4638 Comp Plan Amendment - 5.43 Acres 2861 E Lake Mary BlvdOrdinance No. 2021-4638
An Ordinance of the City of Sanford, Florida amending
the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan, as previously
amended; providing for amendment of the Future Land
Use Map of the Future Land Use Element of the City of
Sanford Comprehensive Plan relative to certain real
property, approximately 5.43 acres in size (Tax Parcel
Identification Number 17-20-31-501-0000-0220),
addressed as at 2861 East Lake Mary Boulevard, and
described in this Ordinance from Seminole County SE,
Suburban Estates, to City LDR-SF, Low Density
Residential; providing for legislative findings and intent;
providing for assignment of the land use designation for
the property; providing for severability; providing for
ratification of prior acts of the City; providing for
conflicts; providing for codification and directions to the
Code codifier and providing for an effective date.
Whereas, the real property which is the subject of this Ordinance is
approximately 5.43 acres in size; and
Whereas, Jesus Image Inc. of Lake Mary, is the owner of certain real property
which real property is located at 2861 East Lake Mary Boulevard and is assigned Tax
Parcel Identification Number 17-20-31-501-0000-0220 by the Property Appraiser of
Seminole County; and
Whereas, the officers of the property owner are Michael Koulianos, Heath
Flock, Julie Noble, Jessica Koulianos and Randy Needham; and
Whereas, the applicant on behalf of the property owner is Shayanna Day of
Interplan, LLC which is located at 200 East Central Parkway, Suite 4000, in Altamonte
Springs; and
Whereas, the property is located on the south side of Lake Mary Boulevard
just east Wyndham Preserve, approximately 1,200 feet west of Brisson Avenue and
1,240 feet east of Sipes Avenue which is very proximate to the Orlando -Sanford
1i age
International Airport; and
Whereas, on January 25, 2021, the City Commission enacted Ordinance
Number 4579 which annexed the subject property into the City; and.
Whereas, the real property which is the subject of this Ordinance was
assigned the County's SE, Suburban Estates, land use designation prior to annexation
of the subject real property; and
Whereas, the City of Sanford's Planning and Zoning Commission, as the
City's local planning agency, held a public hearing on September 2, 2021 to consider
amending the Future Land Use Map of the Future Land Use Element of the City of
Sanford Comprehensive Plan and recommended approval of the proposed Future Land
Use Map amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for the subject property as requested
by the property owner; and
Whereas, Section 163.3187, Florida Statutes, relates to the amendment of
adopted local government comprehensive plans and sets forth certain requirements
relating to small scale amendments and which are related to proposed small scale
development activities and provides, among other things, that such amendments may
be approved without regard to statutory limits on the frequency of consideration of
amendments to the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan; and
Whereas, the City of Sanford has complied with all requirements and
procedures of Florida law in processing this amendment to the City of Sanford
Comprehensive Plan including, but not limited to, Section 163.3187, Florida Statutes;
Twe
Whereas, the City of Sanford has complied with Florida's Community
2 1 P a g e
Planning Act which was amended during the 2021 Legislative Session by the passage
of Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House
Bill Number 59 (initially codified as Chapter Number 2021-195, Laws of Florida) to
require every city and county within the State "to include in its comprehensive plan a
property rights element" (Section 163.3177(6)(i)1, Florida Statutes).
Now, therefore, be in enacted by the People of the City of Sanford, Florida:
Section 1. Legislative findings and intent.
(a). The City of Sanford has complied with all requirements and procedures of
Florida law in processing and advertising this Ordinance.
(b). This Ordinance is internally consistent with the goals, objectives and
policies of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Sanford and the proposed
Comprehensive Plan amendment does not trigger any urban indicators and adoption of
this amendment will discourage the proliferation of urban sprawl within the City of
Sanford.
Section 2. Amendment to Future Land Use Map.
(a). The Future Land Use Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plan of the City
of Sanford and the City's Future Land Use Map is hereby amended by changing the
land use designation from Seminole County SE, Suburban Estates, to City of Sanford
LDR-SF, Low Density Residential, with regard to the real property which is the subject
of this Ordinance as set forth herein.
(b). The property which is the subject of this Comprehensive Plan amendment
is described in the exhibits hereto and is assigned Tax Parcel Identification Number 17-
20-31-501-0000-0220 by the Seminole County Property Appraiser and is more
31 P a ge,
specifically described as follows:
Lot 22 of the plat of PALMER'S SUBD, as recorded at Plat Book 2,
Page 41 of the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida.
Section 3. Implementing Administrative Actions. The City Manager,
or designee, is hereby authorized to implement the provisions of this Ordinance as
deemed appropriate and warranted.
Section 4. Ratification Of Prior Actions. The prior actions of the City
Commission and its agencies in enacting and causing amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan of the City of Sanford, as well as the implementation thereof, are
hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 5. Severability. If any section, sentence, phrase, word, or
portion of this Ordinance proves to be invalid, unlawful or unconstitutional, it shall not
be held to impair the validity or effect of any other action or part of this Ordinance.
