Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1699* FRS Envir Chg Ord No. 1 (15)
ypRjlj Tuesday, February 02, 2016 —18 7 PURCHAM III G ERA s;' TRANsMITTAL MEMORANDUM TO: City Clerk/Mayor RE: PPM Consultants, Inc RFQ 14/15-22 Environmental Site Assessment & Characterization Services. , The item(s)noted below is/are attached and forwarded to your office for the following action(s): ig F-1 Development Order a t u ❑ Final Plat(original mylars) ecor in ❑ Letter of Credit Rendering F-1 Maintenance Bond ❑ Ordinance --Deputy--Cify'Manager ❑ Performance Bond ❑ Payment Bond F-1 Resolution ❑ City Manager Signature F-1 ❑ City Clerk Attest/Signature ❑ City Attorney/Signature Once completed,please: Z Return originals to Purchasing- Department F-1 Return copies n Special Instructions: MOW 50� Ord4-17 4V�(' From Date TADept forms\City Clerk Transmittal Memo-2009.doc --Q DocumEw APPROVAL 2/2/2016 10-052 AM Contract Agreement Name: PPM Consultants, Inc RFQ 14/15-22 Environmental Site Assessment & aracterization Services. Pu sing Man ger Date Finance irector Date ity Attorney Date AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA AND PPM CONSULTANTS, INC., FOR SOLICITATION NUMBER: RFQ 14/15-22/ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT & CHARACTERIZATION SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT (hereinafter the "Agreement") is made and entered into this day of 6Z"b 2016, by and between the City of Sanford, Florida, a F orida municipality, (hereirlafter referred to as the "City"), whose mailing address is 300 North Park Avenue, Sanford, Florida 32771, and PPM Consultants, Inc., Inc., a Louisiana corporation, ("PPM" throughout)") whose address is 1600 Lamy Lane, Monroe, Louisiana 71201. The City and PPM may be collectively referenced herein as the "parties". WITNESSETH: IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants, promises, and representations contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1. Recitals; Procurement Type. The above recitals are true and form a material part of this Agreement upon which the parties have relied. This Agreement was procured under the provisions of the Consultants Competitive Negotiation Act as set forth in Section 287.055, Florida Statutes. Section 2. Authority. Each party hereto represents to the other that it has undertaken all necessary actions to execute this Agreement, and that it has the legal authority to enter into this Agreement and to undertake all obligations imposed on it. The persons executing this Agreement for each party certify that they are authorized to bind the party fully to the terms of this Agreement. PPM's Project Manager under this Agreement shall be Ms. Amy L. Guilfoyle unless and until such person is modified by providing written notice to the City. Section 3. Scope of Agreement. This Agreement is for the services as set forth in Exhibit "A" (the City's procurement solicitation documents) and Exhibit "B" (the responses thereto from PPM) all of which are incorporated herein as if fully set forth herein verbatim) and it is recognized that PPM shall perform services as otherwise directed by the City all of such services to include all labor and materials that may be required including, but in no way limited to, the goods and services provided by subconsultants as may be approved by the City within the amount of compensation to be paid to PPM. Section 4. Effective Date and Term of Agreement. This Agreement shall take effect on the date that this Agreement is fully executed by the Parties hereto. This Agreement shall remain in effect until the completion of all services under any work order issued by the City have been fully performed in accordance with the requirements of the City; provided, however, that, the indemnification provisions and insurance I I P a e provisions of the City's standard contractual terms and conditions shall not terminate and the protections afforded to the City shall continue in effect subsequent to such services being provided by PPM. No services have commenced prior to the execution of this Agreement that would entitle PPM for any compensation therefor. Authorization for each portion of the work shall be implemented by the issuance of work orders by the City. It is noted that the City's Brownfield Redevelopment Program is funded through a Brownfields Assessment Grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The grant has been awarded and is scheduled to terminate on September 30, 2018. This Agreement shall terminate on December 31, 2018, but shall be automatically renewed for successive 12 month periods ending on December 31 of each successive year and continue into effect from year-to-year as a continuing contract for the services set forth in RFQ 14/15-22 unless and until this Agreement is terminated in accordance with the Terms and Conditions referenced in Section 6 or with 90 days advance written notice by one party to the other. Section 5. Compensation. The parties agree to compensation which shall be established in each work order issued in accordance with PPM's Standard Rate Table, January, 2016, attached hereto. Section 6. Standard Contractual Terms and Conditions. All "Standard Contractual Terms and Conditions", as provided on the City's website, apply to this Agreement. Such Terms and Conditions may be found at the City's website (www.SanfordFL.gov). The parties shall also be bound by the purchasing policies and procedures of the City as well as the controlling provisions of Florida law. Section 7. PPM's Mandatory Compliance with Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and Public Records Requests. In order to comply with Section 119.0701, Florida Statutes, public records laws, PPM must: (a). Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the City in order to perform the service. (b). Provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the City would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, or as otherwise provided by law. (c). Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law. (d). Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to the City all public records in possession of PPM upon termination of the contract and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. All records stored electronically must be 21 11 a -, c provided to the City in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the City. (e). If PPM does not comply with a public records request, the City shall enforce the contract provisions in accordance with this Agreement. (f). Failure by PPM to grant such public access and comply with public records requests shall be grounds for immediate unilateral cancellation of this Agreement by the City. PPM shall promptly provide the City with a copy of any request to inspect or copy public records in possession of PPM and shall promptly provide the City with a copy of PPM's response to each such request. Section 8. Time is of the Essence. Time is hereby declared of the essence as to the lawful performance of all duties and obligations set forth in this Agreement. Section 9. Entire Agreement/Modification. This Agreement, together with all "Standard Contractual Terms and Conditions", as provided on the City's website, and including, without limitation, the exhibits hereto, constitutes the entire integrated agreement between the City and PPM and supersedes and controls over any and all prior agreements, understandings, representations, correspondence and statements whether written or oral in connection therewith and all the terms and provisions contained herein constitute the full and complete agreement between the parties hereto to the date hereof. This Agreement may only be amended, supplemented or modified by a formal written amendment of equal dignity herewith. Section 10. Severability. If any term, provision or condition contained in this Agreement shall, to any extent, be held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of such term, provision or condition to persons or circumstances other than those in respect of which it is invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby, and each term, provision and condition of this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law when consistent with equity and the public interest. Section 11. Waiver. The failure of the City to insist in any instance upon the strict performance of any provision of this Agreement, or to exercise any right or privilege granted to the City hereunder shall not constitute or be construed as a waiver of any such provision or right and the same shall continue in force. Section 12. Captions. The section headings and captions of this Agreement are for convenience and reference only and in no way define, limit, describe the scope or intent of this Agreement or any part thereof, or in any way affect this Agreement or construe any provision of this Agreement. Section 13. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which, taken together, shall constitute one and the same document. 31 11a Section 14. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors in interest, transferees and assigns of the parties. Each party hereto represents to the other that it has undertaken all necessary actions to execute this Agreement, and that it has the legal authority to enter into this Agreement and to undertake all obligations imposed on it. The signatories hereof represent that they have the requisite and legal authority to execute this Agreement and bind the respective parties herein. Section 15. Remedies. The rights and remedies of the parties, provided for under this Agreement, are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or otherwise necessary in the public interest. Section 16. Governing law, Venue and Interpretation. This Agreement is to be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. Venue for any legal proceeding related to this Agreement shall be in the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit Court in and for Seminole County, Florida. This Agreement is the result of bona fide arms length negotiations between the City and PPM, and all parties have contributed substantially and materially to the preparation of the Agreement. Accordingly, this Agreement shall not be construed or interpreted more strictly against any one party. than against any other party and all provisions shall be applied to fulfill the public interest. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and PPM have executed this instrument for the purpose herein expressed. Attest: THE CITY OF SANF ,-" . By: Jeff Triplett Cynth Porter, City Clerk Mayor NP Dated: ( 4. Approved as to form and legality for Use and reliance by the City of Sanford, Florida. By: William L. Colbert City Attorney Dated: Z /C ADDITIONAL SIGNATURE BLOCK ON FOLLOWING PAGE: 41Pagc Attest: PPM CONSULTANTS, INC. Keith D. yron L. Todd Perry, President Secretary Dated: _ 5111age " t - � ' �j(��'z��—/L��-y�• eve `'=; oWS_X_ RM X =' a, Item No., � LEDs C)t Cl CITY COMMISSION MEMORANDUM / _ JANUARY 11, 220 16 AGENDA 16-013 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission PREPARED BY: F. William Smith,Purchasing Manager SUBMITTED BY: Norton N. Bonaparte Jr., City Manager SUBJECT: Approve Ranking of Firms for Profession ervices for Environmental Site Assessment Characterization STRATEGIC PRIORITIES: ❑ Unify Downtown&the Waterfront ❑ Promote the City's Distinct Culture ❑ Update Regulatory Framework ❑ Redevelop and Revitalize Disadvantaged Communities SYNOPSIS: Ranking of firms for conducting environmental site assessments involving hazardous and petroleum constituents and to provide environmental site assessment and characterization activities and related services on a 3-year contract basis for the City under its Brownfields Redevelopment Program is being requested. FISCAL/STAFFING STATEMENT: Funding for this work is available through an Environmental Protection Agency brownfields grant for conducting environmental site assessments involving hazardous and petroleum constituents. BACKGROUND: The City solicited statements of qualifications in accordance with the Request For Qualifications (RFQ) process to retain one or more qualified environmental services consulting firms to provide environmental site assessment and characterization activities and related services on a 3-year contract basis for the City under its Brownfields Redevelopment Program. On September 20, 2015, the solicitation identified above was formally advertised to invite all interested firms to submit statements of qualifications to compete for the award of the subject work. It is noted that seven firms responded to the solicitation which is a very favorable result for the City in terms of competition among potential vendors and the economic vitality of the City. The following table summarizes scoring for the shortlisted firms: RFQ 1411 5-22;Environmental Assessment and Characterization Services r- C � o Uj n- i a Scoring Team Christine 85 90 45 Dalton Bilallftikhar 85 90 82 Tom George 86 93 77 Totals 256 273 204 This competitive procurement was implemented in compliance with City's Procurement Policy which is consistent with the State mandated competitive negotiation process for the services in question. Action taken based upon this memorandum will complete the process by designating the ranking resulting from evaluations of the firms included on the short list which will determine the order of negotiations. LEGAL REVIEW: If awarded,the City Attorney will engage in Contract preparation. The City Attorney concurs with the stated requirements of the CCNA. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Commission approve the ranking of firms reflecting the firm of PPM being ranked number 1, ECT being ranked number 2, and Terracon being ranked number 3 and to authorize the City Manager to negotiate an award in the order of ranking and to execute all documents as required. SUGGESTED MOTION: "I move to approve the proposed ranking of firms reflecting and to authorize the City Manager to negotiate an award in the order of ranking and to execute all documents as required." Attachments: 1.Newspaper advertisement 2. Score Sheets 3. Solicitation Opening Certification Orlando Sentinel Published Daily ORANGE County,Florida STATE OF FLORIDA Tj�OUl;SrFt 0 0FflOFttS0 s SoOcrtebouHumbertiHI7 5-Zt COUNTY OF SEMINOLE solri UMON t" 1 ' CttAFU.11:1fNIZM1TIONSERY(CES °- �iipegJngDStsTindTrma'OctpberT9 t!AISaT.=. Before the undersigned authority personally appeared xuggat�tnoa nb(iej t ; cdtdl�°''nda1On n ltsghTs-QPaii[ab(c°Ti Sheri Schmitz/Adys DelValle/Brian Hall/Charity Casas/Jean M. a-" submissions may° be dawnlopded. v�liGat who on oath says that he or she is an Advertising dT f i r irdfl 9.0 ndex- . y g asax,aaae-68ir this vilit Provide Representative of the ORLANDO SENTINEL a DAILY newspaper ►nstrudrans and acce�ss� m htro published at the P a J pit jzon R stTtOemherezgttci}c h a l �R Florida;that the attached py of d rt sem being a Legal Notice in the matter of 11120-Advertisement for Bid,RFP 14/15-22 was `rhe>clrr of Sanford ha received F published in said newspaper in the issues of Sep 20 2015. Aaericw EsEPa' er°t P`°tectt°"x awneelds Grant iar_WsonducNhO EnVlroncrientai , ssments In Asse yatktng hazardous an¢._ petroleum consTtfuents 7fie eTty is Affiant further says that the said ORLANDO SENTINEL is a soucteng srotarC,enrs aT crittrnfjcatte is r newspaper published in said ORANGE County,Florida,and that thenvinmentai,�se[vtcmOesrecom:ctc�to ; -ossedsmenYrovtde environmental site said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said w ana cha�anerl:anon acTtv(ttes and retgted serykes on a 3-Y.eor conlraat basis{ar The etiy - ORANGE County,Florida,each day and has been entered as andep,its aroWnHeids t2e¢eveloamenr periodicals matter at the post office in ORANGE County, in Progr°"' '` P P tY.Florida, �� �< .COneofs�f�icetack�°ut�+ectoaa Iles said ORANGE County,Florida,for a period of one year next �tq This pnd ail other sgtfarar°Pigns = preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement;A+rgm�15'T°`°hmcr cf s°mm's�'°"t r members,members of t�e;EVaTUatian h! and 3etection CQmmtizee-otpKy afher and affiant further says that he or she has neither paid nor promised cttrWfictat andrDF erKsp'oyeeorherihan YhmgghyheKdtyofSan fordP,urchasirm " any person,firm or corporation any discount,rebate,commission or �tA.aces$$f dur n ai g this procurement ' shah•not he oflowed Any refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in a»empts to conracr trarernize qr rn(lue(tce aarsonrtel tndrented above { the said newspaper. z, ay result to dtsqualtricajion of tile' ffend(na party or firm coMOM-ou2chosina cityif�- --"""'l :•` - Senior¢'�jor[da 40j.698.5g3lt r i �' / J { emoti. purchostn§�SSOftfordit g°v I =-- r�rj:'r. s• F iNttfitrttt smith"PUSehas(ng Manager' ; YCityotSanford ,- .r.. Signature of Affiant Printed Name of Affiant t> easT Sworn to and subscribed before me on this 21 day of September,2015, by above Affiant,who is personally known to me(X)or who has produced identification( ). ignature of Notary u Iic DEBORAH M.TONEY NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA �� c? We C040ASSION#FF 065219 F: EXP1R=-S:November 18.2017 .Name of Notary,Typed,Printed,or Stamped 3594481 Orlando Sentinel Sold To: City of Sanford-C000124060 PO Box 1788 SANFORD,F!,32772 Bill To: City of Sanford-C000124060 PO Box 1788 SANFORD,Fl,32772 to s 4`i'•ati S1PP.cc lte9fCld ri7Ritn S!c{.IMsa aecvmah. 7YM.k11lm. 0.'acNN NyfvY,e2.s rj+N�'1i.IM` 10 WSid —P«i -p.Gti.fil W H JM[.i0alt=f! IP+inrcllwN afi tYt.a1 h MfP.•aNw ttllcyt7talYn Lf�NM[I i WIntW.tWk. aXV«lhn.P.f�tWpy)fl�^nf.h;WbW bb 7M IIir st LaMrd ha H1M1 ia;.fK."1'r'iw mt«tu rieictwn P[aMN/rga Gmt Ut {4i4XttN PcHtrylyffNry[t0t1 S:t. 1Y.YAHeNt w.Nrsq RRCr.Vt�K awi. i ryn«�m..}s v) TbNff+NaGate�w «bnuenfamtl mlq i�l.+.^'Piro emit+«vitrh�r RnfP b PfatY}r n.ImmNrl.i Yir OL'FIA reN/ bN tr:PPCWQOtiM ao� s}�rYnn<iti Watlt M NM+MN� tW+MKMnf Prott+an. Cnfrtl Siil�cwTNacceW olttslat9tn b tlil bla NI IMN(y21iC1/Ai/ /� AMNMlS ro fund'{try lONmiSYM �. 111NflNtl!l1 n.N(Q!� PN WIl U0 apt t!1!•�OeP CP+W.tI!!N;sf/OP.! Pi/.pdet nMY!amPiPrrr•Bia•1MatP� �..... Ymwet�atbhgN�1•�ROPIIlri««I«t dIF/1![w{tt.�Nlf{M t0:1.pOnMO�/N/SI�Y}��'Oi eOW r!'AIN[f�AfWi'tiLWb d Of T! Pflrrgl*PR IVa M1tn1. tiwahom:Prystatt sw'WauR IaNN Y iF;I{t fW Wu.�.dN'�5�1 NN01�f0lU1V' Ar PP• f.MII:ta.SP+.t.Ptl<I+a.rP rartaklr Oar N Tmtlaafl OSZ9/8i N3XIc 3594481 ' City of Sanford Florida — Purchasing Division {C 877— Phone: 407.688.5028 FAX: 407.688.5021 email: purchasing(aD_sanfordfl.gov web page: www.sanfordfl.gov Date: October 21, 2015 Solicitation Number: RFQ 14/15-22 Title: Environmental Site Assessment & Characterization Services Opening Date: October 19, 2015 at 2:00 pm 1. Barnes,Ferland&Associates 2. Cardno,Inc 3. Environmental Consulting&Technology(ECT) 4. E-Sciences,Inc S. NorthStar Contracting Group,Inc 6. PPM Consultants 7. Terracon r Respectfully, F.William Smith, Purchasing Manager . . . , . . " . ' ( / aslman mol �eum». '-u '^ '~"08B / 41 tu tA �_�' uo:)ejaal t co r, s luelinsuoD 0 cn rn m Wdd {eau Lr) Ln to auauoaInu3 00 °° °0 0 m L QJ a v -� o a Y y i $ E L = o U m !- t O N uo:)eaaal � 00 r- m n N Wdd rn rn T cfl Ln N 133 00 coo 00 C 0 Y 76 L Q � L 0 � Y v to N H E 1 •L � Y .0 = 0 0 U m RFQ 14/15-22 Environmental Assessment and Characterization Services 0 W i � L Scoring Team Christine 85 90 45 Dalton Bilillftikher 85 90 82 Tom George 86 93 77 Totals 256 273 204 CITY OF SANFOR0,FLORIDA-PURCHASING DIVISION SOLICITATION OPENING CERTIFICATION AND MINUTES 255.0518, Florida \ A. So|b�tationT�a�nd �JUDlbe[ . ' Opening Date hn Location of Opening: City Commission Chambers 1. On this date the opening of the solicitation response identified above is hereby vefifiedmnd the public announcements recorded below regarding the solicitations received were duly made. It is noted that no other business was conducted, there were no discussions and noinput was received from anyone in attending. There was no attendance record made. |FB-Announced the name cf each bidder and the amount of their bid. RFP-Announced the name of each respondent. X RFQ-AMnouncedtheRmmnmofemohreapmndaDt. __If any submission was not opened and/or announced, check this item and indicate specific information on tabulation below. 2. Name of City d the bids: I &A Certification (1) 7/ - - r_ l 41-11111alw QJIV 8""iyLAW /0_'d /f, — Certification(2) BA4"�l J�:� �4-V&pz 9 t'� I Signature L.J date printed name and titlb / < -}-/Q| submissions were opened and read. The tabulation below reflects the information read. _ __Any solicitation(s) not opened and/or read are so noted below along with reason for exclusion. 3. —The public notice required by§288.0105 and 286.011 Florida Statutes is attached hereto. 4' The following listed persons attended and spoke at the bid opening identified above. Tabulation -Barnes, Ferland &Associates Cardno, Inc. E-Sciences, Inc. NorthStar Contracting Group, Inc. PPM Consultants Terracon ( ' xon�/ here = ����"=" "` "=" °" �°",y " ''"==°""� `=""="~ ~` ~ additional~ ^ r~w~~~^~ __ z CONSULTANTS 9 750 South Northlake Boulevard, Suite 1012 Altamonte Springs; FL 32701 tel 407.240.1127 fax 407.2401310 wiavv!.ppmco.com October 16,2015 Mr.William Smith Purchasing Manager City of Sanford 300 North-Park Avenue Sanford, Florida 32771 Re: Statement of Qualifications for providing Environmental Assessment and Characterization Services Dear Mr. Smith: ' i PPM Consultants, Inc. (PPM) appreciates the opportunity to present the enclosed statement of qualifications for providing environmental assessment and characterization services to support brownfields redevelopment for the City of Sanford. We also want to extend our congratulations to Sanford on winning an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Brownfields Assessment Grant. We have reviewed and are thoroughly familiar with Sanford's Work Plan and have the . 1 available resources to start this project immediately. PPM has been providing environmental services for over 21 years and has been assisting clients with EPA Brownfields assessment grants since 1997 when the initial EPA brownfields pilot grant program was established. PPM has experience working with over 170 cities and municipalities in developing brownfields programs and we are confident that our knowledge and capabilities will be an asset to the City of Sanford. We have the experience to provide all services required under the assessment grant including all management tasks. PPM is prepared to meet,all federal requirements for work funded by Sanford's EPA Brownfields Assessment Cooperative Agreement and comply with the EPA's Terms and Conditions. PPM is committed to the City of Sanford and will continue to be responsive and available to your needs on the project. I will serve as the Program Manager for this project and Amy Guilfoyle will serve as Project Manager. We will successfully complete the scope of services under this grant in a timely and cost efficient manner that is well within the contract budget. PPM is certain that our proficiency in providing past and current successful brownfields support will be beneficial to the City of Sanford in the establishment and ongoing management of a Brownfields Redevelopment Program. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments at 1- 800-761-8673. Sincerely, PPM Consultants, Inc. Kei h D. Pyron, P.G. 1 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SERVICES, TO SUPPORT BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT t CITY OF SANFORD f . Preperrecl for —1877- City of Sanford William".Smith,PurchasingManager j RFQ--Number 14115-22 OpenDate: October 19,2015 Time: 2:00 pm Prepared by: IBM v r CONSULTANTS _4 a �: FPM Consultants,Inc 750 South Northlake Boulevard,Suite 1012 Altamonte Springs,FL 32741 407=240=1127 phone iz k October 1911,,2015 l� s, e i nommmmawmmw r ARM CONSULTANTS f COVER LETTER TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS/EXPERIENCE 1 A. Relevant EPA Brownfields Redevelopment Project Experience 1 B. EPA Grant Administration Experience 4 C. Environmental Assessment/Testing Qualifications and Experience 4 D. Firm Quality Assurance and Quality Control Measures and Approach 5 E. Safety 7 F. Public Participation Program 8 G. Key Personnel Experience 8 j 2.0 APPROACH TO UNDERSTANDING SCOPE OF SERVICE 12 A. Strategy and Process for Project Completion 12 B. Project Time Frame 16 C. Role of Subcontractors 17 D. Key Project Personnel Roles and Responsibilities 18 _3 E. City of Sanford Roles and Performance 20 F. Assistance to City in Preparing Forms and Grant Reports 21 G. Community Outreach 22 H. Capacity 23 1 3.0 ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIVENESS 24 APPENDICES Appendix A—SF-330&Organizational Chart Appendix B— Required Submittal Forms '' ® 5 ,111112 s i EM PPM has been a leader in Brownfields since the inception of the program. PPM has an 18-year solid track record of completing Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) brownfields projects. Our firm grasp on the brownfields i program is directly related to the vast experience of our personnel. PPM staff members have been featured speakers at the EPA National, Region IV, and Region VI Brownfields conferences and workshops. Due to our level of understanding, PPM was selected to provide technical assistance to cities and counties throughout EPA Region IV and VI by means of a $1,500,000 EPA Technical Assistance Brownfields (TAB) Grant. PPM has experience dating back to the first brownfields grant received in Florida. PPM has assisted grantees in preparing some of the highest ranking assessment grant applications in Region IV. PPM has assisted over 170 government entities and non-profit organizations by holding workshops, preparing grants, conducting site inventories, reporting, program management, and providing technical consulting under EPA's TAB Grant. Our personnel have served as board members on the Florida Brownfields Association and have helped shape the j program in the state. a. Relevant EPA Brownfields Redevelopment Project Experience PPM has relevant EPA brownfields redevelopment experience dating back to 1997 when we won our first contract in the state of Florida. Since that time we have been selected by dozens of municipalities and other government entities to perform work under their EPA Brownfield grants. A listing of these clients is shown below: • City of Eustis, Florida • Monroe County,Alabama • City of Ocala, Florida • City of Selma,Alabama • City of Plant City, Florida • City of Guin,.Alabama • Escambia County, Florida •City of Decatur,Alabama • City,of Pensacola, Florida • City of Pascagoula, Mississippi •West Florida Regional Planning Council •City of Jackson, Mississippi •Central Florida Regional Planning Council • City of Holly Springs, Mississippi •Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council •State of Mississippi • City of St. Petersburg, Florida •City of Baton Rouge, Louisiana City of Mobile,Alabama •City of Monroe, Louisiana •. *.City of Prichard,Alabama •City of West Monroe, Louisiana You want the best from your EPA Brownfields funding,so choose the consultant with the best track record of success. PPM has the best track record of success in Florida and is the best fit for Sanford based upon the following. PPM has the most EPA Phoenix Awards of any consultant for redevelopment sites in Florida. The EPA Phoenix award is the highest award given by the EPA in recognition of successful redevelopment based upon positive impact on the environment, conservation, and the projects general and long-term economic and/or social impacts. The efforts of PPM Offers Award Winning Experience" our personnel in providing clients with technical assistance � Page 1 i with brownfields sites have resulted in these clients receiving recognition including four EPA Phoenix Awards. It is accomplishments like these that have established PPM as a recognized leader in the brownfields program, including both technical and management aspects of the program. • •' 0 • 0 '•' 00 • e• • 0 0• 0 0 0 0 • FPM specializes in Brownfields redevelopment. Our firm does far more than perform site assessments under the brownfields program. We put our efforts into working with realtors, developers, and other stakeholders in order to make redevelopment a reality. This capability comes from our staff understanding economic development based on several of our personnel previously employed with municipalities in that capacity. For example, Charles Ray who serves as our Economic Development Team Leader, served as the Economic Development Coordinator for the City of St. Petersburg for 19 years. During his tenure, he utilized over 6.5 million in brownfields funding leading to some of the most successful redevelopment projects in Florida, resulting in two EPA Phoenix Awards for the city. • . . . -• o • -e- e• • • e la Crosse Waldo Extensive Brownfields experience in Florida. PPM has worked Pensarnla �,, with the most clients in Florida under the State and EPA i' Alachua ,Haa5wthorne FortSt.loe - Sil�iri s brownfields programs, including counties . cities regional Newberry p g p g � g � � g Bellevie Ocala Eustis planning councils, and non-profit organizations. PPM has Sanford Counties Leesburg `Mulberry provided services pertaining to brownfields for over 40 clients Winter _ Melb- in the state of Florida. Our experience extends from near the Cities ourne Plant City southern tip of Florida all the way to the panhandle. Our Other organizations St.Petersbu Haines ty experience includes every aspect of program management and Palmetto technical performance of brownfields. Ft.Myers CONSULTANTS Immokalee Florida Brownfield Clients . r- r . . . ® 0 • •. •- 0 09 • 0 t- a e- • • •- • o •o a • • PPM is the most knowledgeable concerning the City of Sanford's brownfields needs. PPM has been involved in the development of Sanford's brownfields program for over three years. In this time period, PPM has assisted the City of Sanford with obtaining grant funding, facilitated community outreach events, performed site inventories, and worked with city personnel to develop a redevelopment strategy to focus on the historic Georgetown and Goldsboro communities. In addition, PPM's Project Manager, Ms.Amy Guilfoyle, and her team have been working for the City for the past four years on projects including the Former Police Station assessment and remediation project. Over the past four years, PPM has been involved with community events, understands the dynamics of the City, and knows what the City expects from their consultant. Page 2 I Ip • r' • r • r :- • • • 0 • •• PPM has extensive EPA brownfields technical experience. PPM has gained TABtechnical experience directly from working at over 85 EPA funded brownfields sites throughout the Southeast under the $1,500,000 TAB TECHNICAL ASSISTANCETO BROWNf1ELD5 Grant. PPM was selected by city and county agencies to prepare Work Plans and conduct brownfields related work in Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana. Through this experience, PPM understands the brownfields technical process and what is required not only to obtain approval of a Quality Assurance Project Plans(QAPP) in EPA Region IV, but to help bring projects through to successful remediation. These Work Plans have proven to establish a "required standard" amongst the regulatory community. For example, the EPA was so pleased with one of PPM's Work Plans submitted for the 2500 Palafox property (Escambia County, Florida Brownfields project) that the EPA used it as an example of how Work Plans should be developed during a workshop held in Miami, Florida. MEN=•• a • s I PPM has an excellent track record of achieving site closure. It is one thing to have remediation experience, but what is more important is the number of sites that are brought to closure after remediation is completed. PPM has received "No Further Action" status for hundreds of sites that have been impacted by various contaminants. We have technical specialists who understand the relationship between environmental and economic issues. Our team has brought these sites to closure using common sense solutions that are also the most economical. Many regulatory personnel including those at Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) have im stated that we have one of the best track records of achieving closure. We have helped our clients receive over 640"No Further Action"letters to prove it. • e•.• a • • e • e - • • o o • -•- - •• The PPM team has great success at securing additional funding. PPM understands that the first step in securing additional funding from the EPA's Brownfields program is to show results with the money that has already been j awarded. PPM has assisted over 25 local governments with securing EPA brownfield funding. Our redevelopment successes have been established and provide the EPA with assurance that the funding will be well spent with the PPM Team on board. Our personnel have helped obtain over 10 million dollars in EPA brownfield grants across the Southeast. Our team is also able to secure for the City of Sanford other types of funding to help leverage the City's Brownfields Program. Other potential funding sources include Community Development Block Grant(CDBG), US Army Corp of Engineers, and US Health and Human Services. Page 3 0 AM � .0 Pffie { 1 - b. EPA Grant Administration Experience 3 PPM has personnel that have brownfields program administration experience dating back to the inception of the program in 1997.This experience includes: •Writing Grants • Conducting Workshops • Preparing Work Plans • Reviewing Technical Reports • Preparing CIAPPS • Preparing Site Eligibility Forms • Preparing Quarterly Reports • Updating ACRES (EPA Assessment, • Organizing Stakeholder Meetings Cleanup, and Redevelopment -Conducting Site Inventories Exchange System) • Performing Community Outreach Some of this experience has been gained through our personnel providing these services under the EPA TAB grant,where PPM has assisted over 170 government entities and nonprofit organizations by holding workshops, preparing grants, conducting site inventories, and providing consulting under EPA's TAB Grant. These services € have been provided to dozens of counties, cities, quasigovernment agencies, and Indian tribes throughout EPA Region IV and Region VI. For example, PPM has conducted site inventories for 20 government agencies including Pensacola, Melbourne, Sanford, Winter Garden, Haines City, Plant City as well as Brevard County, 1 Collier County, Orange County, Seminole County, and the West Florida Regional Planning Council in the State of Florida. Our current Vice President of Government Initiatives and Brownfields, Charles Ray, has 9 years of hands-on experience managing the City of St. Petersburg's Brownfields Program and 19 years' experience as an Economic Development Coordinator. As a Brownfields Program Manager, he established a successful city program and obtained over $6.5 million dollars in Federal and State Brownfields grants. His brownfields redevelopment experience includes obtaining resources available to local governments from other federal agencies in addition to EPA, including CDBG funding from Housing and Urban Development (HUD), plus technical and financial I assistance from the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers and U.S. Health and Human Services. Each of these Federal i agencies has financial and technical resources to contribute to a successful brownfields program. Our management services will also include assistance with the completion and submission of all EPA Brownfields Agreements and forms. PPM will provide assistance with the completion and timely submission of the City's quarterly reporting to EPA. We will also provide assistance in submitting and updating data in EPA's ACRES. Brownfields site activity reporting via the ACRES is a requirement of U.S. Congress and the responsibility of the brownfields grantee. PPM will assist the City to submit and maintain property specific information via the on- line ACRES database. ACRES reporting is supplemental to the quarterly reporting to the EPA regional office. C. Environmental Assessment/Testing Qualifications and Experience PPM has extensive experience performing Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) for property transactions. PPM personnel have collectively conducted over 2,750 Phase I ESAs in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard E1527-13, "Standard Practices for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process" for commercial real estate and standard E2247, "Standard Practices for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process for Forestland or Rural Property". Many of the Phase I ESAs were performed for local lending institutions in Page 4 , Dow. r '�! i Florida such as: Community Bank, Compass Bank, The Peoples Bank, SunTrust Bank, Hancock Bank, Regions Bank, Wachovia Bank, and Whitney National Bank. All site investigations and technical report reviews will be performed by individuals that meet the definition of an Environmental Professional as set forth in 40 CFR §312.10(b). PPM personnel have performed thousands of subsurface investigations in Florida and are s. t thoroughly familiar with the complex geology of this region. These investigations include Phase II ESAs performed to assess recognized environmental conditions identified by Phase 1 ESAs and site investigations under enforcement action by the FDEP and the Brownfields Redevelopment Program. Phase 11 ESA activities included soil borings; temporary and permanent monitoring wells; soil sample collection; groundwater sample collection; asbestos surveys;and lead-based paint surveys. PPM has initiated over 420 remediation projects, with many of these sites being in Florida. PPM evaluates the unique characteristics of each site to determine the best remedial method, and develops a remedial action plan specific to the pY� geologic and physical setting of the location. Throughout the remedial design and implementation process, PPM's focus is to bring a site to closure as rapidly as possible. PPM has also helped pioneer innovative technologies such as ozone sparging that work very well in subsurface environments similar to Sanford. The remediation experience of PPM's staff encompasses dry cleaning facilities; industrial and government sites 1 contaminated.with chlorinated solvents; Superfund sites, petroleum underground and above ground storage tanks; pipelines; refineries; bulk fuel terminals; chemical plants; shooting ranges; schools; and various commercial and industrial sites. The PPM project team approach utilizes the individual technical talents of engineers, geologists, and environmental scientists to enhance remedial design efforts, streamline project efforts,and shorten the time required to complete cleanup. PPM has experience with a wide array of remedial technologies and has made significant technological advances in many categories due to our extensive experience with remediation. PPM has performed hundreds of remediation projects at sites throughout the southeast over the past 21 years. This experience has resulted in significant design advances that have solidly established PPM as a leader in remediation.At many sites, PPM has been able to achieve remedial cleanup goals in less than two years with some sites reaching closure in as little as six months. d. Firm Quality Assurance and Quality Control Measures and Approach PPM implements a quality system designed to ensure that environmental activities undertaken by the firm produce the type and quality of results needed and expected, i.e., all environmental data generated and processed will be scientifically valid of known precision and accuracy, acceptable completeness, representativeness, and comparability and legally defensible. The system has been implemented for all environmental programs. PPM's quality system includes the following components: • Quality system documentation; • Annual reviews and planning; • Management assessments; • Training; • Systematic planning of projects; • Project-specific quality documentation; u. Page 5 g Room (......� f • Project and data assessments; and • A list of the tools for implementing each component of the quality system. Documentation of the PPM quality system is provided in both corporate and site specific documents. These include Quality Management Plans (QMP), which serves as the "umbrella" document under which other quality management documents.are developed; QAPPs written to address the unique characteristics and scope of work - for individual sites; and Quality Assurance (QA) plans provided by subcontractors. The overall QMP is reviewed and updated at least annually by the Corporate CIA Director, Mr. Mike McCown,with input from all members of the QA team,to include improvements in the system,which arise from the overall quality improvement process. The Corporate QA Director also meets with key members of the QA team at least annually for long range planning related to QA issues. It is their responsibility to ensure that QMPs and QAPPs are developed consistent with EPA and state requirements. Ultimate approval of these documents is the responsibility of the Corporate QA Director. PPM will prepare a QMP for this brownfields project to assure that field data, analytical data, and project - deliverables obtained and submitted to support Brownfields assessment programs are appropriate and scientifically sound. The QMP has been prepared in accordance with EPA Quality Management Plan guidance documents. The QMP presents the policies, organization, objectives, functional activities, and management systems to ensure that proper quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) procedures are in place to ensure that all technical data generated during the performance of environmental activities on Brownfields projects is accurate, representative of site conditions,and defensible. PPM is committed to providing a high degree of quality in all delivered environmental and engineering services. Sustaining a high level of quality through all of our environmental data acquisitions and reporting activities is a - must in order to 1) ensure that the data generated accurately represents site conditions, since it is often used to support decisions that could affect human health and the environment; 2) ensure that the regulatory agencies who review our work maintain confidence in the scientific data provided; and 3) enable PPM to sustain repeat business from our clients. To preserve this degree of quality, PPM maintains a comprehensive QA program that establishes a solid foundation for data generation, analysis, and interpretation and report preparation, review, and approval. PPM is dedicated to allocating the resources needed to (1) attract personnel with the experience and ability to meet our QA objectives, (2) conduct required training, (3) provide time for senior management to oversee the QA process, and(4) meet intramural and extramural requirements to ensure our objectives are met. The QMP provides an overview of the methods in which QA is managed in our firm, but the QMP does not provide site-specific QA/QC procedures. As allowed in the EPA document entitled "EPA Requirements for Quality Management Plans", PPM will provide such specific QA/QC information in detail in individual QAPPs developed specifically for an individual project. PPM Management is responsible for establishing and implementing PPM's quality policy. Only experienced senior technical staff will be assigned to provide guidance and review. PPM's corporate management structure provides for direct and continuous oversight responsibility, clear lines of authority, and the integration of activities. PPM's QA program is considered a corporate responsibility and is managed by a firm principal, Mr. Mike McCown, QA Director. Mr. Greg Stover will assist the Corporate QA Director with the QA program for the City of Sanford project work. Page 6 Am N W"61 WE f " Brownfield projects typically include the following activities that are supported by the PPM QA/QC system: 1 • Preparation of Phase I and Phase II ESA reports; • Project planning and development of site specific work plans,QAPPs, and other documents; • Collection of samples from all media (soil,sediment,groundwater,surface water,air); • Preparation of deliverable documents; • Purchase of equipment and supplies; • Hiring of subcontractors and vendors; • Obtaining grants, and writing of contracts, and other extramural activities; and • Maintenance of documents and records. Each of these components is addressed in the QMP. Internal coordination among each of PPM's organizational units will be continually maintained via meetings, conference calls, and electronic mail. during the project ! planning stage and throughout the project. The frequency and duration of this communication will be based on the size, scope, and duration of the project. Only personnel with the training and experience to conduct the required tasks will be selected to perform the work. Considerations in selecting personnel include job functions, past experience and performance, the percentage of time devoted to other job functions, physical and environmental demands and hazards, cognitive skills, oral and written communication requirements, and other job-related knowledge and skills. PPM is committed to ensuring that all supplies, equipment, and subcontracted i services are of the highest.quality. Procedures to ensure quality will apply to purchased items and services that directly affect the quality of PPM's environmental programs. This also extends to all procurement documents or extramural agreements, including grants, cooperative agreements, and contracted and subcontracted activities, involving or affecting environmental programs. Laboratory analysis will be performed by independent testing laboratories that maintain high QA/QC standards i in accordance with EPA protocols. Duplicate, blank, replicate, and spiked samples will be used to develop estimates of the quality of the analytical data. Detection limits will be in accordance with EPA-approved methods, where available,for analysis of organics and inorganics. Field audits will be conducted to ensure that proper sampling techniques and chain-of-custody procedures are followed. Field data compilation, tabulation, and analysis will be checked for accuracy. Calculations and other post-field tasks will be reviewed by project personnel. e. Safety I Preparedness and training are paramount to PPM's success. In order to reduce the chance of injury, PPM provides each employee with the training necessary to perform his/her job. Initial training and refresher courses will comply with the specifications of the applicable Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulatory standards to ensure employee competency. Attendance is mandatory and employees are expected to cooperate and participate in training sessions. Employee input is essential to ensure continual improvement of the safety program. The table below presents a brief list of the training provided by PPM. Adm�n�strative4Personnel F�eld.Personnel Corporate Safety Policies Hazard Communication Corporate Safety Policies Emergency Action Plan Fire Prevention Plan Hazard Communication Hazard Assessment&Personal Bloodborne Pathogens Emergency Action Plan Protective Equipment Selection Lockout/Tagout Bloodborne Pathogens Respiratory Protection Hearing Conservation 8-HR OSHA HAZWOPER Refresher CPR/First Aid/AED Training Page 7 F �� ®I>a 1 3 j f. Public Participation Program PPM has extensive experience in performing community outreach. Our community outreach has included j notification and education of the EPA Brownfields program through a variety of means such as through production of flyers, website postings, workshops, town hall style meetings and stakeholder meetings. In addition, PPM has held meetings to bring together local government personnel with interested developers and landowners interested in seeking Brownfields and other grant opportunities for redevelopment. PPM has performed community outreach through meetings and workshops all across the southeast including Sanford, Brevard County, Melbourne, Plant City, Haines City,Orange County, Crystal River,Winter Garden,Collier County, Port St.Joe,Hawthorne,St. Petersburg, Chipley, and Fort Walton Beach, Florida. These meetings have served to educate the public,which in turn helps garner overall support for the Brownfields program. Three of the PPM's employees have formerly served for several years in the capacity of Brownfields Coordinators for municipalities. Their experience includes the development of EPA Community Involvement Plans. They have not only developed these types of plans, they have implemented them successfully to the greater education and involvement of the community. PPM's Project Manager, Amy Guilfoyle, and Community Outreach Specialist, Charles Ray, have participated in town hall style meetings and have met with groups in the City to garner support of the brownfield program. In addition,our team has produced flyers for distribution to City residents. g. Key Personnel Experience For this assessment grant, PPM has assembled a team of some of the most experienced environmental professionals in Florida. If the City of Sanford is looking for the most qualified and experienced firm in brownfields, then PPM is that firm. PPM has been working in Florida since 1995 and has been completing assessments under the EPA Brownfields program in Florida since 2000. In addition, our key personnel have performed work for numerous clients in Florida such as Sanford, Melbourne, Orange County, Winter Garden, Eustis, Haines City, St. Petersburg, Plant City, Escambia County, Brevard County, Pensacola, Collier County, and Seminole County. PPM also has completed EPA funded assessment grant projects for Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, Central Florida Regional Planning Council, and the West Florida Regional Planning Council and state agencies. With this wealth of experience, there is no task required under the Sanford's Grant that PPM is not proficient in completing. ' Amy Guilfoyle will serve as the Project Manager. Ms. Guilfoyle is an environmental scientist and serves as the District Manager in PPM's Orlando, Florida office. Ms. Guilfoyle is currently the Project Manager for the City of Sanford's Former Police Station project. She has also worked closely with the City of Sanford's staff in preparing for this grant award, including preparing a site inventory and attending community meetings. Her experience I includes petroleum and hazardous waste site assessments, Phase 1/11 ESAs, and remedial system installation and operation. She has been responsible for site investigations, contamination assessments, and remedial implementations at gas station facilities, commercial and industrial businesses, agricultural properties, and along roadway corridors. Ms. Guilfoyle brings experience working with municipalities in assisting with the EPA Brownfields program to include grant writing, site inventories, generic and site specific QAPPs, ACRES reporting, minority reporting, conducting and supervising Phase 1, 11, and III ESAs. Over the past 6 years, Ms. Guilfoyle has been active in the Florida Brownfields Association and in 2014 acted as the Co-Chair of the Education and Outreach Committee. Ms. Guilfoyle's experience includes: Page 8 ® ® � .