4565 Planned Dev Re: for 2461 Cherry LaurelOrdinance No. 2020-4565
An ordinance of the City of Sanford, Florida relating to
the rezoning of approximately 3.4 acres of real property
located at 2461 Cherry Laurel Drive (Tax Parcel
Identification Number 32-19-30-301-008E-0000) to create
the 2461 Cherry Laurel Drive Property Planned
Development (PD) (map of the property attached);
rezoning the property to a PD, zoning
district/classification master plan; providing for
approval of the 2461 Cherry Laurel Drive Property PD
Master Plan; providing for the taking of implementing
administrative actions; providing for conflicts; providing
for severability; providing for non -codification and
providing for an effective date.
Whereas, Alan E. Fulmer and Patricia A. Fulmer are the owners of certain
real property which land totals approximately 3.4 acres in size, which real property is
located at 2461 Cherry Laurel Drive and is assigned Tax Parcel Identification Number
32-19-30-301-008E-0000 by the Property Appraiser of Seminole County; and
Whereas, the applicant on behalf of the property owners is Jason W. Searl,
Esquire, of Gray -Robinson Attorneys at Law; and
Whereas, the property is located in unincorporated Seminole County on the
north side of County Road (CR) 46A which is also known as H.E. Thomas Parkway and
the property is located approximately 640 feet east of Rinehart Road; and
Whereas, the property is not within a Sub -Area established in the 2015
Seminole County/City of Sanford Joint Planning Agreement; and
Whereas, this Ordinance is enacted pursuant to the home rule powers of the
City of Sanford as set forth at Article VIII, Section 2, of the Constitution of the State of
Florida; Chapter 166, Florida Statutes, and other applicable controlling law; and
1lPage
Whereas, the City Commission of the City of Sanford has taken all actions
relating to the 2461 Cherry Laurel Drive Property PD rezoning action set forth herein in
accordance with the requirements and procedures mandated by State law.
Now, therefore, be in enacted by the People of the City of Sanford, Florida.
Section 1. Legislative findings and intent.
(a). The City Commission of the City of Sanford hereby adopts and
incorporates into this Ordinance, as legislative findings and intent, the above recitals
(whereas clauses).
(b). The approval set forth in this Ordinance is subject to the specific
conditions that are set forth subsequently in this Ordinance and the Property Owner has
agreed that no requirement herein lacks an essential nexus to a legitimate public
purpose and is not roughly proportionate to the impacts of the proposed use that the
City seeks to avoid, minimize, or mitigate.
Section 2. Rezoning of real property/implementing actions; 2461 Cherry
Laurel Drive Property PD.
(a), Upon enactment of this Ordinance the property, as depicted in the map
attached to this Ordinance shall be rezoned from the zoning classification resulting from
a separate and distinct 2461 Cherry Laurel Drive Property PD consistent with the
provisions of this Ordinance.
(b). The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to execute any
documents necessary to formalize approval of the 2461 Cherry Laurel Drive Property
PD rezoning action set forth herein action taken herein with regard to the 2461 Cherry
Laurel Drive Property PD and to revise and amend the Official Zoning Map or Maps of
21 Page
the City of Sanford as may be appropriate to accomplish the action taken in this
Ordinance.
(c). The conditions to be incorporated into the pertinent development order
relating to the action taken in this Ordinance include the following:
(1). Pursuant to Section 4.3.G of the Land Development Regulations
(LDRs) of the City, this rezoning action taken herein shall expire 3 years
from the effective date of this Ordinance if all improvements have not
been completed or an extension granted by the City Commission.
(2). All development shall be consistent with the Cherry Center PD
Master Plan, dated September 4, 2020, unless otherwise specifically set
forth in any associated development order; provided, however, that all
subsequent development orders shall be consistent with the provisions of
this Ordinance.
(3). Unless specifically requested and approved on the Cherry Center
PD Master Plan or the associated development order, any required
elements missing from or not shown on the PD Master Plan shall
otherwise comply with the City's LDRs to include, but not be limited to, the
following:
(a). The vehicular uses requirements within Schedule E, Section 1.0
of the City's LDRs.
__31Page
(b). Tree mitigation in accordance with Section 4.2 of the City's
LDRs criteria for tree removal, replacement and relocation shall be
met prior to development of the site.
(c). The development shall be in accordance with Schedule G —
Architectural Design Standards, of the City's LDRs.
(4). All land use activities conducted on site shall be in accordance with
Schedule B — Permitted uses, of the City's LDRs for the GC -2, General
Commercial zoning district with the additional permitted uses of vehicle
dealer sales and vehicle rental as identified on the Cherry Center PD
Master Plan. Vehicle repair is prohibited and unlawful.
(5). A Light source shall be setback no less than 75% of the width of
the reduced buffer depicted along the property lines of the parcel.
(6). A comprehensive signage program meeting the standards of the
City's LDRs is required for the development.
(7). A decorative and functional fountain shall be installed in all wet
retention ponds as part of development approval which approval shall
provide for ongoing maintenance requirements and responsibilities upon
the appropriate party, but not the City.
(8). The Property Owner shall work with staff to provide a
comprehensive landscape design, including enhanced landscaping above
and beyond the minimum code requirements in the reduced buffers and
41 Page
project entrances to be reviewed and approved during the development
plan review process.
(9). Any and all fencing and security barriers proposed shall be
reviewed and approved by staff during the development plan review
process and may require upgrades to decorative or vinyl coated materials
depending on the location proposed.
(10). It is prohibited and unlawful to display any streamers, banners or
temporary signs on site unless a permit has been issued by the City.
(11). The outdoor storage and/or display of vehicles shall be limited to
the quantity of vehicle parking spaces as identified on the Cherry Center
PD Master Plan and outdoor storage and/or display of vehicles shall be at
grade and located within the designated areas.
(12). Any use or operation determined by the City to need wastewater
pre-treatment shall comply with the requirements established by the City.
(13). Any dispute relative to the aforementioned matters shall be
resolved by the Planning and Zoning Commission, after a public hearing,
by means of a development order or denial development order relating
thereto.
Section 3. Incorporation of map and 2461 Cherry Laurel Drive Property
PD Master Plan.
The map attached to this Ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed and
incorporated into this Ordinance as a substantive part of this Ordinance amending the
2461 Cherry Laurel Drive Property PD.
51Page
Section 4. Conflicts.
All ordinances or part of ordinances in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby
repealed. City staff shall harmonize the approval and actions set forth herein together
which those taken relative to the 2461 Cherry Laurel Drive Property PD with all past
actions of the City relative to the property being hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 5. Severability.
If any section, sentence, phrase, word, or portion of this Ordinance is determined
to be invalid, unlawful or unconstitutional, said determination shall not be held to
invalidate or impair the validity, force or effect of any other section, sentence, phrase,
word, or portion of this Ordinance not otherwise determined to be invalid, unlawful, or
unconstitutional.
Section 6. Non -codification; Implementation.
(a). This Ordinance shall be not be codified in the City Code of the City of
Sanford or the Land Development Code of the City of Sanford; provided, however, that
the actions taken herein shall be depicted on the zoning maps of the City of Sanford by
the City Manager, or designee.
(b). The City Manager, or designee, shall implement the provisions of this
Ordinance by means of a non -statutory development agreement which shall be
executed by the Property Owner, or their successor(s) in interest within 60 days of the
effective date of this Ordinance or the 2461 Cherry Laurel Drive Property PD property's
zoning classification shall revert to an un -zoned property status.
(c). The property which is the subject of this Ordinance is subject to code
6 1 P a g e
enforcement action in accordance with the controlling provisions of law.
Section 7. Effective Date.
This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon enactment.
Passed and adopted this 26th day of October, 2020.
Attest: City Commission of the City
Sanford Florida
A
7 1 P a g e
Traci Houchin, MMC, FORM.
City Clerk
ayor
Approved as to form and legal S
William L. Colbert, City Attorney
7 1 P a g e
WS RM
CITY OF
Item No.
Skl4FORD
FLORIDA
CITY COMMISSION MEMORANDUM 20-203
OCTOBER 26, 2020 AGENDA
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission
PREPARED BY: Sabreena Colbert — Senior Planner
SUBMITTED BY: Norton N. Bonaparte, Jr., City Manag
SUBJECT: Planned Development (PD) Rezoning; 24rCherry Drive
THIS IS A QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTER AND, AS �S,UdH, REQUIRES DISCLOSURE OF
ALL EX -PARTE COMMUNICATIONS, INVESTIC*ATIONS, SITE VISITS AND EXPERT
OPINIONS REGARDING THIS MATTER.
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:
❑ Unify Downtown & the Waterfront
❑ Promote the City's Distinct Culture
❑ Update Regulatory Framework
® Redevelop and Revitalize Disadvantaged Communities
SYNOPSIS:
A request to amend the Planned Commercial Development zoning for 3.4 acres to establish land use and
design standards for the Cherry Center PD, a proposed commercial development including vehicular
related uses at 2461 Cherry Laurel Drive has been received.
The property owners are Alan E. Fulmer and Patricia A. Fulmer. The applicant is Jason W. Searl, Esquire
with Gray — Robinson, who was responsible for completing the required Citizens Awareness and
Participation Plan (CAPP) meeting on January 27, 2020.
