4313 Silvestri RezoneOrdinance No. 2014 -4313
An ordinance of the City of Sanford, Florida relating to the Silvestri
Estates Planned Development ( "PD "); providing for the rezoning of
real property totaling approximately 214.54 acres in size consisting
of generally and addressed at 2401 East Lake Mary Boulevard
(Property Appraiser Tax Parcel Identification Numbers: 07- 20- 31 -5LR-
0000 -0010, 07 -20 -31 -5LR -0000 -0020, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0030, 07-20-
31-51-11-0000-0040, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0050, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0060,
07- 20-31- 5LR - 0000 -0070, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -00803 07- 20- 31 -5LR-
0000 -0090, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0150, 07-20-31 -5LR- 0000 - 0160,07 -20-
31 -5LR- 0000 -0170, 07- 20- 31- 5LR - 0000 -0180, 07- 20- 31- 5LR - 0000 -0190,
07- 20- 31- 5LR -0000 -0100, 07-20-31-5 LR-0000-01 10, 07- 20- 31 -5LR-
0000- 0120, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0130, 07- 20- 31- 5LR - 0000 -0140, 07 -20-
31- 5LR - 0000-0200, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0210, 07- 20- 31- 5LR - 0000 -0220,
07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0230, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0240, 07- 20- 31 -5LR-
0000 -0250, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0260, 07- 20 -31- 5LR -0000 -0270, 7-20 -
31- 5LR - 0000 -0280, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0290, 7 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0300,
07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 - 031 0, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0320, 07- 20- 31 -5LR-
0000 -0330, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0340, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0350, 07 -20-
31- 5LR - 0000 -0360, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0370, 07- 20- 31- 5LR - 0000 -0380,
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0390, 07- 20- 31- 5LR - 0000 -0400, 07- 20- 31 -5LR-
0000 -0410, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0420, 07 -20 -31 -5LR -0000 -0430, 07 -20-
31- 5LR -0000 -0440, 07- 20 -31- 5LR -0000 -0450, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0460,
07- 20- 31- 5LR -OA00 -0000, 07- 20- 31- 51_11-01300 -0000, 07- 20- 31 -5LR-
0000 -0000, 07- 20- 31- 5LR -OD00 -0000, 07- 20- 31- 5LR -OEOO -0000, 07 -20-
31- 51-R -OF00 -0000, 07- 20- 31- 5LR -OG00 -0000, 07-20-31-51-R-01-100-
0000, 07- 20 -31- 5LR -OJOO -0000 and 07- 20- 31- 5LR -OSOO -0000) all
located within the City Limits (map of the property attached) from
PD as approved in Ordinance Number 4129, enacted on August 25,
2008; providing for the taking of implementing administrative
actions; providing for the adoption of a map and PD master plan by
reference; repealing all conflicting ordinances; providing for
severability; providing for non- codification and providing for an
effective date.
Whereas, Safari Investments, LLC (whose managers are Sadique M. Jaffer and
Mohamedtaki Jaffer), is the owner of certain real property, totaling approximately
214.54 acres) in size (consisting of numerous tax parcels of real property) and located
at parcels addressed at 2401 East Lake Mary Boulevard and has applied to the City of
Sanford, pursuant to the controlling provisions of State law and the Code of Ordinances
of the City of Sanford, to have the property rezoned to the Planned Development ( "PD ")
IIPil, U
zoning classification from the existing zoning classifications and with the project being
named the Silvestri Estates PD; and
Whereas, the property owner has submitted a request to amend the future land
use map designation from I- Industrial to GC, General Commercial, (21.52 acres), and
to LDR -SF, Low Density Residential, (193.02 acres), for the purpose of developing the
commercial and residential project called Silvestri Estates PD; and
Whereas, the property owner has also applied to rezone the property to PD,
Planned Development, in order to establish specific development and design standards
for their project. The planned development proposes commercial uses fronting along
East Lake Mary Boulevard and 377 single family lots south of the commercial tracts
extending west to Mellonville Avenue and south to Pine Way; and
Whereas, excluding the proposed commercial and wetland/buffer areas, the net
density for the residential development is 2.9 units per acre; and
Whereas, the Citizen's Awareness Participation Plan (CAPP) requirements of
the City relative to the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan have been
met by the applicant to the satisfaction of the City and the CAPP procedures of the City
have been adhered to and honored with the applicant and owners being willing to meet
with any concern citizen or stakeholder should they have any questions or concerns
regarding the application and proposed use of the subject property said CAPP meeting
occurring on August 27, 2013; and
Whereas, the City's Planning and Development Services Department has
conducted a thorough review and analysis of the demands upon public facilities and
general planning and land development issues should the subject application be
approved and has otherwise reviewed and evaluated the application to determine
2j11ago.
whether is comports with sound and generally accepted land use planning practices
and principles as well as whether the application is consistent with the goals, objectives
and policies set forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan and determined that the
proposed the amendment of the City's Comprehensive Plan relative to the subject
property as set forth in this Ordinance is internally consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan of the City of Sanford and the controlling provisions of State law; and
Whereas, the City's Planning and Development Services Department has
determined that, to some extent, the actions taken herein are curative in that the
provisions of this Ordinance eliminate a conflicting land use that is proximate to
wetlands; and
Whereas, and, indeed, the City's Planning and Development Services
Department thoroughly reviewed numerous reports and studies submitted to the City by
the applicant in support of the subject application; and
Whereas, on December 5, 2013 the Planning and Zoning Commission of the
City of Sanford recommended that the City Commission approve the subject rezoning
as set forth in this Ordinance and, together with the recommendations of the City staff,
recommended normative development conditions as well as the conditions set forth
herein; and
Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Commission have
determined that the proposed the rezoning of the subject property as set forth in this
Ordinance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Sanford, the Land
Development Regulations of the City of Sanford, and the controlling provisions of State
law; and
Whereas, the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida has taken all
3111 ����i�.
actions relating to the rezoning action set forth herein in accordance with the
requirements and procedures mandated by State law.
Now, therefore, be it enacted by the People of the City of Sanford, Florida:
Section 1. Legislative findings and intent.
(a). The City Commission of the City of Sanford hereby adopts and
incorporates into this Ordinance the City staff report and City Commission agenda
memorandum relating to the application relating to the proposed rezoning of the subject
property as well as the recitals (whereas clauses) to this Ordinance said recitals being
fully adopted and incorporated as an integral part of this Resolution.
(b). The City of Sanford has complied with all requirements and procedures of
Florida law in processing and advertising this Ordinance.
(c). This Ordinance is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan of the City of Sanford.
Section 2. Rezoning of real property /implementing actions.
(a). Upon enactment of this Ordinance the following property, as depicted in
the map attached to this Ordinance, totaling 214.54 acres in size, shall be rezoned from
the MI -2, Medium Industrial, zoning classification to the PD, Planned Development,
zoning classification for the Silvestri Estates PD (parcels addressed at 2401 East Lake
Mary Boulevard or Property Appraiser Tax Parcel Identification Numbers: 07- 20 -31-
51-R -0000 -0010, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0020, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0030, 07 -20 -31 -5LR-
0000 -0040, 07- 20 -31- 5LR -0000 -0050, 07- 20 -31- 5LR -0000 -0060, 07- 20 -31- 5LR -0000-
0070, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0080, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0090, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0150,
07- 20 -31- 5LR -0000- 0160,07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0170, 07-20-31-51-R-0000-0180, 07 -20-
31 -51-R- 0000 -0190, 07 -20 -31 -51-R- 0000 -0100, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0110, 07- 20 -31-
51-R -0000 -0120, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0130, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0140, 07- 20- 31 -5LR-
4111 z���c
0000 -0200, 07 -20 -31 -5LR -0000 -0210, 07 -20 -31 -5LR -0000 -0220, 07- 20 -31- 5LR -0000-
0230, 07- 20- 31- 5LR -0000 -0240, 07- 20 -31- 51-R - 0000 -0250, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0260,
07- 20- 31- 5LR -0000 -0270, 7 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0280, 07- 20 -31- 5LR -0000 -0290, 7 -20-
31- 5LR -0000 -0300, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0310, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0320, 07- 20 -31-
5LR -0000 -0330, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0340, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0350, 07- 20- 31 -5LR-
0000 -0360, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0370, 07- 20 -31- 5LR -0000 -0380, 07- 20 -31- 5LR -0000-
0390, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0400, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0410, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0420,
07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0430, 07- 20 -31- 5LR -0000 -0440, 07- 20 -31- 5LR -0000 -0450, 07 -20-
31- 51-R - 0000 -0460, 07- 20- 31- 5LR -OA00 -0000, 07- 20 -31- 5LR -OB00 -0000, 07- 20 -31-
5LR -OCOO -0000, 07- 20- 31- 5LR -OD00 -0000, 07- 20 -31- 5LR -OEOO -0000, 07 -20 -31 -5LR -
OF00 -0000, 07- 20- 31- 5LR -OGOO -0000, 07- 20 -31- 51-R -01-100 -0000, 07- 20- 31- 51-R -0J00-
0000, and 07- 20- 31- 5LR -OSOO -0000) with the development conditions as set forth
herein.
(b). The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to execute any
documents necessary to formalize approval of the rezoning action taken herein and to
revise and amend the Official Zoning Map or Maps of the City of Sanford as may be
appropriate to accomplish the action taken in this Ordinance.
(c). The conditions to be incorporated into the pertinent development order
(which must be signed and executed within 90 days of the enactment of this Ordinance
by the City Commission or the rezone reverts back to the previous MI -2, Medium
Industrial, zoning classification) relating to the action taken in this Ordinance include the
following and the subject real property shall be subject to a development order which
incorporates and contains the following conditions:
1. Pursuant to Section 4.3.G of the Land Development Code of the
City of Sanford, this rezoning shall expire 5 years from the effective date
5 11', i c
of the approval if improvements have not been completed or an extension
granted.
2. The minimum building setbacks and design standards for the single - family
lots are as follows:
Type of Lot No. of Lots Front Side Rear Street Side Max Height
50'
75'
203 25' 5' 15' 10'
174 25' 7.5' 15' 10'
3- stories
3- stories
3. The property shall be developed generally in accordance with the
land uses and development standards identified on the Silvestri Estates
PD Master Plan revision date of November 25, 2013 contingent upon the
southern uplands portion of the conservation easement on Tract C, Silver
Lakes Industrial Park, being vacated by the St. John River Water
Management District, unless otherwise specifically set forth in this
Ordinance or any associated Development Order. With regard to the area
of Tract C encumbered by the conservation easement on Tract C, the
northern portion shall remain encumbered by the conservation easement
or otherwise in conservation status as approved by the City and with a
form being approved by the City Attorney. If the conservation easement is
not vacated, as set forth herein, such that the PD Master Plan may be
implemented, the property owner shall submit a revised PD Master Plan
to the City within 90 days of final action relating thereto and said PD
Master Plan shall be subject to such approvals as the City may deem
appropriate under the processes and procedures set forth in the City's
Land Development Regulations,
4. All air conditioning units shall be placed in the rear of the lots that
are 50' in width.
5. Unless specifically requested and approved on the PD Master Plan,
any required elements missing from or not shown on the PD Master Plan
shall otherwise comply with the City's Land Development Regulations.
6. Street lights shall comply with the City's Land Development
Regulations (Schedule N). However, additional requirements for the street
lights may be considered during engineering plan review based on the
type of light fixture and mounting height being designed.
i. Landscaping for the single family lots shall be designed in a
manner and of a quality equal to or exceed the specifications provided to
the Kay's banding subdivision.
S. During preliminary subdivision plan review; stem wall construction
may be required for houses built on the 50' wide single- family lots.
9. The applicant /developer shall coordinate with the owners of Lots 1-
14 of the adjacent Magnolia Park subdivision and construct a wall and/or
landscape buffer along the current conservation area /easement (Tract C,
Silver Lake Industrial Park) with the type of construction being the City's
determination.
10. A mandatory homeowners association which is perpetual in nature
shall be created with powers acceptable to the City and in a form
approved by the City Attorney which homeowners association shall be
managed by a professionally licensed property management company.
11. All homes shall have articulated front elevations accented with at
least one decorative accessory such as raised stucco banding; foam
bands, shutters and decorative accents; stone; brick; or siding. Metal
71P <����
siding and scored banding shall not be used on a home.
12. All Lots shall be irrigated and separately metered as approved by
the City. The irrigation control box shall be mounted such that the
homeowners association will have ready access to the sprinkler controls.
13. The homes within the developed community shall have varied
architectural features and homes with the same front fapade shall not be
repeated in close proximity to each other. In order to achieve this goal, no
two homes will be constructed with the same front facade when such
home are located directly beside each other. No home with the same
front facade either will be constructed directly across the street from a
home with the same front facade or to either side of the home directly
across the street. The City shall not issue any building permit without the
applicant affirmatively demonstrating that this condition has been and is
being adhered to.
14. All homes shall be painted and maintained in earth tone colors.
Loud, blue, black, red and purple colors are prohibited as determined by
the City.
15. Landscaping shall be equal to or greater than the specifications
established for Kays Landings as determined by the City.
16. The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions (DCCRs),
as approved by the City, shall require each home owner to maintain their
property by properly irrigating its yard and landscaping; keeping their
yards mowed and the painting thereon maintained as required by the
homeowners association and the City. Should any homeowner fail to
comply with the requirements of this condition, after being duly notified of
the violation in accordance with the DCCRs, the homeowners association
shall have the power and the duty to bring the lot into compliance and
place a lien against the lot for all cost incurred in remedying the violation
and the City shall have the power, but not the duty, to do likewise.