Section 6. Conflicts. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict
herewith are hereby repealed.
Section 7. Codification/Instructions to Code Codifier. It is the intention of
the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida, and it is hereby ordained that the
provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the codified version of
the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan and/or the Code of Ordinances of the City of
Sanford, Florida in terms of amending the Future Land Use Map of the City.
Section 8. Effective Date. The small scale Comprehensive Plan
amendment set forth herein shall not become effective, in accordance with Section
163.3187(5)(c), Florida Statutes, until 31 days after the enactment of this Ordinance. If
challenged within 30 days after enactment, the small scale amendment set forth in this
4 1 P a g, e
Ordinance shall not become effective until the State land planning agency or the
Administration Commission, respectively, issues a final order determining that the
subject small scale amendment is in compliance with controlling State law; provided,
however, that this Ordinance shall not take effect until the annexation ordinance
annexing the property that is the subject of this Ordinance is final.
Passed and adopted this 8th day of November, 2021.
Attest:
Sanford, Florida
r
Traci Houchin, MMC, FCRM Z'
City Clerk
Approved as to form and legality.
William L. Colbert, Esquire
City Attorney
City Commission of the City of
5 1 ' 'a g e
CITY OF WS RM X
SkNFORD rl r- I
FLORIDA Item No. r
CITY COMMISSION MEMORANDUM 21.242
NOVEMBER 8, 2021 AGENDA
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission
PREPARED BY: Eileen Hinson, AICP — Planner Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Norton N. Bonaparte, Jr., City Manager
SUBJECT: Amend the Future Land Use designation of a 5.28 acre site from SE,
Suburban Estates (County) to
Family
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:
LDR-SF, Low Density Residential — Single
F-1 Unify Downtown & the Waterfront
F-1 Promote the City's Distinct Culture
Z Update Regulatory Framework
F] Redevelop and Revitalize Disadvantaged Communities
A request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use designation for 5.43 acres at 2861
E Lake Mary Boulevard from SE, Suburban Estates (Seminole County) to LDR-SF Low Density
Residential — Single Family (City of Sanford) has been received.
The property is owned by Jesus Image, Inc. The applicant is Shyanna Day of Interplan, LLC who
was responsible for conducting the modified CAPP (Citizens Awareness and Participation Plan).
A copy of the letter which was distributed is attached.
The Affidavit of Ownership and Designation of Agent forms are attached and additional
information is available in order to ensure that all potential conflicts of interest are capable of being
discerned.
FISCAL/STAFFING STATEMENT:
According to the Property Appraiser's records, the subject property is vacant with no structures.
Based on the 2020 property tax roll, the subject property has a combined total assessed value of
102,366. The total tax bill for the subject property in 2020 was $1,424.26. The applicant is
proposing to develop a House of Worship, which will generate no tax revenue to the City.
No additional staffing is anticipated if the land use amendment is approved.
BACKGROUND:
The 5.28 acre site is located south of Lake Mary Boulevard just east of Wyndham Preserve and
south of the 3.04 acre property proposed to be developed in conjunction with this property if the
requested land use and rezone are approved.
On January 25, 2021, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 4579, annexing the property
into the City. When incorporated, the subject property retained its Seminole County future land
use designation of SE, Suburban Estates. The applicant has submitted a request to amend the future
land use map designation for the 5.28 acre site from SE, Suburban Estates (County) to LDR-SF,
Low Density Residential — Single Family to support the proposed development of a House of
Worship. The adjacent property, which provides access to Lake Mary Boulevard currently has a
land use designation of GC -General Commercial. A General Commercial land use was determined
to exceed the intensity of the properties to the east and west without primary frontage on an arterial
or connector road. The most appropriate land use to support the use requested by the applicant yet
remain compatible with the surrounding uses and land uses would be LDR-SF, Low Density
Residential Single Family.
The following policy supports the request to allow a House of Worship. If the property does not
develop as such, the proposed land use supports density and intensity which is appropriate to those
existing uses, immediately adjacent to this site
Policy FLU 1.2.2: Designate Low Density Residential — Single Family (LDR-SF) Districts. The
areas delineated for LDR-SF development shall include existing stable single family areas, as well
as those areas identified for future low density residential single family development in order to
provide sufficient land area to meet projected single family housing needs. Areas delineated as
LDR-SF shall allow residential development with a maximum density of up to six dwelling units
per acre comprised of single family detached homes on individual lots. Supportive community
facilities and accessory land uses as defined in the LDRs may be located within areas designated
LDR-SF.
Development within the LDR-SF designation shall be required to meet the following general
criteria together with the performance criteria established in Policy FLU 1. 1. 7 in this Element:
• Compatible with the quality and character of existing low density single family
neighborhoods;
• Compatible with existing and anticipated future developments;
• Compatible with natural features of the land and other policies within the Comprehensive
Plan impacting natural resources.
