040990-Regular MeetingMINUTES 0 S 3
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
APRIL 9,
19 90
The City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida, met in Regular Meeting on
April 9, 1990, at 7:00 P.M. in the City Commission Room, City Hall, Sanford, Florida.
Present:
Mayor-Commissioner Bettye D. Smith
Commissioner Robert B. Thomas
Commissioner Whitey Eckstein
Commissioner A.A. McClanahan
Commissioner Lon Howell
City Attorney William L. Colbert
City Manager Frank A. Faison
City Clerk Janet R. Donahoe
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman.
A public hearing was held in accordance with Notice published in the Sanford Herald
on February 7, 1990, as follows:
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING OF A PROPOSED
DEVELOPMENT UNDERGOING DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL
IMPACT REVIEW AND ASSOCIATED PROPOSED CHANGES AND
AMENDMENTS IN CERTAIN DISTRICTS AND BOUNDARIES OF
THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD,
FLORIDA.
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in the
Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, at
7:00 o'clock P.M. on April 9, 1990 to consider a proposed development
that is undergoing the development-of-regional-impact review and
associated changes and amendments to the Zoning Ordinance of the City of
Sanford, Florida, as follows:
A portion of that certain property lying between State Road 46
and Hughey Street (Oregon Avenue) extended westerly and
between I-4 and Elder Road extended southerly is proposed to
be rezoned from AG, Agricultural, to PD, Planned Development.
Said Property being more particularly described as follows:
EXHIBIT 1
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Portions of Sections 29 and 32, Township 19 South, Range 30 East,
Seminole County, Florida, described as follows:
Commence at the North 1/4 corner of said Section 32 and run
S 89'47'35" W along the North line of said Section 32 for a
distance of 25.00 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence run
S 00'19'43" E parallel with and 25.00 feet West of the East line
of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 32 for a distance of 756.31
feet to the point of curvature of a curve concave Easterly, having
a radius of 386.67 feet and a central angle of 29'00'00"; thence
run Southerly along the arc of said curve for a distance of 195.71
feet; thence run S 29'19'43" E for a distance of 115.39 ~eet to the
point of curvature of~a curve concave Westerly, having a radius of
690.00 feet and a central angle of 49'21'20"; thence run Southerly
along the arc of said curve for a distance of 594.38 feet to a
point on said curve, said point also being the Northeast corner of
Lot 3, PINE LAKE GROVES, as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 27 of the
MINUTES"
City Cotnmission, Sanford, Florida
APRIL 9~
19 90
Public Records of Seminole County, Florida; thence run
S 22°07'05, W along the East line. of said Lot 3. for a distance of
194.73 feet to the point of curvature of a curve concave South-
easterly having a radius of 1030.36 feet and a central angle of
23'02'00"; thence run Southwesterly along the arc of said curve and
said East line for a distance of 414.21 feet; thence run
S 00°54'55'' E for a distance 441.20 feet to a point 25.00 feet
Westerly of the Southeast corner of the Northwest 1/4 of said
Section 32; thence run S 89°50'40'' w along the South line of said
Northwest 1/4 for a distance of 2260.'12 feet to the Easterly Right-
of-Way line of Interstate 4; thence run N 23'52'59" E along said
Right-of-Way line for a distance of 5224.00 feet; thence run
S 86°52'56'' E along said Right-of-Way line for a distance of 99.02
feet; thence run S 00'15'36" E along said Right-of-Way line for a
distance of 83.29 feet; thence run S 86'52'56" E along said Right-
of-Way line for a distance of 21.44 feet; thence run S 00°15'36'' E
along the Westerly Right-of-Way line.of Oregon Avenue (said line
Avenue being 25.00 feet West of and parallel with the East line of
the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 29) for a distance of 2036.44
feet to the Point of Beginning. LESS a 100.00 foot Railroad Right-
of-Way in Section 32, Township 19 South, Range 30 East.
AND
Commence at the South 1/4 corner of said Section 29 and run
N 89'47'58" E along the South line of said Section 29 for a
distance of 25.00 feet to the Point of Beginning; thenc~ run
N '00°15'36'' W along the East Right-of-Way line of Oregon Avenue
(said line being 25.00 feet East of and parallel with the West line
of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 29) for a distance of 2040.51
feet; thence run N 89'44'24" E along a non-radial line and the
Easterly Right-of-Way line of Interstate 4 and Oregon Avenue for
a distance of 28.60 feet to a point on a curve concave Easterly,
having a radius.of 1382.39 feet, a central angle of 21'46'05" and
a chord bearing of N 10'51'07" E; thence run Northerly along the
arc of said curve and said Right-of-Way line for a distance of
525.20 feet to a point on said curve; thence run S 73°52'32'' E
along a nonlradial line and the Easterly line of lands described
in Official Record Book 1807, Page 117 of the Public Records of
Seminole County, Florida for a distance of 212.69 feet; thence run
the following courses along said Easterly line: N 87°42'28'' E for
a distance of 403.86 feet; N 39°12'28'' E'for a distance of 226.39
feet; N 01°32'33'' W for a distance of 147.58 feet; N 49°53'19'' W
for a distance of 129.71 feet; thence leaving said line run
N 15'57'29" E for a distance of 372..62 feet; thence run
N 49°53'19'' W for a distance of 180.00 feet to the said Easterly
Right-of-Way line of Interstate 4 and Oregon Avenue; thence run
N 40°06'41'' E along said Right-of-Way line for a distance of 133.40
feet to the point of curvature of a curve concave Southeasterly,
having a radius of 189.85 feet and a.central angle of 49'38'40";
thence run Northeasterly along the arc of said curve and said
Right-of-Way line for a distance of 164.50 feet; thence run
N 89'45'21" E along said Right-of-Way line for a distance o~ 9.59
feet; thence run S 00'14'39" E along the West line of lands
MINUTE S 0 5 5
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
APRIL 9,
described in Official Record Book 1613, Page 106 of the Public
Records of Seminole County, Florida for a distance of 159.80 feet;
thence run N 89'45'21" E along the South line of said lands for a
distance of 150.00 feet; thence run N 00°14'39'' W along the East
line of said lands and a non-radial line for a distance of 169.80
feet to a point on a curve concave Northwesterly, having a radius
of 112.00 feet, a .central angle of 51°43'46'' and a chord bearing
of N 39'30'00" E; thence run Northeasterly along the arc of said
curve and said Easterly Right-of-Way line for a distance of 101.12
feet to a point on said curve; thence run N 89°30'17'' E along the
Southerly Right-of-Way line of State Road 46 for a distance of
74.97 feet to the point of curvature of a curve concave Northerly,
having a radius of 2010.08 feet and a central angle of 00'34'12";
thence run Easterly along the arc of said curve and said Southerly
Right-of-Way line for a distance of 20.00 feet to a point on said
curve; thence run $ 00°16'35'' E along the East line of the
Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 29 for a
distance of 255.40 feet; thence run N 89°45'21'' E for a distance
of 30.00 feet; thence run S 00°16'35'' E parallel with and 30.00
feet Easterly of said East line of the Southwest 1/4 of the
Northeast 1/4 for a distance of 328.03 feet; thence run
S 89'34'42" W along the South line of the North 2218.00 feet of
said Section 29 for a distance of 30.00 feet; thence run
S 00°16'35'' E along said East line of the Southwest 1./4 of the
Northeast 1/4 for a distance ~ 419.69 feet to the Southeast corner
of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 29;
thence run S 00'17'42" E along the East line of the West 1/2 of the
Southeast 1/4 of said Section 29 for a distance of 2640~32 feet to
the Southeast corner thereof;..thence .run S 89'47'58" W along the
South line of said Section 29 for a distance of 1295.73 feet to the
Point of Beginning.
