System ........ $ 20,304.65 For Update of Water, Wastewater & Reclaimed Water Impact Fees ................ $ 975.89 For Mas~er Wastewater Pump Station. $ 624.66 For Sanford/Lake Mary Recl. Water...$ 858.46 go For Eff. Storage and Spray Irrigation Systems ................................. Z 7,470.77 ho For Vacuum Sewer System .......... $ 12,230.63 For Groveview Recl. Water Line...$ 1,503.20 j. For Rate Coverage Study .......... $ 594.43 k. For FY 90 Revolving Loan Program.$ 2,809.87 no For Jewett Lane Sewer Imp ........ $ 2,423.53 For Adaption of Rate Coverage Report & Impact Fee Report ....................... $ 4,840.26 For Additions to Main Water Treatment Plant ................................. $ 2,427.55 Tabulations of Bids: (t) .98~./89-71, High Pressure Sewer Cleaning Hose (Utility Department) Memo and Tabulation of Bid submitted from Utilities as follows: MINUTES City Commission, Sanford, Florida 325 19 -Sa MEMORANDUM August 21, 1989 TO: City Manager ~66 From: Utility Director /~ Re: Bid #88/89-71 High Pressure Sewer Cleaning Hose Mr. Faison - On 08/01/890 bids were opened for the purchase of 1,200 feet of high pressure hose. This hose is used on our cleaning trucks to clean sewer lines. Bid packages were mailed to seven (7) vendors with responses from all of them. One response was a "No Bid". The attached bid tabulation lists the various vendors with their associated prices. The low bid was submitted by Hydraulic Hose of Orlando, at a total price of $2,268. Their hose meets the majority of the listed specifications. The outside hose diameter is slightly different than the one specified. Their product is satisfactory and meets the intent of the specifications. It is recommended that the bid be awarded to Hydraulic Hose of Orlando at a cost of $2,268. Funds are available for this purchase under account number 451-4540-536-64-06. PM/ap xc: PurchasinG Agent ~/~~' Sewer Superintendent attachment ID TITkE Hi-Pressure Sewer Cleaning Hose 1D NUMBER 88/89-71. PENING DATE 8~°]'~89TIME_ 2:00 3STING TIME/DATE FROM:~ - BIDDERS Amazon Hose Orlando Davis Meter Orlando Hydraulic Hose Orlando TERMS }lose BID TABULATION r~,lUllg '~ rlt~ A t~rot~-"l' Wl'IIlI~t Y'I~: ~i~ ~u~ ~,~. ~ ,,= ~,~ u, ,,=~ c;r~ . TAB ULATE D BY: m~. VERIFIED BY:~_ UNTIL- - _/ _PAGE $ 2.84 $ 3,408 NO BIDS ........ $ 1.89 OPENED BY:_ __Walt Sherin P'A 2-3 wks 10 days IPM Inc. Ft. Lauderdale Orlando Hose Orlando Jet-Vac New Smyrna Beach Rawhide_Orrville ~MARKS; $ 2.10 $2,520 $3.i161 $3,739. 2.20 $2,640 2.24 $2,688 2 WkS 30 days' -10 days 2 wks CIRCLED PRIC[ INDICATES A~ARD Account ~ 451-4540-536-64-06 7 Requests 7 Responses 326 MINU ES City Commission, Sanford, Florida ~uGu~'~- 2fl 19 (2) 988/89-75, Cemetery Entrance Improvements (Recreation and Parks Department) Memo and Tabulation of Bid submitted from Director of Parks as follows': CITY OF SANFORD RECREATION & PARKS DEPARTMENT Recreation. and MEMORANDUM TO: City Manage~/ FROM: Directo~ SUBJECT: Cit½ of Sanfor'/°/'" ' d RE: Bid #88/89-75 Municipal Cemetery Entrance DATE: August 22, 1989 Improvements Director of Recreation & Parks recommends awarding Bid#88/89-75 Cemetery Entrance Ways to Shoemaker Construction Co, Inc. of Sanford, Fi. as low bidder and meeting specifications. Amount of bid was $54,837.00. Amount in budget - $60,000.00 JRJ/lt Copy: Walter BID TITLE Cemetery Shearin Entrance Ways QID NUMBER 88/89 - ?? _ OPENING DATE. 8-22-8%1ME 2:00 pm POSTING TIME/DATE FROM:, ,, / Al.exanddr Construction Big Oak Construction Sanford Central Coast Contract Palm Coast Cornerstone Building Systems _~ T. nn~norl, FI Shoemaker Constructiol Sanford, -The Samdel Ja~s Co'. Or].sndo TERMS ~ng N/B NIB TOTAL $57,990.00 $55,504.00 $5~,837.0~( $62,987.0C START 9/15 ARO 9/1 AR0 COFIPLETE 11/15 days 10/1 OPENED BY: Walter Shearin TABULATED BY:J-~m Jernigan VERIFIED BY:~, ~!o, ward Je~r,r~e PAGE OF ' PAG R£UARKS: CliiCLEB PRICE INDICATES AWARB 15 requests - 6 responses Amount in budget ~60,000.00 001-5051-572-63-57 ,OO~ REV. 11-5-85 MINUTES 5 2 7 City Commission, Sanford, Florida A'u gu ~ 't- 2J::J 19 89 (3) 988/89-78, Portable Personal Compuer (City Manager/City Clerk Department) Memo and Tabulation of Bid sumbitted from City Clerk as follows: MEMORANDUM August 22, 1989 TO: CITYMANd~~' FROM: CITY CLERK? RE: BID TAB ~88/89-78, PORTABLE PERSONAL COMPUTER Bids were opened August 21, 1989 for portable personal computers ("lap top" computers) for the