17. Wood or chain link fencing are prohibited.
18. All garages shall be maintained such that the number of vehicles
designed to fit within the garage may do so.
19. No home owner shall regularly park in the street.
20. Parking on yard areas is prohibited.
21. No inoperable vehicles, boats, or recreational vehicles shall be
permitted to remain on any lot unless it is concealed within a garage and
unable to be viewed from any abutting property or a street.
22. Two canopy trees in the rear yards of the 50' lots (Lots 21 through
58) that abut the commercial property shall be planted prior to the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
23. The foregoing restrictions shall not be amended or removed from
the DCCRs without the written approval of the City in a recordable form
approved by the City Attorney.
Section 3. Incorporation of documents. The documents attached to this
Ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed and incorporated into this Ordinance as a
substantive part of this Ordinance.
Section 4. Conflicts. All ordinances or part of ordinances in conflict with this
Ordinance are hereby repealed.
Section 5. Severability. If any section, sentence, phrase, word, or portion of
this Ordinance is determined to be invalid, unlawful or unconstitutional, said
911'a'=e
1111111 piIIIIII "1, 111,
other section, sentence, phrase, word, • portion of this Ordinance not oltherwisi-r-
City Code of the City of Sanford or the Land Development Code of the City of Sanford;
provided, however, that the actions taken herein shall be depicted • the zoning maps
of the City of Sanford by the City Manager, or designee.
1�
T-M -mum,
the execution and recording of the Development Order referenced in this Ordinance;
provided, however, that said Development Order must be fully executed and delivered
to the City Clerk for recording within 90 days of the date of enacted of this Ordinance.
Otherwise, this Ordinance shall be null and void and of no force and effect.
Passed and adopted this 1 oth day of March, 2014.
Attest.
City Commission, of t e City of
Sanford, Florida 7
Cynthia Porter, City Clerk Jeff Triplett,
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency.
"William L. Colbert�, City Attorney
DOCUMENTS ATTACHED HERE
11IPI c
��WS RM X
871% Item No. '
CITY COMMISSION MEMORANDUM 1 4.071
MARCH 10, 2014 AGENDA
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Comm. . n
PREPARED BY: Russ Gibson, Planning and Development Se ' s Dir or
SUBMITTED BY: Norton N. Bonaparte, Jr., City Manager
SUBJECT: Rezone 214.54 acres at 2401 E. Lake Mary Boulevard from MI -2, Medium Industrial
to PD, Planned Development (Silvestri Estates)
THIS IS A QUASI-JUDICIAL. MATTER AND, AS SUCH, REQUIRES DISCLOSURE
OF ALL EX-PARTE COMMUNICATIONS, INVESTIGATIONS, SITE VISITS AND
EXPERT OPINIONS REGARDING THIS MATTER.
SYNOPSIS:
The property owner is requesting to rezone 214.54 acres located at 2401 E. Lake Mary Boulevard from MI -2,
Medium Industrial, to PD, Planned Development (Silvestri Estates).
FISCAL /STAFFING STATEMENT:
Based on the 2013 property tax roll of Seminole County, the subject property is assessed as grazing land with
a total value of $80,673. 'fhe total tax bill in 2013 for the 214.54 acre site was $1,643.
No additional staffing or City resources are required if the subject property's future land use designation is
amended.
BACKGROUND:
The 214.54 acre site is located on the south side of E. Lake Mary Boulevard between two residential planned
developments - Magnolia Park PD to the west and the Brisson West PD to the east. All of the subject property
is in the Silver Lakes Industrial Park Replat (58 parcels) approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission
and City Commission in January 1993. Since then the property has remained undeveloped.
The current property owners have submitted a request to amend the future land use map designation from I-
Industrial to GC- General Commercial (21.52 acres) and LDR -SF, Low Density Residential (193.02 acres) for
the purpose of developing a commercial and residential project called Silvestri Estates. "Me owners have also
applied to rezone the property to PD, Planned Development in order to establish specific development and
design standards for their project. The planned development proposes commercial uses fronting along East
Lake Mary Boulevard and 377 single family lots south of the commercial tracts extending west to Mellonville
Avenue and south to Pine Way. Excluding the proposed commercial and wetland/buffer areas, the net density
for the residential development is 2.9 units per acre.
The minimum building setbacks and design standards for the single family lots are as follows:
No. of Lots Front Side Rear Street Side Max Height
50' lots 203 25' 5' 15' 10' 3- stories
75' lots 174 25' 7.5' 15' 10' 3- stories
Unless otherwise specified on the PD Master Plan, the commercial and residential development will comply
with the standard zoning requirements in the City's Land Development Regulations.
n..._.. 1 .r 4
The applicant held a Citizens Awareness Participation Plan meeting on August 27, 2013, and has provided a
meeting summary.
CITY ATTORNEY REVIEW:
The City Attorney has prepared the ordinance making the technical edits and adding the conditions approved
by the City Commission at its meeting of February 10, 2014. The recommendation of City staff is to approve
the ordinance that contains the conditions adopted by the City Commission. The condition of approval
includes the property owner entering an implementing development order with the City and should the
development order not be entered the existing zoning would remain in effect. The Comprehensive flan
amendment would continue to be processed. As noted in the City Commission's previous meeting, that
amendment has been determined to be curative in view of policies within the Comprehensive Plan relating to
wetlands protection.
RECOMMENDATION:
On December 5, 2013, the City of Sanford Planning and Zoning Commission recommended
approval to rezone 214.54 acres located at 2401 E. Lake Mary Boulevard from Ml -2, Medium
Industrial to PD, Planned Development for Silvestri Estates subject to approving the comprehensive
plan amendment and a Development Order that includes the following conditions.
1. The subject property shall be developed in accordance with the PD Master Plan for Silvestri Estates
with revision date of November 25, 2013 contingent upon the existing conservation easement on
Tract C, Silver Lakes Industrial Park being vacated by the St. John River Water Management District.
2, The PD rezoning shall expire five (5) years from the effective date of the rezoning ordinance if all
improvements have not been completed or an extension granted.
3. All A/C units shall be placed in the rear of the homes on the 50 -foot wide lots.
4. Unless specifically noted and approved on the Planned Development Master Plan for Silvestri
Estates, any required elements missing from or not shown on the PD Master Plan shall otherwise
comply with the City's Land Development Regulations.
5. Street lights shall comply with the City's Land Development Regulations (Schedule N). however,
additional requirements for the lights may be considered during engineering plan review based on the
type of light fixture and mounting height being designed.
6. Landscaping for the single family lots shall be designed equal to or exceed the specifications provided
to the Kay's Landing subdivision.
7. During Preliminary Subdivision Plan review, stem wall construction may be required for houses built
on the 50' wide single family lots.
S. The applicant /developer will coordinate with the owners of Lots 1 -14 of the adjacent Magnolia Park
subdivision and construct a wall and /or landscape buffer along the current conservation area /casement
(Tract C, Silver Lake Industrial Park).
On January 13, 2014, by a vote of 4 to I (Commissioner Jones dissenting), the City Commission approved
first reading of Ordinance No. 4313 to rezone 2401 E. Lake Mary Boulevard to PD, Planned Development as
recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission subject to the following conditions.
a. The proposed 50' lots shall be changed to a minimum 55' wide
b. The proposed 5' side yard setbacks shall be changed to a minimum 7.5'
C. The existing 30' tract adjacent to Magnolia Park shall remain as a buffer
d. The applicant to work with staff regarding Home Owner- Association documents to restrict
repetitive home design (building elevation) of adjacent houses or with houses across the
street.
The proposed language for the Development Order for Silvestri Estates:
Owner shall, at or prior to the time of platting, record a Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and
Restrictions that shall contain the following Architectural Limitation:
"It is the intent of the Developer that the community has varied architectural features and that homes
with the same front fad ade are not repeated in close proximity to each other. In order to achieve this
goal, Builders shall not build two single - family horns with the same front facade directly beside each
other. In addition, Builders shall not build a single family home with the same front fa4ade either
n---
directly across the street from one with the same front facade or to either side of the home directly
across the street."
On February 10, 2014, by a vote of 3 to 2 (Commissioners .Tones and McCarty dissenting), the City
Commission approved first reading of Ordinance No. 4313 to rezone 2401 E. Lake Mary Boulevard to PD,
Planned Development as recommended by the Planning and zoning Commission subject to the following
additional 13 conditions that are also included in the ordinance:
I. A mandatory homeowners association which is perpetual in nature shall be created with powers
acceptable to the City and in a form approved by the City Attorney which homeowners associations
shall be managed by a professionally licensed property management company.
2. All homes shall have articulated front elevations accented with at least one decorative accessory such
as raised stucco banding; foam bands, shutters and decorative accents; stone; brick; or siding. Metal
siding and scored banding shall not be used on a horne.
3. All lots shall be irrigated and separately metered as approved by the City. The irrigation control box
shall be mounted such that the homeowners association will have ready access to the sprinkler
controls.
4. The homes within the developed community shall have varied architectural features and homes with
the same front facade shall not be repeated in close proximity to each other. In order to achieve this
goal, no two homes will be constructed with the same front facade when such home are located
directly beside each other. No horne with the same front facade either will be constructed directly
across the street from a home with the same front facade or to either side of the home directly across
the street. The City shall not issue any building permit without the applicant affirmatively
demonstrating that this condition has been and is being adhered to.
5. All homes shall be painted and maintained in earth tone colors. Loud, blue, black, red and purple
colors are prohibited as determined by the City.
6. Landscaping shall be equal to or greater than the specifications established for the Kay's Landing
subdivision as determined by the City.
7. The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions (DCCRs), as approved by the City, shall
require each home owner to maintain their property by properly irrigating its yard and landscaping;
keeping their yards mowed and the painting thereon maintained as required by the homeowners
association and the City. Should any homeowner fail to comply with the requirements of this
condition, alter- being duly notified of the violation in accordance with the DCCRs, the homeowners
association shall have the power and the duty to bring the lot into compliance and place a lien against
the lot for all cost incurred in remedying the violation and the City shall have the power, but not the
duty, to do likewise.
8. Wood or chain link fencing are prohibited.
9. All garages shall be maintained such that the number of vehicles designed to fit within the garage
may do so. No home owner shall regularly park in the street.
10. Parking on yard areas is prohibited.
11. No inoperable vehicles, boats, or recreational vehicles shall be permitted to remain on any lot unless
it is concealed within a garage and unable to be viewed from any abutting property or a street.
12. 'Two canopy trees in the rear yards of the 50' lots (Lots 21 through 58) that abut the commercial
property shall be planted prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
13. The foregoing restrictions shall not be amended or removed from the DCCRs. without the written
approval of the City in a recordable form approved by the City Attorney.
It is staff s recommendation that the City Commission adopt Ordinance No. 4313, as amended in accordance
with the actions taken by the City Commission at its meeting of February 10, 2014, to rezone 214.54 acres
located at 2401 E. Lake Mary Boulevard from MI -2, Medium Industrial to PD, Planned Development for
Silvestri Estates subject to approving the comprehensive plan amendment and a Development Order that
includes all recommended conditions."
The City Clerk published notice of this public hearing in the Sanford Herald on February 26, 2014.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
-.. 1 -P n
"I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4313 to rezone 214.54 acres located at 2401 L. Fake Mary Boulevard from
MI -2, Medium Industrial to PD, Planned Development for Silvestri Estates subject to approving the
comprehensive plan amendment and a Development Order that includes all recommended conditions."
