DO #21-04_310 Elm Avenue_RecordedThis Instrument Prepared By and Return To:
Julie Adams Scofield, AICP
Historic Preservation Planner
Planning and Development Services Department
City Hall
300 North Park Avenue
Sanford, Florida 32771
\� Tax Parcel Identiflcation Number: 25-19-30-5AG-0507-0030.
Case #: 21-000647
Permit* COA21-000011
GRANT MALOY, SEMINOLE COUNTY
CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER
CFN# 2021054266 Bk:9912 Page:11014106(6Pgs)
REC: 04/26/2021 11:51:02 AM by cjones
RECORDING FEES $52.50
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD OF THE CITY OF SANFORD DEVELOPMENT
ORDER No. 21-04 RELATING TO 310 ELM AVENUE AND ISSUING
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
The Historic Preservation Board (HPB) of the City of Sanford issued this
Development Order issuing a Certificate of Appropriateness relating to and touching
and concerning the following described property: 310 Elm Avenue, which is assigned
Tax Parcel Identification Number: 25-19-30-5AG-0507-0030 assigned by the Seminole
County Property Appraiser.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Property Owners: Gerie E. Vogt and Kimberly M. Parr
310 Elm Avenue
Sanford, Florida 32771
Applicant: Gerie E. Vogt
761 Rantoul Lane
Lake Mary, Florida 32746-4249
Project: Approval of the HPB to construct an attached deck with regard to property
located at 310 Elm Avenue.
Requested Development Approval: The Applicant requested approval of the HPB
to construct an attached deck with regard to property located at 310 Elm Avenue.
Additional Findings: The subject property is located in the Sanford Residential
Historic District.
111,alge
:Z I "_j
3 0• CY fy k 0- s
'-,Cot Of"A
i
;orf.!
Fit
'Jis't'A. qq Oj
'i twollcill
03
i
;orf.!
Fit
'Jis't'A. qq Oj
The frame vernacular structure was built in about 1910. In 2009 the building was
converted to office use, and site improvements, including a handicap ramp on the south
side of the building was approved.
When the building was returned to single-family use the ramp was removed and
replaced with an attached deck and railing. There is no record of a building permit or
certificate of convenience being issued for the deck. There is also an attached deck on
the rear of the building that has been issued a certificate of convenience (minor review).
In 2021, the deteriorated decks were replaced entirely.
The property owners are seeking after the fact approval to install a wood deck,160
square feet in size, with railings attached to the south side of the structure.
Schedule "S" of the City's Land Development Regulations (LDRs) and the recent
resolution adopted by the HPB relating to administrative reviews allow for detached
decks not visible from the street to be approved as minor reviews. Though positioned
closer to the back of the building, the proposed deck is visible from Elm Avenue. An
outdated survey attached shows a fence obstructing view of the deck, but there is no
intent or interest to replace the fence.
The project meets applicable lot development standards. Schedule S of the City's LDRs
does not provide clear standards for decks. Generally, decks without railings are
proposed for back yards and are approved through a minor review if setback
requirements are met and no character defining features are impacted. Because this
deck and railing is attached and visible from the street, it is similar to a porch, though
lacking a roof. The intent of Schedule S of the City's LDRs is that all additions, including
porches, be in character with the style, scale and materials of the primary structure, and
21Pagc
.±t .00 0 A P01 L :06 '�Wh 10
N., MA
W!rli .. 'i 'i«': n)!OW 1, 9MIDAM 1SIamumqA n SaU Wo clan . . w
I'm-, ..:Iii t.", irfib `:1' '(! 11 i
K! 4 QUIT: 11 . n 1 k, o! Fri, ' in AHmET mCm c: oervael iaj3?rj pniibi.--, ;r
A WWI
W "SA rv&W no ova V sv 7 Amb 30 A Yija;, }o -%".)
i 11 0010 Mum Inu) :,o s jlUo
ljq!, -nche;, - j
68F.M30 bum . ':And A mump Y& ov ON
"Immmy MY lo em? rum so "i Uekidl.tp- ;-,! -,-! 6
1061K oil YW:W 1.00110
"embsoq ycm T awak a 0 1 "M RA v st j1Gqk A u lyme , , ;n. -f; ;c : i I
Ahjd 'it!
shnWe axr in wob P" 1MACIM !',WO W110 40'
-Y 41, b weim 1000 1 APUM DsvoqqF A -, A
SOL SLOSMA WOSQd WS e0vAst gi)MA0 0 XOM K W W )0 NCO!&" OPS,
Hs WA4 YyAQ vJ w F! QW, . lo mvp� AT M 1 f Ur vy,
i1 F3
-009se-1 bid 1: �
ul "i i " -- -, :. .� �! on) now [SAW'.
that they be attached in a way that does not obscure or damage defining architectural
features. The proposed wood deck does not obscure architectural features, and could
be removed without damaging the original structure, however it is a "modern feature"
not strongly related stylistically to the house.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
(a). The conclusions of law in the prior Certificate of Appropriateness are
hereby ratified and affirmed.
(b). Pursuant to Section 8.0 of Schedule "S" of the City's LDRs, the HPB has
reviewed the proposed Certificate of Appropriateness and all application documentation
and matters relating thereto in accordance with the procedures for altering historic
landmarks or structures within historic districts as set forth in Schedule "S" of the City's
LDRs.