Together containing 213.703 acres more or less and being subject
to any rights-of-way, restrictions and easements of record.
Ail parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be
heard at said hearing.
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida.
ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a
decision made with respect to any matter considered at the
above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of the
proceedings, including the testimony and evidence, which
record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS 286.0105)
Publish:
February 7, 1990
Janet R. Donahoe
City Clerk
The City Clerk reported that Notices of the public hearing were sent to agencies
and owners on February 7, 1990.
The Chairman announced that the Commission would hear from those persons present
to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the proposed development of regional impact.
19 90
O56
]~['T'I~TT Tr~,~.T~ S
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
19
The Director of Engineering and Planning appeared and reported that the proposed
Development Order dated April 2, 1990, was prepared based on recommendations contained in
a document prepared by the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council, which was based
on the deliberation of their Project Review Committee. The proposed Development Order
closely tracks the ECFRPC recommendation except in the following areas: Transportation -
Condition No. 30 refers to the type of intersection improvements at Hickman Drive (Realigned
Oregon Avenue) and State Road 46. The draft Development Order provides local government
flexibility by placing the right-in/right out and signalization question in the hands of the
Florida Department of Transportation, which will be called upon to issue a permit for that
intersection; The issue of Rinehart Road between Lake Mary Boulevard and CR 46A surfaced late
in the project review process. Seminole Properties Mall is no different than other
Developments of Regional Impact in the area such as Heathrow International Business Center,
Primera and Timucuan in that the transportation methodology'for Seminole Properties assumed
that Rinehart Road would be four-laned pursuant to an Economic Development Transportation
Fund Grant from the Florida Department of Commerce for industrial expansion. The grant was
lost because the subject industry, Stromberg Carlson, will not be expanding. Although
previously believed that Rinehart Road was funded by the grant, and more recently related
that the Grant was lost, this may now be changing, and the expansion may once again become
alive. Recognizing potential road deficiency, the Region's recommended Condition No. 31
requires the developer to participate with local governments and other areas of developments
of regional impact to four-lane Rinehart Road. The City's Draft Development Order provides
additional flexibility whereby the developer may participate in local funding of deficiency
for construction of the proposed CR 46/I-4 Interchange or the four-laning of Rinehart Road;
Affordable Housing - The issue of affordable housing is reflected in Region's recommended
Condition No. 34, which is also reflected verbatim in the City's Draft Development Order.
After much discussion, including a presentation by Central Florida Legal Services, on behalf
of the Sanford Housing Authority Tenants Association, the Regional Planning Council decided
that the affordable housing question should be handled on a comprehensive regional basis. In
that regard, the Council formed an Affordable Housing Committee which will recommend
affordable housing policies and procedures for developments of regional impact. Also,
because the proposed project is completely non-residential, the Region permitted the
developer to delete the housing question in the Application for Development Approval; gopher
tortoises - The City's Draft Development Order generally strengthens the Region's language
by providing $15,000 specifically earmarked for relocating the animals. While the City is
the designated recipient of the funds, for administrative purposes, the City will not be
responsible for the relocation, and it has not yet been determined who will be responsible
party; Concurrency - Recent discussions between representatives of the Mall and Regional
Planning Council resulted in recommendations to revise the language relative to concurrency.
Paragraph 36 as revised to read as follows: "Development of the project shall proceed only
if the public facilities and services necessary to meet the needs generated by the
development are available concurrent with demand. Provided the transportation improvements
requ:Lred to be constructed or funded pursuant to Paragraph 31, above, are constructed, the
City hereby finds that the transportation facilities and services necessary to accommodate
the impacts of Phase I of the project will be available concurrently with the demand for
such services".
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
APRIL
057
9,
1990
Those persons appearing in favor were as follows:
Jim Willard, Swann and Haddock appeared and introduced Tom Schneider, Vice-
President, Melvin Simon & Associates, and Mr. McIntosh, Civil Engineer, McIntosh &
Associates. He stated that the Seminole Properties DRI consists of 214 acres, and that the
focal point of the project is the proposed 1,250,000 square foot Regional Mall. Also, he
referred to the master plan previously submitted, and said that he was available for
questions from the Commission.
Commissioner McClanahan asked Mr. Willard for the name of the title holder of the
property which would be a continuation of Hickman Drive. Mr. Willard stated that Viola
Kastner is the owner.