Attachments: Site Vicinity Map /Aerial Map
Ordinance No. 4313
PD Master Plan for Silvestri Estates revised November 25, 2013 (3 pages)
Project Information Sheet (2 pages)
Citizens Awareness Participation Plan (CAPP) report (16 pages)
'Trip Generation report by GMB Engineers (2 pages)
Seminole County Public Schools Impact Analysis (3 pages)
Imagine Sanford brochure (2 pages)
Affidavit of Ownership and Designation of Agent (2 pages)
Information presented at the December 5, 2013 P &Z Commission meeting
Copy of PowerPoint presentation given by Mr. Coover and Mr. Evans (20 pages)
Public Comment form submitted by Melonic Beadling
Public Comment forin submitted by Tracy Sanford
Email received from Silas and Linda Barker
TADevelolnnenl Revic -03 -Land Dcvclopmcn02013%Sslvcr lake (Saf i i )nv I.LCJ-Ika silver Lakes 111(h.8i. sl ParklRe,onoU: Memo 1- 27- 2014TC. Memo -Remne 2461 I lake Mary Ii]vd,doc
n. -.__ n . -r n
Ordinance No. 2014 -4313
An ordinance of the City of Sanford, Florida relating to the Silvestri
Estates Planned Development ( "PD "); providing for the rezoning of
real property totaling approximately 214.54 acres in size consisting
of generally and addressed at 2401 East Lake Mary Boulevard
(Property Appraiser Tax Parcel Identification Numbers: 07- 20- 31 -5LR-
0000 -0010, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0020, 07 -20 -31 -SLR -0000 -0030, 07 -20-
31- 5LR -0000 -0040, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0050, 07- 20- 31- 5LR - 0000 -0060,
07- 20- 31- 5LR - 0000 -0070, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0080, 07- 20- 31 -SLR-
0000 -0090, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0150, 07-20-31- 5LR -0000- 0160,07 -20-
31- 5LR - 0000 -0170, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0180, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0190,
07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 - 0100, 07- 20- 31- 5LR - 0000 -0110, 07- 20- 31 -5LR-
0000 -0120, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0130, 07- 20- 31- 5LR - 0000 -0140, 07 -20-
31- 5LR - 0000 -0200, 07- 20- 31- 5LR -0000 -0210, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0220,
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0230, 07- 20- 31- 5LR - 0000 -0240, 07- 20- 31 -5LR-
0000 -0250, 07- 20 -31- 5LR -0000 -0260, 07- 20 -31- 5LR -0000 -02701 7 -20-
31 -5LR- 0000 -0280, 07- 20- 31- 5LR -0000 -0290, 7 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0300,
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0310, 07- 20- 31- 5LR - 0000 -0320, 07- 20- 31 -5LR-
0000 -0330, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0340, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0350, 07 -20-
31- 5LR - 0000 -0360, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0370, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0380,
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0390, 07- 20- 31- 5LR - 0000 -04001 07- 20- 31 -5LR-
0000 -0410, 07- 20- 31- 5LR -0000 -0420, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0430, 07 -20-
31- 5LR - 0000 -0440, 07- 20 -31- 5LR -0000 -0450, 07- 20- 31- 5LR - 0000 -0460,
07- 20- 31- 5LR -OA00 -0000, 07- 20- 31- 51LR -01300 -0000, 07- 20- 31 -5LR-
0000 -0000, 07- 20 -31- 5LR -OD00 -0000, 07- 20- 31- 5LR -OEOO -0000, 07 -20-
31- 5LR -OFOO -0000, 07- 20 -31- 5LR -OGOO -0000, 07-20-31.51-R-01-100-
0000, 07- 20 -31- 5LR -OJ00 -0000 and 07- 20- 31- 5LR -OSOO -0000) all
located within the City Limits (map of the property attached) from
PD as approved in Ordinance Number 4129, enacted on August 25,
2008; providing for the taking of implementing administrative
actions; providing for the adoption of a map and PD master plan by
reference; repealing all conflicting ordinances; providing for
severability; providing for non - codification and providing for an
effective date.
Whereas, Safari Investments, LLC (whose managers are Sadique M. Jaffer and
Mohamedtaki Jaffer), is the owner of certain real property, totaling approximately
214.54 acres) in size (consisting of numerous tax parcels of real property) and located
at parcels addressed at 2401 East Lake Mary Boulevard and has applied to the City of
Sanford, pursuant to the controlling provisions of State law and the Code of Ordinances
of the City of Sanford, to have the property rezoned to the Planned Development ( "PD ")
zoning classification from the existing zoning classifications and with the project being
named the Silvestri Estates PD; and
Whereas, the property owner has submitted a request to amend the future land
use map designation from I- Industrial to GC, General Commercial, (21.52 acres), and
to LDR -SF, Low Density Residential, (193.02 acres), for the purpose of developing the
commercial and residential project called Silvestri Estates PD; and
Whereas, the property owner has also applied to rezone the property to PD,
Planned Development, in order to establish specific development and design standards
for their project. The planned development proposes commercial uses fronting along
East Lake Mary Boulevard and 377 single family lots south of the commercial tracts
extending west to Mellonville Avenue and south to Pine Way; and
Whereas, excluding the proposed commercial and wetland /buffer areas, the net
density for the residential development is 2.9 units per acre; and
Whereas, the Citizen's Awareness Participation Plan (CAPP) requirements of
the City relative to the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan have been
met by the applicant to the satisfaction of the City and the CAPP procedures of the City
have been adhered to and honored with the applicant and owners being willing to meet
with any concern citizen or stakeholder should they have any questions or concerns
regarding the application and proposed use of the subject property said CAPP meeting
occurring on August 27, 2013; and
Whereas, the City's Planning and Development Services Department has
conducted a thorough review and analysis of the demands upon public facilities and
general planning and land development issues should the subject application be
approved and has otherwise reviewed and evaluated the application to determine
2 1Page
whether is comports with sound and generally accepted land use planning practices
and principles as well as whether the application is consistent with the goals, objectives
and policies set forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan and determined that the
proposed the amendment of the City's Comprehensive Plan relative to the subject
property as set forth in this Ordinance is internally consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan of the City of Sanford and the controlling provisions of State law; and
Whereas, the City's Planning and Development Services Department has
determined that, to some extent, the actions taken herein are curative in that the
provisions of this Ordinance eliminate a conflicting land use that is proximate to
wetlands; and
Whereas, and, indeed, the City's Planning and Development Services
Department thoroughly reviewed numerous reports and studies submitted to the City by
the applicant in support of the subject application; and
Whereas, on December 5, 2013 the Planning and Zoning Commission of the
City of Sanford recommended that the City Commission approve the subject rezoning
as set forth in this Ordinance and, together with the recommendations of the City staff,
recommended normative development conditions as well as the conditions set forth
herein; and
Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Commission have
determined that the proposed the rezoning of the subject property as set forth in this
Ordinance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Sanford, the Land
Development Regulations of the City of Sanford, and the controlling provisions of State
law; and
Whereas, the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida has taken all
3 � P a c
actions relating to the rezoning action set forth herein in accordance with the
requirements and procedures mandated by State law.
Now, therefore, be it enacted by the People of the City of Sanford, Florida:
Section 1. Legislative findings and intent.
(a). The City Commission of the City of Sanford hereby adopts and
incorporates into this Ordinance the City staff report and City Commission agenda
memorandum relating to the application relating to the proposed rezoning of the subject
property as well as the recitals (whereas clauses) to this Ordinance said recitals being
fully adopted and incorporated as an integral part of this Resolution.
(b). The City of Sanford has complied with all requirements and procedures of
Florida law in processing and advertising this Ordinance.
(c). This Ordinance is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan of the City of Sanford.
Section 2. Rezoning of real property /implementing actions.
(a). Upon enactment of this Ordinance the following property, as depicted in
the map attached to this Ordinance, totaling 214.54 acres in size, shall be rezoned from
the MI -2, Medium Industrial, zoning classification to the PD, Planned Development,
zoning classification for the Silvestri Estates PD (parcels addressed at 2401 East Lake
Mary Boulevard or Property Appraiser Tax Parcel Identification Numbers: 07- 20 -31-
51-R- 0000 -0010, 07 -20 -31 -51-R -0000 -0020, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0030, 07- 20- 31 -5LR-
0000 -0040, 07 -20 -31 -SLR -0000 -0050, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0060, 07 -20 -31 - 5LR -0000-
0070, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0080, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0090, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0150,
07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 - 0160,07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0170, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0180, 07 -20-
31 -51-R- 0000 -0190, 07 -20 -31 -51-R- 0000 -0100, 07- 20- 31- 5LR - 0000 -0110, 07- 20 -31-
51-R- 0000 -0120, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0130, 07- 20- 31- 5LR - 0000 -0140, 07- 20- 31 -5LR-
4�11agc
0000 -0200, 07 -20 -31 -51-R- 0000 -0210, 07 -20 -31 -5LR -0000 -0220, 07- 20 -31- 5LR -0000-
0230, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0240, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000.0250, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0260,
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0270, 7 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0280, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0290, 7 -20-
31- 51-R - 00000300, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0310, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0320, 07- 20 -31-
51-R - 0000 -0330, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0340, 07- 20- 31- 5LR - 0000 -0350, 07- 20- 31 -5LR-
0000 -0360, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0370, 07- 20 -31- 5LR -0000 -0380, 07- 20 -31- 5LR -0000-
0390, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0400, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 00000410, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0420,
07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0430, 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0440, 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0450, 07 -20-
31 -51-R- 0000 -0460, 07- 20 -31- 51-R -OA00 -0000, 07- 20 -31- 51-R -01300 -0000, 07- 20 -31-
51-R -0000 -0000, 07- 20- 31- 5LR -OD00 -0000, 07- 20 -31- 5LR -OE00 -0000, 07- 20- 31 -5LR-
OF00 -0000, 07- 20 -31- 5LR -OGOO -0000, 07- 20 -31- 51-R -01-100 -0000, 07- 20 -31- 51-R -0J00-
0000, and 07- 20 -31- 5LR -OS00 -0000) with the development conditions as set forth
herein.
(b). The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to execute any
documents necessary to formalize approval of the rezoning action taken herein and to
revise and amend the Official Zoning Map or Maps of the City of Sanford as may be
appropriate to accomplish the action taken in this Ordinance.
(c). The conditions to be incorporated into the pertinent development order
(which must be signed and executed within 90 days of the enactment of this Ordinance
by the City Commission or the rezone reverts back to the previous MI -2, Medium
Industrial, zoning classification) relating to the action taken in this Ordinance include the
following and the subject real property shall be subject to a development order which
incorporates and contains the following conditions:
1. Pursuant to Section 4.3.G of the Land Development Code of the
City of Sanford, this rezoning shall expire 5 years from the effective date
of the approval if improvements have not been completed or an extension
granted.
2. The minimum building setbacks and design standards for the single- family
lots are as follows:
Type of Lot No. of Lots Front Side Rear Street Side Max-Height
50' 203 25' 5' 15' 10' 3- stories
75' 174 25' 7.5' 15' 10' 3- stories
3. The property shall be developed generally in accordance with the
land uses and development standards identified on the Silvestri Estates
PD Master Plan revision date of November 25, 2013 contingent upon the
southern uplands portion of the conservation easement on Tract C, Silver
Lakes Industrial Park, being vacated by the St. John River Water
Management District, unless otherwise specifically set forth in this
Ordinance or any associated Development Order. With regard to the area
of Tract C encumbered by the conservation easement on Tract C, the
northern portion shall remain encumbered by the conservation easement
or otherwise in conservation status as approved by the City and with a
form being approved by the City Attorney. If the conservation easement is
not vacated, as set forth herein, such that the PD Master Plan may be
implemented, the property owner shall submit a revised PD Master Plan
to the City within 90 days of final action relating thereto and said PD
Master Plan shall be subject to such approvals as the City may deem
appropriate under the processes and procedures set forth in the City's
Land Development Regulations,
4. All air conditioning units shall be placed in the rear of the lots that
6 1Pagc
are 50' in width.
5. Unless specifically requested and approved on the PD Master Plan,
any required elements missing from or not shown on the PD Master Plan
shall otherwise comply with the City's Land Development Regulations.
6. Street lights shall comply with the City's Land Development
Regulations (Schedule N). However, additional requirements for the street
lights may be considered during engineering plan review based on the
type of light fixture and mounting height being designed.
7. Landscaping for the single family lots shall be designed in a
manner and of a quality equal to or exceed the specifications provided to
the Kay's Landing subdivision.
8. During preliminary subdivision plan review; stem wall construction
may be required for houses built on the 50' wide single- family lots.
9. The applicant/developer shall coordinate with the owners of Lots 1-
14 of the adjacent Magnolia Park subdivision and construct a wall and/or
landscape buffer along the current conservation area /easement (Tract C,
Silver Lake Industrial Park) with the type of construction being the City's
determination.
10. A mandatory homeowners association which is perpetual in nature
shall be created with powers acceptable to the City and in a form
approved by the City Attorney which homeowners association shall be
managed by a professionally licensed property management company.
11. All homes shall have articulated front elevations accented with at
least one decorative accessory such as raised stucco banding; foam
bands, shutters and decorative accents; stone; brick; or siding. Metal
71}'atrc
siding and scored banding shall not be used on a home.
12. All Lots shall be irrigated and separately metered as approved by
the City. The irrigation control box shall be mounted such that the
homeowners association will have ready access to the sprinkler controls.
13. The homes within the developed community shall have varied
architectural features and homes with the same front facade shall not be
repeated in close proximity to each other. In order to achieve this goal, no
two homes will be constructed with the same front facade when such
home are located directly beside each other. No home with the same
front facade either will be constructed directly across the street from a
home with the same front facade or to either side of the home directly
across the street. The City shall not issue any building permit without the
applicant affirmatively demonstrating that this condition has been and is
being adhered to.
14. All homes shall be painted and maintained in earth tone colors.
Loud, blue, black, red and purple colors are prohibited as determined by
the City.
15. Landscaping shall be equal to or greater than the specifications
established for Kays Landings as determined by the City.
16. The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions (DCCRs),
as approved by the City, shall require each home owner to maintain their
property by properly irrigating its yard and landscaping; keeping their
yards mowed and the painting thereon maintained as required by the
homeowners association and the City. Should any homeowner fail to
comply with the requirements of this condition, after being duly notified of
8IPagc;
the violation in accordance with the DCCRs, the homeowners association
shall have the power and the duty to bring the lot into compliance and
place a lien against the lot for all cost incurred in remedying the violation
and the City shall have the power, but not the duty, to do likewise.
17. Wood or chain link fencing are prohibited.
18. All garages shall be maintained such that the number of vehicles
designed to fit within the garage may do so.
19. No home owner shall regularly park in the street.
20. Parking on yard areas is prohibited.
21. No inoperable vehicles, boats, or recreational vehicles shall be
permitted to remain on any lot unless it is concealed within a garage and
unable to be viewed from any abutting property or a street.