The Affidavit of Ownership and Designation of Agent form is attached and additional information is
available in order to ensure that all potential conflicts of interest are capable of being discerned.
F'ISCALISTAFFING STATEMENT:
According to the Property Appraiser's records, the subject property has an existing single-family
residential structure built in 1985; the property was homesteaded in 1997. Based on the 2019 property
tax roll, the property has an assessed value of $479,119. The total tax bill for the property in 2019 was
$12,537.69.
No additional staffing is anticipated if the rezoning is approved.
BACKGROUND:
The above referenced property is located on the north side of County Road (CR) 46A (also known as
H.E. Thomas Parkway) and is approximately 640 feet east of Rinehart Road. The subject property was
rezoned from A-1, Agriculture to PCD, Planned Commercial Development, in unincorporated Seminole
County and issued a Development Order on April 14, 1994. The current PCD zoning on the property
was never finalized in the County and, therefore, the preliminary site plan approved at the time of
rezoning has expired and is inoperative.
On August 6, 2020, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended the City Commission deny the
request to amend the Planned Development zoning by a unanimous decision, 7 to 0.
At the August 24, 2020 City Commission meeting the applicant presented a revised plan. The item was
continued in order to allow staff time to review the revisions. A revised site plan was received on August
31, 2020 identifying vehicular rental and dealer sales as the primary use with a car wash and gas pumps
proposed as ancillary uses and not available to the public. Specific variances are also listed including the
following deviations:
Reduction/elimination of the required landscape area or island; Schedule J, Section 2.2
requires 1 landscape area per 10 parking spaces.
Reduction in parking space size from the required 10'x20' space to 19'x18' space.
Reduction in landscape buffers along the north, west (front -Cherry Laurel Drive), and
south (front -CR 46-A). Schedule J, Section 2.3 allows for a reduction in buffer width to
15 feet only if the lot is less than 200 feet deep.
The City Commission continued the request a second time at the September 14, 2020 meeting per the
request of staff and the applicant.
On October 12, 2020, the City Commission approved first reading of Ordinance No. 4565 to amend the
Planned Commercial Development zoning for 3.4 acres to establish land use and design standards for
the Cherry Center PD, a proposed commercial development including vehicular related uses at 2461
Cherry Laurel Drive. More specifically and described above, the uses proposed include an Enterprise
vehicle rental facility and dealer sales including ancillary uses and deviations.
The City Clerk published notice of the 2nd Public Hearing in the Sanford Herald in an appropriate
manner.
LEGAL. REVIEW:
The City Attorney has reviewed the staff report and has noted the following: Section 166.033, Florida
Statutes, provides as follows (please note emphasized text):
"(1) When reviewing an application for a development permit that is certified by a professional listed
in s. 403.0877, a municipality may not request additional information from the applicant more
than three times, unless the applicant waives the limitation in writing. Before a third request for
additional information, the applicant must be offered a meeting to attempt to resolve outstanding
issues. Except as provided in subsection (4), if the applicant believes the request for additional
information is not authorized by ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal authority, the municipality,
at the applicant's request, shall proceed to process the application for approval or denial.
(2) When a municipality denies an application for a development permit, the municipality shall
give written notice to the applicant. The notice must include a citation to the applicable
portions of an ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal authority for the denial of the permit.
(3) As used in this section, the term "development permit" has the same meaning as in s. 163.3164,
but does not include building permits.
(4) For any development permit application filed with the municipality after July 1, 2012, a
municipality may not require as a condition of processing or issuing a development permit that an
applicant obtain a permit or approval from any state or federal agency unless the agency has issued
a final agency action that denies the federal or state permit before the municipal action on the local
development permit.
(5) Issuance of a development permit by a municipality does not in any way create any right on the
part of an applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any
liability on the part of the municipality for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain
requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes
actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. A municipality shall attach such a
disclaimer to the issuance of development permits and shall include a permit condition that all
other applicable state or federal permits be obtained before commencement of the development.
(6) This section does not prohibit a municipality from providing information to an applicant regarding
what other state or federal permits may apply."
The above -referenced definition of the term "development permit" is as follows:
"(16) 'Development permit' includes any building permit, zoning permit, subdivision approval,
rezoning, certification, special exception, variance, or any other official action of local
government having the effect of permitting the development of land." (Section 163.3164(16),
Florida Statutes).
Thus, if this application is denied, a denial development order must be issued which must cite to the
applicable portions of each ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal authority supporting the denial of the
application. For example, if a goal, objective or policy of the Sanford Comprehensive Plan were to be
the basis for a denial, then such goal, objective or policy must be part of the motion proposing the denial.
A denial development order would be drafted to implement the actions of the Planning and Zoning
Commission in the event of such occurrence. Accordingly, any motion to deny must state, with
particularity, the basis for the proposed denial.
The term "development order" is defined as follows and, as can be seen, refers to the "granting, denying,
or granting with conditions [of] an application"
"(15) `Development order' means any order granting, denying, or granting with conditions an
application for a development permit." (Section 163.3164(15), Florida Statutes).
RECOMMENDATION:
Pursuant the City Commission's action at first reading of Ordinance No. 4565 to amend the County PCD
zoning for 3.4 acres to establish land use and design standards for the Cherry Center PD, including
specific vehicular uses, staff recommends the City Commission consider the following conditions to
accompany any approval in an associated Development Order:
1. Pursuant to Section 4.3.G of the Land Development Regulations (LDRs) of the City, this rezoning
shall expire 3 years from the effective date of this Ordinance if not all improvements have been
completed or an extension granted.
2. All development shall be consistent with the Cherry Center PD Master Plan, dated September 4,
2020, unless otherwise specifically set forth in any associated development order; provided,
however, that all subsequent development orders shall be consistent with the provisions of this
Ordinance.
3. Unless specifically requested and approved on the Cherry Center PD Master Plan or the
associated development order, any required elements missing from or not shown on the PD
Master Plan shall otherwise comply with the City's LDRs.
4. All land use activities conducted on site shall be in accordance with Schedule B — Permitted
uses, of the City's LDRs for the GC -2, General Commercial zoning district with the additional
permitted uses of vehicle dealer sales and vehicle rental as identified on the Cherry Center PD
Master Plan. Vehicle repair shall be prohibited.
5. A Light source shall be setback no less than 75 percent the width of the reduced buffer depicted
along the property lines of the parcel.
6. A comprehensive signage program meeting the standards of the City's LDRs shall be required
for the development.
7. Unless specifically requested and approved on the Cherry Center PD Master Plan or the
associated PD Development Order, all development shall comply with:
a. The Vehicular Uses requirements within Schedule E, Section 1.0 of the City's LDRs.
b. Tree mitigation per Section 4.2 Criteria for Tree Removal, Replacement and Relocation
shall be met prior to development of the site.
c. The development shall be in accordance with Schedule G — Architectural Design
Standards, of the City's LDRs as defined therein.
8. A decorative and functional fountain shall be installed in all wet retention ponds as part of
development approval which approval shall provide for ongoing maintenance requirements and
responsibilities upon the appropriate party, but not the City.
9. The applicant shall work with staff to provide a comprehensive landscape design, including
enhanced landscaping beyond the minimum code requirements in the reduced buffers and project
entrances to be reviewed and approved during the Development Plan Review process.
10. Any and all fencing and security barriers proposed shall be reviewed and approved by staff during
the Development Plan Review process and may require upgrades to decorative or vinyl coated
materials depending on the location proposed.
11. It is prohibited to display any streamers, banners or temporary signs on site unless a permit has
been issued by the City.
12. The outdoor storage and/or display of vehicles shall be limited to the quantity of vehicle parking
spaces as identified on the Cherry Center PD Master Plan and outdoor storage and/or display of
vehicles shall be at grade and located within the designated areas.
13. Any use or operation determined by the City to need pre-treatment shall comply with the
requirements established by the City.
14. Any dispute relative to the aforementioned matters shall be resolved by the Planning and Zoning
Commission, after a public hearing, by means of a development order or denial development
order relating thereto.
Additional comments or recommendations may be presented by staff at the meeting.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
"I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4565."
Attachments: (I).
Project Information Sheet.
(2).
Site Vicinity and Aerial Maps.
(3),
Affidavit of Ownership.
(4).
CAPP Summary.
(5).
Traffic Impact Analysis.
(6).
Letter and Email from City of Lake Mary.
(7).
Architectural Renderings.
(8).
PD Master Plan (Conceptual Site Plan) dated September 4, 2020.
(9).
Ordinance No. 4565.
