Loading...
05.18.95/"a 11, THE LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR 1995 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission SUBJECT: Regularly Scheduled Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission, 7:00 P.M., Thursday, May 18, 1995, in the City Commission Chambers, City Hall, Sanford, Florida. AGENDA 1. Hold a Public Hearing to consider a request for a Conditional Use for property located at 319 East 2nd Street in a SC -3, Special Commercial Zoning District, for the purpose of motorcycle parts and accessories sales and service. Owner: Edwin A. Baetzman & Jessie Almedia Representative: Robert A. Zlokas 2. Hold a Public Hearing to consider a request for a Conditional Use for property located at 4195 S. Orlando Drive in a GC -2, General Commercial Zoning District, for the purpose of U -Haul Truck, Trailer and Equipment Rental. Owner: Artie Grindle Representative: Alan Nielson 3. Hold a Public Hearing to consider a request for a Conditional Use for property located at 1016 and 1016 112 French Avenue in a GC -2, General Commercial Zoning District, for the purpose of outdoor display. Owner /representative: O.W. Wilson 4. Hold a Public Hearing to consider a request for a Conditional Use for property located at 1 120 Sanford Avenue in a GC -2, General Commercial Zoning District, for the purpose of automobile sales and service. Owner: Carmelo Gould Representative: Shiu P. Singh Hold a Public Hearing to consider a request for a Conditional Use for property located at 813 Magnolia Avenue in an SR -1, Single Family Dwelling Residential Zoning District, for the purpose of a bed and breakfast. Owner: James & Laura Straehla Representative: Rosalyn M. & J. Wayne Curenton 6. Hold a Public Hearing to consider a request for a Dimensional Variance for property located at 100 Aero Lane in an AG, Agricultural Zoning District, for the purpose of a chain link fence with in the front yard setback; 25 feet required, 6 feet proposed, a variance of 19 feet. Owner; Page Private Schools, Inc. Representative: Dr. Charaline Luna 7. Consider the Site Plan for Lot 3, Sanford Central Park, a warehouse /storage use located at 140 Coastline Road in a RI -1, Restricted Industrial Zoning District. Owner: Tern Suarez Representative: Kevin J. Spolski 8. Consider the Site Plan for changes to the International Arrivals /Departures Building at the Orlando Sanford Airport located at 1 Red Cleveland Boulevard in a RI -1, Restricted Industrial Zoning District. Owner: Sanford Airport Authority - Lessee: Central Florida Terminals, Inc. Representative: Nelson Blankenship, Jr., AIA 9. Consider the Site Plan for an office /warehouse use for Lot 4, Keyes Seminole Industrial Park located at 40 Keyes Court in a RI -1, Restricted Industrial Zoning District. Owner: Lake Mary Belway Commerce Park, Investors Ltd. Representative: David Skyles 10. Any other business from floor or Commission Members. 11. Reports from Staff. 12. Minutes. ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC. If a person decides to appeal a decision made with respect to any matter considered at the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of the proceedings including the testimony and evidence, which record is not provided by the City of Sanford (FS 286.0106) Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the personnel office ADA Coordinator at 330 -5626, 48 hrs in advance of the meeting. MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 18, 1995 7:00 P.M. CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Helen Stairs Lynn Stogner Ross Robert Ben Dyal A.A. McClanahan James Valerino Mark Platts MEMBERS ABSENT: Cynthia Holt- Miller Leon Brooks OTHERS PRESENT: Jay Marder, Director of Planning and Development Russ Gibson, Land Development Coordinator Mrs. Stairs called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. The first item on the Agenda was to hold a Public Hearing to consider a request for a Conditional Use for property located at 319 East 2nd Street in a SC -3, Special Commercial Zoning District, for the purpose of motorcycle parts and accessories sales and service. Owner: Edwin A. Baetzman & Jessie Almedia; representative: Robert A. Zlokas. Robert Zlokas, 2311 S. Grandview Avenue, was present for representation. He stated that he would like to build custom bikes with sales of parts and also the sale of some clothing. There will be no outside repairs. Mr. Zlokas stated that only bikes will be displayed on the outside. He stated that he was aware of Staff's recommendations and that he has no problems with them. Mr. Zlokas stated that he will be renting the third corner of the building. There was no one else present to speak in favor of or in opposition to the request. Mr. McClanahan moved to approve based on Staff's recommendations. Seconded by Mr. Stogner. All in favor. Motion carried. The next item on the Agenda was to hold a Public Hearing to consider a request for a Conditional use for property located at 4195 S. Orlando Drive in a GC -2, General Commercial Zoning District, for the purpose of U -Haul Truck, Trailer and Equipment Rental. Owner: Artie Grindle; representative: Alan Nielson. Alan Nielson, 1515 S. Eola Drive, Orlando, was present for representation. He stated