Loading...
2003 Comp Plan Amdmt - Ord. 3781 r , COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR (1st or 2nd Annual/Revised) (Owner/Year) GENERAL DESCRIPTION: Request, Map. Ad received from City Planner: "t ' J' D Property Owner and Address: SCHEDULED PERFORMED Request Ordinance from C__1 ______ney n , AD to SH to advertise 1st PH �' 1t5• D J 1f.J VOS Publish 7 days prior to PH [FS163. 3184 (15) ] �'[ • `(,A U� "1 �� dj 1st PH (must announce intent to advertise and hold second PH) 0 •V(J S 1st Reading of Ordinance No. g•0 3 . Send copies of Amendment/Plan to State & others line hi e'4fn t 1 �m as applicable (check w/City Planner) Chr(�lr�laii ■1 / (7 10 [FS163.3184 (3) ] State to send comments in 60/90 days [FS163.3184 (4) (5) (6) . City has 120 days from receipt of comments to adopt, or adopt w/changes, the proposed Amendment/Comp Plan. (EXCEPT S.163.3191 PLAN AMENDMENTS) [FS163. 3184 (7) ] . This is done at the 2nd PH. Hol•� nd PH fo • ds# • • ish 11 • s -•rior to P [ • : 6. 441 ( ) ] Pub ' - AD to SH to advertise 2nd PH /V'-T k-21-c>3 Np &r,L -o3 _ Publish 5 days prior to PH [FS163.3184 (15) ] S. 3k..,3 3 f. 2nd PH & 2nd Reading & Adoption of Ordinance No. 91- a. Notification to Departments: Dir. Eng. & Plan. City Engineer Lan _ e 1 Send copies of adopted Comp Plan/Comp Plan Amendment: * to State within 10 work days after adoption * to regional planning agency & any others that have filed a written request 9- (' Note: Votes to transmit/adopt must be majority vote of those present. (FS163.3184 (15) (a) ] � 6f-iint-r/ -Pi)Q • • . • (::::::::::::::::::7 -,7 ,P' " .• ... ✓ \1► ... ... . .•.. • ... ... .... ......... : -•::::::K:-.....: N ~ ..................... ...... ........ ........................ ..............:. 9 I mil� ....... aoaY��voonoecazeo�aapeeoer b e :::.:.:::.:.:::::::::.i...3.::::. • . a�ee ao a :, : mmo ................. ......... ....... ....... ." .•.'.'.'."..'...•...•... ....•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.. � �dB ►'� ,.g#�9—rue 0 •-'•i :i: •: CSC R whip�g :ay ' '!!!::•:i:y:j;.: ......•: ama�amuR4 76ti0QY' iOYi�S8�66C00ato0cI 6)20=a9???...::::::-::Q.4:- g*::�. .. ...... ...... �AH30070LiT00D7Q� �1000' e8IIE761E�; �q Ft '1:.:W.. in.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'::.':..... .... ■ �S�d i�:::....� OemtletOefe2S�8��l800t �� 1l6170t:•;•;};.- pppppp :- }: aocxi3553 265M59MrtxncoarzCOXIXOaxraaaoMoo eeeeaxoeeeoo1•IVII• pit WIZ 'N10 ::. ...L: • .'"'.••''':•:''••:..•... 9'm�x�de '� x�ro�o ji wa�oov tyris `s ■inmoe000u ::"."....�y1I...''''''''.:**:::::::::1,::::::. �ora��nosoa $� �gf�p�L6 mc000��_��■mss -- .::::!!'!••.•''•''.'.'...:........ S8�s22iia4°aB�Sm� &5 ��14� �� t ..�.... eee =Loss xessiossa •;:}:•:::fie Q�i!&895fbl59r��:�`.:•.:• ��►� °:... :::: : ::.:::: : :: .. ♦ X01 IR ... it•• ` r�1 To 0000f i . . . ... ........ iiir n slo. is :'.T w ..� •'•• .::•..::.. ... }}, .,....::::.:.,...:•::.:.:.:.:.::::..„, ..... .:.:.:„........:::::.::.::::::„...:.„ Ws rglia....,E ... q • .... ..........: .. ................. ........... ....f................ffiliii................k.RIM — /Ir; tur.:.. ...................... ........ ............ ......... . :..,�p =::::............................, 1 .• .... . inf•::::::::::::::::::::::::::: oak „t, • 4, •...*::::::::::::..:1::::::::::: ...::. 'IF 7:::::::::::::::.:.::::::.::::::::::::: 111.` •• ................... t, • .. •••....••• ::::::.,.... . ...... ..:::-..::::::::. iis. a ::::::.::::.: , •.." :::.:::::::.- § ,...••• , .:::111:.----6% mi :::::::::::: .....::::::::::::::::„„„••••, x)--Ligle, L 11 c i••• ,* 'N. 11 o :-�:•::::: S L d U N U • f0 c U ,: 111 "' s . t�. 7 } Y Q o o 1- a;: ::: .... . W L p a U E iC4 g�+""r^� :is Ow Y d 0 d ors J z • CN i:5 o 7\__\,t ( ..\,t, I I ` ( Ill N1.)\-C,` 1 erm mote 3teratb An Independent Newspaper SANFORD,SEMINOLE COUNTY,FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF SEMINOLE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Daniel L. Ping who on oath says that he is 'd itor/pl ih1 i Shc r of the SEMINOLE HERALD,a Newspaper Published at Sanford,In Seminole County,Florida:that the attached copy of the advertisement, Legal Display Advertising being a in the matter of Notice of Change of Land Use Ordinance No. 3781 kafthe , was published in said newspaper in the issues of August 31, 2003 Affiant further says that said SEMINOLE HERALD is a newspaper published by the Seminole Herald, at Sanford, in Seminole County, Florida and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Seminole County,Florida,and has been ente --: .s secon• c : s mail matter at the post office in Sanford,in said Seminole County,Florida,f• a period of one ye next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement and iant furt• ays tha he has neither paid nor promised any person,firm or , • ation any discoun rebate, sion • refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for pub i : 'on in the gai s s• ••‘ • �Ci_ u_, ure of Affiant) Sworn to and subscribed before me this 31st da f,- IAugUSt gi 3 o�.0 k Elizabeth L Bennett li t.''LLiL :itf, e My Commission DD007927 Signatur f notary public) o,F,p Expires March 11 2005 Personally Known ✓ or Produced Identification LE02 (0501) Type of Identification Produced e " ote iPera1b An ndent Newspaper • ,. _. _ SANFORD,SEMINOLE COUNTY,FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA lr COUNTY OF SEMINOLE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Daniel L. Ping who on oath says that he is Editor/Publisher of the SEMINOLE HERALD,a Newspaper Published at Sanford,In Seminole County,Florida:that the attached copy of the advertisement, being a Legal Display Advertising in the matter of Ordinance No. 3781 , was published in said newspaper in the issues of August 31, 2003 Affiant further says that said SEMINOLE HERALD is a newspaper published by the Seminole Herald, at Sanford, in Semtnole County, Florida and that the said newspaper has .- - .fo been continuously published in said Seminole County,Florida,and has been entered a second class '1 matter at the post office in Sanford,in said Seminole County, Florida,for a per.d of one year net preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement and affiant f i rther s. s that he h neither paid nor promised any person,firm or corp. . •I n any discount, =•ate, om • ion or refu d for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publi on in the sai. n spa 1.- l r. Adar__ _ . ' AA. '7:11trre of Affiant Sworn to and subscribed before me this 31st of Auelust t q 3 xi, Y•o, Elizabeth L Bennett tgnati of notary public) /�� f My Commission DD007927 y�y,, Personally Known `cr fog Expires March 11 2005 or Produced Identification '''''' LE02 (0501) Type of Identification Produced NOTICE OF CHANGE OF LAND USE The City of Sanford proposes to adopt the following ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 3781 . . : t .' `,--a.*h ?s A 0 '.1 .. (\ AN ORDINANCE.OF THE.CITY OFSANFORD,.FLORIQA,AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3528 (CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN) AS PREVIOUSLY AMENDED; PROVID- ING FOR AMENDMENT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT, TRANS- PORTATION ELEMENT, HOUSING ELEMENT, INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT, CONSERVATION ELEMENT, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT, INTER- GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELE- MENT AND CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT ELEMENT; ADDING PROPERTY ANNEXED INTO THE CITY TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEV- ERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. Regarding property shown below: I o . Fo1 T?41 da y , isit R r 4'•Itil iniiii ii::!:1:;:lil:',Iiiiiii :ilili:ililii:illiiiiiiili,..:::. c-v, f3 x�,� s 1 ��1,A L i itti Trt 3 ,, 3 9t9' ,} I -4•, > i jE t 4 :,ed :r! I: .,„ .,.tiai osil 11 p• 3� ''''''J'"? It"'. 1, ) it 3& �r>!;lTls"8 az6F3�{r y r Y w t 3'.3l � �.. tyiF y p :�c�" 1,.;,,,,,,,, i, . . N et 4;i iii ttUil unmet 1 Ik} c 1 ... Ig a ' nki i a , _, tl�lllrtf ! *~ 0. }Air 1 /46, `i • an;, .,,0 0: �, �. y Val . —3 r ("'1: -4 t '' q ' Ivy 041 4 ?rrs'r-q1 ..,�� ll.':; 't f ,( is '.P a{ KEY ,,;-• `k1}t ii' .,d• s 3sssl °�. �3;e CCC y:. ,t.,i ' ,$,R , 3' �1' y f z 3. r4, i q, ./ ; f 3 ,EE 2 "0�@ i` � F S 3 123..1 Parks.Reoraation A, *. c;:,} 1 a €a',0•'x , 8 Open Space j mr ,.s.y, F - ...._.,__ i C-2 Airport industry k.'"Ti av ,y ,.;, „ L_ '' t . d Oommarto 9€ 'V. �' city L}mtta ;�Y -..J ... , �* %` 1 yy��., w U _ .� o.wa.•so+.P¢aa..w,.3ar o...w.c w,arm� A public hearing on the ordinance will be held on Monday, September 8, 2003, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible, by the City Commission of Sanford, Florida, in the City Commission Room, City Hall, 300 North Park Avenue, Sanford, s Florida. 2 Interested parties may appear at the meeting and be heard regarding the proposed ordinance. Copies of the proposed amendment to the Future Land Use Plan Map of the Comprehensive Plan are available at the Department of Planning and Community Development and at the City Clerk's Office, City hall, Sanford, Florida, and may be inspected by the public. ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION MADE WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THE ABOVE MEETING, OR HEARING, HE MAY NEED A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, INCLUDING, THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE, WHICH RECORD IS NOT PRO- VIDED BY THE CITY OF SANFORD. (FS 286.0105) PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES NEEDING ASSISTANCE TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY Cingula • OF THESE PROCEEDINGS SHOULD CONTACT THE HUMAN RESOURCES impose not a to OFFICE ADA COORDINATOR AT 407-330-5626 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE approve Melboui MEETING. and and We e FarnilyT, Cynthia Porter, forreba De ut Cit Clerk Industrii P Y Y Telefont BellSou • • O CORRECTED ORDINANCE NO. 3781 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3528 (CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN) AS PREVIOUSLY AMENDED; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT, TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT, HOUSING ELEMENT, INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT, CONSERVATION ELEMENT, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AND CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT ELEMENT; ADDING PROPERTY ANNEXED INTO THE CITY TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Sanford's Planning and Zoning Commission, as the City's local planning agency, held a public hearing on April 17, 2003, to consider amending the Future Land Use Map Of The Future Land Use Plan Element, the Transportation Element and the Recreation And Open Space Element of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Commission, as the City's governing body, held a public hearing on April 28, 2003, to consider the same amendments to the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan, Sanford, Florida; and WHEREAS, the City of Sanford has complied with requirements and procedures of Florida law in processing its first annual amendment in 2003 to the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA: SECTION 1: That portion of the Future Land Use plan Element referenced as the Future Land Use Map is hereby amended by including certain lands incorporated into Corrected Ordinance No. 3781 Page 1 ' • • the City Limits of the City of Sanford, Florida, and by changing the land use designation assigned to certain other lands. A copy of additions to the Future Land Use Map and the changes to the Future Land Use Map and respective land use designation for such lands is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference incorporated herein and hereby made a part of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan. SECTION 2: That portion of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and included herein, which depicts revisions to the Goals, Objectives and Policies or text or exhibits of the: (A) Future Land Use Element, (B) Transportation Element and (C) Recreation And Open Space Element is hereby made a part of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan. SECTION 3: SEVERABILITY. If any section or portion of a section of this Ordinance proves to be invalid, unlawful or unconstitutional, it shall not be held to impair the validity, force or effect of any other action or part of this Ordinance. SECTION 4: CONFLICTS. All Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed. SECTION 5: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately when the State Land Planning Agency issues a final order determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184(9), Florida Statutes, or when the Administration Commission issues a final order determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184(10), Florida Statutes, whichever occurs first. Corrected Ordinance No. 3781 Page 2 • . PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of e�,� 2003. City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida ` � r Brady Lessard, Mayor ATTEST: c Z , CITY CLERK CERTIFICATE I, rr y, CityJClerk of the City of Sanford, Florida, do hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Corrected Ordinance No. 3781 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida on the 6 4z day of , 2003, was posted at the front door of the City Hall in the City of Sanfor , Florida, on thec44`of , 2003. AS THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA Corrected Ordinance No. 3781 Page 3 • • MEMORANDUM Stenstrom, McIntosh, Colbert, Whigham, Reischmann & Partlow, P.A. SunTrust Bank •Suite 22 200 W. First Street PO Box 4848 Sanford, Florida 32772 TO: Antonia Gerli, Senior Planner CC: Mayor Brady Lessard Al Grieshaber, City Manager William L. Colbert, City Attorney, Esquire FROM: Lonnie N. Groot, Esquire RE: Corrected Ordinance No. 3781 Amending Ordinance No. 3528 DATE: September 24, 2003 am attaching for your review Corrected Ordinance No. 3781. Please advise if you would like me to also provide this ordinance to you by email. Once this ordinance has been finalized, please provide my office with a copy. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please feel free to call with questions and to let us know if we can be of further assistance to you in any way relative to this or any other matter. Enclosure I:\Lng\Cities\2003\Sanford\Letters and Memos\Gerli mm encl corrected ord 3781.wpd Sanford � • Fl o� f d Gt�`� °rld P.O. Box 1788.32 772-1 788 d Telephone(407)330-5673 Fax(407) 330-5679 Department of Engineering, Planning and Zoning September 15, 2003 Mr. Ray Eubanks - Florida Department of Community Affairs 3 Division of Resource Planning and Management , Plan Processing Team 2555 Shumard Oak Blvd. °� Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 RE: Adoption of City of Sanford First Comprehensive Plan Amendment of 2003 (DCA No. 03-1). Dear Mr. Eubanks: The Sanford City Commission is pleased to transmit to you the adoption package for the first Comprehensive Plan amendment of 2003. Enclosed are three copies of the City of Sanford's adopted first Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The Sanford City Commission adopted the amendment by ordinance 3781 on September 8, 2003. A list of changes from the original transmittal,the adoption ordinance,a copy of the required public notification and the Citizen Courtesy Information List are included in the adoption package. • The City requests that the Notice of Intent be published in the Seminole Herald, 300 N. French Avenue, Sanford, FL 32771 (407 322-2611). Sanford will place the notice on its website: www.ci.sanford.fl.us. A copy of the adopted amendments to the Comprehensive Plan has been sent directly to the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council,the Department of Environmental Protection,Seminole County,Florida Department of Transportation,the City of Lake Mary and the St.Johns River Water Management District. The proposed amendments are available for inspection at the City of Sanford Planning and Community Development Department, 300 North Park Avenue, Sanford. If you have any further "The Friendly City" • • questions related to the amendment, please do not hesitate to contact: Antonia Gerli, AICP City of Sanford Planning and Community Development Department P.O. Box 1788 Sanford, FL 32772-1788 Phone: 407 330-5672 FAX: 407 330-5679 gerlia@ci.sanford.fl.us Sincerely yours, Russell Gibson, AICP Director of Planning and Community Development Attachments: Adoption Ordinance City of Sanford Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan List of changes to the amendment Citizen Courtesy Information List Copy of Public Notification Cc: Al Grieshaber, Sanford City Manager met Dougherty, Sanford City Clerk Lynn Griffin, Department of Environmental Protection Peter Fatizzi, Florida Department of Transportation, District 5 Dick Galantowicz, Policy Analyst, St. Johns River Water Management District Donald Fisher, Director, Seminole County Planning and Development Department John Litton, City Manager, City of Lake Mary Sandra Glenn, Executive Director, East Central Regional Planning Council . • LIST OF CHANGES TO CITY OF SANFORD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (No. 03-1) Pursuant to 9J11.011 5(a) 5.a, FAC The amendment has been modified to address the objections, recommendations and comments report received from the Department of Community Affairs. Objection 1: Natural Resource Protection The future land use designation for wetlands on the east side of the Airport has been changed from Airport Industry and Commerce to Resource Protection. The future land use map now - shows these wetland areas as Resource Protection. A 3' X 4' map of the Airport Layout Plan has been provided. At this scale, the wetland areas are clearly visible. Additional policies have been added to the Comprehensive Plan to ensure the protection of natural resources on Airport property: Policy 1-2.4.1 incorporates the goals from the Airport Master Plan into the Comprehensive Plan. Goal 4 from the Airport Master Plan pertains to the preservation of natural resources. Policies have been added under this goal to ensure that an environmental assessment is performed prior to any development in the Airport Master Plan, to ensure compliance with federal, state and local regulations for the preservation of protected plant and animal species, to ensure water quality. Objective 2-1.12 also pertains to the protection of natural resources on Airport property. Policies under this objective require the Airport to maintain its list of threatened and endangered species and monitor the FFWCC list of the same, relocated protected species and mitigate for structural and nonstructural impacts of development. • There are no water wells, well head protection areas, lakes or floodplains located on airport property. The soils and water resources maps have been revised to show the proposed boundaries of the City. Objection 2: Clarify actions to be taken to accomplish the goals and objectives of the Airport Master Plan. Policies have been added under each Master Plan objective to demonstrate the explicit measures that the Airport will take to achieve the Master Plan goals that are incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan. The policies are taken from the Master Plan, the FAR Part 150 Study, and the Airport's economic development plan. The policies describe modifications to runways, roadways, the terminal building, hangars, the control tower, commerce park and parking areas as 1 of °° • • well as discuss funding sources, marketing and business strategies, navigational improvements, safety measures, natural resource protection, aviation procedures, noise abatement procedures and compatibility with federal, state and local regulations. Objection 3: Impacts of Airport development on the Regional Roadway System. The future traffic circulation map (Map 2-9) and Roadway Improvements 2020 (Map 2-11) have been updated. The 5-year Capital Transportation Improvements chart has been revised and updated. This is located in the transportation element and not in the Capital Improvements element. Completed improvements have been removed from the chart and new improvements have been added. Policy 2-1.12.3. now includes requirements for a traffic impact analysis as the preliminary level of traffic analysis, a requirement for a more detailed analysis if the preliminary level of service information indicates a deficiency in capacity and the requirements from the DRI development order for monitoring, modeling and mitigation. This policy prohibits the Airport from developing when service levels are below the minimum adopted service levels. The monitoring, modeling and mitigation programs require the Airport's coordination with the City, Seminole County, the FDOT and the ECFRPC. A statement has been added to Policy 2-1.12.1. Integrate the Airport with Regional Transit, to require the Airport to incorporate signage to direct the public to available transit and to inform the public about transit and ridesharing. The data and analysis for the evaluation of transportation facility impacts has been revised to include a trip generation assessment for the development of the Master Plan for the years 2005, 2010 and 2020 (page 61). This is followed by a section discussing the reconciliation of Airport traffic impacts with the development of transportation facilities. Objection 4: Interlocal Agreements The Airport does not have any interlocal agreements for public facilities. Policy 2-1.12.3 discusses interlocal agreements among the City, the County, FDOT and the Airport for roadway improvements. This policy discusses the scope of roadway improvements and who will pay for the improvements. Objection 5: Mitigation for Structural and Non-structural Impacts Objective 2-1.13 and, in particular policy 2-1.13.6 discusses the Airport's mitigation strategy. 2 of 3 • • Objection 6: Policy to Protect and Conserve Natural Resources within Airports Objective 2-1.13 and its six implementing policies address how the Airport will ensure the protection and conservation of natural resources within the airport. In addition, Policy 1-2.4.1 incorporates Goal 4 from the Airport Master Plan which pertains to the preservation of natural resources. Policies have been added under this goal to ensure that an environmental assessment is performed prior to any development in the Airport Master Plan, to ensure compliance with federal, state and local regulations for the preservation of protected plant and animal species and to ensure water quality. Other changes to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment The data, inventory and analysis has been amended provide additional information on the consistency of the amendment with the State of Florida Comprehensive Plan, additional evaluation of the impact of the Airport's development on transportation facilities and additional background data on the incorporation of the Airport Master Plan into the comprehensive plan. The following additional supporting documentation has been included: Metroplan Year 2020 Long Range Transportation Plan Update Metroplan FY 2003/04—2007/08 Transportation Improvement Plan Metroplan FY 2007/08—2017/18 Prioritized Project List FDOT Tentative Work Program for Seminole County 2003/04—2007/08 3 of • • ORDINANCE NO. 3 ?al AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3528 (CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN) AS PREVIOUSLY AMENDED; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT, TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT, HOUSING ELEMENT, INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT, CONSERVATION ELEMENT, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AND CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT ELEMENT; ADDING PROPERTY ANNEXED INTO THE CITY TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Sanford's Planning and Zoning Commission, as the City's local planning agency, held a public hearing on April 17, 2003, to consider amending the Future Land Use Map Of The Future Land Use Plan Element, the Transportation Element, the Housing Element, the Infrastructure Element, the Conservation Element, the Recreation And Open Space Element, the Intergovernmental Coordination Element, the Capital Improvements Element and the Concurrency Management Element of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Commission, as the City's governing body, held a public hearing on April 28, 2003, to consider the same amendments to the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan, Sanford, Florida; and WHEREAS, the City of Sanford has complied with requirements and procedures of Florida law in processing its first annual amendment in 2003 to the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan. Ordinance No. 3 7 8 Page 1 - I • NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA: SECTION 1: That portion of the Future Land Use plan Element referenced as the Future Land Use Map is hereby amended by including certain lands incorpora;ed into the City Limits of the City of Sanford, Florida, and by changing the land use designation assigned to certain other lands. A copy of additions to the Future Land Use Map and the changes to the Future Land Use Map and respective land use designation for such lands is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference incorporated herein and hereby made a part of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan. SECTION 2: That portion of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and included herein, which depicts revisions to the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the: (A) Future Land Use Element, (B) Transportation Element, (C) Housing Element, (D) Infrastructure Element, (E) Conservation Element, (F) Recreation And Open Space Element, (G) Intergovernmental Coordination Element, (H) Capital Improvements Element, and (I) Concurrency Management Element is hereby made a part of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan. SECTION 3: SEVERABILITY. If any section or portion of a section of this Ordinance proves to be invalid, unlawful or unconstitutional, it shall not be held to impair the validity, force or effect of any other action or part of this Ordinance. SECTION 4: CONFLICTS. All Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed. SECTION 5: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately when the State Land Planning Agency issues a final order determining the Ordinance No. 3 `] f Page 2 • • adopted amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184(9), Florida Statutes, or when the Administration Commission issues a final order determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184(10), Florida Statutes, whichever occurs first. /^ PASSED AND ADOPTED this F� ` ) day of j��k 4It�liG4," 2003. !VCR- - ATTEST: A. -- _/ ■ • / ■/ITY CLERK 0 As the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida CERTIFICATE I, Janet R. Dougherty, City Clerk of the City of Sanford, F,} da, do hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Ordinance No' 1P • SED • II ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida on the: '1day of • +fib , `7 '2003, wa posted at the front door of the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, on the 0 of % 003. 4 �` A r THE CITY CLERK Of THE / - CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA Ordinance No. 37 g( Page 3 .ti INI July tLtIVItIV I, MOUIIV'VI/tLLMLN I, INI-HAS I HUCTURE ELEFv T, . _2 ,. �: i ONSERVATION ELEMENT, CREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEME INTER- GOVERNMENTAL COORDI N ELEMENT, CAPITAL IMPROVEM ELE- _ :MENT AND CONCURRENC MANAGEMENT ELEMENT; ADDING PROPERTY ANNEXED INTO THE CITY TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEV- ERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE r�Regarding property shown below: it. l k?ii �. __ „qi i i'iiiiiiii:i Ii i i I 114. :;ii IN r limaiiii.rik rr 5 iLea' � r€ ['~i �'�� is n iii _ __, `iii gii tip- �f E> s� IVI kGII Y d � filF AUbd 2 A.® , a,: } f 'l' _.f:K- a till c�i NI iii a'Ae�kliariut . ►U� : . .i J f *..� ;,$ r-raa.-w;, �* ...'�°K.i .J3.4 I2 YT Err e 1 - �.��' �r-�ti rrr� ilk� �_° � ,.�� ���r `I ,,c�""'Pi gs .. 19111111/- �iIRb3a�e EIH J°I �._ e l r p)( i111ir i r• iklf€ t ;� €9 1-j'.. -It11ii - - • 3F"'k,•-• "J;Lw'' b 'a g' lit �� 9 G1I$ 4�NR4a Fd ..44 �I'�iik3 i �� . dl sd3 7 ,A' of: ita ^s q aiY43rfsg:.2 aa: a i mint. . r— .1 -cia± f1- data. . 1kil:iii' irAq _ ae 1l11 - f . t1 J %�..����/�!)i ! a4 1411 ¢,ai`M , "P a ;-. r X S NE T • >t �A./. -,/;3�, �� i, iE t 1-f -ii/Y a.:;,-:: ::?-:j:;;!.;13,-.1- +.s/ �� [ Ys .le 4�rr t ...'; �€s11/ -tea i! a s',R�`�s > r A o f .t, c PPL'e z ii a ills ;:lob '/, � :r� fit{ ��' �€�� ca ���� w ��� �a: e'���'� }j} £c� E:Y L't '3` aF ,�„ ,, ,.,/ 2 =5 ' ' . •� i IIfP li �r x'24.h$1-1, mot; a 34 `a_' x1.-?-- �aa 2 KEY tom.* a4*..F'r0 t ':a n V 4';fit°44';,. : 3 t ;;*. s 2 >;. 'e` ...f? �-i Parks,R°craalion IEi1 a ��. } t � 1-,s 8 Open Space ,:A• r r x./.�: 37..Y .4' [221-2 Airport industry -;al:44�J C' -ta k. acoczlawcs ftdrivied4:a4:s 4( Ti itar , „, iiii ...-44 imiiiiiA A public hearing on the ordinance will be held on Monday,September 8, 2003, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible, by the City Commission of Sanford, Florida, in the City Commission Room, City Hall, 300 North Park Avenue, Sanford, Florida. Interested parties may appear at the meeting and be heard regarding the proposed ordinance. Copies of the proposed amendment to the Future Land Use Plan Map of the c Comprehensive Plan are available at the Department of;Planning and Community_- Development and at the City Clerk's Office, City hall, Sanford, Florida, and may bg inspected by the public. ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC:IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION MADE. :. ITI4.RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THE ABOVE MEETING,O14,,,.../pp, EAF ING HE MAY NEED A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS,�nF ICLUDINGIeTHE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE, WHICH.RECORD IS NOT PRO -".4 SIDED BY THE CITY OF SANFORD. (FS 286.0105) - PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES NEEDING ASSISTANCE TO PARTICIPATE`.IN ANY . OF ,` i-JESE .PROCEEDINGS! SHOULD CONTACT THE HUMAN RESOURCES ' OFFICE ADA COORDINATOR AT 407-330-5626 48 HOURS IN'ADVANCE OF THE MEETING. i,'„ Cynthia Porter, Deputy City Clerk C Icl 5 CD.O�, n.--,, G P.D"'.. - O OQ C d 0 Z C17 •"s. �� ° mo=o c " r' Cu o ∎-<° CC r a4.�s Q O H O 0 O rS Q. 1-' 0 O 0 m yovoy•p W n o N a d N O Q [D .I w 0 0- y CL Z' N p .. m n. K 3 c cm 0-^ 0.9 o- N = 0 A) = F-'- F-'- oa r ci r 0+ j c.o m 9 O • I-, C [n Cn co ,v ^ co <N �'o^ 0 `° a .D co 00 N 0 0 VV 0 0 ° 0 cD ° 0 " N '� c9 0 CO s n )iii y N ��, v 0 F-' 0 0 0.II O`i7� _• � C N N '-, n 0 O O 27.ri Ct 0--0 0 n, = .., - O. s`< Cy= CD CD W O Cr j o Z7 \_0. c 0 0 0 �c 7J 0 fl n CZ7 - 'ti ao' ao o ; O a a -» et c o c 17 z CD o o = b �o 0 na t- -n a 0 cc `°' c° A c � � o ° c P. N- 0 -CD ZE b 0 00oov, w - 0 n. o =t= t N 5 '�' ? = mcOD ,, 0 0 70 rt = a b it o _ n_ = o o.. r C7 Q/ "b 0 cD iD ,a-.",o 0 y ^ 0 CT' > a = V• • c,cr z'.., Al 0 c �: O •0 CD Cy .< m o C1 ■ 1 ` `D °--, s - > o CD C1 c a + ..c 0 o'°; o- o so- i y 0 _ AD O v, _ - r CD CD CD Z Cn it HJ.'liI • ti1 1 J I C!1 1 L•i C.1 C'/ J- i • Q) N Q CL) � � 4a. /`4-1 C ° a. VJ ir a1 3 { CL.) �1 3 1 z • o ct o c • O `� o U }' ! x o • • • • 0 L O 3 0 3 U 0 ` ), 4 N•,-,, 0 ' Ct � , N p 3 0~ 00 U o a� Ct Q > �' o cA o Cr) U U N p ,vi I 4.) r--) Cl) �� 1 3 E • O -d Co) '''' Z •tD.A a.) ) E a) 0 E v o r-- �� , a, z CD� Li a, � o 1 I ►--a Z Q a �o v V . 0 .... ..1 -4....) la) Cl) (1) E ;-- (1.) Eci, 0 -.< cn r •v—.I f•- '1 ... ,.. (I.) .-C I,• •.i ' _ • • . - •-■ Q") E . , ,L) ct ■....._.■ c/D .-- . • CL) .-4 ---- c..) a) ;•-4 Cr) r• C•11 L) Co • rn-I 7 ,,9 (i) Li L , :1;4_ <, . „. 0 u _ , •,_., N , 1 i 1 ...._,a 1 1 , (t 1 i . ci) i 1 1 1 . , 1 1 •,—,, , C•_) C-) ! , , I i . cip I , II cn 1 1 1 7:i -7S I i ■ 1 s , I i I 1; I ■ I I I I I I I , s I I I I 1 (1) 1 1 i , Z 1 1 cu N •r•al i 1 I I I l ...4.... •1■1 i I I I 1 I I I I I • • CORRECTED ORDINANCE NO. 3781 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3528 (CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN) AS PREVIOUSLY AMENDED; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT, TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT, HOUSING ELEMENT, INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT, CONSERVATION ELEMENT, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AND CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT ELEMENT; ADDING PROPERTY ANNEXED INTO THE CITY TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Sanford's Planning and Zoning Commission, as the City's local planning agency, held a public hearing on April 17, 2003, to consider amending the Future Land Use Map Of The Future Land Use Plan Element, the Transportation Element and the Recreation And Open Space Element of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Commission, as the City's governing body, held a public hearing on April 28, 2003, to consider the same amendments to the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan, Sanford, Florida; and WHEREAS, the City of Sanford has complied with requirements and procedures of Florida law in processing its first annual amendment in 2003 to the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA: SECTION 1: That portion of the Future Land Use plan Element referenced as the Future Land Use Map is hereby amended by including certain lands incorporated into Corrected Ordinance No. 3781 Page 1 ' • • the City Limits of the City of Sanford, Florida, and by changing the land use designation assigned to certain other lands. A copy of additions to the Future Land Use Map and the changes to the Future Land Use Map and respective land use designation for such lands is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference incorporated herein and hereby made a part of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan. SECTION 2: That portion of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan attached hereto as Exhibit `B" and included herein, which depicts revisions to the Goals, Objectives and Policies or text or exhibits of the: (A) Future Land Use Element, (B) Transportation Element and (C) Recreation And Open Space Element is hereby made a part of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan. SECTION 3: SEVERABILITY. If any section or portion of a section of this Ordinance proves to be invalid, unlawful or unconstitutional, it shall not be held to impair the validity, force or effect of any other action or part of this Ordinance. SECTION 4: CONFLICTS. All Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed. SECTION 5: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately when the State Land Planning Agency issues a final order determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184(9), Florida Statutes, or when the Administration Commission issues a final order determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184(10), Florida Statutes, whichever occurs first. Corrected Ordinance No. 3781 Page 2 • • PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 3o t, 2003. City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida CI Brady Lessard, Mayor ATTEST: eA-,A cam, CITY CLERK �1 CERTIFICATE /� 'T— •-._mom (�J , C I, Janet-:—Dougherty, CityJClerk of the City of Sanford, Florida, do hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Corrected Ordinance No. 3781 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida on the S41 day of , 2003, was posted at the front door of the City Hall in the City of Sanfor , Florida, on thee"` of , 2003. AS THE CfI'Y CLERK OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA Corrected Ordinance No. 3781 Page 3 • FROM CYNTHIA PORT , DEPUTY CITY CLERK September 9, 2003 MEMORANDUM TO: DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY ENGINEER SENIOR PLANNER ORDINANCE NO. 3781 Attached is a copy of Ordinance No. 3781, passed and adopted by the City Commission on September 8, 2003. • ORDINANCE NO. 3 ?gi AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3528 (CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN) AS PREVIOUSLY AMENDED; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT, TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT, HOUSING ELEMENT, INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT, CONSERVATION ELEMENT, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AND CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT ELEMENT; ADDING PROPERTY ANNEXED INTO THE CITY TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Sanford's Planning and Zoning Commission, as the City's local planning agency, held a public hearing on April 17, 2003, to consider amending the Future Land Use Map Of The Future Land Use Plan Element, the Transportation Element, the Housing Element, the Infrastructure Element, the Conservation Element, the Recreation And Open Space Element, the Intergovernmental Coordination Element, the Capital Improvements Element and the Concurrency Management Element of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Commission, as the City's governing body, held a public hearing on April 28, 2003, to consider the same amendments to the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan, Sanford, Florida; and WHEREAS, the City of Sanford has complied with requirements and procedures of Florida law in processing its first annual amendment in 2003 to the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan. Ordinance No. 3 7 $( Page 1 S • . y NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA: SECTION 1: That portion of the Future Land Use plan Element referenced as the Future Land Use Map is hereby amended by including certain lands incorporated into the City Limits of the City of Sanford, Florida, and by changing the land use designation assigned to certain other lands. A copy of additions to the Future Land Use Map and the changes to the Future Land Use Map and respective land use designation for such lands is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference incorporated herein and hereby made a part of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan. SECTION 2: That portion of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan attached hereto as Exhibit `B" and included herein, which depicts revisions to the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the: (A) Future Land Use Element, (B) Transportation Element, (C) Housing Element, (D) Infrastructure Element, (E) Conservation Element, (F) Recreation And Open Space Element, (G) Intergovernmental Coordination Element, (H) Capital Improvements Element, and (I) Concurrency Management Element is hereby made a part of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan. SECTION 3: SEVERABILITY. If any section or portion of a section of this Ordinance proves to be invalid, unlawful or unconstitutional, it shall not be held to impair the validity, force or effect of any other action or part of this Ordinance. SECTION 4: CONFLICTS. All Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed. SECTION 5: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately when the State Land Planning Agency issues a final order determining the Ordinance No. 3 'c f Page 2 • • adopted amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184(9), Florida Statutes, or when the Administration Commission issues a final order determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184(10), Florida Statutes, whichever occurs first. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 0 day of 7 -e 2003. R ATTEST: t ITY CLERK As the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida CERTIFICATE I, Janet R. Dougherty, City Clerk of the City of Sanford, F,}gkda, do hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Ordinance No' IP •ir SED • 11 ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida on the: ' lday of .air ,Lei/ 2003, wa posted at the front door of the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, on the ._ of 003. d• ,l1L/r A THE CITY CLERK tv THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA Ordinance No. `>7 2( Page 3 • • INTRODUCTION The first City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan Amendment of 2003 contains five major amendments: • New Land Use Designation of Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PRO); • Amended Chapter 6, Recreation and Open Space Element; • Incorporation of the Orlando Sanford International Airport Master Plan into the Comprehensive Plan; • Incorporation of the land use compatibility recommendations from the Orlando Sanford International Airport FAR Part 150 Study. • Future Land Use Designations for parcels annexed into the City by the Orlando Sanford International Airport. • . i LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENTS GOAL 1-2: FUTURE LAND USE MAP. CONTINUE TO MAINTAIN AND MANAGE A FUTURE LAND USE MAP. The Future Land Use Map Series, Maps 1-1 through 1-9 herein, reflect City policy for managing the allocation of future land use. The Future L and Use Map Series (Base Year 2005) is supported by the Comprehensive Plan Data Inventory And Analysis (1991). Land use designations on the future land use maps have been allocated pursuant to goals, objectives and policies stipulated in the Comprehensive Plan, together with analysis of population,housing and land resources. The process of allocating these land use designations has considered the need to conserve natural resources including wetlands, the Lake Monroe Shoreline, flood plains, water recharge areas, fish and wildlife, consideration of capital improvement needs, and conservation of fiscal resources. The future land use map series shall designate areas for the following uses: FUTURE LAND USE MAP DENSITIES/INTENSITIES MAP LAND USE DESIGNATIONS SYMBOL DENSITY/INTENSITY RESIDENTIAL USES du/acre Low Density Residential-Single Family LDR-SF less than or=6 du/acre Low Density Residential-Mobile Home LDR-MH less than or= 6 du/acre Medium Density Residential-10 MDR-10 less than or= 10 du/acre Medium Density Residential-15 MDR-15 less than or= 15 du/acre High Density Residential-20 UDR less than or= 20 COMMERCIAL USES Floor Area Neighborhood Commercial, Office NC .35 General Commercial, Office GC .35 INDUSTRIAL USES I .50 SUBURBAN ESTATES SE 1 du/acre PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC USE PSP .35 Includes: Education, Public Facilities Transportation, Private Recreation, and Other Institutional. ` S • PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE PRO .25 Includes Municipal Recreation and Open Space RESOURCE PROTECTION RP Wetlands and Aquatic Habitats (1) Floodways and Drainageways (I) Aquifer Recharge Area (2) Wellfield Protection Areas (2) Upland Wildlife Habitats (2) Floodplains (2) (1) Within wetlands,aquatic habitats, floodways and drainageways no development is permitted pursuant to Policies 5-1.4.1 (together with Policies 5-1.7.1 and 5-1.8.1);5-1.2.1;and 5-1.2.5,respectively. However,in certain cases,in order to avoid a taking of property without just compensation,the City shall negotiate a minimal development right necessary to provide"reasonable"use of the land. In such cases, development shall be shifted to the upland portion of the site. However,where no upland exists,development rights within the wetland, floodways or drainageways shall be negotiated in order to protect private property rights and preserve"reasonable"use of the land while preserving the physical and biological functions of the wetlands,floodways and/or drainageways through mitigation techniques identified in the policies cited herein(cross-reference Policy 1-2.7.1). (2) The FAR for these areas shall be restricted pursuant to performance criteria identified in Policies 5-1.2.6,5-1.7.1,5-1.8.2 and 5-1.3.1. In no case shall the FAR exceed the FAR for the underlying Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use designation. However, the building footprint and total impermeable surface shall be restricted to maximize permeable surface while preserving a"reasonable" development right pursuant to the policies identified herein(cross-reference Policy 1-2.7.1). (3) Where a federal, state, or regional agency has jurisdiction over a resource protection area,the City shall not grant a development right which exceeds the development right provided by such agencies having jurisdiction. MIXED USE DISTRICTS Map Commercial Industrial Residential Symbol I-4 High Intensity HI 1.0 FAR .50 FAR Less than or =to 50 u/a Waterfront/Downtown WDBD 2.0 FAR 1.0 FAR Less than or Business District =to 50 u/a Westside Industry WIC .35 FAR .50 FAR Less than or &Commerce =to 20 u/a Airport Industry AIC .50 FAR 1.0 FAR Less than or &Commerce =to 50 du/a Less than or =to 1 du/a Residential/Office/Institutional ROI .35 FAR * Less than or =to 20 u/a *Asterisks denote land use not permitted under land use designation. Note: F.A.R. denotes: Floor Area Ratio =Gross Floor Area/Site Area. The density and intensity of historic resources shall be governed by the density/intensity assigned to the _ specific future land use designation regulating the respective historic resources. This section of the future land use element shall define the nature, density and intensity of the allowable uses for each of the designations represented on the future land use map. Nothing in this section shall • • preclude necessary community facilities from locating within any future land use designation when such activity satisfies established criteria of this plan and the city's code of ordinances. The future land use map series shall be maps I-1 through I-9. The future land use map: the future land use map (sheets 1-44) and policy designation shall depict the proposed distribution, extent and location of land uses for the year 2005. The official future land use map (scale: one inch to one thousand feet) is on file with the city planning office in city hall. Maps 1-1 through 1-4 and map I-9 of the future land use map series shall denote natural resources to be conserved through plan implementation. Map 1-5 shall indicate historic resources. Map I-6 denotes vacant and undeveloped lands. Maps 1-7 denotes areas targeted for redevelopment and renewal. Map I-8 denotes planned developments within the City of Sanford. e • . • „ . . . . .. . . . •. --. - ' .. .. . -- . ' .. . - .. - . - . .. . _ . -- -- - - - - e.. - - . - .. . - . . . -- . . - Policy 1 1.3.3 of the Chapter. b. Assure safe operations of aircraft through: e - -- . - . .. - - - . -- •. .. _ . - ... . -_ . -.. .. . . .• MD- .. .- _ -•- • .. -- .. -. ... - t:- . . .. - impact near the airport. .. . . .• . .. fib. .. .. ... . . ..•... - . .. . .. . - . . - . -•. . • •. - -- • -- - - . - - .. - .. _ • a. �1 cvcI:. . . ..• . .• . - . - : •• • -- .. - . . - . Dcvelepruent-of-an-operatiion • .. .. .. •. • • .. '. - .-• . c. Achieve-alert-and-industrial-develep -- . . - e-adopted-Airport Master Plan and-compatible-with-environmental-sonstraiuts-throw • ! . y -0-P-reper on an: - ;: - • . . - - - .- .. • . • .. • • • •.. . . - i ae t-new }[c�i ie-airpeft •❑Preserving th- - . _ . : . •• ... . • - - . .. - -• Objective 1 -2.4: M anaging Airport L ands: The City shall manage lands owned by the Orlando- Sanford Airport and surrounding uses to minimize airport impacts to adjacent land uses and conservation resources in a manner that also protects the integrity of airport operations and safety through the following policies: Policy 1-2.4.1: Airport Master Plan. The City hereby adopts the Airport Layout Plan (ALP) of the Airport Master Plan as the document to guide development of the Airport. Any modification to the uses in the Airport Layout Plan shall require an amendment to the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan. The City hereby adopts the goals and objectives of the Airport Master Plan as the general guidelines for' development o f t he Airport t o ensure t hat Airport facilities w ill b e adequate t o meet b oth long- and short-term demand for a viation s ervices. The goals and o blectives reflect p olicy goals to b e r eached through the master planning process. These goals include the ultimate development of self-supporting facilities to serve the existing and future aviation needs of the region; the achievement of compatible land uses in the vicinity of the Airport; and provisions for the type of development that will yield the most public benefit of the investment represented by the airfield. Goal No. 1. Continue to meet and enhance the level of service provided to all Airport users. Objectives: a. Promote passenger processing which is convenient for all segments of the traveling public, through reduction of delays and the promotion of a safe and pleasant experience. b. Provide adequate runway capacity for estimated demand in terms of annual and hourly operations. c. Provide adequate runway length to meet existing and forecasted operational needs. • • d. Provide opportunities for development of services associated with air carrier, charter, corporate- type GA, cargo, flight training, and recreational flying operations. e. Effectively integrate commercial air carrier operations with commercial and non-commercial GA operations. f. Provide other aviation related support facilities needed to support a full range of aviation services. Policies: a. In order to promote convenient passenger processing and a safe and pleasant experience for passengers, by 2020, as dictated by demand, the Airport shall: • Provide functional building modifications including expansion of the ticketing areas. Federal Inspection Services (FIS), concession areas, inbound and outbound baggage, passenger and baggage s ecurity screening areas, a parking g arage, expanded rental car facilities and various support function facilities. • Realign the Red Cleveland Boulevard main entrance to accommodate international apron/gate expansion and to become a two-level, three-lane terminal frontage road. • Expand the Welcome Center to accommodate increased levels of international passenger traffic. • Provide a 32-gate terminal. b. In order to provide adequate runway capacity and runway length and to effectively integrate commercial air carrier operations with commercial and non-commercial GA operations, by 2020, as dictated by demand, the Airport shall: • Extend Runway 9L-27R to 12,000 ft to ease current international operational restrictions and accommodate forecast operations and future fleet mix that include larger international transports, such a s the B 747 and A380. T he 1 oad-bearing capabilities o f Runway 9L-27R shall be improved to 400,000 lbs dual tandem wheel (DTW) load to accommodate the demand for greater stage lengths from the increased number and frequency of existing large and heavy air transport aircraft. • Extend Runway 9R-27L to a maximum of 7,140 ft long, widened to 150 ft, and strengthened to accommodate larger commercial aircraft. • Extend Runway 9C-27C to an ultimate length of 5000 feet. • Construct a new 4,000 foot long parallel runway south of existing Runway 9R-27L for general aviation aircraft. • • • Provide taxiways for each of the above runway improvements including adequate taxiway entrances and exits and full-length parallel taxiways. c. In order to provide opportunities for development of services associated with air carrier, charter co •orate-t as e GA car:o fli•ht trainin: and recreational fl in• o•erations b 2020, as dictated by demand, the Airport shall: • Utilize areas of land between Runways 9L-27R and 9R-27L for GA development, including corporate and conventional hangars and larger apron and other aircraft parking areas. • Utilize areas of land between Runway 9R-27L and new Runway 8-26 for lighter GA development, such as T-hangars, small conventional hangar, and Fixed Base Operator (FBO) facilities. • Construct new taxiway, ramp area, hangar, and warehouse facilities on the north side of the airfield, as part of the new Northside Aviation Complex, to serve air cargo and heavy maintenance demands. • Coordinate with Pan Am World Airways and Delta Connection Acedemy, or other airlines, on their proposals for new maintenance and training facilities on the north side of the airport. • Provide a dedicated cargo facility that would include several large cargo warehouses on the northeast side of Runway 9L-27R. d. In order to provide other aviation related support facilities needed to support a full range of aviation services, by 2020, as dictated by demand, the Airport shall: • Move Airport support and maintenance areas to an expanded area between the southwest side of the terminal apron and Carrier Avenue. • Encourage the non-aviation properties that develop on Airport property to develop in ways that enhance the air operations and Support those functions that are directly dependent upon Airport services. • Continue to utilize available but underdeveloped land areas to the west of the airfield and in the Airport Commerce Park. _ • Construct a new air traffic control tower and coordinate with the FAA to determine the most appropriate location for the tower. Goal No. 2. Provide guidelines for future development, while satisfying anticipated demand. Objectives: • • a. Establish land .arcels to meet antici ated demand. b. Provide adequate airside and landside facilities to meet anticipated demand, while meeting all FAA requirements. c. Continue to market facilities to domestic air carriers, international operators, and integrated air cargo operators. d. Effectively market commercial and non-commercial GA operators and facilities. e. Develop a self-sustaining commerce park, which will benefit the Airport and the community as a whole. Policies: • The Airport shall continue to secure funds from the FAA, the State of Florida and local public transit funding sources for the acquisition of lands for projects listed in the Airport Master Plan. • The Ai sort shall continue to utilize the FAA-a. .roved ALP as its •rim. .lannin• document. • The Airport shall continue to promote and market the Airport's assets including Commerce Park, the Foreign Trade Zone (#250) and the Small Business Incubator. • The Airport shall continue to maximize the economic development potential of the airport commerce park and surrounding areas by the following measures: • Installation of necessary roadway, water, sewer and drainage facilities, when applicable. • Coordination with Seminole County to recognize the Airport as a `Target Area' as specified in the County's Economic Development Strategy. • Establishment of connections with venture capital firms and financial institutions to support the airport. • Utilization of target business incentive program jobs growth incentive application._ Goal No. 3. Provide an Airport that is safe and reliable. Objectives: a. Provide navigational, landing aids, and meteorological facilities, which enhance the safety and reliability of operations under all weather conditions. b. Protect FAA mandated safety areas, runway protection zones, and other clear zones. 