062590-Regular Session MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
une 25,
157
The City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida, met in Regular Session on
Monday, June 25, 1990 at 7:00 P.M. in the Commission Room, City Hall, City of Sanford,
Florida.
Present: Mayor-Commissioner Bettye D. Smith
Commissioner Whitey Eckstein
Commissioner Robert B. Thomas
Commissioner A. A. McClanahan
Commissioner Lon Howell
Acting City Attorney Michael Gray
City Manager Frank A. Faison
City Clerk Janet R. Donahoe
Absent: City Attorney William L. Colbert
The Mayor introduced Wanda Curry, teacher, Sanford Middle School, who presented
students from Sanford Middle School. The students submitted a Sanford community booklet
"from kids to kids", and described sections of the booklet they worked on, as follows: Shawn
Cunningham, the Cover; Molly Young, the History of Sanford; Stacey Saunders, City Government,
Angela Wiggins, SanfOrd Middle School; Anna Roberts, Consumer Kids; Vera June, Help; and
Marsha Lazenby, Summary.
A public hearing was held in accordance with Notice published in Sanford Herald on
June 5, and 15, 1990, as follows:
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING OF PROPOSED CHANGES AND
AMENDMENTS IN CERTAIN DISTRICTS AND BOUNDARIES OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA
Notice is hereby uiven that a Public Hearin§ will be held in the
Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford,
Florida, at 7:00 o'clock p.m. on June 25, 1990, to consider
changes and amendments to the Zoning Ordinance of the City of
Sanford, Florida, as follows:
A portion of that certain property lying at the
Southeast corner of Mellonville Avenue and Pine Way,
is proposed to be rezoned from AG, Agriculture to.MR-
1, Multiple-Family Residential. Said property being
more particularly descriSed as follows:
Legal Description: SEC 18 TWP 20S RGE 31E N 675 FT
OF W 2/3 'OF N/W 1/4 OF SE 1/4 (LESS E 427.5 FT &
RDS), AS RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
Ail parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity
to be heard at said hearing.
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida.
ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a
decision made with respect to any matter considered at
the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim
record of the proceedings, including the testimony and
evidence, which record is not provided by the City of
Sanford. (FS 286.0105)
DOnahoe
City Clerk
Publish:
June 5 and June 15, 1990.
City Clerk reported that Notice was sent to Apple & Seeds Investment Company, owner
on May 21, 1990.
The Chairman announced that representatives for Apple & Seeds Investment Company
requested to withdraw the rezoning application without prejudice.
MIN UTES
City Cofnmission, Sanford, Florida
3une 25,
1990
City Clerk reported that Notice was sent to Apple & Seeds Investment Company, owner
on May 21, 1990.
The Chairman announced that representatives for Apple & Seeds Investment Company
requested to withdraw the rezoning application without prejudice.
Commissioner McClanahan moved to accept the request to withdraw said application
without prejudice. Seconded by Commissioner Eckstein and carried by the vote of the
Commission, as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
A public hearing was held in accordance with Notice published in the Sanford Herald
on June 18, 1990, as follows:
NOTICE OF
CHANGE OF
LAND USE
The City of Sanford proposes to change the use of the land within the
area described in the following legal description:
A portion of that certain property east of U.S. 17-92 (Orlando
Drive) and between Airport BoUlevard and Americana Boulevard.
Said Property being more particularly described as follows:
Commence at the NE corner of Sec 11, Twn 20 S, Rge
30 E, Seminole Co., Fi run S00=39'14"E alg the E
line of the NE 1/4 of said Sec 11, 2015.21'; the
run S89~20'46"W 559.72' to th Ely ROW line of US
Hwy 17 & 92 and the PCB; the run S64°13'00"E
200.00'; th run N25647'00"E 125.00'00; th run
S64~13'00'E 324.99'; th run S25~47'00"W296.50'; th
run N64°13'00"W 524.99' to the said Ely ROW line;
th run N 25~47'00"E 171.50' to the PCB, containing
3.000 acres more or less.
A public hearing on the proposal will be held on Monday, June 25, 1990
at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible, by the City Commission
of Sanford, Florida, in the City Commission Room, City Hall, Sanford,
Florida. The City Commission will consider a small scale amendment to
the Future Land Use Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
Interested parties may appear at the meeting and be heard regarding the
proposed plan amendment.
Copies of the proposed amendment to the Future Land Use Plan Element of
the Comprehensive Plan are available at the Department of Engineering
and Planning and at the City Clerk's office, City Hall, Sanford, Florida
and may be inspected by the public.
ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a
decision made to respect to any matter considered at the above
meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of the
proceedings, including the testimony and evidence, which
record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS 286.0105).
Janet R. Donahoe
City Clerk
Publish:
June 18, 1990
The Chairman announced that the Commission would hear from those persons present
to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the proposed small scale comprehensive plan
amendment. No one appeared.
Recommendation submitted from City Planner, that the site be designated Community
Commerce in Sanford's Future Lane Use Plan based on comparable designation in County plan,
existing commercial character of site and surrounding area at the present time and
availability of services at the present time.
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
June 25,
159
1990
On recommendation of City Manager, Commissioner Howell moved to table the public
hearing regarding same pending receipt of recommendation from Planning and Zoning Commission.
Seconded by Commissioner Eckstein and carried by the vote of the Commission, as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
'Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
On motion of Commissioner Howell, seconded byCommissioner Eckstein and carried by
the vote of the Commission, as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eck~tein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
Ordinance No. 3010, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.
1990 OF SAID CITY; SAID ORDINANCE BEING A ZONING PLAN; SAID
AMENDMENT CHANGING THE ZONING OF A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY
LYING BETWEEN FRENCH AVENUE AND CORDOVA DRIVE AND BETWEEN COLONIAL
WAY AND KATHERINE COURT FROM SR-1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, TO
RC-1, RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS
AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
was introduced and placed on first reading.
On motion of Commissioner Howell, seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by
the vote of the Commission, as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
Ordinance No. 3011, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA CLOSING, VACATING, AND
ABANDONING A PORTION OF A 10 FOOT WIDE PORTION OF AN EAST-WEST
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT IN BRISTOL CIRCLE, PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
was introduced and pla~ed on first reading.'
On motion of Commissioner Howell, seconded by Commissioner McClanahan and carried
by the vote of the Commission, as follows:
Mayor Smith AYe
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
Ordinance No. 3012, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE
NO. 2078 OF SAID CITY; SAID ORDINANCE BEING THE CONVENIENCE FOOD
STORE ORDINANCE; AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF A CONVENIENCE FOOD
STORE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
was introduced and placed on first reading.
A public was held in accordance with Notice published in the Sanford Herald on June
14, 1990, as follows:
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE
ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF
SANFORD, FLORIDA
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held in the
Commission Room at the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, at
7:00 o'clock P.M. on June 25, 1990, to consider the adoption of an
ordinance by the City of Sanford, Florida, title of which is as follows:
160
MINUTES
City Commlss~on, Sanford, Florida
3,one 95,
19 90
Ordinance No. 3009
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA,
RELATING TO RECREATIONAL RAMPS, AMENDING ORDINANCE
NO. 2094 WHICH CREATED SECTION 18-35 OF THE SANFORD
CITY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR SUMMER HOURS OF OPERATION
OF RECREATIONAL RAMPS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY,
CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
A copy shall be available at the office of the City Clerk for all
persons desiring to examine the same.
Ail parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be
heard at said hearing.
By order of the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida.
ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If the person decides to appeal a
decision made with respect to any matter considered at the
above meeting of hearing, he may need a verbatim record of the
proceedings, including the testimony and evidence, which
record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS 286.0105)
Janet R. Donahoe
City Clerk
Publish: June 14, 1990
Ordinance No. 3009, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE C~TY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, RELATING TO
RECREATIONAL RAMPS AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2094 WHICH
CREATED SECTION 18-35 OF THE SANFORD CITY CODE TO PROVIDE
FOR SUMMER HOURS OF OPERATION OF RECREATIONAL RAMPS;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
introduced and placed on first reading at meetin~ of June 11,'1990, was next placed on second
reading. After being read by title, the Chairman announced that the Commission would hear
from those persons present to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, Ordinance No. 3009.
No one appeared.
Commissioner Thomas moved on the second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 3009.
Seconded by Commissioner Howell and carried by the vote of the Commission, as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
Thereupon, the Chairman announced that the City Commission of the City of Sanford,
Florida, had passed and adopted said Ordinance No. 3009, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OFTHE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, RELATING TO
RECREATIONAL RAMPS AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2094 WHICH
CREATED SECTION 18-35 OF THE SANFORD CITY CODE TO PROVIDE
FOR SUMMER HOURS OF OPERATION OF RECREATIONAL RAMPS;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
The next item of business was consideration of a request from Simon and Associates,
Inc., developer of Seminole Town Center, for the City to approve the concept of Tax Increment
Financing for said property, and to request Seminole County to delegate to City of Sanford
the authority to implement provisions of FS163, part III.