that because of the widening of County Road 427, he has had to move his business. He stated that he has found in Sanford one of Artie Grindle's property that was originally set up as a used car lot. while in Longwood, the business name was Agri -Mart which sold pet and animal feed and supplies, along with U -Haul equipment rental. Mr. Nielson stated that he is an authorized dealer for U -Haul. The primary business is for the sale of pet feed and animal supplies. U -Haul is the secondary business with plenty of parking area. Mr. Nielson stated that there is a possibility of produce display. The U -Haul is basically display of vehicles.. At the most, there will be 4 to 5 trailers and 2 trucks on display. MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 18, 1995 PAGE 2 There was no one else to speak in favor or in opposition to the request. Mr. Dyal moved for approval as presented. Mr. Platts seconded. All in favor. Motion carried. The next item on the Agenda was to hold a Public Hearing to consider a request for a Conditional Use for property located at 1016 and 1016 1/2 French Avenue in a GC -2, General Commercial Zoning District for the purpose of outdoor display. Owner /representative: O.W. Wilson. Oscar Wilson of Wilson's Trading Post was present for representation. He stated that he needs to display outside. He presented the Commission with some pictures of items displayed on the outside of his store. He stated that he runs a pawn shop at this location and that he does not display any junk. He stated that he is 36' back from the sidewalk and that he has a 2' area in front of the building that he places his merchandise for display. Mr. McClanahan stated that the sidewalk in front of his building is not a common thoroughfare to foot traffic. The Downtown area was approved for display of merchandise on the sidewalk where people walk around it. Mr. McClanahan stated that he did not see the difference and do not think the Commission can be discriminatory. We cannot penalize someone someplace other than downtown on a much wider street which does not have any pedestrian traffic. Mr. Marder stated that as of now, this applicant is here because of outdoor display considerations that seem to be under reconsideration. It is something that is a result of our Code Enforcement Officer going to this man's business as well as a number of other businesses throughout the City, to give them warnings under the citation program. There are some overall considerations. Mr. Marder stated that it is his understanding that the Chamber of Commerce has taken some initiative to develop a committee that will come up with some recommendations with regards to how, if , what or when outdoor display of merchandise can, should, shouldn't be, or how it would be permissible. Mr. Marder stated that there was a proposal that was reviewed by this Commission as an amendment to the Land Development. Regulations that places certain conditions on outdoor display, certain height limitations, certain area limitations, etc.. within the public right -of -way, i.e. particularly sidewalks within the Downtown area. Mr. McClanahan noted that all along 17 -92, there are furniture stores that consistently display furniture on. the outside of the buildings. Either the Commission is going to clamp down on everybody or its not going to clamp down on anybody as far as he was concerned. What is fair for one is fair for the other. Mr. McClanahan stated that until there is a policy established by the City Commission as to how to control outside display, he does not feel that Code Enforcement should. be targeting individual businesses at this time. Mrs. Stairs stated that she believes there is a 60 -day moratorium until there is a proposal to be presented to the City Commission. Mr. Platts stated that he believes there is a policy in the Code which prohibits outside. display unless there is a conditional use granted. Mr. Robert asked if the car lots are affected. Mr. Marder stated that the automotive comes under a separate section of the regulations. Over the years, as newer businesses. have been established, the City has required them to put in buffer landscaping to the fullest extent possible.. MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 18, 1995 PAGE 3 Charles Stevens, 320 Oak Avenue was present to speak in favor of the request. He stated that it is of great essential that we use these displays. He stated that he has been employed at this location for over 2- years. Charles Branden, 206 E. 19th Street, spoke in favor of the request. He stated that he has a business at the end of Park Avenue. There is parking in front of his shop and about a 3 -foot space where he use to display. He stated he had. warnings from the City. He stated that he could put out new merchandise but not used merchandised. He stated that the name of his business : is Nearly New. The merchandise that is displayed looks new. He asked what is the difference. Mr. Branden stated that when he was first told. that he could not have outside display that his business went down 50 to 60 %. Dean Ray, 2558 El Capitan, stated that he was in favor of the request. He stated that he has a business on the corner of 4th and 17 -92 and that he has been warned and