Loading...
101689-Workshop Session MINUTES City Commission, Sanford, Florida October 16, 19 89 The City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida, met in Workshop Session in ti City Manager's Conference Room in the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, at 4:00 P. on October 16, 1989. Present: ,e Mayor-Commissioner Bettye D. Smith Commissioner Whitey EckStein Commisdioner Robert B. Thomas CommisSioner Lon Howell Commissioner A. A. McClanahan City Manager Frank A. Faison City Clerk Janet R. Donahoe Absent: City Attorney William L. Colbert The Meeting was called to order by the Chairman. The first item of business was a briefing by the Finance Director, of Police a Ld Fire Pension Boards' activities. She reported three ordinances would be needed to accompli;h the boards' objectives as follows: (1) PoliCe Pension - Ordinance to increase benefit rate to 2.75% -- second reading will be October 23,1989. (2) Fire Pension - Ordinance to increase benefit rate to 2.1%, retroactive April 1, 1989. (3)Fire Pension - Ordinance to increase benefit rate from 2.1% to 2.2%, effecti;e ~ctober 1, 1989, to coincide with increase in contributions from 3.6% 4.6% The Chairman asked if there were any questions. There were none. The next item of consideration was a request from the Sanford Aero Modelers f)r outlease of a portion of Site 10 for a proposed model flying site. Memorandum dated October 2, 1989 submitted fr.pm Director of Engineering and Planning follows: October 2, 1989 MEMORANDUM City Manage,~r/~/ Director of Engineering and Planning Sanford Aero Modelers - Request for Outlease TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mr. Faison: Sanford Aero Modelers' letter of September 22, 1989 requests that the City approve the concept of outleasing of a portion of Site 10 for a proposed model flying site. Although a specific site within the property is addressed in the letter, and prior discussion, I believe that this location is more of an example than a specific site request. I believe it would be feasible to include planning for such a model facility in the overall planning for Site 10, if the City Commission chooses to do so. Although the issue has been previously discussed by City Commission, I am not certain that actual approval of the concept of collocation of the proposed model facility with the utility function for which Site 10 was purchased, was actually approved by City Commission. In considering the request of the Sanford Aero Modelers Club, I believe several factors need to be considered. First, the land was purchased utilizing utility enterprise funds (bonds). The form of lease and land utilization should be such that there is no degradationQf "utility purpose" in terms of irrigation capacity. Secondly, at/though this is the first request of its type we have received for long term use of a portion of the site, I anticipate that as time goes on we may receive other similar requests. Action taken on this request may set something of a precedent for the future. MINUTES Ci~ Commission, San~rd, Flofida Oc~obB~, If th9 ~4~y o~mml~n ~ m~v~d ~ ~ppr~ve the coneep~ 9~ p~anninq ~w ~h~ ~,,n~nD nn ~n appropriate portion Q~ $~te 10, it is recommended that the approval ~e given with the clear conditions that at the appropriate time the Model Club will enter into an appropriate lease for the specific parcel to be leased, be responsible for making all site improvements necessary for this operation, maintain the grounds appropriately, utilizing reclaimed water for irrigation, and pay an appropriate rental for the use of the property. (The Lake Jessup Hunt Club pays $8,000 per year rent, in addition to performing significant conservation and fence maintenance activities.) 401 Because of unknown added engineering costs inherent in planning for this function, it is requested that City Commission direct Staff to include this planning in the ongoing Site 10 final design. Three members of the Sanford Aero Modelers were present to answer any questions rom the Commission. The Chairman asked if the Commission was in favor of the concept, to ,hich the Commission answered they were. The Commission requested the City Manager, City .ttorney, and Director of Engineering and Planning identify the engineering and lease .etails, and submit a proposal to the Commission. The 'next item of business was a request from Commissioner Howell to discuss two ypes of regulatory ordinances: A. Convenience Store requirements and B. Sample Ordinance n demolition of crack houses. The City Manager reported that the City of Gainesville had found their Ordinances elpful as a robbery deterrent, and that Sanford had three robberies the past month. .fter discussion, the Commission requested that consideration of Convenience Store .egulations be placed on the October 23, 1989 Late Agenda. Gary Winn, Building Official, appeared and reviewed the Dade County, (Miami) rdinance 88-59, and Ordinance No. 88-29, which he reported was similar to Sanford's ondemnation/demolition procedures. He recommended that language contained in Dade County ~rdinance 88-59, Section 17B-15, regarding uninhabitable structures, be incorporated in ;anford's Code. The Commission authorized to place the matter on the October 23, 1989, Late Agenda. The next item of business was an Insurance (Medicare) Committee Update from )irector of Personnel, Tim McCauley. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL DCTOBER 12, 1989 MEMORANDUM VIA: FROM: SUBJECT: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION PERSONNEL DIRECTOR~ INSURANCE COMMITTEE UPDATE BACKGROUND: Several months qgo, during budget work sessions, a question was raised b7 Commissioner McCl~nahan regarding possible duplicate coverage provided by the City's health fnsurance compared to the coverage already provided to those retirees who are medicare eligible. Specifically, is continuing to provide regular City health insurance to medicare eligible retirees a cost-effective proposition? 1989 402 MINUTES City Commission, Sanford, Florida October 19 89 Since this issue was one of a complex nature due to the existence of the "Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act" and since any change in this benefit would impact fifty-one (51) retirees in this category, an insurance committee was formed to provide a diversity of opinions and suggestions. The committee was composed of a representative from each Department, two (2) representatives from the retiree population, and Commissioner Eckstein. PURPOSE: It is the purpose of this memorandum to provide to the Commission as a whole, information regarding the topics discussed at the last meeting (October 6, 1989) a~d to obtain from the Commission direction in response to these topics: The complex issues contained in the provisions of the "Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act" were synopsized by the Personnel Director and were provided to each member. The Personnel Director informed the members that recent legislative action appeared to effectively "kill" the Act thus making this aspect of the situation moot. Discussion ensued regarding the possibility of "replacing" the City's "regular" health insurance currently provided to medicare eligible retirees with a "medicare supplement". The consensus of opinion seemed to consider this to be a viable option. However, there was some concern noted in the discussion of coverage, deductibles, and prescription riders. Commissioner Eckstein proposed a "tier-system" of administering health insurance benefits to retirees. The essence of this proposal was to offer City-paid health insurance on a percentage basis based.on attainit%g certain levels of longevity/service and age. For example, an employee having attained 25 years of service, and having achieved "Retirement Age" may be entitled to 100% of City-paid health benefits while an employee with 10 years of service would be entitled to a lesser percentage. The proposal also contained a "Grandfather" provision for existing retirees providing for continued 100% eligibility. The Commissioner's concern seemed to focus on overall budget increases, millage rate increases, etc., as the cost of doing business has increased over time. It was noted that personnel-related cost increases have been identified as being significant. CONSIDERATIONS: On the surface, replacing traditional health insurance with a medicare supplemental insurance for medicare eligible retirees warrants consideration. Since the number of supplements and associated cosns is so diverse, specific recommendations regarding this issue cannot be made at this time. Careful consideration should be given to type of coverage, deductible and co-payments, prescription riders, and cost. This can only be determined by soliciting requests for proposals (R.F.P.'s) from vendors providing this service. If the City Commission directs pursuit of this effort it should be noted that the time necessary to accomplish this endeavor is approximately 60-90 days. It should also be noted that changing the current structure of insurance benefits will require formal City Commission action and approval. Consideration should be given to defining retirement criteria based on the following: -A. A "general" employee is currently defined as retirement eligible upon meeting one of the following criteria: Completed ten (10) years of service with the City and attained the age of 62 or over. Meets the criteria of the existing provisions of the Florida Retirement System (F.R.S.) and has completed ten (10) years of service with the City. A "public safety" employee is currently defined as retirement eligible upon meeting the provisions as outlined in Chapters 175 or 185 F.S. The statutes contain two (2) different provisions: Ten (10) years of creditable service and attainment of age 55 or older. Twenty-five (25) years of creditable service and attainment df age 52 or older. iNUTES''¥: City Commission, Sanford, Florida O_ctober 1989 Consideration should also be given in differentiating between a retiree not eligible for medicare as opposed to a retiree that__is medicare- eligible. Currently, all employees retiring from