The City will coordinate with the School Board regarding residential development within this
district as required in the Public School Facilities Element to ensure the availability of adequate
school facilities.
The (draft) Lake Mary Boulevard Corridor study currently underway supports land uses intended
for mixed commercial and residential supportive uses along this segment of Lake Mary Boulevard.
If approved, the applicant is further seeking to rezone the property, combined with the property to
the north, to PD, Planned Development.
Per the State's Policy Act (Chapter 163 F.S.), any plan amendment shall discourage the
proliferation of urban sprawl. In order to determine that a plan amendment does not constitute
urban sprawl, the amendment must be analyzed as to whether it incorporates a development pattern
or urban form that achieves four or more of the following eight criteria:
1. Directs growth and development to areas of the community in a manner that does not
adversely impact natural resources;
2. Promotes the efficient and cost effective provision or extension qfpublic infrastructure and
set -vices;
3. Promotes walkable and connected communities and provides for compact development and
a mix of uses at densities and intensities that support a range of housing choices and a
multimodal transportation system;
4. Promotes conservation of water and energy, -
5. Preserves agricultural areas and activities;
6 Preserves open space and natural lands and provides for public open space and recreation
needs;
7. Creates a balance of land uses based on demands of residential population for the
nonresidential needs of an area; and,
8. Provides uses, densities and intensities of use and urban form that would remediate an
existing or planned sprawl development pattern or provides for an innovative development
pattern such as transit oriented development or new towns.
The proposed amendment has been analyzed and found to promote the following criteria: 1, 2, 3
and 7.
• Criteria I — The subject site is not located within a well field protection zone or acquifer
recharge area.
• Criteria 2 — The subject parcel is immediately adjacent to an expanding area, infilling land
between multiple residential neighborhoods. A House of ff"orship is a residential
supportive use and is being appropriately placed off a main corridor with immediate
accessibility to residential.
• Criteria 3 — Irrigation on the proposed development would be provided by the City of
Sanford reclaim service.
• Criteria 7 — The proposed use will support the residential uses recently constructed and
under construction along the Lake Mary Boulevard corridor
Objective FLU 1.15 Prevent Proliferation of Urban Sprawl and Develop Efficient Systems
for Coordinating the Timing and Staging of Public and Private Development. The City shall
continue to enforce adopted LDRs which require that proposed land uses be adequately served by
management, solid waste disposal and hazardous waste management. The subdivision and site
plan review processes shall provide a unified system for coordinating the efficient location, timing,
phasing, and scale of public and private development. For example, in order to abate urban sprawl
and maximize use of existing infrastructure all new development shall be required to hook up to
the existing central water and wastewater system.
Per Exhibit B of the JPA, SE, Suburban Estates, (Seminole County Land Use Designation) is
equivalent to SE, Suburban Estates (City of Sanford Land Use Designation). Exhibit B describes
equivalent future land use designations in the City and the County comprehensive plan. The
designations have been deemed equivalent due to their similar intensities and densities of
allowable development.
The applicant has requested to modify the land use to a land use compatible to those adjacent that
will support the proposed future use.
Per Exhibit D, the subject property is within Sub -Area 4 of the JPA. Exhibit C identifies the
following about Sub -Area 4.
Establish Ohio Avenue as a north -south line separating low density residential uses to the
west and airport -related uses to the east. Lands designated as industrial west of Ohio
Avenue shall maintain that designation.
An east -west alignment established by Eaglewoods Trail shall serve as a dividing line for
residential density within Planning Area 4. Properties to the north of this line shall develop
at a maximum of 3.5 units per net buildable acre. Properties lying south of this line and
north of Pineway shall develop at a maximum of 2.5 units per net buildable acre. These
densities shall not apply to properties currently assigned the County HIP -AP Future Land
Use designation.
Residential land uses and residential zonings shall be discouraged if within three hundred
(300) feet of the centerline of the OSIA's new runway system east to the conservation area
adjacent to Lake Jesup.
The City and County shall ensure that land uses surrounding the airport are compatible
with noise levels generated by the airport use through the following measures:
1. All land east or south of the OSIA's new runway system shall be developed based on
the part 150 Noise Exposure Maps and Compatibility Plan prepared in 2001 for the OSIA
by Environmental Science Associates (ESA), as approved by the FAA and any revisions
to the noise exposure maps that may occur as the result of airport development. If new
residential land uses or residential zoning districts are permitted, an avigation easement
and development order approval shall be required.
2. New residential land use designations and zoning classifications (single-family
detached, duplexes, townhomes or condominiums) shall be prohibited where noise
contours are greater than 60 DNL (day -night noise level). Multi -family residential
developments shall comply with the guidelines issued by the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) and Department of Transportation relating to airport compatible
uses and will be allowed between the 60 and the 65 DNL noise contour only with an
avigation easement and associated development order and shall be designed to meet the
soundproofing regulations pursuant to the FAA Part 150 Noise Compatible Land Use
Guidelines.