7 • • ! c. Minimize possible obstructions to air navigation. d. Provide adequate Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF) access roads, facilities, equipment, and personnel, to maintain response time under all conditions. e. Ensure that airside and landside operations and facilities meet all applicable security standards. a. Ensure that parking facilities are adequately sized and easy to negotiate. b. Develop facilities to meet the demands of the current and future critical aircraft. Policies (as funding is available): • The Airport shall install the following navigation aids on extended runways: • Runway 9R-27L: PAPI-4/Category I ILSPAPI-4/Category I ILS/GPS/MALSR • Runway 9L-27R: MALSR, PAPI-4, ILS, NDB, Outer Marker, Middle Marker, GPS, RVR • Runway 18: ILS, MALSR, PAPI-4, GPS • Runway 36: GPS, MALSR, PAPI-4 • Future 4th Parallel RW 18-36: PAPI-4 (each end) • The Airport shall maintain the runway safety area (RSA), based on the critical aircraft design group, free of objects except for those that need to be located in the RSA. • The Airport shall continue to acquire land within the runway protection zone (RPZ) in order to ensure that the area is free of land uses that create glare, smoke or other hazards to air navigation. • The Airport shall maintain the object-free area (OFA) in a manner free of any above`-- ground objects protruding above the RSA edge elevation except for objects that need to be located in the OFA such as navigational equipment and holding aircraft signage. • The Airport shall install improvements to airfield lighting, signage and pavement markings to enhance the safety and reliability of operations. • The Airport shall continue to maintain a fire rescue department in order to protect the lives and property of the citizens and travelers to Central Florida through immediate response to emergency needs, rapid suppression of fire, competent application of life- - saving techniques, and public education. -- • The Airport shall comply with the City's requirements for size of parking spaces and configuration of parking lots. • The Airport shall design new facilities and change or reposition existing facilities to • accommodate the length and wing span of its existing critical aircraft, the Airbus 330 or its future critical aircraft, the Airbus 380. Should the critical aircraft change, the Airport shall modify the design of all existing and proposed facilities utilized by the critical aircraft to accommodate the critical aircraft. • • • Goal No. 4. Develop the Airport and its vicinity to minimize negative environmental impacts. Objectives: a. Identify the major environmental issues of concern. b. Minimize potential environmental impacts, and provide special attention to minimizing residential dislocation, air and water pollution, and wetland impacts. c. Provide a facility that minimizes adverse effects on other environmental concerns. d. Develop an energy-efficient Airport layout to provide ease of air and ground access. Policies: A complete environmental assessment (EA) shall be required for each of the projects enumerated in the Airport Master Plan and on the ALP. Each EA must be completed before design and construction begins. A site survey shall be used to assess specific vegetative community types on-site and the possible presence of threatened and endangered species shall be completed during the EA and/or EIS process for each project. A species-specific survey methodology shall be utilized to ascertain the definitive presence, population density, and location of all threatened and endangered species and species of special concern. Review of possible wetland impacts on and in the vicinity of the Airport will be conducted during the EA and/or EIS process for each project. • The Airport shall continue to comply with all current federal, state and local guidelines as it applies to the protection and preservation of protected species of plants and animals. • To ensure water quality, the Airport shall coordinate with both the FDEP and the St_ Johns River Water Management District in order to obtain NPDES and Environmental,-,. Resource permits. • If federal funds are used by the Airport, the FAA will meet 49 CFR, Part 24: Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition for Federal and Federally assisted Programs. • The Airport shall develop an energy-efficient Airport layout, as funding is available, to provide ease of air and ground access by: • Minimizing passenger walking distance. • Providing convenient passenger loading and unloading. • Providing an equal level of service and access to all terminals from the parking areas. • Maintaining operational flexibility. • Realigning the terminal circulation roadway to continue following the face of the terminal building, ultimately providing dual-level departure and arrival terminal curb 9 • frontage from Red Cleveland Boulevard on the east side, westward until it intersects Airport Boulevard. • Expanding the operational capacity of the airfield to effectively accommodate the increase in traffic expected, as well as the aircraft mix anticipated to use the Airport including extension of the three primary runways, addition of associated taxiways, and consideration of a new runway in the long term. Goal No. 5. Promote the development of compatible land use in undeveloped areas within the Airport vicinity. Objectives: a. Promote land use planning and development objectives for on-Airport and off-Airport land use which are compatible with the anticipated long-range needs of the Airport and the community as a whole. b. Designate areas for future development (i.e. air cargo, heavy aircraft maintenance, flight training, etc.). c. Locate Airport and access facilities so that growth may be controlled through land use planning and zoning. d. Develop and implement a Master Stormwater Plan in conjunction with St. John's River Water Management District and FAA criteria. Policies (as dictated by demand and subject to available funding): • The Airport shall continue to develop according to the Airport Master Plan which designates areas for air cargo, heavy aircraft maintenance, flight training, parking, terminal expansion, commerce and industry. • Airport lands shall be designated Airport Industry and Commerce on the Future Land Use-- Map. All development on Airport property shall be consistent with the policies and objectives of the Airport Industry and Commerce land use designation. • Lands affected by the airport but off airport property shall be developed consistent with Policy 1-2.4.9: Airport Industry and Commerce Land Use Designation including the submittal to the City of Sanford of a noise impact analysis and required sound insulation in_ areas within the airport impact noise zones. • The Airport shall continue to coordinate with Seminole County, Metroplan Orlando and the Florida Department of Transportation to provide the most appropriate and effective means of ensuring adequate ground access to the Airport. • The Airport shall ensure that adequate stormwater management facilities are available to meet St. Johns River Water Management District requirements for water quality and attenuation volumes for each phase of development. This shall be accomplished by IO • • adherence to the Stormwater Master Plan prepared by Post Buckley Shuh and Jernigan (May, 2003) or as may be amended from time to time. Goal No. 6. Develop an Airport that supports local and regional economic goals while accommodating new opportunities or shifts in development patterns. Objectives: a. Achieve a level of service and user convenience such that the Airport is a positive factor in regional economic development decisions. b. Achieve capacities o f t he airfield, the t enninal area s ystems, and C ommerce P ark s o t hat the Airport may be an attractive location for major airline maintenance, cargo, and other aviation related hub. c. Provide appropriate and achievable commercial opportunities at, near, and on the Airport. d. To assure economic feasibility, identify an equitable distribution of user charges, distribute the burden of capital investment, maintenance, and operating costs, while keeping overall costs within an acceptable level. e. Identify financial alternatives and funding sources available for the implementation of aviation and non-aviation projects. f. Quantify financial resources available for funding projects identified and recommended, as well as identify project implementation. g. Develop an airport layout plan (ALP) that easily integrates with existing and proposed transportation infrastructure, to encourage economic growth. Policies (as dictated by demand and subject to available funding): • The Airport shall install airfield, terminal, access and parking improvements in accordance with the Airport Master Plan and ALP in order to achieve a level of service and user convenience that will make the Airport a positive factor in regional economic development decisions. • The Airport shall expand and strengthen runways and taxiways, install state-of-the-art navigational instruments, upgrade and expand terminal facilities, construct new hangar, cargo and warehouse facilities on the north side of the airfield and construct a new air traffic control tower, in order to attract major airline maintenance, cargo, and other aviation related hub. • In order to attract tenant business at Commerce Park, and spark development of the remaining land area, the Airport shall complete the following items: • Identify available parcels by number, acreage, and the available utilities that are in place for prospective tenants. • Set a lease/buy cost associated with each parcel, for proposals and financial analysis I • i by prospective tenants. • Develo• a corn•rehensive develo ment •lan that identifies business sea ents and their locations within the commerce park. • Develop minimum standards for construction and maintenance of tenant businesses in the commerce park. • Construct roadway, drainage, and utility infrastructure where necessary, to create value and attract potential tenant businesses. • The Airport shall adhere to the ALP in allocating peripheral airport lands for commercial and industrial development in order to provide appropriate and achievable commercial opportunities at, near, and on the Airport. • The Airport shall utilize the information in Chapter 10, Financial Feasibility, of the Airport Master Plan when determining revenue sources and expenditures for airport improvements, identifying an equitable distribution of user charges, distributing the burden of capital investment, maintenance and operating costs, keeping overall costs within an acceptable level and quantifying financial resources available for funding projects identified and recommended, as well as identifying project implementation. • The Airport shall continue to seek continuous funding for airport development from the FAA entitlement and discretionary funds and the FDOT airport development program and, when funding is available, from Congressional appropriations, economic development assistance grants,TEA-21, and the Surface Transportation Program (STP). • The Airport shall continue to coordinate with Seminole County, FDOT and Metroplan Orlando to ensure adequate vehicular capacity on primary surface access roads to the Airport and to reduce overall traffic congestion. Goal No. 7. Minimize Costs To All Users (I.E. Passengers, Airlines, Flight Training.Facilities, -- Employees, Etc.) Of The Airport. Objectives (as dictated by demand): a. Minimize airspace congestion and delays for air carrier and GA aircraft operations through procedural changes and/or provision of additional navigational aids (NAVAIDS). b. Minimize airside congestion through construction of runways, taxiways, and aprons, when the costs of providing the additional capacity are less than the additional operating costs associated with aircraft delays. Policies: • The Airport shall minimize airspace congestion and delays by modifying local approach and departure procedures, providing facilities to accommodate simultaneous airfield • s operations and increased airfield capacity and/or installing the improved navigation aids enumerated in the policies of Goal 3. • The timing o f a irfield i mprovements s hall c oincide w ith existing o r p rojected a viation demand as documented in Chapter 5, Demand/Capacity Analysis and Chapter 6, Facility Requirements of the Airport Master Plan. Goal No. 8. Ensure Adequate And Convenient Ground Access To The Airport. Objectives (as dictated by demand): a. Provide safe access and easy-to-follow signs to Airport roadways and facilities. b. Provide adequate lane capacity on roads leading to the Airport to serve existing and future activity. c. Provide adequate land capacity on internal circulation roadways serving functional areas (terminal, GA, cargo, flight academy, etc.). d. Provide parking facilities (for GA, cargo, terminal, etc.) that are conveniently located and easily accessible. e. Incorporate multi-modal opportunities into Airport development plans (e.g. commuter or high- speed rail). f. Maintain close coordination with Regional Planning Council, Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO), FDOT, and other transportation groups. Policies (as dictated by demand): • The Airport shall continue to coordinate with FDOT, the County and the City to ensure that routes to the Airport are well marked. The Airport shall increase signage west of the,.. Airport Boulevard/Red Cleveland Boulevard intersection, to separate traffic sooner and reduce congestion by 2005. • The Airport shall continue to coordinate with FDOT, the County and the City to ensure adequate lane capacity on roads leading to the Airport to serve existing and future activity. • The Airport shall expand Red Cleveland Boulevard to three 12-foot lanes in eaeh direction by 2010. • The Airport shall add additional service roads as airport improvements are implemented. • The Airport will provide parking convenient to employee work areas. The Airport shall provide space for limousine and bus loading curb-side at both domestic and international terminal entrances. l ; • r► • The Airport shall coordinate with LYNX, Metroplan and FDOT to ensure that, once demand is sufficient, multimodal transportation shall be included in the Airport's development plans. • Airport staff shall continue to participate in Regional Planning Council, Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO), FDOT, and other transportation groups. Goal No. 9. Minimize The Impact Of Noise On Neighboring Residents and Noise Sensitive Land Uses Through Noise Abatement And Mitigation. Objectives: a. Design and select noise abatement measures that_minimize the number of people exposed to noise above day-night noise level (DNL) greater than 65 decibels. b. In selecting noise abatement actions, avoid actions that would adversely affect capacity, impose restrictions on Airport use that would be discriminatory, or that could erode prudent margins of safety. c. Design and select (if necessary) land use mitigation measures for noise sensitive land uses exposed to aircraft noise between 65 and 75 decibels. d. Maximize, to the greatest extent possible, any mitigation projects that may be eligible for FAA funding assistance, aside from the Airport Improvement Program (ALP), that minimize the impacts of noise upon the surrounding environment. Policies (as dictated by demand and subject to available funding): • The Airport s hall continue to acquire n oise-sensitive 1 and b ased o n the FAR P art 1 50 Noise Study prepared by ESA in 2001. • The Airport shall continue to support the Sanford Airport Noise Abatement Committee w (SANAC) in its efforts to study and implement noise reduction measures both on and off Airport property. • When possible, the Airport will work with the FAA to modify runway flow percentages to maximize east flow. • When possible, the Airport willll work with the FAA to reduce flyovers of residential communities by beginning a northwesterly turn approximately three (3) miles west of the beginning of take-off roll on runway 27R. • When possible, the Airport shall work with the FAA to require jet aircraft conducting ILS flight training to continue along the runway heading to gain altitude beyond the Airport property boundaries prior to making the turn to the north. 14 • • • When possible, the Airport will extend east-west runways on the east end to reduce noise intrusion on the more heavily populated west side. • The Airport shall coordinate with the FAA to implement noise abatement operational procedures to reduce the exposure of aircraft noise on neighboring communities. • The Airport shall utilize FAA funds to acquire additional noise monitors. Goal No. 10. Develop An Airport That Is Consistent With Federal, State, Regional, And Local Plans. Objectives: a. Develop the Airport as a regionally significant asset and make it consistent with national, state, and metropolitan system plans. b. Develop the Airport in accordance with local land use and transportation plans. Policies: • The Airport shall develop according to the Airport Master Plan and the ALP which have been designed to meet all federal, state and local plans. • The Airport development shall be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and land development regulations. • The Airport will work with Metroplan Orlando's 2020 Long Range Transportation Plan and Transportation Improvement Program and with FDOT's transportation plans to assure responsible development. Policy 1-2.4.2: Airport Expansion and Coordination with the Conservation Element. The implementation of the Airport Master Plan shall be coordinated with the Conservation Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Expansion and operation plans shall minimize impacts to environmental resource":_. consistent with policies set forth within the Comprehensive Plan. Resource Protection and Conservation lands shall be protected through the use of open space requirements, clustering, conservation easements and wetlands buffer and transition areas, or mitigation as approved by the St. Johns River Water Management District. Policy 1-2.4.3: Public Facilities. The development of the Airport Master Plan shall be phased concurrent with major public roadway improvements and the installation of drainage, sewer and water utilities. As necessary to ensure that development of the Airport is consistent with public facility standards, the City or Sanford Airport Authority, as appropriate, shall enter into any necessary interlocal agreements for the purposes of the provision of public facilities and services in order to maintain the adopted level of service standards for facilities subject to concurrency. Policy 1-2.4.4 Adjacent Development to be Compatible with Airport Operations. The City's Future Land Use Map and the Official Zoning Map shall continue to delineate all Runway Protection Zones (RPZ) established for the airport. These clear zones shall be, at a minimum, consistent with is • • requirements se t forth b y the Federal A viation Administration. D evelopment and 1 and u ses activities within a RPZ shall be consistent with regulations established by the Federal Aviation Administration. Schedule R, Airports and Aircraft, of the Land Development Regulations shall continue to control land use activities, height, and construction to ensure that development and activities within the RPZ and other areas of the City are consistent with standards set forth by the Federal Aviation Administration. Schedule R is consistent with Chapter 333, Florida Statutes. Policy 1-2.4.5: Coordination with the FAA. For structure heights that require approval from the Federal Aviation Administration, the City shall issue no development or construction permit until authorization has been received from the FAA. Policy 1-2.4.6: Coordination through Development Review. The City Department of Engineering and Planning shall coordinate with Airport staff regarding development applications, zoning changes, and land use amendment petitions proposed for property adjacent to or near the airport. Policy 1-2.4.7: Protection from Noise Exposure. Future expansion of the airport property and runways shall be focused to the east and south to minimize airport noise and development impacts to urban residential areas to the north and west. The Airport Authority shall continue to monitor noise impacts generated by airport operations and enforce compliance. Lands annexed near or adjacent to the airport shall be assigned land use designations compatible with t the Airport Master Plan and in a manner consistent with the joint planning agreement established with Seminole County. The City shall ensure that land uses surrounding the airport are compatible with noise levels generated by the airport use through the following measures: 1. All land east of Ohio Avenue and north of Pine Avenue shall be developed for airport related uses based on the part 150 Noise Exposure Maps and Compatibility Plan prepared in 2001 for the Orlando Sanford Airport by Environmental Science Associates (ESA), as approved by the FAA and any revisions to the noise exposure maps that may occur as the result of airport development. 2. Residential uses and public educational facilities shall be prohibited south and east of the airport's runway system. However, transient rental multifamily residential units may be constructed provided they are outside the 60 DNL and do not include mobile homes. 3. The following uses are compatible with the Airport and shall be permitted east of Ohio Avenue and North of Pine Way: • Industrial Parks; • Business Parks; • Commercial Developments; • Attendant retail; 1() • • / • Service and Hotel Uses; l • Medium and high-density rental residential Developments; • Agricultural uses; • Public Uses; • Residential uses outside 60 DNL only with an avigation easement and development order restrictions. 4. Single family residences shall only be allowed on existing one-acre suburban estates or larger lots. No new lots, parcels or tracts shall be created for single-family uses or multi-family uses in private ownership. Existing parcels may not be subdivided for residential uses other than multifamily rental uses. 5. An avigation easement shall be required and included in the recorded deed of any property prior to the construction of a single family dwelling unit or a multifamily dwelling unit. Policy 1-2.4.8: Monitoring and Evaluation of Airport Layout Plan and Goals of Airport Master Plan. The Airport Layout Plan and the goals of the Airport Master Plan shall be reviewed on an annual basis in order to ensure that the development is proceeding according to the Plan and that goals are being achieved. Review shall also establish that public facilities are in place to accommodate expected development. The annual review shall be the responsibility of the Administrative Official. The Sanford Aviation Authority and the local planning agency shall consider findings and recommendations of the Administrative Official. Monitoring and evaluation procedures shall incorporate the following: Consistency review: determination of whether development is proceeding according to the Airport Layout Plan and goals of the Airport Master Plan; Determination that public facilities can accommodate proposed airport development for next period; Accomplishments: Review of annual progress towards fulfillment of Airport Layout Plan and goals of Airport Master Plan; Unanticipated Problems and Opportunities: The report shall describe the nature and extent of unanticipated and unforeseen problems and opportunities occurring during the past year; Recommend Amendments: The report shall contain recommendations concerning new or modified goals and objectives and substantial modifications to the FAA approved Airport Master Plan arid resultant Comprehensive Plan amendments that are necessary during the coming year. Policy 1-2.4.9: Airport Industry and Commerce Land Use Designation (AIC). The "Airport Industry and Commerce" (AIC) land use designation is a high-intensity mixed use policy for managing lands comprising the Orlando Sanford Airport and adjacent lands capable of supporting a variety of residential, commercial and industrial uses. 17 I • The Airport Industry and Commerce designation is intended to encourage the expansion of industrial land �. uses in areas where airport noise impacts will prohibit residential development and provide additional areas for mixed-usemixed-use development that would be compatible with airport operations. The majority of such lands is located in airport property and is subject to the Airport Master Plan. Certain properties, primarily east of Beardall Avenue, are located in the 2005 noise zone. The Orlando-Sanford Airport shall develop according to the Airport Layout Plan (Map 1-10), adopted as part of the Sanford Comprehensive Plan. Any substantial change to the designated uses in the Airport Master Plan requires an amendment to the Sanford Comprehensive Plan. Upon annexation of lands that are currently within the jurisdiction of Seminole County and are included in the Airport Layout Plan, the lands will be automatically given the land use designation of Airport Industry Commerce. Upon annexation of lands currently within the jurisdiction of Seminole County and included in the Airport Layout Plan,the lands will be given a zoning consistent with the existing zoning of the Airport. The land use mix in the AIC is intended to provide a full range of urban services and facilities including: 1. Industrial and Business Parks; {. 2. Office Complexes; 3. Commercial and retail developments; 4. Service and hotel uses; 5. Medium to high density rental residential developments; ti The maximum intensity of industrial and commercial development measured as floor area is 1.0. The maximum intensity for rental residential uses is 50 units per acre. The Development Review Team, the Airport Zoning Board and the Airport Design Review Team shall review development included in the ALP for compliance with the Sanford Land Development Regulations. Development contemplated by the ALP shall comply with all land development regulations included, but not limited to, setbacks, landscaping, parking, drainage and floor area ratios except where such regulations conflict with FAA rules and regulations. With the exception of the development included within the Airport property, The City shall require that all new development within the "AIC" designated area be developed as a "Planned Development" (cross reference Policy 1-2.8.1). As a "PD" Planned Development, all such new development shall be required to address infrastructure needs, provision of services, development phasing, development intensity and land 1S I • address infrastructure needs, provision of services, development phasing, development intensity and land use compatibility as part of an integrated design scheme which includes very detailed strategies and techniques for resolving development impacts. - - - . •. . . - - - .. . The location of future high density residential developments shall comply with guidelines issued by the Federal Aviation Administration and the Department of Transportation relating to airport compatible uses, noise zones, approach zones and other safety measures. Future high and medium density residential developments shall occur outside the 60 Ldn (day/night sound level) noise contours. In addition to compliance with all performance criteria of Policy 1-3.2.5, "PD" proposals in the "AIC" area will be the subject of negotiated development agreements. The review process shall involve County, state, regional and federal agencies having jurisdiction over impacted resources. No development order shall be granted prior to City approval of the development agreement. Developments within the "AIC" that exist prior to the adoption of this Plan will be "grandfathered". However, all new development in the Airport Industry and Commerce Area outside the Airport boundaries shall incorporate performance criteria to implement Objective 1-2.4 and Policy 1-3.2.5. Such criteria shall include but not be limited to: • Narrative and graphic information required for review of rezoning petitions, for site plan review, and other related procedural requirements. • Impact analysis, including plans for managing any potential impacts on air operations. • Noise impact analysis, including required sound insulation in areas within the airport impact noise zones. • Requirements for controlled access and internal circulation, including provisions for cross access easements, and joint use of driveways. • Requirements for perimeter buffer yards; • Management framework for encouraging development of strategically planned sub-centers of commerce and industry; • Dedication of necessary rights-of-way; • Use of pedestrian and mass transit facilities to reduce vehicle trips. 19 • ! Objective 1-2.5: Allocating Public And Semi-Public Services (D�. The Future Land Use Map shall allocate land resources for public and semi-public facilities and services as specified in the policies stipulated below. These sites shall be compatible with adjacent land uses to the greatest practical extent. The sites shall also fulfill the unique site location requirements included in functional plans and shall be responsive to the needs identified in related demographic and supportive needs analysis. This o bjective shall be measured through the implementation of the following policies: Policy 1-2.5.1: Public and Semi-Public Land Use Designation (PSP). The public and semi-public(PSP) land use designation is intended to accommodate existing public and semi-public services including: governmental administration buildings; public schools and not-for-profit educational institutions; hospital facilities and supportive health care units; arts and cultural or civic facilities; essential public services and facilities; fire and emergency operation facilities; private parks and recreation areas; utilities;—;; and other similar activities as shall be identified in the land development regulations. Additionally, the Public/Semi- Public designation reflects major transportation facilities including the CSX railroad terminal, plus expressway right-of-way that is proposed for use and/or owned by the Seminole County Expressway Authority. Lands designated for public and semi-public facilities and services shall contain sufficient acreage and open space and be properly screened and buffered in order to minimize potential adverse impacts on adjacent land uses. The maximum intensity of institutional activity measured as a floor area ratio is .35. The City shall monitor the need for increased land area for public and semi-public uses in order to ensure that the public and semi-public land use designation on the Future Land Use Map is expanded to accommodate the development of public and semi-public facilities such as governmental administration buildings; fire,police and rescue services; health care delivery services; and educational institutions. Land uses such as places of worship, cultural or civic centers, and other similar public or private not-for profit uses may be included within this land use designation or within other land use designations as provided for in the land development regulations. With regards to lands located in areas proposed for use by the expressway but not owned by the Expressway Authority, the City shall discourage land use planning or regulatory changes that would result in higher intensities or densities. This policy shall not prevent the reasonable use of such lands pursuant to goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. All new development or redevelopment shall comply with performance criteria cited in Policy 1-3.2.5. This policy shall be implemented through a mandatory site plan review process. Policy 1-2.5.2: Parks, Recreation And Open Space Land Use Designation (PRO): The Parks. Recreation and Open Space land use designation isended--teintended to distinguish Sanford's parks, recreational facilities and opens space facilities from other public uses. This designation is intended for developed City parks and areas of significant open space, including cemeteries. 20 i • Parks and recreation areas shall be readily accessible at the neighborhood and community level. Parks shall be developed and redeveloped according to the level of service standards for parks and recreational facilities, community demand and community input. Parks shall generally provide outdoor recreational facilities. However, community centers and indoor facilities are also permitted up to a floor area ratio of .25. ' 1 I. -. . . ....................... r-, . ........... ....... ... , C ..... .. •- .......................-........................ VI ..- c-. >.. . .... ........................................... ••••----•--••--•••••••--••••------•••----••---• .......-........-.-.7.-.......-.-.-................-.............-.*.-.-.-.7.-.-.-...........-.. ai c -, .... .............................................. --•••-•---•---•••--••••••---•------•••-••---•••••----- 1-1-1 c:t o E_ ........ .................................. P•4 _9 0 P V C c3 (N4 E 0 -__.-------- •••••• ••• • • •••••• "•" ••"""-"•"•"••""•• i ...... .z- ... V tn (1) .. IU 0- 4.• .7 , ••• .. ..-......3...!............- •• ••••'''' •'•••••••••• •• '--------•' '•' • •'''•••'' ' ••' •••••'•••••••• 0 L. 0 .. ......... Z. -iv.:: : ... ... ............ . 0 ••---•--• --.5 •----•-••• "Cid, -t• -•""•••• -"•"---- v. ._ •"•••""- ............. .. ..... ............... _......... -r . w •-• II -----.•••--.....-•--•..- ••••-- •,•- ..... .... 8 rt ..a ....... ...................... ... ........... ............ .. -2 0 si) 1 0 •"'". ..)5 O "•• 1""IX CL 03 , 0 ............ .. •. ................. . .... . ........... ................ Ili •••••---•---•--------- CI) O ....,— ''. Cr Z ....LP.t'• —•'•'';# ,-- O ..-.1%...... ..., IMMI... 4•314V5 c. . .. • .......i.. .:.-.. , m........:... :Le.... ....)-..!•....EVIII, -- li 1 Lo u..1 •• .4,,-440.,-,• ir. . cc (..z, ....\ „c .••••••• •• 0 •-J —•9/W11AM/447. •••• -'-••--•• - ......... ••••••• 0 ............... ••••• .......... ............... .... .. .. ••••...... •T-g.•c•••• ..4. .7 Lo .... ................. ........ ................ •• •---------- .0:4.1.-3-..... ..et..... ........... ....... ........... .: ......D .. ............... ......q.. .. IL.... ,..,4.,:e.,.c..... t w•-•-• "* 0,4: "" ••••- I C 1 -I--•--••-••.•-•..... • ,... .-_,.a..--....ow,•••- , .... • .1 (4 ...... .. I.rw. .i.ri I .. ...01.E'14.1.4....--- 5:-.;.'••11- tpi „.• --•--•• .-.1.::::-:-- 0- "•''•'• ....... --..•. '::::' ;"''''' .w•.1.—..: •.0 0 0 0 ....... en ,. .............'.......141-1*.. II V.I..............• ii:*0 OCR)4 •""•• ••••••• . .............1--- .1-c......-.---.• --• :.: • • 4,,,...*-27...-.--._•:-... - •••....• --------•-•-.p.rTII.-:.t b..r:7.....- ....irr: ank --•--• •••-•• •••-• ..... ••• -•- ... . 0 .0 :..... ....C. co O CL w: .................•71...:.7•7' -:-:::::.-..-.-. , ......... 2 >• - z z. z. : • • 0 2 •Ne -0 L= 0• a) a; ..........-.-.... a- . .,`-:-........ 2 , 4,. --4... a) 1/11° I•16 o: :.. ......4 _ •,,........ '_ , V-%,0:•....:4•41-::.. ai 1111.1. _I 44' cu ? -..., N. N.....• - -o ... ..., ..40■ VI 1:3 C.-.) C C •- U_ CO 76 C _ .....,:,..... .... . c 90 .... b .?_-• -0 CO E :=1' (1)'.:-., ---• ti 0 L., r •ri•RI. 11111 o I •� ■. :-- .:::::;74) 1 I►y�l mo: . 2 a '�I.1 .iii ,_, M �1JJ1_ili�1 2 E ItiZ 'E o:. ;I:r1 i 12 J • , ;' � I/ . 1 r..4:0.44.4 t•• CL f • �r1: . 000� 11 II,J ' �' t I I "'.vNO� . .'.' ■•0*4,.: • w o II I ) .. .I�.'.-.... .,• 0 c P1 A,I� I I, „. ": ' �... '' .: o: . 1II ve ••11 rm........ o .. a 1O 11.1 JYZ 3AV 3llVW • te�� , � Z • LL1 ,. a 3AV a210dNVS �- 3AV N2Nd i, _L` V 3AV N321d ' e:'AV V 4.. 41 .%:■:.% NN,\... . T3 gy,,{,14,....• 4� II I �I 1 .,'iv.• • c LE c v o v 1 til `\:• :E.W.P.. ■®/ A rsv ..`. a_� cn° c -o m iu. o `n � \'_,..• .. t-r r-loy \�r'r�� P '41 to o Cr) rn a o °�\i o Jam"- U w • v c tL 14 %7� :. ,fV -41 to '�7 ti 'tip ,-• 0 -°° °a 2 0 `' C c a r -k. �`� :: :{yr? . �i�� Z a. LC_ a. a. .n in F D : ' St...,,-41.1>; i. .1 1 .• nom.1-4-" ,. -..I.'. � r. _ ;�:.-- '...,-.-.1-'11 ii. .• <4= tip,y�r 1. ••• a- Y - 'o • VI II �� :: � "J N.A".'.: - •• N 1 .. vialikm oeii .M.11 AIM _v f' 1 ti at .... c c ° V o v c o. '' A t'� �� `. IIIIIn�1 �. -'...' ti . ':+1... ::: =� E .i�� o �°e cn N o E c o ■� :04.....--v....'�ti •ti_ti N o a' m E a, _E o n ° v :..�1` ... �� k`ç .%/ .11.._•~r , .r.5: v Q iL LL-- V) °8 0 LL, •.�. c:61."....'' A .ti L-, ;:�-Z-<:;.fL•tf1 E jUI1 C L O Os O O�� ��:. .4': L 'ti^�\\; �1�1~ \\'^ =.�.ti.ti'ti-c Q O ° w W� ` �� CL_ \�`.�:� - L. r};=. c: -.-.,,, 1kk$ IIb;1' i!. 1P ems`, t eA, � c'r? Q ` W = a) a'• in "Al i$1 ` 17° J Ip� cf. - r ilir i:r.fr NM' .::-..-rd# ..t, , I :-......A.dolii'.rodilthr.'i -j- Ao---- ' '44, . [ . N i 147. 4� 1 z • i,r •• o r � ..4 • ...-.........h. 4, , >. ? u".:.'..".."6.:: i''.- var.." - /k 1 � I�'" ��o� �c.. v1 �} •, �' .,11;11,itio 5555551-y >/�••,�. � ...�,.•�r•. I+ �� -- `" —omr _ _ X71- 1'/doll mem vial wear ,�::.�:::• .. b ',' i•Big -iv ,,,. _�. --4 re,`�. I 111 �_ i I • tea V 44 3/�V H 1116LN3L1d o Am . '\ ! ....... l�li'r• '':tip1 r Y ( {F� L}.111 Z. ` yam.. }.ti• • •;` + O '=' \'� �. C '... •.\xis- y• _ o v . vkii,, u N I. ae� o:mss. � ie ∎ ° a) o• ` �.� `' LL o N c m X °X �. -- . .'O a} i:.4-a o � - v) c a .- In. 4 c 77'2 a sue_ /N� �M *-`I v' ,r� � *5 , _' __ m o c '� c o o : ilsi r . , . \ , Z a o p ' ti�•{..:L .^ - ti t a ,\•Or a - a N i I- D D fh , n- gr]7 i •. �a�-. )ate\ 7.a,....N.-., .121; L••Ig•��5) ��• •.•.%- r�•i • 4.' �• •__ �_\.— v� • �+/+fie.�� C V C 0 N w cL \ X`t:na ....\„ , N o E o •: .•L - o '. ' o 4,5 —13, o W >1 • .L. ,• •ti��\J. '.i_.,.... _ I .. . . e . N o) o ,, a� O =:L• • i.5.: • N s E- I �' p a li I 1 �.c o > a .v.. t` 4 n n t ,.,.. _: ��_•1 rs x� i>' t; ! ill Ili QP7 I �;Y SUN I '�o. ®Po • y• 9t • <i° 'i'i $ff ii ff 7x, ' I !fi E 1 I = ,Ipq�r ITd _!_•°1° [° a_ I. T ff ff ff!f !f H q 3 1 ;4, 1 III il f 'y�t'�Y �aa i g �3'..._ :y -a ap' t_,_ tl I O it D I auo 1� 300 l ■ ; `r.� ° �I� i k 8 , b b 6 B •-,� C) 11 1 1 1 t1 if�Y -•1,1..+ �9 �A 7...�s ' �� • •1 ■ 1 Z 1 1 jr /J t�J/ ,v,l'�'".rR� Flx!ffr./-g4 :,'''..W. { ��j_ �•11 11 N �.. •� /_ .'.: ,-er.ri . ..:::: •‘(\ . •••-...71, .- I li 1 X ,.5.i . . ■ • �d$ wr {ff ff ff {{ $ -i ,'' 1 n �y- i I '• '�/ I t� -{ 5 ""• < I p % 1- . / � ! ' �r �F '_ . 11 I p ii £ff '- qq 1 11 j ly_ 1t '1, y7_�5+ i', E -ail?' ; - IIT %1 �'. ' ,. ' I. =I-,Ipp' 7,---......1 (. ,' ?III I I I I I' ', I ' 1.0 I LfY. 'NN�! � II r.%•-'//////II `0 �,✓�' t I I ` : .,, Hu I c �:�rr;11 11 �. • ;! I 1�// �I g 1 ::w : 1• 'f U III I IIlli , I! }, .1 1:wry',k wa: 1, 'r s�f '�- (• _ , II I II I I I I II .I, ' �., ;� ";'�� I 1c ©. II �6:� .I n11,� r '//:%^• '�,j. , , Ir ..(. 9 I• , Ipa q{��j{ :� , 'I j,ll I 1 p•,,, �I ne y r} '.I 1��t F� %; � '.I �1 . .J ,• (°: I i U I I f I T f I I I r i 1 R !„ ' �i. r = �v r r `C' t17 1�r�i 's 'ii/ t .r.. 2..0 j F i g j pp �� x 1 EA F (jjUHjii 9 i it A S a [ J fF ; - R 1 .f - f i! B f g d�go 1 % `` � " � �•- iki v, i 1; . 'c i ` q Il i i t pF. '1, 1t-,. ��/ i�"°1 ...v°r ijr A�� •r•1. ' � rilo�, •t 1!, Z = - I • 1 A, 1! 'd i , •.plr•L`1'il. /<44-y4 \ All '1/ ,e r c'I If `�, % ;f' F H i 1 I, •a } t 6 Lai .v.p,A,�'i=4; ., `L S ,l4,,: 'i ', !,' I \� � .•, «�. V " Y9� .�l t / 2 0 , —,...--•!-.,-'., , I � lzv. , c '�)iii} .'! 'I ",._ .' Q d t )- \` ti)\Jfk.:: /i__; • 0. i ; I1 :;• '� `,'11 r IlLL!� 1 (' 1 !Z'.4 1 _ q. 7 1 ^ y! ` �i(1 1 . 4 ' i .f1 _- - )p-.• • I1: N/�1'. y' • e / V 1.'I"4. ( �. 1{ //,‘•I..' Li,1 'J T!i: , ` r�1. 1 d iikt \.T' e l5(0.M. °- It, J li 191 '14` I lam''- 1 il',•Ill( Z i'. � I_J, ' [�-- ,1 - 'Sw• .;,�-. .�f'•, �/^i : i l i 4 ,• 1�•� :, ,, JII. ; - 1 ,- °Patel I. i; Z .. t 1 Nv I „`1�. Y„,,,,i4„,„.,1'N T»!-4 ,,• !� ,�,�,r'.- rajj �W.'.-</ _1 '-y ' t� • 1, II , n (� -I ' a :.;i_. i 1 ,M,,~' .-i i.+.'•, ..,I..�.l.il f ...,.,:.,1, 14 1 ~' n wPw '� � V1 ,9,• ted r? d I ',�� I ` 1j•:- •,.•m Z D� t '- 1 �--,+1 .1'____.2 Mil " N B_._ t ex :ti �;^ II _ � -i Z ; V,.S7",.1.-�:.,• aEt�l l� K �, •�`;�,�. ., �+i._�.p1�'ig_�x'�t������}� s4i ... ;'3 -'r" 4 3,‘,0 --� 410 � �,I a_�_� � '°""1-.77:7,74,f4.tl�� ...• D Z fn ',:�•} ::;<;. •�9•:•.... �i p_i. pt9 �..L;_......._nn,ww..er.a!Ir�.elae.te�avl..._..0 -�t �C�C I��,11 `1�E•r D Q ,+w s' rw rrre'4's,9e�- Fs, d r . '� -»� �� 7� �___. •Y`°'Z.`3 ,• #5 ��\• M1 C D .� 21\51 - ,.,--t- _ � j 21 r� _ _d _`' '� ^ �� a.�o �.. - P T_- I ' •It d 'I YY �iy 4 t 1•••i �.j� f D 1j �.-0 f ' ' f a.f ll( Pj. ‘�isl J '� ���=$, 1i1.5�� I i FI .\` i' t9 '#p M-- n.uoru � t K l �,M 17 A�I� a n �7 .s1�' , , ^I 4 i j,•.-.s.. i(• • 1 ft•' 1 j, 1 �' • '; 1 .i.[ ` Y ;11 ill -:. ,f‘1 :511 �.1 • nI�1� �. t .'ltl 4 _>,�-- If.- pi st, . �4 1111 -•"'yy ) .F., . ',,. x ..)1, N 0/ .1 :0& t j 9 "� it I c,1 ,•c rtRp ill ai▪ % ) e 1 s °- ' j!I:s%�r# 4�j �. .\,liii 1 .m ,()y,llf'I I�1 1•`•�,:7.':7;144,1111 ,,e: r/,`I'i 10�� �" .}..; - f.:: I. t• [I 1 bats t°ra.,:i'at:3'a•,'1ai�i',�.il ak •/' 1 . i r. , Z ( .... II... I ;i II y1 iii I I I; s 1 p!sy�)1, l C ) •`1( '1.,'.'4► / / • 1111 , LLLL I o �m D A� f m I 1 Y ;,(,/// r___. 11 £IIC111 II ;Jd1•� 9 � l�I�f,▪I �M N 1��I ,may aqY 11 i;1 1; .. :::1,,,,,.4,.. . I I, E.' I�«. �'=L v.,1,1, 1,4 d, llR f _ 1,` I 1-I,'J.- ., •. - ,r 'Ads...,.,, Ti , •.:.'„, t ,:Li,. pOI a rt I.I •.:; ;- l.? j .( 1', ..... 0 I • '^ �...r 1� 11,,,iii t il, . -13 1 L illy r I 'll 1 (;I.∎(I y 1• I } I '',1 I' I ;14'., I ',•i�i 11 1i, �i 1 i I' i �' rs J �. « tI • Z I��--_-I t I1!;1 I I• I I I I d T4,;" • r., 1 r y r !}1 I_,.. f1 ff II� �i.�1,a I 'j;ifi '1, II : � I i.1 �:A" I, I I 1 i..J., r.4O•'+ _ 1.1,J;if; :-ii, I•V. , :V' t ,./1 i I I +°I I'1 a}!-1 I 0. I (.i� /. •• of , 1 - 4 R p :IA' t I II ' I II 1 1 1.}.141 ••• 1 __ j-ti p48! r 4 (r ''1 1i I �r-, I, • ,-;:i.' i l� rlI Y• .1: 711 I1 ` '/1-I �'•L //` ••t4�II. 7., ° .r.....,, 9[.1nµ 4 ' I nwA!°��. I�Y HI 1 i j p/ 1• .'I t..qt... I' .1::, j° .r--_.... �pG�i ��., :•I�� (11,,,..1,... R- *. F yp l R'M ; •, ' - . t /@ 1 11 1 .w1 II 1,`i• °' !t; j 1 g •.r i+. n ...._.....•W_........-_ �:•r.' A,I t `^• ,� ,�.., i I I t ,`.n.J 'r.4. a.F:!-t `,- I \ 1 I i- ..I. 1 :Iv i".1, r., I• I .( 1 , 1, I .;`i -7tl ,'_ ,1';I ` „..„4,;;;;...,!;I , ,. kit ;. „.,,,, 44 FI I •,•,''• R ,p,‘• e I iw:�i M' �,. f. i ; 1 E , • ��( it I ?.vr I. a. mJ` + H, s ( ]j§ ; \..I I I ,,:V;'e mi IJ a �{p. e v a� I c r�,l t5 11111” : L 4I i 1 �;I•r J ill ° li 411.;:.•:',r''� 1' ,;'� '1 t ae.0 (ss 5 ° �� �� .I 1, � ►I j �� 1. � t I:h' 1tt I._II i=i 1.1 i 1 �.� 4.0 r.i: °f �0' I� �1 1 ; , �'_...�� gti ¢ S t1 .1) '� a�l }2"e 1 1l°�.0�1 ' '/ I4,;")..••••'h�,x .......I I .. , { 1' Tilt c 7. p 9 1 a 0 - •:,, � ‘'..,,lit.x h,,,„„,.. 1', i � .`�._ «.l:_T. = ' _, + 111 ,..;I;;"."•;47- i ": r b•QV l - i I'.+1• -t. i r "y, r1�r 11_- 'I I fi } II $ •.t••� f C:) 4f �._. 1 1..— s�" .; fir;' gag ,0 tj I f ,a I ( �' �../.-,.-) �i' _i ' •1 • L. - R Id Ili 1 1 ; • { • 1}_` '. r f:r �= .a..c �- 1■'o�iaij:...f..i ll +� ��q- ,=.',`-o:*,....10...." •••nun �5r1� �« ii n• en. (( L •. mos t;�. -ffta �2? I 11111 f 11 rfl ; 1 G € f t s t IN.: ter.: y-, t gL ' 1t I t t tt p nl... #p�� x •:nom- ;,�• t r 1 f I 1 1 V'Fi'l 1%;‘i*:1.0S° 1 y �' ,. . I a = _ off; w€:MBE i A M \ iI ( { ,� ,S H j :?ir;1;" ) t ''\. '' ■ _7y j7^E a ' :.qi-F)i.:• •+ I .E s r I r i ` � � � � EEEEE �b 8 — A , '' �I .Mill ' 'I s• rrr trrrr �: .... .�,� �.°� ::_I1lI43' __ �■ pis / •{ . t t i i ranzr / aF 11 '%_ :e P j OM an FL 1 . o<1.� II I F F F 1111 " _ s e '.,.(..t 'U''' 1 IIIu:':� mr'4`,, L ._.._ I(: n' I_ 1�� ■ f I J t t t I l it ..a �, s— =i,eu; !,' .Q L. �1 I;h`• 1 r r r 1 I I• I,. I i i 1 1 1 1 1 ° 1.1:: -, ,1 {'lilt _ 11■J...Rt I i ,I If I : + : + ... �� X15 Ii .� t t HIHi . p 111 I I 1' aJ ■ '"— ._1 I • . . 1 – f} { I 1411 .tai, -1-1 ti ����- \7�I`r •f n 1Ll tek �f`ii/rPi 'a, flQ J;e t a ! r„ �I l t I� 9 �� I {�I'r 1L 11111 -1. 1 <'( - I._ItftL it - 1,14 1 Ii: i o.. i 5r{ 1 .1• �., - 111111 .la•.'I ' gale I. , , �.1 ' r—.I`-� I I ii!ri Z 2.2E51 m T 9 4.1. , q 3 '',: „m ;�tl:l .": 11 -i1 i 1 . ' _ I , • —_.L.1--1—_ L7l. i.1 , h. 4 1 1 ,� 1!_ 11.i{ww A W ='_I 1 ' - �, • ,;(•,, f 4biii i i I ,1 I . =L=' '^,I • u, 1✓---=!...*:-vY' �# y -. • ti_. ■t1. 4, a aw. r.' 1I _' -1 ', ' �.I 1. ._" L_ I. .: p— a 11 �„� Its 1• J 1l1 , . • . 1, /// /i� �1 n It. 1 Fl I ,..:‘.2W::::.){ _ _ — — ` ;nom ...:r , UI111 /� ( 1 1111 .k. i? eu L•�. , ._t -.. I. i:f•5'• .1 I F I lltll Kirk l 11 I I,n i J l l l l f,l I 'i�•` X,r ,DES 1 – ' i 4 .1 .'1'h•e 1i•r I lr ' �,._ I '• / t,f�/� 1444444'44,�r �.� ,1 /l•1`♦I .:., f 1� II �y,1(� �J{�1��LII '��'i• I'I\'11'lI,11111�1,,��If I .ql I Nr �.� 1�:• di'194 � I �tT�`�'tt \,`�,• LW .r:A St. ,.PUIMIIMIUM�t„40„,,�C-.\} ,F 'LII �LfSlf llll+h.. I I 1 �'' t I ' I Zt;27 y•. ' flu J INI10 i Iu (b/I i I p OP 1 •.i I `L,t+ .1• _� � v !fie - IMLV/ia r•' , 1 4.)..' wrva5.. : .�w_ .. ---s. k fi�//. i� \ �y I A/,Inl,4m i i` 11 a 1.1 F llllfllfl I}4 `'yL�?,'s'� II h s/ 1111111111 L� I gal 1 I 1 1 / l 0 '' I 1 y i e4 I IWiI 111... 1`x{•i t ♦� II I _. 1 (:� I e F:144_111 1 5 _' __ ' _- I I I f I. urrw{ A ` `g- tt jryIMN i a'/ 1...,II�a'F i '• , c �' n - , P • 11 N�MNHIII.,pi 11WH'111�r 4 ri��■1 �' .., . 1 ._`•1 \f. I / .. �, J 9. tl` iL •,� \ I IIL. •III _ S I. .. n A _. _ -�. .rq' ''I I 1► ..�Hflll9 Jar- may 'i 'b _•- I :.. / k I az?[ri a F ' 17T" ' �� 1 ' (� I� •+1w. yf F ~U III ��� h `� �A S1Y®®r ®\� s . 1•,:';.;.0o0'.'4, ti i JrHlk ow FH■ I� - +' ,v__ (� , � Ir , n .i,j. rl [ICI t° --_� ' 11� SHE 1. al W O�IIf1I1�J A,, &,, __ ,,, I J' .:,,,,/,..I '„,+• 't G.�:l lflfflNN6ga:• ff °: :II.''I, 9 1 / I - b \ �} °a,. u . 4,,,,.„ I.:,1, }Ammo E°` flff$.G' 9�frffl I II 1~f I0 1% I ... ," 31` a, "• . J e 1 : 1 ._,� ,.. r t : . ' u All s1::: :a s ' i i / 1>. . j 11 11 i , '`Bonn L NU ■ - gig }1��s''��11 1;;1 .{ s1,a'• I'>'91N4�1'7 �1���1DI� p� :m~ <' Cr1 Ir ,a �P2,i/1W g�&� I » ' t• fl}1fff11-RIN � Ir4 /,',x,� f— l Rhflf�dR11I11ffF�IHMf.1:A14F �I,le a : cD V1 �I I `1 11 :.• • 0: 1NffNIN4 ♦iW H$r4r/1 (•I� I'u 1 4� W81W�I�IN if9 �l ro ��' — l , o . a ems” li[i. '"" toff kid 1 1 •. - ui11 f ai..e' ,,, _#--BERIREla v[131, IrwJ(}i1f . R°r ':rtf411rud'Ld 3@ :i..l'1 ■. /, 1„ 4•• {{1 lLi B 01 f'E1 1N9 '9 E1F4r-8448 E 103 14011i+,11310,,, .I O l.�,t3N F1 , I ,1,21...1. I i 14 III ■ 2 1 A'r$..�1 ',• !1f�ff1'd'IlF1(=4f'f rA�1 7, lW �? `'_ .1 L' .' '"'I.; it Iti 1 r°I lllu11111i'I"' i air Iarl I. 11111(4°1141 � I!�mnrfwLP11 INI■�l Liar , * • : I a Cit - , i . 1-.. ' i•■la fK, ' I 1 I cal /pf#111111P,' y 1 S -I' • t■■Rut1 ' .�" o 0 f1p1{fl11811 I r � ! � h '� I awl � III { ' �` �. f1 �Bil4� ■� �' �CP1�1N1NlfNRfNc'H1�1■■■ L' p Ia 1 ' ,' rmI I1 1 I1 }, ' 11 a ' B - 41;1 ■ F` O\V. ..'. fir-`. ' i 0.'0,,,, -,,'[h ggi- I f \`�\�< 1'- I:�PN �81HS4h}P f9HIIP _■� 1 �.ti mrJ ,.1 a Q•¢ IN• ■yi, - X31 u� 1 it! _ -� !..E - ,� r�€.'F�EH9;' FAFNI l ti. — i cw• ' i ®_'' 'S�' _1 1 u■ f1hi1 t'' Fl vim ;..; I� p+ I _ �!! flf61 }m ii r \� „i '':',.:".41',111-1',.- IIPII1,r>li_tij a ff11 H1: I''.1.:,,_D11�1 '.42.4:. p 1 is ,�� t;ll► uyi ,¢ , "s r— — /IH H/InIIy1I1 I__ I , , ,.a�I,j� ,,,�:.1.p ❑per I o I .� Imo.. )). '/."," r r Iirfl RR".' --I'� .. . . 4 � f '- L��frF t it�7L1TU]n_.� n r 'I:'a Ili D. -® 11 t W . - - ■��a 6® FI f__ l g44,E4 u.'IS/:'.,r ..sc, •-I'Minn IM E 'ari l ' 11.Er���l II II I tub 'f.,6 eJA{l ,I I I I1Ifl'15.we..,1 l Ismi B { ' HI I t 1'1.1.'1.11 •. . •� \ :..•. ..,.:i. .. . _ I .I 111111-, �M1ff 1 !,I•urui q■b• •• III `'dP-I® 1 L /� ! rlIY :1111,; I ■ I N'I a 1 ) I (,1 ❑ t L I 1 s. • Z F� ��� I li !. • 1 »ill { I , I , / 1I IgI E w.; Aim I li f 1 1 I;Ii, 1II fllGll - I _ ! 1 n, II L�ILIIJ' ..J l �- gal t flH „.^411 1{4 I .,d,, I I I_ /�/ Jww EMI !I I i . . .• ( .)r • 1 !� f 6M�hl,l�w ;I (1I..M Ili ( Y ' ' -r NH 1u&H4 iAII I Il li 1111 . 11P��• -- . .f 1171 l , .__ /s 1 '"- M� 1.1 .nn'� �r " ' �' I. ( ; hr C r fY11N61h ) i�. IIL_: I I J 1i r 1 $ p I I I T11f, I'I IF1' 1 U I . II� { I' II 1 ,� 1111 I . 1 i L,'' - I 1 �I. I , I 1 II I 1111 • 1 r t 1 I 1 -. X11 I ( TI 0 I- • .. I I 4. 1 I 1 -(..1 d ' II ' I I J. : . I j-1 i (' f I 1 t 1 ` j� I -I i .I 1111 I L .111111 1{ 1 i • • • __ r 5 L( O �o IJ J Ii L_ r [o of Ell II I ► 1 °cp.,- ._____, , r---- ---- it- [-) I- - - 7 I\1 I i 11 Q E I ,_ —rit_ 4, .N.._- 1:3 1/ .• m•IN Tim 7 11691a E =,w�i-■+iii �'��N o— '---, I / VI �1 a iii ��i■ =v j i.`1 I L 1 I j; �+ ANIII••••••••■•11/ ' ■ If"- f i ��•••••••••••w••w••■•••• N- A/. tr-�1 .� . an A ■■■■w■■■w:•■a■:■■■■ ■■w��■c =••• ■■ AV HON3213 IMMUNI At. .. INIMI In MIMI lit 5....m.... , ..� ■■ ■1■■�. Vim \� / CZ -, C Nookumi.-,,c, ,Tim „1 D r _ I .OIL J �� •Q Z Q LO CLI cr ....i 1 - ----,,. ...— 5 _Tn I _ , , , , . ., _i_ , , -..,' ......_,,,. . _.- - __, . i .t r__, Frill \ .; I -{1 -- O - Tom- �� cf) . .____„:6------- .., (‘11 Li -i LI ' 1. f---- -4s' — • 4•0 1 *kV�l V c- TI . / __... .,. ,, ,), ., N\ y < ( 1... E \-9 - ,_ \ ._, I -!%-.\ Q - I' , `=--J a i --- � I� f. = cn , ' . j b • -. 9i. �-L I Ni • .1 •, ' 1 ' ' ;i • • � �,{�C•C�?a Cf S, a�s•f-C t ♦,� emu■�` ■■• ;-� ' ',•,111/� < ' {:its •�c CrCf< 1G�� 1 C •.<••• ``: uo::ll 1■\: :/ !e Q e+< ' < !gm �O a f{< . 1. --— '0.0414 .4. ] � h4!11T ■ ■i r �_:<(f �i E_J ::' ';;:i: .■W; i< . < <,< <U.'.'. ,L�L,I r••.•F({ :•e•8•, •+ ` t■u■t . .s < . :K.- � <.... <'< 3• E .•••••:::::::.•:::.•:•:•:•:.:.:•:.:..,,...« - .''°•°•°•°``■IL t < < ' •?• : •"`' . 111< x+ 3 U• -,-I, - ::., El:::�■:■.CD�i -` ti\ iii 3_ ®�I, <. �lii - '! -: kilt.:.! ). r- t ti■•" I�'Iti■1 �` .�� <e�![�141,011 . :■ice 9 /. `�' _ /• aIu! pu)r ac®•■n:.�i'.::`W ,T-• -- I ,1111■ ' ®;' .<. - .<.�• 1 •-�J// t:u.-.,• • '` •"ems r, F-• a � I®®®E®�� "VII '� e.T■�itiiiSS' 1`I ��T .Hl 2fili.r �u■.A Q .°...2'erueod® ®®❑®� 1p� .n u'" ___ •; ■ft; ,,,® aoei...t_. L�'III • ¢ 3 3 In:�N38®.,..® ,. WiM,.;ou 'UAgn�,:::=: •.I_ °I.If. ■rum Lr•2ig®®®�3'+ .&iL:�=® _.u.n. _m =wok," rte' VIII - Naps Y-'� ®®i7(111I 1t,r. 153.\`•$ 11fYj q":. II�I"1' :�I ► �n• -� s. W;1 -.... C3 L = /•g ild:_..,+i_?� 1=. i r I tl rel �. _.• ...r c 1I II�I�'K :::�-:::. .■ 1 III,.__� ,. P. •e/ :tea®®®::8EEEF III I �_ � I::_�ow9.3, I!i i : . �� Mel �1 �a��s.:-�:g®®ms s ®:: �aes�® . . '`.. •o!• I • .<•< i5 1 I - �eAd H3N32ld 1® 1(1116 ®®�•, . gIn.� / �- •••;;u■�i:: • 3rlsmt '�® r/.'<'<;<'<;<;< , ?EE1 tiG®®®®-:, ■ilii11 •rrn• ... I.n■ ‘'.'.•. _qr,1; 0 0 C-)••Mg :::::::::::.•.•.'‘ '.:.: iktt114.;...G-D31Miris jE E'EE,-".:_i-:rat! Umr,Ais.,..,:::;.; ,77....r.inis No 1 IN I LI.6;mast ilidAli ._,A.A.'."...."..•"....OflItr;:•:91.. ..44,4,R..., 1-c, c:4 ,--. <C• -•ti •! -II roafpa .AI .::: 1 =_■■��7`-` Al *`,.j•:: Ct I'■: (V 111111•00,s --:,•••`•__ - 1 I < < !'-t<.= <.r:.iVW ■/ 1, iii• L. /�, R a <' ■EIIip■plu.n.0 '�i y ,i■. IIII■� .■ 1�•••I S1< .• .:F .211.414.:14.' ■:■r. ` / r )� �1_4$er 7■w� < 4,16.'7 I f.,•4.. tflr� ■ .•�. f� ` u fnr,<�Il,ai!icrV.tll "�\ 11•' < ■�ii!!r o♦'� ,, •a �■ < <. .■tlt�i ■•�''','0 t� i ' < •e•°•° i'1ii' -4,. t vs e o•o .' /\.1<-. T..,..II. •<_l�'AIIIIIa r a=- :v_�':i :!• 0/0.0.0.18.1,1, I, :=<, . •~ /o•e•°..„.. � .< �\ , r� ..:,I!. <-<.<.<. .11,:•••...> °' ° o, .\\I°•..........1.1-01 4 - 7.� �. �< --.• •_ �ooeeeeo0 < << <i�N.:,t,,, '��- :'AAA?,ooee < e�ooee ( O o•e e e e e e 'Y' I -=1,-5,1111:::- r o•o.- ►< 7 �T� �j ,,. ••- e!••••• �: :1•2111-•2 • :.,_ •< < < - t IA?I/�: • �! .,i <, ;e�-/ w Ix Q O . ►!• �., rte' ■�■-i.■■ T \ b �.lol Sii■ < e'F-_ :a�'<•< • I `-11 - II i<.-'°'1.���A..-114 ° � �4 �"a1�r V1 [z.. O CIO) o o e o-o to 1,_,,� .•i�', �;�'S ,�, < < .<.< U 000)00 H. -. i II:uu. ` \ ' Q. Q. • .♦ _ Ill ! •p ` 1■■ n l< ■r►T:••�}� _•'o•olo•°r'`'te„' !�■•:•`U� ��:�•< < I.. < < • <III C"�iI7I�'II�.�•<•�•`�`:_.s r < iii \ r- �/ .*<!<!e+ .Sy .I=i i<' I�<. 1�i.<.< < In IMii■iirlp,• I .�.•• QU...IhI<.<_a:\C!S`;I I c , .i�a!r1` I!- :1`° ll ■�°/ �• '.1,111 r.I ,` < <. <•y_.1T•2!-.7,< ■■ iii• `1`.<. \• 1 01 till *• •�Cf�•<•<•<• \ 0,_._.a O1:.t <-11th -. <_< <X11 I "- °�■ ',• 1- t -,..'11141 r .L.A. ,U< ■1 T1 ' e- -:tint-- i■!i� u < <^i p I_ a:ll " r •• 'L. • p�•� < < <n�. ■■n�'1; . l'"I• �I11,.,,I■[5$:.,.!....,11�f RI 1 a8� '•.-• .+: I 111•ur„ u■� < < ■■ r � .(.7. -tomb I. grl Ill ' �� CID .„:k-r. 5' '1.,.r�.�-- IIKII <. < .:< i ,.-1.1.,, .■d 3,. l �`iiil�I��i <t• q s INN` - - - `, .y;; + ■m�, 323II.<! ■r•I • ::•i E A !�, �`• ■ur yr• uu:: it ■ - •r' . .,:.:4 > E i �,'•,• <,t- y- .-<=.-n-_;-_. �..2.!!r, -!..r,u■ fr if.•.'<- 1�I IIi '-, 1;'�•=-i :'�� 3 u 4 � •I1 Il \ ' ._.: •: .:ail,+:-- �;.■■�i 'Z:17. i {'p I 9 ,,:ii I � D�z U •••• 4::.:+:+:.::::::.;\o••II. • • 11 i ea j t r (� 4 v O in. '. , Q`. I: I.ct lit w a C - R •.r <1• ■• 1 ■■■ � u O to ( re 1 .. .'. `: ■ ii r�I y h .�l E o fl , <u■ 1 . , „ < :: < I �® � S i „ � < l C <,1 i _ N,i --- • U • • ,: Tnttttttn 1■n = <- ( .., — — . G.. - ■�•tttttu u.. ■••• 11 m 1 ~ (- t •••••tt••• ■e •••��• I icc p a �� tttttttt■ tttt u --.'/t. t -tttt■�r (- 1 ■tt6.. z 11' •••111170T111(Or{Ala 39ttt11� '_ ,rL ••••••••-- - ••.m••n•. , ttttatttttt •■tttmtttttr _ .- _� , --� - tttttttt:tttttttl�ttttn a } .1 • ■tttatttttttttttm'6ltttt�� l �f� I ttttttttttttttttmtttttetn L�+ Q, . -, > ��utttteeettteettettttttttn tJ) t� `� < ■tt.ststtttetsttettmttettttt: • >- I, �ttttotttttttttttttttttttn •••••••••••••••••••••••••I w °• •. ■i.ttttuttttttttt■ ROOF - r J ,''ttttttttmttttttl ■tt■ r_ ___ 1 • F w- t tttttsttttttttttt� '1:tt■ i V , Ittttsttttmtttttt. ■tttttttottttt■ 7� 3 v ttttutttttttttt.. 1 re ttttttttmttttttte, 1 —. -i . : In ttttsttttmtttttttr —. - t ••••••••••••••••l a� � III!! ttttt••tailttt••UA! - 5 ...EL_ ■■■E, 'ttttttmttoettttuo O •■■• Ittttttmttttttt•nl — W AI■■ r ■■.n ■L ■ttsmut•tttt•tuo ai "Ci LC 1-I®ii 0...,,,___ht i1il iin! 'Pm'VIII�'" ■tttttttttttoa C/�■:1:lEolm11.1 �II�III1_.�■■■ ;- ■tttt■ ■tteE ui ■■,■ ��® -LI.u.nnr .oily te_eetitttm .�®®© .'I r t1! ■urt'/rttottt■ ■ttm 1 111 ■ . V' momm® I imp �aAttttt7t11••Il • In L gym® !-'J!4 H (l�11I��....a� - !Jr :I' ;,: / < r ff :I-1110010 rb / III :..mss..c� �����1 i■ •, ��aomamm��- Via- ` •,.. 11 .■: 1:1-_ .-, 0.■,•1H©oomommss L .■■ �� :,. •• F�1 g EP31000OmOm®®�L[� p�����■arr■�a ■■r a■ a i.i��llguL . '�1 \ '{ + F' .•■ •,i-ii II FL.rn•.r.# I.1 ■I IIGfr71����Ma. ' �•-��►-. �'-�1Et' .AIL.. 2L: .I..ra ■li 4_ _ ,. ■ It . 1...11amn o to ill 71■ mosir 11/F:;;.%tea>sa:e..avtm n •. I a.7;._. •••� B®®mtDOQIO' ❑ml■ur■ '��Lrin�ll...—••..a d-°:•:WEI11101'C1L- � n���� �UJOUL 1.1 IIOCOM'S tEmEtE�: .--r..0.:;:e. z�rIlhL' JUIlI r- G:P 1 r®e® ,11■ • •iii I i i 'l•: ,IR7r••:.:•:�• �ttr�■:i' -1 FI:�-r i■I+1 ' <� r•1 L.,_,-;:u.,.°-_-e': iii is i� ;,•�._�� Z►rj 1 1�1 i .immmum , j.i■■r:r.•..• .._-�r,� ��� .- r U `- . .am®m®,��II11111'1� • wa■a:;❖:•r:❖:■�ri111 �_���_I , _� U_ iinu -.■m10OmQ�❑IDPINv-i•, 11'-3.11.1.°:❖".• ,!' ::l" i .,* N \ �. r�-1 I■■■HOB®_,.--.-Sm®®6gZ1 �. . 3�-�.._•_.:.::..•°<_in 1 :■■■1■.. ���77 //L.L. T `I 1 /rLrNll'.I ■■r�' < ■■rill_■ O s •% iii°i:� -- _ Q� 'fi. ■■I.■ Irl'■V r..3.1::::::::I FO❖• CC <.s C� •• Jr."- 2 �8®©2rkrk a '!l. •.. a nig. N.-1�1�►1111 •;..•< .•o°.• r- ' 3f a ■■ ■ri1..r.tuu�ig{{{ �6 i�•I'�2�0:�: C�T 1—� ■■ i, mOGssRrin L ,� hi r �J omx3sa®r•.i t� 111i� ,,„..,I • Ccc< ■■• N•• ii• jjlJl! - � : '� --a s-Zt=.l■ r° t�Gs�d 1 ��, , 1 <. eft La2t � �{i� �. ” r n1•. '`'•:�''-,i�- 1- ---. .k /4 1-4 \1 € 'I -113 r 11 ,� ir1<h'��� Ct <i/ O ^'‘ _e -� MI:!�� ■.., �■r =rte •:°•I I. 111-‘- -{ ,'i 4J3i1%1\ ifp'. ici J AIIIIIMIIIM.1.- Aifffill r __:=3; x:::::04.:,:,...‘, e... .. _.. � i �� � �Iail N ! m � ' I •p .°° e I �� I � � Ii iii•. .-t ri' � %• ■� � o ` +... '3 % i..rarn •dr ■. -- r ' mo V\ ({{ ■• • Y..... ': •.iiCCC i .. c " a. tl....... 1 ti.a r 4 — 1_I ingyttiihmi:w el ' . 1 ���,. �, o _ ...:r4r.""' •'..,),X■'---"'-`..- ' Eiliglil.4:---': -11_1 , (24 r24 at r rttu X6.8 < I ■■■�' �" .:_... ne, ,..... Ill_ x z 1. ., y I: - F as di •II Q • •Tt� 1 1 \\\. I < t. ! •< < \,--+ccc � 6 ` f1I j 1`. ,t , ; Q o•■ - ,R'I� I. �b4 .1 t`•` ---- _.�.-- - ---' - -----�--- -- E O• c t ...I I .I S� �i- n p 2 I — < u -c . . • • . <C 1 1 CZ.I ilC a) cr) 0 a:1 Z c._ — ' ,, —4- . _ NI I -'4■4 Ill \ 1 = f 1\ ■., , , 4..) ', ■ \ .h.S..... 1 E ■ I. •■• P-cs II GL) ■ N N N, N 11 11 A'Ni NOUNWO 1 N N:RIN 11 1 1nb. I _ CI \ • Ell • 1 1 - I; PEI* LS, PIO 1 1::"14N1 L. . 0 a) NN i k =.4 •PEN \CNN CI CA i i V) = 1 J t (NI a) (2) ( , Av iivanv3a I 11 I-1 pri= I I 1 li 1 g (1) — 1 T 11• li I •— cc! $12* © 5 LJ , IN I I 1 I 1 1 I , 1 1-4 C 1 = 'I. (,....) li; : i Iii i 1 I i 1 •1 ICS , . -. ;...■ - 0 1 lim.4 .000 D Ct I i 1 . I 1 I I 1 fl44 ger © --;-----..------'-- --- .---------;--,-----...----....._. < •^.,.. - 5 1-- // --' .--j:- _I 1.-- I n.....--_ o _._ , ______ fl 7- -------"______ fl — .--= - :.. t. t ° ••—( n u f,----------,■___....,,, U , i"--1 is Co) 1 , — , I , -- .1. ) g F2 i 1 1 \ ( \ 7.- L-3 ,) 1---'-i ‘'l . g -Lc ! --- , , --- -------r- -E--.------- I :5. Ln rt ' I 1 ---,=-- `... IT _. 1 ---) '.7.- - 1 i 1 LT,LI .! ! . I 1 . I ' I - ! i 1 i 1 1 1 '*'•. 1 1 IJ J I • __ I -..-!... ai 1 . V 01H0 . _, . _ ---,- 1 : .; 11 . 11 1,- -- -■ ; 1 1 jf.. '.=3' • ! .. I 1 - • ,j,-1--, ; .. —_ . - -- . .._ -..... .. . _J._ . . . ! a ,•••••e •e e••.•o•a oj.•tilt,o o o•°. Leo ' •° "Ct 1(! ` ' °j VI,e o e {c• CC<•{(<C 7<C1`(C<C cv _°.___ - -• • •. ;•• cc«{ccc {<••••,<•,44./ .cf: t<{<c C<{C««f = C) e e o,A'e a e-e "-'‘1e a--e o-o ' '4 �=�•e a <C< <C(CC ° °•a of `t.0° ti C{«ti<ft f«< I— °) q�QQpe.�e _<-..a° < -°-° •<•o o- �•v•o WAWA a e•< e {e. «<-•°•, it. {CCi C<<CCt{{{{{{<{ O a ■I :•e• •`' o•<) .•°•e•et Ie e , ••°•o•°•,•< •e e e-e •o a t<#e•, <<<■ <C C C t C t C c f C f f C .�s ?:>i::e0<'<'.-. • •*A a 1► �4r -1 sok *f•e a/••�•IC 0,•,•• <�<<1 CC{<CflCf«l<C z• .E.:: ;; .:.•e ' , o•o•e ■1e 04 h■. ..-o e e*At,ilvt, < •.< a e• 000eoo e o e r o 0 o e e At*" •!!' .'•L ■I 1:::: o� °r°•°•°•°• {{{{{•°•°•°•°•° C C C«C C rn ■■■ ■■. ■ i • ■`t.°. 0.0.01 C{<CC •o a•a•.•a•�•� <C<{CC ._ .' 1 lure.li C C < 4 •o•°•°•o o•<•<•e o {{{{{ W E II I 'IIII.�:< I ........•....: ■■u■■. Pj < ••1.1•••j CCCC St-O•+r 1 ∎ '< ,• 4..•°•°j° ..<. °•°•°•°•°•o•°•e•°•° {{Ci ..a ••o•o•o•tii■r•...-a1 ■■■■I as 11■•+ o° < < , o e o o e< o e e < :Weer; v11.. .... ■■■■I■■I :f°•°•o e . o•e•e o o•<•e o•o .CC."e 3 < .T. ■4,1.44■■ :.._...4 < < < i •-■-- •. •o e'- 4144. o e•<•<•°•o• /e•°•o• < < < < '<'< ■u■■11i • ••• 14414$4144.4•44444•44 ..••• + 3 U _ 11I�� < 000 ett o moms ` •�•i• • Tiii� �<I`I• <C<Ct 44444 ::::'< 111010,,•„{{{{C EEJ I <.1u < . . . `' 1 < •I�• ' ' ! ■ !.,<•°•° {{ °r• 7}■i — 444.444 4.::::` \IIIIIi.i.1: °i C{<o • I • 4. : . • : : IIII V III��IIII!J "I�'1I I• 3 ;<'. '<'<'.< ` ' < - .'. IE ' ` ` > ::::A min w „-----.-_..----..... pi [I . ,, ..... . . . . 11,.., .« . ..... MGM 4 <'�'< 4'4'4'4 <'< e: < ■ ■. < • • -. ! _ `n ss// i :i:;lli < s4.4 AV ntl4ai :::: " .■® i� :? : < <'<'< e ��I uu �u■ < < 4'4'4'4 M ` .`•< 1 "III ' ° _11111111_ ■u■'.du1■7. < 4444 1' <I 1111111::u - °d<.<. .4.4.4.4.4.4 ■■•�u� O < :<.<. 1 :?:»?? e•e•e l< < < 4 < < 4 <'I i� e , C� ii • ! 4.<f < < ■•• ■■■ J_"J e e e e.... <'<'<'<' '4'41--. [11 ........ ;MI +••r +r• 44Ioo <<•< f`• 'ce i-' < V ` • t: c 1<< <NIII 4.40..111 '`< . o w cn V r o m cc) <-< a a v)EMI WI 4444 < 4 ••••• °0 0 O < 4'4-_4-_4'_. -4.4 .....II IIIIIIIHhIHhIIIflH 111111 a .. . . . . .< 4.• ;111. $<:. .:<:<::-.1::: ::<:4.-:-:•:-:.:•;-:,-,1 1 f....<.< 4.4.\111.4..4. ::::: 0 M 12 •'••'•••❖`•` :.,4: -. < 4 7 t. -.. :1 <'•I •4 COQ / .,. . . . . . 1111::: < <I m 'ee;,,,,.0.<.....«.<,:.<.