TADevelopment Review\03-Land Development\2020\2461 Cherry Laurel Dr - PDRZ\CC\CC - 10-26-20_2nd Reading\CC Memo - 2461 Cherry
Laurel Dr - PD Rezone - 10-26-20_2nd Reading -LNG- 10- 1 5-20.docx
PROJECT INFORMATION — 2461 CHERRY LAUREL DRIVE
PD REZONE
Requested Action: Amend the Planned Development zoning for 3.4 acres to establish land use and design
standards for Cherry Center PD, a proposed commercial development including vehicular
related uses at 2461 Cherry Laurel Drive
Proposed Use:
Project Address:
Current Zoning:
Current Future Land Use
Legal Description:
Tax Parcel Number:
Site Area:
Property Owner:
Applicant/Agent:
CAPP Meeting:
Commission District
Vehicular Related Uses
2461 Cherry Laurel Drive
PD, Planned Development (unincorporated Seminole County)
HIPTI, Higher Intensity PD, Target Industry
SEC 32 TWP 19S RGE 30E FROM SW COR RUN E 588.64 FT N 22 DEG 33 MIN 55
SEC E 220.22 FT TO POB RUN N 22 DEG 33 MIN 55 SEC E 71.09 FT N 10 DEG 58
MIN 39 SEC E 140.82 FT E 587.86 FT N 47 DEG 00 MIN 00 SEC E 232.83 FT S 11
DEG 43 MIN 46 SEC W 359.55 FT S 84 DEG 58 MIN 53 SEC
ALONG CURVE 567.18 FT W 50.92 FT S 83 DEG 54 MIN 33
BEG
32-19-30-301-008E-0000
3.4 Acres
Alan E. Fulmer and Patricia A. Fulmer
Jason W. Searl, Esquire — Gray -Robinson Attorneys at Law
Phone: (407) 843.8880
Email: Jason.Searl@Gray-Robinson.com
The applicant held a CAPP meeting on January 27, 2020.
District 4 — Patty Mahany
W 44.26 FT NWLY
SEC W 77.57 FT TO
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPLIANCE REVIEW
Planning staff has reviewed the request and has detennined the use and proposed improvements to be consistent with
the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
Existing Land Use: Single Family Residence
Zoning
North PD, Planned Development
South AG, Agriculture
East AG, Agriculture
West PD, Planned Development
Uses
Multi -Family Apartments
Baldwin -Fairchild Oak lawn Chapel
Vacant Agriculture
Multi -Family Apartments (PD Approved)
CONCURRENCY
Concurrency is a finding that public facilities and services necessary to support a proposed development are available,
or will be made available, concurrent with the impacts of the development. An assessment will be made at the
development review stage.
Courtesy
Honda
Wo
Sam's Club
Courtesy
Acura
D
Sanford
Infinity
AG
Headqu er
Hyunda' Solara
Apartments
SITE
R 46A
PD
0
Oaklawn
Memorial Park
Z
I
Site
2461 Cherry Laurel Drive
Parcel No: 32-19-30-301-008E-0000
0 S OTY OF F ORD AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND DESIGNATION OF AGEN
R09flVA I I
Please use additional sheets as needed. If any additional sheets are attached to this document, please sign here and note below:
Ownership
1, Alan E. Fulmer and Patricia A. Fulmer hereby attest to ownership of the property described below:
Tax Parcel Number(s): 32-19-30-301-008E-0000
Address of Property:
for which this Ann'
It. Designation of Applicant's Agent (leave blank if not applicable)
application is submitted to the City of Sanford.
As the owner/applicant of the above designated property for which this affidavit is submitted, I designate the below named individual
as my agent in all matters pertaining to the application process. In authorizing the agent named below to represent me, or my
company, I attest that the application is made in good faith and that all information contained in the application is accurate and
complete to the best of my personal knowledge.
•• Agent (Print): Jason W. Searl -Signature:
Agent Address:Gray inson, 301 E. Pine St., Suite 1400, Orlando, FL 3i
Email: Jason.SearlgGray-Robinsonxom --Phone: 407-244-5601 Fax:
A. All changes in Ownership andlor Applicant's Agent prior to final action of the City shall require a new affidavit. if ownership
changes, the new owner assumes all obligations related to the filing application process.
B. If the Owner intends for the authority of the Applicaffs Agent to be limited in any manner, please indicate the limitations(s)
below. (i.e.: limited to obtaining a certificate of concurrency; limited to obtaining a land use compliance certificate, etc.)
The owner of the real property associated with this application or procurement activity is a (check one)
A Individual o Corporation o Land Trust ❑ Partnership u Limited Liability Company
n Other (describe):
1. List all natural persons who have an ownership interest in the property, which is the subject matter of this petition, by name and
address.
2. For each corporation, list the name, address, and title of each officer; the name and address of each director of the corporation;
and the name and address of each shareholder who owns two percent (2%) or more of the stock of the corporation. Shareholders
need not be disclosed if a corporation's stock are traded publicly on any national stock exchange.
3. In the case of a !gat, list the name and address of each trustee and the name and address of the beneficiaries of the trust and the
percentage of interest of each beneficiary. If any trustee or beneficiary of a trust is a corporation, please provide the information
required in paragraph 2 above.
11171H�7�_I-
4. For t_3aELnerships, including limited partnerships, list the name and address of each principal in the partnership, including general
or limited partners. If any partner is a corporation, please provide the information required in paragraph 2 above.
5. For each limithd Irabirrty company, list the name, address, and title of each manager or managing member, and the name and
address of each additional member with two percent (2%) or more membership interest. If any member with two percent (2%) or
more membership Interest, manager, or managing member Is a corporation, trust or partnership, please provide the infatuation
required in paragraphs 2, 3 and/or 4 above.
Name of LLC:
6. In the circumstances of a contract for aurckase. list the Warne and address of each contract purchaser. if the purchaser is a
corporation, trust, partnership, or LLC, provide the information required for those entities in paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and/or 5 above.
Name of Purchaser: AC PROP, LLC
Date of Contract; May 7, 2019
NAME
TITLE/OFFICE/TRUSTEE
OR BENEFICIARY
ADDRESS
gra OF
INTEREST
Jonathan Moore
Manager
710 E. Colonial Dr., Orlando, FL 32803
100
(Use additional sheets for more space.)
7. As to any type of owner referred to above, a change of ownership occurring subsequent to the execution of this document, shall be
disclosed In writing to the City prior to any action being taken by the City as to the matter relative to which this document pertains.
8. 1 affirm that the above representations are true and are based upon my personal knowledge and belief after all reasonable Inquiry. I
understand that any failure to make mandated disclosures is grounds for the subject rezone, future land use amendment, special
exception, or variance involved with this Application to became void or for the submission for a procurement activity to be non-
responsive. i certify that 1 am legally authorized to execute this Al'[ l' agd to bind the Appiioan or Vendor to the disclosures
herein. r ...? r
l
10/14/19
Date Owner Agertt, Applicant Signature
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF OiU512N,�
Sworn to (or affr nd subscribed before me by �f1 �(,i 1.e1- C�lc�. ��,-►(' I th�Y ,
on this f L�1, 201211--
Signature
01211—.Signature of Notary Public Print, Type or Stamp Name of Notary Public
Personally Known 0 OR Produced Identification ID
Type of identification Produced � L b L -
affidavit as ownership - January 2016
Amber Pdmff
NOTARY PUBLIC
WATE OF FLORIDA
Canerrrff CSGOUi' 4
EWr% 131 W"O
I N SON
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
407-843-8880
JASON. SEARL r0,GRAY-ROB1NS0N.00M
Citizen Awareness and Participation Plan
Proposed Rezoning
2461 Cherry Laurel Drive, Sanford, FL 32771
1. Overview:
301 EAST PINE STREET
SUITE 1400
POST OFFICE Box 3068 (32802-3068)
ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32801
TEL 407-843-8880
FAx 4-07-244-S690
Bou BATON
FORT LAUDERDALE
FORT MYERS
GAINESVILLE
JACKSONVILLE
KEY WEST
LAKELAND
MELBOURNE
MIAMI
NAPLES
ORLANDO
TALLAHASSEE
TAMPA
W4SHINGTON, DC
IVEST PALM BEACH
A neighborhood meeting for the proposed rezoning of the property located at 2461 Cherry Laurel
Drive, Sanford, Florida 32771 was held on Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at Bentley Elementary
School, 2190 Oregon Avenue, Sanford, Florida 32771. The meeting was required as part of the
Citizen Awareness and Participation Plan (CAPP) submitted in conjunction with the Rezoning
application. The Seminole County Property Appraiser parcel identification number associated
with the subject property is 32-19-30-301-008E-0000.
2. List of Meeting Invitees:
A list of affected parties that were notified of proposed project and invited to attend the
neighborhood meeting is provided hereto as Exhibit "A". Meeting notices were mailed prior to
the meeting to the property owners within 500 ft. of the subject property, and to relevant parties
t'
at the City of Sanford.
3. Meeting Notice:
A copy of the meeting notice is attached hereto as Exhibit "B".
4. Date and Location of the Neighborhood Meeting:
Wednesday, February 5, 2020
Bentley Elementary School
2190 Oregon Avenue
Sanford, Florida 32771
5. Meeting Attendance:
No one from the public attended the meeting. Applicant did not receive any phone calls or
emails regarding this proposal.
6. Summary of Concerns:
None.
