Loading...
DO # 21-20_117 Wst 10th Street_RecordedThis Instrument Prepared By and Return To: Julie Adams Scofield, AICP Historic Preservation Planner Planning and Development Services Department City Hall 300 North Park Avenue Sanford, Florida 32771 Tax Parcel Identification Number: 25-19-30-5AG-1204-0060. File #: 21-003304 Permit #: COA21-000107 GRANT MALOY, SEMINOLE COUNTY CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER CFN# 2021108680 Bk:10016 Page: 1048-1057(10Pgs) REC: 08/17/2021 10:49:33 AM by jeckenroth RECORDING FEES $10.00 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD OF THE CITY OF SANFORD DEVELOPMENT ORDER No. 21-20 RELATING TO 117 WEST 10TH STREET APPROVING A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS The Historic Preservation Board (HPB) of the City of Sanford issued this Denial Development Order relating to an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness relating to and touching and concerning the following described property: 117 West 10th Street, which is assigned Tax Parcel Identification Number: 25-19-30-5AG-1204- 0060 by the Seminole County Property Appraiser. FINDINGS OF FACT Property Owner/Applicant: Ruth Chiguano 105 Frances Drive Altamonte Springs, Florida 32714-3223 Project: Approval of the HPB for an after the fact approval relating to a partial demolition and alterations to an accessory structure relative to property located at 117 West 10th Street. Requested Development Approval: The Applicant requested approval of the HPB for an after the fact approval relating to a partial demolition and alterations to an accessory structure relative to property located at the 117 West 10th Street. Additional Findings: The project is located at 117 West 10th Street in the City's Residential Historic District as described and depicted in Schedule "S" of the City's I I P a g e Land Development Regulations (LDRs). The 2 -story frame vernacular building was constructed in 1914 according to a review of the Seminole County Property Appraiser's records. The building has been altered and suffered fire damage, but retains architectural integrity. Recently the property owner has made significant repairs, installed missing wood windows, restored the original doors and painted the house. The accessory structure, which can be seen from the street was also in disrepair and a minor review Certificate of Appropriateness was issued for like for like repair and replacement for plywood wall cladding and doors. The work that was accomplished, however, without the requisite development order being obtained, exceeded those approvals and the applicant is now seeking after the fact approval for the following: (1). Re -siding the exterior walls with plywood routed to mimic horizontal siding. (2). Replacing plywood doors with the same faux siding and cross members to resemble carriage doors. (3). Demolishing the "lean to" portion of the building on the southwest corner due to poor conditions. (4). Constructing a 120 square foot addition to replace the demolished portion with metal roof to match garage (house is shingled), scored plywood siding, wood window and door, and composite shutters. The shed addition to the garage was not a contributing feature and has no historic, architectural or environmental significance individually or in relation to the ensemble of structures within the historic district. The structure was not important to the overall 21 Page integrity of the historic district and did not add aesthetic interest to the historic district.. The garage addition/replacement will have wood window and doors, routed plywood siding that matches the rebuilt garage, but not the main structure, metal roof to match the garage, but not the main structure, and similar wood door and windows to the main structure. The appearance of the faux clapboard siding is more appropriate than the flat plywood panels, but does not match the siding profile of the main structure and surrounding properties. This would not be approved for a primary residence and the product is NOT equal or is a reasonable substitute for wood clapboard or wood drop siding for the existing accessory structure and the new addition to that structure. Other than the waived criteria of Schedule "S" of the City's LDRs, as set forth below, the proposed new construction meets the criteria of Schedule "S" of the City's LDRs. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW (a). Pursuant to Section 8.0 of Schedule "S" of the City's LDRs, the HPB has reviewed the proposed Certificate of Appropriateness and all application documentation and matters relating thereto in accordance with the procedures for altering historic landmarks or structures within historic districts as set forth in Schedule "S". (b). Specifically, Schedule "S" of the City's LDRs provides as follows: (1). No landmark or structure within a local historic district shall be demolished or removed, in whole or in part, until after an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness has been approved by the Board based on the following criteria: (i). The historic, architectural or environmental significance 3 1 P a g e of the structure. (ii). The historic, architectural or environmental significance of the structure to the overall ensemble of structures within the district and the importance of the structure to the integrity of the district. (iii). The aesthetic interest that the structure adds to the district, or in the case of an historic landmark, to the City. (iv). The number of remaining examples of similar significance in the district or, in the case of an historic landmark, in the City. (v). The difficulty or impossibility of reproducing such a structure because of its design, texture, material, detail, size, scale or uniqueness of location. (vi). The plans for future utilization of the site and the effect those plans will have on the architectural, historical, archaeological, social, aesthetic or environmental character of the district. (vii). The reasonable measures that can be taken to save the structure from further deterioration, collapse, arson, vandalism or neglect. (viii). Any measures that have been taken to prevent the structure from deteriorating, such as performance of normal maintenance and repairs and provision of normal tenant 4 1 