�) z I • Project Manager for the City of Sanford Former Police Station remediation project • Experience with EPA Brownfields experience for several different contracts in Florida including Cocoa, Plant City, Eustis, New Smyrna Beach, and Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council • Provided grant writing assistance to multiple cities in Florida • Senior reviewer of Phase I and Phase II ESAs • Orlando Journal Award Winner for Women Who Mean Business(2015) • President of the Florida Association of Environmental Professionals Keith Pyron will serve as the Program Manager. Mr. Pyron, a Professional Geologist registered in Florida, has 29 years of environmental consulting experience. Mr. Pyron has over 16 years of experience in almost every aspect of the EPA Brownfields program. This ! experience includes both technical and program management experience. Mr. Pyron's management experience has been gained through assisting dozens of cities and counties j with their brownfields programs throughout the Southeast United States. Mr. Pyron has also managed dozens of EPA Brownfield projects that include assessment and remediation along with hundreds of other environmental projects. Mr. Pyron's career in Florida began in 1991 and includes major contracts for clients such as Murphy Oil USA, Lockheed Martin,the City of St. Petersburg,and the City of Plant City. Mr. Pyron's experience includes: • Registered Professional Geologist in Florida • Responsible for helping governmental clients secure 7.6 million dollars in EPA brownfields funding • Managed hundreds of assessment and remediation projects in Florida and the southeastern US j • Program Manager who provided EPA grant administration for 6 EPA funded Brownfields Projects in J Florida • Program Manager for one of the most successful brownfields program's in the country that helped the client receive two EPA Phoenix Awards. • Assisted over 55 counties,cities and other government agencies with their brownfields program Charles Ray will serve as the Community Outreach Specialist. With over 20 years of EPA ! Brownfields experience, Mr. Ray has a keen understanding of the entire brownfields program including directing Phase I and Phase II ESAs, corrective action planning, grant preparation, work plan preparation, quarterly reporting, ACRES database reporting, community involvement, and the filing of site eligibility forms. Much of Mr. Ray's experience was gained in his 19 years of experience as the City of St. Petersburg's Economic Development Coordinator. His years of experience have proved invaluable to our clients who are first time EPA Brownfield grant recipients. Mr. Ray's experience includes: • Managed one of the first EPA Brownfields Assessment Pilot Grants(awarded in 1997) • Organized 65 community outreach events for governments within EPA Region IV • Former Brownfields Coordinator for one of the most successful EPA brownfield programs in the country • Requested speaker at 15 EPA National, Regional,and state brownfields conferences • Managed over$6.5 million in federal funded brownfields programs • EPA Phoenix Award recipient for Johnnie Ruth Clarke Medical Center in 2006 • EPA Phoenix Award recipient for St. Petersburg College Douglas L.Jamerson,Jr. Midtown Center in 2014 • Assisted 120 governmental agencies with brownfields under EPA TAB grant Page 9M ' • Developed and administered public participation programs for dozens of cities in the EPA Brownfields i program Michael D. McCown, P.G.,will serve as the QA/QC Manager. Mr. McCown has managed or participated in numerous brownfields projects throughout the southeast. Mr. McCown has also completed many successful redevelopment projects at EPA funded brownfields and federally funded leaking underground storage tank sites. His role will be to oversee the program and ensure that on-site QC personnel meet corporate, program, and project QC standards. Mr. McCown has prepared many site characterization work plans, technical sampling and analysis plans, quality control plans,generic QAPPs, and site-specific QAPPs for EPA Regions IV and VI. Mr. McCown has provided much of the quality control and senior review for most of PPM's large industrial and federal government projects. Mr.McCown's experience includes: • QA/QC Manager for Brownfields Contracts 16 separate governmental clients • Provided primary QA/QC review for over 470 company-wide environmental projects • Responsible for 32 QAPPs for numerous EPA Brownfields sites in southeast • Invited by EPA to presentation on how to prepare QAPPs at EPA New Brownfields Grantees Workshop • Senior Advisor for the City of Plant City EPA Brownfields Remediation Grants i Gregory P. Stover, P.G.,will serve as the Senior Technical Advisor. Mr. Stover has 34 years of experience and is a Senior Project Director with PPM. He is a professional geologist registered in the State of Florida. Mr. Stover helped to develop the Phase 1 ESA scope of work for his previous employer in the late 1980s that was later adopted by two of the largest real estate investors in the country (Prudential and Equitable) as their standard scopes. Due to their involvement on the ASTM E committee, this scope had a large influence of the eventual industry standard practice established by ASTM in 1993. Mr. Stover was responsible for developing PPM's report formats for the ASTM E1527 revisions of 1994, 1997, 2000, and 2005. Mr. Stover has prepared and presented several due diligence training classes to banking institutions and PPM employees. Mr. Stover has corporate responsibility for the standardization and quality control of PPM's Phase I and Phase 11 ESA product and the training of our All Appropriate Inquiry(AAI) compliant Environmental Professionals. Mr. Stover has performed, managed, and/or reviewed thousands of Phase I ESAs j and hundreds of Phase II ESAs. With this background, Mr. Stover is one of the best qualified Environmental Professionals in the United States for reviewing Phase I and Phase 11 ESAs to ensure they are consistent with EPA regulations concerning AAI. Mr.Stover's experience specific to the criteria outlined in the RFP includes: • Environmental Professional involved with several EPA Brownfields Projects in Florida i • Conducted or managed several hundred Phase 11 ESAs involving environmental media testing including volatile organic compounds (VOC), semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOC), herbicides and pesticides, poly chlorinated biphenyls(PCB), metals, asbestos, lead-based paint in soil,groundwater, surface water, and building materials. • Preparing and QC review of several dozen generic and site-specific QAPPs • Have provided senior QC review of environmental reports for over 25 years Jeri Thrasher, CSP, will serve as Environmental Health & Safety (EH&S) Manager. Ms. Thrasher has over 16 years of experience in the environmental field and is a Certified Safety Professional. She currently serves as PPM's Health and Safety Officer responsible for ensuring the health and safety of our personnel on environmental restoration and EPA F brownfields projects. She has years of hands-on field and management experience conducting soil and groundwater contamination investigation and remediation projects. This ®1® 1 PM- (.�. i experience takes her far beyond theory and gives her insight on how to establish EH&S programs that are field tested and proven. Ms.Thrasher's experience includes: • Certified Safety Professional (CSP) • 16 years of experience in the environmental field • Corporate Safety Manager for all EPA brownfields projects Roy Therrien, P.G.,will serve as the Team Leader for conducting Phase I ESAs. Mr.Therrien has over 22 years of experience in Florida managing and conducting subsurface environmental assessments and remediation projects. Mr.Therrien's assessment experience extends across a wide range of petroleum and hazardous chemicals with hundreds of projects completed in Florida. Mr. Therrien has extensive experience in due diligence for property transfer assessments and has conducted or supervised over 100 ASTM 1527 Phase I and 11 ESA for commercial businesses, industrial facilities, undeveloped land, former citrus groves, dry cleaning sites, hazardous waste sites, and gasoline stations. Mr. Therrien is one of the leading experts in environmental databases in the State of Florida. He has designed environmental databases using private data as well as publically available data obtained from the FDEP, Florida Department of Health, EPA, county property appraiser websites, water management districts, and other state's regulatory agencies. Mr.Therrien's experience includes: 0 1 • Registered Professional Geologist in Florida • 22 Years of environmental consulting experience in Florida J • Project Manager for three EPA Cleanup Grant projects for Plant City • Project Manager for three EPA Brownfield Assessment Grants for Plant City, Eustis, and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Cliff Settle will serve as the Team Leader for Phase 11 ESAs. Mr. Settle has 16 years of assessment and remediation experience in Florida and has vast knowledge of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection's Standard Operating Procedures for Field Activities (DEP-SOP-001/01). He has completed site assessment of petroleum and hazardous substance impacted sites and remediation through the use of air sparging/soil vapor extraction (AS/SVE), rt ozone system, bioremediation, dual phase extraction, and source removals. Following n interpretation of groundwater and soil data obtained from site assessment activities, he has u completed several pilot tests to evaluate appropriate site specific remedial technologies. Mr. Settle is skilled in monitoring and remediation well installations through the use of roto-sonic, conventional, and direct push drilling technologies. He also acts as the Health and Safety Officer for PPM's Orlando Office,overseeing all health and safety plans and procedures. Mr.Settle's experience includes: • Completed over 350 assessment projects in Florida • Experience with brownfields assessment and redevelopment • OSHA 40-Hour Construction Supervisors Training # • Orlando's Safety Officer ! Deborah Zimmerman, CHMM will serve as the Team Leader for Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Surveys. Ms. Zimmerman has 25 years of experience performing asbestos and lead- based paint surveys throughout the southeast. Ms. Zimmerman is well acquainted with the 4x ASTM 1527-13 and EPA's AAI requirements and meets all requirements of an environmental professional as defined by AAL She has also performed a wide range of environmental projects including soil sampling, groundwater monitoring, asbestos inspections, lead-based fu -' s i ®1111 1 °z R K,"`" i paint inspections, mold assessments,and UST closure assessments. Ms.Zimmerman's experience includes: i • Registered Certified Hazardous Material Manager(CHMM) • Performed or supervised over 6,500 mold, lead-based paint and asbestos inspections j * Conducted over 500 Phase I ESAs • EPA Brownfields experience with four separate contracts • Environmental assessment experience in Florida since 1988 Lee Rodgers, P.E., will serve as Team Leader for Analysis of Brownfields Cleanup Alternatives (ABCA)/Cleanup Planning. Mr. Rodgers is a Senior Engineer and District Manager for PPM's Pensacola office location. While working as a Senior Engineer, Mr. Rodgers has performed site assessments and reviewed work plans, cost proposals, site 1 assessment reports, Phase I ESAs, QA/QC plans, and remedial action plans (RAP) for sites throughout Florida. Mr. Rodgers has both designed and installed remediation systems involving technologies from bio-remediation to ozone injection to dual phase vacuum extraction. Mr. Rodgers is also a professional civil engineer with land and site development experience across the southeast. Mr. Rodgers's experience includes: • Registered Professional Engineer in Florida • 20 years of remediation experience • Responsible charge for over 85 environmental projects in Florida • Assisted in development of EPA brownfields programs for six different government entities 4 1 a. Strategy and Process for Project Completion After contract award, PPM will work with the City to develop site inventories and site selection and to schedule a grant kickoff meeting that will typically include the EPA Project Manager, the City's Brownfields Coordinator and support staff, the PPM Project Team, stakeholders, and the interested public. In this meeting the purpose 3 and objectives of the program will be explained and site selection can be presented for public comment. Stakeholder coordination is an integral facet of a successful brownfields program. Stakeholders are a network of entities with different priorities and backgrounds. For any project to be successful it is necessary to understand each stakeholder's financial interest, technical experience, primary and secondary objectives, familiarity with the project and the product, biases, and sensitivities, as well as other external influences. This is best done through face-to-face stakeholders meetings. PPM will also take exceptional efforts to inform residents within the brownfields project areas through workshops, public meetings, and one-on-one contacts. PPM will assist the City with preparation and distribution of public meeting schedules to advise the general community stakeholders on the progress and I status of brownfields projects. The City can employ television, newsletters, newspaper (neighborhood and primary), a website, and church bulletins as the primary sources to promote and ensure effective communication. These and other resources to inform community stakeholders of the Brownfields Program activities will be implemented. As directed by the City, PPM will coordinate meetings with local non-profit 501(c3) organizations. The purpose of these meetings will be to establish partnerships or work agreements to further facilitate effective community involvement. -- Page 12 I IN Nw. i PPM will also provide the City with educational materials to be distributed to the community via workshops, meetings, and one-on-one contacts. Many of these educational materials have already been produced by the EPA and PPM for the purpose of educating the public. The educational materials include websites, flyers, brochures, and newspaper articles. Additional materials will be produced according to the needs of the lcommunity. If requested, PPM will also assist the City with development of a Community Involvement Plan (CIP) as required by the EPA. PPM has already preformed a preliminary site inventory for the City of Sanford. We reviewed the state database for potential brownfields sites and interviewed City personnel for sites of interest. We then conducted a windshield survey to identify abandoned or underutilized properties with land uses that may be perceived to be impacted with hazardous substances or petroleum products. These properties included gasoline service stations, auto shops, dry cleaners, warehouses, and various abandoned properties. During the reconnaissance photographs and locations were recorded in a database. PPM would revisit this list and update it as needed. E The sites would then be prioritized based on a set of site selection criteria that PPM has developed working with --, other communities. This selection work sheet has 23 evaluating factors with a full point score of 114. Any sites with a score over 55 would be moved to the next step —whether that is a Phase I or Phase II ESA. The higher rated criteria for properties include those with recent redevelopment interest expressed by a developer; are city-owned; pose a potential threat to drinking water supply; are potential catalysts to area redevelopment; have high visibility; actively being marketed by commercial realtor; are within Targeted Brownfields Area; or sites in which access can be easily obtained. PPM typically provides the work sheet to the city's Brownfields - Coordinator so that they may comment and revise the scoring system based on their own goals and scoring importance. Priority will also be given to sites that have specific interest to the City. Site prioritization will enable the project to proceed at a faster pace so spending milestones for grant compliance are met. ESAs are conducted in a phased approach at prioritized properties. In the first phase (or Phase I ESA) existing information is obtained for sites from site interviews, document review, and site reconnaissance by a trained environmental professional. The purpose of the ESA process is intended to permit a user to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations for Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and liability Act of 1980 liability. The goal of the Phase I ESA is to identify recognized environmental conditions, or RECs, in connection i with the property. In order to understand the purpose and scope of the phased ESA process it is very important for all stakeholders to understand the definition of a REC. Essential components of the REC definition require the (1) presence or likely presence, (2) on the property of, (3) hazardous substances or petroleum products, (4) due to a release, indication of a release, or material threat of a release, (5) to the environment (soil, surface water,groundwater,,or air), and (6) is not de minimis(i.e. "a condition that generally does not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies"). If any RECs are identified by the Phase I ESA, the investigation may proceed to the second phase (or Phase II ESA) that involves the collection of environmental media such as soil and groundwater samples to confirm the presence of RECs in connection with the property. i One important consideration in the Phase I ESA's REC evaluation process is the role of migration of released hazardous substances or petroleum products to or from the property in the evaluation of a REC. For the purposes of the ASTM practice, "migrate" and "migration" refers to the movement of hazardous substances or petroleum products in any form including, solid and liquid at the surface or in the subsurface, and vapor in the subsurface. A release on the subject property(i.e.the property that is the subject of the ESA) is a REC regardless of any migration within or from the subject property, so migration's importance to a REC evaluation is truly about offsite releases. Solid contaminants have a very limited potential to migrate directly and usually depend Page 13 on physical transport by surface water or dissolution into surface water or groundwater. Liquid contaminants j may migrate directly along surface water runoff pathways at the surface, or vertically leaching through vadose zone soil, as light non-aqueous phase liquids (LNAPL) moving along the top of the groundwater interface and in the direction of groundwater, or as dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPL) sinking vertically through the groundwater aquifer and laterally in the direction of the slope of confining layers. The primary factor controlling the lateral migration of NAPL is the mass released. Only very large NAPL masses can sustain NAPL migration i over 100s of feet. The primary means for long distance, lateral migration from Site A (offsite) to Site B (subject property) is dissolved phase migration within groundwater. Long distance migration is enhanced by factors such as high contaminant mass, fast groundwater velocities, and chemical characteristics such as high solubility, low carbon absorptivity, low water to air volatility, and low degradation rates. The REC evaluation for groundwater migration will be made based on the quality of the information gathered about the release by the Phase I ESA, the physical setting of the site, and distance. In general, PPM will provide the opinion that offsite releases located hydrogeologically downgradient and at increasing distances are not RECs. The remaining migration pathway, "vapor in the subsurface" is derived from the volatilization of solid, liquid, or dissolve -phase contaminants that are already in the subsurface. Vapor migration must occur within the vadose I zone (i.e. unsaturated soil zone), so the natural gradient is usually either up or down depending on the vapor density of the chemical in question. There may be some lateral spread of vapor, but this usually occurs over short distances. Significant lateral migration of a vapor from Site A to Site B will in most cases be dependent on the migration of LNAPL or dissolved-phase contaminants in groundwater from Site A to Site B first. If a REC decision is based on groundwater migration, the companion vapor migration does not make the condition any more a REC. Where vapor migration can migrate over moderate distances independent of its soil or groundwater source is via subsurface conduits such as buried utilities. The ASTM practice specifically states that vapor migration in the subsurface is described in ASTM E2600-10 standard for vapor intrusion into buildings; however, ASTM also states nothing in the ASTM E1572-13 practice should be construed to require application of the Guide E2600 standard to achieve compliance with AAI. Despite this clear ASTM statement, many in the environmental industry have reacted by interpreting that the ASTM Phase I ESA scope should include an evaluation of vapor intrusion. PPM uses the literal meaning of the ASTM statement and regards the ASTM E2600-10 as a separate phase of assessment that may be recommended in the Phase I ESA report when onsite buildings are present and vapor migration is suspected. Once the sites are prioritized and selected, PPM will provide Phase I ESA cost estimates to the City's Brownfields Coordinator for approval. As desired by the City, PPM will then either assist the City or directly pursue written site access agreements. Once site access agreements are obtained, PPM will schedule the Phase I ESA site visits and coordinate this schedule with the City and the property owners. Phase I ESAs will be conducted in accordance with good commercial and customary practices as described in ASTM E 1527-13 and will meet the EPA's AAI requirements. Phase I ESAs will typically be completed within one month of obtaining the site access agreement. When a Phase I ESA is completed for a property, PPM will complete an AAI Reporting Requirements and Redevelopment Checklist(EPA Form 560-R-11-030) and a Site Eligibility Form for each site and submit these ( documents to the EPA Project Manager. At this point, PPM will enter the property profile information into EPA's ' ACRES database. Early in the project a generic QAPP will be prepared so that EPA approval will be in hand well before any Phase II ESAs are needed. The purpose of a QAPP is to support Phase II ESA field sampling activities,sample analysis,and data management associated with the implementation of a site assessment. The QAPP will describe the policies, procedures, specifications, standards, and documentation sufficient to produce quality data consistent with EPA Brownfields Site Assessment and FDEP standards. The QAPP will provide a solid foundation for data generation, analysis, and interpretation for sampling conducted at a site, as well as deliverable preparation and review. It Page 14 , f will address procedures to assure the precision, accuracy, completeness, representativeness, and comparability of field and laboratory data generated during the course of a project. It will guide field, laboratory, review, and project personnel in all relevant aspects of data collection, assessment, management, and control. The EPA requests that the grantee allow for 30 days for QAPP review. After EPA's approval of the generic QAPP, completion of the Phase I ESA, and approval of the site's brownfields eligibility, sites with RECs may proceed to Phase II ESA. Cost proposals will be prepared for the City and site- specific QAPPs will be prepared for the EPA and FDEP to review and approve. Phase 11 ESAs will be conducted in accordance with ASTM Standard E1903-97 and will meet all FDEP and EPA requirements. The primary objective - of a Phase II ESA is to further assess RECs identified by the Phase I ESA. Phase II ESA work plans may vary based on the location of the RECs and the nature of the Chemicals of Concern (COC). Typically, sampling points for onsite Areas of Concern (AOC) will be as close as conditions allow to the AOC with respect to underground and overhead structures and utilities. Sampling points for offsite RECs are generally installed along the property line or lines that face the condition. Groundwater sampling points are again a necessity to properly assess offsite issues. The number of the groundwater sampling points depends on the length of the property boundary and - the potential width of the groundwater plume. Work plans are specifically tailored to the nature of the REC and may also be structured in sub phases. Work plans meant to address RECs that are suspected releases may be designed to only install soil borings and monitoring wells in sufficient location and number to confirm or deny that impact has occurred to soil and groundwater above cleanup target levels. If the initial phase of investigation confirms that the suspected release is an existing release, additional phases of assessment may be designed in a work plan addendum to delineate the extent of impacts to soil and groundwater. If the existing release was a known condition at the time of the Phase 1 ESA, the Phase II ESA may be designed to supplement or update the previous subsurface investigations. This may entail use of existing monitoring wells on the property. If the existing release has been fully delineated under FDEP oversight, there may be no need for a Phase 11 ESA. RECs that are a material threat of a future release might not require a Phase II ESA; however, there may be value in collecting soil and groundwater samples in order to establish baseline conditions prior to property acquisition. The EPA requests that the grantee allow for 2 weeks for site specific QAPP review. Once the site specific QAPP is approved by the EPA, the field work will be coordinated with the City, property owner,drilling subcontractors,and laboratory. As with the findings of the Phase 1 ESA, results of the Phase 11 ESA will be reviewed with City personnel prior to issuing the draft and final reports. Upon completion of Phase 11 ESA reports, PPM will update the ACRES database. With need and approval, subsequent deliverables such as ABCA for sites with confirmed contamination problems. A major aspect of a successful brownfields program is the ability to effectively establish a redevelopment plan. This feature is for both those sites that require additional remediation and those that do not. If requested, PPM can assist the City with integrated cleanup and redevelopment plans after completion of the ABCA. Factors affecting cleanup alternatives that are evaluated include site layout, structures, utilities, and whether contamination is limited to the subject property or extends beyond property boundaries. The a redevelopment plans(park area/open space, parking lot,single family housing,multi-story buildings)also impact the appropriateness of remedial technologies. For a contaminated site, an integrated remediation and redevelopment plan can be a complex issue because of all these factors. However, the assessment results, viable remediation alternatives, acceptable cleanup levels, and potential redevelopment projects will be factored into this evaluation process. The end result will be the presentation of various cleanup alternatives for each of the proposed options and a cost estimate for each of the options,which will aid the City and potential developers in determining the most desirable redevelopment option. Page 15 AM 1011 F3 �� � t For both remediated brownfields sites and non-contaminated brownfields sites (those which were found to be clear after a Phase I ESA), PPM will also work with the City to identify development options available, including historic preservation, green space planning, and reuse for housing and commercial business which ties into the -, City's overall economic redevelopment initiatives. PPM's redevelopment process leverages the stakeholder and community involvement established throughout the lifecycle of the brownfields project, as well as insight into additional funding and partnership options available to promote and enhance the City's