« a; i _. ri E c /�� t - '�F. ■111 (ll <; .qn. L �::�: • 1111 "r ': 3 .,•����%; ;riirl=1110. r(3 • U i,_ a) o 0 a. Lt.' o O E ._ 1 �i ,,.:011 „.... _ d C, IO■..t ," PG ! C]-■ ra-■ U ----.■MW GGGG .ii■t■■■■• �71111 NEP:alr a 'assault' ti■EM■I■E/ r11 r•1 ■■■..■■■■EMOMNR m- ■■■■■■■■•a■■■.■ �1 I ■■■■.■■■■.■■■■.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■¢ X11 ■■t/./t■t.■■/t./■■///■■/ISIS/■ (Z. ■■■01■■■■.■■■O■■■■■■■■■■■■■■/� C/� �J � .......311.................. ' --- ■■■■/ mod . Nam. ii IUR■■■■■EE■■■■■■E■ 1■■■■■MME■ I..UE■■M■■■■■■■■■■ 'T• T ...■■■.■■ 1..■■....■■■■■.■■■ Nt■OON...1.........■■■■■E.■ 't 5 .EE.EE• aI.. M••••• t .... ........ ■■EEEE■ ■.II....... ■■■■/■■■■ ■■■/■■■■ ■M■■E...■ ■■■E■■/■ , G O ..w.. .EI..Mt■■■■■Ei0 .■.EE■■■M, ■t0■■■.■ I DE ■■ ■■ u.■.EM.EU./EE/' ■.■■■.E.M ■EM.■■.■ U � E MUM N ■....t■E...■/t■; ■■■■■■■..I ■.■..... U aN MUM ■■■EE■■■■■a■.■E, ■EE■■■.EE ■E.....■ _ _ ■■m., ■M..■ UUL_■■■■ ■..ENEMOE ■■■.O■■E■ ■E.■ i NMI MEN ...■lR/■US ■ • -NEM■ ■■■.■■■E■. ■ !■ ■ EEO■ MME■ ■ ■■ E■ MUMMIES, OMEN MESE, EE . E■ IE ■ ■ MEN, ■■■O■ONEE ■■E■ CD — }� . ■■ V, ■ ..■ //00.■ U.N., ■.■■000■■. ■■■000■■E' ■■0.■■■■ ■t■ ■tOa00t/■ ■■■■O■O■t ■■O■O■O/. ■■ ■■ ■■■■■■MMUMME■.E ■/■EE■■■■■■E..■EE■ ■■/■ ■■■Ea.■■■ ■ ■■■ ■■ ■■■■■■■/■ ■E■ ■■■■■■■E■ ■■■■■■■■■ ■ ... ■ ■■ .^- ■_......■.■E.EROMO■ SEE.■ ■••••••_._ • ••• - - - no •• ■..E....■ - /E..■ �.y ■..E■ISOEEOE.■\ ■MI AV 1WV4aV38 ■O■■a.EE■ ■.■t.■■.■ (y ■■■■■ = ■■E..E•EEMOE■ ■■I ■B.■■ISEEIS ■■...■■.■ ■O■■tI ■../..■■../.■ ■.1 ■N......t. ■0.■■■..■ ■..■■ C'tl M ■■t■■.■■■■■E■ ■EI ■.O■EE.■ ■■■■■■■■■ ■.■E■' F�--1 cD ■■/O■■a■■MERE ■■I ■■ ■ ENEM ' ■■■■■■■■■ 1/\■■.■■t■ 4^ ■..t.....0..■ ■■ U REMISE -''��I .■.a■■■.■•..0■cD, (I) N � ■O/E.■■..M..■ ■n I•:•......<a: ..iii°ii UU••• ;'-' U Q t ■E■MMENNEME•■ EMI , ,- > *�'0�. EE■■E■■■■■■■■ _, `J .-a �1 ■■■E■■E.■Et■ ■■■■.■■■■OO ®�...®®.®D®®.®®�°... ■.■■■.■.■■■■■ MIEN CZ' ■■■■■■■■■■OOOMb.■ a`•®•®®••.... • r .�M$SE■■■■■■■■■ � Q ■■..■■..E.■.■..■E ®®O4..... ■■M■■■ ,. ■■■■■■■■■ 5 ■■.■■......■■.O■■ I ■■■■.■■.■■/ ■■■■■■■■■ ■M.E.■..EE.M■■EE■ die.44' '®®.• .■■...■.a■..■.■■..■■■t.■ ■OE■■■E.■..■■■Ot■ I■E■.E■ 04'` ■OO■..O■E■■EE.■■■O■■■■■■• O ■■EE■■E.■/EM.ON■ iU..E.■„.. ■.E■■■/ ■ a■■0..■■O■■■■.■■ - ■OE■■■■ ■MO■■..O■ IE ■ .■ i./.■■■.E■■■■■.E■■■a■■■■.■■, ' ...... ..UNUUNNU. U. UU • U UNUiiiiiU UUU. .. . NN UN• U Uii UU I N o BIO[l and ... ■■•■.O■■■•■O■■MO ■/..■E•••••••••••••• .,.•E■■■...■■•• ••••••E■ISE..ISEMtU.■E.E..■.EEEEE/■.■/■ ■■■■■.■■■■UQ,• ■■■■■.■■■■■■■■■■■■OEM■.■■■■■ttt.■■EM■■aa • , ■M.O..■■.■, .4- N ■■■■E■■.■■■t■■O E. O■■O■. ........ ■■EE■E 'E.aa.EE■ IS.K ., ■■■..0.■■■...■M.■./...■■■■■■EE EE.■■M■E■UM..O■a.■■■■.E ,..■■■M.E■ O N O ■■■ ■...■■■■■M■■EEE. O■■..OEU■■..t...■■. ■■ ■ ■■ ..UL" ■t■■EMO■■I ■t.■■■■.■■■.O■ME■■■■■■■t0■■..■■E■MOUE■■..■/.■a00■■■E.- ■E■Mt1EM■.I C.}.* I ■■.......■■■..■■..■■■......■.■■■■.■■/■■■■t■■■M■■■■■E■ ■■t■..■■■1 ■■■E.■■E■■...■/■t.■.O■■■■.E■■■■OE■■t■■■E■O■■0■■■■■■■■ ■■M■■■■■■I Q Q U ■M.■■M■■E■■■M.M.■EEOE.■■O■.UEOEEM/EOM■a■■OEO■■.■■■■■t■ ■■■■■■ rr��rr ■/EE.■.......■/■■0■.•M■■■MO.■..OM.M.■■■a.O■■aa■■■■■■t■ MMMIMMMIIMMM, r1� ct ■.EEU ■EE//EE../EUO.•MMEEUO/EOM/■M.■.E■EMOOMUMMEM■■■E■ 1■...■E■EE Z 3 ■..■■...m.....U.■O.EE■■■t■■EE..■E■■■■■UEEO..■.■■.■■t■■ .OM .. r CA ■■■/Mt.■O.M■■.MU■.E.■M■■EO/MM/OMO/■■■ - --■■.a■■■■.■■ ■t■■.UMMEI ■■...■■■OM■■■■M■O.t■■■■■O■■■O.■O■.■ ■■NOON ■t■■■M■■■I �1 ■■■E■■■■.O■E..M■M.■■■..OE/t■■ EE■ , _ - - - 011111111"1 O1 ■.■■■....■/. ■■/.t■.E.■EEEN.E■E.■ , i■ ... -- - . < ■■■■....OEOM■■OOEMENNE■.EE■.EOO■ ■■ . ■EU.■■E.E.. OMEN I - O ■.■■M....■E.O■M.00■■.■■.E■■EOO■ M OC•��,®,�`..M■■■■.■■■ - u.��v,0 E ■ISM■■■■■E■■MM■■■00■■■■■MOON./■ ■t.o. ` ■O■■■■■■■ : MI y = ■■M■■■■■O■■E■■■M■■■O■■■■, Era . : ■■■■■■■■■■ , -� �®� E ■MERE■■■O■•■■•■■•O■■••••t■■.■ ••k.����C v o� ■■■■■■■■■■■ N ``. o u - ■■.M■■■■O■■■■■■■■■M■■■■■t■E■■ 1 ' ■ ...o ,••••••••••• ell I ■■■■■■■■O■■■■■■■.O■■O■■■ ■■■■ ■■■ ®oo@�.p®,0■■■■■■■■■■ , w o T ■■■■■■e■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ MUM , ■■■ • ■■■■■■■ o E = Co) ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■M■■■■■■■■M.■■M ■■M■ �0.. ..�` C� .�o ■■■■■■ - E ■■■E■■M■■■■■■■■■■■■M■■EE.■■ I ■M■■ 9 Q. \. o r C/1 , u 5 ■.......0..■■■......■■■■ ■■ ,.....M4..3 , , ■O■■.■M■O■OO■■■O■MM■■■■M.■O.MOEE■■ : .. C� Q o ■■■■■■■■■M■■■■■■■■O■■■■■I ■■ IEMMO■■ ■■■M■■■■■■■■O■■■■■■■■■■■ISM■ M■■M■■ ■ ` . cr- Y ■■■■■■■■O/O■■■OM■OM■M■■■ ■■ -■tMM■■ ■■ 5 fl Q '_1 ■O■M■■■■■■OM■■■■■■■O■■■■ OMEN ■O■ ; o ■■M■■■■■M■■O■O■■■OEM■E■■M■■■MEMOM■-■O■• /� ■■■/■M■■■t■■■O■$■O■E/■ ■ ■■MM■■M■ ■M■ % ■■■■■■■■■MOO■■■M■OM■■1 O ■MMEOO■ ■E■ AV 01140 ✓ L ■■M■■■■0EMEM■■■MOO■■■■■ ■MMOM■ ■E■ ■■■M■■■■OM■■■■■EOO■■■M■■ ■EM■■ ■OR - 1 ! • 1 c"" < ■■■■MERE■t■■■■■■M■■O■■■■■ ■■. ■.O/EOOE/OEOEE000OOOEMO■O■ ■O■ / _ ■O■■■■■■■■■■.O■■O■■O■EO■■■■ - ■■■ ■E. y,n MOMMMIMMEMEMMMMOMOMMMOMOMMEMM MOM MM_ • • TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT AMENDMENTS Policy 2-1.10.3: Proposed Roadway Capital Improvement Program. The City of Sanford shall coordinate with FDOT and Seminole County to ensure that the roadway improvements identified in the table below are completed in a timely and cost efficient m anner. The t able b elow also identifies the estimated cost, the timeframe, and the funding of the improvement. This table includes projects listed on the Long Range Transportation Improvement Programs by Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), the City, and the County. These improvements are also portrayed on Map 2-11. START PROJECT NAME/LOCATION IMPROVEMENT SOURCE YEAR COST Federal and State Projects US 17-92 Riverwalk (Mellonville Ave to Sidewalk/Bicycle STP; SE; 4999-2000 $-17695,000 Wayside Park at I-4) Facility DDR;DIH 2003 $8.5M I 4 at CR 16AE4 Interchange FD 17 4999-2000 $2-50,000 _ ---- . __ e : .- : 4-lane-Expressway MAIR; LF 1998 99 $35,458,000 Greeneway(Old Lake Mary Rd to I 4) 4-Lane-Expressway TFRT;P99A 19-� 99 0 $ ,819,000 I 4 at Greeneway PKYI; 1999 2000 $65,766,000 MAIR: P99A; SR 46 at Upsala Road Add Right Turn DDR;DIH 2000 01 $4-x,000 Lane I-4(Lake Mary to US 17-92) Add 2 lanes NH, DIH -1-9994000 S4376657000 2002 $27.5M I-4 at US 17-92 Interchange Resurface IM 1998 99 $367,000 Reconstruct Ramp 2005/06 $16M th Street to Wylie) FDOT 2000-01 $693,000 Sidewalk FDOT 2001 02 $125,000 US 17 92(Country Home to 26th St) Sidewalk FPQT 2002 03 $1,234,000 I-4 at SR 46 Interchange DS,DIH,DS 2002-03 $3.5M Improvements 1-4 St. Johns River Bridge Replace Bridge Garvey 2002 $14M Bonds SR 415 New Bridge;4-lane DIH, DDR 2004/05 Design Park Drive(25th St. to 26th St.) Sidewalks SE 2004/05 $96,000 Seminole County Projects Airport Blvd. (CR425 to SR 46) Add 2 lanes; LOGT;RIF; 1998 99 2003 S20,891,00O Realign OCST East Lake Mary Blvd. (US 17-92 to Airport) Add 2 lanes FDOT; RIF; 1998 99 2002 $8,300,000 LOGT; OCST East Lake Mary Blvd. (Airport to SR 46/CR New 2 lane Road RIF; LOGT; 1998 99 2003 $3,000,000 415) OCST Rinehart-Road-(SR-46-to CR 46A) Ad 2 lanes RIP; LOGT; -1-499-2000 $1,130;000 OCR • • . START PROJECT NAME/LOCATION IMPROVEMENT SOURCE YEAR COST OCST 2003 . • a.: . •: : . . Traffic y City Funded Projects St.Johns Pkwy(Rinehart Rd to Airport Blvd) New 2 lane road City 2003 $5M Unfunded Projects _ White Cedar Ave./Church Street New 2 lane road City Unfunded $3M I-4 at 46 Major Interchange 2004/05 $11M Design US 17/92(Shepard Rd.to E.Lake Mary Rd.) 6-lane Unfunded $39M SR 46(Sanford Ave.to SR 415) 4-lane Unfunded $15M SR 415 4-lane Unfunded Airport Blvd.(US 17/92 to Airport) 4-lane Unfunded Source: Metroplan Orlando Urban Area Transportation Improvement Program,FY 1998/99-2002/03 Notes: (1) This project is not improvement,but incentive money for the contractor to complete the project early. (2) Volusia MPO has designated$2,905,000 for the Project Development and Environmental Study and the Preliminary Engineering.Metroplan Orlando is asking for addition$12 million to complete the design as well as 514 million in TEA-21 funds for this project Metroplan Orlando has ranked this project as the number 4 priority unfunded project,and the number 1 priority unfunded project for Metroplan Orlando/Volusia County MPO. (3) Metroplan Orlando has ranked this project as the number 2 priority unfunded project This project is a major interchange at 1-4 and SR 46. Abbreviations: DDR State District Dedicated Revenue Funds DIH State Designated In-House Funds FDOT Florida Department of Transportation IM Federal Interstate Maintenance Funds LF Local Funds LOGT Local Option Gas Tax MAIR Minimum Allocation for Federal Interstate Resurfacing Funds P99A 1999 A Bonds from Seminole County Expressway Authority (SCEA) PKYI Parkway Improvement Funds from SCEA OCST One Cent Sales Tax from Seminole County RIF Road Impact Fee Funds from Seminole County STP Surface Transportation Program—Federal Urban Highway Funds SE Federal Enhancement funds used for Bicycle/Pedestrian Projects TEA-21 Transportation Equity Act for the 21°Century TFRT Toll Facility Revolving Trust Fund • 7 i • • / Poli 2-1.12.1. Inte:rate the Air,ort with Re_Tonal Transit. The Cit shall annuall coordinate with l LYNX and Seminble County regarding the feasibility of a transit feeder route that links the airport with the regional bus transit system. At the time light or commuter rail is evaluated between Sanford and Orlando, the City shall encourage LYNX, Metroplan Orlando (MPO) or the entity conducting such study to also evaluate the potential for feeder bus routes linking the airport with regional transit centers and/or intermodal facilities, existing or planned within the Sanford area. Once regional transit is provided, the Airport shall work with public transit providers to incorporate signage to direct the public to available transit and to inform the public about transit and ridesharing. Policy 2-11.2.2. Integrate Bus Transit Facilities with Future Airport Expansion Plans. Pursuant to the Airport Master Plan, site design plans for future airport terminal areas shall accommodate locations for future public transit service at convenient locations for travelers and employees. Site design shall also consider the design needs for charter buses, including access and bus parking and passenger loading areas. Policy 2-1.12.3. Transportation Improvements and the Airport Master Plan. The City shall ensure that coordination occurs between the development anticipated by the Airport Master Plan and any proposed or future state, local or regional transportation plans and improvements. Pursuant to Polic 2-1.3.5 of the Sanford Comprehensive Plan an development on Ai sort erorert that is anticipated to generate 1,000 daily trips or 100 peak-hour trips shall be required to submit a traffic impact study. The traffic impact study shall include: 1. Total projected peak-hour trips for the proposed development. • pass-by capture rate (commercial land uses only); • internal capture rate (planned development only); • peak-hour external trips based on ITE Trip Generation Manual, most recent Edition; and • peak-hour directional projected vehicle trips on all segments of the arterial and collector street._ system which are adjacent to the development project or as determined`necessary by the Administrative Official. 2. Design capacity of the accessed road(s). 3. Analysis of traffic distribution on the road network including all links impacted by more than ten percent (10%) of project traffic or five hundred (500) trips per day, whichever is greater. 4. Necessary operational improvements to the City, County, or State maintained transportation system - in order to maintain the appropriate level-of-service for the roadway. 5. Justification, including appropriate references, for the use of any trip generation rates, adjustments factors or traffic assignment methods not previously approved by the City. 6. The latest edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual shall be used to calculate these estimates. Adjustments to these estimates may be made, based on special trip generation information supplied by the applicant. 7=t • • In determinin• imp acts on available ca acit for roadwa s the followin I criteria shall be used: • The im.acts of develo.ment shall be based on the .eak-hour .eak direction tri s associated with the land use designation in which the proposed development shall occur, using the most recent published edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers', Trip Generation manual, or as may be subsequently updated. Internal capture rates may be considered in determining traffic volumes for mixed use developments; however, the applicant shall bear the burden of demonstrating any internal capture rates upon five (5) percent of the total nonresidential trips. • Roads analyzed shall include all links impacted by more than ten percent (10%) of the project traffic or receiving five hundred (500) trips per day,whichever is greater. . • Methodologies used to determine transportation concurrency shall be consistent with methodologies established in the FDOT LOS Guideline. • Roads analyzed shall include all links impacted by more than ten percent (10%) of the project traffic or receiving five hundred (500) trips per day,whichever is greater. • Methodologies used to determine transportation concurrency shall be consistent with methodologies established in the FDOT LOS Guideline. If the preliminary level of service information indicates a deficiency in capacity based on adopted level of service (LOS) standards, the developer has two alternatives: a. Accept the level of service information as set forth in the comprehensive plan; b. Prepare a more detailed alternative Highway Capacity Analysis as outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 2000, Transportation Research Board. The trip distribution shall be consistent with the presets of the approved trip generation model, i.e. the Seminole County Trip Generation model, the Orlando Urban Area Transportation Study (OUATS) model, or another distribution model approved by the City, the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council (ECFRPC)- Seminole County, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), the Department of Community Affairs and the Airport Authority. The impact area shall include adjacent roadway segments. Analyses and models shall be consistent with professional standards established in one(1) or more of the following documents: a. Highway Capacity Manual 2000, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, 2000. b. Florida Highway System Plan, "Traffic Analysis Procedures," Florida Department of Transportation, Bureau of Multi-Modal Systems Planning, most recent edition. c. Florida Highway System Plan, "Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual," Florida Department of Transportation, most recent edition. d. Tri Generation 6th Edition Institute of Trans.ortation En•ineers. 75 Y•' • . e. Transportation and Land Development, Stover, Virgil G., Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1988. Traffic Study Results/Mitigation: a. The Airport shall not develop when service levels are below the minimum service level adopted in the applicable local government's comprehensive plan during the peak hour and the project contributes, or is projected to contribute with the next phase of traffic, ten percent of the adopted LOS service volume of the roadway or intersection as determined by the monitoring program required in the preceding recommendations, unless mitigation measure and/or improvements are `secured and committed' for completion of construction during the phase in which the impacts occur. The schedule of improvements shall be tied to the development level at which the improvement is needed within each development phase. The results of the traffic impact study will be used to determine the then-current conditions regarding improvement needs and priorities, and the pace of both development under the Airport Master Plan and the area develo.ment. The stud will evaluate the a. .ro.riateness of .ro,osed mitigation measures, as well as validate the transportation assumptions developed for the original Application for Development Approval for the Development of Regional Impact dated February 28, 2000. These assumptions relate to, but are not limited to, impact area, planned and programmed improvements, existing conditions, project traffic, pass-by traffic, modal split, internal capture, distribution of traffic, and daily and peak-hour trip generation rates, identification of areas where project traffic is significant an adverse, projected roadway levels of service (AADT and peak-hour) for 2005, 2010, 1015 and 2020 and annual growth rates for the affected area. The developer of Airport property shall identify the needed roadway improvements necessary as a result of significant and adverse roadway impacts form the proposed development. b. The `securing and commitment' of adequate mitigation/measures shall include one of the following: 1. A roadway improvement scheduled for construction within the first three (3) years of the appropriate local government's comprehensive plan capital improvement element (or as otherwise provided in the applicable jurisdiction's capital improvement element); 2. A roadway improvement scheduled for construction within the first three (3) years of the Florida Department of Transportation's Five Year Work Program; 3. A binding financially secured and irrevocable commitment by the Airport or other appropriate person or entity for the design, engineering, land acquisition and actual construction of the necessary improvements (with posting of a cash bond, surety bond, irrevocable letter of credit, escrow account or other security in a form acceptable to the agency of jurisdiction) within the next three years and incorporated by reference into the development order; 26 • 4. Any other mitigation option permitted by law, including a local government development agreement consistent with Chapter 163, F.S., or a proportionate share payment agreement pursuant to and consistent with Chapter 163 or Chapter 380, F.S., and related rules, which ameliorates the projected impact and is incorporated into the development order by amendment. These improvements shall occur by the required threshold in order for the project to proceed. If the Airport can demonstrate that a project listed in the Airport Master Plan does not adversely affect the Regional Roadway network as determined by the monitoring and modeling tests discussed above, then the Airport may proceed with the development. c. In the event that a roadway widening is identified which is not compatible with adopted policy of the FDOT (8 or 10 laning of a state roadway) or local government (constrained), the Airport, the City of Sanford, Seminole County, the ECFRPC and the party having either maintenance or jurisdictional responsibility for the facility shall jointly determine alternate mitigation solutions to provide for the movement of people. Toward the achievement of the objectives in the two preceding conditions, an agreement(s) among the City of Sanford, Seminole County, the FDOT, and the Airport may be entered into within twelve months of the City's approval of any development project discussed in the Airport Master Plan which affects the Regional Transportation system. Said agreement(s) shall address and clarify such issues related to equity in the application of fees for transportation improvements. Said fees shall be based on a fair- share basis with respect to the improvements to be provided and not solely on the basis of impact fees. However, such an agreement would not alter or waive the provisions and requirements of the other recommendations listed above as a mitigation measure for the transportation impacts of the Air- ort Master Plan. In the event that one of the designated parties to the agreement (other than the Airport) fails to execute said interlocal agreement(s) within the specified time, then the Airport or developer of Airport property may proceed with the project based on the traffic impact study. The Airport shall be responsible for 100% of all on-site transportation improvements necessitated by on site implementation of the Airport Master Plan. The City of Sanford Administrative Official shall be responsible for monitoring the development and —. enforcing the provisions of this policy. The City shall not issue any permits or approvals or provide any extensions of services if the Airport fails to act in substantial compliance with this policy. Policy 2-1.12.4.: Access to the Orlando Sanford Airport. The City's Transportation Plan and Airport Master Plans shall continue to provide efficient linkages between airport main entranceways and the state intrastate highway system via arterial and collector roadways including the eastern and northern extension of Lake Mary Boulevard to SR 46 and the Greeneway (SR 417) in order to provide improved access and to minimize future airport traffic impacts to Sanford Avenue. Policy 2-1.12.5: Minimize Impacts to Adjacent Airport Roadways. Service roads on airport property shall be used to the greatest extent possible to capture internal airport trips thus minimizing the need to use off-site public roads to travel between airport facilities. ?7 • • Policy 2-1.12.6: Coordination with Metroplan Orlando Long Range Transportation Plan. The Airport shall maintain consistency with the goals of the Metroplan Orlando Long Range Transportation Plan. The Airport shall coordinate the timing of future development with the timing of roadway improvements in the Metroplan 2020 Long Range Transportation Plan. Policy 2-1.12.7: Coordination with Metroplan Orlando and FDOT on Right-Of-Way Acquisition. The Airport shall coordinate with FDOT and Metroplan Orlando on acquisition of rights-of-way for roadway projects on roads surrounding the Airport, including State Road 46. Policy 2-1.12.8: Integrate the Airport with Bicyclists'Needs. In the interest of safety and to promote alternative forms of transportation, the Airport shall accommodate bicycles to the extent practical and within the limitations of maintaining bicyclist safety and airport safety and security. Objective 2-1.13. Protection of Natural Resources within Airport Boundaries. The City shall ensure that all development within the Airport protects and conserves natural resources, consistent with FAA regulations. Policy 2-1.13.1: List of Threatened and Endangered Species. The Airport shall continue to maintain a detailed list of occurring and potentially occurring threatened and endangered species. Policy 2-1.13.2: Monitoring FFWCC Database. The Airport shall continue to monitor, on a yearly basis, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) database for the presence of protected bird species, including the bald eagle. Policy 2-1.13.3:Environmental A ssessments. The Airport shall continue to complete environmental assessments, including a threatened and endangered species for each phase or portion of development. Policy 2-13.4: Coordination with Federal and State Agencies. The Airport shall continue to coordinate with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) and/or the FFWCC on best management practices for the protection of threatened and endangered species and species of special concern. Policy 2-1.13.5: Relocation of Protected Species. The Airport shall continue to relocate protected species i n accordance w ith federal, s tate and 1 ocal e nvironmental s tandards i n o rder t o c onserve and protect their value. Policy 2-13.6:Mitigation for Structural and N on-structural I mpacts. The Airport shall continue to obtain environmental resource permits for storm water drainage and wetlands impacts from the SJRWMD. Permit applications shall address the protection of wetland systems and/or the need for mitigation measures for adverse structural and non-structural impacts from airport development upon adjacent natural resources and land uses as deemed appropriate by the SJRWMD. The Airport shall also continue to coordinate mitigation measures for adverse structural and non-structural impacts on protected species with the FFWCC and USFWS. 2S • • \I\ T \ -I iicf2 . A j / Z /,f * * * :..• - / ' i w i� c x • / / )• c=.r .e /, ' I •• vI } 1.,________J , t � 1 . • ^ g(yypq ■Y -`� - i = oL)lr^•(- --- . �, 1 _, ` 000� n • ` Fi I • \ 1 < 1 t A 1 V ,1 ., ---,"._---____ 4-- 4( - lir ___ ,->, • 1 „,I I r I !. i * el (44 iz AY 3ninNOn3w 1 A. OO „V l ` '7 -I G 1 Ji r 5 '� I r X �� - =' AY aao3NYS •• r Y- r••EYa•t.`ails-`-. 7 d•, i _•t_' �-\Op.1 L~i r �� _L '1 I ''- *',f�0 k.M AY HJN3a3 -X I y "I o: �1 t .*w. s-- - 1 eta`'` - } * ,,,; - 1= -* rI\ 5�.. f -ia d. ao*O� • -i c- to c y� t 1 1 obi ' 1 dJ•• /T --'L I^ � 1 _l.''Imo• t• �'/� - I =•J� 1 1`4x4 ■''1 .... �� ~ !lot 1••t -r Y• •anoiiaoaaly t'L• ��cN y\\\ __i rl.- d-IK- O =� � I I-I :t •11• I 4C 1. 1 -1 °-` - ••. •� , 94 t!-�J1, 1 t—-I y .* -0C od'' N, it 1 ti-Li --- ----- at I _ :` _• ON I ems \ • �J• El_ 1� ^` * - g aJ Oa Yl ••-_I 1 -I 1,21.1N11-10D a -- 1 - -4C V -=-d •0 N ° �° a c� ° 6 - of J i u U U Q E Q u F. __ tr m u alllrb31A' `; :_ ' • - 7 7 . 7 2 o 7c * U U U U v in 2 -Jr O * c 1 -k • _ N *�i 3( 4-4 • •G1. • • . . Map 2 - 11 Roadway Improvements (2020) 12 ,s 6 1 _ 15; ' , 16 i F n, aiiiiii.,ap, ..- xi1/41i\\:\:2\---....? Air1---1 i i --J t. .i 7tIIIIIIIII i �;———r... --4 s -1-31 _ 1 . 7 \ 1 0 , o ! 14 b , 1 .; 6 ` 16 y i 1� - -� i () i � ti ribk ! 1 t1.. ,_.____.........i -'i i i 9 NORTH ® Interstate 4 O St. Johns Parkway/ ® Park Avenue/Railroad East-West Connector Crossing ® Riverwalk 0 Interstate 4 / 0 County Road 415 17 & 92 Interchange © East Lake Mary Boulevard 0 U.S. Highway 17 & 92 ® Park Avenue Sidewalk O East Lake Mary Boulevard/ ap Interstate 4 / SR 46 ID North White Cedar Rd/ Siver Lake Drive Interchange Church Street © County Road 46A a) County Road 15 O Airport Boulevard ® State Road 46 East It of Sanford I)cparunenl of Planning&Community Development,August 2003 J:\ARCVIF\V\CRA\roadway imp,20:'0.a; . • City shall, on an annual basis and prior to adoption of the annual capital budget, review the need for new recreation sites and facilities. The analysis shall be predicated on data, standards, and policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan. The analysis shall be directed toward maintaining a system of recreational sites and facilities which is responsive to user needs. Policy 6-1.1.3: No Existing Deficiencies In Recreational Resources. The Comprehensive Plan Data Inventory and Analysis indicates that existing recreational land and facilities satisfy existing demand. - - - - standard by 1997. -- ►. " � • -- -- .. . - _. - -- -- ,• • • . . . . ' _ • • . • • • . . • • • • :. e • . _ . . • . ' I • 1 1• �. . - .. •. . - .. . .. . -- • . ' • • • : *: : • • • -• ' . . ' 1 i 1 Y.. •• Y.. • - - . - - -. •• 91 •- planning-peried: .. Projects Required to Meet Short Range Needs Estimated Cost a. Sports Complex/Community Park S 1.8 million b. Improv----- , S .8 million including a community pool in kind services. In addition, the swimming pool shall also receive funding from the Seminole County Policy 6-1.1.4: Projected Recreation Needs over the Long Range Planning Period: 2002-2010. The-- Comprehensive Plan Data Inventory and Analysis indicates that there are no additional recreational facilities needed in Sanford through the year 2010. Policy 6 1.1.6 6-1.1.5: Recreation Impact Fees for Recreation Improvements. -- • . - ., .. - purposes such as aquifer recharge (cross reference Policy 5.1.2.6). In order to compliment this program, the City shall require site plan review procedures that require multiple family developments and The City maintains a mandatory recreation impact fee program. In order to ensure that private development contributes to recreation, park and open space demand generated by the respective developments, all residential development shall be directly assessed for demands generated by the development. )O • • Policy 6-1.1.-76: Future Recreation Capital Improvements. City recreation improvements for which public funds are required, as opposed to developer financed improvements, shall be scheduled and incorporated as capital projects in the Capital Improvements Element. Policy 6-1.1.87: Maintenance of Existing Recreation Land and Facilities. T he City s hall maintain existing recreation land and facilities through the use of proper management and funding techniques. The City shall assure that recreation facilities are well managed, well maintained, and that quality recreation programs are available to all residents. This shall be partially achieved by continuing efforts toward collecting, maintaining, and updating data concerning public and private resource inventory, recreation improvement, and demand factors, and by improving design criteria and evaluation to attain a high quality park and recreation system. Policy 6-1.1.98: Utilize Creative Concepts of Urban Design and Conservation of Environmentally Sensitive Open Space. All plans for development or redevelopment of parkland resources shall incorporate creative concepts of urban design and landscape. The plans shall be designed to preserve existing areas of unrestricted access along the shoreline of Lake Monroe and prevent "walling-off' views of the water. Active and passive recreation areas shall be planned in a manner compatible with unique natural features of the site. Park development plans shall be designed to preserve resource protection areas. The design shall provide a circulation system to minimize conflict between pedestrians and vehicles. Adequate landscape and screening shall be integrated into park development plans to minimize land use conflicts, protect stability of established residential areas, and enhance community appearance. Policy 6-1.1.E-09: Promote Environmental Concern as Part of Recreational Programs. The City shall provide environmental education and management as an integral part of park and recreation policies and programs, in concert with environmental interest groups such as the local Audubon Society. Support for cooperative programming between resource agencies and local educational advisors will provide park and- recreation resources as an instrument for environmental teaching, and as a means for accomplishing this objective. The City shall develop educational nature trails along environmentally unique segments of Lake- Monroe to provide opportunities for environmental education. Policy 6-1.1. 10: Designate or Acquire Open Space and Natural Reservations. "Natural reservations" are areas designated for conservation purposes, and operated by contractual agreement with or managed by a federal, state, regional or local government or nonprofit agency such as: national parks, state parks, lands purchased under the Save Our Coast, Conservation and Recreation Lands or Save Our Rivers programs, sanctuaries, preserves, monuments, archaeological sites, historic sites, wildlife management areas, national seashores, and Outstanding Florida Waters. - Lake Monroe, a tributary of the St. Johns River is a natural reservation. The City of Sanford has also designated all wetland areas within the City as "Resource Protection" or "Conservation" areas on the Future Land Use Map. The City shall enforce performance criteria designed to protect and preserve wetlands, wetland transition areas and water management areas as cited in 5-1.4.1. The City shall enforce its - stonnwater management and wetland preservation regulations to provide for the dedication of conservation ;il • . easements or reservations where the City finds that the dedication is reasonable in order to protect the value and function of a wetland or to further the objective of stormwater management plan. The City shall protect wetlands pursuant to Policy 5-1.4.1. Data and analysis presented later in the Conservation Element: Data Inventory and Analysis of this Plan entitled, Analysis of Wetland Buffer Regulations, provide comparative analysis of the City's wetland design and performance criteria. The City's wetland buffer criteria stipulated in Policy 5-1.4.1 are either equally or more restrictive than those of other public entities with wetlands jurisdiction. The City shall protect wetlands by requiring that new development institute wetland buffers to comply with the following design and performance criteria: 1. Retain Natural Drainage Characteristics - Natural surface water patterns shall be maintained. Proposed drainage conditions shall approximate existing drainage conditions. The velocity of water flowing through wetlands shall remain approximately the same before and after development. 2. Minimize Alteration or Modification - No land use or development shall be permitted that would result in the elimination o f any beneficial function of a wetland. If permitted, any alteration or modification of wetlands shall be the minimum necessary to conduct the use or activity. 3. Stormwater - The use of cypress, hardwood swamp, bayhead, and hydric hammock wetlands for water retention shall be permitted when utilized to decompose dissolved organics and when such wetlands are not connected to surface waters. Stormwater detention basins shall screen, filter, trap and/or otherwise prevent sediment and debris and minimize the amount of chemicals entering wetlands. Channelization of water to or through a wetland shall not be permitted. 4. Ground Floor Elevation- When structures intended for human habitation are proposed to be located in wetlands t hat are not regulated b y the provisions o f 0 rdinance N o. 1 859, the A dministrative Official shall be authorized to establish and require a minimum ground floor elevation sufficient to-- prevent future flood damage of buildings on the parcel in question based on the best available information. 5. Wetland Buffer- A wetland buffer of twenty-five (25) feet in width shall be provided adjacent to wetlands that are five (5) acres or less; a wetland buffer of fifty (50) feet in width shall be provided adjacent to wetlands that are greater than five (5) acres. The area of wetlands in question shall include all contiguous wetlands located on the site and adjacent to the site. The width of the wetland buffer shall be measured and provided parallel to the edge of the wetland in question. The required wetland buffer shall, unless otherwise provided for in this ordinance, be planted and maintained in landscaping materials including ground cover, shrubs, hedges or trees. The following uses shall be permissible within a wetland buffer: • Required project improvements; • Permitted public service structures; • Walkways with pervious surfaces; • Required landscaped areas. 3 1 • • The following uses shall be prohibited within a wetland buffer: • Vehicular use areas,off-street parking and/or loading and service areas; • Buildings. In addition, all off-street parking spaces located adjacent to wetland buffer shall be provided with appropriate tire stops, curbs or other vehicular bumper guards designed to prevent any encroachment of vehicles upon the required buffer. OBJECTIVE 6-1.2: PROTECT OPEN SPACE SYSTEMS. The City shall preserve open space for recreation activities, for utilitarian uses, for purposes of conserving resource protection area identified in Objective 1-2.7 and Policy 1-2.7.1. The Comprehensive-Plan cites performance criteria for achieving preservation of open space cited in the below stated policies as well as in Policy 1-1.1.1. This objective shall be measured through the implementation of the following policies. Policy 6-1.2.1: Open Space Preservation Criteria. The City of Sanford defines three types of open space as cited below: 1. Utility Open Space. Utility open space includes the following: 2.6.1; • Transportation Corridors - Preserved through the Future Traffic Circulation Map, Objective 2-1.5, and Policy 1-2.5.1 and 1-2.5.2; • Potentially Incompatible Land Use Buffer Areas- Preserved through Policy 1-1.1.1; • Stormwater Retention Areas-Preserved through Policies 6-1.1.11; • • Provision of open space by all new development: Policy 1-1.1.1. These uses are all essential to the protection of human welfare. These areas are be by definition necessary utilitarian areas preserved in order to accommodate their respective functions. 2. Conservation Open Space. Conservation open space includes the areas identified as resource protection areas in Policy 1-2.7.1. The applicable performance criteria, which the City shall administer, are cited next to each type of open space. • Wetlands and Aquatic Habitats - Preserved through the Resource Protection designation of the Future - Land Use Map; Map I-1, Water Resources Map; and Policies 5-1.4.1, 6-1.1.11; • Floodways and Drainage Ways - Preserved through the Resource Protection designation on the Future Land Use Map; Map I-1, Water Resources Map; and Policies 5-1.2.3, 5-1.2.4, 5-1.2.5, 6-1.1.11; 3? • • • • Aquifer Recharge Areas and Wellfield Protection Areas - Preserved through the Resource Protection designation on the Future Land Use Map; Map I-1, Water Resources Map; and Policies 4-4.1.1, 4-4.1.2, 4-4.1.3, 4-4.1.4, 5-1.2.6, 5-1.2.7, 6-1.1.11; • Upland Wildlife Habitats - Preserve pursuant to Policy 5-1.3.1. The Vegetative Communities Map I-9 in the Future Land Use Element together with Table 1-2 in the Future Land Use Element which identified "Endangered and Potentially Endangered Fauna Species Indigenous to Habitats Identified within the City of Sanford" shall be used as a guide for locating wildlife habitats and protective measure shall be involved after on site analysis protection measures shall be involved as a condition of site plan review. • Floodplains - The areas are identified on the Water Resources Map I-1 in the Future Land Use Element shall be protected pursuant to Policy 5-1.3.1. 3. Recreation Open Space. City parks and recreation areas are included in this category as identified in the Recreation and Open Space Data Inventory and Analysis and as delineated on the Future Land Use Maps I 7 and I 8 and inventoried on Table I-1 in the Future Land Use Element. These lands are preserved pursuant to the "Public and Semi Public" Parks, Recreation and Open Space designation on the Future Land Use Map and Objective 6-1.1 and accompanying Policies 6-1.1.1 through 6- 1.1.11. The above criteria are designed to protect and preserve natural systems, including not only active parks and recreation areas, but also natural conversation open space systems, and utilitarian open spaces. The purpose is to achieve preservation of scenic and/or passive open spaces as well as areas accommodating more active recreation activities. The City shall ensure that all new development is designed in a manner compatible with natural system and shall not encroach upon open s pace systems. T he C ity s hall require dedication of o pen space s ystems"- and/or conservation easements in order to implement this policy where such action is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare and does not impose a"taking" without just compensation. The City may consider the allocation of existing parkland for another use provided that all three (3) of the following conditions are met: • the proposed use is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of this Comprehensive Plan; • the facilities located within that park can be provided at another park within the City (i.e., no net loss of recreation facilities); and • the resulting level of service for park land is not less than the adopted level of service of 4.0 acres/1,000 people. 3 3 . . OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS CITY OF SANFORD PROPOSED AMENDMENT 03-1 I. _CONSISTENCY WITH CHAPTER 163, PART II, AND RULE 9J-5, F.A.C. The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 03-1 consists of text amendments to the Future Land Use Element, Transportation Element, and Recreation and Open Space Element, and three Future Land Use Map (FLUM) amendments. One of the FLUM amendments changes 311.5 acres from"Public-Semi Public"to "Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces" and the Department does not object to this FLUM amendment. The Department does not object to the proposed text amendments to revise the goals, objectives and policies of the Recreation and 'Open Space Element. The remaining two FLUM amendments and text amendments to the Future Land Use Element and Transportation Element address the Orlando Sanford International Airport. One FLUM amendment changes 243.72 annexed acres from "County Higher Density Planned Development (HDPD)-Airport" to City"Airport Industry and Commerce." The second PLUM amendment adds the Airport Layout Plan (ALP) of the Orlando Sanford International Airport to the FLUM. The proposed text amendments add new Future Land Use Element Objective 1-2.4 and Policies 1-2.4.1 through 1-2.4.9, and add new Transportation Element Objective 2-1.12 and Policies 2-1.12-1 through 2-12.6. The amendments to the FLUM and text are proposed in order to incorporate the Airport Master Plan into the City's Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the requirements of Section 163.3177(6)(k), F.S. The Department raises the following objections to these proposed amendments: 1. Objection: The City proposes to amend the FLUM to add the Airport Layout Plan and to amend the FLUM to change 243.72 acres from"County Higher Density Planned Development (HDPD)-Airport" to-City"Airport Industry and Commerce." The FLUM amendment to add the -- Airport Layout Plan to the City's FLUM does-not show the location and amounts of proposed airport-related and aviation-related development on the PLUM. Both of the proposed FLUM amendments are not supported by sufficient environmental suitability data and analysis identifying natural resources (soils, wetlands, surface water, vegetation, wildlife and their habitat, and floodplains) that may be affected on-site and off-site by the amendments and demonstrating that the proposed amendments ensure the protection of natural resources consistent with the requirements of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Rule 9J-5, F.A.C. The designation of wetland areas as City Airport Industry and Commerce is inconsistent with Conservation Element Policy 5-1.4.3 of the City's plan, which provides that wetlands will be designated as Resource Protection. Both of the amendments do not propose to update the Future Land Use Element"Existing Land Use Map" and "Future Land Use Map" to show the following natural resources: waterivells and wellhead protection areas, lakes, floodplains, wetlands, minerals, and soils, as required by Rules 9J-5.006(1)(b) and 9J-5.006(4)(b), F.A.C. The amendments are not consistent with the following provisions of the City's Comprehensive Plan: 1 • • • Future Land Use Element Objectives 1-3.2 and 1-3.6, and Policies 1-3.2.2, 1-3.2.5, 1-3.6.1, and 1-3.6.2; and Conservation Element Goal 5-1, Objectives 5-1.2, 5-1.3, 5-1.4, 5-1.7, 5-1.8, 5-1.9, and 5-2.1, and Policies 5-1.2.5, 5-1.3.1, 5-1.4.1 through 5-1.4.5, 5-1.7.1, 5-1.8.1, 5-1.8.2, 5-1.9.1, and 5-2.1.3. The proposed amendments are not consistent with the requirements of Section 163.3177(6)(k), F.S. The amendments do not ensure that the natural resource protection commitments included in the Orlando Sanford International Airport Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Development Order are adequately addressed in the plan amendment. Sections 163.3177(2, 3 and 8); 163.3177(10(e); and 163.3177(6)(a, d,j, and k), F.S.; Rules 9J-5.005(2, 5 and 6); 9J-5.006(1)(b); 9J-5.006(2)(b and e); 9J-5.006(3)(b)1., and 4.; 9J- 5.006(3)(c); 9J-5.006(4); 9J-5.013(1)(a and b); 9J-5.013(2)(b), 9J-5.013(2)(c)6., and 9.; and 9J-5.013(3)(a and b), F.A.C. Recommendation: Revise the amendments to show the natural resources on the Existing Land Use Map and Future Land Use Map. Revise the amendments to include environmental suitability data and analysis demonstrating that the proposed amendments ensure the protection of natural resources consistent with the requirements of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Rule . 9J-5, F.A.C. Revise the amendments to designate the wetland areas as Resource Protection. Revise the amendment to ensure that the natural resource protection commitments included in the Orlando Sanford International Airport DRI Development Order are adequately addressed in the plan amendment. Revise the amendment to include a large scale ALP clearly identifying areas designated for airport-related or aviation related development. Revise the amendments as necessary to be supported by and consistent with the data and analysis and to protect natural resources. 2. Objection: The proposed Future Land Use Element Policy 1-2.4.1 incorporates the goals and objectives of the Airport Master Plan into the comprehensive plan as the general guidelines for development of the Airport intending to ensure that Airport facilities will be adequate to meet both long-term and short-term demand for aviation services. However, the proposed Policy 1- 2.4.1 is vague and inadequate because it does not establish specific meaningful and predictable standards to guide development and establish such standards based on supporting data and analysis. Pursuant to Rule 9J-5.005(6), F.A.C., objectives and policies shall establish meaningful and predictable standards for the use and development of land to and provide meaningful guidelines for the content of more detailed land development and use regulations. Under Policy 1-2.4.1, there are no corresponding policies listed that establish specific guidelines, as well as measurable parameters for each general strategy. Therefore, the goals and objectives stated under Policy 1-2.4.1 do not establish meaningful and predictable standards in the comprehensive plan. The proposed amendment is not consistent with the requirements of Section 163.3177(6)(k), F.S. Sections 163.3177(2); 163.3177(6)(a, b,j and k), F.S.; Rules 9J-5.003(90); 9J-5.005(2, 5 and 6); and 9J-5.006(3)(c), F.A.C. • • Recommendation: The City needs to ensure that objectives and policies in the plan provide clear and specific guidance to ensure that Airport facilities will be adequate to meet both long- and short term- demand for aviation services. As such, the City should revise Policy 1- 2.4.1 to clarify the specific actions that will be taken, or the City should add the goals and objectives of the Airport Master Plan as specific goals and objectives for the comprehensive plan and then add implementing policies. Support the revised amendment with data and analysis. 3. Objection: The proposed text amendments to the Transportation Element and both of the proposed FLUM amendments (ALP amendment; and 243.72 acre amendment) are not supported by adequate data and analysis addressing the following: (1) the impact of the maximum development potential of the proposed airport master plan on the transportation system; (2) analysis demonstrating that the adopted level of service standards for roadways will be maintained, including identification of road improvements (scope, timing, and cost of improvement) needed to maintain the adopted level of service standards of roadways; and (3) analysis demonstrating that the amendments and any needed road improvements are internally consistent with the Transportation Element and Capital Improvements Element. The text amendments to the Transportation Element are not supported by data and analysis demonstrating that the Airport Master Plan is consistent with METROPLAN Orlando's Long Range Transportation Plan regarding the planning and provision of any road improvements needed to maintain the adopted level of service standards for roadways impacted by the airport as required by Section 163.3177(6)(k), F.S. The amendments do not ensure that the transportation facility commitments included in the Orlando Sanford International Airport DRI Development Order are adequately addressed in the plan amendment. Also, the Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT) has indicated that not all of the proposed roadway improvements included in Table 2 are reflected in their five-year work program. The proposed amendments are not consistent with the requirements of Section 163.3177(6)(k), F.S. Transportation Element Objective 2.1.12 and implementing Policies 2.1.12.1 through 2.1.12.6 require coordination of airport development and transportation facilities; however, there is no clear coordination between transportation improvements and airport development. The transportation study in the amendment is not clearly based on the maximum development potential of areas designated as Reserved for Future Aviation Related Development. Sections 163.3177(6)(a, b,j and k); 163.3177(2 and 8); 163.3177(10)e; and 163.3180, F.S.; and Rules 9J-5.005(2 and 5); 9J-5.0055; 9J-5.006(3)(c) 3 and 4; 9J-5.006(4); 9J- 5.016(1,2, and 4); 9J-5.016(3)(b)5; 9J-5.016(3)(c) 5 and 6; 9J-5.019(3)(a, b, d, e,f, g, h, i and k); 9J-5.019(4)(a); 9J-5.019(4)(b) 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10; 9J-5.019(4)(c) 1, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21; 9.1-5.019(5), F.A.C. Recommendation: The City should revise the proposed amendments to include adequate and relevant data and analysis to identify the impacts of the proposed airport master plan development on the transportation system, identify transportation facility improvements (scope, timing, and cost) necessary to maintain adopted level of service standards, and to demonstrate that the proposed airport master plan will not result in roadways operating below the adopted level of service standards for the short term (5-year) and longer range planning timeframes. • Include data and analysis demonstrating that the transportation facilities needed to support the airport master plan are consistent with METROPLAN Orlando's Long Range Transportation Plan. Data and information related to state highway system facilities should be consistent with the latest FDOT data available; it cannot be assumed that FDOT will be responsible for facility improvements that have not been included in the five-year work program. Revise the amendment to ensure that the transportation facility commitments included in the Orlando Sanford International Airport DRI Development Order are adequately addressed in the plan amendments. Revise the amendments as necessary to be supported by and consistent with the data and analysis. The City should revise the Future Traffic Circulation Map and Capital Improvements Element as necessary to be internally consistent with the airport master plan and coordinate with adjacent local governments to ensure that the road improvements necessary to support the proposed airport master plan are appropriately recognized. The Capital Improvements Element data and analysis should identify the necessary projects, including project timing, cost estimates, and funding sources and the Capital Improvements Element Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements should include projects that are to be relied upon to maintain the adopted level of service. Revise the plan amendment as necessary to maintain internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements. 4. Objection: The proposed Future Land Use Element Policy 1-2.4.3 addresses interlocal agreements for public facilities to serve development of the airport master plan. Policy 1-2.4.3 is not adequately supported by data and analysis addressing: (1) the impacts of the airport master plan on the transportation system by phase of airport development; (2) the transportation facility improvements (scope, timing and cost of improvement; and party responsible for implementation of improvement) by phase of airport development necessary to maintain the adopted level of service standards of transportation facilities that may be impacted by airport development; and (3) when each interlocal agreement needs to be executed, the scope of projects for each agreement, and the parties for each agreement. The amendment does not include as supporting data and analysis any executed interlocal agreements addressed by Policy 1-2.4.3, and the amendment does not demonstrate that such executed agreements are consistent with and supported by the analysis addressed in items (1, 2, and 3) above. The proposed amendment is not consistent with the requirements of Section 163.3177(6)(k), F.S. Sections 163.3177(6)(a, b,j and k); 163.3177(2 and 8); 163.3177(10)e; and 163.3180, F.S.; and Rules 9J-5.005(2 and 5); 9J-5.0055; 9J-5.006(3)(c) 3 and 4; 9J-5.016(1,2, and 4); 9J- 5.016(3)(b)5; 9J-5.016(3)(c) 5 and 6; 9J-5.019(3)(a, b, d, e, f, g, h, i and k); 9J-5.019(4)(a); 9J- 5.019(4)(b) 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10; 9J-5.019(4)(c) 1, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21; 9J-5.019(5), F.A.C. Recommendation: Support Future Land Use Element Policy 1-2.4.3 with data and analysis regarding transportation impacts, necessary transportation improvements, when each interlocal agreement needs to be executed, the scope of projects for each agreement, and the parties to each agreement. Include as supporting data and analysis any executed interlocal agreements necessary for the purposes of providing transportation facilities to maintain the 'l • • adopted level of service standards for facilities subject to concurrency, and demonstrate that the agreements are consistent with and supported by the data and analysis. Revise the amendment as necessary to be supported by and consistent with the data and analysis. 5. Objection: Rule 9J-5.019(4)(c)18, FAC, requires the Transportation Element to include a policy to mitigate adverse structural and non-structural impacts from airports upon natural resources and land uses. Existing Policy 2-1.13.5 partially addresses this, but does not address mitigation measures where impacts are not minimal. Therefore, the policy is not consistent with the requirements of Rule 9J-5.019(4)(c)18, F.A.C., and Section 163.3177(6)(k), F.S. Sections 163.3177(6)(b,j and k), F.S.; and Rules 9J-5.003(90); 9J-5.005(6); and 9J- 5.019(4)(c)18, F.A.C. Recommendation: Revise the amendment to include a policy addressing how the city will mitigate adverse structural and non-structural impacts from airports upon natural resources and land uses. 6. Objection: Rule 9J-5.019(4)(c)19, FAC, requires the Transportation Element to include a policy to protect and conserve natural resources within airports. Existing Policy 2-1.13.5 partially addresses this, but does not address protection or conservation measures where impacts are not minimal. Therefore, the policy is not consistent with the requirements of Rule 9J- 5.019(4)(c)19, F.A.C., and Section 163.3177(6)(k), F.S. Sections 163.3177(6)(b,j and k), F.S.; and Rules 9J-5.003(90); 9J-5.005(6); and 9J- 5.019(4)(019, F.A.C. Recommendation: Revise the amendment to include a policy addressing how the City will ensure the protection and conservation of natural resources within airport. II. CONSISTENCY WITH STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments (FLUM amendments for the Orlando Sanford International Airport; Future Land Use Element text amendments to Policies 1-2.4.1 and 1-2.4.3; _ and Transportation Element text amendments to Objective 2-1.12 and Policies 2-1.12.1 through 2-1.12.6) are not consistent with and do not further the following provisions of the State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, Florida Statutes) for the reasons noted in the objections raised above: (a) Goal 9.a (Natural Systems and Recreational Lands), Policies 9.b.1 and 9.b.7; (b) Goal 15.a (Land Use), Policy 15.b.2; (c) Goal 19.a (Transportation), Policies 19.b.2, 19.b.3, 19.b.8, 19.b.9, 19.b.13, and 19.b.14; and S • • (d) Goal 25.a (Plan Implementation), Policy 25.b.7. Recommendation: Revise the plan amendments as recommended for the objections raised above in Section I of this report. () HISTORIC i • WATERFROATGATEWAY •� City of Sanford, Florida t \ 1 P.O. Box 1788 • 32772-1788 • (407) 330-5608 • (407) 330-5606 Facsimile ilt%Vtitg iii'i Office of the City Clerk August 19, 2003 Janet R. llougherty, CMC NOTICE OF CHANGE OF LAND USE (18 point or greater) The City of Sanford proposes to adopt the following ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 3781 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3528 (CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN) AS PREVIOUSLY AMENDED; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT, TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT, HOUSING ELEMENT, INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT, CONSERVATION ELEMENT, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AND CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT ELEMENT; ADDING PROPERTY ANNEXED INTO THE CITY TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. Regarding property shown below: [insert map] A public hearing on the ordinance will be held on Monday, September 8, 2003, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. or as soon thereafter as possible, by the City Commission of Sanford, Florida, in the City Commission Room, City Hall, 300 North Park Avenue, Sanford, Florida. Interested parties may appear at the meeting and be heard regarding the proposed ordinance. Copies of the proposed amendment to the Future Land Use Plan 'Nap tit"the Comprehensive Plan are available at the Department of Planning and Community Development and at the City Clerk's Office, City Hall, Sanford, Florida, and may be inspected by the public. ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION MADE WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THE ABOVE MEETING, OR HEARING, HE MAY NEED A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, INCLUDING, THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE, WHICH RECORD IS NOT PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF SANFORD. (FS 286.0105) PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES NEEDING ASSISTANCE TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY OF THESE PROCEEDINGS SHOULD CONTACT THE HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE ADA COORDINATOR AT 407-330- 5626 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING. /J i(T Cynthia Porter, Deputy City Clerk ************************************************************************ Advertise: not less than 2 columns wide by 10 inches long ad on S day, August 31, 2003 in General Circulation portion of the paper. ********************************************** *************** ***** NEED TO PROOF AD - FAX 407-330-5606 The Friendly city R_zo • N ':':•:•:•::•:'::':':= ,' .� ...... .. ....••..• (� E� ::•:: .........:L.:...I:............. •-•.:-.:•-•-•-----------: '• : ��::1':: : •{ T{CS •'{tl T • , c ............•..,........................... E 0 } i 9" a0C .e 0r _ �y� f y , >axzoaaar '� 00p'A ' 04PiPiR eeeeNe .�.. aa�a9sa mmeel .. .. Q _ SE VIE rt• � w. Sb006 ��•.• ... •1114 ii� •1 6 ... .�"�: OOfRSientra�� � � 7R17QiYA'ai:•is::::1: :� ::•:. .t .. sa3��a� :::::::::t.. ::..........:::::::::.7. ........ . .. .... g9004'"W70000;90D � fMC7)707i009093 :ji•... 9• � •���.•i: .......... �ocw .......... •••.•... •r'........ A00�0070000 1007 �•.�: .j,:.. .... n':':'::::::'::.... 0>mvecmfetSalSga:lE�Y ::•i':r- ,..f:;:.:' 4"31 1XXICCzcwv 33:"Qrsxaoom�azo:15:2ao m+ ezz�s V2 -MI - l - v *,mo oorx wawoacmxtas��oo a . ■temae .,, ......' ..0.-....-.•••••••••••• --•Ammotawasesszsgo..margiaimmossosMIEU+�m�ae.x���•nex�oossasa�r mx�7as >»xxoeeeee � ,� ............. F 0p9i00WSec00700::::t7G4� dD� a�3��a� �.� G :V Y•.•.• �•.....':::.'::.'.:•...-. .:Y:•:: }}j}j•• •.:. fie Mr .:::.'•: ... —Ecg • ii• rma # o ::.0g o=...._ iSiAi ..: iM. }} meet. : \' :•J ti•..... .........:.:.........::.....: .. . ......... .... ....... ..... .......•.-.•.......•..••••...•... M-.F.,A•-•:::::::-::-. .- I_ O ,• .......::::::::::::::::::' ....-.-7.--..:•:•:1-:•-:-.--.•:•:•:•:-::Hi.:-.•:•:-:•-,., --• ggerwormY-••••;:::...-...."P•„,"......... .......:: k.:::..:....... •r...... ... .:::•:::: ::::::::::•::. ........... . :........... 0 4111104 A..:-.......:.. .- .........................................................x..,..L t� �i .tom r 1 ::.:„. .....„. :::::::::::::::::: .................. :::::: IMO a ::::::::::.:.: ,,,,:• ::::::::::.-- . •14 RE i • I I Y L yMIRYp `' Cc) U .f II op ::::::.:::::::::::::.,��III : 7 • >_ ° E .. f :::� _ U.1 '� n j o I�� 111 \ �l.. a �, ' T ( h — • • CITY OF SANFORD AGENDA MEMORANDUM DATE A•ri128 2003 ITEM NO. OWE, SUBJECT: Addendum to the First Comprehensive Plan Amendment of 2003 to add 4.7 acre NAS Sanford Memorial Park to the Parks, Recreation, Open Space future land use designation DEPARTMENT: Engineering and P ing D IVISION: AUTHORIZED BY: Jay Marder CONTACT: Antonia Gerli EXT:5672 MOTION/RECOMMENDATIO$: Approve addition of NAS Sanford Memorial Park to future land use designation of P r: , Recreation and Open Space BACKGROUND: The Orlando Sanford Airport requests that the NAS Sanford Memorial Park,located on the Orlando Sanford Airport property,be included in the new land use designation of Parks,Recreation and Open Space. The park is 4.7 acres and located at the corner of Marquette Ave. and Red Cleveland Boulevard. The park is open to the public. N LA." —;, rv � CO Reviewed by: CM CA Deputy CM Regular X Consent Work Session Briefing Finance Dir. Other 410 411 April 15, 2003 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF LAND USE (18 point or greater) The City of Sanford proposes to adopt the following ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 3781 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3528 (CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN) AS PREVIOUSLY AMENDED; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT, TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT, HOUSING ELEMENT, INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT, CONSERVATION ELEMENT, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AND CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT ELEMENT; ADDING PROPERTY ANNEXED INTO THE CITY TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. Regarding property shown below: [insert map] A public hearing on the ordinance will be held on Monday, April 28, 2003, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. or as soon thereafter as possible, by the City Commission of Sanford, Florida, in the City Commission Room, City Hall, 300 North Park Avenue, Sanford, Florida. Interested parties may appear at the meeting and be heard regarding the adoption of the proposed plan amendment. Copies of the proposed amendment to the Future Land Use Plan Map of the Comprehensive Plan are available at the Department of Engineering and Planning and at the City Clerk's Office, City Hall, Sanford, Florida, and may be inspected by the public. ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION MADE WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THE ABOVE MEETING, OR HEARING, HE MAY NEED A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS INCLUDING THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE WHICH RECORD IS NOT PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF SANFORD. (FS 286.0105) PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES NEEDING ASSISTANCE TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY OF THESE PROCEEDINGS SHOULD CONTACT THE HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE ADA COORDINATOR AT 407-330- 5626 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING. ci2) ( Janet R. Dougherty, CMC City Clerk ***** ********************************* Advertise: not less than 2 columns wide by 10 inches long ad on Sunday, April 20, 2003 in General Circulation portion of the paper. ******************************************************************************* F:F:\Sha clerk\COMPPLAN\2003 PH Ad 1.doc r U .. ie m ..... / 1111 ■ :• r/ � o • N • ••• ••'• mita .::'..•:.•:::::.•: I- •-•••-:-•..••..•:::::::::::::.•:.•:•:•:•:•'.-:•:•:•:•:•:::"..•:•:.•:•:•:•:::•:•:€•:•"--"" • ...... ......................... .............• ��c::::::::::e• E ice•::::..•::::... ..................... .... 9 .............••.. .............. ......... . ............. ...... ......:.....:.:.:..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.! --;:...i.:...m. ...........:...: ...... ...... ..................... ..• t 9" .... .......• • ......... ...•................... �� S 2 iab ,� Q F asaav 1 iiu , >4wWtgWL000w91�' dEEEldp 00 A{11.... ................... �sao° �33eeaopppg� aoa. • 1 outa@goa ,.Or t�eooawawwoa:- :':;;�''' 000n matSMSXCXUXO I g��aaooa� ae�..-...'•.•' i� -::, : :' :: ': ':...:.....'e' : '''': . wttaoa°°taoaaavx� 000j�9, �:::::: g �inanwScsialbS9 AEoiP• ti �s{::15 �;. a..: xxo»t aotaoaomaw trµ5etaoar:acowo541:=aao°tao° 2i55451E•ttitititss �� �::: � asaa<mt aasaxow azwowocwtaAOasasa���owaaa�:::: ■r,n�moa .:: .'.'.'..'.'.::::.:...:..........................: :: ��naoaeo saaexa a taoosaata��lb� � aaaetaesxt0000ao AM b�OOOO xu''''''•!!'•'•'::':•''•''':':•'•• S8�2545SVEZIEB S® �p��li� �� �E �I......."may.. _ ..'.'.'..'..'..'.:.':::.'.'.'.'.':. iaQOC>007ii00 0C t�4SES9aia1 00000aaa ian�as� e:•:::;ii:::•:':•:•:: ` (I 4).j 1 •arter Page Advertisement-Publish April 6,201 18 Point heading es( otice of Amendments to the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan The City of Sanford proposes to amend the Future Land Use Element, the Transportation Element w ' and the Recreation and Open Space Element of the Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use ..� Plan Map of the Comprehensive Plan. -- i Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the City of Sanford Planning and Zoning ` Commission, acting as the City of Sanford's Land Planning Agency, in the City Commission Chambers, City Hall, Sanford, Florida, at 7:00 p.m. on Thursday, April 17, 2003 to consider proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Plan Map within the areas depicted in the below map: p (Insert Map of City of Sanford) Summary of Map Amendments Map Acres Existing Future Land Use Plan Map Proposed City Future Land No. Designation Use Plan Map Designation 1 311.5 Public/Semipublic Parks/Recreation/Open Space 2 243.72 Industrial;High Intensity Airport/Industry/Commerce It is anticipated that the Sanford City Commission will consider this matter at a public hearing on Monday,April 28,2003 in the City Commission Chambers,City Hall,Sanford,Florida,at 7:00 p.m. Interested parties may appear at the meeting and be heard regarding the transmittal of the proposed plan amendment to the City Commission. Interested persons may submit written comments. The proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan can be inspected by the public at the Department of Planning and Community Development Office, Second Floor,Sanford City Hall,300 N. Park Avenue, Sanford, Florida. For further information contact Antonia Gerli at 330-5672. ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a decision made with respect to any matter considered at the above meeting or hearing, he/she may need a verbatim record of the proceedings including the testimony and evidence, which record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS 286.0105) PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES NEEDING ASSISTANCE TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY OF THESE PROCEEDINGS SHOULD CONTACT THE PERSONNEL OFFICE ADA COORDINATOR 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING AT 330-5626. statutes->View Statutes->2002->Ch0163->Section 3184: flsenate.gov Page 1 of 9 • f I S e r CI t e, g o V . eltome Session Camn�ittees Senators Informati::.^ statutes dl Lobbyist b Center COratitUtion Information View Statute4 Jeaiui Statutes Constitution Laws of t-wnua Order Select Year: 12002 "i Go The 2002 Florida Statutes Title XI Chapter 163 View Entire COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL Chapter INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS PROGRAMS 163.3184 Process for adoption of comprehensive plan or plan amendment.-- (1) DEFINITIONS.--As used in this section, the term: (a) "Affected person" includes the affected local government; persons owning property, residing, or owning or operating a business within the boundaries of the local government whose plan is the subject of the review; owners of real property abutting real property that is the subject of a proposed change to a future land use map; and adjoining local governments that can demonstrate that the plan or plan amendment will produce substantial impacts on the increased need for publicly funded infrastructure or substantial impacts on areas designated for protection or special treatment within their jurisdiction. Each person, other than an adjoining local government, in order to qualify under this definition, shall also have submitted oral or written comments, recommendations, or objections to the local government during the period of time beginning with the transmittal hearing for the plan or plan amendment and ending with the adoption of the plan or plan amendment. (b) "In compliance" means consistent with the requirements of ss. 163.3177, 163.31776, when a local government adopts an educational facilities element, 163.3178, 163.3180, 163.3191, and 163.3245, with the state comprehensive plan, with the appropriate strategic regional policy plan, and with chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, where such rule is not inconsistent with this part and with the principles for guiding development in designated areas of critical state concern. (2) COORDINATION.--Each comprehensive plan or plan amendment proposed to be adopted pursuant to this part shall be transmitted, adopted, and reviewed in the manner prescribed in this section. The state land planning agency shall have responsibility for plan review, coordination, and the preparation and transmission of comments, pursuant to this section, to the local governing body responsible for the comprehensive plan. The state land planning agency shall maintain a single file concerning any proposed or adopted plan amendment submitted by a local government for any review under this section. Copies of all correspondence, papers, notes, memoranda, and other documents received or generated by the state land planning agency must be placed in the appropriate file. Paper copies of all electronic mail correspondence must be placed in the file. The file and its contents must be available for public inspection and copying as provided in chapter 119. (3) LOCAL GOVERNMENT TRANSMITTAL OF PROPOSED PLAN OR AMENDMENT.-- (a) Each local governing body shall transmit the complete proposed comprehensive plan or plan amendment to the state land planning agency, the appropriate regional planning council and water management district, the Department of Environmental Protection, the Department of State, and the Department of Transportation, and, in the case of municipal plans, to the appropriate county, and, in the case of county plans, to the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, immediately following a public hearing pursuant to subsection (15) as specified in the state land planning agency's procedural rules. The local governing body shall also transmit a copy of the complete proposed comprehensive plan or plan amendment to any other unit of local government or government agency in the state that has http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App mode=Di splay Statute&Search String=&L... 4/15/03 statutes->View Statutes->2002->Ch0163->Section 3184: flsenate.gov Page 2 of 9 • filed a written request with the governing body for the plan or plan amendment. The local government may request a review by the state land planning agency pursuant to subsection (6) at the time of the transmittal of an amendment. (b) A local governing body shall not transmit portions of a plan or plan amendment unless it has previously provided to all state agencies designated by the state land planning agency a complete copy of its adopted comprehensive plan pursuant to subsection (7) and as specified in the agency's procedural rules. In the case of comprehensive plan amendments, the local governing body shall transmit to the state land planning agency, the appropriate regional planning council and water management district, the Department of Environmental Protection, the Department of State, and the Department of Transportation, and, in the case of municipal plans, to the appropriate county and, in the case of county plans, to the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services the materials specified in the state land planning agency's procedural rules and, in cases in which the plan amendment is a result of an evaluation and appraisal report adopted pursuant to s. 163.3191, a copy of the evaluation and appraisal report. Local governing bodies shall consolidate all proposed plan amendments into a single submission for each of the two plan amendment adoption dates during the calendar year pursuant to s. 163.3187. (c) A local government may adopt a proposed plan amendment previously transmitted pursuant to this subsection, unless review is requested or otherwise initiated pursuant to subsection (6). (d) In cases in which a local government transmits multiple individual amendments that can be clearly and legally separated and distinguished for the purpose of determining whether to review the proposed amendment, and the state land planning agency elects to review several or a portion of the amendments and the local government chooses to immediately adopt the remaining amendments not reviewed, the amendments immediately adopted and any reviewed amendments that the local government subsequently adopts together constitute one amendment cycle in accordance with s. 163.3187(1). (4) INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW.--The governmental agencies specified in paragraph (3)(a) shall provide comments to the state land planning agency within 30 days after receipt by the state land planning agency of the complete proposed plan amendment. If the plan or plan amendment includes or relates to the public school facilities element pursuant to s. 163.31776, the state land planning agency shall submit a copy to the Office of Educational Facilities of the Commissioner of Education for review and comment. The appropriate regional planning council shall also provide its written comments to the state land planning agency within 30 days after receipt by the state land planning agency of the complete proposed plan amendment and shall specify any objections, recommendations for modifications, and comments of any other regional agencies to which the regional planning council may have referred the proposed plan amendment. Written comments submitted by the public within 30 days after notice of transmittal by the local government of the proposed plan amendment will be considered as if submitted by governmental agencies. All written agency and public comments must be made part of the file maintained under subsection (2). (5) REGIONAL, COUNTY, AND MUNICIPAL REVIEW.--The review of the regional planning council pursuant to subsection (4) shall be limited to effects on regional resources or facilities identified in the strategic regional policy plan and extrajurisdictional impacts which would be inconsistent with the comprehensive plan of the affected local government. However, any inconsistency between a local plan or plan amendment and a strategic regional policy plan must not be the sole basis for a notice of intent to find a local plan or plan amendment not in compliance with this act. A regional planning council shall not review and comment on a proposed comprehensive plan it prepared itself unless the plan has been changed by the local government subsequent to the preparation of the plan by the regional planning agency. The review of the county land planning agency pursuant to subsection (4) shall be primarily in the context of the relationship and effect of the proposed plan amendment on any county comprehensive plan element. Any review by municipalities will be primarily in the context of the relationship and effect on the municipal plan. (6) STATE LAND PLANNING AGENCY REVIEW.-- http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App mode=Display _Statute&Search String=&L... 4/15/03 statutes->View Statutes->2002->Ch0163->Section 3184: flsenate.gov Page 3 of 9 • • (a) The state land planning agency shall review a proposed plan amendment upon request of a regional planning council, affected person, or local government transmitting the plan amendment. The request from the regional planning council or affected person must be received within 30 days after transmittal of the proposed plan amendment pursuant to subsection (3). A regional planning council or affected person requesting a review shall do so by submitting a written request to the agency with a notice of the request to the local government and any other person who has requested notice. (b) The state land planning agency may review any proposed plan amendment regardless of whether a request for review has been made, if the agency gives notice to the local government, and any other person who has requested notice, of its intention to conduct such a review within 35 days after receipt of the complete proposed plan amendment. (c) The state land planning agency shall establish by rule a schedule for receipt of comments from the various government agencies, as well as written public comments, pursuant to subsection (4). If the state land planning agency elects to review the amendment or the agency is required to review the amendment as specified in paragraph (a), the agency shall issue a report giving its objections, recommendations, and comments regarding the proposed amendment within 60 days after receipt of the complete proposed amendment by the state land planning agency. When a federal, state, or regional agency has implemented a permitting program, the state land planning agency shall not require a local government to duplicate or exceed that permitting program in its comprehensive plan or to implement such a permitting program in its land development regulations. Nothing contained herein shall prohibit the state land planning agency in conducting its review of local plans or plan amendments from making objections, recommendations, and comments or making compliance determinations regarding densities and intensities consistent with the provisions of this part. In preparing its comments, the state land planning agency shall only base its considerations on written, and not oral, comments, from any source. (d) The state land planning agency review shall identify all written communications with the agency regarding the proposed plan amendment. If the state land planning agency does not issue such a review, it shall identify in writing to the local government all written communications received 30 days after transmittal. The written identification must include a list of all documents received or generated by the agency, which list must be of sufficient specificity to enable the documents to be identified and copies requested, if desired, and the name of the person to be contacted to request copies of any identified document. The list of documents must be made a part of the public records of the state land planning agency. (7) LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW OF COMMENTS; ADOPTION OF PLAN OR AMENDMENTS AND TRANSMITTAL.-- (a) The local government shall review the written comments submitted to it by the state land planning agency, and any other person, agency, or government. Any comments, recommendations, or objections and any reply to them shall be public documents, a part of the permanent record in the matter, and admissible in any proceeding in which the comprehensive plan or plan amendment may be at issue. The local government, upon receipt of written comments from the state land planning agency, shall have 120 days to adopt or adopt with changes the proposed comprehensive plan or s. 163.3191 plan amendments. In the case of comprehensive plan amendments other than those proposed pursuant to s. 163.3191, the local government shall have 60 days to adopt the amendment, adopt the amendment with changes, or determine that it will not adopt the amendment. The adoption of the proposed plan or plan amendment or the determination not to adopt a plan amendment, other than a plan amendment proposed pursuant to s. 163.3191, shall be made in the course of a public hearing pursuant to subsection (15). The local government shall transmit the complete adopted comprehensive plan or plan amendment, including the names and addresses of persons compiled pursuant to paragraph (15)(c), to the state land planning agency as specified in the agency's procedural rules within 10 working days after adoption. The local governing body shall also transmit a copy of the adopted comprehensive plan or plan amendment to the regional planning agency and to any other unit of local government or governmental agency in the state that has filed a written request with the governing body for a copy of the plan or plan amendment. http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App mode—Display Statute&Search String=&L... 4/15/03 statutes->View Statutes->2002->Ch0163->Section 3184: flsenate.gov Page 4 of 9 • • (b) If the adopted plan amendment is unchanged from the proposed plan amendment transmitted pursuant to subsection (3) and an affected person as defined in paragraph (1)(a) did not raise any objection, the state land planning agency did not review the proposed plan amendment, and the state land planning agency did not raise any objections during its review pursuant to subsection (6), the local government may state in the transmittal letter that the plan amendment is unchanged and was not the subject of objections. (8) NOTICE OF INTENT.-- (a) If the transmittal letter correctly states that the plan amendment is unchanged and was not the subject of review or objections pursuant to paragraph (7)(b), the state land planning agency has 20 days after receipt of the transmittal letter within which to issue a notice of intent that the plan amendment is in compliance. (b) Except as provided in paragraph (a) or in s. 163.3187(3), the state land planning agency, upon receipt of a local government's complete adopted comprehensive plan or plan amendment, shall have 45 days for review and to determine if the plan or plan amendment is in compliance with this act, unless the amendment is the result of a compliance agreement entered into under subsection (16), in which case the time period for review and determination shall be 30 days. If review was not conducted under subsection (6), the agency's determination must be based upon the plan amendment as adopted. If review was conducted under subsection (6), the agency's determination of compliance must be based only upon one or both of the following: 1. The state land planning agency's written comments to the local government pursuant to subsection (6); or 2. Any changes made by the local government to the comprehensive plan or plan amendment as adopted. (c)1. During the time period provided for in this subsection, the state land planning agency shall issue, through a senior administrator or the secretary, as specified in the agency's procedural rules, a notice of intent to find that the plan or plan amendment is in compliance or not in compliance. A notice of intent shall be issued by publication in the manner provided by this paragraph and by mailing a copy to the local government. The advertisement shall be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices appear. The advertisement shall be published in a newspaper that meets the size and circulation requirements set forth in paragraph (15)(e) and that has been designated in writing by the affected local government at the time of transmittal of the amendment. Publication by the state land planning agency of a notice of intent in the newspaper designated by the local government shall be prima facie evidence of compliance with the publication requirements of this section. The state land planning agency shall post a copy of the notice of intent on the agency's Internet site. The agency shall, no later than the date the notice of intent is transmitted to the newspaper, send by regular mail a courtesy informational statement to persons who provide their names and addresses to the local government at the transmittal hearing or at the adoption hearing where the local government has provided the names and addresses of such persons to the department at the time of transmittal of the adopted amendment. The informational statements shall include the name of the newspaper in which the notice of intent will appear, the approximate date of publication, the ordinance number of the plan or plan amendment, and a statement that affected persons have 21 days after the actual date of publication of the notice to file a petition. 2. A local government that has an Internet site shall post a copy of the state land planning agency's notice of intent on the site within 5 days after receipt of the mailed copy of the agency's notice of intent. (9) PROCESS IF LOCAL PLAN OR AMENDMENT IS IN COMPLIANCE.-- (a) If the state land planning agency issues a notice of intent to find that the comprehensive plan or plan amendment transmitted pursuant to s. 163.3167, s. 163.3187, s. 163.3189, or s. 163.3191 is in compliance with this act, any affected person may file a petition with the agency http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App mode=Display Statute&Search String=&L... 4/15/03 statutes->View Statutes->2002->Ch0163->Section 3184: flsenate.gov Page 5 of 9 . • pursuant to ss. 120.569 and 120.57 within 21 days after the publication of notice. In this proceeding, the local plan or plan amendment shall be determined to be in compliance if the local government's determination of compliance is fairly debatable. (b) The hearing shall be conducted by an administrative law judge of the Division of Administrative Hearings of the Department of Management Services, who shall hold the hearing in the county of and convenient to the affected local jurisdiction and submit a recommended order to the state land planning agency. The state land planning agency shall allow for the filing of exceptions to the recommended order and shall issue a final order after receipt of the recommended order if the state land planning agency determines that the plan or plan amendment is in compliance. If the state land planning agency determines that the plan or plan amendment is not in compliance, the agency shall submit the recommended order to the Administration Commission for final agency action. (10) PROCESS IF LOCAL PLAN OR AMENDMENT IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE.-- (a) If the state land planning agency issues a notice of intent to find the comprehensive plan or plan amendment not in compliance with this act, the notice of intent shall be forwarded to the Division of Administrative Hearings of the Department of Management Services, which shall conduct a proceeding under ss. 120.569 and 120.57 in the county of and convenient to the affected local jurisdiction. The parties to the proceeding shall be the state land planning agency, the affected local government, and any affected person who intervenes. No new issue may be alleged as a reason to find a plan or plan amendment not in compliance in an administrative pleading filed more than 21 days after publication of notice unless the party seeking that issue establishes good cause for not alleging the issue within that time period. Good cause shall not include excusable neglect. In the proceeding, the local government's determination that the comprehensive plan or plan amendment is in compliance is presumed to be correct. The local government's determination shall be sustained unless it is shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the comprehensive plan or plan amendment is not in compliance. The local government's determination that elements of its plans are related to and consistent with each other shall be sustained if the determination is fairly debatable. (b) The administrative law judge assigned by the division shall submit a recommended order to the Administration Commission for final agency action. (c) Prior to the hearing, the state land planning agency shall afford an opportunity to mediate or otherwise resolve the dispute. If a party to the proceeding requests mediation or other alternative dispute resolution, the hearing may not be held until the state land planning agency advises the administrative law judge in writing of the results of the mediation or other alternative dispute resolution. However, the hearing may not be delayed for longer than 90 days for mediation or other alternative dispute resolution unless a longer delay is agreed to by the parties to the proceeding. The costs of the mediation or other alternative dispute resolution shall be borne equally by all of the parties to the proceeding. (11) ADMINISTRATION COMMISSION.-- (a) If the Administration Commission, upon a hearing pursuant to subsection (9) or subsection (10), finds that the comprehensive plan or plan amendment is not in compliance with this act, the commission shall specify remedial actions which would bring the comprehensive plan or plan amendment into compliance. The commission may direct state agencies not to provide funds to increase the capacity of roads, bridges, or water and sewer systems within the boundaries of those local governmental entities which have comprehensive plans or plan elements that are determined not to be in compliance. The commission order may also specify that the local government shall not be eligible for grants administered under the following programs: 1. The Florida Small Cities Community Development Block Grant Program, as authorized by ss. 290.0401-290.049. 2. The Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program, as authorized by chapter 375. http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App mode=Display Statute&Search String=&L... 4/15/03 statutes->View Statutes->2002->Ch0163->Section 3184: flsenate.gov Page 6 of 9 • • 3. Revenue sharing pursuant to ss. 206.60, 210.20, and 218.61 and chapter 212, to the extent not pledged to pay back bonds. (b) If the local government is one which is required to include a coastal management element in its comprehensive plan pursuant to s. 163.3177(6)(g), the commission order may also specify that the local government is not eligible for funding pursuant to s. 161.091. The commission order may also specify that the fact that the coastal management element has been determined to be not in compliance shall be a consideration when the department considers permits under s. 161.053 and when the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund considers whether to sell, convey any interest in, or lease any sovereignty lands or submerged lands until the element is brought into compliance. (c) The sanctions provided by paragraphs (a) and (b) shall not apply to a local government regarding any plan amendment, except for plan amendments that amend plans that have not been finally determined to be in compliance with this part, and except as provided in s. 163.3189 (2) or s. 163.3191(11). (12) GOOD FAITH FILING.--The signature of an attorney or party constitutes a certificate that he or she has read the pleading, motion, or other paper and that, to the best of his or her knowledge, information, and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, it is not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay, or for economic advantage, competitive reasons, or frivolous purposes or needless increase in the cost of litigation. If a pleading, motion, or other paper is signed in violation of these requirements, the administrative law judge, upon motion or his or her own initiative, shall impose upon the person who signed it, a represented party, or both, an appropriate sanction, which may include an order to pay to the other party or parties the amount of reasonable expenses incurred because of the filing of the pleading, motion, or other paper, including a reasonable attorney's fee. (13) EXCLUSIVE PROCEEDINGS.--The proceedings under this section shall be the sole proceeding or action for a determination of whether a local government's plan, element, or amendment is in compliance with this act. (14) AREAS OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN.--No proposed local government comprehensive plan or plan amendment which is applicable to a designated area of critical state concern shall be effective until a final order is issued finding the plan or amendment to be in compliance as defined in this section. (15) PUBLIC HEARINGS.-- (a) The procedure for transmittal of a complete proposed comprehensive plan or plan amendment pursuant to subsection (3) and for adoption of a comprehensive plan or plan amendment pursuant to subsection (7) shall be by affirmative vote of not less than a majority of the members of the governing body present at the hearing. The adoption of a comprehensive plan or plan amendment shall be by ordinance. For the purposes of transmitting or adopting a comprehensive plan or plan amendment, the notice requirements in chapters 125 and 166 are superseded by this subsection, except as provided in this part. (b) The local governing body shall hold at least two advertised public hearings on the proposed comprehensive plan or plan amendment as follows: 1. The first public hearing shall be held at the transmittal stage pursuant to subsection (3). It shall be held on a weekday at least 7 days after the day that the first advertisement is published. 2. The second public hearing shall be held at the adoption stage pursuant to subsection (7). It shall be held on a weekday at least 5 days after the day that the second advertisement is published. (c) The local government shall provide a sign-in form at the transmittal hearing and at the adoption hearing for persons to provide their names and mailing addresses. The sign-in form must http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App mode=Di splay Statute&Search String=&L... 4/15/03 statutes->View Statutes->2002->Ch0163->Section 3184: flsenate.gov Page 7 of 9 • • advise that any person providing the requested information will receive a courtesy informational statement concerning publications of the state land planning agency's notice of intent. The local government shall add to the sign-in form the name and address of any person who submits written comments concerning the proposed plan or plan amendment during the time period between the commencement of the transmittal hearing and the end of the adoption hearing. It is the responsibility of the person completing the form or providing written comments to accurately, completely, and legibly provide all information needed in order to receive the courtesy informational statement. (d) The agency shall provide a model sign-in form for providing the list to the agency which may be used by the local government to satisfy the requirements of this subsection. (e) If the proposed comprehensive plan or plan amendment changes the actual list of permitted, conditional, or prohibited uses within a future land use category or changes the actual future land use map designation of a parcel or parcels of land, the required advertisements shall be in the format prescribed by s. 125.66(4)(b)2. for a county or by s. 166.041(3)(c)2.b. for a municipality. (16) COMPLIANCE AGREEMENTS.-- (a) At any time following the issuance of a notice of intent to find a comprehensive plan or plan amendment not in compliance with this part or after the initiation of a hearing pursuant to subsection (9), the state land planning agency and the local government may voluntarily enter into a compliance agreement to resolve one or more of the issues raised in the proceedings. Affected persons who have initiated a formal proceeding or have intervened in a formal proceeding may also enter into the compliance agreement. All parties granted intervenor status shall be provided reasonable notice of the commencement of a compliance agreement negotiation process and a reasonable opportunity to participate in such negotiation process. Negotiation meetings with local governments or intervenors shall be open to the public. The state land planning agency shall provide each party granted intervenor status with a copy of the compliance agreement within 10 days after the agreement is executed. The compliance agreement shall list each portion of the plan or plan amendment which is not in compliance, and shall specify remedial actions which the local government must complete within a specified time in order to bring the plan or plan amendment into compliance, including adoption of all necessary plan amendments. The compliance agreement may also establish monitoring requirements and incentives to ensure that the conditions of the compliance agreement are met. (b) Upon filing by the state land planning agency of a compliance agreement executed by the agency and the local government with the Division of Administrative Hearings, any administrative proceeding under ss. 120.569 and 120.57 regarding the plan or plan amendment covered by the compliance agreement shall be stayed. (c) Prior to its execution of a compliance agreement, the local government must approve the compliance agreement at a public hearing advertised at least 10 days before the public hearing in a newspaper of general circulation in the area in accordance with the advertisement requirements of subsection (15). (d) A local government may adopt a plan amendment pursuant to a compliance agreement in accordance with the requirements of paragraph (15)(a). The plan amendment shall be exempt from the requirements of subsections (2)-(7). The local government shall hold a single adoption public hearing pursuant to the requirements of subparagraph (15)(b)2. and paragraph (15)(e). Within 10 working days after adoption of a plan amendment, the local government shall transmit the amendment to the state land planning agency as specified in the agency's procedural rules, and shall submit one copy to the regional planning agency and to any other unit of local government or government agency in the state that has filed a written request with the governing body for a copy of the plan amendment, and one copy to any party to the proceeding under ss. 120.569 and 120.57 granted intervenor status. (e) The state land planning agency, upon receipt of a plan amendment adopted pursuant to a compliance agreement, shall issue a cumulative notice of intent addressing both the compliance http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display Statute&Search String=&L... 4/15/03 statutes->View Statutes->2002->Ch0163->Section 3184: flsenate.gov Page 8 of 9 • • agreement amendment and the plan or plan amendment that was the subject of the agreement, in accordance with subsection (8). (f)1. If the local government adopts a comprehensive plan amendment pursuant to a compliance agreement and a notice of intent to find the plan amendment in compliance is issued, the state land planning agency shall forward the notice of intent to the Division of Administrative Hearings and the administrative law judge shall realign the parties in the pending proceeding under ss. 120.569 and 120.57, which shall thereafter be governed by the process contained in paragraphs (9)(a) and (b), including provisions relating to challenges by an affected person, burden of proof, and issues of a recommended order and a final order, except as provided in subparagraph 2. Parties to the original proceeding at the time of realignment may continue as parties without being required to file additional pleadings to initiate a proceeding, but may timely amend their pleadings to raise any challenge to the amendment which is the subject of the cumulative notice of intent, and must otherwise conform to the rules of procedure of the Division of Administrative Hearings. Any affected person not a party to the realigned proceeding may challenge the plan amendment which is the subject of the cumulative notice of intent by filing a petition with the agency as provided in subsection (9). The agency shall forward the petition filed by the affected person not a party to the realigned proceeding to the Division of Administrative Hearings for consolidation with the realigned proceeding. 2. If any of the issues raised by the state land planning agency in the original subsection (10) proceeding are not resolved by the compliance agreement amendments, any intervenor in the original subsection (10) proceeding may require those issues to be addressed in the pending consolidated realigned proceeding under ss. 120.569 and 120.57. As to those unresolved issues, the burden of proof shall be governed by subsection (10). 3. If the local government adopts a comprehensive plan amendment pursuant to a compliance agreement and a notice of intent to find the plan amendment not in compliance is issued, the state land planning agency shall forward the notice of intent to the Division of Administrative Hearings, which shall consolidate the proceeding with the pending proceeding and immediately set a date for hearing in the pending proceeding under ss. 120.569 and 120.57. Affected persons who are not a party to the underlying proceeding under ss. 120.569 and 120.57 may challenge the plan amendment adopted pursuant to the compliance agreement by filing a petition pursuant to subsection (10). (g) If the local government fails to adopt a comprehensive plan amendment pursuant to a compliance agreement, the state land planning agency shall notify the Division of Administrative Hearings, which shall set the hearing in the pending proceeding under ss. 120.569 and 120.57 at the earliest convenient time. (h) This subsection does not prohibit a local government from amending portions of its comprehensive plan other than those which are the subject of the compliance agreement. However, such amendments to the plan may not be inconsistent with the compliance agreement. (i) Nothing in this subsection is intended to limit the parties from entering into a compliance agreement at any time before the final order in the proceeding is issued, provided that the provisions of paragraph (c) shall apply regardless of when the compliance agreement is reached. (j) Nothing in this subsection is intended to force any party into settlement against its will or to preclude the use of other informal dispute resolution methods, such as the services offered by the Florida Growth Management Dispute Resolution Consortium, in the course of or in addition to the method described in this subsection. History.--s. 9, ch. 75-257; s. 1, ch. 77-174; s. 4, ch. 77-331; s. 7, ch. 83-308; s. 8, ch. 84-254; s. 8, ch. 85-55; s. 9, ch. 86-191; s. 7, ch. 92-129; s. 77, ch. 92-279; s. 55, ch. 92-326; s. 10, ch. 93-206; s. 34, ch. 94-356; s. 1445, ch. 95-147; s. 5, ch. 95-181; s. 11, ch. 95-310; s. 2, ch. 95- 322; s. 26, ch. 96-410; s. 16, ch. 97-99; s. 2, ch. 97-253; s. 3, ch. 98-146; s. 12, ch. 98-176; s. 15, ch. 2000-158; s. 34, ch. 2001-254; s. 7, ch. 2002-296. http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App mode=Display Statute&Search String=&L... 4/15/03 statutes->View Statutes->2002->Ch0163->Section 3184: flsenate.gov Page 9 of 9 • • Welcome • Session • Committees • Senators • Information Center • Statutes and Constitution • Lobbyist Information Disclaimer: The information on this system is unverified.The journals or printed bills of the respective chambers should be consulted for official purposes. Copyright©2000-2003 State of Florida. Contact us. Privacy Statement http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App mode=Di splay_Statute&Search_String=&L... 4/15/03 • CITY OF SANFORD �=POu � DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ,„120 ( MEMORANDUM To: Roger Dixon, Acting City Manager Jan Dougherty, City Clerk From: Antonia Gerli, Senior Planner lJ f ) Throug i y Marder, Director of Planning and Community Development RE: ' Schedule for 1st Comprehensive Plan Amendment of 2003 ..,� Date: April 4, 2003 !:3 The first Comprehensive Plan amendments consist of: • Future land use map amendments for lands annexed by the Airport; • The incorporation of the Airport Master Plan into the Comp Plan; • New policy for noise abatement around the Airport; • New Future Land Use Designation of Parks, Recreation and Open Space pursuant to City Commission Directive; • Update of Chapter 6, Recreation and Open Space Element. The 1st Comprehensive Plan Amendment is nearly complete and the planned schedule is as follows: Planning and Zoning Commission: April 17 1st Reading City Commission April 28 Adoption City Commission October 27 Please let me know if this schedule is convenient for you. The October date is tentative and depends on the DCA review of the amendments. 1. •rter Page Advertisement-Publish April 6,2010 18 Point heading Notice of Amendments to the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan .J The City of Sanford proposes to amend the Future Land Use Element, the Transportation Element Wf and the Recreation and Open Space Element of the Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use .� Plan Map of the Comprehensive Plan. — Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the City of Sanford Planning and Zoning h°,. Commission, acting as the City of Sanford's Land Planning Agency, in the City Commission Chambers, City Hall, Sanford, Florida, at 7:00 p.m. on Thursday, April 17, 2003 to consider proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Plan Map within the areas depicted in the below map: (Insert Map of City of Sanford) Summary of Map Amendments Map Acres Existing Future Land Use Plan Map Proposed City Future Land No. Designation Use Plan Map Designation 1 311.5 Public/Semipublic Parks/Recreation/Open Space 2 243.72 Industrial;High Intensity Airport/Industry/Commerce It is anticipated that the Sanford City Commission will consider this matter at a public hearing on Monday,April 28,2003 in the City Commission Chambers,City Hall,Sanford,Florida,at 7:00 p.m. Interested parties may appear at the meeting and be heard regarding the transmittal of the proposed plan amendment to the City Commission. Interested persons may submit written comments. The proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan can be inspected by the public at the Department of Planning and Community Development Office,Second Floor,Sanford City Hall, 300 N. Park Avenue, Sanford, Florida. For further information contact Antonia Gerli at 330-5672. ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC: If a person decides to appeal a decision made with respect to any matter considered at the above meeting or hearing, he/she may need a verbatim record of the proceedings including the testimony and evidence, which record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS 286.0105) PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES NEEDING ASSISTANCE TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY OF THESE PROCEEDINGS SHOULD CONTACT THE PERSONNEL OFFICE ADA COORDINATOR 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING AT 330-5626. • ..1---'—• ¶ _ I N U ................................ 6 WC 0 •• :: N /' ro N • l a E C Y m ..... ... ... ::: : .::::: :...::::::::. i:::: d::.:-?.:.:r iii a ... 111:::::::::::-:E::::::-.4. ...... .......... ........ ............ iIi ° i j �y�� I i 1 .............. :: ............... a� �y •L • I sisal x0em �$ 1:::::.:.:.::.::.::.::.::::::,.1„;1 M 1nII VI.�.........: mats �j mil::::::: ::k:::.. ... �p _ � a06.ia93aReS9R «Room* d0,1$ •••••••:::::: ‘"::..10 8& 7R b9lacCentES ti::: ii g'::.'.'...igniarirOXFOXCNIXON91110#0 ggggiaOCCCDJ :::3:;:: ;:::::: m�pG�pppp�lyl��•••1' .••••.•.':.':.•:.•••••.•:'•:'. —a�83HSa�i�P94 480 . 2 :.�� ■Ilia a :•::�.. sxAmmoozcaaafxao>r^ ozcoar.�xaaaaaaooxioomoe�xaaoo�� e �"� ■:::: wsstexeo-.maxi•ax<as eon maxla w,xam 00°°00 '�°°m :.:.: •::.:::.::.:':.'.:::..:.::.:::' s�sa� l o �arasa � ....... ::.?-w:::::::::•'••••:•• ..:: ,��a�axcaa ���&� ��,�awassava0��00.w :':: . :•:•:•:•::•:•:'::'::•:•••:•••••••• a0oaxmxoaafa�..amso stEMINE pi'���mszlt M , —..... :: Ion aacsoocoo0[oa0oca 00«0x«0 aaoxaa °aaoaaw.-nQr m•.._.:.:._•.C�'•••••••••••:::•'•••••.. asp :r6 11EMZE a �,�rA ��'`''.••':: ::.:::'•:. L. i EGIESSE «0000 0o�ro oIaaI/a giAMIRSE woo ':'':.. 1 ......................: �� g� ..... ......... 1 :1 text a1 ......................... ... ..•::::.:.:.,............1i1Iri.... ............ .......... ..::-.......450::..::m ... -kip um ..= '................: J � Oaf :• =-::•:•::•:. ••••••••:•-.,..--...-:::::::::::::::::::::=MI•• .•*:ii.. •►•'n :` : 111- .- .. --lb JI M --- psis a ::.:.:::.::.:.: ./. .... :.:::::::::.-- ,.. •triAllna a • 4/ i U I c y, 1 n a cu cn c cu : :'• • ,1IIII imp ..•,.... . . W., •,.:...:.-.::.:-...?:;,..-..;,).-: 1 a j p a(. E cc...., 0.,III - .--.. • -...........1..... ..-•::::::::::::::::::..,. p mir , • ._ 0,, •••:::: se Imo% Id . ' [ti ....,, `1.v\l. ••:::::.... 1 ■ m"' � City of Sanford T a�ditian.arwer /(1 l�l � 'i 0 PLANP•NG & ZONING CONOAISSION A. 4e.41,,M, ;t,, Thursday - April 17, 2003 City Commission Chambers, 1" Floor, Sanford City Hall 300 North Park Avenue, Sanford, Florida Regular Meeting Agenda - 7:00 P.M. Approval of Minutes ' • April 3, 2003 Regular Meeting Minutes Consent Agenda — Development Plans r'v : DP-1 Consider the Site Plan for a proposed 3,800 square foot building addition to the St. Paul Missionary tt_I r Baptist Church located at 806 Hickory Avenue. c` Tax Parcel Number: 25-19-30-5AG-100C-0020 Property Owner: St. Paul Missionary Baptist Church, Inc. d's'Representative: Magid Kalagchi, P.E. - SK Consortium DP-2 Consider the Site Plan for the Lake Mary Enterprises Professional Centre, a 7,693 square foot office/retail building at 111 E. Lake Mary Boulevard. Tax Parcel Numbers: 14-20-30-300-0050-0000 and 14-20-30-300-0060-0000 Property Owner: Lake Mary Boulevard 17/92 L.L.C. Representative: Thomas H. Skelton, P.E. -American Civil Engineering Public Hearings PH-1 Hold a Public Hearing to consider a Planned Development Rezone and associated PD Master Plan for Consolidated Investment Properties Office Park located at 3551 and 3625 W. 1 .1 Street. Tax Parcel Number: 26-19-30-5AE-010A-0000 Property Owners: Consolidated Investment Properties, Inc. &Albert J. Light Representative: Kenneth Ehlers, P.E. PH-2 Hold a 'u. is Hearing for the purpose of amending the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Plan Map of the Comprehensive Plan. Representative: Antonia Gerli, Senior Planner- City of Sanford Staff Reports SR-1 Review proposed amendments to Schedule S,Historic Preservation,Sanford Land Development Regulations. Representative: Antonia Gerli, Senior Planner- City of Sanford Citizen Participation Commissioners Reports Adjournment ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC. If a person decides to appeal a decision made with respect to any matter considered at the above meeting or hearing,he may need a verbatim record of the proceedings including the testimony and evidence,which record is not provided by the City of Sanford(FS 286.0105) Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the Human Resources office ADA Coordinator at 407-330-5626,48 hours in advance of the meeting. Page 1 of 1 c) . . • 0 • • CITY OF SANFORD AGENDA MEMORANDUM DATE April 28 2013 ITEM NO. ,11/15 • SUBJECT: First Comprehensive Plan Amendment of 2003 c DEPARTMENT: Engineering and Planning DIVISION: AUTHORIZED BY: Jay Marder D CONTACT: Antonia Gerli EXT:5672 9 Ns - Co The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that the City Commission approve the:i I `1 Comprehensive Plan Amendments on April 17, 2003.'b he Comprehensive Plan amendments consist of: (` t • Future land use map amendments for lands annexed by the Airport (254 acres); • The incorporation of the Airport Master Plan into the Comp Plan; `/ A( 1 _0.- , , • New policy for noise abatement around the Airport; \(\) 4 p, • New Future Land Use Designation of Parks, Recreation and Open Space pursuant to City Ot Commission Directive (311 acres of existing parks); wi, • Update of Chapter 6, Recreation and Open Space Element and supporting data, inventory and analysis section to be consistent with 5-year Park Plan prepared in 2000. • It is anticipated that the City Commission will adopt the amendments on October 27. Reviewed by: CM CA III Deputy CM Regular_X_Consent Work Session Briefing Finance Dir. Other ! • • _111 • .?A -- • • • Department of Community Affairs 410 Division of Comprehensive Planning Bureau of Local Planning Attn: Charles Gauthier 2555 Shumard Oak Blvd. Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 May 1, 2003 RE: City of Sanford First Comprehensive Plan Amendment of 2003 Dear Mr. Gauthier: Enclosed is the City of Sanford's first Comprehensive Plan Amendment of 2003. Pursuant to 9J- 11.006, FAC, the City is providing the following information to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA): 1. The City of Sanford Planning and Zoning Commission (Local Planning Agency) held a public hearing to consider the proposed amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan on April 17, 2003. Said amendments include amendments to the Future Land Use Plan Map of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Sanford City Commission held a public hearing to consider the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and transmittal to the DCA on April 28, 2003. A copy of Ordinance 0 No. 3781 is enclosed. Certified copies of the proposed comprehensive plan amendment, including this letter and all supplemental materials, have been transmitted today to appropriate persons at the Florida Department of Transportation, the St. Johns River Water Management District, the Department of Environmental Protection and the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council. 3. The first City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan Amendment of 2003 contains five major amendments: • New Land Use Designation of Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PRO); • Amended Chapter 6, Recreation and Open Space Element; • Incorporation of the Orlando Sanford International Airport Master Plan into the Comprehensive Plan; • Incorporation of the land use compatibility recommendations from the Orlando Sanford International Airport FAR Part 150 Study. • Future Land Use Designations for parcels annexed into the City by the Orlando Sanford International Airport. A formal review of the amendments by the Department of Community Affairs is requested. • • • 3. The City of Sanford anticipates adoption of the amendment in October of 2003. • 4. The proposed plan amendment is not located in an area of critical state concern. 