City Manager reported that the City Attorney has prepared a resolution regarding
same.
Commissioner McClanahan requested that a complete transcript of the Work Session
pertaining to the discussion of Tax Increment Financing be made a part of the official
minutes of this Regular Meeting.
Commissioner Thomas moved to approve the concept and support Tax Increment
Financing, to include said transcript in official minutes of Regular Meeting, and to adopt
Resolution No. 1587. Seconded by Commissioner Howell and carried by the vote of the
Commission, as follows:
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
~une 25,
161
19 90
Resolution No.
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Nay
Commissioner Howell Aye
1587 was read in full. Said Resolution being in words and figures as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 1587
A RESOLUTION 0P THE CITY 0P SANFORD, FLORIDA
APPROVING THE CONCEPT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
FOR THE SEMINOLE MALL PROPERTY REQUESTING T~E
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY,
FLORIDA, T0 DELEGATE TO THE CITY AUTHORITY TO
IMPLEMENT THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 163, PART III,
FLORIDA STATUTES, REGARDING TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING AND DIRECTING CITY STAFF TO COORDINATE
EFFORTS WITH SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND OTHER
GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES.
(CRA) co designate
(TIP District) and
Sanford ad valorem
WHEREAS, the City of Sanford, Florida has received a request
from S/C Specialists, Inc. to create and establish pursuant to Chapter
163, Part 2'II, Florida Statutes, a community redevelopment agency
and establish a tax increment financing district
to use the incremental increase in the City of
real estate taxes resulting therefrom to repay
issued by the district to fund certain offaite improvements,
bonds
and;
improvamants~
SECTION 3:
coordina:e efforts
entities.
WHEREAS, the City Commission has considered 'sAid ~e~g'k-~d ..........
determines thac the said offaite improvements would serve a valid
public purpose and that it is in the public interest for the
improvements to be built.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF
SANFORD, FLORIDA ....
SECTION 1: That the City Commission of the City of Sanford,
Florida expresses its support of the concept of the development of the
Seminole Mall property consistent with =he development order
previously entered herein.
SECTION 2: The City Commission requests that the Board of
County Commissions, Seminole County, Florida delegate to the City of
Sanford, Flo=ida, authority to create and establish pursuant to
Chapter 163, Part III, Florida Statutes a community redevelopment
agency (CRA) to designate and establish a tax increment financing
district (TIP District) and to use the incremental increase in the
City of Sanford ad valorem real estate taxes resulting therefrom to
repay bonds issued by the district ~o fund certain offsita
The City Commissioners directs the City staff to
with the County staff and other governmental
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of June, A.D. 1990.
ATTEST:
As the City Commission of the
City of Sanford, Florida
· i62
MINUTES
City Cofnmission, Sanford, Florida
une 25,
1990
Said transcript of Work Session discussion being as follows:
TRANSCRIPT OF JUNE 25, 1990
WORK SESSION
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
SEMINOLE MALL PROPERTIES
MAYOR SMITH:
The next item is a discussion of Seminole Properties.
Seminole Properties Mall.
CITY MANAGER:
I sent in the packet, their letter of request, for us to
reconsider, and backed up to it, the numbers that they
provided, that were draft numbers in the folder in front
of you. The Simon audit is a report that has been
refined somewhat, and I know that (could not understand)
latest submittal. Tom Schneider and Marsha Oliver from
Simon and Associates is here, and this item has to do
with the letter June 18th requesting, that's in your
packet~ requesting that we reconsider request for the TIF
recognizing that the County will not support taxes for
their side of the TIF.
MAYOR SMITH:
I don't know. I don't know (unable to understand--three
people speaking at the same time)
COMMISSIONER
ECKSTEIN:
It was in the second packet.
MAYOR SMITH: Okay (unable to understand)
CITY MANAGER:
Tom. Do you want to share an overview for the
Commission on the letter,, or just where you folks are in
that consideration.
TOM SCHNEIDER: After the last meeting, uh -- and after our subsequent
meetings with the County,~we uh -- came to a point where
apparently they did not want to set precedent, uh -- by
using a TIF, as a basis'for public financing for outside
improvements for ~a particular development, uh -- what we
have uh -- worked out with them, and -- and what I guess
the direction we are heading uh -- with the County, is
using the existing mechanism of impact fee reimbursement
agreement, which would allow them under their existing uh
uh -- structure to assist in some of the public
improvements that are required, not only for our project,
but for that portion of the County, and uh -- that in the
most recent draft, that we've been discussing, is
approximately a 2 1/2 million dollar contribution, some
of which would come from our uh -- credit from our
collector fees, and some of which would come from uh --
future collector fees generated by our development, uh --
other northern district collector fees, as they become
available and the existing priority uh -- for payment,
and also local option gas tax, or other revenue sources
that might be available.in substitution for the local
option gas tax. It would be an agreement that would be
paid over probably uh -- a 10 to 12 year period, or uh --
may a shade longer than 10 to 12 years, and we have
retained the option in that agreement to have whatever
funds we are due uh -- redirected toward -- to the TIF,
so that the TIF would gain the benefit of those sources
of funds, and would pay down quicker than -- than if they
were done in two separate uh -- sources. So, uh --we
have -- with that in mind, we've restructured the TIF
under, in -- in two alternatives, and both of which uh --
obviously in a reduced dollar amount, and both of which
still pay out in the 14 year projection period, and
somewhere between 37% and 40%. I think it was 39% -- is
where it came out, which was about what was presented
originally. It's obviously a lower dollar amount. Went
from 6-5 to 4-7, uh -- So, it's -- it's basically the
same economic -- I think -- impact to the City, the
County, the County's contributiOn. Not contribution, but
in lieu of uh -- participating in the TIF -- the County's
participation on outside improvements would be this road
impact fee agreement -- reimbursement agreement.
MAYOR SMITH: (unable to understand) for a question? Mr. Howell has --
TOM SCHNEIDER: Sure
COMMISSIONER
HOWELL:
Are you gonna scale back the roads any at all?
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
une
163
t990
TOM SCHNEIDER: Uh -- we are not scaling back the roads. The only thing
that we have still not determined uh ~- is there were two
east-west connections between Oregon Road and Rhinehart
Road. One being along part of the existing right-of-way
of Wilson Avenue, and One being the east-west connection
-- uh -- kind -- kind of referred to as the airport
connector. Um -- I think in the Development Order, and
I think also -- I can't remember who -- who the response
was from, uh requesting really, that we only do one of
the two roads, not both uh, because of the close
proximity of both roads, and also, I think that one road
-- the two roads may conflict somewhat with the proposed
beltway interchange at Rhinehart, if and when that
happens. So, the only change to our plan may be uh --
right now, is currently that -- that the airport
connector would be built, and Wilson Avenue probably
would not be built.
COMMISSIONER
HOWELL:
Uh -- the other question I have is (unable to understand)
our net revenue would be $13,707,000 -- What was it the
last time you brought this TIF (unable to understand) in
front of us?
TOM SCHNEIDER: I -- I don't recall. Uh -- it was in the -- I think it
might have been, not comparing apples and oranges --
I think at that time, we were comparing a timeframe of 2
-- 1991 to 2000. If I recall, and I think this is
actually uh -- showing a presentation of net revenues be
determined at bond, which would go out to 2,004. So, I
don't know that we are comparing apples and apples. But,
as I remember, it was about $8 or $9 million.
COMMISSIONER
HOWELL:
I guess I'm trying to figure out how much more is this
one going to cost us -- the City -- than the last one.
TOM SCHNEIDER: Okay. We are tailoring it and -- and it's not-- This is
obviously not the final documentation, but I will tell
you now, that it will cost you no more than what it did
in the initial presentation. To the extent that it will
costs you more, we will reduce the dollar amount.
MAYOR SMITH: That has been a (unable to understand)
TOM SCHNEIDER: I will make that commitment. Absolute commitment--
COMMISSIONER
HOWELL:
The -- the other thing -- is in the other proposal you
had Wilson Road, and now you're gonna take it out.
TOM SCHNEIDER: Right. The -- the'reason being --
CITY MANAGER:
The City has not indicated that we (unable to understand)
Wilson Road that was in their original (unable to
understand) -- I think --
TOM SCHNEIDER: I might ad, with respect to Wilson Road, the airport
connector is going to be a through street, which goes on
into 15. We're building at the 15, and I -- utilmately
we will go on to Airport Road where Wilson Road was going
to, and always designed to merely T at Rhinehart Road.