(c). Specifically, Schedule "S" of the City's LDRs provides as follows:
(1). Setbacks apply to both principal and accessory
structures.
(2). Residential lot development shall have the following
setbacks:
(1). Front yard: 25'.
(ii). Rear Yard: 2'.
(iii). Side Yard: 50
.
(iv). When a side yard is located adjacent to a street: 7.5'.
(3). Replacement of existing porches with a design or
materials not in character with the style or period of the building are
31Pa—c
qgmsb 1: "wow ion IM W i; lif
L3iLVOA 011AUS1iAIS 9upal 0 tot! .095 ., jSS ?,,-x()V, T .<,;ijj
aim Sw-411qClqqA io, A! n, vial ',c: ,i%;o,%)l:.,:;c,-, art i' f-,
E,.! Y I I �i*Y f:. ) . u ; -;., E i 143
10 osj! 01 H.11jay"?
!o SWOM W rd iii ;ua ae KA Tait OWN
7VIONC, as aeWl:i Ll':!(33 -'vi�,' M In
W My tno A
6 Oj
qjesb 5 Nov ael onq gAW W
:)d! 10 bl"eq 10 31ya act by
ww l6dr, A lu;
prohibited.
(4). New porch elements, such as, by way of examples only
and not as a limitation, balusters and columns, brackets, trim and
architectural embellishments shall be compatible with the style and
period of the building and shall be substantiated by physical or
pictorial evidence of the subject property.
(5). Porch additions shall have a roof type that is either similar
to the existing roof or is in character with the style and period of the
building.
(d). To the extent that a conclusion of law as set forth herein also constitutes a
factual finding, then such shall be taken to be so as part of this Development Order.
(e). The proposed Certificate of Appropriateness is hereby found and
determined to comply with the aforestated.
(f). Additionally, the Certificate of Appropriateness sought is hereby found and
determined to be consistent with the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan and
development of the property as proposed would be consistent with and in compliance to
applicable land development regulations and all other applicable regulations and
ordinances as set forth in the Code of Ordinances of the City of Sanford.
�-r
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1). The aforementioned application for a Certificate of Appropriateness is
APPROVED subject to the condition that the railing be appropriate to the style of the
house, as determined by the Historic Preservation Officer, with any dispute as to that
41 11a e
bnf,-- aif�- too h:
a i i� ic -
to; Ope wh rhW; Mormw ed AW
i i:; 1 ii :., i i; \! el f-,; kc! " :- j �! i .; ! , .,:;6!.j 1 ad i I c ; "t, I n,, i ;:i ,) f ! i'....'j.3 ;),-: i *'., 1, l I r, i 'I :•c
:--.! -If�-Nnhtl ,* ; 1F."'11 'k. , � . " e)
04 to Meq ills Aye add r1h,"v (,I
yNOW-i
-.5 r! also t jwqcpk lo
ci -!i bna On inshm-00 ad
bw-, i
Wdswiqup isma K; bns sponuaw
STWO'.
SAVII CAST 1-1
1; lot rjnwSDW:qS
E61: 01 Sjubloyp Q YwK, OrIj Mll rmohnuo �."!!
Cid n Lru� ;wGic, adlwsaal� NOT
m
matter being brought before the HP B for resolution by means of an additional
development order,
(2). This Development Order granting approval of a Certificate of
Appropriateness touches and concerns the aforedescribed property and is subject to
code enforcement action in accordance with the controlling provisions of law.
Done and Ordered on the date first written below.
As approved and authorized for execution by the Historic Preservation Board of
the City of Sanford at its meeting of February 17, 2021.
A TTES T: HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
OF THE CITY OF SANrf RD
KIRWISMIRMT fim�yg��M
,Run,
W�jj
111 IWI MR, Run,",
i C ai
it to FbIbruary 17, 2021.
5 � i' ,
0 ma, W n to 0 10 k;volqqe q -a r, '--' I �; 1.:i
two !0 ONArvins PHO Anc-,
-m� a ti's :Al no ...0
=30 "Ody neam AWW0 ON y! WMasse W! bonjuldVa T"Va bsVO!qq, 0.
to 6rolaro al ':- ; labiss 10 j7'i ST.
I ON A",
...........
F
--R J, I FINNOW
conditions of this Development Order the undersigned named persons having full
U'ro"INTIZ in
Witness # 1
Printed"Nw-afrne: -41- 'Yj
ess # 2
>
ed N a me ik
RIOI-91 M/TKAJAMM/ 01MRAM,
MIMM-11 MIMMaNMIM11,111
0 : 1
III �II IT I IIIII I IIIIII
FAr a
OR I *���JJMM=wl
MiffIIIIIIII! V11IIIIII! III 111 11
I I I I I ! I I I I •1 11 ! 1 !11•1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 M i 15-1111110001MME
Given under my hand and official sea[ this, :2 (0 da of-F(§Uru,pry, 2021.
OT—A—RY PUBLIC
0sw;%,,4v fly commission expires:
orY "e, Nox, Pub: Can o� F Icx 7da
'-, f
GG 239'
ok
a Nip 6
0 �1 mv
nfS SO LAW L I.-- � "'Cl
b;'i! r)rl) ..c. i...' . 'ok", 'S v w Aj Wwaq VeSM
-�rlv.vj Kam uEl"Mal in Smf L
in
a Jim do
won c 1
m�'-
�S
it bed list 0 1J.
f.'fi -10'ieci
Los
yION! A.
-nn
An AS&