Loading...
08.21.03W- - --- L � r.. ?C �.1; .5TH' •�j7 rS�'��''S7'�ti City of Sanford PLANNING &ZONING COMMISSION Thursday - August 21, 2003 City Commission Chambers, V Floor, Sanford City Hall 300 North Park Avenue, Sanford, Florida Regular Meeting Agenda - 7:00 PAS Approval of Minutes Public Hearings August 7, 2003 Regular Meeting Minutes PH -1 Hold a Public Hearing to consider a Conditional Use request to establish outdoor Storage and an Above Ground Fuel Tank in a RI -1, Restricted Industrial zoning district for the Crane institute located at 3880 St Johns Parkway. Tax Parcel Numbers: 28- 19 -30- 5NR -0000 -0100 and 28- 19 -30- 5NR - 0000-0110 Property owner: Crane Institute of America Publishing and Products Inc Representative: Jim Headley, Director - Crane Institute of America Development Plans DP -1 Consider the revised Preliminary Subdivision Plan for Magnolia Club, a proposed 105 unit fee simple townhome community located at 595 Andrews Road. Tax Parcel Numbers: 18- 20 -31- 300- 006A1006E1006D10060 -0000 Property owners Kenneth & Rebecca Burke, Deboarah Neukam, Kenneth Burke, Mary Mixon & Patricia Vassallo et al Representative: Berry J. Walker DP -2 Consider the Site Plan for the proposed Marina Riverwalk Trailhead Centre, a proposed 2,490 square foot retail facility with a drive thru and public restrooms for the Riverwalk at 330 E. Seminole Boulevard. Tax Parcel Number: 25 -19 -30 -515- 0000-0010 Property owner: City of Sanford Representative: Bob Horian - Suncor Properties, Inc. DP -3 Consider the Preliminary Subdivision Plan for the proposed Airport Boulevard Townhomes - Suncor, a proposed 328 unit townhome community at 100 Americana Boulevard. Tax Parcel Numbers: 12- 20 -30- 300- 012C1012M1012N1012TI012U -0000 Property owners: MOD Properties, LTD; Osceola Inv. Co. Inc., Trustee; and Legacy Inv. LLC Representative: Bob Horian - Suncor Properties, Inc. Staff Reports Citizen Participation Commissioners Reports Adjournment ADVICE To THE PUBLIC. If a person decides to appeal a decision made with respect to any matter considered at the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of the proceedings including the testimony and evidence, which record is not provided by the City of Sanford (FS 286.0105) Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the Human Resources office ADA Coordinator at 407-330-5626,48 hours in advance of the meeting. Page 1 of 1 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 21, 2003 7:00 P.M. CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS CITY HALL, SANFORD, FLORIDA MEMBERS PRESENT: Ross Robert Brian Volk Mike Skat Gary Lowell Bobby VonHerbulis Carol Dennison Richard Huber Eddie Green MEMBERS ABSENT: Andy Kutz, excused Rami Yosef an, excused Otto Garrett, excused OTHERS PRESENT: Russ Gibson, Director of Planning and Community Development Nick B alevich, Planner Mary Muse, Recording Secretary Mr. Robert called the meeting to order at 7:02 P.M. I►► I lot ill M OU Mr. Skat moved to approve the Minutes of the August 7, 2003 Regular Meeting. Mr. VonHerbulis seconded. All in favor. Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARINGS. Hold a Public Hearing to consider a Conditional Use request to establish outdoor Storage and an Above Ground Fuel Tank in a RI -1, Restricted Industrial zoning district for the Crane Institute located at 3880 St Johns Parkway. Representative Edward Carreras was present. He stated that Crane Institute is requesting to have outdoor storage on Lot 10 to park cranes outside. During the evening hours, they park the cranes outside by the building within a 6 ft green vinyl fenced -in area to prevent them from being vandalized. On Lot 11 they are requesting to have an above ground diesel fuel tank, which meets all of the codes. The code requires the tank to be a minimum of 200 feet away from any structure. The delivery truck fills the cranes first and a moderate amount is placed in the storage tank. Mr. Gibson stated that the proposed improvements have been installed and a warning notice was issued by the Fire Department for the installation of the fence and tank before obtaining permits and double PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES — MEETING OF AUGUST 21, 2003 PAGE 2 permit fees will be required. Lot 11 has been approved for outdoor storage with the requirement of site plan approval and additional landscaping, which has not been completed. Mr. Gibson also stated that he would like to amend staff s recommendation to include that the height of the cranes being stored in the compound area shall not be greater than the height of the building. Mr. VonHerbulis asked about the proposed storage shed on Lot 11, which appears to be on Lot 10 behind the dumpster area. Mr. Gibson stated that the shed is actually an existing canopy carport located behind the dumpster area and he is not sure if a permit was issued. Mr. Carreras stated that the canopy carport is used for a break area and a waiting area for those waiting their turn to train on the cranes. Mr. VonHerbulis stated that he is concerned about the cranes being visible from St Johns Parkway that the area needs to be screened. Mr. Lowell stated that he remembers a car business on 46 not being allowed outside storage within a fence area that was visible from the street. Those present to speak: James Oakley, business owner of 3905 St Johns Parkway, was present. He stated that they have spent a lot of money on the exterior of their building so it would be appealing and he is opposed to the outside storage of heavy equipment. He has prospective tenants coming to look at the property and does not want them to be standing in the parking lot looking at the heavy equipment. Another concern is that Sub Zero was not allowed to park or store equipment or vehicles in the driveway and they had to obtain additional property for their parking needs. He also stated that he is not in favor of an outdoor storage tank because of spillage possibilities. The Crane Institute should have obtained approval before they did anything to the property. Tom Ball, contiguous property owner, was present. He