/59683/1941733099 vt
www, gray-robinson.com
EXHIBIT "A"
CMI -LAKE MARY INC C/O PROPERTY TAX
PO BOX 130548
HOUSTON TX 77219
CMI LAKE MARY INC C/O STEWART
PO BOX 11250
NEW ORLEANS LA 70181
EOGHAN N KELLEY FAMILY LP
4300 W LAKE MARY BLVD
#1010
LAKE MARY FL 32746
FULMER, ALAN E & PATRICIA A
PO BOX 952458
LAKE MARY FL 32795
HEADQUARTER AUTO GROUP OF
5895 NW 167TH ST
HIALEAH FL 33015
HOTEL AND RESORT INV LLC
2885 ALOMA LAKE RUN
OVIEDO FL 32765
HOTEL AND RESORT INV LLC
2885 ALOMA LAKE RUN
OVIEDO FL 32765
SEMINOLE B C C COUNTY SERV BLDG
1101 E 1ST ST
SANFORD FL 32771
SOLARA APARTMENTS OWNER LLC
120 WELLS AVE
NEWTON CENTER MA 02459
EXHIBIT "B"
January 23, 2020
Dear Current Property Owner:
Re: Proposed Rezoning
2461 Cherry Laurel Drive, Sanford, FL 32771
We invite you to a neighborhood meeting to review and discuss the proposed Rezoning of the property
located at 2461 Cherry Laurel Drive. The proposed Rezoning will convert the property from a PD (County)
to a PD (City). A preliminary site plan concept is provided with this notice.
The neighborhood meeting with provide the local community with a venue to discuss the proposed use and
improvements to the property, to provide support for the proposal, or voice any concerns there may be with
the plan. All are welcome. A full-sized copy of the plan submitted to the City will be available for your
review at the neighborhood meeting. If you are unavailable to attend but have questions to ask or comments
to provide, please email those questions or comments to Jason Searl at Jason. Searl@a Gray-Robinson.com.
The meeting will be held at the following location and time:
LOCATION:
Bentley Elementary School
2190 Oregon Avenue
Sanford, Florida 32771
DATE:
Wednesday, February 5, 2020
TIME:
6:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.
Sincerely,
Jason W. Searl, Esq.
/7/298439155872 v1
/7/298#39155872 vi
F -
z
�ga
CL
0
w z
q�0
a
w00
fFZ
OLjw
V=v
APRIL 2020
CHERRY CENTERmetre COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT
SANFORD, FLORIDA
Traffic Impact Analysis
LTEC # 20-1401
... . . . .. ..
..........
luke
transportation
engineering
consultants
CHERRY CENTER - CR 46a COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
SANFORD, FLORIDA
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Prepared for:
Acquisition Consultants
710 East Colonial Drive
Orlando, FL 32803
Prepared by:
LUKE TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS,INC.
P.O. Box 941556
Maitland, Florida 32794-1556
407-423-8055
www.Ltec-FL.com
April 2020
Page I ii LTEC # 20-1401
Cherry Center — CR 46A Commercial Development — City of Sanford TIA
P Rt)fK, SSJO NAL E NGs IIE E RI IIG U RTI 5CAT---
1 hvf f�bv f erfi tv 1?1 a! I am a r 0 q V 0 r ed JYC f to in I a 10 n 9: near i n & 0 Q a L e Qi ir�'-. Lifida �,rac teci n f W; t 1,
Luke ra.n5periaiiop[-.9 i-geerire corpora 'or
.F aozr%.3riicd m opera-za, as cm
ly}' -ii
Raou1311,0n.. L3Ow-d i�f Peo',Cssiorla' Enswcas, and Am !--zve prep.31-c-d or apprc)-.-e�
evah.i.m. Ion, ?irluli I) ES, I C -.'IC I L:Sie)SS. 0- Ti v [-.:I if -,Ii ilprl-h-f f.'p'.) I [f. -'l 'i -If
LOCAMN: C� 4 q! r v.-� a .................................. -.% .. ...........................................
ir
, rl*: 65ci p t iq 4), fc-m 5 . i ". a n !,,: -------------------- — ----------------------
: .1(i 1 vyl0 d P.c. ".h m "11 2 pmx1—.! w C -S .3 f of a".mf('s 145 cii'Vc'lop MC, I.C,5 ki I ts :f s. lit airied in "his
cpoa a (a st a n- a mL to " h n pro f ession-31 pizc,,.zcc- ot vanspo f t at io i% en p, in e e r i n g 3s appif e a Ithyou S h
-p r o fitisr i,-, n al, : LI C�I TICn I ZJeI '-' L'XPZ'; in(I Z C.
NAM C
A,)fii '. WDQ
, fe
Ik
............
Ch orry Ccy? (e f - C.R d -FA C(J;q 3.- tI C r 1%1 J r, C'V.VJ 0 F M e n 1 V t;j S;vrj r#
INTRODUCTION
This traffic study was undertaken to provide the required traffic data in accordance with the study
methodology procedures required by the City of Sanford. The proposed Cherry Center — CR 46a
Development will be located on the westbound roadway segment of CR 46a approximately 850
feet east of Rinehart Rd. Figure 1 shows the location of the development site.
Based on direction from the City of Sanford staff, this traffic analysis study was completed to
address the transportation study requirements for the development plan. A copy of the
transportation impact study methodology, which was reviewed and approved by City of Sanford
staff and Seminole County staff, is included in Appendix A.
Project Description
The proposed development site will consist of a car wash: 1 tunnel wash stall and 5,000 square
feet of office/retail use. Currently the parcel is undeveloped. Access will be via a right-in/right-
out onto westbound CR 46a (WB) and a full access driveway on Cherry Laurel Dr, north of CR 46a
WB. Figure 2 shows the conceptual site plan with the access connection.
Study Oocurnentation
Based upon the study methodology assumptions, the impact area will consist of roadways
impacted by Project trips that are equal to or greater than 500 daily trips or greater than 10% of
the adopted level of service (LOS) P.M. peak hour capacity of the study roadway. Table 1 was
developed to show the Project impact area based on the 500 daily and 10% of the adopted level
of service (LOS) P.M. peak hour peak direction service volume thresholds. Table 1 lists the roads,
lists the number of lanes, the adopted LOS standard, adopted service volume, 10% threshold
volume, Project trip distribution based on the OUATS 2025 Long Range Transportation Model
assignment and a determination of significance. Based on the minimum criteria, none of the
roadways are significantly impacted. The table lists the roadway segments within the 1 -mile
radius to per Seminole County guidelines. The study roadways are as follows
• Rinehart Road
• CR 46a
In addition to the Project access connection, the following intersections were analyzed:
• CR 46a at Rinehart Road
• Westbound CR 46a at Cherry Laurel Lane
• Eastbound CR 46a at Cherry Laurel Lane
Page 1 1
Cherry Hill CR 46A — City of Sanford TIA
LTEC # 20-1401
1*0c Cherry Center
luke L City of Sanford, Seminole County, Florida
transportation
engineering L
consultants #20-1401 Site Location Figure 1
P age 12
Cherry Hili CR 46A - City of Sanford TIA
LTEC#20-1401
.pn
77" -
x
cA
A
0
LEGEND
�0raw sed access
point
lake
LZ=
engineering
consultants #20.1401
I 4VItight-Out
lt
Access
Conriectimi
J;
F'ull AcceJ,
14
Corinec
Lnerry Lenter
City of Sanford, Seminole County, Florida
Site Plan and Access Points Figure 2
P a g e 13 LTEC # 20-1401
Cherry Hill CR 46A - City of Sanford TIA
TABLE 1
Potential Study Impact Area Determination
Roadway
10% of
Project Tris
Project P.M. Peak
Percent
Distrib.
Daily
P.M.
Pk Hour
% of
LOS Std
10%/>500
I Sig?
Segments
# Of
Lanes
Adopted Roadwa '
Adopted
LOS
From
To
Class
LOS
Cap.
CR 46A
International Pkwy
1-4 WB Ramps
4LD
Arterial
D
2,000
200.0
13.7%
86
3
0.15%
No
1-4 WB Ramps
1-4 EB Ramps
4LD
Arterial
D
2,000
200.0
31.5%
198
7
0.35%
No
IA EB Ramps
Rinehart Rd
4LD
Arterial
D
2,000
200.0
50.6%
319
12
0.60%
No
Rinehart Rd
Country Club Rd
4LD
Arterial
D
2,000
200.0
76.6%
483
18
0.90%
No
Rinehart Road
South Mall Entrance
CR 46A
4LD
Arterial
D
2,000
200.0
7.4%
47
2
0.10%
No
CR 46A
Anderson Lane
4LD
Arterial
D
2,000
200.0
18.6%
117
4
0.20%
No
1 -Roadway Classification and Adopted LOS from City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan.
Peak Hour Peak Direction Service Volumes from FDOT 2013 Quality/Level of Service Handbook and Seminole County Comprehensive Plan (2020)
2 - Project trips based on daily and P.M. peak hour peak direction total traffic.
Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc., 2020
= . I
Cherry Hill CR 46A - City of Sanford TIA
LTEC # 20-1401
EXISTING ROADWAYS AND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
Existing roadway segment traffic volumes, on the study roadways, were provided by Seminole
County 2019 traffic count data, including both daily and P.M. peak hour directional traffic
volumes. Existing traffic volume data at study intersections is based on February 12, 2020 turning
movement counts.
Study Roadways
Table 2 provides a list of the roadway parameters utilized in the analysis. Included in this table
are: functional classification, adopted Level of Service (LOS) standards, roadway service volumes
(updated with the 2013 FDOT Quality/Level of Service Handbook) and existing traffic volumes.