overall economic and growth planning objectives. For closing sites with soil and/or groundwater contamination that did not originate from an underground petroleum fuel storage tank, the Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) and Brownfields Program are available as optional avenues to expedite site closure. Both of the optional programs are client paid and have different advantages and disadvantages to a site owner. After completing sufficient site assessment to determine if FDEP involvement for a site is warranted or desired due to residual soil and/or groundwater contamination, PPM will advise the City whether one of these two optional programs could help the City meet its objectives. After discussing the advantages and disadvantages of VCP, the Brownfields Program, and the associated costs, PPM will advise the City regarding the program best suited to the site and planned redevelopment. If one of the optional paid programs is selected by the City, PPM can also assist with preparation of the required submittals to the FDEP. Following entry into VCP or Brownfields Program, PPM will prepare additional work plans, I corrective action plans, reports, restricted use covenants and conduct any additional assessment or site monitoring required by the FDEP. -� b. Project Time Frame After the EPA Brownfields Assessment Cooperative Agreement was executed with the City of Sanford, the 3- year, 12-quarter,36-month clock began for the completion of all work under the grant. Year 1,Quarter 1 (Months 1-3): This is typically the period that the City will go through the contractor selection process. Once selected and under contract, PPM will be prepared to provide full service for this contract and work on a Work Order basis. t Year 1, Quarters 2-4 (Months 4-12): Depending on the length of the contractor selection process and the schedules of the City's Brownfields Coordinator and EPA Project Manager,the grant kickoff meeting will typically occur within Quarter 2. This meeting will be integral to the impending project schedule by helping establish site priorities and by educating the stakeholders and the public in the importance of obtaining site access I agreements. Site prioritization will enable the project to proceed at a faster pace so spending milestones for grant compliance are met. The first sites will be prioritized and selected during this period, then the site access agreements will be obtained and the first Phase I ESA site visits can be scheduled and performed. The first # Phase I ESA reports should be completed by the end of Quarter 3. The Phase I ESA reports and site eligibility forms will be submitted to EPA,which may require up to one month for review and approval. The generic QAPP will be prepared near the end of Quarter 2, so EPA approval will be in hand well before any Phase II ESAs are needed. The preparation of the generic QAPP, including City review time, is estimated to require 2 to 4 weeks from authorization to proceed. EPA approval typically will require 1 month. Phase II ESA 1 site specific QAPPs must be submitted after the generic QAPP is approved. Some Phase 11 ESAs should be in 1 progress by the end of Year 1. A Year 2 budget projection will be prepared at the end of Year 1 for the EPA. The City should be able to demonstrate substantial progress to the EPA by the end of Year 1. Year 2, Quarters 5-6 (Months 13-18): As required by the EPA, at least 35 percent of the grant monies (>_$140,000)must be expended by Month 18. This will require that a substantial number of Phase I and Phase II ~— Page 16 ,r, �, Q w. a ���� I ESAs be completed by this time. For example, if the average cost of a Phase I ESA is$4,000 and the average cost of a Phase II ESA is$20,000, it will require about 10 Phase Is and 5 Phase Its to meet this goal. Expenditures for project management and community outreach will also be included in this project milestone. Years 2-3, Quarters 7-10(Months 19-30): This period will mostly be devoted to preparing ABCAs and RAPS for higher priority sites, as needed, and conducting Phase I and II ESAs on lower priority sites. A Year 3 budget - projection will be prepared at the end of Year 2 (Quarter 8) for the EPA. Approximately 90 percent of the grant monies ($360,000) should be expended by the end of Quarter 10. PPM will recommend an in-town meeting with the EPA Project Manager during Quarter 10. This meeting will be used to demonstrate project progress and to strategize the best use of the remaining project budget. During Month 30, the EPA will send a pre-close out letter questioning whether the City,needs to request an extension. The City will have 60 days in which to respond. Year 3, Quarters 11-12 (Months 31-36): The deadline for submitting all Phase II site specific QAPPs will be in Month 33. Projects with QAPPs submitted any later than Month 33, will not provide adequate time for review, - field work, analysis and report writing to completed by the end of the grant. This period will mostly be devoted to targeting lower priority needs with whatever monies may still be available. It should be recognized that any expenditures incurred after the expiration of the grant will not be reimbursable by the grant;therefore, PPM will work to complete all site work by the end of Quarter 11 and to complete all closeout reporting before the end of Quarter 12. Important Schedule Consideration: For Phase II ESAs, it is very important for the proper and timely disposal of impacted investigation derived wastes (IDW), such as soil cuttings and purge water, to start the waste profile process as soon as possible after the receipt of laboratory analytical reports. The City should already have decided who they consider to be the generator of non-hazardous or hazardous waste on non city owned property before the Phase 11 ESA projects begin. The most expedient choice is the City, but there may be reasons why the City prefers to avoid this status. Conversely, property owners may be reluctant to take this responsibility for an investigation they did not solicit. When these issues are not resolved before IDW is generated, resolution may be a long and tedious process, which may threaten the end of the grant period for Phase II ESAs conducted in Year 3. PPM will assist the City with this issue during the site access agreement and Phase 11 ESA planning process. C. Role of Subcontractors PPM has selected a number of highly qualified subcontractors who will provide support services under this ' contract. All were selected based upon their established professional relationship with PPM, project experience, geographic location, and minority status. The following subcontractors are licensed and insured, and have the proper training,as necessary,for this contract. Ambient Technologies, Inc. (ATI) and its' wholly owned subsidiaries and affiliates have rW1 earned a reputation for providing responsible, quality, conscientious, and dependable geo-services since 1993. We will be working directly with Mr. Carlos Ramos, P.G., Chief corps rare Executive Officer in St. Petersburg, Florida. ATI is a licensed water well driller with direct M Earth of Eryrr{eare push technology rigs. ATI (doing business as GeoView) also provides surveying, mapping services, sinkhole investigations, and ground penetrating radar services. ATI is a Florida Certified Minority Owned Business Enterprise (MBE). PPM and ATI have worked together on projects under the City of Plant City Brownfield Assessment and Cleanup Grant Contracts and the City of Eustis Brownfield Assessment Grant Contracts. Page 17 y 9 9.7.7 � � � � i Southern Research Laboratories, Inc. (SRL), located in Orlando, Florida is an !Ptuthem independent commercial testing laboratory specializing in organic analyticals. SRL arcs, was founded in 1991 to provide state of the art environmental analytical services to tories,Inc. - consulting companies, government entities, and industrial businesses. All analyses undertaken in accordance with our rigorous internal quality control and National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program procedures are backed by first class customer service. SRL is minority owned and operated business and is certified as a MBE by the State of Florida. i Petroleum Resources& Development, Inc. (PR&D) is an environmental construction company located in Merritt Island and servicing all of Florida. With a combined experience of over 45 years, PR&D has constructed, serviced and modified remedial systems for a large part of the environmental industry throughout Florida. PR&D brings the expertise needed for a whole range of projects from installation to upgrade and complete removal. PR&D is an SA certified small socially and economically disadvantaged business. I I Clark Environmental, Inc., located in Mulberry, Florida, will assist with hazardous, petroleum, or other waste disposal services. Clark is a Florida Certified Women- F"IRONMERALC I owned Business Enterprise (WBE) and a disadvantaged business enterprise. PPM and Clark have worked together on multiple sites throughout Florida. PPM will work directly with Mr.Jim Clark, CHMM for disposal coordination. d. Key Project Personnel Roles and Responsibilities l The following individuals will be working with the City of Sanford on a daily basis: Amy Guilfoyle will serve as the Project Manager. Ms.Guilfoyle will assign the projects to the appropriate Team Leader depending on the type of work that is to be conducted. Ms. Guilfoyle's specific role as Project Manager will include,but is not limited to, the following: • Serve as the primary key contact/liaison between the City,the EPA,and FDEP • Provide effective coordination between the Team Leaders, QA/QC Manager, and the Health and Safety Officer and ensure overall continuity of the Brownfields Program • Assign Team Leader responsibilities - • Full subcontractor management authority j • Full purchasing authority • Meet with technical staff to discuss technical issues of the projects • Provide senior technical review of work plans and reports 1 • Review status reports • Ensure that corrective action measures are taken to facilitate work being completed in an efficient and cost effective manner,while maintaining high standards of quality In addition, Ms. Guilfoyle will facilitate communication concerning the progress of the project to the City's Brownfields Specialist. Ms. Guilfoyle will field any questions that the City, the EPA and the FDEP may have during the course of the project,and will be accessible 24 hours a day by cell phone and email. Mr. Roy H.Therrien, P.G. and Mr. Cliff Settle will be the Team Leaders for Phase I and 11 ESAs. Mr. Therrien and Mr. Settle will serve as secondary contacts/liaison between the City, the EPA, and FDEP. Their other duties as a Team Leader are described further below. Page 1$ ®il! 1 !�. j Charles Ray will serve as the Community Outreach Specialist. Mr. Ray serves as a key resource for community outreach during the grant program. Mr. Ray's duties will include the following: -� • Support adherence to all EPA grant management protocols and reporting requirements • Review all work plans and quarterly reports submitted to EPA • Facilitate effective coordination between the City and PPM with the community and other stakeholders • Facilitate community outreach and public education. The following individuals will also play key roles in the completion of this project: Keith Pyron, P.G. will serve as the Program Manager. Mr. Pyron will ensure that all internal resources necessary to complete this project are available to the City of Sanford, the Project Manager, and the Project Team. Although not submitted as a daily liaison, all contract and programmatic communications will be through Mr. Pyron. Mr. Pyron is a Principal of PPM and is in charge of the Orlando office. His responsibilities as the Program Manager include: • Review and sign all contract documents • Responsibility for contract performance and execution • Contract/Task Order signature authority I • Full human resources authority(hire/fire,salary/incentives) • Full backing/support of PPM Board of Directors • Responsibility to ensure schedule and budget is met • Any corrective action needed toward project execution. Michael D. McCown, P.G. will serve as the Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Manager. As QA/QC Manager, Mr. McCown will be responsible for maintaining a high degree of quality for all reports, design, field activities, and ensuring that all laboratory data is of such quality that it can be utilized to evaluate the site in accordance with EPA guidelines. Mr. McCown's duties will include, but are not limited to,the following: s • Reviewing and approving QAPPs; • Providing external review of field sampling activities; _ • Coordinating with state regulatory QA officer, PPM's project managers,and the client organization to ensure that program and project QA objectives are in place and implemented and that project personnel are aware of these objectives; • Coordinating with project staff to ensure that all QC procedures in the field are followed and documented; • Maintaining all project QA records and files in all SOPS and technical guidance documents; • Performing office and field audits; • Recommending, implementing, and/or reviewing actions taken in the event of QA/QC failures in the j field' and [ • Reporting all QA/QC finding to project management and the corporate QA office. Gregory P.Stover,P.G.will serve as the Senior Technical Advisor. Mr.Stover's duties will include the following: • Developing and maintaining AAI-compliant Phase I and Phase_II ESA field forms and report formats • Coordinating QA managers and QC senior reviewers for Phase I and Phase II ESAs • Training environmental-professionals involved with Phase I and Phase 11 ESAs • Primary QC senior reviewer of Phase I and Phase II ESAs Page 19 F197.7 mv � �` Jeri Thrasher,CSP will serve as Environmental Health&Safety Manager. Ms.Thrasher's duties will include the i following: • Development of all site-specific HASPS i • Oversee HASP implementation,which will include meetings,site inspections,etc. r • Prepare and file health and safety reports from the safety meetings, training sessions, and onsite inspections. There are four Team Leaders assigned to work on projects for this Brownfields Assessment contract. Mr. Roy H. i Therrien, P.G.will be the Team Leader for Phase I and Mr.Cliff Settle will be the Team Leader for Phase II ESAs. These two will prepare generic and site-specific QAPPs. Mr. Lee Rodgers, P.E. will be the Team Leader for Cleanup Planning and Remedial Design. Ms. Debbie Zimmermann,CHMM will be the Team Leader for Asbestos - and Lead-Based Paint Surveys. Ms. Amy Guilfoyle, the Project Manager, will assign each project to one of the Team Leaders. The Team Leader will oversee all PPM technical staff and subcontractors assigned to the project for activities on site and in the office. The.Team Leaders will be responsible, at a minimum, for the following activities: • Assign tasks to technical staff on team • Procure services of subcontractors, as necessary • Preparation of monthly status reports • Review site-specific data pertinent to all phases of the project (i.e., site characteristics, aquifer testing, # sampling results,free product recovery,geotechnical data, etc.) § • Conducting weekly project team meetings to discuss the progress of the project • Ensuring that project fieldwork and deliverables are completed within the requested schedule I • Ensuring that the project related activities are completed within the specified budget • Overseeing development of all documents prepared by the team • Scheduling and management of all PPM project personnel and subcontractors • Obtaining any and all required permits and/or offsite access • Review of all deliverables prior to senior review • Notification of client, EPA, and FDEP of all field activities, at a minimum of five days prior to commencement of field activities I In addition, each Team Leader will be responsible for keeping the Project Manager and the Brownfields I Specialist advised of the progress of each brownfield project that they have been assigned. g The key project team personnel listed in this SOQ have the availability required to fulfill the workload obligations associated with this contract. PPM routinely analyzes project workloads and prepares detailed workload projections to ensure that qualified staff is available for assignment. We are confident that this proposed management team will deliver the service and technical skill needed to accomplish the mission directives. 1 e. City of Sanford Roles and Performance The RFP asked the respondents to explain what work we would expect of the City of Sanford to perform and the roles the City staff will play in the completion of this program. Frankly, we are used to thinking from the viewpoint of what the City of Sanford will-expect of PPM. Even so, since we are asked, our primary answers are involvement,communication, and expeditiousness. It is expected that the City will be intimately involved as the lead partner with community outreach, stakeholder involvement, site prioritization and selection, cost proposal approvals,and EPA negotiations. Page 20 Aft F ®t■ 1 1111 i PPM does not expect the City to produce any deliverables that are not completely internal, but many cities elect to do so with some programmatic forms and reports (see next section). If the City does produce such deliverables, PPM is fully willing and able to provide assistance. If the City wishes for PPM to produce programmatic reports, some information, such as financial information on quarterly and annual reports, will require input from the City. Deliverables produced by PPM, such as Phase 1/11 ESA reports, ABCAs, and QAPPs, will be submitted as drafts to the City for review and approval before submittal to the EPA. When draft deliverables are provided to the City, PPM asks that reviews, work plan and cost proposal approvals, report reviews, and city-information be provided in a timely manner with respect to project deadlines. -� We are confident that the City's objective is to prepare as many brownfields sites for redevelopment while efficiently using all of the grant monies within the time period of the grant. Over the 3-year grant, there are several points that it will be incumbent upon the City to communicate to PPM how to best fulfill this objective. - PPM will proactively communicate with the City in meetings, phone calls, and emails, but if at any time the City has a need or a concern, PPM asks that the City call us immediately. For example, if the City chooses to take the lead role in obtaining site access agreements, PPM requests that the City contact PPM if any difficulties are encountered. Case in point, in one city for which PPM was the Brownfields Contractor the City's Brownfields I Coordinator was also the Code Enforcement Officer. When he knocked on doors he found the owner's first(and lingering) reaction was that they were in trouble, which greatly impeded his progress. After he asked for help, PPM took over this task and the agreements (including with one very recalcitrant owner of two sites) began to flow in quickly. f. Assistance to City in Preparing Forms and Grant Reports i PPM will assist in the preparation of all necessary forms and grant reports required of the City by the EPA. This 1 assistance may be instruction, review, or actual preparation as is desired by the City. If the Work Plan and CIP have not been finalized at the time of the contract award, PPM will be a valuable resource to help complete these documents. Forms such as the AAI Reporting Requirements and Redevelopment Checklist (EPA Form 560-R-11-030) and the Site Eligibility Form are a consequence of the Phase I ESAs; therefore, will be part of the Phase I ESA report l package prepared by PPM. PPM is prepared to make all entries and manage the EPA's ACRES database on behalf of the City. The ACRES database will report on interim progress (i.e., assessment started) and any final accomplishments (i.e., assessment completed, cleanup required, contaminants, institutional controls, engineering controls) by completing and submitting relevant portions of the Property Profile Form. The ACRES data entries will be made i as soon as the interim action or final accomplishment has occurred, or within 30 days after the end of each reporting quarter. Project progress will be tracked on a quarterly basis with quarterly reports due to the EPA Project Manager 30 days after the.end of each quarter. PPM will prepare these quarterly reports and include task progress and expenditures accumulated by the City and PPM. Quarterly progress reports will include a summary of approved activities performed; summary of the performance outputs/outcomes achieved; a description of problems encountered that may affect the project schedule and a discussion of meeting the performance `A outputs/outcomes; an update on project schedules and milestones; a list of the properties where assessment activities were performed and/or completed; and a budget recap summary table. The table will include the following information: current approved project budget, costs incurred during the reporting quarter, costs incurred to date (cumulative expenditures), and total remaining funds. If applicable, the budget will provide separate accounting of costs incurred at hazardous substances brownfields sites and petroleum only brownfields 4 -~ Page 21 AUL ?T Dow. '� - I sites. The quarterly progress reports will clearly identify which activities performed during the reporting period jwere conducted with EPA funds and will relate EPA funded activities to the objectives and milestones in the EPA approved work plan. Semi-annual Minority/Women-owned Business (MBE/WBE) Utilization Report (EPA Form 5700-52A) are due with the quarterly reports after Quarters 2,4, 6, 8, and 10. Annual Federal Financial Reports (SF425)are due at the end of Years 1 and 2. - Within 90 days after the expiration of the grant, the City must submit all financial, performance, and other reports required as a condition of the grant. PPM will assist the City with the preparation of the following closeout documentation: 1. An Assistance Agreement Closeout Checklist. 2. A Final Report that captures the site names, what work was done at each site and how much was spent at - each site. The report will also provide information that documents the outreach efforts done by the City and other activities that help explain where the funding was utilized. 3. A Final Federal Financial Report(SF425). 4. A Final MBE/WBE Utilization Report(EPA Form 5700-52A). 5. A Lobbying and Litigation certification (EPA Form 5700-53). 1 g. Community Outreach PPM has helped Sanford establish an existing Brownfields Program and we have already conducted significant public outreach efforts. The following section describes PPM's experience and expertise in community outreach and public involvement. ' PPM follows EPA and State of Florida Guidelines to establish effective and responsive community outreach and public involvement. At a minimum,the a ., process includes the following: • Help Sanford form a Brownfields Advisory Committee(BAC) 0 Develop a Public Involvement Plan(PIP), if not already developed • Hold community workshops in the neighborhoods targeted for redevelopment • Hold visioning sessions with the public to solicit their input on fulfilling the redevelopment needs of the § community • Provide educational materials for public information • Inform stakeholders about the planned, ongoing, and completed brownfield redevelopment activities in their communities • Provide the public the opportunity to express comments and provide input on technical decisions throughout the process • Identify and resolve conflicts and concerns • Follow National Environmental Justice Advisory Council (NEJAC)Guidelines A BAC is established during the initial phase of grant implementation and is maintained throughout the grant agreement. The BAC members usually include the following stakeholders: County representatives, Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) representatives, economic development organizations, local elected officials, public health officials, developers, landowners, bankers, brokers, realtors, chamber of commerce members, environmental advocates, church leaders, other community-based organizations, and interested citizens within the designated brownfields project areas. This helps the City of Sanford to ensure diversity within the Page 22 stakeholders, reflects the neighborhoods within the area, and involves individuals and businesses that have the skills,talents,and passions needed to make the City of Sanford brownfields project a success. 