Harry Ellis, 2410 South Key Avenue, appeared and reported that he is in favor of
the project with the understanding that the gopher tortoises will be relocated. He further
stated that property owners have donated land, transportation has been provided by a trucking
firm, individuals have volunteered their services, food and drink has been donated, and he
is currently pursuing liability insurance donations from insurance companies. Mr. Ellis
introduced Walt Wheeler, a registered biologist, who has offered his assistance, and said
that the $15,000.00 is needed for land banking. Further, the developer is working with him,
the tortoises will be laying their eggs in April and June, and the developer has agreed to
delay the project until the eggs are hatched.
Walter Wheeler appeared and reported that stringent guidelines must be followed,
permits must be obtained, and recipient sites need to be selected, and it could be a problem
to find a low populated site.
Matt West, City Planner, Lake Mary, appeared and reported that the City is not
opposed to the project, but has some concerns. The City of Lake Mary would like to impress
upon the Sanford City Commission, that although there are other DRI's that will impact
Rinehart Road, the Mall is different becaus~ it will generate 40,000 trips immediately upon
opening, and the impact will be more immediate than with Heathrow, which is being phased in
gradually. Further, Lake Mary cannot support Condition 31 in the proposed Development Order
unless there is a fair share agreement, and the construction of Rinehart Road is under way
before construction on the mall is started. The City of Lake Mary submitted a letter dated
April, 4, 1990 as follows:
JOHN C. LITTON
CITY MANAGER
POST OFFICE l~OX ~O7OO
LAKE MARY. FLORIDA 327g$-O7OO
April 4, 1990
Mr. Frank Faison, City Manager
City of Sanford
P.O. Box 1778
Sanford, FL 32771
Subject: SEMINOLE PROPERTIES ADA/DRI DEVELOPMENT ORDER
Dear Frank:
PHONE 407- 323- 7910
FAX 407- 323-9998
R~C£1VED
APR 0 4 19 0
SANFOND
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
APRIL 9,
19 ~0
Thank you for.meeting with us last MondaY. to discuss the
Seminole Properties DRI and ....... its impact .on Rinehart Road
within the City. of .~,Lake Mary. As we indicated at our
meeting, we are/~e~ohcerned .that the ADA/DRI and the draft
Development Order/fOr-this project.'do not accurately reflect
the traffic impact'/of the Seminole Properties Mall on that
portion of Rinehabt''~ Road between C.R. 46A and 'Lake Mary
Boulevard. We stil'I'!~elieve very strongly that the Develop-
ment Order for~'<?i..th~s~ .project should include a condition
,.requiring that::'~e6t~on of Rinehart Road be. Widened to four
lanes, with.,,~.~~,9~rI participation,, .... if.'!.:.~.~not;-'complete
financial re~oHs~b'il~i~, prior tO iSs~danc~-of a c~tificate
of occupancy f0t"-'-Ph~se I. While I .understand Sanford's
position, let there'be no misunderstanding that the property
owners abutting'Ri,nehart Road, along with the City of Lake
Mary, are being placed in a reactionary mode with no
financial benefit 'being derived from this development.
What continues to concern us, is the fact that the
Development Order for the Seminole Properties DRI stems from
an administrative error regarding programmed roadway
improvements that went into the assumptions included in the
DRI Traffic Impact Analysis. The Seminole Properties traffic
consultant mistakenly included the widening of that portion
of Rinehart Road in the City of Lake Mary to four lanes as an
improvement that would be funded and completed by others
prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for Phase
I. This caused the analysis to conclude that no further
improvements to this section of Rinehart Road would be
required, and that the development of this project would have
an adverse impact on the level of service provided on this
section of roadway. I think we all agree, however, that it
is imperative that the City's section of roadway be widened
prior to the C.O. being issued since even Phase I creates an
unacceDtab~_~ev~! of service on a two-laned Rinehart _Road .....
Further analysis using the East Central 'Florida Regional
Planning Council'S 10% Rule included that traffic generated
by the mall would have a significant and adverse impact on
the level of service provided by this link. Let us also not
forget the additional traffic that will be placed on other
roadways in Lake Mary as a direct result of this project,
including Lake Mary Boulevard.
I would appreciate your.making this letter a part of the
official "package" of items to be reviewed by Planning &
Zoning as well as your City Commission. Unfortunately, I
will not be able to attend the Planning & Zoning meeting
tomorrow evening since that is our regular Commission
meeting. I do, however, plan on having our traffic
consultant, Steve Precourt with Dyer, Riddle, Mills &
Precourt, Inc. present to answer any questions your board may
have.
Sincerely,
John C. Litton,
City Manager
cc: Steve Precourt
JCL:sbt
Sharon Carter, Sierra Club, appeared and reported that she is not in favor or
opposed to the project, however, she is concerned because 17% of the site is on the Floridan
aquifer recharge area, that she would like to keep the turtles where they are, and
recommends that the Commission put in a liberal open space requirement. Further, the
developer should be able to find creative ways to keep open space, build a mall, and maintain
the recharge area. Land banking seems to be a cold and cruel way of handling the situation
because the developer has no responsibility; it becomes an emotional issue. Also, the
recipient site must be a permanent preservation site for tortoises, which will be hard to
find because people wishing to donate land will be losing their economic benefits to said
land, and $15,000.00 to relocate, in all likelihood, will not be enough.
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
APRIL 9,
059
19 90
Hannah Pinkney, Apartment No. 7, Castle Brewer Court, appeared and reported that
she is in favor of the mall because it will provide new jobs. She stated that if the
developer is able to spend so much money on the mall project, it should be able to provide
affordable housing in the Goldsboro and Georgetown areas, which are very run down.