Based upon this analysis, all the roadway segments currently operate at an acceptable LOS (both
daily and P.M. peak hour), except for CR 46a from 1-4 WB ramps to Rinehart Road.
Study Intersections
The study intersection was analyzed under existing conditions using the procedures of the
Highway Capacity Manual, 61h Edition for intersections with the Synchro 10 software. Weekday
P.M. hour turning movement counts were conducted at the study intersections (see Appendix B
for the turning movement summary of the existing intersection) and existing geometric
conditions.
Figure 3 shows the existing P.M. peak hour intersection turning movement traffic volumes at the
study intersection. Table 3 includes the summary results of the intersection analyses. The
Synchro 10 and HCS worksheets are included in Appendix C. As can be seen, all but one of the
study intersections operates at satisfactory levels of service. The intersection of CR 46a and
Rinehart Road currently operates at a deficient LOS.
Prograrn ed/Manned Roadway I provernents
No programmed roadway improvements are underway or scheduled within the next three years
on study roadways.
As part of the 1-4 Ultimate plan, the 1-4 at CR -46a interchange will be converted to a Diverging
Diamond Interchange (DDI) and the intersection of CR 46a and Rinehart Road intersection will be
reconstructed to eliminate all left turns (Mid -Block U -Turns intersection). All east -west left turns
will turn right and make U-turns on Rinehart Road and travel back through the intersection. All
north -south left turns will travel through the intersection and make a U-turn and then turn right
at the intersection.
r
Cherry Hill CR 46A — City of Sanford TIA
LTEC # 20-1401
TABLE 2
Existing Studv Roadwav Parameters
Roadway
Traffic Volumes
Meets
Generalized Service Volumes Thresholds'
Segments
# Of
Lanes
Adopted Road ay
Daily / Peak Hour Peak Direction
From
To
Class
LOS
LOS B
LOS C
LOS D
LOS E
V/C
Source
ID
CR 46A
Daily
Pk Hr
Daily
Pk Hr
Daily
Pk Hr
Daily
Pk Hr
International Pkwy
1-4 WB Ramps
33,995
C
0.95
1,760
CR 46A
C
0.88
Yes
Sem
International Pkwy
1-4 WB Ramps
4LD
Arterial
D
19,150
0
34,110
1,910
35,820
2,000
42,560
2,000
1-4 WB Ramps
1-4 EB Ramps
4LD
Arterial
D
19,150
0
34,110
1,910
35,820
2,000
42,560
2,000
1-4 EB Ramps
Rinehart Rd
4LD
Arterial
D
19,150
0
34,110
1,910
35,820
2,000
42,560
2,000
Rinehart Rd
Country Club Rd
4LD
Arterial
D
19,150
0
34,111
1,910
35,821
2,000
42,560
2,000
Rinehart Road
0.81
1
1,354
1,291
C
0.68
No
Sem
235
CR 46A
Anderson Lane
35,508
1 D
South Mall Entrance
CR 46A
4LD
Arterial
D
19,150
0
34,110
1,910
35,820
2,000
42,560
2,000
CR 46A
Anderson Lane
4LD
Arterial
D
19,150
0
34,110
1,910
35,820
2,000
42,560
2,000
Existing Conditions (20191 Level of Service
Roadway
Traffic Volumes
Meets
STOP
AADT Z
P.M. Peak Hour'
Segments
Adopted
LOS
Traffic Count
From
To
Volumes
LOS
WC
Volumes
LOS
V/C
Source
ID
CR 46A
EB
WB
International Pkwy
1-4 WB Ramps
33,995
C
0.95
1,760
1,247
C
0.88
Yes
Sem
46a
1-4 WB Ramps
1-4 EB Ramps
42,763
F
1.19
2,207
1,569
F
1.10
No
Sem
46b
1-4 EB Ramps
Rinehart Rd
42,763
F
1.19
2,207
1,569
F
1.10
No
Sem
47
Rinehart Rd
Country Club Rd
27,768
C
1 0.78
1,487
1,010
C
0.74
Yes
Sem
48
Rinehart Road
NB
SB
South Mall Entrance
CR 46A
29,113
C
0.81
1
1,354
1,291
C
0.68
No
Sem
235
CR 46A
Anderson Lane
35,508
1 D
0.99
1,880
1,622
C
0.94
Yes
Sem
236
1- Roadway Classification and Adopted L05 from City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan.
Peak Hour Peak Direction Service Volumes from FDOT 2013 Quality/Level of Service Handbook.
2 -Daily traffic volumes from Seminole County traffic count program.
3 -P.M. Peak Hour traffic volumes from Seminole County traffic count program, LTECTMC traffic counts, FDOT 2018 TCI..
Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc., 2020
TABLE 3
Study Intersections Existing Level of Service
Traffic I P.M. Peak Hour
Intersection Control I Delay (Sec/Veh) I LOS
CR 46A at Rinehart Road'
CR 46A Westbound at Cherry Laurel Lane z
CR 46A Eastbound at Cherry Laurel Lane 3
CR 46A at U-turn 4
CR 46A at Oregon Ave/Via Albina Ln 5
' - Intersection
Z - WB ( NB/SB
3 - EB -L SB -L
° - EB -U-turn 1 WB - U-turn
5 - Intersection
SIGNAL
83.8
F
STOP
0.3 17.7/16.2
A I C/C
STOP
0.3 123.9
ASC
STOP
11.216.2
BSC
SIGNAL
18.8
B
Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc., 2010
• _ •
Cherry Hill CR 46A - City of Sanford TIA
LTEC # 20-1401
CR 46a at Rinehart Rd
2+(l)=3
144+(6)=150 k-121+(5)=126
507+(20)=527 X546+(22)=568
373+(15)=388 f-301+(12)=313
CR 46a
471+(19)0+(l)=490-- 1 82
%
A !� 62 2 = 5 9+(25)=654
972+(39)=1011—>- 652+(26)=
2)678
535+(21)=556---
S. z (
3: CR 46a EQ at Cherry Laurel Dr
26+(I)=27
MrsIL
60+(2)=62--A
1705+(68)=1773—* -
1`i: CR 46a WB at S. Site Entrance
X—a+*0
0+0=0 -,4-960+(30)=990
2: CR 46a WQ at Cherry Laurel Dr
12+k--0+(1)=1
29+(1 151)=13 -4--943+(28)=971
=30 17+(1)=18
1 49+(2)=51
4: Cherry Laurel Dr at W Site Entrance
0
0+(0)=0 k-0-(0)=0
41+(2)=43
IL f-0+0=0
1C) W, Site Ent.
0+(0)=O
49+(3)=52
6: CR 46a at One-way Pair Split
-4-916+(37)=953
0+(I)-1
CR 46a
<1
12+(I)=13 -x'
1752+(70)=1822--O-
7: CR 46a at Oregon Av / Via Albina Ln
166+(6)=172
13+(I)=14
49+(2)=51 JIL
A4.--176+(7)=183
*-797+(32)=829
0+(1)0(I)=21
(F
,:—- 1)=1
3+(l)=4--
4
LEGEND 76+(3)=79 --- 1 13+(1)=14
1561+(62)=1623 --- > :E� 7+ =g
35+(l)=36 ---V 19+(1)=20
P.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
1234 + (12) = 1246
TOTAL TPAFFIC
GROWTH TRIPS
EXISTING NOT TO SrALE
BACKGROUND GROWTH RATE (2%/ YEAR)
ILI C Cherry Center
111(.e City of Sanford, Seminole County, Florida
tramportalion
eurpleermig INS Existing + Growth Trips at Intersections
mnsultints 1120-1401 Figure 3
P a g e 17 LTEC # 20-1401
Cherry Hill CR 46A — City of Sanford TIA
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The proposed Cherry Center site will consist of a 5,000 square foot Office/Retail (shopping
center) and a one (1) tunnel wash stall car wash. To determine the traffic impact of this
development, an analysis of its trip generation characteristics was made. This included the
determination of the increase in trips to be generated by the proposed development.
Trip Generation
The trip generation was calculated utilizing the 101h Edition ITE Trip Generation Report data as
summarized in Table 4. Utilizing the ITE trip generation rates, the proposed land use will generate
an estimated 737 vehicle trip ends per day. Of this total, 62 vehicle trip ends occur during the
P.M. peak hour with 31 vehicles entering and 31 vehicles exiting the site. Pass -by trips were
calculated as part of this study. Those trips reduced the daily trips to 630 vehicle trip ends and
the PM peak hour trips to 46 vehicle trip ends with 23 vehicles entering and 23 vehicles exiting
the site.