22. Two canopy trees in the rear yards of the 50' lots (Lots 21 through
58) that abut the commercial property shall be planted prior to the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
23. The foregoing restrictions shall not be amended or removed from
the DCCRs without the written approval of the City in a recordable form
approved by the City Attorney.
Section 3. Incorporation of documents. The documents attached to this
Ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed and incorporated into this Ordinance as a
substantive part of this Ordinance.
Section 4. Conflicts. All ordinances or part of ordinances in conflict with this
Ordinance are hereby repealed.
Section 5. Severability. If any section, sentence, phrase, word, or portion of
this Ordinance is determined to be invalid, unlawful or unconstitutional, said
9111ag
determination shall not be held to invalidate or impair the validity, force or effect of any
other section, sentence, phrase, word, or portion of this Ordinance not otherwise
determined to be invalid, unlawful, or unconstitutional.
Section 6. Non - codification. This Ordinance shall be not be codified in the
City Code of the City of Sanford or the Land Development Code of the City of Sanford;
provided, however, that the actions taken herein shall be depicted on the zoning maps
of the City of Sanford by the City Manager, or designee.
Section 7. Effective Date This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon
the execution and recording of the Development Order referenced in this Ordinance;
provided, however, that said Development Order must be fully executed and delivered
to the City Clerk for recording within 90 days of the date of enacted of this Ordinance.
Otherwise, this Ordinance shall be null and void and of no force and effect.
Passed and adopted this _day of March, 2014.
Attest: City Commission of the City of
Sanford, Florida
Cynthia Porter, City Clerk Jeff Triplett, Mayor
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency.
William L. Colbert, City Attorney
10111 a " C
DOCUMENTS ATTACHED HERE
Silver Lake
Park
SR=
Invacare Father's Table
I -2
Magnolia
170 Lots
N
Site
2401 East Lake Mary Boulevard - Silvestri Estates
Parcel Numbers:
07 -20 -31 -5LR -0000 -0010 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0150
07 -20 -31 -51-R- 0000 -0020 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0160
07- 20- 31- 5LR -0000 -0030 07- 20- 31- 5LR - 0000 -0170
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000.0040 07- 20- 31- 5LR -0000 -0180
07- 20- 31- 5LR -0000 -0050 07- 20- 31- 5LR -0000 -0190
07- 20- 31- 5LR - 0000 -0060 07- 20 -31- 51-R - 0000 -0200
07- 20- 31- 5LR - 0000 -0070 07- 20 -31- 51-R - 0000 -0210
07 -20 -31 -51-R- 0000 -0080 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0220
07- 20 -31- 5LR -0000 -0090 07 -20 -31 -5LR -0000 -0230
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0100 07 -20 -31 -5LR -0000 -0240
07-20-31-51-R-0000-0 110 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0250
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0 120 07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0260
07- 20- 31- 5LR - 0000 -0130 07- 20- 31- 5LR -0000 -0270
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0 140 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0280
AG
07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0290
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0300
07 -20 -31 -5LR -0000 -0310
07 -20 -31 -5LR -0000 -0320
07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0330
07- 20 -31 -5L R- 0000 -0340
07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0350
07- 20 -31- 5LR -0000 -0360
07- 20 -31 -5 L R- 0000 -0370
07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0380
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0390
07 -20 -31 -5LR -0000 -0400
07- 20 -31 -5 LR- 0000 -0410
07- 20 -31 -5L R- 0000 -0420
. EI
z°
a
...........
SITE
Brisson West
375 Lots
07 -20 -31 -5LR -0000 -0430
07- 20-31- 5LR -0000 -0440
07- 20- 31- 5LR -0000 -0450
07- 20 -31 -5 L R- 0000 -0460
07- 20 -31- 5LR -OA00 -0000
07- 20- 31- 5LR -OB00 -0000
07- 20 -31- 5LR -OCOO -0000
07- 20 -31- 5LR -ODOO -0000
07- 20- 31- 5LR -OEOO -0000
07- 20 -31- 5LR -Ol✓ 00 -0000
07- 20- 31- 5LR -0000 -0000
07 -2 0- 31- 5LR -0 H 00 -0 0 00
07- 20- 31- 5LR -OJOO -0000
07- 20 -31- 5LR -OSOO -0000
E ,,.,.r +. �....� �n,.+ s:rwwv a. Mn.ts.•er. n +.••,:.n ruwv vro�n� n l ., ..� C
I l9 ,,'o �n '81lf3i1.t83Ala 1tlY1Y8 H
3 Y
- S09LC vain YOItlOId 00NY1lSO .,
311N3AY YWtlI Oli ypl �yl�w.�
sF cvciu avw cw:•.,00,:a e:a ax..,a niw, �, >.e:•: ..w o-..eu•, NVId N316YME Od -
----------- - - - - -- - 'ONI bNl!l3�NiF�N�
u +�.& s,... , +,.,, .!, < >.:r W ..,<!9 a,.. S M b A a r 831Y193 IH19WHO 0;
I I L
o' g I sq
#r G � � t i r •s
P
S
. --------- . ....... .....��'
�a
� M I
:1
i
la ;u�ss✓z� e r;vxnu�xne aa.y
Co
"� �e ggGdi �ryq,r o°
% h v
o�r� kS,�Gah, t Y i
gtf
gd% F i r 5a8
a y y f
A "r
+
FF
a_ a_
s, idN2��EE
9 R
33E a<�ksla
4H s•eS °L;t
i( II,.Y
xtt,�
K Y
FetSi?
a
y ,E
iy o lE'.
E
� s�aixanax aa3,5t �, "tg ,'i�.i
aaaaaenaaa aaaa ana aas
crcr:
a rrC..r r1r ,$
III �x�,S�i$i Za�3; 03��,3dxYt�`r' §'Yi°
ILL
`� a�u�e �a §g� HI .,°•_y °o °'a o: ,. oj`SM:tVacoS -
b
�E£s
c5ra� y
2 §sue Bbd §as: ��P� ���.. �
"YYY I.a YlI.YY'tY 3 "Y: I Y YYY'tY
1
i
8
4
O
O
V
r 2
Otte v m R SUN IOWIVS ago
GNVA3 SBIVI I W14814118 wimav as
PROJECT INFORMATION — 2401 E. HAKE MARY BOULEVARD
fc a 9 REZONE FROM MI-2 TO PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
Requested Action: To rezone property from MI -2, Medium Industrial to PD, Planned Development
Proposed Uses:
Project Address:
Current Zoning:
Proposed Zoning:
Current Land Use:
Tax Parcel Numbers:
Commercial and Single Family Residential
2401 E. Lake Mary Boulevard
MI -2, Medium Industrial
PD, Planned Development (Silvestri Estates)
Vacant
07- 20 -31- 300 -5LR -0010 and 07- 20 -31- 300 -5LR -0460
Legal Description: THAT PORTION OF SILVER LAKES INDUSTRIAL PARK REPLAT, AS RECORDED IN PB 46, PGS 54 -62,
INCLUSIVE, OF 'THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE E 114 COR OF SEC 18, TWP 20S, RGE 31 E, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA,
RUN THENCE N. 00'03'34" W., A DISTANCE OF 40 FT ALONG THE E BOUNDARY OF THE NE 1/4 OF SAID SEC: 18, TWP 20S,
RGE 31 E, TO A POINT ON 'rHE N R -O -W LINE OF PINT: WAY AND THE POB; THENCE 5.89 °56'27" W., A DISTANCE OF
1,763.18 FT ALONG, SAID N R -O -W LINE OF PINE WAY BEING 40 FT N OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE S BOUNDARY OF
THE NE 1/4 OF SAID SEC 18, TWP 20S, RGE 31E; THENCE LEAVING SAID N R -O -W, N, 00 °08'07" W., A DISTANCE OF
1,284.67 FTTO A POINT ON TIME SLY LINE OF MAGNOLIA PARK, AS RECORDED IN PB 63, PGS 54 -59, INCLUSIVE, OF THE
PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE SLY, ELY AND NLY BOUNDARY OF SAID
MAGNOLIA PARK, THE FOLLOWING THREE COURSES: 1) N. 89°57'14" E., A DISTAANCI; OF 441,22 FT ALONG 'rHE N
BOUNDARY OF TLIE E 1/3 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC 18, TWP 20S, RGE 31 E; 2) N. 00'06'59" W., A DISTANCE OF
1,324,56 FT ALONG THE W BOUNDARY OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SAID SEC. 18, TWP 20S, RGE 31 E; 3) S. 89 °58'02"
W., A DISTANCE OF 1,324.97 FT ALONG THE S BOUNDARY OF THE SE 1/4 OF SEC 7, TWP 20S, RGl 31E, SEMINOLE
COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE N. 00 °14'44" W., A DISTANCE OF 698.28 FT; THENCE N. 89 °57'51" E., A DISTANCE OF 871.21
FT ALONG THE S BOUNDARY OF THE W 871.2 FT OF THE N 625 FT OF THE SE 1/4 01= SAID SEC 7, TWP 20S, RGE 31E;
THENCE S. 00 °14743" E., A DISTANCE OF 60 FT; THENCE N. 89'57'51" T., A DISTANCE OF 705 FT ALONG THE S
BOUNDARY OF THE E 800 FT OF THE W 1,671.2 Fr OF THE N 685 FT OF THE S 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SAID SEC 7, TWP 20S,
RGE 31E; THENCE S. 00'02'10" F,., A DISTANCE OF 100 FT; THENCE N. 89 °57'51" E., A DISTANCE OF 100 FT- THENCE N.
14 "00'09" 1,"., A DISTANCE OF 103.06 FT; 'THENCE S. 89 °57'51" W., A DISTANCE OF 30 FT; THENCE N. 00 °14'43'' W., A
DISTANCE OF 560 FT; THENCE N. 89'57'51" E., A DISTANCE OF 100 FT; THENCE N. 00 °14'43" W., A DISTANCE OF 54.67 FT
TO A POINT ON THE SLY R -O -W LINE OF E LAKE MARY BLVD; THENCE ALONG SAID SLY R -O -W LINE THE FOLLOWING
(7) COURSES: 1) N. 89 °57'5" E., A DISTANCE OF 1,672.72 FT' ALONG A LINE BEING 70 FT S OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE N
BOUNDARY OF THE S 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC 8, TWP 20S, RGE 3 1 E TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; 2) SELY, 768.64 FT
ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE 'r0 THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 918.95 FT AND A CENTRAL ANGLE 01`47'5Y26"
(CHORD BEARING S.66 °02'28" E., 746.43 F'T') TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; 3) S. 42'04'44" E. A DISTANCE OF 343.41 FT, 4)
5.47-55116" W., A DISTANCE: OF 15 FT; 5) S. 42'04'44" I: >„ A DISTANCE OF 200 FT; 6) N. 47'55'16" E., A DISTANCE OF 15 FT; 7)
S. 42 °04'44" E., A DISTANCE OF 244.48 FT; THENCE LEAVING SAID SLY R -O-W LINE OF E LAKE MARY BLVD, S. 00`00'3I"
E., A DISTANCE OF 364.88 FT TO A POINT ON THE S BOUNDARY OF SEC 8, TWP 20S, RGE 31 E; THENCE 5.89 °59'29" W., A
DISTANCE OF 686.29 FT; THENCE S. 00'05'10" E., A DISTANCE OF 662.43 FT ALONG TIME E BOUNDARY OF THE NW 1/4 OF
THE NW 1/4 OF SEC 17, TWP 20S, RGE 31E; 'THENCE N. 89`59"44" W., A DISTANCE OF 1,312.75 FT ALONG THE S
BOUNDARY OF THE N 112 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SAID SEC 17; THENCE S. 00'OY34" W., A DISTANCE OF
1,946,39 FT ALONG THE E BOUNDARY OF THE NE 1/4 OF SAID SEC 17, TWP 20S, RGE 31 E TO A POINT ON THE N R -O -W
LINE OF PINE WAY'TO THE POB. CONTAINING 214,544 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
Site Area: 214.54 acres
Property Owner: Safari Investment, LLC
Sadique laffer, Manager
27 N Summerlin Avenue
Orlando, Florida 32801
Phone: 407.649.9888 Email: sicl�jtifi'erral�oo.coan
Applicant: William E. Barfield, Esq.
225 South Westmonte Drive, Suite 3000
Altamonte Springs, Florida 32714
Phone: 407.478.1866 Fax: 866.473.0427 Email: wbarlield.(i lwbarieldlaw.con,
Pagc 1 of 2
Engineer of Record: David Evans, RE
Evans Engineering, Inc.
719 Irma Avenue
Orlando, FL, 32801
P hone: 407.872.1515 Fax: 407.246.0963 Email: dcvans cr)cvanse(Zg)) nc.com
CAPP: The applicant held a Citizens Awareness Participation Plan meeting on August 27, 2013,
The CAPP meeting summary is attached.
Commission District: District I - Commissioner Mark M`Carty
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPIAANCE REVIEW
Existing Future Land Use: 1, Industrial
Proposed Future Land Use; GC, General Commercial and LDR -SF, Low Density Residential
CONCURRENCY
Concurrency is a finding that public facilities and services necessary to support a proposed development are
available, or will be made available, concurrent with the impacts of the development. The concurrency facilities
evaluated by the City of Sanford include the following:
Dr°ainabe: The project shall comply to and be engineered to the adopted 25 Year, 24 Hour LOS /Storm
Event. Note, the Land Development Regulations allows the Administrative Official to increase
the design frequency standard if deemed necessary.