Bill Abbuehl, Central Florida Legal Aid, Representative for the Seminole Joint
Tenants Council, appeared and reported that his clients, which are comprised of low income
families, support the project with some reservations. They are concerned about affordable
housing, job opportunities will be low paying ($10,000.00 to $13,000.00), and service
oriented. Further, Professor Chuck Connerly, Florida State University, has prepared an
analysis which estimates that 600 affordable housing units will be needed for service
employees working at the mall. Federally subsidized programs dropped down to zero, and
virtually no affordable housing for low income people has been built since 1982, the Mall
creates additional problems and exacerbates the already existing problem. Also, Florida
Statutes relating to DRI's take into account favorable or adverse effects on low income
housing. Chapter 380 states that the developer has to be consistent with State Comprehensive
Plan, Chapter 187, under housing goals, which says public and private sectors will increase
safe low and moderate income housing. Further, his clients urge the Commission, that before
implementing Condition 34, the developer should be required to either construct 600
affordable housing units, contribute $13 million to affordable housing trust fund, or set up
tax increment financing to include truly blighted areas such as Goldsboro.
Tony VanDerworp, Seminole County Representative, appeared and reported that he is
not opposed to the project, but rather the way the Development Order is written. Mr.
VanDerworp read a recently submitted letter dated April 9, 1990, outlining additional
conditions which were not listed in the County's letter of February 27, 1990. Letter from
Seminole County dated April 4, 1990 submitted as follows:
COUNTY OF SEMINOLE
FLORIDA
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PHONE: (4{)7) 321-1130
April 9, 1990
1101 EAST FIRST STREET
SANFORD, FLORIDA 32771
Honorable Bettye Smith, Mayor
City of Sanford
P.O. Box 1778
Sanford, FL 32772-1778
Subject: SEMINOLE PROPERTIES DRI
Dear Mayor Smith:
The County has reviewed the subject development and has determined
that the development will have significant impacts upon County
services and facilities. Therefore, the County is requesting that
the following conditions be placed in the development order:
DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITION #31
Based on the traffic impacts of Phase I and existing
deficiencies, the following improvements are required prior
to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy during Phase I:
06O
MTNT S
City Co~nmission, Sanford, Florida
APRIL 9,
19 c90
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS:
1. I-4/S.R.46 Interchange Improvements
ae
Signalization of east off-ramp;
S.R.46 eastbound from eastbound I-4
(northbound) dual right turn off-ramp must be
constructed; and
Free flow northbound right lane to I-4.
2. Intersection Improvements
Dual left turn lane from south leg of Hickman
Drive for westbound S.R.46 movement;
Dual left turn lanes from Rinehart Road
Extension for westbound S.R.46 movement; and
Dual left turn lanes on S.R.46 for southbound
movement to Rinehart Road.
3. Signalization
Hickman Drive/S.R.46;
Rinehart Road/S.R.46;
North project entrance/Rinehart Road
Extension;
South project entrance/Rinehart Road
Extension; and
Rinehart Road Extension/C.R.46A.
4. Other Transportation Requirements
Compliance with Seminole County Road Impact
Fee Ordinance; and
Sidewalks on both sides of Rinehart Road from
S.R.46 to C.R.46A.
In addition, the proposed development order contains a
condition that commits the County to participate in the
funding of construction for the four-laning of Rinehart Road
and commits the developer to participate with other area DRI
projects to fund the construction of the interchange at
C.R.46A and I-4. The County would respectfully request this
paragraph be omitted from the development order because the
required monitoring and modeling program will determine
additional necessary transportation improvements. In
addition, this program will determine whether or not both
improvements need to be made, the timing for such improvements
and the appropriate funding sources.
INFORMATION ITEM
The County acknowledges that' under current Florida law,
Developments of Regional Impact (DRI's) are vested from
concurrency laws. However, the County also recognizes that
due to the size and scale of DRI's, as well as the impacts
upon public facilities inherent with a DRI, special
concurrency requirements are necessary in order to effectively
implement the provisions of a DRI development order.
Therefore, the County would like to suggest the following
language be incorporated in the development order Item #36:
"This project shall be in compliance with the
Concurrency Management System enacted by the
City of Sanford. The intent of this provision
is to insure that the developer bear the
financial burden of all impacts upon public
facilities rationally related to the DRI."
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed
development order. If you have any questions, please don't
hesitate to contact me or Tony VanDerworp, Planning Director, at
(407) 321-1130 ext. 7371.
Sincerely,
RS/JS/jms
(smit0409.js2)
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Ro ert J. ur~
S~~airman
CC: Frank Faison, Sanford City Manager
Jerry McCollum, County Engineer
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
APRIL 9,
Cliff Guillet, Executive Director, ECFRPC, 1011 Wymore Road, Winter Park, appeared
and reported that the Regional Planning Council is pleased to see the Development Order as
drafted, that it was very consistent with the position of the Council, and the Council
recommends approval subject to Condition 31 and Condition 36, which was submitted in the
Council's report. Mr. Guillet stated that he spoke with Staff, the City Planner and
Engineer, and Mr. Willard, and believes that they have reached an understading regarding the
agreement language, and would urge that the City Commission include and adopt language to
change "public facilities" to "public transportion" in the concurrency condition. Further,
with that change, the ECFRPC supports the Development Order, with caution regarding Condition
No. 31. Recommendations dated March 28, 1990 submitted from ECFRPC.
Don Durastanti, Jr., Holiday Inn, located at I-4 and SR 46, appeared and reported
that he basically has no problems with the project, however, the March 30, 1990, Development
Order, Exhibit 1 refers to the realignment of Oregon Trail off of SR 46, which he is opposed
to because he owns 150 feet of property off of Oregon Avenue, and an additional 300 acres
behind the property, and feels said realignment would restrict his growth.
No one appeared in opposition to the project.
The City Manager stated that he was delighted that the hearing went well, and that
no one objected to the project.
Commissioner Howell moved to approve, and authorize the execution of, the
Development Order consistent with Staff's comments regarding Conditions 30, 31, and 36, and
Seminole County's letter, and to require dual turn lanes for west bound movement only if City
deems necessary after review of applicant's traffic study, rather than making it mandatory.
Seconded by Commissioner Thomas.
Commissioner McClanahan moved to amend the motion to include that the Development
Order include developer's willingness to forego TIF. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas.
