DO #21-01_1101 Park Avenue_RecordedGRANT MALOY, SEMINOLE COUNTY
CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER
CFN# 2021051193 Bk:9906 Page:474-482(9Pgs)
REC: 04/19/2021 3:59:47 PM by hdevore
RECORDING FEES $78.00
This Instrument Prepared By and Return To:
Julie Adams Scofield, AICP
Historic Preservation Planner
Planning and Development Services Department
City Hall
300 North Park Avenue
Sanford, Florida 32771
Tax Parcel Identification Number: 25-19-30-5AG-1303-0060.
File * 20-009090
Permit #: COA20-000316
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD OF THE CITY OF SANFORD DEVELOPMENT
ORDER NO. 21 -01 RELATING TO 1101 PARK AVENUE AND ISSUING
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
The Historic Preservation Board (HPB) of the City of Sanford issued this
Development Order issuing a Certificate of Appropriateness relating to and touching
and concerning the following described property: 1101 Park Avenue, which is assigned
Tax Parcel Identification Number: 25-19-30-5AG-1303-0060 by the Seminole County
Property Appraiser.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Property Owners: Kelah N. Clarke and H. Michael Deneka
(As Co -Trustees)
1101 Park Avenue
Sanford, Florida 32771-2851
Applicant: Kelah N. Clarke
1101 Park Avenue
Sanford, Florida 32771-2851
Project: Approval of the HPB to construct a single story rear addition, 400 square
feet in size, relative to property located at 1101 Park Avenue.
Requested Development Approval: The Applicant has requested approval of the
HPB to construct a single story rear addition, 400 square feet in size, relative to
11 P a g e
property located at 1101 Park Avenue.
Additional Findings: The proposed structure and work are compatible with and
are located in the City's Residential Historic District.
The primary structure located on the property is a colonial revival style single family
home built, based upon the records of the Seminole County Property Appraise, in 1925.
The 2 -story main structure is flanked by 1 -story additions, and there is a small porch
addition to the rear fagade. The exterior wall material is metal siding, but the building
retains architectural integrity. The Property Owners have applied for approval to
construct a single -story addition to the rear, 400 square feet in size, replacing paired
windows and adding an exterior entrance on the north elevation of the addition. The
proposal shows an impact to an upper story window, but revised plans maintains the
window. The addition would not be visible from the primary street. The project also
includes removing screening from the existing rear addition on the south side.
The proposed addition will comply with all applicable setback requirements. The scale,
massing, and architectural elements of the proposed addition are compatible with the
property and are similar to the contributing structures in the historic district. The one-
story addition is in the back and clearly discerned as an addition and could be removed
without harm to the essential form and integrity of the property. The proposed wood
siding matches the original wood siding on the house. The Property Owners propose to
construct a hipped roof with architectural shingles to match the house. The existing
windows are wood windows with various configurations—the main house with 311, 4/1
and 5/1 lites, and the windows on the addition are 6/6. The existing windows will be
2 1 P a g e
relocated to the new outside walls and a wood door to the addition will be custom built
to match the existing front entrance door.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
(a). Pursuant to Section 8.0 of Schedule "S" of the City's Land Development
Regulations (LDRs), the HPB has reviewed the proposed Certificate of Appropriateness
and all application documentation and matters relating thereto in accordance with the
procedures for altering historic landmarks or structures within historic districts as set
forth in Schedule "S" of the City's LDRs.
(b). With regard to the application of Schedule "S" of the City's LDRs, the
requirements thereof provide as follows to include the Secretary of the Interior's
Guidelines:
(1). The setback requirements which apply to both principal and
accessory structures are as followings:
(A). Front yard: 25'.
(B). Rear yard: 2'.
(C). Side yard: 5'; except when a side yard is located
adjacent to a street, in which case 7.5'.
(2). New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction
shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property.
(3). New work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be
compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features
to protect the architectural integrity of the property and its
31Page
environment.
(4). New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be
undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the
environment would be unimpaired.
(5). To maintain the predominant scale and proportion of the historic
district, new buildings, additions and alterations shall be designed to
ensure that all elements of the building fagade are aligned with the
fagade elements of the neighboring structures (e.g. windows, doors,
etc.)
(6). Building features within new construction shall be compatible
with the color, material, and character of the property, neighborhood
and immediate environment.
(7). Board trim at corners and around openings shall not exceed 6"
except at the front door surround which may be any size or
configuration.
(8). For new construction, additions and alterations, the wall finish
most acceptable for the architectural style shall be utilized.
(9). The following materials are generally acceptable for principal
and accessory structures within the historic districts:
(A). Wood clapboard, wood shingle, wood drop siding,
wood board and batten siding or equal as determined by the
Board.
4 1 P a g e
(B). Brick, stucco; and stone or cast stone.
(10). Any and all additions that are sided with aluminum or vinyl or
other simulated cladding shall be clad with materials to match the
original historic structure in size, profile, shape, color, orientation and
texture.
(11). Principal building roof shape and materials shall be consistent
with the style of the structure.
(12). All pitched roof planes shall match in material, shape, texture,
design, dimension, color, and other identifying features.
(13). Principal building roof shape and materials shall be consistent
with the style of the structure.
(14). Roofs clad with red cedar or white oak shingles; or with
galvanized steel, or asphalt shingles are consistent with most styles
in the historic district.
(15). All new windows shall have mullion profiles similar to
contributing structures.