Table 4
Estimated Trip Generation Rates (1)
Land Use
Size
ITE
Land Use
Code (2)
Tri
Daily
Generation Rates
P.M. Peak Hour
Total Enter Exit
Daily
Traffic Volumes
P.M. Peak Hour
Total Enter Exit
Shopping Center
5,000 SF
820 / E
115.74
9.25 4.44 4.81
580
47 23 24
Car Wash
1 Stall
949 / R
156.20
1 13.60 6.66 6.94
157
15 8 7
Total
737
62 31 31
Land Use
Size
Pass -by
Ca ture % 3
AM I PM
Pass by Traffic Volumes
P.M. Peak Hour
Daily Total Enter Exit
Net New Traffic Volumes 4
P.M. Peak Hour
Daily Total Enter Exit
Shopping Center
5,000 SF
5% 34%
107
16 8 8
473
31 15 16
Car Wash
1 stall
0% 0%
0
0 0 0
157
15 8 7
Total
107
16 8 8
630
46 23 23
(1) Trip generation calculations from 10th Edition of ITE Trip Generation Report.
(2) ITE Land Use Code Number/ E =Fitted Curve Equation, R =Average Rate
(3) Pass -by trips from 3rd Edition of ITE Trip Generation Handbook
(4) Traffic Volumes minus Pass -by Capture Trips = Net New (Primary) Trips.
Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc., 2020
P a g e 18 LTEC # 20-1401
Cherry Hill CR 46A — City of Sanford TIA
UM3WOH=
Project distribution and assignment of the project traffic to the study roadways was based upon
an OUATS Model 2025 assignment and a review of the existing traffic patterns. The
socioeconomic data was updated to reflect the proposed development in a separate traffic zone.
Subsequently, a selected zone assignment was performed to determine distribution of site trips
in the impact area to the area roadways.
Figure 4 shows the Project trip distribution on the roadway segments. This distribution was
utilized to assign Project traffic at the study intersections.
LTEC # 20-1401
Cherry Hill CR 46A - City of Sanford TIA
Cherry Center
lake City of Sanford, Seminole County, Florida
transportation
engineering L
consultants #20-7401 OUATS Model Project Distribution Percentage Figure 4
Cherry Hill CR 46A - City of Sanford TIA
LTEC # 20-1401
PROJECTED TRAFFIC TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT
The Project trips generated by the proposed development were combined with background
traffic and assigned to the study roadways and intersections. Table 5 presents the projected
2022 daily and P.M. peak hour background traffic volumes for each study roadway segment.
Background traffic was based on a minimum 2% annual growth rate for the 2022 background
traffic volumes.
Study Roadways
Table 6 provides an analysis of projected daily and P.M. peak hour traffic conditions for the study
roadway segments to be impacted by the proposed development. Included in Table 6 are the
new Project trips estimated to utilize each impacted roadway segment along with total traffic for
each segment. Based upon this analysis using the projected daily and P.M. peak hour traffic
volumes, all the study roadways continue to operate at acceptable levels of service, except for
the segments of CR 46a from 1-4 to Rinehart Road.
Intersection Analysis
To determine the projected Level of Service provided by the intersections to be impacted by the
proposed development, a capacity analysis was conducted utilizing the procedures of the
Highway Capacity Manual, 6t" Edition for the signalized and unsignalized intersections. This
analysis used existing traffic volumes plus growth traffic volumes and Project traffic volumes.
Figure 5 shows the projected 2022 build -out P.M. peak hour traffic volumes at the study
intersections with the existing/proposed geometric conditions. Printouts of the intersection
analyses may be found in Appendix D. The projected intersection levels of service and delay, for
each study intersection, are shown in Table 7. The analysis includes both a background traffic
and total traffic analysis. As can be seen, at build -out of the proposed development, all the study
intersections will operate at acceptable levels of service, except for the intersection of CR 46a
and Rinehart Road.
P a g e 1 11 LTEC # 20-1401
Cherry Hill CR 46A — City of Sanford TIA
TABLE 5
2022 Daily Background Traffic Calculation
Roadway
Segments
Existing'
Annual Growth2
Total
Background
From
To
CR 46A
EB
WB
EB
International Pkwy
1-4 WB Ramps
33,995
1,360
35,355
1-4 WB Ramps
1-4 EB Ramps
42,763
1,711
44,474
1-4 EB Ramps
Rinehart Rd
42,763
1,711
44,474
Rinehart Rd
Country Club Rd
27,768
1,111
28,879
Rinehart Road
2,207
1,569
88
63
South Mall Entrance
CR 46A
29,113
1,165
30,278
CR 46A
Anderson Lane
35,508
1,420
36,928
2022 P.M. Background Traffic Calculation
Roadway
Segments
Existing
Annual Growth'
Total
Background 3
From
To
CR 46A
EB
WB
EB
WB
EB
WB
International Pkwy
1-4 WB Ramps
1,760
1,247
70
50
1,830
1,297
1-4 WB Ramps
1-4 EB Ramps
2,207
1,569
88
63
2,295
1,632
1-4 EB Ramps
Rinehart Rd
2,207
1,569
88
63
2,295
1,632
Rinehart Rd
Country Club Rd
1,487
1,010
59
40
1,546
1,050
Rinehart Road
NB
SB
NB
SBNB
SB
South Mall Entrance
CR 46A
1,354
11291
54
52
1,408
1,343
CR 46A
Anderson Lane
1,880
1,622
75
65
1,955
1,687
1 - From Table 2
2 - Default 2% Annual Growth Rate
3 - Total Background checked to ensure traffic growth is at least minimal 2% growth per year.
Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc., 2020
Page 112 LTEC # 20-1401
Cherry Hill CR 46A - City of Sanford TIA
TABLE 6
2022 Study Roadway Parameters
Roadway
Project
Generalized Service Volumes Thresholds'
Segments
# Of
Lanes
Adopted Roadwa
Daily / Peak Hour Peak Direction
From
To
Class
LOS
LOS B
LOS C
LOS D
LOS E
EB. YY@
ED MSM
Daily Pk Hr
Daily Pk Hr
Daily Pk Hr
Daily Pk Hr
CR 46A
International Pkwy
1-4 WB Ramps
35,355
D
0.99
86
35,441
D
International Pkwy
1-4 WB Ramps
4LD
Arterial
D
19,150 0
34,110 1,910
35,820 2,000
42,560 2,000
1-4 WB Ramps
1-4 EB Ramps
4LD
Arterial
D
19,150 0
34,110 1,910
35,820 2,000
42,560 2,000
1-4 EB Ramps
Rinehart Rd
4LD
Arterial
D
19,150 0
34,110 1,910
35,820 2,000
42,560 2,000
Rinehart Rd
Country Club Rd
4LD
Arterial
D
19,150 0
34,111 1,910
35,821 2,000
42,560 2,000
Rinehart Road
NB a
ha 5&
N.@ 5a
South Mall Entrance
CR 46A
4LD
Collector
D
19,150 0
34,110 1,910
35,820 2,000
42,560 2,000
CR 46A
Anderson Lane
4LD
Collector
D
19,150 0
34,110 1,910
35,820 2,000
42,560 2,000
2022 Projected Daily Traffic Conditions
Roadway
Project
Meets
Back round
Traffic 2 LOS V/C
Project Traffic
Total
Segments
%of
Capa.
Adopted
LOS
From
To
Traffic
LOS
V/C
CR 46A
EB. YY@
ED MSM
Ea M
International Pkwy
1-4 WB Ramps
35,355
D
0.99
86
35,441
D
0.99
0.2%
Yes
1-4 WB Ramps
1-4 EB Ramps
44,474
F
1.24
198
44,672
F
1.25
0.6%
No
1-4 EB Ramps
Rinehart Rd
44,474
F
1.24
319
44,793
F
1.25
0.9%
No
Rinehart Rd
Country Club Rd
28,879
C
0.81
483
29,362
C
0.82
13%
Yes
Rinehart Road
NB a
ha 5&
N.@ 5a
South Mall Entrance
CR 46A
30,278
C
0.85
47
30,325
C
0.85
0.1%
Yes
CR 46A
Anderson Lane
36,928
E
1.03
117
37,045
E
1.03
0.3%
No
2022 Projected P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Conditions
Roadway
Project
Meets
Back round
Traffic; LOS V/C
Project Traffic
Total
Segments
% of
Capa.
Adopted
LOS
From
To
Traffic
LOS
V/C
CR 46A
EB. YY@
ED MSM
Ea M
International Pkwy
1-4 WB Ramps
1,830 1,297
C
0.92
3 3
1,833 1,300
C
0.92
0.2%
Yes
1-4 WB Ramps
1-4 EB Ramps
2,295 1,632
F
1.15
7 7
2,302 1,639
F
1.15
0.4%
No
I-4 EB Ramps
Rinehart Rd
2,295 1,632
F
1.15
12 12
2,307 1,644
F
1.15
0.6%
No
Rinehart Rd
Country Club Rd
1,546 1,050
C
0.77
18 18
1,564 1,068
C
0.78
0.9%
Yes
Rinehart Road
NB a
ha 5&
N.@ 5a
South Mall Entrance
CR 46A
1,408 1,343
C
0.70
2 2
1,410 1,345
C
0.71
0.1%
Yes
CR 46A
Anderson Lane
1,955 1 1,687
1 D
1 0.98
1 4 1 4
11959 1 1,691
D
0.98
0.2%
Yes
1 - Roadway Classification and Adopted LOS from City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan.
Peak Hour Peak Direction Service Volumes from FDOT 2013 Quality/Level of Service Handbook.
2 - Daily traffic volumes from Seminole County traffic count program.
