Loading...
10.07.93FROM THE LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR t"00 October I, 1993 TOO Planning and Zoning Commission SUBJECT: Regularly Scheduled Fleeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission, 7:00 P.M., Thursday, October 7, 1993, in the City Commission Chambers, City Hall, Sanford, Florida AGENDA 1. Consider the Final Plat for Seminole Towne Center, a commercial subdivision, located at 200 Towne Center BI in a PD, Planned Development zoning district. Owner: Seminole Investors, Inc. and Seminole Towne Center LJP Representative: Thomas Schneider 2. Consider the Site Plan for Seminole Towne Center, a regional shopping mall, located at 200 Towne Center Blvd in a PD, Planned DEvelopment zoning district. Owner: Seminole Towne Center LP Representative: Richard Merkel 3. Consider the Site Plan for Florida Solar, an office warehouse use, located at 235 Coastline Road in a FBI -1, Restricted Industrial zoning district. Owner. C.B.C. Industrial Park, Inc. Representative: H. D. Holsumbach Consider the Si#e Plan for Universal Mapping, an office /warehouse use, locate at 201 Tech Drive in a RI-1, Restricted Industrial zoning district. Owner: C.V.C. Industrial Park, Inc. Representative: H. D. Hol urnbach 5. Any other business from floor or Commission Members. 6. Reports from Staff. 7. Approval of Minutes. ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC. if a person decides to appeal a deasion made with respect to any muter oonsidered at the above meeting or hearing, he may need a verbatim record of the prooeedings including the tesfimony and evidence, which record is not provided by the City of Sanford. (FS 2W.01 05). Persons with disabilities needing assistance to pa rficipate in any of these proceedings should contact the personnel office ADA Coordinator at 330 -5626 48 hours in advance of the meeting, MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OF OCTOBER 7, 1993 7:00 P.M. CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Mike Davis Leon Brooks Joe Dennison Tom Speer Cynthia Holt - Miller Cathryn Welch John LeRoy Helen Stairs Ben Dyal OTHERS PRESENT: Jay Marder, Director of Planning and Development Bettie Sonnenberg, Land Development Coordinator Marion Anderson, Recording Secretary The Chairman called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. The first item on the Agenda was the consideration of the Final Plat for Seminole Towne Center, a commercial subdivision, located at 200 Towne Center Blvd. in a PD, Planned Development zoning district. Owner: Seminole Investors, Inc. and Seminole Towne Center L /P; representative: Thomas Schneider. Mr. Tom Schneider stated that he was representing Seminole Towne Limited Partnership and Seminole Towne Center Investors. He stated that they were requesting one small modification to the plat. Mr. Schneider stated that the .2 acre parcel around the wetlands (TR. 18) needs to be annexed into the City and that it would be done as soon as possible. Mr. Dennison asked if this was the small piece of land on which a sewer lift station is located. Mr. Schneider stated "no. The existing lift station will be relocated to TR. 17". He stated that they are resolving an exchange of land with the State. The Mall has deeded to the State approximately .3700 of an acre and the State has deeded to Seminole Mall .3700 of an acre. Mr. Davis asked if the plat, as submitted, was correct. Mr. Schneider stated "yes ". Mr. LeRoy moved on approval with the recording of joinder and consent of Seminole County for Tract 18. Seconded by Mrs. Welch. All in favor. Motion carried. The next item on the Agenda was the consideration of the Site Plan for Seminole Towne Center, a regional shopping mall, located at 200 Towne Center Blvd., in a PD. Planned Development zoning district. Owner: Seminole Towne Center L /P; representative: Richard Merkel. Tom Schneider represented the request. He stated that they were requesting a modification to the first of staff's recommendations. Mr. Schneider requested that the final parking detail be approved through the administrative process. He asked that the commission recommend the approval of the site plan conditioned upon the final parking detail being approved at staff level. MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OF OC'T'OBER 7, 1993 PAGE 2 Mr. Marder stated that the parking detail issue, due to the engineering details considered at staff level, was being resolved. The end islands need to be raised due to the traffic circulation safety pattern. Mr. Schneider stated that what was shown on the previous site plan was that certain end islands would be raised and landscaped as opposed to all end islands being raised and landscaped. He stated that the issue is if unlandscaped islands are to be raised. Mr. Speer stated that he didn't understand why City staff would think about having the end islands raised 4 with concrete. Mr. Schneider explained that the position taken by the City was that the raised concrete islands discourages people from parking at the edge of the ring road. Mr. Speer stated that the policing of this was for the Police Department and the Mall Security. Mr. Schneider stated that in other malls, typically they have raised islands around curves and entrys. He stated that he did not think that each island needs to be raised as opposed to the City wanting each raised. Mr. harder stated that City Staff had done a considerable amount of research on the parking detail. This was a technical engineering type detail and there are strong feelings on this at Staff