P a g e improvements. In addition, whether the structure was willfully or negligently allowed to deteriorate. Properties cited for Demolition by Neglect that are not repaired may not be granted a demolition permit. (ix). The determination by the Building Official that the structure is an imminent hazard to public safety and that repair would be impractical. (x). The economic hardship imposed on the owner if the application for Certificate of Appropriateness for demolition is denied. (A). The submittal of a detailed report describing all aspects of the structure's historical and architectural characteristics from the City's historic resources inventory and Florida Master Site File This report shall be prepared by a qualified person knowledgeable in historic preservation under contract with the City at the applicant's expense. (xii). The submittal of a detailed report describing all aspects of the structure's physical condition prepared by an architect, licensed design professional or registered civil engineer at the applicant's expense. 5 1 P a g e (2). Accessory structures shall be of a similar style, color, design and material as used for the principal residence. (3). Building features within new construction shall be compatible with the color, material and character of the property, neighborhood and immediate environment. (4). A material consistent with the style of the structure shall enclose the undercroft of decks and foundations with spaced piers. (5). The material shall be slightly recessed from the fagade of the building and shall not overlap or be flush with the outer surface of the original piers, supports or siding. (6). Board trim at corners and around openings shall not exceed 6" except at the front door surround which may be any size or configuration. For new construction, additions and alterations, the wall finish most acceptable for the architectural style shall be utilized. (8). The use of synthetic materials is prohibited and unlawful for exterior wall surfaces with the exception of fiber cement siding, which may be approved by special development order for detached new construction only. (11). Synthetic materials may be allowed for trim details and architectural elements on new construction. (12). The following materials are generally acceptable for principal and accessory structures within the historic districts: 6 1 P a g e (i). Wood clapboard, wood shingle, wood drop siding, wood board and batten siding or equal as determined by the (ii). Brick, stucco; and stone or cast stone. (13). New garage doors may be constructed out of wood. fiberglass or steel and shall not exceed a maximum width of 9' for a single door on front loaded garages and 16' on alley loaded garages. (14). Garage doors, 16' in size, must be architectural, carriage - style doors that complement the main building and garage building. (15). Setbacks apply to both principal and accessory structures. Residential lot development shall have the following setbacks: (i) Front yard: 25. (ii). Rear Yard: 2'. (iii). Side Yard: (A). 5'. (B) 7' 6" when a side yard is located adjacent to a street. (16). There shall be a minimum separation of 10' between principal and accessory structures. (c). To the extent that a conclusion of law as set forth herein also constitutes a factual finding, then such shall be taken to be so as part of this Development Order. (d). The proposed Certificate of Appropriateness is hereby found and 7 1 P a g e determined to comply with the aforestated requirements and provisions. (e). Additionally, the Certificate of Appropriateness sought is hereby found and determined to be consistent with the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan and development of the property as proposed would be consistent with and in compliance to applicable land development regulations and all other applicable regulations and ordinances as set forth in the Code of Ordinances of the City of Sanford. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1). The aforementioned application for a Certificate of Appropriateness is APPROVED and the review criteria above stated in the Conclusions Of Law for the items set forth above in Section (b) (1) (iv) through (xii) are hereby WAIVED and the 180 day waiting period relating to demolition activities is also hereby WAIVED; PROVIDED HOWEVER, that the replacement garage siding shall match the main structure as determined by the Historic Preservation Officer with any dispute relating thereto being brought before the HPB for issuance of a development order or denial development order relating thereto as the HPB may determine to be appropriate. (2). This Development Order granting approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness touches and concerns the aforedescribed property and is subject to code enforcement action in accordance with the controlling provisions of law. 81 Page Done and Ordered on the date first written below. As approved and authorized for execution by the Historic Preservation Board the City of Sanford at its meeting of June 16, 2021. A TTES T. HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOAR OF THE CITY OF SANFORD 11 MMC, FCRM,,C TarWny P Date: Nunc pro nj FChbirffia .-I Z � an to June 16, 2021. 9 111 a g e JOINDER AND APPROVAL OF CONDITIONS I V PROPERTY OWNER IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the subject Property Owner has signed and sealed these presents the day and year written below and AGREES to all of the terms and conditions of this Development Order the undersigned named person having full authority to execute this document relative to all of the property associated with this Certificate of Appropriateness. ATTEST.- - WiIPrines , # 2ie:!i�ur�e... STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF SEMINOLE ) ACKNgWLEDGME!JT The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of 9"Physical presence or 0 online notarization, this(I day of June, 2021 by Ruth Chiguano. She is personally known to me or produced 01-1 "L -'s C-CIL5'� as identification. X41 ANOTARYUBLIC KSHAR H. PATEL My commission expires: aldopf)A3 Commission# GG 906511 Expires August 22, 2023 Bonded Thm Troy Fain Insumnee SM -385-7019 101 fWAVIRM WA U5,, Cato! wwj—t AFT ql 1 AT, SAA ANK F.. ( fWAVIRM WA U5,, Cato! wwj—t AFT ql 1 AT, SAA ANK