Motion failed to carry upon a r°ll call vo~e, as follows:
Mayor Smith
Commissioner Eckstein
Commissioner Thomas
Commissioner McClanahan
Commissioner Howell
Nay
Nay
Aye
Aye
Nay
The Chairman called for the vote on the original motion, and same was carried by
roll call vote of the Commission, as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Nay
Commissioner Howell Aye
A public hearing was held in accordance with Notice published in the Sanford Herald
on March 20 and 30, 1990, as follows:
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING OF PROPOSED CHANGES AND
AMENDMENTS IN CERTAIN DISTRICTS AND BOUNDARIES OF THE
THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA.
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in the
Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, at
7:00 o'clock P.M. on April 9, 1990, to consider changes and amendments
to the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Sanford, Florida, as follows:
A portion of that certain property lying at the
Northeast corner of the intersection of Fifth
Street and Bevier Road is proposed to be rezoned
from AG, Agriculture to that of RI-l, Restricted
Industrial. Said property being more particularly
described as follows:
19 90
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
APRIL 9,
1990
The West 1/2 of South 455 ft. of Blk 50 MM Smith's
Subdivision, PB 1, PG 55, of the Public Records of
Seminole County, Florida.
Ail parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be
heard at said hearing.
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida.
ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a
decision made with respect to any matter considered at the
above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of the
proceedings, including the testimony and evidence, which
record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS 286.0105)
Publish:
March 20, and 30, 1990
Janet R. Donahoe
City Clerk
The City Clerk reported that Notices of the public hearing were sent to the owners
on March 10, 1990.
The Chairman announced that the Commission would hear from those persons present
to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the proposed rezoning.
Ann Wallace appeared on behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Ball, owners, to support the
rezoning.
Recommendation submitted from City Planner to rezone the property as advertised.
On recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Commissioner Eckstein
moved to authorize the City Attorney to prepare the proper ordinance to rezone the property
Seconded by Commissioner Howell and carried by the vote of the Commission as
as advertised.
follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
A public hearing was held in accordance with Notice published in the Sanford Herald
on March 20 and 30, 1990, as follows:
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING OF PROPOSED CHANGES AND
AMENDMENTS IN CERTAIN DISTRICTS AND BOUNDARIES OF THE
THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA.
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in the
Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, at
7:00 o'clock P.M. on April 9, 1990, to consider changes and amendments
to the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Sanford, Florida, as follows:
A portion of that certain property lying between
Elm Avenue and Myrtle Avenue and between 12th
Street and 13th Street is proposed to be rezoned
from SR-1, Single-Family Dwelling Residential to
that of GC-2, General Commercial. Said property
being more particularly described as follows:
Lot 7 & 8, Block 14, TR 6, PB 1, PG 60, Town of
Sanford, of the Public Records of Seminole County,
Florida.
Ail parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be
heard at said hearing.
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida.
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
APRIL
063
19 90
ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a
decision made with respect to any matter considered at the
above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of the
proceedings, including the testimony and evidence, which
record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS 286.0105)
Janet R. Donahoe
City Clerk
Publish: March 20, and 30, 1990
The City Clerk reported that Notices of the public hearing were sent to the owner
on March 9, 1990.
The Chairman announced 'that the Commission would hear from those persons present
to speak:in favor of, or in opposition to, the proposed rezoning.
Robert Hermann, 1205 South Elm Avenue, appeared to support the rezoning, and
reported that he would like to open a small auto repair.business, which would be a 30 X 30
building on a 50 X 100 lot between the south side of his home and Rich Plan, and showed
pictures of the surrounding area. He stated that the person who opposed the rezoning owns
a two-family unit which abuts his home, that he is just as interested in keeping the area
preserved as the gentlemen opposing the rezoning, and that the character of the neighborhood
would not be changed.
Randy Foster, 1214 South Myrtle, appeared and reported that he is not in favor or
opposed to the rezoning, but asked what the City's future plans were regarding that area, and
what his chances would be for selling his home if the area went commercial.
The City Manager stated that 13th Street is slowly increasing its business
presence, and is moving in the commercial direction.
Commissioner Howell stated that five years ago the majority of the area was zoned
multi-family, which was ultimately rezoned to single-family to prevent encroachment in the
neighborhoods.
Recommendation submitted from Planning and Zoning to rezone the property as
advertised.
rezoning.
On recommendation of the City Planner, Commissioner Howell moved to deny the
Seconded by Commissioner Eckstein.
Commissioner Eckstein moved to table to next Regular Meeting and to discuss same
at the Work Session. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the
Commission as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Nay
Commissioner Howell Aye
The Commission next considered Board Appointment/Re-appointments/Resignations, as
follows:
Board of Adjustment & Appeals: The City Clerk reported there is one vacancy
(term of Gerald Gross expired January 8, 1990.) The Commission took no
action.
B. Human Relations Advisory Board:
1. The City Clerk reported there are two vacancies (Reverend Woodard
declined appointment and Marcus Kendrick is no longer a Sanford
resident.) The Commission took no action.
Resignation submitted from Mary Whitehurst.
action.
The Commission took no
e
The City Clerk reported Sandra Petty and Scott Quinn were removed from
the board in accordance with the By-Laws. The Commission took no
action.
064
MINUTES
City Cohamission, Sanford, Florida
APRIL 9,
Central
will expire, as follOws: William Halback, April 24, 1990; E.C. Harper, Jr.,
April 24, 1990; William Horn, April 12, 1990; and Ernie Watson, April 25,
1990. Commissioner McClanahan moved to re-appoint the aforementioned
members. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the
Commission as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
The Commission next considered a proposed ordinance regulating the hours of
operation for City parks. On motion of Commissioner McClanahan, seconded by Commissioner
Howell and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
Ordinance No. 2099, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 18
OF THE CITY CODE ENTITLED OFFENSES AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS, BY
CREATING SECTION 18-35 FOR THE PURPOSE OF REGULATING THE HOURS OF
OPERATION OF CITY PARKS AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS
THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
was introduced and placed on first reading.