3. An avigation easement shall be required and included in the recorded deed of any new
lot prior to the construction of a single family dwelling unit or a multi -family dwelling unit
for properties located in the area depicted in Map 1-13 of the City Comprehensive Plan.
All development must be phased concurrent with major public roadway improvements and
installation of drainage, sewer and water utilities.
The City and County shall require land use changes and/or zoning changes to ensure that
existing neighborhoods in the area are converted to airport compatible uses. This transition
of uses must minimize adverse impacts on the neighborhood during the conversion process.
Seminole County and Sanford will encourage mass transit facilities in the area and jointly
work toward the restoration of Lake Jesup.
Resource Protection and Conservation lands must be protected from the adverse impacts
of development with open space requirements, clustering, conservation easements, wetland
buffers and transition areas.
In order to minimize land use/noise conflicts, the County shall recommend that the Sanford
Airport Authority purchase lands where noise contours are 65 and greater DNL consistent
with the FAA Part 150 OSIA Noise and Land Use Compatibility Program approved by the
Federal Aviation Administration.
No new residential future land use and/or zoning is allowed within the areas covered by a
noise contour of 60 DNL and higher. New public educational facilities shall be prohibited
if within three hundred (300) feet of the centerline of the OSIA's new runway system east
to the conservation area adjacent to Lake Jessup.
LEGAL RF-vipw:
The City Attorney has not reviewed the staff report but has provided the following:
This matter is not a quasi-judicial matter as amendments to local government comprehensive plans
are legislative in nature. That being said, if a proposal to amend the City Comprehensive Plan is
to be recommended for denial, it would be appropriate to state the particular reason for such a
recommendation to be considered by the City Commission - such as the proposal is internally
inconsistent with a goal, objective or policy of the Comprehensive Plan or inconsistent with
controlling State law or the like.
The City Commission approved the first reading of Ordinance No. 4638 on October 25, 2021.
The City Clerk published notice of the 2nd Public Hearing in the Sanford Herald on October 27,
2021.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is staff's recommendation the City Commission adopt Ordinance No. 4638.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
"I move adopt Ordinance No. 4638."
Attachments: Project Information Sheet
Site Vicinity Map
Site Aerial Map
Affidavit of Ownership
Letter from Applicant
Ordinance No. 4638
TADevelopmetit Review\03-Land Developmeiit\2021\2861 E Lake Mary Blvd\CPA\CC\CC Memo -2861 E Lake Mary Blvd - SCCPA-SE to
LDRSF.docx
PROJECT INFORMATION - 2,861 E. LAKE MARY BOULEVARD
„
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Requested Action: Comprehensive Plan Amendment for 5.43 acres at 2861 E Lake Mary Boulevard
from SE, Suburban Estates to LDR-SF Low Density Residential — Single
Family
Proposed Use: House of Worship
Project Address: 2861 E. Lake Mary Boulevard
Current Zoning: AG, Agriculture
Proposed Zoning: I'D Planned Development
Existing Land Use: Vacant
Tax Parcel Number: 17-20-31-501-0000-0220
Site Area: 5.43 acres
Property Owners: Jesus Image Inc.
PO Box 950640
Lake Mary, FL 32795-0640
Applicant/Agent: Shayanna Day — Interplan, LLC Phone:407-645-5008
200 E Central, Suite 400 Email: Sday@interplanl1c.com
Altamonte Springs, FL 32701
CAPP Meeting: A modified CAPP process was conducted and a letter was forwarded to the
required buffer on June 10, 2021. A copy of the letter is attached.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPLIANCE REVIEW
Planning staff has reviewed the request and has determined the use and proposed improvements to be consistent
with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
Current Future Land Use
Proposed Future Land Use
SE, Suburban (Seminole County)
LDR-SF, Low Density Residential - Single Family
Zoning Future Land Use Current Use
North GC -2, General Commercial GC, General Commercial Vacant
South A-1, Agriculture (County) SE, Suburban Estates (County) Single Family
East A-1, Agriculture (County) SE, Suburban Estates (County) Single Family
West PD, Planned Development LDR-SF, Low Density Single Family Wyndham Preserve
TADevelopment Review\03-Land Development\202 1\3851 E Lake Mary Blvd\CPA\PZC\Projeet Info - 3851 E Lake Mary Blvd - CPA.doc
City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Site: 2861 East Lake Mary Boulevard
Parcel No: 17-20-31-501-0000-0220
Proposed Future Land Use: LDRSF - Single Family Residential
5.43 Acres
Legend
Existing Land Use
Agriculture
DA
Public
Mobile Home
Single Family Residential
Vacant
Future Land Use
Airport Industry & Commerce
General Commercial
Low Density Res, Single Family
Suburban Estates
11
Existing Land Use
---§A-N �DDOIII�K III
E. LAKE MARY BLVD
of '06
'a
z
III
NUN
I
millsN
August 2021
Present Future Land Use
---�-AND DOLLInO::i� r'-2
I E. LAKE MARY BLVD
City of Sanford Department of Planning & Development Services, August 2021
—SE—
;eminol
County
SE
S M
ROOM
/
10
Seminole
County
. .... .....