5. The proposed plan amendment is not located in the Wekiva River Protection Area. 6. The proposed amendment is not one of the exemptions to the twice per calendar year limitation. 7. Sanford has sent copies of its adopted comprehensive plan including amendments with support documents to all applicable review agencies listed in Rules 9J-11.009(8)(a) through (h), FAC. 8. The contact person for the First Comprehensive Plan Amendment of 2003 is Antonia Gerli, AICP, Department Planning and Community Development, (407) 330-5672, Fax (407) 330- 5679. Sincerely yours, Brady Lessard Mayor, City of Sanford • Certified copies to: Lynn Griffin, Department of Environmental Protection Peter Fatizzi, Florida Department of Transportation, District 5 Greg Golgowski, East Central Florida Regional Planning Council Dick Galantowicz, St. Johns River Water Management District Donald Fisher, Seminole County Planning and Development John Litton, City of Lake Mary Cc: Roger Dixon, Acting City Manager Jay Marder, Director of Engineering and Planning Jan Dougherty, City Clerk • • • • ORDINANCE NO. 3781 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLOP,IPA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3528 (CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN) AS PREVIOUSLY AMENDED; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT, TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT, HOUSING ELEMENT, INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT, CONSERVATION ELEMENT, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT AND CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT ELEMENT; ADDING PROPERTY ANNEXED INTO THE CITY TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Sanford's Planning and Zoning Commission, as the City's local planning agency, held a public hearing on April 17, 2003, to consider amending the Future Land Use Map Of The Future Land Use Plan Element, the Transportation Element, the Housing • Element, the Infrastructure Element, the Conservation Element, the Recreation And Open Space Element, the Intergovernmental Coordination Element, the Capital Improvements Element and the Concurrency Management Element of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Commission, as the City's governing body, held a public hearing on April 28, 2003, to consider the same amendments to the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan, Sanford, Florida; and WHEREAS, the City of Sanford has complied with requirements and procedures of Florida law in processing its first annual amendment in 2003 to the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA: • Ordivaucc No.3781 Page 1 • • • SECTION 1: That portion of the Future Land Use plan Element referenced as the Future Land Use Map is hereby amended by including certain lands incorporated into the City Limits of the City of Sanford, Florida, and by changing the land use designation assigned to certain other lands. A copy of additions to the Future Land Use Map and the changes to the Future Land Use Map and respective land use designation for such lands is attached hereto as Exhibit"A" and by this reference incorporated herein and hereby made a part of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan. SECTION 2: That portion of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan attached hereto as Exhibit `B" and included herein, which depicts revisions to the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the: (A) Future Land Use Element, (B) Transportation Element, (C) Housing Element, (D) Infrastructure Element, (E) Conservation Element, (F) Recreation And Open Space Element, (G) Intergovernmental Coordination Element, • (H) Capital Improvements Element, and (I) Concurrency Management Element is hereby made a part of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan. SECTION 3: SEVERABILITY. If any section or portion of a section of this Ordinance proves to be invalid, unlawful or unconstitutional, it shall not be held to impair the validity, force or effect of any other action or part of this Ordinance. SECTION 4: CONFLICTS. All Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed. • (hdinancc No.3781 Page 2 ■ • • SECTION 5: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective • immediately when the State Land Planning Agency issues a final order determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184(9), Florida Statutes, or when the Administration Commission issues a final order determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184(10), Florida Statutes, whichever occurs first. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2003. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK • As the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida CERTIFICATE I,Janet R. Dougherty, City Clerk of the City of Sanford, Florida, do hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Ordinance No. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida on the day of , 2003, was posted at the front door of the City Hall in the City of Sanford, Florida, on the_of 2003. AS THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA • Ordinance No.3781 Page 3 • • 0 0 0 • • • FIRST COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT OF 2003 HISTORIC WATERFRONT GATEWAY iiiv 1778:fie"-Z- 1.e0 LORIDA 1s�1 pO RAT ED 41e* Sr IVN N CITY OF SANFORD April, 2003 S • • • TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 LAND USE ELEMENT 1 GOAL 1-2: FUTURE LAND USE MAP 1 Objective 1-2.4 Managing Airport Lands 14 Policy 1-2.4.1 Airport Master Plan 14 Policy 1-2.4.2 Airport Expansion/Coordination with the Conservation Element 18 Policy 1-2.4.3 Public Facilities 18 Policy 1-2.4.4 Adjacent Development to be Compatible with Airport Operations 18 Policy 1-2.4.5 Coordination with the FAA 19 Policy 1-2.4.6 Coordination through Development Review 19 Policy 1-2.4.7 Protection from Noise Exposure 19 Policy 1-2.4.8 Monitoring and Evaluation of Airport Layout Plan and Goals of Airport Master Plan 20 Policy 1-2.4.9 Airport Industry and Commerce Land Use Designation(AIC) 20 OBJECTIVE 1-2.5 ALLOCATING PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC SERVICES 24 Policy 1-2.5.2 Parks,Recreation and Open Space Land Use Designation(PRO) 23 Map 1-10 Airport Layout Plan(ALP) 24 • FUTURE LAND USE MAP Exhibit A CHAPTER 2 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 25 Objective 2-1.12 Coordination of Aviation Facilities with Surface Transportation 25 Policy 2-1.12.1 Integrate Airport with Regional Transit 25 Policy 2-1.12.2 Integrating Bus Transit Facilities With Future Airport Expansion Plans 25 Policy 2-1.12.3 Transportation Improvements and the Airport Master Plan 25 Policy 2-2.12.4 Access to the Orlando Sanford Airport 25 Policy 2-2.12.5 Minimize Impacts to Adjacent Airport Roadways 26 Policy 2-2.12.6 Coordination with Metroplan Orlando Long Range Transportation Plan 26 CHAPTER 6 RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT 27 Goal 6-1 Maintain and Increase Adequate Recreational Opportunities And Open Space For Visitors and Residents of Sanford 27 Objective 6-1.1 System Of Parks And Recreation 27 Policy 6-1.1.1 Level of Service Standards for Parks and Recreation Facilities 27 Policy 6-1.1.2 Monitor and Update Recreation Demand and Supply Analysis 27 Policy 6-1.1.3 No Existing Deficiencies in Recreational Resources 28 S • • PAGE • Consistency with the Florida State Comprehensive Plan 36 Consistency of Goals and ALP of Airport Master Plan with Metroplan Orlando's 2020 Long Range Transportation Plan ..38 Evaluation of Service and Facility Impacts of the Airport Master Plan 41 Consistency Of Goals and ALP of Airport Master Plan with Sanford Comprehensive Plan 50 Consistency of Noise Abatement Policies with City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan 56 Data, Inventory and Analysis for Recreation and Open Space Element 58 New Future Land Use Designation of Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PRO) 73 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION Schedule R,Airports and Aircraft, Sanford Land Development Regulations ,.74 EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: Seminole County Vision 2020 Comprehensive Plan 2020 Multimodal Transportation Map Exhibit 2: Map of Regional Activity Centers Exhibit 3: Seminole County Vision 2020 Comprehensive Plan Map of Projected Roadway Level of Service 2020 •Exhibit 4: Seminole County Vision 2020 Comprehensive Plan List of Needed Unfunded Transportation Improvements Exhibit 5: Map of Noise Exposure Protection Area • • • INTRODUCTION The first City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan Amendment of 2003 contains five major amendments: • New Land Use Designation of Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PRO); • Amended Chapter 6, Recreation and Open Space Element; • Incorporation of the Orlando Sanford International Airport Master Plan into the Comprehensive Plan; • Incorporation of the land use compatibility recommendations from the Orlando Sanford International Airport FAR Part 150 Study. • Future Land Use Designations for parcels annexed into the City by the Orlando Sanford International Airport. • • • AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF SANFORD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN • • • • • LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENTS GOAL 1-2: FUTURE LAND USE MAP. CONTINUE TO MAINTAIN AND MANAGE A FUTURE LAND USE MAP. The Future Land Use Map Series, Maps 1-1 through 1-9 herein, reflect City policy for managing the allocation of future land use. The Future Land Use Map Series (Base Year 2005) is supported by the Comprehensive Plan Data Inventory And Analysis (1991). Land use designations on the future land use maps have been allocated pursuant to goals, objectives and policies stipulated in the Comprehensive Plan, together with analysis of population, housing and land resources. The process of allocating these land use designations has considered the need to conserve natural resources including wetlands, the Lake Monroe Shoreline, flood plains, water recharge areas, fish and wildlife, consideration of capital improvement needs, and conservation of fiscal resources. The future land use map series shall designate areas for the following uses: FUTURE LAND USE MAP DENSITIES/INTENSITIES MAP LAND USE DESIGNATIONS SYMBOL DENSITY/INTENSITY • RESIDENTIAL USES du/acre Low Density Residential-Single Family LDR-SF less than or=6 du/acre Low Density Residential-Mobile Home LDR-MH less than or=6 du/acre Medium Density Residential-10 MDR-10 less than or= 10 du/acre Medium Density Residential-15 MDR-15 less than or= 15 du/acre High Density Residential-20 HDR less than or=20 COMMERCIAL USES Floor Area Neighborhood Commercial, Office NC .35 General Commercial, Office GC .35 INDUSTRIAL USES I .50 SUBURBAN ESTATES SE 1 du/acre PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC USE PSP .35 Includes: Education, Public Facilities Transportation, Private Recreation, and Other Institutional. • 1 • S PARKS,RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE PRO .25 • Includes Municipal Recreation and Open Space RESOURCE PROTECTION RP Wetlands and Aquatic Habitats (1) Floodways and Drainageways (1) Aquifer Recharge Area (2) Wellfield Protection Areas (2) ' Upland Wildlife Habitats (2) Floodplains (2) (1) Within wetlands,aquatic habitats, floodways and drainageways no development is permitted pursuant to Policies 5-1.4.1 (together with Policies 5-1.7.1 and 5-1.8.1);5-1.2.1;and 5-1.2.5,respectively. However,in certain cases,in order to avoid a taking of property without just compensation,the City shall negotiate a minimal development right necessary to provide"reasonable"use of the land. In such cases, development shall be shifted to the upland portion of the site. However,where no upland exists,development rights within the wetland, floodways or drainageways shall be negotiated in order to protect private property rights and preserve"reasonable"use of the land while preserving the physical and biological functions of the wetlands,floodways and/or drainageways through mitigation techniques identified in the policies cited herein(cross-reference Policy 1-2.7.1). (2) The FAR for these areas shall be restricted pursuant to performance criteria identified in Policies 5-1.2.6,5-1.7.1,5-1.8.2 and 5-1.3.1. In no case shall the FAR exceed the FAR for the underlying Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use designation. However, the building footprint and total impermeable surface shall be restricted to maximize permeable surface while preserving a"reasonable"development right pursuant to the policies identified herein(cross-reference Policy 1-2.7.1). (3) Where a federal,state,or regional agency has jurisdiction over a resource protection area,the City shall not grant a development right which exceeds the development right provided by such agencies having jurisdiction. •MIXED USE DISTRICTS Map Commercial Industrial Residential Symbol I-4 High Intensity HI 1.0 FAR .50 FAR Less than or =to 50 u/a Waterfront/Downtown WDBD 2.0 FAR 1.0 FAR Less than or Business District =to 50 u/a Westside Industry WIC .35 FAR .50 FAR Less than or &Commerce =to 20 u/a Airport Industry AIC .50 FAR 1.0 FAR Less than or & Commerce =to 50 du/a Less than or =to 1 du/a Residential/Office/Institutional ROI .35 FAR * Less than or =to 20 u/a *Asterisks denote land use not permitted under land use designation. Note: F.A.R. denotes: Floor Area Ratio=Gross Floor Area/Site Area. The density and intensity of historic resources shall be governed by the density/intensity assigned to the specific future land use designation regulating the respective historic resources. S 2 • • This section of the future land use element shall define the nature, density and intensity of the allowable uses for each of the designations represented on the future land use map. Nothing in this section shall preclude necessary community facilities from locating within any future land use designation when such activity satisfies established criteria of this plan and the city's code of ordinances. The future land use map series shall be maps I-1 through 1-9. The future land use map: the future land use map (sheets 1-44) and policy designation shall depict the proposed distribution, extent and location of land uses for the year 2005. The official future land use map (scale: one inch to one thousand feet) is on file with the city planning office in city hall. Maps 1-1 through 1-4 and map 1-9 of the future land use map series shall denote natural resources to be conserved through plan implementation. Map 1-5 shall indicate historic resources. Map 1-6 denotes vacant and undeveloped lands. Maps 1-7 denotes areas targeted for redevelopment and renewal. Map I-8 denotes planned developments within the City of Sanford. Objective 1-2.1: Allocating Residential Development. The Future Land Use Map, identifying future land use policy, shall allocate residential density based on the following considerations: • past and projected future population and housing trends and characteristics; • provision and maintenance of quality residential environments; • protection of environmentally fragile natural systems; • the need to plan for smooth transition in residential densities; and • provision and maintenance of traffic circulation and multiple-family improvements. • The City shall maintain amended land development regulations that include performance standards regulating the allowable density on any specific site for which new development is proposed. These performance standards shall address: • Stormwater Management and Floodplain Protection • Traffic Impact Analysis • Minimum Open Space Criteria • Perimeter Landscaping, Screening and Buffering • Preservation of Wetlands • Concurrency Management System • Recreation Land and Facilities • Erosion and Sedimentation Control Policy 1-2.1.1: Density Defined. Maximum gross residential density shall be determined by dividing the "maximum allowable units" by the "gross land area" (i.e., dwelling units/gross land area). All residential densities denoted on the Future Land Use Map stipulate the maximum gross densities permitted for development on the land. Gross land area shall be defined as those contiguous land areas under common ownership proposed for residential development. In cases where residential land abuts waters of the State. the boundary shall be delineated as established by the State and no density credit shall be granted for waters of the State. In cases where residential land abuts floodplains, wetlands, or other environmentally sensitive lands, density credit shall be further restricted to ensure protection of such environmentally sensitive lands. The intent shall be to allocate density credits only to developable uplands. Policies 5-1.3.1 and 5-1.4.1 • stipulate specific actions for maintaining and protecting wetlands and floodplains. 3 • • • Density is expressed in terms of a range up to a specified maximum. Where so stated as a range, the maximum density is not guaranteed by right. Specific density assigned to new development shall be compatible and consistent with established residential development patterns and shall provide reasonable use of the land. Criteria to be considered in allocating density shall include, but not be limited to, the following: a. Protect the integrity and stability of established residential areas; b. Ensure smooth transition in residential densities; c. Require application of sound landscaping and urban design principles and practices; d. Protect environmentally sensitive areas; e. Minimize the impact of flood hazards; f. Ensure compatibility with Seminole County land use policies together with federal, state and regional agencies having jurisdiction or managing authority over land and water resources; an g. Provide reasonable use of the land. Policy 1-2.1.2: Low Density Residential Single Family Development (LDR-SF). The areas delineated for "low density" residential single family development shall include existing stable single family areas as well as those areas which have been selected for future low density residential single family development in order to provide sufficient land area to meet projected single family housing needs for low density development. Areas delineated on the future Land Use Map for low density residential development shall accommodate residential development with a maximum density of up to six(6) dwelling units per acre and shall be comprised of single family detached homes on individual lots. Specific densities will be determined by such factors as natural features of the land, density and/or intensity of developed and/or • undeveloped land surrounding development, level of accessibility, housing supply and demand, adequacy of public facilities, consumer preference and other factors which may be identified in the land development regulations. Supportive community facilities and accessory land uses may be located within areas designated for single family low density residential uses. The City's five year plan evaluation pursuant to 163.3191, FS, shall ensure that sufficient land area is available to meet the projected demand for single family neighborhoods. Development within the "low density residential single family" designation shall be required to meet the following general criteria together with performance criteria cited in Policy 1-3.2.5: • New development shall be compatible with the quality and character of existing low density single family neighborhoods(Cross-reference Policy 1-1.1.1); • New development shall preserve open space consistent with Policy 1-1.1.1; • Densities shall be compatible with existing and anticipated future developments; • Ensure compatibility with natural features of the land and comply with performance criteria outlined and cross-referenced in Policy 1-2.7.1 as well as other policies within the Comprehensive Plan impacting natural resources; and, • Minimize burden on existing and projected supportive public services and facilities within the area by complying with concurrency management regulations. • 4 • • • Policy 1-21.3: Medium Density Residential Development (MDR). Areas delineated for "medium density residential development" shall include existing and committed medium density residential neighborhoods as well as those areas which have been selected in order to meet projected housing needs for medium density development. The latter areas were selected based on their proximity to existing or planned multiple family housing development and based on the availability of public facilities to service the projected residential development demands. Areas delineated on the Future Land Use Map for medium density residential Development shall be developed,redeveloped and/or maintained as stable medium density residential neighborhoods. The Future ' Land Use Map contains two medium density residential land use designation which are distinguished by the maximum permitted density. The least intensive medium density (MDR-10) designation shall permit up to a maximum of ten (10) dwelling units per acre. The more intensive medium density residential(MDR-15)designation shall permit up to fifteen(15)units per acre. The medium density designation is intended to provide sufficient land area for developments of medium density residential development, adequately supported by public services and facilities and compatible with existing and anticipated future land uses. The medium density policy designation includes a mixture of single and multiple family structure types. Supportive community facilities and accessory land uses may be located within areas designated MDR. • Review of specific densities of developments shall be directed toward preserving stability of established residential areas. Sites for medium density residential developments should be located so that they provide a smooth transition between lower density residential areas and areas developed and/or designated for other more intense uses. Generally, the MDR-10 designation should be located between the perimeter of low density residential areas and areas of higher density or intensity, while the MDR-15 designation should be allocated to highly accessible areas. All new development within the "MDR" designated areas shall comply with performance criteria cited in Policy 1-3.2.5. This policy shall be implemented through a mandatory site plan review process. Policy 1-2.1.4: High Density Residential Development (HDR). High density residential development ranges up to a maximum twenty (20) units per acre. The high density policy designation is intended to provide sufficient acreage for high density residential development which shall be adequately supported by public services and facilities, and maintain compatibility with the surrounding area. The specific areas designated for high density development shall be accessible to existing or anticipated future major thoroughfares and requisite utilities. In addition, these areas generally shall be highly accessible to commercial services. Specific density of future development proposals within these areas shall provide for smooth transition in residential density, preserve stability of established residential areas, and shall include sufficient open space, parking and landscaping to reinforce goals and objectives for quality living areas. All new development within the "HDR" designated areas shall comply with performance criteria cited in Policy 1-3.2.5. This policy shall be implemented through a mandatory site plan review process. • 5 • Policy 1-2.1.5: Mobile Home Low Density Residential (LD • R-MH).denhal Development(LDR MH). The Future Land Use Map designates existing and committed mobile home development for "mobile home low density residential development:' The density of the mobile home parks or subdivisions shall be permitted up to a maximum of six (6) units per acre; however, specific site densities must be consistent with the policy, map and standards of the Comprehensive Plan and the City's land development regulations. Replacement of existing mobile homes in existing mobile home parks and sites of record, as of the effective date of this Plan, shall be permitted and shall not be deemed inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The City shall ensure that new mobile home development shall be consistent with performance criteria cited in Policy 1- 3.2.5. This policy shall be implemented through a mandatory site plan review process. Objective 1-2.2: Allocating Commercial Development. The Future Land Use Map shall identify the allocation of commercial land for: 1) residential/office/and institutional mixed uses; 2) neighborhood commercial development; 3) general commercial development; and 4)central business district development and redevelopment. The allocation of land for commercial development shall be compatible with goals and objectives identified in the Comprehensive Plan and consistent with supportive research and analysis. The policies stated below provide an explanation of the purpose, intent and character of the commercial land use designations. This objective shall be measured through the implementation of the following policies: Policy 1-2.2.1: ResidentiaUOffice/Institutional (ROI). The Residential/Office/Institutional(ROI) policy designation is a planned mixed use designation designed to accommodate business and professional offices as well as high density multiple family residential opportunities and institutional uses. The allowable maximum residential density shall be up to a maximum of twenty (20) units per acre. The maximum • intensity of institutional development measured as a floor area ratio is .35. This land use policy designation expressly excludes general retail sales and services, warehousing, and outside storage. Furthermore,this policy designation is intended for sites which: • Have accessibility to major thoroughfares or are located along the outer fringe of core commercial areas; • Build on the purpose and function of the central business district and Lake Monroe waterfront; • Encourage reinvestment in declining residential areas adjacent to commercial core areas. • Have potential to be served by a full complement of urban services; • Contain sufficient land area to accommodate good principles of urban design. including sufficient land area to provide adequate landscaping and buffers to separate existing as well as potential future adjacent land uses of differing, intensity; • Frequently serve as a transition area which buffers residential uses located in one area from a nearby area which accommodates uses of a higher intensity. al/ 6 • • The City shall ensure that new development within "ROI" designated areas complies with performance criteria cited in Policy 1-3.2.5. This policy shall be implemented through a mandatory site plan review process. Policy 1-2.2.2: Neighborhood Commercial Development (NC). Neighborhood commercial development is allocated to commercial sites accessible to major thoroughfares near residential neighborhoods. The maximum intensity of neighborhood commercial development measured as a floor area ratio is .35. Sites within this designation are intended to accommodate shops with limited inventory or goods meeting performance criteria of the Comprehensive Plan cited in Policy 1-3.2.5. This policy shall be implemented through a mandatory site plan review process. The "NC" designation is not intended to accommodate residential development except on a limited, conditional basis. However., duly approved residential uses existing at the effective date of the Comprehensive Plan shall be deemed permitted uses. Neighborhood Commercial activities shall include shops catering to the following markets: • Neighborhood residential markets within the immediate vicinity as opposed to community-wide or regional markets; or • Specialized markets with customized market demands. Commercial development within the neighborhood commercial district shall generally be restricted to the following uses: • • Business and professional offices; • • Neighborhood convenience stores; • Small limited item shops and stores restricted to retail sales of convenience items and services including barber,beauty care, and other personal services; • Drug stores, laundry and dry cleaning pick-up stations; and • Specialty shops. Areas designated for neighborhood commercial development shall generally include areas where individual properties and uses are located on sites of less than three (3) acres. Such areas are not intended to accommodate large scale retail sales, service, and trade activities, generally serving a community-wide or regional market. Such stores usually differ from neighborhood commercial shops since the former usually require a larger floor area, carry a relatively large inventory,and require a substantially greater parking area. Residential development within areas designated for neighborhood commercial development shall be permitted on a conditional basis. Uses which are not intended to be accommodated within the neighborhood commercial area include the following: large scale discount stores, full service department stores or hardware stores; large wholesale and warehousing activities; sales, service or repair of motor vehicles, machine equipment or accessory parts, 411 including tire and battery shops; automotive service centers; commercial amusements; fast food 7 • establishments primarily serving in disposable containers and/or providing drive-in facilities, and other • similar services to be expressly defined in the land development regulations. Policy 1-2.2.3: General Commercial Development (GC). The General Commercial (GC) areas are designated on the Future Land Use Map for purposes of accommodating community-oriented retail sales and services; highway-oriented sales and services; and other general commercial activities. The general commercial land use designation is intended to include the easterly portion of the First Street business district. The general commercial designation also is intended to include pre-existing commercial corridor development along such major thoroughfares as French Avenue, Orlando Drive (US 17-92), and strategic intersections along Airport Boulevard. The General Commercial designation generally shall be located in highly accessible areas adjacent to major thoroughfares which possess necessary location, site, and market requirements. The maximum intensity of general commercial development measured as a floor area ratio is .35. All new development within "general commercial" designated areas shall be required to comply with performance criteria cited in Policy 1-3.2.5. This policy shall be implemented through a mandatory site plan review process. This area is not generally intended to accommodate manufacturing, processing, or assembly of goods, sales and service of heavy commercial vehicle and equipment, or related services or maintenance activities; warehousing; uses requiring extensive outside storage; or other activities which may generate nuisance impacts, including glare, smoke or other air pollutants, noise, vibration or major fire hazards, or other impacts generally associated with more intensive industrial uses. The areas designated for general commercial development are specifically not adaptive to permanent • residential housing and such uses shall be located in other areas designated for residential development. Existing residential development within areas designated for general commercial development shall be "grandfathered" as permitted nonconforming uses or approved on a conditional basis. On the other hand, transient residential facilities including hotels and motels, or residential care facilities should be located in areas designated for general commercial use. Policy 1-2.2.4: Limit Community Retail Commercial Development to General Commercial (GC) Areas. Community-oriented retail commercial goods and services shall be encouraged to locate within existing development corridors that are already committed to such uses and are specifically designated as General Commercial on the Future Land Use Map. Conversely, general retail commercial developments shall be discouraged in other areas of the City. This locational policy is intended to prevent the proliferation of additional strip commercial highway development and to encourage infill and redevelopment in already- established highway commercial areas. Community commercial areas generally contain everyday goods and services that serve the Sanford area. Shopping areas with major grocery store chains or similar large scale grocery stores, drug stores, drive-in-banks, automobile sales, service and repair establishments and mini-warehouses typify community-oriented commercial areas. Such areas are differentiated from regional commercial areas typified by a large scale shopping mall in close proximity to Interstate 4 and small neighborhood commercial centers supporting a given residential area. Policy 1-2.2.5: Prevent Additional Corridor Strip Retail Commercial Development. To prevent the proliferation of typical strip commercial development along certain relatively undeveloped segments of • 8 • • • major roadways, this policy shall identify specific road segments and undesirable uses. The following general land use activities,when allowed to proliferate in an uncontrolled manner along a roadway, result in urban sprawl and strip commercial development: • Retail Sales • Drive-In Restaurants • Alcoholic Beverage Sales Establishments for Off-Site Consumption • Automotive,Truck,Equipment and vehicular Service, Sales and Repair • Other Highway Oriented Commercial Uses shall be as cited in the Land Development Regulations. The above-described uses shall be discouraged for lands adjacent to the following road segments: • State Road 46 East between the CSX Railroad Crossing and Beardall Avenue • Lake Mary Boulevard • Upsala Road • Airport Boulevard between State Road 46 West and Bungalow Boulevard Policy 1-2.2.6: Waterfront/Downtown Business District (WDBD). The Waterfront/ Downtown Business District is designed to provide centralized residential, governmental, cultural, institutional, and general commercial activities within the downtown and waterfront urban area. The designations provides a planning and management framework for promoting the revitalization, development and redevelopment of the Lake Monroe waterfront and the historic downtown commercial area as designated on the Future Land • Use Map Series 1-1: Land Use Policy Designations. This expanded land use category includes the City's historic Central Business District(CBD) area, and is in response to the goals contained in the Lake Monroe Waterfront and Downtown Sanford Community Redevelopment Area Plan. The purpose of the Waterfront/Downtown Business District(WDBD)is to: • Generate a revitalization effort that attracts private sector investment and strengthens the City's economy; • Establish the district as a regional center; • Strengthen public/private partnerships; • Enhance the livability of North Seminole County by encouraging improved residential, retail. educational,cultural and entertainment opportunities; and • Provide the framework for redevelopment and infill. The WDBD is located in an Urban Service Area, and is comprised of those areas that are in close proximity to, and have, historically, been most influenced by the St. Johns River and Lake Monroe. In the late nineteenth century, the commercial center of Sanford grew up along the Lake Monroe waterfront in the eastern portion of the WDBD. This area contains the traditional downtown area of Sanford. The Waterfront/Downtown Business District (WDBD) is designated as the City's "central business district." The western portion of the WDBD contains commercial uses based upon the railway line, as well as significant institutional, residential, and recreational facilities located therein. Density/Intensity: Intensity and density standards within the WDBD have been designed to attract quality private investment and stimulate the vibrant atmosphere of mixed-use activity that is typical of a • thriving downtown. Developers in the WDBD may utilize the comprehensive infill program (Objective 9 • • 1-3.3.5) to further maximize floor area ratios and multifamily residential densities. The maximum • intensity of nonresidential development, other than industrial, measured as a floor area ratio is 2.0 for the areas east of French Avenue, and 0.35 for the areas west of French Avenue. These floor area ratios are intended to illustrate the amount of development on both specific parcels and in the district overall. However, through the implementation of the comprehensive infill program, individual developments may exceed these maximum floor area ratios and residential densities. The maximum density for residential development shall be 50 units per acre. The maximum floor area ratio for industrial uses shall be 0.50. Performance Criteria. Upon plan adoption, all new development shall comply with performance criteria of Policy 1-3.2.5 as well as the following criteria, all of which shall be implemented through a mandatory site plan review of new development: 1. Historic District Compatibility: The design of future development and redevelopment within the vicinity of the historic district shall be compatible with the design of buildings of historic significance which are located within the historic area and its environs. Reference historic district boundaries on maps I-5 and 1-6. Site plan review shall incorporate criteria to ensure that the design of new structures, including building materials, roof lines, fenestration and setbacks, are compatible with buildings of historic significance. 2. Parking Provisions: New development within the WDBD shall be served by adequate parking resources. New development shall provide off-street parking sufficient to serve each proposed new development either on site or through the provision of a shared parking agreement. In the historic district, where off-street parking cannot be accommodated on-site, applicants for • development may contribute to a special parking fund, which shall be established for purposes of purchasing land and contributing strategically located parking facilities and pedestrian walkways linking major retail activity centers, residential areas, and social, civic, recreational, or cultural attractions within the downtown area. 3. Urban Design Amenities: Proposed new development shall provide a higher level of urban design amenities including landscaping, compatible signage, and pedestrian linkages together with a broader mix of land uses attractive to potential users of the downtown area. 4. Site Plan Review Process: The site plan review process shall include management procedures necessary to implement the WDBD development criteria, objectives and policies cited in the comprehensive plan. Where appropriate, the site plan review process shall ensure the preservation and enhancement of the "original" traditional neighborhood by implementing the recommendations of the historic surveys of the downtown area and the historic residential area along the Park Avenue Corridor. 5. Reinforce/Regenerate Historic Buildings: Encourage development and redevelopment of projects that reinforce and regenerate the historic significance of buildings and corridors within the historic area and its environs. • 10 ' • • 6. Strategic Parking Resources: Promote development of adequate parking resources in strategic areas of the WDBD and pedestrian walkways linking major retail activity centers, as well as social, civic, recreational, or cultural attractions within the downtown and waterfront area. 7. Mix of Land Uses: Achieve a higher level of urban design amenities together with a broader mix of land uses attractive to potential users of the downtown and waterfront area. 8. Regulatory Concepts: Provide a planning and management framework that incorporates regulatory concepts necessary to implement redevelopment planning objectives together with the recommendations of the historic surveys of the downtown area and the historic residential area along the Park Avenue Corridor. Policy 1-2.2.7: I-4 High Intensity Center (HI). "I-4 High Intensity" is a planned mixed use designation intended to promote and regulate anticipated development within the vicinity of the I-4/State Road 46 Interchange. I-4 High Intensity land uses shall include commerce, industry, and high density residential development. The maximum intensity of development within the I-4 High Intensity designation shall be an FAR of 1.0. Maximum residential density shall be fifty(50)dwelling units per acre. This area corresponds to maximum intensities and densities of the "Core" designation applicable to adjacent unincorporated areas pursuant to the Seminole County Comprehensive Planning Program's High Intensity Planned area. The City shall require that all new development within the 1-4 High Intensity Center(HI) be developed as a "Planned Development" (cross-reference Policy 1-2.8.1). As a "PD" Planned Development, all such new development shall be required to address infrastructure needs, provision of services, development phasing, • development intensity and land use compatibility as part of an integrated design scheme which includes very detailed strategies and techniques for resolving development impacts. In addition to compliance with all performance criteria of Policy 1-3.2.5, "PD" proposals in the I-4 High Intensity Center will be the subject of negotiated development agreements. The review process shall involve county, state, regional, and federal agencies having jurisdiction over impacted resources. No development order shall be granted prior to approval by the City of the development agreement. Development within "HI" designated areas existing prior to adoption of this Plan will be "grandfathered." However, all new development within the 1- 4 High Intensity Area must: • Be designed to accommodate and encourage use of multi-modal transportation systems; • Incorporate access controls as may be deemed necessary including dedication of cross easements and joint uses of driveway and off-street parking areas; • Employ buffer yards, internal and perimeter landscape amenities, as well as landscape and design techniques for ensuring land use compatibility within a dynamic mixed use setting. • Achieve a high standard of urban design amenities, including pedestrian walkways which link activity centers with parking areas, transit stops, urban plazas, and other open spaces and amenities intended to reinforce appropriate design themes; • 1 l • • • Incorporate a planning and management framework and regulating concepts necessary to regulate • development within the "I-4 High Intensity Mixed Use Development," a strategically located center for 'regional commerce and industry; and • Comply with performance criteria of Policy 1-3.2.5. Objective 1-2.3: Allocating Industrial Development. The Future Land Use Map shall allocate land resources for existing and anticipated future industrial needs and requisite support services. This objective shall be measured through the implementation of the following policies: Policy 1-2.3.1: Industrial (I) Land Use Designation. The allocation of land use designations should provide a high priority to industry's frequent need for strategically located lands which are accessible to air, rail and highway transport facilities, as well as labor markets and necessary urban services. The Industrial (I)designation is intended to provide strategically located sites. The City shall work with industrial interest groups to pursue a selective industrial expansion policy set forth herein in Policy 1-1.3.3. The maximum intensity of industrial development measured as a floor area ratio is .50. Industrially designated areas are not adaptive to residential use and as such residential activities shall not be located in areas designated for industrial development. This provision shall not prohibit residences for exclusive use by night watchmen or custodians whose presence on industrial sites is necessary for security purposes. The Industrial (I) land use designation shall be allocated to industrial sites accessible to rail facilities, and/or major thoroughfares. The sites shall be buffered from residential neighborhoods. Industrial uses include: manufacturing, assembling and distribution activities; warehousing and storage activities; and other similar land uses which shall be regulated through appropriate zoning procedures. Heavy metal fabrication, batch plants, salvage yards, chemical or petroleum manufacturing or refining,rubber or plastics manufacturing, or other use generating potentially harmful environmental or nuisance impacts shall be prohibited. These uses typically generate heavy truck traffic, require significant acreage, are difficult to screen and buffer from residential areas, and therefore, should be carefully located in industrial areas in conformity with performance criteria cited in Policy 1-3.2.5. Based on the extensive impacts which industrial development frequently generates, if a proposed industrial development of either five (5) acres of land area or five thousand (5,000) square feet of gross floor area requires either a Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map amendment or rezoning, the proposed industrial development shall be developed under provisions of a planned unit development petition in order to allow maximum flexibility in design to the applicant and to avoid any major adverse impacts which may not be anticipated during a less in-depth plan review. Policy 1-2.3.2: Westside Industry and Commerce (WIC) Planned Mixed Use Designation. The "Westside Industry and Commerce" (WIC) area is a planned mixed use designation intended to promote development of a major center of commerce and industry in the vicinity of the West SR 46 corridor. The corridor's proximity to 1-4 as well as the planned Eastern Beltway provides access to regional markets and a substantial labor force. The CSX Main Rail Line also provides a transportation amenity of regional significance. S 12 • • • The land use mix is intended to include intensive industrial development. Commercial development within the "WIC" area shall be restricted to operations that provide essential commercial services to industrial development. The maximum intensity of commercial development measured as a floor area ratio is .35. The maximum intensity for industrial development as a floor area ratio is .50. The maximum residential density shall be 20 dwelling units per acre. The City shall require that all new development within the Westside Industry and Commerce activity center (WIC) be developed as a "Planned Development" (cross-reference Policy 1-2.8.1). As a "PD" Planned Development, all such new development shall be required to address infrastructure needs, provision of services, development phasing, development intensity and land use compatibility as part of an integrated design scheme which includes very detailed strategies and techniques for resolving development impacts. "PD" proposals in the "WIC" area will be the subject of negotiated development agreements. The review process shall involve county, state, regional, and federal agencies having jurisdiction over impacted resources. No development order shall be granted prior to approval by the City of the development agreement. Development within "WIC" designated areas existing prior to the adoption of this Plan will be "grandfathered." In addition to the performance criteria of Policy 1-3.2.5, all new development in the Westside Industry and Commerce Area shall comply with the following: • Requirements and procedures for obtaining a WIC mixed use Future Land Use Map designation and • appropriate zoning; • Standards for controlled access and internal circulation, including cross access easements and joint use of driveways; • Development standards for Gateway Corridor Development Districts, including requirements for buffer yards, landscaping;and screening,off-street parking, and signage and; • Planning and management criteria regulating the land use mix, intensity, and qualitative standards for assuring land use compatibility and consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Objective 1 2.4: Managing Airport Lands. The Airport Master Plan and the City's land development a. Foster use of lands comprising the Orlando Sanford Airport at Sanford in a manner that contributes Policy 1 1.3.3 of the Chapter. b. Assure safe operations of aircraft through:••• - - ..- - . . 'mal-gnjund-l-environment. 13 • • • c. Achieve airport and industrial development that is consistent with the adopted Airport Master Plan :Preserving the ecologically unique areas on the property. • • • .. -• .•••• • ; . , .- . - - vices; •Objective 1-2.4: Managing Airport Lands: The City shall manage lands owned by the Orlando- Sanford Airport and surrounding uses to minimize airport impacts to adjacent land uses and conservation resources in a manner that also protects the integrity of airport operations and safety through the following policies: Policy 1-2.4.1: Airport Master Plan. The City hereby adopts those portions of the Airport Layout Plan (ALP) of the Airport Master Plan that are located within the city limits as the document to guide development of the Airport. Any modifications to the Airport Layout Plan shall require an amendment to the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan. The City hereby adopts the goals and objectives of the Airport Master Plan as the general guidelines for development of the Airport to ensure that Airport facilities will be adequate to meet both long- and short-term demand for aviation services. The goals and objectives reflect policy goals to be reached through the master planning process. These goals include the ultimate development of self-supporting facilities to serve the existing and future aviation needs of the region; the achievement of compatible land uses in the vicinity of the Airport; and provisions for the type of development that will yield the most public benefit of the investment represented by the airfield. • 14 • • • Goal No. 1. Continue to meet and enhance the level of service rovided to all p Airport users. Objectives: • Promote passenger processing which is convenient for all segments of the traveling ublic P t through reduction of delays and the promotion of a safe and pleasant experience. • Provide adequate runway capacity for estimated demand in terms of annual and hourly operations. • Provide adequate runway length to meet existing and forecasted operational needs. • Provide opportunities for development of services associated with air carrier, charter, corporate- type GA, cargo, flight training, and recreational flying operations. • Effectively integrate commercial air carrier operations with commercial and non-commercial GA operations. • Provide other aviation related support facilities needed to support a full range of aviation services. Goal No. 2. Provide guidelines for future development, while satisfying anticipated demand. Objectives: • Establish land parcels to meet anticipated demand. • Provide adequate airside and landside facilities to meet anticipated demand, while meeting all FAA requirements. • Continue to market facilities to domestic air carriers, international operators, and integrated air cargo operators. • Effectively market commercial and non-commercial GA operators and facilities. • Develop a self-sustaining commerce park, which will benefit the Airport and the community as a whole. Goal No. 3. Provide an Airport that is safe and reliable. Objectives: • Provide navigational, landing aids, and meteorological facilities, which enhance the safety and reliability of operations under all weather conditions. • Protect FAA mandated safety areas, runway protection zones, and other clear zones. • Minimize possible obstructions to air navigation. • Provide adequate Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF) access roads, facilities, equipment. • and personnel, to maintain response time under all conditions. 15 • • • Ensure that airside and landside operations and facilities meet all applicable security standards. • • Ensure that parking facilities are adequately sized and easy to negotiate. • Develop facilities to meet the demands of the current and future critical aircraft. Goal No. 4. Develop the Airport and its vicinity to minimize negative environmental impacts. Objectives: • Identify the major environmental issues of concern. • Minimize potential environmental impacts, and provide special attention to minimizing residential dislocation, air and water pollution, and wetland impacts. • Provide a facility that minimizes adverse effects on other environmental concerns. • Develop an energy-efficient Airport layout to provide ease of air and ground access. Goal No. 5. Promote the development of compatible land use in undeveloped areas within the Airport vicinity. Objectives: • Promote land use planning and development objectives for on-Airport and off-Airport land use which is compatible with the anticipated long-range needs of the Airport and the community as a whole. • Designate areas for future development(i.e. air cargo, heavy aircraft maintenance, flight training, etc.). • Locate Airport and access facilities so that growth may be controlled through land use planning and zoning. • Develop and implement a Master Stormwater Plan in conjunction with St. John's River Water Management District and FAA criteria. Goal No. 6. Develop an Airport that supports local and regional economic goals while accommodating new opportunities or shifts in development patterns. Objectives: • Achieve a level of service and user convenience such that the Airport is a positive factor in regional economic development decisions. • Achieve capacities of the airfield, the terminal area systems, and Commerce Park so that the Airport may be an attractive location for major airline maintenance, cargo, and other aviation related hub. • Provide appropriate and achievable commercial opportunities at, near. and on the Airport. • 16 • • • • To assure economic feasibility, identify an equitable distribution of user charges, distribute the burden of capital investment, maintenance, and operating_costs, while keeping overall costs within an acceptable level. • Identify financial alternatives and funding sources available for the implementation of aviation and non-aviation projects. • Quantify financial resources available for funding projects identified and recommended, as well as identify project implementation. • Develop an airport layout plan (ALP) that easily integrates with existing and proposed transportation infrastructure, to encourage economic growth. Goal No. 7. Minimize Costs To All Users (I.E. Passengers,Airlines, Flight Training Facilities, Employees, Etc.)Of The Airport. Objectives: • Minimize airspace congestion and delays for air carrier and GA aircraft operations through procedural changes and/or provision of additional navigational aids (NAVAIDS). • Minimize airside congestion through construction of runways, taxiways, and aprons, when the costs of providing the additional capacity are less than the additional operating costs associated with aircraft delays. • • Minimize the amount of financial subsidies provided by the Airport to air carriers for operations (i.e. fuel,parking, etc.). Goal No. 8. Ensure Adequate And Convenient Ground Access To The Airport. Objectives: • Provide safe access and easy-to-follow signs to Airport roadways and facilities. • Provide adequate lane capacity on roads leading to the Airport to serve existing and future activity. • Provide adequate land capacity on internal circulation roadways serving functional areas (terminal, GA, cargo, flight academy, etc.). • Provide parking facilities (for GA, cargo, terminal, etc.) that are conveniently located and easily accessible. • Incorporate multi-modal opportunities into Airport development plans (e.g. commuter or high- speed rail). • Maintain close coordination with Regional Planning Council, Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO), FDOT, and other transportation groups. • 17 • • Goal No. 9. Minimize The Impact Of Noise On Neighboring Residents and Noise Sensitive Land Uses Through Noise Abatement And Mitigation. Objectives: • Design and select noise abatement measures that minimize the number of people exposed to noise above day-night noise level (DNL) greater than 65 decibels. • In selecting noise abatement actions, avoid actions that would adversely affect capacity, impose restrictions on Airport use that would be discriminatory, or that could erode prudent margins of safety. • Design and select (if necessary) land use mitigation measures for noise sensitive land uses exposed to aircraft noise between 65 and 75 decibels. • Maximize, to the extent possible, any mitigation projects that may be eligible for FAA funding assistance, aside from the Airport Improvement Program (AIP), that minimizes the impacts of noise upon the surrounding environment. Goal No. 10. Develop An Airport That Is Consistent With Federal, State, Regional, And Local Plans. Objectives: • Develop the Airport as the region's alternative to Orlando International Airport (MCO) and make it consistent with national, state, and metropolitan system plans. • • Develop the Airport in accordance with local land use and transportation plans. Policy 1-2.4.2: Airport Expansion and Coordination with the Conservation Element. The implementation of the Airport Master Plan and shall be coordinated with the Conservation Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Expansion and operation plans shall minimize impacts to environmental resources consistent with policies set forth within the Comprehensive Plan. Resource Protection and Conservation lands shall be protected through the use of open space requirements, clustering, conservation easements and wetlands buffer and transition areas. Policy 1-2.4.3: Public Facilities. The development of the Airport Master Plan shall be phased concurrent with major public roadway improvements and the installation of drainage, sewer and water utilities. As necessary to ensure that development of the Airport is consistent with public facility standards, the City or Sanford Airport Authority, as appropriate, shall enter into any necessary interlocal agreements for the purposes of the provision of public facilities and services in order to maintain the adopted level of service standards for facilities subject to concurrency. Policy 1-2.4.4 Adjacent Development to be Compatible with Airport Operations. The City's Future Land Use Map and the Official Zoning Map shall continue to delineate all Runway Protection Zones (RPZ) established for the airport. These clear zones shall be, at a minimum, consistent with 18 • • 410 requirements set forth by the Federal Aviation Administration. Development and land uses activities within a RPZ shall be consistent with regulations established by the Federal Aviation Administration. Schedule R, Airports and Aircraft, of the Land Development Regulations shall continue to control land use activities, height, and construction to ensure that development and activities within the RPZ and other areas of the City are consistent with standards set forth by the Federal Aviation Administration. Schedule R is consistent with Chapter 333, Florida Statutes. Policy 1-2.4.5: Coordination with the FAA. For structure heights that require approval from the Federal Aviation Administration, the City shall issue no development or construction permit until authorization has been received from the FAA. Policy 1-2.4.6: Coordination through Development Review. The City Department of Engineering and Planning shall coordinate with Airport staff regarding development applications, zoning changes, and land use amendment petitions proposed for property adjacent to or near the airport. Policy 1-2.4.7: Protection from Noise Exposure. Future expansion of the airport property and runways shall be focused to the east and south to minimize airport noise and development impacts to urban residential areas to the north and west. The Airport Authority shall continue to monitor noise impacts generated by airport operations and enforce compliance. • Lands annexed near or adjacent to the airport shall be assigned land use designations compatible with the Airport Master Plan and in a manner consistent with the joint planning agreement established with Seminole County. The City shall ensure that land uses surrounding the airport are compatible with noise levels generated by the airport use through the following measures: 1. All land east of Ohio Avenue and north of Pine Avenue shall be developed for airport related uses based on the part 150 Noise Exposure Maps and Compatibility Plan prepared in 2001 for the Orlando Sanford Airport by Environmental Science Associates (ESA) and any revisions to the noise exposure maps that may occur as the result of airport development. 