So, it's -- it's certainly more of a uh -- road that will
serve as uh -- I don't want to get the terminology
confused, but -- I mean -- I look at it as kind of an
arterial type road. Although, from -- from Seminole
County's definitions, it's not arterial.
COMMISSIONER
HOWELL:
Because -- because I could -- I would not support this if
it was going to cost the City one more penny.
TOM SCHNEIDER: It won't. As -- as I said, we will make a commitment to
the extent that the numbers don't work out, it will come
off the dollars of the TIF. It will not be added to the
participation of the City.
MAYOR SMITH: Mr. McClanahan is next (unable to understand)
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
You said that the County impact fees were -- you were on
the boards at the same time that the TIF was on the board
for County's participation. This isn't anything new
about the impact fees. You'd already asked the County,
and had already projected the County impact fees being
used to offset this.
TOM SCHNEIDER: No. uh -- as a matter of fact uh -- quite the contrary,
we, we had made the determination, and the -- the
decision had been made to include the whole thing in the
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
TIF, and it really comes out about the same, because of
the relative differences in the millage rates. Uh --
their millage rate is about half of yours. So, it's
about a 1/3 to 2/3 participation. We had always -- we
had discussed with the Staff uh -- that -- that would be
a way to cut down the TIF, depending on where the numbers
came out, but we had always planned on including it in
.the TIF. When -- when the County uh -- took the
position, that they did not want to use a new vehicle for
it's precedent value -- precedent value, we decided to go
back to the uh -- the use of an impact fee agreement with
respect to Rhinehart Road.
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
I think they showed some (unable to understand) uh --
impact fees is presumed an expense for offsite
improvements. That's what your're paying impact fees,
and this is front-end money. This is not tax revenue.
(unable to understand) this is impact fees paid on the
front-end, and that is ligitmate use for em. Therefore,
we're talking about apples and oranges. Here now --
We're talking about projected tax revenues as opposed to
impact fees. I don't have a problem with -- with using
impact fees that Mall (unable to understand) would pay on
the front-end for legitimate purposes for whatever is in
conjunction with the developers. But, the -- I have a
question. On at least two other occasions, and even
asked it of the bond council, our bond council out at
Tallahassee, and I -- I still haven't gotten an answer.
Maybe somebody here today, has got the answer. If you
have a shortfall, of the projected revenues. Well, let's
not make an assumption. 'You -- uh -- the money raised
from the TIF first goes to reducing the bonded
indebtedness. Is -- is that a given fact? (unable to
understand) That's true, isn't it? That, if only half
the projected revenues, that you projected raised, that
goes first to retire the bonds and the administration of
the bonds. Is that correct?
TOM SCHNEIDER: Uh -- right.
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
That's a simple question. The next que'stion that I asked
was -- If the shortfall uh -- in any given year -- if the
buildout is slow (unable to understand) project, and
granted, this is the most optimistic development schedule
that you folks have here. I only build little old
houses, and I know that you got a very optimistic
projection here, on this thing. The magnitude you're
dealing with. But, if we assume that years one through
five, that your development doesn't -- doesn't go
according to -- to schedule, and it doesn't raise enough
money -- Not only doesn't it raise enough money to
retire the bond -- Of course, if it doesn't do that
there ain't gonna be anything left for the tax payers of
Sanford. But, let's say, that the first five years, it
doesn't even raise enough to retire the bonds. The
question I've asked is -- Does that -- a bigger portion
come out of the next, given that the first priority is
the retirement of the bonds?
TOM SCHNEIDER: No. I think we've stated clearly, and I'll try to state
clearly again. Let me know if it's not clear. Uh --
there is -- there is set out in the bond documents a
certain -- certain ratios and percentages, and
obligations, and if for example, 37% of the total ad
valorem -- ad valorem increment is to go to the district
to pay off the bonds. That's all that goes to the
district to pay off the bonds. If that's not enough,
that's between us and the bond holders. The -- the only
obligation to the City is exactly ~hat's called out on
the bond document. There is absolutely no risk to the
City of any shortfall. If there's any shortfall -- If
there's any shortfall in the payment of the bonds, or in
the -- or in the generation of ad valorem taxes by the
property, that's between us and the bond holder.
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
You say no shortfall. But, you agree, that if it doesn't
generate the projected amount, it's a shortfall, because
we don't get any money. We don't get anything. We don't
get any. If only 37% is raised, it goes to TIF. Right?
TOM SCHNEIDER: No.
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN: Well.
MINUTES 6 5
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
25,
19911__
TOM SCHNEIDER: No. That's not What I'm saying at all. That if -- if the
ad valorem taxes were -- were discussed with the County
assessor, and based on your current uh -- rates for
commercial developments -- the total tax dollars were --
were estimated, and I think those are very good
assumptions -- solid assumptions -- I don't think
there's any room for much -- much to be at question.
Now, this is only again or -- or addressing that
increment over and above what's being generated from that
real estate today. So, out of that -- out of that a
$100.00 of that increment,' if only $37.00 -- only $37.00
can go to the TIF, the rest goes to the City.
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
But Sir. The evaluation out there now is based on
agricultural, which is zip. So, there isn't any base.
There i~n't any tax base out there now. We're not gonna
get anything based on that. Now. If we can hurry up and
get the assessor to assess you before you start building,
and put it on the record as your purchase price, and get
it up there to 6, 7, 8, 9, or $13 million, whatever the
price is, then we'll have a base. But, we don't have a
base to start from now. We're in agricultural zoning.
But again. Now. I'm confused, because the documents
that I read, and I've asked our council this too. The
documents I read said, that the first money -- the first
portion of that raised, each year -- it goes to retire
the bonds -- up to that obligated portion.
TOM SCHNEIDER: Only to the obligated portion. Correct.
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
That's right. But, if only 37% of the projection is
raised the City doesn't get anything. Is that right?
TOM SCHNEIDER: No. That's not right. If instead of a $100.00 are
raised -- only $50.00 are raised -- that means that the
development -- the district gets $18.50. If $100.00 are
raised, the district gets $37.00 -- the district gets 37%
of the increment.
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
That's -- isn't what it says in the documents I read, and
the (unable to understand) TIF, as far as, I --
TOM SCHNEIDER: Now. As far as -- I think the other side of that question
is -- is how close are we on the estimates. What taxes
will be generated by the Mall, and that is -- You know -
- it's not pure speculation, because you have a regional
mall in Seminole County -- Altamonte Mall.-- and, the
basis for assessing our mall, is by law, consistent with
the basis for -- for assessing uh -- Altamonte Mall. So,
I don't think there's that much uh -- guess work in
coming up with the numbers as to the gross taxes.
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
Well. The reason that -- that I say there optimistic
projections. I just completed six months study of all
the malls in the City limits of Sanford. Uh -- over 50%
of the spaces in --
TOM SCHNEIDER: You don't have a mall in the City limits of Sanford.
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
Well. Let's say commercial space that's for rent in the
strip malls, and whatever you want to call em -- over
50%, including %he downtown, which is even more so --
But, there's two malls -- so called malls. They're not
regional malls, but there malls.
TOM SCHNEIDER: No. A mall -- a mall, by its nature, is -- is an
enclosed project. A strip center is an open project. It
also has different types of tenancies. But, if you look
at the true malls in -- in the Orlando metropolitan area,
which would include Seminole County, Orange County, uh --
even Volusia County -- going up that far -- Osceola
County. The vacancy rate is probably -- in generally --
an the 2% to 3% range. Um, I don't think you're making
a valid comparison in -- in looking at uh -- a mall
versus the community center or strip center.
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
(unable to understand) I know people go to buy, and to
spend money.
166
MINUTES
City Co~nmission. Sanford, Florida
3une 25,
1990
TOM SCHNEIDER: But, they're different types of shopping trips. I mean -
- uh -- you're talking about a convenience type shopping
experience in a strip center, versus, a comparative type
shopping experience in a mall. And, I think that when
you are looking to get something quickly at a Wal-Mart,
or a K-Mart or, or a strip center, you are making one
type of trip. You're making a different type of trip,
when you want to go to a mall, and spend a certain amount
of time at a mall, and do a different type of shopping.
MAYOR SMITH:
I saw (unable to understand) a special issue of Newsweek.
I think -- that I just got yesterday, about growing up
teenagers in America. Do you know how many teenagers go
to the malls on their dates.
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
Do you know how much money they got to spend.
MAYOR SMITH: More than you and I.