1 PPM will provide assistance to the City of Sanford to develop a PIP acceptable to the EPA, FDEP, and community I stakeholders. The purpose of the PIP is to facilitate education of stakeholders and to encourage their f participation in Sanford's brownfields projects. Another purpose of the PIP is to ensure that the execution of -- the projects under the grant comply with the EPA grant requirements for public involvement. PPM takes exceptional efforts to reach and inform residents within the brownfields project areas through workshops, public meetings, and one-on-one contacts. PPM will assist the City of Sanford to prepare and distribute public meeting and workshop schedules to advise the general community stakeholders on the progress and status of brownfields projects. Typically, Brownfields Grantees employ television, newsletters, newspaper, a website, and church bulletins. These media can serve as the primary sources to promote and ensure effective communication. Also,these primary sources are communicated in the languages of non-English speaking residents. These and other resources to inform community stakeholders of the Brownfields Program activities will be implemented. As directed by the City of Sanford, PPM will coordinate meetings with local non-profit 501(c3) organizations. The purpose of these meetings is to establish partnerships or work agreements to further facilitate effective community involvement. PPM conducts Brownfields 101 Workshops within organizations and during times when most of their memberships are not at work. PPM will also provide Sanford with educational materials to be distributed to the community, workshops, meetings, and one-on-one contacts. Many of these educational materials have already been produced by the EPA, FDEP, Florida Brownfields Association, and PPM for the purpose of educating the public. The educational materials include websites, flyers, brochures, and newspaper articles. Additional materials are produced ' according to the needs of the community. Three of the PPM's employees have formerly served in the capacity of Brownfields Coordinators for municipalities. One of these individuals, Mr. Charles Ray, is the Community Outreach Specialist for this project. i He has not only developed community involvement plans, they he has implemented them successfully to the greater education and involvement of the community. h. Capacity The PPM Team has more than enough personnel available to perform the work for the City of Sanford. Our fully staffed office is located in Seminole County and is less than 30 minutes away from the City. Our Project Manager lives less than 10 miles from the City of can respond quickly if needed. The Team's workload is such that we can easily manage the entire contract without any difficulty. We have never completed any one of our 30 EPA grants behind schedule and have the full capacity to meet the 3-year assessment grant schedule. PPM has the necessary personnel to sufficiently address any work that would be required under this contract. PPM has selected key personnel that are experienced and certified in their areas of expertise and all have excellent track records of completing projects of this nature. In addition, all key personnel assigned to this project have no less than 10 years of experience in the environmental field in Florida. In addition, the team has redundancy of personnel incorporated into almost every key position to ensure that projects can be spread among qualified personnel so that no one becomes overloaded with tasks under this contract. In total, the combined team has over 107 employees from which to draw from for this contract. - Page 23 ?T F i I Many of the aspects of when and how PPM intends to coordinate with the City staff, property owners, and the -- federal grantor throughout the project is discussed in parts 2b, 2d, 2e, and 2f. This section will summarize and focus on the requested topic. All of our key professional staff will be available to the City whenever a need arises. These needs should be communicated first to the Project Manager, Amy Guilfoyle. Alternate contacts depending on Ms. Guilfoyle's availability will be Mr. Roy Therrien or Mr. Cliff Settle, both for project related matters. During the course of the project, PPM will communicate with the City, on a minimum of a monthly basis to discuss topics such as site prioritization, site access issues, project statuses, EPA responsiveness, financial statuses, community outreach scheduling, and any City needs. On a quarterly basis, this communication will become more involved with the preparation of quarterly reports and of MBE/WBE and financial reports on a i semi-annual basis. Most communication will be by telephone, email, or GoToMeeting, but face-to-face meetings are recommended on a minimum of a quarterly basis. Whatever deliverable is produced by PPM (e.g. QAPPs, Phase 1 and II ESA reports,quarterly reports,etc.)will be submitted to the City for review, comment, and approval before submission to the EPA grantor. PPM will also provide assistance to the City for the preparation of any deliverables you may need to produce (e.g.financial reports). Good communication between the City, stakeholders, the EPA grantor, the FDEP, and PPM, is critical to the success of this project. Every project will encounter obstacles. It is counterproductive to pretend otherwise. The City and stakeholders may have competing priorities. The EPA Project Manager who has bought into the work plan may be changed in the middle of the 3-year grant. Property owners may be recalcitrant. Bad weather may disrupt Phase II drilling schedules. Obstacles will not be overcome by ignoring them or not seeking help. PPM has been through many of these EPA Brownfields projects and in each case where the City and PPM communicated as a team with mutual interest in project success,the problems were solved. PPM will maintain this kind of communication with the City of Sanford. Page 24 ?T � � IIII r PPM 1 APPEND IX A4 SF-330 & ORGANIZATIONAL CHANT r ARCHITECT- ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS 1 4 c � ''A CUN,TRACT, INFl3RMATIQN a 1.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) RFQ Consultants to Provide Environmental Site Assessment and Characterization Services, Sanford, FL 2.PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 3.SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER f October 16, 2015 RFQ 14/15-22 B ARCHITECT TENGINEER-,'POIN T,OF.CONTACT ., . . � . >. 4 NAME AND TITLE Keith D. Pyron/Principal 5.NAME OF FIRM PPM Consultants, Inc. [ 6.TELEPHONE NUMBER -FAX NUMBER E-MAIL ADDRESS 407-240-1127 1407-240-1310 fKeith pyron@ppmco.com Complete this sectio C, PROPOSED TEAM ( h forthe prime eon#racfor and.all key sub�ontractors:j: _ Check W cc Zp 9. FIRM NAME 10. ADDRESS 11. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT Z OU > 0- _9 a W� PPM Consultants, Inc. 750 South Northlake Boulevard Suite 1012 a. X Altamonte Springs, FL 32701 2 ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE b. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE d. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE e ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE f, ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE ❑CHECKIF BRANCH OFFICE D ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM © (Attached) { _3 AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330(REV. 312013)PAGE I. { E:RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT -; = (Complete one Section E for each key person) ' 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Am Guilfo le Project Manager a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Y Y 1 g 14 3 15,FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) PPM Consultants, Inc., Altamonte Springs, FL 16.EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE) B.S. in Biology—University of Central Florida, 2001 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc. j Florida Association of Environmental Professionals, Florida Brownfields Association 19.-RELEUANT'PROJECTS, , (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2�VIYEA COMPLETED EPA Brownfields Assessment Grant, Plant City, Florida PROFESSIONALSERCFS R CONSTRUCTION (lfapplicable) 2015 2013 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Eldefscope,size,cost,etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X I Check if project performed with current firm a. District Manager responsible for staffing, coordination, and client contact for the City's EPA assessment and remediation grants. The Former Hydraulic Hose/Telco Gas Station, Gro-Mor Fertilizer Plant, and Stock Lumber were identified as priorities for redevelopment because they are part of several blocks of former commercial and industrial businesses that the Community Redevelopment Agency would like to redevelop. The main objectives of the environmental cleanup activities at these sites were to remediate impacted soil and groundwater at the facilities. $1,400,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED EPA Brownfields Grant, Cocoa, Florida PROFESSIONALSERVICES CONSTRUCTION (lfapplicable) 2012 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Bdefscope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [x I Check if project performed with current firm b. Project Manager responsible for QAPP preparation, conducting and supervising Phase 1/II ESAs, and reporting under the City's Brownfield's Assessment Grant. $25,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED Former Police Station, Sanford, Florida PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) Ongoing 2015 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [x I Check if project performed with current firm c.Contract Manager responsible for soil and groundwater sampling; preparation of contamination assessment report; bid specifications and RAP; and regulatory correspondence. Soil excavation activities were conducted in 2015. Approximately 2,124 tons of hydrocarbon-soil were excavated and properly disposed. Approximately 302,400 gallons of groundwater was dewatered, treated, and disposed in the municipal storm waters stem. $77,805 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED l EPA Brownfields Grant, Eustis, Florida PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (lfapplicable) 2012 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [x I Check if project performed with current firm d. Project Manager and District Manager responsible for staffing, coordination, and client contact for Phase 11/111 ESAs under the City's EPA Brownfields Program. An active gas station site was identified by the City of Eustis as a priority for redevelopment because groundwater contamination from this site was known to have affected at least four city blocks of commercial and residential properties along a major business corridor in Eustis, South Bay Street. PPM conducted _I Phase II and II ESA activities at the site. The site was under a regulatory consent order with the FDEP who was responsible for reviewing and approving cleanup activities at the site. After negotiating the work scope with the FDEP, PPM completed the assessment by installing eight additional wells and five soil borings. As a result of these activities, the extent of contamination was able to be delineated and all outstanding FDEP regulatory issues were addressed. PPM then negotiated with the FDEP to get a Natural Attenuation Monitoring (NAM) Plan approved for the site. The NAM Plan was approved and the site is currently in groundwater monitoring. $315,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, West Palm Beach, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I CONSTRUCTION (lfapplicable) 2014 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Briefscope,size,cost etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [x I Check if project performed with current firm e. District Manager responsible for staffing and coordination of work conducted under a EPA Brownfields Assessment Grant. A Phase I ESA was conducted on 11 parcels that are in a State of Florida designated Brownfield area owned by the Westgate-Belvedere Home Community Redevelopment Agency.Westgate-Belvedere Home CRA is redeveloping several block uses for mixed used (residential and commercial) purposes. PPM conducted the Phase I ESA on the 11 parcels and identified one parcel, a used car dealer, with a recognized environmental condition, a drum of used oil that leaked on to the adjacent ground. PPM has arranged with the site tenant to have the used oil pumped form the drum. Phase II ESA activities to assess the soil and groundwater at the drum area are pending as of October 2013. $30,000 STANDARD FORM 330(REV.3/2013)PAGE 2 E RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED.FOR THIS CONTRACT {Complete one Section E for each key person) „ 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Keith D. P ron, P.G. Program Manager a"TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Y 9 g 29 20 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) PPM Consultants, Inc., Spanish Fort, Alabama 16.EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) fG'CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE) B.S. Geology—University of South Alabama, 1980 rofessional Geologist, Florida PG0001594 in AL, TN, KY, MS, MO, NC, SC 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications,Organizations,Trainin ,Awards,etc.) Florida Brownfields Association 19:RELEUANT PROJ"ECTS . . w (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED 2500 Palafox Street, Pensacola, Florida PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (lfapplicable) 2009 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Briefscope,size,cost,etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X)Check if project performed with current firm a.EPA Program Manager for Escambia County to assess and remediate site. Excavation was used with ° engineering controls to mitigate arsenic contaminated soil on planned office complex. $196,976 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED EPA Brownfields Grant, St. Petersburg, Florida PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (Ifapplicable) s 2004 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X l Check if project performed with current firm b. Program Manager for multiple Brownfields sites including historic Mercy Hospital site. Duties included Phase I/Phase 11 ESA's, UST removals, pilot test, and RAP preparation for DPVE cleanup $57,190 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED EPA Brownfields Grant, Eustis, Florida PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 2012 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X I Check if project performed with current firm c. Program Manager for Phase 11/III ESAs and GPR surveys conducted under EPA Brownfields Program at an active gas station and convenience store. $215,058 1 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED j EPA Brownfields Grants, Plant City, Florida PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I CONSTRUCTION (lfapplicable) 2014 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Briefscope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X l Check if project performed with current firm d. Program Manager for EPA assessment and remediation grants. Conducted several Phase I ESAs, source area removal of petroleum at one site and arsenic and benzo a rene at two sites. $1,400,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED , Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Florida PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (lfapplicable) i 2014 N/A 1 (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X l Check if project performed with current firm e. Program Manager for TCRPC Council $1,000,000 EPA Brownfields Coalition Grant. Projects included interfacing with coalition members, supervising Phase I and Phase 11 ESAs. Included in the projects were 10 Phase I ESAs completed simultanesouly on two city blocks within their community redevelopment area. STANDARD FORM 330(REV.3/2013)PAGE 2 __l 6 E:RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED;FOR:THIS CQNTRACT :" {Complete one Section E for each key person} 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Quality Assurance/Quality Control -a.TOTAL R wrrH CURRENT FIRM Michael D. McCown, P.G. Manager 26 21 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) i PPM Consultants, Inc., Birmingham, Alabama 16.EDUCATION (DEGREEAND SPECIALIZATION) �eology.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATEAND DISCIPLINE) B.S. in Geology—University of South Alabama, 1983 —AL, MS, TN 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS Publications,organizations,Training,Awards,etc. USACE/NAVFAC Contractor Quality Management Course; Annual 8-hour OSHA Hazwoper Refresher, First Aid/CPR/AED 19..RELEVANT PR'OJECT,S (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) �05FESSIONALSERVICES CONSTRUCTION (lfapplicabfe) EPA Brownfields Assessment Grant, Decatur, AL 2015 1 NIA (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Briefscope,size,cost,etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE I X I Check if project performed with current firm a. Program Manager or City of Decatur, Alabama EPA Brownfields Assessment Grant. Assisted with preparation of award- winning grant application; assisted the City with identification and prioritization of sites; conducted community outreach; promoted program to area lending institutions and real estate professionals; managed all aspects of grant, including technical lead navigating environmental issues on numerous projects in the City. $396,000 ! (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED HUD HANO, New Orleans, LA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I CONSTRUCTION (Ifapplicable) 2007 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Briefscope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE I x I Check if project performed with current firm b. Completed 40 HUD Form 4128 Environmental Assessments at housing projects in New Orleans, LA to comply with NEPA requirements.Assessments included determination of Finding of No Significant Impact(FONSI)of sites as they relate to coastal barrier resources,floodplain management, historical and cultural resources, noise, hazardous i operations, airport hazards, wetlands, toxic chemical and radioactive materials, threatened and endangered species, farmlands, sole source aquifers, and environmental justice. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED Flagstone Shell Emergency Response, Madison, Alabama PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (Ifapplicable) i 2006 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Briefscope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE I x I Check if project performed with current firm c. Program Manager at an emergency response site in Madison,Alabama where an 8,000 gallon gasoline release from a UST had migrated over one mile and impacted one of the largest municipal supply wells in the state. Tasks completed included coordination with emergency responders, the EPA, ADEM, and the media;tank removal and excavation; installation of 22 soil borings/monitoring wells to determine fate and transport through three different saturated zones; sinkhole evaluation; electromagnetic resistivity surveys to map the top of bedrock; free product recovery using mobile ' enhanced multi-phase extraction; and design/installation of a Dual Phase Vacuum Extraction System. $650,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED Montgomery Bulk Terminal, Montgomery, Alabama PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I CONSTRUCTION (Ifapplicable) 2014 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Briefscope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE I x I Check if project performed with current firm d. Program Manager at a bulk petroleum terminal in Montgomery, Alabama with three release incidents in 1990, 2003, 2009, and 2011. Completed remediation of the release at the loading rack in 2005. Completed a Risk Assessment in accordance with the Alabama Risk-based Corrective Action for a surface kerosene spill in 2007. A new subsurface release was discovered from a vapor recovery return line in July 2009. Managed the emergency investigation and remediation project that involved the release of an estimated 140,000 gallons of gasoline to groundwater within the midst of a city well field. Installed 5 remediation systems within 43 days of discovery required close coordination with client, ADEM. To date remediation program has recovered over 100,000 gallons of light non-aqueous phase liquids. A new surface release of approximately 12,000 gallons of gasoline occurred from a ruptured pump seal at Tank 7 in December 2011. Within hours nearly 95%of the released product had been recovered and excavation activities were initiated. Residual petroleum hydrocarbons beneath the tank footprint and pump are urrently under assessment. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED EPA Brownfields Assessment Work, Plant City, Florida PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (lfapplicable) 2014 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Briefscope,size,cost etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE I x I Check if project performed with current firm e. QA/QC Manager/CAP Preparation for City of Plant City, Florida EPA Brownfields Assessment Grant. Assisted with preparation of award-winning grant application; assisted City with QA/QC oversight on all aspects of projects and _ reporting, and prepared Corrective Action Plan. STANDARD FORM 330(REV.312013)PAGE 2 i E RESUMES O,F KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR,THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section,E for each key person) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Greg Stover, P.G. Senior Technical Advisor 36 20 -; 15.FIRM NAMEANDLOCATION (CityandState) PPM Consultants, Inc., Spanish Fort, AL 16.EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 117.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE) B.S. in Geology—Auburn University, 1979 JGeologist—AL, AR, FL, MS, TN 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Asbestos Building Inspector's Course,AHERA(BCM Engineers, Inc.)March 1988, UST Training Seminar,(BCM) 1992, Hazardous Waste Worker Training Seminar 29 CFR 1910.120(University of Alabama-Birmingham), November 1988;Refreshers: 1990 through 2011, Hazardous Waste Supervisor Training Seminar 29 CFR 1910.120, (Professional Training Group) 1995(#595-4179), Risk Based Corrective Action Seminar, (ASTM)October 1996, Introduction to Section 106 Review, University of Nevada,Reno, Heritage Resources Management Program,Oklahoma City,Oklahoma,2001,Alabama Risk-based Corrective Action Course(RAM Group)—1998,2001, 2007, First Aid/CPR/AED,American Red Cross,American Institute of Professional Geologists, MEM-1437,ASTM International E50 Subcommittee Member(No. 1177482),Author and editor of The PPM University Newsletter,a quarterly education-culture newsletter that began publication in January 2009.40 Hour OSHA Hazwo er 8 hour Hazwo er Refresher Course 2015. I , _ 19.?RECEVANT PROJECTS ; (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED EPA Brownfields Program, Plant City, Florida PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) 1 2013 1 NIA (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Briefscope,size,cost etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X 1 Check if project performed with current firm a. Project Manager for the remediation activities at the Gro Mor Fertilizer and Stock Lumber sites conducted for the City of Plant City, Florida under their EPA Brownfields Cleanup Grant. Mr. Stover also provided senior QC review for Phase I ESAs under the EPA Assessment Grant and also assisted the Orlando office with the Snowden Park assessment. Project cost:$1,092,406 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (city and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED Murphy Montgomery Terminal, Montgomery, Alabama PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I CONSTRUCTION (lfapplicable) Ongoing N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Briefscope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE I X 1 Check if project performed with current firm b. Program Manager for soil and groundwater remediation associated with multiple releases of motor fuels from a petroleum terminal. Project included completion of a Risk Assessment in accordance with the Alabama Risk-based Corrective Action(ARBCA);emergency response investigation and remediation of an estimated 117,930 gallons of gasoline to groundwater in the vicinity of a city well field; installation of five remediation systems,operation and maintenance of remediation systems;and recovery of over 116,000 gallons of gasoline). Project cost:$2,509,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED C.J. Peete Housing Redevelopment Project, New Orleans, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (Ifapplicab/e) Louisiana 2011 1 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Briefscope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE I x 1 Check if project performed with current firm c• For the C.J. Peete Redevelopment Project for the redevelopment contractor under contract to the Housing Authority of New Orleans (NANO). A Management Option 2 Risk Assessment was prepared in accordance with the Risk Evaluation/Corrective Action Program (RECAP) in 2008. Approximately 50%of the 50-acre site was impacted by at least one Chemical of Concern(COC)with concentrations above RECAP screening standards,including lead,arsenic,and PAHs,such as benzo(a)pyrene. This data was put in perspective with historical studies performed across New Orleans by the USEPA and others and a thorough research of site history, which established these COCs to represent elevated urban background conditions. Since all of the COCs were non-volatile, a Soil Reuse Plan was prepared that mitigated the risk of exposure while providing a material resource needed during the redevelopment. All soils with a risk factor>10"5 were excavated and disposed offsite. All remaining soils within 3 feet of the surface that have a risk factor>1e will be covered with the hardscape of the future development. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED EPA Brownfields Program, City of Mobile, Alabama PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (lfapplicable) 2012 1 NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Briefscope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE I x 1 Check if project performed with current firm d. Project Manager for thirteen (13) EPA-funded sites for the City of Mobile,Alabama in 2010-2012. Phase I ESAs have been prepared and approved by EPA for all ten sites. Mr.Stover prepared and submitted the draft site-specific QAPP for the first site to the US EPA - Region 4 Site Manager,who returned the comment,"Overall, I think you did an excellent job in pulling this document together......didn't take anytime whatsoeverin going through the review because you had everything according to the checklist." Nine QAPPs were prepared under this EPA Contract.$400,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED EPA Browntlelds Program, City of Mobile, Alabama PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (lfapplicable) Ongoing N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Briefscope,size,cost etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE I x 1 Check if project performed with current firm e. Project Manager for Mobile's second EPA Assessment grant awarded in 2014. Currently performing Phase I and Phase II asbestos and lead-based paint surveys on 14 sites owned by Mobile Airport Authority supporting new Airbus redevelopment of Brookley Field. STANDARD FORM 330(REV.3/2013)PAGE 2 t .. E RESUMES OF°KEY PERSONNEL PRQPOSED`FOR THIS CONTRACT - (Complefe one Section E for each key petsgn 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE 4 Environmental Health &Safety a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Jeri Thrasher, CSP. Manager 18 16 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) PPM Consultants, Inc., Monroe, Louisiana 16.EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE) B.S. in Toxicology—Northeast Louisiana University, 1997 M.B.A. in Business Administration—University of Louisiana CSP—Certified Safety Professional - 2014 at Monroe, 2005 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) 4044NT PROJECTS . (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2)YEAR COMPLETED Project Management Work, Southeast PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (lfapplicable) ' Ongoing N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Briefscope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X)Check if project performed with current firm a. Toxicologist/Project Manager responsible for Phase I ESAs for commercial and industrial properties in accordance with American Society of Testing and Materials(ASTM)standards. Assessments included site observation, report preparation and management of others conducting additional assessments. 