Loading...
06.16.81MINUTES Planning and Zoning Commission June 16, 1981 7:00 P.M. Members Present: J. Q. Galloway, Chairman Jim Barks Forrest Foggin C. B. Franklin John Morris Cliff Miller George Willis Members Absent: Sheila Roberts Frank Whigham Others Present: Leah Rogers, Zoning Inspector Mack LaZenby, City Engineer /Utility Director The meeting was callb.d to order at 7:00 P.M. by the Chairman, J. Q. Galloway. The first item for discussion was a Public Hearing for a conditional use of a storage building in the SC -3 zoned district and a site plan for an office and storage building for First Federal of Seminole at 119 Elm Ave. represented by James Lee. He said the office is for a part -time maintenance man and the building is for old records and plumbing and air conditioning materials. It will be a concrete block building with a shingle roof, will be landscaped and they plan an attractive building. Mrs. Burke Steele, 206 Elm Ave., was present to inquire as to the type of building planned and said Mr. E.L. Ley, a neighbor, was also planning to object to a metal building with more parking on 2nd St. She had no objection to the type of building and the parking problem to be resolved in the future. Mr. Morris moved to approve the site plan with the required parking, with the proponent to get permission from the City Commission on a definite time for completion of the parking area. Mr. Miller seconded. Motion carried. Mr. Barks abstained. The next item on the agenda, a Public Hearing for a conditional use to sell beer and wine on the premises for the Fox Fire Restaurant in the GC -2 zoned district at 3221 Orlando Drive was dismissed for lack of representation. The next item was a Public Hearing for a conditional use for a shopping center in the GC -2 zoned district for Village Marketplace on the SW corner of Highway 17 -92 and Lake Mary Blvd., represented by Marc Hagle. A revised plan was pre- sented after receipt of the comments from the Zoning Inspector and City Engineer, but the City Engineer was present and said some of the details on the engineering problems need to be clarified and the landscaping plan clarified on the internal parking area. Mr. Morris shoved to table the item. Mr. Franklin seconded. Carried. The next item for discussion was to consider a final plat of 234 lots, zoned SR -1 of Groveview Village, First, Second and Third Additions, represented by Herbert Ross. Mr. Tom Gru, Surveyor, was also present to represent the plat and said he had been in contact with the City Engineer and the utility easements were shown on the plat. Mr. LaZenby was present and said he wanted the developer to be aware of the fact that this development is at the end of the water system and the existing system MINUTES - Planning & Zoning - June 16, 1981 - 7:00 P.M. Page 2 cannot service any more homes, without some modification and the nearest point for extending service is in Hidden Lake and outside this builder's property. He said he would be glad to get with them and point out the possibilities of the extensions. The density was discussed and Mr. LaZenby said the mix of duplexes and S/F would not cause a problem once the water problem is corrected. Mr. Willis moved to approve the plat which will be presented after the solution to the water service problem. Mr. Foggin seconded. Motion carried. Mr. Thomas Hayes was present to represent a site plan and change of use from a S/F dwelling to a Real Estate Office in the RMOI district at 635 W. 25th St. After discussion of the driveway and the reason for removal of some of the trees, Mr. Barks moved to approve the site plan and change of use as submitted. Mr. Miller seconded. Motion carried. The next item for consideration was a site plan for condominiums in the PUD zoned district in the remaining northern section of the Sanora subdivision, Replat of Sanora, Units 1 & 2, represented by Roger Timlin and Keith Lemieux, of Dan -Way, Inc. Mr. Timlin said it will be a true condominium concept and since the density for the original PUD was for smaller units than they are building, they feel they are not exceeding the density requirement. The City Engineer said that the site plan is not complete as far as the location of water and sewer services, the drainage, and the dimensions on the driveways. Mr. Morris moved to table until engineering details can be added to the site plan. Mr. Barks seconded. Motion carried. The next item for consideration was a site plan for an office addition to an existing building in the SC -3 zoned district at 205 N. Elm Ave., represented by William Royster. He said the required 5 -ft. concrete apron will be added to the plan on the driveway onto Elm Ave. Mr. Morris moved to approve the site plan. Mr. Franklin seconded. Motion carried. The