3 -P.M. Peak Hour traffic volumes from Seminole County traffic count program, LTEC TMC traffic counts, FDOT 2018 TCI..
Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc., 2020
Page 113
Cherry Hill CR 46A - City of Sanford TIA
LTEC # 20-1401
11: CR 46a at Rinehart Rd
3
1S0+(2)=152Wx-568+ 6+(2)=128
k-12
568+�4
12
527 �3 � 80
3 -4-568+(12)=580
_�57
313+(4)=317
1
490-
1011+(12)=1023--
556
654+(4)=658
8 582
3: CR 46a EB at Cherry Laurel Dr
62+(15)+[6]=83--A
1773+(3)-[6]=1770--
5: CR 46a WB at S. Site Entrance
�'j
�tz
k—o+(5)+[21=7
0+(13)+121=15 '*-9+0+(3)-[2)=991
2: CR 46a WB at Cherry Laurel Dr
13+W)+ 6]=21 k—l+(3)=4
3 4 (8� -<-971+(10)=981
f-18+(3)=21
+(15)+161=72
4
,41: Cherry Laurel Dr at W Site Entrance
0
43 0 k-0
V-0+(10)+[6]=16
tr
0+(19)+161=24
51
ltl: CR 46a at One-way Pair Sprit
-4-953+(5)=958
CR 45a
13+(3)=16-
1822+(5)=1827---
7':
3+(3)=16-1822+(5)=1827---
7': CR 46a at Oregon Av / Via Albina Ln
17
14
4-183
-4-829+(5)=834
v-21
1
LEGEND 79--A
1623+(5)=1628--->- 8
P.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 36 20
1234 + (12) + [34] = 1280
TOTAL TRAFFIC
PASS -BY PROJECT TRIPS
NET NEW PROJECT TRIPS NOT rO SCALr
BACKGROUND TRIPS
NO C Cherry Center
Dike F;7wpF;T; City of Sanford, Seminole County, Florida
transportation
eqVilweliq ME= Build -out Trips at Intersections
C0n5UIt,jjjt5 420-1401 Figure 5
Page 114 LTEC # 20-1401
Cherry Hill CR 46A — City of Sanford TIA
TABLE 7
Study Intersections Buildout (2022) Level of Service
Background Traffic
Traffic I P.M. Peak Hour
Intersection
Control
Total Traffic
P.M. Peak Hour
Sec/Vehl LOS
CR 46A at Rinehart Road'
SIGNAL
96.4
F 97.8
F
CR 46A Westbound at Cherry Laurel Lane 2
STOP
0.2 26.5/15.6
A ( D/C 0.3 31.3/16.7
A I D/C
CR 46A Eastbound at Cherry Laurel Lane 3
STOP
0.3 23.5
A I C 0.3 25.9
A I D
CR 46A at U-turn 4
STOP
11.5 119.9
B I C 11.6 20.0
B I C
CR 46A at Oregon Ave/Via Albina Ln s
SIGNAL
20.1
C 20.2
C
Cherry Laurel Lane at Project Site Entrance 6
STOP
N/A
N/A 7.419.2
A ( A
CR 46A Westbound at Project Site Entrance 7
STOP
N/A
N/A 13.0
B
' - Intersection
z -
WB ( NB/SB
3 - EB -L SB -L
4 -EB -U-turns WB - U-turn
s - Intersection
6 -SB I WB
7 -SB
Luke Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc., 2020
Page 115 LTEC # 20-1401
Cherry Hill CR 46A — City of Sanford TIA
STUDY CONCLUSIONS
This study was undertaken for a traffic impact analysis for the proposed Cherry Center — CR 46a
Development will be located on the westbound roadway segment of CR 46a approximately 850
feet east of Rinehart Rd in Sanford. The study consisted of the determination of the vehicular
trips which would utilize the area roadways as a result of the proposed development. The
project's daily and P.M. peak hour trips were distributed and assigned to the adjacent roadways.
Build -out is projected to be by the end of 2022.
• The proposed site will consist of a 5,000 square foot office/retail and a one (1) tunnel wash
stall car wash.
• Access for the proposed development will consist of a single access connection on Cherry
Laurel Lane, north of CR 46a westbound. Another access point will be located on CR 46a
westbound, just east of Cherry Laurel Lane.
• The net new trips to be generated by the proposed development were estimated to be 646
net new daily trip ends and 46 P.M. peak hour net new trip ends.
• Based upon this analysis, all the existing study roadway segments operate at acceptable
levels of service, except for CR 46a from the 1-4 WB ramps to Rinehart Road.
• Based upon this analysis, all the existing study intersections currently operate at an
acceptable level of service except for the intersection of CR 46a and Rinehart Road.
• Based upon this analysis, using the projected daily and P.M. peak hour traffic volumes, all
the study roadway segments will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service, except
for CR 46a from the 1-4 WB ramps to Rinehart Rd. Conversion of the existing interchanges
to a Diverging Diamond Interchange will improve the roadway LOS.
• Based upon this analysis, all the proposed study intersections will operate at an acceptable
level of service, except for CR 46a at Rinehart Rd. Construction of the Mid -block U -Turns
intersection will improve the intersection LOS.
• The proposed access driveways should be designed to City of Sanford and FDOT design
standards.
Cherry Hill CR 46A - City of Sanford TlA
LTEC # 20-1401
Page 1 18
Appendix A .- Traffic Study Methodology
Cherry Hill CR 46A — City of Sanford TIA
L TEC # 20-1401
MEMORANDT-T.N1
tunspWation vngneedgig + planning
TO: Russell L. Gibson, AICP, Director Via: RUSS=.GMS0N@Sanf6rdfLgov
Planning andDevelopment Services, City of Sanford
FROM: J. Anthony Luke, P.E.
DATE: March 6, 2020
RE: Transportation Study Methodology — Cherry Center - CR 46A Commercial
Development (ITEC Nn 20-1401)
This summarizes the proposed Transportation Study Methodology for a proposed
commercial/retail site at the northeast comer of CR 46A and Cherry Laurel Lane in
Seminole County. The site developer is in the: review process of an annexation of the site
property into the City of Sanford. The propertywill also be rezoned based on policies and
procedures adopted by the City. This methodology includes the transportation study
required for the City of Sanford's traffic impact analysis (TIA)/concurrency management
system (CAIS). Subject to City staff review and approval, this methodologywill be applied
in the traffic impact analysis completed for the proposed site. The CR 46A Commercial
Development (Project) site location is shown in Fig -tire 1. The following sections provide
the components of the proposed methodology.
1. Proposed Development
The proposed Cherry Center Project site is a ±3.41 -acre parcel located at the
northeast corner of CR 46A and Cherry Laurel Lane, east of Rinehart Road and
the 1-4 & CR 46A interchange. The majority of the property is undeveloped,
and a portion will be redeveloped. The Project plan is proposed to be developed
with commercial/retail uses. Fig -Lire 2 presents the conceptual Project site
plan. While the developer does not have specific uses identified at this point,
the site is proposed to contain the following uses for purposes of the TIA.
6, Office: 5,600 sq ft
0 Retail uses: 12,915 sq ft
0, Car Wash: 1 tarmel wash still
2. Site Access
Page 119
Access is proposed to be provided via t -%No (a) direct access connections. A full
access driveway- is proposed to be along the Cherry Laurel Lane frontage, and a
right -turn -only (in/out) driveway is proposed to be along the CR 46A frontage.
Cross access w%U be provided to uses within the Project site. The proposed
connections are shown in Figure 2.
MUM
") ( i."", eI 'J: I , I u., 7" i, t' I '!: , 2'Y'', C i16� '� 1, 11 ,.ii5, I",, !-I I � i " ,I ' 'J ', If �, I �1 , f )
Cherry Hill CR 46A — City of Sanford TIA
LTEC # 20-1401
r I ns 1) 0 r U3 -"' 10 Il
On s I,] I t'� 11 t 5
MEMORANDT-T.N1
tunspWation vngneedgig + planning
TO: Russell L. Gibson, AICP, Director Via: RUSS=.GMS0N@Sanf6rdfLgov
Planning andDevelopment Services, City of Sanford
FROM: J. Anthony Luke, P.E.
DATE: March 6, 2020
RE: Transportation Study Methodology — Cherry Center - CR 46A Commercial
Development (ITEC Nn 20-1401)
This summarizes the proposed Transportation Study Methodology for a proposed
commercial/retail site at the northeast comer of CR 46A and Cherry Laurel Lane in
Seminole County. The site developer is in the: review process of an annexation of the site
property into the City of Sanford. The propertywill also be rezoned based on policies and
procedures adopted by the City. This methodology includes the transportation study
required for the City of Sanford's traffic impact analysis (TIA)/concurrency management
system (CAIS). Subject to City staff review and approval, this methodologywill be applied
in the traffic impact analysis completed for the proposed site. The CR 46A Commercial
Development (Project) site location is shown in Fig -tire 1. The following sections provide
the components of the proposed methodology.
1. Proposed Development
The proposed Cherry Center Project site is a ±3.41 -acre parcel located at the
northeast corner of CR 46A and Cherry Laurel Lane, east of Rinehart Road and
the 1-4 & CR 46A interchange. The majority of the property is undeveloped,
and a portion will be redeveloped. The Project plan is proposed to be developed
with commercial/retail uses. Fig -Lire 2 presents the conceptual Project site
plan. While the developer does not have specific uses identified at this point,
the site is proposed to contain the following uses for purposes of the TIA.