9 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED Toxicologist, Various Sites, Southeast PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) Ongoing N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X 1 Check if project performed with current firm b. Toxicologist responsible for third-party asbestos and lead air monitoring during abatement projects. Having a Contractor/Supervisors license, air samples were collected prior, during and upon completion of abatement and sent to laboratory for analysis, and final report was generated and issued to client. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED Senior Health and Safety Officer for PPM Consultants, Inc. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable) Ongoing NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Briefscope,size,cost etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X 1 Check if project performed with current firm c.Senior Toxicologist/Senior Health and Safety Director responsible for company safety and health program development, implementation and enforcements. This is achieved through oversight of Safety Supervisors delegated to six branch locations in Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida to ensure safety compliance is uniformly achieved throughout he company. Specific duties to achieve regulatory compliance include, but are not limited to, the following: managing medical surveillance program through pre-employment, random, post-accident, and suspicious behavior drug screens and breath alcohol tests as well as post-hire and annual physical examinations; reporting and monitoring employee injuries/illnesses using OSHA logs, managing workman's compensation cases, and maintaining injury/illness statistics in i keeping with industry averages; safety and health management through third party consortiums; educating employees through annual in-house policy refreshers, outsourced trainings, and monthly safety briefings; generating site-specific health and safety plans (HASPS) including projects involving benzene releases, excavations, remedial system installations, chemical injections, and routine site investigations, which include soil boring, monitoring well installations and abandonment; ordering and maintaining required safety equipment as required by field-related processes; performing scheduled and random audits to ensure overall safety compliance is maintained; and conducting incident and near-miss investigations and root-cause analysis to prevent future occurrences. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED Groundwater Sampling, Various Locations in Louisiana �OFESSIONAL SERVICES I CONSTRUCTION (lfapplicable) Ongoing NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Briefscope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X 1 Check if project performed with current firm Cl.Responsible for groundwater sample collection and report generation for over 50 sites throughout Louisiana as well as storm water sample collection and discharge monitoring report(DMA generation for Louisiana sites. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED t Environmental Compliance, Various Locations in Southeast PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (lfapplicable) Ongoing N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X 1 Check if project performed with current firm e.Responsible for environmental compliance of industrial facility through proper hazardous/universal waste disposal, Tier 11 - reporting, storm water and Spill Prevention Countermeasure and Control (SPCC)compliance, and industrial wastewater and storm water permitting requirements and reporting. STANDARD FORM 330(REV.312013)PAGE 2 j E RESUMES,OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED:FQR'448""'d NTRAGT Com:lete one U611;SecE for each ke erson YA ) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Charles Ray Community Outreach Specialist I.a.TOT20 b.WITHCURR5 FIRM 3 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) PPM Consultants, Inc., Altamonte Springs, FL 16.EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE) B.A., Wesley Theological Seminary 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc Florida Brownfields Association 19 .RELEVANT PRJEGTS: (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED EPA Brownfields Assessment Grant, Plant City, Florida PROFESSIONAL SERVICESI CONSTRUCTION (lfapplicable) 2015 1 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Briefscope,size,cost,etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X 1 Check if project performed with current firm a. Brownfields Specialist responsible for community outreach for city's EPA assessment and remediation grants.The Former Hydraulic Hose/Telco Gas Station, Gro-Mor Fertilizer Plant, and Stock Lumber were identified as priorities for redevelopment because they are part of several blocks of former commercial and industrial businesses that the Community Redevelopment Agency would like to redevelop. The main objectives of the environmental cleanup activities at these sites were to remediate impacted soil and groundwater at the facilities. $1,400,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED EPA Brownfields Grant, Eustis, Florida PROFESSIONALSERVICES CONSTRUCTION (lfapplicable) 2012 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Briefscope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X 1 Check if project performed with current firm b. Brownfields Specialist assisting city with grant preparation, community outreach, and brownfields program development. An active gas station site was identified by the City of Eustis as a priority for redevelopment because groundwater contamination from this site was known to have affected at least four city blocks of commercial and residential properties along a major business corridor in Eustis, South Bay Street. PPM conducted Phase 11 and II ESA activities at the site. The site was under a regulatory consent order with the FDEP who was responsible for reviewing and approving cleanup activities at the site. After negotiating the work scope with the FDEP, PPM completed the assessment by installing eight additional wells and five soil borings. As a result of these activities, the extent of contamination was able to be delineated and all outstanding FDEP regulatory issues were addressed. PPM then negotiated with the FDEP to get a Natural Attenuation Monitoring (NAM) Plan approved for the site. The NAM Plan was approved and the site is currently in groundwater monitoring. $215,058 t (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED x EPA Brownfields Grant, St. Petersburg, Florida PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I CONSTRUCTION (lfapplicable) 2006 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Briefscope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X 1 Check if project performed with current firm J c.Program Manager for Brownfields Program from the inception in 1997 to 2006. Obtained $6,500,000 in Brownfields funding and facilited several business explansion and relocation transactions. Won two Pheonix Awards for exemplerary redevleo ment efforts. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED EPA Brownfields, City of Mobile, Alabama PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (1fapplicable) 2012 1 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Briefscope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X 1 Check if project performed with current firm i d. Brownfields Specialist assisting city with grant preparation, community outreach, and brownfields program management development. $388,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED EPA Brownfields Grant, Jackson, Mississippi PROFESSIONAL SERVICES lCONSTRUCTION (lfapplicable) 2010 NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Briefscope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [x 1 Check if project performed with current firm e. Brownfields Specialist assisting city with grant preparation, community Outreach, and brownfields program development. $400,000 -' STANDARD FORM 330(REV.312013)PAGE 2 E RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED'FOR THIS,GONT t T v ; (Complete one Section E for each key person) , 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM I Roy Therrien, P.G. Phase I ESA Team Leader 24 7 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) PPM Consultants, Inc., Altamonte Springs, FL 16.EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE) B.S. in Geology, A.S. in Land Surveying, MBA JProfessional Geologist, FL -� 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) 19.RELEVANT"PROJEGTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (Cityand State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED EPA Brownfields Assessment Grant, Plant City, Florida PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I CONSTRUCTION (lfapplicable) 2015 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X)Check if project performed with current firm a. Mr. Therrien's duties included program management, preparation of Community Involvement Plan, Quality Assurance Project Plan(QAPP) preparation, technical support/presentations during community involvement meetings, analysis of i brownfields cleanup alternatives, remedial bid specifications, oversight of construction contractor for removal of soil, monitoring well installation, soil and groundwater sampling, permitting, and report preparation. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED EPA Brownfields Grant, Eustis, Florida PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I CONSTRUCTION (11 applicable) 2012 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE IX)Check if project performed with current firm b.Project manager for the work that was conducted for a USEPA Brownfields Assessment Grant for the City of Eustis. An active gas station site was identified by the City of Eustis as a priority for redevelopment because groundwater contamination from this site was known to have affected at least four city blocks of commercial and residential properties along a major business corridor in Eustis, South Bay Street. PPM conducted Phase 11 and 11 ESA activities at the site. The site was under a regulatory consent order with the FDEP who was responsible for reviewing and approving cleanup activities at the site. After negotiating the work scope with the FDEP, PPM completed the assessment by installing eight additional wells and five soil borings. As a result of these activities, the extent of contamination was able to be delineated and all outstanding FDEP regulatory issues were addressed. PPM then negotiated with the FDEP to get a Natural Attenuation Monitoring (NAM) Plan approved for the site. The NAM Plan was approved and the site is currently in —groundwater monitoring. $200,000 1 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED Contamination Assessments, Sanford, Florida PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (lfapplicable) 2014 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [x)Check if project performed with current firm c. Project Manager responsible for site assessemnt activities at the former City of Sanford Police Station. Duties included project management; soil and groundwater sampling; preparation of assessment report, bid specifications for source removal, and regulatory correspondence. $200,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, West Palm Beach, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (lfapplicable) 2014 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [x I Check if project performed with current firm d.Project Manager for the work conducted under a USEPA Brownfields Assessment Grant for the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. A Phase I ESA was conducted on 11 parcels that are in a State of Florida designated Brownfield area owned by the Westgate-Belvedere Home Community Redevelopment Agency. Westgate-Belvedere Home CRA is redeveloping several block uses for mixed used (residential and commercial) purposes. PPM conducted the Phase I ESA 1 on the 11 parcels and identified one parcel, a used car dealer, with a recognized environmental condition, a drum of used oil that leaked on to the adjacent ground. PPM has arranged with the site tenant to have the used oil pumped form the drum. Phase II ESA activities to assess the soil and groundwater at the drum area are pending as of October 2013. 30,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Various Sites throughout Florida PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (lfapplicable) Ongoing N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [x)Check if project performed with current firm e. Project Manager responsible for Phase I and Phase 11 environmental site assessments and facility audits throughout the State of Florida. Mr. Therrien has conducted or supervised over 100 ASTM 1527 Phase I ESAs for commercial businesses,industrial facilities, undeveloped land, former citrus groves, dry cleaning sites, hazardous waste sites, and gasoline stations. STANDARD FORM 330(REV.312013)PAGE 2 3 i E, RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED;FOR TNlS CQNTRACI' -. < {Complete one Section E for each key person) E 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE I a. Cliff Settle Team Leader— Phase II ESAs TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM 16 3 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) { PPM Consultants, Inc., Altamonte Springs, FL I 16.EDUCATION (DEGREEAND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE) B.S. in Geology—Indiana University, 1999 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards etc 40-Hour OSHA Hazwo er, 8 hour Hazwo er Refresher Course, FAEP I9 RELEVANT PROJECTS. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED Former Sanford Police Station, Sanford, Florida PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (lfapplicable) Ongoing 2015 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Briefscope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X I Check if project performed with current firm a.Project Geologist responsible for oversight of the construction contractor during excavation activities at the Former City of Sanford Police Station located at 815 South French Avenue, Sanford, Florida. Between February 2 and 9, 2015, PPM monitored the excavation of approximately 2,123 tons of hydrocarbon-impacted oil for proper disposal. The final excavation measured approximately 80 feet long by 55 feet wide by 8 feet deep. Approximately 302,400 gallons of groundwater was dewatered from the excavation area, treated, and hen disposed in the municipal storm water system. Effluent groundwater analyses indicated the dissolved hydrocarbons were removed by the remediation system prior to discharge to the municipal storm water sewer system. Soil samples were collected from the sidewalls and bottom of excavation area. 3 Monitoring wells MW-14 and MW-15 were previously impacted with high levels of dissolved hydrocarbons. ` Both wells were destroyed during excavation activities. Post-excavation laboratory analytical results for groundwater samples collected on May 7, 2015 from replacement well MW-14R showed an approximate 95.8% decreased in dissolved hydrocarbons and monitoring well MW-15R showed an approximate 99.9% decrease in dissolved hydrocarbons. ,Groundwater samples collected from downgradient monitoring wells MW-21 and MW-23 on May 7, 2015 were impacted with benzene, total xylenes, and naphthalene exceeding heir respective GCTLs. The concentration of total xylenes in monitoring well MW-23 exceeded its Table V, Natural Attenuation Default Concentrations. The site is currently undergoing quartering natural attenuation monitoring. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED Circle K/The Pantry, Inc., Florida PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I CONSTRUCTION (lfapplicable) On oin N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Briefscope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X I Check if project performed with current firm b. Project Geologist responsible for petroleum contamination assessments and remediation at multiple facilities. Tasks included installation of monitoring wells, advancement of soil borings, collection of soil/water samples, installation of remedial systems, report preparation, and site restoration/well abandonment. i (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED FDEP Petroleum Restoration Program, Florida r7Ongoing SSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (lfapplicable) NIA (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X l Check if project performed with current firm c. Project Geologist/Project Manager responsible for petroleum contamination assessments and remediation under the state funded Petroleum Restoration Program and the Former Pre-Approval Program at multiple facilities. Tasks included installation of monitoring wells, advancement of soil borings, collection of soil/water samples, installation of remedial systems, project oversight, report preparation, and site restoration/well abandonment. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED FDEP Hazardous Waste Dry Cleaner Program, Florida PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (lfapplicable) 2011 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Briefscope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X I Check if project performed with current firm d. Project Geologist responsible for hazardous waste contamination assessments and remediation under the state funded Hazardous Waste Dry Cleaner Program at multiple facilities throughout Florida. Tasks included installation of monitoring wells, advancement of soil borings, collection of soil/water samples, installation of remedial systems, project oversight, report preparation, and report review. i E RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSEDFOR THIS CQNTRACT {Complete one Sectrtin E for each key person:) i 12.NAME 113.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Team Leader—Asbestos/Lead Based TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Debbie Zimmermann, CHMM 2 Paint 6 12 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (CityandState) PPM Consultants, Inc., Spanish Fort, Alabama 16.EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE) B.S. Biology &Business—University of South Alabama, 1979 Certified Hazardous Materials Manager 1 B.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) AHERA Inspector/Management Planner, Certified Mold Remediator �. 9:RELEVAN T PRQJECTS '. ..;. ? (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION T17 applicable) Baldwin County Public Schools, Spanish Fort, AL 2009 N/A 1 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Briefscope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE (X j Check if project performed with current firm a. Team Leader for the lead-based paint remediation of building interiors at Spanish Fort Elementary School. $1,065,037 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED i Selma City Schools, Selma, Alabama PROFESSIONALSERVICES I CONSTRUCTION (lfapplicaRe_) 2008 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE (X j Check if project performed with current firm b. Team Leader and inspector for microbial investigations at four elementary schools. $26,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED I Housing Authority of New Orleans, HUD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I CONSTRUCTION (Ifapplicable) 2006 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Briefscope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE (X j Check if project performed with current firm c. Team Leader for mold inspections on 6,200 units following Hurricane Katrina. $1,420,374 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED Charter School, City of Pensacola, FL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (Ifapplicable) j 2008 NIA $ (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X j Check if project performed with current firm J d. Team Leader for mold inspections at Charter School. $3,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I CONSTRUCTION (Ifapplicable) N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Briefscope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE (X j Check if project performed with current firm I e. STANDARD FORM 330(REV.312013)PAGE 2 4 f E RESUMES OF'KEY PERSONNEL PRQPOSED'FOR THiS CONTRACT Com lete one Section E for each ke erson 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Team Leader—ABCA/Cleanup a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM Lee Rodgers, P.E. Planning 22 7 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) PPM Consultants, Inc., Spanish Fort, Alabama 16.EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 1 .CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATEAND DISCIPLINE) B.S in Civil Engineering—University of Alabama, 1993 —AL, FL, GA, SC, NC, TN, MS, NCEES 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc. OSHA HAZWOPER 40 HR, MSHA 40 HR, ASCE, Manufacture Alabama Environmental Committee, Florida Petroleum Marketers Association Environmental Committee, Florida Brownfields Association, Capstone Engineering Society, Georgia Erosion and Sediment Control Certified Designer, BEEST Air Dispersion Modeling Design 19:RE�EVANT.PROJEGTS . .. , tt (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED f C.J. Peete Housing Development, New Orleans, LA PROFESSIONAL SERVICESI CONSTRUCTION (Ifapplicable) i 2012 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Briefscope,size,cost,etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE [X I Check if project performed with current firm a.Senior Design Engineer for the site investigation conducted prior to the redevelopment of a public housing project. PPM as tasked with conducting Phase I and Phase 11 Environmental Assessment, Asbestos Surveys and Abatement/Demolition Oversight for the project. PPM prepared a Remedial Action Plan (RAP)to govern the handling of contaminated soils during the redevelopment activities. PPM's team provided on-site oversight of the implementation of he RAP and post-development care. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED Wilson Service Center, Spanish Fort, AL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (Ifapplicable) 2015 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Briefscope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 1 X I Check if project performed with current firm b.Senior Design Engineer for the development of a Remedial Action Plan for the remediation of an urban site contaminated with petroleum constituents. Remedial action technologies included dual phase vacuum extraction and ozone injection. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION. (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED f Southwire, Carrollton, GA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (Ifapplicable) 1998 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Briefscope,size,cost etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 1 X I Check if project performed with current firm I c.Project Manager/Senior Engineer for a multi-million dollar RCRA remediation project for an industrial client. Contamination included metals and semi-volatiles. Project involved: delineation of contamination on the surface, in the subsurface soil, in stream sediments and in a lake bed. Investigation included rapid bioassessment protocols for periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish, soil and groundwater. Remediation involved extensive excavation activities including mass grading and targeted grading. Remediation of the contaminated soils and sediments was achieved through stabilization. The project involved coordinating both State and EPA RCRA Programs and the successful delisting of a waste stream. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED Harmony Oaks, New Orleans, LA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I CONSTRUCTION (Ifapplicable) 2012 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Briefscope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 1 X I Check if project performed with current firm d.Project manager for project involving housing authority of large city and an investment group led by Wall Street bank to provide comprehensive environmental consulting services before, during and after the development of the housing complex. The development project was part of the city's effort to revitalize the city center following hurricane damage. The project involved identifying impacted soil, removing impacted soil for disposal, placement of a witness barrier and clean fill, I and managing quality control efforts during construction to ensure the remediation plan was followed. Post construction monitoring was also required. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2 YEAR COMPLETED I Multiple, Alabama (state-wide) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (Ifapplicable) 2015 N/A (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Briefscope,size,cost etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 1 x I Check if project performed with current firm e.Project Manager for federal LUST Fund contract administered by the ADEM for leaking UST sites. Responsibilities included managing multiple task orders involving emergency response, UST closure, contamination assessment, pilot —testing, corrective action planning, risk assessment, corrective action, and well abandonment. STANDARD FORM 330(REV.3/2013)PAGE 2 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. CoMp/ete one Section F for each project.) 