Roadways. The project will require a traffic study at time of development. however, GMB Engineers and
Planters, Inc. conducted a trip generation comparison between the existing land use for industrial
and the proposed development plan and concluded there would be a reduction of 1,633 daily
trips, 1,237 AM peak hour trips and 819 PM peals hour trips for the proposed development plan
condition. A copy of the GMB trip generation assessment is attached.
Water.- Water services will be provided by the City of Sanford.
Setiver . Sewer services will be provided by the City of Sanford.
LOS Standard Project Demand facility Capacity
Potable Water: 144 gal/capita/day 131,600 gals /day 10.51 MGD
Sanitary Sewer: 132 gal/capita/day 112,800 gals /day 7.3 MGD
Solid Waste: 2.46 lbs /capitalday 2,312 lbs /day 21.5 million tons
School., A School Impact Analysis (SIA) letter was issued on .Tune 4, 2013 by Seminole County Public
Schools. A copy of the findings by SCPS is attached to this report which has the potential school
enrollment impacts surnmarized as follows:
Type
Concurrency
Service Area
Enrollment
Capacity
Students
Generated
by Project
Programmed 3
Year Additions
Reserved
Capacity
Remaining
Capacity
Elementary
E -10
2135
2629
84
0
201
209
Middle
M -1
5179
6047
44
0
249
575
High
H -1
6527
7445
55
0
293
570
TA)evclop Ile III RerieSV`,0 }.l.nnd DovelopmenfQ013'SiIver Lake Park PD (Abdu Ili imein Family I.P) -Ika Silrer I..Acs Biisigcss Park`Rezouc'•Pe ojCCl Info Slice I , Rezone -2100 F lake Miry III rd.doc
Page 2 of 2
City of Sanford Citizens Awareness and Participation Plan
Silvestri Estates
A Citizens Awareness Meeting was held for the proposed Silvestri Estates project on East Lake Mary
Blvd. This meeting was held to inform the public of the process and proposed development in the
property formerly called the Silver Lake Industrial Park. Residents within 500' of the property were
noticed and a list and notice form is enclosed in this report. The meeting was held at the City of Sanford
Chamber of Commerce at 400 E. Vt St. at 5:00 on August 27, 2013. Approximately 25 residents
attended the meeting at the Chamber.
Concerns, issues and discussions during the meeting.
A detailed description of the project was proposed at the beginning of the meeting, This description
included the process of converting the industrial property to residential and commercial. This
description included the process at the City of Sanford and the meetings that would be required that the
public could attend. This summary included the comprehensive plan change, planned development and
preliminary subdivision plan public hearing. This process description included methods for the residents
to research the information presented on the city's website and the way each resident would be notified
of the public meetings.
The discussion included the proposed development and how the effect of the proposed residential
development would reduce the impact of traffic, noise and the effect of reduced property values of the
surrounding single family residents from the existing industrial zoning. A detailed description of the
project layout including the large amenity area and access from the multiple lot sizes was discussed.
Access points for the development were also addressed including Mellonville and East Lake Mary Blvd.
A question and answer period followed the project presentation.
Concerns and questions of the meeting attendees.
1. What was the minimum square footage of the proposed lots in the development?
a. The minimum square footage is 1500 sf.
2. What is the minimum price for the houses in the development?
a, The minimum price will fluctuate based on market demand once the project is
developed but the assumption based on projections is $175,000.
3. Mellonville Road is congested in the morning hours and during school pick up and drop off in the
afternoons. Residents stack on Mellonville to pick up kids from drop of at East Lake Mary Blvd.
a. This project has limited the number of cars on Mellonville to the 75' lots on the west
side of the development. As an alternative and during peak hours the residents in the
west 75' lots can also exit onto East Lake Mary Blvd. A traffic study will be conducted to
City of Sanford Citizens Awareness and Participation Plan September 11, 2013
determine the effect of the limited traffic from this development onto Mellonville Road
as required by the city during the approval process.
4. What is the timing of this development?
a. Getting through the multiple processes will take approximately one year. Construction
and acceptance of the infrastructure will take approximately six months. So houses
would be available in two years. Estimated build out would be in five years.
5. A request was made to develop this project like Baker's Crossing.
a. Developer agreed to review Baker's Crossing. Developer is aware of the issues related
to Baker's Crossing. Silvestri Estates will be designed and developed to avoid these
issues.
6. Existing industrial property owner on the southwest corner of the property asked about future
impact of his development when change to residential on this property was made.
a. Explained that his property would always remain industrial and he would be able to
develop as industrial consistent with the city's zoning ordinance. Discussed screening
from adjacent residential development would be determined at time of permitting.
7. One resident asked about the effect of the rental rates of properties in this development.
a. Developer explained that these properties would be sold on a fee simple basis and that
rental development was not anticipated.
8. Residents asked that a list of uses permitted on the commercial lots be added to the plans.
a. A list of permitted uses on the commercial lots would be added to the proposed plans,
9. One resident asked that the entranceway for the residential development be nicely designed
a. The developer stated that the entrance will be appealing to the residents and
surrounding communities.
10. A resident asked if the roads would be private or public.
a. The developer stated that the non -gated portions of the roadways would be public and
the gated roads would be private.
11. One resident asked if an aerial plan including the proposed development adjacent to Magnolia.
a. An aerial plan including the surrounding residential and commercial development was
emails to this resident.
12. Two residents along Magnolia Park Trail mentioned that they were not allowed to pull a pool
permit. They asked if this development would impact their ability to pull permits in the future.
a. The developer did not have details at the meeting but followed up with the city
following. It was understood that city code prohibits more than 50% impervious area
on each lot and that the storm water system in Magnolia Park was not designed to
retain more than 50% impervious on each lot. The large houses on the smaller lots and
a pool exceeded the 50% impervious threshold on these lots.
In general most of the attendees were in favor of the change from Industrial to Residential and that the
proposed use was appropriate for this area.
The meeting concluded at approximately 7:00
2
HUTC]HISON, MAMELE & CO,OVER, R.A.
AY Ty. �,w,G F ✓s /&,JD CLIJNISC,Y J,"PS 4o I
�Nq UAIIA C� HUTD-flSU4 JR
FICJ-14,PU)L N/14,%4FLE
C,-CC)YEI:R
ECA7-10 CER
ryljn,�I TAL & FA�,ALY L 41'
E� i;-IFTNIE COUF, r CFI T I:F q u ALIgLISt 13. 2013
Cr �I I -'�BCIRAPVE
R L-: Silvestri F"States CAPP ]'sleeting
g
Dear resident:
PS i 0(4 ULTCq',J BR IID44f,3, 230 NC�R T H PAFP�,,,
POST CFr IC' Ft4 - x r o49
SP,NFOPED FL LDRD,4x :_�R T - 49
PAX �4M� 330
f� MY Office represents the owner Ofa proposed Mixed uric project known as Silvestri
,states. The property lies between F. Lake Mary Blvd. a11(1 pineway Ave. between
Mellonville Ave. and frisson A\Ic. "]'his project was approved and platted in the 1990's
to allow indLIStrial uses only. The ownQr is now seeking to amend the existing land use
and zoning approvals to convert the use ti -om industrial to low density residential, with a
general commercial use 11loNved on the lots fronting E. Lake Mary Blvd,
The City of Sanford staffhas requested that we hold a CAPP meeting with any
it neiL)
Oibors, Which is \VhyyOLI are receiving this letter. The CAPP Ineeting is
being field at the San florcl (Iianiber of Commerce, 400 E. I" St- Sant'ord, Florida, which
is at the intersection of" Sanford Ave. and is' S,. in downtown, at 5:00 - 6:30 p.m. on
August 2�7. 2013, '['he purpose ofthe CAIII) meeting is to SlIOW YOU what is being
proposed and to discuss any concerns you may, have. We will have a set of plans to show
y "OLI and \IOLJ Nvill be able to ask qt,wsti011s ofull.),self, the owner's representative, and our
engineer.
Should You have air)/ questions., please call me or my assistant. Mindy,
Very trUly yOUI-S,
Stephen 1-1. Coover
�a
C -A I'll
_.irI1^I: I IN(i - A> 6I ",S] 7.:_(}13
01AN1I
M)1:)FZES5
Y
I'll ON NJjNOIIIA
AT UaAwnlf F(
• �
i
1 1
V� Ile
2la-) 7- 6 �4� 9
.._
I C`�U�
VA
0 Eo M; no
I
� � �'�
i ..�� ��._ �� s � �� -ivy" ._
-r�'��• � "` "� � �
v LL { 1 1 i E� ('G✓�7 t" i�
5c. 3 ISLAM.«.........
i �
r
r.
��.
k
Z3
' xA '
� 5mv? vs
fiats u_6,}r.:)t I/0
C, A/ul,�
�CC0 y
_Am
::So 6 �,-?YLLE
1.-(C,
ry
�ar�'�! PC-to
Benjamin O. Benham, Trustee
2003 Via Tuscany
Winter Park, FL 32789
Seminole County BCC
1101 E. I" Street
Sanford, FL 32771 -1468
Carolyn J. Hughey, Trustee
P.O. Box 790
Osteen, FL 32764 -0700
Brisson Investments, LLC
27 N. Sunimerlin avenue
Orlando, FL 32801 -2929
Serengeti Properties, LLC
27 N. Suns erlin avenue
Orlando, FL 32801
Mary O. Smith
1700 Pineway
Sanford, FL 32773 -7233
Richard E. Johnson, Jr.
Vivian J. Hechinger
206 Clear Lake; Circle
Sanford, FL 32773
Marylin R. Wittmer
1805 Pineway
Sanford, FL 32773 -7235
S.R. & Joyce C. McClures
1565 Pineway
Sanford, FL 32773 -7270
David E. Dieska
121 Citrus Tree Lane
Longwood, FL 32750
Marilyn B. Thompson, Trustee
1505 Pineway
Sanford, FL 32773 -7270
Ahmad Nasajpour
Shahla- Foroughi
3502 Palrnino Road
Melbourne, FL 32934 -8128
Lana T. Mahoney
809 McCrainie Road
Lakeland, FL 33809
Mr. & Mrs. Howard E. Sullivan, III
280 Lakeshore Drive
Lake Mary, FL 32746
Mr. & Mrs. Kenneth A. Burke
4250 Bloom Lane
Sanford, FL 32773
Mr. & Mrs. William J. Thomas
1335 Pineway
Sanford, FL 32773 -7234
Ernest G. Fasciana
1315 Pineway
Sanford, FL 32773 -7234
Tomkat Enterprises, LLC
P.O. Box 952946
Lake Mary, FL 32795
Dhiram Holdings, LLC
2942 Finch Ave. E Scarborough Ontario
Canada MIW2T0
Munsifali Rashid
Shabanali Salha
290 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Maria M. Ciriaco
286 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Swapnareddy & Reddys Sama
280 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Laszlo Barna
Zsuzsanna Barna
1009 Tudhope Court
Sanford, FL 32773
Donovan & Stacey Virgo
P.O. Box 953212
Lake Mary, FL 32795 -3212
Susan G. & Jason Jackson
1005 Tudhope Court
Sanford, FL 32773
Scott T. Nguyen
1003 Tudhope Court
Sanford, FL 32773
Thomas E. & Lillian Hamilton
1009 Berry Court
Sanford, FL 32773
Rizwan & Masuma Dhiram
1007 Berry Court
Sanford, FL 32773
Purush Utarn D. Punit
1005 Berry Court
Sanford, FL 32773
Colfin AI -FL4, LLC
5575 Rosebriar Ave.
Orlando, FL 32822
Peter & Veronica Cusick
260 Magnolia Trail Park
Sanford, FL 32773
Ahmedali H. & Sherbanu F'azal
285 Magnolia Park Trail
Sanford, FL 32773
Brittany F. Hughes
Jared W. Crowley
256 Magnolia Park TrI
Sanford, FL 32773
Adnan Haque
Ali Farazana
254 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Judy Ueltschy
Henry J. Cardoza
250 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Mohammed T. Hossain
248 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773 -7240
Luthfa Ahmed
244 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
RSO, LLC
1370 Pineway
Sanford, FL 32773 -7224
Tofazzal Hossain
Chand Sultana
240 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Thomas E. & Gulin Cosgrove
238 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Carlos A. Stennett
232 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Magnolia PD Prop Assn, Inc.
2180 W. S.R. 434, Suite 5000
Longwood, FL 32779
Kostadia & Xenofon Karoutsos
224 Magnolia Park TO
Sanford, FL 32773
Mai Vuhoan
Chadi Badi
222 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
DaudaIysameer H
Zahra S, Ali
220 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Nelson & Ruth A. Medina
218 Magnolia Park TrI
Sanford, FL 32773
John T. & Amy Dovidaitis
216 magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FI., 32773
Ruben D. Yanira Feliz
212 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Ed Georgynah
Sarwat Fam
214 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Norma L. Ball
Jola A. Cope
210 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Ainsley G. & Ivorine D. Lennon
239 N. 6 "' Street
Prospect Park, NJ 07508 -2026
Prudencio L. & Margarita S. Torres
206 Magnolia Park TrI 429
Sanford, FL 32773 -7212
Dawn R. Cruise
204 Magnolia Park TO
Sanford, FL 32773
Miloje & Violeta Kopanja
202 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, Fl, 32773
Cheryl D. Lee
200 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Zulfikar A. Jaffer
113 Beligian Way
Sanford, FL 32773
Beverly L. Staley
196 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
John T. & Robbin A. Meyers
121 Ancona Avenue
DeBary, FL 32713
Ying C. & Chiul Lee
1106 Cypress Loft PL
Lake Mary, FL 32746
Suzanne B. Staccone
James Jew, Jr.