cited. He stated that when he could display outside. he would take in approximately $.2000 a week. Now, with no outside. display, he takes in approximately $200 a week. On weekends when the Code Inspector is not working he takes in up to $1500. He stated that if something is not done soon, that he would have to close his business. Bob Bali, 2210 S. French Avenue, owner of a small bicycle shop, was present to speak in favor of the request.. He asked when was this ordinance passed or adopted. Mr. Marder stated that the present ordinance with the present provisions for outdoor display and storage was originally passed, and has pretty much stayed the same, in 1988. There has been a change in the way the Code Enforcement Division has been instructed to administer that portion of the Zoning Code. Up until recently, the City has basically left long standing situations alone, where there has been outdoor display. There has been some discussion by the City Commission to treat everybody the same regardless. of how long they've been in business. Mr. Ball stated that he_ would hate. to think that the "Friendly City" would revert back to a policy that would stamp out the small businessman. Everything that he has seen done in the City of Sanford regulating business since 1970 has been to strangle. He stated that small businesses can't put out banners, can't put out signs, can't do this or that and yet within a black of his business there is an illegal sign that is advertising a business. Mr. Ball stated that Sanford is losing its image as a friendly city. Mr. Ross asked. r. Marder if this Commission voted to overturn the City's recommen ti.ons and. to allow Mr. Wilson, who has paid a fee to come here, w uld this mean that the rest of these people have to pay a fee to outdoor display merchandise. Mr. Marder stated that as of now, people would have to come before the Commission because of the way the system is set up. Regardless of what happens tonight, the ordinance would not be change. Mr. Platts asked Mr. Wilson if he would be willing to limit his display to a certain number of feet on either side of the entrance. Mr. Wilson stated "yes ". Mr. McClanahan stated that the Commission would be faced with making arbitrary decisions from now on if there is not some guidelines from the City Commission. He stated that he does not feel comfortable deciding on each individual. case without know what the merits are. He stated that he would not like to take action on any of these cases, but rather suggest to the City Commission that they put on a moratorium until they get their act together and establish some type of hard guidelines_ that this Commission can use and go by. MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 18, 1995 PAGE 4 Mr. Gibson stated that the City is in a position currently to even require new merchandise to at least submit site plans depicting the areas of outdoor display. Simply to have on record those areas that have been approved for display so that other areas i.e., parking, are not being utilized as such. Certain sites include Scotty's, Wal -Mart Plaza, Food Lion. Those location that do display new merchandise are required to submit site plans to have on record.. The City, at this time, can take the opportunity to place other reasonable conditions on the site, i.e., if the materials require screening or any further setbacks from adjacent uses. Alfred DeLattibeaudiere, 807 Sanford Avenue, stated that he was in favor of this request. He does not like for people to lose money from their businesses. The only way that you know that this business is open, is when you see the commodities displayed outside. He stated that it is in the best interest of the City and this businessman to allow him to display his commodities. Mr. Robert moved to approve on the conditions that the a) display area shall be limited to 10' on either side of door /entrance facing French Avenue, b) displays are limited strictly to the sidewalk next to buildi4g and shall not be greater than 6' in height, c) display items are to be placed indoors during hours not open for business, and d) conditional use approval effective until such time City Commission changes or revokes outdoor display regulations. Seconded by Mr. McClanahan. All in favor. Motion carried. The next. item on the Agenda was to hold a Public Hearing to consider a request for a Conditional. Use for property located at 1120 Sanford Avenue in a GC -2, General Commercial Zoning District, for the purpose of automobile sales and service. Owner: Camela Gould; representative: Shiu P. Singh. Shiu P. Singh, 369 Providence Blvd., Deltona, stated that he would like to have a couple of cars, not to exceed 6, on the property for sale, and all repairs will be done on the backside of the property. Cars left for repair will be stored inside of the fence. Alfred DeLattibeaudiere, 807 Sanford Avenue, stated that he has been living at this address for 8- years. The property in question is 3- blocks from his house. He stated that he supports the request. There was no one. else present to speak in favor of or in opposition to this request. Mr. McClanahan moved for approval based on. Staff's recommendations. Seconded by Mr. Robert. After discussion, Mr. McC lanahan