the City receive the same health insurance as a "regular" employee (100% City-p~id). If the Commission directs restructuring this benefit to repla¢~ the current scenario with a medicare supplemental type policy for medicare-eligible retirees, how would restructuring affect an employee retiring prior to medicare-eligible age? It is assumed that once a tier-structure is established, the percentages of City-paid contributions will be defined and can be applied in either case. Consideration should be given to providing a cash option alternative to the retiree in cases where the retiree may not prefer to be covered under the group plan. The City currently has retirees in this status. POSSIBLE RECOMMENDATIONS: The issue pertaining to replacing the current regular health insurance with a medicare supplement for those retirees who are medicare-eligible appears to have merit based on the assumption that the replacement benefit is comparable and results in a more cost-effective plan. It is recommended that requests for proposals be solicited and reviewed by a panel consisting of three (3) retirees in this category, the Personnel Director, and Commissioner Eckstein. Upon completion of this process, further recommendation to the City Commission would be forthcoming. Review of the existing definitions of retirement eligibility as outlined previously in this memorandum indicates a minimum service criteria of ten (10) years. It would stand to reason that this remain the minimum service requirement since it is applicable to all employees. Regarding "maximum" service or "full vesting" for benefit eligibility, an arbitrary figure of twenty-five (25) years is suggested. A possible tier structure could be considered as follows: COMPLETED SERVICE PERCENT CITY-PAID 25 Years 100% 20 Years 75% 15 Years 50% 10 Years 25% Less than 10 Years 0% This is. of course, only an example of possible structuring. In terms of establishing an age criteria it is recommended that no specific age be identified since the City's employees are involved in different retirement systems having different criteria. It would be more prudent to simply tie the age requirement to the definition of "retired" status as being eligible for receipt of benefits of whatever plan the~employee is in at the time of retirement. No deferment would be perniitted. In other words an employee that leaves the City employment after ten (10) years service at age 40 would not be entitled to receipt of paid health insurance benefits since they 8o not meet the age criteria of the retirement plan they are in. Therefore, that same employee Would not be entitled to any City-paid health insurance and could not defer eligibility for health insurance benefit to such time as they can receive the "pension" benefit. In relation to the consideration of a cash option alternative it is recommended that the City continue the practice currently in place. That is; allowing the retiree to opt for the cash equivalent in lieu of the coverage. CONCLUSION: The analysis and possible alternatives offered in this memorandum are merely possible options. There is a potential for significant future cost reduction. Depending on Commission direction, formal policies will need to be formulated and incorporated into the Personnel Rules and Regulations. It should also be explored as to whether or not any Ordinance would be required for Commission adoption. The Personnel Director reported the Insurance Committee had merely arrived at a Iood starting point, and that there were several issues involved, such as the prescription 'ider supplement of the insurance plan which would have to go out to bid to see what it would 4 0 4 MINUTE S City Commission, Sanford, Florida October 16, 19¸ cost. Another issue was consideration of a tier system of retirement benefits, with benefits determined by age and length of employment. Commissioner Eckstein reported that Sanford was the only City in Seminole County that provided insurance to retirees. The City Manager reported that Staff needs direction as to how to structure these benefits, that there were a lot of options and new federal legislation pending. The consensus of the Commission was to proceed with preparation of bid specifications, and request bid proposals for a Medicare Supplement, with benefits close to current benefits. The next item of business was consideration of request from Scott Ferguson to build a small shelter, as an Eagle Project, in Veterans Memorial Park so that Sanford citizens could enjoy the view of the lake and the park. The Commission commended the idea, and asked if Mr. Ferguson would consider another location. The Commission requested Staff to explore the matter further with Mr. Ferguson and prepare a workable idea concerning other sites, and types of design structures for the shelter. Commissioner McClanahan reported on recycling solid waste and how this would be accomplished in Sanford. He discussed franchising out versus City pick-up of re-cyclable material. Attest: ity Clerk There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. ,/~vI A Y 0 R