SE
0 Seminole
County
Requested Future Land Use
E. LAKE MARY BLVD
SE )r(�/Jmx//
Seminole
County
SE
0 Seminole
-z— County
1--SE—
Seminole
I County
AFFIDAVIT OFAWNEBSUIP AND DEMGNATION QF AGENT
Please 1440 w0lonpl 00,04 as needed, If any Additional s0*eJ4 are attached to this document, please: sign nere ana nroze rje,!c,-,v
NIS
I.
IA
I. Qw
1 kv ri. � MA I � to`a- tre, W04y -10W to ownership of the prPpAny qgArfip=a paialk
TAX Parcel NYm4Pr(@
Address of Propqriy; for which t,0�14 CPA
and PQ Rezone application is siiomilw to the, City of Sanford,
Il,. QestBnatjQn of Appfio;.04 Agent (!o;iv@ blank if not api?Iioabje
As the ownerlapp4pent of the above designated property for w
hiph this affidavit ovit is submfttqd, I 041gnaia the Wow name;ll irjaioouoi
as my Agent in All matters pertaining to the application process, in authorizing the agent named helow to feproion; Ma, or my
company, I attest that the Application is made In good NO and that All information contained in the
complete to the best of My personal knowledge,
Applicant's Agent (Print.); $heYanna Pay Signature;
Agent Address: 22()
Central Parkway STE 400 Altamonte, FL, 3270-1
64�,�008 7 -
Email, s0loylVinlerplanlic,orn Phone, 40T Fax: I'A U,, I (o
III, Notice to Owner
AI All changes in Ownership and/or Applicant's Agent prior to final action of the CO shall require a new affidavit. It ownership
changes, the new owner assumes all obligations related to the filing application process.
8, It the Owner intends for the Authority of the Applicant's Agent to be limited, In Any manner, please indicate the limitations(s)
below, (i,e,: lirnited to obtaining a certificate of concurrency, limited to obtaining a land use compliance certificate, etc
The owner of the real property associated with this application or procurement activity is a (check one)
slindividuak5) o Corporation .-A Land Trust Partnership Limited Liability Company
Other (describe):
1. List all natural persons who have an ownership interest in the property, which is the subject matter of this petition, by name and
address.
2. For each coMgirgtion. list the name, address, and title of each officer, the name and address of each director of the corporation;
and the name and address of each shareholder who owns two percent (2%) or more of the stock of the corporation. Shareholders
need not be disclosed If a corporation's stock are traded publicly on any national stock exchange,
3. In the case of a trust, list the name and address of each trustee and the name and address of the beneficiaries of the trust and the
percentage of Interest of each beneficiary. If any trustee or beneficiary of a trust is a corporation, please provide the Information
required in paragraph 2 above.
Name of Trust: b\ I A
4, For partnerships, Including limited partnerships, list the name and address of each principal in trio, portner4nip, ;ncliminiI
general
or limited partners, If any partner Is a corporation, P10060 Provide the Information required in paragraph 2 abovo,
5, For each IIrQW 'ab i' ggmpany, list the name, address, and title of each manager or managing merntier-, and tht narne ana
address of each additional member with two percent (2%) or more membership Interest, It any mumbfir with two or
More membership Interest, manager, or managing member is a corporation, trust or partnership, please proylclq to
required In paragraphs 2, 3 and/or 4 above,
Name of LLC: Nt
6, In the circumstances of A contract far purchase list the name ante Address of each contract purchaser. if the pumnaser is a,
corporation, triist, partnership, or L40, provide the Information required for those entities in paragraph;{ 2, 3, 4 anolor S aooye
Name of Purchaser;
Date of Contraipt,-_&A g -c'
NAME I TITLWOFFIC&ITRUSTE-F. I ADDRESS I % OF
(Use additional sheets for more space,)
7. As to any type of owner referred to above, a change of ownership occurring subsequent to the execution of tnis document, shalt be
disclosed in writing to the City prior to any action being taken by the City as to the matter relative to which this 0ocurrvi'a pertainti
1 affirm that the above representations are true and are based upon my personal knowledge and belief after all reasonaole inquiry. I
understand that any failure to make mandated disclos4res is grounds for the subject rezone, future land use amendment, Speciil
exception, or variance involved with this Application to become void or for the submission for a procurement activity to be non-
responsive, I certify that I am legally authorized to execute this Affidavit and to bind the Applicant or Vendor to the disclosures
herein.