On motion of Commissioner Thomas, seconded by Commissioner Howell and carried by
the vote of the Commission as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
Ordinance No. 2097, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, TO ANNEX WITHIN THE
CORPORATE AREA OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, UPON ADOPTION OF
SAID ORDINANCE, A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY LYING EAST OF
U.S. 17-92 (ORLANDO DRIVE) AND BETWEEN AIRPORT BOULEVARD AND
AMERICANA BOULEVARD; SAID PROPERTY BEING SITUATED IN SEMINOLE
COUNTY, FLORIDA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION
PROVISIONS OF SECTION 171.044, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
was introduced and placed on first reading.
On motion of Commissioner McClanahan, seconded by Commissioner Howell and carried
by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
Ordinance No. 2098, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, TO ANNEX WITHIN THE
CORPORATE AREA OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, UPON ADOPTION OF
SAID ORDINANCE, A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY LYING BETWEEN
OHIO AVENUE EXTENDED SOUTHERLY AND $IPES AVENUE AND BETWEEN NORTH
WAY EXTENDED EASTERLY AND PINE WAY; SAID PROPERTY BEING SITUATED IN
SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VOLUNTARY
ANNEXATION PROVISIONS OF SECTION 171.044, FLORIDA STATUTES;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
was introduced and placed on first reading.
The next item of business was consideration of requests for time extensions on
Condemnations as follows:
A. Report No. 89-27, 1118 West 14th Street, Charlie and Louise Beasley, owner.
B. Report No. 89-89-16, 1104 Willow Avenue, George and Elmira Hall, owners.
1990
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
APRIL 9,
065
Ce
Report No. 89-89-20, 1018 Jessamine Avenue, James and Jackie Blackshear,
owners.
D. Report No. 89-89-8, 1109 Willow Avenue, Charles R. Magunson, owner.
On motion of Commissioner Howell, seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by
the vote of the Commission, as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commission Howell Aye
the Commission authorized:
A. Report No. 89-27:'90 day extension, with inspection and review in 30 days.
Be
Report No. 89-89-16: final 60 day time extension, with inspection and report
in 30 days.
C. Report No. 89-89-20: final 30 day time extension.
D. Report No. 89-89-8: final 30 day time extension.
The Commission next considered items on the Consent Agenda, as follows:
A. Vouchers for the Month of March 1990.
Be
Tabulation of Bids for Parks Department Triplex Mowing Machine. Memo and Bid
Tabulation submitted as follows:
CITY OF SANFORD
PARKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
FROM: Director of Park~
TO: City Managerial"
SUBJECT:
DATE: March 28, 1990
Bid #89/90-41 Triplex mowing machine
Director of Parks recommends awarding Bid #89/90-41 Triplex
Mowing Machine to Locke Mowers, Inc. of Tucker, Georgia as low
bidder and meeting specifications,
Amount of bid was $5,095.75
Amount budgeted $7,500.00
JRJ/lt
BID TABULATION
TI'I~E Triplex Mowing Machine ~',4.u~,~m,*l~*~,~,n~.m,mm~c,.e:~u.~. OPENED ~Y:. ,~alc She,~r};n
NUMflER 89/90-61 ~'~""~'~ TABULATED flY;.., Howard Jeffries
'-- .... ~ ........... J ~ -ira Jer'
~NING DATE ~27-90TIME 2:~ Dm *'.~~..u~m~.a VERIFIED flY:. iran
;TING TIME~DATE FROM: ,/ UNTIL / .PAGE OF ' PAGE(SI'
Orlando
Robinson ~
Hims
~cke ~rs,
~un ~ulpmen/
Or[ando
gut-Ki~
Orlan4o
OO1~5051-572-6&-05 Other Machifi~ry Equipment Additional . , '.'.~.'..~'
City Manager recommended acceptance of lowest bid, which met specifications,
from Locke Mowers, Inc. in amount of $5,095.75.
Commissioner McClanahan moved as follows:
A. Approve vouchers for the month of March 1990.
1990
066 MINUTES
City Co~nmission, Sanford, Florida
APRIL 9,
1990
Seconded by Commissioner HOwell and carried by the vote of the Commission as foll'°ws:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
The next item of business was the consideration of Petition for Annexation for a
portion of property at the northerly corner of the intersection of Tucker Drive and SR 427,
Michael and Janet Korgan, owners. On recommendation of the City Manager, Commissioner Howell
moved to authorize the City Attorney to prepare the proper ordnance to annex said property.
Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
On recommendation of City Manager, Commissioner McClanahan moved to adopt
Resolution No. 1580. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the
Commission as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
Said Resol%.tion No. 1580 being in words and figures as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 1580
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
AUTHORIZING CITY PLANNER TO EXECUTE AN END
USER LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR EPPL7.
NOW, THEREFORE,
CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1: That the City
into a License Agreement with the
Agency, Planning Information Center for
EPPL7.
SECTION 2: That Jay Marder,
authorized to execute such agreements
implement the Agreement on behalf of
Florida.
ATTEST:
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE
of Sanford, Florida, enter
Minnesota State Planning
the software entitled
City
as
the
Planner is hereby
are necessary to
City of Sanford,
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of April, A.D. 1990.
of Sanford, Florida.
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
APRIL 9,
067
1990
The Commission next considered a proposed ordinance to amend City Ordinance No.
1083, to revise the definition of "Insurance Company". On motion of Commissioner Thomas,
seconded by Commissioner Eckstein and carried by the vote of the Commission, as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
Ordinance No. 3000, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 16
OF THE SANFORD CITY CODE REGARDING OCCUPATIONAL LICENSES TO AMEND
THE DEFINITION OF "INSU.RANCE COMPANY" AS DEFINED IN SECTION 16-12
THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
was introduced and placed on first reading.