1 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Environmental Consulting Services, Sanford Police Station, Professional Services Construction Sanford, Florida Ongoing 2015 PROJ 23',,. EC7 OW NER'S INFORMATIO - -- a.PROJECT OWNER POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Sanford, Florida 7. Thomas Geor e 407-688-5086 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) PPM provided environmental consulting services on the Former City of Sanford Police Station located at 815 South French Avenue, Sanford, Florida. The former vehicle fueling area was located at the northeast side of the property and consisted of the former LIST area, two former fueling dispensers, and a former vehicle utility/storage building. One petroleum discharge was reported for this facility on August 2, 1990. The discharge is eligible for state cleanup funding under the Petroleum Cleanup Participation Program. However due to a property transaction with Seminole County, the City elected to conduct voluntary assessment activities. The vehicle fueling operations began in 1974 and ended in 1999. In 1974, one 2,000-gallon unleaded gasoline LIST and one 3,000-gallon UST were installed at the site. In 1990, the LISTs were removed and replaced (in the same tank pit)with one 10,000-gallon unleaded gasoline LIST. The 10,000-gallon UST was removed in 1999. Site assessment activities were conducted in 1990 and 1991. Remedial activities were conducted between 1992 and 1999 with installation of six recovery wells on a downgradient off-site property and operation of a pump and treat groundwater system. In 1999, the 10,000- gallon UST was removed (1999 Tank Closure Assessment Report by Ardaman and Associates, Inc.). No further work was conducted until 2010. Assessment activities conducted between 2010 and 2012 indicated the extent of soil and groundwater impacts had been delineated. The extent of the soil and groundwater impacts were limited to the "carve out parcel" and the 'ROW of 8th Street. The impacted area extended from the former dispenser area east under the former storage building and just past the northern edge of pavement of 8th Street. The vertical extent of hydrocarbon impacts was estimated to extend to a depth of approximately 8 feet BGS. Remediation and Post Remediation Groundwater Sampling Summary: • Soil excavation activities were conducted between February 2 and 9, 2015. Approximately 2,123.66 tons of hydrocarbon-soil were excavated and properly disposed. The final excavation measured approximately 80 feet long by 55 feet wide by 8 feet deep. • Approximately 302,400 gallons of groundwater was dewatered, treated, and disposed in the municipal storm water system. • Post-excavation assessment activities included the advancement of soil borings and the installation and sampling of monitoring wells. • Laboratory analytical results for three vadose-zone soil samples collected from borings off the north side of the excavation area, north of 8th Street within the city owned ROW, indicated no SCTL exceedances for BTEX, MTBE, PAHs, or TRPH. 0 Monitoring wells MW-14 and MW-15 were previously impacted with high levels of dissolved hydrocarbons. Both wells were destroyed during excavation activities. Post-excavation laboratory analytical results for groundwater samples collected from replacement well MW-14R showed an approximate 95.8% decreased in dissolved hydrocarbons and monitoring well MW-15R showed an approximate 99.9% decrease in dissolved hydrocarbons. • Soil excavation and dewatedng were effective in significantly reducing dissolved hydrocarbon concentrations at the site. .. 25 FIRMS'1FR SECTIWC,INVOLVEDW , IT ,THIS`PR PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2) LOCATION (City and State) T(3)ROLE a.PPM Consultants, Inc. tamonte Springs, Florida JEnvironmental Consultant- STANDARD FORM 330(REV.312013)PAGE 6 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects,if not specified. 2 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) ' 22.YEAR COMPLETED EPA Brownfields Assessment Grant, Plant City, Florida Professional Services Construction 2014 N/A -2&TROJEC T"ER INFORMAT]OW - a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Plant City, Florida Karen Collins 813-659-4232 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(include scope,size,and cost) PPM has provided environmental consulting services to the City of Plant City as a prime contractor since 2009 under their US EPA Brownfield Assessment Grant and Cleanup Grant/Revolving Loan Fund. PPM worked on eight sites for the City of Plant City including a former fertilizer plant, a police station, commercial businesses, former gas stations, and an automotive repair facility. Contaminants of concern include petroleum products, metals, pesticides, and radionuclides. The specific projects included: • Former Police Station: Phase I ESA • Former Baker Street Gas Station: Phase I ESA, Phase 11 ESA, SSQAPP, Underground Storage Tank (UST) removal, Tank Closure Assessment • Former Restaurant/Commercial Business: Phase I ESA * West Automotive Repair: Phase I ESA • Former Wheeler Street Gas Station: Phase I ESA, Phase 11 ESA, SSQAPP, LIST removal, Tank Closure Assessment • Former Hydraulic Hose/Telco Gas Station: Phase 11 ESA, Remedial Acoon Plan,-Analyses • of Brownfield Cleanup Alternatives (ABCA), SSQAPP 0 Gro-Mor Fertilizer Plant: SSQAPP, ABCA, RAP, Remediation • Stock Lumber: SSQAPP, ABCA The Former Hydraulic Hose/Telco Gas Station, Gro-Mor Fertilizer Plant, and Stock Lumber were identified as priorities for redevelopment because they are part of several blocks of former commercial and industrial businesses that the Community Redevelopment Agency would like to redevelop. The main objectives of the environmental cleanup activities at these sites were to remediate impacted soil and groundwater at the facilities. A Community Involvement Plan was prepared for the three sites in order to obtain public opinion. The Hydraulic Hose/Telco Oil site was formerly two adjoining parcels occupied by a light industry and a gasoline station, respectively. Due to the soil composition, the effectiveness of many in-situ remedial techniques such as air J sparging would likely be limited, it was determined that the excavation technology chosen would include smear and saturated zone soils to remediate soil and groundwater at this site. PPM completed the ABCAs, confirmation 1 sampling and delineation, Source Area Removal Work Plans, site specific QAPPs, and source area removal (SAR) excavations at the three sites. In addition, PPM provided support for community outreach, performed US EPA ACRE database updates, assisted with US EPA required quarterly reporting and minority participation reporting. The former Baker Street Gas Station has already been redeveloped as part of an adjoining health care facility. At the Gro-Mor site, shallow soils impacted by semi-volatile organic compounds were excavated and disposed of at an offsite facility. A Remedial Action Plan for removal of fertilizer based contaminants (ammonia nitrogen, nitrates, sulfates, and manganese) was developed for a portion of the site. The RAP included natural attenuation, and phytoremediation using trees to uptake the impacted groundwater. The site has been redeveloped into a park, and plans are underway to market adjacent properties to developers using institutional and engineering controls to manage the remaining impacts. Contract: $1,400,000 '�"R -SEQTION,CI�y,9L E":T- PRQJECT F Z, _,ZOM, a.1(1)FIRM NAME )FIRM LOCATION (City and State) 1(3)ROLE PPM Consultants, Inc. Pitamonte Springs, Florida JEnvironmental Consultant STANDARD FORM 330(REV.3/2013)PAGE 6 i F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. 3 i Complete one Section F for each p*ct. 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22,YEAR COMPLETED Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, Palm Beach, Florida Professional Services Construction Ongoing A 23;-PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME C.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council I Greg Vada 772-221-4060 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) PPM Consultants, Inc. (PPM) was retained by Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) in 2013 to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of 11 neighboring parcels (Cl through C11) located in West Palm Beach, Florida. The parcels are planned to be redeveloped by the Westgate/Belvedere Homes Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) as Renaissance Mixed Use-Phases 1 and 2. The work was conducted for TCRPC under their United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Brownfield Program Assessment Grant No. BF-95482011. Seven of the 11 parcels are vacant grass covered lots. The other parcels include two single-family residences (Parcels C4 and C5), an office building occupied by a church group (Parcel Cl), and a used car sales lot (Parcel C7). The subject parcels are located in West Palm Beach, Florida in a mostly residential area located between Palm Beach County Airport to the south and Okeechobee Boulevard to the north (a major east-west thoroughfare in West Palm Beach). Available historical documentation indicates the parcels were developed between 1938 and 1963 except for Parcel C7 which was developed in 1994. All of the developed parcels had single-family residential usage except for Parcels C1 and C7. Parcel C1 was originally an apartment building, converted to office space in the 1980s. Parcel C7 was first developed in 1994 as a used car sales lot. Since then it operated as a used car sales lot with use as a towing company in the early 2000s. The historical and current uses of the parcels as residential properties, an apartment building, and office space are j not considered to represent recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property. The current and historical use of Parcel C7 for car detailing activities and minor car repairs is not considered to represent recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property. The use of Parcels C9 and C10 to stage dirt excavated from the adjoining Palm Beach County Lift Station No. 5243 is not considered to represent a recognized environmental condition in connection with the subject property. This assessment revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property except for a 55-gallon drum containing used oil located at the southwest corner of Parcel C7. The drum is not being maintained and used oil leaking out of a bung hole on top of the drum had impacted the soil around the drum. FIRMS,,FROM SECTION°C-INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT 25 . .< . . .,. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3)ROLE a.PPM Consultants, Inc. Itamonte Springs, Florida Environmental Consultant STANDARD FORM 330(REV.3/2013)PAGE 6 l . F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20 EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. 4 Complete one Section F for each project) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED EPA Brownfields Assessment Grant, Eustis, Florida Professional Services Construction 2 N/A WE JOWN N OR 0 T -23 FO MATION�� a.PROJECT OWNER POINT OF CONTACT NAME OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Eustis, Florida 7P Dianne Kramer 352-483-5460 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(include scope,size,and cost) The City of Eustis contracted PPM to provide environmental consulting services as the prime contractor from 2009 through 2012 under their US EPA Brownfield Assessment Grant for $400,000 (BF-95442009). PPM conducted assessments on seven sites for the City of Eustis including a gas station, a golf course, and other commercial properties. The seven sites are discussed further below. PPM conducted a Phase I ESA, Phase 11 ESA, Site Specific QAPP, and Health and Safety Plan on the Former Healing Waters World Outreach Church. The I chemicals of concern associated with the subject property were dry cleaning solvents and fuel oil. A GPR survey was conducted to locate any buried underground storage tanks or boilers. Soil and groundwater samples were collected at the site. No impacts were identified and no further assessment was recommended. PPM conducted a Phase I ESA, Phase 11 ESA, Site Specific QAPP, and Health and Safety Plan on the Generations Restaurant. The subject property operated as a gas station through the late 1960s and as a grocery 1 store through the mid-1970s. Due to the previous use of the property, a GPR survey was conducted to locate any buried underground storage tanks. A GPR anomaly at the former tank and dispenser area at was found to be a probable steel tank at a depth of 1.9 feet below ground surface. Soil and groundwater samples were collected at i the site. No impacts were identified and no further assessment was recommended. PPM conducted a SSQAPP, Phase 11 ESA, Phase III ESA, and Natural Attenuation Monitoring Plan for the Phillips 66 Food Mart. This site was identified by the City of Eustis as a priority for redevelopment because groundwater contamination from this site was known to have affected at least four city blocks of commercial and residential properties along a major business corridor. Groundwater samples were collected from PPM recommended the installation of seven shallow monitoring wells and one deep monitoring well delineating the horizontal and vertical extent of dissolved hydrocarbons. PPM negotiated on the behalf of the City and the property owner to implement a Natural Attenuation Monitoring Plan. PPM conducted a Phase I ESA, Phase 11 ESA, Site Specific QAPP, and Health and Safety Plan on the Former Pine Meadows Country Club. Phase 11 ESA included soil and groundwater assessment surrounding the former putting green east of the clubhouse and the former 9th green area southwest of the clubhouse. TI INVOLVED WITH FIRMS:FROM THIS,'_PROJEQT,', ', , J FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3)ROLE a]PPM Consultants, Inc. .[Altamonte Springs, Florida lEnvironmental Consultant STANDARD FORM 330(REV.3/2013)PAGE 6 i F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 90 projects, if not specified. 5 Complete one Section F for each ro'ect. 21.TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED The McWilliams Property, Pensacola, Florida Professional Services Construction 2015 N/A 77 77- 23:;.PROJECT UWNER'S INFORMATION! .... . . .. .. .,.... u. _ . a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER The City of Pensacola, Florida I Brad Hinote 1 850-435-1645 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) PPM was retained by the City of Pensacola to complete Phase I, Phase II, and Clean-up Planning at a former gasoline station known as the McWilliams Property. The City planned on acquiring the property for redevelopment as a parking lot to relieve event parking and congestion near the downtown area. A preliminary record search i revealed that the facility had operated as a Gulf Oil Corporation gasoline station and auto repair facility from 1958 through 1978 when it was purchased by the current owner. Since then, the facility has been used as an office and storage space. A Phase I records search revealed that in a 1992 tank closure report, holes in one or more tanks were noted during the removal of gasoline, diesel, used oil, and hydraulic oil USTs. A Discharge Reporting Form (DRF) was submitted, and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) determined that a Site Assessment and, if needed, clean-up was required. The FDEP further determined that the current property owner was the responsible party; therefore the site was not eligible for funding under any of the State Funding programs at the time. PPM argued that since the current owner had never used the facility as a gasoline station or repair facility, that the Gulf Oil Corporation was the responsible party. PPM further argued that since the Gulf Oil Corporation entity no longer existed, i.e. that there was no viable responsible party; the facility was therefore I eligible for funding of a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment and Clean-up Planning under the City of Pensacola Brownfield Grant. PPM coordinated with the FDEP to develop a streamlined Phase II Work Plan, to complete the assessment as quickly and efficiently as possible while providing sufficient detail to reach a clean-up -, decision. PPM advanced ten soil borings and installed three permanent monitoring wells in and around the former UST areas, dispenser area, and former hydraulic lift locations. Soil samples were collected for laboratory analysis based on soil vapor readings and/or signs of visible staining, and groundwater samples were collected from each monitoring well. Results of laboratory analysis revealed no Chemicals of Concern (COCs) above their respective Clean-up Target Levels (CTLs) in soil or groundwater. PPM recommended a No Further Action status be designated for the site and is currently in pending status. 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION G INVOLVED WITH,THIS PROJECT . (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3)ROLE a.PPM Consultants, Inc. Pensacola, Florida Environmental Consultant STANDARD FORM 330(REV.3/2013)PAGE 6 4 I G.KEY,PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION 1N,EXAMPLE PROJECTS 28.EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F 26.NAMES OF KEY 27.ROLE IN THIS (Fill in"Example Projects Key"section below before completing CONTRACT(From table.Place"X"under project key number for participation in PERSONNEL{From Section E,Block same or similar role.) Section E,Block 12) 13) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 7 8 9 10 Amy Guilfoyle Project Manager X X X X - Keith D.Pyron,P.G. Program Manager X X X X X Mike McCown,P.G. QA/QC Manager X X X X X Greg Stover,P.G. Senior Technical Advisor X X X X X Jeri Thrasher,CSP Health&Safety Manager X X X X X Charles Ray Community Outreach Specialist X X X X X I Roy Therrien,P.G. Phase I ESA Team Leader X X X X 9 Cliff Settle Phase II ESA Team Leader X X X X Debbie Zimmermann,CHMM Asbestos/Lead Base Paint X X ii Lee Rodgers,P.E. ABCA/Cleanup Planning X X X X X 5 i 29 EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) NO. TI � TL E OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) Environmental Consulting Services,Sanford Police Station, 1 1 Sanford,Florida 6 _s 2 EPA Brownfields Assessment Grant,Plant City,Florida 7 Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council,Palm Beach, 3 Florida 8 4 EPA Brownfields Assessment Grant,Eustis,Florida 9 The McWilliams Property,Pensacola,Florida 5 10 STANDARD FORM 330(612004)PAGE 4 i ;W ADDITIONAL` INFORMATION. 30.PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. f t is AUTHORIZED'REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing Is a's#atemen#of fact§ 31.SIGNATUR 32.DATE 10/16/2015 33.NAME AND TITLE Keith D. Pyron, P.G./Principal I l 44 t i E II( i y 5 1 E i 1.SOLICITATION NUMBER (Ifany) ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS RFQ 14/15-22 2a.FIRM(OR BRANCH OFFICE)NAME 3.YEAR ESTABLISHED 4.DUNS NUMBER FPM Consultants, Inc. 1994 1959441817 2b.STREET 5.OWNERSHIP 750 South Northlake Boulevard, Suite 1012 a.TYPE 2c.CITY 2d.STATE 2e.ZIP CODE Corporation Altamonte Springs IFL 132701 b.SMALL BUSINESS STATUS 6a.POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE None Keith D. Pyron, P.G, President 7.NAME OF FIRM (If block 2a is a branch office) I PPM Consultants, Inc. 6b.TELEPHONE NUMBER 6c.E-MAIL ADDRESS 407-240-1127 keith.pyron(crppmco.com 8a.FORMER FIRM NAME(S) (Ifany) 8b.YR.ESTABLISHED 8c.DUNS NUMBER i 9.EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE 10.PROFILE OF FIRM'S EXPERIENCE AND ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS a.Function c.No.of Employees a.Profile c.Revenue Index Code b.Discipline b.Experience Number (1)FIRM (2)BRANCH Code I see below 02 Administrative 30 2 E09 lEnvironmental Impact Study 8 -I 08 CADD Technician 3 E12 Environmental Remediation 9 I 10 Chemical Engineer 2 E13 Environmental Testing 8 12 Civil En ieer 4 H03 Hazardous Toxic Waste Remediatio 5 16 Construction Manager 2 W02 Water Resources Groundwater 3 23 Environmental Engineer 2 24 Environmental Scientist 13 3 30 Geolo ist 30 2 42 Mechanical Engineer 1 48 Proiect Manager 3 50 Risk Assessor 3 58 Tech nician Anal st 9 59 Toxicologist 3 i Other Employees Total 105 7 11.ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER -- SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRM FOR LAST 3 YEARS 1. Less than$100,000 6. $2 million to less than$5 million (Insert revenue index number shown at right) 2. $100,000 to less than$250,000 7. $5 million to less than$10 million . a.Federal Work 3 3. $250,000 to less than$500,000 8. $10 million to less than$25 million b.Non-Federal Work 8 4. $500,000 to less than$1 million 9. $25 million to less than$50 million c.Total Work 8 5. $1 million to less than$2 million 10. $50 million or greater 12.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. s c.NAME AND TITLE Keith D. Pyron, Principal AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330(REV.3/2013)PAGE 6 i twG o c U '.4 • V a GNU � � o tj -414 •` � Ey ,o � o o � �ru rC s� o -�c ai U a CIO) H e° pr V *a U bi . rn a z cl �t w . • —' U U W � � • z E i Florida Statutes On Public Entity Crimes THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND SWORN TO IN THE PRESENCE OF A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICIAL I AUTHORIZED TO ADMINISTER OATHS. 1. This sworn statement is submitted to The CITY by Keith Q. Peron on behalf of PPM Consultants Inc whose business address is: 750 South Northlake Boulevard, Suite 1012, Altamonte Springs, FL 32701 and(if applicable)its Federal Employer Identification Number(FEIN)is 72-1256279 (If the entity has no FEIN, include the Social Security Number of the individual signing this statement: ). 2. 1 understand that a "public entity crime" as defined in Paragraph 287.133(1)(g), Florida Statutes, means a violation of any state or federal law by a person with respect to and directly related to the transaction of business with any public entity or with an agency or political subdivision of any other state or with the United States, including, but not limited to, any bid or contract for goods or services, any lease for real property, or any contract for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, involving antitrust, fraud, theft, bribery, collusion, racketeering, conspiracy, or material misrepresentation. 3. 1 understand the "convicted" or"conviction" as defined in Paragraph 287.133(1)(b), Florida Statutes, means a finding of guilt or a conviction of a public entity crime, with or without an adjudication of guilt, in any federal or state trial court of record relating to charges brought by indictment or information after July 1, 1989, as a result of a jury verdict, non jury trial,or entry of a plea of guilt or nolo contendere. 4. 1 understand that an"affiliate"as defined in Paragraph 287.133(1)(a), Florida Statutes, means: 1. A predecessor or successor of a person convicted of a public entity crime:or 2. An entity under the control of any natural person who is active in the management of the entity and who has been convicted of a public entity crime. The term "affiliate" includes those officers, directors, executives, partners, shareholders, employees, members, and agents who are active in the management of an affiliate. The ownership by one person of shares constituting a controlling interest in another person, or a pooling of equipment or income among persons when not fair market value under an arm's length agreement, shall be a prima facie case that one person controls another person. A person who knowingly enters into a joint venture with a person who has been convicted of a public entity crime in Florida during the preceding 36 months shall be considered an affiliate. 5. 1 understand that a"person"as defined in Paragraph 287.133(1)(e), Florida Statutes, means any natural person or entity organized under the laws of any state or of the United States with the legal power to enter into a binding contract and which bids or applies to bid on contracts let by a public entity, or which otherwise transacts or applies to transact business with a public entity. The term "person" includes those officers, directors, executives, partners, shareholders, employees, members,and agents who are active in management of an entity. 6. Based on information and belief, the statement which I have marked below is true in relation to the entity submitting this sworn statement. (Please indicate which statement applies.) X Neither the entity submitting this sworn statement, nor any of its officers, director, executives, partners, I shareholders, employees, members, or agents who are active in the management of the entity, nor any affiliate of the -3 entity were charged with and convicted of a public entity crime after July 1, 1989. The entity submitting this sworn statement, or one or more of the officers, directors, executives, partners, shareholders, employees, members, or agents who are active in the management of the entity, or any affiliate of the entity was charged with and convicted of a public entity crime after July 1, 1989. The entity submitting this sworn statement, or one of its officers, directors, executives, partners, shareholders, employees, members, or agents who are active in the management of the entity, or any affiliate of the entity was charged with and convicted of a public entity crime subsequent to July 1, 1989. However, there has been a subsequent proceeding before a Hearing Officer of the State of Florida, Division of Administrative Hearings and the Final Order __ RFQ 14/15-22 Environmental Assessment Respondents Business Information Affidavit 1 State the true, exact, correct and complete name of the company, ----.,Sole proprietorship, —partnership, _LLC, x corporation, —trade or fictitious name under which you do business and the address of the principal place of business: 750 South Northlake Boulevard, Suite 1012, Altamonte Springs, FL 32701 The correct name of the Company is: PPM Consultants, Inc. a. FEI/EIN Number: 72-1256279 b. Trade Mark Name: 2. If Offeror is a corporation or LLC, answer the following: a. Date of Incorporation: December 11, 1993 b. State of Incorporation: Louisiana C. Chief Executive Officer- Name and Title: Keith D. Pyron, P.G./Principal/President d. Vice President's Name:– Michael D. McCown e. Secretary's Name: L. Todd Perry f. Treasurer's Name: L. Todd Perry 9- Name and address of Florida Resident Agent: Amy Guilfoyle, District Manager 750 South Northlake Boulevard, Suite 1012, Altamonte Springs, FL 32701 3. If Offeror is an individual proprietorship or a partnership, answer the following: a. Date of Organization: b. Name, Address and Ownership Units of all Partners: C. State whether general or limited partnership: 4. If Offeror is other than a sole proprietorship, corporation or partnership, describe the organization and give the name and address of principals: RFQ 14/15-22 Environmental Assessment 5. If Offeror or company is an operation under a fictitious name, submit evidence of compliance with the Florida Fictitious Name Statute. 