P.O. Box 22544
Oakland, CA 94609
Carl M. & Lisa A. Stokes
188 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Raymond & Marie J. Racine
186 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773 -7212
Sylvester G. Syberina F. Wynn
184 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Sajida S. & Mumtaz Ahmad
182 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Linda J. Simpson
180 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Juan A. & Teresita D. Rivera
178 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Mardhia Jafier
173 Magnolia Park TrI
Sanford, FL 32773
Jan A. Grover
9 Aztec St.
San Francisco, CA 94110
Gerald D. Fritz, Trustee
719 Fox Valley Dr.
Longwood, FL 32779
Roshanali Jessa
193 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Esan Duncan
187 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Musadig & Zinat Bhalloo
8 Oak Lane
Green Brook, NJ 08812
Florida Prop 3, LLC
1201 Hays St.
Tallahassee, FL 32301
Shahids Khoja
SaIima F. Virani
195 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Suzanne E. Kleiman, Trustee
446 Mills Dr.
Benecia, CA 94510
Bradford Taylor
Catherine Doyle
1617 Plymouth Ave.
San Francisco, CA 94127
Matthew M. & Jennifer L. Hahn
201 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Mark A. & Deborah E. Lehner
P.O. Box 624
Tribune, KS 67879 -0624
Christopher & Nicole Woodcock
205 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Craig L. & Nora F. Carson
209 Magnolia Park TrI
Sanford, FL 32773
Loomis J. & Deborah A. D'Amico
215 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773 -7215
Nicholas L. & Felicia Y. Fisher
217 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Joseph & Muriel Umrah
219 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Ronnie & Michele Rogers
648 Caledonia Place
Sanford, FL. 32771 -6403
Willie J. & Rhonda T. Fisher
172 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Jeffrey S. & Lisa C. Reuscher
170 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Linda Crytzer
574 Lehigh Dr.
Deltona, FL 32738 -8621
Kevin & Angelo S. Zakrzewski
2849 Egrets Landing Dr.
Lake Mary, FL 32746 -7416
John M. & Alicia J. Welch
164 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
W. Nathan & Carolyn Wilson, Trustees
15050 Lynn Avenue
Los Gatos, CA 95032
Larry E. & P. Jill Goring
I60 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Eliseo & Wanda Y. Badillo
158 Magnolia Park TrI
Sanford, FL 32773
Nezarnudin Bedar
156 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Shabbir & Sabira Mohamed
ISO Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Troy H. Walirich
148 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Gwendolyn Taliver, Trustee
146 Magnolia Park TrI
Sanford, FL 32773
Maura Brown
151 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Murtaza A. & Zainab J. Rahim
145 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Zahra Alloo
143 Magnolia Park TrI
Sanford, FL 32773
Zulfiikar & Fizza Mohamed
141 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Coke E. Bean
139 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Helen M. Maeinnis
Cynthia Adcock
137 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
William R. Kennedy
104 Willow Drive
Lake Mary, FL 32746 -3688
George & Deborah Paulik
132 Magnolia Park Tr•1
Sanford, FL 32773
Alfred & Victoria Mathis
134 Magnolia Parl< Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Alysa Lenahan
Gloria Lenahan
136 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Fred S. & Diana Dworkin
138 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Ahmed Khaki
142 Magnolia Park 'Frl
Sanford, FL 32773
Eduardo M. & Mercedes Lopategui
1107 Pine Oak Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Adrienne R. Shearer
8010 Jones Rd.
Jessup, MD 20794
Anwarali M. & Bashir M. Rashid
299 Terracina Drive
Sanford, FL 32771
Brenley C. & Editha Y. Porral
100 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Jose B. Rajendran
Mary J. Jaynes
102 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Sidrat Ahmed
Ebrahim Ahmed
104 Magnolia Park Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
M.arya Joe Saleh
695 Mainderley Run
Lake Mary, FL 32746 -2617
Sayed T. Haider
Baqri Zehra
1110 Pine Oak Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Marlene E. Ford
1112 Pine Oak Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Qambar R. & Lvovskava Yulia Baqri
1114 Pine Oak Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
Aqua Trust, Inc.
7025 CR 46A 91071 -160
Lake Mary, FL 32746
Ali Baqri
Sumbul Fatma
1109 Pine Oak Trl
Sanford, FL 32773 -7200
Juan A. & Carmen Y. Flores
1200 Pine Oak Trl
Sanford, FL 32773
ELM Ventures, LLC
975 Bennett Dr.
Longwood., FL 32750
Invacare Corp.
1 Invacare Way
Elyria, OH 44035
MG Real Est, LLC
c/o Accounting Mgr.
P.O. Box 1509
Sanford, FL 32772
City of Sanford
2399 W. Lake Mary Blvd.
Lake Mary, FL 32746 -3657
Abdulhussein Family LP
1265 Upsala Rd., Suite 1157
Sanford, FL 32771.5700
Kraig A. Hudson
3585 Ohio Ave.
Sanford, FL 32773 -6641
Pablo Fonseca, Jr.
Elba H. Fonseca
3565 Ohio Ave.
Sanford, FL 32773
4 il_oimoimoom
GIVIG ENGINEERS & PLANNERS, INC September 10, 2013
William E. Barfield, Esq.
William E. Barfield, P.A.
225 S. Westmont Ave. Suite 3000
Altamonte Springs,, I'L 3,2714
Re: Sylvestry Estates
Trip Generation Comparison
GMB Project No, 13-080M
Dear Mr, Barfield:
Pursuant to discussions with David Evans of Evans Engineering, Incorporated, GMB
Engineers & Planners has COndUcted a trip generation comparison regarding the
existing land use as it relates to the proposed development plan. The 214,54 acre
project site is currently zoned as Industrial. The trip generation, as denoted in the
laStilLite of Transportation Eijgjtj� r 11E) Trip Generation Manual. 9" Edition for
ITE code 130 (Industrial Park), Nvill produce 13,124 daily trips, 1,700 AM peak hour
Trips, and 1,830 PM peak hour trips. The proposed land use is commercial/single
family residential (ITE codes 820 and 210 respectively). The proposed trip generation
produces 11,491 daily trips, 523, AM peak hour trips, and 1,011 PM peak 11OLIr trips.
Table I (attached) provides a detailed analysis of the trip generation comparison. In
comparison of 1he two trip generators, there is a I'edLICtiO11 Of 1,633 daily trips, 1,237
AM peak hour trips, and 819 PM peak hour trips for (lie proposed development plan
Condition.
Respectftilly,
Earl Krichbaurn
Project Manager
GMB Engineers & planners, lne,
GMB Orlando
2602 E. Livingston St,
Orlando, FL 32803
Office: 407.898.5424
Fax! 407.89&5425 a a5
WWW.6mB'rC
All
gn
Wgo'.
i.
JE,
N. j
Is
1;
j
JE,
-E
To: William E. Barfield/Safari Investments, LLC
Sanford City Council'
From: Michael Rigby, AICP,, Facilities Planner, Seminole County Public Schools
Date: June 4, 2013
RE: Silver Lakes Future Land Use Amendment /Rezone Project No: 13-1136
Seminole County Public Schools (SCPS), in reviewing the above request, has determined
that if approved, the new FULM designation and/or zoning will have the effect of increasing
residential density, and as a result generate additional school age children.
Description-, +/- 214,5 acres located near East Lake Mary Blvd. & Silver Vista Blvd. within
the City limits of Sanford. The applicant is requesting a change to residential' zoning that
would allow a maximum of 377 single family detached dwelling to be developed within the
requested zoning and future land use designation.
Parcel ID(s), See attached list
Based on information received from Planning and from the application for the request, SOPS
staff has summarized the potential school enrollment impacts in the following table:
Comments:
The students generated at the three CSA levels would at this point be able to be
accommodated without exceeding the adopted levels of service (LOS) for each CSA by
school type, or there is adjacent capacity to meet LOS as allowed by interlocal agreement.
Any planned expansions/additions in the current five-year capital plan would provide
additional student capacity to relieve the affected schools.
Review and evaluations performed on proposed future land use changes and rezones,
unplatted parcels, or projects that have not revived final approval do not guarantee that the
developments subject to this declaration are exempt from, or determined to meet the school
concurrency requirement, which is effective as of January 1, 2008. Changes in enrollment,
any newly platted developments, and any subsequent final development approvals may
affect the provision of concurrent school facilities at the point of final subdivision approval,
including the potential of not meeting statutory concurrency requirements based on future
conditions.
SCIIIiII01C COLHAY Public Schools, Facilities Planning Dept. Printod 6/4/2013
Students
concurrency
Generated
Programmed 3
Reserved
Remaining
Type
Service Area
Enrollment
Capacity
by Project
Year Additions
Capacity
ca aclt
Elementary . ......
E-10
2135
2629
84
0
201
209
Middle
M-1
5179
6047
44
0
249
575
High
H-1
6527
7445
5,5
0
293
570
Comments:
The students generated at the three CSA levels would at this point be able to be
accommodated without exceeding the adopted levels of service (LOS) for each CSA by
school type, or there is adjacent capacity to meet LOS as allowed by interlocal agreement.
Any planned expansions/additions in the current five-year capital plan would provide
additional student capacity to relieve the affected schools.
Review and evaluations performed on proposed future land use changes and rezones,
unplatted parcels, or projects that have not revived final approval do not guarantee that the
developments subject to this declaration are exempt from, or determined to meet the school
concurrency requirement, which is effective as of January 1, 2008. Changes in enrollment,
any newly platted developments, and any subsequent final development approvals may
affect the provision of concurrent school facilities at the point of final subdivision approval,
including the potential of not meeting statutory concurrency requirements based on future
conditions.
SCIIIiII01C COLHAY Public Schools, Facilities Planning Dept. Printod 6/4/2013
Terms and Definitions:
Capacity: The amount of satisfactory permanent student stations as calculated on the date
of the second DOE count in October of the current school year. The number of students that
can be satisfactorily accommodated in a room at any given time and which, is typically a
lesser percentage of the total number of student stations. NOTE: Capacity is ONLY a
measure of space, not of enrollment.
Concurrency Service Area (CSA): A geographic unit promulgated by the School Board and
adopted by local governments within which the level of service is measured when an
application for residential development is reviewed for school concurrency purposes.
Enrollment: For the purposes of concurrency review, the enrollment level is established
each year as per Public School Interlocal Agreement Section 12.4 A, which sets the level on
the date of the second FTE survey for DOE, generally taken the in mid - October.
Programmed 3 Year Additions: New permanent school capacity within the CSA, which will
be in place or under actual construction within the first three years of the current SCPS
Capital Improvement Plan.
Remaining Capacity: The capacity available for future development after the addition of any
programmed capacity and less the reserved capacity.
Reserved Capacity: The total number of student stations reserved in the respective CSA's
that are assigned to projects via a SCALD certificate.
School Size: For planning purposes, each public school district must determine the
maximum size of future elementary, middle and high schools. Existing school size is
determined solely through FISH data. Seminole County Public Schools has established the
sizes of future schools (with the exception of special centers and magnet schools) as follows:
i) Elementary: 780 student stations
ii) Middle: 1500 student stations
iii) High: 2,800 student stations
Students Generated by Project: is determined by applying the current SCPS student
generation rate (calculated by using US Census data analysis) to the number and type of
units proposed. The number of units is determined using information provided by the County
and/or from the applicant's request. If no actual unit count is provided the unit count is then
estimated based on the maximum allowable density under the existing /proposed future land
use designation.
Utilization: A State Board Rule prescribed percentage of student stations that a room (and
proportionately, a school and school district) can satisfactorily accommodate at any given
time. From a school /campus analysis perspective, "utilization" is determined as the
percentage of school enrollment to capacity, Current DOE established K -12 utilization
factors are as follows:
Elementary 100 %, Middle 90 %, High 95%
Seminole County Public Schools, Facilities Planning Dept. Prinfed 6!4'2013
Silver Lakes Parcel ID List
Property Owner: Safari Inv LLC
Sanford, FL 32773
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0080 07 -20 -31 -5LR -0000 -0410
07-20-31 -51-R-0000-0340 07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0090
07- 20 -31 -5L R- 0000 -0400 07- 20- 31- 5LR -OF00 -0000
07- 20 -31- 5LR -0000 -0390
07 -20 -31 -5LR -0000 -0380
07- 20- 31- 5LR -0000 -0420
07- 20 -31- 300 -023C -0000
07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0050
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0280
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0020
07- 20 -31- 51-R -01300 -0000
07- 20- 31- 5LR -0 C00 -0000
07- 20- 31- 5LR -0 D 00 -0000
07- 20- 31- 5LR -0 E 00 -0000
07- 20 -31 -5L R- 0000 -0190
07 -20 -31 -5LR -0000 -0200
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0060
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0450
07- 20- 31- 5LR -0000 -0370
07-20-31-51-R-0000-0 110
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0030
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0270
07-20-31-51-R-0000-01 30
07-20-31-51-R-01-100-0000
07- 20 -31- 5LR -0000 -0160
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0180
07 -20 -31 -51-R -0000 -0220
07- 20 -31- 5LR -OG00 -0000
07- 20 -31- 5LR -0000 -0240
07- 20 -31 -5L R- 0000 -0310
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0140
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0360
07- 20 -31- 5LR -0000 -0070
07- 20- 31- 5LR - 0000 -0040
07- 20- 31- 51-R - 0000 -0010
07- 20- 31- 5LR - 0000 -0250
07- 20 -31- 51-R -OA00 -0000
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0120
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0440
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0230
07- 20- 31- 5LR -0000 -0460
07- 20- 31- 5LR -0000 -0430
07- 20- 31- 5LR - 0000 -0290
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0210
07- 20- 31- 5LR - 0000 -0330
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0150
07 -20 -31 -5LR -0000 -0170
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0100
07- 20 -31- 5LR - 0000 -0350
07 -20 -31 -5LR -0000 -0260
07- 20 -31- 5LR -0000 -0300
07 -20 -31 -5LR- 0000 -0320
E
�B 6
I
01
71
7E5
7�7
4Z
IV 9 In'
Designation of Agent
I, Ownership
1, ✓&L , hereby attest to ownership of the property described below;
Tax Parcel No(s): See attached legal description
Address of property: jkZ Z2�Ld
for which this Development Plan application Is submitted to the City of Sanford.