stated that he is opposed to where they are parking the equipment that they have plenty of property behind the building and there it would not be a negative impact. They also need to fence the property and buffer it with landscaping or with an opaque screen. Where the fuel tank is currently located, it appears that it is not 200 feet from the adjacent property and what about the adjacent owner when they build on their lot and the tank is not 240 feet away. A safety concern he has is that if a larger crane was brought in and was being operated close to the property and it was to fall over it would cause damage to the ad j scent property. He also stated that the landscape has not been installed for Lot 11. Mr. Cameras stated that they will compensate for anything they have done wrong and understands the aesthetic of the storage, but the concern is the safety of the equipment. They will apply for some type of a corral on Lot 11 for the equipment. Mr. Lowell asked if they were to put a corral on Lot 11, would they have to bring the lot up to code in order to use it. Mr. Gibson stated that in accordance with the original approval they would have to bring it to code and a site plan will need to be submitted and approved before they could use it. No temporary storage is allowed on Lot 11 until all improvements have been completed and approved. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES — MEETING OF AUGUST 21, 2003 PAGE 3 Mr. VonHerbulis moved to approve the Above Ground Fuel Tank on Lot 11 to be located in accordance with the Fire Department's approval and all of the appropriate containment, protection with bollards, and distance requirements. Also, he asked Staff to get with the development of Lot 12 so the tank will only have to be installed once. Mr. Skat seconded. All in favor. Motion carried. Mr. VonHerbulis moved to deny Lot 10 request for the outdoor storage and fencing on the east side of the building. Mr. Skat seconded. During discussion, Mr. Gibson stated that a Certificate o f Occupancy is issued only on a structure. A Certificate of Completion was issued on Lot 11 for stabilization, which was permitted. Lot 11 had a site plan that was approved by Staff per the conditional use approval. Mr. Ball suggested giving them approval to use the storage area on a short -term basis until Lot 11 is fenced. Mr. VonHerbulis stated that his concern is that the work was done first without approval or permits, but does not have a problem limiting it to a 90 -day period to remove fence and storage. Mr. VonHerbulis amended his motion to deny the outdoor storage request but grant 90 days to allow time to remove the outdoor storage and fencing with the stipulation that the cranes are not allowed to be in the storage area during business hours, Monday through Friday. Mr. Skat seconded amended motion. All in favor. Amended motion carried. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. Consider the Revised Preliminary Subdivision Plan for Magnolia Club, a proposed 105 -unit fee simple townhome community located at 595 Andrews Road. Representative Berry Walker was present. He stated that they started with 114 units, but has cut it down to 105 units. After meeting with St John's Water Management, they have come up with a different design to stay out of the wetland area. The new design will be a three -unit building, which looks more like an estate home instead of an apartment style home. Mr. Skat stated that he appreciated Mr. Walker's effort that has been put into this project. Mr. Gibson stated that the County is aware of Mr. Walker's project and they are currently constructing the missing segment from Lake Mary Blvd. into Magnolia Park, which serves as the entrance to Magnolia Club and they are aware of the total volume of traffic in this area but have determined traffic signalization is not needed at this time. Mr. Skat moved to approve per Staff s recommendation. Mr. Lowell seconded. All in favor. Motion carried. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES — MEETING OF AUGUST 21, 2003 PAGE 4 Consider the Site Plan for the proposed Marina Riverwalk Trailhead Centre, a proposed 2,490 square foot retail facility with a drive thru and public restrooms for the Riverwalk at 330 E. Seminole Boulevard, Representative Bob Horian was present. Mr. Horian stated that when he became involved in the Riverwalk project, he found there was not a restroom facility along the 1.2 -mile trail. He is proposing a building that will contain two vendors and the bathroom facility. The larger of the two vendors would be a coffee oriented establishment and the smaller of the two would be a dessert/yogurt establishment. Both establishments would have walk -up and drive thru service. They have created a ten -car stack for the coffee establishment and a five -car stack for the ice cream establishment. The establishments are meant to serve walk up customers more so than drive thru customers. There are seven pictures that were found in the archives that will be displayed on site and there will be an outdoor patio area, which is part of Riverwalk that will provide tables, benches, and canopy areas. Due to limited parking in the area, the drive thru is more of a convenience and if the drive thru is not a success, they are willing to modify the plan. Mr. Gibson stated that he has spoken with Mr. Horian regarding an amendment to Staff s recommendation. The request before the board will require City Commission approval as noted in Item C for the lease maintenance agreement in addition to a waiver request for the drive thru facilities since there is a prohibition of drive thru facilities in the downtown area. Mr. VonHerbulis questioned the traffic flow on site. Mr. Horian stated that there will be a right in only across the walkway. The drive thru to the left is for the ice cream establishment and the drive thru to the right is for the coffee establishment. Mr. VonHerbulis suggested a "hash mark" area to prevent parking in the designated crosswalk areas. Mr. Gibson stated that they will ensure the safety of the pedestrians. Ms. Dennison