(16). If single hung or double hung windows are placed in groupings,
a 4" to 6" trim piece shall separate the windows.
(17). If a window contains divided lites, true muntins or simulated
true -divided lites (where a wood frame is glued to the exterior of the
glass with a very high bond (VHB) adhesive system) shall be used.
5 1 P a g e
(18). If double pane windows are installed, an internal shadow bar
shall also be used between the glasses.
(19). Inserted or removable grilles and flat grilles that do not replicate
the profile and characteristics of the original window are prohibited
on the exterior of the windowpane.
(20). The interior of the windowpane may have an inserted or
removable grille provided that the grille is not flat and has a profile.
(21). Windows and doors shall be glazed in clear glass with no more
than 10% daylight reduction.
(22). The use of reflective glass and reflective film is prohibited on all
buildings.
(23). Rectangular windows shall be casement and single or double
hung; circular and hexagonal windows may be fixed or pivot.
(24). Doors with modern designs, flush or sliding glass doors, or any
type of door that is inappropriate to the style or period of the
structure are prohibited.
(c). To the extent that a conclusion of law as set forth herein also constitutes a
factual finding, then such shall be taken to be so as part of this Development Order.
(d). The proposed Certificate of Appropriateness is hereby found and
determined to comply with the aforestated requirements.
(e). Additionally, the Certificate of Appropriateness sought is hereby found and
determined to be consistent with the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan and
6 1 P a g e
development of the property as proposed would be consistent with and in compliance to
applicable land development regulations and all other applicable regulations and
ordinances as set forth in the Code of Ordinances of the City of Sanford.
(1). The aforementioned application for a Certificate of Appropriateness is
APPROVED based on the finding that the proposed new construction is consistent with
the purpose and intent of Schedule "S" of the City's LDRs and complies with the
specific guidelines contained in of Schedule "S" of the City's LDRs.
(2) . This Development Order granting approval of a Certificate of
Appropriateness touches and concerns the aforedescribed property and is subject to
code enforcement action in accordance with the controlling provisions of law.
Done and Ordered on the latest date written below.
As approved and authorized for execution by the Historic Preservation Board of
the City of Sanford at its meeting of January 20, 2021.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
OFT E CITY OF SANFORD
W.
Traci Houchin, MMC, FCRM, City Clerk Tainm vy Agni Ch it
Date:
Uncpro tune 46Jahuary20,20211.
77
tiu)Wa6a W*ead, HPB Clerk
I INFINIFI
7 1 P tia g c
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the subject Property Owners have signed and sealed
these presents the day and year written below and AGREE to all of the terms and
conditions of this Development Order the undersigned named persons having full
authority to execute this document.
A TTES T -
Witness # 1. 'e
Printed Name:
Witness 2.
Printed Name:
XELAH N. CLARKE AND H. MICHAEL
VENEKA
Kelah N. Clarke, Co -Trustee
V ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF ftME-5,
COUNTY OF-ft-M`TN0L-E---)
eka, Cb -Trustee,
This instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me by means of M -/physical
presence or o online notarization, thisA ,
JL� d a y of 4anUffy-, 2021, KefatrN--=ke-and—
H. Michael Deneka. They are personally known to me or L__] produced
as identification.
(Signature of Notary Public)
Print Name: ('d,tn' Akv,A� .
Notary Public, State of -FI o-r-ida V 'tt-
Commission No,: ,Ian ? ,
My Commission Expires:__I -31 �0, ('
81 P CART E.ABELIL
NOTARY PUBLIC
Commonwealth of Virginia
Reg. #226982
-IJ38A .3 WIND
ousu t YFIATOV
Finig•liv 10 r$iravrriOMMo")
JOINDER AND APPROVAL OF CONDITIONS BY PROPERTY OWNERS
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the subject Property Owners have signed and sealed
these presents the day and year written below and AGREE to all of the terms and
conditions of this Development Order the undersigned named persons having full
authority to execute this document.
A TTES T.•
Witness # I
Printed Name: 4cy
Witness # 2
Printed Name:
STATE OF FLORIDA
KELAH N. CLARKE AND H. MICHAEL
DENEKA
4-Wl- a ?,�
K61ah N. Clarke, Co -Trustee
H. Michael Deneka, Co -Trustee
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
COUNTY OF SEMINOLE )
This instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me by means of X physical
-e7 "I NAr-t'46
presence or o online notarization, this /-/— day of 4anttsfy, 2021, Kelah N. Clarke*im&
4
1,5
They I efe, personally known to me or j produced
as identification
8111 a ge
C.
(Sig
be of Nota rf Public)
I
Print me:
Notary Public, 9falW—of Florida
Commission No.: 6 6 23*7649
My Commission Expires:
it
JALLS
Notary POO State of f 10 10ri(dwO
Commission 9 GG 234756
A
My Comm. Expires Aug 31, 2021
Bonded ths National Notary Assn.
PROPRNP-40. 40-arqW — — — —
8111 a ge
C.
(Sig
be of Nota rf Public)
I
Print me:
Notary Public, 9falW—of Florida
Commission No.: 6 6 23*7649
My Commission Expires:
s
t• ., t 1:t'a.ii s11t� ,;e: �tUl•tM ��Jt. ;i!.•.
'Of:_
� .. • .. .e �: (i'�7.'4: ii6F�YWji ✓,Vf+���s��Civ .