2. Residential uses and public educational facilities shall be prohibited south and east of the airport's runway system. However, transient rental multifamily residential units may be constructed provided they are outside the 60 DNL and do not include mobile homes. 3. The following uses are compatible with the Airport and shall be permitted east of Ohio Avenue and North of Pine Way: • Industrial Parks; • Business Parks; • Commercial Developments; • Attendant retail; • 19 • • • Service and Hotel Uses; • Medium and high-density rental residential Developments; • Agricultural uses; • Public Uses. 4. Single family residences shall only be allowed on existing one-acre suburban estates or larger lots. No new lots, parcels or tracts shall be created for single-family uses or multi-family uses in private ownership. Existing parcels may not be subdivided for residential uses other than multifamily rental uses. 5. An avigation easement shall be required and included in the recorded deed of any property prior to the construction of a single family dwelling unit or a multifamily dwelling unit. Policy 1-2.4.8: Monitoring and Evaluation of Airport Layout Plan and Goals of Airport Master Plan. The Airport Layout Plan and the goals of the Airport Master Plan shall be reviewed on an annual basis in order to ensure that the development is proceeding according to the Plan and that goals are being achieved. Review shall also establish that public facilities are in place to accommodate expected development. The annual review shall be the responsibility of the Administrative Official. Findings and recommendations of the Administrative Official shall be considered by the Sanford Aviation Authority and the local planning agency. Monitoring and evaluation procedures shall incorporate the following: •Consistency review: determination of whether development is proceeding according to the Airport Layout Plan and goals of the Airport Master Plan; Determination that public facilities can accommodate proposed airport development for next period; Accomplishments: Review of annual progress towards fulfillment of Airport Layout Plan and goals of Airport Master Plan; Unanticipated Problems and Opportunities: The report shall describe the nature and extent of unanticipated and unforeseen problems and opportunities occurring during the past year; Recommend Amendments: The report shall contain recommendations concerning new or modified goals and objectives and modifications to the Airport Layout Plan and resultant Comprehensive Plan amendments that are necessary during the coming year. Policy 1-2.4.9:Airport Industry and Commerce Land Use Designation (AIC). The "Airport Industry and Commerce" (AIC) land use designation is a high-intensity mixed use policy for managing lands comprising the Orlando Sanford Airport and adjacent lands capable of supporting a variety of resideutialr commercial and industrial uses. • 20 • • The Airport Industry and Commerce designation is intended to encourage the expansion of industrial land uses in areas where airport noise impacts will prohibit residential development and provide additional areas for mixed use development that would be compatible with airport operations. The majority of such lands is located in airport property and is subject to the Airport Master Plan. Certain properties,primarily east of Beardall Avenue,are located in the 2005 noise zone. The Orlando-Sanford Airport shall develop according to the Airport Layout Plan (Map 1-10), adopted as part of the Sanford Comprehensive Plan. Any change to the designated uses in the Airport Master Plan requires an amendment to the Sanford Comprehensive Plan. Upon annexation of lands that are currently within the jurisdiction of Seminole County and are included in the Airport Layout Plan, the lands will be automatically given the land use designation of Airport Industry Commerce. Upon annexation of lands currently within the jurisdiction of Seminole County and included in the Airport Layout Plan,the lands will be given a zoning consistent with the existing zoning of the Airport. The land use mix in the AIC is intended to provide a full range of urban services and facilities including: Industrial and Business Parks; • Office Complexes; Commercial and retail developments; Service and hotel uses; Medium to high density rental residential developments; 6.Elementary, middle and high schools. The maximum intensity of industrial and commercial development measured as floor area is 1.0. The maximum intensity for rental residential uses is 50 units per acre. The Development Review Team shall review development included in the ALP for compliance with the Sanford Land Development Regulations. Development contemplated by the ALP shall comply with all land development regulations included, but not limited to, setbacks, landscaping, parking, drainage and floor area ratios except where such regulations conflict with FAA rules and regulations. With the exception of the development included in the Airport Layout Plan, The City shall require that all new development within the "AIC" designated area be developed as a "Planned Development" (cross reference Policy 1-2.8.1). As a "PD" Planned Development, all such new development shall be required to address infrastructure needs, provision of services, development phasing, development intensity and land 21. • use compatibility as part of an integrated design scheme which includes very detailed strategies and • techniques for resolving development impacts. Existing communities shall be protected from the encroachment of airport related uses through the use of design standards to the maximum extent possible. The location of future high density residential developments shall comply with guidelines issued by the Federal Aviation Administration and the Department of Transportation relating to airport compatible uses, noise zones, approach zones and other safety measures. Future high and medium density residential developments shall occur outside the 60 Ldn (day/night sound ' level)noise contours. Existing communities shall be protected from the encroachment of airport related uses through the use of design standards to the maximum extent possible. In addition to compliance with all performance criteria of Policy 1-3.2.5, "PD" proposals in the "AIC" area will be the subject of negotiated development agreements. The review process shall involve County, state, regional and federal agencies having jurisdiction over impacted resources. No development order shall be granted prior to City approval of the development agreement. Developments within the "AIC" that are existing prior to the adoption of this Plan will be "grandfathered". However, all new development in the Airport Industry and Commerce Area outside the Airport boundaries shall incorporate performance criteria to implement Objective 1-2.4 and Policy 1-3.2.5. Such criteria shall include but not be limited to: •• Narrative and graphic information required for review of rezoning petitions, for site lan review, and other related procedural requirements. P • Impact analysis, including plans for managing any potential impacts on air operations. • Noise impact analysis, including required sound insulation in areas within the airport impact noise zones. • Requirements for controlled access and internal circulation, including provisions for cross access easements, and joint use of driveways. • Requirements for perimeter buffer yards; • Management framework for encouraging development of strategically planned sub-centers of commerce and industry; • Dedication of necessary rights-of-way; • Use of pedestrian and mass transit facilities to reduce vehicle trips. Objective 1-2.5: Allocating Public And Semi-Public Services r . The Future Land Use Map shall allocate land resources for public and semi-public facilities and services as specified in the policies • 22. • • • stipulated below. These sites shall be compatible with adjacent land uses to the greatest practical extent. The sites shall also fulfill the unique site location requirements included in functional plans and shall be responsive to the needs identified in related demographic and supportive needs analysis. This objective shall be measured through the implementation of the following policies: Policy 1-2.5.1: Public and Semi-Public Land Use Designation (PSP). The public and semi-public(PSP) land use designation is intended to accommodate existing public and semi-public services including: governmental administration buildings; public schools and not-for-profit educational institutions; hospital facilities and supportive health care units; arts and cultural or civic facilities; essential public services and facilities; fire and emergency operation facilities; private parks and recreation areas; utilities;; and other similar activities as shall be identified in the land development regulations. Additionally, the Public/Semi- Public designation reflects major transportation facilities including the CSX railroad terminal, plus expressway right-of-way that is proposed for use and/or owned by the Seminole County Expressway Authority. Lands designated for public and semi-public facilities and services shall contain sufficient acreage and open space and be properly screened and buffered in order to minimize potential adverse impacts on adjacent land uses. The maximum intensity of institutional activity measured as a floor area ratio is .35. The City shall monitor the need for increased land area for public and semi-public uses in order to ensure • that the public and semi-public land use designation on the Future Land Use Map is expanded to accommodate the development of public and semi-public facilities such as governmental administration buildings; fire,police and rescue services; health care delivery services; and educational institutions. Land uses such as places of worship, cultural or civic centers, and other similar public or private not-for- profit uses may be included within this land use designation or within other land use designations as provided for in the land development regulations. With regards to lands located in areas proposed for use by the expressway but not owned by the Expressway Authority, the City shall discourage land use planning or regulatory changes that would result in higher intensities or densities. This policy shall not prevent the reasonable use of such lands pursuant to goals,objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. All new development or redevelopment shall comply with performance criteria cited in Policy 1-3.2.5. This policy shall be implemented through a mandatory site plan review process. Policy 1-2.5.2: Parks, Recreation And Open Space Land Use Designation (PRO): The Parks, Recreation and Open Space land use designation is intended to distinguish Sanford's parks, recreational facilities and opens space facilities from other public uses. This designation is intended for developed City parks and areas of significant open space, including cemeteries. Parks and recreation areas shall be readily accessible at the neighborhood and community level. Parks shall be developed and redeveloped according to the level of service standards for parks and recreational facilities, community demand and community input. Parks shall generally provide outdoor recreational • 23 • • facilities. However, community centers and indoor facilities are also permitted up to a floor area ratio of 411 .25. • • 24 ��� — i - II ■■_ 71 ' H ° 111111/1 0 a V ' it r__-.7■■■I_1 111111111171i Mit eigibm. s �� �'17 .......... 7 It,, IiWi i i , _,... _�= F-�.� filiaa T- ■ i ., .ur J- i j _ 1 11 ■�..i 1,-,_. r ■ �,_-�L ..•I. ; ■E�II�IJ. ti ? II! mom moo I �..f. gP 1 1111 -- 11��F �+" - :1111 wr. .. II.' ■ o ' ,. NI ■ as , , } ` j I r ■11I . 1 MI6 1_' ■ �O�■ mi = w F II a f l I 7r_ 1.-f c „i f t w I din '`,° 174...7m et al c ■■•r rr o ." .1. a ■iij�' - `-pii+.. ❑. 37 Ali ■ 1- . III I I 1..6.7 i o,00.-•.x!' J■ mil' a3 1J®® : - li ®®,,:::,,.: ti �} 111 �y > .g . ;•• tl. ® i {� ® ° n ,s 1■111 • ■■ 1111■ ■ / �, ' i1 wall • 0 ■-4 .'.='. il, 1 II ° _ ■�\� Q■.® VIII,......,., \T■ Lam' Ib P sr 1 =I■■ _, Lin i -.1'0,':- 1.7"'. i----1711 wig 1 Lt.` GIB L- I_ • p 1 ~� I - / �A` ""`.�' o Ir _ ° IrL p� .atll 11111 I _ Y 'C P ��kk�� _ . ,- I MI/ :;JJIL.i '! c . �� . �:-+ vim=ilea �� MEN/1111 MIN I :11!i Gl 11 � .i 1 Y Vs- tv. r IAA I •s■N 1 � 1 cep r Iu I 1� ' III it �� . M s:. .�� I�SC�■�= I I ,it i -ail `. 0. ' -Pa.1..11.I:' ''.'® i IHIhllll i. �Ih1l11■ice :' �' ° ' << i 1 i!;I ii i I, 1,,jx i I Hll■ 11 1- : ' ° y,' -4, ,1 j S f f f f 3 ij € i i ; ; . I hi I ■ :°111 I�rii �I . . . R 1i 1 1 I !�I 11 �■ u �■ - '__ 1 1111) 11 {I !� *��/1111 -1�� '. ,-` w ° 91! !# 1� ! If;i i i i '� 11 �r E1 ? 1 H j it ■ 1 of ' • �." `�' n 111 ; "� i' i;1 ` II; lj ,. ix., .eta i ,I�� w1 9# i ■ ]1!:�p j19l; , ■ ! 4 # s#I It wi 1�..+ :Toltra."alt-i. r ��\ 1 1 1 1111 11 I 11 111 22 g,} -,3::, 0.a. I @!_ ;IZr� S � �■�=f��`'7IfIID.6. AIelli (CBI / �, ',� „_ / 1 - L _ii 1• WWII a. ii z INI Ice • I •�1---4 W cc a - [jooi io i 1 1 _ U,l II 1 co ,,_ r c, - ), . , . _ . ,_ re o E r Q imam. r71 , .� iu it Jiiai ' MI � ■� II� • EC qrn (S=N� trJ - E Is) �a w■■3itd11 r-. -, ...... .-■.I■■■■ r 4 _ _ 1�! •1•111111111111111. 41Pl■ Oft • ����■� ��I� J 1 ins 1 ` 11■■■■■■■■�I/ ►�rr. LI mil /■n■■■■■■■■■■I/■IM■•■■■■ 1 - ti11 �1e■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■�■�■■■■ �■Ic�i��c7 11 ,E- :i ■■■■■■■ ■■■.�■■:■■■■..��0: ■tea ct ■■■■■.■.•-.=■■■■ iii�■■■■�,'—I ■ -, _ ,i01":41111111111•11111•11-MMENI �t�`�==�_` OM 1 a ► i■1m■�niiiima .11 ■�� a,. .1 L (14 Nil Al lig Immo NEN mow, ..- m■■■■ ■ AMA i : Fill NOVI divall'imi,-.,:111.11 00,,,,_ = ;Ai ;i ■1 111�� Wi �� '- ,• �”Ct d 0 Ca4 .�� ice, M / rte•► 1r? rmal. • I V co iiiii, ..® •/ r- - "� � 04 • mil 1 u, _I �.� .n, l „.,, , . ;.. • �, 1 1 L O Y /,T. . LI--- i L._-±`-------- --,-AA, H • N © - - EL vi I-1_- ,-- ig irjr ! P3 1..1 b._ „„..-- _ c1,.., _ fl -h -i ( r �� Vii- 1 "s N 3 • _t \I.* 1 o �r -- r o \\ _J''--'— • -J U i` --�\1 r _ i °C 1 U T” [, a x • 'I V 1 3 o <�/1 hb\ 1 11 � a z _ U CC C C 1i. f <��■ ,: < <�icn •....hI! ■■• I < ` <■■■6 < ' .�CC y; .9r-et< - .<. .<'�Ira t:■. h.11'N �f�lr<h 1" >>.< s s < ■� 0 C{{ �1 :�`� �i°rod uu■i:; < r � iI:_ •_ ..1 Fr'�f �u' {{{{{ a� �_o+o o` i�iy...!1 n■r ...... �� i% ■Il i ---%{4sA-C1 Aged tt .C 'd'/• 'Lt!IlIlI!"l.iri ee;{{ {{. . . . . .' tt■ i i i < < n{{ _ ••••-.••-.•- ot'iii !':1'll��1®®.lire `rte` i<$ • _C�i r"<■ ,' i<'< `.i�. �<.< < < J ��Ill�lil�� ..-�CC nu,, < < <t> ,<•;.•<.<.i <�.-...• I_I • 1 • ••11�°r°i i < < < ��ia®�i�•�•<•< <•< <No •< •.1,,,•'•'-'•I:ii�1!�II��I •1-.R.I L� < 1 <,<;<• �'.<_o' ,:' iii to E : �..�.�� III tE:: ..' �' --ar ,• !— 5:!♦2'� ®'I',i �` , .'.�'ft...- ! I-:' ■„®®�a..7. ��15,,, o1•. t U 4 mar,:VW:1 - •.- < <' 'El ll E • hB� 19n®®:':�:.:i Tom. t/a'�uq/ ii `< <li _u„�:ri /J 1mi�. z••.r• _IIy—!ir•ito�'Itmi 1tk...0 4-1;r°�tV''...�.®y ' ® _11 'ID.'', � II��K,®�®i ®oii�M:sn.t9�.0,..,:"''''''111:;::::: •- %•. I:° ®�hi®!�+a',•,��.I!' L .1�®�3"RE®®®®.'_=®®mom ii'uii• ■:a nil::...32....i, •na eu,, > Ci, In "� �? ®u©®®-e.ilaiiiliial rl 1�l�®�® ��IIIIt�'��I��l� �;. �ti ..� 111 �I •' - •'- 'n'j®®®�®E:a®.t��i l��® ® ■■I�a4 ■-� m� rod•00 1�mmfEEe�a • E8AV HON3ais IEI Ir�frz `u®® e /w,���. 1 rn N.�1 ' IP wt'T�I !MINE < •;•;•;••• ��<4J11 ®T®®_®�� I m !l•- »:nu a' ••:::::::.(0.41;44 /�• ® 0101 i` tai1a- ' �� M �!j2n1 ■I:®n�',on� �,�'1 •ilai���rnat�la•yy■■■►p• I. J•.• 4 fx - Q IL II,:TWAT .tb,„,,..'1,0;T.;,'I :*.API' 11,:,--",...t,...---..,-- c: ;it:-:''; Orliet 11-.1114 1 0�y 1<�"0.0i.a■I ® -Cdi�� III '1 .■.�t\��® 7•1111M.1-7.1...�F INS■a■y� :r. E. •. ••.•.•.ILi■) O -r r: 1 , 71 III! ._ ♦ .. .... .1. ... e. t L. .;r '.iLS'.::.� 111. ,;i I' 1 11 i,i31i'!aU ��f/f,..■r �<<•�.-`, < im:l lad to En 5-.. � �'.• Y �s / �I n.� ®fit:�� I�<��< < � r' 4°<0.00 t ,■U /GM :, ti ®�, ', _ 04., tots --1 • t°t 7... •.. 1�42' :1 l�I - 3� y,l o '- <1111f .14°114144.6/244#1,44:,•,'-/tV • tt��l,( 1 -1-•) +at44 r■ii 11•`•`•. dII ''.VIII r - ��•.•��- o<000 = kr= .i•I V] ' tenth < n ?. 1:: : I I `1-owo.# . 1°tat°rtato ' I O e 0 0 0 0 0 e• /�- •_. e o o e e e o o 01111:„._t, - J .•��o+o+o+ i°<'•or ' < < f�`•�■�i®i∎1h1I■ . ',°t°t// <•' d1 .t+°'r<q ' r ilf,. -j �Tl V .-i kr ��t ,,,�a�■<.■■■• <• ,.°r ,, i < < 1 L Il Fr*” .^- `77��< :'12 `'� ■' v) < 0 o�ilat+alt1: ::'`.4- 1 ■ '� Llli. .1'�1 < yf • ; 1`I••• i}o+o+o•o'o�uu q1 Suu utit- < Q� �l�"'�7.r ov ■fa ��-� eS� < < < < % I � V] en .•N°t°roto-•-r` .<-< <1 ■■ I:::■ i• _..if`I to\`L.'- N x..�• li fiLk, CO D iat°t°tr�ng. ♦/ . • F- ■... 1 it • .awl l <1 •''.' 4:14ri C..) ttt � ! <y; • <•<lll < < < <In �'IIII'd.. . -y ,`•i � 2< <.< ..14- a, a CQ ;MO 'ttc •� ...u :°. < < < < < < •<.l�■.Q%I�' �'.I'IIL:0.:ft f1'\Ili,f�1{E¢...<:<:`. •.i ,1 O - 4 a <! < '< �(� N .-.• OD]n t :1111......ih ri ■: . o■■ �_. 1 mama . Lltz{ <' r• II A. .■■I_. .■111111 ' VIfhIIi i■■■Iu�Ii1i'� - ” �� I � I�.I•.'3.i:. �� ■i ` u�■i:;:�< <.I' /• p. low 1�1��iC ...awl c i4'JLHIi 11i■1�� d :■iii rrog, n nn-■ux . u . - : �e{C<! t�rss!, (I1^III - (Th" 2 © °f f a�r•:�i II- :Illli 'Illlll ` ■■ __ ._ II {1 e ,., ,' i 1 U <_ .O I <-a-� r J • a ■ A r,.<.I I e <.< nt a ,< I■I a_ =`,,,,', iai). ._■t■y _ rz co) mit .4.-.•• V u • ■■ ■u■ , •■a:I�V _ Q E a < Il a j ••. • •.: It■■■IIi■■■ t■■■■■■-�1 /_ Q7 cn r . • I■■■■t■■■■ ■ ■L■r+• ■■■1�.J1 1Q 1t mitt■■■11■■■. L /(d ■■■I■11 1 1:� i�t■lu■ +ca I■■■■6.. Z ,Wm.�I ■■■!. 1 tl■War■■■. +., �.■.�■t11■■■■■ ■tt■■■■■■ �.:• ~�_ —■�■■ • ���I■■■■11■■tll■■■■■ttU'■■■■■1 .,- ■BIB Itt■■11■tttt■ttt•UWI■■■/- ��uttnl■ttll■ttttt■ttt■■tmtn t� Q-1 > F- ,��I■■■■t5E?EP-t•••••:■••e■■mttl C/] If) Q . En 1 I -1.•..1111■■JL■■e■■p■t!e■■t.IttG a a U �. ' 117 •'I'��1t■t■Ilt■■I1tt■tttt■■■■ttm■tl .":■�1 ••••11•••••••••••tt•••••••l 1 w — ••�■ ■�1ttt■llmttllttttt■ --:■' r_ - J �• '!Ittt■••••.ttttt■1 cEtt1 w It■t■Iltt■■■1111■1111 n■■■■ ,� J Ilt■■■lltttr■)t■■■ W. ��■..yI 1••••11■••11•••••••II 1•M 1" I••••••••ll•••••••l r Co)1 . , 61 1••••■ttl.■■■■tt■r .— /o1 :=C7 r } II 1;1111 I! 11••••Ilt••■•••••••1 ■■11.11■■■e•s••• . .IEI ' 1 1■1( "c-rn 1■■Jt7ltttt■ttttttl; rm Cr.t®inru--'� ., 1 not 110111:1 11® o■t•■ntm■■tt■■■■oe ��� 0 C I®r11rJ1 1� I�I�r- \1.1®+UI \I ill ■••11611■ttt■ttttli eV ' W �1 Fmt /-`- 11■ II ,1 ■11■■1111■■1111••■G. _� (/j a/ �.■I ii inLD©'11•LI IIIII,I �.E.•1\y" ��a ■11■■■■411••1.G uI_ = •�..:® W r IF ■ U.rp1 ono 1_ ■0111•• ■•■@L' __ _ _ �� r mom[o®i 'ig lipI IIIri�G'I���-1►1`��■t■tatr�t■■■.fi_ .� 111 \ ' E g..- 111 r■ ,11'1 li I..I {Fy E BE�00mOmm65 'I� a1Y//1� :,�"•r1II��' 1 `�i.i 1 / ILLU lr Il'llfnrl �� I�■A /■ rmai-1mM• //.'.. il11.1 i;h1,"'12001 II►1Ir1III•l.1 ., •11' T°JL bIii..l . _w. ' - ]_= �, ■■..�- ^ of r.• 11 111 unl Milan II II 11 o•i• T j i1\uu i <;1�T,.■r i .: G 6®G3mmUmom017U.u a❑®E1.IIIII.II •••i.5 �11111•L L '° !� +•�m1+i' MOm17mmOm\m0m9s�®E� `'••••r0•• ■Z !" ®.•111 •. NEED ®®-_... 11 • •• 7{ �I IOU NI 'itI �: \n �� Ct ■•••oZ ■■TE11130:03bFIR1®� Il ■mmi.•v••••• 111•- IF�—•11 I-1 P^ � 31®®pfBz 2FRi H3N32IJ 0U111111111n i ril '- !.<.<•<•<::• r+-1 io I... u.5aoo4� x ,Lnl 111 rl n , ... ■14 ■.,§®�® IL �1•X11=1.111111 /�1 :5r1 .. , : --•'•'•,6, ...,. ■■. -- �e S. IN mil lug*OW 1.iI \�.�!(+7•°,. • (.0�::1'71 ■ ■■ 1 3� / ti ..1 .111 C.s,111► 1 3���E9Z�cssa®Cs%�:� ?� L:9/n.u1 r- .. ..11.n •({{ ,'I.§. :• c+ •■ . ■■ =Ce.•?3333 0� 1111ii{.. //c-.6icottt ({(( e- . ■■ u■■ a L` ,• )• ail I--i,ipu1 tin•-•, -• 1, •41. r t"� •• (� •u■a �C1 � 3'• mQ�..'t! 'I I,� ■15■Gr'�'1.4.i•1� W I .,,•, 4:: "CJ .,1,..� ■■ 4111/ st)Il•.1 ■■ e- }� y�1'7�.'fill�,�'�- - - 1 'II� I e ax? . (( .C�•':;:;�<.33 c*� `�' ,`411 Y 5CLIJ.J.Ir AA $t� �I';:JI . ## #{e- a .....1... C� �I O _ _ i1.. 41,' w�.0 .1 I (( 4'.. XT1 ' ". �(4' 4Ii '$j)W= :. . _((c _i QD CO E Nos 1 ((( ■i■ 1 l- _1 t - ■�� I� \ r'{4' ` iii wan .., '1 1 I. Illi 4.4 W in EN MO ({( r■i _f w t w II , 7 �•1„ .",-,„,--. . „.... ,) ,,,,, (cc .1: _ _ I�a L I ' I' —1,01E:.....„, r 0 ail f 1 IIr■� �} ~ N : ilum --= 111_ will, --�... _ , (� Q U vs „_______L. 1 ..,- rommr- Ai 1..1 _------mo-m . it i ••mb, _■ ; 1 ( - Imo-I _ ( c(• ���r�',.��� J� �� h' ::: r �I SII—� fir. - ry 1�1I I `~ i. p 111 1 1 I %>., IN---,>.. •�,� ��� �,� ..-_ I �f C 1 f ! _I Q 1 • .. wee _ LI ' I-1 1-J a c 0 -i V J - 4b� ���N r Z 1.. .__--`---1 — ----- o ran J • • . a _ I- N I z • u N \..\ \ IIII AV NOa3WVO \■\ C'4 00 k a Mts. i �� 1,\ _ •� N = CA Ct nv iivoad3a 11 1 L 11 J l CV - I A\ \I 2 o-4 „ < 0 M;•1 I I Ct .. �I it_ ' I U N E _____,.._ - ( fly- V 1 I III 0000 ❑ ra CI/w)L W K YI 5 41" I' I � W � g N E _----) _ ——- u �,;/' I Z ---N ( I 1 1, 11 // IF---I .— , - E ... 1 n • 6 I ❑ ' _,---.. c 3 L. y n E. • 1J iJ_ o � L� AV OIO,---- i-----7-: • • -°•"`°°•""∎°•"-<+<tof t°fir' °tpfpfpf°�rptp tpr {{(4-{ ,_`i1 t,rofefoto e cc {{{ {<{«« C{«C rr�rrfofafofo {{{{{{{{ {< °fpfp+}< {�O,{{ ««<C«««< 2 � efo!osefo m",.i34} °moo.,ono-o—o. 4",fofo{{{ {{{{{ ....AA • ,c,,, { <CC«<47<C<C47< F- °� :�t. 'f tt •o,♦r r t f fefptp� 'tofofofo ofito (o ((CA*, °+ {{{ C C «<('««« w a <r r-'::::° 'tot� :<•<•<•�otafp��p1■1atp. tptptpfptefpfpfplpta p Mpfpt C<�C C C r « Q t• <'<'<'tptpt°�'I "*.:::744-4• ,. miij"i.:. .::i4ii <<'<;;; <'<I ` ■. 1'f°'47 i� °_`•`-►°t°f°f°t°f°f°t°f°f <47<C 11■ <:51:4 2.! <•���•• ■ ■i 111 • .r�'ttf `•Iffffltf• CC �� t•et I' <'t'c ■■■■' ' < < <'< ■■■■ 0.0.0 e..e..e 0 0 0 0 4 •... . i::l: •r ••(<4747C '•■•■ ' ►off ««< all I ' ' • • • • • • • .1111• I i •!1°hf° (,•° • .1111 . -- °f°t° {{,�°r• _ _` :0... 111111111 III III <x.471 �1•y III a <,< < t ■■■e < _<:<:<:� ,..) .:, V/ tl NOi13 • IM ..1 <'< IIII��I�IIII�...���ill1....... ..• ,,,...... ,::::::.::::::: •,.........•; '`.<rJ� IS 111111:< < ; > w En ■ <• < < < < t X11111111' .1 .......• . . __, . . . . .1 IOU im I — I il ri ell il •,...• sue. 4r `.:.< I tllltl08tl38 ::i: I��' I' < < < < t < < < `: 111111 I Milli C M ■■■III ■u■ • • • • • < ••< il _ �..y 1.4.4 lu■ un , •CL) N e < < < < o eoo; • • • •.e.c.c • cd--- 111 i i:i • nlvt♦ tftfl .--r < <� <. 1 Iyt°fof°fof<fofot�� <'e < <'< < <'<'<.i, . ■•/�/.�) � .•.• �° ■ a =- e°<°° < • _t ' 't ——— ■1111■ i:. tt � ,, +of°t<tofptptp ,. +.: '.;t 1-f<:<,<,<,t, •,<,t:<'<'t'<'< <!f< <,<,<,•: , < <,< , 17.". Q 4. /' .1::' 1717 ✓� it u<90]a 11%1;1 u■ U • 11.11 r/ •o i■.■■ CZ III ilijj '<•<,< <, • ry :' � :IIIIIIIIII 1111111 . e E l 00 c <s <� i i ii E� i <: 1"11111 •<•%:::;: a <,c,<-t.t •, -� < e < < < e e • e g• .` ••• ii�< < < < <.� mill. t 1■■■■1 < t < ••• e < ,<1 C L• • ' rf �,'. t 1111 '1'1 z*.*.*.' , I i.,„ .. .. . . i< _<:. _-� r ... t ._U • • t - _ U 1 t N m,.- U .. Q N =v I� L F 1 P-4 If■■■I■IU■m..- ■■t■I■■N.■tty a U ■At■I■tmo.m. ■■■■■■tmtut' ■■ttl...tt► ■••uI■■■ ■utll ut it �y MOW, ■ttt..tttftttt■ j< ■tut■.......... ■■.■■■...t■...■ 1 o ■■tt■ttttttttt■ r-i E W ■■■■■■■.ttlNt■ al ■....ttttttttt■I■ut■■■m■.I■■t'I al mu ■t■■.u■■t..ft■■1UM.UUI...I.■■ i m ■tuft.■ ut..A1■Muff.■■I.t■ .■■...■■ = 1.tt■ Itt." I■■■■ ■tllt■/tt.■■■■■■■t..■ ■ 1.4 MMOMEMMEMUMEIMMIIMOMMMEMMEM ■t..tut.tllt■I....■u.M■t.*u■ E - ■.■tut■■■11■■I■■t■■.■.■.milt■ ■.. .■.... ■ ■■A■■..■■■■.■ - 0/1 ■■..m■■ AtlNOd3Wtl� Itlt■1■■/■ • ■.tm.1■■■■Ilmm■■■■■ MIIMMMEM■.....■ 1E1 =Minim t....■.■.■ ■■■■m■■■■ _ ■AM.■ Itl■•It■t■ ■I■■EMMEM ■■■■■.I.■ �I �° ■■ ■■ .•■..■■.......■i ■.■t..ttmlttt■ft■■■ �I ry It■tUI■■.t■tu■EIMMOM....■■■■..tt■■■ U Ct 4.+ ■ENE■.■ ■■uM■■A.■■MI ■■NE■■M■■/MENE.u■p mamma Itltt if ttmtt■■.i summon ■.mm...N■ 1-4 z ■■m■N■■ I....I■■■MMEMOM ■■■■■■A.■ ■.■t....■'gm. I.... ..... . . -. .. 1 P* iiur.-mmomm ■m■ 1ttt1 ■.tt■ ■■■■■mm■■■I■■■AM■■■■I■■II■■t■■ ■t■■ �1 ■I .f■uf...m■ It■■■I■■■■■MI■.■ ■■t■■■■■■/■Nil■ a) r=""."" .■ 1.Y/ ■N■f1 ■tMOMMMO■■ It.t■I■■■u■■■■■■■.■■■■.■■I..t■ C/] ■■■-----,■■■ill ■ It.■■■■■I.■t■■Mi ■t■A■■■■II■■MMM..M■ •• ■ttt■■■.•tt■t■t�■ IIM■■I■mt■■■■.■ ■■■■.MA■I/■.uMMEMEM ■■ ■tttt■tt■.ttml■ • IMMII.IUII.■EMIIMMI ■t■IN■..■ ■■t■■tt■■ /WO ■t■f■■t.N■■Nti■..■■ ■ttlt■I■■AE.■■ ■■.t■■II■■ II■tuMMEME is V1 , ■■■■a.l■■■■a....■ ■.t■■■■■■■...IU ■..■■■.■■ ■.m.t..■■ .I . ■ lj ■ANI■■e:.■..■ .n ■l■I..■I■■ ■■■..■■■■ a IMMIMM ■.■ CC3 c-r ■M.I.UII■■A..■ EMI 1 ■•lat■■■I almaIl■ MOW /, 411, ■■■...II. a■■■ ,N■ ' AEI IMMMO■'f<f 1■■■N■■NU■ ■.t■ ■■MOMMUM.I■■A■ 'IMM , ill IMP.. ({{( IMMIIIIMMUMi MUM■N.IE.n■■IIIMI■ ,.■ I {I{{<f{« 1■■MENE■t■ ■.■■ U • ■■■■E.n■■III■ '■■ {!' {c I7at■■■NM' u■■■ C7 :Q ■f■■I■n■■■■■I{ ■.■■■■awMww..t l{{<<tcc<t{{{c<f{{ < ■N■■■u■■■■I■■ ■■I c{<{t{<{<<{{< GiC { �■■■■■.■■■■■.■ .., rri ■■..I■■■.me_..eu■ c{{{t<{f<{{c -aiia I' { r.t■■I■.■■ ■.ttttNAII■AMII.N■ almli■■■.MI �T1 ••• ::: ••- O ■■tut■N■■■..M.■ ■.i■■.'ff< im■■t.IMEMM.t.t.t■.■■■■m■I■.ft■.n■■■■■■■■a IIII■■ t<t'■■■■■■a M■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■t '" ::: V ■t...t■n■u■■■u■■ I■■II■II {{{■•II■A.tt■M.■.tt.■■a.t.a1 -1 L.!? ■■■ ■■■..■n■MA.■M■.■■ MIME d■■■■■■A■.■m..MEMEMMttm.■■■I ■■■■..II.■■.■.■■..■■..■■.■■■■M■■■■■■.■.■■■.■.tu■MN.■l■■ .o ■■.■■■■■■■■■■■■.t■■■■■■t■■■■II■A■■.■■■ ■I■■.■t..t...■ ■..■.■11■■A■MEMME I■.■.IMAM■■■■I■■t.■■�■MMEMEM■N..■ ■■■)■■Ilw■■■■.■.1.■■■.■■■■■■I■■■I■■.■I■.■ ■■M■■■■N.■a Q ' ■■■■■■n■■I■■■I.■■.M.■■I■a■■a■■■■■A■.A..■A■■m■■a■A■kINMI■■■It■n U ' ■..■■■n■■■■■■■■■Af■.■■■■■■■■■■M■■■■A■■A■..■■■NA■I.■■■wl ,� ■■.■.NMI■.1 /millsommemmi ■■e=_..emMeemmeeemEM..M Mee:emMOMeeeee■N■MI.eeeeel■■EMM. IM.■.■■I■■I Z C ■.alum■■II■■A■■.■■■■..■■■■.■.■.■t■■■.AI..■.■■■■■MI■m■■■2I.U.M■.I■II ' ■MMM■MUNIIII■■■■■■■■■■■■■M■■■■■■■■■A■MAO■m■■■■■.■.■■■■.■I1.■■■.■JPh COD •MYi•••niMMiG••••••••••B••••••••••.•M•■■.•••.••.i•••••••••I ••II••••••I 3° (OD ■■I■■.n■III■I.■.■II■I■.■tt■■II■AI■■.■■IU.■.■.■.t■I..I■■.■I ■t..■.■.■I ri ■..I■■II■IIIIAM■■.IIIA■■■A■■■■■■■IIII■III■■■I■■■■.■■■.■■■1 ■t■■■.■.■I h' - ■■■I.I11■IIII■II■M.lIIAI■■■■■■.■■.N.■■■•■ 7\•••••••I ■••••••■■1 !`. <, % 6 ■■■■all■III■.III.■I..I■■I■A..■■u■■■ %.■■■.■■■ME. . [ ■■A.■■■■tl h. .< < N o ■■■■■NIINMm■■.t.N.■.■■.MIA.■■■MMERM • - -- - ■I■ 0'0~ ,< c' ■■■■■■ILM■■■t■■■■■■It■.■■.•■MIAMI ■IIII■■I■■■■MI■■■■.A' ■■■■.■' ■I F < ••••••N■■IIII■■■■■■■■A■•••••••••••' •r7r•e-`+-.ceemee.eee. ~y,/ o a ■■.A■■ll■IN■■■.■■■■■AU■■■ -- ••, CCCtCC<{ ■M.■■I■■■ U ANN > E ■■■■■.n■11mU■mtt■■...■■■■ ;...-- d NI r{<{{f{®MI■■■■.■t■■ {1 o u° ■.A■■■n.■I■■A t.■M e..■..■■ I.M t MI N {<c{<f<A.M■A■t N■m■ ♦4 z ' ` ■■■■mmummII■A■■A■M■■.■.MI■ i.tt■/,t• {'{{f«ff ■tt.IIIAI■ �" g V ■■I■■■aeal.■■■■■.■tI■■ IIII■;■■■ tt".{{{{{{{ ■a■II■.■.■ W o O E ■■■■MIIIII,II.■■..■■......mil■■-■IIII {{{<cccf ®■■■tt■ " > ^+ ^ca ■t,Iant■ut.ttma.tt.a■ ■■■ ■I a■-cct�{ c `G o m /' I I U o ■■■IItaII■MMMOMIttl■■a I■■■ ■AII■`{{{4 u > / n/ 1 U ■■.Iltn■II■.m.IIIUIII■...■ ■■■ ■III■ c (� ■.IIII■IIII■■I■■.■■■EMMIIM IA■u' MIEN ■Et.■ ■ {( �_-. n g <"e ■.a■NI■IUAMI.N.■■I■.■.t■ -.--MEMO ■■M.` - ■■■■t■t,IUIIU.•l...NINI...mtt■tt■■ mom.' d■f■t■■11■IAIUA■.NNNN.t■ ■■ ■..I..I■ ■MI..'- ' ■■.II■.■M■AEU■t■Nlttt■ ■ EM MEN ■■■ 5 ■■ ■■.■■■l1EMEMMEMMEM■It.■■ • ■,N■.■ ■■■ MONO �'� ■t•I■■III■■■.mmom■I■.■■■ ■ ■Ill■ ■mr'._ -_ -- - ° ■EU■■IUMMOMEMMOMOM■.I■A■■ • MUM ■t■ - - _�- .as --- ------------- ■■■IIItMtmtfm■.M.t■m.fuf■ ■ - .■I' �� c ■.tElNlltfl.ttltm...ml..NMI.■ ■ ■MI' (off wag) n - - in o G • • TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT AMENDMENTS demand-is-met, • • • • _ . . . .. - ._ - .. e .- .. coordination occurs between the Airport Master Plan and any proposed or future transportation Objective 2-1.12. Coordination Of Aviation Facilities with Surface Transportation Plans. The development of the Orlando Sanford Airport shall continue to be coordinated and consistent with transportation plans and the Transportation Element to ensure efficient integration with regional surface • transportation systems and to minimize traffic impacts on local roads. Policy 2-1.12.1. Integrate the Airport with Regional Transit. The City shall annually coordinate with LYNX and Seminole County regarding the feasibility of a transit feeder route that links the airport with the regional bus transit system. At the time light or commuter rail is evaluated between Sanford and Orlando, the City shall encourage LYNX, Metroplan Orlando (MPO) or the entity conducting such study to also evaluate the potential for feeder bus routes linking the airport with regional transit centers and/or intermodal facilities, existing or planned within the Sanford area. Policy 2-11.2.2. Integrating Bus Transit Facilities with Future Airport Expansion Plans. Pursuant to the Airport Master Plan, site design plans for airport terminal areas shall accommodate locations for future public transit service at convenient locations for travelers and employees. Site design shall also consider the design needs for charter buses, including access and bus parking and passenger loading areas. Policy 2-1.12.3. Transportation Improvements and the Airport Master Plan. The City shall ensure that coordination occurs between the development anticipated by the Airport Master Plan and any proposed or future transportation improvements. Policy 2-1.12.4.:Access to the Orlando Sanford Airport. The City's Transportation Plan and Airport Master Plans shall continue to provide efficient linkages between airport main entranceways and the state intrastate highway system via arterial and collector roadways including the eastern and northern extension of Lake Mary Boulevard to SR 46 and the Greeneway(SR 417) in order to provide improved access and to minimize future airport traffic impacts to Sanford Avenue. 25 • Policy 2-1.12.5: Minimize Impacts to Adjacent Airport Roadways. Service roads on airport property • shall be used to the greatest extent possible to capture internal airport trips thus minimizing the need to use off-site public roads to travel between airport facilities. Policy 2-1.12.6: Coordination with Metroplan Orlando Long Range Transportation Plan. The Airport shall maintain consistency with the goals of the Metroplan Orlando Long range Transportation Plan. The Airport shall coordinate the timing of future development with the timing of roadway improvements in the Metroplan 2020 Long Range Transportation Plan. • 26 • • • RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT AMENDMENTS CHAPTER 6: RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT • - , . . _ . . 163.31.77(6)(e), F.S.,and 9J 5.011(3), F.A.C. GOAL 6-1: PROVIDE MAINTAIN AND INCREASE ADEQUATE RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES AND OPEN SPACE FOR THE VISITORS AND RESIDENTS OF SANFORD . . . ' e . e • ! . 'e . • e ITEM OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE SITES Objective 6-1.1: System Of Parks And Recreation. -- • . . --. adoption of the annual capital budget, review the need for new recreation sites and facilities. The analysis be directed toward maintaining a system of recreational sites and facilities which is responsive to user needs. Continue to provide recreational facilities adequate to meet the recreational needs of residents and visitors consistent with the level of service standards established in policy 6-1.1.1 Policy 6-1.1.1: Level of Service Standards for Parks and Recreation Facilities. In systematically planning for needed recreation land and facility improvements, the City of Sanford shall apply the level of service standards cited below. These standards shall be used as level of service criteria in reviewing proposals for development orders or permits. Recreation Land Area Standard: 4 acres per 1,000 population Recreation Facility Standards Baseball/Softball Diamonds 1 field/3,800 persons Basketball Courts 1 court/5,000 persons Playground Apparatus Areas 1 facility/3,000 persons Shuffleboard Courts 1 court/1,000 persons Football/Soccer Fields 1 field/5,000 persons Handball Courts 1 court/6,5000 persons Tennis Courts 1 court/3,000 persons Policy 6-1.1.2: Monitor and Update Recreation Demand and Supply Analysis. At a minimum the City Tables VI 6 "Park Acreage Supply and Demand Analysis: 1990 2005" and VI 9 "Recreation Facility . . . .. • , •. _. , - -- •• . . . b. . . . • • The City shall, on an annual basis and prior to adoption of the annual capital budget, review the need for new recreation sites and facilities. The analysis shall be predicated on data, standards. and policies contained in 27 • • • ; rj the Comprehensive Plan. The anal sis shall be directed toward maintainin• a s stem of recreational sites • and facilities which is responsive to user needs. Policy 6-1.1.3: No Existing Deficiencies In Recreational Resources. The Comprehensive Plan Data Inventory and Analysis indicates that existing recreational land and facilities satisfy existing demand. . � , - - - - . . - - • - - . . . - - ....• standard by 1997. planning period 1991. 1996. • • . . . ' . . • . . - • ) . 1 i 1• p ark acreage a g eimprovements b Y 1.997. The ef o following arc scheduled during the •1997 2005 long range planning period. .. - . • a. Sports Complex/Community Park S 1.8 million b. Improvements to community park, S .8 million including a community pool •• . . !. - - .. . - - -. . , , .. , _ • , _ - - , del-Betel. Policy 6-1.1.4: Projected Recreation Needs over the Long Range Planning Period: 2002-2010. The Comprehensive Plan Data Inventory and Analysis indicates that there are no additional recreational facilities needed in Sanford through the year 2010. Policy 6 1.1.6 6-1.1.5: Recreation Impact Fees for Recreation Improvements. The City shall mandate and enforce programs designed to retain open space for passive recreation as well as for other specific space re -• •- . . - - • - '. : . ••-• . '. •-. o twenty percent. The City maintains a mandatory recreation impact fee program. In order to ensure that private development contributes to recreation park and open space demand generated by the respective developments, all residential development shall be directly assessed for demands generated by the development. • 28 • • Policy 6-1.1.-76: Future Recreation Capital Improvements. City recreation improvements for which public funds are required, as opposed to developer financed improvements, shall be scheduled and incorporated as capital projects in the Capital Improvements Element. Policy 6-1.1.87: Maintenance of Existing Recreation Land and Facilities. The City shall maintain existing recreation land and facilities through the use of proper management and funding techniques. The City shall assure that recreation facilities are well managed, well maintained, and that quality recreation programs are available to all residents. This shall be partially achieved by continuing efforts toward collecting, maintaining, and updating data concerning public and private resource inventory, recreation improvement, and demand factors, and by improving design criteria and evaluation to attain a high quality park and recreation system. Policy 6-1.1.98: Utilize Creative Concepts of Urban Design and Conservation of Environmentally Sensitive Open Space. All plans for development or redevelopment of park land resources shall incorporate creative concepts of urban design and landscape. The plans shall be designed to preserve existing areas of unrestricted access along the shoreline of Lake Monroe and prevent"walling-off" views of the water. Active and passive recreation areas shall be planned in a manner compatible with unique natural features of the site. Park development plans shall be designed to preserve resource protection areas. The design shall provide a circulation system to minimize conflict between pedestrians and vehicles. Adequate landscape and 411 screening shall be integrated into park development plans to minimize land use conflicts, protect stability of established residential areas, and enhance community appearance. Policy 6-1.1.1-99: Promote Environmental Concern as Part of Recreational Programs. The City shall provide environmental education and management as an integral part of park and recreation policies and programs, in concert with environmental interest groups such as the local Audubon Society. Support for cooperative programming between resource agencies and local educational advisors will provide park and recreation resources as an instrument for environmental teaching, and as a means for accomplishing this objective. The City shall develop educational nature trails along environmentally unique segments of Lake Monroe to provide opportunities for environmental education. Policy 6-1.1.1410: Designate or Acquire Open Space and Natural Reservations. "Natural reservations" are areas designated for conservation purposes, and operated by contractual agreement with or managed by a federal, state, regional or local government or nonprofit agency such as: national parks, state parks, lands purchased under the Save Our Coast, Conservation and Recreation Lands or Save Our Rivers programs, sanctuaries, preserves, monuments, archaeological sites, historic sites, wildlife management areas, national seashores, and Outstanding Florida Waters. Lake Monroe, a tributary of the St. Johns River is a natural reservation. The City of Sanford has also designated all wetland areas within the City as "Resource Protection" or"Conservation" areas on the Future Land Use Map. The City shall enforce performance criteria designed to protect and preserve wetlands, wetland transition areas and water management areas as cited in 5-1.4.1. The City shall enforce its stormwater management and wetland preservation regulations to provide for the dedication of conservation • 29 • • easements or reservations where the City finds that the dedication is reasonable in order to protect the value • and function of a wetland or to further the objective of stormwater management plan. The City shall protect wetlands pursuant to Policy 5-1.4.1. Data and analysis presented later in the Conservation Element: Data Inventory and Analysis of this Plan entitled, Analysis of Wetland Buffer Regulations,provide comparative analysis of the City's wetland design and performance criteria. The City's wetland buffer criteria stipulated in Policy 5-1.4.1 are either equally or more restrictive than those of other public entities with wetlands jurisdiction. The City shall protect wetlands by requiring that new development institute wetland buffers to comply with the following design and performance criteria: 1. Retain Natural Drainage Characteristics - Natural surface water patterns shall be maintained. Proposed drainage conditions shall approximate existing drainage conditions. The velocity of water flowing through wetlands shall remain approximately the same before and after development. 2. Minimize Alteration or Modification - No land use or development shall be permitted that would result in the elimination of any beneficial function of a wetland. If permitted, any alteration or modification of wetlands shall be the minimum necessary to conduct the use or activity. 3. Stormwater - The use of cypress, hardwood swamp, bayhead, and hydric hammock wetlands for water retention shall be permitted when utilized to decompose dissolved organics and when such wetlands are not connected to surface waters. Stormwater detention basins shall screen, filter, trap and/or otherwise prevent sediment and debris and minimize the amount of chemicals entering wetlands. Channelization of water to or through a wetland shall not be permitted. 4. Ground Floor Elevation-When structures intended for human habitation are proposed to be located in wetlands that are not regulated by the provisions of Ordinance No. 1859, the Administrative Official shall be authorized to establish and require a minimum ground floor elevation sufficient to prevent future flood damage of buildings on the parcel in question based on the best available information. 5. Wetland Buffer- A wetland buffer of twenty-five (25) feet in width shall be provided adjacent to wetlands that are five (5) acres or less; a wetland buffer of fifty(50) feet in width shall be provided adjacent to wetlands that are greater than five (5) acres. The area of wetlands in question shall include all contiguous wetlands located on the site and adjacent to the site. The width of the wetland buffer shall be measured and provided parallel to the edge of the wetland in question. The required wetland buffer shall, unless otherwise provided for in this ordinance, be planted and maintained in landscaping materials including ground cover, shrubs,hedges or trees. The following uses shall be permissible within a wetland buffer: • Required project improvements; • Permitted public service structures; • Walkways with pervious surfaces; • Required landscaped areas. • 30 • • i The following uses shall be prohibited within a wetland buffer: • Vehicular use areas,off-street parking and/or loading and service areas; • Buildings. In addition, all off-street parking spaces located adjacent to wetland buffer shall be provided with appropriate tire stops, curbs or other vehicular bumper guards designed to prevent any encroachment of vehicles upon the required buffer. OBJECTIVE 6-1.2: PROTECT OPEN SPACE SYSTEMS. The City shall preserve open space for recreation activities, for utilitarian uses, for purposes of conserving resource protection area identified in Objective 1-2.7 and Policy 1-2.7.1. The Comprehensive Plan cites performance criteria for achieving preservation of open space cited in the below stated policies as well as in Policy 1-1.1.1. This objective shall be measured through the implementation of the following policies. Policy 6-1.2.1: Open Space Preservation Criteria. The City of Sanford defines three types of open space as cited below: 1. Utility Open Space. Utility open space includes the following: 0 _Cropland Preserved through the Suburban Estates (SE) Future Land Use designation and Ply 1 2.6.1; • Transportation Corridors - Preserved through the Future Traffic Circulation Map, Objective 2-1.5, and Policy 1-2.5.1 and 1-2.5.2; • Potentially Incompatible Land Use Buffer Areas-Preserved through Policy 1-1.1.1; • Stormwater Retention Areas -Preserved through Policies 6-1.1.11; • Provision of open space by all new development: Policy 1-1.1.1. These uses are all essential to the protection of human welfare. These areas are be by definition necessary utilitarian areas preserved in order to accommodate their respective functions. 2. Conservation Open Space. Conservation open space includes the areas identified as resource protection areas in Policy 1-2.7.1. The applicable performance criteria which the City shall administer is cited next to each type of open space. • Wetlands and Aquatic Habitats - Preserved through the Resource Protection designation of the Future Land Use Map;Map I-1, Water Resources Map; and Policies 5-1.4.1, 6-1.1.11; • Floodways and Drainage Ways - Preserved through the Resource Protection designation on the Future • Land Use Map; Map I-1, Water Resources Map; and Policies 5-1.2.3, 5-1.2.4, 5-1.2.5, 6-1.1.11; 31 • • • Aquifer Recharge Areas and Wellfield Protection Areas - Preserved through the Resource Protection • designation on the Future Land Use Map; Map I-1, Water Resources Map; and Policies 4-4.1.1, 4-4.1.2, 4-4.1.3,4-4.1.4, 5-1.2.6, 5-1.2.7, 6-1.1.11; • Upland Wildlife Habitats - Preserve pursuant to Policy 5-1.3.1. The Vegetative Communities Map I-9 in the Future Land Use Element together with Table 1-2 in the Future Land Use Element which identified "Endangered and Potentially Endangered Fauna Species Indigenous to Habitats Identified within the City of Sanford" shall be used as a guide for locating wildlife habitats and protective measure shall be involved after on site analysis protection measures shall be involved as a condition of site plan review. • Floodplains - The areas are identified on the Water Resources Map 1-1 in the Future Land Use Element shall be protected pursuant to Policy 5-1.3.1. 3. Recreation Open Space. City parks and recreation areas are included in this category as identified in the Recreation and Open Space Data Inventory and Analysis and as delineated on the Future Land Use Maps I 7 and.I S and inventoried on Table I-1 in the Future Land Use Element. These lands are preserved pursuant to the "Public and Semi Public" Parks, Recreation and Open Space designation on the Future Land Use Map and Objective 6-1.1 and accompanying Policies 6-1.1.1 through 6- 1.1.11. The above criteria is designed to protect and preserve natural systems, including not only active parks and • recreation areas, but also natural conversation open space systems, and utilitarian open spaces. The purpose is to achieve preservation of scenic and/or passive open spaces as well as areas accommodating more active recreation activities. The City shall ensure that all new development is designed in a manner compatible with natural system and shall not encroach upon open space systems. The City shall require dedication of open space systems and/or conservation easements in order to implement this policy where such action is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare and does not impose a "taking"without just compensation. The City may consider the allocation of existing park land for another use provided that all three (3) of the following conditions are met: • the proposed use is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of this Comprehensive Plan; • the facilities located within that park can be provided at another park within the City (i.e., no net loss of recreation facilities); and • the resulting level of service for park land is not less than the adopted level of service of 4.0 acres/1,000 people. Policy 6-1.2.2: Grantsmanship for Open Space Conservation. The City of Sanford shall pursue recreation and open space grant funds from available state programs, including but not limited to, the "Land and Water Conservation Trust Fund, "the "Save Our Rivers" program, and the "SWIM" program operated • 32 • • • through the water management districts in order to implement recreation, open space, and conservation goals, objectives, and policies. The City shall seek funds to acquire land and/or conservation easements necessary for the protection of Lake Monroe and its tributaries, especially environmentally sensitive wetlands and flood plains. The purchase of such lands and/or conservation easements shall be directed toward establishing and maintaining in perpetuity linear open space systems for recreation. The City Manager, or designated representative, shall meet with the Seminole County administer, or designated representative, quarterly to identify open space land acquisition and recreation improvement needs and determine relative City-County priorities in efforts to jointly seek a share of the limited State funding resources identified herein for recreation and open space improvements and purchase of open space including environmentally sensitive lands. OBJECTIVE 6-1.3: ACCESS FACILITIES. The City of Sanford shall continue to ensure that all existing and future public recreational facilities and designated areas of historic significance have operational bicycle and pedestrian access facilities as deemed appropriate by the City Commission and pending adequate participation by the State in handling these improvements. Policy 6-1.3.1: Right-of-Way Improvements. The City has established vehicle access facilities serving all public and private recreational sites. As future roadway improvements are analyzed, the City shall consider non-motorized transportation needs and F-DOT design standards for bicycle facilities. • Policy 6-1.3.2: Design of Access Facilities. All new or redeveloped public parks as well as major redevelopment improvement within historical areas shall be designed and constructed with accessways which are compatible with the character of natural and historic resources. Policy 6-1.3.3: Bicycle/Pedestrian Accessways. Neighborhood parks shall be provided with bicycle and pedestrian accessways as deemed feasible by the City Commission. In planning and designing these accessways, the City shall consider the need to remove barriers limiting access to the physically handi- capped. Policy 6-1.3.4: Parking Areas and Bicycle Accommodations. The City shall provide parking spaces and bicycle racks at recreation sites where needed and deemed feasible by the City Commission. Policy 6-1.3.5: Facilities for Handicapped and Elderly. The City shall ensure that public and private facilities, including recreation improvements, are designed in a manner which are accessible to the handicapped and the elderly. Objective 6-1.4: Access To Lake Monroe And Its Tributaries. The City shall continue to preserve access to Lake Monroe and its tributaries as directed by Policy 6-1.4.1. This objective shall be measured through the implementation of the following policies. Policy 6-1.4.1: Require Access Points to be Provided as Needed. Approximately three linear miles of Lake Monroe shoreline lies within the City of Sanford. Approximately 1.9 linear miles (4620 linear feet) of • this shoreline are under public jurisdiction as either resource protection areas or public facilities, including 33 • • parks and municipal/county facilities. Only approximately 4752 linear feet of the shoreline are in private or • semi-public ownership. State Road 17-92 ( and. Seminole Boulevard) abuts virtually the entire shoreline from the west city limits to Mellonville Avenue. No development other than a water dependent municipal marina; a Best Western and an adjacent restaurant; and a public water front park directly abut the water's edge. Therefore the shoreline remains highly accessible, and the City shall preserve the shoreline access. The City shall provide both visual and physical access to Lake Monroe by preventing the "walling-off'of the lakefront and preserving public open space systems adjacent thereto. Objective 6-1.5: Public And Private Coordination In Planning And Implementing Recreation Improvements. During its annual review of recreation site and facility needs (See Objective 6-1.1.), the City shall coordinate planning for recreation improvements with each level of government, including the Seminole County School Board, environmental interests groups, and the private sector in order to promote recreational opportunities in a cost effective manner. Policy 6-1.5.1: Joint School-Park Concept. The City in concert with Seminole County School Board shall implement joint school-park facilities to ensure that school sites, which are or in the future may be located within the City, incorporate appropriate recreational amenities. This concept realizes economy and efficient use of potential park and recreation resources centrally located to potential user groups. The City Manager or designated representatives shall meet quarterly to implement and improve upon joint school- park programs and resources. Policy 6-1.5.2: Coordinate with the Private Sector. The City shall, during the development review process, require applicants/developers to design projects in a manner which incorporates open space • systems defined in Policy 6-1.2.1. The City shall disseminate public information concerning public improvement programs in which the private sector may participate on a voluntary basis for purposes of providing assistance in improving community appearance of open space system through landscaping, dedication of open space conservation easements, or other programs directed toward complementing programmed public initiatives. Policy 6-1.5.3: Utilize Grantsmen and Other Appropriate Fiscal Advisors. The City shall assure that the advantages of all appropriate local and non-local sources of financial and technical assistance are sought and received. Alternative funding sources and impacts shall be monitored so that appropriate State and federal assistance programs are pursued in a timely manner to ensure the attainment of recreation objectives in a cost effective and fiscally equitable manner. Policy 6-1.5.4: Improve Coordination With Other Human Service Planning Efforts. The City shall ensure realistic plans and responsive action to meet identified needs in a cost-effective and fiscally equitable manner by encouraging the use of local park and recreation resources for a wider range of human delivery services (i.e., health information, consumer protection, nutrition, bookmobiles, etc.). Coordination shall include planning activities to provide a hike and bike trail system throughout the City within open space, park and street corridors. All future recreation facilities shall be designed for multipurpose use where appropriate. • 34 • • • Policy 6-1.5.5: Inform Citizens of Existing Recreation Opportunities and Issues. Out reach efforts shall target residents such as the handicapped or economically disadvantaged who do not regularly participate in recreation programs, as well as more traditional user groups. Policy 6-1.16: Review Plans and Policies. Review and amend as necessary existing plans and policies based on continuing analysis of problems and issues related to parks, recreation and open space. These analytical efforts shall include evaluation of major shifts in the indicators of supply and demand and shall be reviewed on a continuing basis. Identified future land and capital improvements shall be scheduled and programmed in the capital improvement program and budget. Policy 6-1.17: Fiscal Management. Review and evaluate park land acquisition proposals and recreation development programs to determine changing fiscal implications. Each year fiscal management policies including the capital improvement program and budget shall be reviewed, evaluated, and refined to reflect current program priorities for parks, recreation and open space. The capital improvement program shall reflect changes in recreation needs based on consumer demands and the impact of development trends and shifts in population magnitude and distribution. • S ;; • • DATA, INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS • • • • 1. Consistency of Amendments with State of Florida Comprehensive Plan The proposed amendments are consistent with the State Comprehensive Plan. The amendments regarding the new land use district, Parks, Recreation and Open Space and the amendments to Chapter 6: Recreation And Open Space Element do not involve any development. Rather these amendments merely clarify the importance of existing parks and recreational facilities to the community. In addition,Chapter 6 has been updated to reflect completed and on-going projects. The Sanford Comprehensive Plan amendments furthers, and are compatible with, the following goals and objectives of the State Comprehensive Plan: Goal 7 Water Resources (a) Goal.