amende his motion for approval to include the parking of automobiles requiring repair or service shall. be restricted to the enclosed fenced area, and all body work and repair shall be indoors with no repairs or services to be permitted between the hours. of 10:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M. Mr. Robert seconded the amendment. All in favor. Motion carried. The next item on the Agenda was a Public Hearing to consider a request for a Conditional Use for property located at 813 Magnolia Avenue in an SR -1, Single Family Dwelling Residential Zoning District, for the purpose of a bed and breakfast. Owner: James & Laura Straehla; representative: Rosalyn M. & J. Wayne Curenton. Mrs. Stairs stated that she represents the owners in this particular Conditional Use and waived her voting rights. Mrs. Stairs signed a Conflict of Interest Form. MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 18, M1995 PAGE 5 Rosalyn Curenton, 1456 Northridge Drive, Longwood, was present for representation. She read into the record a prepared speech stating that she has found a treasure, wants to own it, wants to live in it and enjoy it, and she wants to share it with others. She wants to add some ginger bread trim at the roof line and around the porch area. She will plant a rose garden with trellises. Her plans include, in the future, building a gazebo in the backyard. Ms. Curenton stated that she plans to have four guest rooms on the second floor. There are already four zooms on the second floor and two rooms have baths. It will be fairly simple. to add two more bath rooms. She stated that she. will open with the two rooms that already have baths and make other improvements as guest stay builds. Her living quarters will be on the third f loon which includes a sitting room and an office, a bedroom and bath. The Strahela.s have already provided ample off - street parking. Ms. Curenton stated that the reason she chase this property was because it has four guest rooms available. She stated that in all the research she has done, it indicates that it is very difficult to have a successful, profitable, viable bed and breakfast with less than four guest rooms. She stated that she has never done this type of thing before. Jami Meeks, 621 Park Avenue, stated that as a board member of the Historic Trust, the Trust would like to see another bed and breakfast in the Historic District. It is in keeping with the District. Mary Larson was present to speak in favor of this request. She stated that she and her husband has very large families. It would be nice to have a place across the street where her family could stay during family gatherings. Mr. Platts moved to approve with the following stipulations: 1) use of the property shall be limited to single family residence or bed and breakfast in; 2) when operated as a bed and breakfast inn, the property shall be owner occupied and owner operated; 3) the number of guest rooms shall be limited to the four existing bedrooms less the owners living quarters; 4) the architectural significance and integrity of the structure shall be maintained.; 5) the minimum daily rate shall not be below $50 per night; and 6) all City regulations and requirements including but not limited to site p l'a'n review shall be complied with. Seconded by Mr. Dyal. All in favor. Motion carried. The next item on the Agenda was to hold a Public Hearing to consider a request for a Dimensional Var iance for property lo'cat'ed at 100 Aero Lane in an. AG, Agricultural Zoning District, for the purpose of a chain link fence within. the frontyard setback, 25 feet required, 6 feet proposed, a variance of 19 feet. Owner: Page Private Schools, Inc; representative: Dr. Charaline Luna. Dr. Charaline Luna, 650 E. Airport Blvd., was present for representation. She stated that the chain link fence. would be installed in the rear, along the dirt road by Aero Lane, not on 46. On the Aero Lane side the fence will be 6" and on the dirt road side it will be 4 without barbed wire. There was no one else present to speak in favor of or against the request. Mr. Stogner moved for approval based on Staff ' s recommendations: a) chain link fence shall not be located between State load 46 and the principal existing building on the site; b) chain link fence shall MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 18, 1995 PAGE 6 be permitted within six feet of the right -of -way of Aero Lane for areas south of the principal existing building located on the site. Seconded by Mr. Dyal. All in favor. Motion carried. The next item on the Agenda was the consideration of the Site Plan for Lot 3, Sanford Central Park, a warehouse/ storage use located at 140 Coastline Road in a RI -1, Restricted Industrial Zoning District. Owner: Tem Suarez; representative: Kevin J. Spolski. Kevin Spolski, 2805 Carrier Ave., was present for representation. Mr. Robert moved for approval. - Seconded by Mr. Dyal. All in favor. Motion carried. The next item was the consideration of the Site Plan for changes to the International Arrivals /Departures Building at the Orlando Sanford Airport located at 1 Red Cleveland Blvd. in a RI -1, Restricted Industrial. Zoning District. Owner: Sanford Airport Authority, - Lessee: Central Florida