moved to approve per Staff's recommendation with the additional item of the drive thru waiver from the City Commission. Mr. Lowell seconded. Mr. Skat and Mr. Volk abstained, all others in favor. Motion carried. Consider the Preliminary Subdivision Plan for the proposed Airport Boulevard Townhomes — Suncor, a proposed 328 -unit townhome community at 100 Americana Boulevard, Mr. Gibson stated that there is a revised plan that reflects the proposed project due to the original plan included an additional parcel, which is now not included. Representative Bob Horian was present. He stated that he is currently redeveloping the old Kmart Plaza and is looking to bring in fee simple ownership units. The project will be identical to the Placid Lake Townhomes with the same developer. The project will be built in three phases, in which the developer intends to build one phase per year. Mr. Lowell stated that with the increased utilization of the shopping center, it would be a great opportunity to run a pedestrian/bicycle/walking trail from the townhome project to the shopping center. Mr. Horian stated that the only way to do this would have the trail through the alley, which is not PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES — MEETING OF AUGUST 21, 2003 PAGE 5 appealing. There will be a sidewalk along Airport Blvd. with an extensive landscape upgrade along 17 -92 and Airport Blvd. Ms. Dennison asked if there would be a traffic light at Americana Blvd. Mr. Horian stated that the County does not feel a light is warranted at this time. Mr. Gibson stated that Item f of Staff s recommendation requires a traffic study to be submitted and Seminole County will have to review and make appropriate assessment because it is County right -of- way. Mr. VonHerbulis questioned the location of the general commercial zoned portion that will require a conditional use. Mr. Gibson indicated located on the map and stated that a public hearing will be presented at a future date for the project located within the GC zoning. Mr. Lowell moved to approve per Staff s recommendation. Mr. Huber seconded. Mr. Skat abstained, all others in favor. Motion carried. ADD ON ITEM: Consider a request for a Comprehensive Sign Program for Sanford Plaza located at 2921 Orlando Drive. Representative Stan Smith was present. Mr. Smith stated that he is trying to clean up the plaza and wants to install canopies with signage. With the restriction of the signage allowed on a canopy, he can not meet the tenants signage needs. He submitted pictures of the Winter Park Village showing various canopies with signage. He has installed several canopies at the plaza and is now having problems with the signage size restriction. Mr. Gibson stated that he wanted to present Mr. Smith's request to obtain direction from the board. Under the sign regulations, a property owner can request a comprehensive sign program. The primary issue for Mr. Smith's request is to increase the signage on the canopies. Mr. Lowell stated that the signage needs to be addressed for the whole development comprehensively. He has no objection on changing the signage size on a canopy as long as the remainder of signage is addressed. Mr. VonHerbulis suggested to Mr. Smith to submit a plan for the whole project, indicating various phases of completion and showing sizes and locations of the canopies. Mr. Smith requested an increase on the width and height on the canopy signage and asked to be granted a time deadline to submit a comprehensive sign plan proposal. Mr. Lowell suggested granting approval for temporary banner signs until a comprehensive plan is approved. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES — MEETING OF AUGUST 21, 2003 PAGE 5 Mr. Smith requested that the canopies with channel letter signage be addressed and approved tonight with the road sign being addressed later. Most of the window signage has been removed. Mr. Skat moved to allow afifty- percent variance on the existing installed canopies (fifty- percent width instead of the 33.33 percent with height remaining as required by code) and the owner is to submit a comprehensive sign plan within sixty days. Mr. VonHerbulis seconded. All in favor. Motion carried. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. STAFF REPORTS, Mr. Gibson reported that the Florida Department of Community Affairs has determined the Regional Activity Center is in compliance with State requirements and has issued an approval. Mr. Gibson reported that Phase I of The Preserve at Lake Monroe is almost complete and Phase 2 is continuing to be constructed. Also, Centex Homes is upgrading from a wood fence to a 6 -ft. concrete block wall along the zoo property line. Mr. Robert asked if there is a block wall behind the single - family homes in Phase 1. Mr. Gibson stated that he would check and report back. COMMISSIONERS REPORTS, Mr. Skat asked about the status of Venetian Bay. Mr. Gibson reported that the City Engineer issued a letter to the developer advising them action needs to be taken. Approximately six permit applications have been submitted, but will not be released until everything is completed and submitted. Mr. Lowell asked about the signage on the old Scotty's site. Mr. Gibson reported that there was poor communication between the City and the occupant and staff is currently trying to get the business in compliance with building and site issues, including signage. Mr. Skat mentioned the razor wire that was being installed at the old Gibson's Truck World location. Mr. Gibson reported that he has contacted John Jones and asked him to communicate with Kevin Fall, Seminole County, regarding the City's concern about that type of element being installed along the 17- 92 corridor and will continue to have a dialogue with the County to ensure everyone is on the same page. Mr. Lowell reported that he noticed wall packs along the front side of the building at the Pinecrest Shopping Center. Mr. Gibson stated that he would look into it and report back. Mr. VonHerbulis questioned why the City Commission is trying to revoke an approved plan at White Cedar/Rand Yard