6, Office: 5,600 sq ft
0 Retail uses: 12,915 sq ft
0, Car Wash: 1 tarmel wash still
2. Site Access
Page 119
Access is proposed to be provided via t -%No (a) direct access connections. A full
access driveway- is proposed to be along the Cherry Laurel Lane frontage, and a
right -turn -only (in/out) driveway is proposed to be along the CR 46A frontage.
Cross access w%U be provided to uses within the Project site. The proposed
connections are shown in Figure 2.
MUM
") ( i."", eI 'J: I , I u., 7" i, t' I '!: , 2'Y'', C i16� '� 1, 11 ,.ii5, I",, !-I I � i " ,I ' 'J ', If �, I �1 , f )
Cherry Hill CR 46A — City of Sanford TIA
LTEC # 20-1401
Luke Transurtation Enqineerini SU[taiits
3. Trip Generation.
The loth Edition of the ITE Trip Generation.Report will be used for the trip
generation of the proposed hotel development. Table 1 s-unimarizes the
estimated weel,-day daily and P.M. peak- hour trip generations. The estimated
pass -by traffic volumes are also shoiwm, based on standards from ITE.
4. Study Intersections
Per the proposed methodology, the study intersections are listed below and
shown on Figure i:
• CR 46A and Rinehart Road - i
• NVestbound CR 46A and Cherry Laurel Lane - 2
• Eastbound CR 46A and Cherry Laurel Lane - 3
• W, estbound CR 46A and Project Entrance — 4
• Cherry Laurel Lane and Project Entrance - 5
5. Trip Distribution/Assigiiiiient
Figure 3 is an OUATS 2025 plot showing the base network—Aith the estimated
project trip distribution percentages. The model network included all planned
and programmed roadways and improvements within the impact area. The
socioeconomic data for the Project was updated to reflect the proposed
development in a separate traffic zone. Subsequently, a selected zone
assignment was performed to determine distribution of site trips in the impact
area to the area roadways. The final assignment of Project trips to the Project
access comiections will be re,,,ie,.%,ed with existing travel patterns observed in
the h-itersection turning movements.
6. Trip Inip act Assessment
• Assessments for the Existing (2o2o) condition and Project's build -out
(2o2a) condition x,611 be provided.
• Background traffic i%rill be based upon projected 2o22 traffic volumes
(existing + historical growth/FDOT projections).
• Project traffic will be combined with background traffic to obtain total
traffic flows.
• The study intersections will be analyzed using the procedures of the
Figgie ay Capacity.Hanual, 6th Edition and Synclu-o io software
for signalized and unsignalized intersections.
• Intersection level of service and delay will be provided at each study
intersection.
• Analysis to be performed for the weekday adjacent street P.M. peak -hour
peak- hour of generator.
Trzaffie Repoi-t
The signed and sealed traffic report will summarize the study procedures,
analyses and recommendations. All support documents will be included in the
report.
Please review and let me luiow if we need to schedule a meeting to discuss the proposed
methodology.
Page 2 of 6
Cherry MY CR 46A — City of Sanford TIA
LTEC#20-1401
Cherry Center
City rjf Sanhwu', Sl.�,,2 ru i r ;, �� c C a �j ri ty, r i da
"'If, t,rvr,,*irn � �,j i �,r 'i
a g e 121 LTEC # 20-1401
Cherry Hill CR 46A - City of Sanford TIA
1 6 -rl C-04 1!�WJ tat lt�
lalm Lrx7neo. ,
Page 122
Cherry center
City tY Sjrifcredl, County, Fk-,,ficJa
tmd elc-vm Pui'r,;Ll�
Cherry Hill CR 46A — City of Sanford TIA
Rv (Y( 6
LTEC#20-1401
uj
CL
F�,,jfw Ar cc ,l
u
Page 122
Cherry center
City tY Sjrifcredl, County, Fk-,,ficJa
tmd elc-vm Pui'r,;Ll�
Cherry Hill CR 46A — City of Sanford TIA
Rv (Y( 6
LTEC#20-1401
I
s Of6
Page 123 LTEC # 20-1401
Cherry Hill CR 46A — City of Sanford TIA
Page 1 24
Cherry Hill CR 46A - City of Sanford TIA
LTEC # 20-1401
Page 125
Cherry Hill CR 46A - City of Sanford TIA
LTEC#20-1401
August 11, 2020
Ms. Amye King, AICP
Director of Planning
City of Sanford
300 N. Park Ave.
Sanford, FL 32771
RE: PD Rezone at 2461 Cherry Laurel Dr.
7-.�TiT�:fIT�
The City is in receipt of the plans and staff report related to the above referenced project. As you know, through its
long-standing Intergovernmental Coordination relationship with the City of Sanford, the City of Lake Mary has voiced
concerns in the past regarding projects proposed on the north side of CR 46A, adjacent to Rinehart Rd. We've even
had to collaborate on one project in that area: the 7 -Eleven located at 4955 CR 46A, which split our two jurisdictions. I
think we would all agree that the use and intensity of that site has caused daily access challenges which should not
be replicated within this corridor.
The City is very concerned about the proposed project at 2461 Cherry Laurel Dr. On June 16, 2020, 1 sent an e-mail
to Ms. Sabreena Colbert detailing some of our more specific concerns related to the Future Land Use, proposed uses,
access control, transportation improvements, and the future plans for that NE comer of Rinehart Rd. and CR46A. We
appreciate that your staff reached out to us to discuss our concerns in greater detail. The staff report prepared by Ms.
Colbert, which was presented to the Planning & Zoning Commission on August 6, 2020, details not only the technical
issues with the proposal, but also several of our concerns noted in said e-mail. As the project continues to move
forward through your process, it would be helpful if you could continue to provide the staff reports and any updates on
actions taken by staff or the City as a whole.
We look forward to continuing to collaborate on the issues and challenges of growth in our area.
Respectfully,
J*b
Stephen J. Noto, AICP
Community Development Director
City of Lake Mary
snoto lakema .corn
(407) 585-1440
911 Wallace Court I Lake Mary, Florida 32746
www.lakemaryfl.com ( Phone: (407) 585-1362 1 permits@lakemaryfl.com
Colbert, Sabreena
From: Stephen Noto <SNoto@lakernaryfl.corn>
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 1:37 PM
To: Colbert, Sabreena
Subject: RE: 2461 Cherry Laurel Dr. Project
Thanks, Sabreena. A few questions:
Based on the interlocal we received, it appears an annexation is required in to Sanford. I have
some questions on that:
o Does staff support the annexation if the proposed uses are of concern?
If annexed, what is the proposed zoning and FLU? I noticed on the FLU map that
the property to the east is MDR1 0 and the properties to the west and north are
High Intensity. Is your High Intensity similar to Lake Mary's HIP -TI (High Intensity
Planned Target Industry)? I ask because of the underlying uses they are
proposing (car wash, gas pumps, etc.). Our HIP -TI is more about high
tech/health/and support retail and restaurants. I wonder if car wash and pumps
falls within that type umbrella.
Has the County reviewed the access? As you know the elevation changes combined with the
7-11 and Solara apartments, along with backup from the 46A/Rinehart intersection, makes the
traffic flow in that area very tricky. The right-in/right-out on 46A is of great concern, as is
additional trips in and out of Cherry Laurel. Is there any chance of Cherry Laurel extending to
the Hyundai access? It's a shame folks can't get to Rinehart NB without having to access the
46A intersection.
o Speaking of which, I noticed the applicant detailed the LOS issue at 46A and Rinehart
Rd. and subsequently referenced the 1-4 BtU improvements (diverging diamonds)
proposed west of that intersection. Is the City and/or County going to push for
temporary improvements or phasing of the project that would lessen the impact to that
intersection?
Generally, the City is very concerned about additional densities and intensities in that area (from
Rinehart east to Hills of Lake Mary). This project combined with the potential density/intensity of the
project proposed at the NE corner of 46A and Rinehart will bring about substantial traffic flow issues
at that already struggling intersection. I think it may be helpful to have a discussion between Sanford,
Lake Mary, and the County to understand the short term impacts to that intersection, especially given
possible funding challenges to roadway projects as a result of COVID-19. Allowing developers to rely
on future non -local improvements that aren't fully funded could be very bad news for us.
Thanks—
Stephen J. Noto, AICP
Community Development Director
City of Lake Mary
(407) 585-1440
From: Colbert, Sabreena <Sabreena.Colbert1SSanforAf1 anit>
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 1:11 PM
To: Stephen Noto <Npto @lakernaryfl.com>
Subject: RE: 2461 Cherry Laurel Dr. Project
REVISION DATE REVISION DATE
' CAR SALES / RENTAL FACILITY - -- z DEVELOPMENT
n=o ,
a o CHERRY LAUREL DR & CR 46-A
�—' SANFORD, FL -..-.--- �A29354
708 E. COLONIAL DR, STE 100 PH: (407) 271.8910
ORLANDO, FL 32803 FAX: (407) 442-0604