1-alf - _4A
Datefawner, Agent, Applicant Signature
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF SEMINOLE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that thl d Y, before me, an officer duly authorized to administer oath d.take acknowledgments,
personally appeared( � v, A) n�?, OM , �0 I is personally known to me or (I who produced
;0 1 1 LA �;'W rL_ L as identification
and acknowledged before Me that s/he executed the spme, SwoKn�andaubscdbed before M byL64 4klk ' f0V,1AW,6v means of
0 physical presenqe oro online notarization on the Eay of \'J _�JIZ
, 202W)a said Berson did take can oath and was first
duly sworn by me, on oath, said person, further, deposing and saying that s/he has rel the foregoing and that the statements and
allegations contained herein are true and correct,
G
' �d[L�00
WITNESS my hand and official seal in the Coun and Ite llp��afciresd' thl ay of 20212111
Notary u1b`l_lc; -state of Florida
(Affix Notarial 6
Attidavil Or ClAnaMbip, Februmv MM printed Name: SeCa \) cc� C)
DORIS CASULLO
d
Notary Public - State of Florida
9
2025
Assn.
Commission N HK 09671]
9
my Comm. Expires Feb 23, 2025
A*
Banded through National Notary Assn.
" Ek,
4, For egdft-_r hi Pinrkiding limited partnerships, list the name and address of each pflnotpAl in Inc! ponriwAmp, irl.tziiminq gonow
or limited portrivr?, if any partner is q cwpQrotion, ploog@ provido the information roqt.mod in potoompti Z a44 -if;
5, For each limit IiAblifty, company, 11M tho nomo, Wto5is, and tmQ Q1 togh M4049w of monaigifig mft'rritm. Ono tri. rlorrnrcl
'104rop's of eggh a0diogn@1 member with two percent (2%) Qr mi?ro meM0414hip lnletok( It arly rrlorroi?r War) w , 941ms-,m fRl)
more m4mbori4hip interest, mmo.por, or managing msmbgr to 4 qorpQr@Aiqn, trtm or pArtnwwp; pjt7444 pw4
rgqviroO in pompralPho ?, 3 etnOtpir 4 o4qy@: visa; u,,F,,,
Name- of LLO!
In the Ai(Pum5lance§ of Ai cop$EW for era ase, list the name and @00rq44 of each POMIrAQ! P41004r� it !Piw Py,'PriPW - A
PPIPqr4tiqn, trust, partnership, or LLP, provide the intgrmAticin required tsar those W05 in pafogtPph,4 R, 5, 4 ariolpf 5 cera t
Name cif NF044or"
PMA of. Qqntra,011 Vi I i \
(Vea additional sheets for, more space.
As to any type of owner referred to above, a change of ownership Occurring subsequent to the execution of mis *N11 Ge
disclosed in writing to the City prior to any action being taken by the City as to
the matter relative to which tqi4 0,ir,4mzn; pen,m-�
8. 1 offirm that the a0cVo representations are true and are based upon my personal knowledge and 401(of 4ftor 411 lnqwry
unclom;Pnd that Any failure to me" mandated OisoJQ44ros is grounds for the SqO)OPI (0.7ora: future Jana w�e 5peoot
exception, or variance involved with this Application . P CAMPF1 to become VOW Of for the 54bM1451 n for A plopp.loinviril 40ivily IP Onon-
responsive I certify that I am legally authorized to wo4te this Affidavit and to 004 lho Applicant or Yonvi, to tt*
horqln
v6 -D
PAW
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY Of SEMINOLE
I HEREBY C TF the day. before me, an officer duly authoqed-fo administer oaths nd 1, a * cknovvieOgments,
personally appeared RIT005who is personally known to me or Vwho produced aWa-S .. ,L5 as identification
ondkpowled9od before Me that sitle, executed the q p, Sworn 0,dsqbscr1be0 before me, by by means of
hy,
hysical presence or online notarization a se
of L74
e; 20211fth said person did take on oath and was first
ujv s�
my swam by me, on oath, said person, further, deposing and saying that sthe has'
allegations contained herein are true and correct, read the foregoing and that the statement
s and
WITNESS my hand and official seal in the Count and 8 o last Q a , t , LVday oto-Zl s , —1202,01.