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
Well. Let me -- let me tell you this -- Bill (unable to
understand) why don't you put your oar in here, because
this isn't the way I've understood it. That uh --
there's nothing that I can read, and maybe I didn't read
it thoroughly enough, that says that's the way it's gonna
happen. Now. What we're hearing here is. That if a
$1,000,000.00 is raised, that only $370,000.00 of it is
going to retire those bonds.
CITY ATTORNEY: I think, to have an absolute answer Commissioner. We
would have to see bond documents, which don't exist at
this time.
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
Well. If I lose the battle, I want to be sure that~this
gets in the bond documents.
CITY ATTORNEY: Alright Sir. But. What the developer is saying -- is,
that they will guarantee, in another manner, everything
beyond approximately 37% -- is the figure that I'm
hearing. Uh -- a bond deal could be structured
consistent with what they're saying. One is not
structured that way today, but one could be structured.
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
Could you give me that chart that we presented, and then
tell me what that means.
CITY ATTORNEY: Tell you what the chart means?
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
Yea. What does it say there? What does it say?
the percentage -- that the City's going to get.
--that
COMMISSIONER
ECKSTEIN: 61%.
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
I'm talking about year to year Whitey. Look at that
thing we got handed out to us, and let him explain it to
you.
COMMISSIONER
ECKSTEIN:
I understand.
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
Whitey. Would you explain that thing. Or let
(unable to understand) maybe he can explain it.
CITY ATTORNEY: It's Mr. Schneider's document. I prefer that he explain
it.
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
Well. Maybe Mr. Schneider could explain it to me then.
I -- I (unable to understand)
TOM SCHNEIDER: This is uh --.this is uh -- this is a projection, and
this is the one that does not take into account the
County uh --
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
I'm sayin -- that if you're gonna get 75% of the money
that is raised for 3 or 4 years, there -- it doesn't say
37%.
TOM SCHNEIDER: I understand what you're saying. Uh -- the problem with
that, or not the problem~.but -- but the document there
is -- is projecting -- If you'll look in the back, I
think it's the second to the last page -- that's the one
MINUTES 1 6 7
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
June 25,
1990
that ~Aows in the letter explains that there were two
scenarios, and it compared -- and it compared one
situation, and then it compared with the second
situation, and the second situation is the one that we
are -- uh -- we are trying to structure. The other was
for background information only, because the second to
the last page shows a projection, and the average is 39%.
Now. Your point is well taken. That in years one, two
and three, the percentages go 50, 75, 75, 75. (unable to
understand) There are three 75% years. Those are years
where the mall is not fully assessed, and is still under
construction.
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
But, you're still saying we're gonna forego 75%, not 37%.
TOM SCHNEIDER: No. What we're saying is 39%, and that's on the average.
There is'a period of time before the -- before the -- the
taxes kick in because the mall's not built yet, that the
percentage is higher. The average -- well -- I mean in
looking at the other end of the spectrum in the last few
years, there's zero and 13%, and that's when -- you know
-- there are over $2,000,000 in net taxes to the City.
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
(unable to understand) you are saying the averages are
39%, and I'm saying that the way you're presenting it
here, the average might be 39%, but that's not what's on
this table. Now. We keep getting different -- different
scenarios, and I -- It's -- it's very difficult to know
which one were -- were gonna be considering for a vote.
TOM SCHNEIDER: The next to the last page is the one that -- uh -- that -
that I think accurately represents the --
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
This doesn't mean anything
(unable to understand)
TOM SCHNEIDER: Well. It does if you'd read. If you'd read the letter,
it explains what that particular presentation is for --
uh -- it's not -- it's not for consideration, its for
the Board approval. It's what would happen if type of
presentation -- We tried to walk -- Since this has taken
various forms, and shapes over the period of time that
we've been discussing it -- What we tried to do is
reconstruct so you could -- you could follow it, and --
and we could have a path that shows -- you know -- where
we got -- how we got to here from here, and that was an
intermediate step that we were looking at.
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
When do you anticipate having something on -- some
equipment out there working, and so forth. (unable to
understand) timeframe.
TOM SCHNEIDER: Right now.
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
(unable to understand)
TOM SCHNEIDER: Well. We were planning on an opening in August of '92.
We got some -- some obviously -- some negotiations that
are still in process, and nothing can be done until those
negotiations are -- are finalized. We have department
store commitments now, from three department stores -- uh
-- and -- and uh -- this -- this project is going to be
open between August of '92 and March of '93. Basically,
department stores only open about two times out in the
year. So, you really have to work an opening to fit
either an August-September frame, or a March-April frame.
So, if it slips to April, it slips to April. If it slips
to April, construction will start in approximately --uh -
- May of '91. If it -- uh -- if -- if we are able to
hold an August opening, it will start towards uh -- late
fall this year.
MAYOR SMITH: (unable to understand).
COMMISSIONER
ECKSTEIN:
Yes. The figures aren't exactly saying -- but I
understand why you structured somewhat, because -- you
know -- in preparing what the original TIF is, we're
losing -- Like the year 1995 -- $160,000.00, or
whatever, because 1995 I had -- you know -- we're
looking for some projects hopefully by then, mainly
recreation. So, money's not quite there. But, that's uh
-- Mack uh -- I go to the Altamonte Mall once a year. Uh
-- my wife goes a lot more often, and my ohildren are
down in uh -- Tampa. So, I have one son home with me,
and I decided -- well -- let's go to Morrisons so, you
MiNU S
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
19 9[]
can walk around the mall. I want to assure you -- you --
know how many people from (unable to understand) the mall
was incredible. How many people from Sanford, I ran
into. I said -- What are you doing here? Well, I'm
going to a shower -- have to buy a wedding gift for this,
this, and this. It was unbelievable Mayor -- the number
of people --
MAYOR SMITH: (unable to understand--two people talking at once)
COMMISSIONER
ECKSTEIN:
Uh -- a cross -- a cross section of all ages that were
there. I just couldn't believe the number of Sanford
people down there. Now. I think it's a complete waste
for these people to go all the way down there, and plus,
how many people (unable to understand) from Deltona to
(unable to understand) whatnot. I mean -- this is our
opportunity here. The numbers are a little bit
different, but still it's 39% as opposed to 37%. There
is a greater pay back than TIF originally restructured.
But, that (unable to understand) the County's not quite
participating the way that we had originally intended.
If we let this opportunity go away -- I'm telling you --
I think uh -- we'll have to uh -- uh (unable to
understand--three people speaking at the same time)
MAYOR SMITH: We'll see what Mr. Howell has first.
COMMISSIONER
HOWELL:
First of all. I have two questions.
department stores?
Who are the
TOM SCHNEIDER: We will be making public announcements probably
within in the next 2 to 4 weeks.
COMMISSIONER
HOWELL:
The other thing is -~ is that everybody's failed to
address here. If you got the 39 -- you got the 37. But,
you got uh, hundreds of acres out there that gonna be
developed because of that Mall.
COMMISSIONER
ECKSTEIN:
Thousands.
COMMISSIONER
HOWELL:
The growth is gonna be incredible. I mean -- look at any
mall in uh -- uh -- Florida. When they go in, look and
see what happens to it. The growth is -- the growth out
there is gonna be incredible, and the tax base will be --
will be unbelievable.
COMMISSIONER
ECKSTEIN:
(unable to understand--two people talking at the same
time) Well there's uh -- thousand acres out there besides
-- besides that 214 acres.
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
How are you going to tell the next developer that you
won't give them a TIF. Now, you can tell em -- you can
tell em, but politically -- let's -- let's be realistic
about it --
CITY MANAGER:
Uh -- I'd like to answer that one. As I recommended,
when we first started studying this particular TIF --uh
uh -- at these people's request -- I would suggest to
you to consider any developer that can bring over 200
acres to the City, and annex it. It can represent over
several thousands of jobs, by virtue of its construction,
and the tax flow to the City's benefit of the magnitude
of this. I would say -- we should say, yea -- we stand
ready to consider a TIF. So (,unable to understand)
those kinds of strong numbers -- Then -- then, I think
you have to take a long -- long look, and I think the
right to say yes, or the right to say no, rests with the
City Commission. I think you can take choices.
COMMISSIONER
THOMAS:
The City of Sanford as far as uh--
CITY MANAGER: Pardon.
COMMISSIONER
THOMAS:
TIF district --
CITY MANAGER:
(unable to understand three people speaking at the
same time)
MAYOR SMITH: If we want to do this --
CITY MANAGER: I recommend that we go along with it. Yes.