6. How many years has your organization been in business under its present business name? 20 7. Indicate registration, license number or certificate numbers for the businesses or professions which are the subject of the Proposal/Bid. Please attach certificate of competency and state registration. 9. State the names, telephone numbers and last known addresses of three (3) owners, f individuals or representative of owners with the most knowledge of work which you have performed ! or goods you have provided, and to which you refer(government owners are preferred as references). Keith D.Pyron, P.G. 30704 Sgt. E.I.Boots Thomas Dr,Spanish Fort,AL 36527 251-990-9000 (name) (address) (phone number) ._2 : i Michael D.McCown,P.G. 5555 Bankhead Highway,Birmingham,AL 35210 205-536-5650 (name) (address) (phone number) L. Todd Perry 1600 Lamy Lane, Monroe, LA 71202 318-323-7270 (name) (address) (phone number) THE OFFEROR ACKNOWLEDGES AND UNDERSTANDS THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN RESPONSE TO THIS j QUALIFICATIONS STATEMENT SHALL BE RELIED UPON BY THE CITY IN AWARDING THE CONTRACT AND SUCH INFORMATION IS WARRANTED BY OFFEROR TO BE TRUE. THE DISCOVERY OF ANY OMISSION OR MISSTATEMENT THAT MATERIALLY AFFECTS THE OFFEROR'S QUALIFICATIONS TO PERFORM UNDER THE CONTRACT SHALL CAUSE THE CITY TO REJECT THE BID OR PROPOSAL,AND ER THE AWARD T EL AND TERMINATE THE AWARD AND/OR CONTRACT. _ . � b s Signature orAffiarlK Dat _ Keith D. Pyron, P.G. Principal Typed or Printed Name of Affiant Title State of Florida, County of CS C On this IG day of o c fo b-e( a0/5 , before me, the undersigned Notary Public of the State of Florida, personally appeared i ke; r1 pyrra and (Name(s)of individuals who appeared before notary) whose name(s)is/are Subscribed to the within instrument, and he/s,a/they acknowledge that he/she/they executed it. WITNESS my hand and official seal. NOTARY PUBLIC NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF FLORIDA y � r,/ / SEAL OF OFFICE: 6-ro,'k gein 1- dr-Lwq (Name of Notary Public:Print,Stamp,or Type as Commissioned.) _Personally known to me,or_CProduced identification: br;J. 6 L;Le15,0 (Type of Identification Produce _DID take an oath, or _DID NOT take an oath. END OF SECTION ----=- ,�o,►•* °••�y AARON HEINTZELMAN Commission#FF 21356 RFQ 14/15-22 Environmental Assessment *= — •, My Commission Expires May 23, 2017 I 1 _j j COMPLIANCE WITH THE PUBLIC RECORDS LAW Upon award recommendation or twenty (20) days after opening, submittals become "public records" and shall be subject to public disclosure consistent with Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. Proposers/Bidders must invoke the exemptions to disclosure } provided by law as applicable to the response to the solicitation, must identify the data or other materials to be protected, and must state the reasons why such exclusion from public disclosure is necessary.The submission of a proposal authorizes release of your firm's credit data to the CITY. If the company submits information exempt from public disclosure, the company must identify specifically with which pages/paragraphs of their bid/proposal package are exempt from the Public Records Act, identifying the specific exemption section that applies to each. The protected information must be submitted to the CITYand the City in a separate envelope marked accordingly. By submitting a response to this solicitation, the company agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the City of Sanford harmless in the event we are forced to litigate the public records status of the company's documents. A 0 l,� is I Signature of AfBant Date 1 Keith D. Pyron, P.G. Principal Typed or Printed Name of Affiant Title State of Florida, County of �-5c-,„ 6; a On this day of 0 C.4-6 ber 20 15, before me, the undersigned Notary Public of the State of Florida, personally appeared �e , i�vro�t and (Name(s)of individuals who appeared before notary) whose name(s) is/are Subscribed to the within instrument, and he/she/they acknowledge that he/she/they executed it. WITNESS my hand and official seal. NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF FLORIDA NOTARY PUBLIC n SEAL OF OFFICE: P n rc , 9e,,i Jz P 1/ me4.,i (Name of Notary Public: Print, Stamp,or Type as Commissioned.) _Personally known to me,or VProduced identification AARON REIN ZELMAN ���r+c�ct 1�r:1e�S C�cztSp : Commission#FF 21355 (Type of Identification Produced) My Commission Expires DID take an oath,or May 23, 2017 — DID NOT take an oath i l i 3 s This Form Must Be Completed and Returned with your Submission RFQ 14/15-22 Environmental Assessment Conflict of Interest Statement 1. Keith D. Pyron, P.G. of PPM Consultants Inc deposes and states that j Name of Affiant Name of Company 2. The above named entity is submitting an Expression of Interest for the CITY project identified below. 3. The Affiant has made diligent inquiry and provides the information contained in this Affidavit based upon his own knowledge. E 4. The Affiant states that only one submittal for the above project is being submitted and that the above named entity has no financial interest in other entities submitting proposals for the same project. } 5. Neither the Affiant nor the above named entity has directly or indirectly entered into any agreement, participated in any collusion, or otherwise taken any action in restraint of free competitive pricing in connection with the entity's submittal for the above project. This statement restricts the discussion of pricing data until the completion of negotiations and execution of the Agreement for this project. 6. Neither the entity nor its affiliates, nor any one associated with them,is presently suspended or otherwise ineligible from participating in contract lettings by any local,state, or federal agency. 7. Neither the entity, nor its affiliates, nor any one associated with them have any potential conflict of interest due to any other clients,contracts,or property interests for this project. 8. 1 certify that no member of the entity's ownership, management,or staff has a vested interest in any aspect of or the CITY. 9. 1 certify that no member of the entity's ownership or management is presently applying for an l employee position or actively seeking an elected position with the CITY. 10. In the event that a conflict of interest is identified in the provision of services, I, on behalf of the above named entity, will immediately not' e CITY in writing. fl Signature of Affiant Date Keith D. Pyron, P.G. Principal Typed or Printed Name of Affiant Title State of Florida, County of 5 c b iati On this day of vco�er 20L5 before me, the undersigned Notary Public of the State of Florida, personally appeared t-kA rc n and i (Name(s)of individuals who appeared before notary) whose name(s)is/are Subscribed to the within instrument, and he/she/they acknowledge that he/she/they executed it. WITNESS my hand and official seal. a6' NOTARY PUB,IC, STATE OF FLORIDA NOTARY PUBLIC t SEAL OF OFFICE: A�r6,, t�e�n �Z�IMar� (Name of Notary Public:Print,Stamp,or Type as Commissioned.) 11 11 lop AARON HEINTZELMAN +""n•�, Commission#FF 21356 -• *: My Commission Expires OF 23, 2017 _l FORM NO. CFI 18.204 1 This Form Must Be Completed and Returned with your Submission 1 RFQ 14/15-22 Environmental Assessment NON COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT The undersigned, by signing this document hereby certifies that the company named below hereby i is or does: 1. States that the entity named below and the individual signing this document has submitted the attached bid or proposal: 2. He is fully informed respecting the preparation and contents of the attached proposal and of all pertinent circumstances respecting such proposal; 3. Said bid or proposal is genuine and is not a collusive or sham bid or proposal; j4. Neither the said bidder or proposer nor any of its officers, partners, owners, agents, 1 representatives, employees or parties in interest, including this affiant, has in any way colluded, conspired, connived or agreed, directly or indirectly with any other bidder, proposer, firm or person to submit a collusive or sham bid or proposal in connection with the Contract for which the attached bid or proposal has been submitted or to refrain from bidding or proposing in connection with such Contract, or has in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement or collusion or communications or conference with any other bidder, proposer, firm j or person to fix the price or prices in the attached bid or proposal or of any other bidder of proposer,or to fix any overhead,profit or cost element of the bid or proposal price or the bid or proposal price of any other bidder or proposer, or to secure through any collusion, conspiracy, connivance or unlawful agreement any advantage against the City of Sanford or any person interested in the proposed Contract. : 3 5. The price or prices quoted in the attached bid or proposal are fair and proper and are not tainted by any collusion, conspiracy, connivance or unlawful agreement on the part of the bidder or proposer or any of its agents, representatives, owners, employees, or parties in interest, including the individual signing this document. PPM Consultants Inc. 4 Bidder Signat re of Authorized Representative(Affiant) Date Keith Q. Pyron, P.G./Principal Printed or Typed Name and Title of Authorized Representative(Affiant) COUNTY OF CS Lv- 61 ra STATE OF FLORIDA _ On this l(o day of bc_.kvioe c , 20 15 before me, the undersigned Notary Public of the State of Florida, personally appeared whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument, and he/she/they acknowledge that he/she/they executed it. WITNESS my hand and official seal. He/She is personally known to me or has/'produced t (or;�ct A;I izrs �;cPn�c' j' as identification. (Notary Public in and for the/County and State Aforementioned) SEAL My commission expires: Me.. �L do i'7 END OF SECTION AARON HEINTZELMAN + °y Commission#FF 21356 g, My Commission Expires May 23, 2017 hr It 9 1 RFQ 14/15-22 Environmental Assessment entered by the Hearing Officer determined that bwas not in the public interest to place the entity submitting this sworn statement nn the convicted vendor list. (Attach e copy of the final ondec) ' \ UNDERSTAND THAT THE SUBM|SS|ONDFTH|SFOF(MTOTHECONTFB\OT|NQOFROERFORTHEPUBL|OENT|TY IDENTIFIED IN PARAGRAPH 1 (ONE) ABOVE |8 FOR THAT PUBLIC ENTITY ONLY AND, THAT THIS FORM IS VALID THROUGH DECEMBER 31 OF THE CALENDAR YEAR IN WHICH IT IS FILED. | ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT | AK8 | REQUIRED TO INFORM THE PUBLIC ENTITY PRIOR TO ENTERING INTO A CONTRACT IN EXCESS OF THE | | THRESHOLD AMOUNT PROVIDED |N SECTION 287.O17. FLORIDA STATUTES FOR CATEGORY TWO OF ANY CHANGE |N THE INFORMATION CONTAINED |N THIS FORM. r- State ofFlorida County of � � On this day of 20 ma, the undersigned Notary Public of the State of Florida, personally appeared (Name(s)of individuals��ho appeared before notary) whose name(s)is/are Subscribed to the within instrument,and he/she/they acknowledge that helshe/they executed it. / | WITNESS myhand ! | and official seal. NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL OFOFFICE: (Name of Notary Public:Print,Stamp,or Type as Commissioned.) _ | Personally k�wnbzm�or ^� __ Produced identificati Commission#FF 21356 My Commission Expires May 23. (Type..Identification. ....~~.' D|O�keonoa� 'or DID NOT take anoath. ' _ FORM NO. PEC152O^ — This Form Must Bu Completed and Returned with your Submission RFQ 14/15-22 Environmental Assessment Certification of Non-Segregated Facilities By affixing his signature to this form, the Respondent/Bidder certifies that he does not maintain or provide for his employees any segregated facilities at any of his establishments, and that he does not permit his _ employees to perform their services at any location, under his control, where segregated facilities are maintained. The Bidder certifies further that he will not maintain or provide for his employees any I segregated facilities at any location under his control where segregated facilities are maintained. The Bidder agrees that a breach of this certification will be a violation of the Equal Opportunity clause in any contract resulting from acceptance of this Bid. As used in this certification, the term "segregated facilities" means any waiting rooms, work areas, restrooms and washrooms, restaurants and other eating areas, time clocks, locker rooms and other storage and dressing areas, parking lots, drinking fountains, recreation or entertainment area, transportation and housing facilities provided for employees which are segregated by explicit directive, or are in fact segregated on the basis of race, color, religious disability or national origin, because of habit, local custom, or otherwise. The Bidder agrees that (except where he has obtained identical certifications from proposed subcontractors for specific time periods) he will obtain identical certifications from proposed subcontractors prior to the award of subcontracts exceeding $10,000 which are not exempt from the provisions of the Equal Opportunity clause, and that he will retain such , I certifications in his files. The nondiscriminatory guidelines as promulgated in Section 202, Executive Order 11246, and as amended by Executive Order 11375 and as amended, relative to Equal Opportunity for all persons and implementations of rules I and regulations prescribed by the United States Secretary of Labor are incorporated herein. NOTE: The penalty for making false statements in offers is prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1001. Dater L t V Keit� D. Pyron Principal Print Name Title t ._9 i Official Address: 750 South Northlake Boulevard, Suite 1012 Altamonte Springs, FL 32701 I FORM NO. SFAC 16.204 This Form Must Be Completed and Returned with your Submission RFQ 14/15-22 Environmental Assessment C I Drug-Free Work Place I The undersigned, in accordance with Florida Statute 287.087 hereby certifies that the company named below does: 1. Publish a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violations of such prohibition. , i 2. Inform employees about the dangers of drug abuse in the workplace, the business's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace, any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs, and the penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations. 3. Give each employee engaged in providing the commodities or contractual services that are proposed a copy of the statement specified in subsection (1). i 4. In the statement specified in subsection (1), notify the employees that, as a condition of working on the commodities or contractual services that are under bid, the employee will abide by the terms of the statement and will notify the employer of any conviction of, or plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, any violation of Chapter 893 or of any controlled substance law of the United States or any state,for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five (5) days after such conviction. 5. Impose a sanction on, or require the satisfactory participation in a drug abuse assistance or 4 rehabilitation program if such is available in the employee's community, by any employee who is so convicted. -, 6. Make a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of this section. PPM Consultants Inc. r Firm Authorized Signature Ddte ` Keith D. Pyron, P.G./Principal Printed or Typed Name and Title f i 3 FORM NO.DFWP 14.204 This Form Must Be Completed and Returned with your Submission _ RFQ 14/15-22 Environmental Assessment i �C�,Os�b9 MEMORANDUM FINANCE DEPARTMENT- PURCHASING DIVISION Email: bill.smithCa7sanford.fl.gov Phone: 407.688.502815030 Fax: 407.688.5021 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS OUTLINED BELOW APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTS FOR SERVICES WHEN THE CONTRACTOR PERFORMS ON OR OFF CITY PREMISES • When contract cost not to exceed$500,000; not to exceed 180 days;no unusual hazards exist 1. The CONTRACTOR bidder shall be required to provide, to the City of Sanford "City," prior commencing any work, a Certificate of Insurance which verifies coverage in full compliance with the requirements outlined below. Any work initiated without completion of this requirement shall be unauthorized and the City will not be responsible (Ref: items 17 and 18, standard terms and conditions included with City of Sanford Purchase Order). 2. The City reserves the right, as conditions warrant,to modify or increase insurance requirements outlined I below as may be determined by the project, conditions and exposure. Outline of Requirements: -� UP TO VENDOR POLICY LIMITS,BUT WITH MINIMUM COVERAGE REQUIRED POLICY LIMITS OF: Workers'Compensation Employers Liability$500,000 *Certificates of exemption are not acceptable in lieu of workers Each Accident $500,000 compensation insurance Disease $500,000 Commercial General Liability shall include-Bodily injury liability, 3 Property Damage liability,Personal Injury liability and $ 1,000,000 Per Occurrence 1 Advertising injury liability Coverages shall include:Premises/ $ 1,000,000 General Aggregate Operations,Products/Completed Operations;Contractual liability; -, Independent Contractors, Explosion;Collapse;Underground Comprehensive Auto Liability, CSL,shall include "any auto"or $ 1,000,000 Combined Single Limit shall include all of the following.owned, leased, hired, non-owned $ 1,000,000 General Aggregate autos, and scheduled autos. Professional Liability(when required) $ 1,000,000 Specific Requirements: It is noted that the City has a contractual relationship with the named vendor, contractor or provider(collectively referred hereinafter as Contractor)applicable to a purchase order, work order, contract or other form of commitment by the City of Sanford, whether in writing or not and has no such contractual relationship with the Contractor's insurance carrier. Therefore, the onus is on the Contractor to insure that they have the insurance coverage specified by the City to meet all contractual obligations and expectations of the City. Further, as the Contractor's insurance coverage is a matter between the vendor and its insurance carrier, the City will turn to the Contractor for relief as a result of any damages or alleged damages for which the Contractor is responsible to indemnify and hold the City harmless. It is understood that the Contractor may satisfy relief to the City for such RFQ 14115-22 Environmental Assessment i damages either directly or through its insurance coverage; exclusions by the insurance carrier not withstanding, the City will expect relief from the Contractor. i I o The insurance limits indicated above and otherwise referenced are minimum limits acceptable to the City. Also, all contractor policies shall to be considered primary to City coverage and shall not Contain co-insurance provisions. o All policies shall name the City of Sanford as Additional Insured, except for professional liability policies and workers compensation policies. o Professional Liability Coverage,when applicable,will be defined on a case by case basis. o In the event that the insurance coverage expires prior to the completion of the project, a renewal certificate shall be issued 30 days prior to said expiration date. o All limits are per occurrence and must include Bodily Injury and Property Damage. o All policies must be written on occurrence form, not on claims made Form, except for Professional liability. i o Self insured retentions shall not be allowed on any liability coverage. I o In the notification of cancellation: The City of Sanford shall be endorsed onto the policy as a cancellation notice recipient. Should any of the above described policies be cancelled before the expiration date thereof, notice shall be delivered to the City of Sanford in accordance with the policy provisions. fi o All insurers must have an A.M. Best rating of at least A-VII. o It is the responsibility of the Contractor to responsible to ensure that all Subcontractors retained by the Prime Contractor shall provide coverage as defined herein before and after and are the responsibility of said Prime Contractor in all respects. o Any changes to the coverage requirements indicated above shall be approved by the City of Sanford, Risk Manager ' o Address of"Certificate Holder" is: City of Sanford; Attention: Purchasing Manager; P.O. Box 1788(300 N Park Avenue); Sanford, FL 32771 Phone: 407.688.5028/5030 FAX: 407.688.5021 o All certificates of insurance, notices, etc. must be provided to the above address. 3. 1 hereby certify that if the contractor on whose behalf this information is submitted is awarded a contract for E any portion of the work contemplated, the insurance and bonding requirements outlined above shall be met as required. PPM Consultants Inc. El m Date I l l _<-o'-;�/ Principal Authorized Sign ture Title 1 T:\Purchasing\Purchasing\A-purchdocs\INSURANCE REQUIREMENTSUNS REQ'S UPDATED 7-14-08 Form Revised 2.9.2011 This Form Must Be Completed and Returned with your Submission RFQ 14/15-22 Environmental Assessment i I Truth in Negotiations Certificate E This is to certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the wage rates and other factual unit costs supporting the compensation (as defined in section 287.055 of the Florida Statues (otherwise known as the "Consultants' Competitive Negotiations Act" or CCNA) and required under CCNA subsection 287.055 (5) (a) submitted to the City of Sanford, Florida Purchasing and Contracts Division either actually or by specific identification in writing, in support of RFQ 14/15-22 * are accurate, complete, and current as of 10/16/2015 (Date)**. This certification includes the wage rates and other factual unit costs supporting any Work Orders or Amendments issued under the agreement between the Consultant and the CITY. Firm PPM Consultants, Inc- s 9 Signature ✓ Name Keith D. Pyron, P.G. Title Principal Date of execution*** 10/16/2015 *Identify the proposal, request for price adjustment, or other submission involved, giving the appropriate identifying number: RFQ 14/15-22 **Insert the day, month, and year when wage rates were submitted or, if applicable, an earlier date agreed upon between the parties that is as close as practicable to the date of agreement on compensation. ***Insert the day, month, and year of signing. (End of certificate) l This Form to be Submitted if and When Specifically Requested by the City RFQ 14/15-22 Environmental Assessment Res1ponse, Submission Form PART I General 1.01 Description The following Request for Statements of Qualifications, for (1) RFQ 14/15-22 Environmental Assessment and Characterization Services This Response is submitted by (2) PPM Consultants, Inc. 750 South Northlake Boulevard, Suite 1012 Altamonte Springs, FL 32701 Telephone 407-240-1127 Fax 407-240-1310 amy.guilfoyle@ pmco. coff (1) Title and Solicitation number as shown in the Invitation keith.pyron@ppmco.com (2) Name, address, telephone, fax number and email of Proposer. 1.02 The Undersigned: A. Acknowledges receipt of: Addenda: Number 1 Dated 10/1942015 Number 2 Dated 10/19/2015 B. Has examined the Solicitation Documents and understands that in submitting his/her Response, he/she waives all right to plead any misunderstanding regarding the same. C. Understands that the responsibility for delivering the submission to the CITY on or before the specified date and time will be solely and strictly the responsibility of the Respondent. The CITY will not be responsible for delays caused by the United States Postal Office or a delay caused by any other occurrence. Offers by telephone, fax, email or other electronic means will not be accepted. It is understood that any deviation from a completed, signed (original signatures) proposal delivered on or before the designated time, date and place, as provided herein, to the CITY will be resolved against the individual or firm submitting the response. D. Agrees: 1. To hold this Offer open for 90 calendar days after the opening date. 2. By signing this document the responding individual or firm hereby agrees to negotiate in good faith, to be bound by specifications, terms, conditions, scheduling and representations as stated and submitted with this form and/or as established by subsequent negotiations. However, it is understood that the CITY reserves the right to declare any submission nonresponsive if exceptions to specifications, terms, conditions, etc. of the solicitation are not acceptable in the opinion of the CITY to meet the requirements of said solicitation. 3. To enter into and execute a contract with the CITY, if awarded on the basis of this Offer and/or subsequent negotiations agreed upon by the CITY and the Bidder/Proposer. RFQ 14/15-22 Environmental Assessment f i I 4. To accomplish the work or service in accordance with any Contract j resulting from this request. I 1.03 Miscellaneous Requirements and Affirmations Statements of Qualifications shall be submitted using the attached forms and in compliance with the instructions provided with this request. e Number of originals and complete copies to submit: a. One original, 5 copies and one electronic disc in pdf format all in one package, to CITY as indicated below. 1.04 Protests Protests, if any, shall be submitted in compliance with City Purchasing Policy in all respects. Failure to file protest to the Purchasing Manager within the requirements a and time prescribed by the Purchasing Policy of the City of Sanford, shall constitute a waiver of proceedings. 1.05 SUBMITTED, si ned and sealed this 16th day of October X�( 1- Bidder ropos,er By(Signature) 'bate i Keith D. Pyron, P.G. /Principal Printed Name and Title Corporate/Company Seal On the Envelope Containing Your Submission: The Return address—Your Company Name and Address j Address or Deliver To: William Smith, Purchasing Manager City of Sanford P.O. Box 1788 (300 N. Park Avenue, Room 236) Sanford, FL 32772 In the Lower Left Corner of the Envelope, Provide the Following: RFQ Number: RFQ 14/15-22 Environmental Assessment Open Date: October 19, 2015-Open Time: 2:00 p.m. (Non-public) I i This Form Must Be Completed and Returned with your Submission RFQ 14/15-22 Environmental Assessment