WdW6'ii f16,to f qrl4a
(Affix Notarial Seal)
Printed Name;
Aft4avit of 0*nefshtp • Febtualy M20
MELINDA J. RINNE
MYCOMMISSION #GG34593i
EXPIRES: June 19, 2023
Bonded Thru Notary Public Uroderwrtters
lip
Over 40 y( --?ars and 40,000 pojects
Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendment Justification Statement
July 0.2O21
zmsCENTRAL PKWY
SUITE 4000
xommuwrsSPRINGS, pLzzro1
ph: 407.645.5008
ix: 407.629.9124
^*0011595/m3660
The applicant, Jesus |nnago. LLC, has applied for approval of the Jesus Image Church Planned
DeVa|Op[OeDt (PD) for two (2) tax parcels in the City of Sanfo[d. Florida. The aDUthe[D parcel was
'USt nBDerd|y annexed into the city. The application for the P[) iDC|Ud8s 8 request for 8
comprehensive plan amendment for the southern tax parcel from Suburban Estates (SE) to Low
Density Residential (LOR). The Land Development Regulations a||ovx a house of worship in the
L[]RfutU[8 |mOd use. The northern parcel will retain the General Co[nDlen:iG| (GC) land use, which
also a||OVVs for a house of worship. Policy FLU 1.2.2 indicates that support cnnlnlVOity facilities
and accessory land uses may bglocated inthe Ll]Rfuture land use.
Policy 1.1.1 of the Comprehensive P|oD states the following nunnehC8| criteria for any land use
amendment:
1. The amendment shall be consistent with the State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187
F.8.\ and Growth Policy Act (Chapter 103 F.S]./\pp|icaOt notes that the only part ofthe
Growth Policy Act neDl8iOiOg relates to "urban infill and redevelopment aPeas", which are
not applicable here /gee Sections 163.2511-.2520. F.G.\. Therefore, the following
comments relate only tothe State Comprehensive Plan:
g. Being centrally located in the cDDlnOVDkv aUOVVs this project to be served by
"exsting|oc8|t[80SpOrt8tiOOfa[j|UU8S"indUdingth8(]d@DdOSaOfond|OternaUona|
Airport, SIR 417'and |-4(see Section 1O7.2O1/15\(b)1.;and Section 1O7.2O1U9\
(b) 9.. F.S). It is also noted that the Sanford Airport Authority has requested that
Sun Rail connect to the {][|aOdo Sanford International Airport in the future.
b. The project will be served by locally available Uti|Kv aonvioee and other "existing
public iDfnaStnJ[tUre", vvhidl will not require on-site potable vveUa or septic tanks Or
"the expenditure Vfpublic OlOnige" (see Sections 187.201 (15) /o\ and (b) 1.; and
c. Florida has o goal of promoting families and those policies are supported by the
|OC8tiOn of a house of worship in 8gnford's new raeideOU@| DnOidO[ (see Section
2. The amendment shall be consistent with all the elements Of the City of Sanford
Comprehensive Plan.
a. The existing land use ODthe south parcel is SE which ig@transitional land use,
and the zoning classification is Agricultural (AG). This is the predominant land use
and zoning in this area of the city, where farming and agriculture existed bank into
onLAwoo cmcxoo uxuxuroarWOR rx
^nCxnscmoE cws/wccn/*v INTERIOR DESIGN pcnmnnwo
pmmosexm
penwnnwn sw,nLswcx`, ous oumcmcc
Jesus Image -Sanford
July 6'202l
Page 2 of 4
the 1000'S. The proposed land use for the southern parcel is LIDR, which is
compatible with the pFOp8dv to the west and south. which is also LDFt and SE,
respectively. The property iSbordered bythe 1DOfoot wide Navy canal oDthe east,
and E. Lake Mary Blvd. on the north. The church parking and landscape areas
along E. Labe Mary Blvd. also provides atransition tothe public road.
b. The proposed project meets requirements for Policy FLU 1.22for the L[)F|district.
This density iocompatible with the adjacent residential districts.
C. To show consistency with the Comp Plan, the applicant will address the following
Comp P|8O Policy considerations:
1. Trip generation charactehaUma, impact on existing and planned
transportation facilities and ability toachieve ofuDCUOU@| internal circulation and
off-street parking system, with landscaping amenities; The applicant will
demonstrate internal circulation on the PID Master Plan, later to be supported by a
traffic study. Schedule Cl. Section 2.0. Part naquinao o traffic analysis to show
existing circumstances and the impacts Dfthe project onthemyntenn. At this point
concerning traffic impacts, the applicant would state that the church will produce
less trips than the residential and commercial element, and that E. Lake Mary Blvd.
is performing at an exceptional level of service. Therefore, the request is that the
applicant would provide G traffic study which will provide the gCtVG| traffic numbers
prior to permitting. Landscaping amenities are shown on the PID Master Plan.
2. Relationship to surrounding land ua8a and natural ; As previously
stated, the property is surrounded by low density residential to the south and west,
and the east portion Of the project is buffered by the y4@Vy CaD8| from adjoining
properties to the east. Locating the ChU[Ch building in the rear ofthe property puts
it adjacent to the large retention pond to the west and far away from the residences
which sit closer to E. Lake Mary Blvd.
3. Public facilities and services shall be available concurrent with development of the site.
a. This project will utilize many public serviceo, all of which are available at the site.