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
,lunP. 25,
169
19 90
COMMI S S I ON ER
MCCLANAHAN:
COMMISSIONER
ECKSTEIN:
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
COMMISSIONER
ECKSTEIN:
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
COMMISSIONER
ECKSTEIN:
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
COMMISSIONER
ECKSTEIN:
MAYOR SMITH:
COMMISSIONER
HOWELL:
COMMISSIONER
MCCLANAHAN:
COMMISSIONER
HOWELL:
MAYOR SMITH:
CITY MANAGER:
MAYOR SMITH:
MR. SCOTT:
Okay, (unable to understand two people speaking at the
same time) question. If -- if this -- If they're going
to flock to the mall, and set numbers, and as you just
described -- why is taking 3.3 million dollars away from
the citizens of Sanford so critical to this project.
Citizens of Sanford. (unable to understand) up until six
months ago this is something we never had.
I can sense --
Why should the government give away --
Our consensus on annexing going (unable to understand--
two people speaking at the same time)
Compared to what we give to Simon, what -- what the State
of Florida give to Disney, and look at the payback on
that. Gee wiz Mack, are you anti-growth? It appears to
be --
Well. I could be anti-growth (unable to understand--two
people speaking at the same time) when every year -- when
we have more growth, and every year you go back and raise
the millage, and increase the fees, and we're gonna look
at a one mill increase, in the budget, we're lookin at --
Now. You tell the tax payers, that you're gonna give
away 3.3 million dollars, and you're gonna tax them
another mill.
We're not giving it away.
We're not giving anything away, and secondly, (unable to
understand--two people speaking at the same time) the
growth we have had so far has not been good commercial
growth like this. Uh -- unfortunately, that's what we
had lacked very seriously in (unable to understand--two
people speaking at the same time)
One other question.
I agree with you. But, we're giving the tax back. We're
creating the tax base, and giving it back.
Ten years from now (unable to understand) you'll have
(unable to understand) tax base because of that it's
incredible. The other questions I have. What's the
story on this housing act? I -- I've been out of town,
and --
Well. I'll tell you what -- we've got a -- We have a
work session here with only about twenty more minutes, in
which we cover three other items, and uh -- I don't -- I
can't answer that (unable to understand) Okay, briefly.
(unable to understand--two people speaking at the same
time) Alright -- the State has appealed the final
resolution of the Development Order, which means that
there's a time limit, 30-60 days. I'm not sure which --
that the developer, and the City to go back, and lay more
information relative to affordable housing on the table.
Uh -- these folks came prepared to do that -- (unable to
understand) we've compiled some Staff information on
affordable housing, and I understand there's a meeting
tentatively set for July 9th. It hasn't been confirmed
yet, but we'll (unable to understand) working (unable to
understand) with the State. Don't know the outcome of
it.
(unable to understand--two people speaking at the same
time) Mr. Scott is not on our Agenda, but what would you
like to say?
I just wanted to state, briefly, that if the TIF is going
to be considered, that it at least address (unable to
understand) slum areas. In the area that is subject of
discussion today, is not a blighted, nor a slum area.
!7-0 .......... . ...............
MiNU S
City Commission. Sanford, Florida
&ne 25,
19 9~
MAYOR SMITH:
CITY MANAGER:
Thank you Mr. Scott. (unable to understand) Anything
else? Did you want to say anything else? (unable to
understand) this will be on our Agenda tonight. (Unable
to understand)
The recommendation for tonight's meeting is that --uh--
if you (unable to understand) consider it -- I recommend
the request to go forward with the TIF (unable to
understand) uh -- that you approve the resolution on that
subject, that you will have for tonight, on the table.
The next item of business was continuation of report from City Attorney, tabled at
June 11, 1990 Regular Meeting, to request authorization for City Manager to sign "Estoppel
& Consent to Mortgage" Agreement regarding One Harbour Place. Commissioner Thomas moved to
authorize City Manager to execute said "Estoppel and Consent to Mortgage" Agreement.
Seconded by Commissioner Howell and carried by the vote of the Commission, as follows:
Mayor Smith Abstained
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas AYe
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
The Mayor stated that she will file a conflict of interest form regarding same.
The Commission next considered a request from Personnel Director to renew Worker's
Compensation Claims Handling Contract for FY 90/91 Implementation. On recommendation of City
Manager, Commissioner Howell moved to
implementation effective October 1, 1990.
vote of the Commission as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
approve proposed agreement for FY 90/91, with
Seconded byCommissioner Thomas and carried by the
The next item of business was consideration of request to amend Section 25-5
(Special Requirements) of the Swimming Pool Ordinance. Commissioner Thomas moved to
authorize City Attorney to prepare the proper ordinance regarding same. Seconded by
Commissioner Howell and carried by the vote of the Commission as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
The next item of business was consideration of request from Wansley Moving and
Storage, for temporary mobile office on the south side of their building at 200 North Holly
Avenue. Commissioner McClanahan moved to approve said request. Seconded by Commissioner
Howell and carried by the vote of the Commission, as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
The Commission next considered Materials Testing Services Contract for Master
Wastewater Pump Station Construction. On recommendation of City Manager, Commissioner
McClanahan moved to authorize extension of Contract with Jammal and Associates, Inc., to
provide said materials testing services.
vote of the Commission as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
Seconded byCommissioner Howell and carried by the
) FORM SB MEMORANDUM'OF. VOTIN CONFLI i rOK
COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHEE L C;AL PUBLIC OFFICEES
Smith, Be~tye D.
i03 Country Piece
CITY C()uN'r/
Sanford, FloriSa Seminole
DATEON WHICH vOt'E OCCURRED
June 25, 1990
NAME Of I~OARD. COUNCIL, C'[)MMIS.~tON, AUTHORITh.
City Co~iss ion
3 HI' ~(;ARD, COUNCIL. ('OMMI~StON. ~UIHOKI~,
wHICH I SERVE IS A UNI10E:
X. ('IFY COUNTY ' ~ ~ESR lOCAl AGENCY
NAMk OF POLITICAL
City of
Mt POSI]ION tS:
'X' ELECTIVE i ] APPOINTIVE
WHO MUE'T FILE FORM 8B
This form is for use by any person serving al the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board,
council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally Io members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are.presented
with a voting conflim of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. The requirements of this law are mandatory; although
the use of this particular form is not required by la,*', you are encouraged to use i~ in making the disclosure required by law.
Your responsibilities under the taw when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict 0f interest will vary greatly depending
on whether you hold an etective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay dose attention to the instructions on this form
before·completing the reverse side and filing ~he form.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 'H2.~43, FLORIDA STATUTES
ELECTED OFFICERS:
A person holding elective counw, muni:ipa!, or other local public office MUS'T ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures
to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures Jo the special
gain of a principal (other than a governmem agency) by whom he is retained.
In either case, you should disclose the conflim:
PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publich., stating to the assembly the nature of }'our interest in the measure on
which you are abstaining from voting: and
WITHIN 15 DAYS AF--FER THE ',tOTE OCCURS by' complcLing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording
the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
A person holding appointive cb'uni~; municipal, or other local public office Ix{US-q- ABbr.,kiN'from voting on a measure which
inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the
special gain of a principal (other than a government agent) by whom he is retained.
A person holding an appointive local office otherwise may participate in a matter in which he has a conflict of interest, bur musI
disclose the nature of the conflict before making any anempt to influence the decision by oral or wrinen communication, whether
made by the officer or at his direction.
IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECiSION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH
THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN:
· Sbu s'.n'~ld complete and file this form (before making an)' anempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for
recording the minmes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes
· A cop)' of the form should be provided immediately to ft~e other members of the agency.
· The form should be readpubtiCiv~a~ ~he meeting prior to con.si~eration of the mauer in which you have a conflict of interest.
'IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING:
· You should disclose orall~ the nature of your confiicl in the measure before participating. ----.
· You should coml~lele {he form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minute:
of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
i, Bettye D. Smith , hereby disclose that on June 25
(a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one)
inured Io my special private gain: or
, inured to the special gain of
(b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my interes~ in the measure is as follows:
My son'~ lea~e .a-~ a part of the consideration.
, 19 o0 ·
, by whom I am retained.
July 6, 1990
Dare Fiied
Signat ureb}
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES }112.317 (1985), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIREL
DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWINC
iMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION
<~! ~,RY. REPRIMAND. OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED S5.000.
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
171
The next item of business was consideration of requests for time extensions on
Condemnation Reports as follows:
A. Condemnation 990-7, 408 1/2 Cypress Avenue, Lizzie Debose Heirs, owner.
B. Condemnation 990-13, 606 South Park Avenue, United Companies Financial
Corporation, owner.
The Chairman announced that the Commission would hear from those persons present
to speak regarding said properties.
Terry Raines, representative for United Companies Mortgage, owner of the property
at 606 South Park Avenue, appeared and reported that United Companies Mortgage is accepting
bids to convert said property to a single-family dwelling, and requested a 90 day time
extension to complete repairs.