level. Various shopping centers had been reviewed and a clear example of what not to do in a shopping center can be seen at the Altamonte Mall. There is a considerable amount of uncontrolled and improper parking. Parking in striped islands blocks the view of traffic. It makes for a safer on -site vehicular circulation pattern to have the raised islands with the stop signs where there is an access out to the ring road. Mr. Schneider stated that on the variance request for the consolidation of landscaping, it specifically showed painted end islands. Mr. Brooks moved for approval subject to staff's recommendations of items 2, 3,4 (attached) and based on having flexibility and compromise of an amicable decision by both the developer and the City on item no. 1. seconded by Ms. Holt - Miller. Mr Speer asked if a developer who accepts this type of decision on the site plan can come back to the City if no agreement could be reached. Mrs. Sonnenberg stated that they can always come back on an appeal. All in favor. Motion carried. The next item for consideration was the Site Plan for Florida Solar, an office/warehouse use, located at 235 Coastline Road in a RI -1, Restricted Industrial zoning district. owner: C.B.C. Industrial Park, Inc.; representative: H. D. Holsumbach. Due to lack of representation, Mr. Speer moved to table. Seconded by Ms. Holt--Miller. All in favor. Motion carried. The next item for consideration was the Site Plan for Universal Mapping, an office/warehouse use, located at 201 Tech Drive in a RI -1, Restricted Industrial zoning district. owner: C.V.C. Industrial Park, Inc.; representative: H. D. Holsumbach. Due to lack of representation, Mr. Speer moved to table. Seconded by Ms. Holt- Miller. All in favor. Motion carried. Regarding the minutes, Mr. Dennison noted proposed changes on Page 3, first paragraph. The last sentence should read "fixed based operation" not corporation. In paragraph 6, the last sentence should read "There will be no other chemicals involved." MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OF OCTOBER 7, 1993 '0nrF Mr. Brooks moved to approve the minutes with noted changes. Seconded by Mr. LeRoy. All in favor. Motion carried. Mr. harder explained that the cancellation of the worksession regarding the old Sanford Regulations - Draft Revisions to Land Development Regulations, was due to the fact that he had met with representatives of the Sanford Historic Trust and recognized that advertisements had to be completed and every property owner in that neighborhood would have to be noticed. He stated that there would be a workshop for the Planning and Zoning Commission on October 21 with a Public Hearing the first meeting in November. The City Commission will hold their meeting on December 13th. a There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 7:50 P . M. 3 oe - D6nnison, Chairman FROM THE LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR October 7, 1993 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission RE: PRC Recommendations SEMINOLE TOWNE CENTER - FINAL PLAT Recommend Approval subject to the following condition: Recording of Joinder and Consent of Seminole County for Tract 18. SEMINOLE TOWNE CENTER - SITE PLAN Recommend App roval subiect to the following: 1. Remove the Parking Detail or show the end islands as constructed islands with appropriate stop signs. 2. Provide a detail showing how the existing power poles, guy wires and proposed locations will interact with parking stalls and drivelanes. 3. Identify the transit stop and detail any associated building improvements. 4. Provide calculations for percentage of open space (5% min). UNIVERSAL MAPPING - SITE PLAN Recommend Approval of the site plan only subiect to final engineering concerns 1. Under GENERAL NOTES: a. #5- both the note and the detail should show white for the stop bars while regulatory lines are shown as yellow. 2. The sign for handicap parking fine should read "$100.00 - Fla Statute 316.1957." 3. The landscape requirement (Sch J Sec 2.3.A) along Upsala Rd. is for a 10' strip. A landscape berm is suggested for permanent screening. Sanford Central Park also requires buffering on Upsala Road. This should be coordinated with the park and the development. Note that no access will be allowed from Upsala Rd. 4. Submit a copy of the DER /DEP permit for sewer. 5. Bore and jack Tech Drive; open cuts are not acceptable. 6. If the wet tap for the fire line is on the opposite side of Tech Drive, it is suggested that the location be brought across to the center of the property to serve both halves of the property. 7. Suggest check dams for swale drainage. 8. Sidewalks are required for Upsala Road. FLORIDA SOLAR - SITE PLAN Recommend Approval of the site plan only subject to final engineering concerns 1. Under GENERAL NOTES: a. #5- both the note and the detail should show white for the stop bar while the regulatory striping should be yellow. 2. The sign for parking fine for the parking detail should read "$100 - Florida Statute 316.1957." 3. The required 5' landscaped buffer has not been shown on the east side of the parcel line. Do you intend to request a waiver? I would recommend that the hedge be waived, with the trees to be installed. 4. Submit a copy of the DER /DEP permit for sewer. 5. Required curbing has not been shown throughout the paved area. 6. Suggest check dams for swale drainage. 7. A Developer's Agreenment will be required for the installation of the sidewalks for Coastline Road when and if it is extended as an east /west connector road for the city.