City Clerk's Office (ITEM I), and an Option to Purchase a second, like, unit for the Director of Engineerinq and Planning's Office (ITEM II). Thirteen (13) Requests for Bids were sent, five (5) responses were received, as follows: VENDOR ITEM I ITEM II DELIVERY Micro Supply $2,797.00 Sun Office No Bid Auto Data Services $3,295.00 Computer Works $3,098.00 Sears Business Cir. $2,620.00 No Bid 10 days No Bid $3,295.00 15 days No Bid ASAP $2,620.00 15 days Recommend acceptance of lowest bid in amount of $2,620.00, from Sears Business Center, Altamonte Springs. This bid does meet specifications. ITEM I is budgeted in FY 89 in amount of $2,500.00. The $120.00 is available within the department budget. jd Attachment: Tabulation of Bid z BID TABULATION UID TITLE '~,~/~z-' /~/.J~,~z~,. ~mn,Br~4 .,~,~.-~u~.,m~..~.~Mm DID NUMBER , ~ ' ' ~....~'..~~m~ OPENING DATE ~- ~"" ' TIME.A'°~.- ~,,~~~.~,~~ POSTING TIME/DATE FROM:,, , -/ UNTIL / OPENED BY: I/4//'/z-'r .%~:,'z',;',,' TABULATED BY: ."J~/1 VERIFIED BY:- PA'GE / OF r PA BIDDERS T. E R M S ' ~ , ,,,.? . , /,. ,. ,- ~"o,~,.,/.',,,; I ,//,,,',:~ ~,/,,p/~, , · bi,~ ,¢"FF' r'e.i .. ~,,.,.;,,? .,,'..',.:,., . N ~ Iv~ ...... ..._. ..~:~;..,,/,,,. /.'.',:,;~ 3.~r75. oo ~,z~,.oo /~&~ .... /?~;/,:~../ 3, Cg, oo z)gg /;.,.s,,'/- P 3 2 $ MINUTE S City Commission, Sanford, Florida August 28 19 89 follows: C. Minutes of August 14, ].989 Regular Meeting. On recommendation of the City Manager, Commissioner Thomas moved: A. to authorize payment of statements; B. (1) to accept low bid in amount of $2,268.00 from Hydraulic Hose; (2) to accept low bid in amount of $54,837.00 from Shoemaker Construction Co.; (3) to accept low bid in amount of $2,620.00 from Sears Business Center; C. to approve Minutes of August 14, 1989 Regular Mee%ing. Seconded by Commissioner Howell and carried by the vote of the Commission, as Mayor Smith Commissioner Eckstein Commissioner Howell Commissioner Thomas Commissioner McClanahan Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea Robin Riggins, 16 Sterling Court, appeared to read a paper on the Parks and Recreation Department. She stated that she has worked for the City for nine years as a recreation supervisor, umpire, coach of softball and baseball from 1973 to 1982 and is no longer employed by the City. She stated that 50% of the students responding to the Recreation Task Force Survey had no knowledge of the programs run by the Recreation Department and had not participated in the programs. She said the baseball and soft ball fields were neglected, that the water fountain at the Westside Recreation Center had broken down several times, that there were no lights in some areas, and that when she complained about these matters, the response was "the work order went out". She noted that rain water pours into the Westside Recreation Center and upon complaining was again informed, "a work order is in process". Ms. Riggins stated the Downtown Recreation Center received new pool tables, and the old, used, tables were sent to the Westside Recreation Center. Mr. Guy Brewster, 111 North Orange Avenue, appeared and stated he has six years of background experience with the Senior League, eight years with Junior League and twenty years with Little League. He cited statistics to indicate that in the late 1970's and early 1980's there had been a drop in all three. 6f the Leagues' participants. He stated that protective equipment was very important. He said that four years ago, the cost was $5.00 per person to play and that he had often assisted in this payment for those who could not afford to play by paying from his own pocket. He said the cost will now be increased to $20.00 per person and that no one can afford these expenses, neither the participants, nor the coaches. scorekeepers and that there qualifications, that there were He also said there was a shortage of coaches and were unqualified people in positions that required 15 and 16 year old scorekeepers, rather than adult scorekeepers. He said this was not a 40 hour a week job, but rather it took 80 hours to do the job and that the best solution would be to obtain volunteezs to assist. However, that when he suggested these solutions to the Dep~rtment of Recreation and Parks, or MINUTE S 3 2 9 City Commission, Sanford, Florida August 28 19 89 attemuts to correct the shortages and inefficiencies that he observed and complained about, he was told