Road. Mr. Gibson reported that when the City Commission approved the annexation, it had an accompanying development order that further stipulated other obligations by the property owner as it related to off site road improvements, land use restrictions, and similar performance obligations. The City Attorney's office has made a finding that the developer has not PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES — MEETING OF AUGUST 21, 2003 PAGE 7 fulfilled those obligations and consequently the development order that accompanied it is no longer valid so the findings from the attorney's office will be considered at the August 25 meeting. Mr. Skat reported that the School Board sent a letter to the City regarding reserving a 14 acre parcel on Celery Avenue to build a new elementary school, but during approvals of various projects within the City, the School Board had said there was adequate school capacity. Mr. Gibson stated that the City has a JPA with the School Board that addresses school needs and the City will coordinate with the school district to ensure their interests are being considered in our land use decisions. The City is currently working with Seminole County on an additional JPA as it relates to the Celery Avenue corridor so maybe the City can come up with appropriate policies in the corridor that may have the developers contribute in some fashion to the future school needs. ADJOURNMENT. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 10:11 P.M. Ross Robert, Chairman ,.. WHO MUST FILE FORM 813 This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3'143, Florida Statutes. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which , res to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited. from knowingly voting on a mea- oure which inures to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the parent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or to the special private gain or lass of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163.356 or 163.357, F.S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one -acre, one -vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that capacity. For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father -in -law, mother -in -law, son -in -law, and daughter -in -law. A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange). ELECTED OFFICERS: In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and fling this form with the person responsible for recording the min- utes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS: Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these matters. However, you must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made by you or at your direction. !OU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: • You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on other side) CE FORM SB - EFF. 1/2000 PAGE 1 APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued) • A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. • The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT To INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: • You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. • You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST hereby disclose that on � 1 20 (a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) _ inured to my special private gain or loss; -V' inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate, :? :2n$fXZ 5 C A h) SV N ::::OV- inured to the special gain or loss of my relative, inured to the special gain or loss of whom I am retained; or inured to the special gain or loss of is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me. {b} The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows: a(-0 Date Filed by , which Sig6arure NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000. r 4 CE FORM 8B - EFF. 112000 PAGE 2 WHO MUST FILE FORM 813 This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 11 2.3143, Florida Statutes. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112-3143, FLORIDA STATUTES A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which ,res to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a mea- sure which inures to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the parent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or to the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163.356 or 163.357, F.S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one -acre, one -vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that capacity. For purposes of this law, a "relative includes only the officers father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father -in -law, mother -in -law, son -in -law, and daughter -in -law. A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange). ELECTED OFFICERS: In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the min- utes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS: Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these matters. However, you must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made by you or at your direction. (OU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: • You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on other side) CE FORM SB - EFF. 112000 PAGE 1 APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued) • A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. • The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: • You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. • You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S IN T REST ,hereby disclose that on � 1 , 20 (a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) inured to my special private gain or loss; inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate, � inured to the special gain or loss of my relative, inured to the special gain or loss of whom I am retained; or inured to the special gain or loss of is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows: by , which Date Filed natur NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000. CE FORM 8B - EFF. 1/2000 PAGE 2