On motion of Commissioner Howell, seconded by Commissioner Eckstein and carried by
the vote of the Commission, as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
the Commission authorized:
A. ~90-7:90 day extension, with a report to the Commission in 30 days.
B. #90-13:60 day extension, with a report to the Commission in 30 days.
The next item of business was consideration of request to commence demolition
procedures on condemned structures, as follows:
A. Report %90-1, 1302 Williams Avenue, C.B. Franklin, owner.
B. Report ~90-2, 2100 West 16th Street, Mr. & Mrs. Comer, owner.
C. Report #90-4, 711 & 715 1/2. Cypress Avenue, Oscar Gramling, owner.
D. Report ~90-5, 1018 Willow Avenue, Johnie Henderson, owner.
E. Report %90-19, 407 East 9th Street, Kevin Blackman, owner.
City Manager reported, that extensions were given to said properties, however, no
repairs have been made to bring structures up to code, and notices were sent advising owners
of default.
On recommendation of City Manage~, Commissioner Eckstein moved to authorize Public
Works Department to proceed with demolition of condemned structures A through E. Seconded
by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission, as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
The Commission next considered items on the Consent Agenda, as follows:
A.
Requests for payment of statements:
(1)
(2)
From Schweizer, Inc., for Renovation of Sanford Civic
Center .................................................. $
766.12
From Meridith Corporation, for Twin Lakes Well Field
Project ................................................. $ 11,071.55
Tabulation of Bids for Bid #89/90-53, for High Angle Equipment.
Department) Memo and Bid Tabulation submitted as follows:
(Fire
172
MINUTES
City Coinmission, Sanford, Florida June 25, 19 90
To: City Manager _ ~
From: Fire Chief ~
Date: 6/4/90
Subject Purchase of High Angle Equipment
The fire department recommends accepting the low bid meeting
specifications of ,$.1,727.80 submitted by Fireline, Inc,.
/d.T. Hickson
Fire Chief
RMN:cih
Il3 TITLE high angle equipment r^zu~mm~,:mAe~sv~*~m~:,lmem_~c~t~ OPENED BY:
ID NUMBER 89/90-53 ~u~l~r~lur~:s'ata'#l~--llm#¥vl~l~m¢*r2/ TABULATED BY: G.T. Ransom:
£1.PENING DATE 5/16/90 TIME 2:00 .,~,~a~.~m~,a~m~xc~ VERIFIED BY:
FOSTINGTIME/DATEFROM: / UNTIL /__ PAGE3OF · 3 PAGE~S)
'BIDDERS TERMS TOTAL ,
Del ray Service,
Delray Beach no bid
FireFighters,
Jacksonville no bid
:MARKS: CI. RCLED PRICE INDICATES AWARD ....
~-C ~ 2,000.0_0 __ 001-3001-522-64-06 5 requests - .3 responses '
gill IAt~ULAIIUI~!
D TITLE high angle equipment r^tu~*~ort~z,,~m~r~q:~m~m,lmv~mcn~ OPENED BY: Walter Shearin
) bJUMBER 89/90-53 ~t~r,..~u~m.~a. moa~l~mms,~c.,mmm~¢;r$ TABULATED BY: G.T.Ransom, .,' ·
'ENING DATE 5/16/90 TIME 2:00 .,~,~~a~,z~.o~c~~o VERIFIED BY:
STING TIME/DATE FROM: / UNTIL / PAGE 1 OE' 3 PAGE{S}
1 · 2 3' 4 · , 5 6 · 7 8 9 10 11 12 .
rope
BIDDERS TERMS 3"pulley 2"pulley descender pulley rescue O carabi'ner stretcher Blueline rope bag webbing ;trap, C marker
ireline, Inc.,
.~lleview $45.50 $42.40 $85.00 $43.20 $141.60 $108.00. $196.'00 . $402.00 $78,00 $96.00 54.00 $5.~0
.,lray Service, no bid ..
.~ l ray Beach
[reFighters, no bid
tcksonvil le
4ARKS: CImRCLED PRICE INDICATES At/ARD
~-~ ~ 2,0-~n 001-3001-522-64-06 5 requests - 3 responses
MINUTES 1 7 3
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
June 25;
BID TABULATION
BID TITLE high angle equipment,, r^t~rt~^v~rm~..~c~smvmscz~ OPENED BY:, Walter Shearin
m~u~e~..x~x~v,m~¢tr$ TABULATED By:6, T, Ransom
OPENING DATE 5/16/90 TIME. 2:00 .~.,~=~-~n~a~u.,z~mm~n~ VERIFIED BY'
POSTING TIME/DATE FROM: ~ / UNTIt / .PAGE~OF· 3 PAGE{S) Il
13' 14 15' 16' 17 18' ]9 20 21 22 23 24
' " rope R rope equ~pmen[ m~sh sack '"m~sh sack -- "~OlO
BIDDERS,, TERMS marker marker O bag' (mad)' (~9), gear ~a9 q-r~ng ascender .~pe. ]adder]~ne c]a~s kn~f
Ftre]~ne, Inc.,
Be]]eview $5.00 $5.00 $84.00 $16.00 $16.00 $34.07. $12.00 $41.50 $135.00 $61.60 $12.00 $9..0'
De]ray Service, no b~d
De]ray Beach
F~reF~ghters,
Jacksonville no bid
REMARKS: CI. RCLED PR[CE INDICATES A~ARD .......
~o~e~ ~_ 2,000.00 _ 001-300]-533-64-06 5 reques[s -..3 response~
~oo¢ REV.
City Manager recommended acceptance of only bid, ~hich met specificatio-~--
from Pireline, Inc. in amount of $1,727.80.
C. Minutes of 3une 21, 1990 Regular Meeting.
On motion ofCommissioner McClanahan, seconded by Commissioner Howell and carried
by the Commission, as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
the Commission:
A. Approved payment of statements.
B. Accepted only bid, which met specifications, from Fireline, Inc. in amount of
$1,727.80.
C. Approved Minutes of June 11, 1990 Regular Meeting.
The next item of business was consideration of proposed Reorganization of Public
Works and Parks Department.
Commissioner Howell moved to table discussion regarding same to a budget Work
Session. Seconded by Commissioner McClanahan and carried by the vote of the Commission, as
follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
MINUTES
City Co~nmission, Sanford, Florida
3une 25,
19 90
The next item of business was consideration of installation of 16" Water Main
extension from Central Park Drive to Smith Canal, and proposal from Briar Construction
Company for said extension of Impact Fee Funded 16" Water Main. On recommendation of City
Manager, Commissioner McClanahan moved to authorize installation of same, and accept
proposal from Briar Construction Company in amount of $19,542.74, including the specified
1.1% price addition for a performance bond, to be funded by Water System Impact Fee Trust
Fund. Seconded by Commissioner Howell and carried by the vote of the Commission, as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
The next item of business was consideration of request from Police Chief for Lot
Clearing in areas between First Street and Seminole Boulevard, near 17-92, Maple Avenue, and
Holly Ave.
City Manager reported that the properties have heavy overgrowth, that it would take
City employees two weeks to clear, that the cost would be approximately $7,500.00, that on-
going maintenance would be required, and that the City has not received permission from
property owners to do the work. Further, according to the City's ordinance, undeveloped lots
cannot be cited for a violation of this type.
Commissioner Thomas moved to authorize. City to clear the properties as requested.
Seconded by Commissioner Howell.
Captain Fagan reported that Chief Neal has suggested that a controlled burn of the
area be performed by the forestry division.
Commissioner McClanahan moved to table discussion, to direct Staff to try to obtain
permission from property owners, and report back to the Commission. Seconded by Commissioner
Howell and carried by the vote of the Commission, as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
The next item of business was consideration of Engineering Design for Wet Weather
Outfall to St. Johns River. On recommendation of City Manager, Commissioner Howell moved
to authorize execution of Amendment No. 29, in estimated amount of $111,500.00, to Conklin,
Porter & Holmes Engineering Contract of December 7, 1983, and to provide for preparation of
plans and specifications for the wet weather outfall.
carried by the Commission, as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and
The Commission next considered request to obtain Alternative Technology Funding in
amount of $692,730.00 for Vacuum Sewer System. On recommendation of City Manager,
Commissioner Eckstein moved to approve said request, and authorize Staff to obtain
congressional assistance for said funding as described in Memo from Director of Engineering
and Planning. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission, as
follows:
MINUTES 1 7 5
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
une 25,
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
The next item of business was consideration of Acquisition of Westerly Wastewater
Interceptor-Pump Station Site from Central Baptist Church in approximate amount of
$25,000.00.
