11.02.78MINUTES
Planning and Zoning Commission
Nov. 2, 1978
8:00 P.M.
Members Present:
J. Q. Galloway, Chairman
Wm. Royster
C. B. Franklin
Gordon Meyer
Jan Freeman
Sheila Roberts
Tom Wilson
Members Absent:
Others Present:
Jack Bridges
Rudy Sloan
Al Payne, Zoning Director
Mack LaZenby, City Engineer /Utility Director
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, J. Q. Galloway at
8 :00 P.M.
The first item for discussion was a site plan and conditional use
for Mini - warehouses in the GC -2 zoned district south of 27th St.
and between French Ave. & Druid Park Drive, represented by Robert
Whitaker.
After discussion regarding the parking, drainage, and getting an
opinion from the City Engineer, Gordon Meyer moved to recommend
denial. Mr. Franklin seconded. Motion carried, and Mr. Robert
Whitaker was asked to bring a suitable plan back to the Board,
meeting the city requirements for site plan approval.
The next item for discussion was a site plan for a Day Nursery and
residence for Mr. & Mrs. Earl Pfluke, 2536 Elm Ave., represented
by Mike Drennan. The plan as presented showed a 6 -ft. sightproof
.fence and two parking spaces and a drive long enough to allow two
cars to be off Elm Ave. for pickup and delivery. After discussion,
Mr. Meyer moved to approve the site plan. Mrs. Roberts seconded.
Motion carried. The following letter was presented to the Chairman:
Nov. 2, 1978
I am unable to attend the Planning & Zoning meeting and wish this
letter to go on record regarding the site plan for a Day Nursery
and residence for Mr. & Mrs. Earl Pfluke, 2536 Elm Ave.
MINUTES - Planning and zoning Commission - Nov. 2, 1978 - 8:00 P.M.
Page 2
I am a property owner at 2521 Laurel Ave. abutting the property
in question, and wish to express my feeling that if the Planning
and Zoning Board approves this Nursery in a primarily residential
neighborhood, that a sightproof fence be a requirement. Due to
the fact that my work schedule requires that I work nights and
sleep days, a sightproof fence could reduce noise during the day.
Signed: Robert E. Bernosky, Sr.
Mrs. Freeman asked that the letter be made a part of the minutes,
for record.
The next item for discussion was a Development Plan concept for a
33 -acre Plat to be named "Charmont ", a portion of Hidden Lakes PUD
represented by David Meadows. The.concept proposed the following:
1. All streets shall be concrete curbs and gutters,
asphalt surface over limerock bases.
2. No pedestrian walks.
3. Front yard setback of 20', side yard setback of a
total of 13' for both sides with a minimum of 5' on
any one side, and a rear yard setback of 25'.
4. Density will be 4.1 per acre.
5. Lot size to be 65' x 100' minimum, or 6500 square
feet.
6. No more than 10% of the homes to be 840 sq. ft. living
area.
7. No more than 35% of the homes to be 1,020 sq. ft.
living area.
8. At least 10% of the homes to be at least 1,240 sq. ft.
living area.
9. At least 35% of the homes to be at least 1,300 sq. ft.
living area.
10. Lot width at building set back line to be at least
63'.
Mr. Wilson moved to table the item until the board can get further
information from the City Staff on the surrounding homes, as to
square footage, lot size, setbacks, etc. The two main objections
to the concept being the minimum square footage of 840 and the lack
of sidewalks. Mrs. Roberts seconded. Motion carried.
Mr. Davis was present to represent the Home Owners Association of
Hidden Lakes and requested on behalf of the group, that any further
plans brought before the board be brought to the attention of the
President of the Home Owners Association. Mr. Meyer moved that any
further matters to be brought before the Board regarding Hidden
Lakes be presented to the President of the Hidden Lake Home Owners
Association. Mr. Wilson seconded. Motion carried.
MINUTES -- Planning and Zoning Commission - Nov. 2, 1978 - 8:00 P.M.
Page 3
Mr. LaZenby gave the members some information on Hidden Lakes PUD
and explained the intent of PUD and the need for consistency in
future building and developing. He introduced Mr. Lee Black, a
former Sanford resident who is now connected with HUD in Washington,
D. C. Mr. Black told members about some possibilities through
HUD for the City of Sanford and talked briefly about the things
that have been accomplished and possibilities for the future.
The minutes of the previous meeting were approved as mailed.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
Q. Galloway, Ch ' man