The ownership, as shown on the deed of regord, Is In the name of.
El Individual
Please complete the appropriate section below (type or print legibly)
2--corporation
Provide Names of Officers
Dept. of State Corporate Registration
Number:
Name/Address of Registered Agent:
III. Designation of Applicant's Agent (Leave blank If not applicable):
1:1 Partnership
Name:
Provide Names of General Partners
As the ownertappllcant of the above designated property for which this affidavit Is submitted, I designate the below named Individual as my
agent In all matters pMainlng to the application process. In authorizing the agent named below to represent me, or my company,. I attest that
the application Is made In good faith and that all Information contained In the application Is accurate and complete to the best of my personal
knovirledge.
Applicants Agent: Print Name
Applicants Address:
Contact Person: Phone:
Email: Fax:
WOW 2009 AM&A of 0,,vMtstJp,pdf
• a 6x1...
A. All changes In Ownership and/or Aplicant's Agent prior to final action of the City shaft require a new affidavit. If ownership changes, the
new owner assumes all obligations related to the flung application process.
B, If the Owner Intends for the authority of the Applicant's Agent to be limited In any manner, please indicate the lirriltatlon(s) below, (i,e.,
Limited to obtaining a certificate of concurrenoy; limited to obtaining a land use compliance certificate; etc.)
IV. Acknowledgement
0 Individual
s1WMturq
Print
Name:
Address:.
Phone',
Please use apprrrpriato notary block
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
n Individual
Before me this — day of
20. , personally
appeared
who executed the foregoing Instru-
ment, and acknowrfedged before me
that same was executed for the
purposes therein expressed, (Le,:corporatlon, company,' etc.)
and acknowledged before me that
some was executed for the purposes
therein expressed,
LAYLA 1SEiVE.LIS
yr���,7iY Rl�r
�,• Notary Public • Slate of Florida
• �' « My Comm txpuus l,uy 14, 2015
; Commission M EL 117551
°'� lSuAed through fialaonai Nolary Assn
By:
Partnership
11
Print+,
Marne:
Addre s:�
Phone: to
Corporation
Before MIS 01 S1— day of
1 2i 20J�3pefso 11
appeared a
Personally known � or
Produced identification 1:1
Type of identification produced':
October 2009
(NOTARY STAMP)
My commission expires:
Wru Partnersrrp MNarne
atpnature
rant
ame:
Address:
Phone:
El Partnership
Before me this —day of
20,..„., personally
appeared
partnerlagent on behalf of
a partnership, who executed the
foregoing Instrument and acknowf-
edged before me that same was
executed for the purposes therein
expressed.
A IFS
N'attery PuWlc
M D.u—H r
ra
a
e
V)
W
E
0
u
Z,Ei
8 g,
CL
94
PCX
I
AN
All
30�
IL
I
gA
ra. ci�
0,
F7
E;S
ti. . ....... I ..... .
N
EV
At
w
CL
m
IN
V
lip
der ad.
-6
R
lilts
u 16 3"
Fj 4M r".
!r-j ccn red
Er
10 '? !
01,
to
mill
call
Ism 0
as
�3U
AP I
11 F �1 �
IRA
ca
ke
lei
g lip
vi
A
P-g
ro
CA
4., cia
-91
b, Ni
(,a
all
1 El 11
Wei
Meow;
CE
cx
p vu;
LD
sty)
0 0
r, tv v
raw a
23
VJ
IM
M 5
ON
16
'Ji
CA
pr Me v Nil
RES
El
E EEO 860
Fm
NOEL W8
Its
P 5, OEV a-
14
Ell
Egg 8 (30 1 111;
0 41
mh MWA
10
V p . up I'I'T IN X, vi
At
'(5, C!
B
06
p 8
NIP
Zi
VMS
X-3
A Abu
v erg",
is
T9 S rd;
to 10
4A,
oil- 1 Otis
tj
115
o ,
3
R g Am
ail
, CEO
CL ra
Cr N rYx
JOB
= = I
oii "Ill 01 SVC) Ap- px;p
f al
ell
YRPi
IN
04,
VAN
6 Z S
NO
jam
N
SI 4 1
g, 11 In, x '9' '1,, 111 a
L11
Sw &6
KI P
1 -1 K,
N4
c
oil
S F
z
PIS
V)
n wry t 5 E
, pp
wN. u
@ E�eENU
W
f T"
Sad"
4j rL Ej
I is rN
In
CA
M E
90 j " i
ou Yws
NO
PV "A
H A�
R R N .
CA'
V
IM
cyj 0;
V5
all i
e CA
16 M
Op
r4
T, I h V) g � W S,
aim
2 P9,
mines
Ov
4N
16
M L;
LY
p i
4
W
fit
13
to
cz
IV c
p's
AD
R ZZ
V CL
EKE
moss' g"
iz?
R1 C81-
Sul
ej
r �j C1
Lp
NAM
do
ri
2 Al
its
g a
pi 4,4,
im
9v
Ux
E E
S.
S.
Ed
4-i
pit
Ing
E
Igul 1
4)
24
R,
IN
lop up
A,
04
0,J
05
fa
0
Ept
sit
call
PA
Elm
21
iN, I 1-P
4 44
In
ja
11=1 q#
IrN�
(9
P rF
T4 4j,
err
ig 00 f g
So
;fs 4*3 41;
29
ol,
2 ih
p g
�44 H
20 7�� �
two
a aj
'u 4F
CL
7i
> v '"R a
ra
o .2 42-
CL vs
C'4
0
CA
00 'r E
0 CL
u co
:Z r
p
4) 0
u C,
cn cr
ca
C:� 0
xn
lu ti
oj
tV
03
E ca 5 43
4i
'a >
78 a li 2
t5
E > 4.9 E
cl: A
E
to
E E
—CL CL
>
Ctl "l7 c7 c41
>
g eg 9
.c E Cy N
JS
Fi
eg 15 b
Si. r -6
E Ev
ra
03. '>' M
tj
cl. '2z L) 0 o
4) 04
0
E
i5 g
E
In 10 r-; C6
0 q3
L) a
zz
0 t ;IZI Q
z:
CL
sz
—SZ
-z W
to -SZ
t3
ZZ
Ln Q
et -r4 st • C :z ts Q
'ts
0
-4z
ti
43
ca
as cz� t3 tj
tz" cz,
cd
C�A �3
0 "0
0� -
0 4)
• C) 8
1� it
N
Iz Z
li EWE W
Z2
-Z� -Ej IZ Q Ca, -Z
I�j
sz RZ
Q-
'4 ZZ,
tu
cp ,t3 2 "1
C4
14
-4z 40
CJ
tf E3 st
tq to
3j
-tz
t3
4z
13 zz�
"Z3 tu
tzg
lz
A p tz
Z, t3
k-I
9 yjo q vwNqqn
6 MG'' ft -9 , .
tax
Oz 5 z D2
lava 5y, 14
to v its K I
A -- I ,
9 1 % m S
I
oil 14al h 1%
1 1411
L'O
0
wlqlxj� PIWOMOR
MIA
jjjj 17 EN Eel g
'Val
Re
0
Ile ts
1 1,
z
"un,
Asa
7
"f 7�
fi
p.
yl
"7' r
2ri.
"f 7�
fi
p.
0 Q
>
C)
4-
0 cd
04
0
tn as >
C,3 0
>
no tu; 'o
0
Cd
aj
r.
40-
by
p as , E
aU
>
Oj 0 tci
>
> Ob
'U
z
0
0
cz
0
ai
V�
0 0
o
-ts 4-
>
m r- — to
=
0 0
cr
>
= =
0
ai
>
0
qr
co
0
0 cz
CA .0
aj
C.) 0'
CL
0 0
CL
E
I"u
t4 w
t
v� E C6
0
0
cr cz
v
4)
'A v u
. Z
0
'a�
�a 0 Q u
— >
0 C�3 •>
0
ui
bp J�
CL u
>
4=
u m
U ca: :3 cz C',
as
0
"0
r, w
iJ
O a3 4y
cc
tn
r-
(u
0 > V)
0
. — .— a3
Cl, -
cd
w
0
�n
0 CL
C5
o)
z (U
z
0
a3 tt?
z
C).
M E
-r�
4F
7z)
Cd
7�
44
—
m m >
to
4M.
CL
M 0
0 0
qk
0
4-
>
co 0
bf) 0
Ln E 0
C.)
on
s:� > 0
0 r.
0 0
C, cl v
13
0
Z
0
cd
U
2
0 0
0 0 cl, 0
4)
CQ
CU 0
0
03 0
to cl,
4
aj
ct 0
ul
0 CIS
L q3 C'j co
CO V)
cou
cn
1)
cd 4.
0
cq U
cu En
r4
r 'c� En
cn
t.1
>
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
"WU M~lAAl-vV5
Jill 4 t ' . H 41
11 , 'I I
j,
it
I
III
I
1.1
t It 4 ii I i i I oi. I III 1 )114 id
^I rvu-r+y ----w , I I I V-1
I . �-, e ,"S
. kd
.. .....
LLA
q,
LAI
LAI
it
all
all
. .. .. ........
4A Q4
� L
4"
0110POPW A610
4 11 11 iff
fill
Jill
OHINI'l, ICI m I NOIN V, I
tl
1; 71
-gill-
ll
A
iL
aid
0 ;T
7,
MJ
In
44
4 N4
%�Y
11 "1 K, '114 1 IKE 11"K 1n1 i I, i K li i uao
� � A
� m
. . �m � ��
� 3
,.
�' °.rr�rs�r
City of Sanford
Please check ON E
Written Comment
(Please read my comments into
the Hearing Record.)
Speaker ReqLWSt
(I %vish to speak regarding Uils item.)
----------- . . .......
Public Meeting
Date: .-JL4 T I , n 1: A. M P.M.
----- - -- - -----
PLEASE PRINT CLZARLY
RsVUisl Name: d ., ,I ) Lit 1) (/A-16'N
A,
AddreM
City:: . ....... .
Phonw I L%
Comment regarding Item J I support the action on this Item
1 L'—
(ONE ITEM PERFORM PLEASE 1 oppose the action on this Itern
COMMENT AREA
lc,
YW
.... .... . .
46— 41'1=7—t —,
"S ... . .. . . ..... 1-14
....... . ..
....... . ........ .....
. ... ......... . . ...........
i wilt speak for myself
I wil:l ropt
I And will q)eal( for
ascilt
Speaker Request
(I wish to speak regarding this Horn)
Public Meoting
Date: 20 Thne:
. . . . ........ .. ... . ..... .
PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY
1
"0
Aftem uY.:
�, -) — �
zip: Ir,
19100: IP —T, phGEul:
Comment regarding item I SUPPOrt 010 aCti0t) Oil this ifell)
FM -, N� I
(ONE ITEM PER roRm PLEASE) l oppose the, action on this Item
COMMENTAREA
I will speak for myself
I will represent
And will speak for
FlinsOn, Eileen
From: Silas & Linda Barker <silaslinda @hotmail.com>
Sent: 1'hursday, December 05, 201.3 11 :03 AM
To: Hinson, Eileen
Subject: FW: Russ I have not done a final review on this ernail..thought there Was a 111eeting
to n i g ht..00 ps... LInd a
Frorn: silaslinda@hott- nall.com
To: russell.gibson @sanfordfl,gov
Subject. Russ I have not done a final review on this ernail.Ahought there was a meeting tonight..00ps...Llnda
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 :10:57:07 -0500
Question.
1. Why is the P & Z considering a PUD with 5 to 7,5' setbacks, which clearly shouts out affordable "starter honles ",
when currently there are:
17 foreclosures, in the nearby, recently btilit "Magnolia Park" subdivision and 13 forecloses in nearby
"affordable "Sonora ".
We do NOT need anymore "affordable stater homes ", that bring in low taxes, increase a population in an area with
limited entry level employment.
It is paramount that as citizens of 32773 , we highlight the conflict that the newly proposed P & Z PD Master Plan
for "Silvestri Estates" will have on our zip code and loss of potential tax revenue for Sanford.