Terminals, Inc.; representative: Nelson Blankenship, Jr., AIA. Nelson Blankenship was present for representation along with Steve Jones and Steve Cook. Mr. Blankenship stated that there is a peak load problem in handling the number of planes arriving at one time. The peak load problem is causing the expansion of the Federal Inspection Station. This is a little different than what was submitted before. It is much more economical to enlarge the Federal Inspection Station. at this time. Mr. Blankenship stated that the paved parking in front of the building contains approximately 250 parking spaces. There is an area on the side that has 71 parking spaces. Additional parking that it to be built to the south will supply another 500 parking spaces. Mr. Robert moved to approve based on Staff's recommendations. Seconded by Mr. McClanahan. All in favor. Motion carried. The next item on the Agenda was the consideration of the Site Plan for an office /warehouse use for Lot 4, Keyes Seminole Industrial Park located at 40 Keyes Court in a. RI -1, Restricted Industrial Zoning District. Owner: Lake Mary Beltway Commerce Park, Investors, Ltd.; representative: David Skyles. Jack Munfield, Apopka, one of the owners of the property, was present for representation. Mr. Dyal moved for approval. Seconded by Mr. Robert. All in favor. Motion carried. Regarding the Private Property Rights Protection Act, Mr. Marder pointed out that there has been a bill passed that does a lot more than most of the Planning /Growth Management Advocates would have preferred, in that it somewhat gets into a speculative kind of situation whereby if an owner considers himself damaged, even if they thought they could do something, they could seek compensation. He stated that he wanted this Commission to be aware of it. It does effect what we do in the future because everything as of May 12th forward, is up for grabs in terms of new written regulations and new controls. Regarding the Minutes of May 4, 1995, Mr. Platts stated would like added at the end of second paragraph on Page had stated:Mr. Platts s tated that if a stormwater associated with this project will drain into Crystal Lake conditio of the Lake should be relevant to the aDPlicati that he 4, as he facility then the verbatim of the recording of Mr. Platts statement is: I would like MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 18 1995 PAGE 7 to go on the record that if the facilities that will be approved of this Conditional Use would flow into the lakes, I think they should be a matter of consideration before: this Board." Also Mr. Platts of Roberts Rules add: that with requested of order, the unders rules. The verbatim of the recording is: I withdraw my motion if we're all comfortable that we're gonna have, we have some basic understanding of Roberta Rules. generally guides what we do and we'll be consistent in how we make a decision as long as each time, but I'd like to make sure we keep in mind to be consistent. Mr. Platts moved to approve the Minutes with the stated changes. Seconded by Mr. Robert. All in favor. Motion carried. Mr. Dyal stated that he did not understand Code Enforcement regarding outside display. It is in the Code that used merchandise cannot be displayed outside. What prompted Code Enforcement so that they go out and start writing all this up? Mr. Gibson stated that it was a directive by the City Commission. Mr. Dyal stated that the City Commission decides- to jump out and write all these people up, then theres a moratorium. Mr. Dyal wanted an explanation of exactly what the moratorium is. Mr. Gibson stated that his understanding of moratorium was a relaxation of the aggressive pursuit of enforcing the regulation as it is on the record. However, still with the open provision to cite locations that may pose a health and /or safety risk. There was not only a response from the public in terms of the inconsistency of the City's policy but there was also staffing issues as well in terms of the quantity of cases that were being brought before City Staff to try to address these:, and it was just a difficult position on the Staff in terms of how to respond. Mr. Dyal asked why the applicant. was placed on tonight's Agenda. Mr. Gibson stated that they were one of the first willing to comply with the regulations as they are cited. others have appealed. Mr.. Dyal asked why is the Chamber of Commerce involved... Mrs. Stairs stated that what started the whole thing is the Downtown Historic District outdoor display. That group came up with something they could live with and brought it to the City Commission for approval. The Commission decided that it wanted to enforce some of the areas in the outer circle. The minute this started to happen, the City was inundated but also so was Dave Farr because he represents so many of the businesses. Dave Farr went to the City Commission workshop and appealed to the Commission for the moratorium in order for another group to come in like the group did Downtown. Mr. McClanahan stated that in 1975 the City Commission decided that it was going to enforce every single family dwelling in the City of Sanford that it could only be occupied with a nuclear family. No extended family, no grandparents, no children that have left to return to live. They actually tried to enforce this for six months. How can you force this type of ordinance. They tried and it failed. Mr. Dyal asked if the Commission would see any more applications such as this at the next meeting. Mr. Gibson stated that he did not have any pending. Mr. Stogner requested Staff to look into updating data an bed and breakfast establishments.. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:15 P.M. .0& t7�z� Helen Stairs, Chairperson that on Page 7 regarding the discussion after Mr. Platts withdrew his motion, to FORM 85 MI.- V QW*kNUUm Vr vwi rinv %.vmr«%..I► r%JK C OUNTY, MUNIC[PAL, AND OTHER LOCAL � JBLiC OFFICERS � £ NCIL C(1MMISSION ' LAST NAME -FIRST LAL MAILING ADDRESS CITY r1 WHICH V()'I'E OCC'URR 10 _ C OUN C� NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION: MY POSITION IS: ELECTIVE APPOINTIVE WHO MUST FILE FORM 80 This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, ar other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non- advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. The requirements of this law are mandatory; although the use of this particular form is not required by law, you arc encouraged to use it in making the disclosure required by law. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 1142.3'143, FLORIDA STATUTES ELECTED OFFICERS: A person holding elective county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained. In either case, you should disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS: A person holding appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained. A person holding an appointive local office otherwise may participate in a matter in which he has a conflict of interest, but must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision by oral or written communication, whether made by the officer or at his direction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: • You should complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. • A copy of the form should be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. • The form should be read publicly at the meeting prior to consideration of the matter in which you have a conflict of interest. NAM NAME- MIDDLI: NAML h [i0 AP AUTHO R. COU R I OR CC )MMI TTMr. THE HOARD, COUNC ( AUTHOICITY. OR w S KVL• IS A UNIT Of: Crry _,�) : COUNTY ' OTHER LOCAL AGENCY r IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: • You should disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. • You should complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST I, V z hereby disclose that on 19 (a) A measure came or will tome before my agency which (check one) inured to my special private gain; .or inured to the special gain of , by whom I am retained. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: / ff /S V Date Filed Signature NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317 (1985), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRES: DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED 55,000. From the Director of Planning May 12, 1995 and Devebpmen �1- TO: City of Sanford Planning and Zoning Commission SUBJECT: Recommendations for Meeting of May 18, 1995 ZLOKAS - BAETZMAN- ALMEDIA - Request conditional use approval to permit the sale of motorcycle parts and accessories with repair and service for property Zoned SC -3, Special Commercial located at 319 East 2nd Avenue. 1. Site is Zoned SC -3, Special Commercial and includes a "contributory" structure in the Downtown Historic Commercial District. 2. Adjacent uses include a welding establishment, printing, offices, hardware and automobile repair. 3. Recommend approval of the request to establish motorcycle accessory parts sales with minor service and repair with the condition that all repair and service work shall be accomplished indoors. NIELSON - GRINDLE - Request conditional use approval to permit truck, trailer and equipment rental for property Zoned GC -2, General Commercial located at 4195 South Orlando Drive. 1. Site is Zoned GC -2, General Commercial and was designed for automobile sales including a building and parking areas. 2. Adjacent uses include various automobile sales establishments and a flea market. 3. Recommend approval of the request to establish truck, trailer and equipment rental based on similarity with adjacent uses and the similarity of proposed use with intent of existing site design. WILSON - GRACEY - Request conditional use approval to permit outdoor display for property Zoned GC -2, General Commercial located at 1016 and 1016Y2 French Avenue. 1. Site includes an existing building being utilized as a pawn shop that fronts French Avenue between 10th and 11 th Streets. Planning Recommendations - Page 1 2. A sketch of the site provided by the applicant shows that the building is located approximately 34 feet from the sidewalk which is assumed to be the property line. Parking spaces are approximately 20 feet deep in a perpendicular arrangement with the front of the building. 3. Uses located adjacent to the site include a furniture store, convenience store, a bar and miscellaneous businesses and offices. 