that the Department would be run in the manner that the Department wishes, and that they did not acknowledge his advice or recommendations. Commissioner Howell stated he agreed with Mr. Brewster on the need for volunteers and re-organization and that is why the Department' was now in the process.of being re-organized and split into a Cultural Affairs Department and a Parks Department. Commissioner Thomas stated that he appreciated what Mr. Brewster was trying to do, understood the problem and agreed that the Department needed to change its personnel and attitude. Janet Hewett, 162 Wildwood DriVe, appeared to discuss the conditions at the Westside Recreation Center. She said there was no air-conditioning and that the paint is peeling. Joe Smith, 1709 Peach Avenue, appeared and asked Crooms High School area and Westside Recreation Center, activities instead of having to be driven in cars. Mildred V. Godfrey, 1600 West 12th drugs, shootings, break-ins, and loud music. permitted. that funds be spent on the so that children could walk to Street app'e-ared and reported problems with Ms. Godfrey suggested that loitering not be Natalie McGill, 1508 West 12th Street, appeared and stated that she lived in front of a "crack house"; that even though there is a "bust", the next day the people are out again. Ms. McGill asked why the crack houses could not just be torn down, as they do in Orlando. The City Attorney replied that this evening, an ordinance had just been passed to permit absentee owners of structures under condemnation proceedings to also be notified by posting or publication and this was an effort to demolish condemned structures in a timely manner. The Mayor noted that the Orlando demolitions occurred after all of the legal preliminaries, notifications and processes were complete. Turner Clayton, 1401 Mara Court, appeared and stated that he is President of the Seminole County Chapter of NAACP and stated the City is trying to deter blacks by raising the recreation fees. Also, the Westside Recreation' Center has been in a deteriorated condition for a long time. Mr. Clayton reported lack of police patrols in critical areas and recommended patrols be enhanced in certain areas. Louise Gibson, 1502 West 12th Street, appeared and said that the services in the New Salem' Primitive Baptist Church near where she lived were disrupted by profanity and cursing; that there was loud music being played at 1 to 3 o'clock in the morning; that there was no respect' for the Senior Citizens of the town, homeowners, or the Church and something should be done about it. William Balzer, 222 Bradshaw. Drive, appeared and stated that a sewer manhole on Bradshaw Drive had run over, even though there had been no rain. He said nothing was done for four hours and then the City sprayed disinfec-t~nt' and washed the overflow into the creek. The Commission authorized the Director of Engineering and Planning to check the situation and see what can be done to prevent it from occurring again. Tyrone Alexander, 1619 West 16th Street, appeared and stated water cannot flow 330 MINU ES City Commission, Sanford, FlorRta AuUn.~t 28 19 89 from the corner of his property to Mill Creek. He stated the drainage on' 16th and Mulberry was also deplorable. Further, 16th Street was a drag strip, there was noise, and no police patrol. He said he felt that nothing would be done because he only hears "we understand, we will do" but nothing happens. Annie Addison, 1805 C West 18th Street, appeared and stated there is a problem with "dope", that she lives near a ditch and that all the water would come into her yard if it was not for the ditch, and that the City only cleans the ditch up to the fence. Joseph Smith, 1709 Peach Avenue, apueared again and reported that about four years ago, he had given the City a list of Goldsboro area drainage, problems and that they have not been corrected. Further, he had asked the City to close the ditch near his house and this has not been done, so he bought dirt himself, to fill in the ditch. He stated the City "will not help us there". He asked why his water bill keeps increasing. Mayor Smith replied there was no choice about the water bill and invited Mr. Smith to attend the budget sessions. Mr. Smith cited the drug problem and asked that teeth be put into the law to keep people in jail when arrested. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. ~ ~Y 0 R