The reclaim main is sufficient to serve this project. Potable water and sanitary
sewer will be provided by the City of Sanford. /see phO[ Comp Plan Policy
b. Police, fire and emergency services will be serviced by the local providers and will
have adequate access to the property including [UUUUp|e points of eOtry, and
compliant roadway widths.
4. There have been changes iOpopulation, land use O[economic development tneOdS8Dd/or
projections that warrant @ different land use designation.
a. The area lying south of the Orlando Sanford International Airport between Sanford
Ave. and Cameron Ave. has been a largely rural area for over 3Oyears. Tourism
in Central Florida created SR 417, which connected Sanford with the tourist
Jesus Image -Sanford
July 6,202l
Page 3 of 4
attractions and Disney. When the airport expanded into a CDO101erci8| service
airport in1988due b]proximity tVSR417.the area began @ major traDsfO[0atiOO
with local tD3OSpOriGtiOD and UU|itv iODp[oVe[DeOtS. noise related and future
development acquisitions bythe airport, and over 2,000 acres placed into o new
/\|C |BOd use. which allows high density residential, connnnerCi@| and industrial
uses. Multiple residential SUbdiViSiVOS have been developed and continue to
d8Vg|Dp. OOC8 there are sufficient roofs in the area the commercial element will
develop. There are very few houses ofworship inthe area and those that exist are
antiquated and not serving the residential population inthe area.
b. With Florida nearing the end OfC(]V|D-19. new residents are once again moving
into Florida iOrecord numbers. The requested land use change iocompatible with
surrounding land uses.
c.The City and Seminole County have entered into 8Dinterlocal agreement which,
among other things, aUOVVS the southern parcel |3Od use (which is located in Area
4) to be changed to L[)F|, allowing for a house of worship under the Land
Development Regulations. The iDt8dDC8| agreement also indicates that "public"
uses (such as houses of worship) are CoOnp8Ub|e with the (}dgOdO Sanford
International Airport.
d. The LDR land use would provide more open space and reduce the chances of
eC0|0Qica| damage to any off-site wetlands and envin]nDle[t8|k/ sensitive areas
south of Pineway Ave.. It is common knowledge that most of the properties north
ofLake Jesup all drain generally tothe south toLake Jesup.
e. /\CCeSS to the property through E. Lake Mary Blvd has been improved for public
use. 8idevv8|hS and connecting roads have been provided for use by the
communities that border E. Lake Mary Blvd. and provide a link to the county park
5. There have been sufficient changes inthe character ofthe area Oradjacent lands to
warrant adifferent land use designation.
o. Please see response in4.above.
6. The proposed future land use designation and its allowable uses are compatible with
surrounding land use designations andvvithdlepnefernedgrowthonddeve|opnnantpattemn
ofthe City GSevidenced bvland use policies iOthe Comp Plan. This amendment will not
sigDdiC8Dt|y alter acceptable existing land use patterns or adversely affect the livability of
the area Orthe health and safety Ofthe residents.
8. The requested use is consistent with the properties eaSt, south and vvBSt Of the
proposed development, with E. Lake Mary Blvd. being to the north.
b. This project meets the requirements ofPolicy FLU 1.17 by providing performance
JesLs|magB-SOnford
July 6,202l
Page 4Of4
7. The land shall be capable of supporting development allowed under the proposed future
land use designation as evidenced by the presence or absence on the site of soil types
suitable for development, vegetative habitats, wetlands, wetland protection zones or flood -
prone gneas, well field protection zoO8s. wildlife habi[ats, a[cheo|ogica|, historical or
cultural resources.
g. The existing land use classification is transitional. Amending it to LDR for a house
of worship is a very |ovv intensity use. Any other uses would tend to be more
adverse tOthe environment than the proposed use.
b. A Threatened and Endangered Species report, archeological and historical survey
will be considered during construction plan review and permitting with the local and
state agencies.
8. The proposed amendment will create ademonstrated benefit tOthe City and enhance the
character ofthe community.
a. The proposed development asachurch with adult classes provides a service to
the CO[OOluDitv, bolstering the family unit as desired by the State Comp Plan (see
prior r8fe[8Oc8S). The easy access to SIR 417will provide opportunities for non -
Sanford residents toenjoy theohurch.
b. The proposed Use offers more open space, is less intense than 'USt about any
other use except for a park, and will result in less traffic and less impacts tOthe
environment.
C. The services and infrastructure are in place to support this h3Od use
9. Kthe amendment increases the density orintensity ofuse, the applicant shall demonstrate
that there is a need for the increase in the near planning future (10 years).
a. The 8ppUC8Ot does not believe that the 8OOgDdDleDt increases the density or
intensity of use.
Please feel free tocontact nne ifyou have any questions orrequire additional information. If
8OOnot available, Chris B|udonimthe Project K8anagerandwi||beab|ehmanovvgryou[
questions.
Sincerely,
INTERPLAN LLC
ShevonnaOov