The Commission next considered the Option Contract to purchase site for westerly
interceptor pump station. On recommendation of the City Manager, Commissioner Thomas moved
to authorize the Mayor to execute Option Contract and authorize payment of the $1,000 option
fee. Seconded by Commissioner Howell and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
The Commission next considered items on the Consent Agenda, as follows:
A. Requests for payment of statements.
(1) From Jamal and Associates, Inc. for Material Testing
Service Contract ............................................. $ 3,062.51
(2) From Precon Corporation for Reclaimed Water Storage Tanks .... $ 9,185.84
(3) From Jamal and Associates, Inc. for Soil and Groundwater
Contamination Assessment - French Avenue Utility Site ........ $ 1,495.00
(4) From Schweizer, Inc. for Renovation of Sanford Civic Center..$ 1,614.44
(5) From K & K Builders, Inc. for Construction of Sanford
Fire Station ~3 ............................................... 13,275.00
(6) From Sanford Irrigation, Inc. for Reuse Irrigation
System Contract C (City Parks) ............................... $33,633.61
(7) From Speegle Construction, Inc. for Reuse Irrigation
System Contract B - Mayfair Golf Course ...................... $50,642.49
(8)
From
(a)
(b)
Conklin, Porter and Holmes Engineers, Inc. for:
Master Wastewater Pump Station .......................... $ 4,440.32
Eff. Storage and Spray Irrigation Systems
Contracts B, C and II ................................... $ 8,016.02
(c) Vacuum Sewer System Contracts I, II and III ............. $13,374.05
(d) Site 10 Final Design Engineering and Subconsultant
Services ................................................ $21,462.37
(e) Jewett Lane Sewer Improvements .......................... $ 2,680.50
(.f) Westerly Interceptor Final Design ....................... $10,050.76
(g) Additions to Main Water Treatment Plant ................. $ 5,981.49
(h) Mill Creek & Cloud Branch Preliminary
Engineering Services .................................... $ 670.13
(i) Additional Irrigation System Design Power
Easement at Groverview .................................. $ 1,159.88
Tabulations of Bids:
1. Bid #89-90-39, Hydrant Audit Program,
Tabulation submitted as follows:
(Utility Department) Memo and Bid
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
APRTL 9,
19 90
MEMORANDUM
March 27, 1990
To:
From:
Re:
City Manager 03 ~~
Utility Director
Bid #89/90-39 Hydrant Audit Program
Mr. Faison-
Bids were opened March 20, 1990, for services to conduct a fire
hydrant audit.. The purpose of the program is to acquire a
detailed audit of all the City owned and maintained hydrants
along with a list of operational deficiencies. This information
will be included on a computer diskette that will enable better
inventory and maintenance record keeping.
The bid specifications were developed in three (3) phases. The
first phase would include inventorying all our hydrants and
gathering the necessary baseline information on needed repairs.
Phase II would involve the actual one time repair costs as
developed from the audit. The third part of the program is an
annual maintenance contract that would have a private contractor
responsible for certain repair and maintenance items on our
_ hyd_rapt system.
Bid packages were sent out to al/ interested vendors. Due to the
special'nature of this type of work, we received only one (1)
bid. This bid was from Mueller Service Company located in
Sanford. They are associated with Mueller Corporation, a long
time manufacturer of water supplies and materials in the utility
industry.
Mueller Service Company bid $8,762.50 for Phase I of the program
which is the audit portion. This is a reasonable cost figure for
the 701 hydrants to be evaluated. It is recommended that this
phase of the program be awarded to Mueller in the amount of
$12.50 per hydrant or $8,762.50 for the total.
We received unit prices on specific repairs which may be needed
on the hydrants (Phase II). However, the total repair costs for
Phase II cannot be determined until the audit is performed. It
is recommended that once the total repair costs are determined
and if they are within our budget constraints that this needed
work be authorized.
Phase III of the program is the annual maintenance contract.
Mueller's first annual cost is $16,123.00. The contract can be
renewed each year if approved by both parties. Currently, City
crews perform an annual hydrant inspection and maintenance
program when their work load is slack. Unfortunately, hydrant
maintenance has not been a high priority item compared to line
repairs, new service installation and other routine items. It is
estimated that the cost for City personnel to perform the annual
hydrant maintenance program would be $21,000.00.
If the total costs for Phase II (hydrant repairs) are reasonable,
then it is recommended that we enter into an annual hydrant
maintenance contract with Mueller for a first year cost of $23.00
per hydrant or a total of $16,123.00.
Funds for all three phases are available in account number
451-4530-536-63-00.
PM/dh
xc: Purchasing Agent
Water Superintendent
069
MINUTES
i?=-
City Commission, Sanford, Florida gP.P._IL 9. 19 90
BID TABULATION ... ..
STING TIME/DATE FROM: ..... - ;-/ ~NTIL / , PAGE, 1 ..... OF':-2 . PAGE(S)
' PHASE I ' ' " . ; ' PHASE II 'REPAIRS
..... ' : AUDIT '' ~UDIT ...... ' ..... . 12" 18" SAFETY
B I 0 D fi ~ ~ EXISTING ADD' L · BONNETT NOZZLE 6 EXT. EXT. EXT. FLANGE
JELLER SERVICES
~NFORD , , , , [ $8,762.5[, [$12.50/ea., , $35.00, ,, $3~.00', , $302.00, .,,$338.00,,, $401.~0, ,,,,,$145.00.
, ACCOUNT NO. 451-4530-536-63-00.
h TIT/~ 8YDRANT AUDIT PROGRAR .
~ uti~anKn 89/90-39 ~.~u~.~.,~,m.y~c;r~ 'TABULATED BY:- rau~ t.~uu~= .....
~ 2 '
,STING TIME/DATE FROM: .... i "/ ~NTIL /- . . ,,PAGE 2 OF . z..~PAGE{S)
' PHASE II RE~AIRS,'",(CpNTINUED) :' ' ' ~ PHASE III mlNTENANCE
M I D ~ K H ~ · VALVE CHAIN IAS[ET ~ GASKET' PRIHE & PN[ .LUBRICATIC~N . PRICE O1 HYDRANTS
[UE[LER 'SERVICES '
,ANFORD $190.00 N/C $3,00 $7.00 $35.00 $10.00 $23.00 $16,12,3,.00
SCHEDUL~ 0 F WORK:
EST. START EST.COMPLEq E
DATE DATE
., A~dit Phase I April 2 April 16
Repair Phase I [ April 2
Maintenanr, Phase I[I April 17
ACCOUNT NO.
451-4530-536-63-00
MINUTES ........... i,. ,
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
APRIL 9,
19 90
City Manager recommended acceptance of bid from Mueller Service Company.