We all agree, do we not, that we need to increase our Tax Revenue?
As stated in public record on the Sept 0 Budget meeting the average horne in Sanford is $120,000.
Sanford has the highest lVliliage (20.3894) of any (AV in the central Florida area.
BUY we have the lowest tax revenue....
1. '['his disparity is clue to the fact that our AVERAGE home value is $12OK.
Average—so when you take out the few homes that are are $350K +...the home values are really much lower.
2. In fact according to the "Orlando Regional Realtor Association" statistics attached which de111onstrate general
Sales 101' the first 3 (t11a1101's :
Saiifovd /l,alw Forrest 32171 average llolne sales of $186,713 'West Of 1-4 c0l"' lor.
Saiifbi -d 32773 aVel'age 110111e Sales Of $104, 536
......I'lle cliffe;x'elice •• $82,1,7,7 ...xvay below tlie.. $12to,000 avei,age.
Question.
We often ask what does Lake Mary / Heathrow have that Sanford does not? �:' N ti 1�is. n 5 iN,hi , nine's 2000 study "that
dad ared it the best place to live: in the sou €kern United states! [11 lire national raukinP cc,nducted l.al;e 1\11MA' nlacle it to raautlber
'101 ntost desirable place to live.
/answer. Upscale PUD!
2, Fralna .roaaau<1ry 2009 to .rune. 2009, there �rere. 33 single flantity luanles sold in 1110 1 leathro 1:1- real estate nlarke(. The
hi«hest priced home Sold firc S 1,460,000 and (lie lowesl priced home far 523.5,000.
What did L.ake Mary/Fleathrow have when it was developed in 1985? Vacant land and vision.
Out- concerns are that there is a morturnental disparity between the quality of development tinder review by P & Z
and the vision of the "Comprehensive plan."
The emphasis in the past is to or give tax incentives to corporations to move to Sanford.
But what good does it do when those who are employed move to lake Mary and I-leathrow as there is no suitable
new I-lorne Consti-tiction here in zip 32773?
Qur_DgVly app in ed Police Chief Cecil Sin th,..chose riot to live in the city limits of Sanford, Sadly he 92t #fae
h—lessin fry.._ om the city of Sanford to live outside the city linlits in tile atedconinittnity of LLkerorrest itace nQ
suitable IN, lionies nicetin theirlifestyleivereavaijA4 11
"ile fami 9 jqj _201
Question,
What are the incentives to live in Sanford?
We desperately need to change Sanford's intake. If Lake Mary can transform itself, we have the Opportunity to
create our own airport community of "Lake Nona'" or Heathrow, We have the raw land to Use as the city directs.
Here is what needs to be addressed that more "affordable starter holiles" will not rectify.
Our neighbor has vacated his home and moved to Heathrow, His horne is listed for sale and currently is a rental.
The owner's complaint is that although there has been interest r in the property, the bityers lose interest when they
discover the Sanford crime statistics.
Furthermore the prospective buyers tire not impressed Nvith the overall industrialization of the area. Holvevei, there
have been
Wfiat are the factons negatively inipacting Sanford 32773?
In addition to all t1hesewoes Sanfbi-d's veptitation foi-,geetion 8 liousing, tvansient lionieless
I)ersons, and crinie sea] the deal.
• cAine
• FBI crime statistics show that Sanford has a violent crime rate of 6.65 incidents pet, 1,000 residents
higher than Florida's crime rate of 5,42, The city's burglary crime rate, 16,26 per 1,000 residents, is more
than double the national average of TO.
* Sa`l1fol-(1 IS 1111 ell 0 tl9A'P1!!trelt3L
QLlOte from the City Of Sanford's Nvebsite;
* "City of Sanford's CDBG Five-Year Consolidated Plan Not completed the City's requirement for Enfillernent
Community Status for the Department of Housing and Urban Development"
The quotes below are from the article "nom u•'f t oN % (m Ah ho, a , h sm c Id jwn v N 40,cd k'wskmr in !'m0m it , h r Joy
"Sanford is considered the ghetto of Seminole County," because of them, one black resident said —
because they were so close to private hornes in the small city, where everything seems to be ten inint1teS
away from everything else. Even the nicer parts of town, where older, target- homes sit on manicured lawns;
or the newer town homes and single family house developments surrounded by high walled gates, are no
more than a ten minute drive, from the acres of boarded up public housing.
"Solna n10 is one of f'lofida's most affluent countios, belt of its eleven " }lockets of poverty," nine are
ocated ire Sanford, accor'dinrg to the (,Gr1t1 nI I-_loli(i 3 DI cir,tr, (;..c ntu,.. And Goldsl)oro and Geor -getowtrr
lfalrre to less than 10 pet rent of the city's 53,500
"An unwelcome exodus"
I "he six vacant housing projects are slated to be torn down, and the area redeveloped, ]here are plans for
mixed income, single family homes. Many of the families who left the projects sifted out into greater Sanford,
often receiving a less than warm welcome from the residents of the gated communities and other residential
pockets in the city, like the Retreat at Twin Lakes, where Trayvon Martin was killed. After the recession
devastated horne prices across Florida, some horeowners began renting out their, places, and HUD pays
nearly all of the rent, making Section 8 an attractive offer for sorne desperate homeowners.
• Social and facial Unrest
• "Oliver said some homeowners associations actively fought the new residents, who received rent assistance
from HUD, in some cases prompting the local chapter of the NAACP to get involved."
• We who have invested in Sanford, who live in Sanford, work in Sanford, and love Sanford need to get
aggressive in what we bring our community tip to match the natural resources that should be the envy of
every other city in Central Florida.
• Let us not squander our land, and future with lack of vision,
Sincerely,
I -Anda Harker
3405 S Mellwiville Ave
Sanford F1 32773
407 302 8z }69
From: Silas & Linda Barker [ z��ailtt�: si]��sli:�da�ra?l�otn�ail..cnm� ;Y\;k
Sent: Sun 12/29/2013 11:33 PM -
-r
Subject: Concerns here in the Silver Lake District 32773
As Seminole County, City Of Sanford, and City of Lake Mary are cominitted to working together to '
provide the best and highest duality of life for it's citizens, this letter is going out to all who are in a
position to act accordingly.
We who have invested in Sanford, who live in Sanford, work in Sanford, and love Sanford need to get.
aggressive in what we bring to a con-nnunity.
It is any sincere desire that a dialogue can evolve that will provide significant solutions to a proposed
PUD adjacent to the "Silver Lake District" that will cause more harm than good.
It is paramount that as residents of zip code 32773, we highlight the trouble and conflicting issues that
will descend upon City and County citizens as a result of the newly- proposed P & Z PUD Master Plan
for "Silvestri Estates,"
The P & Z considering an approval of this PUD with 5 to 7.5 ` setbacks - -- which clearly shouts out
affordable "starter homes " - -- when currently there are sewaiteen foreclosures in the nearby recently- -
built "Magnolia Parr" tract home subdivision and thirteen forecloses in nearby "affordable
"Sonora "?
We do NOT need anymore "affordable starter homes" that bring in low taxes, increase a population in an
area with limited entry -level employmcin.
It should be apparent, that the potential for high end development, either residential or commercial to be
replaced by this uninspiring tract housing is a huge financial loss in terms of a future tax base to us
residents, and to the city of Sanford.
We all agree, do we not, that we need to increase our Tax Revenue?
In spite of the low price of houses, Sanford has the highest !Tillage (20.3894) of any city in the
central Florida area. Such information highlights the lowest tax revenue in spite of high tax rates.
1. We heard at the September 9th 2013 Budget ineeting the statistics for the AVERAGE hone price in
Sanford is $120,000. Since a limited few homes are valued at $350,000 or more the evidence below
demonstrates a valuation lower than $120,000,
2. Signi #icam to the community is the statistic attached to the general sales of homes in the first three
quarters of the year based Capon area. The "Orlando Regional Realtor Association" reveals prices based
upon zip codes. The following reveals a divergence in prices:
Zip code 32771, a Sanford /Lake Forrest region, average home sales of $186,713 West of 1 -4
corridor.
Zip code 32773, a different Sanford neighborhood, average home sales of $104, 536
The difference of $82,177 is a pointed decline and a figure way below the $120,000 average.
Question.
We often ask what does Lake Mazy/ Heathrow have that Sanford does not? CNN s Mo:�t;y_1yl_��azinc's
2009 study declared Lake Mary to be the best place to live in the Southern United States. In fhe national
ranking conducted, Lake Mary placed fourth in favorite places to live.
Answer. The answer is simple: an upscale Planned Urban Development is needed here in Sanford as
well!
2. Frow ,laimayy 2009 to June 2009, there were 33 single family homes sold in the Ileatllrow l'1_ real
estate market. The highest pried(] home sold for 51,460,000, and the iowest -- priced home sold for
$1235,000.
What did Lake Mary /Heathrow have when it was developed in 1985? That answer is simple too. They
had vacant land and civic leaders with a vision.
Our concerns center from a monumental disparity between the quality of' development under review by P
& Z and the vision of the "Comprehensive plan."
The emphasis in the past was to give tax incentives to corporations to move to Sanford. As solid as that
goal sounds, irony surfaces. What good does it do when those Corporate executives move to Lake Mary
and Heathrow as there is no suitable, high end, new home construction in zip 32773?
Point in case:
Our newly appointed Police Chief Cecil Smith chose not to live in the city limits of Sanford. Sad] he
rot the blessing from the city of Sanford to live outside the city limits in the gated community of Lake
Forrest. Apparentl no suitable, u scale, sin�lc- family homes existed in 2013 to match the Chief's
desired lifestyle.
Question:
What are the incentives to live in Sanford?
We desperately need to change Sanford's image. If Lake Mary can transform itself, so can we. We have
the opportunity to create our own airport community of "Lake Nona" or Heathrow, We have the raw land
to use as the City and County directs.
Sanford's image reeds revival. Seven hundred "affordable starter homes" will not rectify nor even move
us slightly towards a transformation. It will be just more of the same.
What are the factors negatively impacting Sanford 32773?
Specifically, Our neighbor has vacated his home and moved to Heathrow. His home is listed for sale and
currently is a rental.
The owner's complaint is that although there has been interest in the property, the buyers lose interest
when they discover the Sanford crime statistics. f=urthermore the prospective buyers are not impressed
with the overall industrialization of the area.
In addition to all these woes centering around Sanford's reputation for Section 8 Dowsing, transient
homeless persons and crime are salient variables. These two factors "seal the deal."
o Crime
® 1<BI crime statistics show that Sanford has a violent crime rate of 6.65 incidents per 1,000
residents — higher than Florida's crime rate of 5.42. The city's burglary crime rate, 16.26 per
1,000 residents, is more than double the national average of 7.0.
® Sanford is an entitlement city. Quote from the City of Sanford's website;
"City of Sanford's CDBG hive -Year Consolidated Plan that completed the City's requirement for
Entitlement Community Status for the Department of Housing and Urban Development"
The quotes below are from the article "Before. `l,rayvotr Martin, closure of housing projects stored
tensions in Sanford" 1),� ,Ioy -Arrn Reid I A.yr-il 4, 2012
"Sanford is considered the ghetto of Seminole County," because of then, one black resident said
- -- because they were so close to private homes in the small city, where everything seems to be
ten minutes away from everything else. Even the nicer parts of town, where older, larger homes
sit on manicured lawns; or the newer town homes and single family house developments
surrounded by high walled gates, are no more than a ten minute drive from the acres of boarded
up public housing."
® "Serrainole is one gfTdoridcr's razost affluent counties, but of its eleven "pockets of poverty," nine
are located in Sanford, according to the Central Florida Dream Cew.cr. and Goldsboro and
Georgetown, home to Less than 10her°cent of the city's 53,500
"An unwelcome exodus"
The six vacant housing projects are slated to be torn down, and the area redeveloped. There are
plans for mixed income, single family homes. Many of the families who left the projects sifted
out into greater Sanford, often receiving a less than warm welcome from the residents of the
gated communities and other residential pockets in the city, like the Retreat at Twin Lakes, where
Trayvon Martin was killed. After the recession devastated home prices across Florida, some
homeowners began renting out their places, and IIUD pays nearly all of the rent, making Section
8 an attractive offer for some desperate homeowners.
In conclusion,
We who have invested in Sanford, who live in Sanford, work in Sanford, and love Sanford need to get
aggressive in what we bring to a community. The natural resources should be the envy of every other city
in Central Florida. The pristine lake is umnatched. The majestic trees are signs of beauty unique to few
locations. Void of asphalt jungles, tacky zero- property lines, and cookie - cutter homes, we are proud of
our distinct region. All of these assets are here in the Lake District. The citizens know of their secret
"jewel." Silver Lake should be embraced, promoted, and rejuvenated at each opportunity possible by
people in government, This includes Plarnzing and Zoning employees who should be promoting and
underscoring the existence of a natural setting found uniquely in the Lake District (Silver Lake). If you
do not endorse us, who will do this job? Apparently, this promotion and support should be an inherent
and understood role for city employees. Failure to speak up for us is failing everyone us who live in this
city.
Let us not squander our land, and future because someone is afraid to speak as our advocate, or even
worse, Iacks a vision for the right kind of development.
I Dope to hear a response from all concerned.
Thank You,
Sincerely,
Linda Kellam Barker
3405 S Mellonville Ave
Sanford Fl 32773
407 302 8469