--Florida shall assure the availability of an adequate supply of water for all competing uses deemed reasonable and beneficial and shall maintain the functions of natural systems and the overall present level of surface and ground water quality. Florida shall improve and restore the quality of waters not presently meeting water quality standards. S. Ensure that new development is compatible with existing local and regional water supplies. The only amendment to Sanford's Comprehensive Plan that anticipates any type of development is the incorporation of the Airport Master Plan into the Comprehensive Plan. The City has a water • capacity of 15.5 million gallons per day (mgd). Water usage for the total development of the Airport Master Plan is 826,070 gpd. The Airport's water usage combined with the 2020 estimated water usage for the service area of the Sanford Water Management System leaves an unused water flow of 5.05 million gallons per day. Total Water Capacity 2020 Estimated Usage Airport Usage Remaining Capacity 15.5 MGD 9.62 MGD .826 MGD 5.05 MGD Therefore, there is ample water to serve the needs of all uses and development enumerated in the Airport Master Plan. For a more complete analysis of the compatibility of development in the Airport Master Plan with Sanford's water capacity see: Evaluation of Service and Facility Impacts of the Airport Master Plan and of Lands Annexed by the Airport into the City of Sanford; Potable Water. (1 S) LAND USE.-- (a) Goal.--In recognition of the importance of preserving the natural resources and enhancing the quality of life of the state, development shall be directed to those areas which have in place, or have agreements to provide, the land and water resources, fiscal abilities, and service capacity to accommodate growth in an environmentally acceptable manner. 6. Consider, in land use planning and regulation, the impact of land use on water quality • and quantity; the availability of land, water, and other natural resources to meet demands; and the potential for flooding. 36 • • There is sufficient land, water and other natural resources to meet the demands of development anticipated in the Airport Master Plan. In addition, all public facilities are, or will be in place, to meet the needs of the Airport development plans. For a more complete analysis of the • compatibility of development in the Airport Master Plan with Sanford's resource capacity see: Evaluation of Service and Facility Impacts of the Airport Master Plan and of Lands Annexed by the Airport into the City of Sanford; Potable Water. The Airport is located entirely within the X zone of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and not within any base (500 year) flood zone. (19) TRANSPORTATION.-- (a) Goal.--Florida shall direct future transportation improvements to aid in the management of growth and shall have a state transportation system that integrates highway, air, mass transit, and other transportation modes. 5. Ensure that existing port facilities and airports are being used to the maximum extent possible before encouraging the expansion or development of new port facilities and airports to support economic growth. The Airport Master Plan anticipates the expansion of the Airport mainly to serve commercial carriers and estimates that, by the year 2020, commercial passengers will increase from 1,193,565 to 8,309,352 per year and commercial operations will increase from 5,863 to 28,620. This increase requires that Airport facilities be in place to accommodate the increase in • activity. The Airport Master Plan describes the facilities that are necessary for the expansion and maximizes the use of the Airport property. The Orlando Sanford Airport serves the greater Orlando Area and all of Central Florida and will serve to alleviate some of the future increased demand at the Orland International Airport. Therefore, the amendment to incorporate the Master Plan is consistent with this State goal. 9. Ensure that the transportation system provides Florida's citizens and visitors with timely and efficient access to services,jobs, markets, and attractions. As a part of Florida's transportation system, the Orlando Sanford Airport is one of the gateways to Florida. The Airport is centrally located to Florida's major highways, attractions, markets and services. The Airport Master Plan seeks to maximize the efficiency of the Airport by providing for the facilities that are needed to support future Airport demand. Goal No. 1 of the Airport Master Plan: Continue to meet and enhance the level of service provided to all Airport users, is specifically directed to providing an efficient airport. Therefore, the amendment to incorporate the Airport Master Plan is consistent with this State goal. 15. Promote effective coordination among various modes of transportation in urban areas to assist urban development and redevelopment efforts. The Airport Master Plan takes into account various forms of transportation, in addition to air travel, including light and commuter rail, bus, pedestrian and bicycle travel. Goal 8 of the Airport Master Plan is entirely devoted to transportation and to coordination with the Regional • 37 • • • Planning Council, Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO), FDOT, and other • transportation groups. Therefore, the amendment to incorporate the Airport Master Plan is consistent with this State goal. (21) THE ECONOMY.-- (a) Goal.--Florida shall promote an economic climate which provides economic stability, maximizes job opportunities, and increases per capita income for its residents. (b) Policies.-- 1. Attract new job producing industries, corporate headquarters, distribution and service centers, regional offices, and research and development facilities to provide quality employment for the residents of Florida. The development projected by the Airport Master Plan creates economic development opportunities both within the Airport boundaries and throughout the region. The following chart shows the impact of the development in the Airport Master Plan on the economy of Florida. Category Short Term Mid Term Long Term (2005) (2011) (2021) Output/Revenues $3.01 Billion $5.01 Billion $7.65 Billion Earnings $910.1 million $1.54 Billion $2.32 Billion Regional Jobs 43,564 73,965 111,214 The Airport Master Plan has one objective that states: develop a self-sustaining commerce park, which will benefit the Airport and the community as a whole. The entire Master Plan is designed to create a setting conducive to attracting industry and commerce, including distribution centers for freight and cargo. Therefore, the amendment to incorporate the Airport Master Plan is consistent with this State goal. 2. Consistency Of Airport Layout Plan and Goals of Airport Master Plan With Metroplan Orlando's 2020 Long Range Transportation Plan Goals Metroplan Orlando's goals are used to guide the development of the Long Range transportation Plan. Goals build on the vision statement adopted by Metroplan Orlando: A regional, integrated, multi-modal transportation system that safely and efficiently moves people and goods to, through, and within the urban areas and which enables the community to flourish in a global marketplace. Goal — Intermodal Transportation System: The area will have a regional, integrated, multi- modal transportation system. This will include bus and fixed-guideway transit, high-occupancy vehicle facilities, special use lanes,pedestrian facilities, bicycle facilities, aviation facilities and • express bus service, expressways and improved streets and highways. Intermodal stations will also be a part of the system. 38 • • The Orlando-Sanford Airport is very much a part of Metroplan's multi-modal system. The Airport Master Plan states that in the year 2000, the Airport accommodated 1,086,599 • passengers; 85%were international passengers. The Airport has found a niche with international charter flights, primarily from Europe. Passengers generally come to the area to visit the attractions. The Airport has easy access to State Road 417 which leads directly to International Drive and the Disney/Seaworld area. The Airport Master Plan predicts that the emphasis on international charters at the Airport will shift over the next two decades to an emphasis on domestic commercial travel. By the year 2020, domestic passengers will account for 60% of Orlando-Sanford Airport's commercial passengers. The Airport is integrated into the multi-modal transportation system of Orlando's Metroplan area through easy access to many federal, state and county highways. All new roadways in Seminole County are constructed with appropriate pedestrian paths and bicycle lanes, including those now being constructed or improved near the Airport— CR 427, CR 46A, East Lake Mary Blvd. and Airport Blvd. Seminole County's Vision 2020 Comprehensive Plan indicates that a transit center will be located at the Airport (Exhibit 1). The transit center will connect various forms of transportation such as rail, bus, plane, car, pedestrians and bicyclists. The Master Plan Makes further provisions for multi-modal facilities by including curbside bus stops at the Airport terminal. Goal — International Airports: Orlando International Airport and Orlando-Sanford Airport will be key factors in the area's economic growth. These airports will be linked to other area • activity centers by highway, bus transit,fixed guideway and rail systems. The Orlando Sanford Airport brings benefits to the regional economy in many ways and is poised to expand it prominence on the economic forefront of the Orlando region. As a transportation center, the Airport facilitates commerce through the movements of air travelers and cargo. The Airport also brings essential services to the community, including enhanced medical care, support for law enforcement and fire control and courier delivery of mail. The Airport Master Plan indicates that for every $1 million of output (revenue) the Airport generates, an additional S881,100 is generated in the region as a result of the economic ripple effect. In addition, each S1 million the Airport generates yields approximately$536,800 in total earnings for all workers throughout the entire regional economy. The same $1 million in Airport output results in approximately 18.8 jobs in the region. Non-aviation tenants and Airport visitors at the Airport also produce an impact on the regional economy. The Airport Master Plan predicts the following impacts of the Orlando Sanford Airport on the regional economy: • 39 • • • • FUTURE AIRPORT IMPACTS SUMMARY Orlando Sanford International Airport Source: RIMS II Regional Multipliers(Orlando-Daytona Beach region)and PBS&J Category Short Term Mid Term Long Term (2005) (2011) (2021) Output/Revenues $3.01 Billion $5.01 Billion $7.65 Billion Earnings $910.1 million $1.54 Billion $2.32 Billion Regional Jobs 43,564 73,965 111,214 The Orlando Sanford Airport is positioned within easy access of major roadways, train systems and bus systems (Exhibit 2). The Airport is located within two miles of an entrance ramp to SR 417, a limited access highway that rings the eastern limits of Orlando. SR 417 connects to other major roadways in the area including I-4 and SR 528 (The Beeline) as well as to the area's major tourist attractions—Disney World, Seaworld and International Drive. Port Canaveral, the second busiest cruise ort in the Western stern Hemis here and an international hub for cargo i P g is easily accessed via state roads 417 and 528. The 4-lane East Lake Mary Blvd. is under construction. This will be the main roadway connecting the Airport entrance with SR 417 and SR 46. The proposed 4-laning of SR 46 on the eastern side of Sanford and Seminole County will provide an easy connection between the Airport and 1-95. The Amtrak rail station is just three miles from the Airport. It is anticipated that this station 41/ will also be utilized for the commuter rail station once service from DeLand to Orlando is inaugurated in the near future. At this time LYNX and their consultant, Parsons Transportation Group, are studying the feasibility of a bus feeder route between the train station and the Airport. Existing bus routes are now being modeled to accommodate travel serving the Airport and the commuter rail station in the modeling effort for a commuter rail line. A new route is also being modeled that will serve both facilities. The Airport has already anticipated a bus link by providing a curb-side bus drop off area at the proposed terminal entrance. Goal—Intermodal terminals for transshipment of freight and goods throughout the area will be located near the international airports and other locations which promote the efficient integration and connectivity of the transportation system serving freight movement. The Airport Master Plan has made ample provision for cargo areas within the Airport boundaries. Over 80 acres have been set aside on the north side of the property for cargo facilities. New taxiway, ramp area, hangar and warehouse facilities are recommended in the Master Plan to be constructed in this area. The cargo area will have direct access to SR 46 as well as to the runways. Plans to widen SR 46 to 4 lanes are included in the Metroplan Orlando Long Range Transportation Plan. SR 417 provides access to all of Florida's major roadways. In addition, the Master Plan proposes industrial uses for other portions of the Airport totaling • approximately 350 acres. These areas are linked to runways and taxiways as well as to 40 • roadways surrounding the airport. These areas could also be used for the shipment and warehousing of freight. • 3. Evaluation of Service and Facility Impacts of the Airport Master Plan and of Lands Annexed by the Airport into the City of Sanford Annexed Lands: The annexed lands are included in the Airport Master Plan and, thus any discussion of the Master Plan's consistency with services and public facilities includes these lands. Following is a list of parcels that comprises the amendment to the Future Land Use Map: PARCEL NO. ACRES 03203130001600000 6.49 032031300016A0000 5.05 032031300015A0000 8.57 03203130001500000 9.59 03203130001400000 4.60 032031300017E0000 10.46 0320315AY00000010 7.71 0320315AY0000001A 1.99 0320315AY0000008A 1.00 0320315AY00000110 28.95 0320315AY000014A0 14.77 0320315AY000023A0 30.14 • 04203130001000000 6.50 042031300010A0000 2.46 042031300010B0000 0.10 04203130004500000 5.14 042031300045A0000 2.13 04203130004580000 2.18 082031300033C0000 1.97 10203130000100000 9.41 102031300001A0000 17.52 10203130000200000 19.18 102031300002A0000 2.28 102031300004C0000 9.45 102031300004A0000 4.91 102031300004B0000 4.96 04203130004800000 4.79 042031300042A0000 0.97 04203130004200000 3.47 04203130001100000 1.29 04203130004600000 2.72 04203130004700000 1.02 10203130000400000 9.74 0320315AY00000340 2.21 Total: 243.72 Acres • 41 to 1 • • 0 Potable Water System: The City has a water capacity of 15.5 million gallons per day(rngd). The average daily potable water flow projections for the City of Sanford Water management System Service Area for design years 2000, 2005, 2020,2025 and 2020 were prepared by CPH Engineers, Inc. for the 1999 Utility Strategic Business Plan. The design year projections were obtained by multiplying the projected service area population by an estimated usage of 125 gallons per capita per day (gpcd). The population projections are based on the projection that single-family homes will reach a `build-out' condition in Design Year 2010 and multi-family homes will reach 'build- out' in Design Year 2020. City staff's research supports these assumptions. The following conclusions were drawn: Potable Water Flow Projections For The City of Sanford Water Management System Service Area Design Year Population Average Daily Potable Water Flow(MGD) 2000 46,920 5.87 2005 55,152 6.89 2010 70,713 8.84 2015 75,894 9.49 2020 76,930 9.62 • The following water usage was calculated for build-out of all development anticipated in the Airport Master Plan: Airport Projected Water Usage Per Day (gpd) Use Measure Number Water Usage (gpd). __-_- Passengers (3 gal/passenger) 22,765 68,295 Flight School (25 gal/student) 800 20,000 Commerce Park 1,645 gal/acre 270 444,150 Commercial/Industrial 1,100 gal/acre 80 88,000 Cargo/Maintenance 1,645 gal/acre 167 139,825 General 1,645 gal/acre 40 65,800 Aviation/FBO Total Water Usage 826,070 gpd The Airport's water usage combined with the 2020 estimated water usage for the service area of the Sanford Water Management System leaves an unused water flow of 5.05 million gallons per day. Total Water Capacity 2020 Estimated Usage Airport Usage Remaining Capacity • 15.5 MGD 9.62 MGD .826 MGD 5.05 MGD 42 s • • jr!i Therefore,there is ample water to serve the needs of all uses and development enumerated in the Airport Master Plan. • Wastewater System: The existing wastewater system has a total permitted capacity of 7.3 mgd with an annual average flow of 5.88 mgd. The City will be constructing a new sewage treatment plant to the south of the Airport. Completion of the plant is expected in two years. The plant will serve the airport, as well as the eastern portion of the City. The plant is in the permitting phase at this time and is expected to be completed within two years. The plant will have an initial capacity of 2 million gallons per day with a maximum capacity of 6 million gallons. The construction of phase 2 of the plant, which will provide another 2 million gallons per day, is expected to start in 2006. Phase 3 will be constructed as needed. The total capacity of Sanford's wastewater system, including the new plant, will be 13.3 mgd. Wastewater projections through 2020 were prepared in 1999 by CPH Engineers, Inc., for the Sanford Utility Strategic Business Plan. Design Wastewater Flow Projections For The City of Sanford Service Area Design Year Population Average Daily Waste Water Flow(MGD) 2000 46,628 7.218 2005 54,407 8.384 2010 69,200 10.449 2015 74,046 11.328 2020 75,012 11.752 Policy 8-1.5.1 of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan uses a standard for wastewater of 90% of the standard for potable consumption. The potable water flow of the Airport at build out is determined to be 826,070 gallons per day. Therefore, the wastewater generated by the development anticipated in the Airport Master Plan is 743,463 gallons per day. Total Capacity 2020 Estimated Usage Airport Usage Remaining Capacity 13.3 MGD 11.752 MGD .743 MGD .805 MGD Therefore, there will be ample capacity in the wastewater system to serve the needs of the development anticipated in the Airport Master Plan. Solid Waste: The City is capable of disposing of 358,333 tons of solid waste per year. Current demand for disposal is 264,926 tons per year. Therefore, the available capacity for solid waste is 94,407 tons per year. A recent study by the City indicates that the City has approved enough housing for a population of 56,534, although not all of this housing has been constructed. The study also shows that there is little land left that is suitable for housing both within the City proper and within the Joint Planning Area where the City can annex land from Seminole County. The Sanford Utility 43 • • Strategic Business Plan estimates that for its utility areas which includes not only the City, but • also lands within Seminole County, single family homes will reach a `build-out' condition by 2010 and multi-family housing will reach a `build-out' condition by 2016. This estimate coincides with the City's projections. The build-out condition will exist before 2020 at an approximate population of 60,000 to 65,000. Sanford's population in 2003 is estimated by BEBR at 44,251. Based on Policy 8-1.5.1 of the City's Comprehensive Plan, residential LOS for solid waste is 2.18 pounds/capita/day; the additional 22,000 residents would generate 8,752 tons of solid waste per year. The Airport currently generates about 2 pounds of solid waste per passenger. This figure is not expected to change in the future. This figure includes all airport concessions, airline administrative offices, ticketing counters, flight kitchens, cargo operations, aircraft and vehicle maintenance operations, terminal services, and retail vendors. The major types of solid waste generated include paper, food and other organic materials and plastics. Based on previous comprehensive plan amendments, an acre of industrial uses generates an average of 12,050 pounds of solid waste per year. An acre of commercial uses averages 77,375 pounds of solid waste per year. The following chart illustrates the sources and tons of solid waste that will be generated when all development anticipated by the Airport Master Plan is completed: • Solid Waste Generated by Orlando Sanford Airport at Build-Out Use Measure Number Solid Waste Generated (tons/year) Passengers (2 lbs./passenger) 8,309,352 8,309 Commerce Park 6 tons/acre 270 1,620 Commercial/Industrial 13.7 tons/acre 80 1,096 General 6 tons/acre 40 240 Aviation/FBO Total Solid Waste Consumption 11,265 tons/year The total of solid waste generated by the City's residential development at build-out and the Airport's build-out of its Master Plan Development totals 20,017 tons/year. The available capacity for solid waste is 94,407 tons per year. Therefore, even with additional commercial and residential development within the City of Sanford, there is ample capacity of solid waste disposal. Stormwater Drainage: Based on Policy 8-1.5.1 of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan, development on parcels without positive outfall, including the Airport, have a level of service standard per 25 year storm event of 96 hours of retention/detention. • The Airport will have to submit a drainage plan demonstrating that they meet this standard when 44 • • ' they submit an application for site plan approval. The application for site plan approval is generally submitted after approval for a planned development, conditional use or development of r • egional impact and before a building permits application. The Airport will be free to submit an application for Site Plan Approval for any element of development enumerated in the Master Play, after approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment that incorporates the Airport Master Plan into the Comprehensive Plan. The Development Review Team, including the City Engineer and the Public Works Engineer,will review the application. The Development Review Team will make a recommendation on the application to the Planning and Zoning Commission, which will then approve, approve with conditions or deny the application. Transportation System: The Airport is currently accessed via Lake Mary Boulevard and Airport Boulevard. The entrance drive into the Airport is known as Red Cleveland Boulevard. After East Lake Mary Boulevard is constructed, Red Cleveland Boulevard will be reconfigured and East Lake Mary Boulevard will become the principal roadway into the Airport. East Lake Mary Boulevard is presently being constructed as a 4-lane roadway with a capacity of 31,100 trips. Configuration Of New East Lake Mary Boulevard ` q "€ a ' ' 111 r ,. " R,. ,,,,, , „,,,..„„„,,,,,e,,.,„_ >,... _.,- ! ›.. ,i ii 46 ,,,,,, . 4„,: t. tr.-11� X44 , ,* _._ o- + * a Te f" t k, r , —, t.:- -tk-I ., „,.: ...v.- ,,att4, ,:,,,,,:,:is,,..4:7,,,,,`., ict, A x ,tt45ich, 4 4 �`�. "z �A mow$». is ..£�t o- x,. . '`s ' :, '�' °z " ark' $ z , w • ,'^-,E1r 'fitc a ' .. .' '4114 " '''' ' Iritq It*v' ms41„*„.:-y qy s' _y�'=. t i � v tnS $ `., +Iq y q ar ',....-,1,--.,-; *' t ::. .F,'A D+l .i'• — '''-'4 t6 t� a Si.:A�EbT t tt i> U t . `- ys e,.a : a L!a J . �, ,r.:,,: ii:�`. .� .`4tts .. ' xg • 4110 45 • • • Existing Volumes of Traffic: Table 1 lists the current volumes of traffic on roadways impacted by the Orlando Sanford Airport. TABLE 1 2002 CAPACITY AND VOLUME OF MAJOR ROADWAYS IN SANFORD AFFECTED BY THE AIRPORT CAPACITY VOLUME LOS I-4(Lake Mary Blvd to SR 46) 77,457 105,441 F US 17-92 Lake Mary Blvd to Airport Blvd 40,000 40,255 F Airport Blvd to C-46A 40,000 33,465 D C-46A to SR 46 40,000 28,756 C SR 46 to I-4 17,325 22,852 C SR 46 17/92 to Sanford Ave. 31,100 17,721 C Sanford Ave.to Mellonville Ave. 31,100 23,259 D Mellonville Ave.to SR 415 17,325 22,979 F SR 415 to Volusia County Line _ 17,325 16,107 D Airport Blvd • SR 46A to US 17/92 _ 32,320 15,385 B US 17-92 to Sanford Ave 32,320 11,620 B Sanford Ave.to Mellonville Ave. 17,800 6,744 B C-427 Sanford Ave to Sunland Dr 32,320 14,004 B Lake Mary Blvd US 17-92 to CR 427 32,320 11,740 B Sanford Avenue(CR 425) SR 46 to Airport Blvd 32,320 23,021 C Airport Blvd to C-427/Lake Mary Blvd. 32,320 16,616 B Source: Seminole County Engineering Dept.2002 Traffic Counts Projected Future Volumes of Traffic: Traffic projections are based on modeling by Seminole County and Metroplan Orlando. The City of Sanford provides funding to and participates in the regional transportation modeling process by Metroplan Orlando (the MPO for Orange, Osceola and Seminole Counties). Seminole County performs transportation modeling for the area that includes Sanford. As such, the City has no need to conduct independent traffic analyses. The future land use data upon which the Metroplan analysis is based reflects existing and future land use planning data from the City of Sanford. For determining level of service on County roadways in the long term, Seminole County utilizes Generalized Maximum Service Volumes for County Arterial and Collector Roads - Long range (20 year). For determining level of service on State roadways in the long term, Seminole County utilizes the Maximum Service • 46 • • Volume tables developed by the County for state highways. These standards are based on standards from the Highway Capacity Manual. • That information is compiled by Seminole County with input from the seven cities within the county. In addition, Seminole County estimates and projects populations and employment for each traffic zone in the County. Projections for the entire County have been made for the years 2005, 2010 and 2020. Traffic zones are small areas of the County created for use with the regional transportation model. In essence, Sanford's Traffic Circulation Plan Element and the City's analysis of individual sites incorporates traffic analysis that reflects future development for the entire Sanford area including the unincorporated areas around the City, much of which are subject to annexation. Seminole County has projected roadway level of service for major roadways in its Vision 2020 Comprehensive Plan. For Sanford roadways,the projected levels of service are as follows: Roadway Projected Level of Service I-4(Lake Mary Blvd to SR 46) D US 17-92 Lake Mary Blvd to Airport Blvd F Airport Blvd to C-46A B C-46A to SR 46 A SR 417(Greeneway) B SR 46 17/92 to Sanford Ave. D Sanford Ave. to Mellonville Ave. F M • ellonville Ave. to SR 415 B SR 415 to Volusia County Line&I-95 A Airport Blvd. CR 46A to US 17/92 A US 17-92 to Sanford Ave. A C-427 (Sanford Ave to Sunland Dr) C Lake Mary Blvd. Ridge Road to US 17-92 D US 17-92 to CR 427 B Sanford Avenue SR 46 to Airport Blvd B Airport Blvd to C-427 B Proposed Roadway Improvements: Table 2 lists the roadway projects in Sanford currently on the Metroplan work program. In addition to the projects listed below, both Metroplan Orlando and the Volusia County MPO consider the four-laning of SR 415 to be their number one joint unfunded priority project due to the need to provide additional roadway capacity to serve the travel demand in this corridor. Recently the Florida Turnpike Authority conducted a planning study to determine the feasibility of a toll road to connect SR 417 in Seminole County just south of the airport to Interstate 95. That project was determined to be financially infeasible. • 47 • • Improvements are underway on 1-4 between Lake Mary Boulevard and 17/92 that will increase • the capacity of I-4 to 110,000 trips. In addition, a new bridge is currently being constructed on 1-4 over the St. Johns River. SR 46 improvements from Mellonville Avenue to SR 415 are listed in the Metroplan 2020 Long Range Transportation Plan but are as yet unfunded. However, the Seminole County Comprehensive Plan lists the 2020 level of service for this road segment as LOS B (Exhibit 3). Seminole County has requested that the 4-laning of this segment of SR 46 be moved up on the work program. The Orlando Sanford Airport has agreed to donate land on the south side of the road to facilitate the widening of the road. Seminole County has identified the need for improvements to U.S. 17/92 between Lake Mary Boulevard and Airport Boulevard in its Vision 2020 Comprehensive Plan (Exhibit 4). These improvements are still unfunded but it is anticipated that funding will be available during the existing long range planning period (2020). • • 4 • • w g • tea, �o. o c� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .7r o C o o O O o O O O U ¢ Vi act a ~" Z O M 'p ,-. . ; _.. _. r*; '-'� Z M kfl s M M M M M M N z O b '.. ¢ oo Oo 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 p , ¢ N ¢¢ `0 s �¢ .0 .o ■o ¢ r r- O W �"� Fr M - - - Z - O a CI 0 0 CV O 0 0 p■ C. t� 0 o o a) o a) al 0 O 0 o A N O O c O N O O O O . O U N O o c V O V V O O OU O Uj � 0 _O 'C3 J O O O O a�cl �N� ... .0 E E W -ate N N a 4-4 a W W a is `"V o� Q" 'b:.a > W .e0 Q 0 0 Q Q 0 E 0 0 0 0 °° o 4.) °`le ¢ �.] a. U U a. a, U U U U U U a� a, f0 F- A O __ xW O 3 y a) "0 d [� sue. a,a o o o v v �t y o O 3 0 0 o U a4 0 ® ® a Q s 3 33 c5 V la N . N v' ' N N @F 2 Cr) Q �' A ai a)O v cn O a] al ct 'O a -,,:J O.'O a) 'O N ^ U ) w A ' 3cd 3cd N c9 - .-P . c0 - > U C � > U aQa � o ¢ ¢ w � ua v) > L t C U 0 z 'O too. O E— cd N 0 -� aN 0 E l Gs" ° J u 'O 2 '4 0,'� a) 'C� ?� �� o _� - C ci.k W d _ �G ,. O CZ> v) 0 0 CZ/ ti a/ V) 0 > aG i •O a. o U crd cd u •- 0 N • N L v) -.I. v) v) U U W W W U v) v) • • • • 2. Consistency with the Sanford Comprehensive Plan of Amendment to Incorporate the Airport Master Plan into the Comprehensive Plan Introduction: While the Airport Master Plan (ALP) culminates in a generalized land use layout plan, the Airport Master Plan is not a land use document. Therefore, there is some difficulty in incorporating the document into the Comprehensive Plan. A large share of the document is comprised of socio-economic data, forecast methodologies, demand analysis and alternative plans which, from the perspective of a land use policy plan, are more rightly described as background information. The goals of the Airport Master Plan provide the direction for the development of the airport, much as the goals of the Comprehensive Plan provide guidance for the development of a city, county or state. The goals and objectives of the Airport Master Plan provide the Airport with a detailed strategy for managing development consistent with environmental quality, noise abatement, land use compatibility and adequate access. Since these are subjects traditionally included in a comprehensive plan, it seems appropriate to include the goals and objectives of the Airport Master Plan in Sanford's Comprehensive • Plan. The Airport Layout Plan (ALP) is a graphic representation of the proposed development of the Airport. While general in nature, it provides clear direction for future growth and development. At the same time, the ALP is necessarily flexible enough to be able to adjust to unique opportunities that may be presented to the Airport as well as changes in market conditions. It is appropriate to include the ALP in the Comprehensive Plan. The Airport is the largest single land owner and land use in the City. A such, it greatly impacts many facets of life in Sanford. Its inclusion in the comprehensive plan also provides the public with a greater opportunity to review the future development of the Airport. Background: The Airport Master Plan is a tool that provides the Sanford Airport Authority (SAA) with planning guidance to help ensure that Airport facilities are adequate to meet both the short- and the long-term demand for aviation services. The Plan forecasts demand for airport services including passenger demand, cargo demand and fixed base operations demand. Table 4-14 of the Master Plan anticipates the following increase in passenger demand through 2020: • 50 • • TABLE 4-14 SUMMARY OF COMMERCIAL PASSENGERS Orlando Sanford International Airport Source: PBS&J from Airport Records,2001 Sanford Aviation Authority Average Domestic International Total Peak Peak Peak Year Passengers Passengers Passengers Month Day Hour Historical 1998 63,804 1,129,761 1,193,565 110,902 4,416 1,722 1999 61,375 878,587 939,962 87,338 3,478 1,356 2000 172,313 914,286 1,086,599 100,963 4,020 1,568 Forecast 2001 545,888 818,833 1,364,721 126,805 5,049 1,969 2005 1,332,736 1,999,103 3,331,839 309,583 12,328 4,808 2010 2,414,682 2,951,278 5,365,960 498,587 19,854 7,743 2015 3,763,018 3,763,018 7,526,036 699,294 27,846 10,860 2020 4,985,611 3,323,741 8,309,352 727,077 30,745 11,990 Table 4-18 of the Airport Master Plan forecasts the number of yearly commercial operations through 2020: • TABLE 4-18 TOTAL COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS FORECAST ACTIVITY PREFERRED FORECAST SUMMARY Orlando Sanford International Airport Source: PBS&J,Analysis from Airport Records Operations 2000 5,863 2001 3,454 2005 9,957 2010 16,298 2020 28,620 The Master Plan then determines the types and amount of facilities necessary to support the projected aviation demand. Facilities include both airfield improvements such as runway, taxiway and navigational requirements; terminal requirements including parking, rental cars, terminal layout, and terminal aprons and boarding gates; and landside requirements including access roads, curb frontage, aircraft storage, fuel storage and commerce park. The following table provides information from the • 51 • • • Master Plan on the increase in demand for aviation services and the scope of improvements that are necessary to meet that demand: Existing And Proposed Inventory Of Facilities And Operations Facility/Operations Year 2000 Year 2005 Year 2010 Year 2020 Aircraft Operations 372,493 419,879 471,894 580,551 Commercial Passengers 1,086,565 3,331,839 5,365,960 8,309,352 Air Carrier aircraft parking 12 19 positions Cargo(tons) 12,625 62,392 Cargo/Heavy Maintenance 10 20-30 40-50 70-90 (Acres) Commercial Terminal 406,000 1,250,100 1,974,500 2,877,600 (square feet) Parking Spaces Needed 1,138 5,806 10,150 18,700 (construct garage) Aircraft needing storage 129 285 Aircraft needing tie downs 162 170 Length of Runways • Runway 9L-27R(feet) 9,600 12,000 Runway 18-36 6,000 8,500 Runway 9R-27L 3,760 7,400 New Runway 4,000 X 75' T-Hangars 106 137 167 243 Conventional Hangars (#) 14 19 23 34 (Square Yards) 17,233 21,440 26,087 37,900 Air Commerce Park 270 Acres remain to be developed (undeveloped Acres in existing commerce park on western portion of Airport Commercial/Industrial (non- 0 85 Acres aviation) development on east side of Airport Heavy Maintenance 82 Acres FBO/Corporate/General 40 Acres Aviation Cargo 85 Acres In addition, the following general themes are important in understanding the direction of development in the Master Plan: • 52 • • • • General Aviation facilities move to north, southeast and east middlefield portions of Airport; • Corn Air Flight School expands in Commerce Park; • Commerce Park is fully utilized for general aviation and industrial uses; • Cargo &repair facilities are consolidated on north side of Airport; • Development of north side aviation complex (including Pan Am school and repair facility) will be maximized; • Southeast portion of airport property adjacent to future Lake Mary Blvd. will be utilized for commercial and industrial uses. Consistency with Sanford Comprehensive Plan: Future Land Use Element: The goals of the Airport Master Plan and the Airport Layout Plan articulate and further many of the goals, objectives and policies of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan and have, therefore, been incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan. Goal 1-1: Land Use. Insure that the character and location of land uses incorporate best management practices and principles of resource conservation, promote orderly land use transition, and minimize threats to health, safety, and welfare which may be engendered by incompatible • land uses, environmental degradation,hazards, and nuisances. The Goals of the Airport Master Plan ensure that the Airport will be developed according the sound land use principles. Goals 1, 2 and 3 stress the provision of adequate facilities at the Airport which, in turn, ensures the safety and welfare of passengers, employees and the surrounding community. Goal 4 directs the Airport to develop to minimize negative environmental impacts. Goal 5 promotes the development of compatible land uses. Goal 8 ensures adequate access to, and through, the Airport. Goal 9 addresses the impact of noise on neighboring residents. Policy 1-1.3.2: General Pattern of Industrial Land Use, identifies the airport and its surrounding area as a `center of major industrial activity' and gives `a high priority' to directing `full utilization and development of lands designed for industrial development within the airport property.' Goal 1 of the Master Plan directs the Airport to provide adequate services both for airport uses. Goal 2 of the Master Plan directs the Airport to develop a self-sustaining commerce park and adequate landside facilities. Policy 1-1.3.3: Pursue Selective Industrial Expansion Policy. This policy encourages industrial development that promotes an industrial mix, contribute revenues to the City and generates high levels of employment while not adversely impacting the City's natural resources. Goal 6 of the Airport Master Plan and its associated objectives describes how the airport will develop in support of local and regional economic goals. Goal 4 directs the Airport to develop with minimum impact on wetlands, and ground water. Goal 5 directs the Airport to development a stormwater master plan. • 53 • • S Policy 1-1.3.4: Pursue Nuisance Abatement Standards and Criteria. Goal 9 and its associated objectives are devoted to noise abatement and are consistent with Policy 1-1.3.4 of the Comprehensive Plan. Objective 1-2.4: Managing Airport Lands. In addition to incorporating the goals and objectives of the Airport Master Plan and the ALP, this objective has been rewritten to address current issues related to the Airport and the requirements of section 163.3177, F.S. The objective and subordinate policies now address how the Airport will be managed to minimize adverse impacts to adjacent lands. The existing policies are more directed toward on-site management. The proposed amendments to this objective discuss the relationship of the airport expansion to the conservation element of the Comprehensive Plan, to public facilities, to Chapter 333, F.S., to the FAA, to noise abatement and to the City's development review process. The proposed objective and policies are more relevant, not only to the comprehensive planning process, but also to the relationship between the Airport and the surrounding community. Transportation Element: Goal 2-1: Ensure Integrated Multi-Modal Transportation System. Develop and maintain an integrated multi-modal transportation system in the city of Sanford which promotes mobility and accessibility to move people and goods in a manner consistent with the local and citywide land use, and environmental protection goals, as well as coordinated with proposed residential and economic developments. stress multi-modal mobility that offers transportation and transit services to all residents and tourists in the most efficient, convenient, assessable, and affordable manner possible. The incorporation of the Airport Master Plan goals and objectives into the Comprehensive Plan is consistent with the transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan. An objective under goal 6 directs the Airport to `develop an airport layout plan that easily integrates with existing and proposed transportation infrastructure, to encourage economic growth.' The objectives under goal 8 of the Airport Master Plan direct the airport to: • Provide safe access and easy-to-follow signs to Airport roadways and facilities. • Provide adequate lane capacity on roads leading to the Airport to serve existing and future activity. • Provide adequate land capacity on internal circulation roadways serving functional areas (terminal, GA, cargo, flight academy, etc.). • Provide parking facilities (for GA, cargo, terminal, etc.) that are conveniently located and easily accessible. • Incorporate multi-modal opportunities into Airport development plans (e.g. commuter or high- speed rail). S 54 • • • Maintain close coordination with Regional Planning Council, Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO),FDOT, and other transportation group All of these objectives support and advance the goals of the transportation element of the comprehensive plan. They clearly define the Airport's role in the multimodal transportation strategy for the area and ensure that the Airport will be a major player in the transportation plan. The goals and objective of the Airport Master Plan are consistent with the transportation element. Objective 2-1.12: Adequate Aviation Facilities. The amendment changes the title of this objective to: Coordination Of Aviation Facilities with Surface Transportation Plans. The goals and objectives of the Airport Master Plan and the ALP, proposed to be a part of the Future Land Use Element, provide sufficient information on the provision of adequate aviation facilities through 2020. This objective now addresses the coordination of airport development with LYNX, Metroplan Orlando and City transportation plans. LYNX, Metroplan and the majority of communities in the Greater Orlando Area are united in their support of a truly multi-modal system of transportation. Therefore, while coordination between the Airport and these agencies is included in the Airport Master Plan goals and objectives, it is important to stress the importance of this coordination to achieve the multi-modal system of transportation. Housing Element: The proposed amendments do not affect the housing element. • Infrastructure Element: See Page 41: Evaluation of Service and Facility Impacts of the Airport Master Plan. Conservation Element: Goal 5-1: Conservation. Conserve, protect, and appropriately manage and restore the city's natural resources in order to enhance the quality of natural systems. The Conservation Element addresses air quality, water quality, conservation and stormwater issues, maintenance of flood plain, wetlands protection, soil erosion,protection of aquatic, vegetative and wildlife habitats, energy resource management and protection of historical resources. Goal 4 of the Airport Master Plan is devoted exclusively to environmental issues and is consistent with the Conservation Element of the Sanford Comprehensive Plan: Goal No. 4. Develop the Airport and its vicinity to minimize negative environmental impacts. Objectives: • Identify the major environmental issues of concern. • Minimize potential environmental impacts, and provide special attention to minimizing residential dislocation, air and water pollution, and wetland impacts. • Provide a facility that minimizes adverse effects on other environmental concerns. • 55 • • • Surface water management is addressed under Goal 5. Goal 4 of the Airport Master Plan is consistent with the Conservation Element of the Sanford Comprehensive Plan. Each specific project within the scope of the Airport Layout Plan will be required to undertake an environmental assessment to identify the individual environmental impacts of the development. This is generally accomplished at the time of development review and permitting. Recreation and Open Space Element: The proposed amendments do not affect the recreation and open space element of the Comprehensive Plan. Intergovernmental Coordination Element: The proposed amendments do not affect the intergovernmental coordination element of the Comprehensive Plan. Capital Improvements Element: See Page 41: Evaluation of Service and Facility Impacts of the Airport Master Plan. 3. Consistency of Noise Abatement Policy (Policy 1-2.4.7: Protection from Noise Exposure) with City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan Introduction. In 2001, Environmental Science Associates prepared an update to the FAR Part 150 Study for the Orlando Sanford International Airport. The study identifies current operational activities at the airport and forecasts aircraft operations for the next five years. Current and future noise exposure maps are used to analyze alternative operational and land use noise mitigation measures and for determining the extent of off-airport compatibility. Sanford's Future Land Use Map includes noise contours developed in the Part 150 study. These recommendations are supported by figures from the Airport Master Plan which indicate that from 2000 to 2020, airport passengers will increase by 660% and airport operations by 65%. There will be increased noise exposure from the future expansion of Runway 18-36 to the south and Runway 27-R to the east resulting in increased noise levels to the east and south of the airport. Therefore, residential uses should be discouraged in the Airport Industry Commerce (AIC) Designation of the City of Sanford and the High Intensity Planned Development—Airport (HIP-Airport) designation of Seminole County to the edge of the Resource Protection/Conservation designation and south of the airport (east of Ohio Street) to the edge of the Resource Protection/Conservation designation. While most of the affected land is within the airport boundaries, there is the potential that private individuals could purchase property for development that may be affected in the future by noise levels incompatible with their development expectations. Therefore, the City is adopting, within the Comprehensive Plan, land use measures to ensure future noise compatibility of the Airport and surrounding land uses. These land use measures originated in the Part 150 study as the recommendations for land use compatibility. • 56 • • The amendments to the Comprehensive Plan regarding noise abatement improve the Airport's compatibility with the surrounding area by prohibiting incompatible land uses. The restriction on residential uses will not hamper the City's ability to supply future housing needs. Sanford has approved enough residential development to supply the estimated needs of the City for housing through the year 2013. While 882 vacant acres remain in the Sanford Joint Planning Area, a limited number of sites are suitable for single family development. Most of the vacant acreage is located in heavily commercial or industrial areas. Several vacant sites on Rinehart Road are suitable for multiple family or mixed use commercial/multiple family developments. 1999 Utility Strategic Business Plan projects that single- family homes will reach a `build-out' condition in Design Year 2010 and multi-family homes will reach `build-out' in Design Year 2020. City staff's research supports these assumptions. The City has been working with Seminole County on revisions to its Joint Planning Agreement. The land use measures for noise compatibility will also be contained in that document. Consistency of New Noise Abatement Policies with Comprehensive Plan. Following is proposed Policy 1-2.4.7 pertaining to noise exposure: Policy 1-2.4.7: Protection from Noise Exposure. Future expansion of the airport property and runways shall be focused to the east and south to minimize airport noise and development impacts to urban residential areas to the north and west. The Airport Authority shall continue to monitor noise impacts generated by airport operations and enforce compliance. • Lands annexed near or adjacent to the airport shall be assigned land use designations compatible with the Airport Master Plan and in a manner consistent with the joint planning agreement established with Seminole County. The City shall ensure that land uses surrounding the airport are compatible with noise levels generated by the airport use through the following measures: 1. All land east of Ohio Avenue and north of Pine Avenue shall be developed for airport related uses based on the part 150 Noise Exposure Maps and Compatibility Plan prepared in 2001 for the Orlando Sanford Airport by Environmental Science Associates (ESA). 2. Residential uses and public educational facilities shall be prohibited south and east of the airport's runway system. However, transient rental multifamily residential units may be constructed provided they are outside the 60 DNL and do not include mobile homes. 3. The following uses are compatible with the Airport and shall be permitted east of Ohio Avenue and North of Pine Way: • Industrial Parks; • Business Parks; • Commercial Developments; • Attendant retail; • 57 • • 0 • Service and Hotel Uses; • Medium and high-density rental residential Developments; • Agricultural uses; • Public Uses. 4. Single family residences shall only be allowed on existing one-acre suburban estates or larger lots. No new lots, parcels or tracts shall be created for single-family uses and existing parcels may not be subdivided for residential uses other than multifamily rental uses. 5. An avigation easement shall be required and included in the recorded deed of any property prior to the construction of a single family dwelling unit or a multifamily rental dwelling unit. This policy confirms the industrial and commercial nature of the Airport Industry and Commerce land use designation and of land uses surrounding the Airport. The prohibition of the majority of residential uses supports the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan to plan and design for residential quality, promote orderly land use transitions and protect residential areas from the adverse impacts of transition in land use. This policy supports Policy 1-1.3.2: General pattern of industrial land use, which directs the City to fully utilize and develop the airport property by removing incompatible residential uses which may be deter full development of the Airport. This policy also supports Policy 1-1.3.4, Pursue Nuisance 0 Abatement Standards and Criteria, which directs the City to prevent nuisance impacts associated with industrial activities. This policy is also consistent with Policy 1-2.10.3: Interim Public School Siting Criteria, which states that school sites should be located away from industrial areas and similar land uses to avoid noise. Proposed Policy 1-2.4.7 prohibits schools east of Ohio Avenue thus fulfilling this requirement. The proposed policy is not contrary to any of the Comprehensive Plan's goals, objectives and policies. The policy serves to support the Airport and protect the public from the potentially adverse impacts of noise pollution that are a part of the Airport operations. 4. Recreation And Open Space Data Inventory And Analysis This element provides a recreation inventory and analysis pursuant to the requirements of 163.3177(6)(e) F.S. In addition current and projected needs for recreation sites, facilities and open space are analyzed based on an assessment of existing and projected recreation demands. 1. DEFINITIONS The following is a list of recreation area classifications and respective definitions which are referenced throughout this element: Neighborhood Parks. Neighborhood parks are generally 1 to 15 acres and are accessible by foot or bicycle. Neighborhood parks are designed to serve a population within a radius of up to one-half mile. 58 • • • The service area of a neighborhood park may coincide with that of an elementary school, with the two amenities adjoining or complementing one another. The focus of neighborhood parks is recreational and social activities at the neighborhood level. Neighborhood parks are designed to meet the particular needs of its service area. Typical facilities in a neighborhood park include the following: • play areas for small children; • a ballfield; • one or two hard-surface(possibly multi-purpose)courts; • a passive recreation area with seating and/or picnic area. Community Park. A community park is a larger area that provides a wide variety of recreational opportunities and athletic facilities for groups and individuals. Community parks are designed to meet major active recreation needs of the entire Sanford community that are not otherwise met by neighborhood facilities. Such parks may typically include the following: • multiple playing fields for outdoor league-type team sporting events; • community civic center building(s)for indoor events and programs; • a community swimming pool; • tennis courts; • racquetball courts; • play areas. • In many cases, outdoor facilities are lighted to provide additional recreational opportunities and utilization of facilities. A community park is typically a"drive-to" facility from 10-100 acres in size that services the needs of up to 25,000 people. Community parks are ideally located near collector or arterial roads to accommodate adequate access and should be well-buffered from adjacent residential areas. Special Facilities. Special recreation facilities are unique in their nature and purpose. Special facilities are exemplified by boat ramps, zoos, stadiums and other single-purpose facilities. While development standards are available for such facilities, special facilities are based more on the desires or unique characteristics of a community rather than actual need. Commercial Recreation Facilities. Commercial recreation facilities are privately operated, for-profit facilities such as roller skating rinks, bowling alleys, golf courses, commercial amusements or attractions, health clubs, riding stables and similar facilities. Commercial recreation facilities often reflect a response by business enterprise to a private market need. District Parks. A major or district park is usually designed to provide recreation opportunities to more than one community or to an entire county. These sub-regional parks are often based on a resource that cannot be provided by a community park. District parks can serve populations of about 100,000 people and are typically located within 30 minutes driving time of the users. These parks may provide ample contact with natural aspects of the setting and include large picnic areas,areas for field sports, nature trails, boating facilities and riding paths. • 59 • • • Regional Parks. Regional parks function primarily to provide special natural resource use to people of all sages. They are generally over 3,000 acres in size and within an hour's driving time of the population they serve. Activities available at a typical regional park include boating, swimming, hiking, horseback riding, picnicking, overnight camping, and nature appreciation. Regional parks are generally operated by the State. Recreation Based Functions. In addition to the recreation area classification system, recreation areas can be classified into two broad categories: activity-based and resource-based functions. These terms are defined as follows: Activity-Based Recreation: Recreation which is user-oriented and independent of location or the natural environment and where the activity is more important than the setting. Examples of activity-based recreation are softball,tennis and basketball. Resource-Based Recreation: Recreation that is dependent on a natural resource and where reliance on the built environment is minimal. Examples of resource-based recreation are fishing, camping, hiking and hunting. Most public parks can be classified as either activity-based or resource-based depending upon their size 4110 and predominant purpose. In general,the larger the park,the more likely that it will be predominantly resource-based. 