Commissioner McClanahan stated that he was opposed to by-passing the appraisal.
On recommendation of City Manager, Commissioner Eckstein moved to authorize Staff
to proceed with acquisition of pump station site, and necessary pipeline easements as offered
by Central Baptist Church, and to waive requirement for appraisal of said property to avoid
the expenditure of an appraisal fee estimated to be approximately $1,000.00. Seconded by
Commissioner Thomas and carried by the vote of the Commission, as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Nay
Commissioner Howell Aye
The next item of business was consideration of request for waiver of 2-hour moving
requirement/Peddler's License/Temporary Shed, from Harvey Herrman d/b/a Fireworks World,
(Wal-Mart Parking Lot, 3653 Orlando Drive) from June 27, 1990 through July 4, 1990.
Commissioner McClanahan moved to approve said waiver. Seconded by Commissioner Thomas and
carried by the vote of the Commission, as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
The next item of business was consideration of request from Director of Parks to
Increase Civic Center Rates.
Commissioner Eckstein stated that the percentages were computed incorrectly, and,
therefore, should be recalculated.
On recommendation of City Manager, Commissioner Eckstein moved to adopt Civic
Center User Rate Schedule as described in Memo from Director of Parks. Seconded by
Commissioner McClanahan and carried by the vote of the Commission, as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
The next item of business
appointments/Resignations, as follows:
was Consideration of Board Appointments/Re-
Board of Adjustments and Appeals: The City-Clerk reported that Robert E.
McKee submitted his resignation, effective June 14, 1990.
Commissioner McClanahan moved to accept Mr. McKee's resignation with regret,
and to appoint Bob VonHerbulis, Vice-President of McKee Construction to serve
on the Board of Adjustments and Appeals, subject to verification of Sanford
residency, if required. Seconded byCommissioner Eckstein and carried by the
vote of the Commission, as follows:
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
Be
Human Relations Advisory Board: The City Clerk reported that said Board
should be comprised of five (5) to seven (7) members, and provided a list of
current members. No action required.
19 ?0
176
MINU S
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
19 9Q
Civil Service Board: City Clerk reported that Civil Service Employees
elected Dave Farr to serve on said Board. No action necessary.
The Commission next considered items on the Consent Agenda, as follows:
Requests for payment of statements.
(1) From City Attorney for Professional Services
for May, 1990 ......................................... $
7,302.40
(2)
(3)
From Wharton-Smith, Inc., for Master Wastewater
Pump Station .......................................... $151,042.07
From Lochrane Engineering, Inc., for Sanford
Water Storage Tanks ................................... $ 13,823.25
(4)
From Speegle Construction, Inc., for Vacuum
Sewer Collection System, Contract I ................... $ 58,438.27
Tabulation of Bids for Bid 989/90-54, for Refuse Packers (Public Works
Department, Refuse Division) Memo and Bid Tabulations submitted as follows:
(1) Two (2) Refuse Packers.
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
SUBJECT:
City a
Fleet Maintenance Coordinator & Superintendent
Public Works Directo~~-~ ..~ '"
Bid Recommendation for (2) Refuse Packers
Bid ~89190-54 for the replacement of 2 Refuse packer trucks and retrofiting
existing trucks were opened 6116190. There were 13 requests for bid sent and
we received 9 responses.
We recommend accepting the bid from Ray Pace Equipment Co., Inc. in the amount
of $120,276.50 net after trade in. The unit offered (Loadmaster Edge LM-120-
HC) meets specifications and offers 12 months warranty. We have had previous
experience with Loadmaster products and found them to be adequate for the. job.
We recommend the following bids be rejected from; ~ay pace, Jacksonville with
a net amount of $111,734.50 because the packer offered does not meet
specifications, Metro-Tech. Miami for body only does not meet specifications
by not providing a truck chassis. Municipal Sales with a net amount of
$119,752.00 these units only have a six month warranty versus a 12 month
warranty on the recommended units, or $261.25 per unit. This amount for an
additional 6 month warramty is a sound investment on a Refuse packeT, a single
repair during the 6-mo. period would easily exceed that amount.
Further recommend Hardee Manufacture of Plant City be awarded the bid for axle
installation on existing Refuse trucks for $21,450.00 for six trucks. They
are low bidder and meet specifications.
FK/mk
xc: Purchasing
Refuse Superintendent
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
3une 25,
1990
~D TITLE N~ REFUSe, TRUCKS/RETROFIT
89/90-54 Addendum #2
BID NUMBER
OPENING DATE_ 6/~,4/9.0,. TIME2,00
POSTING TIME/DATE FROM:
,,UNTIL
OPENED OYi, Walt Shearin
TABULATE6 BY:, jerr~ Herman
VERIFIED BY: :, Frank Killgore
PAGE , , ,OF ' PAGE(S)
REFUSE PACKERS~
~mount Trade In ~ade In 'Ne~ Delivex7
Boebinger, Orlando 137,298.6~ 4,500 . 4,500 128,298.08. 115-120 ~ ~ ~eil 5~00
Bc~h~nger, Orlando .. Al.ternate 131,878.0~ 4,500 4~500 122,878.08 L15.-120 De ~ Pac-.Mo.r ,20 ~d
Transtar, Orlando 131,466~00 3,500 3,500 124,466.00.. 120 ARO ModelF°rd LNT805000 0
Ray Pace, Jacksonville 118~734.5~ 3,500 3,500' 111,734.50 90 ARO Ford LNg8.0 0
Loadmaster LM120
..... i ,,, .... Ford LNT80( 0
Ray Pace, Jacksonville 127,274.5~ 3,500 3,500 120,274.50 90 ARO Loadmaster' 20 yd
?~1~ Mioh ( lo~Dactor
Hardee, Plant City NO BID
Metro-Tech, Miami Body Only 36,300.0( .2~_
Municipal Sales, 126,752,00 3,500 ~ 3,500. 119,752.00. 120 ARO pak-Mor 32)B
Lakeland . -. ' .....
Bennet6, Orlando NO BID
Peterson, Lake Wales NO BID
...... ' ~ ~rd £N800
Solid Waste, 136,342.0~ 4~500 4,'500 127,342.60 90-120 Da'.! Pak-Mor 32 ~B
Jacksonvi~ 1~ ...
REMARKS: Ci. mCLI~D PILXCi INDICATI8 AWAgD
13 Requests 9 ~sponses
7004 REV. 11-$-85
City Manager recommended acceptance of lowest bid me'e~-ing
specifications, from Ray Pace Equipment, Inc. in amount of $120,274.50.
(Lower bids did not meet specifications.)
(2) Retrofiring existing Trucks.
BI D TITLE Refuse Trucks/Retrofit .,u~. ,.. * ~ ~,m ~. ~ ---,~ O PEN ED BY: ' walt Shearin
~~ ~~a~ m. TABU~TE6
BID NUMBER 89/90-54 Add~ ~2. ~m~.~olm~mm~ BY: ~ Je~ He~
OPENING DATE 6/14/90 TIME 2'q0 P.m .,,~~a~,~m~ VERIFIED BY:' ~nk Killoore
POSTING TIME/DATE FROM: ./~ UNTIL . / PAGE, OF,,,' .... PAGE(S)
~FIT ~Y '
1988 #95 1986 , ~-'6 1986 #98 198"7e~ 1987 #101 198~
RIDDERS
TERMS
Ford Ford ~ Ford ,.9
· FQrd Ford Fo. rd ~1 ~ .....
Boebinger, orlando NO BID ,
Transtar, orlando 4,500 4,500 4,500 4.,500 '4,500 4,500 27,000 2 days
. each
Ray Pace, Jacksonville NO BID
~rdee, Plant City ~ 3,575 3,575 3,575 3,575 3,575 3,575 21,450 3 days
Metro-Tech, Miami NO BID
Municipal Sales NO BID .*
Lakeland , . . ...... , .
Bennett Truck, Orlando NO BID
Peterson, Lake Wales NO BID
Solid Waste, *:. NO BID
Jacksonville
REMARKS: CI. KCLWD talZCS IMDICATIt8 A~ARD
13 RequeS1~s 9 Responses
7004 REV. 11-$-85
178
MINU
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
~une 25,
1990 ..
City Manager
specifications,
$21,450.00.
recommended acceptance of lower bid, which met
from Hardee Manufacture of Plant City in amount of
On motion of Commissioner Thomas, seconded by Commissioner McClanahan and carried
by the vote of the Commission as follows:
the Commission:
A.
B.
Mayor Smith Aye
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Aye
Commissioner Howell Aye
Approved payment of statements.
(1) Accepted lowest bid meeting specifications, from Ray Pace Equipment,
Inc. in amount of $120,274.50. (Lower bids did not meet
specifications.)