next item was a request from the floor, by Mack LaZenby for consideration of a site plan for AMF Robalo Boat Corp. at the Sanford Airport. He said they are planning a $500,000. addition and would like to be able to start construction soon. There are 60 employees at the present time and they anticipate 150 after the addition. An existing paved area has been committed by the Airport Authority, for parking, and there is an existing drainage ditch. As to the quiesion of landscaping it was pointed out that the Federal Aviation Authority regulates height limitation, etc. and an industrial area should be aviation oriented. Mr. Willis moved to approve the plan. Mr. Barks seconded. Motion carried. There was discussion on parking requirements for mini - warehouses and it was the consensus of opinion that the amount of parking required is minimal, but there should be some criteria. The board requested Miss Rogers to get some samples of definitions for "mini- warehouse" and then ask the City Attorney to write a def- inition for the City of Sanford. It was felt that with a definition of "mini - warehouse" some parking requirements could be set. -2- MINUTES - Planning & Zoning Commission - June 16, 1981 Page 3 The next discussion was regarding the rezoning of Park Ave. from MR -1 to RMOI. Mr. Barks moved to set a Public Hearing for July 16, 1981 to rezone Park Ave. from the center of Magnolia Ave. to the center of Oak Ave. consisting of five blocks plus 2 lots from just north of 7th St. to 12th St. Mr. Miller seconded. Motion carried. A memo from the City Manager asked the members to consider the possibility of reducing the size of the parking spaces for a specific number ( %) instead of requiring all spaces to be 10' x 20', in consideration of the number of smaller cars. The Board rejected the idea because they felt that people would ignore the smaller spaces if they were provided in a specific area. There was discussion on a possible conflict with the permitted use of commercial retail and service nature in GC -2 zoning and a shopping center as a conditional use in this zoning. They felt that maybe it is a conditional use because shopping centers are on a large scale and the retail store space is leased out to different type of uses. There was discussion on Public Hearings required for conditional uses and it was the feeling of the board that home occupations should not require a Public Hearing with notice to property owners within 200 ft. They felt it is.the City Com- mission's deci.sibn to amend the ordinance on conditional uses. I The Minutes of the previous meeting were approved. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. x /✓ J. Q. Galloway, Chairma FORM 4 D N WHICH VOTE OCCURRED: MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT I ,199 PART A Name:. Barks .Tames A Telephone: 305 (LAST) (FIRST) - (MIDOLE) (A/C) (NUMBER) Address: P.O. Box 2279 Sanford 32771 Seminole (STREET) (CITY) I ZIP CODE) (COUNTY) PART B Agency is a unit of [check one] : ( ) State of Florida; . ( X) County, City or other Political Subdivision Name of Agency: City of Sanford Planning & Zoning Commission Position held in Agency: Member PART C MEMORANDUM OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN A VOTING SITUATION [Required by Florida Statutes § 112.3143 (19751] If you have voted in your official capacity upon any measure in which you had a personal, private, or professional interest which inures to your special private gain or the special private gain of any principal by whom you are retained, please disclose the nature of your interest below. 1. Docription of the matter upon which you voted in your official capacity: V -t to � sA r , GC C r i1 1 , V , l X�f 2. Description of the personal, private, or professional interest you have in the above matter which inures to your special private gain or the special private gain of any principal by whom you are retained: 3. Person or principal to whom the special gain described above will inure: a. ( ) Yourself b. dV Principal by whom you are retained: Shinholzer & Logan (NAME) PART D FILING INSTRUCTIONS This memorandum must be filed within fifteen (15) days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who shall incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes. This form need not be filed merely to indicate the absence of a voting conflict. Florida law permits but does not require you to abstain from voting when a conflict of interest arises; if you vote, however, the.conflict must be disclosed pursuant to the requirements described above. PART E (- ff- S 1 I GNATURE OF PERSON DISCLOSING DATE SIGNED NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317 (1975), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED 55,000. CE FORM 4- EFF. 1/1/77