2. INVENTORY OF EXISTING RECREATION SPACE AND FACILITIES A. City-owned facilities. The City of Sanford owns 367.84 acres of parks and open space facilities. Table VI-1 contains the City of Sanford properties and the facilities devoted to recreation and open space. Facilities owned by the City of Sanford have been divided into three categories: Park facilities, Open Space Facilities and Future Park Facilities. Park facilities are those areas owned by the City that currently contain active and passive recreation facilities. Park facilities have been classified according to their function as either active, passive or special. The types of developed facilities have been listed for each park. Open Space Facilities are those areas which the City maintains as green or landscaped areas and which contribute to the green character of the City. Future Park Facilities contain undeveloped properties owned by the City and held for future park development. • 60 • • Facility Changes since 1991: Sanford has made many improvements to its recreational facilities since 1991. The following parks have been developed or upgraded since that time: Wynnwood Park on Park Speer Jenkins Circle Groveview Bay Avenue Woodmere Centennial Academy Manor Starke Washington Oaks Pinehurst Lee P. Moore South Pinecrest James Dunn Derby McKibben The following parks have had major renovations: Red Barber Bentley Wilson Zinn Beck Field Touhy Coastline Chase Westside Boys and Girls Club Memorial Stadium Chase Park now contains four ball fields, in addition to lighted tennis courts, and meets a great need of our citizens. The historic Sanford Memorial Stadium was completely renovated in 1999 and is a splendid attraction both for its historic character and for its professional quality competition ball field. • The renovations have allowed competition events such as the National American Softball Association Championships to occur in Sanford. The City has a new competition swimming pool, the Larry Dale Aquatic Center, which is located adjacent to Seminole High School. The pool is already home to Seminole High swim, water polo and diving teams. The pool also hosted the Golden Age Games in 2002. The aquatic center provides swim lessons, scuba lessons, water aerobics and water polo as ongoing activities. In 2001, Sanford converted Jaycee Park into Paw Park. Paw Park contains facilities for the use of dogs and their owners, including drinking troughs, dog showers, dog waste containers and separate play areas for large and small dogs. The park has been a huge success, with visitors coming from all over Seminole and Orange Counties. Construction on Phase I of the Riverwalk began in late 2002. When completed, the Riverwalk will extend for five miles along Lake Monroe from Mellonville Avenue on the east to Wayside Park near the U.S. 17/92 bridge to Volusia County. The Riverwalk is a 5- mile linear recreational corridor that will provide a multi-use trail, fishing opportunities, seating areas and landscaping. Derby Park was developed in 1993 with assistance from the Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program. The annual All-American Derby race as well as monthly rallies are hosted in this park. Derby Park is also used for large gatherings such as company picnics, family reunions and special events. In addition to the Derby track, Derby Park offers park amenities such as a group picnic shelter, fitness area, a sand volley ball court, multi-use playing field and play equipment. 61 • • • The Sanford Parks Division has added the 5-acre Page Jackson Cemetery and the 2.6-acre Crawford tract to its cemetery management responsibilities. Both properties are adjacent to the Sanford Municipal Cemetery. Page Jackson Cemetery was in a state of disrepair but now has been completely cleaned. The Crawford tract will allow the addition of two thousand grave spaces. The historic caretakers building and the historic gazebo in the Sanford Municipal cemetery have been completely renovated and restored. S S 62 u.A' • • • as o 0 as es � � � c � � o H .FdH ;.'+ U U - U U >, U U bA U U U ci)C a > C7 aa 'a. > a Er+=, aHL a ja r an •. -.+ N N N M ,--4 d- • C H co) 0 Cl) N N O O = U d 0.-0 • ti O.w HC„ L .■. .--I •--I .� .--. .� .� .--i .-. '—+ +••• U w , — — N .-. — O '7' EH • "" • d — Cl) rn a a c -,c ct a z ZZZCZc U ZZZ ZZ L) U °'• E~ Z c, c, cn cr o ["- c"- 00 O \.O In 0 N V M • i N o N N l� M N N CA Q r. "C7 Q) > ai • > _ 3 M `n >,cd v� O▪ > �' „„co� Q o, 3 M Q b�A Q aVi _, 0 00.4 ' w 3wv o � � � a, 0 0 > d � VM' o °o ° 00000 0 kr) 00 � N - . 0Q N N f r-+ CT ,-. �p .-. \O M D N •--, U -� O O 0 a) >, N E � c a, 0 E20 q .� 0 a) , va E U Z > >-, 0 . . -> - C�,- ¢ - °' v o be. on 0 o. v >. (1.) • . a 6. • >, O al O O0 0 1a• < XI4 UUUC.: r� C7UC7 ; ■a; ,-4 • • • —. 7 ct '- .0 b o o O a E- ;o y 0 ~ K v r (:)A cd a? c U O y 0 ° � 6 0 d o 0 0 y -0 O wac7w O a C7 P. WUUa° �n cn v O N .. —. 00 H U 1-1 o •o s VD an 0 x U cat s., o a) 41 ~ O U M w• V) w r cl F Q N VI ca) r.+ c4 Po. = •—• • ,...1--� � M cat CC O t ~1:g r4 U CA 71 y ~ -� N o ∎O w ay Ea Z Z � � z � Z U Z Z zCn ZZ v) v) Cn adai O vl v) VD '71- O N ■O v:) O VD n O M y pp " O N • th Q\N N N • N ca ( Ri > O Q ' -6 .7-.... > > • .. < a> Q , > Q� O Q i-, j T3 v� O ff, > p bA > bA N ¢ i-' N = P > 0 W■ C vi cat 3 o 3o t c� v o � ° .ti � Zaw a, 0 0 � a - • ° � O i. O� N O O N O M 00 > O ,--, > 00 �t > N > O b a. «s N Q . .. U 00 d' ., --. ~ Q' OT Q N N Q Cl)• • L1. o° Y -, -C •- 4 o a (Li U L � � 0 y > O0 ali E 00 Z U c. O 0 cd - O co U cu '� e _a 0 n II il 0 4 0 ...0 .F_j ($3 B- r:c1.1 1.) ,-, ;--, ccS Cel �a 2 .:.3 a a •axCn 33 (733 cA � a2x ct —._ _ a • • MUNICIPAL RECREATION FACILITIES • TABLE VI-1 OPEN SPACE SITES Escambia 830 Escambia Drive 1.0 acre Hibiscus Court 2000 Hibiscus Court .7 acres Lily Court 2000 Lily Court .4 acres Sanford Cemetery 1975 W. 25th St. 34.9 acres Elliot Avenue 500 Elliot Avenue .81 acres Magnolia Heights 20th St. .09 acres Total 37.90 Acres MUNICIPAL RECREATION FACILITIES TABLE VI-1 UNDEVELOPED PARK SITES Country Club Manor 20th St 2.0 acres French Ave. at 18th Street 16.9 acres Hovnanian Park 2141 W. 25th St. 11.7 acres Lo? Cabin site 900 Seminole Ave. 2.9 acres 13t' Street 800 W. 13th St. 3.5 acres Kiwanis Park 701 E. 25th Place 11.6 acres Bel Air I 1800 Palm Way 1.13 acres • Bel Air 2 1801 Palm Way 1.13 acres Groveview Village 143 Anthony Dr. 5.4 acres Total 56.26 Acres B.Non-Municipal Recreational Facilities— Activity—Based 1. Seminole County. Seminole County maintains seven parks in the vicinity of the City of Sanford which can be easily utilized by Sanford residents. Sunland Park is less than '/z mile south of Sanford on U.S. 17/92. The fifteen acre park contains ball fields, tennis courts, basketball courts and a playground. Bookertown Park is a 4-acre neighborhood park just west of Sanford's boundary. It contains a basketball court, a playground and a soft ball field. Roseland Park is another neighborhood park adjacent to Sanford's eastern boundary on Roseberry Lane. Roseland park is 1 acre in size and contains a basketball court and a playground. Lake Monroe Wayside Park is a boat launching and fishing facility on Lake Monroe just west of Sanford. This park is also the terminus of Sanford's Riverwalk. Sylvan Lake park is located 5 miles west of I-4 off SR 46. This 126-acre park with a 188-acre lake contains 6 soccer fields and a sports training facility as well as tennis, racquetball, volleyball, jogging trail and playground. Fishing and boating are also available. This park hosts many national and international soccer teams and tournaments. Due to the magnitude and type of the facilities offered at Sylvan Lake Park, it is popular with Sanford citizens, particularly with those residing on the west side of town. Soldier's Creek Park contains 315 acres adjacent to Spring Hammock Preserve just south of Sanford on SR 419. This park has ball fields and •soccer fields. Lake Jessup Park is located at the terminus of Sanford Avenue. This resource- 65 • • based park provides access to Lake Jessup via a boat ramp. The six acre park also contains picnic facilities. Table VI-2 provides a list of County facilities utilized by Sanford residents. Seminole County, through its Natural Lands Program, also maintains 6 wilderness areas, all within a 20 minute drive of Sanford.These areas offer a variety of resource-based activities as noted in Table VI-3. In addition, Seminole County maintains an extensive trail system through its Greenways and Trails Program. This program has helped to fund Sanford's Riverwalk trail. The County trail system will connect Sanford's Riverwalk with trails throughout the County and with the Cross Florida Trail. 2. Seminole County School Board. The Seminole County Board of Education has added one new school, Bentley Elementary, since 1991. The Board operates seven elementary schools, two middle schools, and one high school within or adjacent to the City of Sanford. Approximately 37.5 acres are available for recreation use at elementary schools, 15.6 acres at middle schools, and 8.4 acres at the high school, for a total of 61.5 acres of recreation. Among the facilities provided at Sanford Middle School is a gymnasium, referred to as Crooms Gym, that offers programs sponsored by the Sanford Recreation Department on a seven day basis. All schools provide facilities for recreation activities. Facilities at elementary school sites primarily represent open play areas, basketball courts, and multi-purpose hard court areas. • The middle schools and high school provide more diversity in the facilities that are available, including track and field facilities, tennis courts, baseball fields, volleyball and paddleball courts, and indoor gymnasiums. Table VI-2, Non-Municipal Recreation Facilities, provides each schools'acreage. All School Board recreation facilities have been classified as activity-based neighborhood parks, although the high school, with facilities such as a track, also serves the entire community to some degree. 3. Private Recreation Space. The following private recreation spaces are included within the City of Sanford. Private Residential Recreation Space. Residential developments, particularly condominium and rental properties, usually provide recreation space to attract tenants to available housing units. These spaces are available to residents and their guests, and are not available to be used by the general public. Such recreation spaces are included in the recreation space inventory because they lessen demand for space that the City may need to provide. In 1988, nineteen residential developments provided some type of recreation space for residents residing in a combined 2,945 dwelling units. Since that time, the number of multifamily residential dwelling units has increased to more than 10,600. The vast majority of these are rental units. The 2000 Census states that the average household size in renter occupied units in Sanford is 2.49 persons. Therefore, these facilities would serve over 26,000 people. In addition, one new single-family subdivision is providing recreational facilities for 241 residences. S 66 • • Table VI-2, Non-Municipal Recreation Facilities, lists private recreation land, including private residential recreation facilities. As indicated in Table VI-2,there is approximately 20.9 acres of privately owned residential recreation space in the City. Private Commercial Recreation Space. A number of businesses provide commercial recreation to the public on a for-profit basis. However, the number has decreased since 1991. Commer- cial recreation facilities are generally operated in one of two ways: a membership fee that covers use for a specific period of time, or a one-time fee paid at the time the facility is used. Table VI-2 includes a list of commercial recreation facilities within the City of Sanford. NON-MUNICIPAL RECREATION FACILITIES ACTIVITY-BASED TABLE VI-2 Non Municipal SITE ACRES TYPE Recreation and Open Central Florida Zoo 122 Special Use Facility Space Sites: Seminole Sylvan Lake Park 126 Community Activity and County Resource-Based • Lake Monroe Wayside 3.5 Special Use Resource-Based Sunland Park 15 Neighborhood Activity-Based Roseland Park 1 Neighborhood Activity-Based Bookertown 4 Neighborhood Activity-Based Soldier's Creek 315 Community Activity-Based Lake Jessup 6 Special Use Resource-Based Non Municipal SITE ACRES FACILITIES Recreation and Open Hamilton Elementary 6 Playground Space Sites: Seminole Wicklow Elementary 3 Playground County School Board Idyllwilde Elementary 6 Playground Bentley Elementary 6 Playground Midway Elementary 4.9 Playground Pinecrest Elementary 6.8 Playground Goldsboro Elementary 4.8 Playground Lakeview Middle 8.4 Athletic Field Sanford Middle 7.2 Athletic Field Seminole High 8.4 Athletic Field • 67 • • • Private Recreation and LOCATION ACRES BASED Open Space Sites: Residential Hidden Lakes 0.5 Activity Mayfair Meadows 0.5 Activity Arbors at Hidden Lake 0.5 Activity Hidden Lakes 0.5 Activity Pine Ridge club 0.5 Activity North Lake Village 0.5 Activity Sandlewood Villas 0.1 Activity Carriage Cove 0.5 Activity Geneva Garden Apts. 0.1 Activity Lake Jennie Apts. 0.2 Activity Groveview Village 0.2 Activity Master Cove Apts. 0.1 Activity Howell Place 0.1 Activity Sailpoint Apts. 0.2 Activity Mariners Village Apts. 0.2 Activity Shenandoah Village 0.1 Activity Ridgewood Arms Apts. 0.1 Activity Lake Monroe Apts. 0.4 Activity Sanford Landings Apts. 0.7 Activity ill Pinewood Trails Apts. 0.4 Activity Towne Center Apts. 0.5 Activity Regency Oaks Apts. 0.5 Activity Plantation Lakes Apts. 1.5 Activity Stratford Point Apts. 0.6 Activity Charleston Club Apts. 0.5 Activity Arbor Lakes Apts. 1.2 Activity Logan Heights Apts. 1.0 Activity Wyndham Place Apts. 0.7 Activity Hatteras Sound Apts. 0.5 Activity Westlake Apts. 0.9 Activity Windchase Apts. 1.0 Activity Regatta Shores Apts. 1.2 Activity Greystone Townhouses 1.0 Activity Placid Lakes Townhomes 0.4 Activity Retreat at Twin Lakes 1.3 Activity Baker's Crossing homesites 1.5 Activity Total 20.9 Acres Private Recreation and LOCATION ACRES BASED Open Space Sites: Commercial Airport Bowl 0.7 Activity Sanora Pool Deck 1.5 Activity • School of Dance and Arts 0.2 Activity Sanford Boatworks & Marina Activity 68 • • 4. Regional Recreation Facilities. Although no regional recreation facilities exist within the city limits of Sanford, Sanford is fortunate to be surrounded by many natural areas in public ownership. These areas afford a wide variety of resource-based recreational opportunities within a short distance from the City. Just one mile south of Sanford, Seminole County maintains Big Tree Park which is home to the `Senator',Florida's largest bald cypress tree. The State of Florida parks and reservations has several parks that are accessible to the residents of Sanford. The lower Wekiva River State Preserve is located 9 miles west of Sanford on State Road 46. This 18,000 acres preserve bordering the St. John's River, the Wekiva River and Black Water Creek offers hiking, camping, horseback riding, canoeing and nature study. Rocksprings Run State Park is located 10 miles west of Sanford on State Road 46. The park contains 14,000 acres of wilderness and offers camping, canoeing, horseback riding, hiking, biking, nature study and an archaeological site. Blue Springs State Park in Orange City offers scuba diving, swimming, canoeing, nature trails, camping, fishing, boating and nature study. Hontoon Island State Park, located 6 miles west of DeLand, offers boating, fishing, camping,canoeing and hiking. The State of Florida also maintains the Little-Big Econ State Forest which has over 6,000 acres southeast of Sanford. The State Forest permits canoeing, hiking, biking, camping, horseback riding and nature study. The St. Johns River Water Management District maintains three conservation areas near 411 Sanford which may be used for resource-based recreation. The Lake Monroe Conservation Area is located 4 miles northeast of Sanford in Volusia County. This area offers fishing, boating, canoeing, hiking, horseback riding, camping and bird watching. The Lake Jessup Conservation Area is located adjacent to Sanford's southern border and contains 3432 acres. It offers similar recreational opportunities to those in the Lake Monroe Conservation Area. The Wekiva River Conservation District contains 23342 acres and is located 6 miles west of Sanford. This area offers fishing, biking, canoeing,picnicking and bird watching. Regional recreational sites available to Sanford residents within a twenty minute drive of Sanford and their facilities are listed in Table VI-3. Federal open space includes the Ocala National Forest and the Canaveral National Seashore. Atlantic Ocean beaches are also readily accessible to Sanford residents. • 69 • • O Ta U d0 b0 b0 00 O C i. G»' t, 0 C VI N °' .0 N 000 U000 PO W a.+ Q' Cl)O . v) C) H 0o • • • • • • • • • • 1-- bA ' 2 y • • • • • • • • • 0 w '. CO Cl) 0 • • • • • • • • O al H U W W a) CO CS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ZCA Q Q Cl) 0. • • • • • • • • W CI ., U O a....y 1 U - c Q 3 • • • • • • • • • o w w of a n Z CO ? • • • • • • • • • • • • • • xzEt r:14 ok O O M O O O N (- v-) O O O h J U et O O o0 O O\ Cr, d' N V 00 Cr, t- V W I.L O O d' O r rn L N V 'I' V Q Q W Cn 0 0 O Q 174 pa j CO CO v u a) a)C) C) C) +� a� C) C) C. — E E E E cn U a. " � " b b ' ° � = H a CO ., ° U U ' gi ' a, a a w ¢ U � ¢ 3 ¢ 3 ¢ 3 ¢ 3 ¢ 3 ¢ 3 ¢ O Q Q q Q 0 00 cn v.) cn vD cn v) cn v0 U 7 U 00 U cn Ucn U rn U 1 v y ° a 1....>cn cn o z _ -C 3 n> 0 > c = CO ti - a CIO u CA , C y 0 a 0 ; w , o �e CL) w ° 3 � C4 o =1 ■3 C � X • Z • • • 3. RECREATION FACILITIES ANALYSIS In 2000, the City of Sanford adopted a level of service standard for parks of 4 acres per 1,000 persons. Prior to 2000, the City had two standards: 2 acres of neighborhood parks per 1,000 persons and 2 acres of community parks per 1,000 persons. The City also has the following recreational standards: Level of Service Standards for Recreation Facilities Table VI-4 FACILITY Number of Facilities per Population BasebalUSoftball Diamond 1 (one) per 3800 Tennis Courts 1 (one) per 3000 Basketball Courts 1 (one) per 5000 Playgrounds 1 (one) per 3000 FootbalUSoccer Fields 1 (one) per 5000 Handball Courts 1 (one) per 6500 The City has removed the standard for shuffle board of one court per 3,000 persons. While the City does have a shuffleboard club, the demand for the sport has decreased over the years. Other sports have increased in demand and the City must concentrate its resources on those facilities which are most in demand. The City has also removed its standard of one swimming pool per 45,000 persons given that the City has recently completed a public pool. With more than half the residents of Sanford living in apartment complexes that provide pool facilities, the demand for additional public pool facilities may be nonexistent or greatly lessened. The following recreational facilities and acreage are available through the City of Sanford and the Seminole County school system in Sanford. Available Recreational Facilities Table VI-5 FACILITY CITY SCHOOL BOARD TOTAL Baseball/Softball Diamond 12 4 16 Tennis Courts 18 3 21 Basketball Courts 13 7 20 Playgrounds 21 7 28 Football/Soccer Fields 3 10 13 Handball Courts 7 2 9 • 71 • • • Based on the current population and the estimates of future population for 2007 and 2010,as depicted in Table VI-6, the City of Sanford has no deficit in either recreational acreage of in recreational facilities through the year 2010. ESTIMATE OF CURRENT AND FUTURE NEEDS FOR RECREATIONAL FACILITIES Table VI-6 Facility Existing 2002 Facility 2007 Facility 2010 Facility Type Number of Needs Needs Needs Facilities (43,251 Estimated (48,490 Projected (51,933 Projected 2002 Population*) Population) Population) Park Acreage 273.6 173 193.96 207.7 Baseball Field 16 12 13 14 Basketball Courts 20 9 10 10 Play Areas _ 28 _ 15 16 17 Football/Soccer 16 9 10 10 Fields Handball Courts 8 7 8 8 • Tennis Courts 21 15 16 17 *BEBR Estimate 4. PLANS FOR FUTURE FACILITIES. Although Sanford has adequate recreational facilities based on its level of service standards, the City is constantly striving to provide the best quality recreational opportunities for its citizens and visitors. The City will continue to upgrade and renovate its parks. Sanford has applied for a Florida Recreation and Development Assistance (FRDAP) grant to assist with the funding of the renovation of Fort Mellon Park. This application is ranked first out of 190 applications. This renovation is part of a master plan to improve the older downtown area of the City. Also included within this master plan are the construction of Riverwalk and the redesign of Memorial Park. These changes will improve the appearance of the Lake Monroe rieverfront and provide a multiuse path along the river. The City will complete phase I of the Riverwalk in 2003 and will continue to work with Metroplan, Seminole County and the Florida Department of Transportation to secure funding and to complete plans for Phases II and III of the Riverwalk. Phase II ranks second in the unfunded bicycle and pedestrian projects at Metroplan and funding is anticipated before 2008/09 fiscal year. The City is in the process of securing designs for two new parks on U.S. 17/92 at 18th Street and on 13th Street. The U.S. 17/92 site is a sixteen acre site across the street from Sanford Middle School. This site • 72 • • • will be a community park. The 13`h Street site will be a 3 V2 acre neighborhood park. The choice of facilities in both parks will depend on public participation meetings. The citizens of Sanford have determined that there is a great need for a Community Center to serve the entire City. The community center is also in the planning stages. 5. NEW FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PARKS,RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE. The City of Sanford has created a new land use designation in order to distinguish its parks, recreational facilities and opens space facilities from other public uses. This comprehensive plan amendment removes all existing parks and open space areas from the Public/Semi Public land use designation and places them in the Parks, Recreation and Open Space(PRO) land use designation. Since 1990, the City Commission has made a commitment to upgrade and expand all of the City's parks and recreation facilities and to improve the City's scenic quality. The City's Strategic Plan, prepared in 2000, enumerates one of its primary goals: `The City's unique assets are unparalleled and enjoyed by residents and visitors alike.' Included in those `unique assets' are Sanford's parks. The City has committed, and continues to commit, substantial funds to improve and beautify the City. Sanford is proud of its parks and wishes emphasize their importance in the community. One way of doing this is to make them easily recognizable in the Comprehensive Plan by giving parks their own designation. The new land use designation will contain 311.5 acres of park land. Those properties under the Table VI-1 heading of`Future Park Site' will remain in their existing land use designation until they are developed as parks. Those properties that are existing parks and open space, as shown in Table VI-1 will have the new land use designation,Parks, Recreation and Open Space. There is no impact to facilities from the new land use designation. Both designations are under the objective for Public/Semipublic uses. • 73 • • • SUPPORTING DOCUMENT: CITY OF SANFORD LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: SCHEDULE R,AIRPORTS AND AIRCRAFT • • • r • SCHEDULE R AIRPORTS AND AIRCRAFT SECTION 1.0 SHORT TITLE This Schedule shall be known and may be cited as "Schedule R,Airports and Aircraft." SECTION 2.0 DEFINITIONS For the purposes of this Schedule, the following terms shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section: Airport-means the Orlando Sanford International Airport, Sanford,Florida. Airport elevation - The highest point of an airport's usable landing area measured in feet above mean sea level. The established airport elevation of the Orlando Sanford International Airport, Sanford, Florida, is fifty-five feet(55')above mean sea level(AMSL). Airport hazard - Any structure or object of natural growth located on or in the vicinity of a public airport, or any use of land near such airport,which obstructs the airspace required for the flight of aircraft in landing or takeoff at such airport or is otherwise hazardous to such landing or takeoff of aircraft. Airport primary surface - A surface longitudinally centered on a runway. When the runway has a specially prepared hard surface,the primary surface extends two hundred(200)feet beyond each end of that runway. The width of the primary surface of a runway will be that width prescribed in Part 77 of the Federal Aviation Regulations(FAR) for the most precise approach existing or planned for either end of that runway. The elevation of any point on the primary surface is the same as the elevation of the nearest point on the runway center line. Airport zoning chart-Refers to a chart or map of the area affected by the airport zoning,which shows the layout of the runways,the airport boundaries and the airport elevation. The chart also sets forth the various zones with the applicable height limitations for each. The chart identifies topographic features such as major streams,rivers,railroads,roads and streets. Airspace height - For the purpose of determining the height limits in all zones set forth in this Schedule and shown on the zoning map,the datum shall be mean sea level elevation unless otherwise specified. Control zone - Airspace extending upward from the surface of the earth which may include one or more airports and is normally a circular area of five(5)statute miles in radius,with extensions where necessary to include instrument approach and departure paths. • 74 • • • Decision height-The height at which a decision must be made during a precision instrument approach, to either continue the approach or to execute a missed approach. Instrument runway - A runway having an existing instrument approach procedure or planned in the Orlando Sanford International Airport Master Plan, July 2002 and FAA approved amendments, utilizing air navigation facilities or area-type navigation equipment, for which an instrument approach procedure has been approved or planned. Minimum descent altitude- The lowest altitude, expressed in feet above mean sea level, to which descent is authorized on final approach or during circle-to-land maneuvering in execution of a standard instrument approach procedure,where no electronic glide slope is provided. Minimum en route altitude - The altitude in effect between radio fixes, which assures acceptable navigational signal coverage and meets obstruction clearance requirements between those fixes. Minimum obstruction clearance altitude - The specified altitude in effect between radio fixes on VHF omnidirectional radio range (VOR) airways, off-airway routes, or route segments which meets route segment and which assures acceptable navigational signal coverage only within twenty-two (22) miles of a VOR. • Runway-A defined area on an airport prepared for landing and takeoff of aircraft along its length. Visual runway - A runway intended solely for the operation of aircraft using visual approach procedures with no straight-in instrument approach procedure and no instrument designation indicated on an FAA- approved airport layout plan, a military service's approved military airport layout plan, or by any planning document submitted to the FAA by competent authority. SECTION 3.0 AIRPORT ZONING MAP In order to outline definitely the horizontal and vertical limits beyond which the projection of any structure or tree will constitute an airport hazard, the Airport Height Zoning Map of the Orlando Sanford International Airport , Sanford, Florida, attached hereto, is hereby incorporated into this article and made a part hereof. SECTION 4.0 AIRPORT HEIGHT ZONES AND LIMITATIONS 1. Horizontal surface: The land lying under a horizontal plane one hundred and fifty(150) feet above the established airport elevation, two hundred and five feet (205') AMSL at Sanford. The perimeter of the horizontal zone at Orlando Sanford International Airport is constructed by swinging arcs of ten thousand (10,000) feet radii from the center of each end of the primary surface of each end of runway and connecting the adjacent arcs by lines tangent to those arcs. • 75 • • No structure shall be permitted in the horizontal zone that would exceed one hundred and fifty(150) feet above the established airport elevation as depicted on the Airport Height Zoning Map of Sanford,Florida. 2. Conical zone: The land lying under a surface extending outward and upward from the periphery of the horizontal surface at a slope of twenty to one(20 to 1) for a horizontal distance of four thousand (4000) feet at Orlando Sanford International Airport . The conical surface extends upward to an elevation of four hundred five(405)AMSL. No structure shall be permitted in the conical zone that would penetrate the conical surface as depicted on the Airport Height Zoning Map of Sanford,Florida. 3. Approach zones: The land lying under a surface longitudinally centered on the extended runway centerline and extending outward and upward from each end of the primary surface. An approach surface is applied to each end of each runway based upon the type of approach available or planned for the runway end and is depicted on the Airport Height Zoning Map of Sanford,Florida. a. The inner edge of the approach surface is the same width as the primary surface of each runway,two hundred and fifty(250)feet wide for runways 9C and 27C;; and one thousand (1,000) feet wide for runways 9L, 9R, 27L, 27 R, 18 and 36 at Orlando Sanford International Airport. The outer edge of the approach surface is: i. • One thousand two hundred and fifty(1,250)feet for runways 9C and 27C. ii. Sixteen thousand(16,000)feet for runway 9L, 9R,27L,27R, 18 and 36. b. The approach zone extends for a horizontal distance of five thousand (5,000) feet for runways 9C, 27C,and fifty thousand(50,000)feet for runway 9R, 9L,27L,27R, 18 and 36. c. The slopes of the approach zones are as follows: i. Twenty to one (20 to 1) for runways 9C and 27C. ii. Fifty to one (50 to 1) for the first ten thousand(10,000) feet horizontal distance with an additional twelve thousand (12,000) feet horizontal distance at a slope of forty to one (40 to 1)until intersection with a plane five hundred(500) feet above the airport elevation for twenty-eight thousand (28,000) feet for runways 9L, 27R, 9R, 27L, 18 and 36 as depicted on the Airport Height Zoning Map of Sanford,Florida. d. No structure shall be permitted in the approach zone that would penetrate the approach slope that runway, as depicted on the Airport Height Zoning Map of Sanford, Florida. 4. Transitional zone: The land lying under surfaces extending outward and upward at right angles to the runway center line and the runway center line extended at a slope of seven to one (7 to 1) form • 76 • • • I the sides of the primary and approach surfaces. However, when the slope of seven to one (7 to 1) intersects a plane five hundred (500) feet above the established airport elevation, the transitional surface becomes a plane five hundred(500) feet above the established airport elevation as depicted on the Airport Height Zoning Map of Sanford,Florida. No structure shall be permitted that would penetrate the transitional surface as depicted on the Airport Height Zoning Map of Sanford,Florida. 5. Altitude: No structure shall be permitted in the City of Sanford that would raise an existing published minimum descent altitude or decision height for any instrument approach to any runway at the Orlando Sanford International Airport , nor shall any structure be permitted that would raise or increase the minimum obstruction clearance altitude or minimum en route altitude on any federal airway in the City of Sanford. SECTION 5.0 USE RESTRICTIONS Notwithstanding any other provision of this Schedule,no use may be made of land or water within the City of Sanford in such a manner as to interfere with the operation of an airborne aircraft. The following special requirements shall apply to each permitted use: • 1. All lights of illumination used in conjunction with streets, parking, signs or use of land and structures shall be arranged and operated in such a manner that it is not misleading or dangerous to aircraft operating from the Orlando Sanford International Airport or in the vicinity thereof. 2. No operation from any use shall project smoke, glare or other visual hazards within three(3) statute miles of any usable runway of the Orlando Sanford International Airport. 3. No operations from any use in the City of Sanford shall produce electronic interference with navigation signals or radio communication between the airport and aircraft. SECTION 6.0 NONCONFORMING USES The regulations prescribed in Sections 4.0 and 5.0 of this Schedule shall not be construed to require the removal, lowering or other change or alteration of any structure or tree not conforming to the regulations as of the effective date of this Schedule, or otherwise interfere with the continuance of any nonconforming use. Nothing herein contained shall require any change in the construction,alteration or intended use of any structure the construction or alteration of which was begun prior to the effective date of this Schedule. SECTION 7.0 LIGHTING • 77 • • Notwithstanding the provisions of this Schedule, the owner of any structure over two hundred (200) feet above ground level must install on that structure lighting in accordance with Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular 70/7460-1K and FAA amendments. Additionally, any structure exceeding nine hundred and forty-nine (949) feet above mean sea level shall install on that structure high- intensity white obstruction lights. The high-intensity white obstruction lights must be in accordance with the Federal Aviation Advisory Circular 70/7460-1K and FAA Amendments. SECTION 8.0 HEIGHT VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USES 1. General. Any person desiring to erect or increase the height of any structure, or use his property not in accordance with the regulations prescribed in this Schedule may apply to the City of Sanford Board of Adjustment or the Planning and Zoning Commission. A variance shall be required for single-family homes or duplexes. A conditional use shall be required for all other uses. No application for variance or conditional use to the requirements of this Schedule may be considered by the Board of Adjustment or the Planning and Zoning Commission unless a copy of the application has been provided the airport manager of Orlando Sanford International Airport for his review and advice as to aeronautical effects of the variance or conditional use. If the Orlando Sanford International Airport manager does not respond to the application for variance or conditional use within fifteen (15) days after receipt, the Board of Adjustments or Planning and Zoning Commission may act on its own to grant or deny said application for a variance or conditional use,respectively. 2. Criteria for granting a variance. No variance shall be approved solely on the basis that such proposed structure will not exceed federal obstruction standards as contained in 14 C.F.R. 77.21, 77.23, 77.25, 77.28 or 77.29,or any other federal aviation regulation. When determining whether to issue or deny a variance,the following shall be considered: a. The nature of the terrain and the height of existing structures; b. Public and private interests and investments; c. The character of flying operations and planned developments of the airport; d. Federal airways as designated by the Federal Aviation Administration; e. Whether the construction of the proposed structure would cause an increase in the minimum descent altitude or the decision height at the airport; f. Technological advances; h. Land use density or intensity; • 78 • . • • i. The safe and efficient use of navigable airspace; j. The cumulative effects on navigable airspace of all existing structures, proposed structures identified in the Sanford Comprehensive Plan and all other known proposed structures in the area. C. Documentation Required. Each person applying for a variance shall submit documentation showing compliance with the federal requirement for notification of proposed construction and a valid aeronautical evaluation. SECTION 9.0 PERMITS 1. Future Uses: No material change shall be made in the use of land, and no structure or tree shall be erected, altered, planted or otherwise established in any airport approach zone, horizontal zone, conical zone or transitional zone, unless a permit therefore shall have been applied for and granted by the City of Sanford Airport Zoning Commission. However, a permit for a tree or structure of less that seventy-five (75) feet of vertical height above the ground shall not be required in the horizontal or conical zone or in any approach or transition zone beyond a horizontal distance or five thousand (5,000) feet from each end of the runway, except when such tree or structure, because of • terrain, land contour or topographic features, would extend above the height limit prescribed for the respective zone. Each such application shall indicate the purpose for which the permit is desired, with sufficient particularity to permit it to be determined whether the resulting use, structure or tree would conform to the regulations herein prescribed. If such determination is in the affirmative, the permit applied for shall be granted. 2. Existing Uses: Before any existing use, structure or tree may be replaced, substantially altered or repaired, rebuilt, allowed to grow higher or replanted within any airport approach zone, horizontal zone, conical zone or transitional zone, a permit must be secured authorizing such replacement, change or repair from the City of Sanford Airport Zoning Commission. No such permit shall be granted that would allow the establishment or creation of an airport hazard or permit a nonconforming use, structure or tree to be made or become higher, or become a greater hazard to air navigation that it was on the effective date of this Schedule or than it is when the application for a permit for replacement, change or repair of existing use,structure or tree shall be granted. 3. Abandoned or Destroyed Nonconforming Use or Structure: Whenever the City of Sanford Airport Zoning Commission determines that a nonconforming use or nonconforming structure or tree has been abandoned for a period of six (6) months or is more than eighty (80) per cent torn down, destroyed, deteriorated or decayed, no permit shall be granted that would allow said structure or tree to exceed the applicable height limit or otherwise deviate from the zoning regulations. • 79 • • • SECTION 10.0 ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY The City of Sanford Airport Zoning Commission is hereby designated the administrative agency changed with the duty of administering and enforcing the regulations herein prescribed within their respective territorial limits. The Orlando Sanford International Airport Design Review Committee (DRC) sits as the City of Sanford Airport Zoning Commission. The duties of the administrative agency shall include that of hearing and deciding all permits under Section 9.0, Permits, but the administrative agency shall not have or exercise any of the powers or duties herein delegated to the Board of Adjustments or the Planning and Zoning Commission. SECTION 11.0 CONFLICTING REGULATIONS Where this Schedule imposes a greater or more stringent restriction upon the use of land than is imposed or required by any other ordinance or regulation,the provisions of this Schedule shall govern. • • 80 • • • EXHIBITS • • ...- (..„.., c • * )... ,-.. *:= .0 4 v i c... i."-- *Ei t I, . 1.11 4 t' •-• C t i ' s''tri, = Li °. _ ...s. c.. trl v• (.1 6 -'z f 3 i 1111.g. ! fill 8! ra c pt.: 1 '''' 2 - , - i ?.r Z SI: ja g .1 ), I7g. g '-: ••z .. Z • U.1 a - 1 , i - 3 tigcs • tfl- 1 ci 'a- ' ------.......\ 4 t E z stij.., irwlt -a g EET.- 3 ki . z 6 I!-.,-, 1.s A 6 .5, k- „-, .27 I 34 .9 ‘,..,) E. -J i "'t L;S-A l'-.1. \,\ + ti X", .1'..2.4!,"i‘ ` o 1 E = / 311 ■,,•-; 1-r4 .L. t ,,. 2 -g 0 = ".1.'-' .. ■ ''....Z:'t''-',A'. ''. 1 i-..."- *•,,,, , '''.'''''''5',1. .,20; 004,..:Nit,- ' 1 1..• ,, <,,t , -4 i 6. ."'E..f, „ i -,--. - f E ..-, :-... ,•,* - ' - , ' • ' , X; ..,. ... / ....:1'...„,..,35.,..;..,,,. ' .11 / ,ft u 1 , .-- • 1-111- .4, . p- : " iNaA4, - , •..s.,,,.• A ;, , 4 ,,,,,,,', f• ,v ..,-7 ,%t'":.':, E •._., t '-.. ,,' , , \,,,,,,,,,, k4, , g..., .,,,,,_.,„ 7 1 .•^,",.,,, ' ,',- k s31"-- . " ' ,4'''-',.., 33' -;...-414/ 4 44.4,,,,, .„. 44443; 4? ! '`'' 4 z ..,, •, ,„ .: • '',4 \..., %.............---' \ (c} ... , rd , ) r" 1 — \ •' \ - - \, ,, _ „ 1 gm N , ..••,..., : .__ 1 _ __. , • ,...... ... 4#.1'..,,/,',4. ; it .• ' : --\.,,..„......„... s., .. .,...‹,,,,.4.,;tc* \ ;... 1 -----• -,,,,\''' \ _ st, ' 4* `, • .i3 7/‘ ' _E . .. x ) .... ,- / _ R • • : 1 a \ Beeach Exhibit 2 • \ `. }. . t` / • ATLANTIC OCEAN e m "\ if 415,1 '' Q \ ,J u i i r+.' AUt. ,rain .. � � - . -� y LAKE COUNTY• .,,i VOLU BOUNTY` w I. • Orland. i f Sanford I Airport 1 z i` ,« 10 • 417 ♦. - c> a i o! • I.- ..--, .....„ SEMINOLE COUNTY •1.... ' / \ ORANGE COUNTY \ Kennedy Space '� I Center - Orlando ` • 7.„ • v._.._. [528] --I Orlando (' {' 1_. C International 1 Di. ey X Airport 0' orld lion ORANGE COUNTY C naveral �.. _.._.._„_:.OSCEOLA COUNTY �.._! --'7 Ia 1 Central Florida Area LEGEND /+\,/' County Boundary • City Boundaries NORTH 10 0 10MI Water .�� • Exhibit 3 • ` Vision 2020 AtillNilt Comprehen ive P A, Seminole Con Florida � . � ,��; � � � � � ; --� , Projected Roadway Level of Service 2020 i LAKE ONROE i, , LAKE 17'1i; � f. 1 ; / HARNE LAKE r oJESU• u r q qmm w. [ ■ 1 VY' 'dill i • ,i i. ■ 4 t L!' 1 1. N LEGEND A Projected Level of Service A 8 C D E F • TRANSPORTATION TRA Exhibit-19 trae(mex.dOC--Last saved:9/6/01 • Exhibit 4 • VIS101111020sCOMpre ens Pianl • .'sd" " Sem no e o n 0.rida _....vk. a.y,.Z. 'C c + sbk� e"�'. ...� - xA a .,,k.. ..`.�...�1. Needed Unfunded Transportation Improvements Segment From a g � . .�.x Improvement Interstate 4 Central Parkway SeminoleNolusia 6-2 HOV Lanes County Line Northeast Connector Greeneway(Seminole 4 Lanes Controlled 1-95 (Volusia County) County) Access Bus Capital and Operation Countywide Bus System Light Rail System Cap/Ops Central Parkway Volusia County New LTR Light Rail System Cap/Ops Orlando International Seminole County New LTR Airport Connection Commuter Rail Orange County Volusia County New CRT S.R. 426 Seminole/Orange Greeneway Widen to 6 Lanes County Line S.R.434 S.R.436 Montgomery Road Widen to 6 Lanes • S.R. 434 Montgomery Road C.R.427 Widen to 6 Lanes S.R.436 Interchange with Red New Interchange Bug Lake Road S.R.436 Interchange with New Interchange Howell Branch Road U.S. 17-92 Lake Mary Blvd Airport Blvd Widen to 6 Lanes Add Bike/Pedestrian U.S. 17-92 Interstate 4 French Avenue Facility Red Bug Lake Road S.R.436/Semoran Blvd Eagle Circle Widen to 6 Lanes Source: Melroplan Orlando • TRANSPORTATION ja TRA Exhibit-18 traeimex.doc-Last saved:9!6/01 W� &, \,., .. , s . r jogg ... Vuill: „ , ..... :::::::::::,::::::::::::. ',N .\ :::.:.:::::,:::::::::::: . .. . 4.....\. \ \ . \ \\ -1, ••• •............ ••• .... ................. •••• ............•••••• ..•..... ......................... *xi". .... ................... :::::::.::::H:::::::.:„. ,,,\,,,,,„„,::,,,,,\.:11\-\\ 1 N\l''„."' ,\„4',., 1 .............•......... . :::.::::::::,::::::::.:i:: .r:::::::::::::::::::::..-71,4 \\ x-sv is::•i•iii:•:i \ \\' .........% ar �t�atati?te. �aati ' \ \,`�" ‘Se* .1'�`� Nk .: ''''''..''''' .\\:\\\:.,,,..•:11:1:1,::',a:ia,121.:-•,-0:.-,4*01,41.7-- Nirq;.'''k§ .‘-‘, ' - \ ter::::::: \ \ \ ..... 1 ,..- :121I.N,.. \\•\\N\ . 1 ;4„,,\N,,'. •..„„. -„,,,c,,,\,, •••, :::::,:.:.::.:.:•,...• .. -.. , -,<.\\:\.N.-N.,:\ lk \ i NN ...................-....:, •:•:•:•::::::::::::::::.: -. -.... ...... ,,,,,,\ :.::::::::-:.x.:.:-..... .. ... ..... 7...:41\ \\N\ ,i.s.,ii . N \ la :::: -.: .::::::::::::::::.:::..... .... . .. i.. ........... -......... \\..\\\, ,I, I, \ Nil. ■-•%.: N\\\\ ,ss,s,ss\t\ ��, .. -:� '� �\\\ is ty .... : .:.:.: :.: .......:........:. .. .. :i.i;i:iii:;::::::::.::::•.\ . \ N,.■ N N,..,,,,\.\\N\NZ7 \11111111 WI c.) cD N\\\\\\.-1/4 11.1 ::::::::::::::::::,:iii.i:i:i:-.....k<N\J‘x..... . X \,.,,,,,,... . , ‘,..,,,,.\\,,,f,,,,,,,, \ iii —....... ‘ . -\\\%,„\-c.. .., :.:::::::::::::::::::.";i::•,.::...-N\1\.,... 1\ ::::.:::: ::P::::iii•..,:v.4::,,tatk\LA,..4\ xx‘ . . . x\\:: \1/4 ‘,1/4.\\%",,N;, M CL .::::::::::m...,.\---,\-3, z.,.k , \,; . :::::::::::::::::::„.:::..1,-,,,,„4, \\,_., ,,..„, , , -4, „.„..... ....,.\\,,,„, \ :.....::::::..::•.::..::•.:,.„::::„.::.:::..:..... .,,,,,,, ,...,,, ,.,,,,,1/4. , \ _ ,... :::::::::::::::.:.,:::::::... ,,,,,,„ • ..: w CD ri . . ': :: . .:::*:::':14.... ... ......................• .. ... . o. .... . . .. . . : Z. .. ;:...:>:.:-ii: ,i... te • [ ! 1 1 A ;� k:�,...' 'r* r '0 0 • ,T m 0 4 of $ i . p kl/ Fi es p'j po t„*.etitioilz—.�. CA U� /�}� ...y".,4�.5 3.:h.nl..yi,ji. 'a L j:.'YaS"•y,, t .„`y,s.1' 13� /Z� _ _ — - — y--, ; m 1 z , a. . . ,r a co r f s,....,,,, . ..„.....- , I'll"'- '''''' —I • po o — 1 .: I- 4 CL. r , -. , 3 0 „,• , r• � } r r! j 9 C Z` i m a 3 W m 1 N '"ym f,°'pi fir ' ` I r m ca a I k to a ' s , , � omA ro-- 0. _ z M T a o-- , t, ds- r f ,f' r y 3 '' :!..41:14.0,....,..„,-- >a fR- �w- ; Y ;,� l 6117 , ; . _ ` ' � -#4.4.:-,, 1. 1 �i. T .4, , °�i m Z ` x tip l , O J.': i ::: --.);r 1 ,: yin -5 i„ Jr'1 �* '?"' N RUNWAY 18.36 I t- if: "..«'�1 , 0-'-. '1'. ' ' : 1171' '' N ''il '''.4: 1 , t"i r \ r� *(C , . . �'. - c`y� I lir CC 7T7 h �L. F v ��, ,r.,.....:44 mow A i I tg +' :, :w 1. I. 7 . gp; .,,,...,, , , 1 I• L— s. r At. VI { 0 ;,..lr,-4' ,;,' \ e, t- I ! � , x s :I) I 1 .,,,,,...'- 1 r,-1 .. L, aI : I )4111 11 1 .. Z $�,,,,: I I I� 1 m p _ 1 j •1 I 1 0 . 0• 0 rD m � ; ,,:, , 1 1 I 1 m ? z ! o < m to 1 I r� ` . /i 73— �,; f � ,•,--41 m -•I D C d �,1 1 ` r- 1 a O r -I ;T ..m<f 1 t s _ �1 , , .«m ,` e i� y. I . .% '%,.,., , ,.4\zyt 3 9 Ir,,,. fie 1d'R : g, / r ` V wy s,y ! � rn Yy ,, Z C Z J SQ 3 • �A 1 , ' 1 m 0 i „. ? k i ' < , Sz ^W44' `) A pTf{ ,! ,,t* ` K'' �' yi f w , . ''''-',0 ' '", s' . +ialit'^q.;,74'..51.114$7,'' •1°> 1 r. . Xx 'Cat c ..,v. /' .:.,t• i •±re i 4 0.,.�` �- �'41t:', d}t "'i.'t I a ,f,, -1...^, ^� 'y • w Al Z Z — v O Z r •t ,1 I / (572 1 I , t , , .. '4-- ---- 1 , , • t , , , '-" Iii , 0 '...._----., b , L9t--. ii,„‘• . .a, -' .-..., J .1":1-k...., 73'2'\),-, v.--"' :_i / . 1. /0 -,:' ) ' ..,..., /__ 11 czi : :° .L-). . •-,------10;: _L.-.. i .1 i 9 9 i 6 pl ) \ -.‘1 ) '1 ' ni, (-) , \ . ... .DC:, , ■..., i - I\ • ,-n-.,,•- ,Y, . 1.1 7'1,.) 1 1: "---- re.'', “t-,.. 'i I 1 1 t i' 11 ,,,t 5 8 1 '• Y • l' 111 - ' — ': :• )_.• 41 .., ico, g „------,---)7-,7- - -t-- -, 2-; ,..--- • ° 1 :1-- •• :.) 1-____Ili • 111•1' '' .71 § 1 '. q , a , ,:y..___ ..: i 1 , :- , (,. (1 4-6 : -4 - --- ---- ---1 ,..../' t, 1 __,..i, ;ivy' ...,,,.. 1 _ :„,_ . 4.-.--• --', i----__-,;::--,--(---,1,--, i -.i'l ' :ii:,,_,' :, s - —°"--1 /,,,- : i , i A C A ' 'r ‘ E I . .. 5 • , •,, 1, ,,t.15 ,,i 4,,--I , ip..,,,) ,L.-i •is •,- ) 1 1, cle -P-- ,---•''' 7 -'-,--4- 1 i ; : - 0% - - .s . 1 iv-^- t i , • -T 1 1 i ' -1,- ,-=- f---sq- , ,., -, _ , : .„ 00;?.... .,,, , ..--1 , 1,,,,,,s‘ i ,, c.) j, 0- 0 ' 2 § „ ; Iiiiillg .E •cl• 41 11 I L--....1--1,'.," ----r „ --n , ,,,,,., ,, ,,: , , , ,\ D 1 1-tgl ! ifiz5 I. , ,;'•,; '''--- ,i, I A.:4(.1,1\\., I qiliksk, IA I,' i! , - ;,„ , 8 , - I I, -•-•-• , ,...., , ; ; ;,,„ ;f,,, 2 • ... g ;kkAN ' . ‘0....."..2. 11 , ■ 11 -411,:r>/' ,,I;M:•• • .*'' ' i i '':'',''. ' L •9"' ' - ‘'' I '' k 2 L' t. ' i litl$ ''i 0081 • I ,k;\ .. .s: € s• •,"—N,""--„it ..., , §,, , t. 3. ,., ",',,,,, Ilcd 1 i I •1•,,'•• , Ifi 0•',;,V;,C ig; : • ; '‘:; 1, - ; • 1,0,k\lp , 4 1 sit us •1 i.t, ,Jg , :,;,,,,4,;;;:,,,,,1 . 1.-,,, _ 1 ,,;--:,--- • I ' ' 'g--.,,t-- , iglif , 13 „ --to <: i „, „ , ',:: 491; ' : WI,: \ . ..-____ i ?..3 I I 0 •7 :,11,,, 1 Es • - 9 g 1 r"-‘) 1),))_1 „,, 1 I Ifk, ,if tl, .i., ,N: ..g a _f_. .: ----..• . ' ; , i -'-• - '-: '° .-- --°';',":,•": = •. • „ 11-',g 1 , t-41V..r: .\ ,, . 'Iv v„,”,• i d , I / '' ‘3 I r qi ■(,, •'''• Lli ''',' a. a iti ,N,ki•",ijil " --•--,e• • ,• 1-,„-• '••.,;.:,,,,;:: g 1 , s ,, )- ,, ., •N 1 eN • 1 I I: -) -1 - ',1 ''''' ' ,,:: :;:„. T,- , .. / , --■. ,, „-.4.. '4,,,,••• •,,i,;.,,,,7.1 i--- - I . g 1 Ii , .f..kf;71,.,.:::: ;;,,i' 1 1 : / ' !, :. i.c4, 4. ,A " 131 trk3.. 1::*, i I i - 1 i 3 o R-) t 1 P I 4 1' ::0‘.., I 4 : ,•,' 1 -0 L i lb, " 2'• i 3, g g ii -. o (.-. 41-'.;'--:,"-11- '1"14.1.4;1; ;--it l'.: 1 II :',,;: lal , I: • It 1_1 •,?' . it::‘,:;‘,411 judi -- 7 . . . ,_,... _ 4- ;it 1 ' u , ■ - , .• . 'L: „.“j+L',-1 f . n , 3.... . -..,,••• - E + ,,‘ i ,, • . ,• , .., ,. „.„,,,..,1. .__ , . ) (4. II \ ...,,, ;II -- -,... - , ...,-iii,...„,_--- L,.. 1 , , ° I it- fl . .1.. .. , , D., 1 ,y 1 i ![.ri, , , ::, 1 0 I (a) --.. :.A.,-,--i. .1 ,.! i .4...s....i, ,,,0 ,,....1..i. L_ I. I .w4_,_4:---, 1- , . ---.....„ 1 ' 1:„ 1 „.: 1 1 1 ,: /, it i ,'1-.4.1-1-1-1- 14'±'; I I .11 N '')--' ' •'. - ' -•'-,''','- r -a-T,-1 I 1 \ - r .1 , i C. ' I ' .. .. .1,1f, , ..,,,,ti r ‘ Fqx.._ I/. 1 •-..., .t.,,,, : I -i" 11.-.-4, ' I . inPc,' .• - f l'- :, II ,•.%. I ii 9--7---c77 , , . z --1--c I ,:IN;Ni, I i +_, 1 i =-1 t :..s.ci . , i: t it 1----7 1-i-k•f,),g , a ...-k__ A '''°-. i 1 1, , \-;.• ,: 1 ; :; 11;1 , • 0 A i 1 .5! 'oil •r,,,,,‘Flr-F-11- ,, t .1 --,41 .--„ I .•;-;›, - 1 \IN ,i ' . ----- -- I , .. , :I it A r)n3: II: ; . 1, id ;„ „ - , /',:a„, :,,, , gg 1 ,. ' N • 'P ,, I', ti ' 4 •''' - 1- .- ' • 'Iml•-- ± - 11 . 1 , ---- 1-- D 0 : .c1 ' ''' --- -71.2-ii- 1-,77- --CIT -; I i ‘----::7-----°.13,;..?..°1,W,I - -F-11-''' i 5 :---1 '------ ' 11 ' i' --' •,.1;1 til•t I r.:i i Ifli ---tr../(la. ,•- :-... t_ :---• r, • J :T.--/ I,I I;I;ki ,,./.4, '•-..- I i:; ' """•-_„14 „,,..,-,er.,...6 I., o I 1*i*,:.'L•.'Aal :poi-,1 --,rii„ ;. ki , . 1. i ill 1\:Ili. 05,4111*41 i ; 1 il 1--. 1:''Al'•% 4- a, `--4 ,.'' irripi 'it.--Flo,.1 , 1 . ,,, .• ,,'' . ,--A' i -It. : 100A41-I 41 1. 1 i i i '.;ac ... frf Efr.J-k, -: ": q g V <CH CL 1 :'(' ''l Irexo Dviii IT 1! II t i "1- .,r'-•-4 --1"; .' . .,‘ if . ii 44 1 F, 2 it 0 i s .2/t.,,.' 11 h./440,,,,, ii i,l, Li,.1 I r::, /iiii q / ',$0 ! :II,,,, I I ,,,1 t,,, ,11,411.7,11 .. : '' ,:1-,, ix .'t• a_ L'' ON cC It „ "‘,:1, iv(1 „' , .10Vdp.:,.-,,.g;1 1 ., ' Ai; 1;,.' . ; ' ',.0- ,, ,t 1 01 II 11*i 0 , igl 1 ''4 'I 1 ' ° 11----:-. ..- . ---.-i- ../11' ''' .• ', (.--J LJ 1.-1 lej" ES)tej I'll Al ' : M!,71 t 1-20 1111 < '7, i j 4 L-1\31 5''":% 0 r 1 "..4.--C '`--=----V ''- ,,,,,,L4,1111----1;4k:ii ° t, : \ 'Ittlri:1 -1 : 1-- 11° l 4 11c\-4,-. i —0 Wig ' , - elt 6 1,qt-14..2-1.' 1 ' .. (1 `, 4 • /,'Y'lt,% ,),',)'7, .. •''''''4. :--,la-,j-,),5' 2__s__ ___----,.;,•-:-,---•-•'-n_ri :=.,`r....i- \„, ,, I, ,---7-r")7:';::i i- , :.0 to.4 /f,(Aot.e7.1 , ._ . 1 1 t,s,, I 1 - ,_,:.----, - ,-<./9 05,--,4 7 : ) ‘‘. • ' Isj ,,,) ••, - . ' -- 3 • I- •• . / . i(/ * / t I; t'''1, ---, - i '-, I ...,: -., ri 51 il ,I•1 = - ' 3 . ti\k:2); :`, 1, . k: .\\\ 1 ‘,• OH :,,., ,f5w I., ,o,' in..:-ii--0,--•• ... 3 : ,,,, 1 1 i ,if -' Ifs '1' ' I, 14- •Ie• szwP I I I! ..:-. :J,t °d., WI Z0,44-W IA ", 'I! I _i,0; 1:- _41...ie .1 ‘.7 Ili ix;114.- II . ,, 11-.- 1,:•••,. ig ;:o?.,4 :; 1 \. , I - %1 "5. /iltr' J., --:!, I il'.-,:f. u,,,, .4_,_ '4" ' 0 ,- : ,'-': , ,,,, .. 's '\ - _,. 1 1 iii g 8f-, :, 'W 51 , ,-gh 0,41... 04 , f) _44-..i: _., ,, lt . ri; g „„,,,'1. ;:, , cil 1 i 1 ' ' '' °, ' - `,... ' ,.---. e....-- 7, -..4-,:, I 'semi ,, •‘---_,.,(±114,:ak Mr! :. ... _ - _1! -4.• i_ ki.: I i 1 i. ' -i: i t .. \ '---.9 .=,i 0 H cr In -, - I: 1 c- ,„,,-. i ,i..f../ , ti-,, . ' !lg.','J '1;.'iq. t'''@ !„.s - ''' " ,:,:,,,,. 0 '• 1 i hiis.' ,,:._-'• ., 1--ri:i,1 i'.°"1.-------=(,...,-.0 - II°.-) -\\\_\-4-'' ,--r"4,1- , 0 0 I-- _:... 11 --••----',1--.- '. tL):0; ' ' \ iv '''' it, iiII-k°; ;;.-'we 11. ----,.■_,: -1;p". I ' , ; k I ir v 1--\ ' 11,:i -4-0, .,,,..-... -- :-.1:- CC ri < r , - - _, • 1 \ t i,,,, in !,d I.'4 ... --."7 ;FF:.f::43 , 3 III : I: i ILI ° 1 1•• _'t:_:, :,__ . _3'°_. -, ,, 0-..¢ . o cK a - a_ 1..1_ < D r 3C--,!-• ---7-‘11- .7,,;,,./) !,-.7,- 't-,-,,):•.-•'3‘,' Ig I '111' -_-----"Ly..--_,E, -- .-'-------Tte:',s,„ 11:* _- Et_m no. . LI w_izt.&ili.v...4.-_---L;_---PLI____,,_ :-,‘•-!-`-:.-1.• c,...4',". ''' :\-\\p'•° . _ z ----- ......r.o.- w.1,-.A.'',W ','HI,;,:::"-•,t,-- ",-,,,Irioll. '.., ----- -- ,7'-- - ''---- ''',,j,t I --• - - ...• I t.‘„64-'-•••;----,;•-••• r•...It:---• `,'-t.tpt, ... -, -i.-2 -,:r -, z , .e...-..9„,, ,Eis,•:'„,,„.?„..„„,,,,,,,,,„,,,,,,„,„....._- -4,....__ • - „ . LUMF--,- 3. ''''3111-1111111 ge.,_,.'2,.:::. ..7s.".-: ,*••-;, ,,,,•$‘:,,i1,i'4..; , ,i'') < cn < z Fr - "flu.3.00rcopoo_rol,Eoo.s.sest',..... . 1.16,,,,..., • .. ..J., , " '',::,..:',W,„,,,,T,,,;..,„;;.4 wr a 7^_.,,,, ..,.---- ,___-. - ___;mifel...., ._,A3-__.,..1•-..-.-11 ,....,__,- -_-____ .. .-1._,,,zs-1,-,==.421F ; „ i----,, 2 o E' , 1-7- eL ra' . 1 Paci.l. .-..,.-1‘71 toF r. istmil, '.' ' .:,,,,,1 • •, n„ y 1 ',......7rt- ...7-,;,..-.7- .., „,., i , , ;1.t _ .... I ''",■-- o _1 - i- - -- --- • t....: . g e+,-,-, - r ___ -- -- --,adorni----115.,:...,..e.'"•,----1—I .-. , -,,,,9--4,----17 ' _7_-1--2---_-... " . . ,IC',z--2, ; go,„0,•.---, ,- , -7,-,--: . a_ ''--■ - I: - 'V', 14--J-)- 11, P- , --g- : .'i f-------,:.-.- 2,-.- ,.' 2 : !,-,i _ ,,,,t.A..).--, -• ,-I, '.-'---• --40.0.-....) .7 r -- -i-r ,Lri, .1.ci i I!" , , l' .fit 41 ,', . ;---17L-'j-'°',;,,1 I ii , N'oil'i46•_'E',,';,.''''Z 7,_ iii, ILA \ 1 , ,,,,,;t7. - ,\,7g7,. ,• ,,, 1. -,\4 1 )z"'`',)• - •, ,,, !--ssom i , , „ . , " „. 4/5}-)•,,,, el',. .., - i ...4.,,-- t , '- -......-1.7 - 41..,._, . f I 'hi.I.;09,-,00 _ ‘ Ii " 1111 1,1 OR 7.,) ,, : '7' 1 ' ,---- -'- PI ! .- - i 1 . , Ifi ;77---1411::' El•II !Ili'44-'1' I I : r z ''''''' t-•'' ' ;',#irl -4 ‘. fii , \--,..-, tz.,.. I I.-' ' __I )1 I h 1 '' ;•■■•)° ' LI\I f/ (- k 1 AVIP-1 I 111 !I ,,- -..- „-''' ,-, ] i /I, t , , 1.,), 1 f l 0 V11 t -1' 1--Ti- :. . • ir (—i anti 11 .., i •9• ' - ' •" d g I: 1 • — II':1° gIV 1: '‘. .4 1,.j.,/ 0, . -' I /' - '';',1, -- 1. 4,11 7.: II 1\ -r. 0'..'" •=1 , 1 '. I! • \ I - Jillij Ir 1, k - ill .. g { t '' F7,1 ;•713-77- 'k I. : —, -- ' L,,'1' ,,,,„ I t , .1- ------,. _-113 1 ,•-• ': , ,.-, 1,-, ,1 ' li 1. i 191:1 w g' °'s -:- ' I : . ■1 1, i ',....r il • • 3 ' ' I I ; 1 . .15 : L. Lle , , ,. -,..: ... , _... , \,..., . . ‘ i AL, ) ,N -11- .1,4-- , ! 1--1 > '.' &! 1 = 1 :,- ',.2' /2 'ti- :. .1 ,-'-, i 0 cl„ . / • ,i II '.,----' „it 1 • •_. i --'--L‘';•- _....it ,—.-1.--.*.%1 6-' --- \;, \ Kloidaii. I. I \ '01 : ; l'I' 1, ■ 1-',. lid ' I I • i i• %WM Ce ■ 1 1 I ,. ' '' I_ C R , , .11- i - , I ' '.." f A, Eli ' ' ' ' li I 1 i I ,r---‘1''1 , 1---- -Mr741 17;) ( ; An \ ! '•-s 111 ' '' ._ 1' 2 Co —1 • 4:' v' II:, - I 1, ' . ' I ° -,::- •H „,..., ,-•_, ii: '' V) < r t r' r4r/4 1 f/r i rr -1-4 ' 'r r -. ...; '-i / A. • • ',, , i ; . 1 ..,,,,,.. Z -.111. : i!, 33-0tirV '-'r-, ,---n, 1(- 1 I 1 44 '''' 'ii,, ■ ■ 111 ; , 1 ,44 •r; i ' i ,44'' j----'--.- ' ; ,, it I. 1 I 1." - it 4 1 ,'-: t-V/i;i2fi' ',#' I,: ‘,„! 0 ',,, ,,, 1 i• , 1- i ° n ! 0 / , I '' i , !1! qi! idIP gl 111g; i g i d ' `--.. ', .7-3,0r. I',. ' /04,/,' /•-' el --• ,-.-.,1/4 - _4* , , ' ' 1,W1 Ogig i W ; q°I 2 'J 5 51 1 1 1 L.Li ••-Y0-61,:- 6.. - Win___, • 1 i ' & 'F°' • 4,04:,- 3,, i :1 , ; , 49n,p I : '-., 101‘ I,CI 4, • )4%,C- X- "1 I fit _J ‘ g• 9 l'hihilillinligffilliiiii b ,,ti •, • ,.,,, wrl,„: i , ,_ _.•.______ _,Ir..• / ,,, 1 ',1.- - . 9 )••• 7 •; ,-, '--,,,,- 1 ' v.= 1/WC, E ir S p %.„--i--.„,, k ,I . i r■ ,'"-, I ,- ... ii L--9 2 Ilitt Flat,n, 11::' ::I, a.„-_,. nom' I --' Y. i • - ---- --- - ;, ---al ' geitlikiikig, , !I ," - I -... Li 1 tu : . ,I ,./.:. —er ., e,el 1 " t .'' \V: 1 ... I 11( . ..1:: 1"..*057drfr .- 0 I e„......,.. 0.e. ii i , ‘ rii-F 0 I( 11111 Illin( I I -i c ' 1 . -. . : ; , ,,,ii.a ._h. ... 1 :, is•?.-3, 1,re,o 41-110., ,_, . 11-1' u i C'',-4I '1 1. 1 1 :1111 I IIIL--P •t 1 1,I C 7— ::' 3,3, 3•4,7 ,e, , _ te----0 i, .':-\L' :°41'.1-1 : , . •.:KO., ,11 dr- ,,,,,,, )„,. -r,,, I • 'lb ■ 0 4' ' ').:•■ .0 '3 " 5‘. 1", : • 0 , ■ 1 , r t - E, 7 '6 6 ' i ,j C.6 e ji -1% 7.4-- ' .. .--4''--- .:. ,■...,, ---- ---:'- .14.2-- ,-,.= --,) If ''. --1 --040 '2, "t°' -T1 P 1 1 °T IT v-4 , I . , ...,,,.. .. -, ...._ .1 , 4 „ i il N ._ 1 1 oa.,( ; , izi , ,mi -,,,gir,r!, • 0.. ,, 8 E -11 111 F. §§ !.! 1,___u3g. __ ..---:. ' Ili ',,,, it igg - -- - L z .. a 11/(fI. '' -1," 1 V(,:r-'''' : '' -",', ' .1 -- •0 ' 1 __ _,,,,,..01•- d-•-i'''-er,', 1,0 1 o 1 ; & , N .... , ; . ,,,,, , i E '10--till;'' :'"=": Ir.___ __:ri. .-'—_..—.-- —..—.....:;,, •: A 2 , .. A/ ! i If tl ,t4§ F,§ RR ' ' 11 ■ 11 ' • 1:2'-P‘ '271, '-' •' Lt' ' ■.' '1- 'a '4,-- ' 'IF- --------. , - - • ,, • 4,11, g•.0; ,7-.0 0• - t., • P ig5, •••,, ,, - I F. ■ ,\2 , o k„,,,s* • 1)414 Iii, II -•.• 4 > , .5 1 i -1 I'''4V ilti I 1 : 1' , :11 , § .L5 ill ! ss ,• 1. r•A li 1 , 1 ■ . 1 , , ' i! IV /1 ,, ,, v,,,„, 12. .p:I ':-9 4.-b,c-6., i, ..: -°•,•-plig-....%prz).t, ' .A6 .“•(). ; .'"F= " :14..".-"Ir.-NS'.-. ..■Ili '.NN E'L)6,.';‘, t I l'i I I' . , , , , , , . .g vI !h Hi 1 t t I I 1 12 i 1 . - - - ' , 1 , , , , I , , 1 , : , . , ' . • ..,. ' 111 • S