(2) Accepted lower bid, which met specifications, from Hardee Manufacture of
Plant City in amount of $21,450.00.
Recommendations submitted from Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of June 7,
1990, as follows:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Date:
City Clerk
Land Development Coordinator
Regularly Scheduled Meeting of the Planning and Zoning
Commission , Thursday, June 7, 1990 at 7:00
P.M. in the City Commission Chambers, City
Hall, Sanford, Florida.
June 12, 1990
RECOMMENDATIONS
Unanimously tabled consideration of the Public Hearing for a
request for a change of land use for that property described
as 3401 Orlando Drive, lying east of Orlando Drive, south of
Airport Boulevard and north of Americana Boulevard for lack of
representation.
Owner: Ishwar Naran
Representative: Howard W. Jewett
(Tabled until the meeting of June 21, 1990)
Daniel Singer, agent for the owner Apple & Seeds Investment
Company, withdrew consideration of the request to rezone from
AG, Agriculture to that of MR-l, Multiple-Family Residential
for property located at the southeast corner of Mellonville
Avenue and Pine Way.
Owner: Apple & Seeds Investment Company
Representative: Daniel Singer
(City Commission hearing date scheduled for June 25, 1990)
FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES
For lack of representation, unanimously tabled consideration
of the request for a conditional use approval for property
located at 2502 Laurel Avenue in a GC-2, General Commercial
District for the purpose of an automobile and truck service
use (four dispensing gasoline islands) for a Speedway-Starvin
Marvin convenience store.
Owner: Calogera and Carmela Baio
Representative: Henry Endrizzi
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
3une 25,
179
19 90
After discussion by the owner regarding the past use of the
structure as a four unit apartment building and its non-
conformity being based on the lack of zoning at the~time of
construction in the 1880's and by opposition regarding the
crime problems that seem to be brought by weekly transient
rental properties, unanimously denied the conditional use
request for a multiple-family use and the use of a
nonconforming structure and lot for p~operty located at 401
Palmetto Avenue in a GC-2, General Commercial District.
Owner: Stephen H. Coover, Trustee
Representative: Charles M. Cameron
Unanimously approved the conditional use request for the
change of use for a nonconforming structure, located at 1310
Park Avenue from a church use to that of a residential care
facility (six residents) in a RC-1 Restricted Commercial
District.
Owner/representative: Mary L Parise
10.
11.
Unanimously approved the conditional use request for an
automobile and truck service use (self-service car wash) for
property located at the southeast corner of Airport Boulevard
and W. 25th Street in a GC-2 property.
Owner: Stan Sandefur
Representative: Dr. Storm Richards
Unanimously approved the conditional use request for an
outside tank storage use (1000 gallon tank for propane gas
dispensing) subject to site plan approval of the site for
conformity to the Land Development Regulations for property
located at 2543 French Avenue in a GC-2, General Commercial
District.
Owner: Bob Gentry
Representative: Jose Velazquez
Unanimously approved the site/engineering planfor an addition
to Ace Hardware, a retail sales and service use, located at
205 E. 25th Street in a GC-2, General Commercial District
subject to the following:
1. Submittal and approval of a detail for the fire
department connection and hydrant.
2. The sidewalk requirement for on Palmetto Avenue was
waived.
Owner: Robert N. and Inez Parsell
Representative: John Reynolds
Unanimously approved the site/engineering plan for Compass
Marketing, a warehouse/distribution use located at 115
Coastline Road in a RI-l, Restricted Industrial District with
a requirement for a sidewalk on Coastline Road.
Owner: Accord, Inc.
Representative: Kevin Spolski ~
By a vote of six to one, approved the site/engineering plan
for Jett-Aire of Central Florida, a corporate office and
aircraft hanger use, located at 1300 E. 26th Place in a RI-I,
Restricted Industrial District subject to the satisfactory
resolution of the requirement for a fire sprinkler system.
Owner: Sanford Airport Authority
Representative: Kevin J.. Spolski
Unanimously approved the site plan for an expansion to the
parking lot for the Jim Lash's Blue Book property located at
4114 Orlando Drive in a GC-2, General Commercial District with
the following conditions:
1. Approval of the final engineering for drainage.
.2. A letter committing to the resolution of the water
service to the existing house when' the existing tenant
moves in 1991.
3. Cross-access easements are not required at this time.
Owner/representative: James D. Lash
Unanimously approved the site plan for a detached sign for
Central Florida Educator's Credit Union, a financial use,
located at 105 E. 25th Street in a G¢-2, General Commercial
District.
Owner: Tropic Bank of Florida/Florida. National Bank
Corporation
Representative: Kenneth Soday
Unanimously approved the site plan for a propane dispensing
station with an underground tank for Discount Propane, a
retail sales and service use, located at 3804 Orlando Drive in
a GC-2, General Commercial District.
Owner: VSH Realty, Inc.
Representative: Jack Bolderson
180
MINUTES
City Commission, Sanford, Florida
1990
12.
On an item heard from the floor, unanimously approved the site
plan for a detached sign for Dr. Joshi, a medical outpatient
use, located at 1001-1005 W. 1st Street in a GC-2, General
Commercial District subject to the following conditions:
1. Removal of the existing 5.3' x .5' detached wooden sign.
2. 25' overall height limitation.
3. 50 square feet of landscaping for the sign location.
Owner/representative: S. K,. Joshi, M. D.
Commissioner Eckstein moved to authorize the City Attorney to prepare the proper
documents to amend leases as follows: A. Monroe Harbor Marina: Revert back to original terms
of 1967 lease, retroactive to January 1990, at 2 1/2% of gross revenues, with a ten (10) year
limit. B. One Harbour Place: Lease terms to be $4,698.00 annual base ra=e, plus 2 1/2% of
gross sales, retroactive to January 1990, for a ten (10) year term. Seconded by Commissioner
Howell and carried by the vote of the Commission, as follows:
Mayor Smith Abstained
Commissioner Eckstein Aye
Commissioner Thomas Aye
Commissioner McClanahan Nay
Commissioner Howell Aye
Mayor Smith reported that she had abstained because her son's lease was a part of the
consideration.
City Manager reported that the'Department of Community Affairs has appealed the
City's Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Seminole Mall Properties, and that the City is
preparing for the hearing on same, to be held on July 9, 1990.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
M' 'A Y~ R
Attest:
~ City Clerk
-- 'FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR
COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
LAST NAME--FIRST NAME--MIDDLE NAME NAME OF BOAKD, COUNCIL. COMMISSION. AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE
Smith, Bettye D. .
103 Country Place
CITY ('OUNT¥
Sanfoard, Florida Seminole
DATEONWHICHVOTE ~'CURRED
June 25, 1990
City Commission
'IHE BOARD, COUNCIL. COMMISSION. AUTHORITY. OR COMMITTEE ON
WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF:
X. CITY .: COUNTY ~.[ OTHER LOCAL AGENCY
NAMe: OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION:
City of Sanford
MY POSITION IS:
ELECTIVE [3 APPOINTIVE
WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B
This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board,
council, commission, authority, or Committee. it applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are presented
with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. The requirements of this law are mandatory; although
the use of this particular form is not required by law, you are encouraged to use it in making the disclosure required by law.
Your responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict of'interest will 'vary greatly'depending
on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form
before completing,the reverse side and filing the form.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR cOMP[IANCE WITH SECTION 1'12.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES
ELECTED OFFICERS:
A person holding elective county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures
to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the special
gain of a principal (o~her than a government agency) by whom he is retained.
In either case, you should disclose the conflict:
PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly staling to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on
which you are abstaining from voting; and
WITHIN I$ DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording
the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
APPOINTED OFFICERS: ,
A person holding appointive c%'umy,' municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which
inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the
special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained.
A person holding an appointive local office otherwise may participate in a matter in which he has a conflict of interest, but must
disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision by oral or written communication, whether
made by the officer or at his direction.
IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE TIIE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH
THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN:
· You should complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for
recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes.
· A copy of the form should be provided immediately !o the o~her members of the agency.
* The form should be read publicly at the meeting prior io consideration of the matter in which you have a conflict of interest.
IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE' DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING:
· You should disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating.
· You should complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes
of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.. , ,.
DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
1, Bettye D. Smith , hereby disclose that on
(a) A measure came or will come before my agency Which (check one)
inured to my special private gain; or
...... inured to the special gain of
June 25,
(b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows:
My son's .lease was a part of the consideration.
July 6, '-1990
Dine Filed Signature
, 19 90 :
· by whom ! am retained.
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317 (1985), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED ':
DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: ' ':'"
IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN
SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5,000. . -