$8,762.50 for Phase I, Phase II (Repairs) and Phase III (Annual
Maintenance Contract) to be performed as needed and within budget
constraints. Mueller Service Company was the only bidder.
Bid 989/90-42, Clarifier Catwalk Material, (Utility Department)
and Bid. Tabulations submitted as follows:
MEMORANDUM
Memo
To:
From:
City Manager ~'q'
Utility Director
Re:
Bid #89/90-42 Clarifier Catwalk Material
Mr. Faison-
On March 29, 1990, bids were opened for the purchase of materials
to repair the catwalk on our number one clarifier located at the
Wastewater Treatment Facility. We are in the process of
repairing and renovating this clarifier which is in poor
condition. We are also developing specifications for further
material replacement on the clarifier.
Bid packages were mailed out to ten (10) vendors with three (3)
responses. One of the responses was a "NO BID". The two
remaining bids were from A.R.C. Fabricators, Inc. and Owens Sheet
Metal, Inc.
Both bidders met the specifications. It is recommended that the
bid be awarded to the low bidder, Owens Sheet Metal - Sanford, in
the amount of $5,520.06 ..............
This is not a budged item. Fund's for this emergency work are
available in the Utility Reserve Account No.
481-0000-536-46-09.
PM/dh
Attachments
xc: Plants Superintendent
Purchasing Agent ~/~/~.m~,/
--BID TABULATION
II1[] TilLE CLARIFIER CATWALK MATERIALSrAm,z m ..z a *,~ m.,,. gm v,,z ~,m,,.. OP~N ~O BY:, WALTER SHEARIN
DIDNUMDER fl9/90-42 n~u~,t.~n=..~mm~e.,.*l,m~elrff TABULATED BY: ALTHEA PARRISH
OPENING DATE 03/29/90TIME 2:00 p.m.,v.,~m~-u~l~m~.o
POSTING TIME/DATE FROM: : ,/ UNTIL /
BIDDERS
h.R.C. F~ -'
VERIFIED BY:
PAGE ] OF' '~ PAGE(SI
3O Days
REL(ARK$:
CI.It. CLED PRT. CIz IIiDICATES AUARD
BID PACKAGES ~ILED ~ ~ (i0) VENDOr: THREE ('3) R.ESI:~NDED ....
ACOOUNT m. 481-0000-536-46-09
The City Manager recommended acceptance of lower bid, which met
specifications, from Owens Sheet Metal in amount of $5,520.06.
Minutes of March 26, 1990 Regular Me~ting.
Commissioner Howell moved as follows:
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
APR][[ 9,
19 9O
required off-street parking spaces at 501-505 East First Street.
moved to deny said request.
Commission as follows:
Commissioner McClanahan
Seconded by Commissioner Howell and carried by the vote of the
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
The Commission next considered a request from Sanford Historic Trust to serve beer
and wine at the Cultural Arts Center on Friday, May 18, 1990, and to waive the requirement
to provide two police officers for the event.
Commissioner Howell moved to authorize to serve wine, and to waive the requirement
to provide two police officers.
the Commission as follows:
Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
The next item of business was consideration of an alternate to the Seminole County
Storm Water Utility Task Force. On recommendation of City Manager, Commissioner Thomas moved
to appoint the Director of Engineering and Planning as the alternate. Seconded by
Commissioner Howell and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
On recommendation of the City Manager, Commissioner McClanahan moved to adopt
Resolution No. 1581. Seconded by Commissioner Howell and carried by the vote of the
Commission as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
Said Resolution No. 1581 being in words and figures as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 1581
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY Of SANFORD, FLORIDA,
RECOGNIZING APRIL 7 14, 1990 AS NATIONAL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WEEK AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE SANFORD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OFFICE
TO FORWARD A COPY OF THIS RESOLUTION TO THE
NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION.
WHEREAS, the week of April 7 - 14, 1990 has been designated
as National Community Development week and the City of Sanford is a
participant in the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program
which funds a myriad of social service, economic development and
housing programs, and
WI{EREAS, in the City of Sanford and in communities
throughout the nation, six=een years of Community Development Block
Grant program funding has developed a strong working network of
relationships between this local government, residents of Community
Development target neighborhoods and the many nonprofit agencies which
provide services and help make possible our co~itment ~o those
neighborhoods, and
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
WHEREAS~ the City o~
Development Block Grant program is a partnership of Federal, State,
County, City, nonprofit and community efforts,'and that the services
funded by the Federal CDBG program, administered by the local
government and often delivered by local nonprofit organizations,
relies heavily on the dedication and goodwill of our combined efforts.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF
SANFORD, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1: That during National Community Development Week
1990, the City of Sanford will give special thanks and recognition
all participants whose hard work and devotion to the neighborhoods an~
their iow and moderate income residents help insure the quality and
effectiveness of the Community Development Block Grant program.
SECTION 2: That the City of Sanford, along with the service
providers and others, hereby petition the U.S. Congress .and
Adminis~ration to recognize the outstanding work being done locally
and nationally by the Community Development Block Grant Program, its
vital importance to the community and to the people who live in its
lower income neighborhoods.
SECTION 3: That copies of this resolution be conveyed to
the appropriate elected and appointed officials in the federal
government and that the City of Sanford, be added =o the roll of those
committed to the preservation and full funding of the Community
Development Block Grant program and maintenance of its essential
features over the course of the next Congress.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this ~ day of
A.D. 1990.
~As~he' Ctt~O~mteeton of the City of Sanford, Florida
APRIL
On motion of Con~anissioner McClanahan, seconded by Commissioner Howell and carried
by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
Ordinance No. 3001, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, TO ANNEX WITHIN THE
CORPORATE AREA OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, UPON ADOPTION OF
SAID ORDINANCE, A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY LYING AT THE
NORTHERLY CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF TUCKER DRIVE AND STATE ROAD
427; SAID PROPERTY BEING SITUATED IN SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION PROVISIONS OF SECTION
171.044, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS
AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
was introduced and placed on first reading.
There being no further business, the mDetin.q was adjourned.
Attest:
-Clerk
1990