4. Recommend denial of the request to establish outdoor display because of the lack of sufficient space in front of the building to properly display objects and a general City policy to prohibit outdoor display, in particular used merchandise, within general highway commercial areas throughout the City. SINGH - GOULD - Request conditional use approval to permit automobile repair and sales for property Zoned GC -2, General Commercial located at 1120 Sanford Avenue. 1. Site includes an existing building located at the northwest corner of Sanford Avenue and East 12th Street. The site has been utilized for automobile sales and appears to include facilities for automobile repair. Site is Zoned GC -2, General Commercial. 2. Uses adjacent to site include a single family residence, automobile repair establishments, automobile sales and miscellaneous businesses. 3. Recommend approval of request to establish automobile repair and service based on similar uses already established in the immediate area and previous similar use of site. CURENTON - STRAEHLA - Request conditional use approval to permit an owner - occupied bed and breakfast inn for property Zoned SR -1, Single Family Residential located at 813 South Magnolia Avenue. 1. The site is a two story, single family residence located at the northeast corner of South Magnolia Avenue and East 9th Street. The site includes approximately 7,500 square feet. The property is designated as a "contributing structure" in the Old Sanford Residential Historic District. 2. The City Commission granted permission for the property to be considered for a bed and breakfast inn as a conditional use by the Planning and Zoning Commission on May 9, 1994. This action by the City Commission had the effect of declaring the use to be a lawfully existing nonconforming use subject to expansion, modification or change via the conditional use procedure. 3. The Planning and Zoning Commission has considered two bed and breakfast inns located at 1011 South Oak Avenue (March, 1992) and 420 South Oak Avenue (October, 1991). The following general conditions and stipulations of approval were enacted upon those sites: Planning Recommendations - Page 2 a. Use of the property limited to single family residence or bed and breakfast inn. b. When operated as a bed and breakfast inn, property shall be owner occupied and owner - operated. C. The number of guest rooms shall be limited to three. d. The architectural significance and integrity of the structure shall be maintained. e. The minimum daily rate shall not be below $50.00 per night. 4. Uses adjacent to site include various single family residences of a similar historic character. 5. Recommend that the request to establish a bed and breakfast inn be approved based on similar uses already established in the general vicinity of the site with the following conditions and stipulations: a. Use of the property shall be limited to single family residence or bed and breakfast inn. b. When operated as a bed and breakfast inn, the property shall be owner occupied and owner- operated. C. The number of guest rooms shall be limited to the existing bedrooms less the owners living quarters. d. The architectural significance and integrity of the structure shall be maintained. e. The minimum daily rate shall not be below $50.00 per night. f. All City regulations and requirements including but not limited to site plan review shall be complied with. LUNA - PAGE PRIVATE SCHOOLS - Request a dimensional variance to permit chain link fence to be located within the front yard building setback for property Zoned AG, Agricultural, located at the southwest corner of State Road 46 and Aero Lane. 1. Site is Zoned AG, Agricultural and includes a private elementary school. Site fronts a major arterial roadway, State Road 46 and a local street, Aero Lane. 2. Applicant requests a dimensional variance to permit a chain link fence to be located within 6 feet of the property line. The City's Land Development Regulations prohibit chain link fence from being located within the front yard building setback which would be twenty -five feet from the Aero Lane property line and 175 feet from the centerline of State Road 46. The State Road 46 Planning Recommendations - Page 3 "base building line" would equate to approximately 75 teet from the property line. The applicant's request includes a letter dated April 18, 1995 that provides justification related to the dimensional variance standards applicable to the site. 3. Existing chain link fence in the general vicinity of site includes industrial locations south of site. In general, there is little evidence of chain link fence located along State Road 46 in the general vicinity of site at this date. The only notable exception regards an old equipment storage yard located in the unincorporated area. 4. Recommend that the use of chain link fence be approved on a limited basis based on the information provided by the applicant and the existing character of the surrounding area with the following conditions: a. Chain link fence shall not be located between State Road 46 and the principal existing building on the site. b. Chain link fence shall be permitted within six feet of the right of way of Aero Lane for areas south of the principal existing building located on the site. Planning Recommendations - Page 4